Slashdot Mirror


Math with Cohen and Groening

An anonymous reader writes "While math on The Simpsons and math on Futurama has been covered by Slashdot before, new background on some of the scientific references is covered in a long transcription of A Futurama Math Conversation with David X Cohen and a short summary of a math club talk to Matt Groening and a number of writers from both shows. Some amusing tidbits are on these pages - for example, when the Simpsons writers contacted NASA for the 40,000th digit of pi, NASA actually sent them a printout of all 40,000 digits."

139 of 187 comments (clear)

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    i love the simpsons! where else could a fat slob like homer get some bomb-ass pussy like marge?

    1. Re:simpsons by Ed+Thomson · · Score: 3, Funny

      i love the simpsons! where else could a fat slob like homer get some bomb-ass pussy like marge?

      Hey, i'm a fat slob that gets bomb-ass pussy

    2. Re:simpsons by locokamil · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have sex with a yellow woman with blue hair? I'll pass...

    3. Re:simpsons by wbren · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hey, i'm a fat slob that gets bomb-ass pussy
      Yeah sure, buddy. You and every other slashdotter here. :-)
      --
      -William Brendel
    4. Re:simpsons by Fallingcow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Every sitcom on TV today?

    5. Re:simpsons by bokane · · Score: 1

      Check SuicideGirls, c.f. hentai.

    6. Re:simpsons by bokane · · Score: 1

      My, that's a rather catty thing to say.

    7. Re:simpsons by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Yeah, hehe, really. I saw a thing on like MadTV where they were advertising "Fat Guy Friday" on whatever channel. It had like King of Queens, uhh, that guy who used to be on Nickelodeon, and someone else. Then they had Raymond and were like, "Ray's not fat yet, but we're working on it."

      You'd probably have to be there. It was funny.

    8. Re:simpsons by BlogPope · · Score: 1
      i love the simpsons! where else could a fat slob like homer get some bomb-ass pussy like marge?

      The originators of the formula, The Honeymooners .

      --
      My other car is a Popemobile
  3. Why NASA? by dj245 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't know why they needed NASA for that. Pifast will spit out the first 40,000th digits in a very short time on modern computers. A million is a reasonable benchmarking number for that program. Finding the 40,000th digit in the text file takes longer than calculating it.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Why NASA? by Joe+Decker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or they could have just Googled up the digits themselves, as they exist as files on the net, in locations such as this one.

    2. Re:Why NASA? by NoTheory · · Score: 1

      Clearly, so they can be the only sitcom in television history to have contracted NASA :P

      (disclaimer: this is speculative hyperbole, i would presume that it is so, but i don't know for a fact!)

      --
      There are lives at stake here!
    3. Re:Why NASA? by IvyMike · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know why they needed NASA for that. Pifast will spit out the first 40,000th digits in a very short time on modern computers.

      That was in episode 9F20, which aired 5/6/93. No Pifast, no google; heck, NCSA Mosaic wasn't even around until June.

    4. Re:Why NASA? by realbadjuju · · Score: 1, Informative

      Here... Pi=3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399 3751058209749445923078164062862\ 08998628034825342117067982148086513282306647093844 6095505822317253594081284811\ 17450284102701938521105559644622948954930381964428 8109756659334461284756482337\ 86783165271201909145648566923460348610454326648213 3936072602491412737245870066\ 06315588174881520920962829254091715364367892590360 0113305305488204665213841469\ 51941511609433057270365759591953092186117381932611 7931051185480744623799627495\ 67351885752724891227938183011949129833673362440656 6430860213949463952247371907\ 02179860943702770539217176293176752384674818467669 4051320005681271452635608277\ 85771342757789609173637178721468440901224953430146 5495853710507922796892589235\ 42019956112129021960864034418159813629774771309960 5187072113499999983729780499\ 51059731732816096318595024459455346908302642522308 2533446850352619311881710100\ 03137838752886587533208381420617177669147303598253 4904287554687311595628638823\ 53787593751957781857780532171226806613001927876611 1959092164201989380952572010\ 65485863278865936153381827968230301952035301852968 9957736225994138912497217752\ 83479131515574857242454150695950829533116861727855 8890750983817546374649393192\ 55060400927701671139009848824012858361603563707660 1047101819429555961989467678\ 37449448255379774726847104047534646208046684259069 4912933136770289891521047521\ 62056966024058038150193511253382430035587640247496 4732639141992726042699227967\ 82354781636009341721641219924586315030286182974555 7067498385054945885869269956\ 90927210797509302955321165344987202755960236480665 4991198818347977535663698074\ 26542527862551818417574672890977772793800081647060 0161452491921732172147723501\ 41441973568548161361157352552133475741849468438523 3239073941433345477624168625\ 18983569485562099219222184272550254256887671790494 6016534668049886272327917860\ 85784383827967976681454100953883786360950680064225 1252051173929848960841284886\ 26945604241965285022210661186306744278622039194945 0471237137869609563643719172\ 87467764657573962413890865832645995813390478027590 0994657640789512694683983525\ 95709825822620522489407726719478268482601476990902 6401363944374553050682034962\ 52451749399651431429809190659250937221696461515709 8583874105978859597729754989\ 30161753928468138268683868942774155991855925245953 9594310499725246808459872736\ 44695848653836736222626099124608051243884390451244 1365497627807977156914359977\ 00129616089441694868555848406353422072225828488648 1584560285060168427394522674\ 67678895252138522549954666727823986456596116354886 2305774564980355936345681743\ 24112515076069479451096596094025228879710893145669 1368672287489405601015033086\ 17928680920874760917824938589009714909675985261365 5497818931297848216829989487\ 22658804857564014270477555132379641451523746234364 5428584447952658678210511413\ 54735739523113427166102135969536231442952484937187 1101457654035902799344037420\ 07310578539062198387447808478489683321445713868751 9435064302184531910484810053\ 70614680674919278191197939952061419663428754440643 7451237181921799983910159195\ 61814675142691239748940907186494231961567945208095 1465502252316038819301420937\ 62137855956638937787083039069792077346722182562599 6615014215030680384477345492\ 02605414665925201497442850732518666002132434088190 710486331734649

    5. Re:Why NASA? by IvyMike · · Score: 1

      NCSA Mosaic wasn't even around until June.

      That didn't sound right to me, and indeed I was misled by a too-quick reading of this page (Which seems like it must be talking about Mosaic on Windows?).

      The actual original Mosaic release notice, on March 15th, 1993: NCSA Mosaic for X 0.10 available.

    6. Re:Why NASA? by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Stick a laugh track on Babylon 5 and it'd become a sitcom.

      Seems like they pestered NASA quite a bit.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    7. Re:Why NASA? by hviezda14 · · Score: 1

      hhhm, it seems it's not complete! :-)

    8. Re:Why NASA? by deetsay · · Score: 1

      OK thanks, so does that mean that the 40,000th digit is "5"?

      --
      "The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand", or so I have read.
    9. Re:Why NASA? by IvyMike · · Score: 1

      Christ, now I was misled by this article's link to the March article.

      I'm giving up on pretending I can give a definitive answer, but this looks like the original announcement of Mosaic, in February, 1993.

    10. Re:Why NASA? by pcbob · · Score: 1

      Um... it's more fun for everyone involved if they ask NASA? Scientists get to guss what it's used for (and also play a practical joke by sending all 40,000 digits), while Groening and krew get to talk to NASA.

      Also, who wants to shift through million digits just to find one number?

    11. Re:Why NASA? by ral315 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because scripts get written WAY before they air (they have to go through animators, recording dialogue, patching it all together, making sure voices match lips, etc.) It wouldn't surprise me at all if they sent to NASA in 1991 or 1992.

    12. Re:Why NASA? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      That's great, but do you have any idea how long it would take to scan through and find the 40000th digit by hand? Assuming you can count a digit once per second, it'll take a little over 11 hours non-stop.

      Sure, you could write code to do it for you, but that's a techy thinking; it wouldn't have occurred to most people, especially back in '93 when PC usage was much less pronounced.

    13. Re:Why NASA? by wfberg · · Score: 1, Redundant

      While the episode aired in 1993, Pi to a million digits was published by the Gutenberg project on 1993-01-01.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    14. Re:Why NASA? by Echnin · · Score: 1

      View it in a monospace font, count columns per row and then count rows? Heck, I think you'd find a text editor back then that'd tell you the row and column number your cursor was at. No need to do it the difficult (and stupid) way.

      --
      Lalala
    15. Re:Why NASA? by adpowers · · Score: 4, Informative

      And these were techy guys.

      I read most of the article. A few years later (1995), David X Cohen wrote a small program to find numbers that fudge to make it look like Fermat's Last Theorem is false (near misses). He used the program to find three numbers that made the equation roughly equal, as in, if viewed on a calculator will low resolution (only showing 8-9 digits), they answers would appear to be equal. Here is one of the two equations used in the Simpsons:

      1782^12 + 1841^12 =1922^12

      Anyway, my point was that they knew how to write code.

      Andrew

    16. Re:Why NASA? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      nobody likes a smartarse.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    17. Re:Why NASA? by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

      fuck you shithead

      You're the one at NASA who printed out the 40,000 digits?

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    18. Re:Why NASA? by rixkix · · Score: 1

      The files are gone for the files containing the digits past 10000. Point made, however.

    19. Re:Why NASA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Or they could have just Googled up the digits themselves

      Here, let me type out all four digits of the year this happened: 1 9 9 3

  4. Re:The simpsons must have... by 0racle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its not their fault that you don't get it.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  5. Ah, so... by wbren · · Score: 5, Funny
    NASA actually sent them a printout of all 40,000 digits
    ...that's why NASA's annual paper budget is $17.3 million.
    --
    -William Brendel
    1. Re:Ah, so... by fbform · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    2. Re:Ah, so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Best. Domain name. EVER!

  6. Instead of NASA... by guyfromindia · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They could have quickly called Daniel Tammet http://www.spring.org.uk/2005/05/daniel-tammet-boy -with-incredible.htm
    Daniel Tammet is an autistic savant. He can perform mind-boggling mathematical calculations at breakneck speeds.
    He can figure out cube roots quicker than a calculator and recall pi to 22,514 decimal places.
    :-)

    1. Re:Instead of NASA... by StratoChief66 · · Score: 1

      Thats just fine and dandy, but they wanted the 40,000th digit, so this guy is about as useful as me in that regard, less if you consider I can probably find a site with the 40,000th faster than him.

      --
      Frylock: "We should have cloned twenties, Jackson wouldn't have given a fuck."
    2. Re:Instead of NASA... by wbren · · Score: 5, Funny
      ...recall pi to 22,514 decimal places
      A lot of good that would have done the writers. After all, would a joke about the 22,514th be as funny as one about the 40,000th digit? I think not! That's what makes The Simpsons such a high quality show. They don't stop at 22,514 like those savants do.
      --
      -William Brendel
  7. Re:The simpsons must have... by locokamil · · Score: 3, Funny

    The only place where pi is funny is when it smacks into someone's face, Three Stooges style.

  8. Mmm... pi by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pi is now funny?

    Of course pi(e) is funny. Haven't you watched Wobbl and Bob ? Of course The Simpsons would pick it up to display a contrast between the world views of Lisa Simpson and her father.

    1. Re:Mmm... pi by GoldMace · · Score: 1

      When I was like 6 or so my mom was making Sheppard's pie while using the first calculator I'd ever seen with a Pi Key...Wow! Two new definitions of pi(e) at once...OK...it was a lot funnier then but I was like 6 or 7...

  9. 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197 by zippo01 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://www.andrews.edu/~calkins/math/pi40000.htm/

    it's 7, the answer is always 7.

  10. Yay. by Sinryc · · Score: 1

    At least when they want to do their comedy, they do it right, damnit. Looks like nerds have friends on TV. :-)

    --
    Yay, I have a sig.
    1. Re:Yay. by gtoomey · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Bailey/Borwein/Plouffe result was astounding in the 1990s.

    2. Re:Yay. by Yorrike · · Score: 1
      And not just maths nerds. Has anyone out there noticed, or does anyone know the reason for, all the geology jokes in the Simpons and Futurama? Not in terms of jokes only geologists would get, but jokes referring to and in support of, geologists.

      Example: A rock comes flying through the window, Homer says: "Ah! A Flying rock! Call a geologist!"
      Or the Futurama episode I, Roommate where Bender goes on a sober, er, bender, with neon signs flashing by like "public library" and "boring geology lecture".
      And Lisa's choice to go for astronomy after dissing geology.

      My theory is one of the writers, or the writer's close friend or spouse, is a geologist. Does anyone have any inside info?

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

  11. If it's base 16 digit, you can find it fast by jfern · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can calculate the nth digit in base 16 in O(n) time with the following algorithm:
    Algorithm

    If you want decimal digits, it's a bit more complicated.

  12. And the 40,000th and 40,001st digits of Pi are by felipin-sioux · · Score: 2, Funny

    42

    --
    Sorry, this sig is beneath your current threshold
    1. Re:And the 40,000th and 40,001st digits of Pi are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, sequence '42' is at position 92 counting from the first digit after the decimal point.
      For finding your birthday in pi checkout
      http://www.angio.net/pi/piquery

    2. Re:And the 40,000th and 40,001st digits of Pi are by idonthack · · Score: 1

      Look a bit lower on the page, they have some interesting stuff on 42.

      The Meaning of Life (42) and Pi
      (Quoting from Scott Glazer): Trying to come up with a significant number to search for, I thought of 42 (the answer to life, the universe, and everything in Hitchhikers's Guide to the Galaxy.) 42 would be way too common of course, so I went for 424242. Came back that this shows up at position 242423. Add one (for the decimal point, I lamely rationalize here) and you get 242424, the reverse of the original input. Now that's meaningful... or something.

      [Editors Note] Amusingly enough, the entire string returned is 242424242. If you disregard either of the ending twos, you find that it's the same position at which you find 42424242. Ahh, the palindromic possibilities inherent in a reversible meaning of life string. --Dave

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  13. And it's down to a quantum finish.. by MustardMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    NO FAIR! You changed the outcome by measuring it!

  14. Funny? by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    that's why NASA's annual paper budget is $17.3 million.

    $17.3 million? That's stretching it, even for a joke. With about 80 digits per line, 50 lines per page, and 40,000 digits per document, how many trees do ten pages kill?

    1. Re:Funny? by wbren · · Score: 1

      Which formula should I use the next time I make a joke about government overspending? Sorry, I just pulled that number out of my ass... I should have expected someone on slashdot would actually call me on it. Way to kill the joke. I hope at least a couple people chuckled before you killed it. You probably kill clowns in your spare time too, don't you?

      --
      -William Brendel
    2. Re:Funny? by compm375 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You obviously missed the part that said they printed five pages per digit and missed three of the zeros in 40,000,000.

    3. Re:Funny? by ChadN · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, as Dave Barry said, the NASA motto is: "This motto alone cost $18 billion."

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
  15. Maple is good at this by jfern · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It just took about 20 seconds to evaluate
    evalf(Pi,40000).

    In case anyone cares:
    The 40000th digit is a 5.
    The 40000th digit after the decimal is a 1.

    1. Re:Maple is good at this by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

      >The 40000th digit is a 5.

      Yeah, but how many digits are there BEFORE the decimal?

      MadCow

      (and yes, that IS sarcastic...!)

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    2. Re:Maple is good at this by eurleif · · Score: 1

      Maple appears to have suffered an off-by-one error in both digits while trying to calculate 42.

    3. Re:Maple is good at this by ToTheBone · · Score: 1

      With or without the leading 0's? ;-)

  16. Re:NASA? by rayde · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i believe that episode aired in 1993... the internet was a different place back then.

  17. I love Slashdot! by bowloframen · · Score: 5, Funny

    An article about the Simpsons, and 19 of the first 20 replies are about pi and the other one's about how hot a blue-haired, yellow-skinned cartoon character is.

    1. Re:I love Slashdot! by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      blue-haired, yellow-skinned

      Hell yes, those crazy punk Japanese girls are hot!

  18. Original story by lxt · · Score: 1

    The original short article from which this was taken (well, the title is exactly the same) is online here, at gotfutrama.com - (shameless plug here) the best (and possibly only?) Futurama news site.

  19. Re:The simpsons must have... by kfg · · Score: 1

    Pi is now funny?

    You may not understand it now, but you'll get pi in the sky when you die, that's no lie.

    KFG

  20. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by Eskarel · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The beauty of shows like the Simpsons, and to an even greater extent South Park, is not so much that they deal with every single important issue, it's that they bring semi-important issues to viewers who would not otherwise be reached.

    Most of my extended family are hard line Catholic republicans, they not only voted for Bush, but did so with joy in their hearts. They don't listen to much of anything anyone tried to tell them about either alternate viewpoints or even their own beliefs.

    However, many of my younger cousins watch South Park and/or the Simpsons and are exposed to ideas which contradict their own, they may not immediately see it, but they are exposed to them without automatically tuning out. This is why these shows are great, because the gags allow a message to get across to people who don't listen to other sources.

  21. Nerds, where are thou? by iibagod · · Score: 1

    News for nerds....and a story about math on Futurama goes without posts....now that's sad.

    1. Re:Nerds, where are thou? by compm375 · · Score: 1

      I think you meant where art thou.

    2. Re:Nerds, where are thou? by iibagod · · Score: 1

      Well the grammer Naz^H^H^H^English nerds are around...thats a good sign.

    3. Re:Nerds, where are thou? by iibagod · · Score: 1

      sorry, grammAR......oh Lord, I'm doing it to myself now.

  22. Pi is da shit by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 4, Funny

    Professor Frink: Gentleman please.... can I just.... your attention please.... ahem. PI IS EQUAL TO 3!
    Audience: *Gasp*

  23. Corny Pi Joke by Adrilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    In ninth grade algebra, I walk into class and the teacher had put an infinity symbol on the whiteboard. I, being the smart ass I am says,
    "Mr. Dewey, who killed eight?"
    Mr. Dewey says without missing a beat,
    "Pi, It's an irrational number."

    (Feel free to throw tomatoes at my post. But I did warn you that it was corny, plus this is as humorous as I get at 2am EDT.)

    --

    "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    1. Re:Corny Pi Joke by Tofuy · · Score: 1

      Was Mr. Dewey named Decimal System Dewey?

    2. Re:Corny Pi Joke by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

      fuck you, if I ever meet you I will kick your ass
      Wow. I hope Adrilla never shows up at your mom's basement then. He should be safe anywhere else.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  24. All 40,000 digits? by eklitzke · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm afraid there are a bit more than that.

    --
    #include ".signature"
    1. Re:All 40,000 digits? by megrims · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A little context impaired, are we?

  25. Re:The simpsons must have... by mranchovy · · Score: 5, Funny

    mmmmmmmmm, pi.

    --
    I am so smart!
    I am so smart!
    S-M-R-T!
    I mean S-M-A-R-T!
  26. Clown killer by tepples · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I just pulled that number out of my ass

    Too bad the Prime Number Shitting Goatse.cx Man had to go 404 and kill my retort.

    You probably kill clowns in your spare time too, don't you?

    Yeah. What's your high score for Clown Killer?

  27. Re:NASA? by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    That just might change the situation.

  28. I just listened to this by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

    I just listened to this podcast the other day from http://www.sciencefriday.com/pages/2005/Apr/hour2_ 042905.html The entire show was dedicated to this.

  29. Re:The simpsons must have... by MarkRose · · Score: 1

    but you'll get pi in the sky when you die, that's no lie.

    Would worshipping 3.14... as a diety be a pious act? Would you make the ultimate piacular sacrifice to become one with the circle? Personally, I'll just anxious piaffe and see what happens.

    --
    Be relentless!
  30. Fermat counter-examples. by Tomfrh · · Score: 1

    I am impressed that David X Cohen made a little C program to generate the supposed Fermat theorem counterexamples!

  31. Why NASA? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why'd they have to contact NASA? And don't give me any crap about it being 1993; Project Gutenberg's pi to a million digits was released before 1993.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  32. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm a freethinker. I let cartoons tell me how to vote.

  33. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by CA_Jim · · Score: 1

    Don't limit it to Republicans or Catholics. Try espousing Libertarian views in San Francisco. Try suggesting that some of the political or economic problems the city faces are of their own making and you will be tuned out as a Republican apologist.

    I agree with you about the Simpsons or South Park because both shows are willing to skewer all sides.

  34. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1, Troll
    Most of my extended family are hard line Catholic republicans, they not only voted for Bush, but did so with joy in their hearts.

    What devilry could have caused them to commit such a deed? What vile, underhanded trick could have persuaded them to take such a course? Not only did they vote for Satan Himself and His Terrifying Cadre of Evil Minions, but they were giddy with glee as they put him back in power!

    Maybe it was that horrid conservative media who filled their minds with images of purple-fingered Iraqis. Or it was those vile priests who told them abortion is wrong AND bad public policy. Or maybe it was that filthy lucre that corrupted their souls and caused them to vote for tax breaks.

    The shame you must feel!

    But hark! In yonder silver screen is a beacon of hope! Clothed in utter humility itself - a sweatshop-animated, 22-minute television sitcom - is God's own shining truth, come to brighten our homes with its glory! It WILL prevail!

    Ahem.

    ...they not only voted for Bush, but did so with joy in their hearts.

    You know you're on Slashdot when this kind of trash is valued.

    Or maybe you're on democraticunderground.com. Whatever. I'm nearly sick of this place, just from snarky, flamebait comments like that.

    --
    I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  35. Re:The simpsons must have... by reklusband · · Score: 2, Funny

    as the comic book guy would say worst comedic pi reference, ever

  36. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by nametaken · · Score: 1

    I think the real genius of South Park is that it cracks jokes at everyone. Basically, it can make anyone laugh at themself. It more or less suggests that a hardcore anyone is probably way out of whack. Alot of SP episodes end up being Daedalus and Icarus stories. They just add a generous dose of humor in the extremes.

    A little laughter can be worth a shitload of perspective.

  37. they got the digit from two sources by blonde+rser · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I never knew that the simpsons also asked NASA for the the 40,000th digit of Pi. But I've known for a while that they asked David Bailey for it as well (Bailey is one of the B's from BBP numbers... which is the formula to calculate an arbitrary digit of Pi in Hex). You can actually see a picture of the fax that the simpsons sent him on the 4th page of this pdf http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/personal/jborwein/pi-slides .pdf
    I always thought that it was pretty cool that they took the trouble to just find out what the right digit was but now I know they actually decided to confirm it as well. That's pride in ones craft right there.

    1. Re:they got the digit from two sources by IvyMike · · Score: 2, Informative

      I never knew that the simpsons also asked NASA for the the 40,000th digit of Pi. But I've known for a while that they asked David Bailey for it as well

      Looks like David Bailey worked for NASA in 1993.

  38. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

    I was going to say that everything I ever needed to know about government came from Bugs Bunny, but you said it better.

  39. The figure is correct by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    He actually asked NASA for the figures for their annual paper budget, and they sent him a 17.3 million page printout....

  40. Because in 1993 by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    David X Cohen and Matt Groening were like "oooohh? They have the internet on computers now?"

    1. Re:Because in 1993 by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

      "And this is the computer that astronauts use to do their taxes!"

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
  41. Re:Really? by Uber+Banker · · Score: 4, Funny

    [Pi has] 40,000 digits?

    Yes it does. Here's all 40,000 of them (in base 10):

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    0

  42. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What makes South Park better at political commentary than The Simpsons is that, ultimately, South Park approaches a view based on common sense, that doesn't kowtow to the left or the right, but sits somewhere in between where most non-ideologues are.

    I mean.... Voting between a Giant Douche and a Turd Sandwich? Classic!

    On the other hand, The Simpsons and Futurama (I think Futurama, especially) are still not bad at political commentary because they take a situation or issue (like global warming, for instance) and, while bringing it to light in an episode, also turn the issue on its head (like when burning robot exhaust gases are used to shift the Earth into a wider orbit, thus cooling the planet). There's still a political bias there, but it isn't used to beat you over the head with like most dramas do these days, and so even if you disagree with the political views, you're still entertained and not offended.

  43. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    It is pretty ironic how the supposedly tolerant liberals turn out to be just as exclusionary, prejudiced, and judgmental as the conservatives they ridicule (as opposed to entering an intelligent discourse with) on a daily basis.

  44. Inspiring and time wasting by cheesy9999 · · Score: 1

    I decided to memorize the first 100 digits of pi after reading this article ... thank you slashdot for wasting an extra couple hours of my time ...

    3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993 75 10582097494459230781640620620899862803482534211706 79

    --
    -tom
    1. Re:Inspiring and time wasting by Adelbert · · Score: 1
      You're probably going to hate me, but as my friend tried to learn as many digits of pi as possible, I picked up the first forty without trying. And I learnt the greek alphabet without practicing.

      For some reason, I have to revise for hours in order to learn for end-of-year tests, though.

  45. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    it is pretty ironic how the supposedly tolerant liberals turn out to be just as exclusionary, prejudiced, and judgmental as the conservatives they ridicule (as opposed to entering an intelligent discourse with) on a daily basis.

    I listen to Rush Limbaugh every day. And every day he goes on and on about just that point. But the difference between him and you is that he is the one telling the Big Lie, and you are the one believing it.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  46. Here's how they used it in the episode... by Sartak · · Score: 1

    Apu: In fact, I can recite pi to 40,000 places. The last digit is one!
    Homer: Mmmm, pi.

    It's from the episode titled "Marge in Chains"

  47. Re:The simpsons must have... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

    You've clearly never beeen to Australia. Pi _can_ be squared (but it's a shitty Balfour's pi).

    --
    What a long, strange trip it's been.
  48. Math conference by AgentPhunk · · Score: 5, Funny

    I recall a joke by comedian Steven Wright (I think):

    I went to a math conference recently, and the hotel at the conference labelled all the rooms with math symbols.
    Mine was Pi. Easy enough to find, but it took FOREVER to dial on the hotel phone system.

  49. I've used the Simpsons to teach math concepts by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 1

    I was a teaching assistant one academic quarter each year when I was in grad school. I was the TA for "Astro 1" twice.
    Even though "Astro 1" was for people with limited math and science backgrounds, there was a lot of really good content in it, at least as taught by the prof who taught it the two times I was the TA for it.
    One thing that had to be covered in the basics was the concept of orders of magnitude. When we talked about orders of magnitude, I had to explain to the students what the columns mean in a decimal number. OK, they had a basic understanding, and they "should" have understood it more deeply by the time they reached college, and yes, it would have been nice if they'd seen and paid attention to "My Hero Zero" on Schoolhouse Rock, but I discovered that a sizeable percentage didn't understand these things.
    After a brief talk about powers of 10, I decided to take the risk of introducing a more complex concept in order to make sure they understood the basic concept. I brought in base 8 by telling them that since the people on The Simpsons have 8 fingers, they would count differently. I showed them why and how, without spending too much time (I didn't want them to think base 8 was what they were supposed to learn). When we were done, they really did seem to understand powers of ten and orders of magnitude much better. They participated more actively and their answers (and even questions) showed they understood powers of ten and orders of magnitude better, which I believe enhanced their appreciation of some of the really cool stuff in the content of the course.
    In the anonymous TA evaluations, there were several positive comments about how I was able to find unusual and interesting examples to help the students understand things.

    --
    "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
    1. Re:I've used the Simpsons to teach math concepts by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 1
      I still have to ask, what are "columns in a decimal number?"
      Let's stick to the left of the decimal point. The first column to the left (the last one before the decimal point) represents "ones." We tend to use a "base ten" or "decimal" number system because we have ten fingers on our hands. In decimal numbers, the next column to the left of the "ones" column represents tens (multiples of the number you get by adding 1 to 9). So, for example, the decimal number "47" represents "four tens plus seven ones." Thinking in terms of body parts, it represents "four complete sets of fingers plus seven more fingers."
      Note that the digits "8" and "9" don't exist in "Simpsons numbers" (octal). Similarly, if you think about the hexadecimal digits A, B, C, D, E, and F, they don't exist in our decimal system. But creatures with 16 fingers might well count that way. They might not use the symbols A-F to express them, but they would have fifteen distinct digits, where we only have ten (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9).
      In any base, that is, independent of the number of fingers in a complete set, a "1" in a given column represents a "complete set of fingers" of the next column to the right. As I said, since most humans have ten fingers, we use decimal (base ten) numbers. The people on The Simpsons would use the base in which the next number after 7 would be "10."
      "Simpsons counting" (counting in base 8 or "octal") would go 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, ..., 75, 76, 77, 100, 101, ...
      So the number "47" in the world of The Simpsons would still represent 4 complete sets of fingers plus 7 more fingers, but that would be a different number than "47" in decimal. Expressing that number in our decimal number system, it would be 4x8 + 7 = 39.
      I would have been really impressed if they'd taken that into account and expressed the 40th digit of pi in base-8 on the episode of The Simpsons from 1993 in which the 40th digit of pi is mentioned. Oh, and of course, it would have to be the 32nd digit of pi (using decimal counting of digits) expressed in base-8, because... well... "40" should mean something different to the Simpsons than it means to us.
      --
      "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
  50. nobody RTFA? by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1
    I only assume this is the case as it's cheap Pi jokes (though some of them were good!) and comments that are tangential to the actual article.

    One of the things that fascintated me in the article was his discussion of his high school experience and the lack of ridicule for brains/interests in education. I would have killed for that. . . most of high school felt like a quest to hide interest in knowledge (or face ridicule, which was inevitable anyway - had I known THAT little tidbit I may have cared less).

    Whereas David speaks of a high school utopia where no matter what your interests were (math and DnD both mentioned in the same sentence) it was all chill.

    I wonder two things - is he simply romanticizing his high school past and it really was as bad as, say, my high school (and from anecdotal evidence seemingly every other high school out there)?
    And if he wasn't, how could I find these high schools to ensure that when(if) I have children I can ensure that I'm getting them into these schools as well?

    I don't think I became OK with my brains until I was out of college.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    1. Re:nobody RTFA? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Going even further off on a tangent, but hey. As I'm someone who is just finishing working their way through high school, I thought you might be interested in my POV about living with the image of a geek.

      I mentioned similar observations in a previous post - basically it is not really your intelligence/clothing/hairstyle/speech impediment/acne/anything else that causes teasing. It's personality traits, with lack of confidence being the greatest homing beacon for people who will give you grief. I honestly have never worked out whether the bullies realise that they tease based on their victim's personality and simply give these other things as outward reasons, or whether they believe that the outward reasoning is truly what drives them and the personality link is just subconscious.

      Unfortunately I don't have any magical formula for gaining confidence, but I do know one thing. People in my school are teased for all the typical things (dressing wrong, being a geek etc.). Those 'geeks' who are calm, confident and friendly (while still spending their time messing with computers and getting top grades) are not seen as targets because the bullies (consciously or otherwise) see that all they'll get from them is a laugh and a comment like "Yeah, I sure do hate being smart. It makes life so difficult." - the bully feels that they've got nowhere and simply moves on to another victim who doesn't have the confidence and as such will probably roll over and give the response that the bully is looking for, one that makes them feel that they've "succeeded" in making this person miserable.

      I've rarely, if ever, seen a situation where the bullying can't be traced back to personality. And I'm not saying that a bully-suceptible personality is a bad thing, I know that I was that suceptible person for a while, but I also feel that as I've got older I've become more strong minded, and that gives me the conviction in my opinions that will prevent other people from laughing at them. That's the other thing that must be kept in mind - humans are very good at judging each other's emotional states and as such just saying or doing the same thing as a "cool" person isn't enough; if anything it'll single you out even more since you're acting like something you aren't - saying what you think but with the unshakable belief that you are correct is what really makes a difference. I can imagine that someone like David Cohen, someone funny enough to lead Futurama and confident enough to become head writer, would have had all the personality attributes to successfully deflect bullies. That's why he had a utopian high school experience (as you put it).

      Everything I've just said is completely unscientific opinion, but it is supported pretty much 100% by my observations of the social hierachy at several different schools I've attended or been associated with. The other thing to keep in mind is that I'm not saying it's right to change your personality, I'm just saying that being completely sure of yourself (whoever "yourself" may be) is important.

    2. Re:nobody RTFA? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Life in Highschool changed for me when I adopted a new personal rule: there are only a few people who's opinions matter. Those people were good friends. Everyone else could get stuffed.

      I suppose that this changed my outward personality. I ended up socializing with people easier. I even ended up making aquaintences with people of various cliques that I would never have interacted with in the past. I ended up going to occasional parties. I even had girlfriends.

      Highschool will never be "golden years" like some staff and my friend's mother claimed they would be. But it was a better experience once I changed my overall attitude and philosophy.

    3. Re:nobody RTFA? by karnal · · Score: 1

      Sounds like typical high school fun.

      After I got out of College, I met a guy who I knew as one of the "bullies". He's actually a really cool person... has taught me a lot on how to keep my guard up when people try to trample on me.

      However, all through high school, all I did was just be an observer. I'd never offer any real reason for anyone to mess with me... most of the bullies there would slam on you to get a reaction, and I learned that early... But, even better, to give them a reaction that stings....

      If I knew then what I know now...

      --
      Karnal
  51. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  52. Re:The simpsons must have... by supersocialist · · Score: 1

    EVERYBODY knows pi r squared. TODAY... pie r justice.

  53. Wrong by phre4k · · Score: 1

    If you consider evalf(Pi, 3) you get 3.14 which is jus the second decimal. You want evalf(Pi, 40001); which gives a 1. /Esben

    --
    "Nobody really checks their email any more. They just delete their spam"
    1. Re:Wrong by phre4k · · Score: 1

      Just replying to myself: It is actually evalf(Pi, 40002) and take the second last to avoid rounding errors

      --
      "Nobody really checks their email any more. They just delete their spam"
  54. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1, Troll

    It's just that the conservatives are a _much_ bigger target, in terms of hipocrisy particularly.

    I mean, Clinton lied about a few blow jobs, whereas Bush lied about the reasons he went to war.

    --
    What a long, strange trip it's been.
  55. Math Nelsonstyle by TimeForGuinness · · Score: 2, Funny

    "That's like asking the square root of a million. No one will ever know." -- Nelson

  56. It's subtler than that. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Gutenberg was ahead of its listed release dates for some time. Note that before they reached 10,000, some texts had release dates long after their completion dates. (That one was actually released in 2003, for instance.)

    Gutenberg release dates are only accurate after 10,000; before that, they're overly pessimistic. The project had planned to release etexts at a certain rate, but when they'd completed their planned quota through 2006 by 2003, they gave up on that idea.

    Common mistake, though.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  57. Re:The simpsons must have... by scottv67 · · Score: 1

    pi r squared?

    I think you may be thinking of the Pyare Square building in Madison:

    http://raid.danenet.org/bcp/pyare.jpg

  58. Re:The simpsons must have... by scottv67 · · Score: 1

    ...or perhaps my friend Gina's restaurant (which was named after the Pyare Square building).

    http://www.jsonline.com/entree/cooking/feb05/30385 2.asp

  59. Re:Really? by Dirtside · · Score: 1
    Yes it does. Here's all 40,000 of them (in base 10):

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    0

    7?? Now you're just making up numbers.
    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  60. Re:The simpsons must have... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    sure, everyone knows pi R squared, but does everybody know (2pi*w*C)^(-1)?

    No. Why? Because our world has failed. That's why.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  61. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    Believe it or not, I don't listen to Rush Limbaugh, because I got tired of hearing the same unsubstantiated rumors and ad hominem attacks over and over again. He's every bit as bad as Al Franken (though when it comes to misinformation, I think Michael Moore has him beat).

  62. All of them.... by Rufus88 · · Score: 3, Funny

    NASA actually sent them a printout of all 40,000 digits

    I'm shocked that the Simpsons writers not only knew that there *was* a last digit, but also knew that the last one was the 40,000th. Even *I* didn't know that! They must've had some help. They must have some Ph.D. mathematicians working on the writing staff. Or maybe one of them is related to a math professor.

    Or maybe I'm just rationalizing.

    1. Re:All of them.... by Durinthal · · Score: 1

      Hey, I know all of the digits, and there's not even 40,000 of them. Just 10.

    2. Re:All of them.... by themightythor · · Score: 1
      Or maybe I'm just rationalizing.
      Or maybe you're just thinking irrationally, or even transcendentally.
  63. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

    The only thing I dispise is dishonesty.

    If you call it judgemental to recognize a mean-spirited liar and a hypocrite, then I guess I am judgemental. If you call it prejudiced because I dispise mean-spirited liars and a hypocrites, - guilty again. If you think it is exclusionary to include everyone but liars and hypocrites, well you've got me pegged. So I guess you're right, but I couldn't be any other way.

    --
    ymmv
  64. Too easy to disprove by Rufus88 · · Score: 1

    1782^12 + 1841^12 =1922^12

    This one's too easy to disprove. Whatever digit 1782^12 ends in, it ends in the same digit that 1922^12 ends in, since each base ends in a "2". That means the difference between the two must be a number ending in "0". But 1841^12 clearly ends in a "1".

    1. Re:Too easy to disprove by adpowers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The woman doing the article has her students figure out why it doesn't work using the odd/even mismatch. However, he used the program again later (perhaps modified, I believe) to find a more close near-miss and one that isn't as easily disproved with the odd/even mismatch.

    2. Re:Too easy to disprove by Zarhan · · Score: 2, Informative

      The program is at http://www.mathsci.appstate.edu/~sjg/futurama/near miss.html And yes, the later version checks for parity.

  65. Silly comedian by Rufus88 · · Score: 1

    Didn't he know it's just "74" on the speeddial?

    (Look at a phone keypad)

  66. Re:The simpsons must have... by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Wow, that building looks exactly like a tree.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  67. Re:Really? by Anm · · Score: 1

    Pies have 40,000 digits?

    Only at .

  68. Re:Really? by Anm · · Score: 1

    Pies have 40,000 digits?

    Only at Wendy's.

  69. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by Shaklee39 · · Score: 1

    The definition of a lie is telling something you know to be wrong. Care to show us evidence that bush KNEW his evidence was incorrect? Thanks, you lose.

  70. Re:Really? by Anm · · Score: 1

    Screwed the joke by not previewing....

  71. Why ask Nasa? by PGillingwater · · Score: 1

    They should have just asked this guy. He memorized Pi to 22,514 digits. I'm sure with incentive he could take it out to 40,000.

    --
    Paul Gillingwater
    MBA, CISSP, CISM
  72. Make that 11 pages... by Man+In+Black · · Score: 1

    With about 80 digits per line, 50 lines per page, and 40,000 digits per document, how many trees do ten pages kill?

    You forgot the decimal point, which unfortunately causes the printout to overflow to an 11th page.

    I guess the authors could have just thrown away the first 10 pages and kept the last one, which (conveniently enough) would contain all the information they wanted.

    --
    -"One machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man." -EH
  73. What? by m3g4t0ky0 · · Score: 1

    Have they finally decided to make a Simpsons episode about Pi? Awesome!

    --
    Har...
  74. Oh yea... well... by ravcam · · Score: 1

    I have pi to 32 million places sitting right here on my desktop :-P.

  75. Re: Best. Domain name. EVER! by danalien · · Score: 1
    yeah, =)

    wonder if slashdot-crew couldn't make an anual award for jewels like these =)

    ... you know, we contribute the funniest/best

    ... then we go and vote on them....

    ... and *tada* ... slashdot-cew give some über-g33ky prize to the winner =)


    of course, *these commits ought to live up to some quantitative Geekness ... *mmm* ... and so forth.

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  76. Re:The simpsons must have... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    Actually, I managed to pass quite nicely, thank you. :P

    It was a one-off comment, and it was inaccurate in many ways. After writing, I realized I should throw a j into there as well, just in case you want to use the above equation to derive a transfer function. :)

    --
    It's been a long time.
  77. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

    Thank you.

    --
    What a long, strange trip it's been.
  78. Re:What's so great about the Simpsons? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

    I think the fact that Bush committed troops to Iraq speaks for itself. If he had genuinely believed that Iraq had WMD, he would have been much more circumspect, because, given Saddam Hussein's record, there was every reason to expect he would have deployed them against invaders.

    --
    What a long, strange trip it's been.