Slashdot Mirror


Sir Tim Berners-Lee Named Greatest Briton

mOoZik writes "BBC News is reporting that Tim Berners-Lee, the father of the World Wide Web, has been named the Greatest Briton of 2004. Berners-Lee had this to say about the honor: 'I am very proud to be British, it is great fun to be British and this award is just an amazing honour.'"

217 comments

  1. Why 2004? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 5, Funny

    What has he done for us LATELY?

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
    1. Re:Why 2004? by ubera · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about the Semantic Web Initiative?

      --
      But what is the SIGnificance?
    2. Re:Why 2004? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      Do YOU think it's going anywhere?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Why 2004? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, Jews and Arabs have been on the web since the beginning. There's no need for an "initiative" to get them to join.

    4. Re:Why 2004? by ReadParse · · Score: 3, Informative

      What has he done for us LATELY?

      Running the W3C, and we owe his as much thanks for that as for creating HTTP and HTML.

      RP

    5. Re:Why 2004? by biglig2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actual answer: this is the first year of these awards, so they couldn't give it to him any earlier.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    6. Re:Why 2004? by lahi · · Score: 0, Troll

      I strongly agree!

      Also, the insane construction which is URL, is so bad, the inventor should be spanked blue. I'm not sure it was Berners-Lee alone, though.

      -Lasse

    7. Re:Why 2004? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By inventing the internet, fairly good-looking British gals can enter the chatrooms, and enliven our sex lives.

    8. Re:Why 2004? by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm glad someone agrees with me.. We both got modded troll for our trouble though.

      I didn't explain myself very well, but that takes so much time and a nasty comment without explanation can be right :)

      OK I'll state my major complaint with http. The URL's contain server names. (Locations.) Instead of services. This makes it necessary to do redundancy and load-balancing at the IP level, which isn't possible to do perfectly, and expensive, etc., and difficult to do wide-area. Just a fraction more intelligence on the client side would have improved the situation a zillionfold. Now we're stuck with it.

    9. Re:Why 2004? by geoswan · · Score: 1
      I think HTTP and HTML are both ill-conceived disasters.. a messy yet simplistic protocol and an awful markup language...

      Okay. But, if that is true, it can't be the whole story, because his implementation has been very successful.

      Ted Nelson first described the idea of a hypertext over four decades ago. So, if everyone is smarter than TBL, why weren't their implementations of hypertext already in use?






      FWIW I don't think your comment deserved to be marked as a troll.

    10. Re:Why 2004? by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1
      Okay. But, if that is true, it can't be the whole story, because his implementation has been very successful.

      I agree. Maybe saying 'disasters' was a bit strong, because I didn't mean failure; as you say both are outrageously successful. I meant that some design decisions in html and http make things a lot tricker now. The ratio of amount-of-extra-thought-not-put-into-it-then to amount-of-extra-usefulness-and-longetivity-it-woul d-have-now is very large. That's why I said ill-conceived disasters, despite it's current success; html and http are both very outdated now, after a mere, what is it, 15 years in operation. Opposing examples: dns, tcp, smtp (ignoring the spam problem that was very difficult to foresee). Two examples:

      • html is very difficult to parse. especially with extensions like javascript, java, flash, and activex it has become an 'information sink' - information can only be retrieved by a human with a web browser. if the content of the html page was easier to parse (as opposed to the mess that is the markup), it would be easier to make search engines much better, and it would be easier to display html on all kinds of devices, instead of just web browsers on pc's.
      • the hard-codedness of a document location (server)in an url. I explained this a bit more in another comment.

      FWIW I don't think your comment deserved to be marked as a troll.

      Thank you, I'm pleased someone realized this, despite my original terseness.

  2. Errant U's by cornjchob · · Score: 1, Funny

    Honor*

    Oops, that's probably flamebait

    Prost Frist, and, uh, stuff like that.

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    1. Re:Errant U's by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      Nonsense! We quite obviously removed an "e" AND a "u" from couleur when we adopted the word. Sure, we added an extra "o", but that was just a joke that the Americans still don't get.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:Errant U's by BarryNorton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not errant, it's a quote! Sir Tim was knighted by the Queen for a European invention and this has been reported on by the British Broadcasting Corporation. It's nice that you chaps across the Pond care enough to relay this, and even nicer when we're properly quoted - don't spoil it with ignorance now!

    3. Re:Errant U's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


      don't spoil it with ignorance now

      Shouldn't that be "ignourance".

    4. Re:Errant U's by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1, Informative

      No.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    5. Re:Errant U's by vze3try7 · · Score: 1

      No, no. That should be "ignoranse".

    6. Re:Errant U's by carboncopy79 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they think they are the centre of the universe.

      Actually the Chinese thinks China is the centre/center of the universe. This is reflected in the chinese name of China.

      Of course that was many many years back.

    7. Re:Errant U's by skaffen42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can't understand how anybody who still refuses to use the metric system can be so upset about an extra U...

      (This is slashdot. Nobody can spell anyway. So if you want to start a flamewar you should rely on trusted methods like the metric system.)

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    8. Re:Errant U's by 91degrees · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yes it shouuld. Tou write british english, youu just add a u after every o. And replace all youur z's with s. You alsou prounouuce Z as "zed", but since we never use that letter whou cares? ;)

    9. Re:Errant U's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America dumbed down the english language to make it easier for the masses to spell correctly, how is that all working for you guys over there?

    10. Re:Errant U's by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 2, Funny


      Moran.

    11. Re:Errant U's by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Don't know how aanybody who still refers to "stones" as a measurement of weight can be so upset about the imperial system.

    12. Re:Errant U's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Had that dental work done yet?

      (slaps forehead)

      What was I thinking? You guys are Brits ...

    13. Re:Errant U's by Scurra+UK · · Score: 1

      ...so we get it for free on the NHS?

    14. Re:Errant U's by m50d · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there's a joke here about a guy who doesn't know how to use an apostrophe correcting someone's spelling

      --
      I am trolling
    15. Re:Errant U's by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      You tell 'im, brother :-P

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    16. Re:Errant U's by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      When was the last time you went to the dentist? I'm NHS and it still costs me a bloody fortune!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    17. Re:Errant U's by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      We need all our u's to stay pristine, for use in text messaging.

    18. Re:Errant U's by ThJ · · Score: 1

      "Ignoranse" is how it's spelled in Norwegian... only we pronounce it "ee-gnoo-rahn-seh". XD

    19. Re:Errant U's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mouran

    20. Re:Errant U's by skaffen42 · · Score: 1

      You do know that "stone" is part of the imperial system?

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    21. Re:Errant U's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's "stone" not "stones". As in "How much less do you wiegh than the average American?" "About 30 stone, mate."

      I don't know why it doesn't have an "s" on the end. It just doesn't. I guess it's part of the rationing the entire world is having to do to make up for dumb, environmentally irresponsible, rednecks putting "s" on the ends of words like "all" and "anyway". I guess Kelvin doesn't have an "s" either (ie "Blimey, it's cold, it's 273 Kelvin. It's freezing it is.")

      (14lbs per stone, if you're that interested.)

    22. Re:Errant U's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doun't you mean "Nou?"

    23. Re:Errant U's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mind him. Apparently he doesn't pay any taxes, because apparently he thinks tax-funded things are "free".

    24. Re:Errant U's by Net_Wakker · · Score: 1
      So if you want to start a flamewar you should rely on trusted methods like the metric system.
      That argument has been won without USians realizing it. As with the UK system these measures were originally defined by physical standard measures - the yard, the pound, the gallon and the bushel.They are now all defined by reference to the S I measures of the metre, the kilogram and the litre. These equivalent measures are exact. See here.
    25. Re:Errant U's by Seumas · · Score: 1

      That was the point, sir! :P

    26. Re:Errant U's by Scurra+UK · · Score: 1

      Just one of the many benefits of being a student ;)

  3. Strange, fortune just printed this out for me... by cortana · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud, adopts as a last resource pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and happy to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority.

    -- Arthur Schopenhauer

  4. I for one... by Xpilot · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...welcome our new British internet-inventing overlords.

    What? What do you mean "it was Al Gore"?

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:I for one... by MoonFog · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, Berners-Lee was behind the World Wide Web, not "the internet", although the two are more or less synonymous to the regular user.

    2. Re:I for one... by pfdietz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Al Gore didn't invent the internet, but during his previous song-writing career, he invented something even more important to information processing: the Al Gore Rhythm.

    3. Re:I for one... by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      The article does get it right: it talks about the Web rather than the Internet. I must say that I was more amused by Lord Foster getting an award for a bridge which was unsafe.

    4. Re:I for one... by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      Aah yes, that little known musical genre that was known primarily for its driving backbeat. Traditionally the beat was pounded out on a large bass drum with a heavy, oversized, wooden drumstick that was commonly known as...

      the log o' rhythm.

    5. Re:I for one... by David+Horn · · Score: 1

      If you live in Canada, we're still your overlords...

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    6. Re:I for one... by Tethys_was_taken · · Score: 2, Funny

      You've been waiting a looong time to use this one, haven't you :)

    7. Re:I for one... by teh_dg · · Score: 1

      The millenium bridge? It was never unsafe. The issue resulted from the engineer subcontracted didnt figure for the tendency for people to step in unison, and this tendency to increase with rhythm of movement. The issue with it was merely that it made people on the bridge feel uncomfortable, and the fix was simply to make the dampers more rigid.

  5. Re:And typically there are some doubters by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Let me guess, he stole the idea of the www from an American? I predict that in 50 years time we will discover that it was - in fact - China that made the first powered flight, landed men on the moon and did virtually everything else first.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  6. It was less of a surprise by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Tim Berners-Lee, the father of the World Wide Web, has been named the Greatest Briton of 2004

    Prince Harry was taken out of the running for Greatest Briton recently for some reason...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:It was less of a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Prince Harry was taken out of the running for Greatest Briton recently for some reason

      However he was named as the Greatest German of 2004

    2. Re:It was less of a surprise by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1, Funny

      May his reign last for a thousand years!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:It was less of a surprise by Hatta · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is just unacceptable! He really ought to resign.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:It was less of a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope the HHGG movie of this year gives 2005 to DNA. That would rock.

    5. Re:It was less of a surprise by Jesus+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Resign?

      Brits should really take matters into their own hands and kick him, and the rest of their supposed superiors, out.

      In the words of Denis Diderot, "Mankind shall not be free until the last king is strangled in the entrails of the last priest."

    6. Re:It was less of a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Then like the Americans we can elect morons to be our superiors instead.

    7. Re:It was less of a surprise by Fembot · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe the word you're looking for is abdicate.

    8. Re:It was less of a surprise by Jesus+2.0 · · Score: 1

      No, the word I'm looking for is the word I used: "strangle".

      Perhaps the poster that I was responding to was looking for "abdicate", but that's an entirely different question.

  7. Re:And typically there are some doubters by ninthwave · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Thats odd as one of the points Sir Tim Berners-Lee was making with all the British papers who were asking him how rich he would be if he had patented "his" idea, was it was not his idea, it was just using things already invented together, and tweaking it for sharing. He himself seems to acknowledge the simple principle that science and technology is a building process off the works of our forefathers in our fields.

    He is very humble about it as he does not see it as a pure invention, the press on the other hand just can't be bothered to learn. The web needs an inventor. Did Edison invent the light bulb?

    Something in the human condition needs this widget here was made by inventor Goosebury. Why I don't know, maybe we understand ideas better when we have a psychology to project the idea onto.

    --
    I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
  8. More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by Dark$ide · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Jane Tomlinson

    At the same awards ceremony, Jane Tomlinson (who suffers with a terminal cancer) was awarded "Greatest British Campaigner". I think that is just a little bit more significant. She has raised £1,150,000 (~USD$2,170,970) for Cancer Research.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_yorkshire/ 4215561.stm

    --

    Sigs. We don't need no steenking sigs.

    1. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Ah but how much money have all the cancer research websites in the world collectively made from on-line donations?

      Flame war in 3.. 2.. 1..

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by hanssprudel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm so very sick of posts like this. There is always some holier-than-thou slashdotter who'll tell us how we should be ashamed of ourselves for developing technology instead of giving our money to cancer victims/sick kids/homeless puppies etc.

      Let me put this out there for you: Who do you think has made a greater contribution to cancer treatment, Jane Tomlinson, or Tim Berners Lee?

      Well, Tomlinson may have collected money that can be used to fund a few more researchers in a field where hundreds of millions are already spent, and finding the solution is not a matter of man-hours. TBL on the other hand, created a brilliant new communication medium that has completely revolutionized the sharing of information between people.

      As somebody who works with research (though not directly related to curing cancer - shame on me!) I can attest that the World Wide Web is an invalvuable tool that has completely changed for the better the way scientists are able to cooperate, publish, and access each others information. Tim Berners Lee wasn't just good at begging together money: he actually created something great, something that brought society forward, something that has improved the efficiency and wealth of all walks of life.

      When efficient treatments for cancer are found, Tim Berners Lee will have deserved some of the credit for it, like he deserves some of the credit for every scientific achievement from now on. All due respect to Miss Tomlinson, but her achievement does not close to compare.

      The same thing goes, btw, to the recent post about the Linux community matching Gates' donation to childrens vaccines. Gates may vaccinate ten million children, but the result will most likely be that those children will have another twenty million children, also living in poverty, and also needing vaccines. The Linux community, on the other hand, has given to developing world a fantastic tool with which wealth can be created, and development spurred.

      Let us not fall for the socialist fallacy that the only good thing one can do in life is to give away ones money. People like Tim Berners Lee CREATE wealth, which is a greater virtue then passing it around!

    3. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      I'd be more impressed if someone who wasn't suffering from cancer raised that money.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    4. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by Pentagram · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let us not fall for the socialist fallacy that the only good thing one can do in life is to give away ones money. People like Tim Berners Lee CREATE wealth, which is a greater virtue then passing it around!

      Both Berners Lee and Torvalds did both though. They created the WWW and Linux /and/ gave them away. Sounds pretty close to the socialist ideal to me.

    5. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by DJCF · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This week, Bill Gates donates 100,000 dollars to help fight AIDs over the next 10 years. In other news, Bill Gates also donates 10 million dollars to help fight linux over the next ten years.

      Bla bla. Above figures made up, etc. But you see my point?

    6. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by bc90021 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Amen. Thanks for the great post.

      Another, more "pragmatic" way to measure the value of what someone did (versus another person) is to see which of them used what the other created. Did TBL use money that Tomlinson raised in his efforts to create and/or expand the usefulness of the World Wide Web? I would suspect not.

      However, is it likely that Tomlinson used the World Wide Web in raising the money that she so admirably raised? I would suspect so.

      So in the long run, Tomlinson's goals were BETTERED by TBL's achievements, and not the other way around. This isn't to say that neither achievement was important; on the contrary, they are both very important. However, since TBL's is the enabler for others, it can safely rank higher than others on the importance list.

    7. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by hanssprudel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Both Berners Lee and Torvalds did both though. They created the WWW and Linux /and/ gave them away. Sounds pretty close to the socialist ideal to me.

      Neither has hesitated to profit from his invention, as well they shouldn't. Both will tell you that the reason they released it for free wasn't altruism, but that it was the only way it could have evolved into what it became.

    8. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Let us not fall for the socialist fallacy that the only good thing one can do in life is to give away ones money. People like Tim Berners Lee CREATE wealth, which is a greater virtue then passing it around!

      People bitched when Bill Gates gave $750 million to support immunization programs too. Most people need to tear other people down or they're just not happy. It's life.

    9. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on whether Lynx was involved in the donations.

    10. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by Pentagram · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Neither has hesitated to profit from his invention, as well they shouldn't.

      To the best of my knowledge, the only way Berners-Lee has made money from the WWW is the awards he has been given for the achievement.

      Both will tell you that the reason they released it for free wasn't altruism, but that it was the only way it could have evolved into what it became.

      Isn't that the same thing? They might not have grown into what they are now, but both individuals would almost certainly have made more cash for their inventions had they sold them.

      I'm not even sure that Berners-Lee would have been able to sell his invention. His research was carried out at CERN, a mostly government-funded institution. So much for your socialist attack.

      I don't know anything about Finland's education system but I'd guess also that Torvalds had some government funding while he was studying at Helsinki university and creating Linux.

    11. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU, that doesn't even come close to what TBL did.

    12. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, you can't see the difference betwwn Bill Gates and Microsoft. You also think the attack on an operating system is much more significant than the aid given to people.

      In other words, you're an idiot.

    13. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by bindo · · Score: 1

      Both Berners Lee and Torvalds did both though. They created the WWW and Linux /and/ gave them away. Sounds pretty close to the socialist ideal to me.

      Neither has hesitated to profit from his invention, as well they shouldn't. Both will tell you that the reason they released it for free wasn't altruism, but that it was the only way it could have evolved into what it became.


      Repeat with me:
      -socialism has nothing to do with altruism!

      -socialism is a 19th-century "scientific" ideology ( := it has a precise analitical definition. and as any *old* scientific theory has been mostly replaced by newer stuff. Have you ever tried applying maxwell's theory to black holes? Little sense there. Maxwell isn't better than Marx. and marx isn't that bad at all if you look at it this way ... :)

      -socialism shoudn't be used as a marketing term for political FUD (this role is currently played by "terrorism")

      So in this sense OSS has a particularly evident "socialist" side. This doesn't mean that it is more important than other sides or that OSS avoids relating with everything new under the sun in the last 150 years ... say for example: marketing, monetary theory, mass production, information theory, free markets, human rights, anthropology etc.etc.
      OSS also abides to the laws of termodynamics, this doesn't mean it doesn't obey evolution theory or that either is relevant or not. :)))

      So what I am saying is that attitude is in some sense irrelevant to history.
      I met the guy ten years ago at one of the first web conferences. He is brilliant and has a filanthopic attitude I would say. Who knows? he might even say he would sympathize with a "socialist" attitude. :)
      I hope, but doubt, he will do it again with the semantic web stuff. As most great men his biggest achievement occured while he was young, but he certainly will have an impact on the same scale of Gutenberg!

      Pity though, I very much agreed on everything with your first post.
      A cynical attitude is healthy but must be applied evenhandedly :)

      Bind0

    14. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that is giving your own effort and money. The socialist ideal is taking others money and giving it away. Quite some difference.

    15. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see what the poster thinks is socialism has anything to do with... anything. Or that in the context it seemed like he was calling Bill Gates socialist and Linus et al capitalist. Or that that characterization of socialism is about as meaningful and accurate as saying the capitalist ideal is having one person end up with all the money.

      But this is slashdot. It's not supposed to make sense.

    16. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah and I'm sure she was able to raise all of that money without using the internet even once.

      Sucks that she has cancer and it looks like she did a good job of raising money to help fight it but raising 2 million bucks doesn't really stand out to make a person the "Greatest Person In Their Country". That 2 million isn't really going to dent cancer that much, its quite a drop in the bucket. Tim Berners-Lee's internet, on the other hand, has the potential and the history for making these sort of campaigns possible. Without the internet we'd be so far back technologically that a cure for cancer would likely be 50 years off instead of 10 or 15 (or sooner).
      Not to mention all the other great stuff that has come as a result of the extensive ability to communicate that the internet has granted us.

    17. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      I don't get that mentality (although I did just see the episode where Shake says your sig, which I loved).

      It's like, some people say "I'd rather see normal people campaign to make pot legal than see NORML people doing it."

      Why should it matter? When the goal will benefit the campaigner, and everyone else as well (less jails, less of the economy wasted on punishing users, more can be spent on treatment, tax it heavily and it'll still be less than it is now but those taxes can benefit society, prisons will have a lower percentage of non-violent offenders (which is bad for the folks that do end up non-violently in prison, but much better for those folks whose only crime is toking up on their own property), in fact I even saw a sign on MA 90, driving from Amherst to Boston, which was promoting legalization saying "$250 million more taxpayer dollars for our schools" or something similar), why does that make the ultimate benefit less simply because "they just want to smoke their pot"?

      Or, to look at it from a different perspective, the people who are being damaged by wrong laws or infections are those people who are most likely to do something about it. The law against walking your alligator without a leash just doesn't bother me nearly as much as losing my uncle (and my dog!) to cancer. So if I were to campaign, it would more likely be to help defeat cancer or blue laws like prohibition, than it would be to get that town in Florida to allow people to walk their alligators down Main Street without a leash.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    18. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and as a 'point up' pentagram i'm sure you approve of liberating your fellow man.

    19. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      Fuckin' A.

    20. Re:More important than Sir Berners-Lee is ... by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      None of that is relevant to my comment, particularly the drugs rant. The OP was celebrating the heroic campaigning of Jane Tomlinson. All I said was that it's less heroic than similar campaigning by people who don't stand to gain directly.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
  9. Re:It's about bloody time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely you meant blimey...

  10. Re:And typically there are some doubters by saldek · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he stole the idea from Al Gore?

  11. Re:And typically there are some doubters by Drantin · · Score: 1

    Are you saying that bringing ideas together in a way not done before is not itself an idea?

    --
    Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
  12. Re:No offenc e/Not meaning to be flamebait... by Rosyna · · Score: 2

    I don't think you understand that the world wide web is not the same thing as the internet.

  13. Sir Tim Berners-Lee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never heard of him.

  14. You are confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    WWW != NET

    1. Re:You are confused by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      WWW != NET
      ... 10 years from now, if Monkeyboy has his way and the DoJ doesn't grow a set of balls ...
      WWW == .NET*
      *(Microsoft dot.net framework)
  15. Re:No offenc e/Not meaning to be flamebait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case nobody has told you yet, the internet and the WWW are two different things.

  16. Re:No offenc e/Not meaning to be flamebait... by davidmcw · · Score: 0

    Well whaddya know he's reading on a page full of HTML as well...

    --
    Just because your paranoid doesn't really mean they aren't out to get you
  17. Re:No offenc e/Not meaning to be flamebait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There should be a moderation for "idiot" of "dunno what he's talking about" or something...

  18. Committee receives an award as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and fashion designer Sir Paul Smith was named as Greatest Briton in Business.

    Post ceremoniously the members of the committee were named Most Humorous Official British Committee. The award shall be presented to them by Mr. Eric Idle wearing nothing but a pair of knickers designed by Sir Paul Smith. Mr. Idle is busy at the moment and is expected to make the presentation some time before Easter.

  19. "Honour"? by skadus · · Score: 2, Funny

    The guy spells 'honor' with a 'u'??

    That's unamerican!

    1. Re:"Honour"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honour is the proper spelling. Also colour is correct.

      And yes its very "nAmerican" and "sa"

      Hate post like this where there is no exuberance of verbosity.

    2. Re:"Honour"? by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes, it is.

  20. Re:No offenc e/Not meaning to be flamebait... by dapyx · · Score: 1

    ...and used the HTTP protocol!

    --
    I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
  21. Re:And typically there are some doubters by jrumney · · Score: 1
    Let me guess, he stole the idea of the www from an American? I predict that in 50 years time we will discover that it was - in fact - China that made the first powered flight...

    Its supposed to be a controlled flight though. Riding on the back of a giant firecracker does not count.

  22. What's the metric for this? by wombatmobile · · Score: 4, Funny

    "greatest Briton"?

    Hmmm. I'm British. I wonder what my ranking is?

    14,223,921st greatest Briton?

    1. Re:What's the metric for this? by Daxx_61 · · Score: 1

      Wow! What a coincidence! I'm No. 14,223,920!

      --
      Quoth the server, "404."
    2. Re:What's the metric for this? by SunPin · · Score: 1
      Hmmm. I'm British. I wonder what my ranking is? 14,223,921st greatest Briton?

      No. It's lower than that. There are a few Indian dudes ahead of you.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    3. Re:What's the metric for this? by KontinMonet · · Score: 2, Funny

      /. reckons I'm 623057th. So there!

      --
      Did he inhale?
    4. Re:What's the metric for this? by KontinMonet · · Score: 1

      Aargh... cut and paste, paste and cut, it always goes wrong at some point: 737319th...

      --
      Did he inhale?
    5. Re:What's the metric for this? by damian · · Score: 2, Funny

      You seem to be the 623057th Slashdoton it seems. But thats just in cronological order.

    6. Re:What's the metric for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gets to be 1337, then?

    7. Re:What's the metric for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      United States > Briton

      pwn3d!

  23. Re:And typically there are some doubters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Did Edison invent the light bulb?"

    Yes, he did. And Alexander Graham Bell invented the Telephone. While other people had similar ideas, they are the people who pushed forward and got the job done so there fore, they are the inventors.

  24. "It's Great Fun to be British" by popo · · Score: 4, Funny


    Ho HO! Indeed! And what a rollicking good time being human as well! Its a smashing good time up here at the top of the food-chain!

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:"It's Great Fun to be British" by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought tigers were at the top of the food chain?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:"It's Great Fun to be British" by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      I thought tigers were at the top of the food chain?

      Not since 1984.

  25. Re:Strange, fortune just printed this out for me.. by l3v1 · · Score: 1

    Why the hell was that modded "interesting", if not that for someone on /. knows who Schopenhauer is - well, no proof even for that since it's a fortune citing - ?

    I am quite astonished, honestly.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  26. Re:And typically there are some doubters by mkavanagh2 · · Score: 1

    I think people need to believe that there are people who can achieve things without the rest of society; to reassure themselves that they could go it alone if they wanted to. People don't like to feel as if they depend on others.

  27. Re:And typically there are some doubters by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Funny
    Actually, telescope technology now being what it is, I'm surprised nobody's noticed that the flag at the supposed Apollo 11 landing site is actually French. I saw it last night with my cheap Wal*Mart Amateur Astronomy Set.

    Apparently the French landed there in the 1930s. They kept it quiet, never being a group to blow their own horn, and then the Americans wanted footage to "prove" they had gone to the moon, the French were all to happy to provide it (which was then doctored to include a US flag instead) due to their gratitude for America's contribution to WW2.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  28. Re:No offenc e/Not meaning to be flamebait... by l3v1 · · Score: 1

    You're just like one of those freaking retards who think the internet is that cute little blue "e" icon down there.

    You didn't intend to be flamebait ? That go the hell out there and get a cure for your ignorance.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  29. Good by SoftDevelop · · Score: 1

    Good Luck To The "Greatest Briton"

  30. Re:Strange, fortune just printed this out for me.. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
    someone on /. knows who Schopenhauer is
    Oh, yeah! He's the one that begins with an 'S'.

    (Cite)

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  31. Re:And typically there are some doubters by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Informative
    Wrong on both counts. Bell did not invent the telephone (though he did patent a design that couldn't work first) - he was a thief.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4 434963,00.html

    Monday June 17, 2002

    Italy hailed the redress of a historic injustice yesterday after the US Congress recognised an impoverished Florentine immigrant as the inventor of the telephone rather than Alexander Graham Bell.

    Historians and Italian-Americans won their battle to persuade Washington to recognise a little-known mechanical genius, Antonio Meucci, as a father of modern communications, 113 years after his death.

    The vote by the House of Representatives prompted joyous claims in Meucci's homeland that finally Bell had been outed as a perfidious Scot who found fortune and fame by stealing another man's work.

    Calling the Italian's career extraordinary and tragic, the resolution said his "teletrofono", demonstrated in New York in 1860, made him the inventor of the telephone in the place of Bell, who had access to Meucci's materials and who took out a patent 16 years later.
    ... further down ...
    He sent a model and technical details to the Western Union telegraph company but failed to win a meeting with executives. When he asked for his materials to be returned, in 1874, he was told they had been lost. Two years later Bell, who shared a laboratory with Meucci, filed a patent for a telephone, became a celebrity and made a lucrative deal with Western Union.

    Meucci sued and was nearing victory - the supreme court agreed to hear the case and fraud charges were initiated against Bell - when the Florentine died in 1889. The legal action died with him.
    , and Edison did not invent the light bulb http://www.naturalhandyman.com/iip/infelectrical/l ightbulbhistory.shtm He just improved it. Others had already demonstrated working light bulbs.
  32. Great Fun to be British? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the heck? Do they have tea-parties and watch Monty Python all day? How the heck can it be fun to be from a country? It's not like it's pre-Christian Polynesia and you get to boink nubile exotic Island girls all day long and eat sweet tree-melons while basking on the beach.

    "Chip cheerio churrah! Off to sweep some chimneys!"

    Oh what fun!

    1. Re:Great Fun to be British? by Linker3000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not like it's pre-Christian Polynesia and you get to boink nubile exotic Island girls all day long and eat sweet tree-melons while basking on the beach.

      You've obviously not been to Butlin's Holiday Camp in Bognor Regis then - mind you, there it's Essex girls and tinned pineapple.

      Pip! pip!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    2. Re:Great Fun to be British? by pjt33 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What the heck? Do they have tea-parties and watch Monty Python all day?
      Not at all, old chap: we don't start the tea-parties until 5pm.
      It's not like it's pre-Christian Polynesia and you get to boink nubile exotic Island girls all day long and eat sweet tree-melons while basking on the beach.
      If you were from pre-Christian Polynesia you wouldn't find the island girls exotic. (See, mods: this post is insightful as well as funny ;)
    3. Re:Great Fun to be British? by KontinMonet · · Score: 1

      And what does an Essex girl use for protection? A bus shelter.

      Boom! Boom!

      --
      Did he inhale?
    4. Re:Great Fun to be British? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were from there yes, then they wouldn't be exotic, but you probably wouldn't find anything too wonderful about laying around on the beach and having sex all day long, it'd just be how things are.

      But if you were Fletcher Christian and you show up before all the missionaries started their BS, then it's a jolly-good time indeed, and the girls would be quite exotic.

      Also I think they have breadfruit, not sweet tree-melons.

    5. Re:Great Fun to be British? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      you get to boink nubile exotic Island girls all day long

      I've heard of this place called Nubia but can never find it on a map. (/me waves to Terry Pratchett.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    6. Re:Great Fun to be British? by Fembot · · Score: 1

      You sterotyping berk! I half-inched my mates computer to have a butchers at this article and I think its bloomin marvellous!

    7. Re:Great Fun to be British? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a Nubia?

    8. Re:Great Fun to be British? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      That's where the nubile folks come from.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  33. Re:And typically there are some doubters by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows that Swan invented the lightbulb.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  34. The person to blame! by Hosting+Geek · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now we know who blame for "www."

    Long live no-www.com!

    --
    For FREE NO ADS! 1GB/20GB PHP MySQL With a Control Panel Hosting
  35. Re:And typically there are some doubters by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

    ""Did Edison invent the light bulb?"

    Yes, he did"

    No, he didn't. He bought Swan's patent .

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  36. Looked up some historical links... by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK, I did some searching for the Neowin article on this, and can just as well post it here too.
    It's a bunch of fun historical documents. ;-)

    - Screenshot of Tim-Berner Lee's web browser/editor gizmo (apparently two apps in one suite, kinda like Mozilla?)
    - Web page (from 1992) describing a very early version of HTML
    - Description of the web (from 1992)*
    - The original WWW proposal from 1989**
    - History of the web

    * = It tells you why the WWW was made... "Tim decided that high energy physics needed a networked hypertext system and CERN was an ideal site for the development of wide-area hypertext ideas"

    ** = excerpt: "Note that the only name I had for it at this time was "Mesh" -- I decided on "World Wide Web" when writing the code in 1990."

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Looked up some historical links... by Patik · · Score: 1
      Screenshot of Tim-Berner Lee's web browser/editor gizmo
      Note the "fetish" link in the HotWired window. Porn was on the web before TBL even finished creating it.
    2. Re:Looked up some historical links... by tehshen · · Score: 1

      What's the word after it? 'Solaris'?
      Could two words ever be more mutually exclusive?

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
  37. What next..... by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 1
    Al Gore didn't invent the Internet!?!

    1. Re:What next..... by ninthwave · · Score: 1

      But Love Story was based on him.

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
  38. Greatest American : Dick Cheney ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has got a funny name and funny clothes : http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/0,1518,339109,00.ht ml

  39. Re:Strange, fortune just printed this out for me.. by crimson30 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why the hell was that modded "interesting", if not that for someone on /. knows who Schopenhauer is - well, no proof even for that since it's a fortune citing - ?

    I, for one, found it interesting that another slashdotter might allude to the silliness of national pride, since, after all, it is taking pride in other people's accomplishments. Personally, I keep my national pride to a miniumum, since I'm no more responsible for the great things America has done than the awful things. Same goes for racial pride. I am not responsible for the great things others have done, nor am I responsible for slavery just because I'm white. I think people should be as proud as their skin color as they are of their hair color. Likewise, there should be no shame.

  40. Re:And typically there are some doubters by ninthwave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No I am not. The people who think he stole part of the web concept from others use the word stole in the wrong way. And I framed my comment more to get a discussion going on actually what does invent mean.

    I find the best inventors and scientists recognise the idea that we do stand on the ideas from society and our peers.

    Newton's "standing on the back of giants..." quote and all.

    --
    I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
  41. Our own Private England by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    2004's greatest American: Lynnie England, liberating Iraq one attack dog at a time! America: love it or lynch someone.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Our own Private England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2004's greatest American: Lynnie England, liberating Iraq one attack dog at a time! America: love it or lynch someone.

      Your link doesn't seem to work (The proxy server received an invalid response: No space left on device) but the correct name is Lynndie Rana England and there is an interesting Wikipedia article about her. See also Lynndie England Defense Fund: "Private 1st Class Lynndie England, an American service woman, needs your help. Please help her and her family in her legal defense. Thank you for your contributions and God Bless." Make a contribution if you can. Thanks.

    2. Re:Our own Private England by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I dunno about any proxy server - the link from my post leads to http://www.freespeech.com/archives/050804PrisonerA buse.jpg (spaces might be introduced to this link's anchor by Slashdot).

      The best way to help England would be to hang Rumsfeld for war crimes. That way England and her sicko cronies wouldn't have to take all the blame for gleefully carrying out Rumsfelds torture policy.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Our own Private England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best way to help England would be to hang Rumsfeld

      Oh yeah, help England. Not that she was a fucking bitch or anything... Fuck you!

    4. Re:Our own Private England by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't get mad at me. Especially when I agree with you about Pvt. England, and you obviously didn't read the next sentence, including

      "England and her sicko cronies" and "blame for gleefully carrying out Rumsfelds torture policy"

      I know it's hard to find any subtlety in the Torture, Inc they've got buzzing along in Iraq. But don't fall for Rumsfeld's strategy of blaming only the demented England and her sick fuckbuddies, without holding Rumsfeld responsible for his torture corps. And don't waste your anger on people like me, who feel the same way, but can see where the real insane "soldier" perverts work: in the Pentagon and the White House.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  42. Re:Well he did do this... by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

    I agree completely. If you aren't going the pronounce the "h" then why use it at all?

  43. Re:And typically there are some doubters by ninthwave · · Score: 1

    And yet the true evolutionary success of the human race has been in social structures that create a memory larger than any individual and more complex and subtle in detail than could be dealt with by instinct. Because our ability to share, store and combine information we have progressed as a species. So I think as a society we subconsciously recognise the value of this web thing, though we may not appreciate the ideal potential it holds and we tend to use it for the base common denominator.

    So an invention meant to let people share ideas, and communicate ideas, is celebrated as an invention of one person, who admits he built on the ideas of others and his idea would have happened without him, it was a natural progression of the ideas that had come before. I think from all the interviews I have read with Sir Tim, the most important thing I have got from him is his pride in his work on trying to keep the web based on open and free standards so that it will always have a large ideal potential.

    --
    I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
  44. Re:Strange, fortune just printed this out for me.. by azzy · · Score: 1

    Schopenhauer was right, wouldn't you say? 'Life without pain has no meaning' ...

  45. Teeth! by zenmojodaddy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm surprised no-one from the States has said anything about the guy's teeth. From Austin Powers to the Simpsons' 'Big Book Of British Smiles', that's all we ever get to hear. British=Bad F*ckin' Teeth.

    Listen, you shiny-gobbed sons of bitches, these are Darwinian survival aids. If we got into a fight and I bit you with these babies, you'd bleed to death in thirty seconds or get a dose of gangrene and end up taking your fingers home in a bag.

    Right. I'm off to throw bricks at a dentist. What ho, my lily-white arse.

  46. Ob. Monty Python by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
    Arthur: "How do you do, good lady? I am Arthur, King of the Britons. Who's castle is that?"
    Woman: "King of the who?"
    Arthur: "The Britons."
    Woman: "Who are the Britons?"
    Arthur: "Well, we all are. We are all Britons, and I am your king."
    Woman: "I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective."
    Dennis: " You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship: a self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes--"

    From. Memory. Where do I collect my geek stripes?

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    1. Re:Ob. Monty Python by agent+dero · · Score: 1

      From the Office of Virginity, it's right down the hall next to 'Abuse', and across from 'Arguments'

      Oh damn, I did it too.

      --
      Error 407 - No creative sig found
  47. Re:And typically there are some doubters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually it was a New Zealander called Richard William Pearse who made the first powered flight, a fact that Americans are strangly not taught in high school???

    Oh yes and Alexander Graham Bell was beaten to the telephone, it was Antonio Meucci an itallian who filed a patent for it in 1871.

    You will be amazed by the mistakes that they refuse to correct in the history books.

  48. In spite of all temptation? by sam_handelman · · Score: 1

    So, what he is saying is, that in spite of all temptation to belong to other nations, he remains an Englishman?

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    1. Re:In spite of all temptation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THAT is funny.

  49. The Self-Congratulatory British by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article puts into strong relief that greatest of British attributes:

    Modesty

    1. Re:The Self-Congratulatory British by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Woo! Yeah! Alright! We're Number One! We're Number One!

      Wanker.

  50. That's not so impressive by craXORjack · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was at a friend's house over the holidays and I noticed that he had received the distinction of being the World's Greatest Dad! Top that, Sir Tim!

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  51. Re:And typically there are some doubters by KontinMonet · · Score: 0

    Yawn. The usual boring Francophobia...

    --
    Did he inhale?
  52. About time for Tim Berners-Lee to get recognition by CarbonUnit_718 · · Score: 1

    When I ask someone who invented the Internet they say "Ummm, um. Bill Gates!" Seriously, most people do think Bill Gates/Microsoft invented the Internet. Few people outside the web developer community has ever heard his name, even though he's made one of the most important inventions of the century.

  53. Re:Well he did do this... by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

    Huh? I've seen people miss out the L from HTML *, but never seen people missing out the H.

    * despite all new operating systems in the last 10 years supporting filenames with more than 3 letters after the dot. It really puzzles me why people still do that. The same goes for text files.

  54. Re:And typically there are some doubters by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Actually it's making fun of Francophobia. But, well, whatever.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  55. No, he didn't invent the WWW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Tim Berners-Lee, the father of the World Wide Web

    Good lord... I give the man credit much in the same way you might give Steve Jobs credit for putting 2 and 2 together with regard to the GUI and home computers. Very brilliant, but the man didn't invent the concepts upon which the web sits. And yes, I know he coded the specific implementation of these things and that's worthy of much praise, but he didn't come up with the concepts that made all of it possible. How about a Slashdot article looking over the very long history of people who came up with these ideas long before the technology existed to actually implement it. Berners-Lee stands on the shoulders of intellectual giants and I applaud his vision, but "father of the WWW" is going a bit too far. This fanboy-style worship of what he did is almost as annoying as how nationalistic British people are when talking about it. Look into the history of it. There's much more to the story of the creation of the WWW.

  56. Re:Well he did do this... by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

    Because it's so often reinforced. Windows and other Microsoft products offer .ini, .txt, .doc, .url, and so on straight out of the box.. so it's a pattern users subconciously follow themselves. I admit, even though I'm a UNIX user, I use .txt! I can't think of many places I've seen .text or .document, if ever. Also, file types are defined in most operating system as being the 3 letter variants, with .html as a nice exception.

  57. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hypertext Gopher. Ooh, ahh, big invention there.

  58. Re:About time for Tim Berners-Lee to get recogniti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Tim Berners-Lee did not invent the Internet.

  59. Re:And typically there are some doubters by nagora · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Did Edison invent the light bulb?

    No. That's why Edison was forced to go into partnership with Joseph Swan who beat him to it, forming the Swan Edison United Electric Light Co. (Ediswan). After Edison bought Swan out he re-wrote history to take the credit, as he normally did with other people's inventions.

    There's not much Edison himself did invent other than FUD and the invention-as-slavery, your-thoughts-belong-to-us conditions which prevail to this day in the IP clauses of large companies.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  60. Re:And typically there are some doubters by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

    You're missing the point: history is written by the victors.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  61. Re:And typically there are some doubters by anethema · · Score: 1

    Everyone SHOULD know this. Unfortunatly people still thing edison invented the light bulb and was responsible in any way for the electricity we have today.

    More and more of the smithsonians innacuracies.

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  62. Re:Strange, fortune just printed this out for me.. by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

    Okay, so let's take a look at the original quote again:

    Every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud, adopts as a last resource pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and happy to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority.

    This would seem to predict that people who have something to be proud of have no need of national pride. You would expect, then, that these people would be less inclined to it. Sir Tim Berners-Lee might disagree. So would a whole lot of other British and American heroes. So would the vast majority of the officers in the US military, who generally hold degrees in higher education. What happens instead is that these people view their accomplishments as part of the greatness of the their country, and rightly attribute their chances to do great things to it.

    National pride is a social imperative that helps keep a country cohesive and working together. The United States would have had a much harder time getting through WWII without it. It generated the amazing cash flow to New York after 9/11. The examples go on and on.

    My theory about you: in forsaking national pride, you seek to distance yourself from the "common man," because you view him as lazy and ignorant - especially them dern rednecks. (I mean, this is Slashdot. We can assume at least half the population here believes that. "Joe sixpack?" Heh.) Thus, it's a manifestation of your selfish pride.

    What a swap: national pride for selfish pride.

    --
    I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  63. Re:Strange, fortune just printed this out for me.. by ph1ll · · Score: 1
    Every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud, adopts as a last resource pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and happy to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority. -- Arthur Schopenhauer

    Perhaps you miss the point. As I see it, a nation voted a geek as their greatest. Which country this was is irrelevent.

    --
    --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
  64. Re:And typically there are some doubters by ninthwave · · Score: 1

    Yes and I am glad to see the point well taken.
    It seems our idea of invention has a myth-making sociological side affect. We want the great inventor, a pop star of ideas. We would rather have an Edison, Bell, Berners-Lee, than a society that greats together.

    I sometimes wonder if the modern laws of IP come together, if we don't see the nation of Greece suing because all IP can be traced to Greek philosophies already published.

    Pete Townsend once said "all musicians are thieves and magpies" implying they kept all the neat and shiny bits in other songs and horded them, churning them together and creating something new. But the same can really be said of all arts. I have never seen anything that you can call new, I think you can see some things that are visionary but even that vision incorporates the past, the now and arranges them to point to an ideal future.

    I think my anger at the modern concept of IP rights is coming more and more from the realisation that we do not do this alone. The scientific method needs community and sharing, knowledge is meant to be communal. I like capitalism as a tool, but is the tool be wrongly applied in this modern age. Should we not be looking for other ways of creating capital than trying to own ideas. I know the down side is how do you encourage ideas in a capitalistic system without monetary incentive. But from a neutral perspective the hording of IP rights and controling of ideas is in my opinion beginning to actual create bad IP, ideas are muted and not becoming full.

    This is becoming a ramble, I don't mind rambling but I am still learning, I hope to never stop and I like throwing out thoughts to see how others reply.

    Thank you to everyone who replied in this discussion because there is just something clicking in my mind on the subject because of this little side discussion.

    --
    I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
  65. Re:Strange, fortune just printed this out for me.. by cortana · · Score: 1
    Berners-Lee had this to say about the honor: ' I am very proud to be British, it is great fun to be British and this award is just an amazing honour.'"

    I am English, but I am not proud of it. Having considered the odds, I am aware that I am very lucky to have been born north of the poverty line at all, let alone to have escaped any of the countries that the Soviet Republic fucked up; some theocratic hellhole in the middle east; China, North Korea, etc etc. I'm relieved, glad, even, but not proud. :)

  66. Re:Strange, fortune just printed this out for me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious."

    -- Oscar Wilde
    (and he is from great britain, you see)

  67. Re:And typically there are some doubters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just SOOO WRONG!! Everybody knows that Johann Philipp Reis invented the telephone. He build the first working telephone in 1860 which covered a distance of 100m. BTW, the first sentence ever transmitted via telephone was "Das Pferd isst keinen Gurkensalat" ("the horse doesn't eat cucumber salad" for you non-german speakers out there).

  68. So how come... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    it wasn't Tony Blair?

    Ask George.

    Personally I think Liz Hurley ought to be declared "Greatest Briton"... (Or maybe Keira Knightley...or Kate Beckinsale...or Kate Winslet...or...)

    Well, maybe Jordan, who really IS "Greatest Briton"...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:So how come... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, maybe Jordan, who really IS "Greatest Briton"...

      Complete slapper, and that's not even counting the oversized and obviously fake boobs. Urgh.

      No fucking wonder she's hooked up with Peter Andre who also- allegedly- had some surgery to get that chiselled six-pack (plus; bear in mind that the video of 'Mysterious Girl' which was played all over the place last year was already quite a few years old, and he probably has a beer belly now. Still, he's lost his record deal again >:-) )

  69. Re:About time for Tim Berners-Lee to get recogniti by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Was it Al Gore?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  70. Re:Strange, fortune just printed this out for me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wilde was Irish. At the time, Eire was part of the United Kingdom, but it wasn't (and isn't) part of Great Britain, which is the big island to the right of it.

    Wales, Scotland, England, and Norfolk make up Great Britain. Northern Ireland, which is still part of the UK, is not part of GB.

  71. Makes me think of They Might Be Giants by tm2b · · Score: 1

    "We were once so close to Heaven,
    Peter came out and gave us
    medals declaring us
    the nicest of the damned"

    ("Road Movie to Berlin", They Might Be Giants)

    --
    "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    1. Re:Makes me think of They Might Be Giants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      made me think of this tune:
      http://www.btinternet.com/~paul.wilkinson46 /gle.ht ml

  72. Getting a little more personal on this... by crimson30 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This would seem to predict that people who have something to be proud of have no need of national pride.

    I make no such prediction. I am aware that my feelings about national pride are in the severe minority.

    National pride is a social imperative that helps keep a country cohesive and working together. The United States would have had a much harder time getting through WWII without it. It generated the amazing cash flow to New York after 9/11. The examples go on and on.

    Do you really need national pride to help other people?

    My theory about you: in forsaking national pride, you seek to distance yourself from the "common man," because you view him as lazy and ignorant

    I don't "seek" to distance myself from the common man. I think putting oneself on a pedestal is an unhealthy and dangerous thing. But you have to realize that some people are just better in some things than others. I lack social skills, physical strength and a number of other things. Does that mean I'm a bad person? I hope not. Should people treat me differently? Perhaps they might treat me accordingly. Should they treat me poorly? I don't think so. The same goes for intelligence.

    Is it so wrong to recognize that you are smarter than some people? It doesn't mean you have to belittle people or treat them like idiots. Why must being better than anyone at anything and knowing it translate to being pompous? Sure, I get frustrated with stupidity and ignorance, but that doesn't mean I'm an ass about it. And please, don't picture me as some typical computer geek who thinks he knows it all. On the contrary, I'm an unsuccessful nobody... and not much of a computer geek.

    As for laziness, as long as someone is self-reliant and not an unappreciative burden, I don't see a problem with laziness. It's only natural. I think people should be free to be lazy if they so choose.

    especially them dern rednecks

    I'm going to dig a hole here and share my feelings on this one, however misguided they may seem. I used to be active duty military and I was in a career field that was highly populated by said folk. The issue I had with the beer-swilling, tobacco-chewing, nascar-watching types was a culture clash. These folks were plenty intelligent in many matters, especially job related mechanics, which in many regards they were my superiror. But, regardless of who was better than who at what, we seemed to have some tension from misunderstanding one another as far as lifestyle and motives and such. So... do I get a little bitter and hostile around redneck types? Eventually, it seems. Do I judge them at first sight? I can't seem to help it. Do I treat them like they're subhuman? Absolutely not, because I've met amazing people of all nationalities, races and cultures. But still, I find it difficult not to stereotype, given the fair amount of homogenity in some cultures.

    You'll note that I keep bringing up race and it's because I feel that national pride is akin to racial pride, which is why it is a source of some disgust for me. Nationalism may bring people together (like racial pride), but in the process, it also tends to draw lines in the sand.

    What a swap: national pride for selfish pride.

    How about national pride for global humanitarianism? ...and selfish pride ;)

    Anyway... feel free to shoot holes in my logic. I'm not above being wrong.

    1. Re:Getting a little more personal on this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans are social animals.

      Identifying with one's group is as natural as anything else humans do.

      It is a sign of atomistic thinking to denigrate identifying with one's group and taking pride in its accomplishments.

      Making fun of someone so identifying, just because they personally did not perform the accomplishment in question, is to miss the point entirely.

      Quite sad, really.

    2. Re:Getting a little more personal on this... by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      Making fun of someone so identifying, just because they personally did not perform the accomplishment in question, is to miss the point entirely.

      I'm not trying to make fun of anyone. And I don't feel that I'm missing the point so much as trying to make a point of my own.

      Do I really come off as being so warped and negative?

  73. Re:And typically there are some doubters by konkani · · Score: 1
    And Marconi did not invent Wireless communications. It was demonstrated at least a couple of years prior to him by the brilliant Indian inventor Sir Jagadish C. Bose. Bose also had a solid educational background having studied under Lord Rayleigh in Cambridge.
    "In 1895 Bose gave his first public demonstration of electromagnetic waves, using them to ring a bell remotely and to explode some gunpowder. In 1896 the Daily Chronicle of England reported: "The inventor (J.C. Bose) has transmitted signals to a distance of nearly a mile and herein lies the first and obvious and exceedingly valuable application of this new theoretical marvel." Popov in Russia was doing similar experiments, but had written in December 1895 that he was still entertaining the hope of remote signalling with radio waves. The first successful wireless signalling experiment by Marconi on Salisbury Plain in England was not until May 1897. The 1895 public demonstration by Bose in Calcutta predates all these experiments. Invited by Lord Rayleigh, in 1897 Bose reported on his microwave (millimeter-wave) experiments to the Royal Institution and other societies in England."

    From: http://www.tuc.nrao.edu/~demerson/bose/bose.html

    The same article also notes that he was the first to use a semiconductor diode, nearly fifty years prior to the invention of the transistor.
    "Although it appears that Bose's demonstration of remote wireless signalling has priority over Marconi, he was the first to use a semiconductor junction to detect radio waves, and he invented various now commonplace microwave components, outside of India he is rarely given the deserved recognition. Further work at millimeter wavelengths was almost nonexistent for nearly 50 years. J.C. Bose was at least this much ahead of his time."
    --
    please change me. - sig
  74. and I thought Al Gore invented it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah right!

  75. Tim Berners-Lee didn't "invent" the internet by Rekkr · · Score: 1

    Tim Berners-Lee didn't invent the internet, he invented HTML.

    1. Re:Tim Berners-Lee didn't "invent" the internet by Fembot · · Score: 1

      internet != world wide web

      world wide web is just one of many applications which sits upon the Internet (note capital I), along with email, ssh and all the other 100s of applications

    2. Re:Tim Berners-Lee didn't "invent" the internet by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      I think I made it clear in the blurb that he invented the World Wide Web, one part of the internet. Other parts include email, usenet, etc.

  76. Re:And typically there are some doubters by tomhudson · · Score: 1
    Johann Philipp Reis invented the telephone. He build the first working telephone in 1860
    He was still several years too late:
    http://chem.ch.huji.ac.il/~eugeniik/history/meucci .html
    Therefore, between 1854 and 1855, Meucci established his first telephone link from Esther's room to the basement (where he had a small laboratory) and to a larger laboratory in the yard. To call attention, a traditional (mechanical) call bell was used, its wires running parallel to those of the telephone. Only one instrument was used at each end, that was alternatively brought to the ear or the mouth of the user.
    ... and ...
    Meucci tried on the above said link very many kinds of telephones, steadily improving the quality of speech transmission with respect to that of his "static telephone" of 1849 in Havana. He came to satisfactory results around 1857, when he constructed an electromagnetic instrument (Fig. A at left, reproduced from "The Chicago Tribune" of 9 November 1885 ), in which he used a tempered steel bar "M", permanently magnetized, and a many-turns bobbin, both of which he bought from one Charles Chester, a manufacturer of telegraphic instruments in Centre St., New York. The diaphragm of this instrument was either made of a sheet of iron or of a stretched animal membrane bearing a small iron disk glued in the center. The air gap between the diaphragm and the bottom pole of the magnet could be adjusted by means of a screw.
    But thanks for playing :-)
  77. History by tomhudson · · Score: 1
    A lot of our "knowledge" of "history" is ethnocentric. I guess the "Not Invented Here" syndrome is far deeper than we normally assume.

    So far, we've seen that:

    1. Bell did not invent the phone
    2. Marconi did not invent radio communications
    3. Edison did not invent the light bulb
    4. Tim Berniers-Lee never said he invented the Web
    5. Al Gore didn't invent the "intarnet thingee" or Gore-tex
    It's not what you know that can hurt you, it's what you know that isn't so...
  78. Re:And typically there are some doubters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Faraday Faraday Faraday Faraday
    Michael bloody Faraday, still unrecognised by the world at large to this day

  79. Mark Lamarr.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    had a routine where he worked out who was in line to to the throne ahead of him, everyone, including foreigners and the dead, were, with the exception of Lisa Riley.

  80. Re:And typically there are some doubters by sootman · · Score: 1

    "Thats odd as one of the points Sir Tim Berners-Lee was making with all the British papers who were asking him how rich he would be if he had patented "his" idea..."

    Furthermore, from one of my favorite wired articles ever, comes one of the best quotes ever...

    W: Do you wish you'd started the Web as a business?

    TBL: If I'd started "Web Inc." it would have been just another proprietary system. You wouldn't have had this universality. For something like the Web to exist, it has to be based on public, nonproprietary standards.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  81. Kate Winslet is Australian by blackpaw · · Score: 1

    See above

    1. Re:Kate Winslet is Australian by DanBrusca · · Score: 1

      Erm, no, she's English.

    2. Re:Kate Winslet is Australian by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      I think you're thinking of Cate Blanchett...

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  82. Great Briton? by camcloud1 · · Score: 0

    Why can't it just be "Great Human". I'm not trolling and am probably off-topic here but the sooner we lose the barriers on this planet called "countries" the better. I was born and currently live on the continent of Australia. But I don't consider myself "Australian". It simply doesn't mean anything to be born here. I am Human. As is everyone else. I could have been born anywhere and would still be encouraged to have the same feeling about where I'm from. But before you come back with "What about your national pride!" if everyone one on the planet has it then doesn't it really cease to mean anything? How can anyone's country be better and then anyone else's? (And I'm not refering to political climates) It just dirt...

  83. DUH! AL Gore invented the internet. by laserawesome · · Score: 1

    Those damn redcoats taking credit for another American invention!

    1. Re:DUH! AL Gore invented the internet. by Gnoll110 · · Score: 1

      hehe Now what was the name of that Hollywood movie where the American broke the Enigma Codes? Gnoll http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/page.cfm?pageid=15 9 Note: Alan Turing was one is the geeks working on this project. http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathemati cians/Turing.html

  84. british doesnt mean english by Stanneh · · Score: 0

    Once again you F'n stupid americans have to point out how stupid "yall" are just becouse hes british it doesnt meen he talks like he's a 1930's stiff upper lipped ponse. you should all learn to behave before we take for granted you all talk like george dubbya not like a ponse more like a nonse.

    --
    I Predict A Riot
  85. Perhaps, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I shan't achieve peace of mind until the last fool running around quoting Diderot hither and thither has been beheaded with the head still up the arse.

    1. Re:Perhaps, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you shan't, shan't you?

      Pretentious prick.

  86. Where did he do the work? by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

    While Sir Tim is indeed British, imho it's ironic, nay tragic, that none of his seminal work was done in a British istitution. Shame, shame, shame. I wonder why?

    1. Re:Where did he do the work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see your point, however CERN is in part British since it is a collaboration between 20 member states (14 when Tim was there), one of which is the United Kingdom.

      I am British and at CERN and I love working with people from all over Europe.

      Tim has just taken the Computer Science Chair at the University of Southampton, so a British institution now has its chance!

  87. Cool by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1
    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  88. Re:About time for Tim Berners-Lee to get recogniti by CarbonUnit_718 · · Score: 1

    I meant the World Wide Web.

  89. Good job by HermDog · · Score: 1

    If it weren't for Sir Berners-Lee and his world wide web, I'd have a fulfilling life. Instead, I'm posting to /.

    --
    JADBP
  90. Re:And typically there are some doubters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup. Powered, controlled flight was performed in Germany and France before the Wright brothers, but the Wrights were better at PR, so "the Wrights flew first".
    Weißkopf and the other guys only cared about inventing cool stuff and flying, not about getting press.

  91. Re:And typically there are some doubters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Far A Day will keep his memory alive.

  92. HTML *is* broken by mshurpik · · Score: 1

    You know, it was about a month into my first web programming job when I realized that HTML is spectacularly ill-designed to do what we were trying to do with it - namely, to automate it (with scripts) rather than hand-code static pages. For example, try writing the code to auto-generate a selectbox. It's tricky, it takes about a half-hour, and it always feels like a hack.

    Why is it so bad? Because there's no syntactic consistency in the interfaces to different commands, like SELECTBOX, TABLE, INPUT etc. On top of that, the browser implementations tend to suck. You have no idea how many web pages I've written that were composed almost entirely of FONT COLOR, because font color doesn't nest.

    Five years later, they've created all kinds of new ultra-hyped languages, like XML, and web scripting is still just as broken as it ever was. So, I don't know if you were kidding when you said that HTML is "an awful markup language," but if you were referring to scripted implementations (which is 90% of the web these days), then you were absolutely right.

    1. Re:HTML *is* broken by mdavids · · Score: 1
      You have no idea how many web pages I've written that were composed almost entirely of FONT COLOR, because font color doesn't nest.

      Font elements were a Netscape extension and their use has been strongly discouraged by the W3C since HTML 4. If you're still using them, and other presentational markup elements rather than using style sheets, it's probably no surprise you find HTML unwieldy.

    2. Re:HTML *is* broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good point, but many extensions were both widely adopted, and much simpler than their W3C counterparts. When you use FONT, you know that every graphical browser on earth will support it.

      Style sheets...I love 'em, but their adoption was pretty poor the last time I checked (a couple years ago). Maybe now I could start using style sheets, but this was 2000.

      -mjs

  93. T.B.Lee was not the first... by sch7572 · · Score: 1

    Going back a few decades in history... In 1945, Vanaver Bush wrote about his vision of Memex

    "Bush saw the ability to navigate the enormous data store as a more important development than the futuristic hardware. Here he describes building a path to connect information of interest:

    When the user is building a trail, he names it, inserts the name in his code book, and taps it out on his keyboard. Before him are the two items to be joined, projected onto adjacent viewing positions. At the bottom of each there are a number of blank code spaces, and a pointer is set to indicate one of these on each item. The user taps a single key, and the items are permanently joined [...]

    Thereafter, at any time, when one of these items is in view, the other can be instantly recalled merely by tapping a button below the corresponding code space. Moreover, when numerous items have been thus joined together to form a trail, they can be reviewed in turn, rapidly or slowly, by deflecting a lever like that used for turning the pages of a book. It is exactly as though the physical items had been gathered together from widely separated sources and bound together to form a new book. "

  94. Re:And typically there are some doubters by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

    Yes! Edison patented a light bulb in the US after Swan had patented his in Britain. The tungsten filament bulb we use these days is pretty much what Swan patented, Edison's Carbon Filament bulb was unreliable and never really took off. Unfortunately many USians let misguided patriotism get in the way of recorded fact.

    Stephen

    --
    "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall