Slashdot Mirror


Thin Client With OSS for Developing Nations

FridayBob writes "The BBC has a story on a new, ultra-thin client that a group of not-for-profit developers, Ndiyo, hope will open up the potential of computing to people in the developing world. Not surprisingly, their system uses open source software. The system runs Ubuntu Linux with a Gnome/KDE deskto and OpenOffice. From the article: 'Licences for software are often a significant part of expenditure for smaller companies which rely on computers. But a recent UK government study, yet to be formally published, has shown that open source software can significantly reduce school budgets dedicated to computing set-ups.'"

252 comments

  1. Thin clients for models by dotslashdot · · Score: 5, Funny

    What about thin clients for models? They regurgitate whatever information you feed them.

    1. Re:Thin clients for models by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      But most of the geeks on Slashdot are too thick to be aware of that fact.

      --
      Be relentless!
    2. Re:Thin clients for models by vranash · · Score: 1

      If that's really true, then why do they always regurgitate 'It's so small!' when I specifically fed them the line 'It's so HUGE!'? ;-p

    3. Re:Thin clients for models by telecaster · · Score: 1

      I worked for a company that Microsoft wanted to have a "sit down" with, they were interested in our media player that was shipped on every HP and Compaq computer sold in the US. Within 6 months, we were out of business and were surprised to see the "Windows Media Player" released with features and functions that we had been selling to our OEM's and making a decent living at it.

      Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

      10 years later, in hindsight, I blame the principals of our company having dollar signs in their eyes and not being responsible by making them sign NDA's up the wing-wang. Of course, we all believed (at the company) they wanted to buy our product and use that as the "Media Player", what we didn't realize then was that they were just interested in seeing where we were headed to ensure that they were going to stomp us out by delivering it "free" in windows.

      It worked.

      In my opinion, There is no reason for the OSS community to have a "sit down".

      How about MS extending the olive branch and open sourcing VB 6? Showing the comminity that they are committed to ensuring their customers have a path or support outside of JUST MS.

    4. Re:Thin clients for models by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      I worked for a company that suffered a similar fate. We were the industry leaders with our products in speech recognition... we entered a technology swap with Microsoft and where did it leave us??? dead in the water as Microsoft incorporated our technology under license in Office and left people not needing to purchase our product anymore to do speech recognition...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    5. Re:Thin clients for models by StormKrow · · Score: 1

      That kind of stuff is old news. Microsoft has been buying out companies and closing them down if they were seen even as a remote threat.

      --
      Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
  2. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Glad to see a full desktop think client and not another Simputer.

    1. Re:Nice by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      It's not a "full desktop thin client" - all it is, according to the article, is a box with 2 megs of ram, to handle a pixel stream from a server. And it's not that cheap., at
      The sub-£100 box
      I can build a full desktop driveless box for about the same price using standard components (no hard drive, etc., and have a lot more features, such as sound, usb ports, much more ram, local processing of data, eetc).

      In other words, who needs it?

    2. Re:Nice by lotsToLearn · · Score: 1

      KDE, Gnome and OpenOffice!! and you call that thin... OpenOffice takes ages to load even on my pretty decent laptop.... think of a low end machine...

    3. Re:Nice by KermitJunior · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like the nick. It speaks volumes for your comment. :)

      --
      There is a Universal Life Value Check it
    4. Re:Nice by lotsToLearn · · Score: 1

      :D

      sure junior...!

    5. Re:Nice by mspohr · · Score: 1
      It's an "ultra" thin client. It just reads a video stream from a server. Thus, even though the low volume prototypes are approx 100 pounds now, it all could be put on a single chip with a few ports and be very cheap.

      The advantage is in group applications where you have multiple users (think schools, internet cafes, businesses). You only need one PC server for many ultra thin clients.

      I'm looking at how to deploy computer systems (for health care) in developoing countries and this would be great!

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    6. Re:Nice by ScumericanNazi · · Score: 1

      Have you even used a simputer ???

      Simputer - for social causes
      http://www.ncoretech.com/simputer/index.html

      SATHI - for military
      http://www.ncoretech.com/sathi/index.html

      Chota - for commercial micro-apps
      http://www.ncoretech.com/sathi/chhota.html

      Simputer successful, Anonymous Coward jealous.

      --
      Sig Heil: Scumerica - Land of the Free* (* 18+, valid papers, health insurance, some restrictions apply)
    7. Re:Nice by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but the article is talking about 2-20 clients, which is not very many, and the processing power on those clients is on a par with your TV set (actually, that's all it is -there's zero cpu for you to use).

      Take a modern cpu, underclock it, and you've got a device that is still faster than this can ever be, and can be passively cooled. The real advantage in terms of money (for thin clients) isn't the hardware - it's in admin time and software. Their approach doesn't make that much of a difference, and the performance hit is way too great (picture a half-dozen people running Eclipse off the same server w/o any local cpu processing - all done on the server, as opposed to the same 6 people running it locally, just using the server for storage/booting/loading the app).

    8. Re:Nice by mspohr · · Score: 1
      Thanks for your insight into the situation.

      I'm looking at this from a particular usage scenario which is a clinic or hospital in the developing world where you want to run a medical records database on 10-20 clients. The "video thin client" seems a good solution in this situation. It is easy to administer, requires only one PC. The clients are potentially very cheap (video memory and a few ports are all that is required... much cheaper and more reliable than even the most stripped-down PC) and reliable.

      I don't think processing power would be an issue in this situation (running LAMP). If you look at the presentation linked on the web site, you'll see that they mapped bandwidth and processor usage of 30 clients doing "extreme programming" and found no bottlenecks.

      I agree that barebones PCs can be a cheap and effective solution but even they are more complex, expensive, and failure prone (for instance they will each need a UPS since power is dodgy) than the "video client".

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  3. That really is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  4. The third world need wireless mesh. by Baldrson · · Score: 5, Informative
    A better solution for the third world is a bootable cdrom image that comes up with a minimal system including:
    1. Wireless mesh software and drivers from widely available and now very cheap 802.11b cards.
    2. A web browser with good javascript/xsl support.

    Such a bootable cdrom (based on Slackware) is already available from LocustWorld.

    Maybe the Ubuntu guys should port it over from Slackware.

    1. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      this is actually a flasher cdrom that will write an image to a hard driver (immediately and without much warning or fanfare)...

    2. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by stubear · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, the third world needs a source of clean drinking water, democratic governments instead of tinpot dictators and warlords, education on how to grow crops instead of remaining nomadic herders, better housing, and public schools to name a few things. Computers don't even rate on any list of things the third world needs.

    3. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by grolschie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've been waiting for a bootable CD-ROM that does only this:

      1). Detects simple hardware i.e. video, mouse, lan, enough for 2D X Windows.

      2). Gets an IP address via DCHP and generates a unique computer name.

      3). Boots to a Remote Desktop login screen without needing to know beforehand a list of computers. Simply, the same as MSTSC where you enter the username, password and computer/server name/address.

      This would cut down many licenses and make Windows thin client networking a breeze. I guess there are numerous systems that can do all this, but either they are complicated to setup, or have extra stuff that is not wanted (i.e. an entire operating system and desktop apps). A simple MSTSC bootdisk would be ideal.

    4. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "No, the third world needs a source of clean drinking water..."

      Yeah, it's such a pity that OSS developers can't write clean water.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      The problem with your idea, and it is a good one excepting this: Windows TS requires a license for every connection to the server. win2k/xp+ have that license built in, but anything different and you need to install licenses on the server to accomidate them.

      Which typically will run you around 150-200 per seat.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    6. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by homer_s · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, a poster here at Slashdot knows more about the needs of the "third world" than the people who live and work there. Hmmm, maybe you should just stick to Soviet Russia and Korea.

    7. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by another_mr_lizard · · Score: 1

      Please quote the part of the linked Beeb article that says low cost OSS thin clients are more important than fresh drinking water, sanitation and affordable housing because I must have missed it.

      --
      "My parents were strict, but they never pitted me against livestock" - Doug Stanhope
    8. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by grolschie · · Score: 1

      I see what you are saying, and realize it may be a concern for some. But CALs we can handle. A full desktop OS installed, we do not want. The specs on the clients would be minimal to re-use older hardware, without having to upgrade every machine in our organization to run XP efficiently.

    9. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A web browser with good javascript/xsl support.

      Okay, a web browser with good Javascript support, I can understand. You get a decent bang for your bucks with web apps. But why XSL? There's nothing fundamentally required about it, it doesn't dramatically change development or user-experience, and it hasn't got anywhere near universal support.

    10. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      http://ltsp.org/ and http://k12ltsp.org/ can boot this kind of setup, but you'll need another, low-powered server to store the boot images. It can then find the rdesktop sewrver and work from there. Piece of cake, and your employees may never know that Linux sits under the system at all.

    11. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The third world does need drinking water and an end to evil dictators. That doesn't mean that it can't use computers. Your own list includes "education to grow crops..." Computers can provide that. "Public schools"... computers can help there.

      And if some woman's baby gets sick and she would really, really like to read up on baby diseases and their symptoms, a computer would be good for that too.

      In any event, some guys with computer expertise are trying to make something cool, using their expertise. I guess you would be happier if they had farming expertise or dictator assassinating expertise, but that's just life for you. Or would you prefer they just do NOTHING?

    12. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by baddu · · Score: 1

      Computers do have a place though. Some bigger countries do have research organizations that specialize in identifying better farming techniques, correct fertilizers, irrigation, weather study and so on. If such information is collated and shared in a timely manner through cheaper information technologies it will be put to use.

      Another area where computers can play good role is in education. I have participated in an adult literacy program using computers in remote villages of Andhra Pradesh state in India. The response was great. Villagers, especially women, were genuinely interested if computers can help solve their problems.

      Main issues are not related to cheaper software or hardware. With Linux, cost of software is negligible. Local problems - lack of continuous electricity, remoteness, proper place to put the computer are more serious. Solutions can be found, if the situation is understood clearly.

      Most often big multinational corporations participate in such studies, get decent publicity and then vanish from the scene once they realize that the market in rural third world is not yet ready for them. But that is another story.

    13. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've just yesterday been asked by a Tanzanian to help set up an internet cafe so some of the (Tanzanian) people working in his volunteer organisation will have a source of income to support themselves. This is in a relatively remote area of one of the poorest countries of the world. I would be providing computers, software and setup. I think you don't know what you are talking about. They know how to grow crops, they probably don't want you to try to 'improve' their government and they would rather pay for their own better housing and schools and water instead of relying on handouts. Freedom from dependency on donations/loans is a major focus for many of these people. Technology gives them greater power generate this income and freedom.

    14. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by rathehun · · Score: 1
      I agree with some of your points, namely
      "source of clean drinking water, democratic governments instead of tinpot dictators and warlords, education on how to grow crops instead of remaining nomadic herders, better housing, and public schools"
      However, I volunteer almost fulltime in a third-world country, with a developmental organisation, premised upon the fact that computers ARE what people need.

      I think if you're thinking of the computer as a object to play solitaire and surf pr0n, then it's definitely not on the top of the third-worlds' DEVELOPMENTAL needs. We can argue relative morality later, NOT on /.

      However, suppose you gave them a computer which provided information on how to make the land more productive? How about if it gave a list of which fertilisers and pesticides would be best for certain varieties of crops? How about if it gave you prices for crops, seeds and fertilisers at various different markets?

      This is what we are trying to do. This is what I believe can work. I may be proved wrong, but our experiments in about twenty-four villages or so are thriving happily.

      R.

    15. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by vhogemann · · Score: 2, Informative

      Huh?

      Now, I'm pretty sure that there are places that are just like you described... but I guess it's not a rule.

      See, I live at Brasil... we're on the third world, but we're also a democracy, as every other country here at South America.

      And we know how to grow crops very well, indeed our governament agency for agriculture, EMBRAPA, develloped some amazing stuff like plague resistant varieties of a number of vegetables, that are also more productive. And agriculture is an industry around here, we have a high production of cereals, and export it to the 4 corners of the world.

      As for housing and public shcools, things could be better... but we got some amazing stuff going on Curitiba like the project Four Head [ http://www.c3sl.ufpr.br/multiterminal/index-en.php ]

      So, I think that we could use some public wireless networking here. We can use also some more computers, like that AMD PIC, and Open Source software.

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    16. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should be very easy to do. Take a KNoppix image and change it so that it automatically logs in on a guest account (no servers, no mounting local drives), pops up a window asking for server and then runs rdesktop to the provided MSTSC address (see rdesktop.org for the client). Heck the hard part would be writing the GUI for getting the server's address. Once that's done, burn a few hundred CDs and you're done.

      Well, the hard part would actually be autodetection of any local printers, floppies and USB drives and then autosharing and mounting them to the TS, keeping in mind that you don't have any account information about who the local user is, so he ask for them form the server. But you aren't asking for that feature.

    17. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by pamri · · Score: 1

      We have a similar effort going on to provide low cost computing for public schools. After much thought, we finally weighed in for a live CD solution over thin clients, because networking still requires maintenance, bandwidth is an issue and still expensive since these schools use donated hardware. We will be using a light weight modified Ubuntu Live CD with XFCE4 as the default desktop, which will be copied and run from the hard disk.

    18. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Everytime computers for the poor nations come up there are posts like this. I'm starting to suspect that Americans are simply afraid of potential competition coming from developing countries. You'd be much better off if India first provided every citizen with relible clean water (which wouyld have taken forever) instead of pursuing hi-tech development. But it seems to be working out fine for them. Sure they have millions in squalor but also tens of millions of educated middle-class people who are bringing their country into the future. If a development country wants to ever be more than a banana republic exporting crops to the First World they have to think about computers and network infrastructure even if most of their citizens dont yet have enough food and live in straw huts.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    19. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

      While you're not too far off, I'd like to point out one very common mistake Westerners make in trying to "fix" the Third World.

      We've often looked askance at nomadic herders, and we keep trying to get them to settle down and farm like we have. What we *don't* take into account is that perhaps that lifestyle is better suited to the land. Europe has especially rich soil and good irrigation, whereas Africa just cannot be plowed so heavily. Their nomadic ways actually were good for not burdening the land excessively with themselves and their cattle.

      Keep them down in one place, and you get soil pounded into dust by cattle herds, overworked for crops, and in the end, desertification.

      That's what happens when a relative newcomer plays the arrogant know-it-all, regardless of technology.

    20. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by killjoe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Typical ignorant american who thinks everybody outside of the US is scratching at the ground digging up roots to eat.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    21. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      No, the third world needs a source of clean drinking water, democratic governments instead of tinpot dictators and warlords, education on how to grow crops instead of remaining nomadic herders, better housing, and public schools to name a few things.

      A low cost, low power computer, can help with all of those. Given a suitable stack of CD's, or even better, an internet connection the computer becomes a library, language tool, political instrument and weather forcaster.

      With one or two shared amongst a village with suitable software, people can use them to:
      - learn to read and write (assuming low literacy is a problem in that area)
      - learn how to find clean water, why it's important, and build pumps
      - better ideas on how to grow crops in their area
      - how to build better houses
      - to provide educational material for their teachers
      - for medical advice, especially information on how AIDS spreads and can be prevented

      with a 'net connection they can
      - participate in politics more easily, by sharing ideas and organisation in their region, and get ideas from other organisations in the world
      - publicise their plight to the world at large, assuming they can't defeat their own warlords
      - see weather forcasts, which will help with farming
      - and overall, become generally more educated and knowledgable. Books are all well and good, but third world villages tend to get odd boxes of very out of date and disparate text books. With an internet connection they have access to massive amounts of up to date information on any subject they could want. Especially as real libraries are starting to open up their content online.

      Assistance programs can help keep a group of people alive. Education and co-operation means they can help themselves climb further. (Though massive changes to the way international finance and aid works wouldn't hurt, neither would removing trade barriers - but that's another discussion.)

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    22. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Actually, what we need is communication. Once the means of communication are in place, the rest can be implemented and kept working.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    23. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Daengbo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Typical ignorant jerk who thinks that ignorance only exists in the US. Does US bashing (when you don't even know if you're accusing correctly) make you feel superior? Does putting words in peoples' mouth make you feel intelligent. Wake up and treat people like people.

    24. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by propertyistheft · · Score: 1

      What the majority of people on the planet (known to patronising Westerners as "the third world") actually need is: 1) Fair Trade http://www.tradejusticemovement.org/ - an end to rich Western nations dumping cheap subsidised goods which undercut their local industry; 2) Cancellation of Debt http://www.debtlinks.org/ - an end to the demand that they pay back money lent to "tinpot dictators" by irresponsible agencies with devious motives: 3) Good Quality Aid http://www.wdm.org.uk/campaigns/aid/index.htm - which includes clean water AND computers, but not expensive and self-serving advice from the rich and ignorant. You have some things right, but most people live in cities already, the majority of those that don't already grow crops. And many people, even in the poorest countries, do use computers.

      --
      Philosophers have to cure many intellectual diseases in themselves before arriving at the notions of common sense.
    25. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by propertyistheft · · Score: 1

      Forgive my ignorance, but why would this be better and how would it work? Wouldn't it involve more hardware than the slim client solution?

      --
      Philosophers have to cure many intellectual diseases in themselves before arriving at the notions of common sense.
    26. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, the third world needs...

      What the third world needs the least is the rich worlds advice, because the advice they've gotten so far has really, really sucked!

      First we came with our guns and took all their resources. Then we let them into our economic system, which is perfectly designed to keep on stealing their resources. The we adviced them to remove all obstacles for our companys to buy up all their valuable resources and forced them to deregulate all that was left. Now, what they really need is to just ignore our bad advice and say 'Hell no, we won't pay the depts - It's you that should be paying us!'.
    27. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Baldrson · · Score: 1
      • The third world needs connectivity.
      • There are a lot of used systems lying around.
      • I see 802.11b radios on sale for $10 and people are ditching their existing 11b radios for 11g radios so that means there are more used 11b around.

      These systems would mesh together to form a parallel and redundant broadband topology providing connectivity.

      With the connectivity the only barrier to full functionality is apps, written in JS/XSL/whatever else is provided by the browser, cached locally from remote servers. AJAX goes part of the way there.

    28. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      You missed a really important one: telecommunications can help small business owners like farmers to find customers and to get a better idea of the market so they know what sort of price to sell at (probably higher than they've been paid in the past).

    29. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Brasil is also in fairly good shape in some ways. In others you have a lot of work. For the most part though you just need honesty and time. You do not become 'first world' overnight.

      Rote learning of definitions is not education. Trivia is nice, but you need to understand the hows and whys. I'm not expert of your education system, but that is one I've heard from others who seem to know something.

      A stable government is a good start. Keep your government stable, educate the people and don't stand for crime. It will take time, but the rest falls into place over a few years.

    30. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by killjoe · · Score: 1

      The parent was your typical ignorant american who thinks people in the third world have no water or food. he thinks people in bolivia, turkey, or bangladesh don't have food to eat or shcools to go to. What's worse he is against trying to bring cheap computing to places because he thinks to himself "what are starving people going to do with computers, we should stop this nonsense right away".

      So sorry fuckhead. He IS an ignorant american. If you think that I am "bashing" the US by pointing that out then you need to get over it. Think of it as an opprtunity to educate your fellow citizens that not everybody who lives in a third world country is starving or lacking water OK?

      --
      evil is as evil does
    31. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      you would be far better served using a custom rebuild of the new Morphix Lite.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    32. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Computers don't even rate on any list of things the third world needs.

      I think that exposure to Western toys can have the effect of tipping these nations toward liberalization. Look at the Soviet Union and Levi's/Pepsi/rock music. When the people see what we've got, they'll want it for themselves. And if it takes WiFi and PDAs to sway them, instead of quotes from Jefferson and Locke, so what?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    33. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by hostyle · · Score: 1

      No offence but you havent a clue what youre talking about. Putting local farmers on the internet will not make one whit of difference to finding customers, and knowing what the market price is doesnt help either. Why? Farmers cant ship their goods to their customers - its too costly. Only bulk retailers can do that (read slaughterhouses, co-ops, creameries/dairies, etc.) Therefore they are dependent on their local bulk supplier - of which there is usually only one. Knowing what the going price on the internet of your carrots should be is useless if your co-op will only pay you half that. What do you do? You can complain all you like - or not sell your vegetables and bury them.

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    34. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by hostyle · · Score: 1

      How does mass importing of American goods improve any countries economy (except the USA - oh, and China)? I know thats probably not what you meant, but its what you seem to be inferring.

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    35. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 1
      No, the third world needs a source of clean drinking water, democratic governments instead of tinpot dictators and warlords, education on how to grow crops instead of remaining nomadic herders, better housing, and public schools to name a few things. Computers don't even rate on any list of things the third world needs.

      How condescendent an illiterate of you. Thank you, we do have democracies in most of our countries. We know how to grow crops. However, we have little help from the illuminated first world.

      Do you know how many of the dictatorships in the third world are orchestrated in the first world ? Do you know how many times the first world, and notably the US has supported these dictatorships. For example in the 70's in South america, and most of the last century in Central America. Did you notice that Irak has recently been invaded by an oil hungry nation, and tens of thousands of innocents iraquies died ? Is that the help we are gonna get ?

      We do need computers. Actually we have computers. But we do need to get to a point where there is no digital divide. We have to avoid intellectual and productive dependency. For everyone's sake. Because after all there is one planet, one human kind, and we should all help each other to live in peace and harmony. Oh, yeah, that's what Free Software is all about.

      Funny thing is, you get modded as insightfull, and I'll get modded down to hell. Anyone has a suggestion for a better Tech forum than Slashdot ?

    36. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1
      No offence but you havent a clue what youre talking about.

      I admit that's possible.

      Putting local farmers on the internet will not make one whit of difference to finding customers, and knowing what the market price is doesnt help either. Why? Farmers cant ship their goods to their customers - its too costly.

      By customers I mean of course the companies they sell to. If I'd meant consumers I would have said consumers.

      Therefore they are dependent on their local bulk supplier - of which there is usually only one. Knowing what the going price on the internet of your carrots should be is useless if your co-op will only pay you half that. What do you do? You can complain all you like - or not sell your vegetables and bury them.

      Ah, well, maybe the farmers could get together and form a new co-op. Or maybe this was just a bad example.

    37. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I think the New World could use all of those things too. Instead we have a dictator warlord who attained power via coup. He fights for aresenic in our drinking water. He encourages herding, discourages decent housing, and has gutted public schools.

    38. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      No, the third world needs a source of clean drinking water, democratic governments instead of tinpot dictators and warlords, education on how to grow crops instead of remaining nomadic herders, better housing, and public schools to name a few things. Computers don't even rate on any list of things the third world needs.

      I'm just still wondering where in that description you got that the poster was from the US. Do you know him personally? Did you assume that he was from the US?

      The fact is that many people in the third world DO need clean water more than computers, but computers with some form of network WILL help these kind of people to get fair prices for their crops, which they often do not.

      Since you are the bastion of morality here, have you ever spent time in villages where people still use shallow, bug-covered wells or the local stream as their primary source of drinking water? I have. They need clean drinking water.

      The poster that you poured your vitrol out onto never said what you claimed he did, and you concluded that, because you found him ignorant, he must be from the US. Use a mirror next time.

    39. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by smithmc · · Score: 1

      How does mass importing of American goods improve any countries economy (except the USA - oh, and China)? I know thats probably not what you meant, but its what you seem to be inferring.

      It's not the influx of goods itself that will improve things. It's the effect that seeing/experience goods will have on the local population. They'll get a taste of what life in the Western world is like, and they'll want more - not only toys, but better jobs, better salaries, greater freedoms, more liberal (in the classical sense, not necessarily the US-politics sense) government, etc.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    40. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "I'm just still wondering where in that description you got that the poster was from the US."

      Well lets see now. He is on slashdot where the vast majority of users are American. He speaks in the American idiom. Notice words like "warlords", "tinpot dictators" and such. Amusingly he also says that all third people live nomadic herder lives.

      Those words make it obvious to me that he is an American.

      "Since you are the bastion of morality here, have you ever spent time in villages where people still use shallow, bug-covered wells or the local stream as their primary source of drinking water? I have. They need clean drinking water."

      Why yes. I spent some time in Afghanistan, iran, iraq, turkey, as well as japan, south korea, europe, australia and new zealand. I have spent a ton of time traveling all over the world.

      Yes there are people who need clean water. Yes there are people starving even here in the US. But you know what, even in afghanistan there is electricity, even in afghanistan there are shcools and telephones, and television and music and YES EVEN FUCKING COMPUTERS. That's especially true for the vast majority of the third world countries that are not savaged by continual war.

      The parent ignorant fuck american claims everybody in the third world is starving, thirsty, lives a nomadic herder life and has no need for computers or computer education. FUCK HIM and all the ignorand american fucks like him. Why don't you go to iran or lebanon or turkey and take a look at one of their schools. You'd be amazed that people ate lunch that day, drink clean water and GASP even have electricity in their classrooms.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    41. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      I agree that it's a wonderful thing to build up information-exchange infrastructure in third-world countries, but I think a lot of people in this discussion forget that said countries dont need computers, they need access to information. Computers are a good vehicle for this, yes.

      --
      SRSLY.
    42. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Well lets see now. He is on slashdot where the vast majority of users are American. He speaks in the American idiom. Notice words like "warlords", "tinpot dictators" and such. Amusingly he also says that all third people live nomadic herder lives.

      Or, he could be from a country where he received a good education in the English language and picks up Americanisms because he (or she) spends a lot of time on largely American sites like Slashdot. You don't know. He didn't say anything about nomadic people.
      The parent ignorant fuck american claims everybody in the third world is starving, thirsty, lives a nomadic herder life and has no need for computers or computer education. FUCK HIM and all the ignorand american fucks like him. Why don't you go to iran or lebanon or turkey and take a look at one of their schools. You'd be amazed that people ate lunch that day, drink clean water and GASP even have electricity in their classrooms.

      He never claimed anything of the sort. He never used the word "everybody." I don't wholly agree with him, but he was making an argument about priorities. There are plenty of countries where people don't have these things, and need them more than computers. He was saying that charities should concentrate on that first.

      That's especially true for the vast majority of the third world countries that are not savaged by continual war.
      But there are a large number of third world countries (a word, BTW which should is deprecated -- use underdeveloped instead) which are. Why don't you go to Cambodia.

      Why yes. I spent some time in Afghanistan, iran, iraq, turkey, as well as japan, south korea, europe, australia and new zealand. I have spent a ton of time traveling all over the world.
      In truth, few of the countries you listed qualify as underdeveloped.

      The bottom line is that you assumed a lot about this person, making generalizations about both him and all Americans ("typical American"), and flamed him without cause, inflicting a sort of poetic justice upon yourself. If you are going to harrass people about their narrow viewpoint, make sure to check yours first.

      It's obvious that you are well-travelled and consider yourself enlightened. You also seem unduly angry at a group of people who you view as unenlightened. You should take the next step and control your anger, asking relevant, pointed questions instead of assuming things that weren't said and casting yourself in a poor light.

    43. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "Or, he could be from a country where he received a good education in the English language and picks up Americanisms because he (or she) spends a lot of time on largely American sites like Slashdot. You don't know."

      I think there might be 1 or 2 percent chance of that.

      "He never claimed anything of the sort"

      Yes he did. I quoted him. You should go read his post.

      "But there are a large number of third world countries (a word, BTW which should is deprecated -- use underdeveloped instead) which are. Why don't you go to Cambodia."

      Well I haven't made it cambodia yet. I suppose to you that completely invalidates my experiences in afghanistan, iraq, iran and the rest of the countries I have been in. Even though I have never been in cambodia let me make a guess OK?

      There are schools in cambodia that need computers. There are schools in cambodia where there is electricy and running water and food. Not every person in cambodia is starving and in need of drinking water.

      The idea that we should not deliver computers to cambodia because some people in cambodia don't have clean water is stupid and ignorant. Only an American would say something that collasaly dumb.

      "In truth, few of the countries you listed qualify as underdeveloped."

      Granted japan, korea, australia etc are not third world countries but iran, iraq definately are and turkey probably is.

      "The bottom line is that you assumed a lot about this person, making generalizations about both him and all Americans ("typical American"), and flamed him without cause, inflicting a sort of poetic justice upon yourself."

      He is an ignorant american and I called him on it. I stand by my assessment which is based 100% on what he said.

      "It's obvious that you are well-travelled and consider yourself enlightened."

      I am well traveled but in no way shape or form do I consider myself enlightened. I simply have had the depths of my own ignorance revealed to me in my travels and interactions with the people of this planet. I admit my ignorance freely.

      "You should take the next step and control your anger, asking relevant, pointed questions instead of assuming things that weren't said and casting yourself in a poor light."

      I don't believe in that crap. I don't care how you see me, I don't care how anybody sees me. When I see ignorant people make outrageous statements and then get modded up I have to speak out. Sorry if you don't like it.

      "There are plenty of countries where people don't have these things, and need them more than computers. He was saying that charities should concentrate on that first."

      That's an ignorant thing to say. It's offensive to say that people should not try to provide third world countries with computers or IT infrastuctrure until everybody has clean water ro food. I have news for you, not every person in the US has clean water or food either.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    44. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      You:Well lets see now. He is on slashdot where the vast majority of users are American. He speaks in the American idiom. Notice words like "warlords", "tinpot dictators" and such. Amusingly he also says that all third people live nomadic herder lives.

      Me:He never claimed anything of the sort. He never used the word "everybody." I don't wholly agree with him, but he was making an argument about priorities. There are plenty of countries where people don't have these things, and need them more than computers. He was saying that charities should concentrate on that first.

      You:Yes he did. I quoted him. You should go read his post.

      Him:No, the third world needs a source of clean drinking water, democratic governments instead of tinpot dictators and warlords, education on how to grow crops instead of remaining nomadic herders, better housing, and public schools to name a few things. Computers don't even rate on any list of things the third world needs.

      Since you say you quoted him, and that I should check his post, I did. Nowhere does he say, "all third people live nomadic herder lives."

      "Or, he could be from a country where he received a good education in the English language and picks up Americanisms because he (or she) spends a lot of time on largely American sites like Slashdot. You don't know."

      I think there might be 1 or 2 percent chance of that.
      But in the end, you don't know, just as you probably don't know where I've lived or what I've done. You might as well start making insults by race now, because you've already crossed that line. Why don't you ask him where he's from before you label him?

      That's an ignorant thing to say. It's offensive to say that people should not try to provide third world countries with computers or IT infrastuctrure until everybody has clean water ro food. I have news for you, not every person in the US has clean water or food either.

      Since I claimed that I don't agree with him, you take extra effort to misrepresent my views, or you don't read well. In no way is this offensive. He was arguing priorities. Some people argue that money in the US should be spent on people who lack food and clean water. Does taht offend you as well?

      You are welcome to answer this if you care to, but since you have stated that "I don't care how you see me, I don't care how anybody sees me. When I see ignorant people make outrageous statements and then get modded up I have to speak out. Sorry if you don't like it," I will stop trying to point out your hypocrisy of ignorantly labelling people whose views you simply disagree with as ignorant.

    45. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would cut down many licenses and make Windows thin client networking a breeze. I guess there are numerous systems that can do all this, but either they are complicated to setup, or have extra stuff that is not wanted (i.e. an entire operating system and desktop apps). A simple MSTSC bootdisk would be ideal.

      http://pxes.sf.net/PXES Universal Linux Thin Client is exactly like this.
    46. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by killjoe · · Score: 1

      The person I was replying to was arguing AGAINST helping third world people get computing infrastructure because they need clean water and food and are nomadic herders. go read his post, I date you.

      I made the deduction that he is an American because
      a) Slashdot is mostly composed of Americans.
      b) He used american idioms

      I deduced that he was an ignorant american because he actually thinks most people in the third world are starving, thirsty nomadic herders who don't need no stinking computers.

      I stand by all my deductions. You have said nothing to convince me that he is not an american nor ignorant.

      OK?

      "I will stop trying to point out your hypocrisy of ignorantly labelling people whose views you simply disagree with as ignorant."

      I don't call him ignorant because I disagree with him. I call him ignorant because he thinks people in the third world are nomadic herders who don't have clean water and food.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    47. Re:The third world need wireless mesh. by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      Computers and communications systems are one of the most effective tools for keeping dictators in check-and one of the most valuable pieces of infrastructure a school can have. Furthermore, if there is going to be _any_ significant trade with the outside, communications infrastructure and computers can greatly improve the terms of trade for the third world.

  5. interesting approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read their white paper. It's not a diskless boot setup. Rather it sends the screen image over Ethernet.

    1. Re:interesting approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a link to the white paper?
      Thanks

    2. Re:interesting approach by Urusai · · Score: 0

      You mean, like X? How is that news?

    3. Re:interesting approach by Daengbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In order for X to work here, they would need an X server on the machine. With no system RAM and only 2MB of VRAM, no CPU and only an FGPU, I rather suspect that it's how they claim, and the pixmap for the whole screen is transported across the LAN. A look at their bandwidth graph supports this idea.

      Everyone else is trying to minimize the bandwidth use by moving to servers like NX, but these guys are going the opposite direction.

  6. Wow by Lukesed · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have no idea what this story is about. Seriously.

    1. Re:Wow by EinarH · · Score: 1, Troll
      It's only in USA that clueless people get rated as interesting and funny...

      [/trollmode]

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    2. Re:Wow by Lukesed · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but what on earth is a "Thin Client"? Lots of other people are probably thinking the same thing. I understand the other stories...

    3. Re:Wow by EinarH · · Score: 3, Informative

      No problem. A "thin client" is a computer or terminal that displays software that is running on a server and/or is running software from a flash based disk or a CD-ROM. On most thin clients the data processing occurs on the server.
      In most of the tradidtional cases a thin client is a networked computer using software such as Citrix.
      The advantages (according to the Citrix folks) are cheaper clients, lower TCO and easier administrations.

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    4. Re:Wow by KaptNKrunchy · · Score: 1
      " It's only in USA that clueless people get rated as interesting and funny..."

      Firstly, It's only in the USA... ;you non-format sticking ESL reject.

      Secondly, were you to have any sense or humor, the post was both slightly funny, and interesting.

      Thirdly, no it's not ok to fuck squirels you sick fuck!

    5. Re:Wow by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      As a thin client administrator for multiple thin client installations (in several towns), I concur with your points.

      However, one always needs to keep in mind the fact that having a single server control multiple PCs means that the failure point is concentrated and can wreak havoc when something goes wrong.

      Of course, since the failure point is somewhat obvious, people usually clue in and accomodate for it.

      Except me. I'm a dumb-dumb.

    6. Re:Wow by inflex · · Score: 1

      "Traditional" ... "Citrix" .... I must be getting old. To me traditional is more like X terms, VT terms, Teletype terms (ugh, I hated writing assignments on those printers with keyboards). Citrix is a baby.

    7. Re:Wow by EinarH · · Score: 1

      You're right. I should have used the word standard (or typical) instead.

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

  7. Re:First Post! by mvdw · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Yes!

    No.

  8. Bandwidth? by two-tail · · Score: 1, Informative

    Hmmm. Many many thin clients, all trying to do stuff (the same stuff) at the same times. Any bandwidth problems that could come up? I would guess that unless utilization is carefully watched, with overflow capacity readily available, it could be a problem. It would also require that the "thin server" (or maybe it's "thick server") be not too far away?

    1. Re:Bandwidth? by slazar · · Score: 1

      With citrix you can run it over a modem so the bandwidth is totally minimal and efficient. With linux technologies I am not sure. Now you do get problems with too many people on a server, taxing its resources and can make other things slow.

    2. Re:Bandwidth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I work we have 30 thin clients connected to a Intel P4 2.8ghz + 1GB RAM. Every user in the network use OpenOffice, Gimp, Gaim, Firefox and Thunderbird the whole day. Most of time we still have 50% idle CPU time and the system is very responsive.

  9. TCO by xx_chris · · Score: 3, Funny

    100 pounds!? Don't they understand that by using open source software their total cost of ownership will be much greater than if they used Windows. Get with program, poor people. Make Bill richer.

  10. Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are these cheap entry-level systems always targeted at the "Third World", rather than poor people here in the US? They'd have much better chances of success in our society, already geared for computer-readiness, in becoming popular - or gaining entry at all. Poor Americans have less of a culture gap to close to become computer users, and are much more able to bootstrap themselves into becoming unsubsidized computer consumers like the rest of us. And American products filter out to the rest of the world after they're out of fashion here, so feeding the American poor would eventually feed the foreign poor, too. Without setting up the foreign poor as better competitors to our domestic poor, upon whom we all depend. The products would be easier to produce and distribute. Aren't our own poor people worth helping?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Development begins at home by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why are these cheap entry-level systems always targeted at the "Third World", rather than poor people here in the US?

      Because the barrier to entry really isn't much of a barrier in the US. Dell sells a $300 machine, Walmart a $200 one. If you can't save up for that $200 Walmart box, you can't save up for the $100 one either. The only other option would be 'free'.

    2. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are plenty of Americans who can't afford a $100 computer, just like the many foreigners. And the difference between even a $100 and $200 computer is $100, which is double, either here or abroad. Poverty means not having enough to eat, let alone invest in a computer, regardless of which currency you lack.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Development begins at home by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Right. And as I said, the next option would have to be 'free'. A $200 machine here in the states is already 'low cost'.

      Meanwhile, thousands of perfectly serviceable PC's are literally thrown out every year by companies in the states. Let's use those.

      Then we get into what the machines in the article are to be used for. Company desktop replacments, networked to a central server. Not standalone home use.

    4. Re:Development begins at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of Americans who can't afford a $100 computer,

      The thing is, there ARE projects to create cheap or free computers like this. The commercial ventures have all failed because nobody will buy the computers.

      Some computer recyling shops have been moderately succesful, but they frequently shut down due to lack of volunteers & funding.

    5. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Nobody will buy the free computers?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:Development begins at home by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, if $200 is $100 too much for you to afford a computer, you probably can't afford $10/month for Internet access. There's other stuff you can do with a computer of course -- but for those purposes you can get a computer for $100, and a lot less, since so many old computers are floating around. If you can hook up with the right charity, you can get an old machine running Window 3.1 or Linux for free.

    7. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The poor foreigners are in an even worse Internet situation. Why are they a better target for these programmes?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:Development begins at home by kiore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps because this system is being developed in the UK where they have a long tradition of developing cheaper computers. Clive Sinclair, Alan Sugar, and many of their emulators hail from there. The simputer was IIRC developed in India, which is in the third world.

    9. Re:Development begins at home by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      People won't buy the cheap, refurbished computers.

      And believe it or not, there are tons of free, refurbished computers sitting around.

    10. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of poor Britons, too.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The main features of the foreign computer aid programmes to which I'm referring is not so much the cheap computers, but rather the programme itself, which helps people get and use the computers. Poor people are no different from the rest of us, primarily needing support to use these machines at all. Most poor Americans are poor because they're disorganized or socialized in a way that excludes activities like computing. While poor foreigners are prohibited by other factors, like actual unavailability of machines. So the programmes are even more important to helping poor Americans, along with affordable machines.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:Development begins at home by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Because cheap computers are in abundance in the US. You want cheaper than the $200 Walmart box? Go to eBay, and plug in PII. $69 Dell and Compaq PII/300 laptops.
      $25 PIII/550 desktops.
      A Compaq PIII/1.0ghz currently bidding at $57. Hell, that is faster than MY main PC was until a few months ago.

      Cheap PC's are very easy to get in the US, if you want one. And if you want the free option, the local library usually has one.

    13. Re:Development begins at home by Yankel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you're confusing "cheap computers" with "cheap computer access."

      TFA pointed out that the target users couldn't possibly afford to put any type of computer in their homes. Not even a $100 thin client, monitor, keyboard and mouse. Besides, buying a thin client won't suffice as a stand-alone home computer. You need a server to run it from. This isn't an entry-level desktop computer.

      The 'thin client' system (see www.ltsp.org for a more detailed explanation) plugs one or two dozen of these thin clients into a fat server -- at a community centre, school or internet cafe. That's when the cost savings kick in. One $1500 server and twenty $100 clients are cheaper than purchasing twenty $300 desktop computers.

      Thin clients are already being used in schools, libraries and community centres throughout North America. Most of them run Windows. It's the concept of a really, really cheap one running open source software that's making it accessible to third-world countries.

      --
      --- Dan
    14. Re:Development begins at home by NineNine · · Score: 1

      And, how are these poor people who want computers going to even know about eBay, exactly? The whole point is that they don't have computers or Net connections already...

    15. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      And there are plenty of American communities without them. What many poor people in America, as anywhere, lack, is a group of people to shepherd them through the process of becoming users, in addition to access they can afford. There's no confusion, except the confusion of
      "worthy poor" with "foreign".

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    16. Re:Development begins at home by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

      hah, my linux running let the wife surf the internet PC is a PIII/800 :) good thing about these lower power machines is noise (or lack thereof) for one

    17. Re:Development begins at home by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      They live in a vacuum? They have no friends or relatives? I understand your point, but there are vey, very few in the western world who can't find someone to ask where to get an inexpensive PC.

    18. Re:Development begins at home by fm6 · · Score: 1

      All good examples, but you neglected one -- that old P133 box your neighbor gives you for free so he won't have to pay a recycling fee.

    19. Re:Development begins at home by fiddlesticks · · Score: 1

      News just in. This isn't an American company

      And perhaps the 'foreign poor' *should* be competitors to the 'American' poor.

      'And American products filter out to the rest of the world after they're out of fashion here, so feeding the American poor would eventually feed the foreign poor, too. '

      so naive. when's it going to happen then?

    20. Re:Development begins at home by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why are these cheap entry-level systems always targeted at the "Third World", rather than poor people here in the US?

      Well first off, this article is about people in the UK. These thin clients are also designed for a centralized computer center, school, or business; not home use.

      Second of all, in urban areas of the US, there ARE projects like this. Unfortunately, they don't get alot of news coverage-- not sexy enough I guess. They are small, poorly funded, poorly organized, stuck in politics, stuck in government bureaucracy, and there aren't that many of them. But they do exist.

      There are also projects which can help in this sort of realm:

      http://www.ltsp.org/
      http://www.osef.org/ (They've been quiet for a while).

      Looks like you are NYC, and I don't know what's available over there.

      There are projects. And yes our own poor people are worth helping, but that doesn't mean you can't help the poor people in developing nations.

    21. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      News to you: most of these projects have been American, and I referred to the projects as a group. More news: I have no interest in subsidizing foreigners to compete more effectively with my neighbors. Another revelation: poor foreign neighborhoods are awash in old American castoffs, from clothing to TV to movies - as any traveler in these places knows well.

      So deluded by your own preconceptions. No more free clues for you.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    22. Re:Development begins at home by fiddlesticks · · Score: 1

      > most of these projects have been American, and I
      > referred to the projects as a group.

      A group of unrelated projects?

    23. Re:Development begins at home by jcorgan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Aren't our own poor people worth helping?

      There sure is a lot of us vs. them in your comment.

      Personally, I am a citizen of the world--the extent to which I feel charitable toward the poor does not follow along national government borders.

      If "our" poor are worth helping, what are you doing to help them?

      --
      Babies are cute because they have to be.
    24. Re:Development begins at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I,for one was thinking this very same thing! Why not enable a few million "financially disadvantaged" folk here in the U.S. A slightly higher price point could probably be dealt with too. You came with good points. A pragmatist here on /. Cool.

    25. Re:Development begins at home by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      The whole point is that they don't have computers or Net connections already...
      No, it's NOT the "whole point". There are LOTS of tasks that computers can handle without needing a connection to the internet.
    26. Re:Development begins at home by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Looks like you are NYC, and I don't know what's available over there.
      Guido will sell you a home computer, complete with all sorts of software and user data already installed, delivered straight from his trunk^Wwarehouse, for $50.00.
    27. Re:Development begins at home by tftp · · Score: 1

      Use friend's computer or find a public computer / cafe.

    28. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      A group of projects related in their essence: getting poor people to use computers more.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    29. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I care more about my neighbors than about your neighbors. It's economics and basic recognition of how human empathy actually works in practice. I work with the NY City Council, frequently advising how tech can create opportunities for disadvantaged people. I spend hundreds, thousands of hours a year doing that, which affects literally millions of my poor neighbors directly, and millions farther away indirectly, by example. What do you do, other than posting holier-than-thou comments to Slashdot?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    30. Re:Development begins at home by shobadobs · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I yell "lol ownzed" at homeless people as I drive by them in my BMW and I picket charities because people would better use their money for themselves. Whenever I'm done with hardware, I burn it because it's MINE and I'll be damned if anybody else is going to use it. And rather than spending thousands of hours per year preaching to city council about how technology can create opportunities for disadvantaged people, I spend thousands of hours per year helping some poor folks in Nigeria find willing volunteers to help transfer their millions out of the country.

      Am I bad?

    31. Re:Development begins at home by nametaken · · Score: 1


      I know they had a project around here where IT professionals donated their time to teach poorer kids how to use the internet. Unfortunatly, I don't think these kids had computers at home.

      What I'd like to see is an organization that takes old machines, rebuilds them with OSS that a machine can run on without dragging ass, and passes them out to less affluent people.

      I know there are parts of the city where a kid could probably afford the $7/mo for unlimited dialup, but probably couldn't afford a $300 machine. No reason he shouldn't be able to at least browse the web. Oh, and no city-wide wireless project here... and I don't see it happening.

      We never did this particular sort of service project in scouts, mostly food drives n' such. Where can I find organizations that do this, so I can help out? Anyone?

    32. Re:Development begins at home by melonman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why are these cheap entry-level systems always targeted at the "Third World", rather than poor people here in the US?

      Because, for many users, this sort of technology just cannot deliver the user experience they want.

      I've spent 3.5 years running a cybercafe in France that sounds remarkably like their proposed setup - 10 diskless terminals connected to a fast Linux server. For many things it's fine. But try watching a realplayer video over a remote X session and watch the network saturate. This proposal uses gigabit cards. OK, that will help a bit, but you still hit a wall with many applications. Note that whatever whizzy (read "expensive") switch gear you have, all the packets either start from or go to the same NIC on the same server, and, ultimately, that's your bottleneck.

      If you have 200 terminals, as the article suggests, that means 5Mbit/sec uncontended bandwidth per terminal, assuming your gigabit setup will run smoothly at 100% load. 2Mbit/sec sounds more likely to me. Try running X over a flakey 802.11b connection and you may spot the problem.

      This will work fine for WP and text-based browsing (the size of OO is a red herring as it lives on the server, not the client). But any kind of large bitmapped image, let alone animation, will kill it.

      Yes, yes, I know, this is not X, it's sending pixel images. So it's doing more or less what Citrix does. Try opening an image of random pixels full-screen over a Citrix session and watch the system hang for several seconds.

      There's no way around the basic facts. Networks are much slower than hard discs. You can compress a lot of images very efficiently, and you can optimise your compression to handle GUI furniture and so on, but arbitary graphical data doesn't compress well, and the time taken to send it is simply the size of the compressed image divided by the network bandwidth. And the much-touted dumbness of the terminal radically reduces your options for context-sensitive compression.

      In other words, it's a low-price solution offering a low-comfort user experience. The assumption tends to be that "poor people" are simple souls who will settle for basic services. Apart from being somewhat patronising, that assumption just doesn't tie up with my experience. Poverty tends to correlate with limited education and limited experience of computer systems. Poor people expect everything to "just work", and are not going to be pleased to learn that they can't use certain sites because of some technical consideration.

      Incidentally, my experience suggests that they are also more likely to have trouble using any software other than whatever software they have used before (inevitably Windows), so expect lots of support calls about switching from MSN to GAIM, for example. And, yes, Africans do use Instant Messaging a lot if they can, as it's much much cheaper than international phone calls.

      --
      Virtually serving coffee
    33. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You're just a stupid cunt who's not old enough to drive.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    34. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Poor Americans are more forgiving of limited technology than are poor Africans?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    35. Re:Development begins at home by KermitJunior · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I like buying a computer for, oh say $50 and then paying $60 shipping.

      --
      There is a Universal Life Value Check it
    36. Re:Development begins at home by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      So they get a PC for $110. Your point?

      Oh, and $60? I went and looked at a couple of these to check the actual shipping price.
      $25
      $35
      $18.80
      Free shipping with $45 Buy-it-now.

    37. Re:Development begins at home by propertyistheft · · Score: 1

      Because us foreigners tend to think that the US is rich enough to look after its own poor. Besides, we're fed up of waiting for the wealth to filter down; strangely enough, most of it seems to flow the other way!

      --
      Philosophers have to cure many intellectual diseases in themselves before arriving at the notions of common sense.
    38. Re:Development begins at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds interesting. Do you have a link or more informaiton about this business? I haven't found anything specific on the internet...

    39. Re:Development begins at home by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      The difference is, 'poor' American people/communities DO have access to very inexpensive computers. If they want them.

      City and public school adult education classes, corporate and personal cast-offs for hardware, very low cost ($7-$10 monthly) internet access, public libraries for totally free access.

      Developing nations lack many of these.

      I've personally given away/sold very cheaply about 15 or 20 of our old corporate castoffs and my old personal machines. Right now I have a short stack of Dell Latitude laptops (PII/300) looking for good local homes. I emphasize 'good', because I know for a fact that at least a couple of the boxes I've given away have subsequently been sold/traded for bag of weed.

      Because there are poor/hungry people in the US should we cut off all food and nutritional aid to foreigners?

    40. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Most of the projects are American ventures to help foreigners. I agree that we're rich enough to "look after" our own poor - invest in them to keep them competitive with poor foreigners, in a world of migratory global capital and labor. But the castoffs I mentioned are secondhand wealth that filters down - all you get when all you do is wait for it. Those more agressive foreigers, many of whom were formerly the poorest, who reach over to grab some, have gotten quite a lot.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    41. Re:Development begins at home by propertyistheft · · Score: 1

      First off, from out here it looks like most US projects are designed to rip-off foreigners (that's why you're so rich in the first place). So its about time you started giving something back. Secondly, the US trade deficit means that you are getting goods in exchange for paper promises, not a bad deal! If you think foreigners are doing so well out of it, perhaps you should go work in a Chinese factory for a while. Third, if you think that setting people up to compete against each other is helping them, I can't agree. Actually, the poor never sit around waiting for second hand wealth - they have to work really hard for it. If they were allowed to sell their products and labour on the open market in a fair trade system it would make us all better off. (Of course it would hurt that migratory global capital that you mention, but hey, I can live with that.)

      --
      Philosophers have to cure many intellectual diseases in themselves before arriving at the notions of common sense.
    42. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Most projects are designed to rip off other people. It's always time to "give something back", but that doesn't happen anywhere. The American poor are closer to the exploiters, and get ripped off every day, with even fewer alternatives than foreigners in who rips them off, so by your "fairness" logic, they deserve first crack at the help. Those "paper promises" foreigners get from Americans for their goods are very useful in obtaining goods from America, and increasingly in getting the US government to enforce policies not in America's own interest. Otherwise, those countries (which practice extremely tight trade controls) wouldn't voluntarily make the trades, as they are zealously anxious to do. If you think the Chinese factory workers are the beneficiaries of their US trade surplus, you must really be a communist, and think that their goverment is communist in more than propaganda, too. I don't know why you think the poor are sitting around waiting for secondhand wealth - all I said is that they get it, usually by working hard.

      People are set up to compete with each other. That's how the fair trade system you desire would operate, too. In fact, your system would be even more migratory, even more global a market for capital and labor than the current one. Fair competition is not always destructive - consider side-by-side boat rowers, each with an opposing oar. Competition is the only feasible organization we can manage for large groups of people. Fortunately, with better communications, competition does not necessarily exclude cooperation. Even a communist recognizes that the dialectic requires antithesis for synthesis.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    43. Re:Development begins at home by propertyistheft · · Score: 1

      It's always time to "give something back", but that doesn't happen anywhere.

      Well I agree with the first part of this, but on the contrary it's happening all over the place (e.g. the story that started this discussion). By MY fairness criteria, all the poor should be helped, not selectively and not to charity, but comprehensively and to justice, see for example http://www.tradejusticemovement.org/wakeup/gwaback ground.shtml. I don't think that Chinese factory workers benefit from their trade deficit (at least not as much as they should). I believe that Americans (among others)do. Even the American poor benefit by being able to buy cheaper goods. Economics is not a zero sum game: the more that is produced, the more there is to go around. That's why the thin client project is a good thing. Fair and properly regulated competition will benefit the economy as a whole, but it doesn't benefit those who directly compete. People rowing in a boat aren't competing with each other, they're co-operating.

      --
      Philosophers have to cure many intellectual diseases in themselves before arriving at the notions of common sense.
    44. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The limited resources for investing in the poor are exceeded by the opportunities to invest, so that means choices. So I choose my neighbors - I help the NY City Council with issues including the "digital divide" (universal access), including a hearing just this morning that oversees the City's 5-year strategic plan. So I know about some projects, and was pleased to learn about the ones you mentioned - thanks.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    45. Re:Development begins at home by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Well, your viewpoint has oversimplified the whole world to a binary pair of alternatives. FWIW, the "giveback" we're discussing is not "charity", but a business venture, like practically any serious global venture. Justice is based in self-interest, even if only the golden "do unto others" rule; helping the poor works best when its an investment in productivity that feeds back to the investor, and allows reinvestment in others. Chinese factory workers benefit from the trade deficit more than the American workers against whom they successfully compete; their flipside is affording to buy other consumables with even their low wages (like anyone else, excepting their mafia governments constraints). The real winners in the Chinese/American trade imbalances are multinational corporates, owned by both Chinese and Americans protected by the governments we all subsidize and underwrite; transpacific labor is the loser. It's kept under control by communications and organizational superiority of the winners, which is why these bootstrapping telecom projects are a good thing, when applied for personal communications upgrades. All these fuzzy or rotated comparisons require some contextual flexibility to sort out, like understanding that two rowers work against each other to move their boat forward: it's coopetition, the operating mode of all these dynamics, harnessable for benefit when properly understood.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    46. Re:Development begins at home by propertyistheft · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I thought it was you who was oversimplifying the world into binary alternatives: american poor v other poor; communists v right thinking people; etc.

      Never mind, I think your economic analysis is pretty good, but you don't seem to understand the difference between competition and co-operation. These are logical opposites and there is nothing to be gained from trying to conflate them. That's not dialectics, it's just wooly thinking. The difference is in the intention, not the physical action. If I put down a brick and then you put a brick on top etc., we might be competing to see who can put down the last brick before it all falls over. On the other hand, we might be co-operating to build a wall. Intention makes all the difference.

      If the rowers were really competing, i.e. trying to outdo each other, the boat would go round in circles, as the stronger got the upper hand. They don't do this, they measure their strokes against their partner, thus making sure that the boat continues in a straight line. Competition can be a useful way of regulating and improving efficiency, but co-operation is fundamental to production.

      --
      Philosophers have to cure many intellectual diseases in themselves before arriving at the notions of common sense.
  11. Who's behind this.. by swab79 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I wonder if Mark Shuttleworth has anything to do with this? What with the Ndiyo being another african word...

  12. FPGAs vs. SOCs by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if their FPGA-based design is really cheaper than using a Geode or Xilleon.

    1. Re:FPGAs vs. SOCs by mvdw · · Score: 1

      I don't know the answer to your question, but I also wonder if their FPGA design will also be open-sourced?

    2. Re:FPGAs vs. SOCs by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      But are there good OSS programs to implement the Verilog or VHDL into a format that can be loaded onto the FPGA?

    3. Re:FPGAs vs. SOCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would be if they got off their ass and made an ASIC.

      fpga is for devel, not rollout

    4. Re:FPGAs vs. SOCs by tftp · · Score: 1

      There are no commercial programs to do that well :-)

    5. Re:FPGAs vs. SOCs by mvdw · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter that much if the free-as-in-beer tools from Altera and/or Xilinx can synthesise the design? We could have a philosophical discussion for a week about the relative merits of free-as-in-speech vs free-as-in-beer, but at the end of the day that's all that's available for synthesis, so you have to use it...

  13. RTFA by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

    This is answered in the presentation; 30 users consume less than 100Mbps.

    1. Re:RTFA by NtroP · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We have one location with over 200 thin-clients on a 100Mb network. The impact is minimal. With QoS and propper VLANing you can to much more than that. Just web-surfing and email take up more bandwidth than the thin-client traffic on that network.

      --
      "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    2. Re:RTFA by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I have used large thin client networks, too. This setup is a little sifferent, though. They are claiming a FGPU with 2MB RAM and, apparently, no systyem RAM. The screen pixmap is apparently piped directly over the LAN, and, from the look of their 20 client setup, they won't be able to support anything larger than that. I guess that you would need a special server, as well, and not just one running X.

      I'm still wondering how this is preferable to something like a Geode with 32MB RAM in a small enclosure connecting via normal X or even NX.

    3. Re:RTFA by wwwillem · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a clone of the SunRay solution (see here). With SunRay's you use a smartcard to access, which has the cool feature, that you can pull your card from the thin client, walk over to another (to discuss something with a colleague, to give a preso in the boardroom, to go home even!!) and plug your card into another SunRay, where your session continues as if nothing had happened.

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    4. Re:RTFA by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Yeah. X doesn't support this while both the SunRay and RDP do. People using LTSP have been clamoring for this since I started using it about five years ago.

  14. Thin Clients are great by NtroP · · Score: 4, Insightful
    We use Thinstation thin-clients here connecting to either Win2k3 Terminal servers or Xandros Terminal Servers.

    The benefits of thin-clients are many. First, the client can be really bare bones (i.e. no HD, minimal RAM, low-end graphics, low processesor speeds, etc) so they can be cheap ($170 + monitor from WalMart or donated machines). Second, to upgrade all your workstations (perfomrance-wise) all you need to do is upgrade or add another server - not hundreds of workstations. Third, to upgrade all you clients (software-wise), you just upgrade the software on a few servers. Managing one or two Win2K3 servers for viruses, patches, malware, etc, beats the hell out of 200 WinXP workstations!

    There are other benefits, but these are the ones that have really made a difference for us. Don't get me wrong, thin-clients aren't the answer for everything. There are many situations where you need to have a fully functioning workstation. However, with the money you save on thin-clients, you can afford to get really good workstations, which in turn can be turned into thin-clients when they are needing to be upgraded.

    Most of our users simply need a means of doing basic office tasks like word-processing, spreadsheets, email, web-surfing, etc. Those are perfect for thin-clients.

    What would I want to have to make it better? Easy. First, get OpenOffice to work properly on a Win2K3 terminal server, It's not real good in a multi-user environment like that (unless I'm doing something wrong - possible). And the number 1 thing that would make it better: can you say "Tiger Terminal Server Edition"?

    --
    "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    1. Re:Thin Clients are great by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

      1 thing that would make it better: can you say "Tiger Terminal Server Edition"? Doesn't OS X already do this via Network booting?

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    2. Re:Thin Clients are great by killjoe · · Score: 1

      " Easy. First, get OpenOffice to work properly on a Win2K3 terminal server, It's not real good in a multi-user environment like that (unless I'm doing something wrong - possible)."

      How is it with just plain old X? If all you are doing is simple office, email, websurfing etc I just don't see how you could justify the cost of a w3k terminal server system. YOu not only have to pay for the server but you have to pay for each client that connects no matter what they are using to connect with.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    3. Re:Thin Clients are great by NtroP · · Score: 1
      We do use "plain old X" in the form of Xandros Terminal Servers (with OpenOffice 2beta) in some limited applications. One of the issues we have with that situation though is that, for some strange reason, Xandros will NOT mount an SMB share off an Xserve that is using the Active Directory plugin. It will mount SMB off a Windows file server and Win2K3 TS can mount SMB shares off the Xserves, but Xandros refuses. We could NFS mount network shares this way, but then those users which have home directories on Windows would be out of luck.

      One of Xandros' strengths as a Terminal Server is that it can be configured to authenticate off AD, auto-create a home directory for a new user and auto-mount the user's "H" drive in a folder called "DriveH" in their home folder. This makes it great because you don't have to pre-create and configure users on a Terminal Server. They can just log in. If we could get it to be able to mount home shares off an Xserve, it would be an excellent solution, as we have about 25 locations with Xserve running Panther as the local fileserver. We are hoping moving to Tiger Server and Open Directory this summer will help that.

      --
      "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    4. Re:Thin Clients are great by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I am trying to do something similar, is there any way I can pick your brains a little?

      --
      evil is as evil does
    5. Re:Thin Clients are great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could use Xboxes as thin clients and thereby get MS to subsidise your Linux installation installation :-)

    6. Re:Thin Clients are great by NtroP · · Score: 1

      You can email me at kevin at northstar.k12.ak.us

      --
      "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
  15. Proposed new mod by fm6 · · Score: 1

    -1: Google is your friend

    1. Re:Proposed new mod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  16. More of the same NON-SOLUTION. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have never understood the idea that "third world" people want, need, or have to settle for "miraculous" $100 computers or thin clients. The truth is that in "third world" countries, bare bones PCs that run your choice of Windows or Linux simply don't cost a hell of a lot more than $100, and often less. It's all about what the market will bare. This thin client bull shit is just more of the same non-solution looking for a non-problem. People in "third world" countries that want computers have them, and those that don't know that they "need" them can get REAL computers cheap. And, thin client or not, it matters little if there is nothing to connect them together. You know, like phone lines, fiber, dish, wireless? Think about infrastructure, than give them REAL computers.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:More of the same NON-SOLUTION. by grcumb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "The truth is that in "third world" countries, bare bones PCs that run your choice of Windows or Linux simply don't cost a hell of a lot more than $100, and often less."

      Welcome to the land of Generalisation, where one anecdotal observation trumps any need for actual data!

      Sorry to be so crude, but what you're saying is so hopelessly wrong that it just about made me jump out of my chair. How do I know it's wrong? Because I'm sitting right now in a developing nation that adds a 40% duty to all imported computer goods. I cannot buy a new PC of any kind for less than USD 1000. (That's about 6 times the legal monthly minimum wage.)

      I've spoken with officials from the department of trade, and they've been extremely receptive to the fact that high computing costs are a huge barrier to development. In fact, they're in the process of lowering those barriers. But even then, the best we could expect would be a roughly $4-500 computer, which still represents a huge amount of money for the average person. When you're earning very little money, every dollar has to count.

      So guess what? We used 8 year-old Pentiums to operate as thin clients to connect to 'modern' PIII 450s running Ubuntu. Here's the press release we just published.

      In fairness, there are a number of countries where computer hardware is cheap. But the fact that some developing countries have cheap computers does not mean that 'the developing world has cheap computers'.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    2. Re:More of the same NON-SOLUTION. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " The truth is that in "third world" countries, bare bones PCs that run your choice of Windows or Linux simply don't cost a hell of a lot more than $100, and often less."

      Can you cite an example of that? It seems to me that shipping alone would cost most of that.

      Note: I'm ignorant on this topic. I'm not challenging your point.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:More of the same NON-SOLUTION. by zootm · · Score: 1

      Upgrade costs. These thin-clients should never need to be upgraded -- the entire raw screen display is streamed over the network, and only the server does any actual computing. Coupling this with the "plug and play" clustering they mention in their presentation for servers, the costs of upgrades are greatly, greatly reduced.

    4. Re:More of the same NON-SOLUTION. by Phil06 · · Score: 0

      Thin client connected to network/server controlled by murderous tryant third world dictator.

      --
      "...and yet, I blame society" Duke - Repo Man
  17. Pointless story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF is a thin client ?

    A hardware platform ?
    A browser ?
    An malnourished third world inhabitant thanks to his corrupt backward government ?

    Oh and a govenment study said OSS is cheaper. Well DUH.

    crap crap crap

  18. Great... by Eyeball97 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Another bunch of do-gooders who think developing nations need cheap PCs. I'm in Africa, my local hardware store's damn near as cheap as I can find on Pricewatch.

    The people you're targeting get paid $50 a month, my friend, and their kids go to a school which is basically 4 walls, a floor, and a roof if they're lucky.

    Oh yes, a server and some thin clients is really what's needed there.

    Not paper and pens. Text books. Teachers. Electricity (what are they planning to plug these things into?).

    The thing about developing nations, is not that they're poor, it's that the divide between the rich and the poor is vast.

    At the other end of the scale, here, you have your rich, your ex-pats, etc - and you have your $5,000/term "International School" organisations who have wireless internet, computer labs, international standard teachers, and they don't need this. Nor do the businesses, most of which are thriving, thank you very much.

    I'm sitting here next to a 3Tb server in my office and a server room full of Dual Xeons next door reading about how developing nations need some sort of solution for cheap computing?

    These people have so lost direction they couldn't find it with both hands and a map.

    It actually looks like a nice system, that would be ideal for reducing costs in schools and some businesses world-wide, I have NO idea what they're doing thinking they're doing this for the good of the "third world".

    If they really want to do something "not for profit", try volunteering for an aids project, a humanitarian project, or a teaching project.

    Sometimes I look at my driver - I pay him $65 a month, and I wonder what he would have been if he'd had the education I did. HE would be sitting in this chair, for a start. I could teach him in front of this PC for a month of Sundays, and it wouldn't make up for the fact he has no basic education.

    1. Re:Great... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see. Your solution is for someone else to fix the problem or volunteer for a humanitarian project, yet you quite concisely point out the problem here:

      it's that the divide between the rich and the poor is vast.

      From your description, these people need a revolution to redistribute the wealth. Obviously the rich people in your country don't really give a fuck.

    2. Re:Great... by emm-tee · · Score: 1

      Score:6, if you ask me.

    3. Re:Great... by Eyeball97 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "My country" is Scotland, as if it matters.

      I don't recall rich people anywhere in the world giving a fuck, generally speaking.

      Revolution? Yeah, that'll work. Gather up every cent in the country, and redistribute it, bring the entire population up to $100 a month instead of $50. I can see how that would help.

    4. Re:Great... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Well it looks like you are all set up. You get to go to the nice schools, pay somebody to drive you around and make fun of the people trying to help the poor.

      Nice.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    5. Re:Great... by Artemis3 · · Score: 1

      It does because you could also get free healthcare, free education, cheaper or free services (electricity, water, gas) more aids and funding for your projects many business oportunities with the state, lower interest rates, etc, in effect needing to use less of that money.

      Lets pick a bad example: Cuba. The people might be poor, but they are not dying of hunger in the streets, even with the many decades US blockade, and more recently a severe drought affecting half the isle.

      These countries can stand much better hardships than any other money oriented societies that would quickly run into anarchy and chaos from all the fightings for trying to keep the already scare resources (See Haiti).

      Things are not so black & white.

      --
      Artix
      Your Linux, your init.
    6. Re:Great... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      "My country" is Scotland, as if it matters.

      Excellent.

      As someone who knows the history of Scotland, I'm sure you are well aware of what happens when one class of people has too much money and power over another class of people.

      Scotland's history is a prime example of why rebellion can help society to progress.

      In fact, if it wasn't for some great Scotish rebelious activity, most Scotish people would still be scrubbing the floors in some great English household or otherwise serving the wealthy English classes. Luckily for you, things have progressed in Scotland.

      Scotland has progressed. What has happened in Scotland is now happening in the rest of the world.

  19. Yawn, Sun already has this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case you don't get it, there is not enough power in third-world countries to boot up your super-cool cases (with those nifty case-mods, of course), along with your 10,000 rpm disk farms and 2X power-sucking CPUs. Don't talk about bootable CDROMs as a solution and open your minds a little and consider that not every country in this world can afford rectangular foot-warmers for each of their computer users - if the "box" has a fan, CPU, or disk drive, it is not practical in large scale in third world countries.

    Sun has had its ultra-thin (I hate these descriptions) client for years. No state at all maintained on the box, and very low power consumption. Sure, to be fair, you have to add in the power consumption of the server in the back room. But, these solutions do indeed make sense for power-deprived nations.

    1. Re:Yawn, Sun already has this technology by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Too bad a Sun Ray costs more than a diskless PC.

  20. I see danger lurking by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The system runs Ubuntu Linux with a Gnome/KDE deskto and OpenOffice. From the article:...

    Pay attention to the beef which is OpenOffice. I am afraid that SUN may pull the plug on java, which OO.o has come to heavily rely on of late. SUN could simply change its license. Let's remember that SUN is practically in bed with M$ after having received some big cash ftom M$, and has never criticized SCO for its actions.

    I personally advocate the forking of OO.o portions that are GPLed so that we can finally be free. How about that?

    1. Re:I see danger lurking by scotlewis · · Score: 1

      Sun is in the middle of making it's chief operating system open source. They've just started an initiative to get as much of the company blogging as possible to make the company more transparent. They keep the Java name (that's right, just the name) so that they can guarantee anything called Java will actually be compatible. So there's very little chance of them taking Java away. And even if they did, the JVM, class libraries and whatnot all have publicly available specifications, so it's not like compatible replacements couldn't be produced.

      And, let's not forget that the 'big cash' from MS was basically Microsoft paying Sun to stop running around calling it an anti-competitive monopolist.

      Reality check: Sun's in the Open Source game for the long haul. Just because they don't worship at the altar of the GPL doesn't make them evil.

    2. Re:I see danger lurking by bogaboga · · Score: 1
      >And even if they did, the JVM, class libraries and whatnot all have publicly available specifications, so it's not like compatible replacements couldn't be produced.

      If this is the case, why won't some parts of OO.o run with IBM's java implementation? IBM has tried to make its implementation work but things are not as smooth as the real java.

    3. Re:I see danger lurking by natrius · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting that there are open source Java projects. Red Hat is using them to compile OpenOffice for the next Fedora version. From what I've heard, it almost works completely.

    4. Re:I see danger lurking by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Which one is RedHat using? I'm just curious here. From what I've seen so far, the 'non SUN' implementations still leave a lot to be desired. And would love to see one that 'does the job'.

      ( Still they are good work, just not enough to replace the 'real' version, yet.. )

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    5. Re:I see danger lurking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Among other things gcc4 has a Java front end http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0/changes.html/. Swing support is incomplete but Java 1.4 support looks good otherwise.

      Also, IBM has very good and complete clean room implementations of JVM and there are other commercial JVMs. So Sun has less real lattitude with their licensing terms than one might think.

  21. You may be right but... by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    I would have expected the flasher to be downloaded from the flasher directory.

    Probably the best thing for folks to do is just subscribe to the MeshAP user list and ask questions.

  22. Ideal American school/library client by davidwr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know about the 3rd world, but the ideal client for most libraries and schools would be:

    1) video, keyboard, mouse, optionally local removable read/write storage
    2) operating system, e.g. Linux, with essential utilities, e.g. firewall and antivirus software
    3) web browser
    4) most common lightweight apps, e.g. low end word processor, and perhaps software specific to the given installation, e.g. front end to a card catalog or other database.
    5) remote access to heavyweight, lightly-used apps like OpenOffice, running on a nearby server

    with hardware just beefy enough to run the local apps plus a few web browser windows plus a few remote-access windows.

    All of this would boot from a read-only, or at least read-only without administrator action, medium, to all but eliminate the threat of malware and end-user malice - reboot and the damage is undone.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Ideal American school/library client by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You could have just said Damn Small Linux.

      /rant These types of solutions have been around for years. The only barrier to their adoption in "developed" countries are the MS blinders that most people wear. Not to mention, any time a non-profit thinks of deploying Linux, MS suits show up with free copies of Windows and brand new Dells. Fortunately, the "developing" world doesn't have such preconceived notions.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  23. Home is taken care of by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Computers cheaper than the ones we already have can't be made commercially -- there's just no way to do it and make a profit. So the vendor has to be a charity. Now, if you're a charity and you think more poor Americans need to have computers, you're not going to subsidize the development of a new kind of computer. You just going to go out, buy standard computers, and sell them at a loss. Or (more likely) give them away. I believe some charities already do this.

    If you read past the headlines, you see that point of these projects is not just to make cheap computers -- though cost is certainly a factor. It's to design new computers that are better suited to local conditions.

    1. Re:Home is taken care of by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      And how is that scenario any more applicable to foreigners than to Americans?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  24. Nice fonts by malraid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Anybody has used a thin client linux distro with nice (ttf support) fonts? I've used LTSP, and while it works nice, the fonts look butt ugly. There seems to be a way to enable ttf, but it seems overly complicated last time I checked.

    --
    please excuse my apathy
    1. Re:Nice fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, right? If your video cards are supported by Xorg then you get pretty fonts by default -- check your hardware ...

  25. Boiiiig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in a third world country, just south of the border and computers cost a lot more than $100 dollars. Even if they cost $100(if you can get me this price then buy for me 1000 units), most of the population has to work 2 weeks to earn this money.

    In the other side, we don't have problems with software's cost, piracy is almost legal.

  26. Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Just south of the border"? Guatemala, Brazil, Argentina, or any number of countries SOUTH OF MEXICO. So go fuck yourself.

    1. Re:Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No moron, I'm in Mexico.

  27. Really? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about? I can get a P3 with a decent hard drive right here in the USA _right_fucking_now_ for damn near $100. If you are suggesting that a P3 is not a "real" computer, and that no one could possibly make use of one, than you are a snob. However, having been to certain parts of Guatemala (admittedly, the more inhabited parts), I can tell you that an adequate P3 box with monitor will in fact cost you around $100. Sure you can't play the latest video games, but you know? So what, it's a REAL computer, not some bull shit thin client or glorified PDA.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But people in Guatemala have $100 to spend on a computer?

  28. Tiger Terminal Server Edition by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

    If Apple decides to do this MS is in for some serious problems. That would be the BEST presentation layer for 95% of users.

    --
    Your Average Joe
  29. Nonsense. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Troll
    I cannot buy a new PC of any kind for less than USD 1000. (That's about 6 times the legal monthly minimum wage.)

    Jesus. What kind of box are you trying to buy? $1000 US? Maybe you should set your sights a little lower and realize that not everyone needs a game box.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Nonsense. by grcumb · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Jesus. What kind of box are you trying to buy? $1000 US? Maybe you should set your sights a little lower and realize that not everyone needs a game box."

      I wasn't going to reply at first, but then I realised that you genuinely don't get it. The country where I live cannot survive on income tax revenues, because the cash economy is almost non-existent. This means that it relies on import duties, business license fees, etc. for its revenues. This means that things like computers have hugely inflated prices. PCs, for example, have a 40% duty slapped on them. Vendors also add large markups because they pay extremely high business license fees.

      All this means that a low-end computer that would cost about USD 4-500 ends up costing not less than USD 1000 when it arrives here. Is it clearer now?

      And stop calling me Jesus. 8^)

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    2. Re:Nonsense. by tftp · · Score: 1

      Will you have to pay the same tax on parts that go into the thin client? If it is more efficient to assemble computers locally, does it include standard PCs? There are usually many solutions.

    3. Re:Nonsense. by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      And stop calling me Jesus. 8^)

      I'm confused; do you hear "religious messages" in your head or are those bastards ignoring the DNC list and masquerading as someone else again?

    4. Re:Nonsense. by ky11x · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Rather convenient that you don't name this "country" you live in, isn't it? If this fictitious country of yours has inflated prices due to import duties, how will the proposed thin clients help? They also have to be imported, and will end up costing "$1000" as you say. Either you are telling the truth and this new product is utterly useless to you (in which case the point made at the beginning of this thread stands) or you are trolling.

    5. Re:Nonsense. by grcumb · · Score: 1

      The proposal that I brought to the Ministry of Trade was that they should reduce the tariff on components to zero. That way, they could still raise needed funds for government, but they'd be helping to increase (semi-)skilled employment here. That would also make computers more affordable for everyone. They were quite receptive to this idea. I haven't seen the final rate proposal yet, but I believe they're lowering duties on systems somewhat, and components even more.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    6. Re:Nonsense. by mvdw · · Score: 1

      If you actually go to the link in the parent post, it's Vanuatu. You can do your own research on whether he's telling the truth about that particular country.

  30. Please use the Coral links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  31. Re: Thin clients cheap? by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First, the client can be really bare bones (i.e. no HD, minimal RAM, low-end graphics, low processesor speeds, etc) so they can be cheap ($170 + monitor from WalMart or donated machines).

    Yep, thin clients are great, when used in the right places. And they have many advantages. But... price isn't one of them. Not yet, anyway.

    Where I live, PC's up to around 200 MHz. (original Pentium and below) are effectively free. You want one? Look around, hand over a sixpack of beer, and you have one.

    Now with a $170 budget, I can get you a (used) PC that includes monitor, and beats the crap out of any thin client you can find for same money.

    How come? Well, we all know electronics today are 'cheap' thanks to the sheer numbers they're produced in. Apparantly in today's world, a standard beige box with off-the-shelf components, is still cheaper (to produce, or second-hand), than a book-sized thin client produced in limited numbers.

    For a business, the numbers may differ. If you'd use old hardware in a thin-client like fashion, you might have to hire someone, to manage parts, build and repair boxes fulltime. In that scenario, it may be cheaper to spend $170 once on thin clients, and very little after that on managing the hardware. But the savings here are not hardware, but management costs. Which I think is the advantage of thin clients anyway.

    I hope some day (maybe soon) these economics will change, and make smaller/smarter boxes cheaper than equal performing WalMart beige boxes. Because they have many advantages, and I happen to like small+smart boxes. Even if they're still a bit bigger, like Mini-ITX or Shuttle XPC's.
  32. Windows or Linux, who cares? by tftp · · Score: 0
    People who want a $100 computer probably don't care if their Windows is not exactly properly licensed (such as, installed from a CD bought for $1 at a street corner.) Linux or BSD does not help in this aspect.

    Furthermore, an old and cheap PC may not be good enough for a modern UNIX-like system, but an old Windows 95 system will be fine on it. Can we recommend Redhat 3.0 to anyone, going back in time? Can we suggest to run it in console mode only, without X? But Win98SE is not a bad choice, given the old PC in question. I still have Win98SE on an old notebook; it runs very snappy. But when I tried RH (8 or 9) on the same notebook it was visibly sluggish, and generally the usability of the system dropped.

    1. Re:Windows or Linux, who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not ownership of the computer that matters, it's connecting it up to the Internet. Your average poor person doesn't have the money to afford the connection, assuming the consumer infrastructure exists. Hence the popularity of Telecentros in Brazil for example. Somebody knowledgeable keeps it running and thin clients make it easier. And just try to connect a roomful of W98 computers to a router and wait for the license sharks and viruses to arrive.

    2. Re:Windows or Linux, who cares? by tftp · · Score: 1
      And just try to connect a roomful of W98 computers to a router and wait for the license sharks and viruses to arrive.

      People in all countries face this issue, not just in developing nations. Besides, Win98 with Firefox is probably more secure than WinXP with IE... Win98 has so few networking capabilities it may be safer than all the later UPnP bells & whistles :-)

  33. Nothing wrong with cheap computers by Tekime · · Score: 1

    It took a government study to figure out that open source software is cheaper? The setup looks pretty smart for that price though. Will this actually make any difference for third-world countries? I have no idea.. but I don't see anything wrong with computers becoming available to more people for less money.

  34. WTF is Electricity??? by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

    They do not even have reliable electricity. More important is immunization, clean water and facilities for waste disposal. NOT COMPUTERS!

    --
    Your Average Joe
    1. Re:WTF is Electricity??? by stutterbug · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'd mod you up +1 for insight, but -1 for presumptiveness.

      When I lived in New Delhi, brown outs were a frequent problem and surges were a real hazard. A colleague of mine returned home once to the smell of ozone and burning plastic and found that a surge had left a scorch mark where his fax machine used to be. Any kind of electronic device required a special kind of expensive current regulator to protect against spikes, and even with one you were no better off if the power ever up and died. A desktop system in this sort of environment would be a mistake. Using laptops is a huge advantage, since it lives on its own power supply and really doesn't care much (or so it seemed to me) about brown outs and surges. So... Go MIT!

      BUT, what you appear to be saying too is that developing countries can choose only three of the four items you list. That's bunk. Education is central to long-term development and while e-learning is mostly bullshit, computer science and engineering education needs computers.

      Also, you'd be best to check your assumptions about the "Third World" at the door. There is a world of difference in the infrastructure and education needs between Burundi and Papua New Guinea on the one hand and Mexico and Kenya on the other. There are many 'Third Worlds' and few of them are of the sort you are probably imagining.

  35. ooffice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all due respect OOo is huge. Why not consider Abiword, the 2.2.x versions and up are considerably improved.

    Also props to these cats! It's nice to see some geeks out there both care about the world and are not all wrapped up in greed or a post dotcom hangover. Keep up the foreward thinking!

  36. Pixel Transmission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the idea of removing all of the intelligence from the client.

    Essentially they have set it up so that the client processes a compressed stream of pixel updates.

    The idea is eventually the entire thing is one ASIC and the supporting doodads required to interface with the I/O and power.

    Sounds like a great solution for POS and remote displays.

  37. US english support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If not then how can they use it?

  38. Trickle down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good point.

    So match parent up with the earlier article, which said the place cheap systems are really needed is in lower-class American schools. Add to that American shoe-string startup companies that don't have venture capital. And add American state and federal government departments that are downsizing.

    Then add the lower classes in Japan and the EU, where people do have working powerlines: I just got back from a year as an exchange student in Sapporo. One friend of mine there has extra PCs to throw away, and it would have cost him--so I took and got them all working with decent software for students. Guess what: I had no trouble finding plenty of classmates with no computer of their own, who were more than happy to have something in the sub-$500 range.

    The lower classes are alive and growing in "rich" countries. And if those lower classes aren't encouraged to get cheap computing access, where is B-b-b-Bill [and friends] going to get his next batch of Microserfs? How will they continue turning IT into a McJobs industry?

  39. There are no thin clients in U.S. ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sick and tired of anti usa flame.

  40. LTSP by diwadm · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here in our university(UP), we've been using LTSP to create thin clients. We run a powerful server (2ghz, 1gb ram) and it can host up to 20 Pentium computers.

    What's nice about the thin client setup is that once an application is loaded, it boots really fast on all the clients. For instance, we start OpenOffice on the server and it boots with a second on a client.

    Another advantage with this setup is control. Since all the clients run on the server, we can restrict access and prioritize security.

  41. this is positive by jbltgz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    nice, this is positive but i'd rather see Zen Linux being used instead of ubuntu.

  42. New thin client? I doubt it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see:

    Ndijo has OpenOffice, Firefox, GAIM, Thunderbird.

    BeatrIX has OpenOffice, Firefox, GAIM, Evolution.

    Ndijo runs Ubuntu Linux with a Gnome/KDE desktop. BeatrIX is Ubuntu derivative with a Gnome desktop.

    And Ndijo is a "new, ultra-thin client"? Give me a break - there is nothing new.

  43. Re: Thin clients cheap? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

    That's why smart people use low-end PCs as thin clients.

  44. For richer or poorer... by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1

    The people you're targeting get paid $50 a month (..) The thing about developing nations, is not that they're poor, it's that the divide between the rich and the poor is vast.

    Personally I have no problem with a vast difference in wealth between the richest and poorest in this world. It's not the size of this scale that matters, but how low the bottom end is.

    Differences in income between $50 or $50K a month don't worry me, but that $50 a month lower end, not enough to provide you with food in your mouth, a roof over your head, clean drinking water, basic healthcare or education, does worry me.

    And for what it's worth, poor people that wander the streets with nothing but the clothes on their back, that don't know where their next meal comes from, can be found anywhere. There's just more of them in 3rd world countries.

    And there are other reasons people don't have PC's, like that the box + monitor + wiring + CD's + papers doesn't fit in their interior, or that they don't like gaming or have better things to do than surf the internets 5 hours a day. Or don't want to spend the time on dealing with dialog boxes, hardware/OS upgrades or spyware cleanup.

    $100 for a computer should be enough for everyone.

  45. Here's a better idea for the developing world... by isny · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cheap and abundant net cafes. People in the developing world don't need to play quake. If they can rent a pc for some period of time, it helps them communicate. Just like the communal pay phone at the general store worked decades ago. Abundancy means they don't have to walk a long distance.

  46. Where's the economic foundation by bw5353 · · Score: 1

    I'm all for this kind of experiments, but unless they are able to get above a critical volume and sell for profit and continue to develop the product, the project will die after some time. Either because the funders get fed up pouring money into the project, or because other standards will take over. A better approach may be to design and sell a cheap computer for the industrialised world to get the volume up. They could then set aside part of the production, and sell it for low-profit prices in the third world. Unless the price/feature ratio is good enough for the rich world, it won't be good enough for the poor one either.

  47. What they need more... by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    We all would like cheaper computer, and I'm sure these will do a lot of good where they're going. But what a lot of third world nations need more than cheap computers, is a sane economy. To that you need to eliminate the corrupt politics, excessive taxes and barriers to trade (both internally and externally). Yes, the US and Europe have these problems as well, but the reason we're not third world is because we don't have them in excess.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  48. Amazing by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    But a recent UK government study, yet to be formally published, has shown that open source software can significantly reduce school budgets dedicated to computing set-ups.'"

    So, in other words, mostly free software can save money?

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the survey shows most of the savings are in hardware and support, not software licenses.

    2. Re:Amazing by chawly · · Score: 1

      That is surely the take I got on it. Had to think about it for a moment though. Long words and so on. Hard for me. May be correct - open source doesn't cost hardly anything - might be a way for the schools to save money. Yep - I can go with that.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  49. Thin Screen Computer! by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

    You, my friend, gave me this idea for Thin Screen Computer - namely, to avoid outrageous import duties, only LCD screens would be imported (and keyboard/mouse, too) and the actual computer will remain in the U.S. or wherever.

    1. Re:Thin Screen Computer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sucks about getting modded down eh M$ weanie?

  50. Environmental cost by andrew71 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is everybody here focusing on price and not on total cost of ownership and environmental costs, which are the real point here IMO?

    --
    13-4=54/6
  51. Optimizing for client-side apps not cross-browser by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    If there is going to be just one browser distributed you may as well make it a browser that can support something more than JavaScript and since everything is stored in 'markup' these days you may as well choose a browser like Mozilla/Firefox where the xsl support is good. I suppose I could have added SVG support as well.

    Basically you want a good application platform that can get its apps downloaded as web pages and cached locally.

  52. I'd go beyond that... by Baldrson · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    What the third world needs is to not lose track of its traditional cultures of self-sufficiency -- even if that means high infant mortaility, short life-span, tribal skirmishes and no "democracy" or computers.

    Hopefully however these cultures can learn from the sickness pervading the developed world as a result of urbanization and retain some of their roots while they admit technology as a defensive measure.

    And developed peoples need to stop thinking of "poverty" in terms of monetary income -- but rather in terms of security of food, water, shelter and viable families -- something many people in developed countries have lost due to dependence on money without adequate security of money supplies.

    1. Re:I'd go beyond that... by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      What if you donated a few hundred PDAs pre-stocked with videos (not language bound, if at all possible) on topics such as well-building, agriculture, 'health', child rearing ... solar powered, of course ...

    2. Re:I'd go beyond that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of Rousseauian bullshit. How do you think you're going to get security of food, water, shelter and viable families without a move towards specialisation and away from self-sufficiency? Self-sufficiency means that you spend your entire short, brutish existence trying to scrape a living from the soil. It's not some kind of utopian dream life where the soil spews forth bounty and all you have to do is dance from field to field picking it.

    3. Re:I'd go beyond that... by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      >PDAs pre-stocked with videos (not language bound, if at all possible)

      "pr0n for da poor"

  53. Re:Here's a better idea for the developing world.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I was surprised when I visited my country of origin. Software piracy is as widespread as it'll ever be, and good cheap HW is hard to find, but these folks get creative and use whatever they can get their hands on from their network of friends or hookups. But the malls are a different story. Entire sections of the mall are boarded off to host CounterStrike tourneys, and your 'local PC rental store' as ubiquitous as Starbucks here in America. Abundancy, indeed, and just barebones cafes.

  54. OT as usual by rathehun · · Score: 4, Informative
    As I have mentioned earlier, the point of these stories is often lost on slashdot. I'm not complaining, just saying so.
    The truth is that in "third world" countries, bare bones PCs that run your choice of Windows or Linux simply don't cost a hell of a lot more than $100, and often less.
    Saeed, where do you live? I live in India, I volunteer at Oxfam in their appropriate technology department, and we have been unable to get boxes - el cheepo, second-hand K6-2s for less than USD 200, with a decent monitor and with a customised, translated version of Linux (free). I would really be interested in the boxes you're talking about, so please do get back to me. Of course, I'm assuming that you're commenting in good faith, not as the nasty troll thing that I keep hearing about!

    The solution that eventually occured was that IBM donated a number of G40e laptops (thank you guys!) so we were able to put low-power, fancy computers out in the field.

    Now the crux of the issue to me, and this is something which I've brought up earlier, so bear with me, is the question, Now What?

    I've got a 2.8 gig 802.11g machine with 512 MB of RAM sitting here, doing what?

    The hard part is making it useful. Not many people out in the villages enjoy reading slashdot regularly, so we have to find useful things that they can use these beasts for.

    Essentially, what we did was to create an information portal, data was downloaded every day over a CDMA 1x connection, and presented in a form which was accesible to people. Weather forecasts, crop and vegetable prices, information about government schemes, employment opportunities in the nearest town and so on. If you want to know more, then drop me a mail and I would be happy to give you full details. Better yet, if you are involved in something similiar, please do get in touch.

    Now the technology part is cool. I designed it to work completely in our favourite browser - Firefox - *ducks*, I used CSS to make sure that when you print out the information it's in an easy to read form. Also, since Open Office, FF, the Linux distro itself a number of other applications have recently been translated into the local language (Tamil) it has been easy for the people themselves to use it, rather than needing either an external person, or to have to painfully learn a new language.
    Just to quickly respond to the infrastructure part, India has been really good at providing communications infrastructure at a grassroots level. Every village is linked with a 2 mbps pipe, and wireless internet using CDMA is fairly easily available. This is a god-send for us, who want to put an IT project in, without having to build this stuff up from scratch. I speak from experience in Indonesia, where we had to transmit using VHF. Fuck, that hurt.

    Now sub-$100 machines are good. But, like someone else was saying here, the people themselves are NOT going to be buying this. It's more likely to be governements, NGOs and the like who do bulk-purchases and then provide them in conjuntion with various other schemes. Remember that in many parts of the world the annual income is less than $350. This is equivalent to somebody paying about $13'000 for a computer in the US (if they earn about $40k, which I assume an IT manager will).

    The technology is cool for us. How useful is it for them?

    R.

    1. Re:OT as usual by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      That was a fascinating comment and an excellent point. Should have been modded up but I will look forward to more comments like that in the future.

  55. Re:Montreal? by montreal!hahahahah · · Score: 0

    Montreal!?
    hahhahhaha

    --
    I feel like I'm taking CRAZY pills!
  56. Re:FPGAs vs. SOCs- from a FPGA Engineer by eddison_carter · · Score: 1

    Depends on the FPGA, you can get one from Xilinx in low quanity that'll run a soft-core processor for about $7 (Spartan-3 series, newest (90 nm) chip in their low cost/high volume line), in production quanity is a lot cheaper.

    In response to the other posters, I have not seen much in terms of open source software for FPGA design, and 0 that worked for creating the hardware bitstream to dump into a chip. There are free versions of the tools avilable from Xilinx and Altera for their respective chips.

    And, FPGAs are really useful as an implementation, not just for prototyping. It can cost up to $30M to set up an ASIC line, not counting engineering or the $100K+ for the tools ...

    --
    I always prefer to start the year off with a bang - or, to be more precise, a series of loud hums, a crackle or two, and
  57. The "sickness of the developed world" by MichaelPenne · · Score: 1

    sells papers.

    But it's really not all that bad.

    And however bad it is, it's much better than high infant mortality and short lifespans (and don't forget brutal dictators and violent religious strife).

    The only thing worse I can think of than dying young due to an easily preventable disease or lack of food is having your child die from an easily preventable disease or lack of food.

    I guess maybe all of the above while the dictator's kids grow fat and healthy and the local gang cuts your arms off to claim their rights to the diamond mine, I guess that could be worse.

    Even worse than a 2 hour commute with a dead iPod battery, even worse than that...

  58. You just described the developed world... by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    And however bad it is, it's much better than high infant mortality and short lifespans (and don't forget brutal dictators and violent religious strife).

    Brutal dictators and violent religious strife aren't characteristics of traditional tribal culture -- they're characteristics of development gone awry as it so often does.

    High infant mortality and short lifespans have been with humans for a very long time. People are built to suffer those losses more than they're built to not even know why they're trying to fill some vague void with their 2 hour commutes to meaningless jobs to pay for gadgets.

    And how the hell are you supposed to get a job delivering papers with all the third world slaves coming into the country, driven from their homelands by "development", to deliver papers for less than minimum wage?

  59. Re:Garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL!

  60. If you can't find a better job by MichaelPenne · · Score: 1

    than delivering papers with all the free educational opportunities that the developed world provides, there are a number of social programs that will help you get on your feet. Even if you can't read, if you can just speak the language you have a great advantage over a recent immigrant.

    The real issue is coming in the next 100 years as labor itself becomes automated, then there will be no more reason for 'jobs', and the only limits on supply will be artificial ones.

    Then what are you going to do for your self-worth?

    Brutal dictators and violent religious strife aren't characteristics of traditional tribal culture

    You are working from a rather unusual version of history, there. Did you start reading at 1600 and just totally ignore everything before that? You never heard of Romans? Of the crusades? Of Constantinople? Of the Aztecs? Brutality and religious strife have been with us since the beginning of civilization, of course. In the last few hundred years more people have been thinking..it doesn't have to be that way.

    People are built to suffer those losses

    People aren't "built" to suffer losses without finding solutions for them, from the time Ogg poked a pointed stick at the lion that was trying to eat his child. We may well die trying, but that is no excuse for accepting a bad situation.

  61. Re: Thin clients cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hi,

    Your comment is very true, but the one thing to consider is that a correctly designed thin-client will be dead silent, small (portable) and easy to move around, lock-down, etc.

    An older PC, while fully capable, will probably have more than one fan, a 5400 RPM+ disk drive, and a noticable case that takes up room.

    Mini-ITX is sort of a solution, but a thin-client really does work well -- for instance, a library for a card look-up system, web browsing, etc.

  62. mod parent up, etc. by DJCF · · Score: 1
    Great post mate. As it happens I went to one of these "International Schools" and let me tell you -- the people there are (for the most part) richer than you or I will ever be. You know where these -- all of these -- "third-world computers" would be really useful?

    America, in the types of schools that can barely afford a computer Lab in the first place. That's where they'd be really useful.

    If you'll excuse me, Amnesty is doing a fair at my college and I promised I'd help out...

  63. No, not 'like X' by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    X11 sends draw commands, VNC sends screen pixels..

    Though agreed, VNC isnt exactally 'news' either.

    Their hardware is the news item. And id love to get my hands on one to work with. Could easily change out the code in the FPGA to emulate other processors. Development boards with the same are much more then $100.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  64. Hardware Availablity by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Any chance there will be a distributor where you can get just one or 2 of these things, with out the display?

    Having a cheap FPGA development board with these features would be great..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  65. can I have one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think these sound really good. Not for the third world but the first. It would mean that I could have a computer in every room in the house, feeding tv, music, voip, web, video conferencing etc.

  66. Re:FPGAs vs. SOCs- from a FPGA Engineer by mrand · · Score: 2, Informative

    And, FPGAs are really useful as an implementation, not just for prototyping. It can cost up to $30M to set up an ASIC line, not counting engineering or the $100K+ for the tools ...

    Yep, some FPGA's are cheap enough that they can be used for both prototyping and production. But comparing one of the least expensive FPGA's in the world with a near maximum "up to" price for ASIC development is not useful. And yes, I'm an FPGA engineer as well (waiting impatiently for 7.1.2i to be released), so I'm not saying this for my love of ASIC's.

    Competitive ASIC's can be developed for WELL under $1M (probably even well under $500k for a good number of devices) including tools and NRE/prototype costs. Still doesn't remove the fact that it takes considerable volume to come out ahead against a $7 FPGA. Against a 2VP50, at closing in on $1k a piece, it's a completely different story.

    --
    -- PGP keyID: 0x4C95994D
  67. Updated site by quentinsf · · Score: 1

    We've just got around, after rather too long, to updating the Ndiyo site. It's still rather minimal, but a good deal more informative than it was before!

  68. Re: Thin clients cheap? by hedora · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where I live, PC's up to around 200 MHz. (original Pentium and below) are effectively free. You want one? Look around, hand over a sixpack of beer, and you have one.

    Now with a $170 budget, I can get you a (used) PC that includes monitor, and beats the crap out of any thin client you can find for same money.

    I thought this until I tried it with my old 366MHz laptop. VNC at 1024x768 was sort of tolerable with an 8-bit color depth after I messed around with compression options. The problem is that the system is too slow to (a) uncompress highly compressed data and (b) to utilize enough of the 100MBit connection to handle an uncompressed stream. There is a sweet spot between a and b, but it's kind of hard to find. I didn't try windows terminal server, since the server was a linux system. Synchronous protocols like X11 (LBX) or NX were totally unusable.

    NX is great for running over slow connections (sub-cable modem), but it doesn't seem to drop frames if the CPU can't keep up... I don't know though, I'm not an expert in this stuff.

    Anyway, it looks like the big advantage of the Ndiyol is that they've done a lot of work to come up with a custom protocol and/or cheap hardware set-up that actually work out of the box for $170. I noticed that they ship with 2MB of RAM. Also, they plan to move the whole thing on to one chip... that should cut cost significantly.

    If they can get full screen video streaming + sound to work, and provide a connector that lets me plug in a remote control, I'm putting one of these in my living room. Assuming that it can run in hot environments, it would outperform all of the sub $2,000 systems that I've been able to find on the market these days.

    (I've been trying to find something that can run as a mythtv frontend, and be silent, small and stable in a 95F room. There are probably some systems out there, but it is really hard to find out the operating temperature range or noise level of prebuilt computer systems.)

  69. Slightly different new Linux Distro #314 by Ulrich+Hobelmann · · Score: 1

    A group of Linux fans are sitting in a bar. One says, "I really like the performance of Linux #180." The next one replies "yes, but Linux #87's package system is better." Another one says "I really like Linux #298's lightweightness."

    One guy says "What do you think about Linux #315's features?" One programmer starts looking totally impressed, stutters "wow, is thaaaat cool" and "man, I didn't know they could do that." All the other Linuxers start looking at each other. "Why? What's with Linux #315?"

    "I didn't know that one yet."

  70. So basically... by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    ...we have yet another case of the first world looking at its needs and mistaking them for being identical to those of the third world. Now entering the beating-a-dead-horse-with-sarcasm-dept:

    Yup, that kind of thinking sure helped the BIA do bang-up work on Indian reservations right here in the US. We'll just invent a concept and throw that at the problem. No need to actually investigate anything with respect to those you're foisting the (non)solution to the (non)problem.

    Definitely kept the third world from being overrun by despots and tyrants, starvation and chaos, etc over the centuries. The third world is truly identical to the first thanks to this simple thinking. A few spiffy PCs and they'll be all set.

    (I vaguelly recall this sentiment being used over the centuries in various forms... "if they drank tea like us, they'd be better off... if they dressed like us, they'd be better off... if they did X like us, they'd be better off...")

    If my eyes roll up any more, they won't come back down out of my head.

    Information access is not now nor has it ever been a problem solved by computers. We used to have a much more educated populace here in the first world before personal computers ever were a gleam in the eye of any but science fiction writers. We had books. And people took the time to learn to read them and then actually read.

    We now have a society where all the information you could ever use and a million times the information you could never use is at their fingertips and the average chucklehead at McDonald's can't spell their own last name consistently.

    The problem is attitude and priority, tyrants know this, and as long as the people are kept divided, kept occupied with basic survival, kept from information in whatever form, they will remain more malleable than otherwise which is what makes them easy prey for out-and-out dictators as well as subversive and subliminal schmucks who bring them to ruin just as surely all the while being lauded by that international brain trust called the United Nations.

    Look at the US. Number one problem isn't information access, it's attitude towards that information and the priority of accessing it. If the people don't want to spend the time or can't spend the time to learn that the area of information exists in the first place, see any relevance to their lives in the second, and have the information spotty and hashed in the third, then they might as well not have it at all because as far as they are concerned, it doesn't exist.

    What the third world needs is to have the time, interest, and desire to go after the information and absorb it whether online or through books/scrolls which have held us in good stead as a species for thousands of years.

    I think showing them the glut of wonderful opportunties first worlders have yet are willfully squandered by them should be one visceral tool. I also think relentlessly pounding non-democratic-forces until they relent to the people is another, but no one can seem to agree on how to do it.

    Thin clients with wireless Internet is the idea in the heads of yuppies with too much time on their hands over at the coffee area at Borders (which is itself a wonderful new expansion of the word "irony"). This is not the idea come up with by someone who is walking a half mile from their village and back several times a day to bring clean water back for the daily doings. This is not the idea in the minds of people who have to damn near rebuild the roof of their hut from scratch every other storm. This is not on the minds of people watching raw sewage in an eight inch deep trench running past their window. "Hmmm, if only we had an old Aptiva to boot a Kubuntu CD with so we could look at how well Sheffield Wednseday is doing... Oh well, better get back to town with my crops..."

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  71. Mod Parent Up - Cybercafes in Tanzania by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I'm going to post about some other parts of this article, so I can't moderate the parent post up, but it's really good.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  72. Thanks..... by Lukesed · · Score: 0

    I probably should have noticed the troll tags...

  73. Bad title pun by hacksoncode · · Score: 1
    The problem I have with this article is that it doesn't contain any details of how one would use an OSS Thin Client to develop a nation.

    I'd like to develop a nation, but I'm missing a couple of key elements, land and people.

    I guess I could simulate them, but if that's all it's talking about then this is really old news.