Slashdot Mirror


Mount St. Helens Shoots Steam, Ash

Wynken de Word writes "Months after the preliminary signs starting showing, Washington State's Mount St. Helens is sending a plume of steam and ash 7,600 metres into the air as of Tuesday, 17:25 PST. See the U.S. Geological Survey site for more updates and, come daylight, check out the Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam."

73 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. No worries by RileyLewis · · Score: 3, Funny

    This story is just a bunch of hot air.

  2. Ouch! by Wwolmack · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, some people would say steam deserves it, but shooting Ash is just wrong.

    Thanks folks, I'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip your waiterbot.

    1. Re:Ouch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks folks, I'll be here all week.

      I'm pretty sure Megan's Law doesn't apply to the Internet, so no warning was necessary.

    2. Re:Ouch! by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...Shoulda linked Ash to Ash Ketchum (pokemon).

      At least then nobody would care if you blew him out a volcano...

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    3. Re:Ouch! by Animekiksazz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Didn't he get shot out of a volcano once, they were fighting in it.. and oh god I've given away that I watched the show.

      *hides*

  3. Amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I live less than 50 miles from St Helens, and I heard about this on Slashdot first.

    1. Re:Amazing... by Polybius · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It will be more amazing when Yellowstone blows its top again. I'm sure you will know if you live within 50 miles of that because you will be killed by falling rock. You will also know if you live thousands of miles east due to the rain of ash.

    2. Re:Amazing... by lobsterGun · · Score: 3, Informative

      50 miles??? PAH!!!

      More like 500 miles.

      Linkey 1

      Linkey2

      Geological records indicate that Yellowstone erupts 'calendar like' every 600,000 to 650,000 years. It last erupted 640,000 years ago. It could go any day!

      At most, there's only 10,000 years left!!! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!

  4. Live from Seattle... by ruprechtjones · · Score: 3, Funny

    Woo hoo! I'm watching it right now from my back door! Wait, no I'm not, it's dark here in Seattle.

    What use is it if the thing blows at 5:30pm? The local news needs footage, man!

    --
    Kip Hawley is an idiot.
  5. photo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
  6. Re:Lava flow by geomon · · Score: 4, Informative

    These are andesitic volcanos, not tholiitic.

    The lavas are viscous. Unless you are in the rim of the volcano or are flying over the ridge with an infrared camera you won't see lava from St. Helens.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  7. NWCN video by bleu24 · · Score: 5, Informative

    NWCN site has a video the "Take a look inside the crater" http://www.nwcn.com/ link shows... well inside the crater. You have to sign up.

    1. Re:NWCN video by bobdotorg · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have it on good authority that their newest member is:

      email: slash@dot.com
      pass: slashdot

      --
      __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    2. Re:NWCN video by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Funny

      this email guy sure gets around... we've logged his Ip from all over the world... perhaps Santa should enlist him as a helper

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  8. No Signal on the camera by jleq · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Heh... no picture, just the usual red/green/blue dashes indicating "no signal", i.e. "the camera melted" Doesn't sound fun.

    1. Re:No Signal on the camera by KORfan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Web cam has been having network problems since March 5, they updated the image at 08:33 PST March 8 along with a message saying the netwrok problem was 30 miles from the camera and that it was being worked on. Of course, with the new activity, I suspect such work may be halted.

  9. The question on everyone's mind... by skraps · · Score: 4, Funny

    How close is Mount St. Helens to Redmond?

    --
    Karma: -2147483648 (Mostly affected by integer overflow)
    1. Re:The question on everyone's mind... by Phroggy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Close enough that they would have gotten a dusting of ash in 1980 (as did we in Portland, though I was too young to remember), but not close enough to do cover them in lava.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:The question on everyone's mind... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Funny

      But what if a large portion of the mountain were ejected in the direction (well, precisely, "at") the MS headquarters? And would there be any way to catalyze such an effect without looking suspicious?

      *reminds self to post as AC

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:The question on everyone's mind... by yiffyfox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Keep in mind that Mt. Rainier is covered with glaciers and would cause massive mud slides if it erupted.

      http://www.co.pierce.wa.us/text/abtus/ourorg/dem /E MDiv/Mt%20Rainier%20VHRP.htm

      In addition to producing tephra, magmatic eruptions of Mt. Rainier can produce lava flows or pyroclastic flows (fast-moving, hot, lethal avalanches of volcanic fragments and gas). The direct effects of such flows are to be expected on and near the steep flanks of Mt. Rainier, largely within the boundaries of Mt. Rainier National Park.

      Much more far-reaching destruction can result from lahars that originate at Mt. Rainier. Deposits of at least 55 lahars within the last 10,000 years have been identified in the large valleys draining Mt. Rainier.

      Lahars look and behave like flowing wet concrete owing to their characteristically high concentration of entrained sediment (commonly less than or equal to 60 volume percent). Because they are gravity flows, they become channeled into valleys. Led by a steep front charged with boulders, logs and any other available debris, they quickly fill pre-existing channels and spread across the adjacent flood plains, destroying mature forests and any human-made structures in their paths, including bridges, dams, roads, pipelines and buildings.

      The depth and speed of a lahar depend on its size, its sediment concentration and the valley configuration. At Mt. Rainier, most of the large lahars are inferred to have traveled as fast as 50 miles/hr at depths of 100 ft or more in confined valleys and at a lower velocity and lesser depth in the wide, populated valleys of the Puget Lowland. For example, remnant valley-wall deposits indicate that the Electron lahar was approximately 50 ft deep in its passage through the mile-wide Puyallup valley 1 1/4 miles upstream from Orting. However, the Electron lahar was about 180 ft deep 6 miles farther upstream, where the main part of the canyon is only about 1/4 miles wide.

      A critical implication from a hazard-mitigation standpoint is that a massive lahar from Mt. Rainier may occur without the kinds of warning usually associated with an impending eruption.

      One much larger, post glacial, flank-collapse lahar has been identified. Known as the Osceola Mudflow, it occurred about 5,600 years ago and was between 10 and 20 times the volume of the Electron lahar. It originated as a massive collapse of Mt. Rainier's summit and upper northeast flank. The Osceola Mudflow filled valleys of the White River system north and northeast of Mt. Rainier, covered more than 80 sq. mi. of the Puget Lowland, and extended into Puget Sound from what are now the Puyallup and Duwamish River valleys. Considered as "worst-case" or "maximum lahar" (only one lahar of this size is known to have occurred in 10,000 years), lahars of this magnitude have been assigned a recurrence interval of 10,000 years.

  10. Did we actually LEARN anything? by SamMichaels · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This happened before...quite recently in the grand scheme of things. Lives were lost, lives were ruined, towns destroyed. There's a small vial of dust sitting on a shelf in my parents' house.

    I'd be interested in hearing about the new technology since then as well as what they plan to do. Detailed info seems scarce on the geological site.

    1. Re:Did we actually LEARN anything? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Funny
      I'd be interested in hearing about the new technology since then as well as what they plan to do.

      In the wake of the disastrous 1980 eruption, the government has been stockpiling hundreds of thousands of tons of baking soda in depots all along the Cascade Range.

      The plan to combat future eruptions is to utilize a fleet of C-130 transports to bombard the volcanoes with massive quantities of baking soda. When the blanket of baking soda combines with the acidic volcanic gasses and melting snowcaps, it will expand into a thick layer of foam that will absorb any lava, ash or debris before it can cause problems for the areas below.

      Our government was very careless in 1980 when they didn't do anything to stop the eruption. They've learned their lesson, and this time around they're not going to be caught off guard.

    2. Re:Did we actually LEARN anything? by geomon · · Score: 2, Funny

      About 6 feet underground ought to do it :-)

      Yeah, and we are all scheduled to move there someday. :p

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    3. Re:Did we actually LEARN anything? by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What we plan to do.

      Well, since it is a VOLCANO, we are going to get the hell out of the way and sit back and watch as nothing we can do will make a damn bit of difference.

    4. Re:Did we actually LEARN anything? by JanneM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no place on the planet that is *completely* safe from natural disaster.

      You are absolutely right, of course.

      However, it's not a binary choice of "safe" versus "unsafe"; it's a smooth range. And some places are inherently a lot less safe than others.

      Living within the expected reach of a known active volcano is one of those less safe places. Just beneath, or on top of, a steep cliff is another. Along a river known to overflow would be a third.

      The problem is that we really like those unsafe places, and for good reason. Floods and volcanic eruptions make for good farming. Steep cliffs make for amazing views.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:Did we actually LEARN anything? by a1cypher · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if anybody lives at the top of a cliff near by a commonly flooding river(waterfall perhaps) With an active volcano nearby...

      Personally, I live in a flood plane but we're relatively well protected by a massive "floodway" that routes floodwater around the city (visible from space actually. =) Other than the remote possibility of the floodway failing, we are relatively safe. No tornados, earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanos.

    6. Re:Did we actually LEARN anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. In North Dakota you have to worry about sheep STDs. I think it fits the wording of "natural disaster".

    7. Re:Did we actually LEARN anything? by NonSequor · · Score: 2, Funny

      When you hear the eruption, duck and cover.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    8. Re:Did we actually LEARN anything? by Kymermosst · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This happened before...quite recently in the grand scheme of things. Lives were lost, lives were ruined, towns destroyed. There's a small vial of dust sitting on a shelf in my parents' house.

      If by "this" you mean today's steam-and-ash explosion, and by "before" you mean the 1980 lateral blast (plinian eruption), you are wrong.

      Relatively, "this" was a firecracker and the 1980 eruption was a stick of dynamite.

      I'd be interested in hearing about the new technology since then as well as what they plan to do. Detailed info seems scarce on the geological site.

      New technology really isn't what's making a difference. GPS clinometers are nice, but keep in mind that in 1980 there was a visible bulge on the side of the mountain before the lateral blast. At the time, nobody figured it'd suddenly fall away and do what it did.

      Specifically, magma with a high gas content was building up inside the mountain due to a plugged vent. It caused visible (to the naked eye) surface deformation on the flank of the hill. Eventually, the slope of this deformation reached a critical point. Finally, coincidentally with a magnitude 5 earthquake, the unstable slope collapsed. This released the pressure on the gas-filled magma, causing instant degassing. Very much like popping the cork on a hot bottle of champaigne.

      What happened today was either a dome collapse or a minor stoppage that was overcome. A very small event.

      Mostly what's changed since 1980 is refined observation and monitoring. Believe me, they are watching for deformation, along with other factors that indicate the character of the eruption sequence. These factors include gas concentrations, surface temperature, lava extrusion rates, seismicity, and others. Instruments to monitor most of these existed in rudimentary form in 1980, they just weren't used like they are today. The huge eruption was a wake-up call: Monitoring and observation are key.

      Today's monitoring instruments are most certainly refined, of course, as technology has progressed. Accuracy has improved quite a bit, and information exchange in the age of the internet and digital communications has improved monitoring quite a bit.

      As for current monitoring technology, geophones that detect low-frequency tremors that indicate rising magma are now emplaced on the mountain and GPS clinometers measure surface deformation on the new dome and sides of the mountain. Regular flyovers also measure surface deformation with LIDAR, sense gas presense of carbon dioxide and sulfur compounds, and measure surface temperature.

      As for what "they" (the USGS is whom I presume you mean) plan to do, I imagine it is sit down and watch, issuing warnings if and when they are needed.

      Disclaimer: I am not a USGS employee, I'm a geek who considered a major in, but took a minor in Geology.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    9. Re:Did we actually LEARN anything? by ChuckleBug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As for what "they" (the USGS is whom I presume you mean) plan to do, I imagine it is sit down and watch, issuing warnings if and when they are needed.

      I read a book about Mt. Rainier (or as we call it up here, "The Mountain") in which the story was told of a USGS person who had to lay low in Orting as the bearer of bad news. He had been trying to get people to prepare for the possibility of a lahar like the Electron, which went right through where Orting now is. They asked him, "What can we do?" He said, "Get to high ground real fast." "No," they asked, "what do we do to protect our homes?" "Nothing," he said. They kept asking questions, and when he kept telling them there is nothing to be done to prevent this, many of them just got mad at him.

      This is not to disparage the citizens of Orting. I understand they have a very good evacuation plan in place. But the initial reaction to the bad news appeared to be blaming the messenger.

      It's hard for people to accept that there are forces of nature from which we can't shield ourselves. All we can do is try to get out of the way.

  11. Hey, that's a US volcano. by r00t · · Score: 4, Funny

    Our volcano is blasting stuff 25000 feet up.
    (it sounds more impressive if you use feet)

  12. Pictures by kitzilla · · Score: 5, Informative
    > Has anyone found pictures of the lava flow?

    Probably aren't any yet. Any flow should have been confined to the crater and obscured by ash and steam. The event came just before local sunset. Things may be clearer in the morning.

    The Mt. St. Helens webcam sometimes picks up the infared glow of exposed lava after dark. It went offline Friday, but service was fortunately restored this afternoon -- just hours before St. Helens burped. Check to see whatever can be seen here. My site also has some background on the webcam.

    KPTV has some impressive stills of the ash plume here.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  13. Uh, it's dark outside. by Radi-0-head · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not to mention it's currently nighttime where the camera is located. Duh.

    1. Re:Uh, it's dark outside. by Everleet · · Score: 3, Funny

      Strangely enough, night time in Washington looks exactly like a color bar test signal.

      --
      It's tragic. Laugh.
  14. Mt. St. Helens Video "Adams Peak" by TheWorkz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We did a video last year for the National Film Challenge which is a good depiction of what we thought an eruption should look like. :)
    www.fwstudios.com
    It was a fun video to do and we did it in only about 60 hours. (that is, wrote, rehearsed, edited, and produced)
    -Luke

  15. Well as with any other natural event by SidV · · Score: 5, Funny

    Damn Global Warming

    1. Re:Well as with any other natural event by CRepetski · · Score: 2, Informative
      In 1883 the Krakatau volcano exploded in the Indonesian archepellago, shooting ash into the stratosphere.

      This caused lots of weird stuff to happen, including the sun looking blue or green, and crazy red sunsets up to three years later.

      Global temperatures were lowered up to 1.2 degrees Celcius in the following year, and didn't return to normal until 1888.

      Not to mention the huge tidal waves killing tens of thousands and the explosion being heard on 1/13th of the earth's surface.

      Crazy!

    2. Re:Well as with any other natural event by SidV · · Score: 5, Funny

      No No No

      Global warming causes Volcanoes.

      Just like it caused the Tsunami in Indonesia, the Kennedy assasination and male pattern baldness.

  16. Re:Crazy by AnFraX · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're both wrong. He hates you both. Individually. :|

    You're right. Now excuse me while I go off and cry.

  17. Is this about MSFT? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Funny
    If it were, God (tm) would have smited (smitten?) them already.

    Now, if they get consumed by a volcano, I'm just going to say it was random.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Is this about MSFT? by dosius · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. Would have + smite = would have smitten.

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
  18. OMG!!!!1 by zephc · · Score: 4, Funny

    it's blowing red, blue, green and black ash EVERYWHERE!!!

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  19. Oops by KenSeymour · · Score: 3, Informative

    I guess it would work better as a link.

    Cascades Volcano Observatory

    --
    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
  20. Just on CBC News by saskboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    CBC News just reported about 4000 small earthquakes about 200km off the west coast of Vancouver Island, none no more than 5.x on the Richter scale.

    They believe this may be related to the growth of a new underwater volcano, and hope to see it's initial erruption. This is almost certainly connected to the eruption at Mt. St. Helens, and I suspect related to the large earth quakes in south-east asia in December.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  21. Re:OMG! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Funny
  22. I saw it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was flying home from SEA -> SJC this evening and saw the thing happen from 20,000 feet. The ash shot up and within a few minutes was at the same altitude as our still-climbing 737. Within a few minutes the ash was well above our altitude and the Captain came on and stated that it seemed to him to be well above 30,000 feet. Needless to say, we flew well clear of the plume.

    That being said, it was an amazing sight to see this huge jet of ash go so high, so quickly. The late afternoon sun lit it just right and I really wish I had had a camera.

  23. Re:Newsworthy? by geomon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My son went looking for news coverage on CNN because we had heard that St. Helens was erupting.

    Nada. This is a non-event for anyone not living in the region (and I do live near St. Helens).

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  24. Re:Lava flow by Zsinj · · Score: 2, Informative

    There shouldn't be any visible lava flow. The best you will get is possibly a bit of lava oozing out at the surface - probably already crusted over, so it would just look like a rock with growing cracks. It has to do with the lava type. The lava in Hawaii, that flows very well, has much less dissolved gases and is at a higher tempurature than the lava in Mt. St. Helens. The dissolved gases is the really important part that make it more explosive. As a gaseous magma rises towards the surface, the pressure from the overlying rock lessens. Like in a soda bottle when you open the top (thus reducing pressure) the dissolved gasses bubble out to the surface. The gasses in magma have nowhere to go. The surface is clogged with solidified magma and is sealed. So, when the gasses inside the volcano dissolve, they have no volume to expand into. So the pressure goes UP UP UP! (like in a soda bottle, if you shake it.) Eventually, this pressure builds up so high that it goes KABLOOIE! and blows the piece of cooled rock that seals the to of the volcano off (this is called the Plug.) The only lava you'd see is after the plug gets blown off and while the plug re-forms.

  25. Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This was reported 24 years ago!

  26. And the corollary... by tool462 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean that Mr. Gates has finally created the One Ring?

    If so, I sure hope penguins have furry feet. Fedora Baggins and Samwise Gentoo can save us.

  27. good photos from Sugar Bowl camera by CRepetski · · Score: 5, Informative
    In case you don't feel like hunting through the USGS website (there's some good stuff in there!) you can cut to the chase:

    http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Volcanoes/MSH/Eruption04 /Monitoring/plume_in_the_evening_8march05.html

    This has some pretty good photos, as well as a picture with (MS Paint?) editing describing what's what.

    The photos are taken from a remote camera on the mountain that takes a picture every 2.5 minutes. This is as good as it gets.

  28. Re:Lava flow by geomon · · Score: 5, Informative

    That could be hot gas. Look up the words "nueé ardente".

    Andesitic lavas have more water in them than tholiitic. That is why volcanos on or near continental margins explode violently and lavas from island chains only shoot ~30 meters into the air.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  29. Re:How long before the USGS is sued by beyobe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Enquiring minds want to know: where were the psychics? Did any of "them" see this coming?

  30. Re:OMG! by mtrisk · · Score: 3, Funny

    I do believe that is the first time I've seen a South Park screen capture modded up as informative.

    /. never ceases to amaze me!

    --

    Without a proper flamewar, Anonymous was undecided on what shell to run.
  31. Not that exciting by Darth+Cow · · Score: 3, Informative

    I live in Portland, Oregon, so I saw the eruption when it was taking place from my front porch.

    It really wasn't very exciting. It was just a bunch of smoke and steam, around the size of several a few months ago.

    Despite it being the sole story on the local news, nobody is going to die or even be injured. Nobody is going to care after tomorrow.

    The volcano is regrowing a lava dome, and the dome is increasing in size. There's no visible lava, or anything more than the normal pickup truck worth of rock that's been added to the dome every second since October.

    I don't get what the big deal is. It's a bit of smoke, that's all.

    1. Re:Not that exciting by homeslice3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unless you've been up close and seen something on this scale, you really don't have a clue what an awesome site it is - no TV, video or photo can capture it.

      St Helens is one of my favorite places; I ride my motorcycle there at least a couple of times a year (lots of twisties on the way and great views. The death zone from the 1980 blast is incredible - you're miles from he top and there are no trees and the closer you get the more moonscapish is it (though life is coming back incredibly fast).

      I was up last fall when the mountain was acting up - a crystal clear day and there was lots of steam and activity. Awesome sites.

      Yesterday it was cloudy in Olympia, so I didn't see the plume so I was a little bummed.

  32. Stereogram by soloport · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, so for others, not so near... If you stare at the web cam shot long enough -- and try to look sort of past your screen -- you can see it in 3D.

    No? Just keep staring...

  33. I disagree. . . by mazulauf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hmmm, are you sure you were looking in the right direction?

    I live in Beaverton, and while I couldn't see the peak (hidden behind the West Hills), I could tell the plume was a _lot_ bigger than any of the others since it started up again.

    Plus, from what I've heard, the dome is growing at the rate of a dump truck load each second (gotta be an order of magnitude more than a pickup truck). If it keeps up at this rate, then the new dome will be peeking above the rim within a few years.

    That would be kind of a neat thing to see from downtown PDX...

  34. Re:Whoa! by plog · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If it had been taken from Victoria, BC you would be able to see the crater.

    Is that a typo? There is an impressive mountain range and a whole lotta horizon between BC and Mt. St. Helens. You can, however, see Mt Baker from Victoria, which puffs a little steam sometimes.

  35. Re:Lava flow by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny
    The lavas are viscous.

    Hell yah they are! They will kick your ass!! I saw this one dude got stuck in the lavas and he just fucking melted...

    What?

    Oh. Nevermind.

  36. Premise of article is mistaken by dhirsch226 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Months after the preliminary signs starting showing, Washington State's Mount St. Helens is sending a plume of steam and ash 7,600 metres into the air.

    It's incorrect to imply, as the posting does, that the earlier activity is "preliminary", and that now the real action is going to get going. We are, in all likelihood, in a dome-building phase. It will have natural variation, times of activity and times of quiescence, just as the volcanic system has on a geologic time scale. There is no reason to expect a large explosive event in the near future.

    -David Hirsch Asst. Professor of geology

  37. 36,000 ft. by Rafikichi · · Score: 2

    USGS Vancouver says it was actually 36,000 ft.

  38. Re:Now if it'd just do that for a few weeks.. by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2, Funny

    Best joke/cartoon about it was during the 1980s eruptive sequence. A guy is standing in a ticket booth with a steaming volcano behind him and what's supposed to be a ski lift running up one side. The sign says "Mt. St. Helens Ski Area". The caption reads, "Sure we know how to make it stop but did you ever try to find a female virgin at a ski area?"

    Oh well, I guess you had to be there.

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  39. Not quite as funny... by jd · · Score: 5, Informative
    I was leaving work in Vancouver at the time it blew. It was quite spectacular. The plume was impressively long. By the tail end, you could see the seperation of ash from the steam.


    What is interesting is that there was absolutely ZERO warning. There had been some minor tremors in the hours before, but nothing that would indicate something on this scale.


    Personally, I think someone slipped the volcano some lima beans.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Not quite as funny... by darkpixel2k · · Score: 4, Informative

      I work in the emergency services sector in Skamania County (the county that the mountain is in) and it put us all into a flurry.

      Within 30 minutes they were having emergency meetings to discuss the ashfall, getting all the services (Fire, EMS, and Law Enforcement) briefed on what to do, etc...

      After an hour they realized the winds would blow it just past the major population areas of our county and into the neighboring county (Klickitat) to the east.

      Right now Klickitat is getting ashfall like it's snowing...

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    2. Re:Not quite as funny... by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If there's anyone in the building trade in that area, they've got a veritable goldmine coming their way. Volcanic ash can be used to make a cheap, strong concrete that will also set underwater. It's also one of the hardiest, which is good for a northern climate.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:Not quite as funny... by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Informative

      People in the pet shop sector have a goldmine on their hands too, I hear it's great for kitty boxes.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    4. Re:Not quite as funny... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, and it will be spread across the entire county, and kind of hard to pick up. Maybe if you got an infinite number of monkeys with shop-vacs...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Not quite as funny... by PMuse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What is interesting is that there was absolutely ZERO warning. There had been some minor tremors in the hours before, but nothing that would indicate something on this scale.

      People who live near volcanos (and earthquake faults and hurricane zones and tornado alleys and flood zones and . . . ) can acquire such an interesting perspective on what "no warning" means.

      I mean, it's a _volcano_. It warned us in 1980. What more can we expect?

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    6. Re:Not quite as funny... by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The ancient romans managed to collect it. What makes you think we can't? The bulk of it will be within three miles of the volcano, besides. Hell, I have a vial of ash from Mt. St. Helens' eruption around 25 years ago as a souvenier, and it's far more valuable as underwater concrete than as souveniers...

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  40. Big Deal by ErikTheRed · · Score: 3, Funny

    I used to live in Texas... we saw things like this after every Chili cookoff!

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
  41. VolcanoCam by ozbird · · Score: 2, Funny

    "This is a static image of Mount St. Helens, taken from the Johnston Ridge Observatory." (my emphasis.)

    Very funny - now turn the lights back on so we can see the volcano...
    Apart from the infrared glow from the lava flows last year, I've only even seen static from the camera in my timezone.

    I prefer the White Island Crater VolcanoCam - despite predictions of an acidic death, Dino lives!

  42. Great, and not so great... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm glad to hear that Steam got shot. It's a crappy palladium-lite as far as I'm concerned. Maybe now that it'd dead I'll get around to buying Half-Life 2.

    But Ash getting shot was great loss. You'd think that if he could survive the army of darkness, he could survive a volcano!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.