Slashdot Mirror


Apple to Release first Tiger Update

Ninj4Bytes writes "AppleInsider is reporting on the first update to Mac OS X Tiger. The update is reported to address 'over three dozen componets, with an emphasis on improving general stability and reliability'. The patch is listed for a mid to late May release."

132 comments

  1. First patch by TuringTest · · Score: 0, Troll

    What, they've already released Tiger? I didn't even notice and there's even a patch!

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    1. Re:First patch by Otter · · Score: 4, Funny
      What, they've already released Tiger?

      Yup! Also, Google has announced Google This, Google That and Google Something Else. Now you're caught up for the last six months -- pay attention from here on!

    2. Re:First patch by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, don't leave him out of the loop like that. For example, SCO is suing IBM! Yep! And apparently Star Wars Episode 3 is coming out NEXT WEEK!

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:First patch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just heard that we landed on the moon.

    4. Re:First patch by shpoffo · · Score: 1

      Geeze - do all you people need to be schooled in the basics? You're forgetting the basic tenet that "All your bases belong to us!"

      .
      -shpoffo

  2. Good by Winterblink · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tiger overall is a great upgrade from Panther. It's got some really neat new features and there's bound to be several of them that anyone will use. That being said, important new core features like Spotlight are not working as advertised for many users. Other things, like Quartz 2D Extreme which is desigend to offload almost all the UI work to the GPU, was buggy enough to be disabled in the Tiger release. There's a lot of work there that's relatively unfinished, and I think it's great that Apple's making motions to get things in order mere weeks after its release.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:Good by Golias · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've got it running on my iBook, and I think it's pretty slick.

      I had it running on the Mac mini which I'm using for a home theater media console, but my Sonica USB soundcard from M-Audio doesn't work with Tiger at all yet, so I had to downgrade back to 10.3.9.

      (Apparantly M-Audio decided the perfect time to roll up their sleeves and start making 10.4 drivers for their Mac hardware was a week after the retail release.)

      From what I've seen so far, Tiger's a pretty sweet OS, and as soon as M-Audio gets their shit together, I'll be running it in the living room.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Good by peragrin · · Score: 1

      nope been running tiger a little less than a week now.

      My problems were that when I orginially upgraded it failed to install the new dictionary toys, and isync.

      I couldn't find those as seperate packages so i had to upgrade everything again.

      Tiger broke 3 applescripts I was using, and had loaded into my dock, causeing the dock to lock up. When i finally got those removed, Tiger behaved. Firefox though doesn't behave very well, it locks up if I leave it running for a day or so. I can force it closed, then restart and I am good.

      Under Panther the only bug I experienced with firefox was the need to use the menu to open a new window to restore the text input boxes.

      All in all no major problems and I haven't had any of the problems that others have had.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Good by Alternate+Interior · · Score: 1

      Spotlight is decidedly not the instant search it claims to be. I still use it frequently, and it's still faster than any other search I've ever used on Mac or Windows, but it's not instant. It could be a RAM issue (I've only got 512MB) or a slow HDD (My mini has only a 4200 RPM HDD) but that doesn't change the fact it's slow. That, however, is the only problem I've noticed.

    4. Re:Good by EggyToast · · Score: 1
      I did an "upgrade" (a general "no-no" from most people, although it doesn't really affect much) and everything has been fine for me. Spotlight takes a moment longer than Quicksilver or Launchbar when it comes to searching, but it also indexes everything. It's also NOT based just on file names.

      For instance, if you type in "word" it'll find documents that contain the word "word" but also .doc files created in word, help files for word, etc. So it's not just based on file names, like the above programs, and works out-of-the-box for the entire system.

      So currently I use both.

      Similarly, I've not experienced any issues with things being disabled, but there's also little out there that utilizes CoreImage functionality. If they've disabled it for the standard windowing GUI, it's not very noticeable.

      Otherwise it's very stable and works as expected. Some of the newer technologies have some quirks but they all seem to be working quite well for me. I know I'm just one person, but it's usually the people who don't have any problems who make the least noise.

    5. Re:Good by Winterblink · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's another example.

      In the "Welcome to Tiger" booklet that comes with OSX, there's a shot of Tiger's spotlight search bringing back results showing documents, images, settings, etc. Under the photos, they focus on a section where you can blow out the details of individual photos and see the metadata used by the search to find it. Clearly shown in the sample (and indeed demoed by Steve Jobs himself at various keynotes) are the keywords assigned to the photos in the iPhoto software. This has never been searchable on my system, even after a rebuild and repair of permissions by the install disc. Some people are reporting this is fine, while others are having the exact same problem.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    6. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI, Core Image is not Quartz Extreme. Core Image is a toolkit that developers can use to create various visual effects like motion blur and such. Quartz Extreme is a new way for the OS to handle the GUI.

      Core Image will not be used at all until there are new applications that actually make use of it.

    7. Re:Good by Shanep · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have the 1.42GHz mini with the 80Gb drive and 1GB RAM.

      I type in "theo de raadt", just for some obscure example which I figured would get some results, since I'm subscribed to misc@openbsd...

      Somewhere between a quarter of a second and perhaps a half a second of finishing typing his name, the results are up (386 total).

      If I type in "network", same deal. A split second I've got results (1134) and then another split second later they're broken up into 9 categories.

      I am impressed. I've used programs like iSys before, however this is integrated from the desktop all the way to the command line.

      At first I was put off by seeing results come up as a type and this caused me to type slower and make mistakes because I was distracted by that and would look at them before they were as meaningful as they could be. I've since learned to just force myself to concentrate on completing the phrase and then looking.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    8. Re:Good by Kplusplus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most likely you never let Spotlight finish indexing your entire HD at first install of Tiger. It's a very low priority background task, so the fact it hasn't hit all your files yet isn't surprising. As to those elements not being searchable, they most certainly are, I added spotlight support to the Colloquy IRC client and know this to be a fact.

      Here is a screencap from when I was testing:
      http://matrixpointer.com/screens/xenon_spotlight.p ng

      --
      -"I'm one of those Mac people that will break a bottle on the bar and hold it to your throat for bad-mouthing my system"
    9. Re:Good by kronin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, there's a distinct difference between Quartz Extreme (which is enabled, assuming your graphics card supports it) and Quartz 2D Extreme (which is currently disabled).

    10. Re:Good by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1


      (Apparantly M-Audio decided the perfect time to roll up their sleeves and start making 10.4 drivers for their Mac hardware was a week after the retail release.)


      M-Audio has a history of doing that. When Panther was released, it took awhile for them to get drivers out for my Revolution 7.1.

      If the Ars Technica review is right, this shouldn't be as big of a problem for future Mac OS X releases. See this for more details.

    11. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an M-Audio Transit on my Mac Mini, and that is working under Tiger. It's even better than Panther, actually. I used to need to unplug it and plug it back in after rebooting to have it selected as the system's default audio device, but since I installed Tiger I haven't needed to do that.

    12. Re:Good by dr.badass · · Score: 4, Informative

      Clearly shown in the sample (and indeed demoed by Steve Jobs himself at various keynotes) are the keywords assigned to the photos in the iPhoto software. This has never been searchable on my system, even after a rebuild and repair of permissions by the install disc.

      I haven't experienced this problem myself, but here are some things you might try, in Terminal:

      mdimport -L will list all of your Spotlight importers -- there should be one for iPhoto, but if there's not, then that's your problem. I don't know why you wouldn't have it, though.

      mdimport -r /System/Library/Spotlight/iPhoto.mdimporter will force Spotlight to reindex everything that that importer can index.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    13. Re:Good by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      So lets see... they control the hardware, and release a product that doesn't quite work right?

      It's more like they released a bunch of products, and only a few of them don't work right in certain circumstances. For the majority, Tiger is fine, but if something does break, it's usually just one thing in a package full of things that work right.

      Also, 10.x.1 releases are to be expected soon after release, as 1) the final version was frozen a month or so prior to the actual release date (so it's been more like six weeks since 10.4.0 was done), and 2) the user base (and the variety of configurations in use) jumps massively -- for every given feature, there's at least one person (maybe thousands) out there using it in a way, or in a combination that the developer hadn't anticipated.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    14. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Spotlight is decidedly not the instant search it claims to be.

      The 4200RPM drive is definitely a limiting factor, as is the bus speed. It's closer to instant on a G5 of any kind, with the much higher bus speed. I reccommend using Smart Folders when possible, as updating searches is much faster than performing a fresh query every time.

      Also, as applications begin using Spotlight internally, you'll find it much more useful. App designers can limit the search to certain data, rather than the truly massive amount searched by the menu bar Spotlight, resulting in massive speed boost.

    15. Re:Good by doggkruse · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is an easy way to enable it. Open /Library/Preferences/com.apple.windowserver.plist and change Quartz2DExtremeEnabled to yes.

    16. Re:Good by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      > Spotlight is decidedly not the instant search it claims to be.

      There might be a problem there for you. I hit command+space, and typed in slashdot, and less than 1 second later, I had 27 entries, including some emails that people wrote me 18 months ago about HP calculators. I've found Spotlight to be very fast, and incredibly useful.

      I've got a 1.5 GHz PowerBook G4 with 1 GB RAM.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
  3. Motorola v60 Syncing... by Fuzzle · · Score: 1

    I'd be happy if they re-enabled my Motorola v60's iSyncing. It worked fine in Panther, now it's broken.

    1. Re:Motorola v60 Syncing... by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      I'd think something like that would be taken care of after the initial scattering of fixes after the new OS release.

      But, here's to hoping . . .

    2. Re:Motorola v60 Syncing... by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Great. I was hoping to install Tiger this weekend but now my Motorola phone and I are nervous...

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    3. Re:Motorola v60 Syncing... by burns210 · · Score: 1

      It worked with my v551 (and my friends too, actually) without a hitch. Over bluetooth too. iSync didn't support this model in Panther.

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. Forced to wait by peebeejay · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I didn't want to be one of those people who held cautiously held off while those around me were having all the fun; I wanted to get on board with 10.4.0. However, since Amazon is shipping my copy of Tiger from Pennsylvania (to Portland, OR) by a combination of mule train and canal barge, I might not get it until 10.4.3 comes out! I couldn't afford the $500 to get on the Apple Developers program and play with the betas, but I might have considered the extra $4 for overnight shipping.

    1. Re:Forced to wait by blatantdog · · Score: 1

      I live in Maryland and it took every second possible to move from Pennsylvania to me as well! I could have walked up and back in that time!

  6. This is pretty common... by CptTripps · · Score: 1

    They did this with Puma and Jaguar. It was 1-2 weeks before they had 10.1.1 and 10.2.1. They just didn't last time...

    --


    My .sig can beat up your honor student.
    1. Re:This is pretty common... by MrPerfekt · · Score: 2, Informative

      They did this with 10.3 too, it was 2-3 weeks if I recall..

      --
      I just wasted your mod points! HA!
    2. Re:This is pretty common... by Chief+Typist · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a simple reason for this -- after the release is declared final, and the GM disk image is created, there is still testing going on.

      During the time that the GM disk is being pressed and shipped, the people in the QA department are finding bugs and engineers are fixing them.

      Apple then distributes the fixes with Software Update after ADC members have time to test the seed (giving them a week or two to do it.)

      -ch

  7. Let's hope they fix Dashboard by wembley+fraggle · · Score: 4, Interesting
    When I got Tiger, I went and downloaded a bunch of Dashboard widgets to try them out. Later, when my Dasboard launchbar grew to 5 screens of widgets I wanted to remove some from the launchbar. Couldn't figure out how to do it, so I went to apple help.



    This is what Help said: "You cannot remove widgets from the Widget Bar or change their order"



    And that's just plain stupid. I hope they fix that soon.

    1. Re:Let's hope they fix Dashboard by ksdd · · Score: 2, Informative

      This hint at MacOSXHints may help.

    2. Re:Let's hope they fix Dashboard by crawdad62 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just go to ~(username)->Library->Widgets and drag them out.

    3. Re:Let's hope they fix Dashboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Don't install shit before you know how to remove it.

  8. FUD alert! FUD alert! by amichalo · · Score: 0

    Other things, like Quartz 2D Extreme which is desigend to offload almost all the UI work to the GPU, was buggy enough to be disabled in the Tiger release.

    According to Apple Tiger's Quartz Extreme page, this is not the case. Perhaps you need to take a look at the Quartz Extreme Requirements.

    For a balanced evaluation of Quartz 2D Extreme, check out this April 28th review by Ars Technica.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:FUD alert! FUD alert! by Winterblink · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you take the developer tools and install them, there is a Quartz 2D Extreme debugger utility that indicates the component is indeed there, but disabled. You can enable it, but some people have said it causes some interesting problems.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:FUD alert! FUD alert! by Anm · · Score: 1

      Quartz Extreme != Quartz 2D Extreme

    3. Re:FUD alert! FUD alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you take the developer tools and install them, there is a Quartz 2D Extreme debugger utility that indicates the component is indeed there, but disabled. You can enable it, but some people have said it causes some interesting problems.

      This isn't a "missing feature" -- nobody had even heard of it until the Ars Technica review -- it's not an advertized feature. It doesn't do anything that can't be done now, it just makes it faster. Apple doesn't even call it "Quartz 2D Extreme" internally.

      QE, however, *did* enable a lot of new functionality. Expose would not have worked at all without hardware compositing.

  9. Hey, maybe they fixed my bug... by Monthenor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I submitted this bug report to Apple the day after Tiger came out. (Bug ID 4104116)

    Summary:
    In Tiger, the iCal Info Drawer becomes an invisible window in Expose's windowing modes when the main window is minimized.

    Steps to Reproduce:
    1) Open iCal.
    2) Open the main iCal window.
    3) Click the "i" button in the lower right (or press command-i) to open the Info Drawer.
    4) Minimize the window.
    5) With iCal as the active application, trigger the Expose "Application Windows" mode.
    6) Mouse over where the Info Drawer would appear if the main iCal window were not minimized.

    A) Now trigger the Expose "All Windows" mode.
    B) Mouse around the empty spots of the screen.

    Expected Results:
    After both step 6 and step B, there should be no window found.

    Actual Results:
    After both step 6 and step B, there is an invisible "window" with no name that can be clicked to activate iCal. It is the approximate size and shape of the iCal Info Drawer.

    Regression:
    OS X 10.4.0 Build 8A428
    iCal 2.0 (1024)

    The bug only occurs IF one is using 10.4.0 AND iCal's main window is open AND the Info Drawer is open AND the main window is minimized. If iCal's main window is open and visible, Expose treats it correctly. If iCal's window is closed, no phantom Expose window appears. If the Info Drawer is closed, no phantom Expose window appears.

    Notes:
    This is obviously not a show-stopping bug, just something very very weird. It does throw off the window-arrangement calculations of Expose, so I suppose it has slight usability implications.

    And once again, as with my iTunes + null separator character bug, it was quickly marked "No Workaround" and I lost privileges to view it. I cannot fathom why they don't want me to see the report again.

    --
    Co-founder of GerbilMechs
    1. Re:Hey, maybe they fixed my bug... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      In certain locales, if the first day of the week is set to monday, and the first of the month falls on a sunday, its not displayed in the new NSDatePicker control in cocoa. Yup, that month officially starts on the 2nd. Immediately obvious because thats what happens for May 2005 :) Reported to Apple a week ago, no action thus far.

    2. Re:Hey, maybe they fixed my bug... by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 0, Troll
      In certain locales, if the first day of the week is set to monday, and the first of the month falls on a sunday, its not displayed in the new NSDatePicker control in cocoa.

      The first of the week is Sunday though. Why would you set the first day of a week to Monday? That's like saying 1am is the start of a new day.

    3. Re:Hey, maybe they fixed my bug... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      No, the first day of the week is whatever your society says it is, Sunday, Monday or even Thursday. Its completely arbitrary. The UK locale has the start ofthe week set to Monday.

    4. Re:Hey, maybe they fixed my bug... by BlueCodeWarrior · · Score: 1

      Or for instance the way my pizza shop does its paperwork...weeks are M-S because we do so much business on the weekend that it makes much more sense to do it that way.

    5. Re:Hey, maybe they fixed my bug... by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      No, the first day of the week is whatever your society says it is, Sunday, Monday or even Thursday. Its completely arbitrary. The UK locale has the start ofthe week set to Monday.

      Geez, I wasn't trolling with that comment, I've just never heard of anyone starting a week on any day other than Sunday. That just seems weird. I could understand if it was an Asian thing or osmething, but why doesn't the UK share the same locale as the US?

    6. Re:Hey, maybe they fixed my bug... by dwightk · · Score: 1

      And once again, as with my iTunes + null separator character bug, it was quickly marked "No Workaround" and I lost privileges to view it. I cannot fathom why they don't want me to see the report again.

      Mostly because they are a big corporation and they hate you... specifically you... you should start a website about how Apple hates you, and live out the rest of your life a bitter, shell of a man...

      --
      Like anyone can even know that
    7. Re:Hey, maybe they fixed my bug... by Sinner · · Score: 1
      but why doesn't the UK share the same locale as the US?
      Specifically, the broken mm/dd/yyyy date format you use in the US torpedoes any idea of using the same locale. Once you get into the nitty-gritty of things like currency, there are a lot of minor differences. And the American spelling of words like "colour" really bugs some people.

      Personally, I like to think of Sunday as being the zeroeth day of the week. I'm guessing if you polled non-programming Britishers, you'd probably find the general consensus is that Monday is the first day of the week.

      --
      fish and pipes
  10. No AntiVirus for Tiger by xactuary · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was at the Apple Store yesterday talking with several employees (wearing very cool spotlight T-shirts) about the lack of AntiVirus for Tiger. They were quite sheepish about the subject and mentioned the training they'd received about how to broach the subject when customers ask about it. The bottom line was that there is no AntiVirus software compatible with Tiger at the moment and that they were to upsell .mac where Apple's servers run AntiVirus on .mac emails. Is this a non-issue? Is it odd that you don't hear much about this? I've read a lot about Tiger over the last six months and that is the first I had heard of this issue.

    --
    Say hello to my little sig.
    1. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by melquiades · · Score: 1

      The reason it's not a big issue is that there's hasn't been a successful virus on OS X ... ever. (Well, there are some Office macro viruses, but....)

      Eventually, somebody will manage to get a Mac virus out there, and then this will become an issue.

    2. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by Golias · · Score: 1

      Why would anybody bother trying to write an AntiVirus program for Tiger?

      1. No virus for Tiger exists yet (or, indeed, for any flavor of OS X), so there's nothing put in your code blacklist.

      2. Most Mac users (myself included) generally don't buy AntiVirus software, so you will only be able to sell it to a relatively small fraction of a relatively small market.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by xactuary · · Score: 1

      Some good-natured soul modded my original post to Funny, which is fine but that was not my original intention. My point was that for folks who get lots of attachments from Windoze users and then send them along to others on that platform, it's a good idea to stem the viral tide as a net citizen. These good works cannot be performed if no AntiVirus exists. I can attest to never seeing virii on Mac OS X, as was pointed out above.

      --
      Say hello to my little sig.
    4. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by Golias · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if you are not exchanging word docs or avi files or whatever with Windows users, then there's really no need for AntiVirus software at this point for the typical home Mac user right now.

      Even if you do want to scan a file for Windows virii, you can do so with any of dozens of free web-based utilities. Hell, send it to yourself in a Yahoo or Hotmail e-mail account, and there you have it.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I understand it, 10.4 Server edition now includes ClamAV http://clamav.net/ for scanning e-mail attachments. 10.4 "regular", I have heard, includes the clamav user and group but not the actual software (much like MySQL in 10.3). Whether or not this is the case, ClamAV can still be installed on OS X (I have done so under 10.3).

    6. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by bjohnson · · Score: 1

      If you want to stem the viral tide as net citizen *stop* forwarding the damn viruses.

      No one make a virus that affects me. Besides, the mail server is the point that viruses should be stopped at.

    7. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by solios · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Mac hasn't HAD a non-Word Macrovirus virus since the Autostart Worm, which turned itself off on 25 December 1998 (iirc).

      Unless you count SevenDust, but that's a Classic MacOS virus. :P

      MacOS X needs AV like a horse needs a fifth leg.

    8. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by steveness · · Score: 1

      Clam AV works fine for me on Panther, but I haven't upgraded yet to Tiger. Then again, the only virused emails I get are from buddies on Windows (Hey Man, is this email attachment a virus?). I can safely open and scan the attachment, and let them know.

    9. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I work for an Apple Store and the only "training" I got about anti-virus and Tiger is that it does not currently work.

      Besides, it is not "upselling" .mac since the previous response to switchers wanting anti-virus software was to sell them .mac to begin with (which includes anti-virus software).

      So the employees you were talking to were not told to sell something else, but simply to bring up some of the other selling points of .mac.

    10. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

      I have been a Mac user since the late 80s and haven't used antivirus software on my Macs since the late 90s.

      I think it is pretty pointless. There really aren't any "Mac" viruses to be concerned about just "PC" viruses that are incompatible.

      In the event that someone actually does write a virus targeting the Mac, I am fairly confident it will be widely publicized and I am certain a patch will be available quickly.

    11. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      "I was at the Apple Store yesterday talking with several employees about the lack of AntiVirus for Tiger."

      Curious. I installed Tiger yesterday, and discovered a new user account had been added: "Clam AV".

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    12. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by xactuary · · Score: 1

      It's all good. I've used .mac for three years now and love it. My saying upselling was not meant to be taken as a slam. My post was simply to point out that currently AV is not available on Tiger. Perhaps Apple is making a statement here. I can't imagine a Longhorn debut with no AntiVirus apps available for it.

      --
      Say hello to my little sig.
    13. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even back when I owned a windows box I didn't think it fair that an Apple user would have to compromise the freedom of using a secure system just so they could protect the Win install I used. the responsibility for protecting a windows system lies squarely on those people who own them, or those they pay to protect them.

      Unless your windows friends are paying you, don't go messing up your Mac just to protect them. Their machine, their problem.

    14. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by Colol · · Score: 1

      As others have mentioned, it's a non-issue at this point.

      However, the fault of there being no antivirus solution compatible with Tiger lies not with Apple (it's not their market), but with the antivirus vendors.

      Tiger wasn't a secret. McAfee, Symantec, and even the smaller Mac antivirus vendors have access to OS seeding. They had more than enough time to put out a patch for Tiger compatibility. Or, to be more in line with the market, they could have had an entirely "new" version ready to roll for full price (and in the case of McAfee, probably another disastrous data deletion bug).

      But for whatever stupid reason, they opted not to. If you feel naked, complain to your antivirus vendor of choice. One-person software shops had whole feature releases of their applications ready to launch with Tiger, but the antivirus giants have only committed to a nebulous "future release" being compatible with Tiger after the fact.

      Granted, the only reason the average user can even buy McAfee Virex today is because Apple licensed it for distribution to .Mac subscribers. Prior to that, you had to buy it from McAfee corporate licensing, and single seats were going for something asinine like $175 since it wasn't aimed at the home market (and Virex sucked even more then).

    15. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by Colol · · Score: 1

      If you dig around Apple's site, you'll eventually discover Clam AV is included with Tiger Server as its e-mail antivirus solution. It's not actually included with the client version of Tiger, but parity beyond software tools is generally maintained between the two versions (hence your new user).

    16. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by grioghar · · Score: 1

      Call me naive, and I've been running Apples for a while now, but do you even NEED AV software at this point? There are no viruses to date for the Mac, and frankly, I'm doubting the possibility in the future. Again, probably naive, but I've put a lot of faith in Apple's engineering team.

      --
      Can you ping me now? Gooood! | Manhappenin.Net - Things to do
    17. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason that you need AV software has nothingto do with Viruses. It has to do with IT policies. IN amny companies and govt. agencies; no computing device may be connected to the network without AV software installed and running. So, the need for AV is not about the risk of viruses, it is about getting permission to plug the computer in in the first place.

    18. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by razjml · · Score: 1

      I caught SevenDust Variant C at some point, and it spread to all of my applications. I forget what it did...was there a creepy extra menu or something? In any case, it embedded itself as an MDEF in the resource fork, so I opened up all my applications in ResEdit and manually plucked it out of each one. Who says you need AntiVirus software to get rid of viruses :-). Of course, it was completely benign anyways, but I felt better with its little 666 resource completely gone.

    19. Re:No AntiVirus for Tiger by Marti+SB · · Score: 1

      I was using Norton Internet Security 3.0. What happens with the Firewall? Does Tiger have some built-in functionality or shall I get worried about that? And back to AV, I am using Office 2004 and Virtual PC, shall I assume I am secure just buying the .MAC services? All together makes me to be more aware and distrustful. The Norton product I bought 1 month ago is still selling in the Apple store saying that it is compatible with mac os x. It is a pity business firms loose candor. That's a negative point in the balance.

  11. Inaccuracy alert! by avalys · · Score: 4, Informative

    You should check your facts before you accuse other people of spreading FUD. If you read the very article you link (at ArsTechnica), you will see confirmation that Quartz 2D Extreme is disabled in Tiger.

    From the second to last pair of paragraphs in your link...

    "There's one final barrier to hardware-accelerated bliss. Quartz 2D Extreme is disabled by default in Mac OS X 10.4.0. That's right, the whiz-bang new technology you just read all about is not actually used in Tiger unless it's explicitly enabled using the Quartz Debug application. Even then, it only applies to applications that are launched after it was turned on. It also appears that Q2DE is re-disabled when you quit the Quartz Debug application.

    Why develop something as impressive as Quartz 2D Extreme and then leave it turned off by default? My inquiries to Apple have gone unanswered, so I can only speculate about the reasoning behind this decision. My best guess is that all of the bugs could not be excised from Q2DE in time for Tiger's launch date, and that it will be enabled by default in a subsequent update--perhaps as early as version 10.4.1."

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  12. Re:This isn't the type of post that belongs on /. by Winterblink · · Score: 4, Informative

    100% of the stories posted on Slashdot don't belong on Slashdot, depending on your perspective. For instance, I don't give a flying fuck about most of the *nix stories posted here, so I:

    a) don't read them
    b) sure as hell don't post in them about how they don't belong on Slashdot

    Now I do this because even though from my perspective I come here for other types of geek news and errata, other people do come here for those types of information. In case you didn't realize, there's a handy feature found in your user profile on Slashdot that allows you to remove items from being shown on your homepage (example: Apple-related news). Give it a try.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  13. Tiger w00t? by el_womble · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can't decide if I like Tiger or not. having splashed out for a family pack, for my iMac G5 (1GB RAM), my Al PowerBook G4 (512MB RAM), my parents Al PowerBook 17" (256MB RAM) and mother-in-law's mini (512MB RAM) I can't say that I've seen anything about it that I would recommend. If anything it feels slower than panther. Spotlight is useful and I played with it for a bit, but its way too slow to be as world changing as we had been promised. I was really looking forward to Automator, but the few times I though it would be useful it wasn't (although I haven't given up yet). Dashboard widgets are an interesting addition, but at a substantial memory cost - I don't feel it on the G5, but the G4s I've got access to you seem to have a choice - Dashboard or Fast User switching... fast user switching is more useful to me.

    My hope is that these new technologies expected Quartz 2D Extereme to be turned on and that once its stable, I'll get the "it just feels snappier" experience that we mac users have come to expect from an upgrade. At the moment this feels more like Win2k to XP.

    To keep this pro apple, its not all bad. There are two technologies that I wouldn't give back: Safari RSS and QuickTime 7, both of which feel positively super charged. But I wouldn't describe them as "worth the ticket price alone", especially as you can now get QT7 for panther.

    This update can't come soon enough. Lets hope it unlocks the true tiger within!

    --
    Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
    1. Re:Tiger w00t? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      I can't say I'm dissapointed with Tiger. It doesn't feel "sluggish," but as for "snappy" I can't really comment because I'm running on a Powerbook anyway.

      Panther was my first version of OS X (only converted last year) so I haven't really "experienced" the ever-increasing speed of OSX.

      However I like the fact that it may get even faster once they work the kinks out of Quartz 2D Extreme... that would just be icing on the cake.

    2. Re:Tiger w00t? by Heisenbug · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean about the no-feature-shock, but keep in mind that this release seemed to focus almost entirely on changes under the hood. The benefits should come over the next year in terms of new applications, faster OS development, and improved stability.

      Whether they actually will or not is another question, of course, but I'm holding off judgment. In the mean time, I too see no particular reason to rush to upgrade.

      (Unless you're into real-time video compositing, in which case Quartz Composer is about the coolest thing ever, at least as free bundled applications go ...)

    3. Re:Tiger w00t? by adpowers · · Score: 1

      I don't know what is wrong with your computers (and grandparent), but my 12" PB is much snappier. All my clustermates who have 12" PBs have upgrade to Tiger and we all agree. For me, I can tell text scrolling in Safari is faster. Also, I don't know what the grandparent said about Spotlight being too slow to be useful. It isn't as fast as in the Keynote, but it'll still search through all the metadata of my filled hard drive in less than five seconds (usually quicker). This upgrade was great. Panther brought Expose and other stuff, but this one feels like a more polished upgrade. The speed improvements are very welcome.

    4. Re:Tiger w00t? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      It's not running slow, but to be frank I hadn't used my Powerbook about a month before Tiger was released. I had to do too much stuff for work which unfortunately requires I use a Windows machine. So if it did get a speed bump I wouldn't notice it (not just didn't).

      However I have no complaints. Tiger's pretty kick-ass. Thankfully I'm back to using it as my fulltime computer again so all is right with the world :)

    5. Re:Tiger w00t? by vistic · · Score: 1

      I don't like how I upgraded to QT7 on Panther... and now I can't view a movie full-screen or present a movie... need Pro for that now I guess.

      And just to remind me... in the menus theres tons of options grayed out with the word "PRO" next to it.

    6. Re:Tiger w00t? by 1010011010 · · Score: 1

      I noticed a speed improvement on every machine I've put it on. I wonder why we have has such different experiences.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    7. Re:Tiger w00t? by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      My hope is that these new technologies expected Quartz 2D Extereme to be turned on and that once its stable, I'll get the "it just feels snappier" experience that we mac users have come to expect from an upgrade.

      Personally, I find Tiger to be noticably faster on my 1Ghz iBook - and I've been consistently complaining about OS X's dismal UI performance for years. It's still not as snappy as Windows, but it's probably on the same level as GNOME and KDE.

      Indeed, it was the Ars review that convinced the speed improvements were enough to justify the purchase. Siracusa is the only reviewer I've read who actually talks truthfully about OS X's performance.

      At the moment this feels more like Win2k to XP.

      The UI still isn't as fast as XP, let alone Win2k.

    8. Re:Tiger w00t? by vistic · · Score: 1

      Need Tiger though....

  14. Missing an important step. by MisterSquid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just go to ~(username)->Library->Widgets and drag them out.

    . . . and shoot them. It's the only way to make sure they don't come back.

    --
    blog
    1. Re:Missing an important step. by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 1

      you forgot to tell him that the bullets have to be silver nitrate. Or was that intentional?... sly...

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
    2. Re:Missing an important step. by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 0

      I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. That's the only way to be sure

  15. Works for me. by RustNeverSleeps · · Score: 1

    This is obviously a bug that needs to be fixed, as I've heard other people reporting it, but it's definitely does work for many. Spotlight searches comments on my iPhoto pictures just fine, and is actually probably my favorite thing to do with Spotlight. Typing a friends name or the name of a place and having pictures of them come up is really nice.

    1. Re:Works for me. by Winterblink · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've tried commenting mine through iPhoto, adding keywords in iPhoto, and using the new "spotlight comments" feature in Finder. For me, the spotlight comments ended up being the only way I could get spotlight to find it, but that particular item is pure metadata on the file itself, not through the iPhoto application where I've been annotating my photos so far. Hopefully the patch fixes, this. :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:Works for me. by Kplusplus · · Score: 1

      Spotlight comments merely make it immediately re-index the item so you just helping it along.

      --
      -"I'm one of those Mac people that will break a bottle on the bar and hold it to your throat for bad-mouthing my system"
  16. Re:This isn't the type of post that belongs on /. by shr · · Score: 0
    Perspective matters, but taking it to 100% is unrealistic.

    I know about customizing Slashdot sections, but I do actually care about Apple news. My point was that this isn't news at all, it is a rumor, and an inconsequential one at that. The slashdot editors should serve as a little bit of a filter, otherwise Apple slashdot will just turn into a dumb RSS feed of Mac Rumors.

  17. Re:This isn't the type of post that belongs on /. by Winterblink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    100% is realistic, there isn't a story on Slashdot that EVERYBODY wants to read.

    The point is that this site will always be one where news is interspersed with rumors, opinions, etc. That is what Slashdot is. This particular posting isn't inconsequential if you're someone like myself who has had issues with the latest OS (not showstopper ones mind you, but issues nonetheless).

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  18. adium by chasingporsches · · Score: 1

    and if anyone didnt notice, about the time tiger was released, Adium 0.8 was released, and what an upgrade it is. however, its crashed on me a few times and is laden with bugs. hopefully 0.8.1 will be released alongside Mac OS X 10.4.1. but i haven't noticed any problems with tiger, except one with dashboard. any dashboard widget which has a tooltip-like text that pops up when you hover over part of it will display that tooltip text when that mouse is on that part of the screen when dashboard isn't shown. for example, my TV channel widget pops up "NBC" when i hover over the NBC channel, but when dashboard isnt shown, when i move over where it would be on dashboard, i see the tooltip thing. anyone else having this problem? its quite annoying. luckily, none of the apple standard widgets AFAICT have tooltip windows, just custom ones.

    1. Re:adium by PinkX · · Score: 1

      FYI, 0.81 was just released.

      Regards,

  19. Mea Culpa by amichalo · · Score: 1

    You should check your facts before you accuse other people of spreading FUD. If you read the very article you link (at ArsTechnica), you will see confirmation that Quartz 2D Extreme is disabled in Tiger.

    I was totally wrong. My appologies to Winterblink. Clearly staed on parargaph 43 of the 46 paragraph, 1 table, and 3 figure Ars coverage of Quartz Extreme in Tiger, it does state that the only way to use Q2DE (if you have the proper graphics card) is to use it in debug mode.

    I am totally perplexed by this and wonder why, when Jobs demoed Q2DE in action during a dashboard demo where Q3DE "splashed" the widgets on the desktop, Apple made the decision to disable the technology.

    I am further confused by the system requirements. Apple states that Core Image requires a "ATI Mobility Radeon 9700, Radeon 9600 XT, 9800 XT, or X800 XT." But the only system I see Apple shipping with an ATI Radeon 9600 XT is a BTO option for the single proc 1.8 PowerMac. The Dual 2.0 and 2.3 PowerMacs and the iMac G5 come with the ATI Radeon 9600, not the XT.

    What the heck is going on in California?

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:Mea Culpa by kronin · · Score: 1

      You're confused. The splash graphic is "Core Image" at work. There's also a difference between Quartz Extreme and Quartz 2D Extreme. Read the Ars Technic article a little more closely...

    2. Re:Mea Culpa by amichalo · · Score: 1

      But even if it is Core Image and not Q2DE doing the "splash", what's with the system specs?

      an ATI Radeon 9600 is not the same as an ATI Radeon 9600 XT, but Apple doesn't even make the XT cards and option for PowerMacs and ships the 9600 with the iMac. Why does Apple make only their top of the line computer support Core Image that they have been promoting?

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    3. Re:Mea Culpa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I am totally perplexed by this and wonder why, when Jobs demoed Q2DE in action during a dashboard demo where Q3DE "splashed" the widgets on the desktop, Apple made the decision to disable the technology.

      "Quartz 2D Extreme" is a term used only in a debugging utility -- it isn't something they've demoed to the public. It's not even that interesting -- it just makes some 2D operations faster. Quartz Extreme (the feature introduced in Jaguar) introduced hardware-accelerated compositing, which enabled new functionality, like Expose. "Q2DE" doesn't enable anything new.

      Core Image, a distinctly different technology, is the thing that enabled the "splash" effect. It *is* enabled on appropriate hardware. On a non-Core Image card, it is disabled. Perhaps you should read the rest of the Ars article?

      However, Core Image works partially on "non-Core Image" hardware, just not in real-time, and not for all possible effects. It's still incredibly fast for the amount of work it does.

      What the heck is going on in California?

      Typos are being made, that's all. The Radeon 9600 has the requisite shader support. You'll note they say "Core Image-capable cards include". It isn't a complete and eternal list. It's just easier to say "These cards" instead of "cards that support ARB_FRAGMENT (or whatever it is)". The 9600 supports Core Image.

    4. Re:Mea Culpa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does Apple make only their top of the line computer support Core Image that they have been promoting?

      If something sounds incredibly unlikely, it probably is.
      The 9600 supports Core Image.

    5. Re:Mea Culpa by Halo1 · · Score: 1
      "Quartz 2D Extreme" is a term used only in a debugging utility -- it isn't something they've demoed to the public. It's not even that interesting -- it just makes some 2D operations faster. Quartz Extreme (the feature introduced in Jaguar) introduced hardware-accelerated compositing, which enabled new functionality, like Expose. "Q2DE" doesn't enable anything new.
      Actually, Q2DE is a lot more interesting that QE imho (although the former requires the latter for optimum efficiency). It allows for translating pretty much the whole GUI interface drawing into OpenGL fragment shader programs. This means a lot more GUI code gets offloaded from the CPU to the GPU, freeing it to do other, useful work.
      --
      Donate free food here
  20. Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will they fix compatibility with a lot of business apps, like Cisco's VPN client, VirtualPC routing/DHCP handling, etc.?

    1. Re:Cool. by Pfhreak · · Score: 1

      Never. As I understand it, the stuff that broke networking on a lot of applications are fundamental changes in Tiger's APIs that can't be fixed without going back to the old (Panther) way. Every major revision of Mac OS X has broken compatibility with at least a few apps.

      Compatibility issues with applications will have to be fixed by the individual software vendors, specifically, they'll have to switch to the new APIs.

      The good news is that one of the big things about Tiger is that Apple has supposedly reached a point where they're done making changes to the APIs that break things. This is mentioned in the first page of Ars Technica's Tiger review.

      --
      The U.S. Constitution needs to be ammended with a "separation of business and state" clause.
    2. Re:Cool. by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 1

      I pretty much read that Cisco had a Tiger dev kit for about 6-8 months before Tiger shipped and they haven't touched it. Hardly Apple's fault.

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
    3. Re:Cool. by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      You "pretty much read" that? Hmm. I would be more confident about your information if you were at least sure you read it. Maybe you could share your information source? :-)

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    4. Re:Cool. by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      As I understand it, the stuff that broke networking on a lot of applications are fundamental changes in Tiger's APIs that can't be fixed without going back to the old (Panther) way.

      And some of those changes might be...

      The good news is that one of the big things about Tiger is that Apple has supposedly reached a point where they're done making changes to the APIs that break things.

      ...the result of the introduction of the "sustainable" kernel interfaces. It sounds as if that might be part of what the Ars Technica article is referring to - interfaces that kernel extensions can use and that won't change in future releases in ways that break things, even if the implementation of those interfaces changes.

    5. Re:Cool. by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 1

      I work for Residential Networking for Rutgers University, which is an off-shoot of Telecommunications and the NOC here at RU. We are an all Cisco shop. Every router and switch in our setup is Cisco, with various models out there. In the ResNet portion of the network alone, I can estimate about 300 (48 or 80 port) switches alone. We are also a testing ground for Cisco's new stuff as well. Test networks are fun! But yeah, someone at the NOC apparently asked them about it and thats what they got. Plus AsSeenOnTV (poster here on /.) who is somehow affiliated with the organizational ranks of Apple also mentioned this in an earlier post about this very same issue.

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
  21. Re:AppleDot again by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

    bad troll! bad!

    lets see, a story about a FREE update which fixes bugs that effect users and the performace of thier computers they spend good money on is a advertisement for apple and not news?

    yeah, an adverstisment. Im sure apple us thrilled we are discussing their fucks ups and free patches and not something that people actuialy will pay for.

  22. Re:This isn't the type of post that belongs on /. by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

    so apple isn't working on a 10.4.1 release and the software is finished?! hoo-ray!! Thanks for the story. lets post it on Slash...err nevermind

  23. Re:This isn't the type of post that belongs on /. by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

    exactly. i find it funny how all these people come out of wood work on apple stories or even slight rumoring and proclaim to be standing up for the virtue of slashdot, like slashdot is some virgin that must remain pure until she is ready to get nasty on her wedding day.

    what they really are saying is they know slashdot, and we must all know it the way they do. kinda fascist if you ask me.

  24. Why does zabasearch... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    ...violate my privacy? Does it do something illegal? Does they do something that other 'information' companies don't?

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  25. I hope this isn't the start of a bad trend by wealthychef · · Score: 1

    I hope we're not seeing a new philosophy here: ship an incomplete product to meet a marketing deadline with major features buggy and incomplete, then patch the problems later. There are no serious bugs that I have found yet in all of four days of playing with Tiger intermittently, but I can already tell that Apple basically rushed out an incomplete product here. Risky.

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
    1. Re:I hope this isn't the start of a bad trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Microsoft's way of handling OS releases. Apple would probably get sued if they started to adopt it.
      The whole world is Microsoft's beta testers.

    2. Re:I hope this isn't the start of a bad trend by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      This is not a new philosophy, not even for Apple.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    3. Re:I hope this isn't the start of a bad trend by paulymer5 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The product was not necessarily rushed. It means that Apple did not stop testing the system since it went gold. A company that declares its software done and then never tests or upgrades it again is far worse than a company that says "let us fix a few things that somehow slipped by."

    4. Re:I hope this isn't the start of a bad trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SP2 had no glaring deficiencies. MS doesn't come close to this kind of sloppiness. They'd be treated much worse for it than Apple does by its apologists.

      Where are all the Microsoft bashers when Apple obviously screws up a release?

  26. Right on schedule by jht · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This has been Apple's pattern ever since 10.0 - I think it's partly because their beta program is so closely controlled. Despite all the testing they do, it's still a tiny fraction of the number of users who install it in the first few days after release.

    The other thing is that once Apple freezes a release as "GM", then you've got a gap of around a month before the public release. So in the meantime, they've got a head start on fixing issues, plus the ones that come up in the first week or two of public release. That makes for a first bugfix release within a month of launch (which has always been Apple's pattern in the X world), followed by further point releases every couple of months afterwards until the next major rev.

    And that's in addition to the (now) monthly security updates and any other updates to components that come along.

    I've got a whole fleet of Macs (iMac G5, PowerBook 667, PowerBook 15" 1.5 and mini at the office, iMac G3 and a pair of iMac G4s at home), and the way I handle a major update is to try it on one system at launch, because some of my customers will jump immediately. In this case, I threw it on my newer PowerBook G4 (I put my copy of Server on the mini). After the 10.4.1 update, I'll probably start deploying it on a couple of the other Macs, but keep 10.3 around for a while so I can support my 10.3 customers.

    A handful of my customers still use 10.2, but it's not enough to bother keeping a 10.2 system around.

    The disadvantage of Apple's approach is that the new release usually has a lot more little minor bugs and compatibility issues than a new Windows rev, because the new MacOS version is in the hands of relatively few people for a shorter development cycle. On the other hand, the fixes are rapid, and within a couple of months all the straggling 3rd party developers have usually caught up. Apple releases entire new versions of the OS in the time it takes Microsoft to release a service pack.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    1. Re:Right on schedule by SPF22 · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with your methodolgy with new Mac operating systems. I work with numerous experienced Mac users and am one myself, and if there is anything that we have all seen since OS 9 came out is, "don't jump in too soon." I think a lot of people new to a Mac will be suprised by this, but that's just the way it is (Apple and WIndows). I installed Tiger on one of my computers, just because I wanted to play with the new features, however, I will wait to put it on my work computers until there is a solid release. And although it is painful to say, others would be smart to do the same.

  27. Family Packed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're married and living at home with your parents and in-laws?

    I know that must be true or otherwise you'd be violating the family pack license.

  28. Can't wait for 10.4.1 by wackymacs · · Score: 1

    This is good news, Apple is certainly on the right track by quickly updating any bugs and security holes that have been reported by users. I am VERY pleased with Tiger and cannot wait for the update, because every update of 10.3 improved my Mac's performance - I'm pretty sure 10.4.1 will too.

  29. O.o by solios · · Score: 1

    Dude, about four minutes after I read your post, I noticed Adium 0.81 is available. :D

  30. License Update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    I consider the brand new Consent to Use of Data in the 10.4.0 License to be broken. Did anyone besides me even notice that Apple had slipped it in there? It's not in the 10.3 License. The new snoop clause they added is wide enough to drive a Mack truck full our personal data through. I wonder if they'll be patching the terms. Maybe they'll make it a little more user protective.

    See the new 4. Consent to Use of Data clause here. While the link is to a sample license, clause 4 is the same as the license included with the Tiger media.

    It would seem that Apple can now collect data on 3rd party Applications and Peripherals you install. And then can share it with unnamed subsidiaries. And just what is "related information" to say Quicken for Mac? For the sake of argument assume Apple is benign and is just going to collect what it needs to implement the Software Updates, and never stores the data or uses it for any other purpose. Why not word the license like that?

    Are there any lawyers out there using Macs? How does this impact you client confidentiality? Or doctors, could this cause a HIPPA violation?

    Software Updates don't need this liberal a Consent. Remote support might, but it should have it's own per incident consent form, and not be applied to all users.

    Come on Apple, you're not supposed to be like this.

    1. Re:License Update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is for, as you surmised, remote support purposes. Apple System Profiler now offers the ability to send your profile directly to Apple for use in troubleshooting. As anyone who's used ASP in the past can tell you, it's a pretty detailed inventory of your system contents.

      More than likely, it also covers the web services widgets included in Dashboard (as they take portions of your personal information -- zip code, city, etc) and transmit them to give you accurate results.

      CYA as always in our lawsuit-happy country.

  31. Standard Slashdottera: by mblase · · Score: 1

    pro-Apple: This is great! Apple's getting their bug fixes out to their customers within only a few weeks after release! Let's see M$ try and release a service pack that fast, ha-ha!

    anti-Apple: This is ridiculous! If Apple can release a major set of bug fixes this soon after releasing the OS, why didn't they just put off the release date a few weeks so they could sell it with the fixed bugs?

  32. soon by inchhigh · · Score: 1

    Tiger is a really good upgrade *cough* a tad rough *cough*

    I hope they get .1 out quick

  33. Apple to Release first Tiger Update by Oscar_Wilde · · Score: 3, Funny

    Apple to Release first Tiger Update

    Oh good! I was worried it would be released by Microsoft.

  34. Imbecile! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SP2 had no glaring deficiencies. MS doesn't come close to this kind of sloppiness.

    WTF kind of comparison is that? You're comparing a .0 OS X release to a Windows Service Pack?

    Plain old XP *did* have some glaring deficiencies, just like 10.4.0 does. Otherwise you wouldn't be running it with not one but two Service Packs applied to it, now would you?

    1. Re:Imbecile! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SP2 is hardly a minor release to fix usability problems. It is equivalent to a $129 major release in Apple's terms. The only difference is Apple charges you to keep up to date while Microsoft gives it to you for free.

      In fact, none of the three releases had anything that prevented me from doing what I wanted to with my computer. I could run XP as well as SP1 at the time without bumping into any visible bugs. You can't say that about Tiger.

      Its unprofessional of Apple, no matter how much you try to refute it. None of the bugs Apple is fixing would have been released had they properly tested it prior to shipping.

    2. Re:Imbecile! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "SP2 is hardly a minor release to fix usability problems. It is equivalent to a $129 major release in Apple's terms."

      Complete, utter, total bullshit.

      SP1 and SP2 are primarily about bugfixes. Especially SP2 -- most of the 'features' are merely additions necessary to fix XP's horrible security holes.

  35. iPod Kernel Panic? by dan_polt · · Score: 1

    Has anyone experienced the iPod kernel panic? I formatted both my computers to Tier with musiuc backed up on them on the iPod only to find that as soon as I connected the ipod, I got the BSSOD[1]. As the iPod is full to the brim I think it may have been to do with the spotlight searching index. [1] black shaded screen of death ;)

  36. Re:Spotlight by wrldwzrd89 · · Score: 1

    I'm experiencing another Spotlight issue. When I try to make a new Smart Folder, change the Kind to Others..., then start typing the kind I want, I get the spinning beach ball while the list of available kinds is loaded. Spotlight is supposed to be fast - I shouldn't be seeing the beach ball when creating a search query! The Spotlight menu item in the upper-right corner works as expected, although the search results aren't quite "instant". Spotlight also gets confused if you have a Smart Folder open while you edit filenames in the Smart Folder or move stuff to a location you've marked for Spotlight not to index. This is indicated by the Searching spinner displayed forever - it never seems to get the results, at least after I waited 30 seconds.

  37. Update iPhoto to 5.0.2 by ibentmywookie · · Score: 1

    Had the same problem. Updated iPhoto to 5.0.2, and it worked.

    --
    -- The doctor said I wouldn't get so many nose bleeds if I just kept my finger out of there!