Slashdot Mirror


Virus Hold Computer Files 'Hostage' for $200

dwayner79 sent in a story about a new virus making the rounds- this one is unique because it locks your files and then demands a $200 ransom to get them back. It seems to me that this might leave some sort of tracable money trail. They don't have much information on any particular transmission mechanism, they just talk about web pages giving it up.

104 of 488 comments (clear)

  1. It won't get a penny from me... by yotto · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Until I see a photograph of my files with today's paper.

    1. Re:It won't get a penny from me... by c0ldfusi0n · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other news, virus writers associate with milk producers to print the output of "dir" on the back of the milk cartons.

      --
      A computer makes it possible to do, in half an hour, tasks which were completely unnecessary to do before.
    2. Re:It won't get a penny from me... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seriously though, the article does not show me any reason that the virus writer can be trusted on his word alone. How would you know that he really will send the key?

      I can see three possible ways this is done: the files could be encrypted with a random key which is sent back to the author - in this case I guess the key could be intercepted on its way out of your computer, but you'd have to anticipate being infected. Alternatively, the virus might always use the same key, in which case one person needs to buy/brute force it and everyone's sorted. Finally, it might use a random key which the writer has no way of knowing - secure, but he'll take the money and run because he doesn't know the key.

      In any of those three scenarios I'd think it makes sense to try to avoid giving him any money. Either that or I've missed something.

    3. Re:It won't get a penny from me... by HadenT · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why not:
      generate random key, encrypt data with it (symmetric),
      encrypt that key with public one (stored in virus itself), destroy random key, give victim encrypted key.
      Victim sends encrypted key to author, he decrypts it using his private key and sends it back.

    4. Re:It won't get a penny from me... by Inkieminstrel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anyone else think this comment is funny in light of the signature attached to it?

    5. Re:It won't get a penny from me... by tchernobog · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not a really new idea, it's inside Andrew Tanenbaum's "Modern Operating Systems"!
      The virus programmer has to have read the book.

      --
      42.
    6. Re:It won't get a penny from me... by GauteL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it uses the same key, but a very long one, all the computers in the world would be very unlikely to break the key in a decent amount of time.

      Remember the RC5 challenge? It took 1757 days worth of massive collaboration effort to break a 64 bit key, showing that 64 bits RC5 is not enough for data that is still sensitive after several years.

      Now they are trying to break a 72 bit version of the same algorithm. It should take 2^8=256 times more computational effort or over 1000 years with current processing power.

      Processing power increases, but you can imagine that something encrypted with a public key algorithm that requires as much effort as 80 bit RC5, could be impossible to break in the time-frame where the data is still valuable, even with a combined world-wide effort.

    7. Re:It won't get a penny from me... by icypyr0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Too bad an FBI investigation/ prosecution costs over $200,000 on average. That's 1000x the $200 ransom. Bottom line; it would have to be a widespred thing for the FBI to give a shit.

  2. This could be good by a_greer2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

    IF it takes spyware hostage

    1. Re:This could be good by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you really think a virus is going to take spyware hostage and then demand $200 for the key to unencrypt it? I don't know about you, but even if it did, I sure wouldn't be happy with this kind of virus on my computer.

      Plus the article mentions this paritcular infection affected only "at least fifteen types of data," most of which were presumably important to the user, like spreadsheets and the like. But again, even if it did encrypt malware ... I don't see how it could be a good thing. Let's introduce them to Ad-Aware, Spybot, etc. instead, and safe browsing habits--the lack of which probably allowed both this virus and the malware on the computer in the first place.

      --
      R.Mo
  3. a fix by MankyD · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Assuming this virus is telling the truth (and I highly highly highly doubt it is), doesn't that mean that there's a simple command you can send to it to fix the problem? What's to prevent anti-virus companies from figuring this out and providing a quick fix?

    --
    -dave
    http://millionnumbers.com/ - own the number of your dreams
    1. Re:a fix by pentalive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A simple command to fix this? try
      "restore backup"

    2. Re:a fix by keshto · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because if the hacker has encrypted the files with a random passphrase and assuming this passphrase isn't the same for all the computers he attacks, it is highly unlikely a security company will be able to easily decrypt the files.

      That is what is particularly scary about this. What if the hacker went offline-- even if you are willing to pay the money, you can't get to the files. They are as good as deleted

    3. Re:a fix by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What makes you think that?

      If I were the extortionist, I'd write the code to obtain a key from some source (perhaps be pre-loaded with several thousand precalculated RSA "public" keys), encrypt the files, and then release a decrypter with the relevent private key for that particular system.

      This works because RSA encryption involves keys that have a public and private portion. The public key is used to encrypt but once encrypted, the data can't be decrypted without the private key. It is immensely difficult to calculate what the private key that goes with a public key is, for larger key sizes (128bits and more) we're talking of the order of decades for the fastest computers to work out. So it's "Pretty Good" encryption.

      So, if he's done his homework ("he" is generic here, I don't mean to imply the person who wrote this is of one gender or another, I know that terms like "sie" and "hir" are probably less known on /. than in other groups where gender discrimination is considered a more important issue that must be tackled. This isn't the 1950s any more, or even the kind of Star Wars crap where women are seen as bearers of future Jedi who stay home and get all emotional and lose the will to live when their partners turn to the Dark Side), this kind of scam will work pre[tt]y well.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:a fix by wren337 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since they recovered the files without the key, it looks like the guy wrote his own crypto. Score one for the good guys. Next time maybe the guy uses a well written public key library. Encrypt the local files with a random symmetric key, encrypt the key with a public key and present it to the user. The user has to email the encrypted symmetric key to the virus writer for decryption.

      There's no reason to think there would be a single interceptable "key" value that would unlock everyone's files. It depends on the skill of the author.

    5. Re:a fix by Mr+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

      (or discover it through brute force if they dare wait that long)


      McAfee runs on an awful lot of enterprise networks, and tons of home users. I wonder how long brute forcing a key through distributed computing would really take. I wonder if McAfee is already using cycles for nefarious reasons. How long until McAfee becomes self aware!

      I need more tinfoil

    6. Re:a fix by jschottm · · Score: 4, Funny

      I need more tinfoil

      There's a family in CA that would prolly be willing to make you a great deal on some tin foil, only slightly used. How big's your house?

    7. Re:a fix by budgenator · · Score: 3, Informative
      according to TFA
      Stewart managed to unlock the infected computer files without paying the extortion, but he worries that improved versions might be more difficult to overcome.

      so it's already been either bruteforced or cracked. My hunch is that a encryption program carried in a virus would be rather simplistic.
      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    8. Re:a fix by httptech · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not a command in the trojan that decrypts the files, it's a program the trojan author sends you after you send him $200. However, the encryption is trivial and just about any reverse-engineer could write a decryptor for you.

      -Joe

      Joe Stewart, GCIH
      Senior Security Researcher
      LURHQ http://www.lurhq.com/

    9. Re:a fix by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unless you found some very fast new way of factoring primes, that'd take a very long time to crack

      I have. The factors of a prime, are the prime, and 1.

      (And I know what you meant. I just couldn't resist)

    10. Re:a fix by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Funny

      Assuming you have no backups, that could really be a problem. Everyone does keep backups, right?

    11. Re:a fix by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 4, Funny
      "s/he" and "his/er" works quite well if you need to get anal about it.


      And what if something has no gender and is an "it", you insensitive clod?

      Clearly, to avoid offending anyone, we all must start saying "s/h/it".
    12. Re:a fix by frankvl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's to prevent anti-virus companies from figuring this out and providing a quick fix?

      Such a virus is the best marketing they can have

    13. Re:a fix by Binestar · · Score: 3, Funny

      'restore' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.

      You are entering the command at the wrong interface. That's not a command you use at a command prompt. It's a verbal command for your IT underling.

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
  4. Finally! by Apreche · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What the hell took so long for this to happen? There are thousands of viruses all around and most of them are so benign. They just eat system resources, send spam, show ads and other bs. It took way too long for someone to make a virus that actually compromises data. I hope soon someone makes one that takes important data files and uploads them to a web server for public view. And another one that overwrites the hard drives 3 or 4 times to prevent data recovery.

    Maybe when this happens people will actually pay more attention to computer security, instead of just putting up with the inconvenience.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Finally! by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You've not been around computers for long have you? We used to have all these nasty viruses, before Visual Basic and script kiddies, back when AOL wasn't on the Internet and dial up was mostly BBSes. Boot sector viruses, trashing hard drive controllers, etc.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:Finally! by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Maybe when this happens people will actually pay more attention to computer security, instead of just putting up with the inconvenience.

      What will do that is a virus that replaces all .jpg files found with goatse, tubgirl and lemonparty.

      So many people have stored their digital camera photos on vulnerable Windows PCs. The only thing that will get them to secure those boxes is the threat that little Sophie's birthday photos, or the last time they went on holiday with Grandma before the illness, might be replaced with hideous porn by some virus...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:Finally! by MullerMn · · Score: 3, Funny

      I knew what goatse was.
      I knew what tubgirl was.
      Never heard of lemonparty before.
      Now I know.

      Allow me to be the first to say:
      AAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

    4. Re:Finally! by EnglishTim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, I'd never heard of lemonparty before either.

      'course, I've got the sense not to look it up...

    5. Re:Finally! by sosume · · Score: 2, Informative

      I too was innocent on the subject of lemon party.

      I expected some funky game involving lemon juice and pie ..

      Now I know as well.

      This is even more gross than goatse, parrot or tubgirl! As a matter in fact I'm taking the rest of the day off, avoiding elderly people, to make sure my mind can recover.

      Fellow /.ers, please take my advise and do NOT google for it.

      I won't be able to get the image I just googled out of my memory next time someone mentions a lemon .. even though I don't really understand the 'lemon' part

    6. Re:Finally! by Dusabre · · Score: 4, Informative

      WATCH OUT!

      There is a thumbnail!

    7. Re:Finally! by srleffler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There was even at least one that could wipe the BIOS eproms, leaving the computer completely inoperable and difficult to repair if not outright irreparable.

    8. Re:Finally! by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, that's exactly why we don't see really destructive viruses anymore: they've evolved. Just like biological viruses, computer virus writers have learned that your virus will spread farther if it doesn't completely kill the host, or generate an overwhelming immune response.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Finally! by imr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It reminds me of DaHalf.
      This one was a perverse bastard. It slowly encrypted your hd track by track at every reboot but decrypted them, so the datas were perfectly safe as long as the virus was there.
      If you removed the virus, you lost the datas since the encryption key was in the virus.

      Do not remove virii before reading what they are about.
      If a virus is on your hd and you want to have it checked, cut the power, remove it from the pc and do not boot it until it is between the hands of a professional.
      Consider switching to linux and entering the land of peace of mind.

    10. Re:Finally! by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you ever heard the phrase "curiosity killed the cat?" It's like a siren's call -- they know it's bad, but they can't help themselves.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  5. Don't give in to the demands of terrorists by saskboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    However, people have been installing and paying spyware removal fees of less than $200, so I won't be surprised when people pay off viruses like this.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  6. I call hoax by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If it were real, we would have heard it from Symantec or McAffee long before a third-world news website.

    1. Re:I call hoax by saskboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I call RTFA ;-)

      "The FBI said the scheme, which appears isolated, was unlike other Internet extortion crimes.

      Leading security and anti-virus firms this week were updating protective software for companies and consumers to guard against this type of attack, which experts dubbed "ransom-ware"."

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:I call hoax by hedleyroos · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are an idiot for dismissing South Africa as third world. We may be in Africa and suffer from some of its problems, but I am sitting here typing my message from a Gentoo box while installing FreeBSD on another machine. Third world? I think not. Also, the sun rises earlier in South Africa than in the US. We sometimes get news earlier than you do because New Zealand and Australia wake up looong before you do.

    3. Re:I call hoax by Misanthropy · · Score: 2

      Yeah, because if it's in an article it's got to be true!

      Sounds like urban legend material to me. Like exploding monitors and the like.

    4. Re:I call hoax by t123 · · Score: 5, Informative
      try the websense website with more detailed information.
      The original infection occurs when the user visits a malicious website that exploits a previous vulnerability in Microsoft Internet Explorer. This vulnerability allows applications to run without user intervention. The malicious website uses the Windows help subsystem and a CHM file to download and run a Trojan Horse (download-aag). The downloader then connects, via HTTP, to another malicious website. This website hosts the application that encodes files on the user's local hard disk and on any mapped drives on the machine. The malicious code also drops a message onto the system with instructions on how to buy the tool needed to decode the files. This message includes the email address of a third party to contact for instructions, and the user is directed to deposit money into an online E-Gold account.
  7. Payment Options by BunnyClaws · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do they accept PayPal?

    --
    "Anything tastes good if you deep fry it."
  8. interesting attack by rayde · · Score: 5, Insightful
    this is interesting. if a virus did this on a large scale, there would be loads of people who would be desperate to recover their data, and likely no feasible way to do it on a large scale without key recovery. but really, does the h4xx0r expect to be able to collect a sizeable amount of money without it being traced?

    yet another reason to do regular backups, so you are never solely dependent on your local copies.

    1. Re:interesting attack by mwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What the virus author should be asking himself is: "should I worry more about the FBI tracing the thing back to me, or the minions of some mobster who just had his, uh, business records zapped by this indiscriminate attack?"

  9. Heh by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nothing for you to see here. Please move along.

    OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH GNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. It appears to have infected CmdrTaco and now the news is being held hostage!!!!!!!!??!?!?!!!!

    1) Infect news site and hold "stories" hostage
    2) Hold a slashpoll to see if anyone noticed
    3) ...
    4) PROFIT!

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  10. I use Bank of America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    so I figure the virus author could deduct the money from my account, himself.

  11. Must be a real moron by Kosi · · Score: 5, Informative

    because his "blackmail-letter" is a file called attention!!!.txt, containing this:

    Some files are coded.
    To buy decoder mail: n781567@yahoo.com
    with subject: PGPcoder 000000000032

    1. Re:Must be a real moron by caluml · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the best **almost** anonymous way of sending messages is to PGP/GPG encrypt them, and post them to alt.anonymous.messages. Then, the right person, with the correct key can download your message, and (if he downloads every message in the group every day), you'd never know which ones he was able to read. And obviously others wouldn't be able to read the contents.

    2. Re:Must be a real moron by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

      I got infected by that virus once. It printed this:

      I hold files kidnap: "GPL.TXT" is one
      To buy decoder mail: n781567@yahoo.com
      with subject: PGPcoder 000000000032

      Oh, darn...

  12. Next time by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Next time the police captures a virus writer, they should put him in a cell and tell him, we'll leave you here unless another virus writer pays us 200$.

  13. Getting away with it... by NCraig · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "The problem is getting away with it - you've got to send the money somewhere," Stewart said. "If it involves some sort of monetary transaction, it's far easier to trace than an email account."
    These guys won't get caught as long as they operate internationally and keep their ransom demands relatively low. As we've seen with the Nigerian Scam, there will be little impetus to apprehend these worthless criminals.
  14. Ransom by mcleaver · · Score: 5, Funny

    SOmeone wrote: "this one is unique because it locks your files and then demands a $200 ransom to get them back." Unique? sounds like a description of anti-virus software to me.

    1. Re:Ransom by Brian+Boitano · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was thinking more along the lines of "Please insert coin to continue".

      --
      What would Brian Boitano do?
  15. Or.... by spotmonk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    you could just spend the change on a blank cd and back up your data before spending 200 dollars to get it back.

  16. I send program to your email... Give me Money! by stanleypane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me, or does this seem a little elementary? FTA:

    "I send program to your email," the hacker wrote.

    And only demanding $200.00 from a business? Sounds like one of the following must be true:

    a) person is stupid enough to demand only $200.00 for a crime most likely punishable as extortion.
    b) person is testing the effectiveness of their program.
    c) person is too short sighted to think of either a or b.

    This is just pathetic.

  17. If a smart crook were behind this ... by Y2 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If a smart crook were behind this, he'd not worry much about collecting the supposed ransom, but would pop his head up as a good guy saying he'd cracked the virus and would sell you a fix-it kit for $50.

    Of course, this means any honest white knight is going to learn the hard way about 20 feds and a flashlight.

    --
    "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
  18. And computer criminals everywhere cringe by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not that I particularly apprecaite idiot crackers making my work harder, but you gotta figure they'll be cringing at this rather blunt and clumsy attempt at extortion{sp}.

    I mean, is it really that much harder to make a virus that silently installs itself and listens for key strokes, then sends those back to you through a few cracked proxies? And there you go: account numbers and passwords.

    Idiots. If they do try to collect on this, they'll be caught, we'll find it's a couple of dumb as fuck kids who thought it'd be cool to "have a couple hundred bucks".

    And while I'm on that, 200 bucks? If you are really trying to get money, why not charge 20 bucks? For 200 bucks, most people are likely to seek outside help. For 20 bucks, people are more likely to just fork it over. I'd bet you'd have a greater ROI with the lower charge.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  19. Wow by NubKnacker · · Score: 5, Funny
    "This seems fully malicious," said Joe Stewart, a researcher at Chicago-based Lurqh who studied the attack software.

    Gee, I wonder how he figured that out....

    1. Re:Wow by httptech · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, funny funny. In context, though, you have to know the question the reporter asked me, which was, "Do you think this software was a test, or do you think it was malicious?"

      -Joe

      --
      Joe Stewart, GCIH
      Senior Security Researcher
      LURHQ http://www.lurhq.com/

    2. Re:Wow by httptech · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep, I cringed when I saw it too. The other posters' comments about reporters is right on - you can talk for 15 minutes and give them a clear picture of the issue, but they'll pick the most impacting statements instead of the ones that explain it. And if you happen to say something that sounds fucktarded out-of-context, you can rest assured you'll see that quote in the article :)

      -Joe

      --
      Joe Stewart, GCIH
      Senior Security Researcher
      LURHQ http://www.lurhq.com/

  20. Isn't that a feature by overshoot · · Score: 5, Funny

    that Microsoft is adding to the next version of Office?

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  21. Re:your new around here arent you by trandism · · Score: 2, Funny

    Then again I still had Freecell and Minesweeper so it wasn't all bad ....which until today are the best software available for the Windows platform

    --
    www.lemonodor.com A mostly Lisp weblog
  22. Why so much press.. by technomancer68 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This has been out for years, it's called Windows XP Activation.

    --

    The Technomancer
    "Men of lofty genius when they are doing the least work are most active."-
  23. I think... by HTL2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    this is probably just an experiment, to see how many people are willing to pay this ammount to get the files back

    He (she?) would get more money if it was a lower ammount in an easy-to-pay system, since many more people would pay.
    Maybe we will see the story sometime soon

    --
    By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
  24. Insightful, but disgusting. by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Funny

    virus that replaces all .jpg files found with goatse, tubgirl and lemonparty.

    Thanks for giving 'em the idea. Next time I go to look at pr0.. I mean my pictures, I'm going to be in fear of opening any of them.. *grumble*

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  25. Fill in the blank.... by ZerocarboN · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Can you find out where to put the word "Explorer" in the following quote?

    In the recent case, computer users could be infected by viewing a vandalised website with vulnerable Internet _____________ browser software
  26. "Malicious Cryptography: Exposing Cryptovirology" by scovetta · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just finished reading "Malicious Cryptography: Exposing Cryptovirology", and it talks greatly about exactly this. The problem is that, due to wonderful things like public-key encryption, evildoers could conduct an attack like this without leaving a trace.

    I'd highly recommend the book (no, I don't know that author).

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  27. Yes, it's possible by 3770 · · Score: 4, Funny

    What the programmer needs to do is to buy a speed boat and have the victim drop the bag from a bridge into the boat and then flee and stage his own death with an explosion.

    I've seen it in the movies.

    The trick is to do that without spending more than $200.

    --
    The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
  28. New Variant by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you dont send the money with in two weeks they start sending the files back, bit by bit.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  29. Subtlely (?) destructive viruses by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've written about this before, but I'm *so* waiting for a virus to do one or more of the following:

    * alter scheduled appointments in outlook/exchange
    * alter contact information in outlook/exchange
    * alter information in ms word and ms excel documents

    The key to all this is to do it in small doses - change a 3 to a 4, alter appointments by 1 hour, etc, introduce a few wrong spellings into ms word documents, etc.

    People have this view that viruses are horribly destructive, and it decreases the estimation of Windows in some. Others stick by Windows, content to use anti-virus stuff because a virus just generally uses up resources indiscriminately or 'steals' data.

    If viruses started attacking the integrity of core MS Office products, not 'just' the operating system itself, more damage would be done to MS' hold on corporate america than any attack on the 'operating system' level by viruses.

    Put more simply, most people really don't understand the ins and outs of operating systems, nor the potential damage than can be done to them. Everyone can understand the damage that could be done by having your spreadsheets altered without your knowledge.

    Well, at least I *think* everyone could understand that.

    1. Re:Subtlely (?) destructive viruses by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm... Subtle damage could indeed be more crippling than overt damage.

      Deleting a file will cause staff to notice, and after the virus is removed, the file will be restored.

      Changing a few random values in a spreadsheet will likely not be noticed as quickly, and when it is, there may not be any way to work out which daily backup to restore from.

      Then there's the effect.

      Deleting a file causes irritation, but has no lasting effect.

      Altering the file subtly will potentially damage a forecast, change the meaning of data or cause an employee to be held in lower regard.

      I've sometimes wondered why virus writers seem little more than children, preferring to see their name writ large than actually do anything malicious. I've come to think it's human nature not to cause damage just for the hell of it.

      I've been waiting for really damaging viruses to appear. This one won't herald the start of them - people will just purge the virus and then restore from backups.

  30. Sounds familiar... by Source+Quench · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is what happened when I installed windows 98... it crashed and a dialog box appeared and demanded that I upgrade to windows XP in order to save my files from digital heaven.

  31. Re:Gives new meaning by njfuzzy · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, that's pretty much the original meaning.

    --
    My Photography - http://ian-x.com
    The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
  32. not my pr0n!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No!!!! Not my 200GB archive of pr0n!! :(
    That'll that forever to redownload and organize...

    Where do I send the money?

  33. Stockholm Syndrome by zbeeble · · Score: 3, Funny

    What happens if after I pay the money, my files do not want to come back ?

  34. I remember them... by aug24 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I lost my third year project (Physics) to one in 1992. Eight months work chewed to bits, but a very nice chap named Jules reconstructed most of it from the actual sectors, with me guessing where-abouts it came from.

    Those were, emphatically, NOT the days.

    Justin.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  35. Re:Retro by HyperBlazer · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Sounds like the first computer virus from what I remember. The one where some repair shop in India had the virus lock the user out of the system. It kindly displayed an ad for the repair shop that said they could fix it though.

    I think you mean the Pakistani Brain Virus.

    Software writers, not repair shop. Pakistan, not India. Not the first virus. It was intended to prevent piracy, and wasn't at all intended to be a "ransom."

    That's the short version of the story. "Welcome to the Dungeon. Beware of the VIRUS." ;-)

  36. Re:Crypto Question by wren337 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a chosen plaintext attack might be an interesting defense. you could keep a series of chosen files with different extentions on your computer, so that when you get hit you have them for the decryption effort. Also you should wrap your monitor in tinfoil. ;)

  37. The first rule of backing up by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is to back up your data on a regular basis.

    This little bit of wisdom has been around since computers hit the home. Now if only people would follow the advice given to them this virus would be a complete non-issue. Instead, we have a bunch of users who are convinced nothing bad will happen to them, (or are completely oblivious to the dangers), complaining since they didn't do what someone told them it was important to do.

    I know I am paranoid, but I make sure important files are regularly copied to 3 different systems. Gmail makes a great place to store some of data - lots of space, geographically separated and administered by people who aren't complete idiots. I also copy my important stuff every week or two and put the disk in a fireproof safe designed for computer media.

    This scheme seems to work well against these sorts of viruses as well as natural disasters and harware failures.

    --
    Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
  38. Re:This won't last long by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then...

    "Nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure"...

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  39. The AIDS Trojan already tried this trick by Mattias · · Score: 2, Informative

    The encrypt-files-and-demand-ransom-trick has been tried before by criminals in 1989. A company sent out disks with software containing a trojan that encrypted the harddisk and then demanded money to decrypt it.

    http://www.claws-and-paws.com/virus/papers/history -of-computer-viruses.html#C05

  40. web services, baby! by abulafia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The ransomware could phone home to a cracked server which provides the key. Or public key crypto could be used.

    --
    I forget what 8 was for.
  41. Gender Descrimination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh yeah. Fuck those gender-descriminating Jedi.

    Anakin: "Padme, you're pregnant. I'm afraid-for the good of the baby-you can't go lightsaber dueling or starfigher riding. You can resume such activities when they are safe for you again, mmkay?"

    Padme: "Okay. I don't want to lose my child, so I'll sit down for this particular strech of 9 months. It's not like I wasn't involved in lots of gunfights before this, so I think I can deal."

    God, some people just try too hard. Your stupid little digression about "sie" and "hir" is almost longer than your entire point.

  42. reminds me of the 'jackpot' virus by Errtu76 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    back in the msdos days (aka: the good old days) there was a virus that locked your pc, did something nasty to your mbr (or fat - i forgot) and you had to play a game (or two .. or usually aLOT) on the slots machine. You would get your system back when you got the jackpot.

    1. Re:reminds me of the 'jackpot' virus by RIAA+Bounty+Hunter · · Score: 3, Informative
      That virus was known as Casino.2330.

      Screenshots

  43. Re:"Malicious Cryptography: Exposing Cryptovirolog by timster121 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The author's name is 14608decf3c24b62a64015d411a862a640e5c1.

    Course, you'll have to read the book to figure out how to decode it.

  44. Re:They and Their by croddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    language derives its meaning from mutual consent. you can't "evolve a new shade of meaning" by yourself. before new forms enter a language, many people must use them for quite a while. we've formalized the lexicon and grammar so that people can actually use language to communicate predictably.

  45. There will be no negotiations. by vertinox · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sorry, but we don't negotiate with terrorists. The files knew the danger when they took the job.

    C:\>format c:

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  46. This makes me wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Will Microsoft start factoring these little occurances into the TCO of Windows?!

    1. Re:This makes me wonder... by XMyth · · Score: 2

      For the love of God.

      How is this in any way a Windows specific thing? The same virus could be written to run on any OS.

      I stand by my earlier statement.

      You're an idiot.

    2. Re:This makes me wonder... by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Informative
      You can protect individual user directories in Windows XP if you set up permissions correctly, just the same as how you can protect individual user directories on Linux if you set up permissions correctly.
      Yes, you can set up XP permissions correctly. Well, XP home kills your ability to do this easily. Read this article. XP Home is pretty much brain dead IMO. From the article about Home vs Pro:
      The most obvious difference is security, which is vastly simplified in Home Edition. Each interactive user in XP Home is assumed to be a member of the Owners local group, which is the Windows XP equivalent of the Windows 2000 Administrator account
      So the majority of all computer users using MS Windows XP are running as admin. They are open to far more problems than the typical Linux or Mac OS X user who are running as a non-admin user. Sure you can run as root/admin under the other OS'es, however it is not the norm.
      I would argue that there are quite a few new Linux users who foolishly make liberal use of the root account to make certain tasks easier. While maybe a competent Linux user would not make such mistakes, theres no reason to expect that a competent user would make the same kinds of mistakes on a Windows machine.
      And your argument would be wrong. All of the major Linux distro's have users create a non-root account at _install time_. When it comes time to do a task that requires root, a nice little GUI window pops up and asks for the root password (oh, this also happens from the console/command line).
      it's not helpful when Linux extremists like you warp the truth to fit your agenda.
      Linux extremists like me? So I say something negative about MS and now I am a "Linux extremists"? Stop being an MS appologist. I make my living by writting software on MS OSes. I just don't appoligize for all the stupid things MS do.
      You should be ashamed.
      Ashamed of what? Not making up excuses for every brain dead thing that MS has done. You should be the one that is ashamed for sweeping the problems of MS under the rug.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  47. Wow, it's like the movie "Hackers"... only lamer by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow - it's like "Hackers"... only ten years after the idea even made the mainstream. And much more low-rent. And without the cool graphics and computer-generated voice. And with less supertankers. And without Angelina Jolie with her nips out.

    How lame is that?

    (And that's leaving aside the huge number of social and technical ways this scam could be improved...)

    --
    Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
  48. laundering the money by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Everyone speculates that laundering the money will be hard. Perhaps not so hard really. This happens daily on E-bay with the western union scams. Apparentyl none of those are ever traced so why not these?

    As for tracing the e-mail well that wont work either: again people do this all the time on e-bay rip offs and none of those get traced.

    besides which the attacker might very well be logging your keystrokes and simply watching for you to send any text continaing a fake address he gave you, then sending this real text somewhere else. Fat chance you would notice this in time to do anything about it. He just picks off the western union number, then pays some street urchin to go collect for him.

    or you could rig this as sort of a two part thing. One is to have the virus encrypt the files. then "coincidentally" this spam e-mail comes offer to sell you a universal decoder program for the low price of 49.99$. THe company could be legitimate in the same sense that McAffee is legit. They just sell decryption tools. Sure they might be suspect but some company IS going to crack this and when they do they are going to SELL the decoder. The evil-doer merely has to be one of many companies offer this product for sale. It would be in his interest to leak the decoding method just so those decoy compamies would appear.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:laundering the money by team99parody · · Score: 5, Insightful
      In fact, Symantec does this to me (at work) all the time. I bought their product once; and every 6 months or however long it takes that license to expire; they keep spamming me with more emails that say if I want to keep my computer safe from all the stuff infectig it I need to pay them more protection money.

      At home, I don't have the problem; since more honorable vendors that distribute their software via apt-get don't run these kinds of protection rackets.

  49. Re:Crypto Question by swillden · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you have just two files its still extremely hard... you need something like 2^23 files to do it in a reasonable amount of time (assuming RSA+IDEA).

    This post is incorrect. Probably a semi-subtle troll rather than an honest error.

    Neither RSA nor IDEA is vulnerable to a known-plaintext attack. In fact, any cipher that is vulnerable to such an attack is considered completely insecure, especially if only 2^23 "files" are needed.

    If you get to choose the contents of one of the files its only about 2^17.

    Neither RSA nor IDEA is vulnerable to a chosen-plaintext attack. There were some chosen-plaintext attacks against RSA a few years back (mid 90s), but proper padding eliminates them. And far more than 2^17 trials were required for typical key sizes. Again, no cipher that was vulnerable to such an attack would be considered secure.

    Obviosly, if the keys are larger, it will take exponentially longer.

    Larger than what? Are you assuming extremely small key sizes in order to achieve the numbers above? Actually, you don't get to pick the size of an IDEA key, because IDEA keys are 128 bits. Though you can arbitrarily fix key bits to produce a smaller effective key, there's no reason why the virus writer would want to do that.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  50. typo by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny
    you misspelled "ls"

    Oh, wait a minute, never mind...

    I forgot we were talking about viruses.

  51. I have a *GREAT* idea to make this a good thing... by fzammett · · Score: 4, Funny

    Twoeasy steps:

    (1) Get this virus into the DMCA-supporters computers.

    (2) When they are screaming that all their data is encrypted, kindly inform them that you could create a crack for it and get all their data back, but unfortunately you would run afoul of the DMCA reverse-engineering laws and therefore cannot help them.

    Yes. Irony is *NOT* dead!!

    --
    If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
  52. A simple request by bunratty · · Score: 3, Funny

    Some kind soul should write a virus that holds your files hostage until Firefox is installed and is set as the default browser. Hint, hint...

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  53. An old remake, using the Net this time, and $$$ by saskboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I encountered a virus just 2 years ago, although it had been written in the 1990s, that encrypted files on a hard drive using a randomly generated and locally stored key. If you removed the virus, you'd lose the key, and access to all files that had so far been encrypted. I don't recall the name of the virus right now, but I spent about an hour looking for a fix to this old virus, and fortunately found an old removal utility on a website that was still hosting it, and it retrieved the simple encryption key, and removed the virus after decrypting all of the encrypted files.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:An old remake, using the Net this time, and $$$ by Leebert · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're probably referring to the "One-Half" virus, if I recall correctly from my days reading alt.comp.virus.

      This was the classic example as to why blindly running "fdisk /mbr" from a boot floppy was a no-no.

  54. Money Agents by gone.fishing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder if this (or some other) extortion attempt is why my bank recently sent it's customers a warning about a new scam that asks you if you would be willing to become a "money agent" for someone in another country. Supposedly, you would allow money to be deposited in your account and then you would send 90% of it along to a Western Union account. According to the scam, this is supposed to be faster, safer, and cheaper for people in forigen countries.

    Seems like a great way of breaking the money trail and it only costs 10%!

    Crooks are pretty inventive.

    1. Re:Money Agents by djrogers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I'm willing to work with a foreign criminal, why wouldn't I just hang on to all 100% of the $$? Crooks don't trust other people that far... It's far more likely that the 'scam' is simply a way to get your checking account info so the crooks can drain it directly.

      --
      Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
  55. Re:viruses that wipe windows by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not sure if you're a troll or not, but us in the linux community don't want to *WIN THAT WAY*.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley