Slashdot Mirror


Printing (Big) Manuals?

Detritus writes "Many companies have stopped providing hardcopy manuals with their products, electing instead to deliver the manuals in the form of PDF files. This becomes a problem when you have an 800 page reference manual and you need a usable hardcopy that is double-side printed and bound. What is the most cost-effective way of turning a PDF file into a bound document? Cheap ink-jet printers are not designed to do this task at a reasonable speed and cost."

196 comments

  1. Work? by Jhon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you are lucky and have access to a decent laser printer at work (like a Canon Imagerunner), take there and print it out. Usually employers are reasonable about such requests. Particularly if you provide your own paper. If they'll let you print at all, they will certainly eat the toner cost for you as well.

    We have several students working at our lab and the frequently print out materials for school. Then again, maybe our employer is just 'cool' about such things.

    About your only other 'cheap' option is to just focus on the sections you need and print THOSE out.

    Outside of that, take it to a printer (kinko's or something) and pay the cost to have it printed and bound (or at least hole-punched). If you NEED it enough, you'll PAY for it if you have no other alternative. Otherwise, your need just isn't that great.

    1. Re:Work? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Cheap ink-jet printers are not designed to do this task at a reasonable speed and cost.

      Right, just as cheap IDE drives aren't designed to serve the Enterprise. It sounds like you need a RAIJ (Redundant Array of Ink Jets), and then you can complete your printout in minutes instead of hours.

      Of course, you'll have to assemble the pages, but if your RAIJ has, say, 10 print nodes, and you're printing 800 pages, just send 80 sequential pages to each print node.

      This is mostly tongue-in-cheek (the play being on RAID, and it's not an exact match because there's no provision for when a printer dies, so the "R" is somewhat incorrect, as in RAID-0). But now after having typed it, I can see writing a simple print spooler which will break jobs up into multiple pieces and send them off to separate printers.

      It's probably still better to have a dedicated printing solution, but when that breaks you're down unless you bought two of them. With a RAIJ, if a print node breaks down you'd only be slowed down 1/N where N is the number of print nodes.

      And I'm sure someone can come up with a nice collating algorithm, so that the user who hits "print" will end up with a stack of 800 pages to pick up at the of the job.

      And, yes, what I'm describing is probably best done by a Kinkos or similar, as others have mentioned.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    2. Re:Work? by dougmc · · Score: 2, Funny
      Right, just as cheap IDE drives aren't designed to serve the Enterprise.
      Cheap IDE drives serve the `Enterprise' (I assume we're talking about a business, not a naval ship, space shuttle or star ship, even though you've capitialized it like it's a proper name) far better than cheap ink jets do. When you work out the per-page cost, low-end ink jets are *expensive*, mostly due to the ink which costs thousands of dollars per ounce when you do the math.

      Even the cheap modern IDE drives are pretty good. SCSI (and maybe fiber channel, though I have no experience with FC) is still king, but even the consumer grade IDE drives can generally handle a good database pounding.

      I'd go all SCSI, but IDE is almost an order of magnitude cheaper now, so in many cases it makes good sense to just do RAID-1 with IDE, even in the `enterprise'.

    3. Re:Work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, just as cheap IDE drives aren't designed to serve the Enterprise.

      Shhhh... don't tell google.

    4. Re:Work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If google loses an index of 10,000 different Livejournal sites due to a hardware failure, no one gives a rats ass. If Citibank loses its index of 10,000 customer credit lines due to hardware failure, people give a rats ass.

      Therefore, Google can use IDE, Citibank can't. Not everyone is Google or has google-like data.

    5. Re:Work? by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      Decent and Canon in the same sentence?

      Ouch.

    6. Re:Work? by Nutria · · Score: 1

      If Citibank loses its index of 10,000 customer credit lines due to hardware failure, people give a rats ass.

      That's what RAID and backups are for...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  2. Kinko by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

    Send them the file and they'll return a bound manual.

    1. Re:Kinko by MuNansen · · Score: 1

      yep, I bet this would be the way to go. Would cost some more money, but how much money is the amount of YOUR time saved worth?

    2. Re:Kinko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it would probably be cheaper than the printer supplies you would burn through too.

    3. Re:Kinko by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      Last time I called Kinkos for something like this, they qouted me 70 cents a page. It was a 550 page document, so we're talking close to $400.

    4. Re:Kinko by mschaffer · · Score: 1

      Unless Kinkos has changed their policy, they are not supposed to be reproducing anything that you do not own the copyright on.

      Apparently, however, they don't mind it if you use their self-serve copiers to make illegal copies of things, though.

    5. Re:Kinko by matthewn · · Score: 1

      Kinko's has gone way downhill since they got taken over by FedEx. When I needed to print a copy of the nearly 600-page Inform Designer's Manual, Kinkos said it would be an overnight job and cost ten cents a page. So I went to the print shop at Office Depot. They did the job while I waited, at 5.5 cents per page.

    6. Re:Kinko by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      It was a 550 page document, so we're talking close to $400.
      Indeed! I have nine 3" 3-ring binders of UNIX documentation that I printed out back around '99. Most of it is vintage tldp.org and a hardcopy of a LFS 3.2 book. At the time I had a Canon BJC-4200 printer and I think I went through about 5 ink cartridges over the course of two or three months. That amounted to about $150 in ink and paper is cheap.

      The BJC-4200 still works but, as of about 2 years ago, it is impossible to find a good ink cartridge for it. Ink cartridges are still sold but the consumer is informed, at the counter, that no returns are accepted once the package is open. It's readily apparent that the ink cartridges have been sitting in the back of a warehouse for probably as long as the printer is old. The last 5 (yes, I paid my money and took my chances five times at three different retail chains) cartridges were dry solid from the moment I opened the package.

      I now suffer with an Epson Stylus C86. It prints nice and all, but what do I need 5000x5000 dpi ultra-snazzy 128-bit color for? I get about 25 pages per ink cartridge. To reprint all my documentation would cost me probably close to $500 or more in ink and I'm not so confident that the printer mechanism would last as long as my trusty old Canon BJC-4200.

      The industry needs to ditch this infatuation with fonts and bitmap and go back to ASCII and cheap dot matrix printers. Remember when you could run off 300 pages of text with a $7 ribbon and then re-ink it until the ribbon shredded?

      I haven't thrown out the Canon. It's by the door but I can't bring myself to part with a perfectly functional printer (which has served me faithfully for better than a quarter of my life) just because the industry wants to fleece me for the ink cartridge. I've been trying to think of what I could do with a piece of hardware which can be programmed to mechanically move the head along an axis. Maybe I can tape a pen or pencil to the head and code a program to use it as a chart recorder by sending lines of varying length to it.
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    7. Re:Kinko by Badfysh · · Score: 1

      Can't you just refill the old carts with a syringe kit?

      --

      I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

    8. Re:Kinko by gregwbrooks · · Score: 1
      Depends on what you use them for.

      Kinko's isn't the cheapest or best option for the simple stuff, but they've got two advantages:

      • A huge number of offices; and
      • The ability to do consistently do complex documents.
      I do a lot of public-sector proposals that have to be delivered to the (potential) client by a very specific date and time, often with strange formatting requirements that boil down to "well, you have to use numbered tabs in a certain color scheme, or we won't consider you for this $500k piece of work!". I ship the proposal (and crazy-detailed instructions) off to Kinko's and they handle the production and delivery. Their integration with FedEx has meant that, a couple of times, the finished job got loaded onto a FedEx Custom Critical truck for four-hour delivery.

      Very cool, and a long way from the old days of actually needing to get something done in a timely manner.

      YMMV, but they're very good some some things.

      --


      "It was a summer's tale: Just a boy, his Linux, and a head full of dreams..."
    9. Re:Kinko by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      I'd thought about it but something about syringe kits just don't look right to me. I had no problem with reinking my own ribbons but there's something that just doesn't "smell" right about syringe kits.

      If I think about it I suspect it's the ink. If I bought a syringe kit I'd fully expect to print pages of paper with ink blots all over them and end up with a printer with ink splattered everywhere inside.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    10. Re:Kinko by unitron · · Score: 1
      " Can't you just refill the old carts with a syringe kit?"

      You have to catch the original cartridge before it runs out, while it's still "wet", once it's dry you can re-fill it but it won't work, and if it's still almost full but dried out from lack of use it won't work either.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    11. Re:Kinko by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      I'd give up your infatuation with the crappy inkjet and buy a <$100 laser printer.

      I bought a refurb laster printer 5 years ago and ran about 7,500 pages from a $60 toner cart.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    12. Re:Kinko by NateTech · · Score: 1

      You can still buy dot-matrix printers from Epson for about $200. Knock yourself out.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  3. laserprinters are way cheap now by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Informative

    Samsung makes a very nice 1200dpi printer with PostScript, ethernet, and duplex printing, that's available online for around $500. Many people are opting for Samsung laserprinters these days over HP and Brother. We have one at work, and it's really nice, plus the Linux support is appreciated.

    1. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      If you have good eyesight, you can also try 2-up printing to reduce the number of pages in half.

      Even a cheap laser without duplexing can still do two-sided printing. You just have to flip the stack over manually and print even / odd pages.

      From the OP: " Cheap ink-jet printers are not designed to do this task at a reasonable speed and cost." No shit sherlock. Just figure that out yesterday? Why would anyone even CONSIDER using an inkjet for a 400 page manual????? The only time I use an inkjet is when I really need color on a few pages. If I'm dealing with a large document, I'll print it on the laser, and just reprint a couple color pages on the inkjet if needed.

      Furthermore, color lasers are now getting really cheap. While they suck for photos, they are great for manuals, web pages, etc.

    2. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

      I have an hp LaserJet 1320 and it's quite a nice printer. It's aimed at the home/small-office market, so I don't know if it will be able to handle the capacity you want, but I've printed documents a few hundred pages long and it's worked fine. I believe it supports both PostScript and PCL, and it can duplex. It does 22ppm non-duplexed, but gets quite a bit slower when duplexing (turning a page around takes more time than feeding a new page). You can get versions with Ethernet networking (1320n), Ethernet networking and a larger (500-page) tray (1320tn), or wireless (802.11b I think) networking (1320nw). The base model (the one I have) costs $400. I'd recommend it, with the caveat that it might not be enterprise-grade-enough for what you're doing. It works great for me though.

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    3. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

      You can find the printer here at hp's website. (The link goes to the small business section.)

      The models they have are:

      • 1320 (no net, one tray, $400)
      • 1320t (no net, two trays, $500)
      • 1320n (Ethernet, one tray, $500)
      • 1320nt (Ethernet, two trays, $600)
      • 1320nw (802.11b/g, one tray, $550)

      Each of the one or two paper trays holds 250 sheets, so you have to load them separately. All of them have a manual feed above the paper tray. All of them have USB 2.0, and the ones without networking (the 1320 and 1320t) have a parallel port as well.

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    4. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative
      A better option is to buy a refurbished laserjet 2100. I got one with a refilled toner cart and a 90 day warranty for $162.50 shipped. I then spent a further $85 or so getting a 10/100MBPS EIO card (J3113A) for it. The printer will do some kind of fancy print mode at 600 dpi where it varies the size of toner dots, and will print 300 or 1200 dpi as well. It is designed to print 20,000 pages a month.

      For still more money, you can get duplex, a second tray, et cetera. I intend to purchase the postscript simm (about $30) which doubles the memory to only 8MB (sufficient for manuals, though) and provides PS level 2 emulation, to augment the PCL 5 that the printer normally speaks.

      The laserjet 2100 is one of HP's finest black and white laser printers, and you can trivially find one with ethernet, or buy one and an ethernet EIO print server, for less than $300. They are not the fastest printers around but my 2100 will probably still be working when the last 1320 has failed :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1, Informative
      Even a cheap laser without duplexing can still do two-sided printing. You just have to flip the stack over manually and print even / odd pages.
      ** DANGER ** DANGER ** WILL ROBINSON ** Do NOT re-feed laser-printed pages in a laser printer, especially if you flip them over.

      The xerographic printing process involves a fusing step, where the paper is heated to high temperature between two rollers, in order to melt the powdered ink. Only the roller on the ink side is designed to be impergious to the molten ink, so when you pass the sheet again, the ink will often melt and stain the other roll, which will then stain every following sheet. Fixing it involves replacing the whole fuser unit ($$$OUCH$$$).

      Note: some very specialized printers are designed to allow page-flipping; so make sure that the printer documentation explicitly states so.

    6. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to do this with an HP 4l at work, not an "enterprise" printer, just a little desktop laser dating to the 90's. We're talking printing downloaded RPG books scanned to PDF with full page coverage because of the backgrounds. I did it for over a year and printed dozens of books of a couple hundred pages each. It ate toner like a son of a bitch, but it never "stained" anything. Perhaps you're simply talking out of your ass? In fact, I just looked around for anyone else reporting this "staining" and I can't find it. Yet I can find countless people flipping pages over manually. Not to mention the dozens of cheap auto-duplexing lasers ("very specialized" indeed). Yep, it's confirmed. You, sir, are an ass-talker.

    7. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Note: some very specialized printers are designed to allow page-flipping; so make sure that the printer documentation explicitly states so.

      Read "some very specialized printers" as "almost any laser printer sold in the last ten years."

      To be blunt, the way to tell if your manufacturer supports it is to ask them. Some very cheap, commercial-quality printers do this just fine. (The $150 Brother HL-1440 I use not only doesn't have a problem, but includeds a duplex printing mode in its drivers.)

      Oh, and it's not @#$!ing "ink". It's "toner." Ink is a liquid, that, in "inkjets", permeates quite a bit deeper into the paper than tonor-flakes.

    8. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I'll one up your Laserjet 2100 (we have one at home) and say a better option is to grab a used Laserjet II or III. They were designed to replace the parts, rather than be thrown away when something dies on it, so they'll last forever. You can pick them up on ebay for about $25. That's cheap enough to buy two extras as parts machines, and still be less than half the price you spent on your 2100 :) . They only print at 300dpi though. I garuntee my two decade old LJII will still be working when the last 2100 and 1320 have failed.

      Oh, and being old as dirt (as printers go), toner is appropriately (dirt) cheap.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    9. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by The_Dougster · · Score: 1

      I sorta did this. I purchased a formerly top of the line HP LaserJet 4M+ on Ebay, added the big memory module, and its working just dandy. That thing is a real workhorse.

      --
      Clickety Click ...
    10. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by jalet · · Score: 1

      100% agreed !

      I had the chance to get a second hand HP2100 with integrated Ethernet + PostScript for 100 Euros. It had only printed 30000 pages.

      Needless to say, I'm HAPPY !!!

      --
      Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
    11. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bullocks. Most modern laser printers have duplexers as OPTIONS. Guess what they do: flip the paper over and run it through again. I've never seen a laser printer that has had problems with 2 sided (manual) printing - even printers almost 20 years ago. This includes xerox, lexmark, HP, brother, samsung, cannon, Oki, and others.

      If you actually came across a printer that has this horrible design defect, please let us all know so we can avoid that brand / model.

    12. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by arb · · Score: 2, Informative

      ** DANGER ** DANGER ** WILL ROBINSON ** Do NOT re-feed laser-printed pages in a laser printer, especially if you flip them over.

      Rubbish!

      As others have pointed out already, many of today's laser printers are designed to be used with duplex units. There is no problem with printing on the reverse side of an already laser-printed sheet. It's even quite feasible to over-print laser-printed forms.

      What you shouldn't do is over-print onto photocopied forms. That's where you can cause some problems with the toner being "melted" off the paper. Laser printers fuse their toner at a higher temperature than most photocopiers, so the printer will melt the photocopier's toner. Fixing this problem merely entails printing a half dozen or so sheets though, as by then the bulk of the toner will have been refused onto the sheets (which will be "stained" as you point out.) Not an overly expensive fix, but a PITA.

      So some handy hints:

      1) Printing on both sides of your paper is quite safe and environmentally friendly.
      2) Don't over-print onto photocopied sheets or print on the back of photocopied sheets.
      3) Use a good quality toner - some cheap recycled cartridges may cause issues with re-feeding sheets, but generally are fine.
      4) If you do have a problem with the toner from a previous print job causing streaking on following sheets, just print a few test pages until the streaking goes away - shouldn't take more than a few sheets. You don't need to replace the whole fuser unit.

    13. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the GP and other responder stated, it depends on the printer. I've had problems with some; others have worked fine.

    14. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      A $500 dolalr printer is COMPLETELY inadequate to the task. First, how many PPM does it do? Not likely anywhere near as high as a 75 or 92 or even a 135 ppm production printer with a sticher. Go to Kinkos or do it at work if you have access to high speed machines like I do. You will save time, sanity and toner...if your employer allows you.

      --

      Gorkman

    15. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Nice printer, but I still would not print a 800 page pdf on it. Would take WAYYY too much time.

      --

      Gorkman

    16. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      They are also dog slow and have barely any memory, and cannot be upgraded to have larger amounts of memory. Speaking from experience, it is entirely possible to create a document that will not print on a LJ II or III, but will print on a later printer. If I were going to buy one of the classic laserjets, it would have to be a 4.

      The 2100 was also designed with repair in mind. I personally have replaced a paper feed/fuser kit on one of these printers, and it is cake.

      Laserjet II and III were fantastic back in the day, and they ARE cheap, but odds are if you get one for that price you're going to have to rebuild it soon anyway. Also, the footprint of those things is amazingly huge for their capabilities, again by modern standards. The 2100 is large enough as it is, but I do agree it's worth it to spend some space on rebuildability.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      How many megs are required for modern printing requirements? Our LJII has two 4 meg modules; seems to work fine.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    18. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by jackbird · · Score: 1
      Did the same, first with a III, now with a 4MV (11x17, baby!) that I got for the price of a luggage cart to get it home on the subway when an office moved and left it behind.

      If you are keeping one of these old things alive, Moe, at fixyourownprinter is an invaluable resource, not just for the kits for common repairs that include video CDs of the installation that he sells, but for the straightforward advice he gives out in the forums even if he never sees a dime. I'm not affiliated with them, just a very happy customer of their repair kits.

    19. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you are "fortunate" enough to get a document with high-resolution graphics, and actually want to print them, the memory requirements can be quite high. I have starved many an 8MB printer trying to print graphic images no higher-resolution than the printer is supposedly capable of.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Ah, ok. Comming from a family who does engineering and finacial stuff, the most we ever use our printer for is word documents, PDF files, and maps.google.com. Since the laser printer works so well, when we need to do color, it goes to walmart, kinkos, or B&W photo (professional photo printer). Waaaay cheaper than buying the $200 printer + $60 in ink every 6 months :)

      (plus we only do/need color printing about once every other month)

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    21. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should check around local used computer shops. They've got 4500's for prices that would break your heart. When I say that it was like seeing Suicide Kings at Target for $5.50 all over again. It's just so much better than that.

    22. Re:laserprinters are way cheap now by samuraichef · · Score: 1

      Seconded! (thirded? fourthed? whatever...) I got myself an HP LaserJet 4M+ off of eBay for about $150 including shipping three years ago. I use that thing far more than the shiny new color printer that came with my Mac. It's nice and all... but who really needs color when you're printing stuff like manuals and video game cheat codes?

  4. notebook/tablet by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First of all, someone needs to call these companies and scream at them until they stop using PDF. If they never intended to print it, there's no point to PDF for a manual. HTML is just fine, and most browsers (including Mozilla) are more lightweight than the official Acrobat Reader.

    Second, if you need to read any sort of electronic document, why not read it electronically? I mean, paper is nice because you can use it even when your computer breaks. Any other reason you want paper? Because you can probably get a decent notebook/tablet pc for less the cost of the equipment to print an 800-page book cheaply, and that way, the text is searchable -- no more thumbing through indexes.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:notebook/tablet by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Unless it has changed recently, getting PDFs to work properly on some Unixes has been a pain in the ass. I've seen a number of big unix companies that *only* distribute their documentations in PDF. That makes life quite difficult.

    2. Re:notebook/tablet by Improv · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can understand that ggv has some possibly tricky dependencies, but xpdf is pretty easy to compile on any Unix. I've compiled it on a number of oddball unices without problem.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    3. Re:notebook/tablet by seann · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      mac os x

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    4. Re:notebook/tablet by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 1
      I mean, paper is nice because you can use it even when your computer breaks. Any other reason you want paper?

      Yes, yes there is. For library reference documents (ie programming libs) then yes a laptop or second screen makes sense - heck, if you have a browser open anyway on a second monitor like I do just open it in a tab.

      If you're looking at something that doesn't have a natural hierarchy though, like generic documentation or specs or stuff, being able to flip several dozen pages in under a second is good. And deciding you're a dozen pages off at a glance without needing to wait for the pdf reader to render a nice postscript image is good too.

    5. Re:notebook/tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also KPDF, which actually just had an impressive overhaul for KDE 3.4, and the new Adobe Reader 7.0

    6. Re:notebook/tablet by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Informative
      First of all, someone needs to call these companies and scream at them until they stop using PDF. If they never intended to print it, there's no point to PDF for a manual. HTML is just fine, and most browsers (including Mozilla) are more lightweight than the official Acrobat Reader.

      Perhaps they never intend on printing it, but they know many end users will want to, and honestly, HTML is not "just fine" to many people (like me) who appreciate the formatting of the PDF documentation, not the least of which is not having tables and images cut in two (and many other formatting issues)...

      Second, if you need to read any sort of electronic document, why not read it electronically?

      Because for many people, searching and cross referencing data are much more efficiant with hard copy. Many people like having a manual open next to them when they work, and do not like having to flip back and forth to some electronic document.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    7. Re:notebook/tablet by frantzen · · Score: 1

      Hey "salesguy bob" can you send me the updated manual for XYZ... How is he going to do that if it's html? What about all of the diagrams and figures? Tarball? Windows users can't read it. Zip file? Some unix users can't read it. What about formatting differences between html renderers?

      PDF stands for portable document format. Think about it.

      Sometimes I want dead tree manuals so I can get away from my computer for awhile and peruse it by the pool or the beach. Ever try using an LCD display in the sun? And for this I don't want HTML. I want PDF so I have page numbers and a usuable index.

    8. Re:notebook/tablet by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Because you can probably get a decent notebook/tablet pc for less the cost of the equipment to print an 800-page book cheaply, and that way, the text is searchable -- no more thumbing through indexes.

      Unless you have a source for equipment that has recently "fallen off of the back of a truck" it's going to be cheaper to go to Kinkos.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    9. Re:notebook/tablet by mschaffer · · Score: 1

      Because you can probably get a decent notebook/tablet pc for less the cost of the equipment to print an 800-page book cheaply.

      There are some very nice and inexpensive laser printers out there! Much less expensive than even a crappy laptop. And then there's the used equipment market...

      Any other reason you want paper?

      Yup, you just cant spread out all of your manuals on a large table when you use a laptop. Sometimes, paper is just better.

      Of course, I don't want a huge inventory of manuals that I don't reference frequently. However, there are always those manuals you can quickly grab off the shelf and flip open to get what you need very quickly. Electronic files are not always better.

      Besides, the original poster wanted to print a manual---not an argument for not printing a manual.

    10. Re:notebook/tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can't read zip files on unix ? Name one unix that zip and unzip aren't available for ? I would imagine anyone smart enough to use Unix can handle downloading a 300K executable.

    11. Re:notebook/tablet by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      HTML isn't just fine at all. HTML formatting is horrible compared to the output from a professional typesetting package converted to PDF.

      Secondly, printed documents are far easier to read. This is no mere luddism - I have thoroughly embraced ebooks. But most ebooks are read sequentially. Technical documentation isn't. Paper documents let you easily flick back and forth between the current page and the appendix at the back that explains what's going on, or rapidly flick through pages. And most importantly of all, reading paper documents is better for some undefinable reason that I can't even begin to describe but which makes the difference between something I can't read and something I can.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    12. Re:notebook/tablet by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Even if we assume that "If they never intended to print it, there's no point to PDF for a manual." is true, you have to allow the converse, "If anyone ever intends to print it, then HTML is a bad idea".

      Making HTML printable involves even worse kludges than making PDF viewable on-screen.

      Cheapest new tablet PC I can find via Froogle (no idea if it is decent or not, just the cheapest) is $750 - I think you can find someone to do a 800 page book for less than a dollar a page can't you?

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    13. Re:notebook/tablet by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      That's the point of the tablet. You have the tablet next to you as you work.

      Many people use computers in the first place because, with an 800 page manual, it's just more practical to do things the Google Way.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    14. Re:notebook/tablet by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      PDF is portable, but loses in every other respect. Kind of like Java.

      And maybe it's easier on his bandwidth for "salesguy bob" to send you a URL, not a zip...

      Differences between browsers? Hey, if someone's thinking of going to Kinko's, they can download a 5 meg browser (Firefox). I'm pretty sure you can do SVG on that, so there are your diagrams and figures right there, probably very printable.

      I've tried using paper in the sun, and I prefer an LCD under an umbrella to white paper, reflecting so much sun I have to wear shades just to read a book. But then, I don't have to deal with this too much. I live in Iowa.

      Page numbers hyperlinks and searches
      Usable index? I prefer my indices to have said hyperlinks.

      Based on that last sentence, I'm amazed that you even use Slashdot -- it sounds like something someone who's never touched a browser would say.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    15. Re:notebook/tablet by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Original poster was asking for an argument, or they wouldn't have sent this to Slashdot.

      In my own experience, electronic text files are always better. But maybe it's just that I actually have more experience organizing tabs and using keyboard shortcuts than creating piles of papers. Maybe it's that I can usually find what I want off Google faster than someone else can find it off a shelf.

      But then, that would be an argument for someone to get more experience using electronic files, not to get more paper files.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    16. Re:notebook/tablet by tepples · · Score: 1

      Zip file? Some unix users can't read it.

      Info-ZIP UnZip is said to be the third most portable program available publicly as source code.

    17. Re:notebook/tablet by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      ebooks are sequential? Sure. But nonlinear stuff is better in text? Are you joking?

      I can rapidly flick around like you wouldn't believe. Ctrl+tab and ctrl+shift+tab in Firefox + ctrl+alt+left/right in GNOME means I gain very little by having a manual in hardcopy.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    18. Re:notebook/tablet by tepples · · Score: 1

      Hey, if someone's thinking of going to Kinko's, they can download a 5 meg browser (Firefox). I'm pretty sure you can do SVG on that, so there are your diagrams and figures right there, probably very printable.

      And watch an SVG diagram get split between pages.

    19. Re:notebook/tablet by tepples · · Score: 1

      But most ebooks are read sequentially. Technical documentation isn't.

      You can't hyperlink in paper as easily as you can in HTML or PDF.

      Paper documents let you easily flick back and forth between the current page and the appendix at the back that explains what's going on

      And switching to a different window or tab doesn't?

      And most importantly of all, reading paper documents is better for some undefinable reason

      Like marking around the edge of your CDs will make them sound "better" to an audiophile?

    20. Re:notebook/tablet by Lady_Neil · · Score: 1

      Second, if you need to read any sort of electronic document, why not read it electronically? I mean, paper is nice because you can use it even when your computer breaks. Any other reason you want paper?

      Yes, I like to anotate ideas I get while reading on the subject.
      Usually, the margins of my books are full of useful anotations I can refer to later on.

    21. Re:notebook/tablet by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      Like marking around the edge of your CDs will make them sound better to an audiophile?
      So you're eyes are so insensitive you can't tell the difference between a printed page and what's on the screen. I pity you.
      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    22. Re:notebook/tablet by Improv · · Score: 1

      True, but installing KDE on many non-Linux, non-BSD systems is nontrivial (although not as hard as GNOME). Adobe Acrobat Reader 7 isn't available as source, so for many platforms, it's not an option (although they're pretty good at supporting a lot of the more popular platforms).

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    23. Re:notebook/tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can rapidly flick around like you wouldn't believe. Ctrl+tab and ctrl+shift+tab in Firefox + ctrl+alt+left/right in GNOME means I gain very little by having a manual in hardcopy.
      I invite you to follow up with slashdot in 10 years, after those delightful key chords have petrified your metacarpi, and tell us whether you'd rather have read the book instead.

      -- Tim O'Reilly

    24. Re:notebook/tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Original poster was asking for an argument, or they wouldn't have sent this to Slashdot."

      Now that's just fucking stupid.

    25. Re:notebook/tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're eyes are so insensitive

      "your".

    26. Re:notebook/tablet by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      And maybe it's easier on his bandwidth for "salesguy bob" to send you a URL, not a zip...

      That is not acceptable in many, many cases. For security reasons usually only one or two people in a client company will have access to the login/password to get manuals on many products. They are usually not the people using it. The internet is not always accessible. People use manuals on their laptops on the plane and in locations where they are working on setting up a network or their is a networking problem.

      Differences between browsers? Hey, if someone's thinking of going to Kinko's, they can download a 5 meg browser (Firefox). I'm pretty sure you can do SVG on that, so there are your diagrams and figures right there, probably very printable.

      Have you ever tried to actually print web pages? It sucks. They don't fit well to a page. Also loading proprietary information onto a browser at Kinkos is a big no-no in many cases.

      I prefer an LCD under an umbrella to white paper, reflecting so much sun I have to wear shades just to read a book.

      LCDs and pretty much all monitors emit light. That makes it impossible to reduce the eyestrain as much as paper under normal lighting.

      Page numbers hyperlinks and searches Usable index? I prefer my indices to have said hyperlinks.

      PDF indexes and TOCs have hyperlinks for most people. If you use a good PDF viewer (read not Adobe) then they usually have very nice auxilliary contents as well. They are also easier to search than a series of web pages.

      On top of that PDFs are exact for diagrams and text relation, not approximate, like HTML. They are contained in a single file. They print very well. They are easily searchable.

      When I write a document I make sure to provide it as HTML and PDF. Both are better for particular use cases. Many people don't like PDF, but this is mostly the result of using Windows in combination with the God-awful Adobe PDF reader. The lack of multitasking in Windows combined with the snail-slow reader makes the whole experience awful. Also, many users view PDFs within a browser which further slows the process. The PDF format itself, however, is very nice. Try ditching Windows and Adobe PDF reader and giving PDF another try. I know every time I use windows and have to open one I curse as the whole machine grinds to a halt. Luckily, I hardly ever use Windows these days.

    27. Re:notebook/tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't there exist PDF -> HTML converters? I guess they may need OCR to work if the PDF consists of a bunch of images.

      I for one look forward to the day when OOo starts to offer editing of PDFs. Then you can just take the components of your PDF and split them back out into files in the format they came from.

      By the way, why not just hang onto your old 486 laptop for use as a PDF bookreaderto have alongside your screamin' modern machine while you work?

    28. Re:notebook/tablet by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      HTML is just fine

      ...until you have a detailed technical drawing with specifically-located text labels in it.

      And you want to zoom in without hitting some blocky aliasing artifacts from a bitmap.

      SVG, easily rendered and easily created and edited with free tools is what is required to obsolete PDF.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    29. Re:notebook/tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Zip file? Some unix users can't read it.

      I bet more unix users can open a zip file than a pdf file.

    30. Re:notebook/tablet by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      You seem to be arguing both for and against printing it out. And yes, I've used other readers -- gv, gpdf, even Google -- and I still say HTML is better for reading on the machine. Especially when I can just hit / for find-as-you-type in Firefox.

      Anyway, other rebuttals, with requisite italic-quoting, in no particular order:

      Have you ever tried to actually print web pages? It sucks.

      Actually, yes. My only complaint is that most browsers print the title and URL of the page.

      LCDs and pretty much all monitors emit light.

      We're almost there. Elecronic paper...

      But even without that, my eyes are pretty well adjusted.

      For security reasons usually only one or two people in a client company will have access to the login/password to get manuals...

      WOAH. Well, that's a technical problem right there. Manuals as trade secrets? But I'm a raving Linux guy, so my reaction is probably misplaced... ...The internet is not always accessible.

      wget -r

      The PDF format itself, however, is very nice.

      As an end format, maybe. But I'd never have that as the only document. I like my sources transparent.

      When I write a document I make sure to provide it as HTML and PDF.

      Good for you! In that case, I don't think I need to convince you of anything -- as long as I can read the HTML and others can read the PDF.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    31. Re:notebook/tablet by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      PDF would be fine if a 3rd party viewer came out that was as full featured as acrobat reader but didn't insist on running the background taking up 60 megs of ram just because you happened to open a pdf hours ago, but didn't close IE. Adobe is also getting really bad about installing scrapbook software and a bunch of other junk when you try to get the free reader as well.

  5. Copy Center by Jeremy.DeGroot · · Score: 1

    How much would Kinko's or OfficeMax or some other commercial copy center charge for this kind of service? It would doubtless be more expensive than having an employer do it for you, but it might be reasonably cost effective if you only need one copy. If I were to try and print 400 double-sided pages on my school's printers, that would run me $28, plus another $2 or so to bind it, so it might beat doing it at a university as well (an important concern for those of us turning in theses).

  6. You've got to be kidding me. by Seumas · · Score: 1

    I can't believe this question is actually being asked, but . . .

    Get a photocopier or laser printer. Get some binding materials - your local office store can help you with that. Then follow the instructions. It's not difficult and it isn't expensive.

    In fact, I'm sure if you asked the office admins at work, they would know EXACTLY how to solve your problem. They're good at that sort of thing.

  7. PrintFu by rebug · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sounds like PrintFu is what you're after.

    --

    there's more than one way to do me.
  8. a cheap old laptop by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

    If you can find a think-pad(or any slightly older laptop with a good quality screen , i would recomend a powerbook /ibook(OS x and its native PDF functionality are great for this) or thinkpad) from 2000 or so (may need a new battery unless you can live with being attached to a wall socket) it will make a grand glorified library . This will in the long run save you alot of a cash on print outs . I use an old laptop for the same thing.
    Just an alternate idea . having a browse around ebay some older laptops are going for around the same price as laser printers so it may be worth a shot .

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:a cheap old laptop by Black+Noise · · Score: 1

      Why not just add another screen instead? Or if all else fails: mpage + magnifying glass.

      --

      Cig? No, thank you.
    2. Re:a cheap old laptop by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Could work , but with the laptop you can also cary it around and have a read when your not at the desk and you wouldnt be tied down as much.Its a flexability thing realy.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    3. Re:a cheap old laptop by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      I got a PDA from work. It came with the Adobe Reader. Lately, I have been putting all sorts of books and papers on my PDA so I can read them over lunch. Not as nice as dead-tree for the actual reading, but much more portable, considering the ~20MB's of mostly plain text PDF's I carry around with me. Japanese, Objective C, Graphics Papers, Manuals, all sorts of stuff.

      And, with the SD card I got, I can carry around two episodes of a TV show. So, I have got a Japanese reference text (several, actually), as well as at least one episode of some old PBS style Japanese TV program from the 80's, whenever I go to lunch.

      I still spend a too large portion of my disposable income on dead trees, but the PDA is a huge benefit. I wish all my dead tree books came with PDF's of themselves.

  9. One word: Kinko's by crmartin · · Score: 1

    Go to Kinko's web site. They will find a Kinkos near you, which in general will only be a few miles away. You can either upload the document, or if it's reasonably small, you can email it to the place you want it printed. You can get it printed for about $5 + 8 cents a page with a plastic comb binding or wire coil binding and covers. I like to get a clear plastic front cover and a black plastic back cover; if it's reasonably small --- say 150 pages or less --- you can get tape binding, which I think is a little more convenient, and cheaper, but not quite as durable. They'll also do Word documents and postscript.

    They'll even deliver it or FedEx it to you if yu're a long ways away.

    1. Re:One word: Kinko's by FidelCatsro · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Of course if your talking a large manual which can run into the hundreds of pages (i have seen them at 800 or more) you could be talking about as much as 5.00+( 0.08*800.00)=69 USD (chuckle). I also assume that this would not be a one off so over the course of a year you could be talking several hundread Cold green.
      Even for a slim 150 page manual your talking 17 USD . For those types of prices you cant get some nice reference books.

      My soloution (which i use myself and which i stated in an earlyer post) was to get an older laptop with a nice screen to use as a glorified book reader.
      I paid 200 for a P3-600mhz with 256MB ram(a really good price at the time, so perhaps it will cost you a little more. Though a 600mhz p3 is overkill for just a pdf reader, but i use it for other things aswell) with a nice 15" screen . It has served me well and works great as a glorified book reader.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:One word: Kinko's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      You seem pretty familar with the capitalist calculations of price and volume, Castro . Didn't you really mean to say "The state saw fit to provide me for my needs a P3-600mhz with 256 ram" ? How would you know the price ?

      You aren't the REAL Fidel Castro at all. I call you out as an impostor.

    3. Re:One word: Kinko's by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Im fidel Catsro ,im his feline contemprary Mewhahhahahaah.I dictate the small nation state of cbua Our plan to dominate the world via shrewed bussines acumin is in full effect.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    4. Re:One word: Kinko's by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      I was doing a lot of this kind of stuff with Kinko's for a while. They were horrible. They would always find some way to mess up the job. The level of hassle was very high.

    5. Re:One word: Kinko's by moonbender · · Score: 1

      When dealing with more than a hundred pages, you'd probably print on both sides of the paper. Great if your printer is duplex capable, slightly annoying if it's not - but still manageable once you figure it out, and easily worth it considering the savings in paper and, crucially, in weight. Also, most people seem to manage reading smaller text, so by printing two pages on one side by side you end up with a quarter of the pages. Still a lot of dead trees, though.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    6. Re:One word: Kinko's by crmartin · · Score: 1

      Work out what it costs per page to print it on your own printer, Fidel. My HP Laserjet costs me about $80 a cartridge and I believe I get 7000-8000 pages from it --- call it 8000, make it simple --- plus 8000 pages of paper for around $8 per thousand, and the printing cost alone is around 2 cents a page. Add in the laser printer, a device to bind the copies, and the covers, and you're probably in the neighborhood of 6 cents a page.

      So yeah, you're paying another couple cents a page to get someone else to do it for you, keep all that specialized hardware, and to redo the job for free if they fuck it up.

      As far as the viewer idea goes, not only is it another box to keep running, but some of us --- especially old farts like me --- don't find reading on a screen all that comfortable.

    7. Re:One word: Kinko's by crmartin · · Score: 1

      I have pretty good luck with my local Kinko's but your mileage etc. I want to try out this PrintFu thing.

    8. Re:One word: Kinko's by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      ;) Im a slightly younger old fart i guess heh, I Actualy prefer to read on the screen as i can zoom and filter colours with the but the typing of a command, Add to that the space argument as i have enough books laying around as it is , so for me a digital soloution works

      Though i can totaly understand an aversion to reading on the screem ,I know a few people who just can't do it for a sustained length or time(/Head-aches or eye-strain)

      As for the "Another box to keep runing" thing , Well ...I am a bti of a masochistic geek ;)

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    9. Re:One word: Kinko's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if your talking a large manual

      "you're".

      which i stated in an earlyer post

      "I", "earlier".

    10. Re:One word: Kinko's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kinkos' pricing sucks, PrintFu.org will do it cheaper, and they will deliver it. I tried Kinkos online Ordering thing 100 times and it never worked on various PDFs. I did PrintFu the first time, and it worked great.

    11. Re:One word: Kinko's by chris_eineke · · Score: 1
      My soloution (which i use myself and which i stated in an earlyer post) was to get an older laptop with a nice screen to use as a glorified book reader.
      I paid 200 for a P3-600mhz with 256MB ram(a really good price at the time, so perhaps it will cost you a little more. Though a 600mhz p3 is overkill for just a pdf reader, but i use it for other things aswell) with a nice 15" screen.
      Two words: Nintendo DS.
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
  10. Layout by BrynM · · Score: 1

    Most printers (and Acrobat, I believe) offer the ability to print multiple pages to one sheet of paper. Unless you need the hardcopy for constant reference, printing 4 pages per side per sheet of paper can be quite readable. It cuts down on wasted paper and cuts down on printing time.

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    1. Re:Layout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternately, modern versions of a2ps will do the same thing.

  11. Not intended as a troll or flame, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What proper nerd hasn't played around with his/her office's binding machines?

  12. Multi-up by redelm · · Score: 3, Informative
    Usually when I have this task, it's for work and I have access to a double sided laser printer. Then I use the printer driver features to print two or four pages per side of 8.5x11" floppy.

    Most large doc are laid-out for printing on smaller paper and are actually oversized on A4/8.5x11. This is only good if you have reduced visual acuity. I don't, and usually go for the 4x to save paper and page flipping.

  13. matrix printer! by rixdaffy · · Score: 1


    ah reminds me of those good old days when I had a matrix printer. sure they made a lot of noise, but it was pretty quick with printing out hunderds of pages with huge source code listings. and you didn't have to worry that much about running out of paper.

  14. Drive around... by Jarn_Firebrand · · Score: 2, Funny

    until you find a company that works with printers. Sneak in, act like an employee, and tell them you're "testing" the printers... then print what you need and get out of there quickly!

  15. Cafe Press? by cei · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.cafepress.com/cp/info/help/learn_book.a spx does mass printing of PDF files, double-sized, bound. Sure, it costs a little bit, but probably less than trying to pull it off yourself.

    --
    This sig intentionally left justified.
    1. Re:Cafe Press? by cei · · Score: 1

      er, that was "double-sided" (now I'm imagining some breakthrough documentary about a guy who goes to Kinko's every day and says "double-side me", and the health implications thereof.)

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    2. Re:Cafe Press? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I was going to suggest that, too - the cost is actually not that bad - but then I realized that they probably won't let you use work copyrighted by someone else. Since it's not really supposed to be a service for one person to get one copy of a book, but for you to put your book online for others to buy copies of.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  16. Put more than one virtual page on an actual page by ahudson · · Score: 0

    Convert the pdf to a ps file, use psnup to put 4 pages onto a single page, print front and back. 800 pages becomes 100 pages.

  17. "Fineprint" for windows by ru-486 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    An excellent program if you're into printing manuals yourself is http://www.fineprint.com/products/fineprint/index. html It is a virtual printer that allows some cool options. My favorite being the ability to fit multiple pages onto a sheet thereby saving time, ink and paper. Here's a list of the feature from the website: Print Preview: Universal print preview with editing capability. Easily add blank pages, delete pages, and re-sequence jobs. Ink Saver: Provides options to convert colored text to black and skip graphics. Multiple Pages on a single sheet: Print 2, 4 or 8 pages on a single sheet of paper. Watermarks Headers and Footers: Watermark, header and footer option allows documents to be marked with the date, time, system variables or custom text. Forms and Letterheads: Allows the simplified creation of electronic forms and letterhead. The preview feature shows how output will appear before you print it to ensure correct alignment. Combine Print Jobs: Allows multiple documents to be combined together as a single print job. This is useful for creating booklets based on web pages, etc. File saving: Save pages and jobs to TIFF, JPEG, BMP, text and FP formats. Clipboard Support: Any printed output can be copied to the clipboard in text, bitmap or Double Sided Printing Support: Booklet making and double sided printing are supported with all documents and printers. Booklets create a professional touch to all documents and are easy to read and carry. Double sided printing cuts paper use in half and reduces travel weight. Paper Scaling: Allows large pages to be scaled to that they fit on standard paper sizes such as letter or A4. Adjustable Margins: Margin adjustment allows for increased text sizes for better readability, by using more of the printable area on the page. Gutter Support: Gutter capability provides space for binding documents. Multiple FinePrinters: Multiple FinePrinters can be created. This allows the creation of "virtual printers" that have different pre-defined settings. For example, you could have a "booklet printer" that automatically prints a booklet or a "letterhead printer" that prints on your letterhead without the FinePrint dialog box appearing. Easy server deployment: Install on a server as a shared printer for easy group or enterprise deployment.

    1. Re:"Fineprint" for windows by ru-486 · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the previous post and the lack of line breaks!

    2. Re:"Fineprint" for windows by mschaffer · · Score: 1

      Most of these features are supported by many laser printer drivers already.

    3. Re:"Fineprint" for windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pdf995 for windows works pretty well and does most of this stuff as well. Install is a little confusing, as it's divided into about 5 parts that you have to download and install individually in a particular order, which is stupid when they could just do a "install_all.exe". Anyway you have to put up with some crummy advertising, but it does write pdf's for free and allow limited pdf editing. Runs circles around cutepdf, which is the only other free pdf printing software that I've used. They both use ghostscript as a base and then build features on top of that.

    4. Re:"Fineprint" for windows by anti-trojan · · Score: 1

      I didn't see any printer driver that automatically sorts pages to create a booklet like FinePrint, though. It is not rocket science but somehow they don't add such nice features.

    5. Re:"Fineprint" for windows by AstroSurf · · Score: 1

      Right on! FinePrint is a great utility. I just printed the 110-page book A Byte of Python on just 7 letter-sized pages! This is just too cool to not have. I know that everyone here has large print jobs on occasion and small print jobs that need tricking out. So... you must go to http://www.fineprint.com/ and download a copy. You'll be glad you did!

      --
      Astro
    6. Re:"Fineprint" for windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using this great little program for many years. Most of the time I just use it for the fact that it always gives me print preview, and for saving a print job to a file instead of actually printing it out (ie for online reciepts). But occasionally I use it for saving paper/toner as well.

  18. Kinko's! by mgahs · · Score: 1

    Take it to Kinko's, or Staples, or any other print center. It'll cost you, but they can bind it for you too. They'll do it right and for a decent price, too.

  19. Laser &c by sepluv · · Score: 1
    Uhh....a cheap laser printer. They're pretty much the same price these days (say $25~$50 for something reasonable) but have a tiny proportion of the running cost.

    Also, use a long plastic thing that keeps the pages together (or a stapler--more fiddly) for binding. Else, you could get a binding machine that makes holes that you put the prongs of one of those cylindrical plastic binding thingies through--that will last forever.

    The really easy option for binding is to just print booklet style (using your printer drivers or printing system--failing that use a PS/PDF convertor like impose+, mpage or poster first) so the pages will then stay together when folded (esp. if helped along with the odd staple).

    --
    Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
    [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
  20. Outscource the job to Kinko's by mysticgoat · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was just looking at a very similar problem:

    • Manual of about 300 pages in .pdf format
    • want double sided
    • want binding that can be used effectively (stay open at desired page)
    • want some durability-- I figure about a year before updates or errata make this obsolete

    The Kinko's in SE Portland quotes me about $25 for a single copy, double side printing, comb bound with vinyl cover. Add $1 to do spiral bound. There would be a discount for multiple copies-- and at this price doing a copy for each of us, and a couple of spares for the Jolt spills, might be a good idea.

    No way I could do this "in house" for such a low cost.

    1. Re:Outscource the job to Kinko's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's not a low cost. Consider calling some competitors, such as a local printshop (the kind that do business cards, broshures and flyers, wedding invitations, etc).

      If you are really going to do a number of copies, for example several hundred copies of the CVS manual for a software company or something, you should be aware of recent advances in short-run paper back publishing. In the "vanity publishing" industry, they now have machines that are essentially giant laser printers with binder/cutter/folders integrated, so that the paper and ink go in one end and a fully finished and coverd paperback pops out the other. These machines have drastically lowered costs.

    2. Re:Outscource the job to Kinko's by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      That's not a low cost. Consider calling some competitors, such as a local printshop (the kind that do business cards, broshures and flyers, wedding invitations, etc).

      For a one-shot of 1 - 6 copies, yes, this was low cost. Since I don't have any free labor available, the cost of comparison shopping for something less than Kinko's quote would be more than any likely savings.

      If you are really going to do a number of copies..., you should be aware of recent advances in short-run paper back publishing.

      I didn't know this. Thanks, if I'm in that situation, I will certainly look into the vanity presses.

  21. less by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    That's why you force them to not use PDF, and try to convert it to something else, if that's possible.

    And flipping several dozen pages in under a second? Isn't that like typing "300g" in less?

    Or better: have the relevant stuff open in tabs, so that flipping through everythnig is done with ctrl+tab, not flipping through several dozen pages looking for something familiar.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:less by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      It's a psychology issue. Maybe in another generation or so this won't be as much of a problem but human beings are trained to index things, in their minds, in book form. That book form has a TOC, an index, chapters, and pages which are physically turned.

      Let's assume you've read a particular book more than three times (I've read LotR and the first six DragonLance novels better than a dozen times). If I had an electronic copy and the paper copy side by side, I bet dollars to donuts that I can find a particular passage much faster and much more easily in the printed edition than I can the electronic edition.

      Sure... if you don't know what you're looking for and you don't really know what you're doing then one long searchable electronic stream is just as good as any paper copy. If you really know what you're doing, though, chances are you'll prefer the paper copy.

      As for the 800-page manuals--well, the manufacturer is obviously inept and implementing a ridiculously horrible design. Hopefully they'll go out of business but probably not. Product quality is, in today's world, superseded by business shenanigans and political chicanery. ie. Superior advertising will beat superior design almost every time.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    2. Re:less by Spoing · · Score: 1
      "It's a psychology issue. Maybe in another generation or so this won't be as much of a problem but human beings are trained to index things, in their minds, in book form. That book form has a TOC, an index, chapters, and pages which are physically turned."

      I used to love hard bound books. Now, I can't stand paper in just about any form. If paper forms of written texts were about as practical as electronic forms, I would likely prefer paper. They aren't except in very narrow cases. For example;

      • Dictionary

      • Thesaurus

      • Magazines

      • Encyclopedia

      ...and just about any other reference text are useless because they aren't easily searchable or discoverable as electronic versions -- and the results aren't as up-to-date or as rich. There are exceptions, true, though those are becoming more rare as time goes on.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    3. Re:less by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      Well, there you go. You've made the important distinction which the article and most posters arguing against printed manuals leave out.

      If I'm printing out an 800-page manual, or a 50 page HOWTO, or a 200 page Documentation manual, chances are I'm not using it for reference. Reference is looking for a very specific small bit of information in an enormous pile of available material. For this task, electronic editions are preferable.

      For anything which requires reading more than a single page of text at a time, absorbing it, and using it to build the next page of text on, the printed text is far superior.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    4. Re:less by Spoing · · Score: 1
      For anything which requires reading more than a single page of text at a time, absorbing it, and using it to build the next page of text on, the printed text is far superior.

      While there are clear advantages to using reference materials on computers, the choice of using paper materials for reading longer texts comes from the habit(!) of having done so in the past.

      I used to agree with you and did prefer printed materials -- even considering it 'more natural'. I don't anymore, even for long hours-on-end studying or fiction -- let alone brief reviews of reference materials. Printed text isn't natural -- it's man made just like the display you're looking at.

      My change in opinion came when the resolution went to about 1024x768 for me.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  22. Geek-friendly 3 ring binders! by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Since printing them out is the question here, there are two possible solutions: Send the print job to your high-speed/high-capacity copier, or go to Kinko's and do the same. Results in nifty geek-friendly 3 ring binders! Most of my home library of docs where made in this way!

    I know, all the anti "dead tree" folks are going to come out of the woodwork, but MANY people still prefer to have a tech manual open next to them when they work, rather than flipping back and forth to some electronic document, searching for some information. For many people, the mind can often search, cross-reference, and make sense of data in hard copy MUCH faster than cumbersome electronic documentation.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Geek-friendly 3 ring binders! by Spoing · · Score: 1
      "For many people, the mind can often search, cross-reference, and make sense of data in hard copy MUCH faster than cumbersome electronic documentation."

      I used to be that way. It's a trained habit. You get over it. Electronic only suffers if you want to read it in your bathtub or when on the couch...not an issue for technical docs.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  23. Evil Hard Copy by fm6 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The Imagerunner is a pretty fancy printer, judging from its web site. I 've never used it, but if its like other color laser printers, it'll cost 10 to 15 cents a page just for expendables. And a lot of companies don't buy their high-end printers, they lease them with a by-the-page charge of 25 to 30 cents. Better ask yourself whether you want to spend $200 plus binding costs just to have the manual in hard copy.

    It's probably a good option to print the manual on a monochrome printer. The kind of graphics you see in most software manuals don't really suffer from being reduced to grayscale. Still pretty expensive, though.

    It's very sad that programmers still feel the need to have hardcopy manuals, even as producing them becomes less and less practical. (Not just cost -- there's the difficulty of publishing and distributing physical documentation for rapidly-changing products.) For that, I have to apologize on behalf of my profession, Technical Writing, which has done a really lousing job of keeping up with the state of the art. We're still not good at creating the kind of well-structured electronic documents that make hard copy unnecessary. Even though most of our work never sees hardcopy, we're still horribly bound to desktop publishing models. We should delivering easy-to-use web sites and help files; instead we deliver stupid PDF files that are just huge page dumps. We don't even exploit the PDF format as much as we should -- it's a horribly obsolete format, but it does support some basic hypertext concepts that would be very helpful, if more people bothered to use them.

    Then again, it's not all our fault. As I said, most techwriters are way behind the times in content management technology. But they only get away with it because documentation isn't a big priority. People in the software industry underestimate its importance and are unwilling to spend a lot of money on it. The don't grasp the skill it takes to do the job right, or the technical difficulties involved in creating and maintaining huge masses of documentation. Hint: it's not a lot easier than maintaining equivalent amounts of source code.

    When I say "people in the software industry" I guess I mostly mean "developers". Whose perception drive a lot of decision making. Mangement often is dominated by former developers, and even when it isn't their decisions are colored by the code-hacker's view of reality. So maybe it is your guys' fault after all.

    1. Re:Evil Hard Copy by Kymermosst · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's very sad that programmers still feel the need to have hardcopy manuals, even as producing them becomes less and less practical. (Not just cost -- there's the difficulty of publishing and distributing physical documentation for rapidly-changing products.)

      I hate online/on-screen documentation. It's a pain in the ass. Especially when you've only got *one* machine to both work with the program and read the documentation.

      Or, perhaps the documentation you need is the service manual for your only (broken) machine that can read the documentation.

      Dead trees are just flat out easier to use. For example, when I am working at a computer, say fixing someone else's code, and I need API documentation.

      If I'm using online documentation, I have to dink around with the mouse (on-screen documentation is just about worthless to use with a keyboard... the one exception: Unix man). So, I take the mouse, click the button that brings up the documentation, then I have to scroll through and find what I'm looking for. Then I click again, and scroll. Click and scroll... blah. Then, once I have what I am looking for, I click back to the code and start to do what I need to do. Now, I can't memorize the specifics of a complex API call that fast, so I have to click back to the documentation... then back to the code, work... back to the documentation... back to the code, work. Then, if I think I need this again, I save it as a "bookmark"... accessing this bookmark takes longer than my tape flags on a real book.

      The same situation using a real book? I use the index. This is fast. I see all the applicable pages at one time, and can make an easy guess at the correct one if the pages are numbered by chapter-page. I turn to this page in the book. I return to my code and read the documentation as needed, maybe turning a page on the book. The code stays on the screen the entire time, and for complicated stuff, I can do a side-by-side comparison without having to juggle windows around. If I might need it again, it gets a color-coded tape flag with a note on what code it applies to written on it.

      We should delivering easy-to-use web sites and help files; instead we deliver stupid PDF files that are just huge page dumps.

      Web site based documentation... seems like a good idea until you are working somewhere that doesn't have internet access. Like, say, the documentation you need is for the router that's going nuts.

      "Help files" and "easy to use" rarely appear in a sentence where "are never" isn't what's in between.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    2. Re:Evil Hard Copy by toddbu · · Score: 0
      Especially when you've only got *one* machine to both work with the program and read the documentation.

      Instead of incurring the cost of printing something, why not just buy another machine? Seriously. You can pick up a PC for so cheap these days and compared to what it costs to print a few manuals, you're probably about break even. Get yourself a KVM switch if you're worried about desk space.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    3. Re:Evil Hard Copy by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I don't deny that online copy is hard to use. My point was simply that it doesn't have to be as hard as it is.

      You mention the difficulty of browsing online manuals when you've only got one monitor. True -- but look back at the costs I estimated in my previous post. A single 800-page manual can cost you enough money to upgrade to a dual-head display!

    4. Re:Evil Hard Copy by bluephone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a horrible idea, the KVM switch for this need. The issue with having ONE machine to both read docs and code is you generally have one display. Your solution brings in a second machine jsut to load the docs, but you're still uysing one display. A much better solution would be to buy a second display and run dual headed. Not only do you get to lookt at docs on one screen and the app on the other, you productivity with other apps goes through the roof. When one of mine died, going back to one display was painful.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    5. Re:Evil Hard Copy by Curtman · · Score: 1

      The code stays on the screen the entire time, and for complicated stuff, I can do a side-by-side comparison without having to juggle windows around.

      Sounds like somebody needs a second monitor. I've got a 21" Nokia CRT for my main display that I picked up really cheap second hand, and a cheap LCD display for viewing documentation. A browser with tabs on a second head is MUCH more convenient than page flipping, and colour coded stickies. The cost is about the same as a few decent text books. Its damn hard to zoom text on paper too. I go cross eyed trying to look through those large magnifying glass deals. ctrl +/- is a breeze though. Books are great for the bus (except to carry), but otherwise they're a huge pain.

    6. Re:Evil Hard Copy by pbox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or if you don't want an extra pain in your putt (aka KVM) just get an extra monitor. If your video card does not support multi-head, just get a new video card as well. All new boxen can handle any number of video cards. You can always get PCI if your AGP/PCI-Express is taken. You can get a decent 1024x768 15 or 17" monitor for 150-200 new and an older used video card for 20-30. That is less than the printing cost!

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    7. Re:Evil Hard Copy by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      A single 800-page manual
      Perhaps the real issue isn't whether or not we want hardcopy documentation. The real issue seems to be incompetent writing skills.

      For tens of thousands of years one of the most important skills was saying what needs to be said in a concise and direct manner. Apparently the world has been overrun by people who feel better about themselves by doing just the opposite.

      Call me radical, but anything that weighs less than a thousand pounds but requires 800 pages of documentation needs to be rewritten/rebuilt/reengineered from the ground up. It's obviously the wrong design.
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    8. Re:Evil Hard Copy by fm6 · · Score: 1
      For tens of thousands of years one of the most important skills was saying what needs to be said in a concise and direct manner. Apparently the world has been overrun by people who feel better about themselves by doing just the opposite.
      "Thousands of years"? Have you read any Victorian writers? Simple. precise prose is a pretty recent invention.

      It's true that a lot of tech manuals are badly written, and a lot tech writers place too much emphasis on creativity. But I think you'll find that most 800-page manuals owe their length to the need to describe lots of little things, not to prolixity.

    9. Re:Evil Hard Copy by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      You're comparing literary writing, which is an exercise in storytelling, which is supposed to pass time, with technical writing.

      If there is a need to describe "lots of little things" then I reiterate: It's a horribly designed product. I wouldn't be using a computer to play music/send email/print docs if I had to code machine language from the BIOS on up for every task. They make 4-button CD players and 12-button telephones.

      800-page documentation manuals are a direct result of featureware. Featureware is the useless implementation of any and all possible capabilities just for the sake of argument. That translates into a product which is the equivalent of grey goo.

      Featureware is becoming readily apparent in iPods and cellular phones, too. The world is being overrun by grey goo. I'd really like to see someone put an end to it.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    10. Re:Evil Hard Copy by tepples · · Score: 1

      The kind of graphics you see in most software manuals don't really suffer from being reduced to grayscale.

      WATCH OUT! Some copyrighted works are licensed such that it is permitted to print them non-commercially in color, but it is an infringement to print them in black and white.

    11. Re:Evil Hard Copy by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Find an old cheap laptop. All you need is a barebones system with PDF support. If it's small enough, the thing will probably take up less space than the manuals would, and if you were thrifty enough be cheaper than pringing 2 or 3 of them.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:Evil Hard Copy by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Pringing. What is pringing?

      I meant to say printing...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    13. Re:Evil Hard Copy by vasqzr · · Score: 1

      The Imagerunner is a pretty fancy printer, judging from its web site. I 've never used it, but if its like other color laser printers, it'll cost 10 to 15 cents a page just for expendables. And a lot of companies don't buy their high-end printers, they lease them with a by-the-page charge of 25 to 30 cents. Better ask yourself whether you want to spend $200 plus binding costs just to have the manual in hard copy.

      Nice try. That may have been true in 1997 but not now. We have an imageRunner 3200, color costs per page are from 1 to 5 cents. We also have an imageRunner 5500. It's a black and white model. 70 pages per minute. Costs someting like a tenth of a cent per page. A ream of paper is $2.25 from Staples. 800 pages? Sounds like the FreeBSD manual. I actually printed this Friday on our imagerunner, it took about 10 minutes (the copier even three-hole punched it for me.

      We should delivering easy-to-use web sites and help files; instead we deliver stupid PDF files that are just huge page dumps. We don't even exploit the PDF format as much as we should -- it's a horribly obsolete format, but it does support some basic hypertext concepts that would be very helpful, if more people bothered to use them.

      PDF is a great format.

    14. Re:Evil Hard Copy by unitron · · Score: 1
      "For that, I have to apologize on behalf of my profession, Technical Writing, which has done a really lousing job ...

      Gee, ya think?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    15. Re:Evil Hard Copy by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I use to hate on-line documentation too but if it's done right, it can be a time saver.

      Look at php.net. Far better than any printed book about PHP. Copy and paste code to test. Can't do that from a manual but sometimes typing code does make you 'get it'.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    16. Re:Evil Hard Copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We lease an imagerunner 5020i from Canon at a cost of 1 cent CAD per black/white page. (It's something like 1.0034535 cents or something). Colour on our iR3220 are 10cents/page. Maybe you need a new account manager :)

    17. Re:Evil Hard Copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having lots of detailed features does not necessarily make something a horrible product. It makes it a horrible consumer product but there and many incredibly detailed products for commercial use. granted this makes them much more complex and no-one uses more than a small subset of the features, but it allows for an economy of scale. I can't imagine how much autodesk or catia would cost if each industry niche needed a custom version that only implimented the 2-300 functions that industry needs. The details are there to expose the power of the underlying system to the professional user.

    18. Re:Evil Hard Copy by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Than you're stuck at only workstation!

      I often find myself at alternate offices or working at home. I need to work effectively everywhere, not just at one cube.

      My solution is a few printed reference manuals for a few things backed up by html documentation. PDF gives you the worst of both worlds... you can't index it or transform into whatever form you like.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    19. Re:Evil Hard Copy by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Find an old cheap laptop. All you need is a barebones system with PDF support. If it's small enough, the thing will probably take up less space than the manuals would, and if you were thrifty enough be cheaper than pringing 2 or 3 of them.

      I have a laptop. You assume that I have space to put it next to another machine, for one.

      Additionally, virtual "bookmarks" such as those provided by a web browser are flat-out inferior to a real bookmark in a real book. You see, the bookmarks in a real book are self-organizing, *and* I can write notes on them describing what project any particular mark applies to.

      Then there is readability. Books are easier on the eyes, IMNVHAAO.

      I've been using and programming computers since my parents got an Apple II plus in 1982. I've since gone on with a formal education in CS, and I still find paper documentation preferable, and will probably never change my mind.

      Old habits, I guess.

      (I'll give some props to the HTML-based java API documentation, it's one of the least-crappy forms of online documentation I've seen... but it takes too much disk space on my measley laptop.)

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    20. Re:Evil Hard Copy by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      I can't imagine how much autodesk or catia would cost if each industry niche needed a custom version that only implimented the 2-300 functions that industry needs.

      As someone who writes software in that industry for a living, I can answer that one for you pretty easily: too much. The level of detail to be represented in a typical high-end CAD application, and the complexity of some of the manipulations such an application must support, are both vast.

      Tipping a hat to certain programming communities: simple things should be simple, and complicated things should be possible. If everything had to be explained in 500 or fewer words of kiddiespeak, we'd still be in the stone age.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    21. Re:Evil Hard Copy by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      And if you don't want to spend even more of your day straining your eyes by looking at a computer monitor, and (like the vast majority of subjects in formal tests) you find it easier and significantly faster to read old-fashioned paper and ink?

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    22. Re:Evil Hard Copy by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I understand all of your point, and I tend to have the same issues with PDF manuals. I was only suggesting an alternative on spending cash on printing them all out. That uses lots of cash, and lots of space.

      As far as bookmarks go, you can always use a small ledger and note what file, what actual page it's on (not what the TOC wrongly reads), and any notes you need. Keep that with the laptop.

      Nothing you can do about not having room, although I can't imagine that you don't have A) crap you can just set it on (papers), B) the floor nearby, or C) your lap. Must be a cramped working space (and dealing with a printed manual would be just as "interesting")

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    23. Re:Evil Hard Copy by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      I agree about php.net, I'm always disappointed that there isn't a similar site for every other programming language out there. The java api stuff is pretty good but doesn't have the nice ability to add comments and it kind of hard to find from sun's website.

    24. Re:Evil Hard Copy by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Yeah... um... okay.

      So just in case I happen to run into the copyright holder who might see my copy of their work in black and white I'll keep that in mind.

      Who cares?

      --
      +++OK ATH
  24. Re:Put more than one virtual page on an actual pag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And than put your butt on a photocopyer, shrink it down by about 50 to 70% so you are tiny enough to read the damn thing.

  25. Print multiple pages on each sheet by Rayder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I usually use the "print multiple pages" filter on kprinter just to get 2 pages on each face of the sheet, so I get 4 pages printed with each sheet, this way is much easier to carry.

    The size letter is normally enough to read it without problems, my Kyocera (damm cheap, 40€, if you buy a used one) does a good work even with small typefaces.

    When the number of pages are less than 80, I use the pamphlet filter, I still get the 4 pages for sheet but you can fold it by half, put a pair of staples and you get a nice booklet to read.

    This small script accepts a .ps file and gives you 2 files to print, one for each side of the sheets, so you can easily have the pamphlet.

    #! /bin/sh
    psbook "$1" | psnup -2 -pa4 | psselect -e > "A.$1"
    psbook "$1" | psnup -2 -pa4 | psselect -o > "B.$1"

  26. Heavy duty laser, hole punch, file by W2k · · Score: 1

    You need a heavy-duty laser printer for this if you want it printed in a reasonable time. You could ask permission to print it at work (or ask a local business), they'll probably let you do it for virtually nothing more than the cost of the paper itself, possibly toner. At the university I go to they'd let me print it for free, no questions asked. It's fairly common for us students to need to print out large documents such as technical manuals from PDF.

    Printing would still just get you loose sheets, however, and you specified hardback. I would suggest using pre-punched paper, or punching it yourself (takes a while but might be cheaper) and then putting everything in a file. Looks very neat and the cover will last forever (if you use a proper file - I prefer all-metal ones), plus it's easy to pick out single sheets for copying or when you don't need the entire manual at once.

    --
    Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
  27. Before you take a pdf to Kinkos... by horati0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most commercial software manuals, pdf or otherwise, specify in the copyright section that reproduction of the manual requires the company's consent before doing so. Not thinking this was actually enforced, I took a CD with a 1000+ page pdf manual for Steinberg Cubase to be printed, only to be told that they couldn't print it due to the copyright restriction.

    The solution was simple enough, I emailed Steinberg asking permission to print it for personal use only, yadda yadda, and they replied (rather quickly, surprisingly) and said it was ok. Took a printout of the email to Kinkos and they happily printed the manual for me.

    I realize I could have easily forged the email from Steinberg, but I considered the possibility, however unlikely, that Mr Steinberg would find out and make an example out of me via a hearty copyright lawsuit, thus ending my home recording career even before it started.

    Not that I have anything against Germans.

    --
    The neutrality of this sig is disputed.
    1. Re:Before you take a pdf to Kinkos... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      The IDIOT at Kinkos should have known better in the first place. I would think Kinkos should rework the policy like this:

      1. If you have a PDF for some software that you want printed, they will let you copy it ONE time. This would qualify as fair use.

      2. If you have a PDF AND it's on the original CD (Stienberg Cubase as an example), print it.

      3. If the PDF file doesn't allow you to print it (POSSIBLE if sticking to Adobe Software), then they can't but if their's no restriction, print away.

      My point is if it's in electronic format(or even NOT in electronic format), copyright or not, it would be fair use so long as you weren't running say 100 copies! Running 1 or 2 copies should be ok.

      --

      Gorkman

    2. Re:Before you take a pdf to Kinkos... by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      Kind of absurd that they won't let you print out a paper copy of a manual. Don't they realize that it's easier to distribute an electronic copy than it is 1000 pieces of paper? What exactly are they worried about? Even if you assume that grandparent pirated the software, the fact that he can't print out documentation doesn't exactly stop him from using the pirated program.

  28. buy a used laserjet or okidata by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

    you can usually find them really cheap, many can still print thousands of pages, as well, most printshops can print pdfs cheaply and easily

    however, of course, the least expensive solution is to buy an old impact printer

    could we raise the bar here a little /.

    --
    Words to men, as air to birds.
  29. University printing by CMGaretJax · · Score: 1

    If you are at a university, or can get to one, it might be worthwhile looking around for an engineering major. As I understand it, they typically have free, unliminted printing, so if you could get one to print this for you, then all you have left to worry about is binding. This certainly works, and happens often at my school (U of Michigan) once in awhile a prof will throw a large file at you and tell you to read it, and printing it off is certainly easier for most people.

  30. ink jets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy cow people.. ink jet printers are not designed to do anything except lock you into expensive ink cartridgeds - get a life - get a laser

  31. Why paper? Because it won't kill my eyes by NanoGriever · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Any other reason you want paper?
    Here's a good reason: reading stuff on paper is easier on my eyes. It is bad enough staring at the screen for long hours coding and doing other things. Whenever possible I would rather read the manuals on paper just to give my eyes some rest.
  32. Mod parent DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The GP poster is not talking out of their ass, I have experienced the problem myself.

    CHECK WITH THE PRINTER MANUAL BEFORE DOING THIS!

  33. Hard copy is great by zogger · · Score: 1

    --there's a great need for publish ready electronic tech manuals, at least over on the blue collar side of things. Weekends I work on machinery, I've just come in from having two manuals outside where I can reference them as I work on some small machinery. Sucks. Duh, your hands get oily and stuff. It would be nice if I could just printout those sections I need and not worry about smudging the manuals I have, the deal is, very few *good* mechanical manuals in print ready format exist from the manufacturers. They just scan in a dismal poorly written and poorly drawn master copy and give you that, usually they suck and are unreadable *if* they even have them. Most places just slide out of it with a "see your local service dealer", they don't even provide a bad manual, let alone a good one you can print out.. Well that's an expensive sucky deal as well, like I'm going to drop what I am doing and go haul some piece of crap 30 or 40 miles round trip to get a few tech specs or to look at a drawing, and pay them 60$ an hour for that once I get there when they want you to "drop it off" for "service". Uh huh, great deal for me.... That was one of my fondest hopes with watching the personal computer revolution happen, unfortunately it hasn't gotten much better from my perspective. Perhaps in white collar clean hands IT it's better with tech manuals, don't know really.

  34. Re:Put more than one virtual page on an actual pag by ReallyNiceGuy · · Score: 1

    You would be my friend by now if you were not Anonymous!!!

  35. I faced this problem by amliebsch · · Score: 1

    Fortunately, if your office has any digital copiers, (in my case, a Ricoh 1045), they are the ultimate solution to this problem. Plug the copier into your ethernet, configure your computer to send it PS or PCL over TCP/IP, and bingo - you have an very high-speed monochrome printer that also duplexes and (optionally) hole punches. I printed the entire Adobe PostScript manual (around 1000 pages) in about 45 minutes, duplexed and hole-punched, and plopped into a 4 or 5 inch binder. Job complete.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  36. Simple by iamweezman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Staples...or pretty much any office store will always run coupons and specials. Call them, find out what they are, what days they are for, and if they can beat out the competitor. Even if they are the lowest price, they go to insane measures to cut the competitor if they are threatened with it because their profit margin is so high and they figure that they will create return business if they get you the first time.

  37. Ask Slashdot: What is the best method of wiping? by bergeron76 · · Score: 3, Funny

    User writes: Recently, while sitting on the commode, it occurred to me that I may not be wiping my bottom properly. So, I ask you fellow slashdot readers, what is the best way to wipe? Do you fold the squares and wipe folded, or is it more efficient to ball up the paper? Also, after how many wipes should I look down at the paper? I know that the first wipe will be dirty, so I try not to look at it. How many wipes until you look at the paper to make sure you're clean?

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  38. Re:Why paper? Because it won't kill my eyes by tepples · · Score: 0

    Here's a good reason: reading stuff on paper is easier on my eyes. It is bad enough staring at the screen for long hours coding and doing other things.

    Have you tried using an LCD monitor for text? I've found that they're a big improvement over old flickery CRTs, and other Slashdot users seem to agree with me.

  39. Valid questions are raised: by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    Why would we want to use paper?

    1. It's hard to take a dual P4 Xeon workstation into the john to study a PDF.

    2. See #1

    Seems to be about that easy.

    Okay, sight gags aside, it would be acceptable if we had head-up displays and PDAs with voice-activated readers that moved around HTML-based help files. Then you can fix the router going nuts and not have a PC around to read the PDF.

    I do of course agree that PDF is a bad bad file format to use for manuals. There's really no excuse for it. However, that being said, while HTML is a lighter way of doing it which can even include snazzy visuals for the attention impaired, it is still only as good as the writer's job on it.

    So a few new rules: mostly text HTML, text whose content is full, broad, and relevant, and no more letting programmers write their own manuals. I'm a better tech writer than I am a coder any day which is why I don't write the docs to my stuff myself and don't work on code on anything I have to document. Cleavage is important for clarity and broad POV in thinking out how the casual user will see it instead of what I thought they would see.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  40. Huh? by op00to · · Score: 1

    Why do you need all 800 pages? Why not just print out the sections you use most frequently, and reference the others via the pdf when you need them?

    Or, take the PDF to Kinkos and say PRINT.

    Wow, that was hard.

  41. so like, by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    the bible?

    Thank you, I'll be here til Tuesday,

    Try the veal!

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:so like, by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      The Bible is mostly storytelling which is supposed to pass time.

      Summarizing the Bible's easy: Nothing really matters but be polite and considerate anyway.

      It's really too bad that the people with the biggest mouths about doing the "right thing" have absolutely no concept of being considerate. Bankers, politicians, CEOs... most of them feel all good about themselves because they go to church but yet they feel absolutely no problem rewarding themselves with multimillion dollar bonuses while laying off thousands of workers at a shot. That's not real considerate.

      Now... back to summarizing that 800 page tech manual.

      The veal's great. Is that cracked black pepper in the seasoning? Yum.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    2. Re:so like, by MarkGriz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Summarizing the Bible's easy: Nothing really matters but be polite and considerate anyway.

      Or, in other words:

      "Be excellent to each other, and, PARTY ON, DUDES!"

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  42. it's called "Book on Demand" by jayrtfm · · Score: 1

    and you can JFGI
    also, Don Lancaster has been writing about it for over a decade

  43. Laser printers + binding machine + intern by hey! · · Score: 1

    = printed manual at a reasonable price.

    OT I know, but it really bugs me that my local elementary school is full of inkjets and screaming for supplies because their budget is overstretched. They could cut operating costs by giving all the teachers laser printers, and having only a couple of color printers for the rare things that need it.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Laser printers + binding machine + intern by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Printers? Schools need more than one?!?! Sheesh.

    2. Re:Laser printers + binding machine + intern by e_feldhusen · · Score: 1

      I work for 4 k-12 schools and it's taken me 2-1/2 years to convince two of them to switch to color laserjets for all printing instead of b&w laserjets and inkjets for color. The politics and arguments to get a switch to happen is staggering. Even with all the research and documentation on the net and doing calculations using the factory "pages per inktank/toner cartridge", it wasn't like leading a horse to water. It was like holding the horse's head under water and it still wouldn't drink.... damn horses..

  44. Re:Why paper? Because it won't kill my eyes by Spoing · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Here's a good reason: reading stuff on paper is easier on my eyes.

    I used to agree...now, I've entirely adjusted. The last time I had eye strain was back when displays were below 1024x768.

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  45. I work at a printing company. by zeath · · Score: 2, Informative

    I work at a printing company. My work involves printing about 40,000 pages of paper a week. I'm lucky that I can print, copy, and bind anything that looks ITish and make it look like work related. I have spiral-bound copies of a boatload of XServe reference pdfs just because I got annoyed at looking at the pdf on the screen, even though I've only used them the day they were printed and they've been tucked away in a drawer since.

    Now, for something useful to answer the question at hand: Find a local, small printing company. They're all over, you just have to look. Call up and ask to speak to their IT dept. I've done small printjobs like manuals, they're insanely easy and fast to do, and a single copy of a 800 page manual (assuming that means 800 planes, 400 double-sided pieces of paper), 3 hole punched in a binder, would cost us roughly $50 to do. This is not a price quote, just an FYI. Reasonably we'd probably ask about $70 to $100, cheaper if it's for an existing/prospective client or a personal favor.

    If you need lots (hundred or more) of copies, you can go really cheap with the "tissue paper" that prints off of a web press and get them for as little as $5 a copy, depending on how you bind them. Unfortunately, we don't do that where I work but we subcontract work that we get that does need it.

    1. Re:I work at a printing company. by zeath · · Score: 1

      Even after making the 400-page-duplex assumption, I still managed to forget when figuring those prices. Those prices should be cut in half - $25 to do, charge $35 to $50.

  46. High capacity printing by 1eyedhive · · Score: 1

    Back in the day when All I had was a dinky inkjet and a HP Laserjet 5L, printing 50 page manuals (RPG, game, whatever) was a bear.

    Now, I have an HP Laserjet 4si, secondhand from a repair shop (cost: free)
    repairs/add-ons: $25 for legal paper tray (@500 sheets)
    A jury-rigged roller fix repaired the lower tray.
    The thing has 1,750,000 pages on it and routeinly does 200 a day (supplemented by a newer and far less workhorseish HP LJ 1200). It supports duplexing, so all i'd need do is print a large document, then flip and re-feed.
    Cost of toner: $40 for a 800-page cart
    the cheap paper is 90% of the cost per page...

    Solution for the commoner:
    find someone with one of these big, honkin' lasers, bring your own paper and print away, or find an old 4si on the cheap.

    --
    Logistical Chaos Officer http://www.slagg.org - LAN Gaming in Sarasota FL,USA
  47. PrintFu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  48. 0.03 euro per page by paulatz · · Score: 1

    If I had to print 800 pages I would use psnup to reduce the number of pages by 2. Here, in Italy, commercial printing cost about 0.03 euro per page, 0.03*400=12.00 euro. Of course it is not cheap, but 12 euro are not that much.

    --
    this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
  49. Re:Put more than one virtual page on an actual pag by orasio · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't be so radical.

    (print even pages)
    psbook -s16 file.ps |psnup -n 2 |psselect -e |lpr -P printer

    (re-feed your pages, print odd pages)

    psbook -s16 file.ps |psnup -n 2 |psselect -o |lpr -P printer

    Will print a nice manual, in several 16 pages booklets, that you can bind with your own stapler in the middle (hint: open the stapler all the way, plus the side of your desk is your friend).

    If you used a nice laser printer (a cheap one will do) then you have a nice, book sized manual, as easy to read as a common book.

    That would be for A4, but if you would like bigger sizes, you can do some tricks to print on legal size, and chop the top and bottom margins, acheiving book-grade font sizes, but you are on your own (hint: man psbook).
    Of course, only use A4.

  50. Fedex/Kinkos by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    I think that's their name now! :D I believe that they can take a PDF file and print it double sided for you and they can even bind it for you.

    At work, I try to keep it electronic when possible, but then print out the parts I need. I always have a machine that can read it around and it's not terribly bad to be using the PDF on one machine or window and doing the operation on the other. I DO print some manuals and for that, I use a Xerox x432 ST Document Center or a Xerox Docuprint 75 or a Xerox Docuprint 92c. The last two print documents at 75 ppm for the 75 and 92 ppm for the 92. All three of these have stitchers as do other printers in the Xerox line. They almost all understand Postscript as well as PCL. They are also NOT cheap. Fedex/Kinko's stores all have similar hardware and you may be able to just hand them a floppy or CD with the manual on it and they can spit it out for you.

    --

    Gorkman

  51. Re:Ask Slashdot: What is the best method of wiping by justforaday · · Score: 1

    What do you mean "wipe"? I thought that's why we wear underwear...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  52. Contact the company? by justforaday · · Score: 1

    Have you considered contacting the company to see if they sell printed hardcopies? Even though most software packages ship with electronic documentation, some companies still have dead tree versions available for sale. It's just cheaper for them not to include one with every single copy they sell.

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  53. From PrintFu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    800 page PDF printed and bound costs $24.00.

    http://www.printfu.org/?mcAction=getPrice&pagecoun t=800

    1. Re:From PrintFu by zeath · · Score: 1

      I replied immediately to my post with that correction.

  54. Re:Ask Slashdot: What is the best method of wiping by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    You wear underwear? I thought that's what toilet paper was designed to prevent.

    Yeah, alright, ok; my girlfriend didn't fall for it either.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  55. CafePress / Lulu by bradediger · · Score: 4, Informative

    I needed a manual printed (perfect bound - like a paperback novel) last year and went with CafePress. They have reasonable prices--I think I spent $15 on a 200-page book, one copy. Decent quality, but the pages were a little yellow.

    Then I found Lulu. Same kind of thing, with a base price of $4.53 per book and $0.02 per page. They do have a page limit of 700 pgs, which would translate into a whopping $18.53. Anyone have any experience with them?

  56. University computer lab by La+Camiseta · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but I go to university here in Las Vegas. The computer labs here charge $0.02/page single sided, $0.04/double sided. I can print out an 800 page book on their high speed printer in about a half-hour for only $16.00, plus cost of binder.

    If you're near a university, or attend any extension courses, you may be elegible to use their computer labs. Check out the price per page and that may be the cheapest option for you.

    IIRC, CopyMax inside OfficeMax only charges $0.02/page for copies. Not sure on the charge for printouts.

  57. Just a suggestion by jack_canada · · Score: 0

    Get a Pentium 1 laptops or something and use it as a portable manual.

  58. Print sections/chapters by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

    Can't you just print the section or chapter you need on a JIT basis?

    --
    You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  59. Slashdot. News for nerds. Stuff that matters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this discussion really that important? Aren't the alternatives pretty obvious?