Slashdot Mirror


Social Bookmarking Services Revisited

pchere writes "Social bookmarking allows you share bookmarks publicly instead of restricting them to the browser favourites. Del.icio.us is such a fast growing community and its users have created a large number of del.icio.us tools to further enhance the service. Organization by tags allows for quick retrieval of sites by topics and bookmarks are available as RSS feeds. An article in D-Lib Magazine reviews the Social Bookmarking Tools to "remind you of hyperlinks in all their glory, sell you on the idea of bookmarking hyperlinks, point you at other folks who are doing the same, and tell you why this is a good thing.""

102 comments

  1. Tags in other sites by esconsult1 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Tags are a great way to organize pictures and other objects as well. Whether its porn, celebrities, or the soon to be launched cityflicker.com

    Sure, you could go to google's image search, but where else can you easily see, for instance, celebrity nipples or this category?

    Just looking at an object, and seeing other tags at the same time is extremely addictive. You can quickly jump to and fro within this kind of taxanomy with little effort. With certain experiments, we've seen a user stickyness not noticed before. And using RSS to monitor a tag is a great way to keep updated on content that you're really interested in.

    While http://flickr.com/>flickr.com fantastic, it is pretty generic, I suspect we'll all see a large group of sites dedicated to tagging almost anything (books, products) that are more specific and open to finding a small but vocal niche of people.

    1. Re:Tags in other sites by empaler · · Score: 1

      You killed them. It's probably the nipple thing.

  2. Yo mods, get off the crack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Del.icio.us is such a fast growing community and its users have created a large number of del.icio.us tools to further enhance the service.

    that..........????

    1. Re:Yo mods, get off the crack! by moonbender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're thinking of the wrong construction. The correct one involves deixis: "Generic reference to social bookmarking communities. Del.icio.us is such a community." Granted, it might also be stress - "This is such a lovely evening!" - but I think that's unlikely.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  3. Link Page by Vanhal · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Couldn't a page of links do the same thing?

    1. Re:Link Page by Teja · · Score: 1

      Why spend the time doingn that when you can just insert a link with just a click or two? Rather than going in updating the page, uploading the page and all... besides, del.icio.us is hosted on it's server, so you don't need space to host the page. Del.icio.us also offers RSS feeds, so you can do much more with it.

      --
      - Teja
    2. Re:Link Page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why the Netscape bookmark format has always been readable HTML, and this tradition has been continued by Mozilla and Firefox. On linux, look for bookmarks.html somewhere below your $HOME/.mozilla directory. I'm sure someone has developed a one-click solution to publish the bookmark file, anyone know of one?

    3. Re:Link Page by Phil+Gregory · · Score: 1

      The article mentions the three axes of social bookmarks: URLs, tags, and users. A simple page of links only gives you the first of those. In addition, the various sites have additional useful features that a page of links would not provide.

      One of the problems I've run into in managing even my small collection of bookmarks is finding things later. Tags help quite a lot with that. "What was that link to the monthly IBM puzzles? Well, I filed it under 'IBM'. Ah, there it is." With URLs and tags (and a decent UI for managing them), you have a workable personal bookmark organizer.

      The addition of other users serves a slightly different purpose. It allows you to find new things on the web. Things like del.icio.us/popular can be used even if you're not involved in the site, but having your links there makes it easier for you to take your links, look for other people who've bookmarked similar things, and see what other things those people have bookmarked.

      Finally, there are some nice things in the UI for the various bookmarking sites. Several of them will allow you to aggregate various combinations of users and tags so you can watch what's new in areas that interest you. For example, I'm interested in command line programs and knotting, among other things, so I watch everything tagged with "cli" and "knots". I also watch specific tags from a couple of people, because they've bookmarked interesting things in the past.

      In del.icio.us, at least, every page is available as RSS. This allows me to do several things. For one, I subscribe to my inbox (the aggregating of tags mentioned above) in my RSS reader. I also subcribe to the bookmark lists of a couple of my friends. Furthermore, I like using Firefox's live bookmarks, which allow you to treat an RSS feed as a bookmark folder. I have several of my personal tags bookmarked in this manner both at home and at work. To add a new bookmark to both browsers at once, all I have to do is tag the link with the appropriate keyword on del.icio.us.

      So if a simple page of links is all you need, great, use it. Even if your needs are more complicated in terms of personal bookmark management, if you don't need the social integration, there are bookmark management systems that you can host yourself (though I've tried a lot of them, and to my mind del.icio.us is a lot more useful even if you discount its social aspect). But if you think you could get some good out of the social linking at a place like del.icio.us, you should definitely try it out.


      --Phil (happy del.icio.us user since 2004-04-09)
      --
      355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI, but an incredible simulation!
  4. de.icio.us by blackicye · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I highly recommend anyone who hasn't yet visited this site to check it out.

    A good place to look is the page of "popular" sites. Some strange and interesting stuff turns up there fairly routinely.

    Stuff like how to cut (i.e. vegetables, meats etc) and Chess strategies among other sometimes bizarre sites.

    http://del.icio.us/popular/

    1. Re:de.icio.us by FutureFeeder · · Score: 1

      It's more like a mini blog, where you can collect all the interesting links you find throughout the day and publcise them. I subscribe to about 30 rss feeds from delicious of varying tags and friends. check out Pantomic which takes social bookmarking to the physcal world through cellphones with bluetooth.

    2. Re:de.icio.us by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      I've honestly never been there, nor see the need to go there, mozilla keeps track of my bookmarks just fine, and what I bookmark wont really help anybody else.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    3. Re:de.icio.us by dmaduram · · Score: 1

      Have to agree completely with parent's post that del.icio.us is excellent.

      Just as a friendly fyi, I'd also suggest Hotlinks, which is slanted to more technical / software articles.

      Also, in terms of bookmarks managed solely by one individual, I *highly* recommend Andy Baio's WaxyLinks.

  5. This is great and all by hsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but how long before it is filled with spam links, ads, ect? i don't see how they are going to keep it clean

    1. Re:This is great and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the astroturfing fuckers behind this post have mod points, that's how.

    2. Re:This is great and all by Metteyya · · Score: 1

      Very simple: you check only links of great popularity OR collected by your friends.

    3. Re:This is great and all by maotx · · Score: 3, Informative
      but how long before it is filled with spam links, ads, ect?

      I personally could care less. del.icio.us allows you to become a regsitered member (free) to have your own section of bookmarks. Only you can publish and customize to that section meaning that the only ads that show up will be the ones you put in there. You can then add a live bookmark in Firefox to the rss feed and have the last 30 links available to you anywhere you go. Rather I'm at home or at work I can keep my bookmarks together easily. del.icio.us will then keep a counter on how many people link to the same place and will give you the option of viewing other people's bookmarks who link to the same sites as you. They then take the most linked sites and place them at del.icio.us/popular. The only spam that will show up is the spam that you look for.

      Some common feeds:
      --
      I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
    4. Re:This is great and all by hritcu · · Score: 1

      Quote from the article:

      There is no question but that spamming of these new social tools can and will occur; it almost goes with the territory that social forums will foster such 'parasites' and some instances have been noted already. So far, however, it does not seem to have been a major problem, largely because spam has been drowned out by legitimate use.

      --
      If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
  6. Backflip by griffinn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Backflip used to work well for social bookmarking. But now its user base has shrunk so much that it's trivially easy to distort the results in the "What's popular" sections.

  7. Is this the beginnings of... by MentalMooMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A massive global pr0n database?

    --
    43rd Law of Computing:
    Anything that can go wr
    fortune: Segmentation violation -- Core Dumped
    1. Re:Is this the beginnings of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Someone already beat you to it: Pornalicious

    2. Re:Is this the beginnings of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err no, you'd be wanting pornalicious for that

  8. A manually operated webcrawler. by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With a few hundred million regular users could this sort of thing compete with search engines?

    Or would it just become a handy place that search engines would mine for data?

    --
    Stop the world; I need to get off.
    1. Re:A manually operated webcrawler. by PerlDudeXL · · Score: 1

      del.icio.us has a meta tag to tell a crawler not to index or follow the links.

    2. Re:A manually operated webcrawler. by Cuntish+Sun+Executiv · · Score: 1

      Search engines do not require html, bots are allowed to grab their RSS feeds. http://del.icio.us/robots.txt

      --
      Solaris 10: The most advanced operating system on the planet.
    3. Re:A manually operated webcrawler. by Dr_Emory · · Score: 1

      Actually, this idea is already being implemented. Check Spurl.net's Zniff Search Engine (beta). It works on the principle you mentioned.

    4. Re:A manually operated webcrawler. by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      The only reason they are still useful is that spammers haven't found them yet. When they start spamming in earnest, you can bet that del.icio.us will rapidly become next to useless for many things. Look what's happened to Technorati.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    5. Re:A manually operated webcrawler. by baadger · · Score: 1

      Afraid not. Pumping this URL into some robots.txt validators shows it to be invalid. Apparently "Accept:" isn't part of the robots.txt standard.

      Which only leaves META tags..for XML feeds...I guess it's about time robot exclusion standards were revised.

    6. Re:A manually operated webcrawler. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look what's happened to Technorati.

      Uh, yeah. Look at how they effectively dealt with spam. Whatever you saw isn't there now.

      Likewise, with del.icio.us spam. It exists, but it's easily dealt with.

  9. One bookmark to rule them all by Saeger · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I got tired of micromanaging and losing bookmarks long ago, so now I just use Google to store my bookmarks and use my brain to store the short keywords that matter.

    Not keeping tons of bookmarks is also a good way to reduce info-overload: you only remember the stuff that matters. No more feeling compelled to check up on hundreds of old links (and then cleaning house of the dead ones yet again).

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:One bookmark to rule them all by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      I just made a web page with all my links and have it hidden on my server.. This way I can access it from any PC.

    2. Re:One bookmark to rule them all by euphony · · Score: 1

      I have quite different expierence. It happened quite often that I found a good place but couldn't retrieve the url from Google the next time. Just registered in del.icio.us but feel pity that they don't support Opera very well. What attracts me, however, is the RSS feed they provide. It will help a lot to sync the bookmarks in browsers at home and at school, I hope.

    3. Re:One bookmark to rule them all by danila · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should use spurl.net - they have a sidebar panel (and bookmarklets) for Opera (and all other browsers) and they let me automatically add all the links to my delicious account. It's not perfect, but good enough for now, until Opera supports social bookmarking natively.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    4. Re:One bookmark to rule them all by otisg · · Score: 1

      ... or you can use a tool that has all of these:
      1. tags
      2. social aspect (folksonomy)
      3. full-text search
      4. private / public bookmarks
      5. nice UI

      Delicious has only 1 and 2.
      If you'd like to have all 5, I suggest you look at Simpy - you can use the demo/demo account.

      --
      Simpy
    5. Re:One bookmark to rule them all by corblix · · Score: 1
      ... now I just use Google to store my bookmarks and use my brain to store the short keywords that matter.

      Yes, I do that, too. I remember being surprised when one day I realized that I could find many sites with Google faster than I could with my own bookmark set-up, however well organized it was.

      Unfortunately, that doesn't work with everything, so I have my default page set to a nicely laid out menu of links I use a lot but cannot look up quickly. There are only 12 of these (mostly bank & credit card sites).

      That leaves the third category: miscellaneous crap that's both hard to find and little used. I just cram all that into my hideously disorganized bookmark file. But now, the fact that my bookmarks are not well organized is not a significant problem.

      A key fact here is that it is basically impossible for anyone to come up with a bookmark organization system that improves my life at all. Because any organizational system requires effort on my part (however small) to get things in the proper place. Currently, the only time I apply any effort is when I encounter a new hard-to-find site that I want to use a lot. And that only happens once or twice a year.

  10. wow, not a fluff piece by Fox_1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I went to the article expecting another pseudo marketing piece, but whoa, what's there is quite a detailed analysis of social bookmarking, including a history of bookmarking that brought back my youth when mysterious programs named Archie and Gopher brought me internet content. Someone went through a lot of effort to put this together. There are some interesting conclusions drawn about the differences between search engines and places like slashdot,wiki..community sites where the ranking of the content is done either by machine (search engine) or individuals (community site). I found it interesting to hear a good explanation of why I stopped using bookmarks (when I used to have huge bookmark files) - it became easier to find the same site again through a search engine. Especially when bookmarks become outdated when URL's change.

    --
    The rock, the vulture, and the chain
    1. Re:wow, not a fluff piece by siriuskase · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thanks, now I guess I'll go read it. It took reading this far into the notes, to confirm it wasn't an article on how to use social networking to find nipples in cyberspace.

      I use del.icio.us. I'ts great, but the /. article sounded like it links to something worthless.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    2. Re:wow, not a fluff piece by LionKimbro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You might be interested in something I'm working on.

      I want it to be easy to use bookmarks in speech, not just keep them in a file.

      You can see this in wiki- in wiki, if you use a [[special link syntax,]] it'll automatically link the text.

      I want that for everything.

      If I'm writing in Slashdot, I shouldn't have to write out less-than a href=quote (lookup-and-paste-URL-here) greater-than blah blah less-than /a greater-than, to tell you about "blah blah." I'd much rather just type [[blah blah,]] and have slashdot look up my link from my namespace.

      Just like in wiki. But it should be possible from any text medium, and it should be able to link to anything with a URL.

      Check out our project if you're interested. We've got a timeline on the scale of a year right now, we've written a bunch of software. We've just formalized our Store spec (so that Firefox and other tools can communicate with a names store in a standard way,) and are in process of formalizing our query spec, so that our name servers all talk the same language. We're about to embark on our Firefox plugin, so you can just name a page as you see it. We have a del.icio.us script as well, that can autogenerate namespace descriptions from del.icio.us XML.

    3. Re:wow, not a fluff piece by william.gunn · · Score: 1
      It's the @nature.com email addresses that got my attention.

      I've heard so much fluff about folksonomies and social this-and-that that I'm well sick of it, but you're right. It's a serious article. I've come to reliably expect real content from dlib; They do a good job. The article at Burningbird.com is a great one, too. There seems to be a divide between people who do official tree-based classification and the tag-based classifiers. The tree people say flat namespaces aren't rich enough to provide context and, without a central authority, the system is open to abuse, while the tag people say you can't possibly expect to know the structure beforehand, so you need tag-based "set" classification.

      I'm reminded of a story about a university which, engaged in a grounds beautification project, wanted to fix the problem of no one using the sidewalks, instead cutting across lawns and making unsightly dirt through the manicured lawns. Instead of replanting grass where the trails had been worn through the lawn, then fencing off the area, which would have created even more of an eyesore, they tore up all the sidewalks instead and planted grass where the sidewalks were. 1 year later, they went back and made winding sidewalks where the dirt trails which had been worn into the grass from foottraffic, and landscaped around those.

      I wish the two sides wouldn't be so opposed, because it seems obvious to me that the two need each other. Tree people are right that unguided mass action is no substitute for the action of an experienced editor, while tag folksonomists are right that you can't set the structure beforehand, and expect people to adhere to it as things change. It's clear to me that the tags are creating the categories that the future, managed, tree-based classifications will need to use.

      In the meantime, what would be wrong with del.icio.us and their like publishing a set of "best practices" for tagging? I know they want things to evolve organically, but surely they could at least issue guidelines on the use of underscores and plus signs, for example, and make recommendations on how to make tags useful for others(akin to good password recommendations, except ones people actually follow).

      Here are some suggestions from my own experience:

      If you're going to use the tag, "Blog" or "web" or "research", or something generic like that, include at least one more tag.

      Look to see which one of the various ways you could tag something is used by most people.

      Provide an example of a two level tag system, where you tag something with a broad general tag, then one or more specific tags. For example: if you're tagging pictures you took of a gigantic live oak, you could tag the picture, "tree" and "live oak". It would address the criticism that tag classification doesn't scale.

      It's not unlike the dynamic between open and closed source software, really. If you have nothing but closed source stuff, there will always be needs that aren't met because there's no market. With nothing but open-source, you'd have everyone writing their own personal version of every app out there, and nothing would work together, unless, of course, people decided on ad-hoc "best practices". The introduction of tabs in the next version of IE in the face of Firefox's growing market share is about as clear evidence as you can get of this dynamic. There was something missing from the closed system, so the open system came up with the fix, and it's being integrated back into the closed system, which most people will continue to use.

      I feel like I should be emailing this to the respective people, not burying it in a slashdot comment, but what the hey.

    4. Re:wow, not a fluff piece by Fox_1 · · Score: 1

      I was told that story when touring the university of waterloo, when looking at their comp sci program. They paths aren't laid out in a manner you expect, but they get you from building to building quite nicely. That university is interesting, relatively young (50 or so years) and they have a very efficient student organization. Their student union is run as a business to make money - and they make piles of it, then reinvest that money back into the university building things like a new building for the math department (I think) and a really sexy building for computer science.

      --
      The rock, the vulture, and the chain
    5. Re:wow, not a fluff piece by william.gunn · · Score: 1

      So it's real, eh? cool. I never knew if it really happened or if it was just a story.

  11. wow? by ohzero · · Score: 0, Redundant

    bookmark sharing? did i accidentally turn on the time machine? Even "cool" things like cross-correlation and ...whatever else you could make cool about this, still don't make it useful.

    --
    -- http://www.criticalassets.com
    1. Re:wow? by starphish · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I love del.icio.us. The only reason I use Firefox over Safari is because of del.icio.us. I have the same live bookmarks on my bookmarks toolbar on my PC, Mac, and work PC, without having to import them when I make changes on one computer. If I bookmark something at work, it shows up on my Firefox bookmarks toolbar at home.

      Also, I have a live bookmark on my mother's, and on a friend's computer. All I have to do is tag something as "Mom", or "Joel", and it will show up in their bookmarks in Firefox.

      When my 70 year old mom asks, "Where can I get cheap ink cartridges?", I will add a bookmark to her Firefox. All remotely.

      --
      Yeah, yeah, yeah. The story is a dupe, the topic is boring, the facts weren't checked. WE GET IT!!
    2. Re:wow? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Hope you don't mind everyone knowing your bookmarks.

  12. Yeah, I'll Bookmark This. by CheeseburgerBlue · · Score: 4, Funny

    Probably read it later.

  13. Good. by Crimson+Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The introduction of social bookmarking was ahead of its time. However, with the phenomena of blogging, podcasting, and the like, a revisiting of this idea is a welcome change to our never-ending search for better quality in our instant information-accessing ways. I see some mention about this topic of likening social bookmarking to a search engine, but I fail to see it. A search engine starts with the assumption you have a big pile of mess you need to plod through to find what you want, and casts the widest net possible to do it. While social bookmarking also addresses this assumption, the search for the content you want does not begin in a randomized mess. I have also heard the phrase P2P for categorized search engines, allowing each person who participates to do some of the sorting for you, saving you from the cast-the-widest-net-possible approach of our most popular search engines; a seemingly valid point. I can see social bookmarking doing for searching what RSS did for syndicated news online. I, quite frankly, hope it does.

    --
    The Crimson Dragon
  14. one for your own site... by Teja · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you would like to host a social bookmark script on your own server, you should try Scuttle

    --
    - Teja
    1. Re:one for your own site... by indicavia · · Score: 2, Informative

      SiteBar is another option if you want to have non-social bookmarks (I think) on your own server. But if that's not important, I would really recomend Spurl.net!

  15. Spammers by Vectorman0 · · Score: 1

    This will become usless once spammers start to catch on...

    1. Re:Spammers by I+Love+Soup · · Score: 1

      I've only noticed a spammer once on the main page, and I've been using del.icio.us every day for a while now.

      I emailed Joshua (the creator) and he banned them right away.

      --
      - Soup is really good.
    2. Re:Spammers by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But these are "registered" sites.. they require at least a user name to get in...so it should be easy to limit spammers... after all, a normal person is going to have a 10-1 follow-to-post ratio... because you'd be following existing links more than making new ones. if somebody shows up dumping links it would be pretty easy to spot.

  16. Second part by Teja · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    - Teja
  17. Bizarre like chess strategies! by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    Whoa, dude! Chess strategies! That's outrageous! http://www.chesstactics.org/ "Predator at the Chessboard" The dinosaur part fetish and gung-ho attitude give novelty. Unfortunately del.icio.us is another big timewaster- I highly recommend staying away from the site!

    1. Re:Bizarre like chess strategies! by blackicye · · Score: 1

      Oh great grandmaster, and font of infinite knowledge.

      That was the exact site that was listed on del.icio.us. Yeah I'm sure an accomplished and oh, so busy, grandmaster like yourself would have no time to puruse a site as pedestrian as this.

      I on the other hand am not a full time professional chess geek, and would not have otherwise stumbled upon "Ward Farnsworth's Predator at the Chessboard."

      So I suppose next you're going to tell me slashdot isn't a huge timewaster and not to stay away from it.

    2. Re:Bizarre like chess strategies! by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      I have found that looking at tags on delicious (things like applescript) have given me way more useful and managable results than search engines like google. On delicious, if I look at the torrent tag, i get very useful information and links. Now that every internet opportunist knows that torrent is a popular search term, there are millions of google hits: Results 1 - 100 of about 5,200,000 for torrent. So, lets say 98% of these are bogus or useless. Yeah, I know, pagerank lets the cream rise, but 5 million is crazy. On delicious I am getting the opposite - about 2% are useless and 98% are great links.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    3. Re:Bizarre like chess strategies! by RalfM · · Score: 1


      That site is about tactics, not strategy. Do you know the difference?

      --
      The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.
      -Bertrand Russel
  18. Hmm... by PsychicX · · Score: 1

    Given what I've experienced of the net in certain circles (counter strike and IRC in general being major offenders), I'm not sure I want to know what other people are bookmarking.

  19. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    but search engines go strictly by a formula... not by "usefulness". Sometimes you want to be suggested rather than randomly pointed... A great example I like is Stumble Upon. It can take you to sites linked to by other people that like similar sites... you can get results "skewed" toward a particular interest...like links from fellow slashdotters. True it's not a "pure" search, but it's based on what YOU like...so it's typically a better search.. also StumbleUpon can help you find stuff you didn't know you were interested in.... making it much better than just a search

    The original Yahoo was like that... links were catagorized by hand rather than automated. at the time [in the early days] it was easier to use yahoo because it came up with more relevant sites...not just a text search.

  20. Self Referential by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who gets the impression that this whole social netbookblogmarkworking thingamebob is all a bit self referential at the moment.

    blogs pointing to social booking marking tools linking to other blogs talking about syndication, itself syndicating another page talking about blogging that links to a social booking site...

    I'm a bit worried about getting involved because I might not get out.

    You heard about the two websites that accidetally syndicated each other didn't you? Right mess it was. In the data center of one of the servers the Janitor had to be called in - it was beyond anything a sysadmin could clear up.

  21. scoring tags by clovercase · · Score: 1

    you should check out nesstags... its a suggestion for a simple improvement to tagging systems.

    basically, tags are given a one-digit score (1 low to 9 high) which informs the system how much a given item belongs to that tag.

    so when bookmarking slashdot, for example, you might give it the following tags: news4 geek9

    this means that slashdot is a 4 on the newsness scale, but 9 on the geekness scale. this sort of quantification would really come in handy for searches. when you search for "news," slashdot would be displayed lower in the results than nytimes, for example.

    it is super easy for the tagger to include the scoring, and the improvement to the system could be immense.

  22. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by RemovableBait · · Score: 1

    You can still have links categorized by hand. Just use a directory, not a search engine.

    There's still the original Yahoo directory: http://dir.yahoo.com/. Which, by the way, you can actually search for what you want. All links are hand moderated, so what you're looking for should be relevent to the category.

    There's also the Open Directory Project: http://dmoz.org/. This is the roughly the same as the Yahoo version.. but its open! :)

  23. Simpy by maharg · · Score: 1

    IMO, Simpy knocks del.icio.us into a tin hat.

    --

    $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
    @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    1. Re:Simpy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree!

  24. Great for finding out about the latest viral pages by workingwithme · · Score: 1

    I've been using del.icio.us for about a year now, but I hardly ever visit the site itself except when I'm adding or retrieving my own bookmarks. Instead, I use the fantastic populicious RSS feeds to tell me what the new popular links of the day are, coupled with RSS feeds for various tag intersections that I'm interested in.

    I've found out about a helluva lot of stuff via del.icio.us over the last year that I just wouldn't have found out about otherwise.If you haven't used it yet, give it a look.
  25. Digg by Teja · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are many general social bookmark services available, but Digg (along with del.icio.us) is one of my favorites in that Digg focuses mainly on Tech related things. It is starting to become more and more popular and is really worth checking out.

    --
    - Teja
    1. Re:Digg by Jaff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem with digg though is that half of the postings are about Techtv or people who worked at Techtv. I've also seen a lot of abuse with people linking to their blogs instead of the actual article. It's spam like that which makes digg more frustrating to me than useful.

      I still use it though.

  26. Data validation by digitalmedievalist · · Score: 2, Informative

    One of the benefits of Del.icio.us is that often the popularity of a particular link tells you something about its quality as a data source--but even better, since you can subscribe a a given user's bookmarks, you can use the link poster as another, more accurate, guide to data validity. I'd also like to point out for Mac OS users, that Buzz Andersen's free Cocoalicious is quite nifty, since it works even when the Del.iciou.us server is unavailable, and that Brent Spiner's news reader/aggregator NetNewsWire works well with Deli.icio.us, in part due to the magic of AppleScript, in part because one of its features allows you to subscribe to tag feeds from Del.iciou.us, Flickr, and Technorati.

  27. xxx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm the xxx section on the CelebrityFlicker gave some real interesting pictures... ;)

    1. Re:xxx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the most amazing was searching the "dildo" keyword

  28. heh by rebug · · Score: 1

    When I hit that site the first three popular links were about del.icio.us.

    --

    there's more than one way to do me.
  29. SPAM!!! He is involved with the founders by CdBee · · Score: 1, Informative

    Do a google search for esconsult1 and w3matter (parent company of cityflicker - notice the correlation.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  30. Re:NICE ENGLISH, JACKBALL by maotx · · Score: 1

    Wow. A troll on Slashdot who has nothing better to do on a weekend. You words move me so much...

    --
    I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
  31. Here's what I want by DeeZee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I want a service that lets me se which sites other people recommend that I visit, based on the site that I'm currently on.
    Could be solved by a mix of RSS-feed and Firefox plugin?

    Anything like this exists?

    Oh, and it should be easy as hell to input a new site, or it will never be popular...

    1. Re:Here's what I want by fugas · · Score: 1

      Are you aware of the excellent StumbleUpon extension?

  32. Ironically? by xant · · Score: 1

    One of the current links on that page is "How to Get Slashdotted." Whatever it says, it must work.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  33. I was doing this back in 1994 on my web site.. by the_rajah · · Score: 1

    I have a personal site and from about 1994 when I first put it online until around 1999, I would upload my bookmark page from Netscape. It was already html so it was easy to do without any reformatting at all. I found it pretty handy and so did my friends.

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  34. Spammers by LionKimbro · · Score: 2, Informative

    Does del.icio.us (or the lesser known Open Source de.lirio.us) feature spammer protection? Or technorati tags, for that matter? How do people filter out spammers?

    I keep thinking: "One of these days, the spammers are going to mess up this system."

  35. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by Dracil · · Score: 1

    The problem is that simply being in a category doesn't mean you'll be interested in it. There are "good" sites and "bad" sites in the same category. The idea with Stumbleupon is that people who are like-minded in their likes and dislikes will get lumped together and basically send each other their sites through "random" stumbles. For example, Stumbleupon also has categories. In something like Christianity, you'll find a bunch of Creationist sites as well. Mark them down, and you're less likely to see Creationist sites but you'll still see the other more useful ones out there.

  36. Social Bookmarks Services Stock Market by otisg · · Score: 1

    Yeah, there is one:
    http://buzz.research.yahoo.com/bk/market/market.ht ml?_mid=8976

    Fantasy market, but fun to play and watch.
    The 2 leaders there, Delicious and Furl, are commercial (one has VC funding and the other is owned by a publically traded company). Simpy is the first independent service there, and I hope you can see why (demo/demo account). Yes, I'm a little biased, see my URL above.

    --
    Simpy
  37. Link trend featue in a Social Bookmarks ecosystem by otisg · · Score: 1

    Hate replying to myself, but Simpy has a few more cool features that Delicious lacks. Link History is one of them. For instance, here is http://www.simpy.com/simpy/LinkHistory.do?title=Sl ashdot%3A%20News%20for%20nerds%2C%20stuff%20that%2 0matters&href=http%3A%2F%2Fslashdot.org%2F&v=1">Sl ashdot's link history.

    Also, I can have multiple "Topics" with Simpy (create a Topic, add a few people to it, watch their links, optionally applying a query filter over them). I use this a lot to keep abreast of useful information that pertains to my work and interests.

    --
    Simpy
  38. Yeah, I'll Bookmark This-Outfoxed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://getoutfoxed.com/

    "There are over 8 billion web pages. Most of them suck.

    Outfoxed uses your network of trusted friends and experts to help you find the good stuff and avoid the bad. (And a lot more, too.)"

  39. Useful for those who want to earn money online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can add things like this

  40. your spam detector needs work by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

    You mean this crap isn't spam? And this and this? Those and many, many more fill the first page of results in the search I did just now after reading your post. Technorati's results change by the minute, but they are still full of thousands of spam posts like these.

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  41. del.icio.us = use.less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Read about it here, thought it was as important as the invention of the wheel (Spin). Went to go use it, found out otherwise.

  42. Yuck by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1

    "Bookmarking" is a highly personal thing - just like tastes in general. Sharing your tastes with a few selected people is ok, but sharing them with just anyone on the planet doesn't make any sense. If I'm interested in a particular person's interests, I'll ask them, or I'll visit their web site if they have one. But I have absolutely no interest in knowing the interests and tastes of someone I don't know - or a bunch of them. To me, this is a very specific form of voyeurism. And heaven knows there is already plenty of that on the internet.

  43. why is bookmarking back now by divadwg · · Score: 2, Informative

    I guess things like backflip are coming back, but this time the services are useful. For one thing del.icio.us and Flickr have shown that embracing the developer community makes sense.
    I think for most people, me included, bookmarking is easier and often provides more useful information to others than blogging, there is clearly overlap.
    Services such as Wists which is somewhere between Flickr and del.icio.us are an example of a bookmarking systems that are complimentary to del.icio.us allowing people to bookmark things such as gadgets, complete with thumbnail images.
    Bookmarking is lazy blogging, but if someone is good at spotting things but not so good at writing I'd much rather read what excites someone via their bookmarks than wade through their blog postings.

  44. Re:SPAM!!! He is involved with the founders by elemental23 · · Score: 1

    So what? The mere mention of a company/project you're involved in does not constitute spamming. What, people aren't allowed to talk about what they do? What he posted was completely on-topic.

    --
    I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  45. Feed Me Links by JimmyZ · · Score: 1

    Also checkout Feed Me Links http://feedmelinks.com/portal

    It's a really great social bookmarking site. The userbase is still somewhat small, but it's growing quickly! Feed Me Links provides a great user interface, Firefox extension, IE plugin, RSS feeds, tags, Flash sidebar, and so much more!

  46. References better than the article? by hritcu · · Score: 1

    Although not very good itself, the article gives a lot of good references. For a more in-depth analysis of social bookmarking I would recommend a very interesting article entitled Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata and written by Adam Mathes.

    --
    If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
  47. Is spam a good enough reason to dismiss smth.? by hritcu · · Score: 1

    Your mailbox is full of spam ... are you not mailing anymore?
    The Web is full of spam ... are you not surfing anymore?
    You are getting spam on your cellphone or even in your snail-mailbox ... are you not using them anymore?
    Finally, even /. has its annoying adds, reposts and non-relevant stuff.

    However, I never heard of someone to completely stop using any of these just because of spam. So, the fact that social bookmarking is prone to attract spam (although so far it has not) is usually not a good enough reason to dismiss it. On the contrary, when spam will happen in social bookmarking systems I will know that the technology is mature enough, enough people are using it and it cannot be stopped.

    --
    If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
  48. Try this out.... by klatty · · Score: 1

    I admit it's my own site and just something I have been fooling around with but one thing that I think it has over some of the other social bookmarking sites is that it allows you to designate links as public or pviate.

    I have most of my links public at http://links.klatt.us/public.php?user=klatt but I have a few that are private.

    ... and oh yah, RSS feeds :)

  49. too small pics by fvdham · · Score: 1

    Why are all these pics so small?
    This is useless.

  50. another community bookmarking service by SJey · · Score: 1

    try URLex share your bookmarks across community, friends, co-workers. create private communities, etc. intersting service :)

  51. Re:SPAM!!! He is involved with the founders by CdBee · · Score: 1

    My essential objection was that is was off-topic - or off at a wild tangent anyway, and there was no declaration of an interest in the site and little real relevance to the debate.

    If people want to link to their own sites in a distinctly spammy / google-bomby way they have that right but they shouldn't end up at +5, Informative, because of it, they certainly shouldn't be gaining karma for posting a blatant shill.

    That's an insult to those slashdotters who actually go out there and find good sites that genuinely add to the debate, instead of just posting porn-links for personal profit.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  52. spurl.net by kbg · · Score: 1

    Try spurl.net it is great. I have moved all my bookmarks to it.
    There is also zniff which searches in the bookmarks in spurl.net

  53. Importing bookmarks by bobllama · · Score: 1

    Nifty tool if you want to import your bookmarks from your browser: http://www.julian-bez.de/delicious/ Makes short work of "seeding" your del.icio.us account.