Slashdot Mirror


BBC Writer Tries PC Repair, Finds Poor Software

twitter writes "BBC author Paul Rubens tried out amateur computer repair and wrote about it. All of the software was for Windows, and he finds what most of us do: "Most of the problems I've been called to look at have been caused by viruses and spyware, some by strange software [conflicts], and only one by faulty hardware." He then flames the whole world of computer repairmen as 'a bunch of unqualified amateurs.'"

64 of 703 comments (clear)

  1. Close Call by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Luckily he wasn't trying out the amateur software development.

    If we went by his definition of unqualified amateurs, most OSS developers would have been in the same category, but look what these "unqualified amateurs" have done to OSS?

    1. Re:Close Call by fitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True... but I would argue that the quality of "unqualified amateurs" back then was much greater than "unqualified amateurs" of today. I mean, really, *anyone* can go out and buy a computer today. Back then, having a computer wasn't the norm. Only the *real* geeks had computers back then, not just every Tom, Dick, and Harry like today. Many/most of them were practically engineers (even if self-taught).

    2. Re:Close Call by bonch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, most of them were people who studied/taught at universities or worked at places like HP, AT&T, etc. At the least, they had formal, academic training.

  2. Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But because computers are so complex, it's inevitable, and usually not very long, before they stop working as they should.

    This is your first mistake. Computers are not inherently complex (even Windows). People have a habbit of making computers more complex than they need to be (i.e. installing whatever whenever and expecting it to remain on there and stable forever). If people would just take the time to understand that they do not need 10000 things in their tray and took the 10 minutes to read exactly what each of those things they installed did they would quickly learn what the Uninstall Program feature is for.

    When a domestic appliance goes wrong, you can ring a repair man. When your car breaks down you can call the garage. But when your computer system goes wrong, who do you call?

    Google or a manual. Just like I did for my burned out tail-light on my car, the squeaking dryer, and the rattling my engine made when it spun a rod. Now, in the case of the spun rod there was nothing *I* could do without taking it to the dealer to repair but at least I had an idea of what to expect when they told me what was wrong with it.

    The simple truth is that although computer systems are sold as consumer goods like fridges or washing machines, there's no computer equivalent of a qualified service engineer who you can get to come around and fix things.

    You bought software or your hardware from somewhere I would guess (if you built this stuff on your own you have enough knowledge to fix it on your own). Take it to them. Dell, Gateway, Apple, whoever. If you're talking about software issues, call the company of the software you installed, oooh, it's Spyware problems. You only have yourself to blame for not researching carefully what you put on your computer. Just because you can modify your computer more easily than most pieces of hardware you own does not mean you should be absolved of all responsibility when it breaks. I wish that more people would understand that.

    It seems incredible, but millions of families and thousands of businesses have no-one to turn to but a bunch of unqualified amateurs to fix the most complicated pieces of equipment that have probably ever existed. It's a scary thought.

    What do you suggest? A school where they teach spyware removal? Or do you propose they learn about securing their networks (wireless and wired), their computers w/firewalls, spyware and virus protection (and frequent scans/updates), and keeping abreast of new news about OS updates and protections to the latest and greatest things out there? Why not spend the 20 minutes reading one of my posts or the 10000000 other posts out there that tell you exactly what you need to know:

    1. Get a software firewall (ZoneAlarm) that tells you when an internal software package is calling home.
    2. Get AdAware, SpyBot, and SpywareBlaster. Keep them up to date and scan frequently.
    3. Install all the latest updates for your OS and keep them up to date.
    4. Don't install something that you don't understand. Check with Google first. It's not hard to spend the 5 minutes with a Google search on the name of the program you want to install to find out if it phones home (and if you don't at least you have ZoneAlarm to give you a heads up).
    5. Get some sort of virus protection (i.e. NAV or AVG)
    6. Realize that regular maintenance is required for ANY piece of hardware (cars, HVAC, etc). Do you not change your oil every ~3000 miles? Do you not check your air filters in your home every month or two? Do you not add water softener salt every month?

    I just gave five pieces of software that are free, easily found on reputable/major distribution sites, and that have probably been repeated elsewhere thousands of times. It amazes me that someone who claims that he can fix other people's problems didn't find this software and then had the audacity to claim that the software out there sucks.

    If only more people were w

    1. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by gotr00t · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Realize that regular maintenance is required for ANY piece of hardware

      I know what you mean, but I have seen old computers that use the Intel 8086. They have been running pretty much non-stop for decades and their cases have never been opened once.

    2. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by prof_tc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but I'm one of those computer students...
      If people started fixing their own computers, I'd be out a lot of my spending money.

    3. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know what you mean, but I have seen old computers that use the Intel 8086. They have been running pretty much non-stop for decades and their cases have never been opened once.

      Exactly, and who put them into place when they originally put them online? People who spent the time learning how to properly operate a computer. In this day and age we have a limitless resource of information easily accessed with two clicks.

      If people are unwilling to spend the time necessary to learn even the most basic skills necessary for the general upkeep of their machines then how can they seriously expect them to work flawlessly?

    4. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by slughead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The simple truth is that although computer systems are sold as consumer goods like fridges or washing machines, there's no computer equivalent of a qualified service engineer who you can get to come around and fix things.

      The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that the mechanics have a union which forces licensing on its members to boost the price of labor.

    5. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Apreche · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thank you for saying everything for me. The one thing I would like to add is a comment about the unqualified amateurs line. There are indeed people you can call to fix your stuff. But just like carpenters and plumbers and the rest, there ARE some jobs that are too small. And all those people are off making much more money at a real company doing big jobs on computers more important than grandmas.

      The real problem here is that unlike your washers and dryers and televisions there is a constant swarm of people trying to break your computer. And due to the design of the computer it is extremely easy for people to break their own computer. It's just the old tool/device argument. And the inherent problem is that the more you want to push for device to solve the user end issues the more you cause performance and security issues. It's a fundamental rule.

      The only solution is user education. It will be solved in 80 years when all the people who haven't had computers for their entire lives are dead.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    6. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by tehshen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People could learn how to drive a computer, but for most of the time they use one, learning its intricacies is not necessary. Computers can work fine for two to three years before becoming overloaded with Spyware and 'breaking'. When that happens, it is replaced with a new computer, or someone comes along to fix it. This is why the majority of people would not want to learn how to fix a computer, or even need to - nearly all the time, the knowledge is not needed.

      It is equivalent (sort of) to learning a new language for a month, all its ins and outs and irregular verbs and so on, so you can speak fluently in a foreign country for a week. Yes, there is a chance you could visit again, but you probably won't. And from then on you'd know a language you would not need to use at all.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    7. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by TykeClone · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that the mechanics have a union which forces licensing on its members to boost the price of labor.

      The difference is in what is being diagnosed and repaired. Mechanical problems are easier to find and diagnose than electrical or software problems. If you have a puddle of antifreeze in the garage - it's a good sign that there is a problem in the cooling system. If you have a system fan in a computer that makes a god-awful sound when you start the machine in the morning, you may have a fan going out.

      Electrical or software problems are more difficult - for both auto mechanics and computer repairmen. If you go to the shop and tell them that the windshield wipers activate when turning on the radio it will take some time to find that the left rear brakelight was improperly grounded. Software problems can be that sneaky - application "a" worked until application "d" was installed - but the real problem happens when application "c" is running at the same time.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    8. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Illserve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would you get over yourself already?

      The means to properly operate a computer is as far beyond the reach of the average person as is the ability to tune their car and replace the fan belt. It's not that their stupid,it's that the concepts are completely alien to them. What seems trivial to you is a goddamned nightmare to most adults who grew up without touching a computer.

      And there's also a selection bias, many people who are otherwise smart, just aren't good at dealing with computer-type systems. Those people have avoided computers until they couldn't any longer. Again, not that they're stupid (well not all of them), but everyone is good at some things, and bad at others.

      Computers have gotten much harder to use successfully as they have gotten more powerful. It is not that the people who put together that 8086 did it "properly", it's that there were far fewer ways to screw it up.

    9. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by OhPlz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How many other devices in your home have millions of transistors?

      For all I know, wood might have a complex cellular structure. It wouldn't matter much to a carpenter. The number of transistors doesn't matter to a computer user either. The number of problems caused by a transistor error are probably quite small.

    10. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, the worst thing an incompetant PC tech can do is reduce your computer to a state that requires a format and re-install to fix. The only things that could possibly be damaged permanently are your data files, and even they can almost always be recovered simply by putting your HD into another, working computer.

      Auto mechanics, on the other hand, actually have to do work on a real, physical machine. They can't undo their mistakes just by sticking in a recovery disc. Plus, cars cost a hell of a lot more money than home PCs do, and, in some situations, can put your life and the lives of others in danger when things go wrong.

      Fixing cars and fixing computers are completely different things, and should be treated differently.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    11. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by DA-MAN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someday people will get over the fallacy that Windows is less stable than Linux. They are equally as stable if you treat them correctly.

      Stability != Uptime

      Fact of the matter is that if you install your updates on Windows you almost always have to reboot, which is not the case on Linux. If you keep your Windows and Linux box up to date your uptime in Linux will be higher than your uptime in Windows plain and simple.

      As far as overall stability Linux is more stable than Windows because Windows getting screwed up is an accepted part of using Windows because spyware/crapware/worms spread like fire and the default permissions on the filesystem allow all users access to everything!

      True any system can be secured with a competent administrator, however most people aren't administrators (and most administrators aren't competent).

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    12. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      1. Computers are not inherently complex (even Windows).

      While parts of computers are not complex, the way they are used makes them exceedingly complex.

      After reading your comments, I put you in category 3. Maybe a high 3, but not a 4. Here's the scale I use;

      1. Total novice. Knows they know nothing and is entirely willing to ask dumb questions.
      2. Moderately experienced. Willing to do dangerous things but are still a bit gun shy. A bit shy about looking like #1 above.
      3. Experienced enough to think they know it all. Usually focuses on a specific specaialty such as a single OS and/or hardware platform. Brash and certian, preachy.
      4. Humbled. Admits they can't know it all. Tends to go into too many details when asked for advice.
      5. Guru. Admits they can't know it all. Knows how long it would take to learn what they don't know. Gives short answers or does not answer.

      Your over emphasis on using specific tools is enough for me to stand by my categorizing you as a #3, even if you don't have all the typical characteristics. I don't put myself in #5, btw; I'm a 3.5 with moments of 4. The 1s think I'm a 5, the 2s and 3s ask my advice and promptly ignore it. A few times the 2s and 3s come back for advice. 4s and 5s ask me questions though the 5s tend to ask some real good ones (not necessarily difficult).

    13. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This guy's never been on the receiving end of a service call generated by an ID-10-T error or what we commonly refer to in the service business as "loose nut behind the keyboard." He's also never tried to figure out a problem when all the user can tell you is, "It won't work, I don't know what happened," and has no recollection of what error messages he may have seen when his machine failed, or has not documented the series of events that caused his error.

    14. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by tehcrazybob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only solution is user education. It will be solved in 80 years when all the people who haven't had computers for their entire lives are dead.

      Hardly. I'm a college student, so the people around me are young enough that they have been surrounded by computers from the day they were born. And yet, many of them are clueless. Just a few weeks ago we had an email virus running amok on campus. I remember when I got the first virus email, my roommate and I laughed as we predicted how many more of those messages we would see in the next week or so. Needless to say, we were not disappointed.

      Some of the people in my classes have no idea what to do with their computers. I mean, most are fully capable of using the computer successfully - complexity isn't an issue. But security is. I overhear people talking about their computers, and it's all I can do to stop myself from laughing at them. I've also had a few friends switch from Mac to Windows. Using a Mac, they had never had to deal with anything but the most basic security before, and I think they were a bit overwhelmed when they realized how much attention they needed to pay while using Windows.

      The problem is caused by people of any age who treat computers as simple tools. Many people just aren't interested enough in computers to learn what they need to know. User education is key, but we have to find a way to get average people interested in education. A computer isn't just a tool. When was the last time you had to do maintenance on your screwdriver?

      --
      Computers need to explode more often.
    15. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Schreckgestalt · · Score: 1, Insightful
      The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that the mechanics have a union which forces licensing on its members to boost the price of labor.

      Another difference is that an auto mechanic knows exactly what can happen to a car. He knows exactly what to do when the engine is broken or whatever.

      Computer repairmen, however, are confronted with an unlimited amount of different issues, and that is also the reason why I stopped offering my help to people who know nothing of computers. When I see a popup that says "Click me NOW!!!11", I don't click it, because I don't know what that's going to do to my computer. Neither do they, but these idiots just click (probably thinking "Hey, if I break something, I'll just call good old Schreckgestalt and ask him to fix it"). And then I am there, sitting at their computer, and have no idea what these people did and they expect me to have a solution (a solution that doesn't include "wipe the disk and reinstall windows and never, ever use Internet Explorer again").

    16. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Brandybuck · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Imagine you buy a new base model Honda Civic. You then go to twenty different third party after-market vendors for stuff like air conditioning, cruise control, etc. You replace your standard fuel filters, brake pads, etc., with stuff ordered online. You get a series of spams about putting magnets in your gas tank and taping crystals to your spark plugs, so you do it. You never change your oil or rotate your tires because it's too difficult to remember to do it. Whenever something goes wrong you have a twelve year old neighbor kid look at it first.

      What is your legitimate auto dealer going to say when you bring your car in for service? He's going to laugh in your face!

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    17. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In working with her over the phone (she is in NO way computer savvy... just a good user) I noticed that she was always reluctant to do ANYTHING without me telling her EXACTLY what to do. Occasionally (not familiar with their computer) I didn't know EXACTLY how to get passed a certain screen and I would just tell her take a look at what she was seeing and make a choice.

      You just described 95% of any helpdesk call.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    18. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Illserve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are being unrealistic because you assume it takes them the same amount of time to learn as you.

      My parents have been working at this hard, for months now. But even the simplest aspects of using a computer have escaped them until recently. These people, god bless them, don't understand that a document, a batch file and a program are the same type of thing on the hard drive. It's just a question of the contents and whether the computer tries to run it or not.

      Ditto with so many little things that you and I take for granted.

      So what, for you, seems to be a trivial amount of courtesy time, is for them the equivalent of learning to speak a foreign language in terms of time investment. And it's not even as much fun.

    19. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by ebyrob · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This guy

      Which guy?

      He's also never tried to figure out a problem when all the user can tell you is, "It won't work, I don't know what happened,"

      At least the user is being honest. Learn to ask the question: "*what* isn't working.", and learn to be nice about it. (Go ahead and strangle the luser in your head if you need to... But even the BOFH doesn't generally resort to impoliteness.)

      ...and has no recollection of what error messages he may have seen when his machine failed...

      So, if the computer knows what the problem is well enough to output an error message, is it too much to expect it to log this information somewhere that an appropriately knowledgeable party can find it later on? Designing systems without this kind of diagnostic facility (and so many other flaws in the modern wintel architecture) seems like an even bigger problem than user ignorance.

    20. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by sammy+baby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I notice that you conveniently fail to address the lines of code argument. The number of computer problems caused by an errant line of code are probably fairly signifigant.

  3. The reason computer techs are unqualified amateurs by Flounder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they knew what they were doing, they wouldn't be wasting their time cleaning spyware off grandma's machine for $12/hr.

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  4. get what you pay for by the+arbiter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "a bunch of unqualified amateurs"

    Perhaps if they were paid more than your typical McDonalds employee they'd be a bit better than said fast-food dispensers.

    --
    Boycott everything - they're all trying to fuck you one way or another
    1. Re:get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In this case the unpaid amateur knows 100x what the well paid IT professional does.

      You neglect to mention what he does. Maybe he's an Oracle developer or even a full time *nix Admin. He doesn't know those things you mention because of specialization. He spends 50 hours a week doing his job well, and has done so for 10 years, he lets the Data Security department worry about squid proxies. That is the nature of specialization.

    2. Re:get what you pay for by electroniceric · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hear hear! Frankly, if this guy wants guaranteed-quality computer repair, perhaps he ought to look for it first, and see what it costs.

      I do think there's an interesting conundrum for companies in here. In the IT industry, and numerous other engineering industries "repair tech" or any kind of frontline support is basically an entry-level job. Try calling the phone guys to repair your line - inevitably, up shows some guy doing his best to sport some peach fuzz. Not infrequently the guy doesn't know what he's doing and hence makes a huge mess. Worse yet, when he does start to know what he's doing, and up and away he goes, to be replaced by another entry level drone.

      The problem is that this is an important part of the customer's interactions with the company, particularly with long-term contracts. So unless they can figure out how to invert that hierarchy, they're be dealing with pissed off customers forever.

  5. Unqualified ameteurs by tehshen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems incredible, but millions of families and thousands of businesses have no-one to turn to but a bunch of unqualified amateurs to fix the most complicated pieces of equipment that have probably ever existed. It's a scary thought.

    Sure it seems scary at a glance (I hire a professional builder to fix my home, I hire some kid down the street to fix my computer) but after a while it does not seem so outrageous. If you're silly enough to download enough viruses or spyware to make Windows not load or your Internet connection stop working, you'd be silly enough to hire an 'unqualified amateur' to fix it.

    --
    Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
  6. I certainly hope by Tebriel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that we stop getting shoddy articles from amatuer journalists. They have no business offering their opinions or articles. /sarcasm.

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
  7. Who wants to pat for a professional? by qwertphobia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Folks don't mind paying $50+ per hour for their vehicle repairs, but nobody wants to pay that sort of money to get their operating system de-loused.

    I think that's a major part of the problem. It's hard to make money as a retail computer repair technician, and it's not a fun career. I would guess that the good ones aspire to move away from retail as soon as they are able.

    --
    Never ask for directions from a two-headed tourist! -Big Bird
    1. Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      People pay 50+ for the simplest computer services. Doctors, lawyers and regular housewives. When you attempt to explain what seems even the simpelest procedures all but a few remain dumbfounded. People with little money are often the fastest to learn, but most want to be ignorant and pay out the ass. What seems simple to geek types is very complicated for most. People pay 50+/hr to install their wireless and run some spyware, anitvirus every stinking day at least here in Philly.

    2. Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's hard to make money as a retail computer repair technician

      The reason it's hard is that if you know what you're doing and are worth $50/hr, you're going to get undercut by the kid down the street who charges $15/hr and doesn't know WHAT the hell he's doing.

      As long as consumers lack the abilities to distinguish between competent and incompetent computer technicians, this problem will always exist.

    3. Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? by John+Napkintosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Folks don't mind paying $50+ per hour for their vehicle repairs, but nobody wants to pay that sort of money to get their operating system de-loused.

      If only one could reformat/reinstall their car troubles away...

      --

      Long signatures suck.
  8. computer repairmen? by ack154 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think he's calling the repairmen amateurs... but the people that joe user ends up turning to. Maybe the kid down the street, or the guy next door who hooked up his own router. Most people don't call someone for PC repair, they just find "someone who knows something" ... no shit that person is an amateur.

  9. Amateurs? Maybe, but certainly qualified by saskboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know people, and am someone who learned back in the mid 1990s how to fix computers, and managed to keep up with current hardware trends to offer service superior or at least as good as a place like Staples, or a box-store repair center could provide.

    In the world of computer repair though, you often get what you pay for. If you're outsourcing your computer repair to the kid down the street, you might get lucky if they're smart and read slashdot, or you could get someone who thinks you upgrade RAM by adding a hard drive.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  10. People treat their Refrigerators better then PCs by hydroxy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If people went around treating their refrigerators as bad as they did their PCs, then we would have the same problem. Put the fridge in the middle of the street, let people take food, put food in, plug it into a DC power source etc. That thing would break in a heartbeat. However all we do is open/close the fridge and occasionally defrost/clean it. Have someone use their PC to goto ONE website ONLY (ie microsoft.com) with a direct pipe to the site - that computer will be bug free for a while. Maybe even 10-15 years just like my last fridge.

  11. Computer Repair(men) by commo1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We really are a bunch of unqualified amateurs. That is, except for a top-level 3% or so (I could be wrong..... I could also be wrong about putting myself in this category). What matters is persistence and continuing research & education (self-taught properly niched persons, not that tech school stuff that is one of the greatest rip-offs and causes of problems in IT today)

    What it comes down to is a very specialized people with a knack for dealing with themundane problems encountered on the desktop today. Server maintenance, network design and upkeep is simple in comparison to the myriad of problems encountered by a low-level desktop tech today, in retail or in a SMB environment.

    The author does bring up some interesting points, however, regarding the difference between car/washing machine repairmen and computer techs..... there is very little one can do to ensure they are being serviced properly in todays marketplace that, at this time, can have no place for certification and the like.... "A+ Certified and Toilet Trained: Equally proud of both." to quote.

  12. Amateurs? by illumina+us · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It seems incredible, but millions of families and thousands of businesses have no-one to turn to but a bunch of unqualified amateurs to fix the most complicated pieces of equipment that have probably ever existed. It's a scary thought.

    And it's about time that vet starts repaying me for all the hours I've put in fixing his computer. So far the pooch hasn't been ill, but then he only has about 500 parts. But when he does get sick, at least I know I'll be taking him to a fully qualified canine service engineer to be mended, not a local amateur.
    Because the people who take their computers apart, use them daily, and usually teach the tech support weanies are really the amateurs. See to be really qualified you obviously need a piece of paper like the CompTIA A+ certification (most geeks, /.ers, and CS students can take that in their sleep). Yep... unqualified amateurs alright.

    We built our systems, tuned them, made them perform better than they should, kept them virus free, and done it for less than going with a retail box just so we can be called amateurs. Sorry, but only pros can do things like that.

    What's really sad though, is that all you need to do to use a computer and have almost no problems is well... RTFM. =/
    --
    -illumina+us "I put on my robe and wizard hat..."
  13. Cost/value by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A car is something that gets you to your job, and you invest thousands in (tens of thousands for most people). $50/hour for a few hours isn't all that much.

    $50/hour for 3-4 hours ($150-$200) is often 20-40% of the original computer cost. When Dell is offering $549 packages deals with a flat screen, most people's knee-jerk reaction is that $50/hour is 'too high'. And it is too high, for most people and what they do. If it's related to their work, they can expense it. If it's just an email/gaming machine, they can buy a new one that's faster anyway.

    1. Re:Cost/value by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I recently had to pay $500 to get my furnace fixed, when the whole thing was probably only worth a few grand.

      A furnance is pretty important during the cold season. And, depending on what type, you have to do it right or else it becomes a health hazzard. A computer, to most people, isn't that important.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  14. The reason by 2names · · Score: 5, Insightful
    most people go to "unqualified amateurs" is this:

    PRICE.

    No one wants to pay $50 - $100 an hour for a qualified person to come to their house and tell them that their computer would run fine if they would stop visiting so many porn sites.

    I have worked on at least 100 home PCs in my lifetime and have not found a single one that was free of pornography. Don't get me wrong, if someone wants to look at porn, that is their business, not mine. But don't get all pissed off when fat-young-heiffers.com loads your machine with digital nastiness that you didn't ask for.

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:The reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have to say, porn sites are not the problem here. For one thing, you can get the same crap from any unscrupulous site, and it's possible to end up at such a site unintentionally. Second, if you are somehow letting this junk in then the real problem is on your end, be it bad software or user ignorance/apathy.

      "Be careful where you surf" may be good general advice, but it is not adequate as a security policy.

  15. Of course they're unqualified. by EarwigTC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nobody with skills wants a market (consumer computer service) with whiny, cash-strapped cutomers who don't think they should have to pay the time and cost it takes, when a better market (business computer service) exists.

    Computers are like other service industries, except that they require a lot more knowledge and care to prevent the problems from happening in the first place. People don't realize that difference, and expect solving computer problems to be like plumbing, with easy estimates of time and cause.

    --
    Promote civility: mod down any post starting with 'ummm'.
  16. People's don't like paying for the repairs by behemot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find that most people are very stingy when it comes to getting qualified or unqualified help in getting their computer fixed. They'll drop a thousand dollars to pimp out their car but won't buy a hundred dollar external drive for backup until all of their business records are wiped out. And its next to impossible to convince people that their Windows systems need regular upkeep, which will come out cheaper than feverishly fixing the systems after they failed.

    I also had a gig providing free tech support for a small non-profit, and when I had to quit it, I looked for a paid support option for them. I have found highly qualified company that would support the network for about $120 per hour on a regular contract. But before them, I have talked to multiple organizations touting only slightly cheaper support options ($75-100) who were utterly incompetent.

  17. It's not a fun job. by The+Evil+Twin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure, there are schools to get certified in Computer repair. But people who get this certification usually end up being the "Amateurs".
    I did computer service work for 4 years while going to school. It was for a consulting firm. I'd be farmed out to different businesses all over the GTA.
    I wasn't great at it. But I knew loads more than anybody and these businesses. After the first service call, all computer related problems were automatically our fault. You constantly had to deal with irate people. No wonder I only made a fraction of what the company I worked for was charging for my time.

    The thing is. I learned this stuff on my own. Taking apart my first computer, perpetually upgrading it, writing my own software, etc. I had an interest. Most people don't. They just want it to work. They want this website to show their video clip, or that file to play this sound clip or whatever. They have no interest in knowing what you should and shouldn't do and how it all works.

    The people who KNOW how it all works usually don't want to do it. I sure don't. After working in computer repair service for four years, I hardly want to help out my best friends let along do it for "someone somebody knows with a problem". And there is the catch. People who know, who are good at it, and who can do a good job, don't want to. It's the Janitorial job of the IT world.

    --
    --- tracer.ca
  18. Nobody wants to help the stupid by LibertineR · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Anyone who has gone through the grief of setting up their computers/networks to run reliably and consistantly is not about to waste time helping someone not inclined to learn, to maintain a computer.

    Who wants to get roped into answering the phone at all hours from someone who cant figure out how to avoid a virus or worm? I wont answer that call from anyone. Get WebTV and shut the fuck up.

    You cant pay me enough to swing by in the middle of my day to remove porn-popups, if you are gonna keep using IE, and not reign in your 13yr boy with a perpetual woody.

    I dont care if you have a pair of 44Ds in your blouse, I aint fixing your machine unless you are prepared to sit on my lap while I load my "Spybot".

  19. PCs by their definition require amateur support by defile · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I sit down in front of a Linux server I can whip out super professional tools like strace and ltrace and lsof and dig through /proc, whip out gdb, etc. and follow everything step by step through the source code. Everything's usually simple enough that I can fit the entire system in my head and see where the broken piece is (except for PAM). The system invites me to do this. I can diagnose problems scientifically, professionally, and quickly.

    When I sit in front of a Windows box, with some exceptions, all I can do is push the same set of buttons that the user has been pushing, and see if I can find a combination that works.

    PCs force me to become an amateur. Reason: bad tools available.

    1. Re:PCs by their definition require amateur support by jimicus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reminds me of a thought I had some years ago.

      They say "a bad workman blames his tools".

      I say "a good workman doesn't use poor tools in the first place".

    2. Re:PCs by their definition require amateur support by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ding. I declare you the winner for this story. Congratulations. For the rest of you: keep hitting refresh and maybe you'll win the next one.

      Seriously, though, this is why I charge more for Windows support than for Linux. It's degrading to spend a couple of hours clicking buttons almost at random and when you've discovered the problem, get told "That was easy!" or "I could have done that!"

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  20. He's right on the last note by Nijika · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Just like anything else, you've got a dozen guys who fell out of some 3 day course who are advertising themselves as the new Turing, and you've got maybe one out of that dozen who actually cares enough to be competent. They can all come from the same course, and know the same stuff, but the difference is in what is delivered and how.

    The problem isn't completely with technical incompetence, the problem can just as easily and will more probably be with care and respect for the customer.

    It's a service issue, not a knowledge issue most times when you run into a computer tech who seems to be bumbling something up. Did they check to see what the problem actually was? Do they care enough if they're only making $7-10 an hour from their employer to save your enterprise business plan or presentation? Probably not.

    Actually the whole thing is a lot like having a car. You can go through a bunch of different mechaniacs who are either dishonest or lazy, but once and a while you find that one shop where they're commited to service. I don't know about you, but I end up holding on to that shop's business card like it's solid gold. And that's an industry where there are standards to meet. I pay more for better, and I'm always happy with the result.

    So WE as computer techies are to blame for this attitude in non computer techies in two ways; way #1, we undervalue ourselves and in turn make the work we do less valuable. #2 we don't do the work properly because we don't respect it ourselves.

    Actually come to think of it, as a freelancer, I'm not competing with these low-balling stained-shirt wearing Linksys cablemodem router admins anymore, I'm going to set my rates accordingly. //more of a rant than I wanted that to be.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  21. Qualifications are overrated by eno2001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've met plenty of people with qualifications (computer science degrees, various certifications, etc..) who couldn't fix the simplest problems or don't even have an understanding of the most basic aspects of the systems. On the other hand, I've met other people who are more than capable and don't even have a college degree or a certification. The bottom line is this: If a person can fix the problem and provide you with an exact description of what caused the problem, and they can reproduce their results, they have the only qualification they need. (ie. they know what they're doing)

    The biggest mistake that a lot of people make is thinking that computers are a business. They aren't. They are a technology and therefore you need technologically savvy people to work with them. I have no formal training at all, but most people I know always come to me for help because they know I can figure out and solve any software or hardware issue on a PC. I think it helps that I have a non-formal background in electronics first. I, generally, know how the circuitry works at the hardware level. So it's very easy for me to rule out hardware problems before I explore the software itself. Many times, I find that the culprit is too many apps that are stomping over each other.

    When I was a Windows guy, it didn't take me long to discover that most of the instability in my system was caused by all the extras I loaded on for convenience. This was an alien experience to me as it wasn't that way in the Atari ST world I migrated from. I didn't like it, but I wound up finding that the best way to run Windows was to keep it lean and pretty plain vanilla. If I wanted extra apps, I always went for Microsoft products because they usually worked the best with Windows. Norton stuff was very cool, but resulted in a lot of instability (this was Windows 3.1). Then I got sick of having only one place to go shopping and moved to Linux. All problems solved...

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  22. Customer confusion... by Eskimore_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm an 'in house' computer tech. It's my sole occupation. I don't work on a helpdesk, not that there's anything wrong with that, I actually bring the machine to my desk and repair it.

    For a while I tried to work independantly. I paid for some advertising and got a little work. Do you know what I found out. People (consumers, not businesses) don't want to spend money on computer repairs. And when they do they usually hire the wrong people.

    I don't mind saying that I'm very good at what I do. And working for myself I had the freedom to do whatever I had to do to please the customer. That stands in contrast to what most 'store techs' have the freedom to do for the customer. They can only do what the customer is paying for... in other words, no extras, no 'going the extra mile'.

    The end result was things like this kindly old lady (my first customer) paying $90/hour for some jerk to format and reinstall her pc. And he didn't update windows or tell her about doing so. WTF is that? 3 Months later she needed more work done....

    So when I formatted her machine I made sure to instruct her on how to get updates. I made sure to give her a quick tutorial on security in general. I also told her she could ask me questions in the future via email if she forgot anything. And I did all of that *for free* because I care about the service I provide.

    I think that a lot of 'rent a tech' types don't really give a damn about what the customer is going through because they're only getting paid $8/hour. (In Canada thats crappy pay).

    But do you know what the funny part is? I worked for about half to a third of what my competitors charged. But they were from the big computer stores so I could charge less and make more... but that's irrelevent to the customer. But I found that most people didn't want to pay me, they would wait until it was so bad they couldn't do anything and then they'd take it to a 'store tech' and get crappy service.

    So ya, no wonder people think the 'average' tech is a dumbass. It's because the tech is from Big O'l Retail Store and doesn't really give a damn.

    You want good computer work, then find someone that does it exclusively. Ask for references. Shop around. But whatever you do don't pay $90/hour for an $8/hour tech to give you $8/hour-quality service.

  23. "IT" covers a wide array of skillsets... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One can be unfamiliar with LAN or common Linux/Unix issues (or PC-related issues at all) and be quite competent in their area(s) of IT expertise.

    A lack of knowledge doesn't always imply incompetence. Sometimes it's simply a lack of knowledge.

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  24. A good analogy by SamMichaels · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I do this for a living. Thank you to all the crappy software vendors, virus creators and spyware companies.

    But seriously...I use this analogy for my customers: You change the oil in your car every 3000 miles, you read the owners manual, you took a driver's test. A PC is a machine just like a car and it needs attention. You need to read up on it and look after it just like any other appliance or machine.

    When you're on the highway, you're sharing the road with other drivers...much like when you're on the internet you're sharing it with other people. You have insurance incase someone hits your car...but you don't have virus protection or spyware protection incase someone from the net hits your PC.

    Same story, different day.

    1. Re:A good analogy by Theaetetus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      When you're on the highway, you're sharing the road with other drivers...much like when you're on the internet you're sharing it with other people. You have insurance incase someone hits your car...but you don't have virus protection or spyware protection incase someone from the net hits your PC.

      [shrug] I use a Mac - it cost a little bit more at the dealer, but it will have higher resale value when I get rid of it. My highway gets me to where I want to go quickly and easily, and I've got a shield around my vehicle that other drivers bounce off of without my knowledge. I can close my eyes (no firewall, no anti-virus) and drive safely and confidently.

      I pick up a little extra money on the side ($55/hr, $75/hr if I don't like the person) fixing computers (both hardware and software), but it's side income. Everyone I know, I recommend to use a Mac. Sure, that'll eventually put me out of business, but it's not my real job anyways, and I'd rather have happy productive friends than unhappy unproductive acquantances.

      -T

  25. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by dtfinch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As little as humanly possible, unless the employer's a commie.

  26. stop porn scaremongering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have gigs of porn, and have never had a problem with malware. The one time I did get something was when I downloaded a crack that included a trojan. Downloading warezed software is inherently risky, but porn seems to be safe - no executables. The only way you could get in trouble is via browser vulnerabilities (and I don't use IE so I'm safe-ish) or something else like buffer overflows in jpeg libraries. Which isn't exactly porn-specific anyway.

  27. Re:Mainstream media catches up to 16 year old boys by Kotukunui · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fixing PCs these days is now the equivalent of mowing lawns when I was a kid. Earning money doing something that the adults didn't want to be bothered with.

  28. Re:Could be a winner for Firefox? by anethema · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah totally. Think of some catchy slogan or something.

    "Firefox: Lets you fuck yourself without fucking with your computer."

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  29. Not all home users are cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I live in a resort town, which means there are a lot of folks who have their second (or fifth) home here. They have computers, they have computer problems, they're used to paying $50/hr to have someone walk their dogs back in Manhattan. They'll gladly pay that for computer service and tell all their friends if you do a good job, even if it costs them $200-$300 for a basic virus/spyware cleanup and antivir/spyware install.

    In the same town I've dealt with friends who've asked me to check out their computer, but then decided a $20 memory upgrade was too much money to make their machine work properly. Just make sure your prospective customers know you're going to charge $50/hr (or whatever) and you'll get the right clients. It's a strange but true phenomenon that people who pay more for your services will be less demanding and more satisfied, whereas those who are getting a great bottom-dollar deal always whine and think they are somehow getting cheated.

  30. A computer SHOULD be just a tool. by DogDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When was the last time you had to do maintenance on your screwdriver?

    And the fact that you have to do maintenance on a computer just means that the industry is still very, very immature. It SHOULD be just a tool. You shouldn't have to learn the intracacies of it just to use it. Case in point: cars. When was the last time you changed a distributor caps, or re-did the points on your engine or had service on your carbureator? Oh yeah. You haven't. Most people your age never have because cars are much more mature than are computers in terms of life-cycle, which is why it's easier to run a car (which is more complex than modern computers). It's getting better (Windows 2000 was a big breakthrough), and it's going to continue to get easier, and easier to use a computer, as it should.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  31. Its not just a tool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's like complaining that a book is too hard to use because you have to spend all this time learning how to read. Some things have a certain amount of complexity and people need to learn. The car analogy is great, except that you aren't expected to repair your car or computer. You do have to learn how to drive a car, and you should have to learn to use a computer. Learning simple things like "read messages that appear on your screen instead of immediately clicking the ok button", and "do not install random shit that you don't need" would solve 99% of people's problems. The fact that people don't treat computers with the same respect they do cars is the problem. People don't tend to shove random fluids in random holes under their hood and expect their car to work, but they do the equivelent to their computers all the time.

  32. Who to call by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article:
    When a domestic appliance goes wrong, you can ring a repair man. When your car breaks down you can call the garage. But when your computer system goes wrong, who do you call?

    In my experience, most people call their ISP, even for problems that are not internet related. How do I know? I work for an ISP. And they expect their ISP to fix it. They see their ISP subscription as a service contract. When, after some questioning, the ISP helpdesk operator ascertains that the problem is not internet related, or not covered by the support policy, then begins the hard part of convincing the customer. It's often easier to tell the customer to reboot.

    --
    You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.