Slashdot Mirror


2004 Digital Media Winners and Losers

An anonymous reader writes "MP3 Newswire has just released Richard Menta's annual digital media winners and losers list. Apple tops the winners list for the second year in a row as does eDonkey and last spring's Grey Album protest. Losers include the term iPod Killers, Winamp, and the WMA format. BitTorrent made both lists. Menta also released a 2005 wishlist. Topping that list is an iPod in-dash unit similar to the old Rio Car. You can see Menta's previous years winners and losers lists."

177 comments

  1. What about CPU? by faragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the winner side may be kind to name ARM, IBM, AMD and VIA designs; at the loser side, Intel, MIPS and Hitachi (CPU division) for being less paranoid than expected (that was the key secret for previous uP series: be paranoid in extremis to survive).

    1. Re:What about CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a life. CPU's are boring.

    2. Re:What about CPU? by Technician · · Score: 1

      Don't count the Intel Centrino in the losers list. The mobile connected products rock!

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:What about CPU? by faragon · · Score: 1

      You're right, thank you for the appointment. Both Pentium M and the Centrino chipset have both excellent design and performance, despite Pentium's IV design fiasco.

  2. YOU, SIR, ARE A LIAR! A DIRTY, FILTHY LIAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Slashdot operates on the CMS known as Slashcode WHICH IS OPEN SOURCE! Slashcode is written in Perl WHICH IS OPEN SOURCE! Slashdot's backend is MySQL WHICH IS OPEN SOURCE! Slashdot's web server is Apache WHICH IS OPEN SOURCE! Slashdot is runned by EXPERT administrators knowledgable IN OPEN SOURCE! Due to the nature of Open Source, it is impossible for there to be bugs or problems. Bugs can only be found in proprietary software.

  3. TiVo by Viceice · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Judging by the news on it, shouldn't Tivo be in the loosers and not winners list?

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    1. Re:TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't anyone spell "losers" or "lose" on the Internet anymore?

    2. Re:TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > shouldn't Tivo be in the loosers

      They should be in the group that's not tight? What in the hell are you trying to say?

    3. Re:TiVo by gordgekko · · Score: 1

      Don't be rediculous!

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    4. Re:TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging by the news on it, shouldn't Tivo be in the loosers and not winners list?

      No, that's reserved for the losers who can't spell "losers". Call me a Spelling Nazi, but there's a reason for standards, which is something the average /.er typically claims to believe is a good thing. The spelling of words in the English language is one such standard.

  4. What a good Article.... NOT by Roliverio · · Score: 1, Insightful


    This guy seriously needs to be more digital Media saavy...

    1. Re:What a good Article.... NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  5. Not a stock investor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With everyone making Tivo knockoffs (got my card @ newegg.com for $30 bucks last year) -- how is that service a winner?

    Did the author forget Tivo charges for DVR when most of us that are tech saavy can get it for free?

    1. Re:Not a stock investor... by way2trivial · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I got tivo for free. what does that make me? not tech savy-- consumer savy?

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    2. Re:Not a stock investor... by wernercd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think it points to the fact that as far as the 'masses' are concerned it did something to bring a good product that NORMAL people can use.

      Sure a technophile can do all this stuff, but the cost is normally a lack of social skills from all the time it takes to learn new techonology. Sure I've known people who can program their own stuff but that's not your 'normal person'.

      Despite all the problems TIVO has due to competition it did brink to the markeplace something that the vast majority of people can use easily.

      I think the ratio of 'normal people' to 'tech savy' is a fairly big difference. Just think of all the people that have no clue what SpyWare is, or how to use WindowsUpdate (Normal people don't use *nix. So don't flame me lol).

      Just my 2c

    3. Re:Not a stock investor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not getting a Tivo for free. What you're getting is a poor knockoff that doesn't come close to the feature set that Tivo charges you for. The most important aspect to DVRs is picture quality and guide quality/accuracy. While the build it yourself DVRs have passable quality, they are certainly light years behind on listing quality - to the point of making them unusable for anyone who has used Tivo before. If you can get by with inaccurate and lousy program listings, then thats cool. Me? I want know what i'm watching, not a brief 2 sentence description.

    4. Re:Not a stock investor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      test

    5. Re:Not a stock investor... by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Of course "normal" people know how to use WindowsUpdate. They have to run it like 12 times a day to keep their machines down to only getting owned 3 or 4 times a week.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    6. Re:Not a stock investor... by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      Not quite.

      Instead it gets owned and they think it's broken and:
      A) Return it to wherever they bought it from for a replacement.
      B) Buy a new computer.

      Hint: Your typical computer user is stupid.

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
    7. Re:Not a stock investor... by wernercd · · Score: 1

      Being possibly the only 'computer literate' person in my family I'll go with my experience on this one and agre with Nuclear here.

      Most of my family wouldn't know WindowsUpdate from a hole in the ground. I've talked some of my family thru using AdAware and found 700-1000 adware products before. Do they have a clue how to get rid of this stuff? Of course not. No more so than I know how to do a tune up or change the spark plugs on a car.

      That's just my experience. I've been away from my family for awhile (In the military and what not) so things may have changed. I seriously doubt it. Although my family don't quite have the resources to buy a new pc every time theirs gets rooted.

  6. Thanks to EMI... by CrackedButter · · Score: 3, Interesting


    or mainly their bitching, I heard about the Grey Album and downloaded it to see what the fuss was about. Had they not done anything I would of been none the wiser, now I posess an albums worth of good music.
    Btw, I don't own any other illegal mp3s. Just the Grey album because EMI moaned rather than marketed it. Given a chance, I'd still pay for the cd however, the bit rates are lower (192kbps) than what I rip at (256kbps).

    1. Re:Thanks to EMI... by rueger · · Score: 1

      I heard about the Grey Album and downloaded it to see what the fuss was about. Had they not done anything I would of been none the wiser, now I posess an albums worth of good music.

      Exactly my experience too. Downloading MP3s is a pain in the butt and I honestly would rather just buy a CD at Amazon or elsewhere. My time is worth enough that I can't be bothered to troll through eDonkey or whatever, then deal with disrupted downloads, bad rips, and seeded files that are full of garbage.

      I do though wind up downloading a few tunes every time that some industry weasel starts whining, or especially when some poor kid gets whacked with an RIAA lawsuit. It's not that there's much major label stuff that I want or need, but I figure it's important to keep reminding these guys that P2P filesharing is here to stay, and that their best choice is to find a business model that exploits the technology instead of driving it underground.

    2. Re:Thanks to EMI... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Imagine what would of happened if EMI did market the Grey album rather than try to destroy it? Had they embraced it and P2P, they would of been far happier than they are now. Look at what happened with the indies, they are looking healthy because of it.

    3. Re:Thanks to EMI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having listened to the Grey Album, I'd say it wouldn't be such a huge groundbreaker were it not for the controversy. I love the Beatles and I think Jay-Z's good sometimes (with an extremely annoying persona overall), but it just wasn't that great. I wouldn't have bought it, and I wouldn't have taken the time to download it, had I not seen the hype everyone built around it. I'm fairly confident 90% of the other people that downloaded it feel the same way.

    4. Re:Thanks to EMI... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Having not listened to Jay-Z at all before, I quite liked it, having a wix between the genres. However 2 things, I thought the Beatles participation was overrated, I expected more vocals, I wouldn't buy Jay-Z's music anyway, except for this.

    5. Re:Thanks to EMI... by Threni · · Score: 1

      > I heard about the Grey Album and downloaded it to see what the fuss was about.
      > Had they not done anything I would of been none the wiser, now I posess an
      > albums worth of good music.

      I temporarily possessed a really shitty rap album, and then I deleted it. Totally unexceptional in every way.

    6. Re:Thanks to EMI... by BioCS.Nerd · · Score: 1

      Speaking of EMI, I'm sort of surprised they didn't make the losers list. Every last one of the albums they release, to the best of my knowledge, are copy protected. Way to go EMI! The respect you show the consumer is outstanding!

      For those of us who still like to own shiny plastic discs, relish in the cover art and packaging, EMI has proven to be quite frustrating. I personally don't own a _real_ CD player (read: dedicated CD player -- i.e. non-computer) and listen to all my music through my computer or my iPod. I've effectively not purchased an EMI disc for at least two years now.

      Come on EMI, get with the game. We'll respect you if you respect us.

    7. Re:Thanks to EMI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Had EMI not raised a fuss the Grey Album would've gone down in history as just another shitty mashup album. Instead it became a cause celebre and was downloaded by thousands of people who probably never even bothered listening to it. Another victory for the labels...

  7. Flawed feature by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Interesting

    WMA's ability to load web content is NOT merely flaw. It's a flawed feature.

    Think like Microsoft for a second. All it wants to do is dominate without any concern for security. It's trying to get the content industry to use its WMA format. Some lackey speaks up at a meeting:

    "I have a great idea. Let's add a feature to WMA so that it'll open up web content. So if EMI wants to distribute an WMA song it'll open an option to buy the whole CD."

    Of course all the brainless other lackeys at Microsoft agree that it's a great idea and implements it, completely oblivious to any security concerns.

    My question is whether Microsoft will be smart enough to disable this feature in future releases.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Flawed feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can disable it in Windows Media Player 10 thankfully

  8. I'm sensing a pattern by aendeuryu · · Score: 0

    2004 winner Apple
    2003 winner Apple
    2002 2nd place Apple Ipod
    2001 3rd place Apple Ipod

    Figured I'd take a look at the front page, and lo and behold, five out of the top six items in the amazon.com ad on the website's homepage feature Apple products. It looks like a dynamic ad, but I reloaded several times just for fun and there were 5 out of 6 Apple products there each time.

    It's so cute when these guys give each other handjobs under the table.

    1. Re:I'm sensing a pattern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. Apple is one of the GOOD GUYS. Their OS is based on an open source kernel, they don't have any security holes that allow bots to spread and they have a friendly and very nice looking GUI that grandma can use. The iPod is the best MP3 player out there. Is it really so bad for Slashdot to give them a little press every now and then to help them in their fight against the evil Microsoft empire?

    2. Re:I'm sensing a pattern by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      Their OS is based on an open source kernel, they don't have any security holes that allow bots to spread

      Let me translate this...

      1) Apple couldn't develop a stable kernel, even though they had many rhapsody and pink projects for over 10 years, so they did the only thing they could, they took other peoples work, and slapped an apple logo on it and are now shoving it with closed and high priced hardware down consumers throats cause they don't know any better.

      Apple's only open source work is DIRECTLY tied to what SPECIFICALLY they had to keep open by license. Anything that falls outside of the license is more closed than even Microsoft Windows. Anyone have the OSX GUI running on a box with the open source Apple distributed? I don't think so.

      2) Apple doesn't have security holes and Mac's don't crash. (Actually they have both, but Apple made most flaws so cosmetically transparent, the users don't even realize their machine just took a dive). It amazes me how many Mac users that have sudden reboots, and crashes but yet don't even know that this is what a crash is, or have an application 'disappear', and then turn around and tell the IT department they never have crashes on their Macs. It is quite amusing at the user ignorance. One company I was in the other day the IT department manager was literally choking from laughing so hard. They had two users in one day, need IT support because of the 'programs disappearing' off the screen, and then turned around and told the IT people that they never had a crash on their Mac.

      If you aren't bright enough to realize that your machine restarting is a crash, then yep, OSX is secure and crash free.

      As for security, really, no holes at all? Then why does Apple's site have patches and articles themselves that say there have been SEVERAL security holes. Even with the release of last OSX update, that apple CHARGED their users another $100 for, it listed MANY security flaws fixed in the OS, and the only way users could get the 'high risk' security holes fixed, was to buy the upgrade. (Apple got another $100 out of the Mac users, and Microsoft and *nix variants are criticized for just posting updates and fixes for free.) How does Apple distort reality for its users so easily? Is it the ignorance level of the main user base, or do they have an active brainwashing program?

    3. Re:I'm sensing a pattern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It amazes me how many Mac users that have sudden reboots, and crashes but yet don't even know that this is what a crash is, or have an application 'disappear',

      Maybe you're one of ten people who's HEARD about this. But you know, I've SEEN my Win98 box, and even my WinXP box pull random reboots too, and they happen a lot more often.

      For every one person who hears about Macs crashing, there are nine people who SEE their PCs crash.

    4. Re:I'm sensing a pattern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only question here is why is this ignored by the slashdot crowd?

    5. Re:I'm sensing a pattern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every one person who hears about Macs crashing, there are nine people who SEE their PCs crash.

      For every one person who hears about a Mac period, there are nine people who have PC's.

    6. Re:I'm sensing a pattern by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're one of ten people who's HEARD about this. But you know, I've SEEN my Win98 box, and even my WinXP box pull random reboots too, and they happen a lot more often.

      I have two Macs in my office alone, are you sure you are barking up the right tree?

      -Assumption is the intuition of fools.

    7. Re:I'm sensing a pattern by fontkick · · Score: 1

      or do they have an active brainwashing program?

      Dear Sir,

      It has come to our attention that you have been posting confidential, proprietary marketing information in a public forum, for the express purpose of exposing underlying technology and processes held by Apple Computer, Inc. Apple aggressively enforces our company's proprietary rights under the U.S. copyright laws, therefore we ask that you remove all references to "ignorance level of the main user base" and "active brainwashing program", or any grammatical variations thereof. Thank you.

      Sincerely,
      Apple Legal Dept.
      Apple Computer, Inc.

  9. What about Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RealNetworks / Rob Glaser should be a huge loser this year, as their online music store and phony "grassroots" capaign failed miserably.

    Sucks to be Rob Glaser.

    1. Re:What about Real? by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, I tried out Rhapsody and they have by far the best selection of music, in my favorite genres) of any store/online music service I've tried.

    2. Re:What about Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that would still make Glaser a WHINER as opposed to a winner. (P.S. He's also still a loser.)

  10. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got through to a few of them. Unfortunately, they were pointed at empty desks in empty rooms. No naked women anywhere.

  11. ipod in dash by humuhumunukunukuapu' · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if you get and alpine cda-xxxx head unit, say like this head unit here, and also get this adapter you will be able to control the ipod from the head unit and have song titles and other info display on the head. this is not the same as the bmw thing...it is much much better.

    --
    i saw the baby, and the baby looked at me
    1. Re:ipod in dash by Quila467 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have the Alpine CDA-9835 and just bought the KCA-420i and a 40 Gb iPod. It works great, and sounds great, but there are some limitations. You control the iPod from the head unit, not from the iPod. The head unit I have, while it was their high-end MP3 player in 2004, can only support up to 512 items. This is more than enough for any of the CD changers it was designed for, but is pretty inconvenient with the iPod. It means I can't see any artists beyond Ministry (the 512th artist alphabetically on my iPod). You can work around this with playlists, or you can disconnect the iPod and select the artist or album you want to listen to beyond 512 and reconnect it, or you can wait until Alpine has released all of their 2005 models and make sure this limitation has been corrected. From their press release last week, it sounds like the 2005 models are much more iPod friendly, although I haven't actually seen them yet.

    2. Re:ipod in dash by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I have an Alpine CDA-9807 head unit. For $40 labor, I had a $10 cable wired from the AUX IN port to the cup holders. Now I just place my iPod in its case in the cup holder, plug in the audio cable, and control the iPod using its own UI.

      For $100 plus installation (or not) the Alpine adapter is very limited. From reviews I've read, the head unit can scroll through titles VERY slowly (one every ~1 second) and it can't view more than a certain number of items (songs, artists, etc.).

      I commend Alpine for building the AI-NET interface into their head units to allow for such an adapter to exist. I just hope Alpine makes a more iPod-friendly head unit in the future.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  12. So what is your power bill like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..now that you're running a full blown computer as a DVR for 24/7?

    Not feeling so tech savvy anymore, eh?

    1. Re:So what is your power bill like.... by mrbcs · · Score: 1
      please.. I moved 5 computers out of my house and my power bill dropped about $12 a month. One was a server with 3 ps and 12 scsi drives.

      They really don't use a lot of power. Now if you have 5 tvs running at the same time.. well.. ;-)

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    2. Re:So what is your power bill like.... by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      What is your rate per kilowatt-hour. Over here it is 18 cents/kwh, and that works out to about $20/month for my computer running 24/7 (with the monitor on perhaps 12 hours a day - I am an addict).

      1 watt costs you about 10 cents/month where I am, so that probably is about 200 watts, including the big and hungry CRT.

  13. Re:OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am having the same problems

  14. Wishlist for 2005: Ogg by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its becoming obvious that a totally open non-DRM format is a precondition for digital music.

    1. Re:Wishlist for 2005: Ogg by BarryNorton · · Score: 2, Funny
      Its becoming obvious that a totally open non-DRM format is a precondition for digital music.
      If that's a precondition I can't wait until such a thing as digital music exists... that will be sweet!
    2. Re:Wishlist for 2005: Ogg by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Why?

    3. Re:Wishlist for 2005: Ogg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't. Just because WMA has a flaw doesn't mean that people are going to flock to an obscure format. iTMS is still going strong, despite the fact that their files are DRMed.

    4. Re:Wishlist for 2005: Ogg by jxyama · · Score: 1
      "precondition"??

      200 million songs bought through iTMS says otherwise...

    5. Re:Wishlist for 2005: Ogg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, lthough their use licence is pretty reasonable, with the ability to burn an unlimited number of copies to CD. Yet I tried sending a DRM'd iTunes file to my sister as an email attachment and Hotmail wouldn't allow it. Moral of the story? Don't use Hotmail to send DRM'd iTunes files.

    6. Re:Wishlist for 2005: Ogg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory free legal music link (though it's not ogg - it is music that artists provide for free)

      iRATE radio

    7. Re:Wishlist for 2005: Ogg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Like CDs.

  15. Where is the winner list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clicking the winners list brought us to:
    ... Overall, it was an active year all around and with that in mind we offer our list of digital losers for 2004.

    1. Apple
    It took the top spot last year and has earned it for this year. The iPod increased its dominating market position for 2004 selling 4 million units during the Christmas season alone. As for iTunes, it sells two out of every three digital song files. No surprises here.

    2. eDonkey ...

    Clicking the losers list brought us to:
    ...The 2004 Losers list is as follows:

    1. iPod Killers
    There were none. A few competing players like the Rio Carbon are excellent, but none have even put a dent on the iPod's dominance. A marketing phrase, nothing more.

    2. Sony ...


    Is this a typho or Freudian slip?

  16. The Real Losers by Anonymous+Butthead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    are unfortunately the customers

    --
    Hey, this is my sig, if you don't like it, STOP READING MY POSTS!
  17. Re:YOU, SIR, ARE A LIAR! A DIRTY, FILTHY LIAR! by aycaramba · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hi mom :)

  18. Considering their lousy competition? No. by Viewsonic · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Nothing even comes close yet. Yeah, you can make your own homebrew DVR box for free and everything, but it's not about cost, it's about features and functionality - Something no one has even came near yet. Their guide listings are the best and most accurate out of any competitor, carry more info, and are quickly corrected when a lineup change happens. You dont see this anywhere else with such a high accuracy rate. You get what you pay for rings true here more than anywhere else.

    As for the cable boxes that are starting to include it, they're even worse than you could ever imagine. UI nightmares ahoy, terrible listings, horrible season pass implementations, and overall just too restrictive.

    The only downside I can give Tivo is their Cablecard HD capable model wont be out until 2006, which is too long. It should have been released by summer 2004.

    1. Re:Considering their lousy competition? No. by JonahDark1 · · Score: 1

      I dissagree complely. I have a cable box from Time Warner in Cincinnati, (Ohio, USA) and it works far better than most of my friends Tivo boxen. Maybe this UI isn't deployed elsewhere.

    2. Re:Considering their lousy competition? No. by tu_holmes · · Score: 1

      I have DirecTiVo (That would be Tivo built on a DirecTV receiver) and I haven't seen any set tip DVR solution that can compare. I'm even looking at a MythTV solution for some things that I may want to do around the house as far as streaming media to other Televisions, but for ease of use, pretty pictures, up to date guides, and just all around pleasant experience... I've got to give it to TiVo on this one. Of all the DVRs around, the TiVo is by far the best you can "buy".

  19. Nowhere on the Losers list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the biggest loser category of all: "Slashdot Subscribers".

  20. sold out website by Jah+Shaka · · Score: 0

    What a sold out website,

    Apple is #1 for their great innovation of having been the first to create the 'mp3 player' and the 'ipod killers' are at the top of the loosers list... what about all the really cool media devices? iRiver plays back MOOVIES as well as music... not just stupid photos, and where is the Sony PSP? The PSP is REAL innovation... games, music, videos, wireless, everything in a handsize package...

    Ironically, they also have the ipod u2 edition for sale at the bottom of the page... just another bunch of Jobs dick suckers if you ask me.

    1. Re:sold out website by JeffTL · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think what he was saying is that as good as any of those devices might be, none of them sell like the iPod.

      To outdo the iPod you need to outdo the concept -- not just make what amounts to an iPod with way-too-small video playback and no iTMS compatibility. There are basically three companies that I believe could not only outdo the iPod in quality but then move the merchandise: Sony (if they get their act together), Microsoft (with their massive R&D potential), and Apple itself (Where do you think the iPod profits and the interest from that $4bn bank account are going? Most likely into research, the lifeblood of any company that depends largely on innovation).

      It's my personal theory that the halo effect was just what Apple had in mind when they went full-bore with iPod and iTunes for Windows -- what may be the world's first self-sustaining itself-profitable ad campaign, with the intention of getting an iMac onto every desk and a PowerBook into every briefcase, with far higher margins than the iPod and a greater potential for sale of software.

      This is particularly true for the iTunes Music Store, which is run at break-even -- its purpose is to provide iPod filler and introduce people slowly to Apple software. Why do you think the Windows version looks a lot like something out of OS X, when they could have easily made it look more like a regular Windows app? So when people go to the Apple store to get an iPod accessory, they stop to look at the G5 -- who could resist? -- and everything looks "just like iTunes" and they take one home. So it's not just a self-sustaining profitable ad campaign, but a multitiered one -- iTMS draws people to the iPod or vice versa, the iPod draws them into the Apple store or to the rear right corner of CompUSA, and then they buy a Mac.

      That's why all the other online music stores are failing -- Napster isn't a hardware company, but they have to compete with Apple, which is running a superior product at just over even for the purposes of selling more hardware. So if anything is more "loser" than a theoretical iPod killer, it's an iTunes killer -- the Music Store business model isn't designed to be necessarily profitable (at least not to the extent of being a company's main business), but rather to transfer a low cost to the consumer to increase the likelihood of purchasing hardware.

    2. Re:sold out website by BeerCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Based on recent computer history (for example, when Word ousted WordPerfect), to outdo the leader, you need to offer "more for less". WP, for all its power, didn't look as nice or seem as easy to use as Word (note the word "seem" - advanced Word features can be just as arcane to find as advanced WP ones), while "buy Word and Excel - get PowerPoint free" seemed like a good idea at the time. OK, so hindsight shows that looks aren't everything.

      So, for a company to outdo Apple in either player or media ditribution, they need to offer something that seems to be "better" than an easy to use player, or something that gives "more" than an easy to purchase download site. Yes, there are players with more capacity / cost less / more features than an iPod, but the public aren't convinced that these make the player "better". Most competitors use tech style naming - look at the name of Sony's MP3 player as an example - when the public is still going fo rthe simple name (iPod + capacity / size). As for the download sites, what people appeciate is consistency. Tracks that are different prices, because record label A wants more money than record label B don't translate well to consumers, who may not be aware (or care) what label an artist is with. Similarly, being able to burn some bought tracks to CD, but not others, or only being able to listen to the music while you continue to subscribe to the service, does not make sense to people who can understand the concept of buying a CD. So, it looks as though the "iTunes killer" has to be something that is as consistent as iTMS for price and burn to CD, and as easy to go from download to "listen" as the iTunes / iTMS integration. The problem is that the bar is already pretty high, so a new player would have to be very very good to make people want to download it and use instead of Media Player / iTunes (those who use something like WinAmp would already consider the option, but may not be a large enough group for the "new" player to make money).

      So, maybe a combined p2p / torrent / general media player, that has a link to an online store with a larger catalogue than the current leaders will become dominant. Because anything less will not be "more for less".

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
  21. mnb Re:Thanks to EMI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Using Lame 3.90.3 and the --alt-preset standard command line switch will give you much better results than a fixed bitrate encode at 256kbs. The file will also be about 25% smaller.

    If file size doesn't matter to you, use --alt-preset extreme. The file size will be about the same, and you can sleep happy knowing that you used more bits.

    1. Re:mnb Re:Thanks to EMI... by CrackedButter · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm very sorry, I didn't mention I was a mac user, all I have been doing is clicking "import" (only once per cd btw), do I need an education in verbose, are you willing to teach me? ;)

    2. Re:mnb Re:Thanks to EMI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess, you're a linux user?

    3. Re:mnb Re:Thanks to EMI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iTunes-LAME is your friend :) Check google.

    4. Re:mnb Re:Thanks to EMI... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Okay thanks.

  22. "can get for free" by oneiros27 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You're paying for packaging and convenience.

    Most maps are available online -- yet ADC and other companies still exist, who package and distribute maps. People still buy TV Guide, and yet again, it's something that people could get online for free, if they knew where to look.

    I've written code to parse the NOAA's collection of METAR information, because my boss didn't want to pay some service provider for them to supply us with the information that had been converted to a more readily understood format.

    But that's not to say that there is no sustainable market for those people who sell the information. In the case of TiVo, they're selling more than just the information, as you're also paying for the rest of your system, and continued R&D. [and of course, lining someone's pockets, but we'll just assume that part isn't a significant number].

    There are plenty of things that are sold where the initial sale results in a loss, but additional money is made over time to justify the cost. Cell phones are a prime example -- they give the phones away, so they can make a profit by selling service. If TiVo wasn't selling service, they'd have to charge you more upfront. [and in fact, there's the 'lifetime' charge, which takes this into consideration, however, they're still losing money in the expense of their modem banks, and whatever else it takes for them to supply to information and distribution infrastructure]

    Just because you aren't willing to pay for the service, doesn't mean that no one else is willing to pay for convenience. We live in a commercial society where people are willing to pay extra for time savings (prepackaged meals), and to show off (luxury vehicles, oversized homes)

    I'm not going to claim that I can predict that TiVo is going to flop, or not, and I did work with my roommate on building a TV-connected game system that was also a PVR a few years ago, and I thought the process was a pain in the ass. I do know that I don't bother using it with the current software, and I haven't gone to the trouble of rebuilding it. I'd probably pick up a TiVo, and recycle that system, rather than go to the process of updating it.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  23. Seriously, jens of sweden?? by fredrik.ryden · · Score: 1

    Jens of Sweden buy cheap stuff from Korea and puts a logo on it... and then sells it expensive

    1. Re:Seriously, jens of sweden?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1: Buy cheap stuff from Korea
      2: Put Skandinavian sounding sticker on
      3: Profit!

    2. Re:Seriously, jens of sweden?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not fair. The Koreans are perfectly capable of putting the logo on it before they ship it. This also saves in production costs.

  24. WMA = FLAC? WTF? by FredThompson · · Score: 2

    Not only is this a shill site, the author doesn't know the difference between lossy and lossless audio formats. Notice how they suggest FLAC might replace WMA.

    1. Re:WMA = FLAC? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In time it might?
      With bandwith and cpu time rising, non-destructive encoding for audio is the way to go.
      Still, why not just use wave then?

    2. Re:WMA = FLAC? WTF? by minerat · · Score: 1

      while true that flac can't replace wma, wma *could* replace flac (not saying that is likely). wma does offer lossless encoding.
      http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/9ser ies/codecs/audio.aspx/

      --
      ...and you've eaten your pen. simply stunning.
    3. Re:WMA = FLAC? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can demonstrate that it is in fact computationally possible to have a lossless compression scheme that has this sort of compression ratio, I am all ears.

  25. Talk about another ancient article on Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, this is SO 2004!

  26. How about NOT like the Rio Car? by Shag · · Score: 1
    Not that the Rio Car was a bad idea or anything (for its time it was pretty darn cool), but a pull-out car-stereo-sized unit you could yank out of your dash and take into the house to hook up to your computer for transferring music is not... elegant.

    A radio with a space for your iPod to actually slide into it - or an iPod dock that flips out of it somehow for the iPod to stand on, as long as it's secured well enough to not fall off when you corner like I do - would be pretty user-friendly. Make a couple models - AM/FM/CD/iPod Dock for those who haven't ripped everything they own and shoved it onto their iPod, and AM/FM/iPod Dock for those who have.

    I googled, and I haven't seen anything meeting this exact description just yet, but I'm sure it's just a matter of time.

    Of course, we also need the trunk-mounted 6-iPod changer, with docks for half-a-dozen iPods... ;)

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    1. Re:How about NOT like the Rio Car? by Drakino · · Score: 1

      Being that I own 2 Rio Cars, I rather quite like them. And because I have used a variant for now over 5 years, anything less seems wrong. It is why I can't really stand an iPod, has too many limitations. The Karma is better, but yet it still doesn't officially do hierarchal playlists.

      The best solutions would be the iPod style dock. However, the head unit should not use the iPod for the interface, instead pull the database files and present a more user friendly interface on the head unit. User friendly in this case being one specificially adapted for car use.

      The theoritical Mark 3 design of the empeg (Rio Car was Mark 2) used a removable hard drive instead of a removable DIN unit, and has a CD drive in it as well. Sadly Rio exited the car market before one could be made.

      There is still one big advantage of my Rio Car though. The pull out design means I can take it inside and hook it to my stereo and resume playing the same music. Mark Lord made some excellent home docks for this purpose, so a dock could just sit in the living room attached to the stereo. Then via ethernet, I can still sync new songs. Or via ethernet, control what is playing, or stream music to a computer. This is something the Karma does too, ethernet in the dock, though the built in software only lets you sunc to the Karma, no remote control or streaming is possible currently.

      Thus far, the empeg remains the most advanced MP3 player I have seen, and it came out back when people were trying to hook up MP3 players to a CD changer. Sadly 6 years later, people are still trying to do the same in car, and the popular portable player still lacks basic things like gapless playback.

    2. Re:How about NOT like the Rio Car? by Crouchy · · Score: 1
      I have been looking into buying an iPod, and have been doing my research, comparing with other products



      My requirements are to have my entire music is available wherever I go, when I am in car, when I am in plane at home, etc.


      To be at home it must plug into my stereo, which like most MP3 devices is not a problem.


      I want a MP3 player to be played for 18 hours on plane, (+ 6 more hours to allow me to get to hotel to charge unit). The iPod can do with the external battery pack, so I will not be limited to the internal 8 hours charge.


      When I am in my car I want to use the Head Unit to control my MP3 player, since the iPod is so common several companies such as Alpine and Pioneer supporting it there new Head Units. I just bought a Pioneer DEH 7600 MP which is iPod Adaptor ready.


      So I have just bought the Pioneer stereo to replace my old Sony Head Unit (Fortunately I could get my money back under warranty do to faulty CD Changer). I have to wait a few months before the Pioneer iPod adapter is on sale, but after reading the press release I can say I can't wait for it.


      For information on iPod Adapter goto:
      http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pna/press/releas e/detail/0,,2076_4313_191756407,00.html


      For information on a range of Pioneer Head Units that support iPod adapter goto:
      URL:http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pna/p ress/re lease/detail/0,,2076_4313_191756410,00.html


      I have also looked into Sony's NW-HD3, but the Pioneer iPod adapter sold the idea of buying an iPod (plus with my bad experiences with Sony Support with Vaio Notebook).

    3. Re:How about NOT like the Rio Car? by genka · · Score: 1

      A radio with a space for your iPod to actually slide into it - or an iPod dock that flips out of it somehow for the iPod to stand on, as long as it's secured well enough to not fall off when you corner like I do - would be pretty user-friendly.

      This is not going to happen. Apple changes iPod form factor with every generation, and even within the same generation, high capacity iPods are thicker, requiring different docs. Maintaining compatibility would be too expensive- considering that no more than few percent of car owners have iPods. That is unfortunate- I myself imagind car stereos where a cassette slot is relpaced with an "iPod slot".

    4. Re:How about NOT like the Rio Car? by -=Zak=- · · Score: 1

      I'd like to have an MP3 player head unit in my car that's accesible via WiFi or bluetooth somehow so that I can sync my car stereo just like I sync my portable MP3 player. Or maybe a portable player with wifi or bluetooth and the head unit accesses it via wireless.

      I don't think "docking" is an option with all the different form factors of MP3 players out there (including the various iPod form factors even).

      -Zak

    5. Re:How about NOT like the Rio Car? by Shag · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that (cassette or 8-track slot replaced with slot for iPod) is pretty much what I was thinking, too.

      And...yeah, they do change the dock with new generations at least sometimes (although in the case of the iPod photo, it's because it needs more output jacks) but I think all the current generation click-wheel iPods (except the iPod photo, which is really another generation in a sense) fit the same docks, regardless of capacity.

      I could be wrong, though.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    6. Re:How about NOT like the Rio Car? by wernercd · · Score: 1

      The Karma is better,...

      I just want to add my 2c here. I have a karma, and I have serious doubts to it's 'better' than iPod.

      Easily Scratchable, Easily skips, non-changable battery, easily breakable wheel, very bad customer suport (From what I've heard)...

      Just wanted to state that as someone who has bought a Karma it had the promise of something good. I loved the layout and the feel of it. But the build and the materials used for it absolutely destroyed any chance it had of being anything close to the much vaunted 'iPod killer'.

      I personally won't buy another Rio product. I have an iRiver now and I love it. I could almost drop kick the thing and have faith it won't be scratch easy/break/skip while running.

      just wanted to state my loathing of Karma before anyone thinks of buying that piece of garbage. Carry on.

  27. So if I just put on this white hat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh please. Microsoft is one of the GOOD GUYS. Their OS may very well incorporate open source code, they have security features that allow useful bots to spread and they have a GUI that grandma actually owns. The iPod doesn't even support WMA. Is it really so bad for Slashdot to give them a little press every now and then to help them in their fight against the evil Apple digital media empire?

  28. MP3 in-dash unit by Smiffa2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about this then from Dension here in the UK, just add a 2.5" HDD of your choice and go: http://www.dension.com/main.php?pageid=49&topid=42

    Ive not had the pleasure of an iPod or 'iPod Killer', but most of my music is MP3-based and I use a car more than walk (not that I'd walk around with an iPod in my pocket these days). End of this month, I'll be hopefully getting hold of one - I think they retail for around £270 - £300 (what that is in $ is anyones guess atm).

  29. Alpine iPod controller = BAD design !!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This is not the same as the bmw thing...it is much much better"

    I seriously doubt you have used one.

    The Alpine iPod controller is one of the most pathetic efforts I've seen in recent years.

    The cumbersome-ness of the Alpine interface must be experienced to be believed. I would actually pay MORE not to
    have to use this interface.

    But, I have no doubt that some people will buy them, just like some people bought Yugos.

    The far better solution is to continue using the iPod's built-in interface.

    BTW, I like Alpine car stereos, but the iPod interface is just plain trash.

    1. Re:Alpine iPod controller = BAD design !!!!! by Quila467 · · Score: 1
      The limitations are in the head unit, not in the iPod interface. Although Alpine says the iPod interface works with the 2004 head units that support Ai-Net (technically they do), wait for the 2005 models to become available. The 2005 models are designed with the iPod in mind, the 2004 models were designed with CD changers in mind.

      Here is Alpine's press release about their iPod ready head units.

      This is the second post I've done about this, so I should say that I do not work for Alpine. I just like their products.

  30. edonkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i find the donkey/overnet network less
    usable last 6 months. probab ly dc++ and
    torrents in the future..

  31. Few Comments on edonkey and sony by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    edonkey is a nice network but keep in mind eMule is the best client because of the many tweaking ability and it's clean cuz its open source.

    As for Sony being #2 in Losers, they imo deserve a lower slot like 5 or 6. While ATRAC is a codec that provides you very limited possibilities (so many little choices of bitrates), the players themselves aren't bad in terms of features such as long battery life (at least on the NetMD, ~45-50 hours playback), 5-band equalizer and the great remotes that makes make it so you don't ever (almost) reach your player to do changes.I think the problem with Sony was really the Software and the Codec itself. If the Minidiscs supported mp3 playback and if the software Sonicstage would of been better (such as better interface and more functionalities) than what it is today, then it would of been a nice player to own.

    1. Re:Few Comments on edonkey and sony by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think Sony should be given the Perennial Loser award. Seriously, they've dropped the ball so many times in the last decade by trying force proprietary standards on a market that doesn't want or need them. For example: ATRAC, Minidisc, MemoryStick, the list goes on.

  32. slashdot broken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    testing 123

  33. PERL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's what happens when you try to write anything over 100 lines in perl...

  34. Nope, reporting the news as accurate as the market by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Informative

    The market has branded the iPod a winner, and this site just reports it. It's not spinning anything (as you would believe).

    6 million iPods sold, possibly 8.

    You also have some strange history there. Apple didn't create the first mp3 player. Or the second, third, or even 10th. Creative and Compaq were ahead of them with hard drive units and Rio, Samsung, and a few others were ahead of them with CD and flash based units.

    Apple is #1 for transforming the mp3 market from niche to mainstream. That is why the iPod is synonymous with mp3 players; not because it's the first, but because it made the market it now rules.

    Kind of like how Ford created the automobile market, even though they weren't by far the first cars.

    What you want is not a list of "2004 winners," and "2004 losers," you want a list of "2004 cool gadgets," but then I would argue what is important:

    The device that no one remembers?
    The device that everyone knows?

  35. 5. Closed Torrent Sites by Neduz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bittorrent is on the winners list, but several key torrent sites that were raided are on the losers list as they have been permanently closed. The maddening thing is that torrent sites don't trade music files, just torrents (little road signs to files) so there is no legal precedent in ANY country that makes them illegal. The problem is, these sites don't have the money to mount a case. The concept of guilty until proven innocent gets a boost here.

    That is not true actually, a few years ago, in Belgium, when mp3's where publicly available on http and ftp servers, some webmasters that only linked to those files or sites were sentenced/convicted in court (I don't know which is the most correct legal term). Here is a Dutch text that describes what happened: http://www.law.kuleuven.ac.be/jura/36n2/dumortier. htm .

    --
    This is one lame signature, please read the message above instead.
    1. Re:5. Closed Torrent Sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also a judge the land of the free found a website criminally responsible for providing a link to a website that carried a utility that would allow DVDs to be played on Linux boxes.

    2. Re:5. Closed Torrent Sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, I think that's a rather different kettle of fish. In that case, the webmasters were themselves linking to copyrighted content. In the case of a torrent site, the webmasters have set up a system for other people to post links.
      The given precedent would likely apply to the people uploading the torrent files, not the webmasters of the torrent sites. They might sued successfully for ecouraging piracy but so long as they themselves posted no links to copyrighted content, they can't have been said to infringe anything.

    3. Re:5. Closed Torrent Sites by ytpete · · Score: 1

      Someone should mod this up. There is indeed a legal precent, in the US, for attacking a site that merely links to a place to get something illegal. As the parent notes, this was a site that linked to another site where DeCSS could be downloaded.

  36. Pioneer iPod Adapter by Crouchy · · Score: 1
    I want one iPod to control all.


    I want all my music needs sorted, car, plane and home.


    When I am in my car I want to use the Head Unit to control my MP3 player, since the iPod is so common several companies such as Alpine and Pioneer supporting with there new Head Units (in Pioneer case you may already have a unit that supports the iPod Adapter).


    I just bought a Pioneer DEH 7600 MP (£180) which is iPod Adaptor ready and the iPod Adapter will be available in March with a suggested RRP of US $140 (so with any luck it will be £100 in the UK).


    For information on iPod Adapter goto:
    http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pna/press/releas e/detail/0,,2076_4313_191756407,00.html


    For information on a range of Pioneer Head Units that support iPod adapter goto:
    http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pna/press/releas e/detail/0,,2076_4313_191756410,00.html


  37. It's a slow news (and comment) day! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've noticed that there aren't too many comments being posted today, so I'll step up and hopefully someone will find some value in what I have to say:

    I've used the eDonkey network since its conception, and suffered through the original client/server software just like all other early adopters. Based on that software's interface, I would have guessed that the eDonkey network would have dried up long ago; but it didn't.

    The turning point for me (and many others) was the release of eMule. It turned the network around very quickly. The best part about eMule is that it's open source. We're able to hack the code to our liking, and when a security flaw is found, we can fix it almost immediately. The next best thing about eMule is how close it feels to the original Napster software, which many of us grew accustomed to using. You run a search, sort by any number of criteria (usually 'number of sources'), and then download the file you wanted.

    Sure the eDonkey network makes getting files very time intensive (you can wait for weeks for a single file to complete downloading), but if you're patient, you'll get what you want. You can also leave comments for each file that show up automatically once someone starts requesting a chunk from you. It's not the best way for fishing out fakes, but it helps. Just like BitTorrent, there is a way to indicate which files are garbage, except you do it through the donkey fakes project.

    The eDonkey network was transferring chunks before BitTorrent was around, and borrowed many ideas from Gnutella before becoming a truly unique P2P network. Thanks to the eMule client, the network is not only faster (due to a better queue/ratio system), it also allows you to put certain files on "release" mode, meaning if someone requests that file from you, it takes priority over other non-release files for the duration of the chunk you're sending.

    This might sound like a bad thing, but I haven't bought a single music CD since I starting using eMule more than 3 years ago. You can find nearly any full album you want and get it within hours. The wait is worth it, as most albums are encoded at 192 kbps or higher!

  38. No one mentions IRIVER anymore... by LiTHiC · · Score: 1

    I have an Iriver IHP-120 that is a 20 gig mp3 player and I have to say that it beats the shit out of ANY mp3 player I have seen. The Ipod is great and I LOVE Ipods GUI but Iriver cannot be matched IMO. Three thing about it that cannot be beaten by Ipod: 1. Copying anything (music included) onto the ihp-120 is so much simpler than the Ipod it is rediculous. When you plug it into the computer, it shows up as an icon in my computer or on the desktop in the case of a mac. Create folders inside as if it is a removable HDD and drag and drop. That is it. No software required. Totally plug and play with ANY computer i have ever tried it with. 2. With an Ipod, to get anything, music or data, on or off the ipod, it must be connected to a computer. Not the iriver. There is a line in jack, a line out jack, and an optical input and output. Plus it has an internal microphone and the option to connect external mics. So not only can you directly connect the 120 to anything with an audio output and record music with real time MP3 encoding on the fly, to can also record anyting around you. I have used the internal mic in numerous buisness meetings and the quality is amazing. 3. A minor detail, but one definatly worth mentioning. Everyone has encountered the corrupted audio file that causes your mp3 player to freeze. With and ipod, most of the time you just have to wait for the battery to run out (which in this case is good cause the battery life is pretty short on an ipod as opposed to the iriver), but not with the 120. on the bottom of the device there is a reset button. Press it with a pin and the device reboots as if nothing happened. Yet, noone mentions the iriver anymore. I have not taken a personal look at the new irvier jukeboxes (http://www.iriveramerica.com/prod/hd/), but I have to say, the IRIVER IHP-120 IS THE IPOD KILLER.

    --
    It is better to be thought an idiot, than to speak and remove all doubt.
    1. Re:No one mentions IRIVER anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't care about that. If they did the iPod wouldn't have 80% of the HD MP3 player market.

    2. Re:No one mentions IRIVER anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three thing about it that cannot be beaten by Ipod:
      1. Copying anything (music included) onto the ihp-120 is so much simpler than the Ipod it is rediculous. When you plug it into the computer, it shows up as an icon in my computer or on the desktop in the case of a mac. Create folders inside as if it is a removable HDD and drag and drop. That is it. No software required. Totally plug and play with ANY computer i have ever tried it with.

      The iPod works exactly as you describe for data. As for music most people prefer to sync it with iTunes because it is easier to create playlists and organize how the music is played.

      2. With an Ipod, to get anything, music or data, on or off the ipod, it must be connected to a computer. Not the iriver. There is a line in jack, a line out jack, and an optical input and output. Plus it has an internal microphone and the option to connect external mics. So not only can you directly connect the 120 to anything with an audio output and record music with real time MP3 encoding on the fly, to can also record anyting around you. I have used the internal mic in numerous buisness meetings and the quality is amazing.

      Granted, the iPod doesn't have recording capabilities but I doubt most people really need it. If they do, there are third party solutions that attach to the iPod.

      3. A minor detail, but one definatly worth mentioning. Everyone has encountered the corrupted audio file that causes your mp3 player to freeze. With and ipod, most of the time you just have to wait for the battery to run out (which in this case is good cause the battery life is pretty short on an ipod as opposed to the iriver), but not with the 120. on the bottom of the device there is a reset button. Press it with a pin and the device reboots as if nothing happened.

      You can wait for the battery to run out if you're an idiot. Or, you can reset the iPod by holding the select/menu button and the play button for about 10 seconds.

      but I have to say, the IRIVER IHP-120 IS THE IPOD KILLER.

      I guess you're right. The iRiver IHP-120 has definitely killed the iPod.

    3. Re:No one mentions IRIVER anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      1) Use the god-damn P tag, will ya? Your post is like a fucking explosion at the Alpha-Bits factory.

      2) With all the cheapo storage space you're gushing about, do you think you could spare a few KBs for a dictionary?

      THERE'S NO _E_ IN RIDICULOUS

      THERE'S NO _A_ IN DEFINITELY!!!!

      For fuck's sake it's like an icepick through the eyes EVERY TIME.

    4. Re:No one mentions IRIVER anymore... by Frank+Dreben · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. I also have the iRiver HP120 and have used an iPod before. No question that the iRiver is better. BUT Apple has the "coolness" factor and the marketing. People want "an iPod", it's become the new "Band-Aid" or "Kleenex". It'll take a lot of effort and something stupid on Apple's part before anything really becomes an iPod killer.
      I love my iRiver!!!!!!

    5. Re:No one mentions IRIVER anymore... by Julia+Cameron · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Thank you for this. The iPods are very nice. However, as a musician I have wanted an iriver for yonks. I don't care whether or not my equipment looks 'cool'. Great equipment is always cool. I don't care what anybody thinks, especially when my choice works for me.

      • http://www.iriveramerica.com/prod/hd/h340.aspx

      • The sleek and compact H340 40GB digital music player holds up to 1200 hours of your favorite songs. Plus, you can transfer and store digital pictures and view them on the vivid color display. A rechargeable battery that lasts up to 16 hours, enhanced 3D sound, ultra-fast USB 2.0 file transfers and simple navigation are just a few of the features you won't find anywhere else.

      The H340:

      Plays up to 1200 hours of digital music

      40GB of internal storage

      Large, vivid color display

      Ultra-fast USB 2.0 transfers

      Supports secure transfers from Windows Media Player

      Rechargeable battery lasts up to 16hrs

      View JPEG or BMP images

      Built-in FM tuner

      Integrated voice recorder

      Record music from any audio source(no PC required)

      Supports MP3, WMA, ASF and OGG music files

      Store or transfer files of any type

      Enhanced 3D audio

      Packed With:

      iriver earphones

      Carrying case

      USB 2.0 cable

      Audio line-in cable

      Installation CD

      AC adapter

      This iriver is the perfect Valentine present for a sweet geek girl like me.

      --
      Julia Cameron
      Oich ù agus hiùraibh éile
    6. Re:No one mentions IRIVER anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just have to point out in relation to your #3), for the ipod holding the play buton for 5 sec or there abouts will force it off, then you can simply turn it back on.(at least I'm prity sure it's the play, don't own one personaly, but both my brothers do)

      As for the first 2 points, well it just diferent strokes for diferent folks, as they say. Neither of my brothers feel the need for an internal mic ext. and being mac users already use itunes for all their music. Not to say iriver isn't cool, it's the only real compatition for the ipod IMAO.

    7. Re:No one mentions IRIVER anymore... by tyler083 · · Score: 1

      yo, ipod does have a reset button as well. just hold the play/pause and menu buttons. it then does a hard reboot.

  39. Bose by adhocboy · · Score: 1

    I would have thought Bose would have made the list. The company has majorly repositioned its legacy systems to support new digital units and formats.

    1. Re:Bose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everything they make still sucks tho.

      no change there.

    2. Re:Bose by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Sucks AND are utterly overpriced!

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  40. iPod's SNR is so low that Apple's ashamed of it by MOGua · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Listening to low quality music on the go is tolerable but attaching that shitty quality music into one's car is just foolish.

    1. Re:iPod's SNR is so low that Apple's ashamed of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your content-to-messagelength ratio is not tolerable.

  41. Legal Specifics by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

    Being convicted means you are found guilty.
    Being sentenced means you are given a punishment for the crime you are guilty of.

    Conviction comes before sentencing.

    1. Re:Legal Specifics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah... You can be forced into paying the opposite party money so they don't take it to the courts...Where you'd loose since you can't afford the even higher cost of lawyers.
      Let's not call that blackmail, by the way :-)

  42. The top of my wishlist? by Moses+Lawn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I won't comment on the winners and losers list, but the number one thing *I* want to see? A volume control for the iPod. Yeah, the scroll wheel is a great metaphor, and I love it, but it's a pain in the ass for changing the volume.

    For one thing, you have to be at the "Now Playing" screen for volume to even be available. Now, imagine you have the unit in your shirt pocket, walking down the street. The next song comes on way too loud (or way too quiet). Quick - reach in and try to find the right spot on the wheel and rotate it in the right direction, without hitting any of the other buttons. Or, try to press the pause/next/previous buttons. Not too easy, is it?

    Ideally, there would be a volume slider and the three playback buttons on the top of the unit, between the hold switch and the remote adapter on the Mini. The hold switch is too big anyway, and could be rotated 90 degrees so so that it moves front-to-back, with no loss of usability.

    Yes, I know you can get an aftermarket remote-control dongle from Apple that does this, but have you looked at those? Big, ugly, heavy things that dangle from the headphones like a tumor. Couldn't they have made something that fit flat against the top of the unit - you know, kind of an elegant design?

    Anyway, I love the unit, but hate the annoyance. It's a small annoyance, but it makes an obvious wart on a really clean design.

    Oh, and the ability to randomize a playlist/album would be absolutely fantastic.

    --

    What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?

    1. Re:The top of my wishlist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sound check is what you want for your volume troubles, it normalizes the volume on all your tracks so that doesn't happen. As per your random request, look in settings, you'll find shuffle.
      I personally don't have a remote control on my 5gb or 15gb but I never felt I needed one, well planned playlists and shuffle are easier.

    2. Re:The top of my wishlist? by Moses+Lawn · · Score: 1

      Shuffle is great, and I use it all the time, but it only operates on the entire list of songs. What I want is to play a playlist randomly - Fast and Loud Tunes For the Gym, Blues, Thoughtful Singers, etc. I know iTunes can randomize a playlist, but I would have to upload it every time I wanted a different order. That's way too much trouble.

      I really like the auto-volume setting, but until I looked it up just now, I thought it was only in iTunes. According to the user guide (which is helpfully not copied to my machine during installation), that's what the cryptic "Sound Check" setting does. However, it apparently only works if you also have it set in iTunes (Huh?). Thank you for pointing this out - it will make my life much happier.

      --

      What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?

    3. Re:The top of my wishlist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just lifted my ipod to test but the battery is dead, I am pretty sure shuffle works on playlists also. could be a firmware glitch but I'd imagine it's always been like that.

    4. Re:The top of my wishlist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.radioshack.com/product.asp?catalog_name =CTLG&product_id=42-2559

      Volume control cable for your iPod. Merry Christmas.

    5. Re:The top of my wishlist? by Moses+Lawn · · Score: 1

      As near as I can tell, and from Googling around the user groups, I don't think it does. At least not on the Mini with the latest updater. Feh.

      --

      What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?

  43. Why was BT in the winner column? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's an unreliable piece of crap. We polled employees at work when we were considering distributing content via BT, and not a single user said they did better than 1 out of 10 downloads completing. I'm sorry, working 10% of the time or less does not deserve an award.

  44. iPod quality = Ashlee Simpson Live by MOGua · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Just found this... If you attach the low sound quality iPod to any car, even Enya will sound like Ashlee Simpson (LIVE)

  45. Re:WMA is a good format by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

    I must concur. WMA, while proprietary, is a great-sounding format. Even 64kb/sec is tolerable--not so with mp3. 128kb/sec on my Creative Muvo sounds fantastic.

    --
    "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  46. Can I write a list and get it on / ? by DaveCBio · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How is this news for nerds or even stuff that matters? It's an opinion piece by some guy that is an Apple fan and runs an MP3 new site. It's fluff.

  47. Re:WMA is a good format by paranoidgeek · · Score: 1

    I agree that WMA is a *good* format, but with *great* open source formats like FLAC and OGG arround, i wonder if it worth selling our privacy to MS for a good format ?

    But still i do find it good that MS users have a decent format that they can call their own.

    --
    Lima India November Uniform X-ray
  48. we're all losers by fishdan · · Score: 0, Troll

    With the demise of Suprnova, I think we're all losers.

    --
    Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm
    1. Re:we're all losers by fishdan · · Score: 1

      Wow, how did that get modded Troll?

      --
      Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm
  49. Re:WMA is a good format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My god...
    If you really believe that, you must be near deaf.

    WMA9 at any CBR bitrate under 160KB/s sounds like ass. The high end is way, way too compressed.

  50. Slashdot main page broken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the slashdot main page broken? It hasnt been updated in some hours .. as in .. according to the main page there are only 4 mod 1 comments to this article.

  51. Re:WMA is a good format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iTunes has lossless audio as well, as does the iPod. In fact, I'm listening to my stereo right now through iTunes->AirPort Express, which uses the lossless codec to stream the music to my stereo over my 802.11g signal on my laptop. It works on Windows and Mac.

  52. Re:WMA is a good format by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

    Actually, for low-bitrate encodings -- spoken-word in particular -- I have found WMA to be far superior to both MP3 and OGG.

  53. RIAA a Loser? Sadly, I don't think so by ShimmyShimmy · · Score: 1

    Has anyone seen that new poster advertising the IP Addresses of everyone they sued? Keep in mind they're getting at least a couple thousand dollars from each of those IP's, and there are quite a few of them.

    All it really takes is a shitty-ass lawyer to take a couple hours (10 at very most) of his time to print some data, send a nasty letter to an ISP, send a nasty letter home, and BOOM, 3-4 figures of instant revenue.

    Although the amount of simultaneous p2p users may not have been affected that much, I'd say they're doing a pretty decnet job of scaring a good nuumber of people.

    But alas, let's pretend they're not scaring anyone. They're still suing a ton of teenagers for what is more or less their life savings or more, and that just goes to cash in the bank. The RIAA is not collapsing and it's not being threatened. For whoever hasn't noticed, CD sales are up this year.

    The majority of the Losers List is companies/products that failed miserably and dumped a lot of money into something that's not paying off. RIAA seems to be excelling quite well. I'm probably preaching to the choir, but support your bands, buy theiir mp3's online, but STOP BUYING RECORDS.

    --
    Partial Credit: The Engineer's Best friend
    "Well, the bridge didn't fall all the way down!"
  54. Urgent Prayer Request ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case any of you all haven't heard the news, Rob Malda was rushed to the hospital earlier today for an emergency operation. This is why the comment posting at Slashdot is currently broken. Please take a moment to pray for his recovery. According to his doctors, although a gerbilectomy is not a common operation, with the proper antibiotics his prognosis is good. Unfortunately, they were unable to save the gerbil. PETA members, please remember the gerbil in your prayers. Thanks, and God bless.

  55. Great, he must be the 7th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    He must be the 7th looser, for actually not being able to count.
    Quoting TFA:

    6. California File Traders
    [...]
    8. Induce Act


    Just tell me if I'm getting wrong, but on my planet, in base 10, 7 comes between 6 and 8.

    Juste my '7' cents...
  56. Do you see the NO DRM camp winning longterm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    phony "grassroots" capaign failed

    Do you mean failed as a Real Rhapsody sales driver/marketing device or that the Freedom of Choice Campaign has failed to build any momentum (or site updates)?

    Admittedly, I don't buy into all the antiReal sentiment and may fail to fully comprehend the taint of Real's sponsorship, but on the face of it, the campaign seems pretty reasonable, especially given that I don't see the Recording Industry Ass. of America giving up DRM voluntarily or being compelled to do so.

    Gigi B. Sohn, president and co-founder of Public Knowledge:
    The more digital music formats are compatible, the more choice there is for everyone. Consumers, the recording industry and the technology industry all benefit when there is more choice in the marketplace. The more choices there are for legal downloading, the less incentive there is for illegal downloading. All companies in the technology and recording industries should take the hint and work together to bring the benefits of digital music to consumers.
  57. Public domain date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regarding the wish list:

    I'm pretty sure the line between copyright and public domain is 1923, not 1928.

    Wikipedia says so too.

  58. Ogg vorbis sucks for portable devices. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sucks battery like it's going out of fasion.

    The iRiver H300 line support ogg which is why I bought it, but on using it I found that with oggs, the battery life is around 30% less than with variable bit rate mp3's. Compared to fixed bit rate mp3's it's more like 50% less.

    192bit quality oggs: 6-7 hours
    192bit quality VBR mp3: 9-10 hours
    192bit FBR mp3: 14-15 hours

    Given that vbr negates the aural advantage that ogg had over mp3, I can't see idealism (free, as in speech) winning out over inconvenence (battery consumption).

  59. Re: Random Rebooting? Windows 98 maybe by ShimmyShimmy · · Score: 1

    Exactly where/when do you claim macs running OSX 'randomly rebooting'? I've been running OSX for well over a year, and I've never had one of these 'random reboots?' Occasionally, when I let my computer sleep, unplugged for an extended period of time on low battery, when I plug it back in, I have to hold the power down to get it to boot up, presumably because of loss of power to memory. However, I have a windows laptop that does the exact same thing.... it's not a mac-specific problem.

    Not once has my entire computer ever crashed in the middle of operation. I assume by random reboot, you mean something along the lines of a blue-screen, which I haven't seen/heard of since.

    Next is ignorant users. Actually, Mac users know a lot more about using their computers than most windows users. Granted they're more detached from the actual computer operations, but who cares? They're much better using applications, which is what the concept of a GUI is based on. Ever heard the phrase "I just click on the e" or "my computer is slow maybe it'll go faster if I defrag it (for the 3rd time this week)"?

    $100 for security holes? Dumbass. The upgrades are for extended features and bug fixes. Windows did this as Windows 98, and Windows ME. No new features, just bug fixes (and new bugs). Oh yeah, and no Time Commando.
    Security Holes, my friend, are updated and patched automatically, similar to windows update, only much less frequent and urgent (due to OS being much more stable and having many fewer security holes), aa well as having smaller download sizes.
    Mac OS being 'crash free' isn't quite accurate, but it's unquestionably the best OS out there. I ran Red Hat 8 for a while, and even the integrated Shoot-em-up game and the Penguin game crashed within a few minutes. Oh sorry, the applications disappeared. OpenOffice still has some miles to go until it can sync well with MS Office, and I wouldn't consider that bug-free either.
    As for Windows, famous of IE and Outlook Express, I think I've said enough.
    All in all, OS X is by far the most stable operating system there is. The only applications that crash more than once a month or so are IE, Powerpoint, and random beta versions.

    Before you pretend you're better than any Mac User, I suggest you do some homework.

    --
    Partial Credit: The Engineer's Best friend
    "Well, the bridge didn't fall all the way down!"
  60. california law=star of david? wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does the site carry this article comparing identifying file swappers with nazis making jews wear star of david. I'm the first to call bullshit when some Zionist uses the anti-Semite card to defend Israel, and now I'll be the first to say that the comparison between the law quoted and the precursor to the Final Solution is preposterous and trivialising an atrocious event.

    1. Re:california law=star of david? wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      parent link is on the article for "digital media losers" page, used as evidence. article writer may be well intentioned but this criticism is sound.

  61. Re:Winamp on the losers list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is wrong with winamp?

    Well, for starters is that obnoxious "skinning" craze it started. And that its own skins are so tiny you can't read them.

  62. ipod killers by DMJC-L · · Score: 0

    ipod killers as loosers? HAHAHa everyonhe I've shown my Iriver ihp-140 to wants one, noone wants an ipod after seeing it, the only thing holding iriver back is it's lack of advertising, the ipod is already beaten on technical merit. It's just a matter of time before it loses. Remember noone needs more market/mindshare than apple... they just need to make a profit on the devices.

    1. Re:ipod killers by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      No. re-read teh comment. It said that the TERM "iPod killers" i sthe loser. Not the actual products.

  63. FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  64. Winners list omition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see "democracy" in the Winners List. What, no more propoganda? I guess those infidels will finally pay for their crimes against Canada, eh? ermm, I mean; yay District INC. of Corumbia.

  65. Mod Parent Up! by Quobobo · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up!

  66. Re:RIAA a Loser? Sadly, I don't think so by BlueCup · · Score: 1

    I disagree, I think that they are losing. For one thing, the lawyers are getting paid, even if they're on a payroll rather than hourly, they're being taken away from other things they could be doing. Not to mention, due to all of this bad publicity, they are taking a cut in sales. Despite a yearly growth of 3(?) percent, in the record industry, their particular labels, especially the main ones, are taking a hit, as people like myself, run from anything they touch, and support the alternatives... They aren't dead yet, and they wont be dead for a long time, but I think they're boat has already begun taking in water.

    --
    WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
  67. bluh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    testing 1 2 3

  68. I have one of these by Nursie · · Score: 1

    A present from my very generous other half. It's great. The little disk caddy hooks up to a PC as a USB 2.0 hard drive for easy and fast file transfer, then slots into the head unit behind the faceplate. I'm very happy with it and highly recommend it. Of course now I have to put all my cd's onto it which is taking aaaaages....

    Dension dh100ix + 40Gbig toshiba drive = all your music available in the car.

    Dension also do an iPod adaptor for other makes of stereo to allow you to hook up your iPod to the cd-changer port on most major branded head units and control it through their changer controls.

    Cool company, if I was the type to invest in the stock market I'd be buying dension right now.

    FYI they're a hungarian company I believe.

  69. R.I.P Slashdot.org (1997 - 2005) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well it's painfully apparent at this hour that Slashdot.org is no more. Some will say Slashdot was a victim of cold corporate indifference, others will point to a right wing conspiracy and of course there's the fact that it never made any money.

    Regardless there will be many walking this earth with a little emptiness in their life that use to be Slashdot.org.

    -- AC

    PS. Can somebody update Wiki? *meh ... I'll do it tomorrow*

  70. Nah, it's still alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once Micahel Sims comes out of his post homosexual orgy coma and feels the need to spew anti-capitalist rhetoric, he'll notice that Slashdot's front page has gone untouched since noon. The other editors are surely still sleeping off their afternoon fist-a-thon.

  71. Re: Random Rebooting? Windows 98 maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come now. Neither Windows, OS X, or Linux are the most stable operating systems there are. Solaris has been stable for far longer than any of these three.

  72. Re: Random Rebooting? Windows 98 maybe by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

    $100 for security holes? Dumbass. The upgrades are for extended features and bug fixes. Windows did this as Windows 98, and Windows ME. No new features, just bug fixes (and new bugs). Oh yeah, and no Time Commando.

    When Panther was released, there was a mass of buzz because Apple specifically said it would not issue security updates for Jaguar. After about a month of bad press and consumers complaining, Apple retracted this policy requiring users to buy the new version to get the security updates.

    However, prior to this, with the release of Jaguar, Apple DID require users to buy the updated OSX in order to get the security fixes that came with Jaguar.

    And if you don't believe this, you are either living in a dream world, or have no idea about what Apple does with its users. Do a quick google on the subject.

    My company deals with TONS of Apple, *nix, and Windows users, trust me, I have been around this topic a bit to long for your revisionist history.

    I've been running OSX for well over a year, and I've never had one of these 'random reboots?' Occasionally, when I let my computer sleep, unplugged for an extended period of time on low battery, when I plug it back in, I have to hold the power down to get it to boot up, presumably because of loss of power to memory. However, I have a windows laptop that does the exact same thing.... it's not a mac-specific problem.

    Really, a windows computer does this too? Hmm... Do you even know what standby and hibernate are? Do you even know that a computer cannot run indefinitely without power? Geesh...

    And I never said random reboots were predominate on OSX, I said when the OS does crash and the system reboots, there are a lot of Mac users that have no idea that their computer just crashed.

    All in all, OS X is by far the most stable operating system there is. The only applications that crash more than once a month or so are IE, Powerpoint, and random beta versions.

    And yet you claim above you don't have crashes, which is it, or does my conclusion that Mac users don't get what crashes are hold true?

    So far with both things you point out, you are just providing evidence for my rash generalization. And I meant it as a rash generalization, I didn't realize that SlashDot Mac users were going to chime in to prove they know nothing about their computer in depth. - Geesh

    Before you pretend you're better than any Mac User, I suggest you do some homework.

    I wasn't even claiming I'm better than or don't even like Macs. I however don't put them on a false pedestal above all other OSes or Computers out of my ignorance or love of their ideal. I use OSX, Windows, and several *nixes on a daily basis. Not only for support, personal use, and development.

    To even hint that I love any one of these far above the others is absurd, you have no idea who I am or what I stand for, so stop putting words in my mouth.

    We can only better the computing world by finding and exploring the best ideals from ALL OS concepts and expanding the best ideas to a fulfilled reality. To state that one is the greatest and ignore the rest is not only ignorant, but does nothing but close your mind and stifle your ability to offer insightful or creative input to the computing world.

  73. yankee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    doodle.

    What's up with /. today?

  74. RIAA a Loser? 10% off Talk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They're still suing a ton of teenagers for what is more or less their life savings or more, and that just goes to cash in the bank."

    Must not have been much, if they couldn't afford all the movies, and music they downloaded.

    Or maybe they're millionaires for all the stuff they didn't buy.

    [BlueCup (753410)]
    "For one thing, the lawyers are getting paid, even if they're on a payroll rather than hourly, they're being taken away from other things they could be doing."

    Sounds like the "If only the KDE and GNOME people worked together? We'd be number one" argument.

    "Not to mention, due to all of this bad publicity, they are taking a cut in sales. "

    Even if all Slashdotters stopped buying music. I doubt it would even be a blip on the spreadsheet.

    "Despite a yearly growth of 3(?) percent, in the record industry, their particular labels, especially the main ones, are taking a hit, as people like myself, run from anything they touch, and support the alternatives..."

    There's more than one reason to run away from RIAA/MPAA products.

    "They aren't dead yet, and they wont be dead for a long time, but I think they're boat has already begun taking in water."

    We say the same about Microsoft, and the Government and whatever is on our shit list, and yet...here they are.

  75. The Real Losers-The Uninformed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "are unfortunately the customers"

    By their own free will too. Remember it's not others responsability to be your brain. It's your responsability. And in this "Internet" age there's no excuse for not being informed.

  76. Yo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has the site gone dead or is just me?

  77. Re:I'm sensing a pattern: translated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me translate your translation...

    1) Apple used a stable OSS kernel as licensed.

    2) Apple shares security holes with other 'nix systems - mostly affecting local users, nothing nasty widespread in the wild (so far).

    Macs do crash, usually because of bad RAM, either as a freeze or a kernel panic with a screen that says so in several languages. Annoyingly mine has frozen once to date, that was after only 2 years of using OS X. YMMV.

    Application crashes are a bit more frequent, the good news being that they don't affect the system. They can be a symptom of running out of free unfragmented hard disc space for OS X to play in.

    The story that the "only way users could get the 'high risk' security holes fixed, was to buy the upgrade" was much hyped in the short interval between a particular Panther update and the Jaguar one that followed. No longer true.

    You want to stick with XP, go ahead. I hear it's almost as stable as OS X.

  78. Dell's iPod Buyback a Loser?! by Myrkridian42 · · Score: 1

    How can they say this brillant plan didn't work? Here's what I did:

    Bought broken iPod from friend - $5

    Buy Dell's Digital Jukebox - $200

    Send in iPod, recieve rebate + $100

    Sold Jukebox on Ebay + $175

    Final Count = $70 Profit! Thank you Dell!

  79. Re:I'm sensing a pattern: translated by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

    Macs do crash, usually because of bad RAM, either as a freeze or a kernel panic with a screen that says so in several languages. Annoyingly mine has frozen once to date, that was after only 2 years of using OS X. YMMV.

    Application crashes are a bit more frequent, the good news being that they don't affect the system. They can be a symptom of running out of free unfragmented hard disc space for OS X to play in.


    And this is different from any other modern OS how?

    Just because the Mac finally got a quite good OS with OSX, doesn't mean that tons of other OSes have not been around doing THE VERY SAME THING FOR A LONG TIME BEFORE OSX.

    You want to stick with XP, go ahead. I hear it's almost as stable as OS X.

    I think OSX is a good OS, I never said it wasn't, nor did I say that XP, Linux, Solaris, BSD, or 20 other OSes were any better than OSX. Funny that you would paint me as an XP person. It is a good OS too, but NOT THE BEST IN THE WORLD EITHER.

    The difference is I don't blindly stick my head up Apples butt just because they finally are offering their customers something that *nix variants, Open Source OSes, and EVEN Microsoft has been offering its customers for years.

    Apple is STILL NEW restrospectivily to having a modern OS, and it is great that they finally do. But I get sick of hearing how it is more secure, crashes less, or when people hype 'cool' features in OSX, when these features have been in other OSes for years.

    It also annoys me to see people in the Open Source world bend to Apples will when Apple has done VERY LITTLE for the Open Source market or movement. Apple's bread and butter is a Closed Software GUI on Closed Hardware. Apple only pays credit to the Open Source and BSD underpinnings in OSX when licenses require them to, or they get a shot of publicity or fanfar by snow blowing the open source world.

    If Apple flips open the GUI and discloses the source, then I will completely rethink the Apple Open Source connectivity, right now it just isn't as real as people would like to believe.

    PS. Why do all the I love this OS or I love that OS zealots almost always respond anonymous?