Guide for the Nintendo Fan at E3
IGN.Cube has details on what its expected Nintendo will be showing off at E3 this year. Whether or not the Revolution gets much airtime is up in the air, but it's anticipated that new DS titles and the system itself are going to recieve the lion's share of attention. From the article: "...we predict that Nintendo will put a noticeable emphasis on its DS lineup and -- save for the new Legend of Zelda -- downplay some GameCube titles. This move seems to make sense as many of the GameCube titles sure to be on display in playable form will either have been previously shown at another event, or will be on the verge of releasing in America. In contrast, we expect several major surprises for the publisher's portable system."
It'd be nice to see some new DS games that aren't rehashes of old N64 titles or geared toward kiddies. I thought the point of the DS was to cater toward older gamers while leaving the GBA for the younger ones.
How many DS games are "N64 rehashes"? Apart from SM64DS? I don't see many, and I don't see many in "production". So I don't get it why people keep complaining about the N64 remakes when there is just one? I think there was some racing game ported from N64 too, but that's about it.
I don't know. When I get my DS (probably this summer) the two games I know I'm picking up are Meteos and Polaris. I'm 22 and this seems to be very much the sort of thing I'm looking for in portable gaming.
--The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
Nintendo's big announcement this year will be that they won't make another console. They have already signed on the dotted line with Microsoft and will make games exclusively for the next XBOX.
Nintendo's last two consoles bombed, they wouldn't get any 3rd party support on a new one and they know they gotta focus on the area's they can still dominate - making games and handheld systems. Their reputation as a home console maker is blown at this point.
Look at what the next XBOX does, it's as much media oriented (or more so) than it is about gaming. Nintendo doesn't want to be in that business. They don't have the resources / clout / desire to do it.
Nintendo is doing the right thing. Focusing on gaming. Focusing on keeping their threatened handheld monopoly.
E3's just a press lovefest. And I have to wonder how much attention it would get if their admission policy were actually enforced. There's not THAT many people in the video game industry, and definitely not that many 16 year olds from the greater Los Angeles area work in the video game industry!
- I want to see something to get me interested in the new Zelda.
- Odama confirmed for release by the end of the year.
- Confirmation of a Golden Retriever in the US release of Nintendogs.
- Pilotwings. Please God give me Pilotwings.
- Alpha Centauri DS online.
- Mario Kart DS online.
- Animal Crossing DS in August.
- Serious Revolution eye candy to shut the haters up. (like it would work)
- The New Tetris DS (you remember, the one from the 64. With the gold and the silver blocks. Best Tetris ever.)
Last E3 was huge for Nintendo fans. Nintendo had promised new ideas and new thinking for years, and they finally brought it to the conference. I can only hope this year will be as exciting.
Nintendo is so 1998. What have they made that was actually worth paying for since then?
I bought my DS for this game. It is innovative - unique, and has a good challenge curve. It doesn't have a traditional story-mode type level progression - but the replay value is good, and hell, my wife plays it as much as I do.
I also got Polarium, which is fun, and challenging, although a little bland.
I can't wait for Kirby.
I'm going to rent PacPix this week and see if it's worth picking up, since the reviews were only lukewarm.
don't bother.
Of course you have noticed that 360 and revolution means the same, what you probably havent noticed is OTHER coincidences between revolution and xbox 2. They both have an ati based graphics card They both support wi-fi They both have an interest in online gaming, (there are rumors a lot of nintendo games will be now online.) However the most interesting detail comes from an image in the site colony.org this image http://www.ourcolony.net/images/gallery/Chicago5.j pg
The xbox is on top of the playstation (yeah right MS!) but why is Nintendo on another window? they dont consider it a competitor... or is it something else?
AND....
How come all next gen consoles are going to be presented in may 12 and e3 except revolution (or maybe they are showing revolution?) why MTV mentioned in its original comercial "a new event, a revolution... "
Some points to freak you out:
Nintendo has been extremely quiet about their console. (more quiet than usual actually)
MS Main intention with x2 is to capture the japanese market. which they are _certain_ to do this time. (why?)
MS refused to create a handheld, even though they could have (an agreement?)
N and MS had been rumored to joint forces for a project to beat sony for years. Lots of economists have mentioned it would be equally beneficial for both.
Weird conspiracy theory of the year:
Xbox 360 is... Revolution
(or Nintendo is involved in it somehow).
We will find out may 12
you may freak out now.
Go ahead MOD my day!
More opinions here
Of course you have noticed that 360 and revolution means the same, what you probably havent noticed is OTHER coincidences between revolution and xbox 2.
j pg
:
They both have an ATI based graphics card
They both support wi-fi
They both have an interest in online gaming, (there are rumors a lot of nintendo games will be now online.)
However the most interesting detail comes from an image in the site colony.org this image
http://www.ourcolony.net/images/gallery/Chicago5.
The xbox is on top of the playstation (yeah right MS!) but why is Nintendo on another window? they dont consider it a competitor... or is it something else?
AND....
How come all next gen consoles are going to be presented in may 12 and e3 except revolution (or maybe they are showing revolution?) why MTV mentioned in its original comercial "a new event, a revolution... "
Some extra points
Nintendo has been extremely quiet about their console. (more quiet than usual actually) isnt weird we know nothing about revolution a few weeks before e3?
MS Main intention with x2 is to capture the japanese market. which they are _certain_ to do this time. (why? what makes them so sure)
MS refused to create a handheld, even though they could have (an agreement?)
N and MS had been rumored to joint forces for a project to beat Sony for years. Lots of economists have mentioned it would be equally beneficial for both.
Weird conspiracy theory of the year:
Xbox 360 is... Revolution
(or Nintendo is involved in it somehow).
We will find out may 12
you may freak out now.
Go ahead MOD my day!
More opinions here
I thought they were suppose to give us a teaser for Mario 128. I'm starting to wonder if that game actually exists.
I can't stop thinking about what would happen if apple bought nintendo...
I am not an apple fanboy (more like a nintendo one) but when I look at the two companies I keep seeing the same features and defects. They center their software only on *their* hardware, they focus on simplicity and ease of use, and be it cheap (Gamecube, Mac Mini) or expensive (Nintendo 64 [long time ago], Power Mac) they make high quality products.
Wouldn't it be cool playing iTunes on your stilish Revolution while you wirelessly download the game saves onto it?
How about individual components that do their chosen functions well and are able to interact usefully with one another?
I want a video player that will play videos on my TV, and that can be accessed from my computer, and that can, in turn, be accessed by my computer.
I want a video game system that can be configured to play music other then that provided by the game (as the X-Box allows), and to be able to access music from whatever device is acting as a music server.
Convergence in functionality is good, if it means good interoperability. Convergence in hardware is OK if the features make sense. Some overlap is not too bad either. A DVD + Digital Cable box makes sense to me (both play encoded video). A DVD + Videogame system sort of makes sense (both use the same physical media). But a Videogame + Cable box does not make much sense to me.
Give me inteligent convergence, and I will be happy. Try to sell me a digital swiss army knife that does many things poorly, and I will just keep my money.
END COMMUNICATION
Sounds like Nintendo is repeating its mistakes of the past...
I can remember E3 (or CES?) before the N64 was unveiled, where all Nintendo had to show was Virtual Boy as it's next big thing, and a smaller form factor for the GameBoy with limited LCD color. There were no big anticipated games either, just sequels for the SNES. Meanwhile Sony was showing the Playstation and Sega showed the Saturn. Nintendo didn't unveil N64 until a year later.
Then for the next generation, it was the same mistake. Sony showed their PS2, Sega had the Dreamcast, Nintendo had nothing (except maybe the Game Boy Advance?). I think the XBOX was shown that year as well. It wasn't until a year or two later that Nintendo finally unveiled the GameCube. It's a great system, but everybody was ready for a new console a year earlier, so alot of people made the switch to PS2. The GameCube came too late, and with too few blockbuster and mature titles.
It's a shame to hear they will be repeating this pattern of entering the arena when the window's almost shut. I can understand being tight-lipped about innovations, but really, the tighter you hold on to something, the less people will care once you let it go.