Slashdot Mirror


Debian 3.1 (Sarge) Released

Mister Furious writes "First, Apple switches to Intel, and now, equally shocking: Debian Sarge is released! Hell has officially frozen over! The scoop is from debian-administration.org: "The new Debian stable release, codenamed Sarge, has officially been released today. Several years of development since the last stable release, Woody, was released on the 9th of July, 2002 over a thousand developers around the world have helped make this release possible." Changes include Gnome 2.8, Firefox 1.0.4, Thunderbird 1.0.2, Apache 2.0.54 (1.3.33 is still available, too!), Postgresql 7.4.7, and more. The news hasn't hit the main Debian GNU/Linux site as of this article's posting. Congratulations to all of the Debian developers and contributors. Thanks for all your hard work and for a great distro!" Here's a link to the Debian Stable "Release" file.

Espectr0 points out an article about the release at Linux Compatible, writing "It is available on 14 (!) CD's or 2 DVD's. It includes XFree86 4.3, GNOME 2.8, KDE 3.3, Kernel 2.4.27, GCC 3.3.5, OpenOffice.org 1.1.3 and much others."

80 of 411 comments (clear)

  1. Yes but... by yogikoudou · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does it run Linux on my Mac x86 ?

  2. in other news.. DUKE NUKEM FOREVER RELEASED! by perler · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a brillant marketing sting, Steve Jobs of Apple, the Debian Developement Team and 3DRealms united and tried to get the attention of the world today by confirming the long rumored news of the release of their respective flagship products, the Intel-microprocessor based "Macintosh Computer", the linux operating sytem "Debian 3.1" and the so called first person shooter game "Duke Nukem Forever" within hours and by doing so slashdotting the website "Slashdot.Org" - the only thing of the whole internet thought to be unslashdottable.

  3. Mail to debian-announce; news on www.debian.org by Josh+Triplett · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mail to debian-announce

    News on www.debian.org

    Congrats to the Debian project!

    1. Re:Mail to debian-announce; news on www.debian.org by tacocat · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know if you are upgrading from stable or not, but you need to upgrade using 'apt-get dist-upgrade' and sometimes need to run it more than once. This prevents things from getting screwed up during the installation process.

    2. Re:Mail to debian-announce; news on www.debian.org by cortana · · Score: 4, Informative

      The difference is: 'upgrade' will never change what packages are installed; 'dist-upgrade' will.

      Say woody had a package foo, and sarge has a package bar, which replaces foo. 'upgrade' will not install bar and remove foo, whereas 'dist-upgrade' will.

      Of course, if you read the release notes, you'd know all this... ;)

    3. Re:Mail to debian-announce; news on www.debian.org by Josh+Triplett · · Score: 3, Informative
      Of course, if you read the release notes, you'd know all this... ;)

      Another important item from the release notes:
      The recommended tool for upgrading between Debian GNU/Linux releases is to use the package management tool aptitude. This tool makes safer decisions about package installations than running apt-get directly.

    4. Re:Mail to debian-announce; news on www.debian.org by kjots · · Score: 2, Funny

      Firefox 1.0.4 is two years out of date? How long was I asleep?!?

    5. Re:Mail to debian-announce; news on www.debian.org by mennucc1 · · Score: 2, Informative
      No, you got it wrong. The best recommended way to upgrade is to use aptitude; and you should use the version of aptitude in Debian 3.1; a very short checklist for the upgrade is:
      • if you do not have aptitude installed, install the one from the Debian 3.0 (codename woody), and install the one from the latest update 3.0r6; you may use the command # apt-get install aptitude
      • change /etc/apt/sources.list to point to Debian 3.1 (codename sarge)
      • # apt-get update
      • # aptitude install aptitude
      • if you use doc-base, #aptitude install doc-base
      • aptitude -f --with-recommends dist-upgrade
      I strongly recommend that you read chapter 4 in the release notes
  4. Congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Direct download links at http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0/. Bittorrent, Jigdo or direct ISO downloads (CDs or DVDs).

    1. Re:Congratulations! by Cupis · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005 /06/msg00003.html

      "A bug has been discovered in the 3.1r0 CD/DVD images: new installs from these images will have a commented-out entry in /etc/apt/sources.list for "http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates" rather than an active entry for "http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates", and thus will not get security updates by default. This was due to incorrect Release files on the images.

      If you have already installed a system using a 3.1r0 CD/DVD image, you do not need to reinstall. Instead, simply edit /etc/apt/sources.list, look for any lines mentioning security.debian.org, change "testing" to "stable", and remove "# " from the start of the line.

      If you installed other than from a CD or DVD (for example, netboot, or booting from floppy and installing the base system from the network), you are not affected by this bug.

      New 3.1r0a images will be available shortly to correct this flaw. We apologise for the inconvenience."

  5. Coincidence? by hunterx11 · · Score: 3, Funny

    In a rare show of solidarity with Apple, the Debian maintainers decided to stay with XFree86 instead of X.org when they heard that Apple was switching to x86.

    --
    English is easier said than done.
    1. Re:Coincidence? by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 2, Informative

      Debian will switch to x.org - they haven't done it because, er, it'd have delayed sarge's release even more

    2. Re:Coincidence? by lakeland · · Score: 4, Informative

      Er... no. Debian announced it will be moving to xorg as soon as xorg makes a proper release instead of a legacy release. I think debian was the first distro to announce a switch to xorg, though I may be wrong.

      In order to get off the ground quickly, xorg has been releasing versions based on xmkmf that have only really been tested on x86 and ppc. That's great, and means 90% of the people reading this can run xorg now instead of waiting six months for a non-legacy version.

      Debian has been about doing things right, and waiting until they can do things right. They don't want to change to the transitional version of xorg and then change to the non-legacy version of xorg in six months. When xorg gets around to a proper build script based around configure, and starts supporting all the architectures of xfree86, then debian will switch to them.

    3. Re:Coincidence? by evvk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "proper build script based around configure"

      autoconf is a quick and dirty hack that has put decent source and library package management back decades. There's nothing "proper" about it, it's just the most popular kid in town.

    4. Re:Coincidence? by tacocat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do you say that?

      Can you please cite some examples where autoconf is lacking and provide cases where there is an existing software which addresses this shortcoming?

      I know it's very easy to make a statement that something is bad, but to be truely useful information it helps to provide specifics.

    5. Re:Coincidence? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1. autoconf tries to have logic for every single supported architecture within it, but of course it only supports the ones that were known at the time of building, and can't handle quirks. You have to build the in manually... compile flags can be particularly evil.. (Digital Unix take a bow!), plus multiple linux distros do things in different ways even if the core OS is the same (Redhat is particularly bad for this... if you don't include certain headers in certain orders if screws up eg. kerberos is dependent on SSL (or is that the other way around? I forget.).

      A much better way would be for each distro/platform to have its own autoconf core, containing all the rules it needs for its paths, quirky library building, etc. That could be installed once by default then a simple autoconf script in each package that interfaces with it/reads config files/whatever will be able to do the right thing without (or rarely) having to do platform specific stuff in the package.

      2. Libtool. The package that the 'rm' command was designed for. Tried to be all things to all systems and 90% of the time does the wrong thing (and on some platforms - HPUX, AIX - doesn't actually work properly at all).

    6. Re:Coincidence? by EvilIdler · · Score: 2, Informative

      SCons tries to improve over Autoconf/Automake, and it's easier
      to make the initial config files:
      http://scons.sourceforge.net/

    7. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Er... no. Debian announced it will be moving to xorg as soon as xorg makes a proper release instead of a legacy release.

      That's not true. The Debian X package maintainers ("strike force") are working on preparing a mostly-monolithic release of X.Org 6.8.2 right now. xprint is already separately maintained and will not be supplied from the X.Org monolithic tree, and xterm may be split off too. Josh Triplett is working on packaging the libraries, but Debian's not planning on waiting for that to happen before releasing X.Org, at least to experimental.

      I think debian was the first distro to announce a switch to xorg, though I may be wrong.

      Debian was certainly one of the first. Branden Robinson raised concerns about the freenees of the new XFree86 license almost immediately. No one in the Debian camp was happy with the new license, so the decision to switch to X.Org was pretty much made for Debian by XFree86 itself.

      In order to get off the ground quickly, xorg has been releasing versions based on xmkmf that have only really been tested on x86 and ppc.

      That's not a serious problem for Debian, which has been building xfree86 4.3.0 for all the architectures in sarge (arm, alpha, i386, ia64, powerpc, mips, mipsel, sparc, s390, m68k, hppa) plus amd64 and i386 versions of freebsd/netbsd and GNU Hurd for years. Most if not all of the patches made for portability's sake have been submitted various to the XFree86 Project and/or freedesktop.org over the years.

      That's great, and means 90% of the people reading this can run xorg now instead of waiting six months for a non-legacy version.

      A guy named Andres Salomon has extremely unofficial packages of X.Org for Debian unstable available now, or (with some difficulty) people can use Ubuntu's. The people who have an immediate need for something that works can get that need filled. Official packages which provide a little more polish and have had more eyes on them will take care of the rest of the people.

      It's possible that the new "volatile" distribution of Debian, intended to bolt onto the now-released sarge and provide updates for non-release-critical problems (like new hardware databases, spam/virus filter rules, device drivers, etc.) might be able to house a stripped-down xserver-xorg-only package in the near future to service the video hardware out there that Debian's xfree86 4.3.0 (with several backported and updated drivers) won't.

      Debian has been about doing things right, and waiting until they can do things right. They don't want to change to the transitional version of xorg and then change to the non-legacy version of xorg in six months.

      Actually if you follow the debian-x mailing list, you'll see that Debian is prepared to cope with that.

      When xorg gets around to a proper build script based around configure, and starts supporting all the architectures of xfree86, then debian will switch to them.

      Debian isn't waiting on that to happen. The sooner it does, the better, but Debian doesn't want to tie its schedule to X.Org's. I agree that Debian's hell-bent on getting things right, though, even though some people characterise their efforts at regression testing as pointless.

      David Nusinow and Branden Robinson (and it looks like Nathaniel Nerode is joining them) are doing most of the work to prepare X.Org 6.8.2 for Debian release. It draws in part from the Ubuntu packages, but not entirely. A Canonical employee named Daniel Stone, who contributed to Debian's XFree86 4.3.0 packages a couple of years ago but then started

  6. Way to go, guys! by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2, Funny

    Congrats all around. Even though I haven't been much of a Debian user, I am very pleased to see this. Making the June 6 projected release date sends a great message to the rest of the larger Linux community.

  7. Whew! by .killedkenny · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maintaining a 3-year-old Woody has been quite er...hard.

    1. Re:Whew! by DirePickle · · Score: 2, Funny

      You've been saving up that joke for years, haven't you?

    2. Re:Whew! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but I live in Canada. My appointment is in August...

  8. At least ! by farib · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dawn lamer warez groups, weren't able to leak a final version of Sarge before the official release.

  9. Excellent news! by fernique · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only thing frustrated me -- the number of Release-Critical bugs is not zero! Why is it so? Could anybody give the answer?

    --
    igor
    1. Re:Excellent news! by EinarH · · Score: 3, Interesting
      IIRC most of those are old bugs from installation reports. They are typicaly quite shallow, like some obscure and hard to reproduce bug in a controller or arch.

      I would think that the team tried to work it out and didn't succeed. Sometimes you've just got to draw that line in the sand and say; that's it: Your bug is not important enough to hold back the whole release.

      Congratulations to the Debian developers.

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    2. Re:Excellent news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The reason is simple. The Debian developers are impatient and rushed things.

  10. Yea D-Day has arrived! by OmegaBlac · · Score: 3, Funny

    I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of "But Debian is so ancient" trolls suddenly cried out in frustration and were suddenly silenced.

    1. Re:Yea D-Day has arrived! by AkaXakA · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nooooooooooooooooooooooo! Not that joke again!

  11. debian.org now has it by Mister+Furious · · Score: 3, Informative

    The original story (I'm the submitter) says that the main Debian site doesn't have the news yet. It has been updated to reflect the release between the time I submitted the story and the time it was posted.

    The news release is here.

  12. Announcement, images, and installation manual by dondelelcaro · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    http://www.donarmstrong.com
  13. Working download link by maswan · · Score: 4, Informative
    Feel free to download cd and dvd images from cdimage.debian.org, we should have plenty of capacity.


    And if we run out, we will do http-redirects to our mirrors around the world, so don't be afraid to get your Sarge now!

    /Mattias Wadenstein - mirror admin, cdimage.debian.org

    1. Re:Working download link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      " Sarge ... is dead !"

      Not to worry! Sarge is Linux based, not BSD.

  14. Re:Bill gates alert! by gregmac · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most people install Debian with the net-install CD (or at least, they should). It's about a 100MB iso that gets a base system installed, and then you can use apt-get to install anything else you'd like. Because of debian's great package management, it also means this CD can be quite old and still install a current version - you just have to apt-get dist-upgrade as soon as you're done installing. Using the same method you can also convert your system to unstable if you'd like.

    All 14 CDs include EVERY package (as in, you'll get 6 or 7 web browsers, media players, and every other obscure program that is in the repository) and source. That's probably unnecessary for 99% of people out there. Not to mention a fairly big waste of bandwidth to download.

    --
    Speak before you think
  15. Habemus Debian! by shywolf9982 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's incredible. Now, Microsoft HAS to release Longhorn. C'mon, you can't let the Debian guys be faster than you....
    Apart from jokes, I'm curious to know if Debian still holds a share of the "market". It was a gooddistribution, but a lil too static. I honestly think they should consider doubling the release speed, or atleast provide significant updates for a release from time to time (who said "and why not call 'em Service Packs?").

    --
    nbody2002:If you can read this you may be addicted to the internet
  16. Re:dang only 12% by Anubis350 · · Score: 4, Informative

    sounds like its time for bittorrent to take over eh?

    go here

    or direct links:
    dvd1

    dvd2

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  17. Re:Kernel by eldacan · · Score: 2, Informative

    2.4.27 and 2.6.8

  18. The end of the world isn't near.... by tktk · · Score: 2, Funny

    I won't start panicking until Duke Nukem Forever goes gold.

  19. KDE 3.4 for Debian Sarge by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those who are using, or want to use, Debian Stable (now 'sarge'), but want KDE 3.4 (instead of 3.3), you can get it from pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org.

    For those who've been using sarge via its 'Testing' monicker, I'm guessing KDE 3.4 will hit 'etch' (the new 'Testing') in the coming weeks.

    Enjoy!

  20. Re:Torrents? by lintux · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, all kinds of images can be found here, and for DVD BitTorrents (x86) you can look here.

  21. Re:Kernel by Trashman · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe The default is 2.4. but you can have 2.6 at install time if you type linux26 @ the boot prompt. 2.6.8 ships with Sarge.

    --
    Do not read this .sig
  22. Re:Congrats! by suitepotato · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Congratulations to the entire Debian Project! Sarge is a Modern Distro Desktop Distro. I wonder what the people who complain that Debian is outdated will say now?

    Just wait another two years when others are running things like Fedora Core 7 and Sarge is looking like he needs a furlough.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  23. read the release notes by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Informative

    before you even think of doing this on a remote system.

    1: there is a package called doc-base that if installed will cause BIG problems unless you upgrade or remove it first.

    2: aptitude is generally considered to make safer descions about upgrade order than apt-get

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  24. Re:Bill gates alert! by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    14 CDs is the cost of OSS now huh?

    Don't you guys ever get tired of this particular bit of silliness?

    So tell me, how many CDs do you need for propriatary software? A quick jog down the aisles of Best Buy infers quite a large number; and at a rather higher cost than for just the blank media.

    KFG

  25. Re:Official announcement by fbjon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think it says something about the Debian team, when announcements are made in 15 languages simultaneously. I can even read security reports in my native language!

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  26. Re:Congrats! by Trashman · · Score: 2, Informative

    They might complain about xfree 4.3

    Um, nope. See this:

    http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/svn/xfree86/trunk/de bian/local/FAQ.xhtml#debianplans

    --
    Do not read this .sig
  27. Re:Bill gates alert! by Phil+Hands · · Score: 5, Informative

    All 14 CDs include EVERY package (...) and source.

    Almost right, 14 CDs is just the binaries (on average, several architectures take 13, ia64 takes 15)

    Source takes 15 more CDs

    For a full set of CDs (that only an anal collector would actually want) for all 11 archs, and the source, you'll need 164 CDs :-)

    As you say, the netinst image is the way to go, unless you want to send a copy to a friend who has no internet connection.

    --

    Debian: GNU/Linux done the Linux way
  28. If Hell has frozen over... by rdwald · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...why don't I have a girlfriend?

  29. Re:Guess what? It is. by petermgreen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    is 14 cds all that big for what is essentially an archive of every peice of free software a debian maintainer has ever cared to package?

    packages on the cds (i belive cd1 is an exception getting special criteria) are placed onto cds by popcon (an optional package that reports back what packages you have installed) output so the high cds will contain really obscure stuff

    the only time i'd even consider getting or making a full cd set is if i knew i was going to be away from the net for a long time.

    if you have a net connection just use either the buisnesscard (base system and full selection of kernels) the netinst (base system and stuff you need for the standard "tasks") or the full cd1. don't bother with the other cds.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  30. You have to wait for the signals by theMinorcan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now, when can we expect Etch?

    These are some of the things that happened between Debian releases:
    a) The Olympic games returned to Greece.
    b) The Pope died.
    c) A German Pope got elected in a conclave.
    d) Apple switched to Intel.
    e) Watergate's Deep Throat identity was revealed.
    f) The French rejected the European Constitution
    g) Boston won the World Series.
    So just sit, be patient and wait for the signals my son.

    1. Re:You have to wait for the signals by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

      So just sit, be patient and wait for the signals my son.

      Revelation 6:12 And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon became as blood;
      13 And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.
      14 And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places.
      15 And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains;
      16 And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb:
      17 For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?
      18 Oh, and Debian Etch was released.

  31. End of days! by fsterman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Red Sox win
    We know who deep throat is
    Apple switches to X86
    and Sarge was actually released.

    Its armageddon. Or the Heart Of Gold just flew by.

    --
    Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
    1. Re:End of days! by LarsWestergren · · Score: 2, Funny

      I finally dug up that strange bump on my driveway. Guess what - it was Jimmy Hoffa!

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

  32. My next three commands... by jusdisgi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally I get to run:

    apt-get update
    apt-get dist-upgrade
    apt-get install duke-nukem-forever

    Yes!!!!

    --
    Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    1. Re:My next three commands... by jusdisgi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      unless you're running as root (bad, bad, BAD!!!!) I think you're forgetting something :)

      Well, at first I saw your handle and figured you were just some Ubuntu-n00b that got told "root's bad, mmkay?" and figured it was now his right as a newly-1337 assclown to go around and scold people for this shit.

      But then I looked at the number by that handle, and realized that it is far, far too low. Ubuntu wasn't even a glimmer in Debian's eye when you signed up.

      So....you've got no excuse. And I must answer:

      Hey pencil-dick! It's my fucking server, and I'll run as fucking root when I fucking feel like it! I'll hack up my sudoers file, add your mother to wheel, and just generally break your dumbass procedural rules! And you'll goddamned well like it, because I pay attention to what the fuck I do as root, at least as much as you asspirates pay attention when you strap "sudo" on the frontend of every damn thing and act like it's somehow safer. So piss off!

      (Sorry everybody. But that's really getting to be one of my hotbuttons. Whoever up and decided that it was better to give every fucking user sudo access and then tell everybody never to su should be shot.)

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    2. Re:My next three commands... by HoaryCripple · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Haha, thanks for the great laugh!

      You're correct. I'm not an Ubuntu-n00b. My nick is from the poem "Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came."

      You are also making the assumption that I am one of those people (your exact terminology was "asspirate") that think everyone should have sudo access.

      And lastly: My god man! Get a grip, it was only a joke. Develop some coping skills please.

  33. Win32 Installer or Port? by OsirisX11 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can someone please link me to the win32 (Windows XP Home) installer, version, or port of Debian Sarge please?

  34. Debian for Users by digitaltraveller · · Score: 2, Informative


    From the release announcement:

    With the development of the new debian-installer, this release features a new, modular and sophisticated installation routine with integrated hardware detection and unattended installation capabilities.

    One problem for newbies solved.

    Now if they only come up with a friendly alternative to dselect that lets you mix and match packages from the unstable tree, I might start reccomending debian to newbies. Heck, I might even use it myself.

    1. Re:Debian for Users by tao · · Score: 2, Informative

      aptitude should be your friend. You can (and should) both use it as a replacement for apt-get (with better results, since it keeps track of packages purely installed to satisfy dependencies) on the commandline, AND as a UI-tool to replace dselect. Then there's always synaptic if you use GNOME (and I suspect there's something similar for KDE, I'm not sure).

  35. Toy Story connection? by JeTmAn81 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I may be missing the obvious, but are Debian releases supposed to be named after characters from the classic Pixar animated film Toy Story? Woody, Sarge, etc...will the next one be Buzz Lightyear?

    --
    "Me? Lady, I'm your worst nightmare -- a pumpkin with a gun."
    1. Re:Toy Story connection? by splint3r · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yes.

      And no.

    2. Re:Toy Story connection? by Whafro · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, and this is clearly why they have such a long release cycle... they have very few names left to use, so they have no choice but to make them count.

  36. Impressive Accessability. by tacocat · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 includes the efforts of the Debian-Edu/Skolelinux, Debian-Med and Debian-Accessibility sub-projects which boosted the number of educational packages and those with a medical affiliation as well as packages designed especially for people with disabilities.

    I spent a weekend doing accessability evaluations on computers. The assignment was for Windows, but the teacher let me use Linux since that was all I had. Turns out my Debian-Linux distrobution had far more accessability features available than anything Windows had. If I had a microphone and a few cameras I could really go to town. But it is worth mentioning that the Linux community as a whole and Debian in particular has done a better than industry standard job at this>

  37. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    How is parent funny?

    "woody" also means erection in english.

  38. x86_64 Support? by imemyself · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know its not 100% necessary to run on AMD64/EM64T processors, and it may or may not even give performance advantages yet, but I think its kind of odd that they have binaries available for pretty minor platforms but don't have any specifically for probably the second most popular after regular x86. I mean RH/Fedora, SuSE, Mandrake, and even Debian-based distros like Ubuntu have x86_64 support, its kind of surprising that Debian doesn't. (And I'm not saying I don't like Debian. I mean apt seriously kicks ass.)

    Will x86_64 be "supported" in whatever will be the next Debian testing? And will Sarge's release mean that testing will rapidly be modernized? If so, I'm looking forward to it.

    --
    Every time you post an article on Slashdot, I kill a server. Think of the servers!
    1. Re:x86_64 Support? by darketernal · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes and no.

      Yes - It's already supported in i386, with the amd64 kernel images. You can run some 64-bit stuff with amd64-libs.

      No - there is no *official* support yet for a 64-bit kernel with 64-bit userland. For an unofficial (and IMO fairly stable) port that will definitely be in etch, check http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ and http://amd64.debian.net/.

      There was a huge debate about it, but leaving it out was for the greater good. Don't worry about it - it's definitely coming up if I can help it at all.

  39. upgrade/dist-upgrade by hypatia · · Score: 4, Informative

    'upgrade' means "update any packages that don't require new dependencies" and 'dist-upgrade' means "update packages and pull in new dependencies if need be". With a long release cycle, each stable release is going to have a lot of the second kind of packages.

  40. Re:Postgresql 7.4.7 by tacocat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Never use a "point zero" release on something you want to work all the time.

    In this case it might be prudent to wait until 8.0 has a bit more shake-down before you convert all your databases to it.

  41. Re:This is new? by tacocat · · Score: 2, Informative

    They will, when it has more established support for the different architectures.

    These things take time to do them right the first time. But possibly not as long as doing it wrong and trying to fix it a few times, but who wants to spend their entire life playing at a keyboard?

  42. Re:MODUP! by maswan · · Score: 3, Informative
    Hah! They aren't even breathing hard. Actually, demand seems to be dropping right now, I had prepared for much worse.


    As it is now, I have to apologize to the mirrors I asked for, since they aren't getting any load either.


    So, bring it on!

    /Mattias Wadenstein - cdimage.debian.org admin

  43. Re:Bill gates alert! by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Informative

    jigdo allows the load to be spread over more mirrors (since it can use any debian mirror not just those that have the cd images) but its still downloading from thier mirrors.

    bittorrent otoh gives most of the load to the downloaders.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  44. So... by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess that by the end of the day, Duke Nukem Forever will be out.

  45. Re:apt-get update broke by kbmccarty · · Score: 2, Informative

    If that's your sources.list, you are running Sid (unstable), not Sarge (which was "testing" until today, and is now "stable"). Anyway, your problems come from the fact that non-us has been deprecated. See section 2.1.2 of the Sarge release notes. Delete the non-US lines from sources.list, re-run apt-get update and you should be fine.

    --
    - Kevin B. McCarty
  46. Re:This is new? by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is Debian Stable, remember. I've been using it on a box at work as a file server/print spooler, and haven't touched the thing in three years. Thats the kind of job Debian Stable is for :) Who gives two shits about the fancy shadowing and render acceleration of the new X flavors, since all the time you'll probably spend with it is however long it takes to set the system up.

  47. How about... by wikinerd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...thanking Debian by contributing to their projects? They are the ones who keep their distribution truly Libre (Free) and community-managed, in contrast with the commercial GNU/Linux distributors. When I will have time I will try to help them with translations. You should do something, too.

  48. The brightside by dmaxwell · · Score: 2, Informative

    A big downer of running Linux on a Mac is missing things like full featured java, flash, wine, nvidia drivers, and few other binary tools. Not that this bothers the purists mind you but some of us have to use them.

    Linux on one of these x86 Macs should run just as well as Linux on decent x86 chipsets.

    Myself, I don't buy new Macs just to run Linux on them but I'll cheerfully deploy spare Macs as servers if they're somewhat beefy.

  49. Re:MODUP! by Script+Cat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah!
    Using Bittorent my bandwidth maxes out not yours.
    But that doesn't mean sarge isn't popular these torrents are lit-up.

  50. Re:DVD Image by darketernal · · Score: 2, Informative

    It might have been on a mirror that was still syncing with a master (which is odd). You should use BitTorrent instead.

  51. Re:any backports.org users out there going to upgr by darketernal · · Score: 2, Informative

    They might be automatically removed due to their dependencies on packages that no longer exist in sarge. I suggest you try it first. The dependency system in apt is very robust and things should happen with those packages if there are any problems.

    Or, things may not have changed, and the backports can be used as is.

    Nonetheless, if you would like to play it safe, do remove them.

  52. Re:You WHAT??!? by darketernal · · Score: 2, Informative

    You generally only need the first few for a successful install.. are you on a modem?

  53. Obligatory Debian Joke by beforewisdom · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow! Fireforx 1.04 ?!

    I only have Firefox 1.0. You know, when a Debian release has a higher browser version then you do, you know it is time to upgrade.