Slashdot Mirror


The History of PDAs in Words and Pictures

evanak writes "For the past four years, I've been studying the history of PDAs. It's all summarized in a 10,000-word article on my web site." This history is also illustrated with some pictures and photographs, which are worth it all by themselves.

130 comments

  1. I'm not reading it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This 'history' is still beta. Version 0.9 indeed.

  2. 1996-2005 by donnyspi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The whole part between 1996 and 2005 seemed to be a blur in the article. Other than that, it was a good summary with some interesting pics.

    1. Re:1996-2005 by Deinhard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I totally agree. While the page title is "history of PDAs" the document title is actually "The Evolution of PDAs."

      While it could be argued that since the introduction of the Pilot 1000, PDAs haven't "evolved" much (except the merger with cell phones), there has been an explosion of types and functionality. The proliferation of commercial, shareware and freeware applications for the Palm OS led to the explosion of usage. Now, just about everyone can find an industry-specific application that is useful.

      Also, the form factor and specifications have improved dramatically as well. The transition from the Pilot 1000 to the Tungsten T3 is worthy of its own essay.

      --
      Successfully condensing fact from the vapor of nuance since 1998.
    2. Re:1996-2005 by NETHED · · Score: 1

      I especially like the movies. Those should last all of 30 seconds after people actually RTFA.

      The thing I noticed was the lack of mention (other than in the bottom) of the TRS-80. It certainly qualifies as a PDA as much as the other early PDAs, as it has a notekeeper, and I believe a Real time clock. Since it was easily programable, you could use it as a simple scheduler.

      --
      --sig fault--
  3. 10,000 words by RangerRick98 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whoa, 10,000 word article! You expect me to read that? Besides, there's like 17 pictures on there. With the conversion rate, that's 27,000 words! Forget that, buddy!

    --
    "You're older than you've ever been, and now you're even older."
    1. Re:10,000 words by Brian+Boitano · · Score: 4, Funny

      I reckon...
      When did they change the definition of "summary"?

      --
      What would Brian Boitano do?
    2. Re:10,000 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Besides, there's like 17 pictures on there. With the conversion rate...

      It's not so bad. They're Canadian pictures.

    3. Re:10,000 words by kaladorn · · Score: 1

      It's not just 10,000 words... that's the SUMMARY! I feel the strange urge to quote Inigo Montoya here.... "I do not theenk that thees word means wha' you theenk eet meens." Or at least, 10,000 words should surely summarize something at least 100x as long.

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  4. Not PDA-friendly by Tx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nice of the author to use a 950 pixel fixed-width table for his article, you'd think an article on this subject would be written so as to render nicely on a PDA.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
    1. Re:Not PDA-friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read 10000 words on a PDA? Hell, I've owned PDAs for years and I doubt I have read 10000 words total in that time.

    2. Re:Not PDA-friendly by lheal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sometimes web designers fall in love with their own creativity and forget that the content is what matters. It's surprising to me that more HTML coders (or CSS coders or autogenerators) don't do this the "right" way:

      <table border=0 width="99%">
      ....
      </table>
      With a percentage-width tag, the box forms to the width of the window and you avoid a lot of problems.

      Then, of course, is the question of why there has to be a box at all.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    3. Re:Not PDA-friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you going to do with that extra 1%?

    4. Re:Not PDA-friendly by lheal · · Score: 1

      >extra 1%

      Nuthin. It's margin. "100%" is ok, too, but I like a little space between the window edge and the text.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    5. Re:Not PDA-friendly by donnyspi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      CSS people know that table tags are only for presenting data, not for formatting a web page. Try DIV instead.

    6. Re:Not PDA-friendly by Saeger · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You know why newspapers are written in multiple columns, instead of flowing to fill the page? It's faster, easier reading when your eyes only have a short distance to dart to get to the next line.

      This is the #1 (valid) reason people still use fixed width designs when they could use a completely liquid layout instead. It's hell to read a 100% width article on a large monitor even after blowing up the fontsize. The preferred solution is to use use min-/max-width CSS.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    7. Re:Not PDA-friendly by HappyDrgn · · Score: 1

      Using the "One Column" Layout "View" option of Pocket IE this displays fine. In fact it looks great on my PDA.

    8. Re:Not PDA-friendly by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      I live on the other end of that. I have a crap 800x600 monitor, which won't fit most of these fixed width sites with a fullscreened browser. Its outright bad design IMO. Though occasionally they just end up cropping off all their ads and it still reads well.

      EVEN WHEN I had a non-sucky monitor that easily fit fixed width pages, it was a problem. I don't want my browser taking up the whole friggin' display, I used a windowed browser 100% of the time. The fixed width sites often had different widths, now I was eternally screwing around with the width of my browser because their dumb layouts had zero give to them.

      Now, EVEN IF it totally sucks to read really huge columns, given a reasonably flexible layout, a user can reduce the width of their browser, or expand it, to suit them.

      The whole cheap fixed width layout argument holds up not in my view, I hope the next person to start off a webpage with a fixed width table spontaneously combusts...

      (further, you can automatically column out your article for the average full out browser, or try to be intelligent and have the server do that based on the browser's reported windowsize. maybe I'm just making too much sense for you though.)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    9. Re:Not PDA-friendly by roystgnr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's hell to read a 100% width article on a large monitor even after blowing up the fontsize.

      By "it's hell", do you mean "I have to shrink my browser window horizontally"? Those of us who like reading 100% of our screen width can't widen fixed-width pages, but a page that respects the reader's browser preferences can be as narrow as you want it to be.

    10. Re:Not PDA-friendly by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Allowing the client to specify formatting and layout was an OK-sounding idea that didn't pan out. Information producers want to control the presentation. In practice, it's not just the formatting that should vary from a full-sized monitor to a 150x150 PDA screen (or a pager), but the content itself.

    11. Re:Not PDA-friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the idea behind newspapers is to make things easy to read, why do they still lay them out so only 2-3 paragraphs of each article are on the first page, and then you have to refold the paper as you go and look at A-14. Then back to the front page for the next article, which will send you to A-4. And this article gets continued in B-12 for some reason.

    12. Re:Not PDA-friendly by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

      CSS is our king.

      div#content { width: 35em; margin-left: 2em; }

      When the user uses the font size up/down button, the layout automatically resizes to match it. (Example site.) Even better, a good PDA should know not to read .css files that are labeled media="screen", and only read the .css files that specify the media to include handhelds. Sadly, very few PDA browsers do this today, but I'm sure the situation will improve as more pages start using modern web design.

    13. Re:Not PDA-friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's what the CSS "margin" attribute is for.

  5. Uhm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think Slashdot mods need to be a little more selective about what they post. This is the cyber equivalent of a puff piece, like writing about the history of rubber spoons. I absolutely could not care less, and I want 30 seconds of my life back. I can't wait until next week's fascinating website, the history of MP3 players!!11111

    1. Re:Uhm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree... must be a slow day here, please move along.

  6. And? by Vertdang · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow, it has both pictures AND photos! (brought to you by the department of redundancy department) Man that's a big farking article.

    --
    Statesmen serve to better the country and help the people.
    Politicians serve to better themselves and help friends.
    1. Re:And? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Those 2 things arent identical, you know....

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  7. Forgot One by ryants · · Score: 4, Funny
    --

    Ryan T. Sammartino
    "Ancora imparo"

  8. fascinating... by k4_pacific · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quite an interesting article. I never realized that Thomas Edison built the first PDA in 1906. It was called the Edison Automatic Electric Calendar. It weighed close to three tons and could remember up to five appointments at once.

    They've come a long ways since then...

    --
    Unknown host pong.
    1. Re:fascinating... by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and it was powered by coal and...

      Parent is a troll guys, come on. +5 Insightful?

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
  9. Microsoft devices? by David+Horn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You seem to have missed out the whole Microsoft / Palm battle, and the newest evolution of Pocket PCs, with VGA screens, 3D accelators and 624MHz processors.

    You can even get a Playstation emulator to run smoothly on the newest ones.

    --
    PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    1. Re:Microsoft devices? by Aphrika · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is a complete lack of Microsoft stuff in the article which leaves what I'd consider quite a gaping hole in the history of PDAs.

      The reason is simply because when Microsoft entered the market, it was the first time a compatible desktop architecture and design had been ported across to a PDA. To a certain extent, they have also been instrumental in turning a PDA into a fully fledged, compatible and capable platform, adding Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, colour screens etc. Palm would certainly have rested on their laurels more if it wasn't for MS entering the market and we'd probably still be using black and white 2MB Palms.

    2. Re:Microsoft devices? by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      Shhhh! This is Slashdot... Don't you know better than to say anything positive about Microsoft? *watches karma go down the crapper*

      :-P

    3. Re:Microsoft devices? by peawee03 · · Score: 1

      To start, the article deals with upto 1995. As far as I can tell, the "desktop architecture" came across with .NET. WinCE is a different architecture from DOS or NT, and handles some things differently.

      Though I agree, PocketPC devices always had the "1337" stuff first (nice, big color screens, fast CPUs, sound, etc) over the Palms, it took the lowering of prices and lengthening of battery lives on PPC machines to really light a fire under the PalmOS camp- and even then, Sony provided most of the competition while Palm was busy introducing a new entry-level PDA (the m100) and a rehash of the now-tired Palm V (the m500 line). Palm itself was only able to compete on the same level as PPC devices with the introduction of the Tungsten.

      --
      I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
    4. Re:Microsoft devices? by salesgeek · · Score: 1


      The reason is simply because when Microsoft entered the market, it was the first time a compatible desktop architecture and design had been ported across to a PDA. To a certain extent, they have also been instrumental in turning a PDA into a fully fledged, compatible and capable platform, adding Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, colour screens etc.


      The author was wise to focus on convergence of the cell phone and the PDA rather than religous OS issues or conjecture about what would have happened if someone did not do something. Had microsoft not entered the PDA market, someone else would have.

      That said, MS does deserve kudos not for PDA bloatware APIs and attempting to turn the PDA into a desktop computer. The kudos for that go to the hardware people who built the platform that included a faster processor, bright color screen, and a PCMCIA or Compact Flash card. MS does deserve recognition for building an os with appropriate multimedia extensions and support for brilliant color, which is what drove palm and RIM (who was lagely left out of the article despite building convergent, internet connected devices in the mid 90s) to focus on smartphones.

      What is interesting is the failure of PDA powered convergent devices to supplant personal media players like the iPod and digital cameras.

      --
      -- $G
  10. Are you asking for a little slashdotting ? by alexhs · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did anyone else read the news as "Please slashdot my web site" ?

    Sadly, the pictures might not be big enough for that.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
  11. LIES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Word's telling me that it's 9446 words. That's quite a bit short of 10,000...

  12. Last paragraph by aardwolf64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's seriously annoying. The guy writes an article on PDAs, then dismisses the past 15-18 years with one paragraph. What about the introduction of color?

    Here is the history of the PDA. I've spent 940 words on calculators, 40 words on actual PDAs, and 20 words on the massive changes that have occurred in the past 15 years.

    1. Re:Last paragraph by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      The thing about history you have to remember is... the present becomes the past. We've read about how things in print are outdated before they even leave the printing press, but the author could just as easily have written this in 1995.

    2. Re:Last paragraph by thgreatoz · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I suspect he did.

      --
      When their numbers dwindled from 50 to 8, the dwarves began to suspect Hungry.
  13. Coming soon... by KipCas · · Score: 0, Troll

    A 50,0000 word thesus about a loose piece of skin between my sack and my browneye about 6 years ago.

    --
    Turk: Let's play Steak. J.D.: What? Turk: Steak. The 1st person to finish their steak is the winner of Steak. -Scrubs
    1. Re:Coming soon... by KipCas · · Score: 0

      It was not a troll. The subject matter was boring and merited my tasteless response.

      --
      Turk: Let's play Steak. J.D.: What? Turk: Steak. The 1st person to finish their steak is the winner of Steak. -Scrubs
  14. re: Partial List of Handheld Computers in sci-fi by mynameismonkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are six words missing from this 10,000 word essay; "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy".

    It featured hypertext, multimedia content objects, a wiki-like browsing interface and of course collaborative document editing (which sounds bad but was mostly harmless).

    Sturdy, rugged, built to take all kinds of knocks, apparently easily recharged despite country (or planet, for that matter) and quite affordable. All pre-1980.

    --
    -- Religion is not an exact science
  15. Re:Nothing... by winkydink · · Score: 1, Informative

    You could. Assuming yuou knew them all and had the time to waste tracking them all down. And find photos. This guy did and provides a nice retrospective.

    But then again, this is Slashdot. You have to try and impress us with how smart you are. Has anybody ever told you how assholic that behavior is?

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  16. PC-6? by FlyByPC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Tandy PC-6 would be IMHO a good addition. I had one in junior high in the mid-80s; it spoke BASIC and assembly. Not too impressive these days, but back then a pocket calculator -- with 16K(!) of memory, and which spoke BASIC was amazing. I even wrote a crude 3D version of "Hunt the Wumpus" for it.

    The On-Hand PC is also pretty cool. I bought one a while back. While it goes through CR2025 batteries like they're candy -- and two at a time -- the idea that you can program yourself a new watch when you get tired of the old one is very cool.

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    1. Re:PC-6? by Skater · · Score: 1

      I still have my PC-6! I don't think it works any more though - I think the connector between the two halves separated.

      The PC-6 was actually made by someone else before it got the Tandy brand name. I think Sharp made it, but I'm really not sure.

      I believe it came standard with 8K, but there was an additional 8K module available for it. I also have the cassette adaptor to allow cassette tape backups.

      Now I want to go play the horse race game on it...I killed a lot of boring class time that way...

    2. Re:PC-6? by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

      Yes -- the original was 8K, with the option to add the additional 8K memory module. I have two of them, the original which works but is very well-worn, and a newer one in near-mint condition. Faster than the Timex-Sinclair I learned to program on -- and far more reliable! (I'm still regretting learning BASIC as my first language!)

      I believe you're right that they were made by Sharp.

      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    3. Re:PC-6? by Skater · · Score: 1

      I was actually starting to write a database program for it that would use the Memo feature to store the albums I owned. It wasn't long before I realized that program + data >>> 16K. (Where >>> is "much greater than".) Still, it was really cool that you could write programs to interact with the memo pad - it was, as we say now, integrated!

  17. how could it not... by Edzor · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ..include the hitch hikers guide to the galaxy, the most useful pda in the known universe!

  18. Sharp PC-1211 by dJCL · · Score: 1

    I have one of those sharp PC-1211 or similar model devices sitting at home. Being programmable in Basic meant that I could mess with it during math class to do my matrix transforms for me...

    And simple graphics capabilities let me make games too.

    Fun little device.

    --
    On Arrakis: early worm gets the bird. Magister mundi sum!
  19. History of PDA, Chapter One by digitaldc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    PDA goes all the way back to Adam & Eve. As the story goes...."That night, God took a rib from Adam's side and made a woman. When Adam awoke the following morning, he found a wife, Eve, lying asleep beside him. Adam was so happy. He took her hand and she woke up. She looked up at him and smiled."
    PDA is very old, indeed.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  20. Beginnings left out? by tfcdesign · · Score: 1

    What about the paper based "organizer." Or items an abbacus? Stop watches? Anything that is protable and and manages data, really. Also, did he mention the first uses of touchscreens? I dunno. Its kinda hard to read in that format. He needs some CSS formatting. I stopped reading.

    1. Re:Beginnings left out? by tfcdesign · · Score: 1

      Back in 1990 or somethingI was using digital devices that held addresses, calendars and notes... I think this is very incomplete.

    2. Re:Beginnings left out? by smart.id · · Score: 1

      Do you know what PDA stands for? Personal digital assistant. Is a pen and paper "digital?" Well, you can be a wiseass and say "yes," because it involves using your digits. Or you can realize that he probably meant electronic devices.

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
    3. Re:Beginnings left out? by tfcdesign · · Score: 1

      Is that true, or is it "Personal Data Assistant?"

    4. Re:Beginnings left out? by tfcdesign · · Score: 1

      Also, from the articale "Apple did invent the actual term "personal digital assistant" PDAs existed before Apple marketing team got involved.

  21. Missing Option: Psion 5 Series by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To me, the Psion 5 series is the ultimate PDA. It has a full suite of Office and PIM applications, compact size, a usable keyboard, decent screen size, and stellar battery life (35 hrs on-time with off-the-shelf AAs). Detractors might point to the lack of hand writing recognition, color, and MP3 playing, but I have absolutely no use or interest in those features (apparently, I am in a very small minority).

    Currently, there is absolutely nothing on the market that is remotely as good as the 5 series -- everything these days sucks in battery-life or keyboard or both.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Missing Option: Psion 5 Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a matter of fact, Psion can play (and record) MP3s:
      http://www.zavorine.com/ :)

    2. Re:Missing Option: Psion 5 Series by wfberg · · Score: 1

      The 5 is just a bit heavy and largish though. The revo fixed all that, and both had EPOC32's great user interface (far better than windows mobile or in fact the symbian-based OSes from Ericsson and Nokia).

      Also, mine is broken.

      So I have a PDA with builtin GSM/GPRS phone, the XDA-II.. Quite nice, but would have been nicer had it been a psion..

      Too bad, Psion really could have made it work, in its time it had more software and developers than even Palm (mostly because the thing came with a scripting language).

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  22. You forgot Hipster PDA by pyramis · · Score: 1
    In a recent reactionary wave to the hassles of PDAs there is the Hipster PDA
    The Hipster PDA (Parietal Disgorgement Aid) is a fully extensible system for coordinating incoming and outgoing data for any aspect of your life and work. It scales brilliantly, degrades gracefully, supports optional categories and "beaming," and is configurable to an unlimited number of options. Best of all, the Hipster PDA fits into your hip pocket and costs practically nothing to purchase and maintain.
    Weather-resistant. Drop-proof. Unlimited battery life. There's even a "docking station".
  23. Re: Partial List of Handheld Computers in sci-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually it is mentioned

  24. Atari Portfolio by rindeee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had an Atari Portfolio back in 1990 (I think it was 1990) and I still like it better than any other I've had. Mind you, it's not that it worked better, or was more capable. It's more an issue of capability for it's day and the fact that it was made by Atari of all companies. It was just an amazing little device that I could use in place of my laptop at the time (a Dell 386/SX-16). I wish I still had it just for fun. What a neat little device.

    1. Re:Atari Portfolio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Also handy for getting cash out of ATM machines if you're about to run into a Terminator whose mission is to guard you.

  25. Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This article belongs in Wikipedia.

    That is all.

  26. this disgusts me... by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    FTFA - In his early 20s, Pitroda received the patent. "There was no contest at all. I got all the claims in one shot," he said. He shared the idea with colleagues at American Express and with Noyce, but neither pursued it. Lacking other investment resources, Pitroda put the invention aside. "I think it was too far ahead of its time. I didn't have the muscles to do it myself," he said. He moved back to India in 1982 and returned to Chicago in 1991, where he saw PDAs becoming commonplace. In court, he won royalty settlements from Casio, HP, Radio Shack, Sharp, and Texas Instruments.

    So not only did this guy give birth to the idea of PDAs.. but also to the idea of patenting something general and sweepingly broad, and then suing later when somebody who isn't too lazy implements his idea... wonderful!

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
    1. Re:this disgusts me... by goneutt · · Score: 1

      He shoulda patented the process of patenting broad and sweeping patents with his royalties, then he could sued more people without comping up with anything new.

      --
      Bacardi + slashdot = negative karma.
  27. Wikipedia Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  28. The Newton Rulzorz by maczealot · · Score: 1, Troll

    First off, this guy is a total fool for not giving the Newton more props.. He OBVIOUSLY never used one: "Regardless of how fancy the Newton's interface is, a digital handheld organizer is a digital handheld organizer, and Wizard models existed four years before the Newton (not to mention many PDAs dating back to at least 1976!)." Yet he had already admitted earlier it was Apple that even INVENTED the term PDA :P Not to mention, to call the Newton an "organizer" is like calling a Cray a "calculator" And althought the handwriting recognition of the Newton was lampooned in pop culture it STILL is better than anything every released. The only thing that I have ever used that even comes close is sadly TabletPC *ducks* Seriously, bashing the Newton in this article is worse than stupid, it is based on some irrational fear of the Newton. Maybe one was being used to VNC into his server and it killed his mom!

    1. Re:The Newton Rulzorz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes we've all used a Newton.

      or should that be

      v1as ueie e11 nsed a Nunbw,

      I'm sorry but the handwriting recognition on the Newton was that bad when it came out and people never changed their opinion of the device even when handwriting was improved somewhat. You Apple history revisionists need a reality check.

    2. Re:The Newton Rulzorz by maczealot · · Score: 1

      And yet people are in love with graffiti? You have to be kidding me. The Newton handwriting rec, like ANY new interface just took some getting used to. I used mine for four years in college to take notes on (and I was a Greek/Philo maj.) Sorry, but if people can learn to write letters one at a time in a completely different way than normal they could have learned the Newton. Sadly, it was just ahead of its time and just a tad too large.

    3. Re:The Newton Rulzorz by metalligoth · · Score: 1

      The Newton had a lot of potential, but like speech recognition, handwriting recognition is a long way from becoming truly useful. It will take some amazing AI for it to hit "the sweet spot".

      I had a Sharp Wizard from 1995-1998, a Clio mini-tablet PC running Windows CE from 2000-2002, and ever since then I've used a Treo. Next up is an XDA III running Windows CE since Palm is dropping syncing with OS X.

      I'll never use a PDA with handwriting recognition and no built in keyboard. They all suck.

    4. Re:The Newton Rulzorz by TomHandy · · Score: 1
      The improved handwriting recognition in Newton OS 2.0 (I believe this was introduced in the MessagePad 130, and really shined with the beefed up horsepower of the MP2000 and MP2100.... I think this is the one that was codenamed Rosetta, and is also the basis for the Inkwell HWR in OS X) is certainly worth noting. It still holds up very well today.

      Either way, there's certainly more to the Newton OS than the handwriting recognition.

    5. Re:The Newton Rulzorz by glass_window · · Score: 1

      Seems it's more an article about PIMs, not PDAs, maybe he got his acronyms confused.

  29. MOD PARENT INSIGHTFUL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is chock full of good information and deserves a good home where people can easily find it.

  30. Missed a LOT of the Newton-era competitors by Bug-Y2K · · Score: 1

    Such as the AT&T "GO". There was a LOT of amazing stuff that came and went between '93 and '96. If you blinked, you missed it, but almost every one introduced some significant step in the evolution.

    And as others have stated, kind of glossed over the Palm/WinCE early days and eventual paths that lead us to now.

    I'd give it a "C+" and say "needs more work"

    1. Re:Missed a LOT of the Newton-era competitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, you're thinking of the AT&T EO. Which ran an OS by Go Corp. The article's missing good discussion on an awful lot of these beasts (Go? General Magic? GRiD? Zoomer?) But part of that is because the Newton, as preborn as it was, smacked their behinds with superior technology as soon as they came out. There's a good reason they're littl emore than a footnote in history.

    2. Re:Missed a LOT of the Newton-era competitors by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      Lessee, it was:

      Go Corp. - they did the OS (PenPoint), a reference hardware design (based on an Intel 286 chip) and licensing.

      NCR and IBM licensed the Intel version of the OS and released pen slate systems (NCR-3125 and 3130, IBM ThinkPad 701T, 703T).

      AT&T bought Go's hardware division, named it EO and made two devices based on the ``hobbit'' chip.

      Finally, Go folded, AT&T gave up, and Taiwan's Ministry of Technology bought all the rights and intellectual property --- I've always assumed to use as a stick to beat up MS over licensing.

      GRiD preceeded the Newton w/ their GRiDPad, but it was a DOS-based system w/ a custom environment not much used save for vertical applications.

      Zoomer was kind of interesting, being a PC running Geoworks w/ Graffiti --- HP's OmniGo 120 was way cool w/ a square screen and keyboard.

      The old Poqet PC (a DOS machine w/ would fit in a (large) suit jacket pocket was way cool, and an early innovation as well.

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  31. One notable absence... by Aphrika · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Microwriter Agenda. While the linked article incorrectly mentions it was the first PDA, it did have one very inetersting feature; built into the right hand side of the device was a 5-key microwriter input system which allowed for 'blind' input. This is a variant of a chorded keyboard - quite an interesting read.

    1. Re:One notable absence... by OldCrasher · · Score: 1

      I still have one lying around. Battery is dead as a door nail, but it still looks great!

      Used this for several years (late 80's, early 90's) loved the fact that the chord keyboard allowed me to type away without having to hunt and peck on the silly little keys.

      Shame about those rechargeable batteries though - sealed in the case. They would hold less and less charge until running on charger power was all you could do.

  32. What, no mention of IntelliSync/sync software? by mveloso · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One thing that everyone forgot about is that in the early days of PDAs there wasn't a really good way to move information between your PIM (Personal Information Manager) and your PDA (Personal Digital Assistant).

    For those lucky enough, you could get your secretary to do it. For everyone else, well, the process involved a lot of typing. And PDAs weren't really made for data entry, as you can imagine.

    Enter IntelliSync, by IntelliLink. They were the first (I believe) data synchronization software independent of the manufacturer or OS. In fact, they were often rebranded by the manufacturer.

    They made it less painful to synchronize with your PDA. As a bonus, it was possible to move between handhelds by synchronizing to your data from one source to another.

    This, of course, was before the Palm Pilot, which probably had the best information synchronization feature of any PDA to date. Instead of being an add-on, it was "part of the package" and worked really well. That, coupled with the small form factor and massive (for the time) data capacity made the US Robotics Palm Pilot a must-have.

  33. Comment from the author... by evanak · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hey,

    Well, I appreciate all the feedback, kind and otherwise...

    I wish some people would READ it all before commenting. For example:
    - Per the article's headline, it only covers the really evolutionary years, from 75-95. So I didn't "miss" from 96-now as one person said here.
    - A few people said I should've include the Hitchhikers Guide. I did, read more carefully.
    - "You didn't include [x] PDA." That's true. The article only includes devices that truly pioneered some new step forward, that did something others hadn't done before.
    - "The Newton Rulz"... I'm not going to touch that one. Already wearing my anti-Reality Distortion Field vest.

    As for the (many!) of you who sent me kind and insightful personal replies -- thank you, I do appreciate it.

    1. Re:Comment from the author... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO ONE has posted "The Newton Rulz".

      All I've seen in that vein has been polite and correct arguments against your brushing-aside of what was a very respectable portable platform.

      Oh, and your smarmy comments about "reality-distortion fields" do nothing to make your point.

    2. Re:Comment from the author... by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

      You are correct

      they posted "The Newton Rulzorz"

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    3. Re:Comment from the author... by TomHandy · · Score: 1

      I think there is something to this. Certainly the points made about whether the Newton was the "first" of anything are worth discussing. But I think it is disappointing that the bulk of the discussion of the Newton is essentially in just saying that it wasn't the "first" PDA. I think this is fine to say, but why spend so much time debunking this? If this is truly a history, why not spend some more time on the things the Newton did well (more than just saying it had a nice UI)? Certainly things like the Wizard came before it, but the Newton still did bring a lot to the PDA table, and it seems odd to me, to say the least, to have a history of PDA's that has almost no discussion of the contributions of the Newton OS and the Newton hardware.

    4. Re:Comment from the author... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that the years since 1996 have been not "really revolutionary" for PDAs, you're missing more than a couple years.

    5. Re:Comment from the author... by MadGravity · · Score: 1

      Thanks for a wonderful walk down memory lane! I still have my TRS PC4 and once in a while I'll plug a new battery into it and do some basic. Had the Atari, had the HP LX95 also. When it first came out I wanted to get a Newton but found it too $$$ so I cannot comment on it but to say, yes it was ahead of its time and could have been more except for the infighting going on at Apple at the time (does anyone remember?). Some of the replies I read, it seem to me that they didn't take the time to read the entire article. Thanks again! //bob

  34. How is the first post REDUNDANT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will someone please explain to me how the VERY FIRST POST is somehow modded as "Redundant"? How about we mod the mod as "clueless"?

  35. General Magic by silentbozo · · Score: 1

    Also completely missing from his article - the contributions (largely lost) of General Magic, which was the counterpoint to the Newton team (having been founded by ex-Apple engineers, like Andy Herzfield). They came out with the MagicCap OS, which was lightyears ahead of it's time (with a long-lasting lithium-ion batter, back in 1995!), and still (in my opinion) unmatched in it's ease of use. Surviving units from Sony and Motorola give a glimpse of what might have been. Unlike the Newton, programming for MagicCap devices really didn't take off.

    Being able to program the USR Pilot (later the USR, then 3Com PalmPilot, before becoming the 3Com/Palm Palm), was the biggest reason for it's success. Thanks to the efforts of a handful of enthusiasts (like Darrin Massena), who got GCC working to cross-compile Palm-compatible 68k binaries, and to USR, for not getting bent out of shape by someone else using their header files, Pilot programming took off, a huge library of 3rd party freeware/shareware became available, and the dominance (for a time) of the Palm platform was assured.

  36. One Word by GIL_Dude · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tricorder...

  37. You forgot my favorite... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...the "Tandy 100". Portable (but not pocket sized) and widely used as a mobile typewriter by news reporters in the mid 80s.

    1. Re:You forgot my favorite... by evanak · · Score: 1

      That's a laptop, not a handheld.

    2. Re:You forgot my favorite... by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      That's a laptop, not a handheld.

      Maybe he got big hands...

      I prefer the Tandy Model 102 myself. I still have 2.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    3. Re:You forgot my favorite... by PW2 · · Score: 1

      I bought one this year for $0.86. I like non-backlit black on gold screens for outside writing in the sun.

  38. Re: Two Words by tfcdesign · · Score: 1

    Mentioned. Fictional.

  39. National Center for Education Statistics by tfcdesign · · Score: 1

    Personal Data Assistant (PDA): A PDA is a handheld device (e.g. Palm Pilot®, PocketPC®, etc.) that may combine many computing activities. PDAs that are more powerful may function as cellular phones, fax transmitters, web browsers, and personal organizers. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/secureweb/glossary.asp #pda

  40. Re: Partial List of Handheld Computers in sci-fi by plusser · · Score: 1

    Douglas Adams did wish that he had taken out a patent for the PDA as a direct result of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. The device in the TV series was very similar in design to the early Psion Organiser.

  41. Comment "To" the author... by Caeda · · Score: 1

    Per the Articles Title "THE EVOLUTION OF THE PDA"
    Per the Articles First sentance "he purpose of this document is to be a comprehensive timeline of the history of PDAs. Specifically, my intention is to clarify which companies premiered each of the primary front-end features that are considered standard in modern (circa 2005) devices,"

    And so, yes, you did in fact "miss" from 96 until the present date as you state intention to discuss the origin of features found in pdas up to the current year of 2005. As you did not discuss anything that came about after 96, you are missing features.

    Also. "A few people said I should've include the Hitchhikers Guide. I did, read more carefully."

    Mentioning the title of a book in passing does not constitute including the Hitchhikers Guide in your article.

    --
    ~~ Please keep your arms, legs, and outright stupidity inside the ride at all times. Thank You ~~
    1. Re:Comment "To" the author... by phabi0 · · Score: 1

      "Mentioning the title of a book in passing does not constitute including the Hitchhikers Guide in your article." Right, why don't we just include mention of every fantastical, fictional "PDA"-like device ever dreamt up by every science fiction writer ever? Then it could be a 25,000 word article instead. Get a life you clueless b0z0.

  42. Kinda Ironic... by tobiasly · · Score: 1

    ...that a portable computer called the "Linus" ran MS-DOS!

  43. I owned a Newton, and I don't agree by Frangible · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but I owned a Newton and I don't agree. At the time the MP was released in 1993, there were many similar devices in that category. Yes, Apple did coin the phrase PDA, and I give them credit for it. But overall I wasn't a huge fan of the PIM apps and the handwriting recognition was abysmal until you loaded Palm software (before they made the Pilot)'s Graffiti on it. Palm made the Casio/Tandy Zoomer PDA apps, and I actually thought those were a lot more useful than the Newton's, though the Zoomer sucked pretty bad due to the low-contrast screen and slow CPU. Anyway, the Newton did have some nice things about the OS and interface that were pretty unique and not even included in today's PDAs but overall while I had fun with the Newton it was a pretty flawed device.

    1. Re:I owned a Newton, and I don't agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the Newton came out, there were many similar devices? Much less for $800? Name three. Go ahead. I'm waiting.

      The Zomer postdates the Newton. Comparing it to the Newton is like comparing a tricycle to a car. The GRIDPAD and ilk predated the Newton; it's also far inferior and *far* more inexpensive. General Magic's stuff postdated the Newton, and were quite different to boot. The EO just plain sucked.

      Like it or not, the Newton was an extremely impressive, almost unique piece of hardware which was just not in the right price point ($400).

    2. Re:I owned a Newton, and I don't agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And let's not forget the Assist function of the Newton. To this day NO PDA can still equal that functionality!

  44. Re: Partial List of Handheld Computers in sci-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sturdy, rugged, built to take all kinds of knocks

    Not to mention it could survive being tossed in a river on prehistoric Earth. It kept on working even after having spent quite a while in the water.

  45. DUH Re:1996-2005 by Trixter · · Score: 1

    The whole part between 1996 and 2005 seemed to be a blur in the article.

    Maybe that's because the HEADLINE reads "1975-1995".

    1. Re:DUH Re:1996-2005 by PMuse · · Score: 1

      How did the grandparent ever get modded up? What a silly complaint! The author of TFA wanted to present the historical research on the precursors to the PDA. He simply stopped at the beginning of the modern era. Nothing wrong with that.

      Besides, covering PDAs from 1995 to present would take more than 10000 words all by itself. Here's hoping he tries it, though.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  46. Hey, I still use a 2MB B&W Palm, by wsanders · · Score: 1

    you insensitive clod!

    Of course I got mine for free (Plam Zire), thrown in with a Dell Poweredge server.

    Perfectly suitable for me, and I didn't have to go out and risk a few hundred on something I didn't like and would end up giving to the nephew.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  47. still waiting for an Apple PDA by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

    Palm based devices suck. Microsoft Windows Mobile based devices suck. Yeah yeah yeah everyone loves their $500 millions-of-colors-video-camera-phone-wireless bricks. Sorry, but a low cost simple PDA with long battery life would kick ass. If Apple could put out a quality iPod Mini priced Newton that fits into my pocket I'd buy one in a second.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
    1. Re:still waiting for an Apple PDA by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Palm already has those. Their low-end is like $150. You can't beat that.

  48. Holy Forgotten legends batman by buttcheese · · Score: 1

    This guy forgot the #1 PDA of all times, The hitchhikers guide to the galaxy, sure you have to be an editor to update the device, but this was one of the the premeir concepts of all time.

    1. Re:Holy Forgotten legends batman by evanak · · Score: 1

      No I didn't. HHGG is included. Read more carefully please.

  49. Re:Nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello, my name is tomstdenis and I am an assaholic.

  50. CSS people have their own religion, yes by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    CSS takes stuff and splits it across multiple files. It also zooms poorly, as it often seems to make assumptions about the resolution I'm running at.

    Tables are fine for formatting a web page. CSS might be the perfect, but tables are definitely the good. And the good has been working and tested for some time, and the perfect is still a bit away from perfection.

    1. Re:CSS people have their own religion, yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank zeus you know what you are talking about

  51. Re: Partial List of Handheld Computers in sci-fi by spagiola · · Score: 1
    How far did you RTA? There's an explicit mention of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy in the 5th para:

    It's also thanks to literature and popular culture concepts, like Douglas Adams' The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and gadgets such as the communicator and tricorder from Star Trek; see more examples below.
  52. penpoint? by gstover · · Score: 1

    Cool article, but there's no mention of Go's PenPoint or the hardware it ran on (originally made by Go, then by Eo).

    1. Re:penpoint? by cei · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Eo is listed under AT&T, but yeah, it needs more.

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
  53. Re: Two Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But was mysteriously missing from the list of fictional references in TFA...

  54. MOD PARENT DOWN TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see topic, parent is trolling

  55. Mod parent down for lies. by Tore+S+B · · Score: 1

    That's BS.

    --
    toresbe