Slashdot Mirror


Asteroid 2004 MN4 May Hit Earth After All

ControlFreal writes "Asteroid 2004 MN4 was introduced earlier on Slashdot, and although scientists are now fairly certain that is will miss earth on April 13th, 2029, the modification to its orbit caused by Earth's gravity may still cause an impact one or a couple of orbits further down the road, the Times reports; the impact probabilities in 2035, 2036 of 2037 will not be known until the exact modification to its orbit is known; in 2029, that is. By then it may be too late for effective counter-measures. An impact would cause an energy release equivalent to about 1 Gigaton of TNT (~4e+18 Joule), and while that won't cause a massive extinction event, it causes widespread devastation. More info on 2004 MN4 can be found here and here."

122 of 857 comments (clear)

  1. Good! by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting


    From the summary:


    An impact would cause an energy release equivalent to about 1 Gigaton of TNT (~4e+18 Joule), and while that won't cause a massive extinction event, it causes widespread devastation.


    I hope this rock hits our planet. I really do.

    This may be the spur humanity needs to get us up off our collective keisters and establish a viable off-planet colony before it's too late. It would be an unprecedented catastrophe, but still survivable, and it seems like this is the only way we're going to learn.

    Then again, it could be a bad thing...instilling a sense of false security. (Hey...this asteroid hit us, and we're still here. Guess all those asteriod doomsday scenarios are bunk.)

    I rather suspect the former will be the prevailing attitude...trouble is, mankind has a notoriously short attention span...would this command enough attention for us to start a space colony project...and actually finish it?


    The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program.
    - Larry Niven


    Will our eulogy be: "The humans became extinct because they couldn't concentrate hard enough on their space program."?

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Good! by Momoru · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Establishing an off planet colony isn't exactly the same as getting up to turn the TV off, even if we started really focusing on this idea now, without some new propulsion technology i doubt even by 2029 we will have this option.

    2. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program.

      How do we know that? Who says they didn't? All of human history would barely register on the fossil record. An intelligent saurian race could well have evolved, had a catastrophic world war, etc. and we'd be none the wiser... except maybe a large extinction event...

    3. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program.
      - Larry Niven


      Wouldn't it be funny if they did have a space program and just haven't bothered coming back?

    4. Re:Good! by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In general terms, having your collective dna stuck at the bottom of a gravity well relying on the "stability" of a single biosphere is not a a good long term policy.

    5. Re:Good! by zapadoo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I hope this rock hits our planet. I really do. This may be the spur humanity needs to get us up off our collective keisters and establish a viable off-planet colony before it's too late.

      Personally, I think we should focus our efforts on keeping the planet we live on viable. If some big rock later undoes the hard work, so be it.

      Meanwhile we're hell-bent on destroying a perfectly viable planet with our own home-grown stupidity - at the rate we are going we'll eventually finish the job whether or not an asteroid beats us to the punch is just a matter of timing.

    6. Re:Good! by darkstar949 · · Score: 2, Funny

      More likely is that people will ignore it until a week before it hits because they would treat it the same way as global warming - it doesn't exist until it begins to affect them, and then it sits in committee for awhile while people decide what to do about it.

    7. Re:Good! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

      without some new propulsion technology i doubt even by 2029 we will have this option.

      New propulsion technology? You mean like Nuclear Pulse, Nuclear Thermal (also in Trimodal for low atmospheric work), Nuclear Salt Water, M2P2, and hundreds of other mature, semi-mature, or proposed methods that we haven't used because it's "too damn expensive to get off this rock"?

      Propulsion is *not* the problem.

    8. Re:Good! by 0racle · · Score: 5, Funny

      That was done on Voyager. It wasn't funny at all.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    9. Re:Good! by delong · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem with those designs is legal - the US, Britain, and (through the former USSR) Russian are prohibited by the Limited Test Ban Treaty and the Outer Space Treaty from exploding nuclear devices in space. That prohibition may also cover engines like Nuclear thermal if it releases radiactive material. I'm all for nuclear propulsion, but those pesky international treaties get in the way.

    10. Re:Good! by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When humanity is staring down the barrel of an asteroid strike, then these treaties will probably not be such a big deal...

      Besides, whenever has our beloved President ever let a treaty stand in his way?

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    11. Re:Good! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That prohibition may also cover engines like Nuclear thermal if it releases radiactive material.

      That's why the modern Trimodal TRITON engine *doesn't* release any materials. And once you get into space, it doesn't really matter how many nukes you blow up, as long as the debris is on an escape trajectory.

      None the less, my point holds. The problem is *not* propulsion.

    12. Re:Good! by DickBreath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How do we know that? Who says they didn't? [who says the dino's didn't have a space program.]

      In all the fossil record, we never find one screw nor washer, no bolts, not a single microchip, no industrial manufacturing complexes, etc. There you have it. Proof in the form of lack of evidence :-), in the best tradition of sco.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    13. Re:Good! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um except that all the links you provided talked about how DANGEROUS those methods are

      No, they talk about the difficulties inherent in how dangerous they are. I don't know if you've checked up on the shuttle boosters any time recently, but they are EXTREMELY dangerous. The key is mitigate the danger in as many ways as possible.

      BTW, most of what you're reading is the 1960's technology. The TRITON Trimodal link is an example of a "safe" engine built in modern times. Besides that, most of these engines are designed to be deployed in space where the extra radioactive pollution doesn't matter.

    14. Re:Good! by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "I hope this rock hits our planet [since it] may be the spur humanity needs to get us up off our collective keisters and establish a viable off-planet colony before it's too late."

      I strongly doubt that. Such a catastrophe will push many governments and citizen groups over the edge of accepting Fascism as a survival tactic. Within such regimes, the ability to look outward to the liberties of space is very repressed. In effect, there will always be a constant reward for killing people and taking their stuff ... and that environment isn't conducive to all the social prosperities and stabilities that we relied upon to even have a space program in the first place.

      2004MN4 would merely whack Humanity back to the social depravities of the Middle Ages. It will take many hundreds of years before cultures rediscover the wonderful benefits of letting your neighbor live long enough to invest in -- and profit from -- your enterprises.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    15. Re:Good! by STrinity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If every human on the planet disappeared tomorrow, our foot-print would be visible in the fossil record for megayears to come. Even if every screw and bolt, nut and washer were crushed beyond recognition by geological processes, they'd still leave behind very distinctive mineral deposits.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    16. Re:Good! by scotch · · Score: 5, Funny
      mankind has a notoriously short attention span.

      Notorious to whom? Short compared to attention spans of what other species? Compared with animals? Do dogs and cats sit around behind our backs and say shit like this:

      Dog: mankind has such a short attention span
      Cat: tell me about it. me and my feline brethren have been working on catching mice for thousands of years. Some of our members have been known to study a mote of dust for upwards of 4 hours
      Dog: I hear you - it's almost as if mankind is famous for having a short attentions spam. Infamous you might say. Heck, I'd go so far as to say they are notoriously short attentioned - wait, where's my tail? Did you seem my tail?

      Or maybe you're communicating with aliens.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    17. Re:Good! by InfoVore · · Score: 5, Funny
      New propulsion technology? You mean like Nuclear Pulse

      I posted this to my local SF group boards a while back. Hope you like it:
      10,000 Tons of Launch Weight: $500 million.
      2000 Mini-nukes: $1 Billion
      Finding a country to let you launch: Priceless

      For normal trips to LEO, there are chemical rockets.
      For everything else, there's Project Orion.

      Several guys in the group work for Lockheed and want it on a T-shirt.

      Cheers,
      I.V.
      --
      "These laws they're passing won't even compile anymore, let alone execute." - anon
    18. Re:Good! by back_pages · · Score: 2, Informative
    19. Re:Good! by cartmancakes · · Score: 2

      It would be a shame if we all died because we weren't legally allowed to blow up an asteroid with a few nukes! :)

    20. Re:Good! by jmc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally, I think we should focus our efforts on keeping the planet we live on viable. If some big rock later undoes the hard work, so be it.

      Couldn't agree more.

      How much would it cost to create a colony on Mars? What would we be able to do on own planet for the same amount of money? It seems to me that for the same amount of money we could develop a way to protect all of humanity from an asteroid strike, rather than send off a select few to the new home of humanity in the stars.

      Besides, is colonizing Mars really any easier or better than colonizing a post-apocalyptic Earth? I would think a self contained biosphere built on Earth would be hella cheaper than one built on Mars. I would guess that Earth after a worst case asteroid scenario would still be more habitable than Mars. If nothing else, the "colonists" will sure have a ton of biomater to subsist on for awhile.

      Personally, these arguements that we need to colonize space because we're trashing Earth sound a bit to me like someone who wants to buy a new house because they don't feel like cleaning their perfectly good existing house. Yeah, the new house may be more fun and exciting, but any way you rationalize it, you're still just rationalizing it.

    21. Re:Good! by gewalker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Creationist website warning. However, it does have fossil screws, hammers and a couple of other fossil artifacts. the link

    22. Re:Good! by lgw · · Score: 3, Informative

      The actual amount of radioactive materials released by these designs is pretty trivial - only of political importance, not environmental. However, the risk of disaster is large. A uranium-based fission pile can be made quite safe if it's never been used: uranium is a *lot* safer than most rocket fuels. Once you start using a fission pile you start building up dangerous decay products, but even that might not be a problem for an engine that wasn't re-used.

      Orion is the exception, but orion is silly for moving anything smaller than a city into space.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    23. Re:Good! by fimbulvetr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You failed to see the rest of his point, or at least you failed to acknowledge it:
      Meanwhile we're hell-bent on destroying a perfectly viable planet with our own home-grown stupidity - at the rate we are going we'll eventually finish the job whether or not an asteroid beats us to the punch is just a matter of timing.
      We can fix this place up, but what's gonna happen when the one comes that we divert?
      What happens with global warming is killing us?
      What happens when we get into a nuclear war?
      What happens when earth starts naturally changing it's weather pattern to something that threatens or survival?
      So what if we can protect ourselves from one thing? FFS man, can't you see we *NEED* to invest time into getting out of here so our species can survive. So what if we fail 10,000 times, at least we're trying!

    24. Re:Good! by csk_1975 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's a debunking of the 100 million year old hammer and ancient spark plug. Sheesh :)

    25. Re:Good! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think OP meant a propulsion system we could actually BUILD Einstein, that means we'll have to be able to afford it too.

      You sir, are obviously an idiot who either can't read or can't be bothered to read. We DID build nuclear thermal engines. They were done. Ready to fly on the Saturn V. They simply weren't needed as the time, because the LHOx engines matured faster. Nearly ALL Mars missions call for NTR engines, which is why the TRITON got built.

      As for nuclear pulse propulsion, most of the work has actually been done, including tests to verify the basic concept. (Test Video) Von Braun himself was a big proponent of launching a mini-Orion on the Saturn V. His idea was that the V would get things to orbit, and the Orions would take them to the solar system. Too bad our government stabbed him in the back by dismantling the Saturn V program...

      It always amazes me how people will happily chime in with criticizim even in the face of overwhelming evidence. No wonder you posted as AC.

    26. Re:Good! by Berner · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a couple of questions... First does anyone have any kind of definate data on this rock? Like trajetory and speed, will it pass in front of the earth or behind it?

      These are important questions, without knowing this it is quite literally impossible to figure out if it is possible to catch it (best case) or deflect it (worst case).

      Propulsion may not be a problem, at least not when it comes to traveling to the asteriod in question. But do we have a propulsion technology that could (with 10 years of drive time) slow/speed up this rock until it falls into a stable orbit around the earth?

      I want an extra planetary habitat for a population in at least the thousands before I'm 50 so that I can still enjoy zero-gee. This asteriod would probably make a perfect place to put such a colony.

      Having this rock in orbit would probably also increase the rate at which we can build ships/habitats/other in orbit, with the bulk materials already up there we can build solar-powered smelters (basicly mirrors) and away we go.

      I REALLY would like to see this rock in a stable orbit, how many of the science-fiction goals wouldn't be within reach if we just got abundant materials for buildning? (space-elevator anyone, anchor material is cheap!)

  2. Date of impact by thewiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    My bet is it will hit Earth on April 13, 2029. After all, it's a Friday!
    I wonder if Jason http://www.fridaythe13thfilms.com/ will show up.

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    1. Re:Date of impact by superpulpsicle · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not to worry. As I learned from the movie Armageddon, we can just sent a couple construction workers to the asteroid, plant a dynamite on the asteroid itself.... blow it up before it hits earth. They'll have no problem volunteering as long as they never have to pay taxes again.

    2. Re:Date of impact by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just put a Liv Tyler type girl on the trip and you will have the smartest - geekiest minds of our time volunteering for that trip - tax free or no tax free

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  3. Orion Project by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    in 2029, that is. By then it may be too late for effective counter-measures.

    Bull. 2029 to 2035 gives us ~6 years to prepare. If the asteroid actually posed clear and present danger, then a crash program to build an interceptor could be accomplished. With apologies to Pournelle and Niven (warning, associates link), the catch-22 is that we would have to give up our fear of the Orion. Using standard building practices + what we know of advanced hydrogen bomb design, we could potentially launch an Orion within three years. The options would be to either send it on an unmanned kinetic-impact course with the asteroid, or to send a team ala "Armageddon" (or some other lame stop-the-asteroid movie) to manually plant and detonate the charges.

    If I'm reading the info correctly, the asteroid is a mere 46 gigatonnes. So as long as we get to it fast enough, there shouldn't be any difficulty in nudging it into a higher orbit. Of course, we may only be able to buy some time in the short term. Orbital mechanics is tricky, and not as simple as just "pushing" the asteroid out of the way. We may actually have to push it toward earth to slingshot it into a more acceptable trajectory.

    One way or another, we have the tech. It's just scary as all hell to behold, and in a crash program would almost certainly add a small amount to the nuclear pollution that already exists on our planet. But if it's a choice between three random deaths from cancer or millions dead from a massive impact, I think the choice is fairly clear. Especially when the former is theoretical and the later is firm.

    1. Re:Orion Project by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bull. 2029 to 2035 gives us ~6 years to prepare.

      You've never had any experience trying to get the government to actually do anything concrete, have you?

      --
      Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    2. Re:Orion Project by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure we could build a giant nuke and send it up there, but why not instead build a giant pyramid with a laser to alter the orbit? Then it's reusable for the next asteroid.

      I mean isn't that the founding fathers were trying to tell us when they designed the $1 bill? Isn't that what Kirk and Miramonte(sp) did to save her planet? Maybe our eulogy will be, "they didn't learn from their historical records"; a berrylium sphere should be enough to power the laser.

    3. Re:Orion Project by Pinkoir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've never had any experience trying to get the government to actually do anything concrete, have you?

      You want an example of the technological progress a government can make in 6 years? Compare a tank from 1939 with one from 1945 (or for a more extreme example, compare an atomic bomb from 1939 with one from 1945). The military technology used by the combatants in WW2 improved massivly over the 6 years of the war and this is while several of the countries were having the crap bombed out of them. When properly motivated by immediate national interest governments have an enormous capacity to get things going.

      And don't give me any of this "Space travel is really hard and expensive" crap either. Most of the cost of the space shuttle is tied up in our desire to have the astronauts return alive to the ground with little risk of anybody on the ground getting killed. Once you throw those restrictions away (which I'm pretty sure you could count on with ~10^9 lives at stake) it gets a lot less impossible to put a lot of nukes on an intercept course with enough fuel to slow down near the offending rock..

      I'm not saying it's a walk in the park but the major roadblocks will be technological not bureaucratic.

      -Pinkoir

    4. Re:Orion Project by stlhawkeye · · Score: 5, Funny
      We not only have the technology, it's hard to predict what our situation will be as 2030 approaches.

      We all could be gone by then.

      For all we know, the United States of Arabia, formed in 2013, will be the world's lone superpower, we will be driving around in our fuel efficient hydorgen-powered Sayyarrah Ansar 4-doors, created by the Sayyarrah Motor Co in response to rising fuel costs after the world's industrial nations burned through most of the cheaply-accessible Arabian oil, leaving the United States sitting on top of the largest intact oil reserves in the world, which it stubbornly refuses to share. The USA (the Arabian states, I mean) will work with the Brazilians space program and the Federal Chinese States (formed after the Chinese Civil War in 2018) to launch an "asteroid-killer" probe at this thing from the secondary pad at Artemis International Station in the north polar region of the moon.

      Or it'll just, like, Africa, or Canada, or some other place nobody cares about, and we'll just live with it. Or the environmentalists will protest that it likely contains spaceborne elementary life forms and that it's an immoral sin of human arrogance to attempt to save our species by eliminating theirs.

      Print this post out now and re-read it in 20 years, it'll be fun!

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    5. Re:Orion Project by delong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You've never had any experience trying to get the government to actually do anything concrete, have you?

      The US did Mercury and Appollo in timeframes that short. And global catastrophe wasn't a motivator then.

    6. Re:Orion Project by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why Orion? it's all new, untested technology. We're all engineers here - we know nothing works right the first time, especially not rocket science.

      Because most of the groundwork has been done to death. There are engineers out there who could build an Orion in their sleep, partly because it's so damn simple.

      The other issue is that there simply isn't enough time to build some other super-booster. Both the Saturn V and the Energia are out of commission due to a lack of production facilities. In the case of the Orion, you'd be building something far simpler and more along the lines of a traditional building or ship hull.

      But you have 20 years

      You'd have 6 years, because scientists will be uncertain until 2029.

      kinetic kill weapons are not that a good idea, little thing called the "law of conservation of momentum" you're not going to move a 64 gigatonne something much by hitting it with the sort of mass you can afford to lift off of earth

      Well, on the small side we could build an Orion of about 3000 metric tonnes. On the large side, we could build one of about 8,000,000 metric tonnes. Maybe it's just me, but I think 8 million tons + a significant amount of relative velocity could make a difference. :)

      I agree with you though, it's something of wishful thinking to hit it with a kinetic kill. The most likely scenario would be to take up station near the asteroid and go through several iterations of planting and detonating hydrogen bombs. The idea won't be to break it up, but rather to provide propulsion. As such, the bombs would be detonated on or near the surface of the asteroid.

      What you do need to do is shift it's orbit, you don't need a lot of mass or a big motor, just time - get started now, drop and iron drive and solar cells on the thing now and fire it up, maybe deliver some more mass in 5 years, carefully watch where it's going and eventually drop it into the sun or Jupiter

      The only problem is that we don't have engines that can make a dent in 46 gigatons of mass. As you pointed out yourself, the law of conservation of momentum is going to have a lot to say about a constant 1/1000 lb of thrust against that much mass.

    7. Re:Orion Project by Ubergrendle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      WWII was fought over a 6 year timespan. That's with technology that consisted of vacuum tube electronics. And it was in a destructive manner...trying to destroy your opponent's means of production. Plastic, RADAR, laser, jet technology, atomic weapons... all developed in 6 years.

      Motivate the human race enough and its ridiculous what we can accomplish. We're 3 generations removed from 'total war' economy. An extinction level event would be sufficient motivation for us to see such economic focus once again.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    8. Re:Orion Project by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only the first nuke poses any meaningful fallout danger, and it's easy to design a bomb to minimize that (especially if there's not much metal at the lunch site). Plus, if we're launching a rocket using 2000 multi-megaton nukes, we can launch it from any place in the world that doesn't have 2000 multi-megaton nukes. ;)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  4. yikes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's it. I'm moving. This neighborhood is really starting to suck.

  5. Bummer by pfizzle · · Score: 2, Funny

    So...let's party like it's 1999?

  6. *cue music* by blew_fantom · · Score: 5, Funny

    ~~Don't wanna close my eyes. Don't wanna fall asleep. 'Cause I'd miss you, baby. And I don't wanna miss a thing. Cause even when I dream of you The sweetest dream would never do. I'd still miss you, baby. And I don't wanna miss a thing~~~

  7. oohh shit... by charon_1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    **puts on tin foil hat**

    1. Re:oohh shit... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

      That won't protect you.

      However, for $699 per head, we can protect you.

      Sincerely,

      Darl Mcbride.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:oohh shit... by TrippTDF · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd like to know what a piece of tin foil is going to do against a meteor impact.

  8. 2037... by athakur999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll be 59 in 2037 which is when I can start withdrawing from some of my retirement accounts.

    I guess I should go ahead and blow my money on a car or something instead since how big my 401k is isn't gonna matter when the monkeys take over the Earth.

    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  9. Let's make an Ark B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've got a list of politicians and patent lawyers all ready and waiting for it.

    The only problem is, I'm not sure whether we should be on it or they.

    1. Re:Let's make an Ark B by ericdano · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hope it hits LA, we could whip out the RIAA and MPAA in one hit!

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    2. Re:Let's make an Ark B by flewp · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can just see it... the MPAA will try to sue the asteroid for violating Deep Impacts copyright.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  10. Other effects by plover · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I wonder if anyone's thought about the effects if the asteroid doesn't directly strike earth. Could it cut a swath through the geosynchronous satellites, destroying one, two or dozens directly? Might it perturb their orbits enough to destabilize the whole lot of them?

    I wonder how close it would have to come to have an effect like that, and what those probabilities would be like?

    As it is, I'm not losing sleep over a %0.042 chance that this puppy will shorten my retirement.

    --
    John
    1. Re:Other effects by Cymage · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't have to imagine a Near miss scenario.

    2. Re:Other effects by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the drug store, but that's just peanuts to space."

      As a geek, you ought to be ashamed that you even suggested that a tiny little rock would take out dozens of satellites. I can see how an English major or a Journalist could make that mistake, but you are on SLASHDOT here, and you should know some basic things about the space and how big it is.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:Other effects by maotx · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know about you but with these numbers from NASA I'm getting ready to move to Mars.

      --
      I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
    4. Re:Other effects by Rorschach1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, it's only going to intersect the proper altitude at two points, right? Remember that geosynchronous satellites occupy a very narrow band over the equator. The asteroid may not intersect that plane at all. Even if it did, it'd be unlikely to hit anything.

      I'm not sure what standard spacing is out there, but I'm sure it's at least a few hundred km. The chance of a 1 km object hitting one of these widely spaced, small objects is not great.

      As for perturbation, I'm sure it's negligible. Even if it wasn't, the satellites should have sufficient station keeping ability to stay put.

    5. Re:Other effects by stlhawkeye · · Score: 3, Informative
      I wonder if anyone's thought about the effects if the asteroid doesn't directly strike earth. Could it cut a swath through the geosynchronous satellites, destroying one, two or dozens directly? Might it perturb their orbits enough to destabilize the whole lot of them?

      That's a lot of space. Geosynch orbit is 22,000 miles. Tack on 4,000 miles for the earth's radius, and it's a shell of space with a surface area of 8.5 billion square miles. Let's pretend we've got 50,000 satellites in that area by 2030. That means 1 sallite per 170,000 square miles. That suggests one satellite occupying a square of space 500 miles x 500 miles, and this thing is under a half mile across, probably less than a quarter-mile. The chances of it impacting anything in that orbit is incredibly tiny.

      Caveat: my math may be off, but the point stands. This object occupies a TINY region of space, and satellits occupy an even TINIER region of space. There's no cloud of buzzing satellites around the planet, they're sparsely populating a huge shell around the planet.

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
  11. 2035 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I knew the Republicans were lying about there being a Social Security crisis in 75 years. Now I don't have to worry about it. Whew.

  12. I know what to do, are you with me? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 4, Funny

    I reckon if we gather up as much lead and place it by the Oval Office, we might just be able to alter the asteroid's trajectory and save ourselves from self-anihilation.

    So let's start collecting lead! Who's with me?

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  13. Ha! by Sairret · · Score: 2, Funny

    I knew my Y2K shelter would come in handy. Who has all the Spam now!?

  14. so we can forget about the 32bit Unixtime thing?:) by NekoXP · · Score: 5, Funny


    19th January 2038 half of us will be dead! Who needs to count the seconds after
    that? :)

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. Not enough time for counter-measures by jim_v2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have no way of knowing, but at the rate technology is going right now, we'll probably have something capable of blowing the thing into gravel by 2035. Or at least something that we can knock it out of the way with.

    I can't even imagine what things will be like in another 30 years...I mean, if in 1915 you told someone that in 30 years a bomb would be built powerful enough to flatten a small city, they'd laugh at you.

    --
    Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    1. Re:Not enough time for counter-measures by MasterOfUniverse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't even imagine what things will be like in another 30 years...I mean, if in 1915 you told someone that in 30 years a bomb would be built powerful enough to flatten a small city, they'd laugh at you. And in 1970 you told someone that in 30 years we would not colonize mooon at some extent, they'd laugh at you. So what's your point? All we can say is future is unpredictable, we can either have a technological breaktrhough of some sort and can zoom into awesome techs or just stay right here..

      --
      "There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people."--Howard Zinn
    2. Re:Not enough time for counter-measures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I mean, if in 1915 you told someone that in 30 years a bomb would be built powerful enough to flatten a small city, they'd laugh at you.

      Yes. And, if in 1975 you told someone that in the next 30 years no rockets would be built powerful enough to send a man to the moon, they'd laugh at you.

    3. Re:Not enough time for counter-measures by grozzie2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I have no way of knowing, but at the rate technology is going right now, we'll probably have something capable of blowing the thing into gravel by 2035.

      Check out the timeline for the us space program, and you plot the trend.

      5 may, 1961 - Freedom 7, first manned sub-orbital flight
      20 feb, 1962 - Friendship 7, first manned orbital flight
      21 Dec, 1968 - launch Apollo 8, first manned lunar orbit
      21 July, 1969 - First manned lunar landing
      12 April, 1981 - First launch of space shuttle
      1 feb, 2003 - shuttle fleet grounded

      There isn't much advancement in this curve, and there is a whole lot of retreat. A once proud program, that had the capability to put a man on the moon, just last week, outsourced to get one of thier folks into low orbit. That is a rather telling 'detail' as to just how much advancement is really happening.

      Technology may be advancing, but I wouldn't be counting on anything the usa is developing to be useful in dealing with an asteroid collision scenario. The current administration has priorities higher than space travel, and, the debts they are running up to achieve those goals, will prevent future generations from persueing any meaningful space program during the timeframe in question.

  17. Practice makes perfect by matth1jd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So this asteroid may not hit the Earth but one will probably slam into us eventually. So why not use this one as a practice run?

    From TFA:

    "This is most likely not the object with our number on it, but one day we will have to address this question and we'll need the technology."

    So let's develop the technology now, when a screw up won't mean utter devastation of part of the planet.

    1. Re:Practice makes perfect by timtwobuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only problem is what if we fail, and it becomes bird-shot instead of a bullet.

      Then it
      1. Becomes even harder to prevent from hitting us 2.It does even more damage if it does

  18. Not a huge amount of energy. by Eunuch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Asian earthquake was some magnitudes greater than that. Of course it's all in how the energy is dissipated.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
  19. Lets solve this problem the American Way! by Daravon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lets have Microsoft patent asteriod collisons and then we'll send all the lawyers after the asteriod to deliver a cease and desist order. Worst case scenario is that we're out a few lawyers.

    --
    I traded all my mod points for these magic beans.
    1. Re:Lets solve this problem the American Way! by LordNor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Worst case scenario is that we're out a few lawyers.

      Wouldn't that be the best case?

  20. Lets put them by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lets put them on the same ship as the hairdressers and telephone sanitizers.

  21. Bunkers? by John+Seminal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The exact effects of any impact would have varied based on the asteroid's composition, and the location and angle of impact. Any impact would have been extremely detrimental to an area of thousands of square kilometers, but would have been unlikely to have long-lasting global effects, such as the precipitation of an impact winter.

    I wonder if people will build more bunkers. I know a person who owns a house, and there is a bunker in the back yard, from the days of a USSR nuclear strike threat (Back in the 70's and early 80's the drill for a nuclear strike was to climb under the desk in the school). It looks kinda flimsy to me, I am guessing the salesperson was real good. It looks more like a shed that is half way in the ground.

    But, if someone wanted to make a good bunker, not just to ease the mind, but something to survive in, how deep would it need to be? I live on flat land, so I can not tunnle into a mountain, which I would assume to be the best choice. What is needed for a good oxygen supply, can you generate your own, or do you need an exhaust? How long would you need to stay underground, and where would you store the water and food? And would you have more than one exit out of the bunker, in case one side suffers damage and is burried under?

    I think it would be cool to have a series of bunkers, with some pre-picked neighbors, people you trust. Have 7 or 8 bunkers, maybe a mile apart, each one acting as a node. The chances for survival would increase, and the time would pass quicker.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Bunkers? by NightWulf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This reminds me of that episode of the Twilight Zone, where this block is having a block party, and then they believe the world is going to end with an attack from Russia. The entire episode revolves around the fact that one family has a bunker, and the other neighbors on the block start fighting to get in. Eventually comparing how they should survive over anyone else. The key to having a bunker is to not tell a soul, keep it from the family too if it's at all possible, so no risk of your kids blabbing it.

    2. Re:Bunkers? by dmarcoot · · Score: 2, Funny

      No Flander's alowed!

    3. Re:Bunkers? by Glock27 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Your simulation was a bit flawed. For the actual numbers given, and 45 deg. angle of impact (considered most likely), effects look fairly severe at 30 km. range, not so bad at 75 (this was for impact into sedimentary rock). If it were to hit in the ocean, I'd say there's potential for a fairly bad tsunami, especially if it were to hit close to shore. Here was my run:

      Your Inputs:
      Distance from Impact: 30.00 km = 18.63 miles
      Projectile Diameter: 320.00 m = 1049.60 ft = 0.20 miles
      Projectile Density: 2681 kg/m3
      Impact Velocity: 12.59 km/s = 7.82 miles/s
      Impact Angle: 45 degrees
      Target Density: 2500 kg/m3
      Target Type: Sedimentary Rock
      Energy:
      Energy before atmospheric entry: 3.65 x 1018 Joules = 8.71 x 1e2 MegaTons TNT
      The average interval between impacts of this size somewhere on Earth during the last 4 billion years is 2.0 x 1e4years

      Relevant figures for a 75 km. distant sedimentary rock hit:

      Ejecta:
      The ejecta will arrive approximately 125 seconds after the impact.
      At your position the ejecta arrives in scattered fragments
      Average Ejecta Thickness: 3.5 mm = 0.138 inches
      Mean Fragment Diameter: 5.62 cm = 2.21 inches

      Air Blast:
      The air blast will arrive at approximately 227 seconds.
      Peak Overpressure: 11900 Pa = 0.119 bars = 1.69 psi
      Max wind velocity: 26.8 m/s = 59.9 mph
      Sound Intensity: 82 dB (Loud as heavy traffic)
      Damage Description:

      Glass windows will shatter.

      For 30 km. range:

      Ejecta:
      The ejecta will arrive approximately 78.5 seconds after the impact.
      Average Ejecta Thickness: 5.47 cm = 2.15 inches
      Mean Fragment Diameter: 63.7 cm = 25.1 inches

      Air Blast:
      The air blast will arrive at approximately 90.9 seconds.
      Peak Overpressure: 59800 Pa = 0.598 bars = 8.5 psi
      Max wind velocity: 115 m/s = 257 mph
      Sound Intensity: 96 dB (May cause ear pain)
      Damage Description:

      Multistory wall-bearing buildings will collapse.
      Wood frame buildings will almost completely collapse.
      Glass windows will shatter.
      Up to 90 percent of trees blown down; remainder stripped of branches and leaves.

      Doesn't sound like too much fun at 30 km.!

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    4. Re:Bunkers? by KarmaOverDogma · · Score: 3, Funny

      I personally love the idea of building a sock-rolid bunker that is so perfect that I am 100% certain to survive the impact.

      Then, when all my friends and relatives in my section of the hemisphere are dead, I'll enjoy struggling for my own survival without clean, readily available running water and food. And then when I get sick after running low on my own hefty (let's be generous and say it's a 12 week supply) of water, I'll be proud of how I struggle to survive with complications from even the most minor of ailments after my modern drug supply is exhausted or proves ineffective.

      When I use my most awsome shortwave radio, I'll be pleased to see how my important politicains (those who lived, that is) are the ones who are rescued first, and will shrug my shoulders as I look at the wreckage of my antennea array from the blast, hoping my small antennea doesnt eat up my power supply before someone can here me.

      I'll be happy to have fully productive days, too, fending off what might be left of others who managed to survive but were less planful as I, as I count my ammunation running lower every day. I'll be thankful my hungry neighbor (the one living in a bunker right next to me) doesn't have a bigger gun than me, either.

      I for one agree that life after a massive asteroid blast would be well on the high odds of survival and most likely fully worth living. After all: With God, all things are possible 8-D.

      --
      uR iGn0ranc3, Their Power
  22. Why not do something now by houghi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They know it will be close in the other years, so why not start planning NOW so that if we know it by 2029 for sure we can either use whatever we worked out or use it for something else.

    The reason it will not happen is because it will still not be eminent and it will be something only those earth saving tree huggers could work with.

    Others have more importand things to do, like making money and the plan of the company only looks ahead 5 years, not 50.

    Well, it was nice knowing y'all.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  23. NASA's impact risk summary by Aspasia13 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The following NASA page contains an impact risk summary of several near-earth object:

    http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/

    Note that this one is in the top three, but with due respect to Douglas Adams, "Don't Panic" appears to be in order.

  24. Re:Asteroids 2k4 by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny


    That game was actually written by NASA, in order to train the nation's children for just such an eventuality.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  25. ah what difference does it make? by Bananatree3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am probably more apt to be hit by an African Swallow then be killed by this asteroid.

  26. Simpsons obligatory quote.. by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Homer: It's times like this I wish I were a religious man.
    Reverend Lovejoy: Run for your lives people We don't have a prayer!

  27. Stop f*cking with my homeowner's insurance! by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 3, Funny

    For Christ's sake, scientists -- MAKE UP YOUR FRIGGIN' MIND ABOUT THESE GLOBAL KILLER ASTEROIDS!

    I just went through paperwork HELL getting the "Asteroids, Meteorites, and Other Heaven-to-Earth Bodies" coverage removed from my AllState homeowners insurance. This after I put it on there when you FIRST told us it was going to hit us!

    Then I had to call Jean, my agent, and f*cking tell her to shred that whole contract and contact my mortage lender when you f*cking scientists said, "Whoa -- wait -- it might NOT hit after all. Our bad." But, of course, the fax machine at my office was on the fritz that week (screw all-in-one concepts, HP!), so I had to take a 2 hour ride through traffic BACK to my house to get the paperwork and OVER TO Jean's office.

    Now, after FINALLY getting the signature pages right, 'cause Jean's assistant can't friggin' spell "interplanetary" for sh*t, I gotta do the whole g'damn thing again.

    Christ -- I'm going to just leave it on there this time and pay the extra 20% on my homeowners insurance premiums this year. It's not friggin' worth going through all that hassle, having to take time off, explaining to my boss what why I'm having to factor "global extinction" into my homeowner savings plan, etc. Dammit.

    I guess, now, that those f*ckers from Homeland Security are going to change the f*cking color of the alert this week too. Then I'll have to go back and talk with Jean about that "Dirty Bombs, Biological/Chemical Agents, and Other WMDs" clause. Dammit.

    IronChefMorimoto

  28. What about ineffective preparations? by cbiffle · · Score: 5, Funny

    If we don't have time for effective preparations, where do I donate toward the ineffective preparations?

    I, for one, want a massive Wile E. Coyote-style flag to pop out of the Earth immediately before the asteroid hits. Preferably reading "Yipe!"

  29. Re:so we can forget about the 32bit Unixtime thing by dlZ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Way to make my 59th birthday seem grim!

    --
    rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
  30. Re:Curious about gravitational pull claim by stuffduff · · Score: 2, Funny
    Let's see, if it were made of Swiss cheese and landed on Switzerland it may result in an open faced toasted swiss sandwich. However this situation could be prevented if we deliver massive quantities of ham, milk and eggs to the area before and erected a gigantic dam made of flaky pastry. Emperor George Herbert Dubah Bush the III may respond to their request for aid bay saying...

    Let Them Eat Quiche!

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  31. Re:so we can forget about the 32bit Unixtime thing by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, there's no way it will hit Earth, otherwise John Titor would have mentioned it...

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  32. Actual energy yields: by product+byproduct · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Actual energy yields: by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Difference:
      The energy of the MN4 impact would be delivered into the athmosphere, a VASTLY less stable enviroment than the earth mantle.
      Not to mention dust|chemical alteration problems...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  33. Re:Curious about gravitational pull claim by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful



    I have no idea....I'm no physicist, but it seems that if they know the object's mass and the object's size, they can figure the object's density, and infer its composition from that. What more do they really have to know?

    (Mabye he's afraid it's composed of antimatter or admantium or neutronium or naquada, or has a quantum black hole at its center, or some other bullshit concern...)

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  34. It'd make a nice Counterweight... by Luxifer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm, lets take that one step further.. Lets capture it in a very high orbit and use it as the counterweight for our Space Elevator. We should just be getting out technology down pat by that time and, hell, this thing is big enough we could actually use it as a base for all sorts of stuff.. kinda a mini-moon.. with elevator access. heh, it'd even make the ISS obsolete. You could use it to capture/send spaceships from/to other sites (Mars...)

  35. Re: Off-Planet Colony by AliasMoze · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Even if we had an off-planet colony, how would we populate it? We can't even get a hundred people into space let alone a thousand, let alone a million, let alone a billion.

  36. Re:so we can forget about the 32bit Unixtime thing by dkone · · Score: 2, Funny

    The half of us who are still living would. Sheesh, for some people, it is all about me, me, me.

  37. Good opportunity by armed+ahmed · · Score: 3, Interesting
    So 2035 would be a good time for a scientific instrument to hitch a ride on an asteroid, then?

    Would be a good chance to put a digger on an asteroid, maybe even park a HST-like observatory on it...

    ...almost as good as a lunar base...

  38. Funniest single panel cartoon I ever saw... by refactored · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...had a huge dinosaur stepping out of a flying saucer looking out unseeingly over the heads of tiny scurrying humans. The caption was, "Hello! Hello Everybody! Hullooo! We're home!"

    I can't remember who the artist was. Sad.

  39. I Bet a case of BEER... by Drexus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I look at this and know that, like many people, this is a cash vehicle and a licence for the US government to do what always wanted to do. With a big scare like this, the US government can get all the funding it wants to put a nuclear spacecraft into orbit. This will allow them to pour trillions of dollars into the "greater good". While they are at it, they will have a nuclear missile platform in space to control any government it so chooses.... with the "permission" of any partnered countries! "Either you with us, or your terrorists".

    Now NASA gets a blank check to research and develop anything it wants. .. It will be convenient for the US government to use this new "planet saver" platform for other "very important" military moves against "terrorist" organizations.

    Kinda like someone fending off "killer minnows" in a bucket of water using a shotgun and a paint mixer.

    I bet a case of Beer that the US government will make an announcement to develop a space vehicle that has the ability to blast something. Not really thinking that all you need to do is give the big rock a shove, so that it never comes near the earth.

  40. Bush planning astronomy cuts by drewzhrodague · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bush is planning cuts in astronomy budgets.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  41. I really hope not by hellfire · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This may be the spur humanity needs to get us up off our collective keisters and establish a viable off-planet colony before it's too late. It would be an unprecedented catastrophe, but still survivable, and it seems like this is the only way we're going to learn.

    If the sole reason you want a space program is paranoid fear that we might be hit by a rock, that's a pretty sad reason.

    I'd like to visit the moons of Jupiter and Saturn. I'd like to see other star systems. I'd like to advance our knowledge of the galaxy and universe and try to find other life forms.

    I mean, if people were dying left and right by micrometeorites hitting the earth and blowing out people's skulls but no one in power cared, I'd be concerned. That's not the case here.

    Let's keep the fearmongering to a dull roar here. How sick does our society have to be when someone start's talking like a bad sci-fi thriller about the end of the world?

    The sole purpose of any space program should be like any other science program, to make the unknown known and to expand the horizons of human understanding.

    Frankly, if the meteor is coming in 2035, my opinion is that it's pretty much too late now. Get out your sandbags and automatic rifles and prepare for the armageddon (not the movie!).

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:I really hope not by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's obviously not the sole reason someone of intelligence would want off this rock, but sometimes to get the unwashed masses moving on something, you've got to light a fire under them (or drop a gigantic rock on them at a few thousand miles per hour).

      Joe sixpack doesn't care about science, or exploration unless it directly affects him. The only reason a lot of the "space race" happened is because people were afraid of the commies. Now that there isn't such a fear, things like NASA get their budget slashed, and creativity suffers. Sometimes you need the fear of imminent death to drive science and technology (like in war).

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    2. Re:I really hope not by hellfire · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So you are saying that in order to light a fire under people about terrorism, you would, say, start a war with some random country that has nothing to do with terrorism just to get people to care?

      There are too many scary parallels between the Iraq war, Vietnam, pornography and this solution to fix our lagging space program.

      --

      "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  42. Impact or not,prepare as if it was coming your way by D4C5CE · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Earth's geologic history is pretty clear: It says, quite frankly, that single-planet species don't last. Right now we're a single-planet species. We need to fix that.

    John Young
    Astronaut

    Houston Chronicle
    2004-12-17

    Okay, the Extinction Level Event may never happen in our lifetimes (except on the silver screen)... but why don't we just prepare as if an asteroid was to hit us in the near future anyway? History has shown how the innovation spurred by space programs pays off in unexpected ways over decades (the U.S. kept its technological edge for the rest of the century), and this time, ironically, this might even encourage improvements in the more controversial (e.g. nuclear and defense) technologies with a focus strongly on "saving the planet". The investment it triggers should also help economies around the globe - threshold countries want to go to space for a reason even today, as they have realised the beneficial side effects of such programs. Even if all we ever get out of it is only the "usual, boring stuff" like affordable spaceflight, a boost to astronomy and advances in all fields of technology, clean power on earth and a holiday resort on the moon etc., in preparing for an impactor that never comes... it still sounds like "A Good Thing (TM)".
  43. What about 2046? Distance r(earth)=0.05 by chopper749 · · Score: 3, Informative

    4x more likely to hit then in 2035. Impact risk

  44. Re:Our Eulogy by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    sheesh, it's funny people, Funny!

    I think the reason some Funny posts get modded Insightful, Informative, Whatever is because starting sometime ago Funny mods no longer improve your karma. Thus to counteract, if a post already has a few Funny mods, a moderator might mod it Informative to boost the poster's karma a bit.

    Makes some sense to me. After all, Funny comments in /. stories are most of the reason I read comments. A real knee-slapper deservers a bit of karma methinks :)

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  45. Them's fightin words! by uberjoe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Watch what you say, or you'll end up in Gitmo for threating the president with all the other freedom haters, you freedom hating hater of freedom.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  46. April 13, 2029 is... guess what day of the week? by atomm1024 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    % cal 04 2029
    Friday. Damn.

    I'm not much of a paraskavedekatriaphobe, but if the probability of it missing doesn't improve, I'm becoming superstitious.

    --
    Signature.
  47. Duck And Cover. by jrivar59 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This stuff is way over hyped. All you need to know to deal with such an event I learned in elementry school.

    Just watch the vid.

    Duck and Cover

  48. Re:Curious about gravitational pull claim by RayBender · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I have no idea....I'm no physicist, but it seems that if they know the object's mass and the object's size, they can figure the object's density, and infer its composition from that. What more do they really have to know?

    Most likely the strength of the material. This determines how much energy is dissipated by tidal forces during the close Earth flyby of 2029. That in turn affects the orbital parameters and hence the possibility of a later impact. The strength of the material (is it solid rock, or a big gravel pile) is very hard to determine remotely.

    --
    Human genome = 3 billion base pairs = 6 GBit. Windows + Office = 20 Gbit. Which is more impressive?
  49. Bush's space program will save all of us. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2, Funny
    I can already see cold war style nucular* shelter companies going around and installing shelters underneath folks' houses.

    But what the U.S. government is already doing may be the very same safety measure that is needed: The renewed interest in a moon base, missions to Mars, etc. This exact same space program, I believe, is being put into effect to install a gigantic weapons system in orbit, very similar to the Death Star in Star Wars. This type of weapons system will be sufficient to blow up this silly little asteroid.

    There are about twenty years left to prepare. NASA, you can rest assured, will come up with all kinds of devices to blow this thing out of the sky. And I'd bet you that the government, with all its supercomputers and whatnot, knows exactly when and where this thing is going to strike, and they're not just sitting around waiting for it to happen.

    In the meantime, I know I'll be stocking up on canned foods and bottled water, and I need to buy more ammo for my handguns. If this thing starts coming down in my back yard, I'll shoot at it myself. Or I'll shoot at any looters that come around looking for trouble.

    * I spelled "nucular" correctly. It's spelled according to the pronunciation of the guy I elected.

  50. Re:Good ol' knowledge... by Typing+Monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    60.000 years ago something like this hits somewhere on the American continent, killing lots of people. Humanity wouldn't be wiped out. The people living far away from the impact wouldn't even know.
    This thing hits New York or Tokyo today, you think you wouldn't care ? Even if you aren't directly affected or anyone you care about is, think about the economy. We aren't self sustained hunters living far away in small groups anymore. Sure, humanity would survive, but would suck loosing your job because the economy took a hit now wouldn't it ?

  51. Nah... No worries... by emtboy9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is plenty of time now. NASA has all the time in the world now to develop a new super secret shuttle, and train a small flight crew. Then they will have plenty of time to hire a rag tag bunch of wise cracking oil drillers to send on said super secret shuttle, while first stopping off on Mir to visit with a crazy cosmonaut and refuel. Once they approach the asteroid, despite all their natural personality classes, they will come together and drill the required distance to the center of the asteroid, deposit a nuke or two, detonate said nukes, thus splitting the asteroid in half and getting each half to go its own seperate ways... and then Morgan Freeman will make a public speech glorifying the heroics of this intrepid band, and we will get to see hollywood make movies about their journy and adventure... oh wait... that already happened. Damn... guess we are fucked then.

    --
    "Our funds have never taken part in toxic or death spiral convertible financings of any sort" -BayStar's managing partne
  52. Re:Our Eulogy by bobgoatcheese · · Score: 2, Funny

    Parent post is currently at +5, Funny.
    Where's the "Ironic" meta-moderation option?

    --
    How's my typing? Call 1-800-eta-shut
  53. Mortal Kombat! by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Komodo Dragon vs. Sewer Rat.

    Round 1. Fight!

    Crunch

    Komodo Dragon wins.

    Fatality

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  54. Re:Our Eulogy by joe_bruin · · Score: 5, Funny

    NOT EARTH, that's where I keep all my stuff!!!

  55. Re:Run for the Border! by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny
    An ocean hit would be worse. Ok, here's a scientific demonstration. Go into your bathroom and fill the bathtub up. Now put a bunch of little plastic guys on the bathroom floor. Go on, I'll wait for you to set it up...

    All done? Ok, now take a big freaking cinder block, stand on your toilet and drop it on the little plastic guys. Ok now that's a bit of a bloodbath, sure. Set 'em up again and then lob the cinder block into the bath tub. See what the problem could be here?

    So if the asteroid hits the ocean, not only will lots of people be killed, but you'll also get in trouble with your wife/parents/room mate for making a huge mess. Go figure.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  56. Not so by rk · · Score: 3, Informative

    While you're right that Hubble wouldn't be too useful for tracking this asteroid, Hubble is perfectly good for looking at things in our solar system.

  57. No Space Program required for survival of Impact by DoninIN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is no need for humanity to have Mars colonies, or an extensive off planet presence for civilization to survive even a dinosaur killing scale impact. Think Cold War era undeground shelters, long term survival planning for large numbers of people, caches of tools, technological implements etc, could be stored away in dispersed caches. Carefully storing up large quantities of survival foods, seeds etc could assure that civilization survives. I'm a big booster for space exploration and colonization, but I've always thought this to be a bit of a BS. train of reasoning. Now using this space program to divert an asteroid is clearly better than hunkering down and digging in. However I really think we could dig in and survive even a big one with 1950 technology.

  58. Re:Point of impact by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And what if it hits in the ocean?

    Lot more water out their covering much more of the earth than land.

    Two thirds of the earth is water so a water impact is more likely than a land impact. In such a case it would suck to be living on an island or any of the coasts in the body of water it hits in because of the resultant Tsunami.

    Just a thought.

    --
    Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
  59. Actual Effects depend on where it lands by N3Bruce · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For a frame of reference, I Gigaton of TNT explosive yield is about the size of 20 Tsar Bomba class nuclear explosions . If the asteroid was kind enough to hit us somewhere on land and thinly populated, such as the Sahara Desert or Siberia, the main effect would be a volcanic winter, such as what happened after the explosion of Santorini, in about 1650 BC or Mount Tambora in 1815 . Not a lot of fun, but civilization would probably go on as usual for most places.

    If it hit in the middle of the ocean, a Tsunami could conceivably wipe out many of the major cities on the Pacific Rim or Atlantic and European seacoasts. Tens of millions could die, and many of the developed world's major cities would be laid waste. Whole countries would be crippled, and the ensuing chaos would disrupt world trade, and potentially destabilize entire regions.

    A direct hit on a major population center, such as Southern California, the area around Bejing, China, or Bombay, India would cause millions of casualties and huge suffering, but the effects would be local enough that the rest of civilization would find a way to get by, even if important industries were wiped out. Such a hit would be a relative longshot, but could happen.

  60. Earth Impact Effects Calculator Link by Baldrson · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Earth Impact Effects Calculator lets you calculate the destructive effect of various asteroid impacts.

  61. No need to fix that 2038 bug by WarmBoota · · Score: 2, Funny

    It looks like we won't have to put in overtime on that 2038 Bug w00t!

    --
    90% of everything is crap. Also, crap is relative.
  62. Re:Our Eulogy by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There will be no eulogy. Humanity will die quickly.

    Denial will reign, as no preparations are done to evacuate the planet. Some will say there is no way to evacuate everyone. Others will say there's nowhere else to go. The real thinkers will know, if we had started years ago, we would have had a chance.

    Most will die from the intial impact.

    The impact will crack the planet's crust, resulting in volcanos, earthquakes, and tsunamis, which continue for years.

    Many will die due to the dependance on transportation systems, or more specifically the failure of them.

    A very few will survive in the cold dust and ash filled atmosphere, through the shaking ground, and giant destroying the costal areas. They will survive for many months on their preserved food reserves, and filtered air. Alone, they will consider themselves the lucky ones.

    In the end, none will survive.

    Many millennia later, other civilizations will have grown in far outlying areas of the universe. They will look at the dry and barren planet, covered by rocks and dirt, and say "nothing could have ever lived here. It's always been a dead planet"

    Eventually, despite taunts, archeologists will find disputed traces of life on the planet. Some artifacts will be found. They will be found frozen in the ice of the polar ice caps, or burried in the sands of the vast deserts. Still others will be below hundreds of feet of dirt, on the iced tops of frozen oceans.

    The artifacts will be carefully examined for many years. There will be many theories to what they are, and what the markings may mean. Could there have been life on this far distant planet? Could a civilization have thrived in this desolate place? Maybe these creatures could be a clue to our ancestory?

    In the end, their markings will be considered random discolorations. The artifacts will be labeled as "common rocks", and thoughtfully put into storage well away from public sight.

    No, as egotistical as we are, there will ne eulogy. There will be no memory of anything we've accomplished. We will be part of the dust on a barren planet, spinning slowly around a dying star.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  63. Re:Our Eulogy by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Overrateed/Underrated mods are a little interesting.

    If you read the Mod FAQ about them (last bullet) you'll see that you can get some odd (but unlikely I guess) combos like +5 Flamebait (that would be cool though :).

    Also, and I don't know this for fact but I've seen others discuss it, if you mod using Under/Overrated too much, you may eventually be given fewer/no mod points. The reason being is that Under/Overrated mods cannot be metamoderated so you get trolls with mod points using them to mod people down without valid reason (political, whatever). There's some big discussions about users getting hit by tons of Overrated mods because they have enough Foes with mod points. Basically there's no way to "balance out" Under/Overrated mods.

    Anyone know more about this?

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  64. Re:Our Eulogy by loraksus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not that I disagree, but damn...
    Perhaps someone should read a little less Nietzsche.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  65. Re:Our Eulogy by pizzaman100 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The real thinkers will know, if we had started years ago, we would have had a chance.

    Speculation here, but likely what ever condition we have on earth after an asteroid impact would still be better than the current conditions on the moon or on mars. If we can design a self sustaining mars colony, we can probably design a self sustaining post apocalype earth society as well.