Slashdot Mirror
Makers of MAKE
BoredStiff writes "An NPR show called The Connection inteviewed The Makers of MAKE.
They discussed who's behind MAKE magazine, and why they think there are a lot of people out there with an interest in re-inventing with the
gadgets that run our daily lives. MAKE magazine is a deliberate throw-back to the how-to science manuals of an
earlier era -- back when technology wasn't so cheap people did more 'do it yourself.'"
I've got my first two issues and at the very least, they are interesting. They straddle the line between pure MacGyver-ness and the kinds of things you'd find in 2600 magazine.
Saturday night I'd like to MAKE my girl, but right now I cannot make ends meet.
It's great to have a magazine dedicated to the people who want to build their own stuff. I remember carving my first spoon. Out of a bigger spoon.
The problem is that you end up with all these little toy gadgets and nowhere to put them. I wish there was a magazine that explained how to build something that could be used to store those gadgets.
In fact i'm using it to write this!
make frist-post
It's an awesome mag. The amount of detail on how to build a project is fantastic, and there's lots of small projects in addition to the two or three large projects. The editors don't mince words about telling you how to hack stuff either. The latest copy had instructions to remove macrovision on certain DVD players.
$7.95/mo, 200 GB disk, 2TBxfer, MySQL, PHP, RoR.
Do the makers of MAKE really make MAKE or is it the content that will make MAKE? Enquiring minds want to make, I mean know.
Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
What truth?
There is no dupe
This is the first time I'm hearing of either The Connection or MAKE. It's a bit unfortunate that there isn't a readable text there. I do have to question how an internet-based magazine expects to survive these days when the tinkerers are more likely to be on the internet anyway.
see a Text Widget
http://www.oreillynet.com/oreilly/make/
I never could figure out how to use "imake". Too complicated. And remember the language Prolog that Borland tried to push!? It was really "make" in disguise.
"make" is really what's behind all the software we use. If it weren't for "make", there would be no new Linux builds.
Best Buy can have you arrested
You mean the one that's popular at Oregon State University and the University of South Carolina?
Yeah, I saw a copy of one at Hooters.
It may be a throwback, but the issues so far have still had a heavy bias toward the whole casemod/ipod/gaming end of the "making stuff" spectrum despite the fact that there are TONS of other topics that still embody the DIY attitude, many of which are actually the same ones that were part of the earlier era of DIY. A lot of those have never gone away. Heck, the whole hippie/commune/energy conservation crowd has been doing-it-themselves for a long time, building practically everything they need.
As I've been digging to find resources for my new site (listed in my sig), I've been thrilled to discover just how many projects are out there fully-documented in arenas I've never messed in myself.
Last night, I made a batch of plastic in my kitchen to put a USB memory key back together. I found the recipe for casein plastic online, didn't have to leave the house because all of the ingredients were already there and I had never even heard of casein plastic until I stumbled across it for site research.
Projects like that, the little laser tripwire kit I found that can be combined with mirrors to give you the security grid shown in every bad heist movie, etc. are all over the place.
Fortunately, it looks like, via their blog and more recent web content (like their contest to start a dead car in the middle of nowhere) that their topics may become more diverse.
The Glass is Too Big: My Take on Things
Scientific American's Amateur Scientist has always had interesting things to make. The older columns (from before the age of lawsuits) featured more exciting things such a a 6-foot homemade rocket, atom smasher, and 20 W CO2 laser.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
Two AIXoids:
- Know how they call 'root' in OS/400 lab?
- How?
- ROOT!
I cannot justify paying for a subscription to a magazine full of information I can easily acquire on the web. Perhaps I am missing something but I just do not see the point.
The inherent DIY-ness of the 'Makers of MAKE' reminds me of my in-laws. With them (in-laws), they have a genetic predisposition which makes them have to do every task themselves, no matter how ridiculously hard and non-cost-efficient.
When he sliced open his leg, my brother-in-law was totally incensed because Walgreen's didn't sell a home suture kit (you think that I'm kidding, but I'm not). I was really scared when my wife decided that she need Lasik eye surgery and began looking at lasers on ebay and googling 'home eye surgery how to.'
Other great DIY 'tinkering' sites I like are AX84.com, 18watt.com, and Byonics.
I'd post a link to my site with pictures/notes on my own hand-built tube amp project or my mini-GPS/APRS project (not yet out of planning), but I'm afraid of the /.-ing I'd take. :)
If you've ever built a Heathkit something or another, or a old analog signal cable descrammbler from radio shack parts (or for the newer generation, if you've ever modded your xbox I guess), you owe it to yourself to check out the Make magazine. It has lots of great projects and it proves to my wife that I am not a crazy as some other people.
"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
But for 20$ canadian, it's too fluffy.
MAKE mag shows you how to MAKE an advertisement and how to MAKE some editor post it to the front page and how to MAKE a bunch of idiots MAKE snide comments on this thinly-veiled ad.
make: *** No rule to make target `magazine'. Stop.
./configure magazine.
In other news, the makers of MAKE magazine sue the makers of the popular command "make", forcing hunders of thousands of l{u,i}n{i,u}x users to type "eckyeckyeckySHAZAM" instead. Man pages proved to be inconclusive and no help to confused sysadmins.
Will wank off Linus Torvalds for fame.
Could you share the link to the casein plastic recipe? I am curious. Thanks.
Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.
I thought everybody knew that Stu Feldman wrote make(1)?
Oh, wait...
As a former computer magazine editor myself, I kind of wondered about the viability of a dead-tree magazine for hackers in the age of the URL myself, especially one that costs fifteen bucks an issue. But MAKE has been very well-received, and they're supporting it with an active daily blog. I've enjoyed both issues so far, and am eagerly anticipating the next. It probably helps that it's from the O'Reilly book people, who really grok hackers, since they come from the same gene pool. Plus their production values are incredible. Full color on every page, high-quality paper, etc. Copies of MAKE will be around at least as long as those old National Geographics in your grandfather's attic.
Serving your airship needs since 1995.
Sort of. And probably a good one.
I grew up reading do-it-yourself books, encyclopedias, magazines (especially Popular Science and Popular Mechanics of the 50s, 60s, and 70s saved by family). Casting aluminum myself was childs play given I went to school with kids who built calculators out of discrete components in elementary school. Do-it-yourself was just what we did. It wasn't different than catching carp yourself instead of pestering mom and dad to buy them for the tank, or sometimes pond you made with a shovel and hose.
Looking this over, I'll probably eventually get around to subscribing. If only American schools of today put more emphasis on the basics that allow us to build more complicated technology. Wood shop, metal shop, auto, electronics, so many are now cut to nothing no matter the administration being right (the basics are reading, writing, math, history) or left (the basics are sociopolitics, emotions, and safety which precludes hands-on anything). People should know how to build the machines they use in case they ever do need to make them.
Maybe I'll buy a couple subscriptions for my local schools.
If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
http://makezine.com/
LAME!! As soon as I read this article, I tried to subscribe to Make Magazine, but they're charging SALES TAX!! I have never and will never pay sales tax on a magazine subscription!
Bad move!
because it reminds me a great deal of being a 13-year old boy in 1981 fascinated with Commodore 62/128 and my old TRS-80. FOr those of us who were at my age during the "pioneering days" of the late 70's and early 80's well remember the emotional ride of discovery. Kids these days have it easy. I don't know of any kid these days who would be interested in making their own radios, burgler alarms, etc. I used to subscribe to magazines like MAKE back in the day and build all kinds of crap. It was fun and it kept me out of trouble.
But who makes the makers?
When I was about 8 or 10, my father ( a machinist, and DIY type, though of a mechanical nature, not techy ) bought me four volumes of _The Boy Mechanic_ -- a *beautiful* set of books by Popular Mechanics, from the 1920's.
These books had *everything* from simple things like making your own arc-lamp to radios, to steam engines, to stirling-cycle engines, to lightweight gasoline airplane engines ( for free flight ) to chassis for a go-kart, to simple transmissions, to making your own lathe, and so on. Plus, a *lot* of pyrotechnics. A LOT of pyrotechnics.
All gorgeously illustrated in the clean slightly-post-art-nouveau style of the 20's, with little boys and teenagers doing things that would get you arrested today.
What broke my heart were paragraphs that would say "Just go to your local chemist's and buy 12 pounds of insert-highly-toxic-explosive-compound". I'd ask my dad and say, "where can I get insert-highly-toxic-explosive-compound". He'd say, "Son, we live in a pussy age where you'd get arrested for just asking about that stuff."
I guess this is how we grow up today. Sterile, hairless wimps.
lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
If you subscribe to O'Reilly's Make magazine, use promotional code M5ZXML to get a free bonus issue (5 for $35 instead of 4).
I pay attention to what Philip Torrone is up to.
He started the engadget Podcast, hackaday, and now MAKE.
it seems like he's really good at getting cool stuff off the ground and then he leaves it to other people once its up and running
http://flashenabled.com/ is his site
"What does slashdotting mean?"
"You've never heard of slashdot?"
"I know it makes websites not work."
why subscribe to the magazine when you can compile it yourself? ./configure
make
make magazine
you need to get the binding right, or it'll fall apart! and don't link to mobile libraries!
I agree that it is a great magazine. Unless you have amazon cash to burn, the cheapest way to get it is direct. Use coupon code M5ZXML to get 5 issues for the price of 4 (~$35).
If you want back issues, amazon is your best bet (you can sometimes find them on half or ebay, but most people hang on to them. Issue 1 and Issue 2 are available. If you do want to use them for a subscription, subscription, you can get 4 issues for $35 and $5 off a future amazon order.
All of the amazon links have a short video & a 10 page excerpt from the magazine.
but what did that have to do with anything?
but the joke only works with unix people, /400 ones have nothing to see here (MOVALONG)
Use the links in parent post, but coupon code G5R2DY for 5 issues for only $30. Wish I knew that one when I subscribed!
Eye Surgery sounds possible, as does lower abdomen and thigh work.
But slipped disks?
Anyone for a home vasectomy? Would you trust your balls in anyone else's hands?
Its _loaded_ with annoying ads, and aside from the 3-4 articles that actually tell you how to do something, the rest of the mag looks like reruns of content I've already seen on Wired News, Slashdot, etc -- in many cases stuff that is 6+ months old.
The how-to articles are decent though. I just wish they would drop the rest of the crap and stick to the goods.
...like many Ph.D.s, administrators, bureucrats, lawyers - you know, those people in charge of things that you get jobs, raises and stuff. Either envious or unappreciative, they find these things trivial, unless of course, it is *their* hobby like collecting old iron horse shoes or old bits of cloth, etc. High-performance computing people that pooh-pooh the embedded systems people, or the engineer that disdains micropower problems.
I myself learned to design a radio receiver, weld, turn a spindle in wood or an end mill a gear blank, and fluid power, but that was quickly thrashed from me to do higher-value stuff like XML and Java. Note the sarcasm.
Call me a dumbass, but .... where is this sig that contains this website? I see no sig below your post, and none in your profile area ...???
Does 2/3 cup of milk only produce enough to make one button?
I have to say when I saw the final product, I was rather disappointed. There was really a huge amount of filler ("how to blog! here is how to get your blog... sign on to a free blog service... don't forget passwords are case sensitive...") and what was interesting was duplicated on the web -- where the material belongs in the first place, IMO.
Make could be really good if they went beyond just replicating the kind of stuff that appears -- for free -- on the web. So far, however, they just seem to be paying (well, I might add!) hobbyists for the rights to reprint their webpages.
For example, they have a long article on how to build a kite camera to do ariel photography. Pretty neat -- but I think anybody who wanted to do that would be far better served by going onto the web and googling (or going to rec.kites.) Then you can compare different rigs, get a diversity of opinions, learn your options -- and, in the end, contribute your own experiences -- all for, well, free.
Protect your liberties. Donate to the ACLU
It's definitely a geekier magazine than most, but none of the stuff seems that unique. Many of the projects are stuff I already read about here on Slashdot or elsewhere on the net; many are oversimplified; many are not explained well enough. It was also funny that they had that article about yak-shaving, but the proposed solutions weren't that inspiring, and then the rest of the magazine is devoted to many ways of yak-shaving that they hoped would be as diverting as possible.
Of course it tries to be many things to many people. There are so many varieties of geekery, so their coverage of any one variety is cursory. Maybe for the type of geeks that have never done anything outside the software area, it's something to get their feet wet.
Popular Science sometimes finds some real, inspiring news that I didn't already read on the net. That is nice. I used to like Electronics Now back in the late 80's and early 90's; they had some really unique projects. EE Times is also an excellent industry news source, but I quit subscribing to the paper version now that it's 100% online and free. With Make, I hope that it just hasn't found its stride yet, not that it's going to be permanently just fluff.
Make magazine, the bane of wives everywhere that want their husbands to throw that old crap away! Just ask my wife about it... she can tell you.
It's right there under every post of mine:
Tinker, hack, DIY...you know, making stuff. [makingstuff.net]
Don't know if they're visible to Anonymous Cowards or not, as I haven't visited the site that way in years.
The Glass is Too Big: My Take on Things
I thought make was hardware-independent. heheh.
The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
FYI, caesin is one of the predominant proteins in milk. It is not plastic. What you are making is a coagulate, using the acid to unfold the proteins and get them to clump together.
Another description of this "plastic" is acid-precipitated cheese.
You have made a lump of mozzarella and dried it out.
Which reminds me, they did a good audio interview with the founder of DIYParts.org, Christian Einfeldt. Funny thing is he credits Adam Doxtater (the "Mouth of Mad Penguin") as being one of the top four people we'll be talking about in years to come. Did I fall of the train somewhere and bump my head?
My brother got me a subscription for my birthday after hearing about it on NPR. There are so many bizarre uses of technology and clearly organized instructions for DIY goodness to boot. Everything from disposable camera aerial kite photography (using silly putty as the timer element!) to a DIY railgun with nothing but a few ball bearings, magnets, and a ruler as construction materials. The reaction produced with this bad boy happens so fast it can't be seen by the naked eye, and you can make it as long as you want, speeding up the reaction to the point that the ball bearings start shattering the magnets used to propel them! Sweet Sassy Molassey this magazine blows my mind!
Phatkat
"Be someone. Help someone.
With sigs turned off in the Slashdot preferences there's basically no way to see sigs. You'd think they'd show each user's sig somewhere in one of the user's info pages, but no. So don't just say "see sig for details" -- actually include the relevant details in the comment text, because lots of readers can't see your sig.
So I too was interested in this retro plastic, and was under the same impression. It's cheese. (I make my own cheese, so the "recipe" I found online was a bit too familiar...) However, further investigation shows that it can be hardened into more of a plastic-like substance by using formaldehyde. How exactly, I have no idea. I've googled high and low, and can only find commentaries of the late 1890's casein plastic that used formaldehyde to harden it. Anyone got a link, or any information, as to how this may be re-produced in the kitchen? Curiousity killed the cat, but I've done things requiring much, much more harmful chemicals in the past, so why not. ;-)
Given that it didn't always work like that (note my user number), and I haven't visited the site under anything other than this account since 1998 or so, there's no reason I should have known that setting existed.
The Glass is Too Big: My Take on Things
The filesystem is the package manager