Disclaimer: I do not own a Wii, XBOX 360, or a PS3 but know people who have various combinations of these systems.
First question: do you have a lot of spare time? I've heard that the Wii is great for people who just want to pick up and go. If you like spending more than a hour or so on a game in one setting, there aren't a lot of those types of games for the Wii yet.
Second question: have you played the new metroid yet? I've heard good things about it so far, and I would guess its more up your alley.
You underestimate the patience of a thousand bored programmers given the option to achieve instant geek celebrity status. Beware, for you have unleashed a storm the likes of which this world has never seen before.
I am one of those people who would rather have three devices that do their respective functions very well than one that does three different things in a mediocre way.
People should just settle for a mediocre all-in-one device? You assume such a device is impossible, yet I say it is very plausible. And why shouldn't it be?
My phone has a calculator, address book, games, etc., why can't it have more? Just because it is hard to design? People won't shy away from a all-in-one device if it is designed well and not overpriced. Just because a device might have multiple functions, does not deem it mediocre.
While this might be funny (or insightful, whatever) now, Bill Gates and co. are hard at work making a DRM windows. In the not so distant future, windows will do its best to restrict its end users. See Vista and DRM
I expect the next one to actually let you swing the controller to swing your sword.
Since the time when I heard about Nintendo's new controller I've been hoping that it would be some kind of improvement on the mouse/keyboard design for PC games. I love using the mouse in first person shooters and other PC games, (like RTS games, ex. starcraft) but I could never get the hang of using the thumbstick for FPS games on consoles. More generically, anytime you had to move some sort of cursor on a console I always seemed to have trouble. I hope Nintendo's new controller can somehow adapt a mouse like feel to console games. Then maybe I'd stand a better chance against friends on consoles!
Indeed my PSP has been the one to give me a new portable experience, albeit not a gaming one. I now really can rely on one device for a flash drive, mp3 player, video and snapshot viewer.
This is what I wish my phone could do for me, for free no less. (Assuming you get the phone free by signing a contract deal.)
When my phone can do all of this (cheaply of course, I'm sure some high end models can already in Japan), the psp has outlived its purpose as a multi-functionality device.
Note: I'm not trying to bash the PSP, I just don't think cramming a lot of features into a portable device like it is necessary unless its my phone too.
I am 22 and was carded for buying a copy of Diablo 2 yesterday from wal-mart. (Rated M) Don't complain to the makers of such software if your son or daughter was playing a Mature game that caused them to commit violent acts. Blame the shopkeeper / store who sold the game to them.
Russian Websites
1) Claim no responsibility for the link. Point out that you in no way control whatever content is linked to.
2) Claim the link was generated using a search engine, and not hardcoded in anyway so again, (1) you are not responsible for said link.
3) Claim that if anyone knows of any copyright violating links that are appearing on your site, insist they contact you so you can take them down.
4)...
5) Profit!
Maybe in the 'near' future, (if Microsoft's new buzzword, "the media PC" starts catching on), these kinds of appliances will be more mainstream. I'm going to be getting a house in the near future, and I will definitely be wiring it up to support multiple PCs in the main rooms of the house.
Yes I did say I have more money than spare time, but when you have little spare time that implies you don't have that much money.;) I am not so ignorant to ignore the Apple factor, I am simply looking for cheaper alternatives that would include only those things necessary, namely remote connect software. Is there any remote connect software that runs on an Apple that can allow one to connect to a non-Apple os?
Take a nice flat panel that basically has components that will allow a keyboard, mouse and OS to be installed/plugged into it. (Wireless capabilities needed too)
On this flat panel/computer, install an OS (I don't care which) that is able to remote connect to a central PC in the house.
This way, I have access to just about any program I would want to use in the kitchen (namely music files, Internet, etc.) with only taking the space of a flat panel monitor, small keyboard and a mouse. Maybe this keyboard is wireless as well and it just stores in a drawer or something, so then the only countertop space is a monitor and mouse.
So the question is, why hasn't anyone invented this yet? (Some smart person should post if it has...) Granted there could be work arounds, like building a mini PC that stores efficiently, but I have more money than spare time.
--
Ugh, I've got tones of ideas like this, I think technology is moving VERY slowly right now. (Possibly due to legal and/or economic issues plaguing the world today)
Am I the only who thinks that the graphics are actually good on gamecube? I've played Doom 3 and Half-Life 2, and I really don't see why anyone should be turned off to Zelda or Mario because of graphics. For example, the facial expressions on the Hero in Zelda were hilarious and very well done. The games weren't designed to feature 'realistic' characters for a reason.
Its like watching live action movies vs. 3d pixar/dreamworks/anime movies... does the hand drawing/modeling make a movie less appealing? It really shouldn't... if it does, then maybe you need to open your mind to new experiences. (This is also an argument seen used against many anime haters, "Who cares about a bunch of lame cartoons? That stuff is for kids!")
As video games become more mainstream, and Microsoft's push to have a 'media center pc' that can do almost everything including playing games (I'm thinking of the future, bare with me) more people are going to spend more money on games, than on for example CD's or DVDs. I for one would rather play a great PC or console game that sit in front of the TV for a couple hours. This isn't true for everyone yet, but like I said, it is a growing trend.(See multiple previous/. stories about lower audiences for television.)
I agree that the increased release of high budget (but not always great) game releases has produced extra sales. I would rather put a new video game on my list than the newest DVD.
In addition make sure your computer has a hard drive. If you try to install HL2 on a computer with no hard drive, it won't matter how much $$$ you spent on that shiny new video card!
I agree. For me anyway, it is more satisfying to do business type programming at work for less than 40 hours a week, enabling me to spend time with my family. To get my kicks out of game programming, I prefer to do it on the side in my spare time when I want to. (Usually just tinkering around with different game SDKs) Of course if someone is really talented, I am grateful for those 60 to 80 hours a week they work. (Doom 3, HL2, etc., THANK YOU!)
What this means in plain english?
Most first person shooter games, such as Quake or Unreal, are built on a graphical engine. The player is essentially a stationery "camera," and the engine creates the sensation of moving through a world by rendering graphics that create that effect. Halo is different, Chris explains. "Halo is a simulation engine. The engine creates the world, then puts the player and the AI in it... [The] characters and their code are isolated from the world."
What the hell is a simulation engine, and if Halo uses a simulation engine where the hell do the graphics come from?
"some ass from Wisconsin"
Maybe you should check the polls and realize that the majority of voters from WI voted FOR Kerry, not like all of the South. Please don't group everyone from Wisconsin with 'THEM', the majority here know how bad Bush is.
Or if you bothered to pre order on Steam you can play Counterstrike Source and see how the engine runs. (granted this is without AI and some other features, but at least you can see how you can run the basic engine)... And if one can play Doom 3, I can't imagine anyone not being able to run Half Life 2. Counterstrike Source runs smooth at 1024 x 768 with High/Medium graphics settings on my GeForce 4 ti4200.
Slashdot Mirror
Disclaimer: I do not own a Wii, XBOX 360, or a PS3 but know people who have various combinations of these systems. First question: do you have a lot of spare time? I've heard that the Wii is great for people who just want to pick up and go. If you like spending more than a hour or so on a game in one setting, there aren't a lot of those types of games for the Wii yet. Second question: have you played the new metroid yet? I've heard good things about it so far, and I would guess its more up your alley.
Counterstrike has had this feature from as far back as when voice chat was implemented in the game - on a per player bases too.
You underestimate the patience of a thousand bored programmers given the option to achieve instant geek celebrity status. Beware, for you have unleashed a storm the likes of which this world has never seen before.
I am one of those people who would rather have three devices that do their respective functions very well than one that does three different things in a mediocre way.
People should just settle for a mediocre all-in-one device? You assume such a device is impossible, yet I say it is very plausible. And why shouldn't it be?
My phone has a calculator, address book, games, etc., why can't it have more? Just because it is hard to design? People won't shy away from a all-in-one device if it is designed well and not overpriced. Just because a device might have multiple functions, does not deem it mediocre.
See the latest news posting on penny-arcade... they just donated 10k to a charity in Jack's name! Penny Arcade News
While this might be funny (or insightful, whatever) now, Bill Gates and co. are hard at work making a DRM windows. In the not so distant future, windows will do its best to restrict its end users. See Vista and DRM
I expect the next one to actually let you swing the controller to swing your sword.
Since the time when I heard about Nintendo's new controller I've been hoping that it would be some kind of improvement on the mouse/keyboard design for PC games. I love using the mouse in first person shooters and other PC games, (like RTS games, ex. starcraft) but I could never get the hang of using the thumbstick for FPS games on consoles. More generically, anytime you had to move some sort of cursor on a console I always seemed to have trouble. I hope Nintendo's new controller can somehow adapt a mouse like feel to console games. Then maybe I'd stand a better chance against friends on consoles!
I'm sure many people have seen this, but its fun to see all the old Nintendo parts from controllers: Click here to design your own Nintendo controller.
You sound like a really boring person. There's more to life than work.
Indeed my PSP has been the one to give me a new portable experience, albeit not a gaming one. I now really can rely on one device for a flash drive, mp3 player, video and snapshot viewer.
This is what I wish my phone could do for me, for free no less. (Assuming you get the phone free by signing a contract deal.)
When my phone can do all of this (cheaply of course, I'm sure some high end models can already in Japan), the psp has outlived its purpose as a multi-functionality device.
Note: I'm not trying to bash the PSP, I just don't think cramming a lot of features into a portable device like it is necessary unless its my phone too.
Best joke I've heard all day. Period.
I am 22 and was carded for buying a copy of Diablo 2 yesterday from wal-mart. (Rated M) Don't complain to the makers of such software if your son or daughter was playing a Mature game that caused them to commit violent acts. Blame the shopkeeper / store who sold the game to them.
Russian Websites 1) Claim no responsibility for the link. Point out that you in no way control whatever content is linked to. 2) Claim the link was generated using a search engine, and not hardcoded in anyway so again, (1) you are not responsible for said link. 3) Claim that if anyone knows of any copyright violating links that are appearing on your site, insist they contact you so you can take them down. 4)... 5) Profit!
Maybe in the 'near' future, (if Microsoft's new buzzword, "the media PC" starts catching on), these kinds of appliances will be more mainstream. I'm going to be getting a house in the near future, and I will definitely be wiring it up to support multiple PCs in the main rooms of the house.
Yes I did say I have more money than spare time, but when you have little spare time that implies you don't have that much money. ;) I am not so ignorant to ignore the Apple factor, I am simply looking for cheaper alternatives that would include only those things necessary, namely remote connect software. Is there any remote connect software that runs on an Apple that can allow one to connect to a non-Apple os?
This is what I want for my kitchen:
Take a nice flat panel that basically has components that will allow a keyboard, mouse and OS to be installed/plugged into it. (Wireless capabilities needed too)
On this flat panel/computer, install an OS (I don't care which) that is able to remote connect to a central PC in the house.
This way, I have access to just about any program I would want to use in the kitchen (namely music files, Internet, etc.) with only taking the space of a flat panel monitor, small keyboard and a mouse. Maybe this keyboard is wireless as well and it just stores in a drawer or something, so then the only countertop space is a monitor and mouse.
So the question is, why hasn't anyone invented this yet? (Some smart person should post if it has...) Granted there could be work arounds, like building a mini PC that stores efficiently, but I have more money than spare time.
--
Ugh, I've got tones of ideas like this, I think technology is moving VERY slowly right now. (Possibly due to legal and/or economic issues plaguing the world today)
Am I the only who thinks that the graphics are actually good on gamecube? I've played Doom 3 and Half-Life 2, and I really don't see why anyone should be turned off to Zelda or Mario because of graphics. For example, the facial expressions on the Hero in Zelda were hilarious and very well done. The games weren't designed to feature 'realistic' characters for a reason.
Its like watching live action movies vs. 3d pixar/dreamworks/anime movies... does the hand drawing/modeling make a movie less appealing? It really shouldn't... if it does, then maybe you need to open your mind to new experiences. (This is also an argument seen used against many anime haters, "Who cares about a bunch of lame cartoons? That stuff is for kids!")
As video games become more mainstream, and Microsoft's push to have a 'media center pc' that can do almost everything including playing games (I'm thinking of the future, bare with me) more people are going to spend more money on games, than on for example CD's or DVDs. I for one would rather play a great PC or console game that sit in front of the TV for a couple hours. This isn't true for everyone yet, but like I said, it is a growing trend.(See multiple previous /. stories about lower audiences for television.)
;)
I agree that the increased release of high budget (but not always great) game releases has produced extra sales. I would rather put a new video game on my list than the newest DVD.
Notice Halo 2 IS NOT on his list
create a game like Half-Life 2, but SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME why they can't write a reliable instant messenger client!!
(Friends program used with steam)
In addition make sure your computer has a hard drive. If you try to install HL2 on a computer with no hard drive, it won't matter how much $$$ you spent on that shiny new video card!
I agree. For me anyway, it is more satisfying to do business type programming at work for less than 40 hours a week, enabling me to spend time with my family. To get my kicks out of game programming, I prefer to do it on the side in my spare time when I want to. (Usually just tinkering around with different game SDKs) Of course if someone is really talented, I am grateful for those 60 to 80 hours a week they work. (Doom 3, HL2, etc., THANK YOU!)
What this means in plain english? Most first person shooter games, such as Quake or Unreal, are built on a graphical engine. The player is essentially a stationery "camera," and the engine creates the sensation of moving through a world by rendering graphics that create that effect. Halo is different, Chris explains. "Halo is a simulation engine. The engine creates the world, then puts the player and the AI in it ... [The] characters and their code are isolated from the world."
What the hell is a simulation engine, and if Halo uses a simulation engine where the hell do the graphics come from?
"some ass from Wisconsin" Maybe you should check the polls and realize that the majority of voters from WI voted FOR Kerry, not like all of the South. Please don't group everyone from Wisconsin with 'THEM', the majority here know how bad Bush is.
I prefer to use my windoze box in a useless user mode as well. What you are suggesting is not a feasible suggestion to most users of the Windows OS.
Or if you bothered to pre order on Steam you can play Counterstrike Source and see how the engine runs. (granted this is without AI and some other features, but at least you can see how you can run the basic engine)... And if one can play Doom 3, I can't imagine anyone not being able to run Half Life 2. Counterstrike Source runs smooth at 1024 x 768 with High/Medium graphics settings on my GeForce 4 ti4200.
The rules mention nothing about mod submissions, am I to assume they are legal submissions?