Slashdot Mirror


Halo Script Hawked To Studios

Gamespot has the story of Microsoft's crusade to sell the Halo movie script to a studio. They really went all out, apparently, with messengers dressed as Master Chief delivering the scripts to the major studios. From the article: "Whatever studio picks up the project would also have to relinquish 'strict control of development' to Halo developer Bungie Studios, who have written a 'bible' which any director and producer would have to follow. Variety's sources say the purpose of the 'bible' is 'to make sure any changes to the script don't alter the universe established in the first two Halo games that will continue in future sequels,' apparently further confirming Halo 3 is in the works."

100 comments

  1. Halo + Marathon by reiggin · · Score: 1

    All this talk of the Halo universe and its bible has me wondering... have they written in this bible how the Marathon games tie in? It's been stated before by the guys at Bungie that yes, there is a link. They just haven't said precisely how. Yet.

    1. Re:Halo + Marathon by FLAGGR · · Score: 1

      One of the webmaster updates says something like: (A rough quote) "Halo and Marathon are completly seperate universes blah blah blah" but I don't think it ruled out links outright, could you please give a source of them mentioning a link?

    2. Re:Halo + Marathon by FinchWorld · · Score: 1
      http://halosm.bungie.org/story/marathon.html

      Unfortunately the article in which they admitted links got chopped when they revamped the site, and i have been unable to find a copy:/

      --
      "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
    3. Re:Halo + Marathon by reiggin · · Score: 1

      Same problem here. I bookmarked a simliar story when I came across it a couple months ago on Bungie's server. Now the linkie no workie. Oh well. Perhaps they're backtreading on the whole issue of having the world's linked.

    4. Re:Halo + Marathon by FLAGGR · · Score: 2, Informative

      bungie.org is a fansite, bungie.net is the official site. Those links were just done sort of like fanfic.

    5. Re:Halo + Marathon by Bagels · · Score: 1

      The Cortana emails strongly suggested such a link, so if you can find those, there should be all the evidence you need right there... I'm not too familiar with the Marathon storyline, but IIRC the emails implied that an AI from the Marathon universe (Durandal, I think) survived the destruction of his/its own universe and was reincarnated as Cortana.

      --
      --- Bwah?
    6. Re:Halo + Marathon by FinchWorld · · Score: 1

      Erm no, there is a link on that bag which pointed to an old bungie.net article (Official bungie site) that was since removed due to redesign where bungie clearly stated a link.

      --
      "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
    7. Re:Halo + Marathon by FinchWorld · · Score: 1

      However in the books it states Cortana was from a cloned copy of Dr Hasely's Brain. I think the writing was more a prophecy.

      --
      "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
    8. Re:Halo + Marathon by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 1

      I looked at the archives for that page and found this link:

      http://web.archive.org/web/20040206174724/http:/ /www.bungie.net/perlbin/blam.pl?file=/site/0/news/ stories/the_marathon_connection.html

  2. Happy they're taking measures for continuity by briankoenig · · Score: 1

    Although I'm sure some will see the $10 million price for the script, and the "Bible" as a sign of Microsoft's vanity, I see it as a good thing.
    The "Bible" will keep the script from hurting the Halo 1-2 story continuity, and also make sure the film doesn't set precedents that the game developers don't want to follow.
    Second, the $10 million price tag will make sure the film studio is fully committed to the project, ensuring a large budget for the film and therefore a better chance at high-quality visual effects and good actors.
    (Endnote: I do realize a big budget != good quality film, but it does help with creating a believable universe. Could the LOTR trilogy be as good as it is if Jackson didn't have such a huge budget to allow the development of Massive and the recruitment of quality actors?)

    1. Re:Happy they're taking measures for continuity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The lack of such control in previous attempts at translating video games to movies is probably a large reason these movies failed. I have a feeling that this is exactly the reason the Doom movie will fail (is it even still in production at this point?) I mean how can you take a move about space marines and a gate to hell being opened on mars and then turn it into a movie about mutants?

    2. Re:Happy they're taking measures for continuity by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First: I wish everyone would stop putting bible in quotation marks and, in this case, capitalizing it. It is actually a technical term in this case and is not referring to any scriptures of a particular relgigion. Any writer that develops a TV series creates a bible. If the intent is for a series of movies, or any series where there will be multiple scripts written by different people, a bible is a must. It describes the characters involved, the relationships between the characters, the standing sets, and, if it's a tech script, there will also be a tech guide, or tech bible that explains exactly what the different pieces of equipment can do, what their abilities are, and what the limitations are. When my agent first got the "go-ahead" that I'd be pitching to ST:TNG, within 2-3 days there were 2 Trek bibles on my doorstep as well as a stack of paper that was full of summaries of all previous episodes. One bible was the regular writer's guide (often called the series bible), the other was Okuda and Sternbach's tech bible. Even before I pitched to them, they wanted to be sure I had all the rules about the characters and gadgets right.

      So, that having been said, I agree. Having a bible is a good thing. It will keep the, "That didn't work like that in the game," problems to a minimum. On the other hand, if the bible was written by gaming people, it could cause problems for a good writer who knows film and finds him or herself restricted by rules that force awkward or limited character development or create situations that don't play well in a 2 hour movie.

    3. Re:Happy they're taking measures for continuity by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1
      recruitment of quality actors

      What I would rather see them do is just use complete CG actors. I like to see the same "people" doing the same parts. How much would return of the king have sucked if Gandalf was played by someone else? Or Return of the Jedi if Harrison Ford didn't come back? I feel the same with video games. I'd love to see a WarCraft movie, but if Arthas was anything but the CG guy I always see in the games, then I would blow the whole thing off as just some high school play no matter how good the special FX are.

      Do you hear that movie studios? Give me the same actors even if they aren't real actors!!!
      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    4. Re:Happy they're taking measures for continuity by Grab · · Score: 4, Interesting

      but it does help with creating a believable universe

      Not really. Check the Matrix for a prime example. And note that good FX != believable.

      Regarding LOTR, the actors were all relative unknowns at the time they were hired. All of them were good actors, yes (although Elijah Wood sadly still doesn't convince as Frodo - ho hum), but none of them were doing it for the money. In fact, none of the crew were doing it for the money at all. Watch the "making-of" bits on the extended DVDs and you'll see how personally committed they all were, and how much each group (actors and support, digital FX, model-makers, etc) really became a family. The sheer *closeness* of them all afterwards was unbelievable.

      Personally I don't there's any other movie that could inspire that kind of commitment, or ever will again. The reason they all committed was bcos it *was* LOTR, not bcos they were being paid. LOTR was a one-off, and I can't see any here-today-gone-tomorrow computer game tie-in getting anywhere near. Certainly not just bcos some studio boss has splurged $10m for the rights.

      Grab.

  3. Interesting... by alvinrod · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "The script was penned by screenwriter Alex Garland (28 Days Later, The Beach), who was reportedly paid $1 million for his services."

    I can't say that I'm a terribly large fan of either of those movies. I think this guy was overpaid just a little much. They could've lifted one of the internet from some fanfic site for a lot cheaper. I'm a little bit worried about how good of a script it is.

    "Whatever studio picks up the project would also have to relinquish "strict control of development" to Halo developer Bungie Studios, who have written a "bible" which any director and producer would have to follow."

    Amen to this though. I wish all movies based on games followed this fashion. It seems to me that a lot of game based movies that could be awesome end up being terrible because they don't follow the game closely. I'm 100% behind MS on this because it ensures that some asshat won't just add or invent new stuff to make the movie look cooler. Just imagine some studio adding a romance sub-plot to appeal to the 55-80 year old woman demographic.

    Otherwise I kind of look foreward to a Halo movie. I'd also like to see a Metriod movie, and MGS movie since all of those games really have great potential. Make a good movie out of them and I will pay honor to it with my $7 movie ticket.

    1. Re:Interesting... by imitier · · Score: 1
      Good points about the Bible -- Bungie has been so careful with it, I would hope this will be some guarantee of quality in terms of the movie's plot.

      But more to the point, where are you paying $7 for a movie ticket? I want in on that action.

    2. Re:Interesting... by mparker762 · · Score: 1

      That's the going rate here in Houston. More like $4 or $5 if you catch a midday show during the weekend.

    3. Re:Interesting... by jon787 · · Score: 1
      I can't say that I'm a terribly large fan of either of those movies. I think this guy was overpaid just a little much. They could've lifted one of the internet from some fanfic site for a lot cheaper. I'm a little bit worried about how good of a script it is.

      I think Red v. Blue would be the perfect fanfic site to get the movie script from :p

      "I knew you could pick up chicks in a tank." -- Tucker
      --
      X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    4. Re:Interesting... by secolactico · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think this guy was overpaid just a little much. They could've lifted one of the internet from some fanfic site for a lot cheaper. I'm a little bit worried about how good of a script it is.

      I agree that it was a bit too much for the script, but I hope you are joking with your fanfic remark.

      If fanfic authors were any good, they probably wouldn't be writing fanfics.

      Ok, that might have been a bit too harsh. There are a couple of jewels hidden in all the muck that are fanfics, but they usually tend to be parodies. "Serious" fanfics are usually not worth anybody's time, including the author's. And don't get me started on "self-insert" fanfics.

      It seems to me that a lot of game based movies that could be awesome end up being terrible because they don't follow the game closely.

      Indeed. But some games just don't have enough material to produce a decent movie, and then you end up with "Adaptation"-like situations.
      And even those that do, sometimes end up being terrible. Remember the Wing Commander movie (tho in all fairness, Chris Roberts turned out to be a crappy movie director/writer. he should have stuck to games)

      As a fan of Halo, I hope do the Master Chief some justice and don't hire Ben Affleck/Hugh Jackman/Russel Crowe/Tom Cruise to play him. They should use an actor that at leat looks like he could kick some butt in real life. Unless they don't intend to show his face. In that case, stuff any extra into the suit and get Samuel L. Jackson to do the voice (he has the attitude, but IMHO lacks the physique, unless he pumps up like Edward Norton in American History X).

      Maybe they could get Owen Wilson... and Ben Stiller could be a covenant soldier... nah.

      --
      No sig
    5. Re:Interesting... by alvinrod · · Score: 1
      I agree that it was a bit too much for the script, but I hope you are joking with your fanfic remark.

      Well, neither are the scripts by the people who get paid $1 million. Honestly, can you think of a movie based on a game that had an excellent or even good script. Generally, they tend to border on mediocrity at best.

      As a fan of Halo, I hope do the Master Chief some justice and don't hire Ben Affleck/Hugh Jackman/Russel Crowe/Tom Cruise to play him. They should use an actor that at leat looks like he could kick some butt in real life. Unless they don't intend to show his face. In that case, stuff any extra into the suit and get Samuel L. Jackson to do the voice (he has the attitude, but IMHO lacks the physique, unless he pumps up like Edward Norton in American History X)

      If they're not going to show the face of the actor, which the probably shouldn't do since you never get to see what Master Chief looks like (I wonder if they'll show him in Halo 3) in the games. In this case just get some grunt to wear the suit and do all the stunt work and have the person who does the voice in the games do the voice for the movie. If you're going to be basing a movie on a game with established voice talent, you should probably carry it over. If the character doens't look the part, makeup artists can always fix that. This would save a boatload of money by sticking with the voice actors instead of forking over several million for an A-list actor. The extra cash could be used to make a better movie, which is just better for everyone.

    6. Re:Interesting... by iocat · · Score: 1
      The (awesome) Halo books by Eric Nylund don't exactly have a love story sub-plot, but they do feature a lot more strong female characters. I hope they make it into the movie.

      Seriously, I was very wary of the books, but I was blown away by Fall of Reach and First Strike. The Flood, by William Dietz was only okay, but he was forced to directly follow the plot of Halo 1, so he had a lot more limitations.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    7. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actor for the role of Master Chief....
      Vin Diesel.
      OK, he has delivered earth shattering performances in all of his films, but judging from XXX, Pitch Black and Chronicles of Riddick, he would make a great Master Chief.

    8. Re:Interesting... by AkaXakA · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? 28 Days later was great! There's another story about it at MacWorld if you want to read more.

  4. Halo 3 'in the works' by skinfitz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It better had be 'in the works' otherwise I for one will not be even considering an XBox360.

    1. Re:Halo 3 'in the works' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen, preach on brotha skinfitz!

    2. Re:Halo 3 'in the works' by FinchWorld · · Score: 1

      It should be named "Halo 2.5: Oh Sh*t we forgot the ending!"

      --
      "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
  5. dont you dare! by LewieP · · Score: 2, Funny

    Uwe Bowl can get lost right now!

    --
    oxymoron of the day - Xbox gamer
  6. They may need plan B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like they want too much control for most studios to take them up on the offer.
    May I suggest instead that they buy a bunch of those disposeable camcorders.

  7. well at least they want to stay true... by teksno · · Score: 1

    the purpose of the 'bible' is 'to make sure any changes to the script don't alter the universe established in the first two Halo games that will continue in future sequels,

    THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!

    even though the ending was t3h sux0r in halo 2, at least they are trying to stay somwhat true to the game. how many movies based on games have been totally unrelated to the games...the only one that was really close in my opinion was final fantasy, the spirits with in...because the final fantasy universe is so disjointed as is...

    thank you bungie. i may actually go see this if its ever made.

    1. Re:well at least they want to stay true... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Hey if you wanna see the movie now. Just go drink a little beer, rent Aliens 2 and Starship Troopers. It'll be the same thing.

    2. Re:well at least they want to stay true... by nicky_d · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to grab an Xbox controller before you start the films. It makes the power loader fight ten times better. Although if you lose, gaming might not be your forte.

    3. Re:well at least they want to stay true... by koi88 · · Score: 1


      rent Aliens 2 and Starship Troopers.

      Aliens 2 and Starship Troopers both are excellent action movies. But Starship Troopers is also a very good satire on totalitarian regimes.
      I know, it's a satire 70% of all people don't seem to get.

      --

      I don't need a signature.
    4. Re:well at least they want to stay true... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      No people do get it. The PROBLEM is that the novel it was based on WAS NOT satire. That is what people get. If you want to tell a satirical story about totalitarian regimes FINE, but don't ruin the master's work in doing so.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    5. Re:well at least they want to stay true... by koi88 · · Score: 1


      No people do get it.

      I know a lot of people who just didn't get the movie.
      Just look up in the web and you will find people writing about"a disgusting glorification of violence" and things like that.
      Are they blind? The soldiers even wear SS-like uniforms...

      I read the book after I watched the film. As I remember, it's not a satire but a pretty serious story. Kind of anti-war with many new ideas.

      --

      I don't need a signature.
    6. Re:well at least they want to stay true... by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      Halo's a very different story. Those movies were more about man vs nature, in that the enemies were swarms of unthinking, unstoppable insects. (well, there was a kind "group intelligence" but it was very alien)

      The primary enemies in Halo are the Covenant, a UN style group of aliens who have a religious mission to kill all humans and make way for their "great journey". The "unstoppable insect" enemy is the Flood, but its really more of a plot device and annoyance compared to the Covies.

      Halo 2 even has a civil war break out within the Covenant and alternating levels have you playing as a alien hero on the side of the rebels.

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    7. Re:well at least they want to stay true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this a joke? That sounds identical to Aliens 2.

  8. Good luck, Bungie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Whatever studio picks up the project would also have to relinquish 'strict control of development' to Halo developer Bungie Studios, who have written a 'bible' which any director and producer would have to follow."

    Honestly, is that how they think it works on Hollywood? It doesn't. The studios aren't going to sink all the money and time into a project and allow themselves to be ordered around by a video game company. That's not smart business from their end, especially when they're gambling on a story like this. A movie based on guys in armor shooting aliens? It's called Starship Troopers, and it bombed.

    1. Re:Good luck, Bungie by FromWithin · · Score: 1

      This is the way it works the other way around, so why not? Film companies have far too much creative control over game tie-ins and have completely over-the-top financial demands. It's good to see the reverse happening. This property started out as a game and the designers are absolutely right to set these demands and not cave in just to get a film company interested. Movies are not the be-all and end-all, and it looks like someone in the game industry has finally realised it.

    2. Re:Good luck, Bungie by aurelian · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's called Starship Troopers, and it bombed.

      I think it did well at the box office, just that they had gone too far over budget. In my view it was quite a decent flick, and a successful satire.

  9. UWE BOLL! by smileyy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Uwe Boll!
    Uwe Boll!
    Uwe Boll!

    --
    pooptruck
    1. Re:UWE BOLL! by PoderOmega · · Score: 3, Funny

      The only movie this guy should be directing is a movie version of Daikatana

    2. Re:UWE BOLL! by LewieP · · Score: 0
      i dont mind you making the same joke as me, but getting more mod points....

      :.(

      --
      oxymoron of the day - Xbox gamer
    3. Re:UWE BOLL! by b0r0din · · Score: 1

      Last I heard he was revamping the script on Duke Nukem Forever: The Movie, slated for release this summer. Unfortunately it's only being released in certain select theatres, such as those residing in the Negaverse.

    4. Re:UWE BOLL! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Uwe Boll!

      I think this may be the first script he's ever encountered that he can't possibly make even worse with bad directing. Any script dictated by a video game design compnay is going to be so bad already that even Uwe couldn't hurt it.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  10. Huh? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Insightful
    apparently further confirming Halo 3 is in the works

    Sorry, I missed the bit where we're all under the assumption that Halo 3 might not be happening.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you also missed the closing tag for your italics.

    2. Re:Huh? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Bungie has been extremely careful not to do anything to confirm that they're creating a game called "Halo 3" that follows the Halo and Halo 2 line in the usual sense. If you look at their statements, they're working on another project, they do have some stuff in mind for a video game based on the Bungie universe, but they won't confirm Halo 3 itself.

      If they are doing a Halo 3 like we all expect, why wouldn't they confirm it? (Other than to be their usual annoying Bungie selves, but I don't think they'd do something stupid on a project as big as this.) My personal opinion is that they'll do a game that isn't quite Halo 3 as we expect it. Maybe it won't follow Master Chief or the Arbiter. Maybe it'll be an RTS like Halo was plannned to be. Or something equally unexpected...but it won't be the sequel to Halo 2 in the manner that Halo 2 was the sequel to Halo.

      The quote about the Halo bible says "further sequels", not "Halo 3". It may not even be a Halo-series game, since the Halo universe overlaps somewhat with the universes from their past games, and probably will overlap with the universe for their next game. For example, the manual for Halo 2 has an e-mail from Cortana to ONI.

    3. Re:Huh? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1
      A crisp twenty-dollar bill says Halo 3 is an FPS.

      Having said that, a Bungie-created Halo RTS? Droooooooooool.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    4. Re:Huh? by nomadic · · Score: 3, Funny

      A crisp twenty-dollar bill says Halo 3 is an FPS.

      I bet it will be a text adventure.

      You stand in a long corridor that runs north and south through the Covenant ship. Organic walls glisten wetly in the dim light, exuding an alien smell that assails your nostrils. To the east a large metallic door is set in the wall.

      >i
      You are carrying:
      a plasma rifle
      a shotgun
      a fragmentation grenade

      >look at door
      The door is made of some strangely colored metallic substance. A red light set into the door indicates that it is probably locked.

      >open door
      The door is locked.

      >unlock door
      What do you wish to unlock the door with?

      >plasma rifle
      I'm sorry, I can't do that.

      >n
      The corridor branches here, heading east, west, and north. Far off in the distance you hear a dull roar and the sound of what appear to be explosions.
      A sniper rifle is lying here.

      >take rifle
      You can't carry that much.

      >drop shotgun
      You drop the shotgun.

      >take rifle
      You pick up the sniper rifle.

    5. Re:Huh? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      That "overlapping universes" idea scares and intrigues me at the same time. Dwarves blowing Covenants to bits with molotov cocktails?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    6. Re:Huh? by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 2, Funny

      I bet it will be a text adventure.

      This is Halo, remember?

      You are in a maze of twisty passages, all alike.

      >n
      You are in a maze of twisty passages, all alike.

      >e
      You are in a maze of twisty passages, all alike.

      >s
      You are in a maze of twisty passages, all alike. You are likely to get eaten by the Flood.


      Etc. Etc. Ad nauseam...

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  11. Master Chief in Action by SwornPacifist · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those curious, here's a picture of one of the the Master Chief messengers

    1. Re:Master Chief in Action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that one of the storm troopers that's assigned to hydroponic lab detail on the death star?

    2. Re:Master Chief in Action by Mukaikubo · · Score: 1

      I see better costumes at most scifi conventions. *sad but true*

    3. Re:Master Chief in Action by floron · · Score: 1

      His active camoflage needs a bit of tweaking...

  12. See: Enter the Matrix by MMaestro · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Movie studio makes huge hit yet when they try to convert it into a video game, it bombs. Badly. Sure the game was a financial success but lets face it, the entire Matrix series never fully recovered from the shock.

    Screw the movie studios. They screwed up The Matrix when they went from movie to video game. They screwed up Tomb Raider when they went video game to movie. They screwed up Starship Troopers when they went from book to movie. They can't seem to do anything right anymore so let Bungie and Microsoft do it. Worst case scenario, if it bombs you blame Bungie and Microsoft for being 'too strict.'

    1. Re:See: Enter the Matrix by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      Sure the game was a financial success but lets face it, the entire Matrix series never fully recovered from the shock.

      In fairness, I'm not sure the Matrix series ever fully recovered from Reloaded and Revolutions. The original was one of the best SF movies ever made. The sequel was a mediocre action movie. The third was an insult to the whole concept.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    2. Re:See: Enter the Matrix by MMaestro · · Score: 1

      But the game came out before/during/at the same time as Reloaded and since the game was leaked to the public early/illegally, I find it easier to simply consider the game to be the beginning of the downfall.

    3. Re:See: Enter the Matrix by Maserati · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. And the game was a lot worse than Revolutions. The story wasn't that bad, but the gameplay stank. Why is there a long stretch in the sewers in a modern game ?

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  13. I wish... by kc32 · · Score: 1

    I wish they had made the producers of the Doom movie consult with Id Software for the script. So far Doom: The Movie sounds like it's going to suck.

    1. Re:I wish... by westlake · · Score: 1
      I wish they had made the producers of the Doom movie consult with Id Software for the script

      Doom remains the prototypical first person shooters. But iD doesn't seem able to carry the ball any further. Story has always been iD's greatest weakness. Carmack never seemed to think it was important.

    2. Re:I wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doom remains the prototypical first person shooters. But iD doesn't seem able to carry the ball any further. Story has always been iD's greatest weakness. Carmack never seemed to think it was important.

      I dunno. Seems to me like Doom has a pretty good story. Mankind screws up and lets evil into the world. One savior descends into Hell and kicks Satan's ass to save humanity.

      I bet if I made up a religion around a story like that, it could become really popular. I could call it "Christianity"...

  14. I read the script... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and yes, I work at one of the studios. I wasn't the one who was given the script to read -- the Master Chief messenger waited for the script to get read and then took the supposedly uncopied single copy back.

    A couple of studios (including mine) have already passed. You can probably already find reports on the net attesting to the unenthusiastic response.

    Someone'll pay millions for it, though, even if it's not any good. Because Halo itself is enough of a name to get decent first-weekend box office and decent first-two-weeks DVD sales six months later. And that's really all that counts, innit?

  15. Red v Blue? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Any word on whether or not they were interested in the script?

    On a more serious note, I wonder well this will fly in Hollywood. As much as there is money to be made, Hollywood types have their own massive egos and control issues. Being told, "Here's a script we want you to make, and a bible you have to adhere to while doing it" might not get the results they are interested in.

    LotR and the Harry Potter movies have been successful even though they don't capture the true canon of the books. I think in the long run they' be better off breaking canon, but having a good movie. The flip side, is that MS has enough money to pay the production costs themselves. Get someone who is good, produce it yourself, and only use Hollywood for the distribution. That way you maintain total control throughoutand you can make sure your investment is wisely spent.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Red v Blue? by skyman8081 · · Score: 1

      Execpt you're forgetting the number one rule of film and theater.

      Never put your own money into a project!

      --
      Two Roommates and a Boyfriend, updates Monday, Wednesday, and Friday
    2. Re:Red v Blue? by darkmayo · · Score: 1

      A lesson that folks at Square(SquareEnix) learned the hard way.

      --
      "I am a kernel in the linux army"
    3. Re:Red v Blue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any word on whether or not they were interested in the script?
      I don't thing Microsoft needs them to come up with a bunch of jokes about farting, shiting, and other types of sophomoric humor.

      They can just rip off the typical halo fanboy's fanfics to get what they need. Heck, they probably have better writing and a better plot, which would be a lot more then Microsoft's sorry excuse for one.

  16. We are sorry..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But we can't let you summon Uwe Boll. We need him down here to help us come up with effective ways to torture souls.

    We do have Derek Smart available, who promises to make the greatest space marine fighting aliens movie simulation ever! He says he will keep things "very" "faithful" to the original for all you purists out there, but if you criticize him or question his movie making credentials he will ban you from seeing it.

    I can't tell you too much of what he has planed, but just wait till you see the $20.00 1,000 key command 2,000-page manual that will go along with the movie!

  17. Re:Man does not live by pixel distractions alone by GrassMunk · · Score: 1

    The irony of this is the man is reading slashdot, and even more so making comments. I thought you said you had something better to do than read slashdot, why dont you go do that and wait for the rest of us to be enlightened.

    Thanks.

  18. Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will suck so bad it's not even funny.

    Pure marketing at its highest form.

  19. yawn by cahiha · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't mind a Half Life movie--that video game had far more interesting characters in it. Morrowind has a bit more potential, too. Even Myst. But Halo just never struck me as a particularly interesting story, even for a video game.

  20. Re:Man does not live by pixel distractions alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Heh yeah, plus, he thinks everyone wants to live a primitive life. I'm quite familiar with the outdoors, etc (even today, I'm barefoot unless I have to go downtown, thick soles and all), but I prefer my life with technology.
    I'll take a geeky girl over a hippie girl any time. Smart chiks are hot!

  21. The ultimate tie-in by amliebsch · · Score: 1

    I can see them attempting to work it so that the film and the Episode III video game are released at the same time. The hype levels would be staggering.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  22. What is he doing with his right hand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, wait a minute.... Ewwwwww!

  23. I actually liked starship troopers by Toxygen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think you give that movie enough credit. I think you should really try and see the finer points of Starship Troopers and not dismiss it because it didn't turn out to be what you wanted it to be. It's subtle and overblown at the same time. It's a great action movie and a satire of humanity at the same time.

    The movie studios have done good work making movies from books and comics (I will admit video games seem to be more miss than hit, but if I was 10 years younger I probably would have enjoyed Tomb Raider) and it's unfair to proclaim anything else they make will be crap just because they dropped the ball on a few films.

    1. Re:I actually liked starship troopers by Zeussy · · Score: 1

      I love starship troopers 1.

      The 2nd (Hero of the Federation)yuck, straight to DVD and then straight to the discount bin. I was waiting so long for a cool sequel and get that lump of shit.

      Off topic I know, but I needed to get it out.

    2. Re:I actually liked starship troopers by Nemius · · Score: 1

      The movies were fun, but did either of you read the book? The only thing the two had in common were the main character's names and bugs!

      As noted earlier up thread, the exisitance of a bible helps maintain consistancy between spin-offs. Think if the universe contradictions in the orignal Star Trek series, let alone those coming out of other series, countless books, etc.

      Remember, there are also Halo books and a ARG chock full of material that has to be considered.

  24. Laughing my butt off by DaveJay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the funniest thing I've read in a long time. My wife works in the feature film industry, and I can tell you that showing up at a studio dressed as a character and carrying a script is -not- what gets a script sold; it's what makes studios put you on an instant rejection list. Neither is showing up with a bible and saying "you can't violate this history when making the film" -- that just tells the studio the contracts have to get creative control away from you, lest you bog the whole thing down over the "accuracy" of the fiction.

    If Microsoft really wants to see this thing made, they have the cash, and cash or publicity are the two possible ways to get a movie made these days. Generate a lot of publicity by deciding to go it alone, sign up the best production company that money can buy, and go nuts.

    Oh, and I doubt the people who would watch a Halo movie are going to give a rat's arse about the backstory, any more than the people who watched resident evil. And hey, guess what -- if they do, it'll be the backstory OF THE MOVIE, not the game.

    Okay, rant over. But it was a rant with a smile on my face, I promise. Hilarious!

    1. Re:Laughing my butt off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because Microsoft DEFINITELY has to play by the rules of anyone else selling a script, right?

      See what they're doing with this? The costume thing? They're stirring up publicity already.

      You're comparing a script that Microsft is selling to a script that I'm selling. Microsft and I are not on the same bargaining level.

  25. I'm only concerned with three things... by MeanderingMind · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ..which you all should also be concerned with.

    1. The voice actor for MasterChief in the games voices him.
    2. The voice actor for Cortana voices her.
    3. Two words, Sergeant Johnson.

    Because of his armor, having one actor do MasterChief's movements and another his voice would work, ala Darth Vader.

    Since Cortana would probably be computer generated, again, no issue.

    And Sergeant Johnson rocks.

    --
    Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    1. Re:I'm only concerned with three things... by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      keith david as sergeant johnson! or maybe samuel jackson. that would be tight!

      i wonder if the bible has anything in there that notes that he should be reincarnated every three scenes just like the game. hmmmm...

    2. Re:I'm only concerned with three things... by Toby_Tyke · · Score: 1

      Listen, in the event that a Halo movie is made, you can be sure that we WILL see Master Chiefs face.

      Don't believe me? See Judge Dredd.

      --
      "I realise this is not a very popular opinion but it's the truth, and there for needs to be said" -Bill Hicks
  26. I have a Halo script on my lying on my book shelf by Neuticle · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember it being titled "Ringworld"

    Seriously, Halo was a good single player game, but the story was always kind of weak and the endings have been major suxxor.

    Larry Niven could poop out a better story.

    --
    "Cheeze it!" - Bender
  27. Re:I have a Halo script on my lying on my book she by thrift24 · · Score: 1

    Not true. The explanation of the story in the game hasn't been great, but their is great story behind Halo.

    I have the three Halo books that are out so far and I was seriously impressed when I read them. The books had a lot of incorrect spellings and poor grammar, but the plot was interesting..probably the fastest I have ever read a trilogy of that size. One of the first things I thought when I finished with the books was, "when are they going to make this into a movie", so I think that if they do this correctly(which it sounds like they are), this could be very cool for the Halo fans.

  28. How could they? by antin · · Score: 2, Funny

    But Halo 2 was such a complete story, wrapping up all loose ends... how could they possible make another?

  29. What about MECH WARRIOR!!?? by Digital_Mercenary · · Score: 1

    Halo Schmalo! screw that. Last I heard MS owns FASA and all rights to the Mech Warrior Series! Now if you doubt a Mech Warrior movie based on the (books/Games) would sell, Blow the dust off a copy of Mech Warrior 2 and re-live that kick ass opening sequence.

    1. Re:What about MECH WARRIOR!!?? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      Mechwarrior > *

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  30. Movies vs Games by Digital_Mercenary · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Did anyone notice that the Star Trek Armada 1 and 2 computers games were more exciting, better written and a whole lot more fun than any of the STTNG Movies?

  31. Re:I have a Halo script on my lying on my book she by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember it being titled "Ringworld"

    Funny. I thought it was titled Consider Phlebas. ;-)

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  32. I wish them by imr · · Score: 1
  33. I always read it as 'Master Chef'.. by aurelian · · Score: 1

    which conjures up an entirely different image.

  34. Plotless drivel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like we need another movie that involves no plot, and lots of space marines shooting aliens. Gee, that's original.

  35. Re:Man does not live by pixel distractions alone by apoc06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i agree, smart chicks are hot.

    the chicks in halo which for all of their intelligence not outrageously large chested and dont really wear skimpy outfits. if halo was made into a movie, i think this would be the first change hollywood would make.

  36. I never read the book by Toxygen · · Score: 1

    I didn't even know there was a book at all until this thread. It kinda makes me want to get a copy and read it though, if for no other reason than to see how different it is from the movie. If I do read it, I'm going in with the full knowledge that it won't be what I expect so I'll be less likely to be dissapointed, but before I say it's bad I need to make sure I think it's bad in it's own right, not because it's not like the movie I watched.

    What did you think of I, Robot?

    1. Re:I never read the book by mink · · Score: 1

      I robot was a good action flick with fuck all to do with the compilation of short stories (none of them named "I, Robot") using the same title, except for (Again) the names of some characters and the 3 laws.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  37. Banks vs Niven - Smackdown! by Neuticle · · Score: 1

    Consider Phlebas by Iain M. Banks:
    First published - 1987
    Awards Won - ? (Zero by my search)

    Ringworld by Larry Niven:
    First Published - 1970
    Awards Won - 1970 Nebula Award (Best Novel), 1971 Hugo Award (Best Novel) and the 1970 Locus Award, amongst others.

    p0wn3d!!

    I'll agree that Consider Phlebas has scored well in many sci-fi reviews: Banks is no hack and it can stand on it's own merits without being thought of as a Ringworld rip-off.

    That said, giving credit where credit is due, Banks borrowed the ring concept: Niven's work was first by nearly two decades, is more widely read and is much more distinguished.

    /Before I packed to move, my books were on four 7' bookcases
    //Stacked horizontally to the top of each shelf
    ///Two rows deep
    ////Not counting the overflow of hardbacks, trade paperbacks and other odd sizes.
    /////BOW TO MY SCI-FI NERDDOM!

    --
    "Cheeze it!" - Bender