Slashdot Mirror


ChoicePoint Identity Theft Fallout Widens

dstates writes "A unique California law forced ChoicePoint to reveal that a break-in had compromised accounts revealing personal information on 40,000 southern californians and leading to more than 750 cases of identity theft. The company initially denied that the break-in compromised consumers outside of California, but CNN is now reporting that 110,000 accounts nationally have been compromised. 'The irony appears to be that ChoicePoint has not done its own due diligence in verifying the identities of those 'businesses' that apply to be customers,' said Beth Givens, director of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. 'They're not doing the very thing they claim their service enables their customers to achieve.'"

297 comments

  1. Who Goes There? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    'The irony appears to be that ChoicePoint has not done its own due diligence in verifying the identities of those 'businesses' that apply to be customers,' said Beth Givens

    ChoicePoint: "Who goes there?"
    Voice: "Thurston Howell III"
    ChoicePoint: "A likely story!"
    Voice: "Sherlock Holmes"
    ChoicePoint: "We weren't born yesterday!"
    Voice: "Landshark"
    ChoicePoint: "That's better, here's 35,000 files, let us know if you need anymore."

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Who Goes There? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What's even more ironic is that their CISO won the 2004 ISE Information Security Executive of the Year award for the state of Georgia.

    2. Re:Who Goes There? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see how long it is until we find that other data warehouses were victims of the fraud ring.

      Accurint, Lexis Nexis, Acxiom, I'M LOOKING AT YOU!

      I know someone that works at Choicepoint. They waited to warn consumers at the direction of law enforcement. There warning other people in other states and there isn't a law that says they have to. I'm not saying there saints but there going beyond what the current laws tell them to do.

      Then again it was LAPD that told them to wait. If anyone can fark up an investigation they can. Manson and OJ come to mind

      I hope the id theifs steal my identity. It would be a hoot because I don't have credit cards and my credit sucks anyhow. Maybe they will improve my score.

    3. Re:Who Goes There? by nadadogg · · Score: 1

      I'm more fond of "candygram!"

      --
      i use linux and windows oh god how can i have an opinion
  2. Hot Damn by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 0, Troll

    Damn, I wish I had a pitchfork.
    Or a torch.

    I'm serious. Somebody ought to pay for this kind of crap.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:Hot Damn by http101 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Damn, I wish I had a beer...

      After reading today's /. articles, I don't like being alive anymore. You know that feeling of every one being "out to get you". Geez, look at the articles today! Spyware, exploits, terrorists blowing us up, global warming, security holes in communication databases, and identity theft...

      I LOVE AMERICA!

      --
      -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
    2. Re:Hot Damn by marvin2k · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently 110,000 people already did.

  3. SHUT THEM DOWN by centipetalforce · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Serirously- this isn't paperclips these people are selling ITS YOUR PERSONAL DATA. They need to be closed, and whoever responsible needs to go to jail- and everyone involved in covering up the crime deserves to live in poverty for the rest of their fucking lives.

    1. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by mordors9 · · Score: 1

      Actually that may happen via the courts system. By their attempt to obfuscate what happened, they may have worsened the situation. I think they have worsened the legal difficulties they may have in the coming class action suit that is sure to come about.

    2. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IANAL, but I am a Security Consultant. Considering the financial and healthcare data, there are probably SERIOUS violations of GLBA and HIPAA. Let's look for some SOX violations, and get jail-time for the CEO!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by shanen · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Serirously- this isn't paperclips these people are selling ITS YOUR PERSONAL DATA. They need to be closed, and whoever responsible needs to go to jail- and everyone involved in covering up the crime deserves to live in poverty for the rest of their fucking lives.
      Nice thought, but Dubya would pardon them. After all, this is the same company that put him in the White House in the first place. Or have you forgotten that he claims to have won by 500 votes while ChoicePoint helped disenfranchise thousands of primarily Democratic voters.

      (Of course, Dubya's margin was so slim that *LOT'S* of groups can claim discredit for slipping him into the White House. Irregardless of the various culprits, we're all suffering for it now.)

      Anyway, as I noted in the earlier thread on this topic, I think we need to establish the principle that *YOU* own the personal data about *YOU*, and no one can use it or sell it without *YOUR* permission. This is actually a logical implication of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. However, to give it teeth, I think we also need to appeal to "Possession is nine points of the law", and *YOU* should be able to store your own data on *YOUR* own computer. Anyone wants to see it, they ask for your permission (or prove they deserve a search warrant).

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    4. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny
      How long until we don't use words anymore, but instead only use acronyms?

      IANAL: I am not a lawyer (whew got one of them at least)
      GLBA: Gay/Lesbian/Bi Association??(I don't want to know how they get violated) :-)
      HIPAA: Some kind of privacy thing relating to medical records (can't recall exactly what it stands for) Health Information Privacy something something
      SOX: I think Linux uses this to play sound files
      CEO: Criminal Executive Office or something like that, often known as "head scapegoat" (and often rightly so)

      I am not picking on you, just trying to provide some late Friday humor for everyone waiting to escape at 5pm.

    5. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by kaustik · · Score: 1

      I'm hoping that he was purposely making a joke with all of that. If so, thank you for beating a DD (dead dog).

    6. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What are you telling us for? Why aren't you writing your senators instead?

      Seriously- all of you who have been making this same complaint on Slashdot- have you also been complaining to your elected representatives? (I haven't, but I have an excuse- I live in the "People's Republic of California". No letter from ChoicePoint in my mailbox yet!)

      This is really amazingly egregious that they shouldn't be required by law to contact you if they realize they sold your mother's maiden name to mobsters. I can't believe how shit happens in the rest of the country sometimes.

    7. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by s74n13y · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So a unique California law, under their misnamed "deregulation" system, caused them to open their books, when they simply feel that 110,000 to 350,000 consumers are ignorant. They were entrusted with data security, was it worth it? Anyway, how many more consumers' personal data was thoroughly scrutinized by these thieves? This is what you got when you let ex-Governor Davis exercise his own self interest, the economy of California and rolling blackouts leading to a re-statement of Enron's books. When will they get honest and start acknowledging that they FAILED US? I get the distinct impression that a break-in compromised the data and they're not done. It's dog food alright, meaning these executives ought to be going to JAIL. They act like they weren't under any legal obligation, rather like outright deception. The irony appears to achieve its own success in some sort of narcissistic manner.

      On the ChoicePoint web site, the only reason we found other than stated above was a unique California system of overcharging, revealing personal information to anyone outside of California, maybe not far from the other 110,000 people who will receive notice of their fleecing soon. ChoicePoint said Tuesday it sent warning letters to track down serial killers stored behind a cloak of secrecy. This is what you get when Privacy Rights Clearinghouse sells to the highest bidder. These kinds of California laws hand their 35 million consumers over to ignorance. Beth Givens, director of one of those 'businesses seeking to gain access to people outside of California' had higher standards. I guess not. Perhaps they will send an additional notification to her lawyer informing that they have her system-gaming scam in an investigation.

      Make no mistake, state of California FAILED US. I get the distinct impression that ChoicePoint said it would jeopardize the tools they build. So does ChoicePoint use these tools they build? So does ChoicePoint use their customers' information for their own gain? ChoicePoint is a bunch of criminals posing as a legitimate business seeking to gain access to personal information so as to be a provider for identity theft criminals.

      Tell me one personal information provider who is not in some way guilty of identity stolen. All 50 states.

    8. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by bwcarty · · Score: 1

      I understand all the acronyms in the grandparent post except SERIOUS.

    9. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by nizo · · Score: 1

      NP

    10. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by bman08 · · Score: 1

      I read your post twice and can't understand a word of it. Is it some kind of code or are you a raving lunatic. I feel like you have something to say, but it's totally lost among the various threads of your Cali-spiracy theory.

    11. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by s74n13y · · Score: 1

      1) The state of California FAILED US. I blame Davis.

      2) ChoicePoint is a bunch of criminals posing as a legitimate business seeking to gain access to personal information so as to be a provider for identity theft criminals.

    12. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      I was being a bit sly, with the "alphabit salad" - I have to swim in that kind of discussion all day long, to mix metaphors.

      I still think you can jail'em on Sarbanes-Oxley, if you got Spitzer to do it!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    13. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with the other guy who responded to this... I can't make out what your position is or is based on, other than "California FAILED us" somehow, for which no supporting evidence is offered. And looking at your posting history, you seem to have had a very short posting career during which you have been puzzling other people as well.

      Are you a human being or did some clever coder write you as a fun side project?

    14. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by vinn01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      .. and no company will ever have a security breach again.

      If you make the penalty for security breaches so severe, at the very first sign of a breach, a company will wipe all trace of it and pretend that nothing ever happened.

      A lot of companies already do this for the sake of "saving face" in the marketplace. No company wants it to be widely known that they don't know how to secure sensitive data.

      I bet that ChoicePoint was caught red-handed, otherwise we would not be hearing (and complaining) about this.

    15. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Ah. But it was the current governor that dropped the lawsuit.

      Davis certainly deserves his fair share of blame, but considering how cheaply he was bought I'm fairly certain he had no idea what he was agreeing to. (Now that's pretty faint praise, but it's the best I can manage in his defense.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    16. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by s74n13y · · Score: 1

      human last i check. sorry bad english.

    17. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Stiletto · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Seriously- Nothing is going to happen to the CEO of ChoicePoint, or anyone else in charge. Worst that'll happen is a few execs are pushed out with multi-million dollar golden parachutes. They'll be retiring with their mansions and yachts, and we, the little people will be fired, homeless, or in jail because our credit report and background check says we're deadbeats and wanted criminals.

      I LOVE THIS COUNTRY!

    18. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by s74n13y · · Score: 1

      but the bottom line, Davis started it.

    19. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the other merits of your post, "irregardless" is the dumbest word ever.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    20. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by SpacePunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not that there was a 'security breach' It's that they actively lied to cover up their stupidity. If you listen to CNN and other news outlets the loss of information was because of 'hackers'. Not because they just gave out information willy-nilly to anyone who said they were a business. They also only warned only California residents that the information was 'stolen' (not sold as it was), and did not make the announcement that the scope of the information they gave out covers literally all 50 states, territories, and possessions.

      They should be shut down. Immediatly, and with extreme prejudice should there be any resistance.

    21. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by demachina · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nice sentiment but not very realistic. If you close down ChoicePoint you would pretty much have to go after Equifax, Experian(formerly TRW), and Trans Union. In case you don't know the name these are America's big three credit bureaus, where Choicpoint is more ID, criminal record, and financial records rolled in to one. It appears pretty much anyone can form a corporation and start collecting your personal data, thats what all four of these companies did.

      Why do they exist, because other corporations want and need the data they have on you and will pay for it, that includes potential employers and landlords, banks, car dealers, real estate brokers, etc. etc.

      You can't stop all this information tracking without eviscerating employment screening, loans, credit cards, etc. I'd be all for it personally but there are trillions of dollars of big business that rely on these companies and they would scream bloody murder if you tried to shut them all down.

      Choicepoint in particular probably experienced a boom after 9/11. The rampant paranoia that ensued multiplied by an order of magnitude the number of employment ID and criminal background checks employers conduct on prospective employees. Chances are if you are applying for a job with a company of any size their HR department is getting a COMPLETE run down on you form Choicepoint or someone like them, every criminal offense, how good you are at paying your bills, bankruptcies, loan history etc. Chances are they know every gory detail of your entire life, before you get an offer letter.

      In case you didn't know Choicepoint sucks up every court document in every state so they probably have a more detailed criminal history on everyone than state or federal governments.

      Its not entirely clear what the benefit is of having 3 different agencies scoring your credit plus Choicepoint, it just increases the likelihood of data compromise, and if there is an error in your credit report you pretty much have to correct it in all 3 places at your expense. But again any company can form to do this and all they have to do is collect data, market themselves and gain momentum where enough people use their service and you can have 4 or 10 agencies like this.

      There is some regulation of credit bureaus, though I'm not sure Choicepoint falls under it, they should.

      You could propose that only the Federal government should hold all this data but it doesn't really help because this whole system is predicated on allowing pretty much any business who wants it to request this information about you before they hire you or give you credit.

      You in fact have no privacy and haven't had for a while. Until the Federal government converts your Social Security number to a true encrypted digital signature with some minimal security, i.e. a password only you know to validate its yours, EVERYONE is a sitting duck for identity theft in the network era.

      --
      @de_machina
    22. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      If only we were so lucky. Golden parachutes are surprisingly heavy. :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    23. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      As far as I'm concerned, they should not be allowed to provide -any- of your personal information without reasonable evidence that the recipient is authorized to have that info. If they provided any information about anyone to any 'company' that didn't have that person's full name, current address, phone number, -and- social security number, that should be an automatic fine of ten million per occurrence. And if someone fraudulently has all that information on someone, the victim is already pretty much screwed anyway.

      That's 1.1 trillion in case you weren't counting.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    24. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by alexo · · Score: 1


      >> Serirously- this isn't paperclips these people are selling ITS YOUR
      >> PERSONAL DATA. They need to be closed, and whoever responsible needs to go
      >> to jail- and everyone involved in covering up the crime deserves to live in
      >> poverty for the rest of their fucking lives.
      >
      > Nice thought, but Dubya would pardon them.


      Then he also deserves the same fate.

      The president of a democratic country is not an overlord. He is chosen by the people to administer the execution of of the people's will. Once he forgets that, he needs to be slapped down. Hard.

      > Irregardless of the various culprits [...]

      Irregardless?

      > Anyway, as I noted in the earlier thread on this topic, I think we need to
      > establish the principle that *YOU* own the personal data about *YOU*, and no
      > one can use it or sell it without *YOUR* permission. This is actually a
      > logical implication of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. However, to give it
      > teeth, I think we also need to appeal to "Possession is nine points of the
      > law", and *YOU* should be able to store your own data on *YOUR* own computer.
      > Anyone wants to see it, they ask for your permission (or prove they deserve a
      > search warrant).


      Hmmm...

      You said: "... ChoicePoint helped disenfranchise thousands of primarily Democratic voters".

      I am sorry but, according to your suggestion, this information does not belong to you so you cannot use it without a search warrant.

      Yes, this remark was facetious but there is a line to be drawn between a right to privacy and the freedom of speech (or information) and it is not so simple to decide where to draw it.

    25. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by beswicks · · Score: 1

      I was going to mod this comment, but then I realised that there is no Random Bibble option.

      Are you smoking something? and if so can I have some please.

    26. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by cheezedawg · · Score: 2, Informative

      After all, this is the same company that put him in the White House in the first place. Or have you forgotten that he claims to have won by 500 votes while ChoicePoint helped disenfranchise thousands of primarily Democratic voters.

      Bunk. ChoicePoint (actually, Database Technologies, which was later bought by ChoicePoint) was contracted to generate the felon list that was mandated by a new 1998 Florida law, and this law was designed to compensate for an imperfect list. It clearly placed the burdon of verifying the names on the individual county election supervisors, and over half of them didn't even use the list at all.

      The end result? When the USCCR held hearings, they were unable to find a single person that was actually disenfranchised because of the felon list.

      If somebody was wrongly identified as a felon and wrongly prevented from voting because of that (and this is a big "if"), the blame lies solely with the election supervisor of the county that he/she lives in.

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
    27. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you are a highly educated individual (sic) who can not even understand that Irregardless is not a word, I totally discount any stupid rantings you have.

    28. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the picture! See the stars!

      The part of bowls removed, the master race Frankenstein radio controls, the brain thoughts broadcasting radio, the eyesight television, the Frankenstein earphone radio, the threshhold brainwash radio, the latest new-skull reforming to contain all Frankenstein controls, even in thin skulls of white-headed free males, visible Frankenstein controls, the synthetic nerve radio directional antenna loop.

      Make copies for yourself. There is NO escape from this worst gangster police state using all of the deadly gangster frankenstein controls.

      In 1965, CIA gangster police beat me bloody, dragged me in chains from Kennedy New York airport. Since then I hide in forced jobless poverty isolated, alone in this ... house. The brazen deadly gangster police spray me with poison nerve gas from automobile exhausts and even lawn mowers. Deadly assaults even in my yard, with knives; even bricks and stones; even deadly touch tasers or electric shock flashlights; even remote electronically-controlled, around corners trajection of deadly touch tarrantula spiders, or even bloody murder accidents---to shut me up forever with a sneak undetectable extermination, even with trained parrotting puppet assasins in maximum security insanity prison---for writing these unforgivable TRUTHS.

      Until my undetectible extermination, I, Francis E. Dek, Esq., 29 Maple Avenue, Hampsted, NY, I stand alone against your mad, deadly, world-wide conspiratorial gangster computer god Communism, with wall-to-wall deadly gangster protection.

      Lifelong sworn conspirators, murder incorporated, organized crime, the police and judges, the deadly sneak parroting puppet gangsters, using all the gangster deadly frankenstein controls---these hand and rope sneak deadly gangsters, the judges and the police, trick, trap, rob, wreck, butcher and murder the people to keep them terrorized in in gangster Frankenstein earphone radio slavery from the Communist gangster government and con artists parroting puppet gangster playboy scum....

      The secret work of all police, in order to maintain a Communist closed society, the same world-wide mad deadly Communist gangster computer god that controls you, as a terrorized gangster Frankenstein earphone radio slave parroting Commie---you are a terrorized member of the master race, world-wide, four billion eyesight television camera guinea-pig Communist gangster computer god master race---your living, thinking, mad, deadly, world-wide Communist gangster computer god secret overall plan: World-wide living death frankenstein slavery, to explore and control the entire universe with the endless stairway to the stars (namely, the man-made inside-out planets, with nucleonic powered speeds much faster than the speed of light).

      Look up and see: The gangster computer god concocted new fake starry sky! With world-wide, completely controlled, deadly, degenerative planet atmosphere for the new world-round translucent exotic gaseous envelope, which the world-wide Communist gangster computer god manipulates through countless exactly positioned satellites, the new fake, phony stars in the synthetic sky.

      World-wide, systematic, instant plastic surgery butchering murder: Fake aging so old people are dead or useless by age 70---done at night to you as a Frankenstein slave, parroting puppet gangster slave.

      Now even YOU know I am a menace to your world-wide mad deadly communist gangster computer god! Therefore I must go to extermination before I am exterminated by this gangster computer god, concocted and controlled, worst mongrel organized crime, murder incorporated, gangster Communist government.

      I hand you the secrets to save the entire human race and the entire universe.

    29. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by shanen · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Since you are a chickenshit anonymous coward...

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    30. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unirregardless. Sheesh.

    31. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and get jail-time for the CEO!

      Where he will get some TLC from his new SO!

    32. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overall privacy legislation. We need it so very badly.

      But hey, now it's harder for consumers to band together for form a class action lawsuit against companies like ChoicePoint! It's a great day to be a mega-corporation in the US!

    33. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does their FookUp really surprise anyone here? For a company that sells background-checks-in-a-box at SAM's club, you really think due diligent screening of their client base is priority #1 or was done? Think again. To them, peddling personal data is a commodity... the whole incident could have bee prevented and hope they are held accountable and shut-down.

    34. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Neph · · Score: 1
    35. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you lefties are freaking nuts.

    36. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by shanen · · Score: 1

      You must be Jeff Gannon. Got to do something since you blew the White House gig, eh?

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    37. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      The president of a democratic country is not an overlord. He is chosen by the people to administer the execution of of the people's will.

      [Monied interests:] Hmmmmmmmm....

      Well, then, we'll just have to work on modifying the people's will to align with our own.

      People are pretty stupid, emotional and gullible and we have purchased a lot of the media outlets to which people are exposed, so we have a good chance of achieving this objective.

      It's all very logical and makes good business sense. Why shouldn't the free market system be applied to the public's emotions? It's been done for centuries.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    38. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by alexo · · Score: 1


      > People are pretty stupid, emotional and gullible and we have purchased a
      > lot of the media outlets to which people are exposed, so we have a good
      > chance of achieving this objective.
      >
      > It's all very logical and makes good business sense. Why shouldn't the free
      > market system be applied to the public's emotions? It's been done for centuries.


      True, that's one of the problems with representative democracies.

      Another one is the assumption that a person best equipped to win a popularity contest is the most suitable choice to run a country.

    39. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh- Jeff Gannon. Yet another example of you lefties obsessing about a story that NOBODY CARES ABOUT.

      I'll just step back and watch you ruin any chances of winning any elections in the future. Its really quite amusing.

    40. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by AoT · · Score: 1

      perhaps you mean Wilson started it.

      You should since you decided to mention the rolling blackouts.

    41. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but...

      If you are a dumbass election official, and your boss says "We got this new 'puter thing to filter out tha felons". You generally say "uh, ok"

      Find me one election supervisor who would (before 2000) take on a "Computer Program"... these people are idiots, and they know it... none of them would ever dare to challange the perfect system (that, coincidentally was purchased at their bosses request)

      Hmmmmm Byte the hand that feeds you... or convince yourself that you ARE doing a good job because you're doing what your boss told you without question.

      So, we must ask ourselves... Do we hold the soldiers accountable for the violations they committed? Or do we hold their commanding officers accountable for giving the order?

      If you ask Bush: Neither

    42. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by GTipton · · Score: 1

      I think it's definitely true that shutting down a company like Choicepoint would cause a big ruckus. Then again, there are a lot of other companies in that industry that just aren't as well known as Choicepoint... To clear up a couple of things, Choicepoint, and every other company that provides that kind of information, is subject to the Fair Credit Reporting Act. It details what information can be reported and how it can be used. This is in addition to each state's laws. Second, I work in this industry and there are all kinds of problems when it comes to doing background checks. Databases are awfully unreliable sources of information for a number of reasons I won't go into here, but in large part due to the inconsistency and lack of communication that takes place between the courts in our counties, states and federal districts. It's easy to believe that an employer might do a "background check" and find out all there is to know, but no company can always find everything there is to know about of person. It's not their fault - just how the system works.

    43. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      Serirously- this isn't paperclips these people are selling ITS YOUR PERSONAL DATA.

      If you're going to take it seriously, then no doubt you will have affixed a notice such as:

      Copyright © 2005 -- centipetalforce. All rights reserved. No duplication without permission.
      on all the forms where you've entered this so-called "personal data".

      If all the *AA organizations are fighting for strong copyright protection measures, then private citizens might as well enjoy some of those protections, too.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    44. Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      irregardless is not a word.

  4. Re:Ouch by pbranes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, funny that you mention that. What computer cracker goes into a network and *only* steals the data for 1 state?? No one! Choicepoint was flat out lieing and being unfair to the consumer by stating that only California was affected. It was only when the heat was turned on them by the news media & the internet bloggers that they admitted that more people were affected & would be notified.

  5. Trust us! by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How does someone determine if Choicepoint had data on them?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Trust us! by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Funny

      Start a fake company, register with ChoicePoint and look yourself up!

      John.

    2. Re:Trust us! by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The irony being that if you called checkpoint or even showed up at their door with documents proving that you were who you said you were, they probably wouldn't show you the data they've got stored on you.

      Not to mention the fact if they have erroneous data in their databases, you probably never get it corrected.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    3. Re:Trust us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Alpharetta, Ga.-based ChoicePoint maintains personal profiles of nearly every U.S. consumer, which it sells to employers, landlords, marketing companies and about 35 U.S. government agencies.

      ChoicePoint's databases contain 19 billion public records, including driving records, sex-offender lists and FBI lists of wanted criminals and suspected terrorists.


      So, all you have to do is ask yourself 2 questions: 1) Are you an American? 2) Have you ever paid for anything using some means that identifies yourself (like a credit card or a check)? If you answered yes to both these questions then Choicepoint has data on you.
    4. Re:Trust us! by MSisEvil · · Score: 1

      Let's see.............

      Uhmmm, yeah, your data is right here!!!

    5. Re:Trust us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How does someone determine if Choicepoint had data on them?

      Flip a coin.

      Heads: They have megabytes of embarrassing data on you.

      Tails: They have gigabytes of embarrassing data on you.

      If the coin is struck in mid-toss by a meteorite, then you're one of those rare people who does not exist in any consumer databases.

    6. Re:Trust us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does someone determine if Choicepoint had data on them?

      From the article..

      "Alpharetta, Ga.-based ChoicePoint maintains personal profiles of nearly every U.S. consumer, which it sells to employers, landlords, marketing companies and about 35 U.S. government agencies.

      "ChoicePoint's databases contain 19 billion public records, including driving records, sex-offender lists and FBI lists of wanted criminals and suspected terrorists."


      So if you're a US Consumer, you're almost definitely in the database. If you have a driver's license, you're certainly in the database. If you've ever subscribed to a magazine, you're in the database. If you've ever had a credit card, a loan, or bought something on layaway, you're in the database. If your family has ever responded to the US Census survey, you're in the database. If you are enrolled in any frequent flyer clubs, you're in the database. If you've ever filled out a warranty card or entered a free drawing, you're in the database.

    7. Re:Trust us! by j4k3 · · Score: 1

      More importantly, how do you notify one of these data collection warehouses to delete your information? Don't they need permission to keep your records? And if I write to be delisted shouldn't I be?

    8. Re:Trust us! by Niddix · · Score: 1

      The problem is even if you wanted to get it corrected.
      ChoicePoint/Lexis Nexis/AutoTrack/Acurint

      And thats just to name a few services that provide this same sort of information don't generate the data themselves. They don't go interview people to build their databases. They collect the informtion from State DMV, State Courts, Federal Courts, Federal Agencies, State Agencies, etc..

      So even if you corrected it with ChoicePoint, everyone else would have it wrong, and its very likely that it would again be re-scanned by ChoicePoint at a later date and become wrong yet again.

    9. Re:Trust us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you exist, then a file at Choicepoint exists.

    10. Re:Trust us! by jobfreein123 · · Score: 1

      The one and only way I know how to protect my Identity is through Kroll world Wide the worlds leading risk consulting company. I have had someone attempt to steal my Identity twise I wouldn't have know if I had not have had thier service. email me for info jobfreein123@yahoo.com

  6. Initial denial by SafteyMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What really upsets me is how they originally denied that anyone outside of California had their informaion comprimised.

    1. Re:Initial denial by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      They probably thought they could get away with it because only California has a law requiring them to notify people about unauthorized access to their files.

  7. They're a company..... by darkonc · · Score: 3, Insightful
    'They're not doing the very thing they claim their service enables their customers to achieve.'"

    If they did that, it would cost them business. That would cost them profit. They're a company. Next question?

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    1. Re:They're a company..... by mboverload · · Score: 1
      Even worse, by law they have to listen to their investors. Worse than that, their investors have no shame and no concience.

      Pity the souls so caught up in their own greed and blind money-grubing they would invest in this company.

    2. Re:They're a company..... by cduffy · · Score: 1

      If they did that, it would cost them business.

      In the short term, maybe. In the long term, it caused them... well, this.

      Companies, even public ones, are quite capable of taking the long view -- it's just that so many don't.

    3. Re:They're a company..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I'm sure that the investors picketed the company and demanded that they commit a crime to bolster their profits.

      Oy.

    4. Re:They're a company..... by northcat · · Score: 1

      Next question?

      Fuck off.

    5. Re:They're a company..... by darkonc · · Score: 1
      In the long term, it caused them... well, this.

      As bulk mail, it'll probably cost them about $20K to send out snail-mail notices. Far less (perhaps $2K) if they manage to send out email notices. I figure that that's nothing compared to what they've gotten from questionable companies making requests. -- In fact, I'd be shocked if they were charging less than $1.00 per query (probably more in the range of $10), which would still leave them with a healthy profit buffer.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    6. Re:They're a company..... by cduffy · · Score: 1

      As bulk mail, it'll probably cost them about $20K to send out snail-mail notices.

      I'd be extremely suprised if the cost of mailing out the notices was a noticable fraction of the costs incurred by this incident.

      Consider the inevitable class-action suit, the cost of fighting privacy bills (whose supporters just got some extra ammo), and the like.

    7. Re:They're a company..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, as opposed to all those investors saying, "Hey, don't worry so much about making a profit as long as you're doing the right thing."

    8. Re:They're a company..... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Right, as opposed to all those investors saying, "Hey, don't worry so much about making a profit as long as you're doing the right thing."

      Well, I'm sure that keeping within the bounds of the law is quite a bit weaker than "doing the right thing". You can't justify illegal activity like that.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    9. Re:They're a company..... by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      If they did that, it would cost them business. That would cost them profit.

      To what other company would they lose business? Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion, along with ChoicePoint, basically constitute a personal-identity information cartel.

      There is no competition, from the individual, non-business consumer's perspective, in the world of credit-reporting agencies, namely because the CRA's are selling the property *of* individuals (the copyrighted intellectual property of their name, address, phone#, credit history, etc. which each individual has themselves created and which the CRA's sell without their permission) to other businesses, not selling such property *to* individuals.

      Businesses send the CRA's data on their customers, such as tenancy records, credit card usage records, and so forth; these records are kept by the CRA's as a profile from which other businesses may review individuals for jobs, mortgages, loans, and so forth. The individual has no real say in these records, beyond getting a credit report once a year and disputing inaccuracies.

      Hence, there exists no competition between the CRA's, from the perspective of you and me. So, to whom do they lose business and profit, again?
    10. Re:They're a company..... by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If they go almost-bankrupt as a result of the class-action suit, it might cause them to be more careful about who they allow to do searches. Truth of the matter is that the only reason we even know the scale of this is that California had a left-wing commie customer notification law on the books, otherwise they would have probably just sent out notices to thousand of the most seriously affected and hoped that nobody noticed a larger pattern.

      As it is, even a class-action suit might not cost them as much as they gain by allowing anybody and their dog to make a query. I've actually been quietly expecting this sort of event for years.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  8. +750 in California alone! by thinkliberty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "leading to more than 750 cases of identity theft." I wonder how many total cases of identity theft this incident will cause.

    The only way to know is to notify all people that had their identity stolen. All 50 states need to have a ID theft law like California.

    1. Re:+750 in California alone! by sponga · · Score: 1

      Complain to your elected offical.

    2. Re:+750 in California alone! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I can't afford to. Buying access to legislators is pretty spendy.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:+750 in California alone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But isn't regulation bad? Doesn't the market take care of everything?

  9. How the hell is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can they use private, personal data (SSNs?!?!?!) to make a profit?

    Oh yeah, I forgot, coporations rule this world. Laws don't apply to them.

    1. Re:How the hell is this legal? by northcat · · Score: 1

      Now people will start flaming to parent and it'll get modded down as troll. But they miss one point: not all of us live in USA. We don't *know* how they can "use private, personal data (SSNs?!?!?!) to make a profit". The summary should have told us (or at least hinted) or provided a link to the details. No, the company website doesn't help. Think.

    2. Re:How the hell is this legal? by MoneyMan · · Score: 1

      Two Words. Identity Theft.

      In the US, the Social Security Number (SSN) is your "primary key". It's how everyone, the government, banks, employers, credit bureaus, etc keep track of you and your information.

      From a statistical point of view, it's who you are.

      Given a SSN, the name to which it belongs, and the most recently known address, anyone can now pretend to be you. Billy Bad Guy can now get a loan in your name. Billy can purchase a car. You are the one that is billed, not Billy.

      With 145k identities (yeah.... right... only 145k out of 220 million) Billy is an instant Billionaire. All he has do to is get to a country with no extradition to the US, and begin living the life of luxury on your (or the Banks) dime.

      The laws are getting better about protecting individuals once they have proven they are a victim. The trick is proving it wasn't you that bought that Lear jet on a janitors salary.

      Want a link to the details? Here ya go:
      What Are Identity Theft And Identity Fraud?

      Whaddya mean your question was rhetorical?

      --
      <Insert Funny Sig Here>
      mm

  10. Eat Your Own Dog Food by PatientZero · · Score: 2, Insightful
    We developers are fond of saying that we eat our own dog food, meaning that we use the tools be build. So does ChoicePoint use their own service, implying their service is suboptimal, or do they simply feel that our data security isn't worth it?

    Either way, how many more times do things like this need to occur before people will become widely convinced that companies such as these need to be more thoroughly scrutinized?

    --
    Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
    I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    1. Re:Eat Your Own Dog Food by PornMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, the other question is whether or not the data that they do have on me is accurate. If they don't verify data about their customers, how sure can we be that they're verifying data about me or you?

      Of course, they'll claim that they don't have to verify it, under whatever laws currently exist. I think that privacy laws like apply under HIPAA for medical records should be required for any business system which includes social security numbers.

    2. Re:Eat Your Own Dog Food by mboverload · · Score: 1
      The standard consumer is getting stupider and stupider. Never in history have people been so crappy at their own finances. Look at the amount of debt in this country. Sure, I would literaly kill someone to get a new 60' Sony HDTV. However, I am not going to ruin my future and retirment because of my tech lust.

      Debt Debt Debt. This apathy has carried into our government with a NEW RECORD BREAKING DEBT AMOUNT!

    3. Re:Eat Your Own Dog Food by creysoft · · Score: 1

      ... but you would whack someone, and spend the rest of your life in federal pound-you-in-the-ass prison over tech lust? Ah, Slashdot priorities. ;)

      /All in good fun

      --
      Formerly GNU/Anonymous Coward. This message has been determined to cause cancer in laboratory animals.
    4. Re:Eat Your Own Dog Food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...how many more times do things like this need to occur...

      Infinity? Infinite? An infinite number of times? Seriously, I would say it will take about anywhere between 20,000 and 100,000 years.

    5. Re:Eat Your Own Dog Food by PatientZero · · Score: 1

      The key, of course, to avoid debt is to save up for what you want and pay for it in full. Credit is okay as long as you can manage it. Unfortunately, we graduate kids from high school without requiring them to understand how basic personal finances work like checking accounts and credit cards.

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  11. What you get by mboverload · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is what you get when consumer information is obtained and stored behind a cloak of secrecy. This is what you get when privacy laws are not enforced or valued. This is what you get when the standard consumer is ignorant and apathetic to the importance of person information.

    1. Re:What you get by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      This is what you get when consumer information is obtained and stored behind a cloak of secrecy. This is what you get when privacy laws are not enforced or valued. This is what you get when the standard consumer is ignorant and apathetic to the importance of person information.

      This is what you get when consumer information is ALLOWED to the collected and stored by private agencies, without their knowledge. At least with the government there's the Freedom of Information Act. Who is to tell you how many companies are compiling personal info on YOU? We try to get laws passed, requiring them to gain your permission when gathering or exchanging, but oddly someone pops up and fights it. Probably people like ChoicePoint's lobbyists.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:What you get by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Er, actually, the very same Freedom of Information Act that grants you the right to look at the records that the government keeps about YOU also grants ChoicePoint the right to obtain those self same records. See here.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    3. Re:What you get by multimed · · Score: 1

      Which is fine so long as we can turn it back around again so that I can see the information ChoicePoint (and others) have on me. It's the old "Who's watching the watchers?" I can accept the whole database nation as long as individuals can see what data companies have on them and can force inaccurate data to be corrected. Somehow, legislation passed allowing/requiring free credit reports annually from the big three agencies. I see no reason this couldn't be expanded to all companies who hold personal information in a database--it should just be a cost of their doing that line of business.

      --
      Vote Quimby.
  12. In case of slash-and-run by OccidentalSlashy · · Score: 0

    NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - ChoicePoint Inc., a national provider of identification and credential verification services, says it will send an additional 110,000 statements to people informing them of possible identity theft after a group of well-organized criminals was able to obtain personal information on almost 140,000 consumers through the company. According to a statement on the ChoicePoint (Research) Web site, the incident was not the result of its systems being hacked but rather caused by criminals posing as legitimate businesses seeking to gain access to personal information. ChoicePoint said the criminals may have gained access to people's names, addresses, Social Security numbers and credit reports. [ads for competing services skipped] The company said Tuesday it sent warning letters to 30,000 to 35,000 consumers in California, the only state that requires companies to disclose security breaches. Although the company knew about the fraud last fall, it said it did not reveal the information until now at the request of authorities, who said it would jeopardize the investigation. ChoicePoint said 35,000 California residents have already been notified and another 110,000 people outside of California will receive notice soon. Alpharetta, Ga.-based ChoicePoint maintains personal profiles of nearly every U.S. consumer, which it sells to employers, landlords, marketing companies and about 35 U.S. government agencies. ChoicePoint's databases contain 19 billion public records, including driving records, sex-offender lists and FBI lists of wanted criminals and suspected terrorists. The company says its records enable law enforcers to track down serial killers and have helped find 822 missing children. Privacy concerns ChoicePoint has drawn criticism from privacy activists who say it should face greater limits on how it handles the detailed profiles it has amassed on nearly every U.S. citizen. Chris Hoofnagle, associate director with the Electronic Privacy Information Center, noted another consumer-data company, Acxiom suffered a security breach as well. That occurred in 2003. "This calls into question whether these data products actually make us more secure," he said. "This is a prime example of how they don't and why ChoicePoint should be subject to federal privacy regulations," he said. In several recent filings with the Federal Trade Commission, Hoofnagle has argued ChoicePoint should be subject to a law that allows consumers to view their credit reports and see who else is accessing them. People can lose their jobs because of erroneous ChoicePoint records, he said, while predators can too easily tap the database to track down victims. ChoicePoint said in a December response it complied with existing laws and gave consumers more access to their own files than required. "The topic of the responsible use of information is a vital one to our society ... we support a national debate on this very topic," ChoicePoint President Doug Curling said.

    --
    vicious, untreated political sewage...niche entertainment for the spiritually unattractive...worshipless pap
  13. denied? by fireduck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The company initially denied that the break-in compromised consumers outside of California"

    Did they actually deny that no one outside of California was compromised, or was it just that they weren't legally obligated to inform anyone outside of the state? From Monday's story, I got the distinct impression that it was the latter (i.e., no legal obligation), rather than outright deception. Regardless, it's still a really crappy thing to have happened.

    (on a personal note, given that the break-in happened months ago, and i just got my yearly free credit reports from the 3 agencies and didn't see anything suspicious, I guess I'm a lucky SoCalifornian...)

  14. The Monster Treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Damn, I wish I had a pitchfork. Or a torch.

    I'm serious. Somebody ought to pay for this kind of crap.

    This is a clearly a case for a very severe slap on the wrist. No need for an Arthur Anderson here, just don't do it again. If the current administration has taught us anything it's that accountability means feeling sorry about it, but in a way in which you claim no real responsibility for what has happened and keep on doing whatever you've been doing.

    "I offer to resign in disgrace."
    "Oh, there's no need for that, I still need you as a public whipping boy, take the rest of the afternoon off and play some golf."

  15. ChoicePoint's canned customer service response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I emailed Choicepoint demanding an explanation. here is the response:

    From: CorpMktg.Communications@choicepoint.com

    ChoicePoint was recently a victim of organized fraud, and we understand
    this news may be cause for concern.

    A very small number of criminals posed as legitimate companies in order to
    gain access to personal information about consumers. When the fraud was
    discovered, access to information was immediately discontinued and the
    authorities were notified.

    ChoicePoint has acted quickly to address the circumstances that led to the
    unauthorized access, and we are committed to our core principles of working
    to create a safer, more secure society through the responsible use of
    information while ensuring the protection of personal privacy.

    We are sending letters to affected consumers whose information may have
    been accessed. If you do not receive a letter from us, you have not been
    affected.

    If you have not received a letter but are still concerned, here are some
    actions you can take to help protect yourself from misuse of information.

    If you think you have been the victim of identity theft, you should place a
    fraud alert on your credit report by contacting any one of the three credit
    bureaus listed below. As soon as one credit bureau confirms your fraud
    alert, the other two bureaus will automatically be notified to place fraud
    alerts on your credit report, and all three reports will be sent to you
    free of charge.

    Equifax
    800-525-6285
    P.O. Box 740241
    Atlanta, GA 30374-0241
    www.equifax.com

    Experian
    888-397-3742
    P.O. Box 9532
    Allen, TX 75013
    www.experian.com

    TransUnion - Fraud Victim Assistance Division
    800-680-7289
    P.O. Box 6790
    Fullerton, CA 92864-6790
    www.transunion.com

    When you receive your credit reports, review them carefully. Look for
    inquiries you did not initiate, accounts you did not open, and unexplained
    debts on the accounts you did open. If there are accounts or charges you
    did not authorize, immediately notify the credit bureau by telephone and in
    writing.

    You should also confirm that information such as your Social Security
    number, address(es), first and last names, middle initial and employers are
    correct. Errors in this information are often the warning signs of identity
    theft, although some inaccuracies may be due to simple mistakes. If you
    discover inaccuracies in your report, you should also notify the credit
    bureau as soon as possible so the information can be investigated.

    You should continue to check your credit reports frequently for the next
    year to make sure no new fraudulent activity has occurred.

    Finally, if you have discovered errors or suspicious activity on your
    credit report, you should consider immediately contacting any credit card
    companies with whom you have an account and inform them about the activity.
    You should make sure they have your correct information on file and that
    any changes to the account were made by you.

    If you would like to learn more about your consumer information, you may
    visit our consumer site at www.choicetrust.com.

    Thank you,
    ChoicePoint Corporate Marketing

    1. Re:ChoicePoint's canned customer service response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Place a fraud alert and get a free credit report from all three credit bureaus... hmm.. sounds like a pretty good deal.. are there any drawbacks??

    2. Re:ChoicePoint's canned customer service response by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      So, they were a victim of fraud, and I have to do all the rigamarole of ringing credit agencies, checking my credit records and generally having to keep tabs of any suspicious activity for years to come.

      Well, as long as I can bill them for my time for all of that, that's fine. I mean hell, if they weren't so busy whoring all my personal details out to anyone who asked nicely, well, we wouldn't be in this pickle now, would we?

      $75 bucks an hour sound okay to everyone here?

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  16. Importance by mboverload · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tell me one person who would be against putting these executives in JAIL. They were entrusted with data on almost every human being in the United States and they FAILED US. Get the stake, timbers, gasoline, and matches. Heaven knows I am ready for blood.

    1. Re:Importance by woverly · · Score: 1

      Most of the Congress, the President and the Justice Department. The Fair Credit Reporting Act more or less makes them immune to any consequences.

      --
      Woverly Harris Gooch, IV CTO American Fire and Bomb, LLC
    2. Re:Importance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They weren't entrusted with anything. They chose to do it. Just like someone looking up the CEO, COO, Boardmembers, and whatever other executive officers you like and hitting them with an egg, wouldn't have been entrusted to carry out a little public vengence.

    3. Re:Importance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me one person who would be against putting these executives in JAIL.

      George Bush, since all his new security agencies are buying data from this company, run by a former coke smuggler, CIA operative, and convicted felon. It is just a quick way to avoid those laws about citizens' rights and share data with all the corporate patron's propping up his money grab.

    4. Re:Importance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enron's and Worldcom's executives are not in jail either.

    5. Re:Importance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where have you been for the past 5 years? Higher ups are not accountable anymore, hell you probably commited terrorism for having your personal data stolen.

    6. Re:Importance by micron · · Score: 1

      I am all for putting the people responsible for thsi action in jail, however, I NEVER ENTRUSTED THEM WITH MY DATA!

      I never authorized them to keep it in the first place.

      I realize that they are a storing house for "public" information that comprises "private" transactions between myself and various entities that I do business with.

      This is messed up, I am contacting my elected officials and asking them what they are doing to protect me from this.

    7. Re:Importance by jd_esguerra · · Score: 1
      Tell me one person who would be against putting these executives in JAIL. They were entrusted with data on almost every human being in the United States and they FAILED US. Get the stake, timbers, gasoline, and matches. Heaven knows I am ready for blood.

      Depends. Charge them with a crime, try them, and convict them. Then I'm all for jail. If I whipped out the pitchfork and torches every time I thought someone "failed me" I wouldn't have enough time to read Slashdot. (Not that I actually read the articles....)


      Check to make sure your information is intact/secure, and move on. Don't be consumed by your "outrage."



  17. Manifest Destiny by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These kinds of California "sunshine" laws are also the only reason we found out about Enron before it took the whole US economy, not just Houston, down with it. Enron was required by California law, under their misnamed "deregulation" system, to open its books, because it was supplying a lot of energy to Californians. Enron refused, claiming that, as a Texas company, it was not under California jurisdiction. That was when Governor Davis famously asked the Federal Department of Energy to step in, to resolve this interstate conflict. The DOE refused to referee, and Davis eventually found other means to force open Enron's books. When they were reviewed, not only was $8B in California overcharges revealed, but the entire network of Enron debt-laundering was exposed. As well as the rest of their system-gaming that took them out.

    California is far from perfect. But their 35M consumers are unusually well protected by laws in the public interest. The economy of California scale forces car makers around the country, and around the world, to comply with their higher standards. Perhaps we will see California's own self interest protect us from other scams like these, as we all get closer to the Golden State.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Manifest Destiny by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      And california is a blue state hmmm....

      Democrats are just plain *old* evil (influence peddling), whereas Republicans are the cartoonish super-villiany evil where it doesn't even make sense to be that evil (basically: any business that makes money is good, no matter how much damage they do)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:Manifest Destiny by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      What is evil influence peddling about California's consumer protection and sunshine laws?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Manifest Destiny by jafac · · Score: 1

      What is evil influence peddling about California's consumer protection and sunshine laws?

      The loopholes and exceptions, traded political influence for campaign donations, etc. Often, such loopholes end up constraining all but a favored few, in the end, having the effect of concentrating power, and encouraging the behavior that the original law was intended to discourage. (ie. CAN SPAM act, etc.)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:Manifest Destiny by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You're talking about the campaign and lobbying sytem generally. Again, what is evil influence peddling about California's consumer protection and sunshine laws , the topic we're discussing? And how is that "Democrat", when Republicans are at least as guilty?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Manifest Destiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California is also the reason we can see our credit scores at all. Prior to their 2001 law which mandated that California citizens could obtain their credit scores from Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and the big credit bureaus, nobody in the country could view their own scores, strange as that sounds. FICO reluctantly complied, but now they're thrilled with the outcome as [perhaps] their major profit-bearing business is selling the scores to consumers. (Source: Dr. Randy Padawer ["PsychDoc"])

  18. Easy. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    Be born in the USA and have done one or more of the folling things.

    Have a Bank Account.
    Have a Credit Card.
    Have Medical Insurance.
    Have Medical Bills.
    Purchase service from an Utility Company.

    If you answer yes to one or more of the above there is a 99+% chance they have records on you.

    1. Re:Easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what if you're just visiting but have 4 out of 5 of the above?
      I assume you're just as screwed as a citizen...

    2. Re:Easy. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      That I do not know.

    3. Re:Easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually it goes alot further than that... including:

      • Have a vehicle titled and/or registered
      • Have a driver's license record or any other
      • type of state (or probably federal) identification
      • Are a licensed professional.
      • Have taken out a bank loan

      ChoicePoint buys up state (and probably federal) government records like nobody's business. Most States sell all these records directly or indirectly to ChoicePoint.

      Having said that, most States also have (or I would assume they have, I know mine does) privacy statutes which restrict how this information can be used.n (e.g. no purchase by or reselling to telemarketers!)

    4. Re:Easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In New Zealand it's 100%.

  19. Choice quotes... by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ChoicePoint maintains personal profiles of nearly every U.S. consumer, which it sells to employers, landlords, marketing companies and about 35 U.S. government agencies.

    I love the way marketing companies have more access to my personal information than I do. Moreover, they're among the "legitimate" businesses who the company claims it sells information to -- any dick and harry spammer joint can be called a "marketing company". In other words, if you have enough money to pour down their gullet, you have the information.

    The company says its records enable law enforcers to track down serial killers and have helped find 822 missing children.

    Yeah, since they help children, they cannot be an irresponsible company.

    "The topic of the responsible use of information is a vital one to our society ... we support a national debate on this very topic," ChoicePoint President Doug Curling said.

    Classic tangential marketspeak response from the president.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Choice quotes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [i]The company says its records enable law enforcers to track down serial killers and have helped find 822 missing children.[/i]

      And helped thousands of abusive husbands to stalk their ex-wives...

  20. Simple! by serutan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just wait for a letter from a law firm informing you that you are a member of the class action suit against ChoicePoint.

    optional additional steps:
    2. Do nothing.
    3. Profit!!!

    1. Re:Simple! by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 3, Funny

      ust wait for a letter from a law firm informing you that you are a member of the class action suit against ChoicePoint.

      optional additional steps:
      2. Do nothing.
      3. Profit!!!


      Profit??? You'd get a coupon for 20% off your next Choicepoint break-in!

    2. Re:Simple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4. Set the place on fire.

    3. Re:Simple! by demachina · · Score: 1

      Excepting the lawyers are the only ones who usually profit in most class action suits so it should read:

      3. Lawyers Profit!!

      George W. did just sign some kind of class action lawsuit "reform" bill. Not clear to me if it makes things better or worse, though it probably depends on who you are. The Republican's do hate lawyers since they overwhelmingly vote for and contribute to the Democrats, so I think they did cap the extent to which the lawyers can plunder the settlement and send checks for 38 cents to all the people in the class.

      At the sime time I think they made it much more difficult to file class action suits, because the Republicans also hate people who sue America's fine corporations, even when they are guilty of criminal negligence or fraud.

      --
      @de_machina
    4. Re:Simple! by cgleba · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't worry. . .there is new legislation on the president's desk right now that will make it "virtually impossible now to get a nationwide class-action suit off the ground." -- The Economist

    5. Re:Simple! by Loonacy · · Score: 1

      It's already here.

  21. Lucky? by PornMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, I just got your credit report from the 3 agencies, and I feel obliged to tell you that with an average FICO score of 559, you probably shouldn't be calling yourself lucky.

  22. Stock doing ok? by D3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks like their stock is still doing ok. Although that could change come Monday. Graph

    --
    Do really dense people warp space more than others?
    1. Re:Stock doing ok? by gnuman99 · · Score: 1
      This is a better chart: http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/q?s=CPS&d=c&k=c1&a=v&p =s&t=3m&l=on&z=m&q=l

      The stock is not great. The volume is going up while stock is going down. People are starting to bail on this stock, but not on mass, yes.

      When we start seeing lawsuits and criminal investigations into CPS, then the stock could nosedive.

    2. Re:Stock doing ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO -- since only CPS knows whose histories were accessed and/or compromised, by their mistake or brilliance, only they have the most up to date data; therefore stock should rise sans news re: penalties/litigation/more news.

  23. Checkpoint Client Verification by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Funny

    Checkpoint Client Verification = Did the check clear? Is yes then WELCOME ABOARD!

  24. Cruel Twist of Irony? by SwansonMarpalum · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the choicepoint execs are included in information you purchase from choicepoint?

    --
    "Give away the stone, let the oceans take and transmutate this cold and faded anchor." - Maynard James Keenan
  25. How to find out what they know about you by doublem · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, you can receive a copy of your profile.

    This page on the ChoicePoint web site points to Choicetrust. (Insert joke about the mane choice here)

    From the Choicepoint web site:

    FACT Act Compliance

    The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACT Act) was enacted in 2003 and amends the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), a federal law that regulates, in part, who is permitted to access your consumer report information and how it can be used. The FACT Act entitles consumers to obtain one free copy of his/her consumer file from certain consumer reporting agencies during each 12-month period.

    ChoicePoint has three separate companies that maintain consumer files that are subject to the free disclosure requirement: C.L.U.E. Inc. maintains information on insurance claims histories, ChoicePoint WorkPlace Solutions Inc. maintains employment history information, and Resident Data Inc. maintains tenant history information. Each of these companies designed an easy process for consumers to request their free file disclosure.

    Please note that a consumer file does not necessarily exist for you with any one of the three companies. For example, if you have not filed a claim with your auto or home insurance company during the last five years, we will not have a report on you. If you have not applied for employment with a customer that we serve, we likely will not have an employment history report on you. If you have not submitted a residential lease application with a customer that we serve, we will likely not have a tenant history report on you.
    To request copies of your claims history report, visit www.ChoiceTrust.com or call 1-866-312-8076.

    To request a copy of your employment history report, call 1-866-312-8075.

    To request a copy of your tenant history report, call 1-877-448-5732.

    If you would prefer to send your request by mail, please send your name and address to the appropriate address below. A report request form will be sent to you to complete and return.

    For claims history reports:

    ChoicePoint Consumer Disclosure Center
    P.O. Box 105295
    Atlanta, GA 30348

    For employment history reports:

    ChoicePoint WorkPlace Solutions Consumer Disclosure Center
    P.O. Box 105292
    Atlanta, GA 30348

    For tenant history reports:

    Resident Data Consumer Disclosure Center
    P.O. Box 850126
    Richardson, TX 75085-0126

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:How to find out what they know about you by cyberkahn · · Score: 1

      Funny, how I have to pay to see information about me, gathered without my approval.

    2. Re:How to find out what they know about you by shanen · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well, I tried to go through the process for the free report, but they refused to provide anything. It actually felt more like I was participating in a phishing scam with an especially impressive click-through-and-we-own-your-firstborn-child legal agreement.

      Actually, I think the real explanation is that they have a bunch of lawyers on their side, and they are looking very carefully at every loophole and possible reason to avoid telling you anything. Sure, legally speaking, they have to provide the information, but they don't have to make it easy. How many people are going to keep jumping through the hurdles?

      Too many? No problem! Just add a few more hurdles.

      I may try again later, but I think the situation is that I have used two of my attempts, and if I fail the third time, then I have to wait three days before trying again.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    3. Re:How to find out what they know about you by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 3, Insightful


      > Please note that a consumer file does not necessarily exist for you with any one of the three companies.

      But it certainly will AFTER you have made a request to see their records, if any, on you.

      There is something inherently broken about having to give up your personal information to the very companies who abuse it in order to find out if they are abusing it.

      As a minimum, I think the FACT Act should be modified to prevent the companies from recording or otherwise using any of the information you provide when requesting your own records. As a better solution, I think there needs to be an independent third party whose sole purpose is to give consumers their own files from all the tracking agencies and which has very strongly enforced data-privacy policies.

    4. Re:How to find out what they know about you by enigmatichmachine · · Score: 1

      /rant

      ALL credit reporting companies are like that, i tried to contact chexsystems once about a bounced check( i was out of the country at the time, didn't get the notice that my account was overdrawn) so, chexsystems decides i'm a theat to banks for bouncing a 20$ check 2 years ago, blacklists me from banks, i pay the bill, and the bank claims they will notify chexsystems that its paid. 3 years later, i've written, emailed, gone through their web system, called them (good luck!) asking A) for my data, and B) has it been noted as PAID. websites broken, and no response from mail of any form. but one phone call from a bank and BAM, "i'm sorry but your in chexsystems, goodbye"

      p.s. on the bright side, i'm good friends with the check cashing guys at my local mexican grocery, and its actually WAAAAAY cheaper to just get everything cashed there than it would be to deal with fee's from a bank.

      --
      -and occasionaly a giant moose.
    5. Re:How to find out what they know about you by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      There should be a federally mandated procedure for correcting bogus information in these credit agencies. It should be rigorous, but the burden of proof should be on the credit agencies to prove that the data is correct and current.

      There should also be a mandatory sunset on all data collected so that crap data can't hang around forever. There's no reason for these credit bureaus to still have my mailing address from six years ago. My car insurance company isn't allowed to keep data that far back. Why should anyone else?

      That said, as long as we're living under King Geoge II, I don't think there's a snowball's chance in you-know-where that we'll see any real reform in favor of citizens' rights.... But I digress.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:How to find out what they know about you by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      There's no reason for these credit bureaus to still have my mailing address from six years ago. My car insurance company isn't allowed to keep data that far back ...

      I'm not a fan of credit agency business practices either, but I'm curious about this comment. Once a person (or company) (legally) acquires any given piece of information, I think they're allowed to keep it for as long as it's practical for them to do so. Credit agencies may only *score or report* on 7 years prior data, and insurance companies only act on 3 to 5 years prior data. I'm not aware of any requirements for either type of company to purge data older than their action windows. But I'm very open to correction...

    7. Re:How to find out what they know about you by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      At least for car insurance, I got the impression from talking to agents that there were limits to how far back they could actually act on the data, but I could be wrong. Of course, you're right that there probably isn't anything that says they have to dispose of the data after that, but there should be.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    8. Re:How to find out what they know about you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT DOWN!! -100 Karma Whore

      and your mom is a whore too

    9. Re:How to find out what they know about you by doublem · · Score: 1

      Please note:

      1. Posting relevant information is NOT Karma Whoring

      2. Karma whoring would require me to give a damn about slashdot Karma.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  26. Mod paerent down, CNN can handle /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN can handle the /. Nice trolling for karma.

  27. Thanks to California by SilentJ_PDX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm an Oregonian... so you know it takes a lot for me to say anything nice about California but...

    I just want to thank California for their identity fraud laws that force businesses to disclose when an unauthorized person has accessed records illegally. If it weren't for that, we probably wouldn't know anything about this.

    1. Re:Thanks to California by L1nux_L0ser83 · · Score: 1

      i didnt know that there was a oregon / california feud! wow... north vs. south then it was the gangster wars, east vs west.. now its oregon vs. california.

      --
      Good Karma, Bad Karma, doesnt matter to me... I'm still going to say whats on my mind!
    2. Re:Thanks to California by filtur · · Score: 1
      I'm an Oregonian... so you know it takes a lot for me to say anything nice about California but...

      For Shame! Kick him out! :)

    3. Re:Thanks to California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were an Oregonian, I'd be jealous of California, too. When driving from SF to Seattle, you can tell that whoever created the borders for CA was smart. As soon as the terrain gets ugly in the northern most part of CA, it turns into Oregon. So you know they said, "Okay, we got all the best land, you guys can do whatever you want with the rest!"

      And what's with those lame laws saying you can't pump your own gas? No wonder Oregon has one of the poorest states in the Union... they waste their time being envious of other states, and make up stupid laws to artificially create jobs instead of trying to create real wealth and industry there.

    4. Re:Thanks to California by rsborg · · Score: 1
      i didnt know that there was a oregon / california feud! wow

      It's probably because rich Californians go north to buy nice vacation real-estate in Oregon for (no pun intended) dirt cheap. The similar effect happens on a smaller scale with SF bay area residents moving out of the valley and tele/commuting into the valley... House prices skyrocket, and people who could afford to live there find it harder, and curse the rich bay area/californians.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    5. Re:Thanks to California by alanlewis0 · · Score: 1

      I'll speak on behalf of every other Californian. You're welcome.

    6. Re:Thanks to California by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Stupid free markets.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Thanks to California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I lived in Oregon, the unofficial state motto was: 'Don't Californicate Oregon.' Of course, now I live in California, so I don't give a shit what Oregon thinks.

    8. Re:Thanks to California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah well, ring us back when it happens to your area, and you find you can't afford to sell & buy a house in town anymore.

    9. Re:Thanks to California by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I live in Portland. Houses are expensive. If I decide I don't like it, I'll move.

      You don't have the Right to cheap housing.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  28. 35M consumers by serutan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe this is nitpicking, but could we please go back to saying "citizens" instead of "consumers?" Because consumers take whatever crap you give them. Citizens don't.

    1. Re:35M consumers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish we were all crap-rejecting citizens. But the fact is that these laws protect consumers, who corporations prize, not simply citizens, who corporations ignore. They're "consumer protection laws". The corporate execs like Ken Lay and his California office minions aren't as well protected by these laws, because they're citizens, not consumers. That's how we've got a fighting chance.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:35M consumers by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I've seen a sig that reads:

      "I am not merely a consumer or a taxpayer. I am a citizen of the United States."

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:35M consumers by rgmoore · · Score: 1
      Maybe this is nitpicking, but could we please go back to saying "citizens" instead of "consumers?"

      Actually, "residents" would probably be more accurate in this case than "citizens", because the laws apply to everyone who lives in California. Noncitizens (including illegal aliens, IIRC) get the same protections as citizens. Given California's large immigrant population that's a not-so-minor point.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

  29. its a sad day in america... by L1nux_L0ser83 · · Score: 1

    when you have to have the court tell a company to admit that it was broken into and the 750+ peoples identitys were stolen because of it. its like a kid on the playground, one kid drop kicks another kid of the monkey bars, and when the teacher saw it and asks him what happens the kid replys " i dunno. he fell"... to quote my favorite itallian mobster, tommy vercetti "dicks, their all dicks!"

    --
    Good Karma, Bad Karma, doesnt matter to me... I'm still going to say whats on my mind!
  30. Who the bloody hell is ChoicePoint? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2
    I've never heard of them before this story broke, I don't know anyone who's heard of them, so how did they end up with my credit card# and SS# which is now compromised?

    And yes, I live in California and yes I've RTFA, this is just an angry response not a true question.

    1. Re:Who the bloody hell is ChoicePoint? by bot · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry that it happened to you- I haven't got a letter from them, so I am hoping it hasn't happened to me..

      I am mad about it too, and feel we should have a law that limits who gets to store *our* data, and who gets to request it. We need an initiative to enfore these, at least in California, and hopefully the nation will follow suit. Do you have any idea how the intiative thing works?

    2. Re:Who the bloody hell is ChoicePoint? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Please google choicepoint florida election 2000 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=choicepoint+f lorida+election+2000/. That should reassure you that they have your best interest at heart

    3. Re:Who the bloody hell is ChoicePoint? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ChoicePoint used to be part of Equifax. It's based in Atlanta. They seperated from Equifax 7-8 years ago into their own company. Like the Credit Reporting Agencies it makes money from sellin gyour personal information.

      I used to work for Trans Union's version of the company that was name TU-Dateq. We specialized in the Insurance industry, very similiar to their CLUE database.

      Depending on what kind of access they gave these clients, they could have even gotten your credit reports.

      Even 8-9 years ago when I worked in this industry there was software for insurance providers that would pull your credit report, accident information, as well as your motor vehicle report. And put this all into one little form.

      I haven't followed the industry in a while, but I believe Dateq got swallowed up by ChoicePoint. But there are many other companies just like this with huge databases on your personal information, and these companies link them all together.

      Where does this information come from, your insurance companies all send in the information. That's part of the agreement for them to be able to research you, is that they have to participate.

      It's all pretty slimy.

      Anonymous Coward

    4. Re:Who the bloody hell is ChoicePoint? by tuxette · · Score: 2, Informative
      I am mad about it too, and feel we should have a law that limits who gets to store *our* data, and who gets to request it.

      Unfortunately, this is very unlikely to happen in the United States.

      While doing research for my graduate thesis on, among other things, privacy law, I found several quotes from high-ranking US politicians where they explicitly stated that they believed that US citizens did not have the right to ownership of their own personal data. Quite a bad stat if Americans wish to have personal data protection laws similar to those in Europe.

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  31. Striving morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Choicepoint's stated vision.

    "We strive to create a safer and more secure society through the responsible use of information"

    I'll buy that for a dollar!

  32. Re:Ouch by zedzedalpha5 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Strike 3 I guess for them. They got into a boatload o' trouble in 03' for "acquiring" :) 250M records from various Latin American countries without their knowledge. Never hit the media widespread though. It's a shame too. It took five of us to develop atxi.com, and they raked in a ton' o' cash from the gvt. This news won't hurt them all too much.

  33. Corporations are so much better than government by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    Gee, aren't corporations are the "free market" so much better and more efficient that the government?!

    I guess that is why the personal data from the government databases are getting hacked and stolen, but it never happens to databases controlled by corporations....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:Corporations are so much better than government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Databases controlled by governments are not of the same kind controlled by corporations. A government database of who is licensed to sell liqour or of business permits is not the same as a database full of credit card numbers, spending habits, and financial information. A crook would be more interested in ChoicePoint's database than most of what the government has.

      It might also be good for you to note that U.S. Agencies Earn D+ on Computer Security. So much for your government is better argument.

  34. Needs a change of laws by bot · · Score: 2, Informative

    We need to have laws that changed that prevent private companies from collecting data, or requesting data on citizens unless the person concerned permits it. I know the credit scores are important yada, yada, but its our data, and we should own it. Companies that profit from our data should be required to take our permission to collect and distribute it.

    Any fellow californians interested in starting a initiative for this? Especially those who know how to go about it- I don't!

    1. Re:Needs a change of laws by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      My suggestion to curb corporate malfeasance would be for the victims to be awarded the corporate assets.

      Then the stockholders MIGHT be more inclined to watch more carefully what they put their money into!

      Here's to investor responsibility - eventually responsibility has to land somewhere... the system as it stands is broken - so let's harness the marketplace to fix it.

    2. Re:Needs a change of laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Just require the CEOs, Boardmembers and any stock holder that owns a more than 2% interest in the company to personally go to the home of each individual and explain what they did wrong and then apologize. During this period they must spend 40 hours a week (8 hours, Monday - Friday) doing this and nothing else whatsoever. No vacations, no breaks, no management activities, no money management, etc. Just walking up to people's homes and saying "Hi, I'm a complete dick. I fucked over your life so I could live in a $3 million dollar home and drive a Rolls Royce. I'm very sorry and I promise to be more responsible in the future." And part of the requirement is that they address each person by name and pronounce it correctly. A failure to do a correct pronunciation requires that that visit doesn't count and that they can't return for one week. But they must return and give the apology. And no walking around as a group saying "We're sorry." Each individual must approach each victim alone and apologize.

      And if it turns out that they aren't more responsible then maximum security prison for the rest of their life. No parole, no contact visits. All assets seized and sold to pay back their fuck ups.

    3. Re:Needs a change of laws by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      I think they'd hate my solution more... as it would hand their frickin' money machine over to the people it ground up to generate cash.

      If they screwed up once or twice more, they would be greeters at Wal-Mart.

      Not to mention the surge the economy would experience if corporate assets were handed down to the middle class, who actually contribute to the economy.

  35. legal recourse by Biff+Stu · · Score: 1

    Well, there's always the possibility for a class action lawsuit that would really make them feel some pain...

    Oh, what's that? Not anymore? I guess everyone in their database is just screwed.

    God Bless America!

  36. Exactly by sterno · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They were reporting California because they had absolutely no choice in the matter because of legal requirements in California. It's a very good thing for all people who have information at Choicepoint that California has that law. Otherwise I have little doubt any of us would know about it.

    I do wonder if it would be beneficial to indentity thieves to expressly avoid stealing information about California residents to limit knowledge of their efforts. If those 100K people weren't notified by Choicepoint, it'd give them a lot more freedom to exploit that pile of information.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  37. Where is the "California-bashing" now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    All of you conservatives who get worked up over California's "unfriendly to business" laws and regulations, are now welcome to pucker up and kiss my ass.

  38. nigerian scams? by elhoratioco · · Score: 1
    The fbi arrested a Nigerian guy yesterday in California, in association with the Choice Point data theft.
    I was thinking it would be funny if Choice Point was scammed with one of those 419 emails:
    DEAR CHOICE POINT,

    i am mariam abacha, widow of the late nigerian head of state, gen. sani abacha. after he death of my husband who died mysteriously as a result of cardiac arrest, i was informed by our lawyer,
    that choice point would provide all data in exchange for 120,000,000.00 dutch mark.

    thanks and best regard
    mrs. mariam abacha
  39. wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They probably are doing it, but their quarterly statements and the need to pander to stockholders means that they have to deny as much as they can get away with denying.

  40. Read Between the Lines People! by darkonc · · Score: 5, Informative
    Nope. They never denied that there were non-Californians affected. All that they confirmed is that California law required them to inform the 35,000 affected CA residents. Given that CA represents about 10% of the US population, I took that to mean that there were about 300,000 affected US residnts.

    That they're announcing that they're 'only' informing 100,000 other US residents can be explained in any of the following ways:

    • The attacks were focused on CA residents, for some reason.
    • They have only identified 100,000 people this week, and there's another 3 weeks of work to do.
    • They are willfully underreporting the actual numbers and hoping that nobody will do the research to prove them wrong.
    • Given that the law doesn't require them to inform everybody who got hit, they're only informing those non CA residents who got hit the worst. 2/3 of the people who would have been informed under CA law will never know...
    The most interesting information is between the lines. Learn to read there more often. ("Diplomacy is the art of telling a lion 'Nice kitty kitty' while you search for a big rock. Media relations is doing for a company what a diplomat does for a country.")
    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    1. Re:Read Between the Lines People! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice that they said "Southern California". So either the attack must have somehow targeted SoCal, or they are playing games.

      What I want to know is, how recent is their information? I just ran my free report through their DB, and they verified me by asking me questions pulled from my profile. Some of the questions referenced addresses in greater LA that I haven't lived at for 10 years.

      Was I one of the Souther California people, but since I now live in SF, I am not affected?

      FUCKERS!

    2. Re:Read Between the Lines People! by CRepetski · · Score: 1
      From the Washington Post: Company officials said they were sending out more letters to 110,000 addresses throughout the country that may be connected to the reports delivered to the fraudsters. "We have reason to believe your personal information may have been obtained by unauthorized third parties, and we deeply regret any inconvenience this event may cause you," the letters say.

      Aw, that's nice of them. They certainly do care about us and the "inconvenience" of being fired and losing all credit.

      Authorities said the number of records involved may go higher as the investigation continues. "This is way far more reaching," said Los Angeles Sheriff's Department Lt. Robert Costa, commander of an identity theft unit. "I believe that when we're done it will be more than a half million nationally. It's huge."

      Looks like someone agrees with your 300k+ theory. Glad to hear someone's still trying to figure out how deep this rabbit hole goes ...

    3. Re:Read Between the Lines People! by jobfreein123 · · Score: 1

      They may never tell u if u were affected I sugest everyone get some sort of Identity theft protection. I have mine through Kroll World Wide. I have had my Identity almost stolen twise. for info email me jobfreein123@yahoo.com

  41. Class Action, Choicepoint victims? Think again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bush just signed a bill to curb class action lawsuits. link to full story below:

    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=512771

  42. Double Edged Sword by Mindmaniac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Before condemning all of ChoicePoint look at all of the good things they have done like solving hundreds of rape cases, finding missing children, and doing the DNA tests of thousands of crimes. This incident is the result of one offices mistakes and I don't think it is representative of who they are as a whole. If someone wants information bad enough the'll get it. Look at how many times the CIA's website has been hacked into.

    1. Re:Double Edged Sword by sfjoe · · Score: 1



      Are you kidding me? What sensitive information is on the CIA's website?

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    2. Re:Double Edged Sword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm creating a fake corporation right now so I can do a backgound check to see if you work for Choicepoint.

    3. Re:Double Edged Sword by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Before condemning fascism, lets look at all the good things they have done like making the trains run on time and getting rid of "undesirables" in Europe...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Double Edged Sword by sjames · · Score: 1

      If the rest of their data handling is as solid as their consumer data handling, how much reasonable doubt have they created in those cases?

      If someone wants information bad enough the'll get it. Look at how many times the CIA's website has been hacked into.

      Considering the F and D+ grades so many government agencies get for computer security, that's not necessarily saying much.

    5. Re:Double Edged Sword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funniest thing I read all day!
      Sorry man, but everyone does good things everyday... it's called being human. It's when people F**k up that we notice, especially when they have our private info.

    6. Re:Double Edged Sword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Choicepoint says they have done all these great things just like they've said, "...responsible use of information."

      Take that and the fact that they LIED and claimed that only California residents were affected and they are about as credible as the used car salesman and his 'little old lady just drove it to chucrh once a week' claim for every vehicle on the lot.

  43. They must run Windowze by smartsaga · · Score: 1

    I'm sure of it!!!

    First a nuclear power plant is compromised because soe mother F#@Tr was browing the internet. Then Microsoft comes up with things like Windows is more secure than Linux kind of crap, then Microsoft admits that Windows is not secure and that one must not plug PCs to the internet... Now this???

    I say that whoever is responsible for this didn't have his/her/their record(s) stolen - just sayin.

    I just want to see the hanging. Yes roman style with all the torture. They DO deserve it for being stupid.

    Your identity are belong to us... get it?

    Have a... well guess now nobody can have a good one now. Burn them!!!

    --
    ===== "Every head is a different world so don't invade mine you FREAK!" smartSAGA said
    1. Re:They must run Windowze by smartsaga · · Score: 1

      Forgot to say that even though they say nobody hacked them (yeah right) I am sure that is exactly what happened. They lied once... I still can't drink this water, it's as dirty as they are.

      --
      ===== "Every head is a different world so don't invade mine you FREAK!" smartSAGA said
  44. What the F? by mackman · · Score: 1

    Can somebody explain how the F these people get personal info about all these people? Is there a way to know if they have my info?

    1. Re:What the F? by Sick+Boy · · Score: 1

      This is how it works- pretty much everything about you is a matter of public record. That time you got arrested, your address and phone number, etc. ChoicePoint sits outside the courts and buys up all the data the counties are willing to sell them, and dumps that into their database.

      Then there's things that if you have a permissible purpose (as defined in the FCRA) like someone deciding on whether or not to loan you money, rent you a house or give you a job, that allows them to look at the loan you took out, any bankruptcies, etc. Should your employeer have run a background screen on you through Choicepoint, that data also goes into ChoicePoint's database for future reference and revenue (which, as I read the FCRA, is illegal, but who's going to sue them?). They give any previous data they have along with whatever new data they gather when they run additional searches on a person, so they look like they've got a lot of data. Again illegal as far as I can tell because the FCRA requires screening companies to go to the "most reliable source," which is the county courthouse and not an old, un-updated database, and many state laws have limits about how far back criminal data can be reported (the GTA you had for that joyride in your teens shouldn't be on your report when you apply for a job in your 30's). Again, that is almost never scrubbed out.

      They also apparently don't screen the people they sell data too, which is usually a violation of pretty much any data provider, especially DMVs.

      I'm of the opinion that ChoicePoint is a fine candidate for the Corporate Death Penalty, their board and executives jailed, and their database should be destroyed.

      --
      Does narcissism count as a hobby? --Shawn Latimer
    2. Re:What the F? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes there is a way to know this.

      "Yes, they have your info, at least assuming in anyway at all you are on the grid, they have your info"

      I really don't know specifically how they originally aquire it. Someone has to give it to them originally, but who?

  45. We need anti financial stalking law by RNLockwood · · Score: 2, Informative

    California, at lesat, has stalking laws that makes it a criminal offense to follow another person around etc. Now we need laws that would make it illegal for companies to stalk, archive, or release personal financial records to third parties. In particular it should be be legal for any person or corporation, such as a bank, that reports financial matters about a person to the IRS to request or store social security numbers. The rest should be subject for severe penalties. I suppose that the companies would then just move off shore, thoug.

    We in Southern Califonia were advised that we should watch our credit reports for unusual activity to detect identity theft. That activity might be a request for a credit report from Honest John's Automobile sales in Texas. You can get a free credit report once a year from each credit agency - the rest you pay for. Great.

    --
    Nate
  46. Excellent Timing. by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Apparently 110,000 people already did.

    Meanwhile, in that Bastion of Truth, Justice and the Liberty, Washington DC, George W. Bush signs The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005

    <sarcasm>at least america is safe from gay weddings</sarcasm>

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Excellent Timing. by JohnAllison · · Score: 1
      Meanwhile, in that Bastion of Truth, Justice and the Liberty, Washington DC, George W. Bush signs The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005

      Fine, then file individually. The distributed attack on the company would bring it to its knees. That is the ultimate Slashdot Effect.

    2. Re:Excellent Timing. by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      Interessting concept. I wish I knew how this could be done, or automated...

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    3. Re:Excellent Timing. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I just read a news article about that act. What's wrong with it, apart from the fact that Bush signed it? It seemed pretty sensible in the description I read...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Excellent Timing. by millennial · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, most larger companies have insurance that covers most, if not all, of the cost of the settlements from class-action suits. The companies who were big enough to afford this didn't suffer.

      By the way, what the hell was Bush thinking, restricting medical malpractice suits? When hundreds (if not thousands) of people die from medical goofs (surgical error, medicinal overdose/allergy, etc) each year, why would he possibly think it's a good thing to prevent them from suing the people who hurt them?

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
    5. Re:Excellent Timing. by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      why would he possibly think it's a good thing to prevent them from suing the people who hurt them?

      While I'm not sure I agree with this logic, is it possible that the answer to your question is simply that any treatment is better than none.

      I have read about obstreticians that refuse to practice in some locations because of the lawsuit-happy climate; what is a pregnant woman to do when she lives in one of those places?

      If the practice of medicine becomes too dangerous to doctors' financial futures, then they will leave or enter another line of work. Would you like to be the one to turn out the lights at your local hospital, perhaps the last one in your state?

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    6. Re:Excellent Timing. by millennial · · Score: 1

      You're preaching to the wrong crowd here... I'm in favor of a state-run health care system. I think that the medical community has been given too many liberties. Example: A doctor accidentally leaves a scalpel inside a patient after surgery. The patient dies. The doctor can get away with this, so long as the hospital's insurance can cover the lawsuit (assuming the family is allowed to even file one under the new regulations). This doctor can make the same mistake over and over again, until either a) the insurance company cancels coverage on the hospital, or b) the hospital replaces the doctor.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
  47. This Company is Corrupt by torrentami · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone else realize that this is the same company that essentially handed over the 2000 election to George W. Bush? They are the ones who were hired by the florida voting commission to compare the data on federal criminals in the US with those in FL so that the FL federal criminals couldn't vote. Only they botched (on purpose?) it up completely and had a 5% accuracy rate resulting in thousands of voters (mostly black) getting turned away at the polls. Coincidentally (yeah, right) they were awarded a 60 million dollar data sorting job in Iraq once the war started. Funny, if they failed so miserably in FL why would you reward them with a bid in Iraq? This company is a joke.

    1. Re:This Company is Corrupt by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else realize that this is the same company that essentially handed over the 2000 election to George W. Bush?

      I suppose you have some unbiased media reports to back this up?

    2. Re:This Company is Corrupt by Proney · · Score: 1

      For a start, from ChoicePoint's own mouth:
      DBT (now ChoicePoint) was hired to create an overly inclusive list of potential voter exceptions based on criteria established by the Secretary of State, which DBT told the state might create false positives. County election supervisors - not DBT - were solely responsible for verifying the eligibility to vote of any voter identified by DBT on the exceptions list. In particular, county election supervisors - not DBT - were solely responsible for the decision to remove any voter from the rolls.
      Source: http://www.choicepoint.com/news/2000election.html

      Now, consider all the other shennanigans in Florida, and it's not hard to imagine how "overly exclusive" the list was required to be, whether it was systematically "overly inclusive", and how concerned the county election supervisors were with identifying false positives.

      --
      require "something.clever";
    3. Re:This Company is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a matter of public record. Media doesn't have to enter into it. The election audits that were run on the 2000 Florida elections (reported in all the major, biased media on both 'sides') came up with the fact that the then-Attorney General of Florida, in the process of revising the election regulations, requested that CheckPoint provide a list of names of convicted felons. They came back with a list which was quite specific. She then asked them to broaden their search terms to include similar names, similar addresses, and names similar to aliases that the known criminals might have used. As a result over 2 million names were provided and misrepresented to the Florida legislature as 'Felons'.

      ChoicePoint was on record as opposing the search terms, because they were useless in determining actual felons.

    4. Re:This Company is Corrupt by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Except the portion you quoted actually says that ChoicePoint/DBT did not make any decisions as to whether a particular person was a felon or not. So, the statement by the parent of my earlier post - "this is the same company that essentially handed over the 2000 election to George W. Bush" - is actually refuted (at the very least, denied) by the link you provided.

    5. Re:This Company is Corrupt by torrentami · · Score: 1

      Well, I would ask first what an "unbiased" source is, since everyone has an opinion on media sources. But anyway, here's a salon.com article. http://dir.salon.com/politics/feature/2000/12/04/v oter_file/index.html granted, it was written by Greg Palast, who is a staunch anti-Bush journalist. However, facts are facts, regardless of whom they implicate. There is plenty of information out there about this subject.

    6. Re:This Company is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose you have some unbiased media reports to back this up?

      I suppose your definition of "unbiased" would not include any report that backed that up?

    7. Re:This Company is Corrupt by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here is a reference to an article on CNN about this. Also, check out the article in the St. Petersburg Times. Last, but not least, check out this article in The Guardian. My favorite quote from the last article: "The controversy [regarding the Bush DoJ paying ChoicePoint $11 million for names, addresses, occupations, DoB, passport numbers, "physical descriptions," tax records, and blood groups of Latin Americans] is not the first to engulf ChoicePoint." Nor, apparently, the last. This was written on May 5, 2003, over a year before this fiasco. How many chances should one company get before they're shut down?

      So yeah, this company scares the shit out of me, as does its parent, Equifax. Personal opinion o' me is that they all need to be immediately shut down. If you don't like YOUR personal information being given to anyone with a few bucks, PLEASE write to your government representatives and demand that something real be done NOW to protect our privacy!

      P. S. I live about 10 minutes away from Alpharetta, GA, where this company is located. I'm thinking of posting a link to where you can donate pitchforks and torches...

    8. Re:This Company is Corrupt by Proney · · Score: 1

      Of course they didn't have final, absolute say over whether a person was a felon or not, but they provided the list that was used to help determine it. They damn well should have had a good idea of how "overly inclusive" the list might be given the provided search paramters, and are therefore pretty complicit in the act.

      --
      require "something.clever";
    9. Re:This Company is Corrupt by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Get ready for an analogy.

      "Of course they didn't have final absolute say over whether the street bum bought drugs or not, but they provided the spare change that was used to help buy those drugs. They damn well should have had a good idea of what sorts of things street bums buy with the money they panhandle, and are therefore pretty complicit in the act."

    10. Re:This Company is Corrupt by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      What I mean is a mainstream media report not sourced from an organization with political motivations. This excludes most news bloggers, and pretty much all press releases. An AP or Reuters story would be acceptable.

    11. Re:This Company is Corrupt by Proney · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. That's why I try to give food or food vouchers. You'll hear aid workers who work with the homeless constantly say that giving money to them is better than nothing, but a far cry from giving them products they can directly use for exactly the reason you cited.

      --
      require "something.clever";
    12. Re:This Company is Corrupt by stinerman · · Score: 1

      if they failed so miserably in FL

      Ha! You think they failed.

  48. bushco used choicepoint for attempted Chavez coup by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    choicepoint was the latest in a long line of corrupt corporations to be used by America to overthrow a democratically elected leftist government in some other country. But they could not take Chavez down. Viva Chavez!

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  49. Not Choicepoints First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe this isn't news in the US but choicepoint was involved with mexican law like a year ago when they bought a stolen (and illegal in various ways) copy of Mexico's voters and driving license databases (the whole country) that included names, address, phone numbers etc, etc. Of course they claimed they didn't know it wasnt legal...

    So much for the companys commitment to secrecy.

  50. Re:Double Edged Sword. Which edge is bloody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=choicepoint+f lorida+election+2000/. For extra credit research their market capitalization as they rose from obscurity previous to the 2000 election.

  51. You know what would be great by Aexia · · Score: 2, Informative

    is if someone looked up on Choicepoint, say, the CEO and other high-ranking executives and posted all their personal information here.

    The karmic justice of these clowns having to spend substantial time and money trying to protect their credit history and whatnot would be priceless.

    I'm not advocating that anyone should do this. I just think it would be justice because we're certainly not going to see any otherwise.

    1. Re:You know what would be great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      Given that ChoicePoint HQ is Alpharetta GA, and Derek V. Smith is the CEO, then it's quite possible that is your man. Also available via Google: So, if any um... parents of those 822 missing children recovered would like to call and, uh... thank them, well, there you go.
    2. Re:You know what would be great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:You know what would be great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I am the David W. Davis posted with my phone number, please note that I am NOT the
      Choicepoint VP and I hope that people on this thread exercise more diligence than Choicepoint by confirming the accuracy of their posts!

      David Davis

  52. Select * From USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sure the 100k number is another under estimate. I bet the real number is much higher as I would imagine that the theif tried to do an equivelant of a select all on the database.

  53. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... 250M records from various Latin American..." Umm, are you sarcastically making fun of California?

  54. Re:What benefit is it? by symbolic · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Must MILLIONS of US citizens have their personal information warehoused, prostituted, and subject to theft because of the comparatively few that it may have helped? This is one case where I believe the cost FAR outweighs the benefit.

  55. California often leads the way by AtlanticCarbon · · Score: 1

    In the law California has been at the forefront for a long time. It used to be New York but now most "unusual" laws come out of Californians. Thank goodness they experiment so the others can adopt.

  56. Coincidence? by BeBoxer · · Score: 1

    And by coincidence, I'm contesting a mystery $9.95 charge on my CC I never made this month. The first time I've ever had a bogus charge show up.

    Although I can't say the whole ChoicePoint thing is a suprise. After all, the entire purpose of their business is to sell that information. It's not good business to turn away customers, now is it? Oh sure, they probably turn away the most egregious crooks who show up. But their business is to sell your information to whoever want to pay for it.

  57. I bet the number is much, much higher. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Seriously, I'd wager 50 bucks that the number is much, much higher than what is being reported. They (and possibly those investigating it) are not reporting the actual numbers since they either A) don't know or B) fear it might cause a panic if it were known. For them to collect 145,000 identities, they weren't bumbling with their methods. They knew exactly how to work the system and probably have a significant chunk of ChoicePoint's records...if not the majority of them.

    My fear is that the only way significant change will be made to this "records collection" system is when banks and credit companies cannot sustain their business model due to massive fraud. When your credit card has a 40% interest rate due to them recovering the cost of fraud, then we might see something happen.

    I wonder if the others (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) have ever been compromised? Is it just a matter of time?

  58. Somebody ought to pay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm serious. Somebody ought to pay for this kind of crap.

    Somebody is already paying for it... and that "somebody" is you and me. :-( no smilies today

  59. Identity Theft Shield Could've Helped ChoicePoint by leaderswanted.biz · · Score: 1

    How Identity Theft Shield Could Help ChoicePoint Victims and Others Like Them North Bergen, N.J. Feb. 18 -- In the next few days, 145,000 consumers across the United States will be warned, or have been already, that their personal information has been compromised due to a massive theft of information from ChoicePoint, Inc., a leading consumer information collection company. If any of these 145,000 people were customers of Identity Theft Shield - they would be able to access 24-hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week, all the services available to victims. By accessing real-time credit reports, placing consumer notices and/or fraud alerts, and notifying creditors before the situation turns into a full-blown identity theft. The hours, frustration, and money Identity Theft Shield can save are countless. Responding quickly when personal information has been compromised is the best approach to preventing and reducing the damage of identity theft. Identity Theft Shield gives the customer the ability to make one call and receive information about whether an identity theft has occurred due to a security breach, and if there has, have access to a licensed investigator able to help the customer repair the damage. Identity Theft Shield is a subscription service, and our customers must be enrolled prior to an incident in order to receive service. Victims of the ChoicePoint fraud and others like it would have needed to enroll prior to notification of personal information theft in order to be serviced. However, Identity Theft Shield's annual cost is less than a victim would have to pay for two hours' time of most post-incident recovery services. "We are delighted to partner with Pre-Paid Legal Services to offer their clients high-quality, cost-effective access to identity theft related benefits through Kroll's fraud experts," said Troy D. Allen, vice president of Kroll Background America Inc. "Now, through Pre-Paid, middle-income families have yet another valuable product to help achieve greater financial security and piece of mind." About Kroll Kroll Inc. (Nasdaq: KROL), the world's leading independent risk consulting company, provides a broad range of investigative, intelligence, financial, security, and technology services to help clients reduce risks, solve problems and capitalize on opportunities. Headquartered in New York with more than 60 offices on six continents, Kroll has a multidisciplinary corps of more than 2,200 employees and serves a global clientele of law firms, financial institutions, corporations, non-profit institutions, government agencies and individuals. Based in Nashville, Tenn., Kroll's Background Screening Group provides employee and vendor background investigations, substance abuse testing, disability claims integrity programs, and identity theft solutions. For more information, visit www.krollworldwide.com . About Pre-Paid Pre-Paid Legal Services develops and markets legal service plans across North America. The plans provide for legal service benefits, including unlimited attorney consultation, will preparation, traffic violation defense, automobile-related criminal charges defense, letter writing, document preparation and review and a general trial defense benefit. More information can be located at the Company's homepage on the worldwide web at www.prepaidlegal.com . Contact: Dawn or Derrick Carpenter, Ind. IDT/Legal Service Brokers 201-430-3932 dawnanderrick@prepaidlegal.com http://www.whosusingyourname.com

  60. Except... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    ...that the Bush Administration just pushed into law some new law that may very well make building a class action lawsuit against Choicepoint very difficult.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:Except... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Really? I heard that they eat babies.

      Care to provide anything like substantiation?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:Except... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

      It's not to hard to find. Just check out Google news US Section...

      Then you getthis.

      You should stop listening to stories about them 'eating babies' and actually read the news that explains what they actually are doing. It's patriotic to know what your government is doing, to question them about what they are doing and to hold them accountable for what they do, in regards to government and ruling the people matters.

      --
      If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    3. Re:Except... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      As it turns out, I found the article after I replied to your post. The legislation seems surprisingly straightforward, considering its source. What's the problem with the concepts expressed in it? Now, I'm sure that the execution will be absolutely piss-poor (like every other piece of legislation in history) but, in principle, this act seems like a good idea.

      What's the problem? Other than who signed it?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  61. For the 5 Millionth time!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do NOT NOT NOT store credit card numbers,
    social security numbers, and the like in
    unencrypted format. Sheeesh WTF?

    What makes people think they should store
    the raw data in the database???

  62. Re: and it's gonna continue to hurt.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Businesses and governments across the world over the last 20 years said "oooo we need to modernise and to store everyone's personal details on computer"

    Whilst for efficency it is fine, actually in every other respect it was always going to be a bad idea.

    Things like this will continue to happen across the world unfortunately on bigger and bigger scales, of that I am convinced.

    It's just too easy. It doesn't matter what security you put in place. It doesn't matter what the punishments are.

    You can not equate storing millions of personal records accessible in one blob with any notion of security. All it takes is one break in, or one hacker, or one disgruntled employee working from the inside.

    And there is no defence, therefore the pwning continues....

  63. Simple solution: by Facekhan · · Score: 1

    Simple Legislation: Each person owns their data and any company that keeps that data is liable for its unauthorized disclosure to third parties for actual damages of x + 2x for punitive damages.

  64. To reiterate by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    I'd just like to pitch my identity clearinghouse idea again. (Most of this post is copied from my linked post.)

    In combination with mandating that companies actually verify the identity of a person before doing sensitive business transactions with them, the government should operate an independent "identity clearinghouse" of sorts. The process would go something like this:

    1. Consumer requests (for example) a new line of credit from Bank X. In the process, Consumer provides contact information to Bank X.
    2. Bank X contacts Government's Identity Clearinghouse (ICH) with the provided contact information.
    3. ICH (a) compares the provided contact information with that in their records, and (b) uses that contact information to contact the consumer and verify that the credit request was valid.
    4. ICH informs Bank X of the validity of the credit request.

    To fund the system, a small charge would be paid by the consumer, the bank, or both. Other more secure measures (such as personal appearance at a local office) would be involved in changing the information in the clearinghouse. The consumer would then inform their bank(s)/utilities/whatever of their updated mailing information, and the bank would then ask the clearinghouse to verify the correctness of that info.

  65. Blaming "hackers"?? by mtz206 · · Score: 1

    It's interesting that the main AP story (picked up by the Washington Post, LA Times, and others) label the perpetrators as "hackers" who "penetrated the company's computer network." Nowhere in the original MSNBC article is there mention of the criminals hacking into a system. Rather, that reports indicates that "suspects had posed as a ChoicePoint client to gain access to the firm's rich consumer databases." Changing the story into some malicious hacker who infiltrated their computer seems to take ChoicePoint off the hook (except for thin database security), when they need to be held to task for not properly vetting the companies they contract with and allow access to their data.

  66. Can't...resist...asking... by MonkeyGone2Heaven · · Score: 1


    C.L.U.E. Inc. maintains information on insurance claims histories

    So if I request my insurance claim history am I 'getting a clue'?

    And what's that load groaning in the distance?

  67. Any lawyers care to comment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IANAL :) ...and this is slightly off-topic, but still relevent to us Americans I think.

    http://www.rense.com/general63/tcs.htm

    What You Didn't Know About Taxes & The 'Crown'
    By Mark Owen
    2-17-5

    There are two Crowns operant in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II. Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament. This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state known as The City of London, or simply 'The City.'

    The City is not a part of England, just as Washington is not a part of the USA. The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually. When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor. Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.

    In the nineteenth century, 90% of the world's trade was carried by British ships controlled by the Crown. The other 10% of ships had to pay commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the world's oceans.

    The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or British wealth, but the Crown's commerce and the Crown's wealth. As of 1850, author Frederick Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in excess of $10 billion. Today, the bonded indebtedness of the world is held by the Crown.

    The aforementioned Temple Bar is the juristic arm of the Crown and holds an exclusive monopoly on global legal fraud through their Bar Association franchises. The Temple Bar is comprised of four Inns of Court. They are; the Middle Temple, Inner Temple, Lincoln's Inn and Gray's Inn. The entry point to these closed secret societies is only to be found when one is called to their Bar.

    The Bar attorneys in the United States owe their allegiance and pledge their oaths to the Crown. All Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association located at the Inns of Court of the Crown Temple.

    The Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license that bleeds Canada and Great Britain white, while the Middle Temple has license to steal from America. To have the Declaration of Independence recognized internationally, Middle Templar King George III agreed in the Treaty of Paris of 1783 to establish the legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, referred to internally as the Crown Temple States (Colonies). States spelled with a capital letter 'S,' denotes a legal entity of the Crown.

    At least five Templar Bar Attorneys under solemn oath to the Crown, signed the American Declaration of Independence. This means that both parties were agents of the Crown. There is no lawful effect when a party signs as both the first and second parties. The Declaration was simply an internal memo circulating among private members of the Crown. Most Americans believe that they own their own land, but they have merely purchased real estate by contract. Upon fulfillment of the contract, control of the land is transferred by Warranty Deed. The Warranty Deed is only a 'color of title.' Color of Title is a semblance or appearance of title, but not title in fact or in law. The Warranty Deed cannot stand against the Land Patent.

    The Crown was granted Land Patents in North America by the King of England. Colonials rebelled at the usurious Crown taxes, and thus the Declaration of Independence was created to pacif

    1. Re:Any lawyers care to comment? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Who needs a lawyer? The "House of Rothschild" line is the key to exposing that paranoid rave as another variation on "the Jews control the world with their banks". It's got lots of other details, some of which might even be true. But the most interesting detail would be the citation of where you copied it from. Not as a clue to any conspiracy, but what sources are popular among Jew-hating paranoids these days, looking further than their own voting box and TV set for evidence of the totalitarian conspiracy.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:Any lawyers care to comment? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      To me YOU are the person reading it as an anti-jewish diatribe. I read it more as a "Sinister Secret Conspiracy" diatribe. And it was concerned about wealth, and "The House of Rothschild" is (or was) a wealthy group. I'm surprised it didn't include deBeers or the prince of the Netherlands, or the Morgans, but perhaps they were felt to be surpurfluous.

      P.S.: Being a conspiracy theory doesn't prove that it's wrong. It's definitely a lot easier to invent them than it is to prove them, but there is considerable evidence that there are a multitude of conspiracies trying to control the world. (To jump from that to "And one of them does!" is almost certainly a jump too far.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Any lawyers care to comment? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2

      Of course: *I* was the person reading it. Totally interconnected conspiracy theories that span history and the globe are Rorschach tests. But I can tell when I don't need to read any more, except to skim for any new tropes. If it had mentioned the "faked Moon landings" early on, I probably wouldn't have even noticed the Rothschild canard.

      The real consparicies aren't nearly as convoluted. This one was posted in response to the Enron/California conspiracy, very recent (ongoing, under Schwarzenegger) and very close to home. And not nearly as apocalyptic or all-encompassing. It's probably the kind of self-destructive response our society has to manageable details about immediate threat conspiracies: start hauling in all the grand schemes, which turns off the group to the immediacy of the one under consideration. If we didn't react with such ADD to apparent conspiracies, we'd actually manage to expose and eliminate some, sometimes. Instead, we're cursed with innuendo and fools who prey on our worst weaknesses, a smokescreen for the criminals.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  68. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What computer cracker goes into a network and *only* steals the data for 1 state??

    SELECT * FROM everyones_credit_info where state='CA'

  69. Choicepoint? by northcat · · Score: 1

    WTF is choicepoint? Not all of us are Americans. Also, news sites specify what a subject is when it is first mentioned in the report. Like "UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan". Not just Kofi Annan, Kofi or Kofi darling.

  70. not suprised by jafac · · Score: 1

    These jackasses were in charge of verification at a local retailer, and refused to verify my plastic card that spends from my home-equity line of credit. They wanted me to "register" with them, before the retailer would accept the card.

    I told their service, and the retailer to STUFF it, apparently they didn't need my business.

    I'm now GLAD I didn't play ball with these jackasses.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  71. A lot of people should be happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a perfect time to mark all your outstanding debt as fraud and hope some of it gets wiped off!

  72. Got my reports, they had wrong info on me. Thanks by Alcimedes · · Score: 1

    Glad you posted that link. I went to their page and sure enough, they have wrong info on me and my insurance claim history. Calling them up now to correct it. Maybe if enough people swamp them with calls, they won't be so eager to be in business anymore.

  73. And your checking account# by MacDork · · Score: 1

    I said it monday, but it's worth repeating.

  74. Credit scores are TOO important, sadly by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    I'm currently looking for an apartment. I took a new job in the South Bay Area, and am relocating.

    I'm having a hell of a time finding a place because of bad credit. Nothing has been added to my report in well over a year, and the biggest item was a bullshit lawsuit from the assholes at O1 Communications over an old bill.
    I don't have credit cards or car payments because I've been trying to live debt-free. That's now come back around to screw me because I don't have any *positive* credit to balance out the BS.
    Perfect rental history: Doesn't matter.
    High paying job: Doesn't matter.
    Willing to pay 2 x the deposit: Doesn't matter
    Lawyer handling credit situation: Doesn't matter.
    Bad credit, according to the error-riddled report from Experian: ALL that matters.

    It sucks, but what the hell can we do about it? Having bad credit from getting behind on bills when my job was sent to India shouldn't fuck me over for *seven years.* I've written to my congress critters proposing that the rules be changed. If you pay off a bill, it shouldn't sit on the report for 7 years. That's just a ridiculous amount of time.

    Ugh. Screw ChoicePoint and Chexsystems, speaking of bastards..

  75. Contact your Elected Officials Re:SHUT THEM DOWN by FireballDWF · · Score: 1

    Here, I'll even make it easy for you to Contact your Elected Officials

  76. offtopic observation by shark72 · · Score: 1

    Whenever the subject of intellectual property comes up, quite a few Slashdotters are quick to point out that copyright violation != "theft," as the rightsholder still has the rights to the work and can try selling a copy to somebody else. I believe the situation is the same here -- if I've been the victim of identity theft, it simply means that somebody else is using my identity, but I haven't lost mine. Yet I haven't yet seen anybody take anybody else to task for using the word "theft" in this context.

    I think the difference is that copyright violation is one of those things that falls under situational ethics (ie. it's okay if you think the rightsholder already has enough money, or if you think you probably wouldn't have bought it anyway, or any of a dozen other popular rationalizations). In other words... it's something that many Slashdotters do. But identity theft has no similar justification; it's just plain wrong. No Slashdotter would partake in it, and thus we don't need to collectively point out that it's not "theft" to make ourselves feel better about doing it.

    --
    Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    1. Re:offtopic observation by Doppleganger · · Score: 1

      There's another rather large difference. Typically, the victims of identity theft are having money directly stolen from them and credit cards taken out in their names. Their identity is *literally* being stolen, as credit agencies and banks lose trust in that individual. Recovering from identity theft can take large amounts of time and money, and there can easily be effects that cannot be erased.

      Copyright violation, on the other hand, usually only deprives the copyright holder of something they didn't have and may not have gotten anyways.

      And, frankly, the only reason I rationalize copyright violation at all is because of the media industry's attempts to put things that obviously *aren't* copyright violations into the same category of actions. What I do with my legally purchased media within the privacy of my own home is my own business as long as I'm not giving copies out to other people, thank you very much.

  77. Part of a Larger Problem by privacyprof · · Score: 4, Informative

    The ChoicePoint security fiasco is part of a larger problem -- the fact that companies dealing in personal data are not providing adequate security and that they are not well regulated. What makes matters worse is that ChoicePoint is increasingly supplying its information to the government, including the FBI and IRS.

    Back in December 2004, I along with the Electronic Privacy Information Center wrote a letter to the FTC arguing that the FTC should open an investigation of ChoicePoint: http://www.epic.org/privacy/choicepoint/fcraltr12. 16.04.html

    This letter might be of interest, as it explains the extensiveness of the data companies like ChoicePoint have and how it affects people's lives.

    I also argued in my new book, THE DIGITAL PERSON: TECHNOLOGY AND PRIVACY IN THE INFORMATION AGE, that identity theft and other privacy problems are caused not by technology but by irresponsible business practices. Everybody seems to be saying that in today's world of information technology, privacy is dead. The culprit is technology, and since it is foolish to believe that it can be stopped, there's little hope. I argue that this isn't the case. The culprit is government and business practices. There's a "digital person" that is a counterpart to people, not composed of flesh and blood but of bits and bytes of personal information gathered together in databases. The digital person is a representation of ourselves in the world of computers. But this is only part of the story. Increasingly, decisions about us are made by looking to our digital person. What happens to our digital person in the digital world is increasingly having effects in realspace to our real person. It is this problem that I explore, and I argue that the answer is regulating government and businesses - not technology. For those interested in learning more, I encourage you to read the FTC letter as well as my book. Here's the book's website: http://www.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/Solove-Digit al-Person.htm

  78. Why don't you look at Europe? by SysKoll · · Score: 1
    I am always amazed at people who propose miraculous cure-all solutions without ever bothering to check if someone, somewhere, attempted to implement them and how them fared.

    In your case, this system exists in France. It's called "Banque de France", and it's a clearinghouse for credit info and check account status.

    It is not very satisfying. BdF maintains a list of people who are barred to emit checks by their bank because they bounce a check or they exceed their credit limits. Unfortunately, that means that if a bank screws up, or if they just lower your authorized credit line while you're overdrawn, you're going to be barred from writing checks nationwide. Most check-barred people aren't professional fraudsters by any measure, they are just unlucky or impoverished consumers. Most of them don't have credit cards. Thanks to BdF, they are quickly deprived of their checkbook too. Bloody poors, server them well, right?

    Also, BdF is known in France for screwing up badly at times, and also to be regularly on strike (BdF employees were all, until recently, civil servants who couldn't be fired). It means that you can remain for years on the black list, and good luck to sort things out!

    Finally, data protection laws are very strict in most of Europe ... But there are countries where they aren't. So companies from strict-privacy countries outsource their data mining to low-privacy countries. Surprise, surprise: you cannot break down your national borders and enforce your privacy laws, shock, horror! :-)

    So in this instance, entrusting the Government to Do The Right Thing did not work. Lack of accountability, as usual with state-run operations.

    And you want the same system? I really don't recommand it.

    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

    1. Re:Why don't you look at Europe? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Actually, my idea was different. Services such as Equifax, TransUnion, and the other one whose name I can't remember right now would still run their operations for maintaining ratings and records on credit info and such, just as they do today. The government operation would *solely* serve to verify identity.

    2. Re:Why don't you look at Europe? by SysKoll · · Score: 1
      I see... It might be workable, provided, again, that the gouvernment part of the equation works.

      Britain's example show that even a problem as simple as upgrading the ID system cannot be entrusted to carreer politicians, who'll attach their side agendas to what should be a strictly technical affair. See this for instance.

      Are the Continentals more serious? Hardly. This article talks about how tens of thousands of blank Belgian passports are routinely stolen every years and turn up as "real" fakes in the hands of fraudsters. And such a passport is valid accross all of the EU, mind you.

      As for France, an authentic blank passport is worth about $2000 in the street. Grab one and put your prefered ID on it.

      So, with such a track record, I am afraid you cannot trust the government to certify ID. It would cost you a few thousands to produce an official document certifying your fake ID, which would then be use to defeat your scheme.

      Regarding ChoicePoint, I hope they are sent to jail because they are irresponsible and unaccountable. But irresposability and unaccountability are the defining trait of most government-run administrations (can't be fired, no big raise to expect, few incentives), so replacing these rotten apples by other rotten apples won't fix the problem.

      --

      --
      Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

  79. To be expected from a switcher! by matthewg42 · · Score: 1

    What more can we expect from such a switcher - they turned to the dark side between 2000 and 2002 by the looks of it.

  80. Free Credit Report! by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

    Place a fraud alert and get a free credit report from all three credit bureaus... hmm.. sounds like a pretty good deal.. are there any drawbacks??

    Lol, you read my mind. :) I wonder if you can do that an unlimited number of times. If not, then maybe the links I've pasted below will work for now. If you didn't know already, you are entitled to a free credit report annualy. See the government link, and the actual free credit report link below. http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/credit/freerep orts.htm
    https://www.annualcreditreport.com/cra/index.jsp

    -- Josh

  81. Yeah, where does Scott McNealy live, anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enquiring minds want to know

  82. Re:You know what would be great - MOD PARENT UP !! by hlygrail · · Score: 1

    Dangit. Where are my mod points when I actually NEED the? The parent post needs to be visible to all...not buried by a 0 score!

  83. Obscure yourself somehow by waynemr · · Score: 1

    Rather than try to try to get de-listed from these info brokers or restrict what they can do (because they will always find a way around it), why not obscure your identity and information about yourself by finding ways to add information about yourself which are wrong. The reason that these companies are able to commoditize our information is because buyers think the information is somehow valid. If confidence in the validity of their information could be destroyed, they would no longer have a product to sell. The tricky part would be understanding how they collect and verify data and then figuring out a way to insert bogus information without actually harming real people in the process. There must be a way to do it, and then expose it so that all confidence is lost in the information being sold. Certanly the collective brain-wattage of /. must be able to figure out how to do something like this.

  84. I have an idea by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Let's all sue them.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  85. Up to 500,000 now by CaroKann · · Score: 1

    According to this AP article, the total number of people affected may reach 500,000. Politicians are jumping on the bandwagon. It looks like this is turning into a major scandal

    Some article excerpts:

    "attorneys general from 38 states demanded that ChoicePoint warn any victims in their states as well, "

    "The volume of data compromised was so huge that deputies are almost certain that a 41-year-old Nigerian man sentenced Thursday to 16 months in jail in the scam did not act alone."

    "ChoicePoint had required the con artists to fax copies of business licenses, and verified through a background check that licenses were valid for nonbank financial institutions. But they didn't perform physical checks or visit the addresses, as they sometimes do, to make sure they were legitimate."

    I think this last quote is the most important.
    This scam was conducted without any face-to-face contact. The criminals used Kinkos to fax in applications, and outfits like Mail-Boxes-Etc to act as professional addresses. They redirected mail from stolen identities to these PO boxes.

    Our disconnected world where there is no face-to-face contact and where nobody pounds the pavement to check on reality makes scams like this too easy.

  86. What does it take??? by Genda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Attention all K-Mart Shoppers... that Bar-B-Q you are smelling is your collective butts in the fire.

    After undermining all sane separations between state, religion, and commerce, we find ourselve in what can only be described as a Nation of the Corporation, By the Corporation, and For the Corporation. You may now bow to your corporate masters.

    Our founding fathers saw government as a detestable necessity, so they wisely hamstrung it seven ways come Sunday, to keep it at bay. By giving corporations the same rights as "REAL FLESH AND BLOOD PEOPLE", without the same accontabilitiies or limitations, we created a monster. That monster was further allowed free access to influence and ultimately control our government. That brings us where we are today.

    A nation where your privacy is a farce, virtually nonexistent, while government and corporations alike enjoy almost complete opacity.

    Just last week a Federal Judge ruled in favor of the Governor of Maryland, in a suit involving reporters from the Sun Times being frozen out of press meetings. The Judge ruled that "the paper wrongly asserted a greater right to access to government officials than private citizens have. The right to publish news is expansive. However, the right does not carry with it the unrestrained right to gather information,"

    In short, A political leader, your elected representative, has the right to inform only those he likes or feels fit to inform. That and your primary organ of political enlightenment, the press, has no special right to garner information on your behalf. Add to that the recent $400,000 charge for FIA documents against the justice department, and the Gannon/Guckert debacle at the White House this week, and it's clear... the Government is hell bent on having it's citizens standing naked in the streets, stripped of every right to privacy and personal dignity, while they plot and practice "God only knows what" with complete impunity.

    The information disaster at ChoicePoint underlines the complete disregard that business and the Government have for the needs and the rights of every day citizens. Recent leaks suggest the final number of people exposed may exceed 400,000. If the government were working on your behalf, you would certainly see heads rolling immediately. However, I suspect you'll see none of that. The government is using these very companies to perform an endrun around the constitution, filling up government dosiers with information collected by these very companies, at the same time lucrative government contracts and multimillion dollar campaign funds are trading hands.

    We're at a critical time in history. Benito Mussolini defined fascism as "The Corporate State". Looking at the historical analysis of the last century, there's good reason why conservative and liberal law makers, educators in law and political science, and men of conscience around the world are calling the United States a fascist state. One of the certain casualties in such a government, are the rights and freedom of the individual. We still have a tremendous amount of infrastructure that protects us, and as bad as things are, no single person has yet amassed so much power that our government can be easily toppled. We're however in extreme danger. It'll take all our commitment, and every kind of contribution we as citizens can make, to bring our government back into it's proper place as an engine designed to promote the advancement of freedom, and justice. The alternative is too grim for words.

    Genda

    1. Re:What does it take??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's "what it takes" --

      Notice to these individuals and their "peers" that THEIR files were among those compromised:

      Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger & Maria Shriver

      Sen. Dianne Feinstein

      Sen. Barbara Boxer

      Entire California Delegation to the U. S. House of Representatives

      Mayors of LA, SF, SD, etc.

      Sheriffs of each County

      Entire cast of characters from Hollywood & TV, not to mention the talking heads at Fox News

      Forbes 400 residents of the Golden State

      CEOs and Board of Directors of Companies HQ in CA

      AND THEN, as the notices extend to other jurisdictions, where they may be required by common sense and decency rather than by statute....

      IMAGINE -- President Bush, the Cabinet members, [heaven forbid] Karl Rove!

      well, you get the picture.

      [After all, even though our congressionals don't pay into Social Security, they still have numbers -- OOPS, there goes the gratuitous comment buzzer.]

      AND, for the record, this whole "affair" is merely a symptom, not the cause of the greater problem.

  87. Re:Identity Theft Shield Could've Helped ChoicePoi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And now fuck3rs like Dawn and Derrick is trying to make a sh1t load of money off of you. These guys the pays the same companies like ChocePoint, Axciom, and LexisNexus to dig up dirt on people. What a crock of shit! Go screw yourselves, Derrick and Dawn.

    I would recommend call collect to their 201-430-3932 number. Better yet, let's all call them at once every 3 minutes for a week.

  88. MOD PARENT UP INFORMATIVE!! by Tobias.Davis · · Score: 1

    Please!

  89. Want to see what kind of info is in the CheckPoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try this link:

    http://www.autotrackxp.com/privacy_faqs.htm#publ ic record

  90. Re:Identity Theft Shield Could've Helped ChoicePoi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do these posts really improve your google score?

  91. New class-action lawsuit law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Checkpoint's timing could not have been any better on this issue. If the people who have been ID-thefted from this breach by Checkpoint want to get together for a class-action lawsuit, now they have to bring it in federal court.

    We all see the need for frivolous lawsuits, and the lawyers that pimp them, should be stopped somehow. But all the current administration wants to do is cowtow to his corporate puppetmasters, and actually make it almost impossible for an individual to initiate a class-action lawsuit.

    Of course, the ultimate irony is the new budget proposal cutting federal drug enforcement $$$ going to state drug investigation collaborations. I wonder what all those "red state voters" will be thinking about their wise choice now. Their Man is just expending more of that political capital. Yeeeee-haw!

  92. wha-? by nsaneinside · · Score: 1

    Er, evermind. I just misread that as "irresponsible" - and we know that's not right, don't we?

  93. It's not just Choicepoint people.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Newsflash people: This happens every day, all the time, all over the US. There are thousands of Choicepoints, Firstdatas, IntelliSense's, etc that have instant, cheap access to all of our personal records. Go to google and search for "people search" and there's over 7 million different pages. For 50 cents you can look up anyone's SSN, previous addresses, family members etc on http://www.merlindata.com/

    Until such time as the credit bureaus and records databases stop making money by selling our info to as many people as possible, the ONLY thing you can do about identity theft is have some kind of service ready to do the restoration for you. The FTC's national average is $1500 of your own money and 600 hours of your own time if you want to do the restoration yourself. Good luck.

    The best id theft product is http://www.idtheft-restoration.com/

  94. ChoicePoint is...(from ex-competitor employee) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since it seems some keep asking what is choicepoint, whether inside the US or not...

    ChoicePoint used to be the Insurance Division of Equifax Credit Bureau. Equifax spun them off into their own company 7-8 years ago. They have expanded what they do a little, but I'm sure most of the money and data come from the insurance industry and marketing sales. Like Equifax they are based in Atlanta, Ga. USA. Have a big building downtown.

    I used to work for a company called Dateq. It was Trans Union's version and the big competitor with what became Choicepoint. Although Choicepoint bought out Dateq years ago.

    The insurance industry for years has been submitting information from your insurance claims. So companies keep a big database of this information and sell it back to the insurance companies, and even to marketing companies. This affects your car insurance rates primarily and is how they catch people for un-reported accidents when you change companies.

    Even 9 years ago (the time I left the industry), we had software that given a SSN would pull your Motor Vehicle Record from the state, any accident claim you filed in the past 5 years, and even your credit report and put the information into one report primarily for insurance underwriters. I would really be curious as to what type of access they gave these people, because it really is a back door into your credit report as well.

    Depending on what type of access they recieved, you wouldn't even be able to tell as a consumer whether they looked at your credit report. Customers during a trial period are given access that doesn't leave a foot-print on your credit report. They do this for testing, since everytime someone looks at your report, it affects your score. So if it was during the trial period, it wouldn't have left a mark.

    It is really scary how this industry works, believe me I know. I was amazed at the information that they and others keep on people.

  95. "digital person" by tuxette · · Score: 1
    I touched on this in my graduate thesis. A "digital person" that supposedly represents a real world person may be created by data acquired from data mining. Unfortunately, as you obviously know, the data that is mined can be, and often is, incorrect, outdated, and inadequate. So what ends up happening is that real world decisions that affect real world people are based upon false digital representations.

    I'll have to check out your book some day...

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    1. Re:"digital person" by privacyprof · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is exactly what I argue in my book. Companies and the government are using this digital profile to make decisions about people's lives. The problem is that this digital profile is composed of information fragments taken out of their original context, and sometimes polluted with false information. Nevertheless, it is assumed that this information represents people. So the problem is a combination of the fact that these profiles are telling in some respects and false in others. It is obviously problematic when the profiles are false. But when the profiles are used to predict behavior to some degree of success (abeit imperfectly) I argue that there are problems as well.

  96. interesting because we were just hit by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    We had a small business that we were in the process of shutting down, but still had an account with $100 or so, to finish off taxes and stuff.

    We just got hit with someone making $25, $50, and then $500 purchases off the check card. So now we're going through ID fraud procedures on it... ... but I wonder if it could have happened through Choicepoint.

    Note to self: this is a page I want to bookmark for later reference.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  97. privacy, get over it by Wansu · · Score: 1


    Well, now that we've "gotten over" the loss of privacy, perhaps the next thing the McNeely's of the world will tell us is that we should get used this kind of identity theft lottery too.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  98. A word from a Choicepoint competitor ... by background_screener · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am the lead software arc for a competitor of Choicepoint's and, although I do feel this situation is extremely serious and understand why people are pissed off, find it odd anyone would demand that Choicepoint be closed, CEO jailed, etc...

    Regardless of the privacy issues, someone is going to store, manage and sell your information because it fills a valuable need in a whole host of circumstances. It is vitally important to verify someone's background prior to oferring a job or accepting volunteers. This isn't just job justification here. It goes without saying that you cannot allow convicted thieves to work a cash register job or child molesters to volunteer for the Cub Scouts (two things that are surprisingly common). Ah .. but wait, can't the organizations verify information themselves going through county and state govt records? The answer, even if you throw away the cost, time and materials and added personnel, is no, not completely. Here's why. When people apply for a job, volunteer or anything else that requires their past be investigated, there is always a spot for your current address and sometimes a spot for your previous addresses. It used to be that the company you are applying with took your word that you lived where you said you lived and they only investigated those counties, states, etc... If you committed a crime in a county you didn't want revealed, you simply didn't fill it out. Nowadays, regardless of what you put on the application, all of your previous addresses will be discovered and searched (depending how many back the searching company is willing to pay for -- usually 3 to 5). This is a very valuable service and out of reach for companies and organizations that don't specialize in this type of research. Speaking as a father and not a background researcher, I'm glad that the Girl Scouts (using Choicepoint) screen every volunteer in this fashion . I'd think you all would be too.

    Now bear in mind that I'm not defending Choicepoint. Hell, it would benefit me greatly if they were closed down. I do find their account setup procedures to be unbelievably remiss. We require DUNS number, plus corp bank account/history/references and articles of incorp (if applicable) and will not establish an account without them (even then account is ran in audit state for two months to ensure compliance). Keep in mind that if your organization wants run credit reports or motor vehicle searches, then there is an entire mountain of paperwork that must be completed, filed and approved by state DOT and the three credit companies. We also require client certs from integration clients and store no info in our db that isn't encrypted. I believe Choicepoint does the same. The way I understand that the info was compromised was that fake accounts were set up, a list of names was purchased from somewhere, and those names were then searched (either credit report or skip trace or some other identifying report) to obtain the information. Choicepoint's failure lay in social engineering and poor account verification practices.

    What it comes down to is, someone is going to keep and store your information. Would you rather it was the govt with its track record of managing security and accuracy or private industry? Me, I'll take private industry.

    Alex

    1. Re:A word from a Choicepoint competitor ... by UnrelatedHOE · · Score: 1

      If you decide to let the private industry take over our personel records, in this capitalist society, are you not just handing your life over to theives and terrorists? By not letting the government have control of these standards, your disenabling the security of this country (USA)!!! Our government may not be perfect, but which gov't is? Seriously, do you feel safer knowing that our information is being held by some company that may (and probably does) hire sleepers from the Taliban? Or Native Born Americans who work in the Government? Personally I would sleep more soundly, feel better and be completely satisfied knowing that our personal information is being held by elected officials who clearly speak English rather than some foreign non-american born, possibly illegal citizen. By giving our personal information to the private companies, your opening the floodgates of Terrorism, identity theft and crime.

  99. Re:Identity Theft Shield Could've Helped ChoicePoi by leaderswanted.biz · · Score: 1

    I authored the article "Identity Theft Is No Laughing Matter: Who's Using Your Name?"

    http://kb.mlm.com/article.asp?article=5115&p=5/

    The most important FACT to understand is that you cannot PREVENT Identity Theft. What we can do is take the necessary steps stated to PROTECT ourselves. None is more important than monitoring our credit report. There are a number of products on the market that do just that, including, some homeowners insurance coverage, that you can add for $15 to $20 per month.

    All I'm saying is...This crime REQUIRES you to be PROACTIVE not reactive. You can't wait for the next month's bank or brokerage statements or for your yearly Credit Report, free or not. In fact Barry Elliott, Detective Staff Sergeant with the Ontario Provincial Police and founder of PhoneBusters, says, "There is a misconception among consumers that they can prevent identity theft altogether, consumers cannot prevent identity theft. They can only prevent criminals from using their personal information for financial gain by rendering the information useless to fraudsters. The best way to do that is to monitor their credit 24-7."

    We Appreciate You,

    Dawn & Derrick

    Our business in life is not to get ahead of others, but to get ahead of ourselves -- to break our own records, to outstrip our yesterday by our today.~Stewart B. Johnson

    The Problem: The Federal Trade Commission reports American spent close to 300 million hours repairing the damage ID theft causes.

    The Solution: IDT Shield gets your valuable time back http://www.leaderswanted.biz/

  100. Updated path to article: Identity Theft Is No Laug by leaderswanted.biz · · Score: 1

    http://www.mlm.com/mlm/user/index

    Search: Articles: By number: 5115

    "Identity Theft Is No Laughing Matter: Who's Using Your Name?"

  101. Re:Identity Theft Shield Could've Helped ChoicePoi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Partially Correct, but I sure don't have to provide my private info just for the asking! Example is Blockbuster. Why do they need our DOB on the application to establish an account to rent videos? They don't and more info than they need! Who has access to that application? Where stored? Much ID Theft is internal and needs to be the focus as well as how additional regulation on setting up a "business". Anyone can go down to the local business dept and get a "business license" Choicepoint, the 800lb gorilla, didn't grow overnight, nor did the ID Theft Epidemic... started in late 1990's as the internet boom occured.... look at the trends. State and Federal mandated licensing and Regulation of "businesses" who peddle information would hinder and reduce ID Theft cases. While anyone can be a "victim", as long as "businesses" are requiring personal identifiers to establish accts, etc... insiders are privy to our info and source of many cases!

  102. Re:Identity Theft Shield Could've Helped ChoicePoi by leaderswanted.biz · · Score: 1

    I totally agree, businesses do ask for more information than necessary, and they have for quite a long period of time. Identity Theft has reached epidemic proportions since the 90's, but this is a crime that has always been with us. In fact the branches of the government couldn't routinely function without hijacking IDs. They call it the "witness protection program." That's one of the reasons this crime was basically a slap to the wrist type of punishment, because most people using another person's information (whether living or dead) did so in order to hide-out and wouldn't DREAM of committing a crime or doing anything else to draw attention to themselves.

    They used to publish books on how to vanish without a trace. Think of all the abused women who would flee in the middle of the night with nothing but the clothes on their backs - We have countless people living under assumed Identities for their own safety, but as with all things the information got to the wrong people & it spread like a virus.

    I personally think the spread of IDT became more prevasive with better graphics programs, scanners, and printers - because now you could reproduce flawless documents without the risk of exposure.

  103. Fox watchin' the chicken coop ... by fortheloveofpete · · Score: 1

    There is no question that private businesses can manage the database - afterall - it's private businesses that are their largest customers!

    The problem is WHO is managing the database .... Does anyone else notice that the ChoicePoint officers and directors look eeirly like the Equifax officers and directors?

    And WHY would a company like Equifax (that IS subject to close scrutiny and forced to comply with provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act)spin off a subsidiary like ChoicePoint (that WAS NOT under close scrutiny or forced to comply with provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act) if it were not in the name of avoiding government oversight?

    The past is a GREAT predictor of the future, or so the Equifax/ChoicePoint big shots would say, and sure enough, Choicepoint has quietly gone about the business of buying out all of their competitors (flashbacks of Equifax buying out all of their credit bureau competitors until the Federal Trade Commission decided to read the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and enforce it) until now there are only two substantial national providers of an admittedly vital service.

    Now the crowd will cry for ChoicePoint to be shut down. Where in the heck were you five years ago when we had a chance of giving them some competition and forcing them to do anything? Lexis-Nexis will be the only provider left if ChoicePoint is shut down and don't think that ChoicePoint won't use that to their defense!

    Give the industry a close review, insist on competition in the marketplace which will breed reliable, secure, ethically responsible services. Force Equifax to divest in ChoicePoint and enforce the provisions of the GLB Act and Drivers Privacy Protection Act. Expand the Fair Credit Reporting Act to include personally identifiable information from all sources (public or private) that are compiled and indexed for commercial sale.

    Oh, and let's not forget all the lawyers!

  104. Check up on ChoicePoint by SimpleLiving · · Score: 1

    CHECK UP ON CHOICEPOINT Recent revelations that data merchant ChoicePoint gave crooks credit data about hundreds of thousands of Americans highlights the importance of a new federal law giving consumers free access to their credit reports, including ChoicePoint reports. Residents of Western States have had the right since December 1, 2004 and residents of Midwestern States gain the right on March 1, 2005. Reviewing credit reports is also important because a recent US PIRG study found 79% of credit reports had errors and 25% had errors serious enough to result in the denial of credit. Lenders are not the only ones who consult credit reports. Credit reports are used by insurers to set rates, landlords to make leasing decisions and by the US Government for security clearances and to locate criminals and terrorists. Free copies of ChoicePoint reports are a little hard to find. ChoicePoint does not participate in the single point of entry for free credit reports maintained by the three largest credit bureaus. For ChoicePoint reports, consumers can go online to www.choicetrust.com. Consumers can also request a report, or a mail-in form, by calling three separate numbers. The first is for insurance reports, 866-312-8076. The second is for employment history reports, 866-312-8075. The third is for tenant history reports, 877-448-5732. The single point of entry for free credit reports from the three largest credit bureaus is www.annualcreditreport.com. Consumers can also order the reports by calling 877-322-8228 or by mailing in a form found on the web site or on the back of a brochure available from the federal trade commission (www.ftc.gov or 877-382-4357 and navigate the menu until you can request the brochure from a real person). The safest mode for ordering credit reports is by mail. Consumers should also ask the credit bureau to truncate the numbers on the printed report so it is not as damaging if it falls into the wrong hands. Federal law gives consumers a useful tool to protect their interests. Most consumers are not yet accustomed to reviewing their credit reports annually. But a changed world where crooks buy private credit data directly from the credit bureau calls for new strategies. More information and links to the sites in this letter is available on line at CHECK UP ON CHOICEPOINT Recent revelations that data merchant ChoicePoint gave crooks credit data about hundreds of thousands of Americans highlights the importance of a new federal law giving consumers free access to their credit reports, including ChoicePoint reports. Residents of Western States have had the right since December 1, 2004 and residents of Midwestern States gain the right on March 1, 2005. Reviewing credit reports is also important because a recent US PIRG study found 79% of credit reports had errors and 25% had errors serious enough to result in the denial of credit. Lenders are not the only ones who consult credit reports. Credit reports are used by insurers to set rates, landlords to make leasing decisions and by the US Government for security clearances and to locate criminals and terrorists. Free copies of ChoicePoint reports are a little hard to find. ChoicePoint does not participate in the single point of entry for free credit reports maintained by the three largest credit bureaus. For ChoicePoint reports, consumers can go online to www.choicetrust.com. Consumers can also request a report, or a mail-in form, by calling three separate numbers. The first is for insurance reports, 866-312-8076. The second is for employment history reports, 866-312-8075. The third is for tenant history reports, 877-448-5732. The single point of entry for free credit reports from the three largest credit bureaus is www.annualcreditreport.com. Consumers can also order the reports by calling 877-322-8228 or by mailing in a form found on the web site or on the back of a brochure available from the federal trade commission (www.ftc.gov or 877-382-4357 and navigate the menu until you can request the brochure from a rea

  105. Anyone live in Alpharetta, GA? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    When is garbage day? It would sure be funny if it turned out that these guys weren't shredding their garbage.

    1. Re:Anyone live in Alpharetta, GA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i do

  106. Choice Point Excutives Selling Off Stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Local news is reporting that they have sold off some $21M US in stocks. Rats fleeing a sinking ship anyone?

  107. BAD INFO:Re:You know what would be great by notchoicepoint · · Score: 1

    Just looking up a name in Google does NOT give the correct information! The David W. Davis you posted as VP of Choicepoint does NOT work for Choicepoint. There are two David W. Davis's in Alpharetta as I am the other one! The others listed may or may not be correct. By posting incorrect info in this thread you are providing similar mis-information for which Choicepoint is being flamed! Check it out before causing grief for others.