Slashdot Mirror


Gigabyte's 3D1 brings SLI to a single card

An anonymous reader writes "Gigabyte have implemented nVidia's SLI on a single graphics board, dubbed the "3D1." The card features two GeForce 6600GT cores (I would imagine two 6800 cores would draw too much power and create too much heat for a single PCB.) Hexus.net have a review of the board, which in various tests was able to compete with a 6800GT, but will it be marketed at a favourable price? You may also want to read Hexus' article - 'An Introduction to SLI' - for a look at how SLI technology works."

153 comments

  1. Too Much power? by Kjuib · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I would imagine two 6800 cores would draw too much power and create too much heat for a single PCB."
    I don't know whether it would or not, but I will be willing to test that for you. Send me one, and I will fill out all the forms and keep track of heating and power levels.

    --
    - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
    1. Re:Too Much power? by mirko · · Score: 1

      When I see that the latest Nvidia occupies to PCI slots in the Powermacs, I'd sugegst they engineered these in order to replace these noisy fans with some refrigerating packaging... I am sure the supplemental volume is not an issue anymore, due to how these video boards size and power consumption increased in the last years.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    2. Re:Too Much power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better Idea. Two 6800 Cores on Two SLI ebabled boards for a total of Four cores. Now lets see how fast Doom 3 runs.

    3. Re:Too Much power? by VoidWraith · · Score: 0

      SLI only supports two cores. Sorry!

    4. Re:Too Much power? by tuba_dude · · Score: 1

      I betcha it'd get almost 30 fps!

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    5. Re:Too Much power? by DeathByDuke · · Score: 0

      you still cant buy one thats in stock eh? ;)

    6. Re:Too Much power? by darc · · Score: 1

      If you mean flames per second, yeah. Perhaps nVidia's dual 6800s could compete with ATI's FireGL series? More bacon grilling fun for all of us.

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
  2. So, by SynapseLapse · · Score: 1

    Let me just be the first, of many, to say when can we SLI this card (or a revision of this card) and have the power of 4 6600 chips?

    1. Re:So, by stupidfoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      This card requires 16 PCI-Express lanes. So, you would first need a motherboard that gives you 32 lanes. I don't believe one currently exists. Is there a limit in the PCI-Express spec?

    2. Re:So, by Peldor · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can already do that in terms of "having the power of 4 6600 chips". Just SLI two 6800 Ultras. Same number of total pipes. Probably faster memory too.

    3. Re:So, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      screw 4, imagine a whole beowulf cluster of em!

    4. Re:So, by VoidWraith · · Score: 0

      SLI doesn't support this. SLI has a method of distributing work among the cards that is infeasible with four cores. It probably wouldn't be a particularly complex rework, but nonetheless, it would not be compatible with more than two cores as it stands now. For more information read the other Hexus article about SLI which was linked in the summary.

    5. Re:So, by Gaima · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The current SLI solutions, from what little (admitidly) I've seen, actually split the 16 lanes between the 2 PCIe x16 slots.
      Giving 8 lanes per slot, which is still more than enough bandwidth.

    6. Re:So, by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      when can we SLI this card

      I don't see where it would go any faster, honestly.

      Look at the charts - when they are not using AA/Oversampling the single 6600GT goes just as fast as the 3D1 and the 6800GT - at all resolutions. The applications are CPU bound and better video isn't going to change that.

      Granted there is always the 1337 crew pointing at the 8xOversampling / 4xAA numbers - but quite honestly the FPS hit going there on any card isn't worth the questionable increase in quality. Given the 60Hz an LCD puts out - and given that it takes a $600 LCD to run 1600x1200 - I'd say that quite honestly these cards are pretty much the same. Hardware has once again outrun software, and right now videocards are processing data faster than the CPU can serve it up. This 3D1 is cool, and it is going to take the early adopters to buy it in order to finance the second generation of the technology (ie, runs on other random motherboards) but I think I'm going to pass.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    7. Re:So, by rasty · · Score: 1

      Faster memory probably yes, but the issue with SLI-ing 2 physical cards is that you get only half the memory! (the two cards have to render the same frame and therefore need the same textures on each)

    8. Re:So, by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      you won't be able to, as this card already takes advantage of the SLI interface, which is desgined only for dual processors, and won't scale to quad

  3. PCBs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are PCBs available which have a thicker copper layer thus are able to be used for even higher current. You can make PCBs for some 100s of Amperes.

    1. Re:PCBs by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Informative

      The question is not moving the power around, it's dissipating that much power. Useless to have 100 amp traces if the load gets so hot the solder melts.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:PCBs by ppanon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure but the interface specs for AGP, PCI, et al. specify how much power a card can draw. If you try to draw too much power it may stress components on the motherboard and lead to failure. Perhaps the parent meant that putting two 6800 cores on a single board would draw power in excess of the maximum ratings for AGP or PCI-X?

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    3. Re:PCBs by enosys · · Score: 1
      Sure but the interface specs for AGP, PCI, et al. specify how much power a card can draw.

      That is easy to solve. You can get power from one of those power connectors used for disk drives. Some single-GPU graphics cards already require that.

    4. Re:PCBs by bwindle2 · · Score: 1

      Which is why a lot of high-end AGP video cards have molex connectors, so they can draw power directly from the power supply, and *not* fry the AGP slot.

    5. Re:PCBs by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the 6800 (Ultra anyway) requires 2 of them already.

      my 6600 GT AGP requires one (The PCI may supply more power and not need one).

      The install guide for my card (that includes the 6800) recomend using 2 seperate power leads from the power supply if possible.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re:PCBs by hughk · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Having worked with dinosaurs, well at least later generations, I can assure you that modern PCs aren't that dense from a thermal viewpoint. The higher-end dinosaurs had the chips sitting in special modules that provided thermal coupling. Unfortunately, you are certainly going to break the ATX spec if you start to generate so much heat and get rid of it.

      Liquid cooling will do it easily, but it would be unusual and non-standard to require it,

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    7. Re:PCBs by swv3752 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A regular 6800 sometimes requires 2 molex connectors. Now building a SLI 6800 would need 4 molex connectors and probably need a 400w+ Power Supply just to provide the needed amps. That is a lot of power going to a single pcb card. It would be difficult to dissipate that much heat. Plus you might need special bracing just to support the card from the weight of hefty heatsinks you will need.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    8. Re:PCBs by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you use the same line from the power supply, it defeats the purpose and you might as well just plug one of them in (assuming they all go to the same power busses, which is most likely the case).

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  4. multicore GPU's by confusion · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This seems like a lot to pack onto a single board - heat and power for sure. With all the talk from AMD & Intel about multi-core CPUs, a multi-core GPU seems like the best plan. Otherwise, we're going to be back to the full length PCI cards soon.

    Jerry
    http://www.syslog.org/

    1. Re:multicore GPU's by pmjordan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if you look at the specs of today's GPUs, they already feature 8-16 pixel processors and 2-8 vertex processors. (numbers somewhere in that order of magnitude) Therefore, they already have multiple cores in a sense. What ATI and nVidia are doing is increasing the complexity of each pixel/vertex pipelines to add features, and adding new pipelines, and widening the memory bus to increase speed. You'll notice that clock speeds are in the 300-500MHz range, presumably for the same reasons why dual-core CPUs (will) have lower clock speeds than their single-core counterparts.

      ~phil

    2. Re:multicore GPU's by dbacher · · Score: 1

      Matrox had multicore GPU's. The G200 was two G100's on a chip, and each core could be directed separately to perform tasks.

      --
      If your code is acting bloated, and is running rather slow, it's likely and predicted that some loops you will unroll.
    3. Re:multicore GPU's by hawk · · Score: 1

      It's about time we had a multicore 6800. Some of us have been waiting 30 years for this! With today's technology, it should be no problem to put a couple of thousand of them on the mask, each with 32k of ram for itself, 16k of rom, and a clever bank switching of the other 16k for oodles of memory.

      Oh. Wait. Nevermind.

      hawk, back to his 8 bit memories

  5. If I read the article right by stupidfoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's basically the a little less than performance of the 6800 at the cost of the 6800, but with more heat than the 6800. Didn't the multiple 6600s perform better than this at a lower cost?

    Am I missing something here?

    And what's this all about? Putting a video card on the carpet? Or a towel? Static electricity kills, people!

    1. Re:If I read the article right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they're in Gainesville, FL where the high today is 81 with 93% humidity, you insensitive clod.

      p.s. my first use of this tired old meme, hopefully my last

    2. Re:If I read the article right by Tx · · Score: 1

      Maybe they have an anti-static carpet. Then again, maybe they shot that after they finished the review, and didn't really care anymore :-).

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    3. Re:If I read the article right by moonbender · · Score: 1

      I haven't read this article, but this isn't the first dual-6600 card, and others claimed to have a higher performance than a single 6800. So more performance, roughly the same cost, more heat.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    4. Re:If I read the article right by Equinox11 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By the way.. I never got the deal about static electricity destroying things since I've always lived and worked in Florida. On a trip to New York it was suddenly all clear... In pitch blackness I ruffled my bed sheets to see a trail of lightning bolts blue in the blackness... I was like WOAH! So that's why there are all those warnings and wrist straps and such! So the whole static thing is dependant on where you live to a large degree.

    5. Re:If I read the article right by jbarket · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see where you've seen another single card SLI solution. Even though, as usual for slashdot, this is actually old news, Gigabyte is innovating here.

      More importantly, about the performance, there are a massive number of 2 card SLI reviews for the 6600 series, and the general consensis is that they just can't keep up, especially when you start throwing more AA/AF and higher resolutions at them. While it may be more cost effective for some people to buy a 6800 in two pieces over a period of time, this is not a way to cheaply gain outrageous performance.

      nVidia isn't going to market a way to turn their budget line of cards into something that beats their flagship line for less money. That's ridiculous. It's simply another application of the technology. They're simply trying to find a way to sell consumers an additional video card, whether it be another budget line card or another 500$ monster.

      --

      -----
      jonathan barket
    6. Re:If I read the article right by moonbender · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see where you've seen another single card SLI solution. Even though, as usual for slashdot, this is actually old news, Gigabyte is innovating here.

      You're right, I probably haven't. The previous stories on Slashdot dealt with the technology in general and the Gigabyte card in particular, that is, the same card this story is on. (Dupe?) Sorry about that.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    7. Re:If I read the article right by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      heh, those lightning bolts in the blackness from the bed sheets are really cool to look at, at night.

  6. Son of a bitch ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I just ordered a dual 6600GT setup from Newegg and here this thing is about to be released.

    1. Re:Son of a bitch ! by Rirath.com · · Score: 1

      How the heck is the above post redundant?

      At any rate, no real worry. You've still got real SLI, meaning you can use two 6800GT's, or two of whatever comes along in the future. As others are saying, this runs slightly less than a 6800GT and has disadvantages.

    2. Re:Son of a bitch ! by Tx · · Score: 1

      The anandtech review recommends a two card solution over this single card, so you win.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    3. Re:Son of a bitch ! by Dead_Smiley · · Score: 1
      According to the article, you would have to buy the Gigabyte motherboard too. Unless you were willing to do that, you haven't lost anything.

      From the aritcle: The drawbacks to the 3D1 are its limited application (it will only run on the GA-K8NXP-SLI), the fact that it doesn't perform any better than 2-card SLI, and the fact that the user loses a DVI and an HD-15 display connection when compared to the 2-card solution.

      --
      I know what the Internet is, what the hell is this Interweb business?!
    4. Re:Son of a bitch ! by VoidWraith · · Score: 0

      Your system is more powerful. Since you already spent the money, it was worth it. Congradulations!

    5. Re:Son of a bitch ! by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      I just ordered a dual 6600GT setup from Newegg and here this thing is about to be released.

      Some people just have far too much disposable income IMHO. WTF do you need a dual 6600GT video card setup for anyway? The most demanding games out there (Doom 3 and Half-Life 2) work just fine with a "lowly" GeForce FX 5600. Sheesh.

    6. Re:Son of a bitch ! by mslinux · · Score: 0

      Don't you have anything better to do with your money? Like invest in retirement or something?

      Four or Five year old HW is still very useable you know.

    7. Re:Son of a bitch ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can spend his disposable income on whatever he pleases... and by dropping a boatload of cash on a high end card he's providing the incentive to innovate, as well as keeping people employed. That's how an economy works.

    8. Re:Son of a bitch ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how do you know he wasn't upgrading from 8 year old hardware? Not all of us want to run 386's until the core melts down.

    9. Re:Son of a bitch ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's how an economy works.


      You meant to say "that's how the souless, materialistic American consumer economy works." Sadly, we've exported said economy to a decent fraction of the world.
    10. Re:Son of a bitch ! by be-fan · · Score: 0

      Four or five year old HW is usable only if you don't actually do anything with your computer. My 2 year old laptop is quite ready to be replaced. It can't run a lot of new games (HL-2, Doom III) at a decent speed, it cries like a baby running CATIA or SolidEdge, takes forever to compile using g++, and can't even encode MP3s fast enough to keep up with the abysmally slow 6x CD rip speeds the DVD drive can achieve.

      Sure, if all you do is use e-mail, Word, and a web-browser, you don't need a lot of power, but the people who spend $500 for a graphics card don't do just that. My next graphics card purchase will be a $500 6800 Ultra, and I'm just happy that I can softmod it into a Quadro without shelling out $1500 for the real thing.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    11. Re:Son of a bitch ! by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      no, actually that's how the capitalist model works. In theory it's no better or worse than many others. Its pervertion at the hands of large corporations is actually the problem, but the general "I innovate, get money from being good at it, and haev funding for further innovation" is actually quite sensible

    12. Re:Son of a bitch ! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Actually SLI for the vodoos were quite usefull for cad cam and designing.

      I use to work at liz claiborne and all the folks in the graphics department for retail design wanted them over the WildCat 1 cards.

      So in essence they do have commercial use and appeal. Last I want to code again and coding opengl and directX apps are more fun to me.

      Maybe its a guy thing? I dunno.

      But writing a mariokart clone on my spare time sounds fun and I have a right to spend money on personal things to make me happy just like some people spend $700 for a skirt. .... but admiting can not afford such a card right now. Oh well. Time to upgrade to a geforce4.

  7. Re:Hello by Rosonowski · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ATi's x600, presuming you can get one.

    --
    01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
  8. S3/968 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try the S3/968. That might be just what you're looking for!

  9. Anandtech review by asliarun · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anandtech has a review on the same.
    Source: http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2315

    1. Re:Anandtech review by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      I hope they don't use different colors for each card each time it's used in a new graph like they do in this article. Kinda makes it harder to read and compare...

      http://www.hexus.net/content/reviews/review.php?dX JsX3Jldmlld19JRD05NjMmdXJsX3BhZ2U9OA== example..

      Top graph:

      3D is blue
      6600 is red
      6800 is yellow

      Next graph:

      3D is red
      6600 is green
      6800 is yellow

    2. Re:Anandtech review by asliarun · · Score: 1

      "I hope they don't use different colors for each card each time it's used in a new graph like they do in this article. Kinda makes it harder to read and compare..."

      No, Anandtech is not known for changing its colours ;-)

    3. Re:Anandtech review by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1
  10. Re:Hello by Rirath.com · · Score: 1

    I'll be getting a 6600GT any day now, and fully recommed it.
    Quite simply, look at the benchmarks and decide for yourself.

  11. Power by bsd4me · · Score: 1

    I would imagine two 6800 cores would draw too much power and create too much heat for a single PCB.

    The power issue doesn't really have to do with the PCB. It mainly has to do with the connector and the number of power pins. If a card draws too much power, the pins or fingers on the connector act as fuses and melt. (I have seen this happen on VME and cPCI boards.)

    --

    (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

    1. Re:Power by NoseBag · · Score: 1

      Yes - and even before they fuse they can start dropping non-trivial amounts of supply V, increasing V ripple at the point-of-use, and lowering operating margins and reliability.

      But splitting a heat source (the chip) into two or more separately packaged chunks can lower the separate die temperatures. This can be a good thing.

      --
      Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
  12. Refrigerate your PC? by Laurentiu · · Score: 1

    No, not yet. But it looks like in a not so distant future it might be cheaper to use one standard air-conditioning system for the whole case than one for each of the 10 processors on various video, audio and processing boards (most of which you will absolutely need in order to play the next [Doom|HL|Halo|...]).

    --
    Just /. IT
    1. Re:Refrigerate your PC? by Riddlefox · · Score: 1

      I've been contemplating doing that. My computer room gets pretty hot during the summer anyways (upstairs in a townhouse), and it'd be nice to have a portable A/C unit in the room. I wonder how much it'd help the temps inside my computer if I took some ducting and pumped nice cold A/C air straight into the intake fans.

    2. Re:Refrigerate your PC? by enosys · · Score: 1

      I suspect that components that dissipate a lot of heat (like the CPU and GPU) would need some sort of individual attention. For example if you had a single source of cold air you would probably need ducts that blow it on those heat sinks.

  13. Gigabyte's Designs by Hiigara · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't figure out what Gigabye's roadmap is. I mean, the dual 6600GTs on a single card came out of no where. Now there is the dual PCI express board coming out that allows any two Video Cards to run in parellel, it's not SLI. Now they come out with this.

    I dunno what they have in mind, but they sure are stiring things up a bit, but arn't they risking alienating nVidia with these "almost" SLI competetor alternatives?

  14. Anandtech not too impressed. by Deathlizard · · Score: 5, Informative

    Anandtech didn't seem to be too impressed by this solution.

    From Anandtech: Unfortunately, in light of the performance tests, there really isn't much remarkable to say about the 3D1. In fact, unless Gigabyte can become very price competitive, there isn't much reason to recommend the 3D1 over a 2-card SLI solution. Currently, buying all the parts separately would cost the same as what Gigabyte is planning to sell the bundle.

    The drawbacks to the 3D1 are its limited application (it will only run on the GA-K8NXP-SLI), the fact that it doesn't perform any better than 2-card SLI, and the fact that the user loses a DVI and an HD-15 display connection when compared to the 2-card solution.

    Something like this might be very cool for use in a SFF with a motherboard that has only one physical PCIe x16 connector with the NVIDIA SLI chipset. But until we see NVIDIA relax their driver restrictions, and unless Gigabyte can find a way to boot their card on non-Gigabyte boards, there aren't very many other "killer" apps for the 3D1


    They pretty much say Stick with true SLI unless size restraints force you into a single card solution

    1. Re:Anandtech not too impressed. by anethema · · Score: 1

      Well I think the point is many many users wont have a SLI motherboard. If they want near-real SLI performance this seems like a good way to do it.

      Course if it only works on gigabyte boards as mentioned, its near useless ;)

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    2. Re:Anandtech not too impressed. by Hack+Jandy · · Score: 1

      The 3D1 only works on SLI motherboards, even though it only requires one slot.

  15. Work on the Graphs by DeathFlame · · Score: 1

    So when hexus reviews the card, they seem to have problems keeping there graphs consistent. Mainly the colours of the lines. The 6800 was yellow in all the tests, but the other two cards would switch colours from one set to the next, and go from blue to red for the SLI 6600 and from orange to green for the single 6600. It would be more logical that if you wanted to switch colours, you'd go orange to red, and then blue to some other blue shade or something. And especially don't us similiar colours (the orange and red) for the different cards when you switch tests. That just leads to confusion or, more likley, a more difficult time in interperting the results.

    1. Re:Work on the Graphs by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Maybe the guy working on it is color-blind.
      Don't laugh - we had a guy in our office that was color blind, none of us knew it until we let him set up Windows 3.0's color scheme to best suit his needs (ok it was a long time ago.) Made the Hotdog Stand color scheme look mild in comparison - it was frightful to us, but the contrast worked great for him.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    2. Re:Work on the Graphs by Hanners · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, I am actually. :P However, I'm not THAT colour blind, so I really can't use it as an exuse. Thanks for the heads-up DeathFlame, I've now sorted out my template for creating those charts to make sure everything is correct colour-coding wise - Once I can get to it again, I'll replace the graphs that need changing accordingly, and hopefully that'll make things much clearer. :)

  16. Because they can, should they? by jacobcaz · · Score: 1
    At what point is all this academic? I looked at TFA and didn't see a price mentioned anywhere for the 3D1, but I imagine it's not affordable. Let me qualify that, I don't expect cheap because it's a new toy and a dual toy at that, which will mean there is a price preimum.

    But at what point do people say, "Gee, that's neat but call me later?" I'm not against the expansion of technology, but there becomes a point of diminishing returns for the price. Is this that point?

    Also the article points out "...the 3D1 requires Gigabyte's own GA-K8NXP-SLI motherboard to operate." How much does that add to the price and does the GA-K8NXP-SLI offer all the features in a MoBo that your average user would need/want?

    I actually want more effort and research put into making our computers quiet, did you see the size of the fan on the 3D1? My computer is noisy enough without having to have not just active cooling on every major component, but massive active cooling on every major component.

    Hey, technologists; I can play all the games I care to on my current hardware, work on making things quieter and consume less electricity!

  17. Why? by Apreche · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, I seriously don't get this SLI thing. I mean, sure there are nuts out there who simply must get 10,000 fps in their favorite games at full resolution. You know, because it make a difference. Just like those audiophiles who buy $5,000 power cables.

    Seriously, what modern PC game wont run well with just one card? I've got an FX 5900 non-ultra 128MB. Doom3 and Half-Life 2 are both my bitch. And if I recall there haven't been any other PC games this year worth mentioning. And if you're not using the extra power to play games, and you're doing some serious 3d work you should have some professional SGI style equipment. The only reason I can really see to have this is if you were developing a PC game that is going to come out in a year or two and you need to have hardware as fast as what we will probably have then.

    So um yeah. Who's wasting their moneys? In fact, with those moneys you can buy a better monitor. Which makes a much bigger difference if the monitor you have is not super awesome.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Why? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I've got an FX 5900 non-ultra 128MB. Doom3 and Half-Life 2 are both my bitch.

      But at what settings? Are they your bitch at full quality on all settings, with the resolution up as far as your monitor can display and your eyes can cope with?

    2. Re:Why? by Mindwarp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've got an FX 5900 non-ultra 128MB. Doom3 and Half-Life 2 are both my bitch.

      Really? You can run both of those titles at maximum detail settings, at 1600x1200, with 16x oversampling and 8x full-screen anti-aliasing at 60fps+ on an FX5900? I've gotta get me one of those FX5900 cards, as my 6800GT basically turns into a thermonuclear device when I try those settings.

      The point is that there are plenty of people out there who DO want to run their games at the maximum possible resolutions and image quality, and quite a few of those people are willing to spend the $500 plus necessary to get the performance they desire.

      --
      The gift of death metal does not smile on the good looking.
    3. Re:Why? by Vaystrem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is an interesting post because a year or so ago most people would have been saying the same thing about your FX 5900.

      The point is - most people do not have upper teir graphics cards. Just like most people do not run the absolute top of the line AMD & Intel processors. They are too expensive and all about marketing.

      Myself with a laptop currently only have a Radeon 7500 onboard. My previous desktop had a Radeon 8500. YOU do not need an SLI or next-gen top teir card because you already have a last gen top teir card.

      Those of us, and there are many, who don't do need an upgrade.

      Why the SLI thing?

      I buy one 6600GT for my motherboard. I'm happy, I like it. 2 years later my games start to suffer, I buy another one. Go look at the benchmarks comparing hte Single to Double... its a 50-100% boost in performance depending on the application. That is really significant and considering where the prices of those cards will be in a year or two - has a lot of bang for the buck.

      Your comment about buying a "Monitor" is ridiculous. If you have a 17" and a crappy graphics card and then go buy a 19" and still have that crappy graphics card - you won't be able to take advantage of the higher resolutions availble on that monitor. Yes some monitors just have better picture quality, Mitsubishi Diamondtron comes to mind, but again your argument doesn't make sense.

    4. Re:Why? by -noefordeg- · · Score: 1

      Uhhh.... D3 and HL-2 are maybe the worst let downs ever.

      Far Cry was the only game which really stood out this year.

    5. Re:Why? by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Why?
      Why you ask?
      Haven't you heard the quote: "A fool and his money are easily parted"

      That the only answer some people will piss away a small fortune just to always have the latest and greatest hardware so they can play games with the graphic options all maxed out.

      To each his own.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    6. Re:Why? by SeanAhern · · Score: 1

      you're doing some serious 3d work you should have some professional SGI style equipment.

      Last decade's technology. No one doing serious 3D work is using SGIs any more, at least not in the DoE. More precisely, SGI is in bed with nVidia and ATI at this stage of the game, so a good number of people are "rolling their own," as it were. Simple fact, a cluster of Linux nodes with nVidia 6800s can toast an SGI any day. And it's a lot cheaper. Check out this article for more information.

    7. Re:Why? by wernercd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I personally couldn't see someone dropping 4k to raise a truck or put NOS in a car to drop it's 0-60.

      Most people can't understand why I'm willing to drop $500 on a new graphics card and 1k on 1Terabyte of storage.

      It has less to do with 'a fool and his money' as it has more to do with 'different strokes for different fokes.'

      Someone dropping $500 on a graphics card just to play Solitare would be a waste of money. But most people who drop that much money aren't into it for that. The same way that pimping a car out if you ain't going to drive it is a waste in my opinion.

      Peace

    8. Re:Why? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Well most 17" crt monitors can only display well up to 1024x768. Most LCD panels top at 1280x1024. While some monitor can display higher resolution, for it ot have the pixel density to do it well, it is gonna cost a bundle.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    9. Re:Why? by Rew190 · · Score: 1

      Well most 17" crt monitors can only display well up to 1024x768.

      Are you serious?

    10. Re:Why? by radish · · Score: 1

      Well most 17" crt monitors can only display well up to 1024x768

      Sorry? I was running 1600x1200 on a 17" CRT 4 years ago, and it looked fine. Now I'm just abotu to get a LCD which can finally go up to that same res. Hmm....progress.. :)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    11. Re:Why? by swv3752 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am not talking about max resolution, which varies from 1280x1024 up to 1600x1200, but the highest resolution that will display clearly.

      It is the rare 17" that can have a pixel density that is high enough to display 1280x1024 with no blurriness.

      I have a Relisys 17" monitor that has a max resolution of 1600x1200, but can only display withour blurriness up 1152x864.

      A lot of recent 17" monitors had only a max res of 1280x1024. Running at 1600x1200 is nice theory but only those with 21" displays are likely to do so.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    12. Re:Why? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      What's the fetish for 17" monitors? When was the last time you saw a gamer with a 17" monitor? All my gamer friends have at least 19" monitors, and a good 21" can be had these days for what you paid for a 19" only four or five years ago.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    13. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds reasonable to connect your ultra expensive computer to a small vintage crt, NOT! Get real, whats next, bashing the latest ferrari becuase it performas badly with bias ply tires?

    14. Re:Why? by Trixter · · Score: 1

      You must not play first-person shooters, where fine detail (for distance shooting) AND a fast framerate (for twitch-reflex aiming and evading) are both mandatory. Otherwise, the machine quite obviously holds you back and affects your performance.

      That being said, there is definitely such a thing as TOO fast. How fast is too fast? Too fast is when your framerate exceeds 1. the refresh rate of your monitor, 2. the refresh rate of your human visual system, or 3. both. Since both top out at 120, anything being 120fps is overkill.

      Almost any card can do 120fps if properly adjusted, but 120fps *with quality* gives you an edge.

    15. Re:Why? by master_p · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've bought an 6800 GT thinking that it just might be able to run Half Life 2 and Doom 3 on my Athlon 3400+. Guess what? the game runs at a very respectable frame rate, over 80 FPS, with all settings maxed out at 1280x1024, except for the anti-aliasing, which I tried it and I saw no real difference (x8 and x2 looks the same; you have to have a very trained eye to spot the difference; and in the heat of the action, it's not important). So I think the press overreacted a little for those two games...I think that they can be run nicely on a lower setting than mine, especially HL2 which scales very well to lower spec machines.

    16. Re:Why? by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      It's not only a matter of gettign 10000 fps. For workstation-grade computers, it might be quite interesting to speed up renders significatively with reasonably cheap hardware. For "regular" applications, in some cases 2 middle-range products will best high-classed products for less money

    17. Re:Why? by OzRoy · · Score: 1

      The advantage of SLI isn't here right now.

      I can go out and buy a 6600GT and it will run Everything at a very good frame rate.

      In a year or two from now though it won't be as good, but I'll be able to go out and buy a second really cheap 6600GT and have a system that can run everything at a very good frame rate again.

      That's what I see as the advantage of SLI. Whether I'll be able to do that I'll have to wait and see.

    18. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just saying something like "there haven't been any other PC games worth mentioning" shows how little you know about PC games.
      Doom 3 and Half-life 2 are PC games equivalents of pop music.
      In my opinion they were both severely overrated. Doom 3 is nothing more then a tech-demo and HL2 is just another first person shooter with pretty graphics and an overrated physics engine.
      There are games that came out last year that were far more fun (Vampire: Bloodlines, Tribes Vengeance, Kohan 2, Warlords Battlecry 3, Dawn of War, Painkiller, Nexus: The Jupiter Incident, to name just a few).

      As for graphics cards you don't seem to know much about those either. 5x00 series of cards is pretty weak at pixel shading. Just look at the latest VGA charts on Tom's Hardware - a 6200 (a budget card) outperforms a 5900 (former top of the line) by 10fps in Doom 3!!
      So you must be running Doom 3 with all the graphics settings turned all the way down and without antialiasing and anisotropic filtering.
      If you are content with that that's fine but that doesn't make you qualified to talk about high-end 3d accelerators.

    19. Re:Why? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      From what I see at www.tomshardware.com, doom3 requires a 6800 just to run optimally at 1024x768.

      Its insane and no graphics card is powerfull enough in my book.

      I would agree witn 1600 x 1800 as excessive but ID software keeps rewriting the rules whenever a new game comes out.

    20. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously don't get it, either.

      I've got an old Matrox card. Its 3d performance is probably pretty pathetic compared to the new cards. But it cost less than $100 brand new, and it runs all the games I've ever played (like Quake III). It's maybe 4 years old now, so that's $25 a year.

      You've got, what, a $300 graphics card? That's almost as crazy to me as $5000 power cables.

    21. Re:Why? by jafuser · · Score: 1

      blurriness is free antialiasing =)

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    22. Re:Why? by AsbestosRush · · Score: 1

      I hate lugging that 40# sob up the stairs is why I like 17" CRTs. best compromise between size and portability.

      Of course, the price of good gaming LCD's are still coming down...

      --
      EveryDNS. Use it. It works.
      AC's need not reply
  18. Some numbers for you by Smilin · · Score: 5, Informative

    You should find this board outrunning the 6800Ultras. This is basically a $400 board outrunning a $500 board (that goes for as much as $600 depending on brand/features).

    The lowdown (using individual boards here but the dual is about the same):
    Doom3 1600x1200:
    6600GT SLI = 77.1fps, Cost = $376 (188x2)
    6800Ultra = 73.9fps, Cost = $489

    According to a great article on www.Anandtech.com it doesn't really outperform two individual boards though. It may be wiser to get a single 6600GT now and SLI later.

    This board somewhat defeats one of the great features of SLI: future upgrades. The idea is you can buy a "good" card today and at some point when it gets a little bit dated you can add more performance at a lower future cost.

    However, a single board SLI solution should help offset the nasty cost of an SLI motherboard right now. The NF4 SLI boards are running about $100-$150 over where they should be simply due to shortages (spanking new product overdemand).

    $255, Gigabyte NF4 SLI mobo
    $188, 6600GT today
    $59, 6600GT 2 years from now (Based on the cost today of a $200 graphics card two years ago, the GF4 4200)

    Total: $502

    Or you can opt for 6600GT performance today and tomorrow without SLI in the picture:
    $149, Gigabyte NF4 non-SLI mobo
    $188, 6600GT today
    $269, 6800Ultra 2 years from now (Based on the cost today of a $500 graphics card two years ago, the GF 5900 Ultra)

    Total: $606

    As you can see even with the badly overpriced SLI motherboards it's still a better deal in the long run. If SLI motherboards get back to reality you could see the savings increase from $104 to ~$200 as well but that's just speculation.

    References:
    All new prices are from www.newegg.com. For the older boards (4200 & 5900U) that are not available at Newegg I used pricegrabber. Anandtech was used for the benchmark and 2 year old reference articles.

    1. Re:Some numbers for you by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It may be wiser to get a single 6600GT now and SLI later

      No! No! If you plan to SLI, buy two matching cards now. You'll pull your hair out trying to find the exact same model and revision to match the one you already have.

      Same goes for multiple CPUs or dual channel RAM. Buy a matching set now, or you're in for a headache down the road.

      PC Video cards have reached the point where, unless you're an "enthusiast" who likes to spend money, you don't need to spend more than 150-200 bucks.

      Nowadays the race is who can run Doom 3 at 1600x1200 at 70 vs 72 FPS. If you consider the average home PC with a 17" monitor that can't even display 1600x1200, and most gaming is done at 1024x768 or 800x600, it seems kind of pointless.

      I generally play at 1024x768, and all these new uber-cards really offer me nothing new over my Radeon 9800, and don't seem to be planning anything new for the next while. They're just ramping up the speed, but I haven't seen any landmark gee-whiz features (true steps forward like hardware T&L, programmable pixel shaders) being added.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Some numbers for you by crazy_pikachu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder what the performance would be if you put 2 of these cards on the SLI board. that would be #$%@ing NUTS

    3. Re:Some numbers for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It also wouldn't work. The nVidia GPUs aren't capable of more than 2-way SLI. This capacity is already taken up by the two GPUs on the gigabyte board. Notice the board doesn't have the plug for the SLI connector at the top.

    4. Re:Some numbers for you by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      "Nowadays the race is who can run Doom 3 at 1600x1200 at 70 vs 72 FPS. If you consider the average home PC with a 17" monitor that can't even display 1600x1200, and most gaming is done at 1024x768 or 800x600, it seems kind of pointless."

      But what detail can you get at 800x600?

      Thats the resolution I use in counterstrike, and in some maps you just cant see stuff, like the new map de_cpl_contra's fences. From far away, you just can't see it at all. If I turn on full AF and FSAA, I see through it fine. The problem is, I then get 20FPS instead of my normal vsync'd 85.

      This is all on a 5600. Not top of the line, but not bottom either.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    5. Re:Some numbers for you by Smilin · · Score: 1

      They are targetting SLI more at people like me than you I think.

      I don't run my games at 800x600 or 1024x768. If I did, I would just go buy a console instead.

      I need a high end card to drive my 22" monitor at the resolution it should be displaying. 1280x1024 with 4xAA or 1600x1200 without is about as low as I really want to go. I'm not concerned about the absolute maximum FPS I can get but there is a minimum that varies from game to game. For Doom3, 40-60FPS at the desired resolution. For a 'twitch' shooter I need the minimum framerate to be pretty close to the monitor refresh rate.

      Finding a second card at some point in the future shouldn't be too difficult as long as you choose wisely. PNY for instance cranks out such a volume that there will be PNY 6600GTs tucked away in every nook and cranny of online retailers for years to come. Heck, you could still find an 8mb or 12mb Voodoo2 SLI out there if you look hard enough.

      The other thing that's nice about SLI is something you kindof mentioned. The next generation of cards might be DirectX v10 or OpenGL 4.x or whatever but it typically takes a while for games to catch up to these features. It's a drag to pay ATI or nVidia research recoup dollars when you aren't using the features. SLI will allow a bit of 'raw horsepower' without paying for added fluff. By the time DX, OGL, Shaders and whatnot really take off it will be upgrade time anyway (SLI or not).

      FYI - Doom 3 looks so good at High detail, smooth FPS and 1600x1200 that it makes you drool. I can't wait to laugh at the XBox version.

  19. Re:Hello by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You fully recommend a product you don't have yet. Who needs a marketing department when you've got an army of fanboys?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  20. Good coverage by JDevers · · Score: 2, Funny

    Man, talk about good coverage. A single board getting TWO Slashdot posts when new GPUs often don't merit one.

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/16/1916 24 7&tid=152&tid=137

    1. Re:Good coverage by vjmurphy · · Score: 1

      Slashdot's decided to inplement their own dual-story SLI technology. However, since the technology is new, only a few articles currently show duplication. Eventually, all stories will be posted twice.

      --
      Vincent J. Murphy
      Spandex Justice
  21. Tacky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do they make all these boards look completely rice and unprofessional? What's with all the tacky gold/chrome and colored connectors, etc? Makes these boards look very cheap/childish.

    1. Re:Tacky by glorf · · Score: 1

      Without all the gold and chrome what else will reflect the light from your glowing IDE cables through the picture window in your case? :)

      If you are not the type to do that then you see the gold and chrome for the 5 minutes it takes to install the thing and you don't have to see it again until the next upgrade and probably won't care.

  22. No Video Standards by Gates82 · · Score: 2
    I hope that this does not mark the beginning of a trend to make video cards only work with specific motherboards. This card will only run with a Giga-Byte MB with the appropriate BIOS.

    Changing from the 3 or 4 versions of AGP to PCI express is going to create a large enough ripple when it comes to upgrading and purchasing new motherboards and video cards, do we really need to have PCI-X that work on one MB and not another?

    --
    So who is hotter? Ali or Ali's sister?

    1. Re:No Video Standards by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      FYI, PCI-X is an entirely different technology to PCI Express... You almost certainly do not mean PCI-X.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
  23. Um.... by KennyP · · Score: 1

    Isn't this what the spare drive power connectors would be perfect for? Kinda like my PowerLeap Slocket adapter - don't want to crowbar the onboard CPU PS, add power with an onboard (or in my case - a cable) power connector.

    And heat dissipation is a job best for a chip/set fan(s).

    Email me to send me my check. ;-)

    Kenny P.
    Visualize Whirled P.'s

  24. Re:These TAIWAN brands are piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're supposed to be ranting about CHINA. It's "Chinese brands" and "Taiwan province", thank you very much. In the future, please conform with Generally Accepting Trolling Principles.

  25. Hang on one sec.... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    I need to look up the melting temperature of FR-4.

  26. Something bugging me about SLI... by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    There is something big that annoys me with 2 card SLI. With 1 card you use the 16x slot as a 16x slot. With 2 cards though they throttle back to be 2 8x slots instead of 2 16x slots. Why do that? Maybe next generation pci express will let you have 2 full bandwith 16x slots on the mb. Throttling back to 8x for 2 cards does impact performance. SLI is pretty awesome but I view the current implementation as version 1.5 (version 1 being 3dfx's attempt).

    1. Re:Something bugging me about SLI... by iainl · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, it really is version 2.

      Unfortunately, it won't become actually useable until version 3, and only stops being an almighty kludge at version 4. Presumably, they'll make it multi-user at 3.11, too.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:Something bugging me about SLI... by NerveGas · · Score: 2, Informative


      You don't need a full x16 slot. Tests have shown that you don't see any performance drop with a single card until you're in an x4 slot - two x8 slots are much more than enough for current-generation video cards.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  27. Static by bsd4me · · Score: 1

    So the whole static thing is dependant on where you live to a large degree.

    Not really. I forget the exact number, but IIRC as little as 20V is enough to zap a component or cause a soft failure. Visible discharge is around 1000V or so. If you spend enough time working with hardware (eg, board design) you will learn the dangers of static.

    --

    (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

    1. Re:Static by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Human skin has a threshold of greater than 15v so at 20v you will feel a shock. If you are not feeling the shock then it is not high enough to do damage.

      If humidity is high enough, static discharge is virtually impossible.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    2. Re:Static by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      Not really. I forget the exact number, but IIRC as little as 20V is enough to zap a component or cause a soft failure.

      Actually the other poster was correct. You have a MUCH, MUCH higher chance of zapping something in a cold, dry climate than you do in a warm, moist climate. While some circuits might get damaged by 20v as you point out, the likelihood of them getting damaged by a 2000v shock is much higher. And when you live in a colder, drier climate the chance of generating high voltage static is very high.

      So his statement was correct- it does depend on your location to a large degree. It's all about probability.

    3. Re:Static by bsd4me · · Score: 1

      Human skin may be able to detect a DC potential at 15VDC, but I have attended several training seminars that have stated that humans don't feel static discharges less than 3500 volts (reference). Most seminconductors fall in the Class 1 category in the chart on that page, so they can be damaged by a discharge that you can't feel.

      As for humidity, check out this. You will see that humidity helps, but it will not prevent damaging discharges.

      If you ever visit a manufacturing facility, or a hardware lab you will see several ESD control measures in place. A hydrometer will almost always be present, but that is more of a warning to call the HVAC vendor than a safe/not safe indicator for discharge. The floor will be conductive, and the engineers and techs will wear conductive sneakers or heel straps. Everyone will be wearing an approved labcoat and wriststrap. All stations will have mats which are checked frequently. Rework stations will have all of the above, and generally also have an ionizer.

      --

      (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

  28. Will they do an AGP 8x Version by cheezemonkhai · · Score: 0

    I for one would like to get this card dumped into my AGP Pro 110 slot ;)

    Although a standard slot and a molex would work too :)

  29. They exist by scheme · · Score: 1
    So, you would first need a motherboard that gives you 32 lanes. I don't believe one currently exists.

    One of the new tyan motherboards for dual opterons has 32 pci-e lanes. It has two Nforce4 chipsets on board giving it two pci-e slots with the full 16 lanes each. Of course the board costs something like $500-$700.

    --
    "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
  30. Re:Hello by Rirath.com · · Score: 1

    Some of us actually do research about a product before purchasing. It's been out for what, a good month or more now? You really think there's a shortage of information?

  31. Other limitations of SLI by L0neW0lf · · Score: 0
    By my understanding, SLI needs to be supported by a particular game to work; nVidia has to give that game support. This is not like the old Voodoo2 SLI setup where if the game used appropriate API's (Glide, DirectX, OpenGL) the game would just run.

    This means that some modern games like Pacific Fighters and World of Warcraft not only don't support SLI, but that they may run slower when an SLI setup is present. I can't justify spending that kind of money on a solution that isn't guaranteed to work, much less buying the Gigabyte 3D1 when you have to use a matching Gigabyte mainboard and won't save any money over two of someone else's 6600GT cards.

    --

    Never look down your nose at others. Someday, someone is bound to see your boogers.
    1. Re:Other limitations of SLI by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      the game will just run, and won't HAVE to support anything directly. The drivers are responsible for choosing what sort of load-sharing mechanism is appropriate for the game (via a list of games/engines), and the user can override those definitions. HOWEVER, nVidia does make public an interface for actual programming of SLI systems, so you can program optimizations with dual gfx cards in perspective.

  32. A Much Better Review Here by Hack+Jandy · · Score: 3, Informative

    A much better review is to be had here:
    http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2315

  33. 3d1x2? by slapout · · Score: 1

    So when are they coming out with a SLI version of this card? :-)

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  34. Neoseeker.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  35. Re:Hello by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it's safe to say you don't actually recommend it, but someone else does. Why don't you come back when you've actually used it, since even reviewers actually take that step no matter what else they've read.

  36. Offtopic by wernercd · · Score: 1

    As a gamer I will have to agree fullheartedly on Doom 3.

    I've played and own all three of these games and I have to say HL2 > Farcry. They both have a good story and both have outstanding graphics. But HL2 was infinitely more enjoyable.

    Peace

  37. Driver corruption caused it. by Chas · · Score: 1

    Of course! They're using a beta card and beta drivers!

    It's causing this color flickering on the graphs. ;-)

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  38. Review by Hanners, same as the site crashing. :) by digitalwanderer · · Score: 2, Informative

    And just for the record, this is Hanners (Andy Hanley) first time breaking the new site he works at Hexus. :)

    He used to love crashing Elite Bastards all the time, but this is his first official time crashing Hexus.

    I'm so proud of him I could cheer, he's one of the good guys. :D

    --
    - "When I say dance, you'd best DANCE motherf*cker!" -Violent Femmes
  39. DUh by UncleScrooge · · Score: 0, Troll

    Welcome to 3 weeks ago.

    --
    Slashdot 1|0 Productivity
  40. Where is the better review? by digitalwanderer · · Score: 1

    Where's the better review? All I can see in your post is a link to Anananananand. :?

    You aren't SERIOUSLY suggesting that Anand has a better review up than Hexus, are you? On a good day I'd say that is highly improbable, but when it's Hanners doing the review I'd call it much more like impossible.

    I don't trust Anand since the FX debacle, their true colors showed thru. :(

    --
    - "When I say dance, you'd best DANCE motherf*cker!" -Violent Femmes
  41. Cards like this ARE "SGI style equipment" by podperson · · Score: 1

    Unless you simply must run IRIX, these days you're doing 3D on PC hardware. Probably studly PC hardware.

    If you're using 3D Studio Max (which may displace Maya as the Gold Standard the way things are going -- sure flame me and say it never will) then you have no choice but to use PC hardware.

    Huge texture memory sizes and the ability to manipulate large polycount scenes in real time are far more important to such folk than gamers.

  42. What? by digitalwanderer · · Score: 1

    The product was announced three weeks ago, these are the first actual reviews of it.

    This IS news. :roll:

    --
    - "When I say dance, you'd best DANCE motherf*cker!" -Violent Femmes
  43. Voodoo 5500 by gatzke · · Score: 1

    My PCI based VooDoo 5500 had an extra cable to hook into an unused hard drive power cord. I assume they could not pull enough power off the PCI bus.

    The card also basically took two slots since both GPUs had big honkin cooling fans.

    Ah, the good old days. Quake 3 at decent FPS in 1600x1200 was sweet, but not as sweet as nethack on a vterm...

  44. SLI on 1 card by IVAces · · Score: 1

    The buzz word of 2005 is "dual core". It just stands to reason that Gpu's go down this same road. You can find "dual core" concepts in the gamming console, server, desktop and gamming pc, and now video cards. One person gets a good idea and everyone jumps on board. If you want to see multi-core taken to the extreme, Check out Suns 32 way server on a chip. http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/jonathan/20040910

    1. Re:SLI on 1 card by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Dual core GPUs sound kinda silly actually. 3-D rendering is usually quite happy with just having more pixel pipelines on the same chip.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  45. Heat... by John+Whitley · · Score: 1

    Ah, heat dissipation and graphics engines. That brings back memories of working in the local University graphics lab one summer doing some project work. Alas, the HVAC vents for the room were stuck full-open; the place was freezing cold. To combat this, I'd make sure the old GE Graphicon graphics engine (at the time, very high-end) under the desk of my workstation was turned on... it was a _very_ effective space heater. 8-)

  46. Cheap DDL card for PC coming? by patniemeyer · · Score: 1

    What I think a lot of us are waiting for is a cheap DDL capable card for the PC to drive a larger monitor. PNY has the Quatro series but they are all priced for the "workstation" market.

    Nvidia has the 6800 DDL for the Mac (to drive the 30" cinema display) but nothing for the PC as of yet.

    Pat

  47. incorrect. by carlcmc · · Score: 1

    it is transparent to the game. The video driver takes care of it.

  48. Better colours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  49. Slashdot kills hexus! by MiggyMan · · Score: 1

    my poor servers, they're killing them.....

    It's official

    --
    Lifesigns: Present Hair: Escaped Age: Increasing
    1. Re:Slashdot kills hexus! by MiggyMan · · Score: 1

      Whoops, forgot the html thang :) <Az|Away> my poor servers, they're killing them.....

      --
      Lifesigns: Present Hair: Escaped Age: Increasing
  50. Wish, Wow, & GuildWars by RubberChainsaw · · Score: 1

    I've got an FX 5900 non-ultra 128MB

    I've got you beat on those settings, and three games that still have my system chugging are WoW (auction houses and pvp), Wish (R.I.P.), and GuildWars (with those huge mob fights). Doom and Half-Life are both carefully designed so that no more than a certain number of polygon will be visible in your field of vision at any given time. But in MMO games that design restriction goes out the window. When 40 players are trying to kill 40 opposing players, your system needs the speed to draw them all, otherwise you're dead.

    --
    I welcome our new 99% overlords.
  51. Re:Hello by Rirath.com · · Score: 1

    Why is this so hard for you? I recommend it based on the research I've done on it and other cards. If you don't like it, fine, so be it. As I said in the start, do your own research, draw your own conclusions. I never claimed to be reviewing the card.

    Recommend:
    To praise or commend (one) to another as being worthy or desirable; endorse:

  52. Re:Review by Hanners, same as the site crashing. : by RipTides9x · · Score: 1

    Oh hush up digi, and go back to your hole over at B3D. There's no postcounts here. :o)

  53. Wasted opportunity by Kris_J · · Score: 1
    Here's what I see when I look at this card: Two dual-6800 cards each using SLI, together using Alienware's video array. Unfortunately, the problems are:
    • No Video Array yet
    • The only company even rumoured to be working on a 2x 16 channel PCI Express motherboard (Tyan) won't even confirm it yet
    • The motherboard BIOS has to be tweaked to cope with the card
    • The card is only dual 6600.
    Given that there are single-card solutions better than this dual-GPU single card, and that it only works on one motherboard are a real problem. Currently, it's just a cute stunt. When it performs better than any other single card and can be paired with another for a record-breaking 4 GPU solution, that's when we need to see a /. article.
  54. You are Wrong, Good Sir by dbretton · · Score: 1

    SLI does NOT need to be supported by a particular gsme.

    The SLI drivers are optimized on a game-by-game basis, running in either half-screen render mode or alternate-frame render mode.

    1. Re:You are Wrong, Good Sir by L0neW0lf · · Score: 1

      From Tom's Hardware Guide:

      After several benchmark tests we noticed some relatively slow performance in two of our games. After turning on SLI HUD in the driver we saw that SLI was not active during these games. Even our efforts to force SLI operation through the expanded driver settings had no effect. After talking with NVIDIA we learned the cause: SLI is not available with some games. NVIDIA has so-called SLI Profiles for games that are defined in the driver. The driver recognizes the game via application detection and executes the SLI mode (split or balancing) designated for that profile. If no SLI profile exists for a game, there is no SLI rendering. It is not possible to force SLI mode or generate your own profile. According to NVIDIA however the driver already contains over 50 profiles for games running with SLI. For newer titles this therefore means that SLI system owners have to wait for a new driver. But even then there is no guarantee that SLI will be possible with a particular game.

      According to NVIDIA there are games that are simply not compatible with SLI. Microsoft's Flight Simulator 9 and Novalogic's Joint Operations for example both cause problems. As of the test date we were unable to find out the precise reasons why. NVIDIA only talks about frame buffering techniques used in games of this sort that are problematic for SLI. Of the 10 games we included in this test, two of them were non-SLI-compatible.


      http://graphics.tomshardware.com/graphic/2004112 3/sli-performance-05.html===

      --

      Never look down your nose at others. Someday, someone is bound to see your boogers.