Slashdot Mirror


Review of iRiver iFP-899

ThJ writes "The iRiver iFP-899 at $179.99 is a portable (8.9 x 3.6 x 2.7 cm), lightweight (75 grams w/battery) solid state music player. With a capacity of 1 GB, it can store ~170 songs at 6 MB each. The iFP-899 features MP3, WMA and OGG support, an FM tuner and a 3-way (line/mic-in, internal mic, FM tuner) MP3 recorder. After purchasing one for myself and using it for a few days, I thought it would be a good idea to give it a brief review. There are plenty of screenshots. Go ahead and enjoy!" Note: this review has some words of caution for those who'd like it to play Ogg Vorbis files, but forewarned is forearmed.

276 comments

  1. For Ogg, I got an iAudio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    And after a firmware upgrade, it works really. I'm quite pleased with it. If you're looking for Ogg or FLAC support (the HD unit) check out iAudio.

    1. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I second that. Having 1MB iAudio U2 playing nicely all my ogg and mp3 (similar features like iR899 - voice recording, radio..) I can recommend it. And functioning as a regular USB external disk... There are a few similar iAudio models, having either built-in battery or single AAA, all very small (U2 is a regular lighter size...realy!) and intuitive navigation.

    2. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      I third that. My iAudio M3 makes me very happy. In addition to the features mentioned in the parent, the M3 has a 20 GB hard drive, a battery life of ca. 35 hours (according to the documentation, and that seems pretty much accurate so far), I like the way it looks more than any other DAP I've seen (including the iPod), and I like the separation of the HDD component and the control doohicky. It's all good.

    3. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by rampant+mac · · Score: 3, Funny
      For Ogg, I got an iAudio and after a firmware upgrade, it works really. I'm quite pleased with it. If you're looking for Ogg or FLAC support (the HD unit) check out iAudio."

      You ogg users must be happy to hear this. All three of you.

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    4. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by flacco · · Score: 1
      You ogg users must be happy to hear this. All three of you.

      cool. so i'm the third guy?

      my entire collection is in ogg

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    5. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by eddy · · Score: 1

      >cool. so i'm the third guy?

      If I'm the first, that only leaves the question of who's #2?

      Anyone else want to admit to being a Vorbis lover?

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    6. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by cowens · · Score: 1

      Vorbis, speex, flac, theora, if it's ogg I love it.

    7. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by Shanep · · Score: 1

      If I'm the first, that only leaves the question of who's #2?

      My name, is number two.

      No seriously, I must be #2 then. My iRiver H340 plays oggs just fine. Only problem being that the batteries supposedly don't last as long as when playing mp3's. I guess this may be due to the H340 having mp3 decoding done in a dedicated chip whereas ogg being decoded in a more generic CPU?

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    8. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by martalli · · Score: 1

      I rip all my Audio Digests (http://www.audiodigest.com/) to ogg vorbis and play them through my Dell Axim with GSPLayer. Why spend the extra MB on mp3 or rip with the B-man's player? No flames on the Winodows device - I can't convince UpToDate (http://www.uptodate.com/) to make a Palm version... martalli

    9. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relax, the Apple trolls are out tonight. They wouldn't know something better than Apple if it bit them up the ... ass I guess, as that's about the only thing they have left to be bitten.

      I pray to Heavens Apple NEVER implements a Vorbis decoder for iPods. I would just feel dirty to have the likes of rampant mac suddenly preaching the virtues of Ogg Vorbis. These days I'm glad I wasn't much of an Intel fan in the fist place.

    10. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

      If you're looking for Ogg or FLAC support (the HD unit) check out iAudio

      I am, and none of the units on their page support vorbis above Q3 and FLAC above Q2. No 24bit audio either? I guess it doesn't have a floating point unit or something. So rather than transcoding my 60,000 file music collection, I'll just wait untill someone releases a "real" portable audio player. It will probably end up taking the same amount of time either way.

      A bit underwhelmed at the current crop of PAPs,
      BBH

    11. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      No, the CPU/DSP used in a iRiver is pretty generic (not too generic, but generic enough to be able to support many formats)

      Ogg simply takes a lot more processing (The reference decoder uses Floating point a lot, unlike MP3). More processing means more battery juice.

      I had the same situation on my old SonyEricsson P800 Mobile Phone. It had support for MP3s and via a Free App, support for OggVorbis. Whereas MP3 support didnt tax the processor (a 200Mhz ARM based unit), Ogg Vorib really stretched the processor to the limit, and also killed the battery quicker.

      It didnt have a hardware MP3 player either.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    12. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by ettlz · · Score: 1

      I'm a Vorbiophile. My ears deserve nothing less.

    13. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by Shanep · · Score: 1

      No, the CPU/DSP used in a iRiver is pretty generic (not too generic, but generic enough to be able to support many formats)

      Okay, that's interesting. Thanks. Most of my CD collection I converted to LAME 256 CBR years ago. I was considering re-doing it all in Ogg, but I probably won't bother. The LAME mp3's sound fantastic anyway.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    14. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That joke wasn't funny the first time, either.

    15. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Mine (G3) had no problems playing high quality Oggs.

    16. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi!

      Everyone looking for reasonably priced good audio players with Ogg Support and all bells and whistles should have a look at the TrekStor devices, eg. the "iBeat Organix" player. I'm still stuck with an old iRiver myself (astonishingly its Ogg support seems to be ok, it's an iFP 390) but I know some happy Organix owners and must admit that this device is tempting. ;)

      (It has FM and radio / voice recording capability as well, in combination with timer functions, etc...

      I could not directly find an international webpage, the German product page is at http://www.trekstor.de/produkte/mp3-player/ibeat-o rganix.html)

      Greetings,

      Gunter

    17. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A direct link to the english spec sheet: http://www.trekstor.de/downloads/produkte/i-beat_o rganix/datasheet_i-beat_organix_v0-01_en.pdf

      The website given in the parent post is also available in English. You can select the English language once you opened it.

      Bye!

    18. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, the number of ogg users have surpassed Mac users! Go ogg!

    19. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      I recently got an iAudio 5 and I love it, but intuitive navigation? I wouldn't call it that. Maybe the U2 player is better, but on mine, there are like three or four different menus and you get to them all by different buttons, or by holding some buttons down for longer than others. It's anything but intuitive. One cascading menu, tied to a single button, would have been better.

      I like the boookmark feature, but I can never seem to remember how to get to that menu. I think you have to switch to file browser mode first, by holding the menu button for two seconds, and then hit mode instead of menu, to get the right menu, then select the last menu item. Gimme a break, all that for a bookmark?!? How about Menu>>Bookmark? And the directional navigation, although not bad, does take some getting use to. It doesn't feel natural. I like that it supports ogg, but it doesn't play the one ogg that I have (plays fine on my Zodiac).

      I'm really not slamming it though. I don't think any other flash player compares. And AA rechargable batteries last forever, I wouldn't even consider lithium given the option. They're cheap and I always have a spare. Great device, I'm glad I did my homework this time before getting yet another crappy MP3 player.

    20. Re:For Ogg, I got an iAudio by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

      I took a look at the G3 specs page again. Vorbis is only supported to Q8. FLAC at Q3. Since all of my vorbis files are at Q10 and flac are at Q8, I'm still screwed.

      BBH

  2. Gone! damn by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

    anybody got a mirror ? :(

  3. Re:Gone! damn by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

    One post, just one and the site is /.ed. I guess this is one of those, hey look at my little review and /. me so I can brag to my friends how my little home system was /.ed.

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  4. Can you say... by countchoc12 · · Score: 0

    slashdotted?

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Soviet Russia jokes make YOU!
  5. Wowww! yee haw!! by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1
    1GB!? 180 dollars! FM reciever!? MP3 Recording!?

    YEEEEEHhaww!!

    (Bounces off walls)
    1. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by Silverlancer · · Score: 1

      The 280-dollar-or-so 20GB iRiver has video support, a color screen, and so on. You can play videos up to 10 FPS on it--perfect for the neighborhood otaku. iRivers are great players.

    2. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by lgftsa · · Score: 3, Informative

      My 1Gb Samsung Yepp has all that, plus line-in MP3 recording and WAV voice notes from the microphone. One AAA battery for 20 hours playback, and it's as big as my thumb. Firmware upgradeable, it's a standard USB mass storage device and has a standard mini-usb socket. The joystck makes for a surprisingly easy to navigate the comprehensive UI.

      YP-T6

      It also costs a whole lot less - $169 Australian for the 1Gb model, which should be about $115 US.

      This device is the best designed personal audio device I've ever seen. The marketing department was obviously boarded up in their offices until the last minute. ;-)

    3. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This entry from the FAQ shows it is not directly comparable:

      Question: What type of music files does Yepp support?

      Answer: Samsung's Yepp player downloads and plays audio that is in the MP3 file format, which is the most popular music format on the Internet. Other music formats are not supported.

    4. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by lgftsa · · Score: 2, Informative

      The person writing the FAQ should probably read the box it comes in, and differentiate between the bundled software's supported conversion formats and the device's native playback formats.

      Here's a summary:

      OGG, MP3, WMA, WAV and ASF playback
      USB 2.0
      Backlit LCD(white) and joystick(blue)
      SRS WOW Surround Sound
      Preset and custom equalizer modes
      FM radio with MP3 recording
      Line in MP3 recording
      Microphone WAV recording
      22x56x23mm
      30g without battery
      20 hours playback

      I just threw an ogg on it and it played back fine.

      Everything is configurable, right down to the backlight and turn-off delays.

    5. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by cerebis · · Score: 1
      Sometimes I think Slashdot really needs an "Astroturfing" moderation flag. This thread of discussion makes me feel like I am in the Truman Show.

      Drink Mococo coffee!

    6. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where can we get one in the states?

    7. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by fm6 · · Score: 1
      It also costs a whole lot less - $169 Australian for the 1Gb model, which should be about $115 US
      Except that this model isn't sold in the U.S. Even if it were, you couldn't assume we'd get the same discounts.
    8. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by lgftsa · · Score: 1

      Import one from AU, UK or SG, just like we have to do from US when things don't get released here.

    9. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      My 1Gb Samsung Yepp has all that, plus line-in MP3 recording and WAV voice notes from the microphone.

      Where did you get this from?? I did a quick google and can't find anyone in Australia selling it apart from ebay dealers (who are only selling the 512Mb model) ...

      How's the OGG playback with it?

      The marketing department was obviously boarded up in their offices until the last minute. ;-)

      *sigh* ... Samsung has never worked out how to market their products :-( Loved the Specifications section, where one of the specs is "Luxurious design" ...

    10. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my 799 doesnt like to play Variable Bit Rate OGGs

    11. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by fm6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Audio U2 has all that, some good features of its own, is much less fragile, and has the same list price.

    12. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I think Slashdot really needs an "Astroturfing" moderation flag. This thread of discussion makes me feel like I am in the Truman Show.

      Yes. I've owned an iRiver H340 for about 8 or 9 months now and to say it plays videos is like saying I'm an olympic marathon champion because I prefer to walk to the local shops.

      The video playback of the H300's is TERRIBLE. I didn't buy it for that and it did not have that feature at the time of my purchase, but I would not be going around touting it as a feature. It is crap. A complete waste of time. The H300's are however excellent mp3/ogg/wma players.

      I wish they would forget about silly features like that and add a decent equalizer. The options for compensating for headphones with too much trebble or too much bass are practically useless and should be fixed.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    13. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by lgftsa · · Score: 1

      You can get one from Australia, the UK or Singapore. Google is your friend.

    14. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iRiver is Korean and not Japanese though.

      Most otaku would probably be using Japanese electronics..

    15. Re:Wowww! yee haw!! by unperson · · Score: 1

      I'll give a second for Samsung! I bought this lil' gem for around $120 at Circuit City a few weeks ago:

      http://product.samsung.com/cgi-bin/nabc/product/b2 c_product_detail.jsp?prod_id=YP-MT6X%252fXAA

      512M flash (1G available), cd -> mp3 encoding through (included) line-in jack, FM radio -> mp3, voice -> mp3, and best of all, excellent OGG support!

      I encode everything using oggenc in '-b 192' and everything has played fine.

  6. "There are plenty of screenshots." by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Not anymore there aren't.

    Please, when posting pictures to a story in Slashdot, take into account that a photo that's 50Kb is going to be loaded thousands of times, with many hundreds of hits a minute. If you don't have that kind of bandwidth, provide a mirror that can.

    I had a 256MB IRiver MP3 player, with the FM tuner in it, and it works well although the software isn't as slick as I'd like it to be.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:"There are plenty of screenshots." by SgtSnorkel · · Score: 1



      (sigh) Here's the blog entry.
      Skip the direct link unless you feel the need to wait for the screenshots to download.

      Review of the iRiver iFP-899
      Thor's blog
      Sunday, June 12. 2005
      Review of the iRiver iFP-899

      Introduction
      The iRiver iIFP-899 at $179.99 is a portable (8.9 x 3.6 x 2.7 cm), lightweight (75 grams w/battery) solid state music player. With a capacity of 1 GB, it can store ~170 songs at 6 MB each. The iFP-899 features MP3, WMA and OGG support, an FM tuner and a 3-way (line/mic-in, internal mic, FM tuner) MP3 recorder.

      User interface
      The iIFP-899 is controlled with 3 buttons (Stereo, Memory/EQ, Mode) on the back of the player, plus a 4-way joystick to the right of the display. The joystick feels clumsy at first, but you adjust to it given some time. The display is easy to read, and has a bright blue backlight with contrast and time-out adjustments. Overall, the interface is very fast and responsive.

      Score: 6 / 6

      Player
      Playback of MP3, WMA and OGG files is supported for bitrates of 8 to 320 kbps for MP3/WMA, and 96 to 225 kbps for OGG. The player lets you organize your music in directories. These can be browsed hierarchically, and there are several playback modes to accomodate for this. There is also a user-adjustable 5-band graphical equalizer, which is neat. Using the iRiver Music Manager you can rearrange your files, and they will appear in that specific order on the player.

      Score: 4 / 6

      FM tuner
      The tuner uses the earphone cord for reception. This works only moderately well. Only the strongest stations come out static-free, and even those frequently switch to mono because of poor reception. If you want to catch the 9 o'clock news, it works for that, but if you want record the Top of the Pops using the recorder, don't expect high fidelity. On that note, the equalizer doesn't work in the tuner, presumably because its signal chain is purely analog, and bypasses the DSP. Using the iTunes Music Manager, you can set 6 letter names for the stations.

      Score: 3.5 / 6

      Recorder
      The recorder is actually two recorders in the menu, but they behave identically. The only difference between them is the sound source. The internal mic sounds surprisingly good, has a high distortion threshold and saturates gently. There is some degree of hiss from the preamp, so you won't be doing concert recordings with it. The impedance of the line input can be adjusted, meaning it can actually double as an external microphone input. I tested this with a Behringer XM2000S (roughly comparable to a Shure SM58) and it worked fine. The recorder's sample rate and bit rate an be adjusted individually, in mono and stereo for the line input and the FM tuner, and in mono for the internal mic. Convenient!

      Score: 3 / 6

      Firmware
      The iFP-899 can be outfitted with two different firmwares, known as the Manager and the UMS firmwares. The Manager firmware is the default, and lets you transfer and manage files using the included iRiver Music Manager software. The UMS firmware enables support for USB Mass Storage, making the player appear as a disk drive to the operating system, but disabling the manager.

      Drawbacks
      - OGG support is very limited and glitches regularly. A major drawback for audiophiles. I can only hope iRiver will fix the glitches in a future firmware version.
      - UMS and iTunes Music Manager support are mutually exclusive, and UMS seems to be a little slower.
      - No support for song alphabetization. This is very unpractical if you're using UMS, and can't manually change the file ordering.
      - The equalizer doesn't work on the FM tuner.
      - Noisy voice/microphone recording.

      Conclusion
      My major draw for buying this player was the OGG support. It didn't deliver on that promise, or at least, it hasn't delivered very well on it yet. It's a quality player in every other aspect, though, and fills my need for entertainment while I excersize. It has a rich surplus of volume and could do a decent job at driving larger headphones than my Koss PortaPro's. Compared to other players in the same price class, it sometimes comes short on space.

      Overall score: 4 / 6


    2. Re:"There are plenty of screenshots." by Yallis · · Score: 0

      Hmh, not even mirrordot was fast enough to fetch it before it blew. Well, I like my iRiver hd based media player, and they better not give up yet. I'm so tired of hearing portable music players being referred to as "iPods".

    3. Re:"There are plenty of screenshots." by ThJ · · Score: 0

      Anybody got some good Apache2 settings to deal with the high traffic?

    4. Re:"There are plenty of screenshots." by ThJ · · Score: 0

      I have the bandwidth. My server is connected directly to Norway's NIX at the University of Oslo's Research Park. My server just couldn't deal with all the requests. Seems to work better now, though.

  7. Article Header by hyfe · · Score: 4, Funny
    There are plenty of screenshots. Go ahead and enjoy!

    Stupid is who stupid does.

    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    1. Re:Article Header by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid is who stupid does.

      Do you have to be stupid to understand that?

  8. won't beat ipod for now by backslashdot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Music players won't beat ipod until two things happen:

    1) they are priced dramatically lower than iPod (think 25% of the cost of one).

    2) Songs can be purchased easily from places other than iTunes. Think Google (type in a song or artist name and it says "buy this song") or Microsoft (with their "Plays For Sure" thing). Microsoft is now entering this space so it'll be interesting to see what happens.

    Of course ideally DRM would just be a couple of bits set in an id3 tag. Players would just comply with it. With Open DRM, independt folks can sell their music without going through a third party like iTunes who wants a cut. Yes, it can Open DRM can easily be haxx0red or editted out, but honestly I dont think a vast majority will bother. At least not for songs where they appreciate the artists work. I mean, itunes has sold nearly 200 million songs, in spite of the existence of P2P networks. Clearly not everyone will pirate good songs they like and appreciate.

    1. Re:won't beat ipod for now by ROFLMAObot · · Score: 1, Funny

      Did you just say "buy" and "song" in the same sentence?

    2. Re:won't beat ipod for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      2) Songs can be purchased easily from places other than iTunes. Think Google (type in a song or artist name and it says "buy this song") or Microsoft (with their "Plays For Sure" thing). Microsoft is now entering this space so it'll be interesting to see what happens.

      Think Yahoo, unless you Think Different(tm), in which case you probably lean iPod anyway.

      <owns and loves a Rio Karma/>

    3. Re:won't beat ipod for now by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I have a 1-year old iPod mini with a dead battery. Now I heard Apple lost the law suit and began a reimbursement program for customers who are willing to go thru the hassle. I say fuck it.

      Does anyone know of another player that can play the songs out of the car stereo like iTrip? I just need alittle help in deciding a replacement.

    4. Re:won't beat ipod for now by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Most of the FM modulators on the market will work with any MP3 player. The original iTrip relied on specific MP3 files to be played to change the frequency; you can probably load these files onto another player and the iTrip will work.

      The iPod has no built-in FM out capability. Anything with a headphone port will work with most FM transmitters.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    5. Re:won't beat ipod for now by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that thing is brilliant.

      I pay Yahoo $5 a month to 'store' my terabyte of music so I can access it home or at the office, and they also gave me 1 million songs with nearly all new releases each week - since I only care to listen at work, home, or on my Pocket DJ that also can play in my car.

      The engine is buggie, and I still have to use WMP to get it to work well with my DJ, but it is still in beta.

    6. Re:won't beat ipod for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's not true.

      A) I'm not giving apple my money, via either iTunes nor an iPod.
      B) I don't want something that needs to be burnt to a cd then ripped again I by cds, rip them, then listen.

      It costs no more (CDs can actually be gotten for less if you buy at places such as www.cd-wow.com or play.com). I actually have the cd, for usually less than the price of the iTunes and I can listen to it on whatever I like. That's why I didn't buy a (*oohh shiny* pffft!) iPod and did a bit of research and got the 512mb version of these iRivers. And haven't had a problem with the ogg playback.

    7. Re:won't beat ipod for now by flosofl · · Score: 1

      I have a 1-year old iPod mini with a dead battery. Now I heard Apple lost the law suit and began a reimbursement program for customers who are willing to go thru the hassle. I say fuck it.

      Good thing you said "fuck-it", since gen-4 iPods (including the mini) aren't covered in the settlement.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
  9. article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Introduction

    The iRiver iIFP-899 at $179.99 is a portable (8.9 x 3.6 x 2.7 cm), lightweight (75 grams w/battery) solid state music player. With a capacity of 1 GB, it can store ~170 songs at 6 MB each. The iFP-899 features MP3, WMA and OGG support, an FM tuner and a 3-way (line/mic-in, internal mic, FM tuner) MP3 recorder.

    User interface

    The iIFP-899 is controlled with 3 buttons (Stereo, Memory/EQ, Mode) on the back of the player, plus a 4-way joystick to the right of the display. The joystick feels clumsy at first, but you adjust to it given some time. The display is easy to read, and has a bright blue backlight with contrast and time-out adjustments. Overall, the interface is very fast and responsive.

    Score: 6 / 6

    Player

    Playback of MP3, WMA and OGG files is supported for bitrates of 8 to 320 kbps for MP3/WMA, and 96 to 225 kbps for OGG. The player lets you organize your music in directories. These can be browsed hierarchically, and there are several playback modes to accomodate for this. There is also a user-adjustable 5-band graphical equalizer, which is neat. Using the iRiver Music Manager you can rearrange your files, and they will appear in that specific order on the player.

    Score: 4 / 6

    FM tuner

    The tuner uses the earphone cord for reception. This works only moderately well. Only the strongest stations come out static-free, and even those frequently switch to mono because of poor reception. If you want to catch the 9 o'clock news, it works for that, but if you want record the Top of the Pops using the recorder, don't expect high fidelity. On that note, the equalizer doesn't work in the tuner, presumably because its signal chain is purely analog, and bypasses the DSP. Using the iTunes Music Manager, you can set 6 letter names for the stations.

    Score: 3.5 / 6

    Recorder

    The recorder is actually two recorders in the menu, but they behave identically. The only difference between them is the sound source. The internal mic sounds surprisingly good, has a high distortion threshold and saturates gently. There is some degree of hiss from the preamp, so you won't be doing concert recordings with it. The impedance of the line input can be adjusted, meaning it can actually double as an external microphone input. I tested this with a Behringer XM2000S (roughly comparable to a Shure SM58) and it worked fine. The recorder's sample rate and bit rate an be adjusted individually, in mono and stereo for the line input and the FM tuner, and in mono for the internal mic. Convenient!

    Score: 3 / 6

    Firmware

    The iFP-899 can be outfitted with two different firmwares, known as the Manager and the UMS firmwares. The Manager firmware is the default, and lets you transfer and manage files using the included iRiver Music Manager software. The UMS firmware enables support for USB Mass Storage, making the player appear as a disk drive to the operating system, but disabling the manager.

    Drawbacks

    - OGG support is very limited and glitches regularly. A major drawback for audiophiles. I can only hope iRiver will fix the glitches in a future firmware version.
    - UMS and iTunes Music Manager support are mutually exclusive, and UMS seems to be a little slower.
    - No support for song alphabetization. This is very unpractical if you're using UMS, and can't manually change the file ordering.
    - The equalizer doesn't work on the FM tuner.
    - Noisy voice/microphone recording.

    Conclusion

    My major draw for buying this player was the OGG support. It didn't deliver on that promise, or at least, it hasn't delivered very well on it yet. It's a quality player in every other aspect, though, and fills my need for entertainment while I excersize. It has a rich surplus of volume and could do a decent job at driving larger headphones than my Koss PortaPro's. Compared to other players in the same price class, it sometimes comes short on space.

    Overall score: 4 / 6

    1. Re:article text by NoData · · Score: 1

      - UMS and iTunes Music Manager support are mutually exclusive, and UMS seems to be a little slower.
      - No support for song alphabetization. This is very unpractical if you're using UMS, and can't manually change the file ordering.


      Well, that sucks. WHERE oh WHERE is the flash mp3 player that supports playlists? I do not understand why, especially with flash capacities growing, this is not a given. If I am storing a good chunk of mp3s on my player, I do not want to have arrange them awkwardly into folders, and wonder if they'll be sorted in the order added, alphabetically by song name, or alphabetically by filename or what. I shouldn't have to change the organization scheme I have on my HD (iTunes style, artist folder, album subfolder) just so I can move them to my player. The HD players (especially the iPods, beside the shuffle) do this well, but they're not flash, and don't have radio, and don't have recording. Anyone know a good, multi-featured flash player with playlist support? iAudio promises it with the U2, but they haven't breathed a word about it in months.

    2. Re:article text by MuMart · · Score: 1
      - OGG support is very limited and glitches regularly. A major drawback for audiophiles. I can only hope iRiver will fix the glitches in a future firmware version.

      Hopefully someone with more knowledge about OGG playback in general will correct me, but I'm guessing the glitches are to do with the reviewer using incompatible OGG Vorbis files.

      Since Vorbis files are variable bitrate and the player only supports bitrates above 96kbps, it will glitch when it encounters any frames below 96kbps in the file.

      Vorbis has a different set of quantization tables for low bitrate frames which take more working memory, which is probably why the support has been left out. You need to make compatible Vorbis files yourself with the "managed bitrate" modes of the encoder.

    3. Re:article text by gozar · · Score: 2, Insightful
      User interface

      The iIFP-899 is controlled with 3 buttons (Stereo, Memory/EQ, Mode) on the back of the player, plus a 4-way joystick to the right of the display. The joystick feels clumsy at first, but you adjust to it given some time. The display is easy to read, and has a bright blue backlight with contrast and time-out adjustments. Overall, the interface is very fast and responsive.

      Score: 6 / 6

      The user interface on the iRiver's is terrible. You don't know whether you're supposed to press a button, or press and hold. Some commands are a tap and hold. I'd give the user interface a 1/6.

      I have the iRiver only because it records, and use it for podcasts. If you are looking for a mp3 player, stay away from the iRiver unless you need recording or FM radio. The Shuffle is a lot better function, and for the same price of the 899, you can get an iPod Mini on educational discount.

      --
      What, me worry?
    4. Re:article text by fm6 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Overall, the interface is very fast and responsive. Score: 6 / 6
      Wait until the joystick springs have worn down a little. If it's like other iRiver "ultra portables" the joystick doubles as a menu button. That's a really nasty kludge, because once its had a little wear, the menu becomes very tricky to access.
      Using the iRiver Music Manager you can rearrange your files, and they will appear in that specific order on the player.
      The current version of the MM gets all flaky if you have more than a dozen or so files in one directory. "Extra" files disappear from the list -- you can still play them, but since you can't see them in the MM, you can't change their play order.

      Also if you record a file, them move it to the main directory (all recorded files appear in subdirectories), it may disappear! This appears to be a bug in the firmware, which seems to get confused by empty slots in directories. Downloading more files can make the missing file re-appear.

      UMS and iTunes Music Manager support are mutually exclusive, and UMS seems to be a little slower.
      Also, the UMS firmware seems to have sound quality issues. Plus you lose the ability to rearrange the play order. I use the UMS firmware anyway, because it's the only way to get around the Music Manager's bugs -- and the fact that the MM won't allow you to upload MP3 files!

      All above comments are based on my iFP-390 -- but most or all surely apply to the iFP-899. Too bad, because it's a reasonable price for a play with that feature set.

    5. Re:article text by lgftsa · · Score: 1

      my Samsung Yepp has support for a playlist, or you could just organise files by folder and tell it to play whichever folder.

    6. Re:article text by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I have an iRiver 700 series flash player, with OGG support and the same limitations as the one in this article. I have found that so long as the OGG file's bitrate stays between 96 and 225kbps, the player has no problems at all. If the file does go out of those limits, it won't play. None of the Vorbis files I have encoded myself using Audiograbber and a quality level of 6 (~175kbps average bitrate) have ever had an issue.

      The OGG bitrate thing is kind of annoying, as with a flash player with somewhat limited space - I would like to use low bitrates. Oh well.

      I should also note that I have never encountered a glitch with my iRiver player either. No crashes, no lockups, no strange behavior.

    7. Re:article text by ArghBlarg · · Score: 1

      Rename all your .MP3 or .WAV files to .REC before transferring them to the iRiver unit. Then it won't prevent you from taking them back off to another PC.

      It's this stupid limitation (to appease the RIAA) that ensures I'll never buy another iRiver unit again. I love my iFP-595 in every other respect, but now that other vendors are offering similar features (MP3 encoding at > 96Kbps, FM tuner, etc.) *and* using the standard UMS system, there's no reason to buy iRiver. Vote with your dollars and avoid any gear that tries to enforce the RIAA's regime.

      --
      ERROR 144 - REBOOT ?
  10. We'll be right back... by Mwongozi · · Score: 3, Funny

    I like to listen to the iRiver while enjoying a nice cool refreshing glass of Pepsi Blue.

    I need AdBlock-for-SlashDot.

    1. Re:We'll be right back... by oddbudman · · Score: 3, Funny

      contract or none, Cmdtaco will not bow to any sponser(poses for pizza hut). well, im sorry you feel that way, but basically, its the nature of the beast... maybe on wrong about this, but the beast does not include on selling out( holds dorrto chip bag)... Timothy, you know what im talking about?...(leans back in chair, dressed all in reebok) its like people only do things to get paid, and thats just really sad.... ( Cmdtaco holding his head) i cant talk about it anymore, its giving me a headache...here, take two of these...( garth unwinds an asprin case) ah...small...yellow...different. Look, you can stay here in the big leagues, or go back to the start, its your choice...( Cmdtaco holds up a pepsi can) and its the choice of a new generation(drinks, then smiles)

    2. Re:We'll be right back... by Wordsmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ummm ...

      While the review is generally positive, it's not all-out glowing. It notes weak points. Are you saying reviews of tech products aren't legitimately of interest to nerds/geeks?

    3. Re:We'll be right back... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Speaking of product placement, I just watched tonights episode of 24, where the master criminals were using an alienware laptop to perform their evil deeds.

      This example was as blatant as anything I have seen in a while, and reminded me of the Independance Day movies with the Apple laptops.

      I don't know if it was intentional, but the AW laptop looked wicked, I just wonder if it comes with nuclear rocket control software built in.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:We'll be right back... by michaeldot · · Score: 1
      the AW laptop looked wicked, I just wonder if it comes with nuclear rocket control software built in.

      With the way Li-on batteries are being recalled these days (esp. those manufactured by LG), it probably has its own thermonuclear explosive device as well.

      I'm being overly fearful, but I'm thinking between the scaldings, the potential for catching fire and/or exploding, the last place you want to put a hotrod laptop... is your lap!

    5. Re:We'll be right back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so is slashdot allowed to do any coverage related to any company on earth?

      honestly. can slashdot even mention a company without it being a so called äd

      or are you just oversentative

  11. Humongous! by LFS.Morpheus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These days, 8.9 x 3.6 x 2.7cm is really quite big (particuarily 2.7cm thick - that >1") and at $180 for 1 GB, its primary focus (playing MP3s) seems to be rather uncompetitive.

    The review fails to mention any sort of side-by-side comparison. Compared to the iPod Shuffle at $150, you get something twice as big, but with a screen and a bunch of extra functionality. Two big factors that, I believe, makes the iPod shuffle sell well:

    Size
    iRiver: 3.5" x 1.4" x 1.1" (5.39 cu in)
    Shuffle: 3.3" x 0.98" x 0.33" (1.07 cu in)

    Weight
    iRiver: 2.64 ounces
    Shuffle: 0.78 ounces

    So for the added weight and size, as well as $30, you get a tuner, a screen, a voice recorder, and OGG support.

    Disclaimer: I don't own an iPod Shuffle, but it seems fair to compare the product to the hottest new thing out there in the market.

    --
    The space unintentionally left unblank.
    1. Re:Humongous! by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why compare it to the Shuffle. If the shuffle was made by anyone else other than Apple -- people would have laughed it out of existence for not having a screen, voice recorder and tuner or most importantly for the /. crowd OGG support.

      I just love how apple can release just the opposite of what people want, and yet they jump on it like it's the most inovative thing since sliced bread. These same people don't mind a HD based player that has a battery that can not be replaced (very easily), and thats ok also, cause it is all the rage.

      Or the fact that OS X is not open source....that's ok also, cause it's apple -- funny how many people abandon their ideals or principals so easily.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    2. Re:Humongous! by StarManta.Mini · · Score: 1

      Why compare it to the Shuffle.

      Because the Shuffle is the first thing that would pop into one's mind as being smaller and cheaper.

      The number of people who care about OGG support is outweighed (probably by a factor of a few hundred) by the number of people who care about iTMS AAC support.

      Or the fact that OS X is not open source....that's ok also, cause it's apple -- funny how many people abandon their ideals or principals so easily.

      If it isn't part of your Open Source Ideals and Principles (TM) to work alongside Closed Source Evil Products (TM), then you'll be in for a shock when you get out in to the real world that's filled with lemmings and control freaks.

      (I should note that Apple's control-freak-ness is a double-edged sword with both good and bad attributes)

    3. Re:Humongous! by Knetzar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yet, I was waiting for a small cheap MP3 player that would be perfect for long runs. Hey, guess what, the iPod shuffle is that MP3 player.

      Just because a product does not fit your needs, doesn't mean that it doesn't fit the needs of others.

    4. Re:Humongous! by Moofie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think the iPod shuffle is The Greatest Design Ever. I think it's rather small, and doesn't have a screen, but it is fairly cheap and rugged. Doesn't solve a problem for me, but some people obviously like it OK.

      I don't know where this "/. crowd" comes from. I don't recall signing a manifesto when I set up my account. You might be stunned to note that there exist more than two opinions on this board.

      "release just the opposite of what people want, and yet they jump on it"

      You contradict yourself. If people buy it, they obviously want it.

      "Or the fact that OS X is not open source"

      Darwin is, but that obviously isn't your point.

      "funny how many people abandon their ideals or principals so easily."

      I haven't abandoned my principles. I do not share YOUR principles.

      I bought my Powerbook because it suited my needs. I bought my iPod because it best fit what I wanted. I don't give a damn about what's "cool". I've never been cool in my life.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:Humongous! by glitch0 · · Score: 1

      The iRiver and the shuffle are both catagorically placed together in competition (price, size, and storage space wise), so it only makes sense to compare them.

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    6. Re:Humongous! by anagama · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why compare it to the Shuffle. If the shuffle was made by anyone else other than Apple -- people would have laughed it out of existence for not having a screen, voice recorder and tuner or most importantly for the /. crowd OGG support.

      I have a Creative NomadII MG from ages ago. It has a tiny little circular screen, fm receiver, voice recorder -- no OGG as far as I know. I haven't used it in about two years. Why? The buttons are in vertical rows on the two thin sides. It's just as easy to delete a song as to play one. On a scale of 1-10, the UI doesn't even rate. It's useless.

      The reviewer notes that the joystick controller on the iriver requires the user to become accustomed to it -- maybe not the UI disaster my Nomad is, but can anyone make a usable interface? Funny thing is, the first time I picked up an ipod, I saw how the UI worked within seconds. Litterally. I didn't have to look at the manual to see what the "A-B" button does (really, that's on my Nomad). This weekend, I set my 4g mini (only $20 more for 400% more storage, solid state issue aside of course) on my dashboard and when I wanted to skip a song, I just reached out and tapped it -- didn't even have to take my eyes off the road (a slight reflection in the window was good enough guidance). I've had the ipod for two days -- no user adaptation required. With my Nomad, I couldn't possibly have done that without taking my eyes off the road even when I was using it daily.

      My Nomad used AAA batteries - I definitely liked that and I agree, the ipods would be much cooler with replaceable batteries. Even so, it was just so easy to control I got it despite that limitation. Realistically, going off the road while switching songs would be a heck of a lot more expensive than prying it apart and replacing the battery in 18 months or so. As for the shuffle's lack of a screen, a tiny screen is simply a danger on the road -- important are easy to hit controls for skip and play/pause. Compared to the device size, ipod buttons are large and easy to find.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    7. Re:Humongous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the Shuffle is the first thing that would pop into one's mind as being smaller and cheaper.

      You must have a very special mind, since most other flash players are smaller, cheaper and have more features than the iPod Shuffle.

      Your Jedi mind tricks won't work outside apple.slashdot.org.

    8. Re:Humongous! by ColMustard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I very much doubt the "/. crowd" care very much about OGG support. I know there are at least a few who care a lot and are very vocal about it, but I bet it's a very small percentage of us who would actually take OGG support into consideration when buying a player.
      I mean, the idea behind OGG behind Free is great and all, and I think it's great that it's being used by a lot of commercial games and stuff, but it just isn't a concern for me when it comes to actually listening to music on a player. I'd much rather just rip to mp3 and listen to my music on the music player that I actually want, which probably wouldn't be an iRiver -- I just haven't read very many glowing (or even positive) reviews for iRiver players.

      --
      Moof.
    9. Re:Humongous! by falcon203e · · Score: 1

      Regarding your comments on Apple: Sometimes the simpler solution, even if it makes the technolusting geeks shake their heads, is in fact smarter and more efficient. I honestly don't understand the purpose of having a screen on a music player that only holds less than 200 of my songs. It's not oversimplification and it's not bandwagon. It's a couple of engineers cutting the crap and making something that is both uncomplicated and functional.

      About OS X: To think that Apple would even think of releasing OS X as open source is absurd. Just because it's based off of Unix doesn't mean it has free and easily alterable. Instead of complaining you could should embrace what Apple does give back to the open source community, such as, recently, their alterations to KHTML in WebKit. Show me another corporation that does stuff like that.

      --
      ----- "All right. It was a miracle. Can we go now?"
    10. Re:Humongous! by toddestan · · Score: 4, Informative

      So for the added weight and size, as well as $30, you get a tuner, a screen, a voice recorder, and OGG support.

      Part of the reason why the iRiver is bigger and weighs more is that it is powered by a AA battery (which is easy to replace).

    11. Re:Humongous! by generic-man · · Score: 1

      The Shuffle was made by someone else other than Apple. It was called the Creative MuVo and it came out in 2001 or 2002. Critics panned it for not having a screen and it was superseded by players like the MuVo TX that did have a screen. The end.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    12. Re:Humongous! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I personally don't think the battery being somewhat difficult to replace really is a problem if the chore only has to be done every two or three years. It's not that hard to get into.

      I think it is more laughable that people that pride themselves in having the "uber skill" of "building" computers have such a hard time getting into such a simple case as the iPod. Not having exposed screws doesn't make it a difficult to disassemble object. If you want my unvarnished opinion, it keeps out the people that shouldn't be inside it in the first place, lacking adequate resourcefulness and all.

      For the record, I don't care about open source if the program works. I use both pay-for commercial and open source software, depending on what I personally determine for myself to be the best solution for the given task. There is a time for ideals, but there is a time for reality too. Most of the apps I do use on OS X happen to be free & open.

    13. Re:Humongous! by fermion · · Score: 1
      The comparison with the shuffle is not a fair one. One either wants a solid state players with these features or one doesn't.

      But I agree on the size issue. Let's compare with a older solid state player, the nomad II. This was a very good machine that cost twice as much. There has been three or four generations since the nomad II.

      The nomad II was 6.5X9.3X2.1 cm. This means the width might is 60% less, but the other dimensions are 30% bigger. This make the device around 30% smaller, overall. The mass is about 15% less.

      So, in four generations we have 16 times the memory, which is expected. Should it be smaller. Maybe. The nomad was already a good size, which was mandated by the memory card, battery, and screen, none of which have gotten smaller. And, after all, it is half the price.

      Of course, a current generation creative mp3 player has 4 gigs for the same price, and in a smaller case. But the same thing applies. One either wants the Ogg and radio, or one doesn't.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    14. Re:Humongous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just love how apple can release just the opposite of what people want

      Slashdot != people. Apple sells to people, not slashdot.

      Also, not everyone on slashdot is the same person. Some like Apple. Some don't. Maybe you're noticing the most the thing you like the least. A lot of people do that.

    15. Re:Humongous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought my Powerbook because it suited my needs. I bought my iPod because it best fit what I wanted.

      So you're one of those Apple zealots - part of the /. crowd, I see...

    16. Re:Humongous! by fliptout · · Score: 1

      Seriously, the Nomads are so poorly designed.. I cannot see myself buying anything from Creative ever again. Not after buying a nomad and, a few years ago, a crappy Savage4 video card.

      I even bought the Notmad software for the nomad.. Well, another $25 wasted. That is some shitty software.

      I just cannot bring myself to buy in to the Apple gayness. :P

      --
      A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    17. Re:Humongous! by anagama · · Score: 1

      I saw a really nice mp3 player at Office-max of all places a few months ago. The UI seemed equal to the ipod and it looked very nice -- completely black without buttons -- just places that you would touch to make things happen. It didn't try to copy the ipod look like some other players, but seemed very nicely made, quietly elegant. I wish I could remember what it was called.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    18. Re:Humongous! by anagama · · Score: 1

      OK, so call me an idiot for 3 useless posts. Here's a link to the m:robe 100. I wish I had recalled this thing when I went to replace my nomad -- it really is sleek I think.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  12. What's the appeal? by puck13 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    1/4 the space of an iPod mini for $20 less (and no wireless)? Lame.

    1. Re:What's the appeal? by j0e_average · · Score: 1

      Do the drop test, then tell me which one is lame....

    2. Re:What's the appeal? by puck13 · · Score: 1

      Well, the iPod has a 30 minute skip buffer, so that's not an issue.

      Durability may be a concern, but I imagine the aluminum sleeve on the mini is pretty protective. They only differ in weight by about 0.7 ounces, so the iPod won't hit much harder.

      I guess I don't see a problem.

    3. Re:What's the appeal? by eingram · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for all iPod minis, but my wife's iPod mini has been dropped twice. The first time was while she was jogging and it managed to unclip and hit the street. The second time it fell was while she was skating and she fell and broke her arm, but not the iPod. Her iPod mini has a few minor scratches on it now, though.

      Mine has been knocked off the kitchen counter (only about 3 feet high) and survived with no marks and no damage to the iPod.

    4. Re:What's the appeal? by Danathar · · Score: 1

      hehe...

      My son tried to "clean" my ipod mini with a brillo pad, and then found some nail polish remover (100% pure Acetone". It still works, but it looks like somebody took it back in time, buried it and found it on some archaeology dig....

    5. Re:What's the appeal? by karmatic · · Score: 1

      This post is useless without pics.

    6. Re:What's the appeal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      I guess I don't see a problem.

      The iRiver uses durable solid state memory. The iPod has a hard drive which could easily break when dropped...

    7. Re:What's the appeal? by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Oh come now...use your imagination! Or do you only read comic books?

      You may laugh now...it was a joke.

    8. Re:What's the appeal? by hector_uk · · Score: 0

      i have dropped my ipod down the stairs a few times, only a few dents in the back show it. i have never had it skip on me and it's light enough to carry anywhere, i dont see the appeal of flash players

  13. Sandisk's Sansa 1xx players are good too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you rather pay no more than $130 instead, the Sansa player is a great buy too, with equivelant feature set (except the line-in and voice recording). Reviews:
    http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=10680
    http://www.expert-zone.com/index.php?module=announ ce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=1418

    1. Re:Sandisk's Sansa 1xx players are good too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own the Sandisk Sansa. Payed less the $100 for the 512 but the real benefit is the SD slot to add all the memory I like.

  14. Wedding Videography Revolution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Us wedding (and other) videographers have experienced a somewhat major revolution using the line/mic in recording function for gathering ceremony and reception audio. You can slip one of these onto the groom and officiet an hour before the ceremony, and with 7 hours of mono recording (on the 512mb) never have to sweat running out of record time....the super battery life kills worrying about your wireless mics dying, and also the concern over loss of wireless frequency or interference. Couple them with a Giant Squid Audio lav and youve got yourself one bad ass little system. I now have three (one for podium speakers).

    1. Re:Wedding Videography Revolution! by moviemaker · · Score: 2

      I wrote the above, and now I have myself an account. If for some strange reason you wish to respond to my post, please use this one so I will get email notification. Thank you very much! Daniel

    2. Re:Wedding Videography Revolution! by jubo · · Score: 1

      I have an iriver 899, this model, and I use it all the time. I love it. I just started listening to podcasts, in fact, I'm even thinking about starting a podcast for wedding videographers. Recording weddings and creating those lasting memories is something I've always wanted to get into. I'm filming a wedding in September for my nephew at no charge to get my business going. I filmed my sister's wedding last May and she loved the DVD and montage I put together for her. I own this microphone here... http://www.giant-squid-audio-lab.com/gs/gs-mono1.h tm I will use it for the wedding in September. Daniel, how many weddings have you filmed? I'd like to email you about it. Reply to me on here or at justinbohannon@hotmail.com

    3. Re:Wedding Videography Revolution! by Life2Short · · Score: 1

      Just curious... So you're saying you record the audio on this small device, then how do you sync the audio with the video?

    4. Re:Wedding Videography Revolution! by moviemaker · · Score: 1

      Yessir...straight to iRiver and synched in Vegas 6. I synch by picking one moment where there is an obvious spike, maybe the opening tones of the organ playing the march, or something else in my non-wedding work. I just synched 3 iRiver tracks and one camera track in about 10 minutes...no real trouble.

  15. Additionally: by LFS.Morpheus · · Score: 1, Informative

    As other posters have posted, for $20 more you can get a 4GB iPod shuffle, with a screen and 4x the storage. Size is 3.6 x 2.0 x 0.5 (3.6 cu in), and 3.7 ounces, make it only marinally larger than this iRiver device.

    --
    The space unintentionally left unblank.
    1. Re:Additionally: by JanneM · · Score: 1

      But still no tuner, and no Ogg support. And for me at least, a radio tuner is a deal-breaker.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:Additionally: by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Heh, you are thinking of the iPod mini, which is hd based, so it's not a fair comparison. People who really exercise hard probably don't want hd based players, but flash works out well since it has no moving parts. However a lot of runners use the iPod mini and it seems toa be able to stand up better than the bigger iPod to being flung around a lot.

    3. Re:Additionally: by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      i think you mean 4gb ipod mini. also, for same price you can get a dell pocket dj, with an extra GB. not as cool, but can often be found for around 180.

    4. Re:Additionally: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You might try the Creative Zen Nano. It's only, I think, $130 for One GB and has an FM tuner, voice recorder and can rip straight from CD or any audio device. And it measures 1.32" x 2.58" x 0.51" and weighs .8 oz without the AAA battery. Works great for workouts.

    5. Re:Additionally: by LFS.Morpheus · · Score: 1

      Yea, twas a typo, but it is a fair comparison. Like you said, the Mini does hold up well while running (I've seen similar, a lot of people using it with the armbands and such). But anyway:

      I think the iRiver is too big to do what you can do with the Shuffle - you don't need to put the Shuffle in your pocket, it can hang from the headphones because its so light. Since you likely would want to put the iRiver in your pocket or in some kind of case, the iPod Mini is also an acceptable product, and its in the price range.

      Personally, I see pretty much no market for this device, it's too expensive, and it's too big. It seems only fills a niche for OGG and anti-Apple zealots.

      --
      The space unintentionally left unblank.
    6. Re:Additionally: by weg · · Score: 1

      Since there's no 4GB iPod shuffle, I'm sure you mean the mini. But all that iPod stuff has a major disadvantage compared to the iRiver: The built-in battery. Apart from that fact that you can't exchange it, it doesn't even last nearly as long as an off-the-shelf battery in the iRiver FP series.

      --
      Georg
  16. Two other reviews... by BlazeQ · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here's a text version and here's an audio version (recorded using the iFP-899).

  17. Re:Gone! damn by ImaLamer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm getting pretty sick of people submitting things like: "The new widget set is out from Conglomo Inc. and I've written a review on my blog."

    Why can't we go back to real news stories and real reviews? I'd like to see products being reviewed by someone who does it for a living. Individual reviews are going to vary and eventually start flame wars.

    Of course any review by a Ziff-Davis publication should not apply.

  18. SanDisk has a similar product by ajknott · · Score: 1

    Looks just like a SanDisk Digital Audio Player, but costs $30 more and supports Ogg.

    1. Re:SanDisk has a similar product by ne0n · · Score: 0

      battery life is also 4 times better than the Sandisk. Get a Samsung Yepp instead, it's cheaper and better and plays Ogg without choking. Exempli gratia.

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
  19. I have an H320 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an iriver H320, it's got 20gb of space, plays any media file i have on my pc, and, after a quick firmware flash, also plays DivX. Oh and its got a bunch of other stuff that I never use, but its a great player, though the H320 isn't the nicest looking player out there.

  20. Ummm. Why are you bouncing off the walls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There are a number of players with the same feature set for much less money (except maybe for ogg support). Both sandisk and creative have 1 gig players for $100 to $130.

    1. Re:Ummm. Why are you bouncing off the walls? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the iRiver 700 series are identical as far as I can tell (some styling aside), and cost quite a bit less.

  21. An dedicated Audio player with flaky Ogg support.. by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

    and my 100Mhz Symbian cellphone, which isn't even stereo, plays Ogg Vorbis without a glitch (using OggPlay, go look in Sourceforge,I'm too lazy for a link)? Before anyone replies that being mono eases the strain on the machine, the Nokia 6620 is stereo and also plays OggVorbis files of high bitrate pefectly. Too bad the battery doesn't last much.
    If they wanted to throw in Ogg support to appeal to the few geeks that prefer it over wma (such as myself, since I refuse to have DRM-friendly media files), they could go all the way and make sure it worked first. Go figure.

    --
    Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
  22. Re:Gone! damn by rudydog · · Score: 1
  23. Only one spec really matters to many: by H_Fisher · · Score: 0, Troll

    Forget the bells and whistles; let's just look at the one specification that's going to be chief for many buyers:

    iPod Photo = $449.00 base price / 60 gb = ~$7.48 per GB

    iRiver iFP-899 = $179.99 base price = $179.99 per GB

    'Nuff said. Even if you do like I do, and say to hell with the "cool" factor, the FM tuner and the recording capability, this sucks.
    The people marketing and manufacturing this ought to know better. Just like you wouldn't send a VW to drag race a Corvette, you shouldn't expect this device to compete on the same playing field as the iPod.

    Show me the same product, at this price, with even 10gb, and I'd consider buying. But no less than 10gb is going to fly, I think, at this point.

    1. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because if I'm a consumer I'm going to spend $450 for a device to look at pictures? You know, what, I could pay $400 for a digital camera and an iRiver and still save $50. People don't usually buy things per/GB. You're comparing two completely different products with different purposes.

      I for one never plan to purchase an iPod for the simple reason it doesn't support OGG vorbis.

    2. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by maddogsplace · · Score: 1

      I'm not a big fan of the MP3. I'd rather stick to listening to CD's. Putting that aside, i do get what your getting at, this iRiver player is a waste of money compared to what iPod can provide.

      --
      Happy 2B Hardcore
    3. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! That's why Apple are stuck with all those useless overpriced iPod Shuffles!

    4. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're missing the point..

      flash based player = good for taking to the gym or on a run

      HD based player = bad for taking to the gym or on a run

      different players for different needs.

      'Nuff said.

    5. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by Kindgott · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure, and go running with a hard drive mp3 player versus a solid state player and see which one performs better.

      Hell, I was going to buy a Rio Karma until I did some research and it turns out jogging can lock the hard drive. I wouldn't be surprised if the same held true with the iPod.

      --
      If there's anything more important than my ego around here, I want it caught and shot immediately.
    6. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by Belial6 · · Score: 0

      Your comparing a solid state machine to a machine with a harddrive. Harddrive players are not suitable for use in as rough of environments.

      For example, the 128mb creative muvo that my 1 year old uses is great for him. It was free from the cable company, but sells for ~$50. I would never consider giving him a $450 music player. I also would not consider giving him a player with a harddrive, as the device is likely to be repeatedly dropped, stepped on, and chewed. Even though, the device is 128mb Creative Muvo=$50 base price = $400 per GB

      Personally I think that the harddrive players are too little and too much at the same time. I either want a device that can hold all of my music, which is several hundred GB of data (the hard drive players are not even close) or I want a device that takes removable media like SD. (which no hard drive player does) Who wants to have to hook up their player to reload their music. That is a pain. If I can't keep everything on the player, I want to be able to keep several SD cards in my pocket, and have access to however much music I care to buy SD cards for, as well as be able to hand a GB or 2 of music to my wife so that she can listen to some of the songs I brough, or to delete one of the music cards when I run out of space on the picture card I took with me on vacation.

    7. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by glitch0 · · Score: 1

      Nobody buys an iPod Photo just to look at photos (well maybe somebody, but it isn't very common.) People buy the iPod photo because it's a color iPod with more storage space.

      wake UP!

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    8. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MP3s at 128k sound like caca. However, mp3s encode with "lame --preset standard" sound as good as CDs, and are about 1.5x the size of 129k mp3s.

      I don't like OGG myself; it sounds like a 90 cent cassette to my ears, and higher bitrates don't realy improve the sound the way they do with mp3.

    9. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by anagama · · Score: 1

      I want a device that takes removable media like SD.

      How about CF -- I only see 1gb SDs on froogle, SDs are up to 8gb (though crazy expensive) but 2gb isn't too bad (cheaper than two 1gb SDs). Besides, I like the size and weight CF -- small enough with just enough oomph to not be mistaken for pocket junk (receipts, lint, candy wrappers). Oh, and good in cameras, cheap adapters for IDE usuage -- I really like CF.
      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    10. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      The iRiver iFP-899 is solid state or do you prefer to gloss over that to make the iPod look like the better product? The iPod is not solid state and instead uses a hard drive which is more volatile so try comparing apples to apples next time (no pun intended).

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    11. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by merdaccia · · Score: 1

      For example, the 128mb creative muvo that my 1 year old uses is great for him.

      From: The law offices of the MPAA.

      Dear Mr. Belial6's 1 year old son,

      It has come to our attention that you are listening to MP3s. Since you do not have an IRS verifiable source of income, we have reason to believe that you are either downloading music illegally or that you are sharing music with your father. This is causing a financial loss to both ourselves and to our client, Mr. T.M. Elmo.

      We therefore ask you to cease and desist this practice, or we will have to prosecute you to the fullest extent of toddler law. Your crime is punishable by a diaper sanction and cookie confiscation. Should you be found guilty in the first degree, you may also be put under house arrest and forced to wear black and white striped jumpsuits until you are four.

      If you need any further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us. Our address and phone number can be found on the enclosed Etch-A-Sketch.

      Sincerely,
      the MPAA

      --

      *blinking cursor*

    12. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by daninbusiness · · Score: 1

      Just wondering - but why does your 1 year old even need a MP3 player? Wouldn't the headphones be a choking hazard anyway? (but whatever works for you)...

    13. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately for Apple, so few people actually consider OGG vorbis when choosing a music player that they don't even see any need to implement a Free standard into their players. Ogg fanboys are funny

      Get a clue, buddy. Nobody cares about Ogg except you and eleven other people.

    14. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Mac fanboys are funny. They used to make fun of Intel, now they think Intel is the greatest thing ever. Now they make fun of OGG. If Apple announces tomorrow that the next generation of iPods will support Vorbis, suddenly OGG will be the best thing ever.

    15. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this?
      Apple PowerMac G5: $2999/2.7Ghz = ~$1110 per Ghz
      Dell Dimension 3000: $448/2.8Ghz = ~$160 per Ghz

      Now, what does this mean? Absolutely nothing.

    16. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by ColMustard · · Score: 1

      Actually, the GP made no reference to Apple except to say why they don't implement OGG vorbis in their players which was in reply to the his parent. I don't know whether the GP even uses any Apple products, but I certainly agree with how ridiculous OGG vorbis evangelists are.

      OGG vorbis is just another format that just happens to have very little support. If you insist on encoding all your music using OGG vorbis, you need to realize you are included in a very very small minority; one perceivably so small that big companies don't see a need to bother with it despite it being Free. While it may be a good format technically, it's hard to be sympathetic that your choice of music players is so limited when you were the one who ripped your music. Sorry.

      --
      Moof.
    17. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by Xenna · · Score: 1

      Personally I think that the harddrive players are too little and too much at the same time. I either want a device that can hold all of my music, which is several hundred GB of data
      My 40 GB iRiver HD player currently holds 4000 songs (at ~50% capacity). Most people think that's a huge amount.

      I'd be inclined to say you're not a typical user. How many songs are you storing anyway? And in what format/bitrate? 100's of GB sounds great for a movie player, but for sound...?

    18. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      He doesn't NEED one any more than he NEEDS MegaBlocks. It is a toy. As I said, it was free from the cable company. Don't you own anything that you don't NEED?

      As for a chocking hazard. No, it is not. I supervise my child when he plays with toys that he is not ready to play with alone. I understand that many parents do not, and would agree that their children should not be given headphones.

    19. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by daninbusiness · · Score: 1

      I see.

      I wasn't trying to make a judgement about your choice to give it to your child, I am just a little curious as to whether he was able to control it, what kind of music was on it, or if it's more of a chew toy than music device? (it's been a while since I was that age and I'm still a few years away from having kids of my own).

      Good on you for supervising your child...can't debate that!

      I also really wasn't 100% sure when you posted your comment whether you really meant a 1 (one) year old or perhaps just meant to type 11...

      Anyway, cheers!

    20. Re:Only one spec really matters to many: by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Hehe..Ok, Yes a one year old. Yes, he actually listens to it. He seems to be partial to power metal, although I have to make sure that the MP3 have been normalized to a level that he cannot damage his ears by turning up full blast. He doesn't seem to have any trouble using it. He plugs the headphones into the socket, and uses the skip forward/back, and the play pause buttons. He does not generally mess with the volume, and does not understand the on/off because it requires holding the play button for ~8 seconds. The player became his because he kept taking the earphones off of my head and putting them on his. Once I had played with the player for a couple of days, I realized the fact taht it only had 128MB of memory mad it impracticle for me. Since it was fee and mostly useless for me, I saw no reason not to let him play with it.

      While I would like to think he is a little genius, realistically, I think that most people just really underestimate children. Unfortunatly this means that many children don't get to streach themselves intellectually until they are old enough to get away from Mom and Dad. There are very few toys that a properly supervised child cannot play with.

  24. I own one already and do NOT recommend it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, so 1 Gb is impressive, but this has been out for at least 6 months. This posting is probably just to boost sales since this item is nothing new. Regardless, the interface for this product is very cumbersome. That and it is impossible to download music without installing software (making it impossible to do from Web cafes overseas). The better alternative is one by Creative. The largest Creative offers is 1/2 Gb, but that is still a load of music / books. The advantage is that the interface is super simple AND all you have to do is plug it in just like a thumb-drive (no cables, no software). Trust me, that fact alone makes it a far better player. Plus it's a lot smaller and a lot cheaper.

    1. Re:I own one already and do NOT recommend it by lewiz · · Score: 1

      There is a USB Mass Storage firmware available, you know? I use it quite happily with my Linux box to transfer my songs.

    2. Re:I own one already and do NOT recommend it by ThJ · · Score: 0

      I am not affiliated with iRiver and if this boosts sales, I did not intend that. If you had read the review properly, you would've know that there are two firmwares for it now, one of them being a new firmware with USB Mass Storage support. The iRiver's interface gets a good rating from me because it's very easy to learn, good looking and very flexible. I could've subtracted half a point for the joystick, but it's only tricky to use in the beginning. I don't regret purchasing it much, but am still disappointed by the poor OGG support.

  25. if you like iriver, check out iaudio by eh2o · · Score: 4, Interesting

    iaudio (aka cowon) makes a couple of small players that have all the same features as iriver (ogg included).

    the iaudio players also function as usb mass storage drives right out of the box, for those who abhor stupid "media player" software and all their crappy DRM restrictions -- copying music (or any other file you want to carry) is literally plug-and-play, drag-n-drop.

    iaudio has also just released 2gb flash players (I have one). within a couple of months there should be more and more 2gb players on the market.

    1. Re:if you like iriver, check out iaudio by SRCShelton · · Score: 1


      No! Please don't!

      I myself have a 40Gb iAudio M3, and although it's a nice unit, it seems to have been totally abandoned by Cowon. One of the reasons I chose this over the other options was the frequency of firmware updates which added new features... but this only lasted until about 5 minutes after their next product was released :(

      For example, the 40Gb player is incapable of handling more than 99 playlists over the whole device, and text display is buggy for long tracknames. There is no ability to search by, or even in some cases display, track metadata (such as year, genre, etc.)

      Even worse is the problem which the flash players have (although it's primarily an issue on the 2Gb players, because of their capacity) - due to what is apparently a deliberate design decision, they simply *will not display* (or play) more than about 400 files. So, unless all of your audio files are more than 5Mb in size, you're wasting capacity.

      Details of these, and numerous other, problems are discussed on Cowon's user forums at Cowon's iAudio site.

      Cowon, for their part, seem to have abandoned their own site: You used to get replies from Cowon staff regularly, and now they don't even answer emails...

    2. Re:if you like iriver, check out iaudio by james_moriarty · · Score: 1

      I can't say I've tried iaudio, but I'm happy to report iRiver doesn't [appear] to support any serrious DRM features.. at least not ones that have gotten in my way. We found that renaming mp3 files before downloading gets around the only restriction. In fact, the latest Linux drivers handle this transparently.

      It's wonderful to see so many vendors supporting ogg vorbis.. this is a huge change from a few years ago.

      Keep on rocking in the Free code,

      Geoff

    3. Re:if you like iriver, check out iaudio by eh2o · · Score: 2, Informative

      abandoned? m3 firmware 1.36 was released on may 27 2005.
      http://www.cowonamerica.com/download/iaudio_rn_m3. html ...only one bug fix though... so maybe they have basically dropped development on the m3.

      one thing about cowon/iaudio that is kind of annoying is that they seem to have about 5 different websites, but not all of them are always up to date. e.g., there are better user forums here: http://www.jetaudio.com/forums/index.php

      that and the bad korean->english translations.

    4. Re:if you like iriver, check out iaudio by eddy · · Score: 1

      >that and the bad korean->english translations.

      I think the worst part for me was the ridiculous hype they've got on their site(s). I was looking it over a few days ago and came across a page which said something like "The iAUDIO is the only player with three trillion audio settings", or something to that effect, where they've basically added up all the combinations of effects and equalizer settings and come up with a few trillion. Wonder if they counted volume levels too?

      Same thing with the rest of their fluffy "sound enhancement" features...

      They've got good hardware and software; stooping to these levels of outrageous PR-buzzwordism is just annoyingly stupid.

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    5. Re:if you like iriver, check out iaudio by Remillard · · Score: 1

      I have a M3L and love it. The lack of an on-unit display is a little tedious at times, but then at other times the remote makes things possible that wouldn't normally be possible with an iPod style unit (e.g. I have the unit in my safely velcroed pouch in my satchel, and the remote external and can flip through songs easily without having to have the whole unit available.)

      OGG support is great. FLAC support skips a little on the M3L, at least the one time I tried it out. I keep my music self organized, so I don't worry about the album/artist browsing aspect, but if someone just wanted to keep everything in a flat directory structure and get around with meta-tags, this could be a show stopper. works fantastic as a 20 gig HD. I keep my work on it as well to transfer between work and home.

      Anyhow, if folks have questions about the M3L, let me know.

  26. Archos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or the Gmini XS200 for only 189.00 (w/o shipping). 20gb sure beats 1...

    That with a third-party operating system, it's not that bad.

    2.3" X .7" X 2.9" (5.9cm X 1.9cm X 7.6cm)

  27. need more medicine by DualG5GUNZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    If there is one thing that my transition to digital music has harmed, it's my ability to tolerate repetition. No longer am I content to sit and listen to just 10 albums. If I have to listen to the same favorite song twice in a day, I just don't have enough choices. These days, I need something that can hold thousands of songs, not 170. A gig just isn't enough. All hail the HD based player.

    --
    "I'm a philosophy major. That means I can think deep thoughts about being unemployed." -- Bruce Lee
  28. A pity by Trogre · · Score: 1

    that ogg vorbis players are still so expensive. I'd rather not have to take my Zaurus jogging if I want to listen to music.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:A pity by glitch0 · · Score: 1

      Or you could just use MP3s..
      Is a moral crusade really worth carrying a huge, heavy, small storage space device (all by portable music standards) with you jogging?
      I own a SL-5500 and it's a big pain to even carry in my pocket walking.

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    2. Re:A pity by eddy · · Score: 1

      How is "sounds better at lower bitrates" (therefore giving you more songs/MB) a moral crusade?

      Not to mention the benefits of SANE tagging and fast encodes.

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    3. Re:A pity by glitch0 · · Score: 1

      Although ogg does sound better at lower bitrates, a quick google search reveals that the difference is minimal.

      Also, the link you provided is either in another language or won't open properly in firefox. Either way, I see gibberish.

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    4. Re:A pity by eddy · · Score: 1

      I dare you to suggest that the difference between MP3 and Vorbis is "minimal" at low bitrates (

      The page is in Japanese, but surely the links are universal? You just point the mouse and click, and (win32) software comes flying. Amazing.

      (Sure, if you want a linux version you'll have to point to the patch and roll your own -- unless you can find a binary somewhere. Hydrogen Audio anyone?)

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    5. Re:A pity by glitch0 · · Score: 1

      Dare accepted. I've already stated that I believe the difference to be minimal, and linked a page with a real world comparison that agrees with that statement. Where's yours?

      I don't usually (like others, I suspect) randomly click on links on pages that are complete gibberish to me.

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    6. Re:A pity by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      that ogg vorbis players are still so expensive. I'd rather not have to take my Zaurus jogging if I want to listen to music.

      You should've ripped your music collection into mp3's. You could've taken your pick among dozens of mp3 players on the market.

    7. Re:A pity by eddy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You can't take someone elses word for it, your ears are your own. If you honestly can't tell a 80kbit mp3 from and 80kbit Vorbis for instance, then... congratulations, I guess. Makes life simpler.

      I won't even bother with your "random click" assertion; I though slashdot were a place of geeks and explorers. If you can't handle downloading and exploring an optimized vorbis encoder when it's pointed out to you, you're obviously neither. Fine, don't bother. Sheesh.

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    8. Re:A pity by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Or you could just use MP3s..
      Or you could just use Windows...

      There are some of us who don't like the silly games Fraunhofer/Thomson want us to play.

      Got an SL-5500, huh? The SL-5600, while still chunky is so much better :)

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    9. Re:A pity by ThJ · · Score: 0

      Yes! Heck, if I encode a conga solo to MP3 at 320 kbps and listen to it on my headphones, it comes out all flabby. Sounds like somebody wet down the drums. Encode the same at any decent OGG bitrate. The result is brutally honest, and this is what I love about OGG.

  29. Only on /. because of OGG support by geekee · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of players that support MP3/WMA, have a screen, 1GB memoery, FM tuner, voice recording, and way cheaper than $180. Even the iPod shuffle is only $150, although it has no screen or FM tuner, or voice recording.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
    1. Re:Only on /. because of OGG support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you did a great job making a convincing argument. You say there are plenty of players that have these 5 features you list, and then offer a single example to support your argument, which doesn't even have 3 out of those 5 features.

      Having a screen, FM tuner, and voice recording were all requirements when I bought an MP3 player. iPod shuffle wouldn't even come close, even if they were selling them for $30.

    2. Re:Only on /. because of OGG support by ThJ · · Score: 0

      The thing that made me buy an iRiver instead of any of the Creative and Apple players was it's feature richness and OGG support. I'm hoping they can get those final glitches out of the firmware soon, so I can actually start using OGG files (see review for elaboration).

  30. Wake me up when... by roubles · · Score: 1

    they make a player with:

    a) replacable and rechargable batteries. The batteries need to be open standard like AA or AAA (so they don't charge us an arm and a leg for the battery replacements) ... and the player needs to be able to recharge the battery via AC or USB.

    b) replaceable, expandable flash storage. so if the hardrive dies, we're not left with a paperweight.

    c) no uploading/downloading restrictions. it works just like a movable hard-drive.

    d) support for every music format under the sun. especially open standard formats.

    e) a UI like the new ipod minis.

    1. Re:Wake me up when... by glitch0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      f) The device plays Duke Nukem Forever.

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    2. Re:Wake me up when... by wickersty · · Score: 1

      So I think I've figured it out. I can get Funny(5) or Interesting(5) so long as I either a) mention, in some subtle or not subtle way, Linux b) bash Apple c) alk about open source d) bring up Duke Nukem Forever in some clever way And imagine if I combine them!!

    3. Re:Wake me up when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And imagine if I they release Duke Nukem forever for linux as open source because apple sucks!

    4. Re:Wake me up when... by glitch0 · · Score: 1

      Although it was meant to be funny, my comment was also showing that what the parent was asking for was unreasonable, and very unlikely to occur.

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    5. Re:Wake me up when... by lewiz · · Score: 1

      The 899 already does a) and c).

      Obviously you didn't bother to read the article to spot a) but a short amount of digging would have turned up the USB Mass Storage firmware that allows it to work just like a USB thumbdrive.

      It's a great piece of kit, but not without its flaws.

    6. Re:Wake me up when... by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      The ipod mini's batteries CAN be replaced by the user. I've seen the instructions for opening the ipod mini and it doesn't require special lock picks like the full size ipod. A new battery will set you back about $30, OK it's not an el-cheapo like a pair of AA's but if you want a small sized unit like the Ipod mini you have to use special parts.

      The Ipod mini uses a type II sized compact flash micro disk (different package though). If Apple had used an actual type IICF micro disk and had a slot to load it, that would have been more like what you wanted. But note that the Ipod's firmware is ON the disk drive (so that not all of the 4 or 6 gb is actually available for your tunes).

  31. Re:Warning about iRiver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Care to elaborate on that? Or do you just like making blanket statements and bolding things to scare people?

  32. Hey, another slashvertisement! by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry, but how is this 'news'? Or even 'stuff for geeks?' Have you seen the specs? Near 200 bucks for just a gig of flash ram? I mean, if the thing did something new, or in a new way, I'd say sure...but this is just another mp3 player! WTF is this doing on this site?

    Again: had someone hacked together an SD card of a gig together with his own breadboard and made an mp3 player, then this would be /. worthy. As is, this is a product which is low on storage and not so high on features. Hell, j.random palmpilot does all this and more! I know my t3 and it's gig'o'SD can whup this iRiver 'till it can't swim nomore!

    So, you want my recommendation (probably not, but this is my post, so screw you :P)): get a zire and a gig of SD ram. Hell, even get a PPC now that those can emulate palm apps!

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    1. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by nagora · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Sorry, but how is this 'news'?

      It's a review of hardware that claims to play OGG files. Since there are very few such creatures on the market, and I have thousands of OGG files, it's interesting news to me to find that it does not in fact work.

      get a zire and a gig of SD ram.

      Does that play OGGs?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by glitch0 · · Score: 1

      Rare creatures indeed.

      "Results 1 - 10 of about 1,150 confirmed / 13,300 total results for ogg player."

      Froogle is useful =P

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    3. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Yes...if you install mmplayer or pocket tunes or any of the many free players.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    4. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by nagora · · Score: 1
      "Results 1 - 10 of about 1,150 confirmed / 13,300 total results for ogg player."

      Many, if not most, of which are iRivers. So, yes, a review which points out that they don't work as advertised is useful.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    5. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by glitch0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, trying to claim that all iRiver models have ogg problems based on a review of one model would be Hasty Generalization which is a common logical fallacy.
      Whoops!

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    6. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Near 200 bucks for just a gig of flash ram? I mean, if the thing did something new, or in a new way, I'd say sure...but this is just another mp3 player! WTF is this doing on this site?

      Frankly, I'm happy they're slashvertising for iRiver now, rather than posting a dozen stories for every new MP3 player that Apple comes out with.

      At least iRiver plays Ogg/Vorbis, so it's "for geeks" in that respect at least, as opposed to Apple's over-priced MP3/AAC players.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by ColMustard · · Score: 1
      At least iRiver plays Ogg/Vorbis, so it's "for geeks" in that respect at least, as opposed to Apple's over-priced MP3/AAC players.
      Oops! You forgot to check prices. This player is more expensive than Apple's flash players.

      If Apple's players are overpriced and iRiver's players are more expensive than Apple's...
      --
      Moof.
    8. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Oops! You forgot to check prices.

      No.

      This player is more expensive than Apple's flash players.

      Yes, it is $30 more expensive, but that gets you a lot more features.

      LCD Screen
      FM Tuner
      MP3 Recording
      Vorbis/Ogg
      3X the battery life
      etc.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by ColMustard · · Score: 1

      So what you actually meant to say is that the iPod is under-featured (for you). Conceivably, someone might be willing to pay less money, especially if any or some of the additional features didn't appeal to them. That trade-off decision belongs to each buyer, and while it's very clear that you feel the extra features are worth 30 bucks, others may not agree.

      No, I don't have an iPod Shuffle -- I just like people to say what they mean and abstain from presenting their personal opinions as fact.

      --
      Moof.
    10. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by laze2000 · · Score: 1

      Pocket Tunes for the Palm (any Palm) plays ogg files. Works great on my Treo 600.

    11. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by evilviper · · Score: 1
      So what you actually meant to say is that the iPod is under-featured (for you).

      No, I meant iPods are overpriced. You don't seem to understand what that means.

      That trade-off decision belongs to each buyer, and while it's very clear that you feel the extra features are worth 30 bucks, others may not agree.

      Yes, "overpriced" is always a subjective determination.

      If all you've got is trivial nit-picking, I won't be continuing this thread...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    12. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by arodland · · Score: 1

      Well, while it's on-topic -- recently I've been following TCPMP for PalmOS, and it's pretty impressive. It's still beta, but it works well (on any ARM-based PalmOS device), and plays a great number of file formats. One of its plugins is based on ffmpeg, so pretty much any file format anyone might care about (including Vorbis) is playable, except for Windows Media Audio -- and I doubt many slashdotters really care about wma. Oh, and it's open-source, of course. Anyway, homepage. Navigation is on the left, don't get fooled into thinking there's nothing there ;)

    13. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by ColMustard · · Score: 1

      You conveniently evaded the point, but I don't see an intelligent conversation coming out of this so have a good life.

      --
      Moof.
    14. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by nagora · · Score: 1
      Actually, trying to claim that all iRiver models have ogg problems based on a review of one model would be Hasty Generalization which is a common logical fallacy.

      It would seem illogical to assume that if they didn't care enough to get it right once, that they got it right some other time. It's not like OGG decoding is hard.

      Either way, the review has made it clear that deeper investigation than believing iRiver adverts is required; so it's still useful.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    15. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by StephanTual · · Score: 1

      Actually, there many players out there that play ogg, and they are certainly not 'rare'. Flac support on the other hand... So yes, the parent parent is right, this is yet again another slashvertisement.

    16. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? When Apple bumps the default RAM in their iMacs it makes the front page.

      I, for one, welcome information on someone's products BESIDES Apple. They're so overexposed I'm getting absolutely sick of them.

    17. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by glitch0 · · Score: 1

      Regardless of whether ot not it "seems" illogical is irrelevant, due to the fact that making a claim like that is inherently fallicious.

      Useful, yes. Slashdot worthy, no. It's your job as a consumer to look beyond the adverts, and showing you how is not "news for nerds" nor "stuff that matters."

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    18. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by nagora · · Score: 1

      Regardless of whether ot not it "seems" illogical is irrelevant, due to the fact that making a claim like that is inherently fallicious.

      No it's not, actually. People display patterns of behaviour all the time. Doing something easy badly is a sign that the person or company does sloppy work. Fact of life; claims to the contrary are illogical in that they are based on invalid axioms (ie, that actions by people are independant of previous actions).

      It's your job as a consumer to look beyond the adverts,

      What, you mean like reading the comments of actual users on, say, Slashdot, you mean?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    19. Re:Hey, another slashvertisement! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the club.

      --
      What?
  33. Re:An dedicated Audio player with flaky Ogg suppor by Agent+Green · · Score: 1

    I'm disappointed with the Ogg portion of this review. Ogg glitches...with what exactly? I expect if he was throwing it some 320k rips, well...duh. Now, if they were lower bitrate like 128k or something, that would cause for significant cause for concern. However, there is no indication to that effect...and based on the specifications, that is an important factor.

    Yes, I rip at 320k...simply because I want to.

    --
    // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
    // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
  34. Music player vs music collection different markets by screwthemoderators · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'm not interested in keeping my entire music collection on a mp3 player, I can always connect earphones to my laptop for that! I want a truly portable player with long battery life. I'm rarely going to listen for more than a 1/2 hour at a time, so 1 GB is more than enough. Solid state is also more durable (droppable) as well as smaller, and I can always add/remove songs. And $450 vs $180 is really the spec that matters for many

  35. Re:Music player vs music collection different mark by glitch0 · · Score: 1

    You mean like an iPod shuffle, which is designed exactly for people with those needs, and is smaller and cheaper than the iRiver?

    --
    -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
  36. You're music sucks! Repeated listening... by screwthemoderators · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously, I love digital players because I can listen to my favorite songs repeatedly, or listen to two or more performances of same song over and over. Repetition on the radio annoys me, but if its songs of my own choosing, I can't bear to only listen to it only once.

    1. Re:You're music sucks! Repeated listening... by DualG5GUNZ · · Score: 1

      the key to that post was not repetition as such. It was repetition forced by having so few choices.

      --
      "I'm a philosophy major. That means I can think deep thoughts about being unemployed." -- Bruce Lee
  37. I bought the iAUDIO 5. Like it. by eddy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes. I bought a iAUDIO 5 a couple of days ago. It's got FM (with scheduled recording), clock+alarm, runs on one AAA battery (I don't like the idea of hardware turning to junk once the battery dies), fast USB transfers, great navigation, nice screen, is small and light (28g), is available in memory sizes from 128MB to 2GB, features a five-channel user-definable equalizer, resumes play where you left off, can bookmark up to 20 positions in audio files (like audio-books), supports many character sets (including Swedish), and most importantly for me, has got great Ogg Vorbis support.

    There are some downsides, it's not very solid, being just a piece of plastic, and the USB- and battery-ports are a little flimsy (especially the USB-flap), and it's pricey for the amount of memory you get.

    However, overall I'm pleasantly surprised! I researched it in detail, making note of criticism such as weak FM-reception (which I can confirm -- not so good indoors, but works outdoors. Adequate), but there's lots of small features which surprised me -- especially how good the navigation is. Small stuff like the wheels protuding a little to make for easy access, to the little "knob" on top of each to not only provide grip for your thumb, but also mark the centre...

    I've only used mine for a couple of days, but I think I can recommend it. I don't understand people who can compare one of these with an Apple Shuffle with no radio and no display and no Vorbis. Just because YOU don't value these features doesn't mean the rest of us are idiots because we do.

    If anyone got a question about this player, just post away and I'll try to answer it.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:I bought the iAUDIO 5. Like it. by nullchar · · Score: 1

      Is the storage built-in or does it use some form of removable card?

    2. Re:I bought the iAUDIO 5. Like it. by eddy · · Score: 1

      It's a standard "fixed size" flashbased player. Removable-media players are, unfortunately, rare, and those that exist are very lacking in features. I'd like one, but they're just not there.

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
  38. Re:Gone! damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey man! The MirrorDot page you are looking for is not here.

  39. but can you change song playing order? by screwthemoderators · · Score: 1

    it doesn't seem like a big deal, but it's a software feature that my Creative mp3 player software doesn't seem to have, and I'm annoyed at having to delete and replace files to get the songs playing in the order I want.

  40. Re:An dedicated Audio player with flaky Ogg suppor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why stop at 320kbit/s? With Q10 you can go to 500!

  41. How is this better than an iPod mini? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mini costs around $200, and you can get student discounts and free shipping. This costs $180 (pretty much the same, since it has no discount). The iPod has twice the space.

    What's to impress us here? The FM tuner (which you can get from a dollar store these days)? The microphone?

    The iPod does one thing, does it well, and doesn't cost too much. Sorry, but it wins.

    (And for the record, I am far from a Mac Fanatic)

    1. Re:How is this better than an iPod mini? by chill · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The iPod does one thing, does it well, and doesn't cost too much. Sorry, but it wins.

      Hmmm... one of my kids just went on a school field trip to San Diego, CA for a week. She took a loaded iRiver-795 and four pack of AA batteries. That'll last her all week and she should have 2-3 batteries left over.

      Exactly how would an iPod Mini work after the charge ran down? She has no way to charge it, so after about day #2 it is nothing more than dead weight.

      So... the iPod loses.

      -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:How is this better than an iPod mini? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are adapters to charge the iPod Mini on the go. You just need a power plug or a cigarette lighter. The battery life is good enough that she would have to *maybe* charge it once...

      unless you're saying your daughter is anti-social and just listens to music all the time.

    3. Re:How is this better than an iPod mini? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Exactly how would an iPod Mini work after the charge ran down? She has no way to charge it, so after about day #2 it is nothing more than dead weight.

      So... the iPod loses.

      Um, AC adaptor? Or a car charger? Or heck, get an external battery pack, if you love running off AA's. There are ways to charge an iPod without using a computer, you know.

      Sure, you've got to buy a $10-20 accessory. But it is more annoying when your battery-dependent player demands a weekly feeding of batteries just to support your normal usage... those AA's add up.

    4. Re:How is this better than an iPod mini? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting that an iriver 795 can run for 40 freaking hours on a single AA battery. I'm in the habit of -recharging- (yes, I use rechargeable AA) every month or so. I've yet to see any other playet match that.

    5. Re:How is this better than an iPod mini? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting that an iriver 795 can run for 40 freaking hours on a single AA battery. I've yet to see any other playet match that.

      Sony's last 70 hours. Oh, and they play mp3's now.

  42. iSukkle doesn't have a display! by screwthemoderators · · Score: 1

    I'm also a little insulted when they push "randomness" as a feature, instead of an awful disadvantage. When it gets a display (a small monochrome lcd will do fine) I'll buy one.

  43. I just bought one by xeoron · · Score: 4, Informative

    the other day, which came with a $20 rebate.

    I bought it mainly to play ogg files and not have to carry around a cdplayer along with a small case of cd's.

    Here is what I have learned:
    1) I have not encountered any ogg glitches. Note: I ripp my cd's using the default ogg bitrates that abcde uses. I have also updated the firmware to the latest version. The sound of the Ogg files sound wonderful on good headphones and not bad on crappy ones. So far I have listened to Thomas Newmon (he wrote the score to American Beauty and A Series of Unfortunate Events both perfect albums to test a stereo's sound quality), Tool, NIN, Tori Amos, Splash Down, Fiona Apple, Neil Gaiman (audio books), Gorillaz, Sarah Mclanchland, Komeda, Juno Reactor, and A Perfect Circle. I list these artists to give an example of the range of sound in voice, melodies, tone, and rhythm in which I have tested Ogg playback.
    2) It does play songs in order within the directory the files are stored. So if each file has a number or letter uses this to to dictate order.
    3) There is Linux support, indirectly, using ifp_gui file-manager program (see sourceforge). It may not work as well as the Windows/OS X program that it comes with, but it makes it so that one can upgrade firmware and upload, download or delete stored files.
    4) Sounds settings, such as 3D sound option works surprisingly well.
    5) One neat little feature is that one can tag a segment in a song and have it loop over that section.
    6) The radio manager lets one tag RF names to stations and set programmed stations.
    7) I live in an area where most radio stations come in fine. Some stations do not come in well, but I assumed it was the cheap headphones I tested it with just acted as a bad antenna.
    8) 1GB is rather small, but enough to last many many hours for a trip or workout.
    9) fits nicely in a hand, and pocket, if I do not want to use the armband or necklace-type thing it came with for transport.
    10) One AA battery will power this baby for ~40 hrs.
    11) Random song selection works quiet randomly.
    12) supports USB2
    13) built in alarm support using either stored music or radio

    Wish it had:
    1) it would have been nice to have a belt clip for it or for them to at least sell one
    2) play list support (but so far I have had not problem with since I like to listen to albums in order or random song selection).
    3) able to charge a rechargeable AA battery.
    4) come with a external power slot to be able to plug it into a wall-socket
    5) for it to to be powered by the USB cord with connected.
    6) option to limit how much data is displayed on the screen or at least support a sleep screen when listening, since there is no need for it to display data about a current song when it is not being looked at.
    7) larger file storage option or expansion.

    1. Re:I just bought one by russ_allegro · · Score: 1

      >1) it would have been nice to have a belt clip for it or for them to at least sell one

      I bought mine from the iRiver website, it came with a belt clip.

    2. Re:I just bought one by ThJ · · Score: 0

      I agree with most of what he's saying. I still claim OGG support is at least half-broken. If a player kneels because parts of a song has a hard-panned solo, that's a broken implementation. Regarding the order of plackback in directories, I can't say I recognize what you say. My player, with the latest UMS firmware, will play back everything in the order you dragged it to the player. Using the manager, it takes the order of the file list literally, but at least you can reorder songs in there.

  44. In a roundabout way, yes. by eddy · · Score: 1

    Speaking for the iAUDIO5.. yes, in a way.

    Normally you're in "file mode" where you pick tracks in the directory (supports sub-directories of course) and they're played sequencially as you'd expect, but you also have a playlist; so you could add the songs you want to listen to in the order you want them to the dynamic playlist, and then enter "Dynamic Playlist Mode".

    The only actions that can be taken on the playlist though is deleting and adding, not "rearranging". I don't know if you'd consider this good enough.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  45. vorbis shmorbis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck Ogg, I want something that plays back musepack

  46. Some of you are missing the point. by H_Fisher · · Score: 1

    Some of you who've replied to my post - and, so far, EVERYONE who's modded it - are obviously not getting what I'm trying to say. So, I'll elaborate, as I ought to have done at the beginning.

    Sorry, ladies and gents, but I'd wager that 90% or more of the buyers of portable music players in general are going to look at three things when they buy their music:

    Does it look stylish?

    Will it play most, or all, of the songs I already downloaded / ripped / bought?

    How much can I put on it?

    In my original post, I said: "Even if you do like I do, and say to hell with the "cool" factor, the FM tuner and the recording capability, this sucks." And I was right. I personally don't care whether or not an iPod plays photos. I don't own an iPod. I don't own an mp3 player, solid state or otherwise, except for the CD MP3 player in my car and a portable CD MP3 player. If I need to turn in my "geek card" for that, well, whatever.

    And that was my whole point, although I didn't make it very well. Whether or not you can play Ogg files on your mp3 player, or record with it, look at pictures on it, listen to FM radio on it - all of this is a fart in a hurricane next to the three factors I mentioned above, when you're talking about the average consumer. And everyone on this site knows it.
    Are most of the people who're technically apt enough to read /. going to buy the iRiver? Not "no," but "hell no." I was just trying to point out what most consumers are going to see when they compare this product to others like it. It's the first, and foremost, comparison *I* make, non-jogger and non-Ogger that I am, when I browse through the MP3 players I come across in stores. Nine out of ten of the music-player shoppers out there aren't going to research this stuff. Their kids are going to ask for "an iPod," I bet, and their parents are going to look at the prices and storage space of those versus the other products they see. That's not trolling, that's common sense.

  47. No, you're missing the point. by eddy · · Score: 1

    We are not here because we're "average consumers" when it comes to electronics/computing gear!

    We don't understand why you even bring it up? Why should we care what the peons settle for?

    That's not trolling, that's common sense.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:No, you're missing the point. by H_Fisher · · Score: 1

      Oh, you're trolling and you know it! The first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem. Me, for instance, I have a problem where I feel compelled to answer trolls ... :-)

      But anyway. Using your logic, this story never should have been posted to Slashdot's front page to begin with. Yet most of us know that those "peons" you refer to are, for better or worse, the ones in the majority when it comes to determining whether gizmos like this one make it. The buying choices they make dictate which products are most readily available, with which features and formats, and at what price.

      Understanding what drives the market - again, for better or worse - is important to anyone who is interested in understanding how technology develops, and what succeeds, and what fails.

      How many times have products that you KNOW are better than the "leading brand" been better at what they did, yet failed because the other guy's products were better-advertised, slicker, or whatnot? Cases in point: all the portable game systems that were supposed to kill the original, clunky, monochrome Nintendo Gameboy.

      Same for portable media players. I hate DRM as much as the next person; I'm all for improvement in media formats. I want to see how the market responds to these concerns when the "peons" finally start coming around to these things that people on Slashdot have been complaining about for months now.

  48. Iriver must die! by fm6 · · Score: 1
    I own an iRiver 390T. Basically, not too bad a gadget, though the 5-way joystick was a really bad idea (gets confused about what's a long press and what's a short one). But I'll absolutely never buy anything from this company again.

    First their software is buggy. Between them, the firmware and the Music Manager get all confused if there's more than a dozen files in the main directory. (Files aren't accessible from the Music Manager listing, or even disappear entirely.) You can get around that by using the UMS firmware, which makes the player look like a thumb drive, but then you lose any simple way to arrange the play order.

    Second, they have no notion of support. Their U.S. support site doesn't have the latest software, and doesn't respond to support requests. Fortunately, the U.K. site is somewhat better, and does have the latest U.S. software. But hey, it's the attitude....

    For my next MP3 player, I need one that has a resume-where-you-left-off feature (required, I listen to a lot of spoken word stuff) and preferrably has a bookmark feature. You'd think these would be standard in this podcast era. Any suggestions?

    1. Re:Iriver must die! by eddy · · Score: 1

      >You'd think these would be standard in this podcast era.

      Yeah, I thought it were?

      >Any suggestions?

      I'm goint to come of as a rabind fanboy, but since you asked; the iAUDIO5 fulfill those requirements. "resume-where-you-left-off" is standard (but can be turned off), and you're limited to 20 bookmarks (ought to be enough for anyone, eh?)

      Suggest you peruse the manual. (a note: I thought the navigation came across as somewhat chaotic when I read the manual before owning the player, but navigation actually works great). I haven't tried using bookmarks and don't really remember how you set them, so I don't know if it's a hassle.

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    2. Re:Iriver must die! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you're fan-boy status is in jeopardy. (Fortunately, your Grammar Nazi standing is still secure!) Judging from the manual, the iAUDIO5 series compares feature-for-feature with the iFP series, and comes off better in almost every respect. Pity I'm broke....

    3. Re:Iriver must die! by eddy · · Score: 1

      >you're

      Ha!

      (It's because I'm so very tired; my spelling and grammar go down the drain pretty quickly once it's past bedtime. Oddly, the same thing happen at the other end of the scale, when I get excited, so I'm at my best only in "neutral".)

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    4. Re:Iriver must die! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      As I've gotten older and more flaky, I've developed this irritating habit of writing the wrong homonym. What really pisses me off is that the distinction between "to", "two", and "too" is the very first bit of formal English I remember learning, and I've never been confused as to which to use. Now I have to carefully read everything I write. Especially on Slashdot, where there are Language Nazis hiding behind every tree. Get a life, people!

  49. converting oggs with python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #!/usr/bin/env python
    import os, sys
    rgues=sys.argv[1:]

    def encode(iTranslate):
    ogg=['oggenc', '-q3', '-m128', '-M225']
    ogg.append(iTranslate + '.wav')
    os.spawnvp(os.P_NOWAIT, 'oggenc', ogg)

    def uncode(iFluff):
    unogg=['ogg123', '-q', '-d', 'wav', '-f']
    unogg.append(iFluff + '.wav')
    unogg.append(iFluff)
    os.spawnvp(os.P_WAIT,'ogg123', unogg)
    encode(iFluff)

    for i in rgues:
    uncode(i)

  50. Re:Warning about iRiver by mangus_angus · · Score: 1

    Shame on you Steve Jobs for posting that kind of stuff.

  51. Re:Gone! damn by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

    "by Adult film producer (866485)"
    "anybody got a mirror ? :("

    Why? You hirin?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  52. Line-in recording quality? What player is best? by Canonical+AC · · Score: 1
    The article says:

    The recorder's sample rate and bit rate an be adjusted individually, in mono and stereo for the line input and the FM tuner, and in mono for the internal mic.

    What are the rates available? I really want a flash player able to record from line-in for recording some music sessions...I'd like 320kbps mp3 or pure wav/pcm if possible (I think the iriver H120 offerred the wav mode). Anybody know of a good player/recorder?

    Canonical Anonymous Coward
    --
    Canonical Anonymous Coward

    Can a sig be more clever than it's creator?
  53. Re:Gone! damn by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    Where's the line? I'd like to be the guy that lubes the girls up.
    Heck, I'd even be the best boy. (I'm not sure what that means, but it sounds like fun.)

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  54. ulterior motives by flacco · · Score: 1
    There are plenty of screenshots. Go ahead and enjoy!

    frankly, i think the blog author just has a vendetta of some kind against his blog provider.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    1. Re:ulterior motives by ThJ · · Score: 0

      I have a vendetta against myself? Dang! The culprit must be punished! :O

  55. OGG player by wew · · Score: 1

    The Samsung YEPP yp-c1 mp3 player plays Ogg Vorbis files fine (in my not-too-demanding experience), and works easily with Linux. If Ogg and Linux support are important to you (as they were to me), it's not a bad choice. I'm not sure whether it's readily available in the West, though; mine was bought for me in China.

    Anyway, here are some pictures: http://www.mobilemag.com/content/100/337/C3890/

    1. Re:OGG player by foxhound01 · · Score: 0

      I have a Yepp! YP-MT6 which i bought for about $100 at best buy, its specs are very similar to the iRiver, 'cept its only 512MB, but it plays ogg flawlessly, encodes mp3 on the fly, fm tuner with lotsa presets, built in mic, and a nice backlit display. for the price, i couldn't be happier, and it works as any other flash drive for transferring files, so it isn't limited to any one OS.

      --


      Linux is to the internet as Duct Tape is to the Universe.
  56. Re:Warning about iRiver by cjsm · · Score: 1

    Well, they gave me great customer service, replacing my iRiver iHP-120 (20 gig harddrive) for free after I accdentally fried it by my own fault.

    I have a shelf above my desk, and I had a couple of adaptors plugged into a surge protector up there. One was for the iRiver, another was for my Nimih battery recharger. Like an idiot, I plugged the battery charger adaptor plug into the iRiver, and within a few seconds, I smelled burning. Realizing my mistake, I pulled it out, but it was to late. It was cooked. I emailed them and explained what happened, and asked if they had some reconditioned models I could purchase. Instead, they sent me a new one for free after I returned the damaged one.

    A mini review: the controls aren't totally intuitive, but it is loaded with useful features, with none of the DRM crap on many other mp3 plays, like my solid state RIO for example. I don't know if the new ones are still like this, though. But it has way more features then an iPod. I wouldn't trade the iRiver for an iPod. The iPod is a crippled player compared to the iRiver.

    cjsm

    --
    This ad space for rent.
  57. Re:Gone! damn by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

    Why? You hirin?

    Are you cute?

  58. Re:Humongous! - Introducing iProduct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  59. Re:Gone! damn by Lshmael · · Score: 1

    Mirrordot only mirrored the first two links, both of which point at the iRiver site.

  60. missing social interaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe she should listen to music less and interact with her peers more. Field trips are about socializing and learning, not interiorizing love, broken hearts and whatever else top 40 is about these days.

    So... your daughter loses.

  61. Re:Music player vs music collection different mark by generic-man · · Score: 1

    The whole "no display flash MP3 player" crap was tried before and was panned. The iPod Shuffle is nothing more than a brand extension for people who want to say they own an iPod but can't afford a real iPod.

    Even my $20 Discman has a more useful display than the iPod Shuffle does. It's not like it's difficult to put a screen and a kickass battery in the same form factor as a Shuffle, but Apple doesn't want you spending your money on such frivolities when you could be buying a higher-end player.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  62. No, shuffle design is really good for that use by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    A while ago I had a Timex MP3 watch. While it was kind of cool I simply didn't use it much, and when I did I did not really use the screen at all because really tiny screens with scrolling text I find very useless in practice. Even in car players where the scrolling screen is a bit larger I almost never leave it on track name and just have the display be the time.

    So the Shuffle is in fact a really excellent idea independant of Apple. One of the keys to a displayless device being practical and usable is something like iTunes which lets you do more advanaced managemnet tasks without an interface on the device itself.

    On a side-note while all of OS X is not open source, a whole lot is so it's again a good real-world compromise for those of us that want to get work done while still supporting open source. Darwin is of course quite open source and a lot of stuff shipped with OS X is also open (like Apache or all the GNU fileutils). One can hope that as support for Apple increases from users of Open source the degree to which they open up parts of OS X also increases.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  63. Why no gapless playback except for Rio Karma? by Deslock · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Rio Karma's gapless playback was awesome... but that device was a little hefty and its boxy shape made it unfriendly to the pocket, which is why I got rid of it. Unfortunately, that's the only MP3 player I know of that supports gapless. Still, there are a slew of nifty 1 GB flash players that can be had for $80 - $150. In addition to the iRiver:

    iPod Shuffle (I picked up a used 1GB model for $80):
    + smallest and lightest of the bunch, iTunes integration, high build-quality, excellent sound, well-place controls, doubles as USB flash drive, recharges when plugged in
    - no screen, non-replaceable battery, can't transfer music through mounted drive

    Creative Muvo N200:
    + FM, AAA battery offers flexibility, voice recorder, line-in
    - a little larger than iPod Shuffle, must juggle batteries

    Creative Muvo V200 (I got a 1GB model on Ebay for $87 shipped):
    Same as N200 but slightly larger and heavier, has integrated USB connector, no line-in

    iPod Shuffle Knock-offs :
    Not as easy to find, but like the shuffle but with more features (but sans iTunes integration). Mixed reviews as far as build quality goes.

    JXD No-name Player :
    The JXD is just one of many feature-rich no-name players on Ebay. Build and sound quality unknown; YMMV.

    And there are several Rio, Samsung, and Sandisk models at Best Buy... and other more exciting ones at dynamism, like the tasty iRiver T10.

    Then there's the iPod Mini, which has Apple's awesome clickwheel in a fairly small package. And the Rio Carbon, which is the most pocketable of the hdd players. Too bad neither of those have a built-in USB connector or FM.

    1. Re:Why no gapless playback except for Rio Karma? by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

      Apparently you and I are the only people in the world who require gapless playback...
      well, if you believe the twats on /.

      It's the reason I haven't bought an mp3 player yet.
      I'm holding out for the chroma - But going by the Rio offerings since the karma i'm not gonna get it.

      Due an upgrade on my phone soon, so i guess i'll just get a phone with a uilt in player.

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
    2. Re:Why no gapless playback except for Rio Karma? by DWIM · · Score: 1
      If you want gapless, one option is http://www.rockbox.org/. They are porting it to the iRiver H1xx-series players and will surely be doing the same for the H3xx-series players too. The progress is good enough that I use their firmware pretty much exclusively now.

      The gapless playback is perfect btw, when using ogg vorbis.

    3. Re:Why no gapless playback except for Rio Karma? by DWIM · · Score: 1
      Sorry to reply to my own comment, but I should throw in that they currently have support for the following codecs:

      MP3
      ogg vorbis
      FLAC
      WAV
      WAVPACK
      AC3

  64. Re:Warning about iRiver by MBraynard · · Score: 1

    No players force you to DRM. You can go and steal /troll/ anything and put in your whatever player. The DRM is an ability to give you access to legal, for sale music - not a limit on you. Personally, I intentionally got a play-for-sure device so I could use Napster (and then I switched to Yahoo).

  65. Samsung yp t6z by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. has all the features of iriver's ifp 899 (1 gig, ogg, voice recording, Fm tuner). it only lacks a line in.

    It is smaller, lighter (AAA battery instead of AA) and cheaper for what i've seen

    only problem is that it's available on bestbuy canada, but not US...

  66. Finally! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1

    A ToshPod killer! I was wondering when the cloners would notice this device and try to take some of Toshiba's share of the pie.

  67. Great player! by wijnands · · Score: 1

    Wife's got the ifp 799 which is the same player in a different housing. Bought it after a very frustrating weekend trying to get to grips with an iPod mini. Well, I can tell you, the iriver has everything the iPod doesn't (except teh image). It's incredibly easy to use and has by far the best sound quality I've ever heard on a portable device!

  68. Re:Gone! damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's the line? I'd like to be the guy that lubes the girls up.
    Heck, I'd even be the best boy. (I'm not sure what that means, but it sounds like fun.)


    Wouldn't you rather be the guy who spooges all over the girls bum crack and all over her face?

  69. The Slashdotting by ThJ · · Score: 0

    Sorry, people! Should've known better, and configured my server a bit better. It has a good connection, I just hadn't allocated the proper resources. Cheers, Thor

  70. I bought one by pesc · · Score: 4, Informative
    I've got one, because it was the only player I could find with (1) OGG (2) UMS (for Linux support) and (3) user-replacable batteries. There are many other players that support OGG (especially disk-based players), but I really couldn't find any other that had the combination I required. Strange, really.

    And you must upgrade the player to have UMS. I had to borrow a Windows machine from a friend to do that, so be warned.

    The OGG support is good but you must stay within the 96kbps to 225 kbps range. Encode your files like this:
    $ oggenc -q 6 -m 96 -M 225 song.wav
    The player don't have any support for playlists. And it doesn't sort the files in a directory. I name all my songs with a tracknumber first, so if I play the songs in alphabetical order, I get them in the track order on the album. But when you save files on the iRiver, they are stored in inode (!) order, and are not sorted. So to preserve ordering I transfer directories (albums) to the iRiver like this:
    $ mount /mnt/fp #mount the player
    $ cd mp3/Britney
    $ mkdir /mnt/fp/Britney
    $ find . -type f|sort|xargs -i cp -v {} /mnt/fp/Britney/
    The transfer speed with UMS is somewhat slow. Also, with the UMS upgrade, the maximum recording rate is 96kbps. But since I don't use the device for recording I don't care.

    The battery life is excellent. I use the same battery for weeks! With OGG, the battery life is reduced somewhat but is still very good.

    And the most important thing: The sound is very good. Especially if you get a better headset.
    --

    )9TSS
    1. Re:I bought one by demi · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to say first that I found this really helpful. I'd been merrily encoding without putting limits on bitrate, and my music collection just happens to stay around the nominal bitrate I usually use (128kbps). When I tried to encode some language lessons, though, it varied a lot more I guess, and it didn't work until I applied these limits, so thanks a long.

      Secondly, I don't use the UMD firmware (I believe for the iFP-790 series the UMD firmware does not have Ogg support, or at least it didn't when I first got it). So I use the free IFP driver which works well for me. I use it on OpenBSD without problems, and since it's written for (mostly) Linux it should work well there, too. I even did a firmware upgrade with it and it worked fine.

      --
      demi
  71. Re:Gone! damn by ThJ · · Score: 0

    Well, as they say: You can always switch the channel. I have tuned the server (which isn't a home server at all) a bit. It's out of the Slashdot storm now.

  72. Re:Gone! damn by ThJ · · Score: 0

    The slashdotting seems to have eased a bit. Try viewing it now. Feel free to ask any questions and I'll try to answer them. :-)

  73. Samsung Yepp ( YP-T6Z ) and OGG, etc. by ivi · · Score: 1


    The book (in my hot little hands) lists:

    "MP3, WMA, ASF & Ogg (sic) Plaback"

    and:

    "Direct MP3 Recording" (from radio & line-in)

    The article's device is the same as YP-T6Z,
    except it seems to have a USB port (covered by a
    rounded cover)?

    Both have the same joystick, etc. (rare feature),
    so, I suppose that Samsung makes both of them.

  74. Owned one of these for about two months now... by jeaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the majority of the whiners are missing the point. No, it isn't an ipod. Yes, ipod has more storage. Yes ipod seems to engender a greater love for it's user interface (never touched one). But for what I bought it for, it has worked out great. I use it for several things, but my favorite is making it into a BASIC tivo device for the radio. I like to listen to several shows on the weekends on NPR. I am never in my car or by a radio when they come on. Solution: iriver FM Tuner + Timer + Record. Now I have my weekend shows on tap for my weekday commutes. Works just fine for this. A bonus is the line in recorder, which I am using to rip my vinyl to MP3. Please don't respond back complaining about the 1.21gigawatt vs. 296mhz encoding/playback/whatchamacallit that your player can do that this one can't. I honestly don't care. It's V I N Y L. Scratchs. Pops. Hisses. And they all sound just fine to my ears. I also listen to books on tape, and it does have a resume function that works just fine, contrary to what someone else posted. So, if you are looking for some time-shifted radio, maybe some encoding, and an MP3 player, take a look. If you are looking for an ipod, cover your face and walk into an apple store. Easter, OUT!

  75. Re:An dedicated Audio player with flaky Ogg suppor by ThJ · · Score: 0

    The player is limited to 96~225 kbps for OGG files. Read the appendix that I wrote just now. It should clear up a few things.

  76. And I bought the 2GB iaudio G3 by Baki · · Score: 2, Informative

    The only difference between the G3 and iaudio 5 is that the G3 has an AA battery (easily replacable but slightly heavier) and the 5 has a built-in lithium ion battery.

    Both have excellent ogg, fm tuner and above all (important for me since I listen a lot to audio books) they are the only players that have really good bookmarks. Also you can speed the playback up which is good for slow paces audio books.

    I intended to buy an iriver before but after some research found out about the iaudio, clearly the better choice at this time.

    1. Re:And I bought the 2GB iaudio G3 by eddy · · Score: 1

      >and the 5 has a built-in lithium ion battery.

      No it doesn't. The 5 run off a single AAA battery. You're thinking about the iAudio 4, or maybe the X5.

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
  77. Bull. Any Mp3 player will beat an ipod. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ipod is ooold news my friend. Those of us who do not believe the hype have known that all along.

  78. Playing low bitrate Ogg files on iFP players by tomal · · Score: 1

    I tried to play low bitrate Ogg Vorbis files on my iFP-790. The results are quite interesting. It seems that it uses the Tremor decoder http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/ and the bitrate is computed by its ov_bitrate function. This function can be fooled in two ways with specially crafted files. The first way is to change granule position of pages to make the decoder think that the total time of the song is shorter and the bitrate is higher than the lower limit. The second way is to append a file with broken headers, which causes the decoder to think that sum of logical bitstreams lengths is bigger than it actualy is (the decoder puts -1 to the starting offset of the second stream). Interested readers should read the Ogg Vorbis specification and Tremor source code to find the details.

    It seems that the player just compares the computed bitrate with the limits and refuses to play the file if it is out of the range. Fooling the ov_bitrate function does not work however, because the player computes the total time of the song from the bitrate and the size of the file (it could use the same routine that the ov_bitrate function uses, but apparently it doesn't) and it plays only for that time, so better compressed files are not fully played. Appending some garbage to the file increases the play time, which confirms that the player uses the physical size of the file to compute the play time.

    There is one reason not to play some Ogg Vorbis files. Some of them use big window sizes (the size of a chunk of music processed in one step) which requires more memory to decode. It is not directly related to the bitrate, the Ogg Vorbis encoder (from xiph.org) uses bigger windows only in very low quality settings (-q -1 or something like that). I do not know why the player checks the bitrate and not just the window sizes. Used window sizes are stored in the headers and it is not more difficult to check them than to compute the bitrate.

    I suppose the firmware could be easily hacked to enhance the limits, but apparently noone has descrambled the firmware to the iFP players.

  79. Samsung Yepp MT6 1GB ~150 Euro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Samsung Yepp MT6 1GB seems OK as well, and is cheaper here in Belgium than iRiver. At least it was when I bought my 512MB version 3 months ago.

    80% of my collection is Ogg Vorbis. Battery life is pretty good, but presumably worse than MP3, anyway it lasts me over a week on my daily commute. It's also handy that the Samsung has a replaceable AA battery.

  80. A better recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I recently purchased Samsung YP-MT6, version Z. It has got 1GB of memory. It supports MP3, WMA, ASF and Ogg as standard and support future codec upgrades.

    40 hours of continous play on a single AA (LR6) battery! Very slim: 25x60x24 mm. 36 grams without battery. It can encode directly to MP3 (max 128kbps) via its line-in or built-in mic that support AutoSync!
    Interface is USB 2.0

    The sound is incredible with SRS or WOW effects turned on.

    I bought it online from www.fnac.com (french site) for 149 EURO (179 US Dollars) More info here

  81. IFP-799 has a waterproof case by jhsiao · · Score: 1
    The IFP-700 series of players from iRiver can also be used with an waterproof case rated to 10ft. Good enough for doing watersports with it.

    The only problem is that it's a tad expensive (about $80) but it is one of the few options for waterproof mp3 players and the only one that allows an FM radio and OGG.

    I haven't tried it, but I'm seriously considering it for doing laps. Especially since the 128Mb IFP-780 is $50 after rebate at Staples until the end of the month.

  82. A major drawback for audiophiles??? by acoustix · · Score: 1
    From TFA: "OGG support is very limited and glitches regularly. A major drawback for audiophiles. I can only hope iRiver will fix the glitches in a future firmware version."

    Since when do audiophiles care about compressed audio? I'm not aware of any true audiophiles who would use devices to playback compressed audio.

    Just an observation.

    -Nick

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  83. Re:Warning about iRiver by cjsm · · Score: 1

    Yea, but try copying your music files back to your computer. The iRiver, at least my model, is seen as nothing more then an external hard drive by windows. I can acess if fully with Windows Explorer. That was my point.

    --
    This ad space for rent.
  84. Consumers aren't taught ethical fortitude. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    Consumers are taught to take whatever is put in front of them, regardless of whose interests are being served.

    Your post is particularly ironic given that so many technocrats argue along the "build a better mousetrap" philosophy. Ogg Vorbis has better tagging support, fewer encumberances (even for proprietors), and, according to every blind listening test I have read, sounds better at comparable filesizes to an MP3 encoding of the same audio. But for years Apple has not added any Ogg Vorbis compatibility to QuickTime, so Apple users can't even make Ogg Vorbis audio files out of their own copyrighted audio files if they want to. Media conference organizers (like the one which just happened in St. Louis) are only available if one gets proprietary QuickTime software (both the archive files they distributed for a while and the live stream were only for QuickTime users). And these are the folks who are ostensibly sensitized to the problem of restricting media access to the large corporate players! It takes a trip to Brazil or Spain to see Ogg Vorbis+Ogg Theora live coverage of conferences, simultaneously broadcasting what happens in multiple rooms.

    [...] funny how many people abandon their ideals or principals so easily

    On /., all you have to do is point the readership to the next sci-fi movie. Your posts get moderated down if you dare to mention that this is one way the multinational movie corporations make money which they use to bring you horrible new copyright laws. The concept of not funding one's own oppression is not something corporate media publishers want you to dwell upon.

  85. Re:Gone! damn by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    It really isn't *you* or anyone else. It just seems we get a lot of crappy reviews lately.

    I read your text and I get +4 Informative.

    Now I'm off to click on a few ads (if you've got them). I always support good websites by clicking a few ads.

  86. Re:Warning about iRiver by MBraynard · · Score: 1
    Why would you want to copy them BACK to your computer?

    I actually can do this with my DRM/PFS device, so I'm not sure what player you had an issue with. I think the Ipod might limit this, but I think there are tools out there that allow it.

  87. Comparisons? by alexo · · Score: 1


    How would the iRiver iFP-799 and iFP-899 compare to the:
    - iAudio 5 and U2
    - Samsung YP-MT6Z and YP-T6Z
    - MPIO FY 400

    Using a single device as both a USB key an an MP3 player is convenient.

  88. My new OGG player: $70 by endoplasmicMessenger · · Score: 1
    I just got an OGG player too. It can play MP3's WMA's and OGG's. It has an FM tuner, built-in mike, and line input. The dimensions are: 8.2 x 3.4 x 1.9. It only has 512MB, but then again, it was only $70. The manual says that there is a 1G model, too.

    See my review here:

    http://forums.xandros.com/viewtopic.php?t=16248&hi ghlight=

    --
    Evolution is a fact. Darwinism is a joke.