Slashdot Mirror


Microwires Can Replace The DVD-ROM

neutron_p writes "A former Soviet Union military development finds its use in modern technology and still remains fascinating." The development comes in the form of a flexible microwire, 10 micrometers thick and 10cm long, with a metal body and a glass coating, which the linked article says "can store 10 Gigabytes of information. It is possible thanks to their magnetic properties. Anyway, it's not that easy. Researchers say that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information."

416 comments

  1. Isolinear chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Star Trek geek in me coming out... :)

    1. Re:Isolinear chips by k96822 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, that's old Trek! They're using bio-mimetic gel packs now. Sheesh, you're so 24th century. :-)

    2. Re:Isolinear chips by Kippesoep · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's "bio-neural gel packs", actually. Do I get modded down for being too Trekkie (especially considering that's ST:VOY)?

    3. Re:Isolinear chips by k96822 · · Score: 1

      Ooh, that's what it was! I knew I was wrong as soon as I posted it, but I couldn't remember the real name. I am out-trekked! I tip my hat to thee!!!!

    4. Re:Isolinear chips by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was unaware -1; funny was even possible...

    5. Re:Isolinear chips by drauh · · Score: 1

      you mean shigawire

      --
      This is a tautology.
  2. What military purposes? by winkydink · · Score: 4, Funny

    3 or 5 times thinner than a human hair, these fine threads were invented in the old Soviet Union for military purposes... Data wig? What?

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:What military purposes? by UWC · · Score: 2, Funny

      And the reading device can be disguised as a Flowbee!

    2. Re:What military purposes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of it like shigawire from the Dune books!

    3. Re:What military purposes? by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      Wire-guided weapons, e.g., torpedoes and the like.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    4. Re:What military purposes? by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      Or shadow-square wire a la Larry Niven... but this stuff seems slightly less durable than that.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    5. Re:What military purposes? by Beatbyte · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates has been using the reader for a loooooooong time

    6. Re:What military purposes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "threading" people. They lodged in people's guts, and a sensor akin to an RFID tag pickup could then ID you for months, so that even if you changed your appearance (Mr. Bond), you could still be IDed.

    7. Re:What military purposes? by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      This is soviet technology. You need to read the fine print -- "Researchers say that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information".

      That's great!

      Let me tell you about the new hard drive method I created for storing large amounts of data on your hard drive. It allows you to write more than 10x the amount your hard drive already contains. In fact I've already installed it with Linux computers. Just copy the files to /dev/null. The only issue is that researchers are having some difficulty reading the information after its stored, but we don't think its that big of a problem.

    8. Re:What military purposes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piano Wire? (hitman style)

    9. Re:What military purposes? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2, Informative
      Umm, no.

      A wire-guided weapon is one that trails a wire from controller to weapon as it flies/swims/moves, allowing control signals to be sent from controller to weapon without those nasty RF emissions that can be jammed.

      Yes, a Mk 48 torpedo trails a miles long wire behind it as it goes....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    10. Re:What military purposes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as I read the headline I thought about the old joke about write only media.

    11. Re:What military purposes? by glenebob · · Score: 2, Funny

      If exposed to bleach, much of the information will be lost. Interestingly, the information that is retained is invariably about such things as hair spray, boys, and that one bitch who always wears stuff from totally last week, oh my gawd!

    12. Re:What military purposes? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Maybe these are the things you drop on a power plant to short it out (trip all the breakers, still usable once the troops march in).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    13. Re:What military purposes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what i hear, the files are encrypted by the system and put on /dev/random ready to be recovered. There are still problems with the decryption though.

    14. Re:What military purposes? by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      So why couldn't this wire be used for a similar purpose? I don't understand your argument. You seem to be agreeing with me.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    15. Re:What military purposes? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Too fragile. When the military is using wire-guided weapons, there are explosions and such happening. It's kind of hostile to wires finer than a human hair....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    16. Re:What military purposes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeh, I heard the old soviet government wanted to recruit bald spies and get them to smuggle state secrets from Europe and the US in the threads of the wigs. Of course they had different styles ready for different storage amounts and disguises...

      Crew cut - for that minimal data storage look
      Flock of seagulls - for hiding in and around dockyards
      Afro - maximum data retention! :)

  3. Write Only Memory by sjbe · · Score: 5, Funny

    the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information

    Is the long anticipated write-only memory here at last? Huzzah!

    1. Re:Write Only Memory by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Fortune quote at the bottom f the page as I am reading this:
      It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one. -- Phil White

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Write Only Memory by Golias · · Score: 2, Informative

      This kind of sounds like a cold-war Soviet press release.

      "Yes, of course Comrade! Our new media-writing technology is vastly superior to that of the decadant Americans. It holds far more data, there's no dispute. Eh? You want to read the data you say? Well no... We are still working on reading device, but all the data is there, no doubt about it! Just look at it! Just by looking at it you can tell it is holding much more data! It's obvious! Another victory for the revolution! Rejoice!"

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:Write Only Memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UNIX has this. It's called /dev/null.

    4. Re:Write Only Memory by serutan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because of course, in Soviet Union, flexible microwire reads you.

      heh-heh, I crack myself up!

    5. Re:Write Only Memory by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, they used this to store information on red mercury.

    6. Re:Write Only Memory by Moonlapse · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      BTW, i consider you to be a whiner

      --
      - I got my free iPod and a free Nintendo DS....why not
    7. Re:Write Only Memory by mog007 · · Score: 1

      It very well could be, considering it's from a formus Soviet Russian.

      Queue the jokes..

    8. Re:Write Only Memory by mutterc · · Score: 1

      I've been waiting for a WOM to store my to-do list on. Currently I have to work around this by putting the to-do's into a Palm Pilot, and never reading them nor setting alarms.

    9. Re:Write Only Memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd mod you informative if I had modpoints. :-/

    10. Re:Write Only Memory by harrkev · · Score: 1

      And yet your link points to a site which questions the very existence of this substabce. Facinating, Captain.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    11. Re:Write Only Memory by Nikker · · Score: 1

      Kind of like data cryogenics. Encode your data today and when they figure out how to use it thaw it out ....

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    12. Re:Write Only Memory by CelticWonder · · Score: 1

      It's been done before. Last time, it was paper with "invisible ink".

    13. Re:Write Only Memory by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Hey you almost understood my humor!

    14. Re:Write Only Memory by OAB_X · · Score: 1

      Modded as iformative? thats at least +3 funny

    15. Re:Write Only Memory by magicclams · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This reminds me of a story I heard about an alien who came to earth and decided to take the contents of the earthling internet home with him, so converted all the data into one long integer, and expressed it as a fraction, then pulled out a rod of known length, carefully measured it, and cut it to the appropriate fractional proportion of the whole.

      When asked how they were going to retrieve that information when he got home, he replied, "That's for the engineers to figure out."

    16. Re:Write Only Memory by glenebob · · Score: 1

      Is that you, Muhammed Saeed al-Sahaf? Well... Almost.

    17. Re:Write Only Memory by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      Parent is not informative.

      Correct. Very sharp on your part.

      It's not an actually cold-war press release. It's just a sarcastic one by parent.

      Ummm...No it's not a cold war press release. You might have a point, but "It's just a sarcastic one" makes no sense.

      And proof to my theory that slashdot mods are idiots.

      Not exactly original, your theory.

      BTW, I consider parent to be troll.

      Thanks for your opinion. It's really too bad you didn't have mod points to protect us from his trolling. May I point out that the OP was making a joke, but you're just spouting shit and adding nothing?

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    18. Re:Write Only Memory by Golias · · Score: 1

      Modded as iformative? thats at least +3 funny

      I also thought so when I wrote it, but apparently not. So far the moderation is:

      30% Informative
      40% Overrated
      20% Insightful

      Not a single "Funny" mod, so clearly my comment was not nearly as hilarious as I thought at the time... but it appears to have been very useful information to some people, oddly enough.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    19. Re:Write Only Memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect for storing write-only programs, like Perl.

    20. Re:Write Only Memory by richardmilhousnixon · · Score: 1

      I think I remember two guys discovering this memory strip a while back that is about 2 meters long, 2 nanometers wide and can store gigabytes of data. Even better, it can be fit into something the size of a human cell. The biggest problem is reading the information.

      --
      -- sometimes AND gates turn me on.
    21. Re:Write Only Memory by ebob9 · · Score: 1

      Pffft, this isn't new. I've had my write-only memory mounted as /dev/null for quite some time!

    22. Re:Write Only Memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the greater difficulty is threading the media into the reader's sewing needle-sized hole.

    23. Re:Write Only Memory by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Where have you been? Write only memory has been here for a while.

      It can be accessed on most non-MS machines at /dev/null...

      *looks quickly for the pun patrol*

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    24. Re:Write Only Memory by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      The problem with that would be that I'm pretty sure you can't cut a rod that exactly. Atoms end up looking pretty big when you have thousands of numbers after the decimal point.

      Also, supposing it was possible, how do you cut such a thing? Surely to cut an exact length you need to know the whole number, which means it must be stored somewhere, like the memory of the computer doing the cutting (since I assume some help would be needed for such precision)

      So, given that, why bother with rods and not just send the raw data instead?

  4. Truly "Write Once Read Never" by vivin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Researchers say that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information.

    Excellent! Now my Perl scripts will truly become Write Once Read Never!!

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
    1. Re:Truly "Write Once Read Never" by glenebob · · Score: 1

      That's not much different from Write Once Un Readable...

  5. No way by CDOS_CDOS+run · · Score: 3, Funny

    [tinfoilhat]I am sticking to my 5.25" floppy, it's the only reliable way to backup data.[/tinfoilhat]

    1. Re:No way by Oen_Seneg · · Score: 1

      Let me guess: You then attach all your floppies to a whiteboard with magnets?

    2. Re:No way by escher · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let me guess: You then attach all your floppies to a whiteboard with magnets?

      Well, how else is he supposed to keep all the bits from falling off?

    3. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You call some fancy shmancy magnetic gizmo "reliable"?? Pffft!

      The only reliable way to store data is to put the right number of marbles in stone jars that you then carry (by foot, mind) to the underground monestary that's been carved deep within the granite mountain to the North.

    4. Re:No way by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      North, hmm lets see which way is that, ah yes jsut check my fancy shmancy magnetic gizmo... yep that way...

    5. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you young 'uns and your technologies! I envy you. We have to find North by looking for the Northstar, or the side of trees with moss... But then, we never misplace the Northstar and get stranded forever, we just wait until a clear night.

    6. Re:No way by Androclese · · Score: 1

      [tinfoilhat]I am sticking to my 5.25" floppy, it's the only reliable way to backup data.[/tinfoilhat]

      BAH!!! You kids and your new fangled toys... Punch Cards are the ONLY way to keep data stored securely!!!

    7. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Young wippersnappers, you were LUCKY to have had eyes to look at the North Star or the side of a tree with moss on it. In my day we found North by floating around in a primordial ooze. We went North only if that happened to be the direction of the current we were in, AND WE LIKED IT!!!!.

    8. Re:No way by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "[tinfoilhat]I am sticking to my 5.25" floppy, it's the only reliable way to backup data.[/tinfoilhat]"

      Heh. There was a time on Slashdot where everybody'd poo poo a story to the tune of "This isn't news!!!" If this story were posted 3 years ago, the first +5 response would be like "This isn't news! All you gotta do is use more floppies!"

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  6. so... by to_kallon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microwires Can Replace The DVD-ROM...Researchers say that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information.
    i can write lots of data but then it's lost??
    where do i sign up for this great *new* technology??

    --


    The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.
    -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:so... by Dues · · Score: 1

      its like saying "i have a lifetime supply of captain crunch, but no one has figured out how to eat it yet..."

    2. Re:so... by Oen_Seneg · · Score: 1

      A slightly more common method: Buy the cheapest Dual-Layer DVD media you can find, and leave it out in the sunlight for a while.

      Anyhow, you'd most likely lose the microwire before you could attempt to read it.

    3. Re:so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Everyone's talking trash about this concept, however just think about what the reactions would have been if you told someone in 1980 that you could fit 60GB of music on a device the size of an audiocasette, or that people would have keychains that can store 1GB of data!

      Hell, my computer in 1993 had a 230MB HARD DRIVE and it was considered to be a decent system.

      Aside from that, I would have to agree that the article is a bit ridiculous. The concept is intriguing, but there doesn't seem to be enough development to the point where this could be practical (not to mention all the challenging issues). Smells like propaganda to me - the "University of the Basque Country" wants to get some early credit for some cutting-edge technology.

  7. hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so, startrek brought us atom teleportation, so can we thank hogan's heros for this one...?

  8. How long before these are removable media? by pete.com · · Score: 0

    and those of us in Info security were worried about 1G thumb drives ...

  9. Reading the information? by nobuzz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Researchers say that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information.

    How the hell can they tell it's there if they can't even read it?

    1. Re:Reading the information? by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      dd if=/dev/null of=/dev/rmt/mw0

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    2. Re:Reading the information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Elaine: Can it cut that thin?

      Kramer: Oh, I've cut slices so thin, I couldn't even see them.

      Elaine: How did you know you cut it?

      Kramer: Well, I guess I just assumed.

    3. Re:Reading the information? by chrisnewbie · · Score: 0

      It's like a flea circus just got to believe in the magic

    4. Re:Reading the information? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, it's entirely possible that they can.

      but the process might cost 100 000$ per strand, or something equivalent of that.

      making it possible but not practically possible.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  10. Great. Just great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm already going batty trying to not lose these fucking tiny cartriges for the Nintendo DS. Now I'm going to have to keep track of a 10cm molecular-width wire and find myself losing them like pencils as they fall out of my pocket.

    I have seen the future and it is inconvenient

    1. Re:Great. Just great. by Golias · · Score: 1

      Now I'm going to have to keep track of a 10cm molecular-width wire and find myself losing them like pencils as they fall out of my pocket.

      Easy. The wire will be factory-sealed in a four-pound polymer housing about the same size and shape as a women's size 10 platform sandal.

      The same plastics company who makes that stupid plastic "tower" for the mac Mini will start pre-fabing storage units to keep them on, but smart hackers will realize that they can do just as well with an ordinary shoe rack.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Great. Just great. by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      go in s supermarket that offers sd-cards, there you will find the solution:
      Supersize package. They put those small cards in boxes you wouldnt loose in the pacific ocean, so you could also put your nanowire in a 2kg steel case and NEVER misplace it :)

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:Great. Just great. by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Funny

      No no no, what they are gonna do is get a big handful of these things and melt them down into a flat, round shaped disc, probably around 12cm in diameter, with a hole in the center... so you can hold it on your finger.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    4. Re:Great. Just great. by macshome · · Score: 1

      I don't know how I could ever loose my DS cartridge. I mean there is only one of them...

      (And yes, I love my DS.)

    5. Re:Great. Just great. by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      That's an anti-theft measure, sadly.

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    6. Re:Great. Just great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only one?? Good God man, what are you thinking! Go buy Wario Ware immediately!

      (Then you'll have two)

    7. Re:Great. Just great. by macshome · · Score: 1

      Duly noted! Problem is, with that many more mini-games I will never, ever pry the DS out of my wife's hands...

  11. Would you trust someone who... by PornMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    thinks that CDs use magnetism to report on new tech?

    "The microwires become diminutive substitutes for the CD-ROM, given that information can be stored magnetically on them, as with CDs."

    1. Re:Would you trust someone who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Magneto-Optical drives stored their data on magnetics materials, but were CD-shaped, and used lasers for the writing process.

      I dont know if they meant M-O or not, but they appeared similar, so its possible.

    2. Re:Would you trust someone who... by justforaday · · Score: 1

      Are you saying they don't?!?

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    3. Re:Would you trust someone who... by QMO · · Score: 1

      The Sony MD (which came out with CD's, never really took off, probably because they kept it proprietary, but has made some inroads as an mp3 player medium) is magneto-optical.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    4. Re:Would you trust someone who... by operagost · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pure crap. I have proven through experimentation that CDs are magnetic. I took a recently-written CD-R and rubbed the bottom vigorously for ten minutes with a permanent magnet. Sure enough, it became unreadable. Not only that, but the bottom isn't shiny anymore.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Would you trust someone who... by northcat · · Score: 1

      They're not saying CDs do use magnetism. They're saying CDs *CAN* use magnetism (which is possible). Read that sentence again. Now, who modded parent as insightful?

    6. Re:Would you trust someone who... by Oen_Seneg · · Score: 1

      With sonicstage jukebox, and the conversion to ATRAC, it didn't make deep inroads. Still, with a microphone makes a useful audio recorder.

    7. Re:Would you trust someone who... by tagish · · Score: 1

      No, they're saying that CDs /do/ use magnetism - perhaps it's a typo for HD.

      They're also saying that each cell can record a byte when it's clear from the context that they're talking about a bit.

      --
      Andy Armstrong
    8. Re:Would you trust someone who... by schon · · Score: 1

      They're saying CDs *CAN* use magnetism (which is possible)

      Please explain. CDs *don't* use magnetism, and *can't* use magnetism, as they're non-magnetic. (Try it - touch a magnet to a CD, the CD won't move at all.) CD's certainly don't (and indeed can't) use magnetism to store data.

      who modded parent as insightful?

      I'm guessing the same people who didn't mod you up.

    9. Re:Would you trust someone who... by ironflippy · · Score: 1

      Sony MDs were semi-popular in Japan for a little while. I do believe that they died out by now. I kinda liked them better than CDs, but then again, I've always prefered magnetic mediums.

    10. Re:Would you trust someone who... by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Your nickname does tend to indicate that you might have some sort of bizarre attraction to magnetic media ...

    11. Re:Would you trust someone who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny! Magnetic aluminum - who would have thunk it!

    12. Re:Would you trust someone who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erm. CDRs use magnetism to set the phase. fool.

  12. Sounds like my backup strategy. by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Backup is easy! The restore is the tricky part.

    1. Re:Sounds like my backup strategy. by operagost · · Score: 1

      The trick to quick backups is sending the output to the null device. Beat that, SuperDLT!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Sounds like my backup strategy. by spuke4000 · · Score: 1

      If you like that, I've got a compression algorithm that will take the 10 Gb down to 1 bit. I'm still working on the decompression algorithm.

      --
      This post cannot be rebroadcast without the express written constent of Major League Baseball.
  13. incredible by sla291 · · Score: 1

    omg, you'll be able to hide several terabytes in your hair !?

    Remerber johnny mnemonic ? No wait, sardaukars with their shigawires in dune ?

    1. Re:incredible by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Why bother with implanting it or having to go to the hairdresser for an upgrade? Buy all microwire clothes, make your wardrobe a SAN! The clothes you are wearing carry the subset of your data that you need on this day. Great!

      btw, the shigawire is a monomolecular metallic fiber, grows inside of some twine. Can be used to cut your head off or store more information than inside your head. (IIRC what the Dune Encyclopedia says)

    2. Re:incredible by sla291 · · Score: 1

      yup I know what it was.. it's just that the sardaukars use to hide them in their hair :)

  14. Not going to happen by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

    It seems obvious that magnetic mediums are going to eventually become a thing of the past, especially for removable media. Optical and solid-state memory like Flash are the way it's going to be.

    Personally, I think three-dimensional optical media will be the next huge leap in removeable data storage, though these tiny metal wires do remind me of those little rings the Seleeches wore in Battlefield Earth :)

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
    1. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?

  15. Bit vs buye by prakslash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the article:

    The researchers calculate that a 10 cm long microwire can carry out 10 million divisions or cells and in each one of these a byte can be stored. In order to store the byte, each one of these cells is magnetised in one orientation or the other.

    Don't they mean a "bit"? How can you store a whole byte with just two magnetic orientations?

    1. Re:Bit vs buye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe a cell is a long enough piece of wire to hold 8 bits.

    2. Re:Bit vs buye by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They also say that CDs store things magnetically. This source is somewhat questionable.

    3. Re:Bit vs buye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's why they're having problems reading the data back.

      <sarcasm>
      But you've got to admit, 8:1 compression is pretty good!
      </sarcasm>

    4. Re:Bit vs buye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe this so called "revolutionnary invention" is just another bullshit like the previously seen on /. "battery-charging sticker"?

    5. Re:Bit vs buye by uucp2 · · Score: 1

      Don't they mean a "bit"? How can you store a whole byte with just two magnetic orientations?

      I guess that is exactly the question the researchers were thinking when they said "the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information".

    6. Re:Bit vs buye by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Never mind that if you have 10 million of them you either have 10 megabits (well, in HD manufacturer lingo, anyway) or 10 megabytes, not 10 gigabytes.

    7. Re:Bit vs buye by k96822 · · Score: 1

      I think he meant CD-RW's. Unless my knowledge is way out of date (wouldn't be the first time), CD-RW's work by magnetically changing the surface of the disk. They are still read optically, though. CD-R's aren't magentic, however, which is why once the laser etches the disk, it is permanent. Now, this is a technology that changes so fast, I could very well be wrong (or, if we wait 10 minutes, I'll be wrong then). Does anybody know if this is done differently now?

    8. Re:Bit vs buye by LurkerXXX · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What about the heading for the paragraph?

      10 Gigabytes in 10 cm long

      followed later by:

      The researchers calculate that a 10 cm long microwire can carry out 10 million divisions or cells and in each one of these a byte can be stored. In order to store the byte, each one of these cells is magnetised in one orientation or the other.

      Pardon my math, but isn't 10 million bytes 10 Megabytes, not Gigabytes? Isn't the articles claim of data density off a thousand fold?

    9. Re:Bit vs buye by Sc00ter · · Score: 3, Informative
      "CD-RW's work by magnetically changing the surface of the disk. "

      Where did you hear that?

      From How Stuff Works

      "To create a rewriteable CD (CD-RW), you need a dye layer that can be changed back and forth between opaque and transparent. This page discusses the special material that CD-RW's use. The material has the property that it can change its transparency depending on temperature. Heated to one temperature, the material cools to a transparent state; heated to another temperature, it cools to a cloudy state. By changing the power (and therefore the temperature) of the writing laser, the data on the CD can be changed, or "rewritten.""

    10. Re:Bit vs buye by rob_squared · · Score: 1
      "Don't they mean a "bit"? How can you store a whole byte with just two magnetic orientations?"


      Very carefully.

      --
      I don't get it.
    11. Re:Bit vs buye by admdrew · · Score: 1

      They might be assuming that you could fit about a large amount of microwires (say, 1000) into a single usable wire, making it 10GB. Still, it's misleading to say what they did.

    12. Re:Bit vs buye by k96822 · · Score: 1

      "An older, hybrid technology called magneto-optical (MO) is seldom used anymore. MO uses a laser to heat the surface of the media. Once the surface reaches a particular temperature, a magnetic head moves across the media, changing the polarity of the particles as needed."

      Reference

      Back in my day, this was fairly common. I keep forgetting that I'm getting old. It's been over ten years since I used magneto-optical disks, but it seems like yesterday.

    13. Re:Bit vs buye by nahaj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Worse, even if you assume that they mean bytes, 10 million of them don't add up to the claimed 10 Gig capacity. There are a number of problems with this report.

      --
      No matter how bad things look, there are hedious details you've missed.
    14. Re:Bit vs buye by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      hmm, 1000 wires bundled togeather. Make that 8,000 if the bit/byte is wrong as it looks like from the writeup. That would make a wire bundle the size of a bundle of a several hundred human hairs wrapped togeather (if the thickness of each wire is a good bit less than a hair). That's pretty good size, plus 10 cm long?

      That doesn't seem like it would be any volumentric improvement over a double-density DVD for storage. Plus Double layer DVDs are here today and work. This thing would require some new tech designed to write/read to a bundle like that.

    15. Re:Bit vs buye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, byte stores YOU!

    16. Re:Bit vs buye by nahaj · · Score: 2, Informative

      Note that since the slashdot article the hosting organization has gone in and made an editorial change with a comment pointing out that the 10 million number is a typo.

      --
      No matter how bad things look, there are hedious details you've missed.
    17. Re:Bit vs buye by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Ahh, good to see they have now fixed that. Now if they will just clarify the bit/byte dispute.

    18. Re:Bit vs buye by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Sony MD is also MO, FWIW. HTH, HAND.

      (Text inserted to defeat the ironically lame lameness filter. Hint to the slashdot programmership: Acronyms are always represented in all caps.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Bit vs buye by k96822 · · Score: 1

      Good point (what I could read of it) :-) Of course, lots of people will claim MD is outdated technology too. But, in the musical world, it is still useful, particularly the players/recorders that have optical in.

    20. Re:Bit vs buye by mkaltner · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's more like 1.19 Megabyte.

      The following sentence explains: "In order to store the byte, each one of these cells is magnetised in one orientation or the other."

      That makes each cell a bit, not a byte. Each cell is either a 0 or a 1, according to the description of how it works. So, if it's 10M bits, it can only store 1.19 Megabytes.

      There's so many errorneous statements in this article that it should be posted under "It's funny, laugh" not "Data Storage".

      - Mike

    21. Re:Bit vs buye by celeritas_2 · · Score: 1

      Apparently a stupid source. It looks like they mean bits not bytes and according to google 10 million bits = 0.00116415322 gigabytes not impressive, toenail fungus is more useful although their data may contain more stupid errors yet to be discovered

      --
      -- Checking emails and kicking cheats `till the day I die.
    22. Re:Bit vs buye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't they mean a "bit"? How can you store a whole byte with just two magnetic orientations?"

      Its a fancy new compression technology where evrey byte must be all 0s or 1s... then each byte can be shortened to one bit!

  16. Maybe I'm the stupid one. by unique+alias · · Score: 1

    The microwires become diminutive substitutes for the CD-ROM, given that information can be stored magnetically on them, as with CDs. Right. Magnetic CDs, AKA floppy discs.

    1. Re:Maybe I'm the stupid one. by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Yeah... you know, there was a time when people thought 3½ floppies were "hard disks" because their casing was somewhat rigid - unlike 5¼ floppies.

  17. Heinlein came up with this... by Theaetetus · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Years back, he hypothesized that future aliens contacting us might bring along their entire libraries on a single piece of titanium. Doesn't matter what size: just mark one end with A, one end with B, and make a notch somewhere in the middle.
    Measure A/B, convert the resulting fraction into a hexadecimal string, and there's your data.

    Only problem is that your microscope has to be really good.

    -T

    1. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by oGMo · · Score: 1

      Not the microscope so much as the accuracy of your ruler. I'm not sure how possible this would be... how many digits accuracy do you need? If we're talking lots of data, we might need billions of digits. I'm not a physicist by any means, but isn't a Planck Length the smallest unit of space, at 1.6x10^(-35) meters? Is that even enough space for the level of precision required? On top of that, do titanium atoms even have the resolution required for such precision?

      It's an interesting concept, but I wonder how realistic it is. Perhaps a real physicist can comment. ;-)

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    2. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Measure A/B, convert the resulting fraction into a hexadecimal string, and there's your data.

      A theory that any information theorist will tell you is utter rubbish. You have no framing information telling you where any piece of the data stops or starts, what original format it's in, and so on. To say nothing that much of the information simply can't be encoded that densely. Here's a simple exercise: you have two of these rods so marked. Encode both of them on another rod.

    3. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by SeanTobin · · Score: 1
      There is something called "impossible numbers" which are numbers that simply do not and cannot exist. Take for example the number 0.43223400240983312345432. It doesn't exist. It can't. It's impossible to generate by any means.
      So, if someone took a plate that was 1 meter long and placed a mark at 0.43223400240983312345432 meters, it wouldn't exist?
      --
      Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
    4. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so find the closest number and subtract/add by n

    5. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      > Only problem is that your microscope has to be really good.

      And that you can't encode one rod onto another rod, since you've used up all the available resolution of the medium. Possibly you could compress all the information from one planet onto a materially-perfect rod a couple meters long at atomic resolution. I'll bet you the algorithm behind that compression scheme would never fit though.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    6. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyright Infringement on galactic scale!

    7. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by SewersOfRivendell · · Score: 1

      What's your source? I don't recall reading that in any of Heinlein's books, or anywhere else. Not doubting you, just wanna know.

    8. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Have+Blue · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This was also invented by Frank Herbert- Dune featured something called shigawire, which sounds very similar to what's described in TFA.

    9. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      We workaround this limitation today quite handily.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    10. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoedelNumber.html

      encode a mark on the bar at the location:

      (1 / (godel number) )

      where the godel number is the complete encoded representation of the data.

    11. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So our world is made up of Plank Voxels?!

    12. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years back, he hypothesized that future aliens contacting us might bring along their entire libraries on a single piece of titanium.

      You mean as opposed to current day aliens contacting us?

    13. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      Every rational number can be generated by the division of two numbers. All of our data is finite and therefore can be repesented as a rational number. Ugh I hate trolls.
      Regards,
      Steve

    14. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have mod points today, but again, unfortunately, "Dumbass" is not one of the choices.

    15. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think perhaps you might mean uncomputable numbers? These are the ones which are impossible to generate by any means. You would never need to encode one, because it would never come up!

      There are countably infinitely many ways of describing numbers in a given language (eg english, or C, or whatever), because you can enumerate all things possible to write.

      There are an uncountably infinite number of real numbers.

      Therefore there are many many more real numbers that cannot be described by any algorithm than there are describable ones.

      I can't give an example, because it would be a performative contradiction to do so.

      They all have infinite decimal expansions with no predicable pattern.

      Some examples of computable numbers include:

      2
      Pi
      sqrt(17)
      0.43223400240983312345432
      0.11 21231234123451234561234567...

      While interesting, I'm not sure how this has any relevance to Heinlein's scheme, because he is encoding a finite amount of information, which requires a finite (hexa)decimal expansions, which is computable.

    16. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Saberwind · · Score: 1

      Assuming a 1-meter wire, I think you'd be constrained to about 40 bits of information due to the size of the Plank length unit.

    17. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Bwmat · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you just divide 43223400240983312345432 by 100000000000000000000000, or am i just missing something here?

    18. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Surt · · Score: 1

      The whole point is that it is physically impossible to make such a mark. You land in between atoms, guaranteed, no matter what material you use.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    19. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      IIRC shigawire is even better, because it can cut your enemies up good. Restraint, murder, and data storage. If you could make a sexbot out of it, it would be the best sci-fi invention ever.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    20. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have two rods with sides A and B marked and one notch each in the middle somewhere to represent the data, you could easily combine the two all you need to do is to put two marks on one rod each the same factional distance between A and B as they were on there own rod. And then label the two marks.

      And this can be extended to as many marks on the rod as you can distinguish.

    21. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's impossible to generate by any means.

      You sure about that?:
      (43223400240983312345432 / 100000000000000000000000)

    22. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by PostItNote · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Chop a wire and measure it from A to B, read that number in binary, and there is your data

      So if the Plank length is the smallest unit of space that we can measure, then how long does a wire need to be to measure a megabyte?

      Well, let's do the math - for 1 Meg, we need to have 8 bits/byte * 1e6 bytes/meg * 1 binary digit/bit = 8e6 binary digits required. Well, 8 million binary digits means that your length has to be on the order of 2^8e6 units, so let's make our units plank length and figure out how many meters that is.

      2^8000000 plank lengths = (10 ^ log_10(2)^8000000 plank lengths =~ 10 ^ 2408239 plank lengths

      Which, in meters, is 1e2408239 plank_lengths * 1.6e-35 meters / plank length = 1.6e2408204 meters

      Now how big is 1.6 * 10^2408204 meters?

      Well, the answer is VERY BIG. As in, it's a number that has no meaning big. I can't describe it's biggitude. Space is peanuts compared to IT. Much larger than the diameter of the universe. Much larger than anything ever imagined ever. Much larger than everything imagined ever all put together.

      Heilein's ideas were definitely stuck in a pre-quantum model of the universe. We can't encode one megabyte this way, much less a CD/DVD/Encyclopedia or anything else like that.

      (Not a physicist, but I have a deep love of Fermi problems)

    23. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put simply, it's bullshit. Or science fiction. First of all this has nothing to do with the article. Second, what you said. There is nowhere even close to the level of precision required to store useful data in the relationship between mark distances.

      By useful I mean above 15 bytes.

    24. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, thats the size of a packet that GSpoof can send to freeze up an XP box using the LAND attack!

      Stupid alien script kiddies!

    25. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by gnuman99 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Measure A/B, convert the resulting fraction into a hexadecimal string, and there's your data. Only problem is that your microscope has to be really good.

      They better turn on their Heisenberg Compensators!

    26. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by ClassicPenguino · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking it was in Between Planets that the blueprints for a secret weapon were encoded on a microwire embedded in some ring. It's only been about thirty years since I read this, though, so someone else can tell me which story that was really in.

    27. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

      I dont remember the titaium disk in one of his stories either.

      But In "Between Planets". The Hero had the message on a thin wire.

    28. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by dynamo · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    29. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd need a damn big rod (huh huh). We're talking galactic size.

      Even then, let's think about it: you've just encoded all the information in the world into a number ... ok, skip forward to the mona lisa. Is that number a book, a song, or a painting? Where's the boundaries? How is it encoded? Seems to me you're going to need a few more of them fancy sticks to figure that out.

    30. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by oGMo · · Score: 1

      Nah, even if you can in theory get that resolution (which it's obvious you can't), you could just include metadata along with everything else. I mean, your hard drive is just one big number, if you look at it that way.

      With enough forethought, you could even devise a format that, given some basic premises, documents itself in the beginning, as well as adaptions along the way. This could even take the form of a virtual machine and virtual code that ran on it, or something more sophisticated.

      The "rosetta stone" problem still exists though; you still need something to tell you how to start that is a common reference; it's not so much a matter of size as a matter of the fact numbers alone aren't helpful. Of course, if you have a stick the size of a galaxy, you could have quite a number of pictographs on there. Obviously that's a pretty dumb way to do things though.

      Ultimately, the more I think about it, the more I think this eventually leads into data compression issues. Assuming you can represent all your data with a rational number (because all your data is, at some point, not infinite), and that you have infinite precision, you actually have two marks on the stick you can make: the fraction, and its inversion.

      In fact, since you have all that blank area, why bother actually having it? Rather, you could say "this is a portion of the stick 2cm long that is this portion of a stick the size of the universe".

      This is where I think it's a compression problem. At some point, you're trying to fit things in which just don't reduce, as other posters have pointed out, and regardless of your precision, it's never going to be enough.

      Right? (I know a bit more about this than I do physics, which isn't saying much, but ;-))

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    31. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by delmoi · · Score: 1

      43223400240983312345432/100000000000000000000000

      Happy?

      --

      ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
    32. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a bit of calculation, it turns out this isn't an unlimited form of storage...

      (covalent) radius of a titanium atom: 136pm
      Length of a meter bar: 1m
      Number of titanium atom widths in a meter bar: 7.4e9 (10^12pm / 136 pm)

      Even if only one atom is displaced by the 'notch', there is still only a maximum of about 7GB of data that you can record with a single notch (on a metre bar, anyway).

      Pretty impressive amount of data for moving a single atom though.

    33. Re:Heinlein came up with this... by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
      Years back, he hypothesized that future aliens contacting us might bring along their entire libraries on a single piece of titanium. Doesn't matter what size: just mark one end with A, one end with B, and make a notch somewhere in the middle. Measure A/B, convert the resulting fraction into a hexadecimal string, and there's your data.

      Only problem is that your microscope has to be really good.

      Assuming for the sake of argument that there are 10**30 atoms in the rod, and that you can represent any value from 1 through 10**30, you can still only store around 100 bits. I wonder if Heinlein worked it out and thought it was too mind-blowing to omit, or whether he never thought about it?

      Note that even if you assume that A, B, and the notch can be anywhere, you have at most 300 bits (times a constant to make up for the fact that 10**30 was not the right number). It's still smaller than a page of a paperback--much less "all knowlege."

  18. The novelty is the size. by idontgno · · Score: 1
    This appears to be just wire recording writ exceedingly small.

    And if you thought getting glass fiber in your skin itched...

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  19. From TFA: by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The researchers calculate that a 10 cm long microwire can carry out 10 million divisions or cells and in each one of these a byte can be stored. In order to store the byte, each one of these cells is magnetised in one orientation or the other.

    Assuming they didn't mean "bits" when they said "bytes", that only sounds like 10 megabytes to me... Not gigabytes. If they meant bits instead of bytes, which seems likely given the description, that's only 1.25 megabytes in 10 cm...

    1. Re:From TFA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      maybe there will be 1000 wires???

  20. Stopped reading after... by sunnydayjj · · Score: 1

    "The microwires become diminutive substitutes for the CD-ROM, given that information can be stored magnetically on them, as with CDs. "

    CDs store information magnetically? Wha?

    How reliable can the rest of the article be?

    --
    "He'd already RATHER be bowhunting!" -Max Filmont
  21. I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The researchers calculate that a 10 cm long microwire can carry out 10 million divisions or cells and in each one of these a byte can be stored. In order to store the byte, each one of these cells is magnetised in one orientation or the other."

    To me, that reads 10 megs, not 10 gigs. Where am I going wrong? Is my brain really just not working today?

  22. It's probably quantum. by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Funny

    How the hell can they tell it's there if they can't even read it?

    If 10GB of MP3s are written on a wire, and there is no reader to play it. Does it make a sound?

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:It's probably quantum. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the sound RIAA slaping a lawsuit on the writter.

    2. Re:It's probably quantum. by Smidge204 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but the RIAA will sue you anyway!

      =Smidge=

    3. Re:It's probably quantum. by JamesP · · Score: 0

      f 10GB of MP3s are written on a wire, and there is no reader to play it. Does it make a sound?

      No, but you still get to be sued by the RIAA...

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    4. Re:It's probably quantum. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter. The MPAA will sue you anyway.

    5. Re:It's probably quantum. by gahzinia · · Score: 2, Funny

      If 10gb of pr0n is on there, and there is no viewer capable, is it still an issue to hide it from your mom?

    6. Re:It's probably quantum. by bvdbos · · Score: 1

      Let them sue. Then they have to prove in court that the wire actually contains the mp3's. For that the RIAA have to develop a reader. Finally something usefull for their money. On the other hand, they'll probably ask massive licensing-costs and sue the hell out of anybody who's "illegally" making use of this technology....

  23. Re:i predict that there will be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    In soviet russia, thousands predicted your statement.

  24. Yeah, that's got to be it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see, from the article...
    given that information can be stored magnetically on them, as with CDs
    and
    In order to store the byte, each one of these cells is magnetised in one orientation or the other.
    Yep. They definitely must be on to something here.

  25. 10 Million "bytes" = 10 Gigabytes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it me or does:

    "The researchers calculate that a 10 cm long microwire can carry out 10 million divisions or cells and in each one of these a byte can be stored. In order to store the byte, each one of these cells is magnetised in one orientation or the other. "

    not sound like a 10 million bits? "One orientation or the other"...sounds like a bit to me.

    AFAIK 10M 1G...again, I must be dumb. Yup.

  26. Magnetic CDs? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

    From TFA: The microwires become diminutive substitutes for the CD-ROM, given that information can be stored magnetically on them, as with CDs.

    Looks to me like a fundamental difference in uses: these wires would be great in pendrives or MP3 players, where flash memory is currently used. No need to use them in place of DVDs or CDs though: we've already got ~50GB optical storage on the way and nobody will be happy if they change the size/shape of the media.

    1. Re:Magnetic CDs? by Oen_Seneg · · Score: 1

      Can't be any worse than the number of CDs I've had to fish out from 5 1/2" floppy drives. If it's not going to be backward compatible, change the shape by all means.

    2. Re:Magnetic CDs? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's pretty pointless to talk about putting the microwires into portable devices until they figure out what the reader is going to look like. For all you know it might be impossible to make it smaller than a breadbox and that would look pretty silly hanging from your belt loop.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. I have unlimited storage! by erroneus · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just save everything to /dev/null and I never have a problem with storage space.

    1. Re:I have unlimited storage! by RangerRick98 · · Score: 1

      I imagine that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information from that solution, too. :)

      --
      "You're older than you've ever been, and now you're even older."
  28. In other words by b1t+r0t · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The development comes in the form of a flexible microwire, 10 micrometers thick and 10cm long

    There's already a name for this. It's called tape.

    (Tape storage started with metal-wire recorders, but esentially they're the same idea, only it's harder to strangle someone with magtape.)

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    1. Re:In other words by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but this wire is only 10 centimeters long, and 10 micrometers thick, and stores 10 GB. Just imagine how many meters of wire could fit on a small spool? 100 meters would be equal to 10 TB. Of course, my guess is that tape drives are approaching that capacity soon anyway.

    2. Re:In other words by The+Other+White+Meat · · Score: 2, Funny

      (Tape storage started with metal-wire recorders, but esentially they're the same idea, only it's harder to strangle someone with magtape.)

      Well clearly, you just aren't properly motivated.

      Wait until your department head deletes the shared workgroup directory a couple of times, and magtape garroting becomes surprisingly easy...

      --

      --- Generation X: The first generation to have SIG lines inferior to their parents... ---
    3. Re:In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clive Sinclair had a stringy drive - Give credit to the Brits, who also invented mercury delay lines/tubes - liquid wire if you like.
      I'm not sure who invented dna, it it is rumored to store bits on a narrow strand of organic material, that can even reproduce, but a company called god thought of it first.Now if only we had self replicationg disk drives.

  29. Wearable data by damsgaard · · Score: 1

    Ahh, the perspectives for a knitted vest with all my data. Only catch is that I'm not sure that I would want to store all my pr0n on something my mother made!

    1. Re:Wearable data by Tjoppen · · Score: 1

      .. or you could go medieval with your core memory mail!

  30. Whose Math Be This? by kortex · · Score: 1

    "The researchers calculate that a 10 cm long microwire can carry out 10 million divisions or cells and in each one of these a byte can be stored. In order to store the byte, each one of these cells is magnetised in one orientation or the other."

    10mil divisions - each holds a byte.
    How does that make 10Gb in 10cm?

    --
    -- kortex "Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts"
    1. Re:Whose Math Be This? by Dman33 · · Score: 1

      10mil divisions - each holds a byte
      Furthermore, how does "one [magnetic] orientation or the other" equate to a byte?

      This article is complete B.S.

    2. Re:Whose Math Be This? by nahaj · · Score: 1

      Note that the online article has been corrected, and there is a note there saying that 10 million was a typo.

      --
      No matter how bad things look, there are hedious details you've missed.
    3. Re:Whose Math Be This? by kortex · · Score: 1

      Heh - good point! This article must have been written by Dan Rather...

      --
      -- kortex "Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts"
  31. HEY! There should be an... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "In former Soviet Russia" joke by now. What gives - are you people sleeping or something ?!?

    1. Re:HEY! There should be an... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In former Soviet Russia, the article screws up the Slashdot Editor!

    2. Re:HEY! There should be an... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, the Beowulf Cluster of Write Only Memories joke about you welcoming Our New Microwire Overlords.

      There. Happy?

  32. Re:Why the fuck doesnt slashdot render in firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a fairly famous bug. It has been resolved in trunk and 1.01, IIRC. In the meantime, the workaround is , , which enlarges the font, then shrinks the font, and will cause the page to render correctly.

  33. Has to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia media read you!

  34. whoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read that as "Micro*waves* can replace the DVD-ROM" -- my bad. I'm able to confirm that this is not true because I've put CDs and DVDs in my microwave and they certainly don't replace them.

    More or less, the microwaves displaces the information on them. Definitely the ultimate in "write once, run never" technology.

  35. 127 year-old dup by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Informative

    This technology dates back a ways to an 1878 invention, and devices such as the Webster wire recorder of the 1940s and these models from WWII.

    Its amazing how often new tech is really old tech.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:127 year-old dup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the "Black Box" recorder in modern aviation.

      I put "Black Box" in quotes because it's really orange

    2. Re:127 year-old dup by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      This technology dates back a ways to an 1878 invention, and devices such as the Webster wire recorder of the 1940s and these models from WWII.

      Heh heh... some KGB agent probably bought this info from a CIA agent pretending to be a military engineer, sold as the latest development in US communications technology back in the 80s, and they've been wasting time with it ever since.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  36. Is this a joke ?? by tajan · · Score: 2, Informative

    The microwires become diminutive substitutes for the CD-ROM, given that information can be stored magnetically on them, as with CDs.

    Since when information is stored magnetically on CDs ????

    10 Gigabytes in 10 cm long
    (...)
    The researchers calculate that a 10 cm long microwire can carry out 10 million divisions or cells and in each one of these a byte can be stored. In order to store the byte, each one of these cells is magnetised in one orientation or the other.

    Seems more like a bit on each cell, not bytes ... And "10 million" is not a Giga ... So we are talking about 1.25 MegaBytes in 10 cm long. Hmmm ....

    What the hell is this article ???

  37. What is Anisotrophy? by vivin · · Score: 2, Informative

    the divisions are carried out internally by means of a process of anisotrophy.

    Anisotrophy? What kind of "trophy" is that? However, there is something known as anisotropy.

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
    1. Re:What is Anisotrophy? by mr.newt · · Score: 1

      Clearly, they meant angiostrophy. See, you can use the wires to tie off whatever's bleeding...

      Aw, forget it.

  38. Southern Hickese: Awww that's nuthin'! by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hyuk!! I got me a storage dee-vice that exists on every Unix system in the world and it's got In-Fi-Night capacity!!! It's called /dev/nul and that sucker seems to have more storage in it than the ocean has water! Of course, like these microwires, I need to figure out how to recover the data from it too.

    [No Offense meant to southerners unless you voted for Bush]

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Southern Hickese: Awww that's nuthin'! by k96822 · · Score: 0

      Oooh, you just HAD to get in a poke at Bush there, didn'cha?

    2. Re:Southern Hickese: Awww that's nuthin'! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ln -s /dev/null /dev/tty9 (or ttyS0 or cua0)

    3. Re:Southern Hickese: Awww that's nuthin'! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Badnarik count? And can I still kick your ass?

  39. More crummy data storage by Friar_MJK · · Score: 1

    Yay! Another medium of data storage. Floppies, hard discs, cd's, dvd's, holographs, and now wire? I guess on the upside it would be a really secure means of storage seeing as though nobody (not even you) can access it. Think of it as a digital time-capsule. You can write all your pictures and movies on it, and even if you tried, you wouldn't be able to access it for at least another 50 years, so voila! No dirt, no mess!

  40. Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A physics news site that describes CD-ROM's as magnetic storage, is talking about super-duper microwires...

    Yea. Right. So, who should I make out the VC cheque to?

  41. Innovation? I think not. by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

    They say they are able to store 10GB of data, but can't read it.

    How is this any different from deleting, except you are limited to 10GB at a time?

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
  42. Communication Skills by k96822 · · Score: 1

    The entire article should be two paragraphs long at most. This is just another example of a scientist trying to sound smart by making a very simple concept sound complex.

  43. GB or Gb ? by Merlin42 · · Score: 1
    From the article

    The researchers calculate that a 10 cm long microwire can carry out 10 million divisions or cells and in each one of these a byte can be stored. In order to store the byte, each one of these cells is magnetised in one orientation or the other.


    From reading the description it would seem 10cm could hold 10 Giga BITS or about 1.25 Gigabytes at best.
    This is still impressive, expescially if some media could be created that used several wires or packaged one very long wire, perhaps in a spiral, like a CD.
  44. Re:Why the fuck doesnt slashdot render in firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly you are doing something improper. Firefox and the Slashcode CMS are open source, therefore are immune to software bugs. Slashdotters say so, so it must be true. If you happen to find a bug in the rendering of Slashcode, please send a patch to Slashcode.com where it will be promptly ignored in place of their clearly superior coding efforts.

  45. Reading is Hard! Math is Hard Too! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Does sound a lot like you're correct, and the author's off by a factor of 1000, or 8000 (or maybe just 100 or 800 if it's 10 million cells per centimeter.) I suspect from the description "magnetized in one orientation or the other" that it's probably one bit per cell.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  46. So thin.... by fitten · · Score: 1

    Don't accidently drop it and try to catch it! It'll cut off your fingers! (as seen in sci-fi shows... the molecular blade)

  47. Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by vivin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the microwires become diminutive substitutes for the CD-ROM, given that information can be stored magnetically on them, as with CDs.

    Since when did CD's start storing data magnetically? I thought it was optically? Where can I buy these new-fangled magnetic CD's?!

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
    1. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      minidiscs are magneto optical. You can get them at best buy :P

    2. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I stopped reading when I hit that line. The rest of the information in the article is suspect because of that obvious blunder.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by harrkev · · Score: 2, Informative

      Keep reading. It gets better! One cell can store a byte! Soooooo. Either one cell has 256 discernable levels, or they have defined "cell" in a funny way.

      But let's assume that the article was not written by a 4th grader. What good is this? How could you possibly have something this fine be able to be read without breaking?

      All modern media is 2D. Floppy, CD, DVD, HD all store data on the surface of a disc. Tape units store data in a 2D at little stripes recorded on the surface of a tape. This means that you can make the tapes and discs thick enough not to break.

      What do you do for something that can probably be broken by dropping a piece of paper on it?

      Hmmmm. On second thought, the idea of "data velcro" sounds neat. How about data velvet? "My painting of Elvis is also a 12GB mass storage unt."

      Data underwear? "Caution. Unrecoverable skid-mark error. Please launder and try again."

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    4. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by Lisandro · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Pun aside, you can buy rewriteably CDRs anywhere - they were magneto-optic-based, IIRC. Minidiscs work that way aswell, like a parent poster said.

    5. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "rewriteably" = "rewriteable"

    6. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Pun aside, you can buy rewriteably CDRs anywhere"

      a rewritable cdr I could have sworn they were called cd rW maybe it was just me

    7. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by schon · · Score: 1

      minidiscs are magneto optical

      They're not CDs.

    8. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by David+Horn · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've got an even better idea - why don't we take several of these new magnetic CDs and stick them in a small metal box that you have permanently inside the computer?

      Excuse me, I'm off to the patent office...

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    9. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by snuf23 · · Score: 2, Informative

      CDRWs are NOT magnetic. Old style WORM and MO drives used magneto-optical technology, but current CDRWs use a dye that can be altered between transparent and opaque states by the laser.

      How do CD-RWs Work

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    10. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All modern media is 2D. Floppy, CD, DVD, HD all store data on the surface of a disc.

      Point of order: Dual layer DVDs are 3D to a degree, even if there are only 2 y values. Plus, I understand IBM has their holographic 3d storage almost ready for prime time.

      I'm not sure it counts, but it's worth noting that all modern hard drives use more than one platter, making them pseudo-3D, as well.
    11. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by phazethru · · Score: 1
      "How could you possibly have something this fine be able to be read without breaking?"

      A pretty plastic casing that doubles as a key chain?

      --
      "I am the Black Mage! I casts the spells that makes the peoples fall down!" ~8BT
    12. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "They're not CDs."

      Are they compact? Are they discs?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electromagnetic Radiation, abbreviated as EM comes in many forms. At very low frequencies, it creates "AC hum": annoying guitar amplifiers. At higher frequencies 150,000 cycles it radiates through the air 'Radio'. At higher frequencies: the bandwidth --now several hundred times as wide-- can accomodate video encoded transmissions 'Television'. Much higher frequencies can penetrate the ionosphere, beamed via satellite. At higher frequencies still, you can actually 'see' the transmission 'light'. Yes homer, photons of light are actually bundles of electromagnetic radiation. I remember I learned this fact when I was 14 or 15 years old. And you know what? It's still true!

    14. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by d-rock · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but they say a 10cm wire can be broken up into 10 MILLION cells, but then say it can hold 10GB. Something doesn't add up.

      Derek

      --
      Don't Panic...
    15. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by Video+Gamer+Z · · Score: 1

      Well it works out to roughly 9.54GB so it's not that far off.

    16. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by schon · · Score: 1

      Are they compact? Are they discs?

      Are floppy discs compact? (They're more compact than CDs) Are they discs?

      For that matter, is a quarter compact? Is it a disc?

      I think maybe you need to re-think your criteria.

    17. Re:Since when did CD's store data MAGNETICALLY?! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I think maybe you need to re-think your criteria."

      I think you maybe need to re-think whether or not I was joking.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  48. Who writes this stuff? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is possible thanks to their magnetic properties. Anyway, it's not that easy. Researchers say that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information.

    L. Ron Hubbard?
    What, do they also use renegades?

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  49. Lengths of Wire...? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    This is beginning to sound a lot like..... *tape*
    Dear god help us!

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Lengths of Wire...? by nsayer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Go back in time. Wire predated tape, actually. The original dictation machines were wire recorders. Wire recorders are still used for flight data and cockpit voice recorders in commercial aircraft (though they are being slowly phased out and replaced, I believe, with flash memory).

      Another novel moment in the history of wire recorders: one of the first VTRs (used at the BBC) was a linear "tape" recorder. Bandwidth being proportional to the speed of the media across the head, they moved the "tape" at amazingly high speed. The only "tape" that would stand up to the stress was actually made of steel - making it more like flat wire than what we think of as tape. Couple the weight of the tape with the amount of it you needed and you wound up with huge 10 foot diameter spools of the stuff. The machine was also quite dangerous - if the tape broke, it would hurl fragments of steel that bore a not-so-passing resembelence to razor blades.

      Fortunately, helical scanning was invented, which allows the heads to fly across the tape while the tape itself moves relatively slowly. But now we're drifting off topic.

    2. Re:Lengths of Wire...? by nsayer · · Score: 1
      Some quick googling has filled in some of the blanks in the above.

      The linear system developed by the BBC was called VERA (look about half way down), for Vision Electronic Recording Apparatus. It used 23" reels of "tape" moving at 200 ips (compare to 15 ips, which is typical even today for analog audio tape). Despite the size of the reels, the high speed meant it could only store 15 minutes of video.

    3. Re:Lengths of Wire...? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      The machine was also quite dangerous - if the tape broke, it would hurl fragments of steel that bore a not-so-passing resembelence to razor blades. --- so that would be a "passing through you" resemblence to Razor Blades?

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  50. Solution? by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1

    it's not that easy. Researchers say that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information.

    How about putting 10,000 of those sticked together and set up in a RAID-like manner? Wouldn't that 1) make it easier to read information 2) make it friggin fast to read information and 3) make it ultra-safe thanks to a crazy amount of redundancy?

    I'm not too sure if this is possible, but I'm curious...

    --
    You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
  51. I can store an infinite amount of information by DrXym · · Score: 1

    By broadcasting it out into space. The greatest difficulty comes when trying to read it.

  52. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My real hair is even better than these thick metal hairs. I can store unfathomable amounts of quantum data, even though I am unable to read or write to it. I will hear no arguments that the ability to store all this quantum static on my head is any less useful.

  53. Sorry by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, your hard drive backs up YOU.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD THIS UP! Unlike most Soviet Russia jokes, this one actually makes sense and fits the conext.

  54. The Greatest Difficulty by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Researchers say that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information.

    I would think the greatest difficulty, if you plan to use them to replace DVD's will be mass production. I doubt you can just stamp these out by the millions quickly and cheaply.

    I like the thought however that you can increase storage linearly just by increasing the length.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:The Greatest Difficulty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about labeling?

  55. obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just only 10cm? enlarge your storage now!

  56. Microwaves... by Reignking · · Score: 0

    I was really confused when I saw something about Microwaves and DVD-ROMs...

    --
    One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
  57. Sometimes bigger is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a DVD, you won't lose it in your couch cushion.

  58. Magnetic Recording? by mephisto73 · · Score: 1

    Brilliant! Those Russians - What will they think of next? A worldwide network of computers utilizing a universal language to communicate? Brilliant!

  59. W.R.O.N.G.! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Write:Read == Once:Never Got-it?

  60. Uh... basic mistake. by ultramk · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article: The researchers calculate that a 10 cm long microwire can carry out 10 million divisions or cells and in each one of these a byte can be stored. In order to store the byte, each one of these cells is magnetised in one orientation or the other.

    When they say "byte" here, they seem to mean "bit". (for the script kiddies, there are 8 bits to the byte) Also, they're referring to "10 million divisions" not "10 billion divisions".

    So it wouldn't be 10 gigabytes, it would be more like 1.2 megabytes, or roughly 122k/cm. To store 10 gigabytes, it would have to be over 838m long, or over 2750 feet.

    Frankly, I'm not horribly impressed.

    Not to mention, this is just in theory. It hasn't actually been done yet.

    m-

    --
    You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    1. Re:Uh... basic mistake. by Gulik · · Score: 4, Funny

      Frankly, I'm not horribly impressed.

      But, he's got technology that, once he gets it to work, will be very nearly useless! How can you not be impressed?

    2. Re:Uh... basic mistake. by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

      From the article: The researchers calculate that a 10 cm long microwire can carry out 10 million divisions or cells and in each one of these a byte can be stored. In order to store the byte, each one of these cells is magnetised in one orientation or the other. When they say "byte" here, they seem to mean "bit". (for the script kiddies, there are 8 bits to the byte) Also, they're referring to "10 million divisions" not "10 billion divisions". So it wouldn't be 10 gigabytes, it would be more like 1.2 megabytes, or roughly 122k/cm. To store 10 gigabytes, it would have to be over 838m long, or over 2750 feet. Frankly, I'm not horribly impressed. Not to mention, this is just in theory. It hasn't actually been done yet.

      To get that kind of surface area out of the medium, perhaps they could flatten them out into circular platters. These platters could them be spun around a central axis at really, really high speed. Some sort of device, an arm or something, could then travel across these platteres to read/write the data from/to the media...

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    3. Re:Uh... basic mistake. by iammaxus · · Score: 1

      Well... assuming that they did indeed mean only 1.2 megabytes for a string like that, it isn't as horrible as you might think at first. For example, 10 gigabytes worth, or 838m of 10 micron diameter wire weighs a mere 1 gram (assuming a density of 15g/cm^3, or a very heavy metal). You may respond saying there is no way you can read such a long piece of wire quickly enough. Well, spiraled up on extremely fast moving disk, with a head that moves back and forth, you can fit quite a lot of data. In fact, on a 3" disk, you can fit approximately 4560m of wire, or about 54GB. Wait a minute, 3" disk, rotating extremely quickly, head moving back and forth, 10^1 GB range... sounds familiar, no? Anyway, I'm sure they did mean 10GB, because I doubt anyone is going to cut a hard drive platter into an extremely thing spiral and call it new technology.

    4. Re:Uh... basic mistake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's next?

      8Kbytes of RAM in a chip 6 inches square?

    5. Re:Uh... basic mistake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! It's a hack in the best tradition of Slashdot. Like booting Linux on your Xbox, so you'll have a 733MHz Celeron-based computer with an out-of-date video card. Or getting the source code for your Linksys router, so you can run... Linksys router code on... your Linksys router. Oh, and your PC, too, so you can replace a $50 box with a $2000 one.

  61. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Researchers say that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information."

    Finally, we have the ultra-high density write-only memory we've all been waiting for. Goodbye DVD-WOM, hello microwire.

  62. Information Storage by SeanTobin · · Score: 4, Funny

    I prefer to store all my information by sending it into a black hole. As with the microwires, reading it tends to be a bit difficult.

    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
    1. Re:Information Storage by glenebob · · Score: 1

      Yeah... but the compression!!!

    2. Re:Information Storage by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Good choice! A black hole gives the greatest data storage per unit surface are of the device. And Hawking's latest work shows that the data can be accessed again by carefully examining the Hawking radiation emitted by the black hole.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  63. Excuse me, but...! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    It is possible thanks to their magnetic properties.

    Excuse me, but one think I like about my CD-ROMs is that they not magnetic, and I don't have to worry about storing they away from magnetic fields.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  64. Speculation by mattmentecky · · Score: 0

    Ah, speculation is so fun!
    Man, you add "could" infront of anything, and well, anything is possible!
    This just in: Slashdot could be taken over by Microsoft, as early as tomorrow!

  65. Obviously using sub-bit compression by ryder · · Score: 1
    It was pioneered in Hamilton '95 along with the Anti-Heisenberg Drivers. See the following URL quoted below: http://www.kluge.net/ham95/features.html#FEATURES. 3

    Anti-Heisenberg Drivers (Memory Compression)

    The development team at Hamilton have recently developed a set of drivers which counteract the strange effect named after the German physicist who first wrestled with the problem. The Heisenberg principle was once a major restriction which prevented people from calculating both the position and velocity of electrons. Now that this obstruction is out of the way, you too can use the individual electrons circling the silicon on your RAM. Current estimates show four 30-pin SIMMS or two 72-pin SIMMS may hold up to 1.5 * 10^23 bytes. ((6.022 * 10^23) * 2) / 8 Avagadro's # * 2 cubic centimeters / bits per byte This technology is currently only a special-case equation for silicon atoms, but has the potential of offering 14x the current memory if enhanced to a per electron, as opposed to a per atom, basis. Research is also currently underway to develop equations to control atoms found in common magnetic media, such a hard drives and floppies, but one researcher interviewed said:

    Actually, I am the lead developer of the original Anti-heisenberg drivers. Those were child's play compared with magnetic media! The strong magnetic fields just throw out previous work into chaos, not to mention the complexity of the molecules we are working with. Currently, our best efforts require so much redundancy that the gain can be achieved through other methods. The silicon-based drivers are much better, requiring only 14x redundancy. But we have researchers working on that, too. Hopefully, everything will move to RAM, which is faster and less complex for us to deal with.
    So, keep your eyes open for it! It sounds like they are working hard, and may be close to a breakthrough. Are there any side effects? The only side effect which we know of are small eddies in the space-time continuum. Speculation leads us to believe this is reason all data is redundantly stored 14 times. One user claimed his version of Hamilton 95 spontaneously upgraded to Hamilton 2043, but that is still unconfirmed. Sub-bit Compression Sub-bit compression is a mis-nomer. Recent posts have implied that use of Hamilton 95 will allow you to compress data to less than one bit. While not entirely true, the use of the anti-heisenberg drivers allows most programs to fit in less than what used to be one byte. Therefore, it is improper to use this as a feature, in itself, even though it is technically true. Note that this is _only_ while the program is in RAM. Another person posted that, upon installation, all memory was overwritten with the hexadecimal value FF. This is totally normal since Hamilton 95 doesn't use standard bits, but only the silicon atoms themselves. Don't be alarmed, as you can easily see that the data on the hard drive is still in 'normal' form.
  66. Back to... by menkhaura · · Score: 1

    Back to Write-Only Memory...

    --
    Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
    Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
  67. Hair Club by MikeA · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll cancel my appointment with the Hair Club for Men till this is perfected. Just think how much data my flowing locks will store.

  68. Re:Guest Post: T4D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since you're going to eventually have to pay for everything out of pocket

    As opposed to having the government give you everything you'd ever need without having to work a day in your life (free health care, food stamps, clothing vouchers, free housing, who needs a job?)

  69. Re:Guest Post: T4D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your a commie. no pun intended with the russian thing.

  70. Useful Applications by CDOS_CDOS+run · · Score: 1

    Now I will be able to have my I-wig music player from Apple. I-wig Crewcut - 1Tb of storage $149 I-wig Dreadlock - 5 Tb of Storage $199 I-Wig Mullet - 10Tb $249 I-Wig Geek (featuring pony tail)15Tb $299

  71. Brilliant. Who needs direct acces anyway? by crovira · · Score: 1

    Imagine, instead of storing data on concentric spirals that can be accessed at a pretty fast rate, we'll be able to have these drives of candy-floss like glassine material whipping around and drawing blood every time a volume needs to be numounted and changed.

    Yeah. That clear forward thinking.

    I can just imagine their using write-only RAM with black hole diodes for the controller.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  72. Floppy? I think NOT sir! by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2, Funny

    [tinfoilhat]I am sticking to my 5.25" floppy, it's the only reliable way to backup data.[/tinfoilhat]

    Fool. Using this untested, so called 'floppy disk' will only lead to data loss. The only tested, and reliable storage meidum is the punch card. Don't trust these new fangled gadgets until they have been proven to be more than some mad scientist's pipe dream.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Floppy? I think NOT sir! by kiberovca · · Score: 1

      The best way is to encode the data into the PI value, just by slightly altering a few pesky universe parameters. That way, you can keep your data forever (or until some stupid dork tries to backup his data), and everybody can read it.

      If they are precise enough, that is.

      Oh, and finally, these few people will really find the meaning of the PI. http://www.42explore.com/pi.htm

      --
      Eric: "What're quantum mechanics?"
      Rincewind: "I don't know. People who repair quantums, I suppose."
    2. Re:Floppy? I think NOT sir! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I store all my files on loose leaf college ruled paper. It's written all in binary so when I want to watch some porn, uh, History Channel documentarys, I just scan it in.

    3. Re:Floppy? I think NOT sir! by forrestt · · Score: 1

      Yes, and encrypting it is as easy as shuffling the deck.

    4. Re:Floppy? I think NOT sir! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no need to change any universe parameters. Just search for your data within the decimals of PI, record the offset, and presto! you're done.

  73. You mean Irrational Number... by aepervius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Number which cannot be expressed as a mean of a division of two integer. For example PI, Square Root 2, Exp (1) etc... Those numbe do exists. but they do Not belong to the rational ensemble.

    For kicker : |N Which read , natural integer ensemble N is included in positive and negative integer ensemble Z , which is included in rational ensemble Q, which is included in real ensemble R which is included into complex ensemble C at which point a therom (completness theorem?) says there is no ensemble in which C is included and is "greater".

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:You mean Irrational Number... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      42

    2. Re:You mean Irrational Number... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C can be included in larger things: e.g., in one direction, C can be included in the quaternions or octinions (but you lose things like commutativity or associativity of multiplication); in another direction, C can be included in larger fields like C(t). You might be thinking about the fact that C is algebraically complete, which is a consequence of the fundamental theorem of algebra.

  74. Impractical by Statecraftsman · · Score: 1

    10GB in 10cm means each bit is going to be stored in only 10 nm of length. With a 5-20 micron diameter of glass, it's going to be impossible to read one magnetic bit at a time. I'd say the bits would have to be on the order of the diameter of the coating. That means we're look it more like 5000 bits in that length of wire.

    1. Re:Impractical by GuardianAngus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If 1Gb = 1e9Gb, 10Gb would be 1e10Gb
      Now, for the sake of simplicity, 10cm = 0.1m
      0.1m / 1e10Gb = 1e-11 b/m, or 1b = 1e-11 meters.

      That puts 1 bit at = 0.000 000 000 01 meters, does it not?
      1nm would be = 0.000 000 001
      1pm would be = 0.000 000 000 001

      Each bit would need to be no more than 10pm (.01nm) for this level of data density. Perhaps my reality has been distorted by too much caffeen. Corrections are welcome.

      So how many LoC's per VW would this be?

  75. Misplaced microwire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saved all my data on amicrowire. Now if only i could find the damn thing

  76. So what you're saying is by Morphix84 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That you have a 10 cm wire that works like a floppy disk, and has the same capacity, except you can't read from it. You compare the magnetic switch technique to CDs, which are optical, and state that this will replace the DVD, even though the highly inaccurate 10 gig capacity is only marginally better than Dual layer DVDs, and we have HD-DVD and Bluray coming out shortly (i.e. before they figure out how to read the data), which will smoke DVDs anyway. WHY IS THIS POSTED ON SLASHDOT!?

  77. Re:Guest Post: T4D by k96822 · · Score: 1

    Wow... so... you'd pretty much rear-end my car with the Dubya sticker on the back then, huh?

  78. Change of Venue Requested by Stanistani · · Score: 4, Funny

    This innovation should have been covered in Wired .

    1. Re:Change of Venue Requested by OAB_X · · Score: 1

      Posts like this make me realize that /. needs a "Score: -1, Bad Pun" rating.

  79. variation on a theme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sticking with my tried and true /dev/nul for all of my write-once-read-never needs...

  80. Re:Guest Post: T4D by k96822 · · Score: 1

    You know, I do have to remind you of one minor-detail. Bush won the election; both popular and electorial. Which means there are a lot more people out there who voted for Bush than who didn't. So, you hate a lot of people.

  81. Re:Guest Post: T4D by Reignking · · Score: 0

    Wow... so... you'd pretty much rear-end my car with the Dubya sticker on the back then, huh?

    I bet that he wouldn't -- because you have a giant SUV while he has a Smartcar. SUV wins :)

    --
    One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
  82. No more than I would trust someone who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    thinks a byte can be stored in one bit.

    The researchers calculate that a 10 cm long microwire can carry out 10 million divisions or cells and in each one of these a byte can be stored. In order to store the byte, each one of these cells is magnetised in one orientation or the other.

    More like 10 Megabits in a 10cm wire, not 10 Gigabytes.

    1. Re:No more than I would trust someone who... by karnal · · Score: 1

      10 million divisions or cells and in each one of these a byte can be stored. In order to store the byte,

      Maybe you can store one of 8 strengths of varying magnetism within each division, which would lead to 10MB. But you're right, how you can get 10GB out of that???

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:No more than I would trust someone who... by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's almost as much as a HD floppy disk! I wish I had a MW reader for my C-64.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    3. Re:No more than I would trust someone who... by Lord+Agni · · Score: 1

      Maybe they use some from of PRML.

    4. Re:No more than I would trust someone who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The researchers calculate that a 10 cm long microwire can carry out 10 million [editor's note: Elhuyar Fundazioa made a mistake here, should be billion] divisions or cells... There was appearently an error by the person who wrote up this article.

  83. Shenanigans? by serutan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know whether to believe this or not. It seems too reminiscent of an old Outer Limits episode called "Demon with a Glass Hand," in which the entire human race has been converted to electrical impulses and stored on a small piece of wire.

    Also the article seems to confuse bits and bytes, and says "researchers calculate that a 10 cm long microwire can carry out 10 million divisions or cells" -- the wire is carrying out divisions? Either this is poorly written or a poorly conceived hoax.

    1. Re:Shenanigans? by PSUdaemon · · Score: 1

      That's a good episode. I was hoping someone on here would bring that up cause I couldn't remember exactly where I had seen that.

  84. Impossible numbers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait...wait...here it comes... Yes! You ARE an idiot!

  85. Black hole memory? by Tjoppen · · Score: 1

    "Researchers say that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information."

    How about just sending light into a black hole? You can cram a lot of data into those things!
    Fairly secure aswell - I'd like to see someone get close enough to read it.

  86. Finally WORN drives at last! by DanielMarkham · · Score: 4, Funny

    I, for one, have been waiting for the Write-Once, Read Never drives.

    Let's face it: half the stuff on your drive you're never going to use again anyway. Might as well save it on a data hair so it will not be there when you don't need it.

    And these things will be easy to design to follow moore's law. Every 18 months, just put a new label on the package.

    1. Re:Finally WORN drives at last! by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Your UNIX or UNIX-like OS most likely already has this amazing technology installed. The WORN drive is usually mounted as /dev/null; any of your standard file-manipulation tools should be able to move files to this time-saving device.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Finally WORN drives at last! by atcurtis · · Score: 1


      In some 20yr old semiconductor catalogues, you can sometimes find Write-Only Memory... Not sure as to the precise application of such devices but I am pretty sure I remember seeing a datasheet from a company called "Signetics Semiconductor" detailing the WOM.

      --
      -- The universe began. Life started on a billion worlds...
      -- Except on one where stupidity was there first.
  87. what the...? by selfdiscipline · · Score: 1

    that's annoying... posting something like that and not explaining it. There's nothing on wikipedia about impossible numbers, and a quick google search comes up with nothing relevant.
    Anyway, why should some numbers exist and others not? I posit that no numbers exist. They are purely an abstraction of the real world.

    --


    -------
    Incite and flee.
  88. Insert Obligatory remark about... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 1

    Insert Obligatory remark about storage capacity of DNA here....

  89. The Horror! by MattyDK23 · · Score: 0

    A return to magnetic media? What next...vacuum tubes?

    1. Re:The Horror! by narcc · · Score: 3, Funny

      What next...vacuum tubes?

      You bet! Except they'll be nanovacuum tubes -- The problem, of course, is changing them when they burn out...

    2. Re:The Horror! by zecg · · Score: 0

      Isn't that what the nanobots do?

      --
      .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    3. Re:The Horror! by narcc · · Score: 1

      So the question remains ... how many nanobots does it take to change a vaccum tube?

    4. Re:The Horror! by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, you can just try to measure them when a change is needed

    5. Re:The Horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bet! Except they'll be nanovacuum tubes -- The problem, of course, is changing them when they burn out...

      That won't stop the audiophiles!

  90. Moving from 2D to 1D to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Following on the heels of the breakthrough of microwires, researchers have announced success in storing data on individual particles. This zero dimensional technology involves selectively magnetizing microscoping grains. So far, researchers admit that there are some difficulties in reading back information. Said a spokesman for the group, "We considered affixing them to a sheet or disc of some kind, but then we would lose all of the benefits of non-dimensionality." When asked what those benefits were the interview was forcibly ended after said spokesman began throwing bar magnets at the press.

  91. Well, the small recovery issue didn't stop Disney by cfsmp3 · · Score: 0

    ... and this is dream world too.

    --
    I would buy karma from ebay but I'm not sure I can trust the seller.
  92. Sounds like my dating strategy! by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finding women is easy! Talking to them is the tricky part.

    1. Re:Sounds like my dating strategy! by bvdbos · · Score: 1

      tlaking to them isn't that hard either but getting them to not walk away as soon as you start talking prvoed to be the hardest part for me... Guess I shouldn't talk about the latest OOO-beta...

    2. Re:Sounds like my dating strategy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Finding women is easy! Talking to them is the tricky part.
      I only talk to alcoholic sluts. Getting them to LEAVE is the tricky part.
  93. Re:Guest Post: T4D by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

    but at least he wasn't going to restructure the US into a country where those of us who make meager earnings are going to suffer. Bush is making this a country where you ned to have at least a six figure salary to just get by since you're going to eventually have to pay for everything out of pocket.

    Those who make "meager earnings" already suffer. They can't blame that on any politician. They will suffer under any regime run by anyone in any country. Bush does not set your salery or mine, our employers do.
    Have to pay everything out of pocket? What do you mean? Food, rent, utilities, taxes? You already have to pay those out of pocket (assuming you're not leeching off the government and having the support your entire life). How can you blame something like having to pay your own bills and earn your own living on Bush? People have been doing that for thousands of years, but now it's suddenly Bush's fault that you have to work?

    It's time to stop blaming everything on Bush. These things have NOTHING to do with him. Why don't you post with a valid arguement next time?

  94. Re:Guest Post: T4D by k96822 · · Score: 1

    Well, close. I have a big gas-guzzling Toyota Camry. $30 to fill the tank! But, I guarantee, I won't notice when I run over his Smartcar in my Toyota either :-)

  95. After checking on the net by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Normally I don't answer to my own post, but this is not Goedel completness theorem. I just can't seem to remmember thwat is the proof of completness of C. Oh well...

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  96. let me add... by thegnu · · Score: 2, Funny

    DVD-WOM

    ha!

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
    1. Re:let me add... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      DVD-WOM? Why, that's my favouwite stowigde media! Ehuhuhuh...

    2. Re:let me add... by ThJ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sssh! Be vewy vewy quiet! I'm buwning my powno!

  97. Re:Guest Post: T4D by HBI · · Score: 1

    I'm doing the same thing for your disloyal side, so we're even.

    My memory lasts forever. Hope yours does too.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  98. Nanites... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Imagine, couldn't we have a few hundred nanites all reading the thread and communicating via RFID back to the master queen nanite?

  99. Plan... by drigz · · Score: 1

    1) Get a box with some metal contacts on the outside
    2) Claim it can store a gajillion gigabytes of data. Don't mention that it cannot be read again.
    3) Profit!!!

  100. Re:Guest Post: T4D by eno2001 · · Score: 0

    That would be spot on. But then again if you consider 51% to be a victory, then I suppose you didn't mind making it through school with D minuses either? ;P

    Actually, I really don't hate anyone. I believe in complete fairness and equality for everyone. But until people get on board with that ideal, there's going to be a lot of dissonance on my part. I don't like this "every man for himself in the name of the almighty dollar" tack that the U.S. has recklessly embarked on. It's disgusting.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  101. Pigzip by Silverlancer · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of this Hackles Strip:

    "I wrote a super, new compression algorithm -- I call it pigzip! Look how much space I'm saving by pigzipping all our application data!"

    "I can't believe it! This pigzip took 3 gigabytes of data, and compressed it down to only... 3 bytes... wait... I'm guessing there's no decompression algorithm yet?"

    "Its harder than it looks."

  102. Could != Can by nfsilkey · · Score: 1

    Kind of a misleading title, dont you think?

  103. Ah, W.M.R.N.. by adeyadey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or to give it its acronym, the long-awaited "Write Many, Read Never" drive is here..

    You know, kinda like those 5 cent DVD-Rs you get down the market..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:Ah, W.M.R.N.. by autocracy · · Score: 1

      Error: /dev/null is full.

      --
      SIG: HUP
  104. It's a bit out of date by seizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This form of memory isn't much different from this 40+ year old tech, is it?

  105. I dont know by blobzorz · · Score: 1

    I don't really trust microwaves... they COULD hurt ya know?

  106. Re:Guest Post: T4D by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    My memory lasts forever too. There is a person who wronged me in grade school (1978 to be exact) with a figurative target on his head if I ever see him again and can do something to make his day miserable. ;P

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  107. Bald Forgetful Men Of The World, Rejoice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you can have cool metallic hair AND keep all 47 episodes of the Monkees close at hand. Meet a cool-looking chick? Tell her your hair holds more information than the local library.

    Hey -- that's not a bald spot! I just ran a virus check.

  108. Re:Guest Post: T4D by erlenic · · Score: 1
    you ned[sic] to have at least a six figure salary to just get by since you're going to eventually have to pay for everything out of pocket.

    Replace "pocket" with "taxes" and you have a perfect description of your plan.

  109. Huh? by MHobbit · · Score: 1

    Reverting from magnetic to optical, and now back to magnetic? Wouldn't that be too simple to screw up the microwire by realigning the magnetic features incorrectly?

    I guess if they can improve it, it'd be all right.

    --
    Debugging? Klingons do not debug. Bugs are good for building character in the user.
  110. Re:Guest Post: T4D by erlenic · · Score: 1

    Proving once again that the phrase "mature liberal" is an oxymoron.

  111. Magnetized CDs by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

    Magnetized CDs? Yeah, I remember those!

    They were black and floppy, and came in their own cases. They were better than modern CDs because you didn't have to take them out of their case before you put them in the computer.

    1. Re:Magnetized CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They were better than modern CDs because you didn't have to take them out of their case before you put them in the computer.
      Not with later CD drives, anyway -- lest we forget the CD caddy.
  112. Will never replace CDs by tuxlove · · Score: 1
    According to the article, the storage capcity of the wire is one megabyte per centimeter length. A standard CD stores 640 megabytes, which is equivalent to 6.4 meters of wire storage. To be useful, it would have to be wrapped up on a spool, and unwound by a drive of some sort in order to be read. It would be similar to tape drives, such as DLT, except potentially much more compact. However, I don't see how something like this could ever replace CDs, because linear storage does not make a good replacement for good old random access media like CDs, regardless of capacity.

    If anything, storage wire technology might replace current tape technology as smaller and maybe more durable (or maybe not). But this definitely doesn't pose a threat to CDs as a fast and convenient storage media.

  113. Re:Guest Post: T4D by k96822 · · Score: 1

    Elections aren't based on gradients -- they win, or they don't. 51% does the trick :-)

    I totally agree about the screw-your-neighbor aspect of America. I don't see how Bush caused that, though.

  114. Re:Guest Post: T4D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since only a minority of the population voted, the percentage who approved of Bush is closer to 20.9%. The adjusted Kerry vote was 19.9% Either way, it is ridiculous to assume the majority of Americans are pro-Bush. A safer assumption would be that most just don't care, because they rightly do not see much of a change in their daily lives, no matter who is in office. Apathy is only marginally better than being pro-Bush, in my book.

  115. Re:Guest Post: T4D by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

    Actually, that would only be true if 100% of the people voted. It was a record turnout, but it wasn't really close to 100%.

  116. Why is reading difficult? by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Just like a spool of tape, it can be put on a spool of string, and run through a writer/reader just like the audio casette tapes. I can imagine the reader must be really sensitive, but if a hard-drive's head can be engineered into an audio casette recorder, it should be possible.

    Now we can look forward to the next iPod getting jammed with spools of hair.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  117. Another great russian invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As all civilized people know, everything great is invented in russia. This amazing invention provides more proof of that, and adds to other great inventions of russian scientists like super compression algorithm which can compress any amount if data to zero size. They are still working on decompression, though.

  118. My Petabyte Storage Device by Bluedove · · Score: 1
    Researchers say that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information


    Well, if it can be write-only, i already have a petabyte storage device on my PC. I call it "Cam's Superfast and Most Excellent Petabyte Write-Only Storage Device", but most of you just call it /dev/null. ;-)

  119. typos by frieked · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know there have been a ton of posts saying how the wire only holds 10 million bits and that's only 10 megs, but if you go back and rtfa again they have updated it, it now reads:
    "The researchers calculate that a 10 cm long microwire can carry out 10 million [editor's note: Elhuyar Fundazioa made a mistake here, should be billion] divisions or cells and in each one of these a byte can be stored. In order to store the byte, each one of these cells is magnetised in one orientation or the other."

    --

    I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
    -Xenocrates
    1. Re:typos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh ok, but it's STILL wrong. Each cell can store one BIT not one BYTE.

      With two ed notes in one sentence, it's looking pretty bogus.

  120. So by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    It's back to the future, is it?

    --
    What?
  121. Re:Guest Post: T4D by k96822 · · Score: 1

    100% of the people who voted count toward the score (ooh, somebody is going to FLAME that, I just know it). 100% of the citizens did not vote, but since they didn't vote, their vote doesn't count in the total. It's like saying 4 out of 5 dentists who chew gun prefer Trident. The numbers don't include the non-gummin' dentists! :-)

  122. Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quoth the sig: I like my coffee like I like my women. Ground up and kept in the freezer.

    All the ha-ha factor aside, you're violating multiple laws of good coffee production there:

    • Grind your coffee as close to brew-time as possible
    • Keep your coffee beans (or grounds if you must) in an airtight container (be it a large ziplock, tupperware) rather than the freezer. Each time you remove coffee from the freezer, you're robbing it of natural moisture during the thaw process.

    Now, try to treat your beans better than that.

  123. Even better data storage device by Tuuresairon · · Score: 1

    So, as someone have mentioned, we already have /dev/null - the greatest write-only data storage device...
    But imagine... We'll be reading about Russian scientists discovering the way to recover data from /dev/null...

  124. Write once, read never by ccharles · · Score: 1

    Pfft! Only 10 gigabytes? I can write an infinite amount of info to /dev/null and not read it...

  125. Worst article ever by cryptor3 · · Score: 1
    Between the magnetic CDs, not knowing whether they mean a million or a billion, and not knowing whether they mean bits or bytes, this has to be least informative article ever. Oh, and don't forget the fact that they appear to be talking about a write-only memory.

    Maybe CDs are magnetic in Soviet Russia.

  126. Recording on Wires by Bilbo · · Score: 1
    Anyone out there remember the old Wire Recorder? It predated the Tape Recorder, putting the same sort of magnetic signal on an extremely fine steel wire. I actually had one at one time. I remember an episode of "Hogan's Heroes" where Hogan received a pair of knitted socks from home. Once Schultz let him have the socks, they took them in and ran them through a hidden wire recorder -- the wire had been hidden in one of the strands of yarn in the socks and contained some sort of secret message...

    Yea, the stuff of great spy stories.... ;-)

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
  127. I have the same problem. by 955301 · · Score: 1

    I have this problem with my brain. I read tens, maybe hundreds of words a day. I take video recordings with my eyes and audio with these things on the side of my head. I forget what they are called. I have been recording and storing this information since the early 1970's so I'm prior art.

    The problem is, my retrieval - it's not so good. Sometimes I have simple read errors such as forgetting the name of my girlfriend. As if that isn't bad enough, sometimes I cannot retrieve an entire section of audio and video, or I get them misaligned. The most drastic case I seem to be able to read right now is when I recalled this cutie pie from college telling me to talk dirty to her. But in reality, that was my step-grandmother.

    If I can get the bugs worked out, I'm sure my life would be much easier.

    So. What were we talking about again?

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  128. Sweet. by haelduksf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Excellent. I've always wanted to garotte someone with the full text of Gone With The Wind. My dream finally comes true!

    1. Re:Sweet. by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Nobody ever tell you "The Wind Done Gone" .

      --
  129. I can store ten gazillion bytes in /dev/null by samuel4242 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The difficulty is reading it.

  130. US technology emulated by the Soviets.... by Macrolord · · Score: 1



    "Researchers say that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information"

    I get it! This is the Soviet equivalent to a zip drive?!?!? ...accidentally cut the thread and you end up with the Clip of Death!

  131. Re:i predict that there will be by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

    Excellent response. If you wern't AC, I'd mod it up.

  132. Re:Guest Post: T4D by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

    those of us who make meager earnings are going to suffer

    Why not try to improve yourself and earn more money, rather than blaming how much you make on the fucking government?

    Bush is making this a country where you ned to have at least a six figure salary to just get by

    Bullshit.

    you're going to eventually have to pay for everything out of pocket

    You mean rather than the government stealing the money from someone else who earned it, and giving it to you in the form of services which you should pay for yourself?

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  133. This technology has been around for ages by Khyber · · Score: 1

    This technology predates back to when they used wires for recording messages and other sessions, now that we've got a better method of storing things magnetically, it only makes sense we'd turn back to older technology, and significantly improve upon it.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  134. Write-Only, eh? by dynamo · · Score: 1

    If reading the data out accurately isn't an issue, here's a simple way to store ANY amount of data on a single wire less than 1 cm long!!!

    0. Start out with a wire > 1cm long.
    1. Take the data and encode it into a sequence of decimal digits. If you don't know how to do this you shouldn't be reading slashdot. This sequence is concatenated into one huge number N.
    2. Cut the wire to a length of EXACTLY 1/N cm long.
    3. Now you can read the length of the wire, invert it, and decode your sequence of digits.

    The wire now contains however much information you wanted to store. Whether you can retrieve that info depends on the accuracy of your reading (and writing) equipment. In the meantime while 1cm is too small for effective equipment to be used, make it an appropriate fraction of 1m. Or 1km. Whatever.

  135. Re:Guest Post: T4D by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

    "Bush does not set your salery or mine, our employers do."

    He does many things which directly affect the salaries of millions of people. For one, not raising the minimum wage keeps many people below the poverty line. The percentage of poor people in this country is higher than it has ever been since the great depression. Taxation directly reduces a person's salary, but his tax breaks greatly favor the top few percent. His plan for Social Security will take retirement money away from people who were depending on it, who were promised it. The idea of pushing SS money to Wall Street where future Enrons and Worldcoms can steal it is outrageous.

    "These things have NOTHING to do with him."

    WAKE UP. We were running a surplus and paying off our national debt until Bush came into office and gave rich people a big tax break and started a bogus war.

    He's making people sick with his overhaul of the clean air act while making it harder for them to get medical help. He'll make it nearly impossible for those injured by big business to hold them accountable.

    He has made a mockery of our justice system with the Unpatriot Act. He let MS off the hook for major transgressions against free trade.

    "valid arguement"

    You can't even spell "argument", but that's no surprise since you are too naive to see how Bush's actions have directly and negatively affected the lives of millions of Americans.

    Bush is not a public servant, he's a power broker as is the rest of his family and his administration.

  136. Hmmm, Frank Herbet says hi by theolein · · Score: 1

    His Shigawire in the Dune series was something similar.

  137. Wire recording is a new thing? by smithmc · · Score: 1


    Is this really all that different (except in size) from good ol' fashioned wire recording?

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  138. Re:Guest Post: T4D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... assuming you believe in the results of Diebold voting machines running on VB that have no paper audit trail.

  139. Re:Guest Post: T4D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha! "stealing the money from someone else who earned it"...

    "Earning" requires "work", something the filthy rich know nothing about. All they understand is manipulating the system to further enrich themselves (at the expense of people who do actually work).

  140. yes, but by selfdiscipline · · Score: 1

    that just means you can't store an infinite amount of data... if you round the fraction down, you're just truncating the data set... what you're left with may be incomplete, but it is valid

    --


    -------
    Incite and flee.
    1. Re:yes, but by Surt · · Score: 1

      It's incomplete, valid, but not 0.43223400240983312345432

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:yes, but by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      No problem. Just add in some parity bits.

  141. Re:Guest Post: T4D by UnrefinedLayman · · Score: 1

    It is the responsibility of the leader of the country to lead by example. Telling the democrats that he embraces bi-partisanship and welcomes their participation provided they do things his way, what with his 51% "mandate," is not setting an example for cooperation and friendliness. It's xenophobia, and right now the Republican party and GWB are working very hard to solidify their powerbase with it. Expect the next fifty years to be a direct reflection of the policies being put into place now and the leadership demonstrated by Bush.

    Bush didn't cause the bitter socio-political divides in America, but he drives the wedge deeper every day. This is a man who casually disregarded the single largest world-wide demonstration ever, saying it didn't influence him a single bit. That's a man with blinders: everything should be considered by someone who leads. Unfortunately, Bush has the bad habit of "sticking to his guns" and not letting himself be swayed once he makes a decision. Even when it is the wrong decision or when that decision has been based on patently false information (e.g., wmd).

    Leading by example means you admit your mistakes and listen to the people you lead, not 51% of them.

    That's one of the issues I have with representatives in congress. They come to congress with an agenda, and that agenda is not to do the will of the people. I think more representatives, rather than toeing the party line, ought to ask their constituents what they think on issues and vote appropriately, not what do the people that voted for them and not the other guy or gal think. But hey, that's a pipedream. At least I don't try to force that agenda on people who don't agree with it.

  142. Zillions of terabytes memory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    My Linux box already has a storage feature large enough you can use to write every byte of data on the planet into... if you never intend to read it back out.

    It's called "/dev/null"

  143. Bogometer alert. by Ten+Ryu · · Score: 1

    This is a hoax, or at least it contains several fatal mistakes. Just do the math:
    1E-1 m / 8E+10 bit = about 1E-12 m / bit
    Taken into account that the spacing between atoms in solid iron is 2.9E-10 m, this is blatantly impossible.

    Moreover, if I remember correctly, the theoretical lower limit to the size of a ferromagnetic domain is about 100 atoms. On the basis of this, I estimate that it is not possible to write more than 8MB on a very thin wire 10cm in length. This is not very impressive to me, but at least it comes close to the '10 million divisions or cells' mentioned in the article.

    Under ideal cicrcumstances, it might be possibly crank 10GB onto a 10cm wire 10m in diameter if one treats it as a cylinder and writes different bits around its circumference. However, this would require truely revolutionary technology, and render the data very vulnerable to torsion forces. Moreover, the article suggests that it is not the case: '"bamboo"-type structure of domains'.

    Furthermore, it is full of fancy-sounding word combinations I can't make sense of, and contains other shameful mistakes, like the "magnetical CD", and the bits/bytes confusion. Taken together, it drives my bogometer into the red...

  144. Oops by Ten+Ryu · · Score: 1

    10m in diameter should read 20 um (that's micrometer) in diameter. I made a typo in the number, and the 'micron' sign was eaten on submission. I know I should have used that preview button...

  145. Magnetic Core Memory by AngstAndGuitar · · Score: 1

    So what I basicaly got out of the article is that they will re use the old idea of magnetic core memory at a much smaller scale..
    right?

    --
    Less look fast, more go fast.
  146. yes, Microwaves can replace the DVD-ROM by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    I dont even use my DVD-ROM anymore, I just connected my Microwave up to my TV and PC and play all my movies through that now. It doubles as a burner too ;)

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  147. Oh, if thats it by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

    Oh, if reading information is not important, then I have developed a much superior technology. Simply take an affortable 10 GB hard drive, and reformat it everytime you fill it up.

  148. Reminds me of an Outer Limits episode by unassimilatible · · Score: 1
    Demon With a Glass Hand.

    In this case, the entire human race was stored on a copper wire, which is a lot of DVDs.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  149. Reading? by alexo · · Score: 1


    > Microwires Can Replace The DVD-ROM [...]
    > Anyway, it's not that easy. Researchers say that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information.


    If reading the information was impossible, this could be a great alternative to the DVD-WOM

  150. Virusy gel pack ; ) by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    That's "bio-neural gel packs", actually. Do I get modded down for being too Trekkie (especially considering that's ST:VOY)?

    If I had mod points, you'd get slapped with a "-1: Reminding us of the dread of the inevitable episode where the ship would catch a cold".

    Fortunatly they did it not too far in the series and we could groan through it, and then move on. But you reminded us! You BASTARD!

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Virusy gel pack ; ) by Kippesoep · · Score: 1

      "Don't worry, my little friend". You can mod that "-1 Evil"!

    2. Re:Virusy gel pack ; ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was so wrong with bio-neural gel packs?

      Why was that the one sticking point when so much of the Trek universe is all fantasy anyway? Just curious how your suspension of disbelief at all the other technobabble was unravelled by the unveiling of said gel packs?

  151. /dev/null by daverabbitz · · Score: 0

    I've found the ultimate storage device even better than this, /dev/null it just never seems to fill up I must of backed millions of movi^H^H^H^Hwork documents up into it. Just wish I could find out how to extract it back.
    Oh yes and I'm filing a patent on backing thhings to /dev/null so that when I do find a way I'll make squillions!

    --
    What could be better than a jet powered motorcycle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8l6GTHLSWE
  152. Re:Guest Post: T4D by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

    "Earning" requires "work", something the filthy rich know nothing about.

    First of all, "earning" does not require physical work. All it requires is obtaining the money legally and ethically. If I invest money and earn interest on it, I am not working for the profit, but I am earning it. If rich people did not invest money, poor people would not:

    - Be able to get a loan (where do you think the money comes from?)

    - Be able to get a job (who do you think creates the companies and the jobs in America?)

    - Be able to purchase inexpensive goods (who do you think creates the companies that make the things you purchase?)

    All they understand is manipulating the system to further enrich themselves (at the expense of people who do actually work).

    The same could be said about those that manipulate our social services like welfare to further enrich themselves at the expense of taxpayers.

    It is truly sad that you feel earning money, making money, obtaining money is "manipulating the system." Perhaps this reveals something about you?

    Are their evil poor people? Evil rich people? Yes and yes. Why do you equate being rich with being evil? For every "evil" rich person you can name, I can name 10 "good" rich people.

    You have allowed the left to brainwash you into thinking in terms of class warfare. Perhaps you'd be better off if you spent your time thinking about ways to improve yourself and earn more money.

    By the way, since you seem to be ignorant on the matter, capitalism is not a zero sum game. A rich person earning money does not take away from the amount of money a poor person can earn. There is not a limited supply of wealth, as some would make you believe.

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  153. 0.1 Angstroms per bit? Rubbish! by chr1sb · · Score: 2, Informative

    This article is full of crap. An angstrom is 10^-10 metres, and corresponds to the diameter of a hydrogen atom. In order to linearly store 10 gigabits (let's assume that the author intended to use "bits" rather than "bytes") in a distance of 0.1 metres, each bit would have to be 10^-11 metres long, which corresponds to a length of 0.1 angstroms. If the author mistook "giga" for "mega", and intended that the wire could store 10 megabits, then that would mean that each magnetic cell would be 10^-8 metres long - 100 angstroms or 10 nanometres. Storing a magnetic bit in such a short distance would be an impressive feat.

  154. There's better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Researchers say that the greatest difficulty will be with the reading of information

    Bah. I have this infinite capacity storage on my computer. I think it's called /dev/null.

  155. Re:Guest Post: T4D by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

    "not raising the minimum wage keeps many people below the poverty line"

    He doesn't even have the authority to change the minimum wage, that is set by ..... Congress. Let's blame him anyways.

    "His plan for Social Security will take retirement money away from people who were depending on it"

    His plan does not decrease current social security, but rather supplemnents it on a VOLUNTARY BASIS. But, how will we ever achieve a true communist state if we allow people to choose for themselves?

    "gave rich people a big tax break"

    Rich people are people just like you and me. Why should they pay such a disproportionate amount of the tax revenue? They have more, and owe it to the rest of us, right?

    "He'll make it nearly impossible for those injured by big business to hold them accountable."

    You mean like the people who were shot by a killer trained by Wal-Mart (through the sale of a video game)?

    "He has made a mockery of our justice system with the Unpatriot Act."

    Once again, passed by the congress, would've been signed by Gore anyways.

    "Bush is not a public servant, he's a power broker as is the rest of his family and his administration."

    This is true of ANY politician (even your beloved Stalin), stop acting like it's exclusive to Bush and therefore makes him somehow worse than the others.

  156. Re:Guest Post: T4D by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

    No, it's not like saying that, because in the gum chewing dentist sentence, the verbiage 'who chew gum' is in there. So that would be more like saying 'More people who voted, voted for Bush than Kerry.' That would be a true sentence, but to say 'More people voted for Bush than didn't' isn't true because that sentence doesn't limit it only to people who voted. Or even Americans for that matter, but I was actually making THAT assumption.

  157. Dear Editor... by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 1

    Hooh! The editor is gonna have Elhuyar Fundazioa's ass for messing up the article with his horrific million/billion blunder. Oh , I would have been so misinformed if the clever Mr. Editor didn't point out that mistake! It's good that he mentioned Elhuyar Fundazioa by name as well. That makes me hate him and his family for that unforgetable blunder.

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
  158. Re:Guest Post: T4D by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

    minimum wage
    -------------
    "He doesn't even have the authority to change the minimum wage, that is set by ..... Congress. Let's blame him anyways."

    He's the top dog Republican. The house and the senate are controlled by Republicans.

    social security
    ---------------
    "His plan does not decrease current social security, but rather supplemnents it on a VOLUNTARY BASIS. But, how will we ever achieve a true communist state if we allow people to choose for themselves?"

    You seem to have no understanding of why we have a social security system. Volunteerism and communism have nothing to do with it.

    tax cuts
    ---------
    "Rich people are people just like you and me. Why should they pay such a disproportionate amount of the tax revenue? They have more, and owe it to the rest of us, right?"

    They do not pay a disproportionate amount of taxes. You're probably confusing "rich" with "middle class". Suggesting that the rich support everyone else is incredibly arrogant.

    tort reform
    -----------
    You mean like the people who were shot by a killer trained by Wal-Mart (through the sale of a video game)?"

    No, I mean the people whose neighborhoods are being rained upon with sulphuric ash by dirty coal plants which are polluting more than ever due to rules changes by Bush.

    patriot act
    -----------
    "Once again, passed by the congress, would've been signed by Gore anyways."

    In case you didn't know, Gore is trying to get the Patriot Act repealed. Bush is pushing to renew it.

    bush sucks
    ----------
    "This is true of ANY politician (even your beloved Stalin),"

    Stop calling me a communist. Who do you think you are, Joe McCarthy?

    "stop acting like it's exclusive to Bush and therefore makes him somehow worse than the others."

    Take a good hard look at the man. Read about the business and politics of the Bush family. Study the VP and members of the cabinet. Consider the mistakes, the lies, the secrets. Yes, he is much worse than most others.

  159. Re:Guest Post: T4D by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

    "He's the top dog Republican. The house and the senate are controlled by Republicans." That doesn't change the fact that he can only sign what they put on his desk. I do understand how Social Security was MEANT to work. Furthermore, I DO believe it should be abolished. Older people have been finding ways to support themselves for thousands of years. If they want to save money, they should save it. If they don't, they should not be forced to (social security). By forcing people to save money in a government account, the governement is telling us that we don't know what is good for ourselves, and I (being amoung the minority of intelligent people) resent that. "They do not pay a disproportionate amount of taxes." It's called a progressive tax system. Not only do they pay more taxes in terms of $$, they also pay a higher percentage [both per capita]. Would you say the services they receive [per capita] is higher than that of a $20,000 income family who pays no [income] taxes due to deductions?? "Suggesting that the rich support everyone else is incredibly arrogant." Maybe you should look up the word arrogant*, because that statement implies that I am rich. The fact is, I am a poor college student, my father's income is BELOW THE POVERTY LINE for our household size, and you have the gall to say that my opinions are biased by my situation? I did not say that the rich support everyone, or that I support anyone. What I said is that they pay disproportionate income taxes, which is true. My father would be one of the one's benifitting by the money put in by rich people, if he chose to go on disability. But he refuses because he believes in earning one's living no matter how hard it is. So, I should support the rich paying higher taxes, afterall it would make my life easier? Maybe that would be true, if I didn't have moral values that teach me otherwise. "Reason is man's only proper judge of values and his only proper guide to action. The proper standard of ethics is: man's survival qua man--i.e., that which is required by man's nature for his survival as a rational being (not his momentary physical survival as a mindless brute). Rationality is man's basic virtue, and his three fundamental values are: reason, purpose, self-esteem. Man--every man--is an end in himself, not a means to the ends of others; he must live for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself; he must work for his rational self-interest, with the achievement of his own happiness as the highest moral purpose of his life." I'll let you guess who that's from. * "Arrogant - Having or displaying a sense of overbearing self-worth or self-importance" from American Heritage

  160. Repost - improved formatting by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

    "He's the top dog Republican. The house and the senate are controlled by Republicans."

    That doesn't change the fact that he can only sign what they put on his desk.

    I do understand how Social Security was MEANT to work. Furthermore, I DO believe it should be abolished.
    Older people have been finding ways to support themselves for thousands of years. If they want to save money, they should save it. If they don't, they should not be forced to (social security). By forcing people to save money in a government account, the governement is telling us that we don't know what is good for ourselves, and I (being amoung the minority of intelligent people) resent that.

    "They do not pay a disproportionate amount of taxes."

    It's called a progressive tax system. Not only do they pay more taxes in terms of $$, they also pay a higher percentage [both per capita]. Would you say the services they receive [per capita] is higher than that of a $20,000 income family who pays no [income] taxes due to deductions??

    "Suggesting that the rich support everyone else is incredibly arrogant."

    Maybe you should look up the word arrogant*, because that statement implies that I am rich. The fact is, I am a poor college student, my father's income is BELOW THE POVERTY LINE for our household size, and you have the gall to say that my opinions are biased by my situation?

    I did not say that the rich support everyone, or that I support anyone. What I said is that they pay disproportionate income taxes, which is true.

    My father would be one of the one's benefitting by the money put in by rich people, if he chose to go on disability. But he refuses because he believes in earning one's living no matter how hard it is.

    So, I should support the rich paying higher taxes, afterall it would make my life easier? Maybe I would support it, if I didn't have moral values to teach me otherwise.

    "Reason is man's only proper judge of values and his only proper guide to action. The proper standard of ethics is: man's survival qua man--i.e., that which is required by man's nature for his survival as a rational being (not his momentary physical survival as a mindless brute). Rationality is man's basic virtue, and his three fundamental values are: reason, purpose, self-esteem. Man--every man--is an end in himself, not a means to the ends of others; he must live for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself; he must work for his rational self-interest, with the achievement of his own happiness as the highest moral purpose of his life."
    I'll let you guess who that's from.

    * "Arrogant - Having or displaying a sense of overbearing self-worth or self-importance" from American Heritage

    1. Re:Repost - improved formatting by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      "That doesn't change the fact that he can only sign what they put on his desk."

      But you ignore the fact that he has great influence over what they bring him.

      "I do understand how Social Security was MEANT to work. Furthermore, I DO believe it should be abolished."

      I did too, once, and I'm still in favor of reforming the system, but not in the ways Bush is proposing. Allowing SS to be privatized means putting it in the hands of those who cannot be trusted to the degree necessary, wall street. It also means going trillions of dollars further in debt to continue paying benefits.

      "Older people have been finding ways to support themselves for thousands of years."

      People can become poor overnight, for any number of reasons. Don't pretend that there isn't a problem with poverty among the elderly. Social Security provides a very important safety net.

      "If they want to save money, they should save it. If they don't, they should not be forced to (social security)."

      And if someone should steal their money, will you pay their rent? People got wiped out by Enron. Twenty years ago it was the Savings and Loans. Brother Neil Bush just happened to be one of those scoundrels.

      "By forcing people to save money in a government account, the governement is telling us that we don't know what is good for ourselves, and I (being amoung the minority of intelligent people) resent that."

      Well, as one of the minority of intelligent people, you should have no problem overcoming the limitations put on you by the dumb people. If you're still college age, I don't think you've seen enough to know everything that's good for you.

      "It's called a progressive tax system. Not only do they pay more taxes in terms of $$, they also pay a higher percentage [both per capita]."

      You're simplifying it into a discussion of just income tax. Let's talk about capital gains taxes, estate taxes, investment credit loopholes, depreciation of luxury cars, yachts, etc. Leona Helmsley wasn't kidding when she said "taxes are for the little people".

      "Would you say the services they receive [per capita] is higher than that of a $20,000 income family who pays no [income] taxes due to deductions??"

      Good question. It's a tough thing to judge because services are rendered in so many ways. How about the compensation that was paid to families of 9/11 victims? How about expensive beachfront property that we end up paying for after a hurricane?

      "Maybe you should look up the word arrogant*, because that statement implies that I am rich."

      Fair enough, I forgot that I don't know who I'm arguing with.

      "The fact is, I am a poor college student, my father's income is BELOW THE POVERTY LINE for our household size, and you have the gall to say that my opinions are biased by my situation?"

      It just seems to me that you are advocating the position of a rich man.

      "I did not say that the rich support everyone, or that I support anyone. What I said is that they pay disproportionate income taxes, which is true."

      If that were true, I don't think so many wealthy politicians would be unwilling to show their tax returns.

      "My father would be one of the one's benefitting by the money put in by rich people, if he chose to go on disability. But he refuses because he believes in earning one's living no matter how hard it is."

      If he is able to earn his living, then strictly speaking, he isn't disabled. If he is disabled, then I would hope he would take advantage of the benefits the system has to offer.

      "So, I should support the rich paying higher taxes, afterall it would make my life easier? Maybe I would support it, if I didn't have moral values to teach me otherwise."

      You are supporting the rich paying lower taxes, making your life harder. That's what Bush has done. Since I don't support it, you have now labeled me immoral.

      IMO, Ayn Rand's fiction bears little resemblance to actual life on Earth.

  161. SPAM, spam and spam! by le_jfs · · Score: 1

    10 Gigabytes in 10 cm long

    I see a new generation of spam coming:

    Increase your hard drive by 3 inches!

    --
    main(char O){O++&&(((O-291)*O+27788)*O-868020?1:putchar(O++) )&&main(O);}
  162. Hogan's Heros... by Tungbo · · Score: 1

    showed many ways for the wire to be hidden and smuggled in. For this application, being hard to read is actually a GOOD property. Only those who knows the right wire and have the right hardware can access the data.

  163. Microwires? Finally! by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    Monofilament, here I come!

    Oh, wait. 20 m? Drat.

  164. 10 million divisons - integer or fp? by linoleo · · Score: 1

    Istrongly supsect that while the microwire might *carry* 10 million divisions, it can not in fact *carry them out*. Microwire FPU, anyone?

    --
    Be faithful to your obsessions. Identify them and be faithful to them, let them guide you like a sleepwalker. JG Ballard
  165. 107 years by Catskul · · Score: 1

    Thats nothing... really Wirerecorders were around much before then.

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  166. Re:Guest Post: T4D by k96822 · · Score: 1

    Well, there are nits to pick on this I suppose, but I think it is reasonably implied that I mean people who actually voted. :-) How can a vote be counted if the person didn't vote? English isn't that precise, by nature.

  167. Re:Guest Post: T4D by k96822 · · Score: 1

    If more people didn't agree with his agenda than didn't, they wouldn't have elected him president. That's the reason we have elections: the will of the people was represented. It is impossible to lead and make everyone happy. He is just making most people happy, which is at the very heart of our democracy. You are doing exactly what you should, though: try to convince people to vote differently next time. The system works!

  168. Thanks :) by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Algebraic complete. Yeah That is it. Thanks. +5 Informative ;). I remmember doing quaternion long ago in math sup. I am still thinking math is fun to do :).

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org