Slashdot Mirror


Microbes That Produce Miniature Electrical Wires

anukit writes "Researchers at the University of Massachusetts Amherst have discovered a tiny biological structure that is highly electrically conductive. This breakthrough helps describe how microorganisms can clean up groundwater and produce electricity from renewable resources. It may also have applications in the emerging field of nanotechnology, which develops advanced materials and devices in extremely small dimensions."

111 comments

  1. Possible cyberjack material? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Interesting read...the first thing that came to my mind when I read this is that these organic wires may be just the thing for the interface between electronics and organic tisue. One of the major problems in cybernetics is that the chemistry of the implants tends to be poisonous to the surrounding tissue, while the chemistry of the surrounding tisue tends to be corrosive to the implant. Over time, the interface degrades and must eventually be replaced. Microbial nanowires may eliminate this problem and pave the way for permanent interfaces sooner than we thought.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by simontek2 · · Score: 1

      interesting thought, It really does have the opportunity to change the way we think of technology. Seriously think of all the things you could do with it. My first thought was cpu's of course, but then reading the 1st post, i realized how much this has a potentional to change life. I will read the article now.

      --
      SimonTek
    2. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by lahuard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why only connect? Couldn't these be used to make actual muscles and organs that respond to electric signals from the brain?

    3. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by ATLgerm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does this mean we'll be able to get wikipedia on an implant? Wait, would just anyone be able to edit it? ^o^

    4. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by Gyga · · Score: 0

      Do you want to be hooked to the internet with all the viruses? Imagine the new spy, unwilling top level officals in the military. I remember this from somewhere, must be missing a detail that makes this an improvement.
      --
      So I say.

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
    5. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by failure-man · · Score: 2, Funny

      Personally, I wouldn't ever jack my brain into a public network. I'd rather not be "0wn3d" and have to pay a script-kiddie $250,000 to have him return my vision to normal rather than having it be static goatse in both eyes. (Or worse.)

    6. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just imagine the bacteria mutating into an infectious agent. Now, instead of getting a fever or a bad cough, we'll get twitching, spasms, irregular heart rhythm, memory loss, etc.

    7. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by Wolfier · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about making the brain itself? Imagine a Beo^H^H^H culture of these buggers, it may eventually THINK for itself :P

    8. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by Gactaculon · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yeah, microbial nanowires must be the solution, because it's not like the human body has a thing for attacking foriegn cells, especially bacteria, right? Sorry to be sarcastic, but this doesnt seem to me to get anybody any closer to solving that particular problem. Better progress would probably be had in researching truly biologically-neutral conductors than in a elaborate scheme to get microbial nanowires to evade the human immune system. Besides, it doesn't even seem to be known that the conductive structure of these organisms is non-toxic to human cells, anyway. Not every biologically manufactured chemical is benign in every biological system, you know...

      This development is all sorts of interesting, but for this particular application? I'm just not seeing the basis for enthusiasm.

    9. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by imhotepmp · · Score: 1
      Yeah, microbial nanowires must be the solution, because it's not like the human body has a thing for attacking foriegn cells, especially bacteria, right?
      Youre assuming that you would need to inject the bacteria into the body which may or may not be the case since nowadays genes can easily be expressed outside the host organism.
    10. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    11. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "it may eventually THINK for itself"

      Oh, I'm sure it will be posting on Slashdot long before that.

    12. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being an anaerob organism, it probably already can infect septic deep wounds. It just hates oxygen and eats whatever organic stuff lies around. It is not contageous, however, not surprising in this atmosphere rich in oxygen.

    13. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      read snow crash or kaleidoscope century.

      you're already networked and vulnerable. latency is only a partial defence.

      "Let override, let overwrite"

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    14. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by shift.red.avni · · Score: 1

      I agree with your post entirely, but if there is any place where irrational exuberance about new technology should be greeted with optimism, it's Slashdot!

      These guys could be really happy in our mouths...

      Do you know what causes toothaches? Cavities allow bacteria to infect the soft tissue inside the tooth causing swelling and pus to build up. The toothache is caused by the pressure buildup on the nerves. I've been told by dentists, that our immune systems are incapable of fighting off bacterial gum infections. Unless the root of a tooth dies, or is pulled out, antibiotics are the only way to cure a toothache.

      Solving the problem of rejection by the immune system is probably just an engineering problem.

    15. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone knowledgable enough on the subject to tell me if this kind of technology could be used to make TRUE randomness in games/systems/encryption/etc? I feel there could be a way with LIVING organic material like this.

      Anyone following my thoughts at all?

    16. Re:Possible cyberjack material? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first thing that came to my mind was that we finally have a replacement for letting two Scottish boys fight over a penny.

  2. Wow. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Funny

    I never really considered the idea that germs could eat food and use it to shit wires.

    1. Re:Wow. by dancpsu · · Score: 0

      Gotta be easier than passing a kidney stone...

      --
      "Scientists don't change their minds, they just die." -- Max Planck
    2. Re:Wow. by Guy+Harris · · Score: 4, Funny
      I make cable all of the time.

      So, given the production method being discussed, would that be SCAT-5 cable?

    3. Re:Wow. by The+Creator · · Score: 0

      I don't know about the germs... but the finns have been eating steel and shitting chain for quite some time now.

      --

      FRA: STFU GTFO
    4. Re:Wow. by coldtone · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the Gap books by Stephen R. Donaldson. In these books they had an alien race that genetically modified stuff to make (err shit) spaceships, weapons, everything. Their only problem was that they could not make enough.

  3. Possible applications in biological computing? by 5plicer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What if, through genetic engineering, we created neurones with these conductive pili?

    --
    The bits on the bus go on and off... on and off... on and off...
    1. Re:Possible applications in biological computing? by erwin · · Score: 1

      Hey! That's a great idea! We could connect them all into this really big neural network that would make a great executive manager of a bunch of processes....Wow, that's amazing clever! Has anyone out there seen a working example of the design pattern?!? ...oh really...a brain, you say? How..how..analog..

      (ps...it's humor)

    2. Re:Possible applications in biological computing? by 5plicer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Could someone please explain to me why on earth my original post was modded offtopic? I was suggestion an application of this new discovery. That is, creating neurones which could survive in an oxygen deprived environment. Surely this could be useful?

      --
      The bits on the bus go on and off... on and off... on and off...
    3. Re:Possible applications in biological computing? by thegamerformelyknown · · Score: 0

      Kinda makes you think about the Battery thing in The Matrix....

  4. Like super-algae by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    More than any nano-tech application (computer nanotech, that is), such a microbe that can be engineered to clean up waste water and then settle to the bottom of a lake and quietly die would be excellent in cleaning up many of our polluted lakes and streams.

    Obviously it would need to be non-toxic to existing wildlife and ideally it would be able to compress and become coal or oil for future generations, but the main goal would be to clean up our messes.

    With small amounts of electrical wiring as byproducts of the "biological" process of the microbe, we may even be able to "harvest" our wiring needs in much the same way we harvest seaweed or shellfish today for consumption.

    This is another amazing step in our God-granted dominion and stewardship of His Creation.

    1. Re:Like super-algae by Gyga · · Score: 0

      Coal and oil would just repollute what you just cleaned. The biggest proplem will being sure it doesn't hurt the enviroment.
      --
      So I say.

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
    2. Re:Like super-algae by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wow. It would be like the Hitchhiker's Guide where nothing is ever manufactured because the universe is so vast than anything you could possibly imagine probably grows somewhere.

    3. Re:Like super-algae by dbIII · · Score: 5, Interesting
      More than any nano-tech application (computer nanotech, that is), such a microbe that can be engineered to clean up waste water
      Already happens. Even oil refineries have oil consuming microbes to deal with their waste water and runoff that contains the oil that gets spilt on site. A major spill will kill all the bugs, but small amounts are dealt with effectively. It's not genetic engineering in that case but simple breeding of the kind you would use to get a better brewers yeast (ie. seperate out the stuff that can handle higher concentations of alcohol or oil and breed it again).

      Other bacteria are capable of dealing with metals, even copper - lookup "acid mine drainage" and you should find a few things - bacteria which previously caused environmental problems (in simplified terms eat copper and excrete sulphuric acid - that's one mean organism!) can be used to solve others.

      There's lots of odd stuff in organicly produced materials. The strangest I've heard of in the feild of metals is dislocation free iron (very strong stuff) in snails teeth (microscopic spiky bits on their tongues are teeth) in Western Australia.

    4. Re:Like super-algae by BioCS.Nerd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You have some interesting ideas here I'd like to talk about for a moment.

      More than any nano-tech application (computer nanotech, that is), such a microbe that can be engineered to clean up waste water and then settle to the bottom of a lake and quietly die would be excellent in cleaning up many of our polluted lakes and streams.
      I'm really leery about something like this. In my experience, an extreme of anything is never a good thing. Perchance an overabundance of this bacteria have an effect that makes the lake worse than before. For example, trees are good, but many trees can be bad. More specifically, if you plant too many evergreens in a confined area, the soil becomes exceedingly acidic. I'm more inclined to try to find out how to finesse the lake back to it's normal condition.

      Your next statement is moot, imho, given the time required to compress critters into oil or coal. Hopefully by then our progeny have developed more interesting and efficient means of energy harvesting.

      With small amounts of electrical wiring as byproducts of the "biological" process of the microbe, we may even be able to "harvest" our wiring needs in much the same way we harvest seaweed or shellfish today for consumption.
      This would be seriously cool and is not hard to envision. It'd be really neat if we could engineer the little buggers to poop transistors too.
    5. Re:Like super-algae by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A similar process was developed for removing radioactive waste from water. A type of bacteria acts like a room ionizer and removes the particles boyance. The radioactive material settles to the bottom of the tank and allowing it to be safely collected.

      Another possible option could be in removing heavy metals from the water not only for toxic polution reasons but to harvest metals. The best way to get industry to clean up after themselves is to give them a way to make it profitable. They don't want to throw away sellable metals but they aren't usually profitable to extract. Bacteria that leaves a metalic residue whether from excreting it or from the dead bacteria itself would be a cheap way of extracting the metals from waste water.

    6. Re:Like super-algae by Mad_Rain · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is another amazing step in our God-granted dominion and stewardship of His Creation.

      Meanwhile, on Magrethea:
      "Pfft. Those earth creatures finally figured out how to get microbes to do some serious work for them. Amazing for a bunch of hairdressers and phone-cleaners. Oh well. Enough slashdot, back to designing fjords."

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    7. Re:Like super-algae by Wescotte · · Score: 1

      This is another amazing step in our God-granted dominion and stewardship of His Creation.

      God's project Life isn't open source.. Screw him :)

    8. Re:Like super-algae by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its called Dr. Chakrabothy strain developed in GE.
      I read it in a Dean Koontz novel - Shadows.

      Obviously you will be Google ing after reading this piece....

    9. Re:Like super-algae by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Here is an aritcle about a worm the uses a copper compound in it's teeth. They actually look metallic.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  5. Really? by Keystroker · · Score: 0

    This is intriguing but was is a feasible use of this?

    --
    Avarus animus nullo satiatur lucro.
    1. Re:Really? by tempest69 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Right now it has apparent feasibility for bioremediation, which should be pretty big on peoples minds. But as for more technilogical/ medical/ anthrocentric uses, it's a building block. at 5 microns X 5 nanometers, it's a bit tough to manipulate by hand. However these might be useful as a product of existing animal nerve cells. Imagine changing neurons to have some "long wires" that would interface with electrodes easier. It might take some work, but it might be worth it. With a little work, it might be easier to have a hormone controlled expression of the "wires", that way you send in a hormone coated electrode, and the neurons would grab on, without being poisoned by the metal.

      Storm

      P.S. IANANTE (I am not a nano-tech engineer)

    2. Re:Really? by NanoGradStudent · · Score: 1

      IAAANTE (I Am An Aspiring Nano-Tech Engineer)

      Nanowiring, and especially CONTROLLED nanowiring will be one of the big enabling technologies for the next generation of electronics (and *PLUG* related to what I'm studying). Researchers have already been able to produce nano-scale wiring that's approximately this size scale: conductive carbon nano-tubes and metallic nanowires made via various means (the last one is not comprehensive BTW) but I doubt anything would beat this in terms of cost and speed of production. But the real boon that could be provided by this will be in getting wiring from electrode A to electrode B (say, from a contact pad on a small square of nanocircuitry to more conventional circuitry on a microchip) reliably, cheaply and quickly.

      --
      Just a little guy, y'know?
  6. Lovley Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Lovley's team speculated that the pili might be miniature wires extending from the cell that would permit Geobacter to carry out its unique ability to transfer electrons outside the cell onto metals and electrodes"

  7. I wish the press release actually said something.. by under_score · · Score: 5, Interesting

    concrete about the pili themselves. It would be neet to know something about their molecular structure.

    Another thing about this article that hit me: genetic engineering really is going strong. I still think of it in some ways as a future technology. But their description of turning of the genes that result in the pili as well as the idea of manipulating those genes to produce pili with various characteristics really points out a high degree of sophistication in genetic engineering techniques.

  8. Re:Can't resist... by dancpsu · · Score: 2, Funny

    First they offered to clean up our waste water.

    Then they started making wires.

    Then they started selling the wires to us.

    Now we need to pay to take a crap.

    --
    "Scientists don't change their minds, they just die." -- Max Planck
  9. Mini power grid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another interesting implication of this research is that it suggests a mechanism for microbes to share energy in a mini-power grid. The nanowire pili of individual Geobacter often intertwine, suggesting a strategy by which Geobacter might share electricity.

  10. Re:Can't resist... by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 2, Funny

    Until they start calling us "ugly bags of water"

    --
    "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
  11. Soylent Brown by unitron · · Score: 1, Funny
    "Geobacter was discovered by Lovley in 1987 at the muddy bottom of the Potomac River in Washington D.C...."

    So that's where they dump the body everytime they find (and have to quickly remove) an honest politician!

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  12. I predict by abulafia · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    that the S&M community will find a ton of interesting, uses. And also that everyone else will be distraught everytime Newsweek recycles the topic, and need to Do Something, with exceptions for watching what other people do.

    -I heart ubiquitous computing

    --
    I forget what 8 was for.
  13. Wheels Within Wheels by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to replace my old Amiga, powered by wheel-running mice, with an amoeba-powered Nokia.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  14. Re:Nice, so can we live forever? by MagicDude · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't want to live forever. Having 200 years of experience may be cool, but having a 200 year old body will definately not be cool. Now, if this technology could be used to transplant my brain into an android body, then I could see perhaps hanging around for a few hundred years.

  15. SPGA by Sheetrock · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've read about some research into microwire-based sublithographic programmable gate arrays.

    This has some potential for the computer industry in the way of getting us closer to Moore's Law but also paves the way for increasing the amount of malleable logic in what was previously fixed silicon applications.

    Of course, nanowire is pretty expensive to produce. Or it used to be...

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:SPGA by Joe+Jarvis · · Score: 1

      Why rely on the microbe to produce the nanowires at its pace and spec? The really interesting stuff is self-assembling (as in self-positioning, not tiny robots building other robots) nanoparticles. These guys allowed coated gold nanoparticles to self-organize on a DNA scaffold... and it can be reproduced in <10 minutes. Watch out Moore's Law.

  16. Fusion People by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    Good call, TMM, but I think that for optimum results, youd need to grow the organic tissue with this kinda stuff. Unless you can modify the system to incorporate the new design (adding other wires of whatever sort), it's gonna be a hack -- and I mean a real hack, with drilling, or surgery. Ick!

    Kudos to the crew at Amherst, stuff like this (indirectly) helps get us off this crazy rock. I partied at Amherst once, this neat grrrl made me a smartdrink, and told me about mobile PA-type systems.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Fusion People by MoralHazard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the idea is the build in interface to neurons in the brain, why would you need to grow something organic? Chip implants that extend inorganic electrodes into the brain are already a reality, and they seem to work fine for research (I'm too lazy to look up the reference on that quadripelegic dude who got one, recently).

      Referring the that story, I recall that there were two big practical problems with the chip implant: 1) you have to drill a hole in the skull in order to make contact, and 2) the electrodes extending from the chip to the brain are too gross of a bridge to get a good signal sampling.

      So something like building ultra-tiny conductors on demand in particular spots would be incredibly helpful in making the existing brain interface more practical, because it could be less invasive and produce much finer connections. Sounds like a hell of an application to me.

  17. sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    another rainforest we rather replicate than culture

  18. Re:Can't resist... by Adambomb · · Score: 0

    ...mostly

    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
  19. The ultimate techno weapon by jimmydevice · · Score: 0

    that will shut down any developing country's tech
    infrastructure by shorting out all the technology.
    It sounds like a great way to return upstarts like
    India or China to a agrarian state. Another use
    would be self destructing electronics. Looking at
    my kids 2 year old ps2 though, I guess they
    already have perfected that idea.
    JimD.

  20. Re:I wish the press release actually said somethin by DirtyLiar · · Score: 5, Informative
    If your read all the waaaaay down to the bottom, you'd have found the following link:

    GeoBacter

    Interesting stuff.

    --

    THINK! It's patriotic

  21. Re:Nice, so can we live forever? by PakProtector · · Score: 1, Funny

    Personally, I'd rather just keep popping my brain into clones of Utada Hikaru every few decades.

    Of course, I'd spend all my time looking in the mirror.

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

  22. Old News by core+plexus · · Score: 2, Informative
    Alaska Bugs Sweat Gold Nuggets

    "Bacterial biomineralization, as it's known among the experts, has been observed in other places and for other minerals. In fact, bacterial abilities to precipitate metals from solution have been used in some very high-tech contemporary methods of treating polluted water. It's even been appreciated that some bacteria can precipitate gold. Watterson himself had found that the spore coats of another bacterial breed serve as nuclei for luring gold out of solution in broths of gold chloride."

    -cp-

  23. What!?! by Randym · · Score: 0
    Why, the NERVE of those guys!

    (It had to be said 8^D)

    --
    DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.
    1. Re:What!?! by blitz77 · · Score: 0

      I'm shocked! Absolutely shocked!

    2. Re:What!?! by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      Wire we even talking about this?

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  24. The Field of Biomimicry by Quirk · · Score: 2, Informative

    While not explicitly linked to biomimicry, the implications relate to this relatively new field. There's now a web site dedicated to dissiminating the developing ideas. My introduction came from reading Biomimicry by Janine M. Benyus. I found a copy in the central library and I think most city libraries would have a copy. It's not a rigorous read and an easy one. As the fields of molecular biology and nanotechnology grow, implementations of biomimicry will provide avenues to harness nature according to it's own rules, or, so I hope. :)

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  25. How about electric cars battery "fuel"? by salec · · Score: 1

    Microbe "soup", easily refillable on pump stations, rich in electric energy, easily harvested ... at last, the final stone in the mosaic!

    And to regenerate the "fuel" (refill the "batteries"), just spill it back in central waste water tank of the pump station...

  26. next up, garbage to power your laptop by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    I'm imagining digging through the trash at airports to find bannana peels to recharge my laptop.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:next up, garbage to power your laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not your Delorean?

  27. The length of these wires by rpcxdr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The nanowires are incredibly fine, only 3-5 nanometers in width (20,000 times finer than a human hair), but quite durable and more than a thousand times long as they are wide.

    In other words, the length of these wires is 20 times finer than a human hair. They sure do work to make these numbers sound exciting!

  28. Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Shihar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Personally, I would look to single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) for what you describe. The real problem we have is that the body has a nasty habit of rejecting anything that isn't made by our own body. I have a feeling that these organically made wires will be no mored loved then the old fashion kind. The issue isn't organic vs inorganic, it is whether or not the body identifies the wires as not being apart of itself. We have evolved for millions of years to whack bacteria that isn't our own, so I wouldn't but the chances high that our bodies will be terribly receptive (though I would be pleased to be wrong).

    There have been some mixed signals as to weather or not nanotubes are carcinogens.
    The latest studies show that SWCNTs to be non-toxic and easily dealt with by the body. It isn't a green light, but it is hopeful. The real magic behind nanotubes is two fold. First, they are really small. Cells are giants compared to nanotubes. Second, nanotubes can be functionalized relatively easily, which is to say you can attach things to the surface of the nanotubes. When people talk about using nanotubes, they rarely mean those nifty little carbon chains that we all know at love. Generally, functional nanotubes have something else on the surface to specialize its purpose. For biological purposes, this means that what you see isn't necessarily what you have to work with. If these bacteria made nanowires turn out to be rejected by the human body, you are out of luck and the work stops there. With SWCNTs though, it just means you need to alter what type of molecules are hanging off of the carbon chain until you find some that the body won't attack and that don't disrupt the properties of the nanotube too bad.

    Simply put... single walled carbon nanotubes are the shit, err, and the future.

    1. Re:Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Illix · · Score: 1

      The body does learn to live symbiotically with some bacteria, such as the E. coli living in our GI tract. If researchers could figure out the mechanism by which the body learns to tell "good" bacteria from "bad," we could theoretically teach it to live symbiotically with Geobacter.

    2. Re:Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Kluge66 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how well tolerated SWNTs will be in the body, since some studies have shown toxicity (see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd= Search&db=PubMed&term=toxicity+nanotube+carbon&too l=QuerySuggestion). Also, while it's probably possible to derivatize the ends of nanotubes without greatly affecting their properties, derivatizing the sides (is this what you mean by "surface"?) would likely degrade their conductivity, as it would disrupt the flow of the pi electrons.

    3. Re:Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wanted to drop a quick thanks for the elitist comments, ass hole. Some guy takes a few seconds to write about a technology and some piss head just couldn't help but make an asinine comment because he didn't use technical jargon so that everyone who isn't a specialist can follow along.

      derivatizing the sides (is this what you mean by "surface"?)

      Are you fucking idiot? What other surface do you think he is talking about? If you are such a fucking expert, shouldn't it be pretty fucking clear that that is the surface in question? The difference between what you said and what he said is that me, with my EE degree can following along. "Derivitizing" the sides means nothing to me. DerivAtizing makes a little more sense because might be a real word, but it is still a word that you can't find the meaning from Google, hence limiting it to chemistry specialist.

      As someone working in a technical field, there is absolutely nothing more irritating in the world then when you need to communicate with a specialist outside of your field and the ass hole you are talking to can't drop his specialist jargon long enough to communicate with others. Yes, I am sure your penis is massive because you have an excellent command of words unique to your field, but for fucks sake, show you actually understand the verbal diarrhea coming out of your mouth and communicate it such that people without years of experience in your specialty can understand.

      Finally, I love how the one even vaugly informative part of your post,

      I'm not sure how well tolerated SWNTs will be in the body, since some studies have shown toxicity

      Is an repeat of what he said,
      "There have been some mixed signals as to weather or not nanotubes are carcinogens."

  29. yellow goo by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    "Geobacter have been used to [...] remove uranium from contaminated groundwater at a number of U.S. Department of Energy sites."

    Who wants to engineer some uranium-eating bacteria, to release into weapons facilities around the world? We'll probably need some bacteria-eating fruit flies, too, to rediffuse the hot stuff back into the crust. Genome hackers, start your engines!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:yellow goo by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      This is really starting to sound like a good SF story. The wicked plans of the bioscavenging terrorists come to a sudden halt when their bioengineering plans come home to roost in their own vats and hives.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  30. Sign me up...... by Rule_Of_The_Bone · · Score: 0

    The possibilities are boundless. There must be thousands of applications in medicine alone. All those wrecked ligaments, old fractures, and muscular scar tissue currently residing in various parts of my body...fixed and powered. No more power problems for artificial organs. Also the headaches associated with controlling and providing power to certain types of optical material/devices would be instantly sorted out. Hopefully the more invasive models designed for bio-remidiation tasks are set up with an off switch! Actually...would it be possible to use this sort of thing to fix nerves damaged by stroke or compression (i.e. extruded lumbar discs)?

    --
    "We herd sheep....we drive cattle...we LEAD people! Lead me...follow me...or get out of my way!" GEN George Patton
  31. Ooooooohhhhh.... by feepness · · Score: 1

    "... nanotechnology, which develops advanced materials and devices in extremely small dimensions."

    Huh, so that's what that is!

  32. Re:Can't resist... by JBHarris · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new nanobot, wire-crapping overlords.

  33. Nanowhat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microwires seems more accurate to me, but I could also mesure my car in nanometers...

  34. So the trash powered hover car is not far off. by bigmike_f · · Score: 1

    So we'll have the trash powered hover car after a few years... FINALLY!!

    1. Re:So the trash powered hover car is not far off. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      So we'll have the trash powered hover car after a few years... FINALLY!!

      Just don't name it "Mr. Fusion", k'?

  35. Re:Nice, so can we live forever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you think that in 200 years, you'll eventually learn to spell DEFINITELY without an A??

  36. Matrix Recharged by killproc · · Score: 1


    So if we follow this "breakthrough" and use colonies of these "lower life forms" to generate electricity to fuel our power grids, exactly how we are different from the machines in the Matrix?

    --
    When you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness. So I got that goin' for me, which is nice.
    1. Re:Matrix Recharged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bacteria are a lot closer to a finite state machine than a thinking entity.

    2. Re:Matrix Recharged by killproc · · Score: 1


      Perhaps they are from your humanocentric viewpoint.

      Opps, I forgot that I don't respond to A.C.'s. Damn....

      --
      When you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness. So I got that goin' for me, which is nice.
    3. Re:Matrix Recharged by trongey · · Score: 1

      >>...exactly how we are different from the machines in the Matrix?

      They were imaginary characters in a Hollywood movie. We're real people. Or maybe not, depending on your existentialist leanings.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  37. A: because it destroys the flow of a message by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Q: Why is starting a message in the Subject line irritating?

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  38. Talking out my ass by CFTM · · Score: 1

    IANAA [I am not an anything] but it seems to me that the human body already comes with a programming language that has four unique identifiers aka DNA. I'm sure people are already exploring this but I have always seen similarities between how computers encode information {0,1 ad naseum} and the way that our bodies encodes information {Adenine, Thymine, Cytosine and Guanine}.

    Personally, I do not think it's too far fetched to think that our DNA is just an elaborate programming language. Whether we're talking Assembly level or C level, who knows but once we're able to crack the genome and REALLY understand how these four "bases" [Let me reiterate, I graduated with a degree in philosophy so I'm blowing smoke out my rear atm] interact with each other it *MAY* become possible to manipulate the human body to produce these things on its own to avoid rejection. I know it's probably a long shot and there are probably an assortment of reasons why this would never work but I've always enjoyed playing with the implications of DNA being similar to a programming language and the power inherent to systems that can be manipulated at a foundational level.

    1. Re:Talking out my ass by |/|/||| · · Score: 1
      Your intuition is right about DNA being digitally encoded information. There are several complications when it comes to reverse engineering it, though.

      The first is that the "computer" that reads the data is extremely complicated and self-modifying. We know a lot about how cells read DNA and enventually translate it into protiens, but there's still a lot that we don't know about the process. Until we understand exactly how the computer translates the code, it's really hard to both read existing code and to "write" new code.

      Another problem is that there's more to the "code" than the sequence of bases. Read up on epigenetics if you're interested. For example, methylation of certain DNA sequences can affect gene expression.

      So the problem is a bit more daunting than some might think. Theoretically, however, there's no reason why we can't reverse engineer the body and use that information to build whatever kinds of organisms we want.

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
  39. I Got One Of Those by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    "a tiny biological structure that is highly electrically conductive"

    Or at least it feels that way when I see a nice picture of Angelina Jolie!

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  40. Great! Now I can finally... by Luxury+P.+Yacht · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... wire my daughter's doll house for Ethernet.

    --
    Bush should have died, not Reagan -- Morrissey
    Morrissey rides a cockhorse -- The Warlock Pinchers
  41. OH SHIT! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

    The Yuuzhan Vong are here!

  42. Capillary electrophoresis? by Hussman32 · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the heavy metal cleanup mechanism is, capillary electrophoresis? How could it be implemented in practice, by injection? Fascinating stuff.

    --
    "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
  43. Basis for Superconductor by Shannon+Love · · Score: 1

    Given the tiny size of the "wires" their resistance must be very low if they have the efficiency implied by the article. I wonder if we could bundle them together somehow to create macro-scale superconductor cables? If not, they might provide clues on how to create such a material on the macro-scale.

  44. DAC's! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know that this isn't in keeping with the story, however, can anyone of you very cleverpeople tell me how a current switching Digital to Analogue Convertor (DAC) works please?!! many thanks!