Slashdot Mirror


Cringely Shows How to Get Free Cell Calls

SafariShane writes "In this week's pulpit, Bob describes how to properly use new software from a company called IPDrum. Basically, you use the free mobile-to-mobile feature of any major carrier to call a dedicated cell phone attached to your computer. That call is then connected to Skype, allowing you to make free cell calls just about anywhere. Just how long till someone does this on a large scale, by overselling the dedicated lines, and starts selling true unlimited cell plans?"

222 comments

  1. Hmm by pHatidic · · Score: 3, Funny
    Just how long till someone does this on a large scale, by overselling the dedicated lines, and starts selling true unlimited cell plans?"

    I'm guessing Cringely has made a prediction

    1. Re:Hmm by ndansmith · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm guessing Cringely has made a predictio

      I'm guessing he has made an investment, too.

    2. Re:Hmm by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      He's quite a bit too late. Companies already offer truely unlimited (local calls) cell phone plans. Fido does this in Canada for $40/mth canadian ($30 or $35 US per month). Plus the usual hidden fees.

      Of course, it's not free long distance, but neither is skype; skypeout might be cheap, but it isn't free.

    3. Re:Hmm by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Before anybody complains that skype-to-skype calls are free, keep in mind that that isn't truely unlimited; that's the exact same restriction that the mobile phone companies put on their same-network unlimited plans, in that the person you are calling must be on skype as well.

      There are two types of unlimited. Unlimited minutes to any local number, and unlimited minutes to ANY long distance or international number. Skype-to-skype isn't to anybody, only people with skype.

      Don't get me wrong, this whole plan is genious, and it allows people to get skype's SkypeOut rates for their cellphones, and if the computer is hooked up to the POTS itself then free local.

    4. Re:Hmm by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll do you one better. I have a $12 asterisk card. I have a landline that allows me to make unlimited calls in the Richmond, VA area. I have broadband.

      I don't care if my landline is tied up most of the time, I have a cellphone finally (just got my first a few months back). Maybe you're in a similar situation. Maybe you'd buy a $12 asterisk card too.

      If we set up the hardware correctly, well then, I can make long distance calls to your area, and you to mine, and it won't cost us anything. Better yet, technically, your grandma down the road, who doesn't even have a computer, could make a LD call to Richmond VA, without it showing up on her bill. She dials into your asterisk machine, it puts it through over broadband to mine. My grandma could do the same thing... or for that matter, anyone in Richmond could do the same thing.

      Why would I do this, you ask? Because even if I only cheat the bastard phone companies out of a nickel of long distance revenue, I consider it a victory.

      Anyone feel like helping?

    5. Re:Hmm by alienw · · Score: 1

      Or, you can avoid SkypeOut's piss-poor quality and use Asterisk and a termination provider (and pay a lot less). 2 cents a minute in or out is a lot cheaper than landline. Of course, 2 cell phones with free mobile-to-mobile will be at least $50 a month, and the carrier will probably catch on and disconnect you.

    6. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you mind if I used your line to dial 1-900 numbers?

    7. Re:Hmm by Guspaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      You just described a VOIP provider ;)

      I'm not sure what they call the ones that work they way you describe, but the idea is you call a local number, get another dial tone, then call a long distance number.

      On the other hand, imagine a free (opensource?) service that tracked all such numbers in all locations, and also when they were in use (Each "node" could report to the master server when it was in use). The only trick about this is getting the numbers to the people. As in, person A wants to make a call, and person B's node is ready, but how does person A get person B's number.

      On a cellphone this is somewhat easy, since they are data enabled devices. A phone (or better, smartphone) could query the master server for a number. However doing it from home might be harder. You could always get a number through a computer, and then dial the node.

      Another possible solution is to have a small number of "master" nodes in each calling area. This node would serve only to stay connected long enough to forward your call to an available node. It would only have to be connected for as long as it took to redirect the call and hang up.

      On the other hand, this isn't terribly easier than making the call from the computer in the first place, and each call uses up two nodes. All we really need is one node, to get is into the POTS. So here is what I propose.

      Opensource projects often survive on donations. Well, do the same thing, and use the donations to support one node in each major city. Start with a few of the largest cities (or calling areas, often multiple area codes are local calls.) In each (or one for starters) city, build a node. Nothing complicated, somebody gets a business line capable of making multiple outgoing calls. The cost of the node is the business phone line and an internet connection to support it.

      I don't know how much bandwidth SIP/IAX uses, but I'm going to guess 24kbit per connection, since that's way more than enough for POTS quality voice. A residential DSL/cable line with 640kbit of usable bandwidth could support 26 simultaneous calls. Probably costs $40 per month canadian. I have no idea how much a business line costs.

      So the trick to getting this to work is simply donations. Monetary donations can go towards the business line, and internet bandwidth can be donated directly or covered by cash donations. The more donations and popular your service, the larger and more cost effective the broadband line. A cogent line for $1000/mth could support 3500 calls, or a large number of users.

      I have no idea if this could work. Just a crazy idea. Who knows. I think it's feasible. Just have to start small and grow.

    8. Re:Hmm by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      I admit SkypeOut's quality isn't great, but the cost pretty nice. Still more expensive than local calls, but really cheap for long distance.

      Can you provide more information about these termination providers?

    9. Re:Hmm by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      You miss the point. Sure, my broadband can provide more than 1 voip link, but I've only got one landline that I can donate to this cause. Figures. Still not sure if its just that my ideas are dumb, or if I do a shitty job explaining them...

    10. Re:Hmm by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      But the cost and quality both suck in comparison to alienw's suggestion. You can spend a lot less rolling your own with Asterisk. Of course it takes a lot more time to get it going. But between the price, geek factor and the customizability, it's a sure win for any Slashdotter worth his/her salt.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    11. Re:Hmm by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

      Get a block of business lines, have them seek, multiple out, multiple in

    12. Re:Hmm by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      That's the thing though, you get donations to pay for a business line and you can make more than one connection to the POTS (Plain Old Telephone System). You only need one such node per city.

    13. Re:Hmm by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      The trick is still the connection between the phone and the PC. My cell phone has a data cable, but it's limited to treating the phone as a modem, or transfering files to/from. I don't know how one would make a voice connection over the low-speed cellphone USB cable that comes with the phones.

      Perhaps one could take this skype cable this company makes and roll one's own software.

    14. Re:Hmm by blyloveranger · · Score: 1
      I'm guessing Cringely has made a prediction
      Guess?!? how about you just RTFA and find out?
    15. Re:Hmm by Redwin · · Score: 1

      "skypeout might be cheap, but it isn't free."

      Unless the recieving machine skype is running on has the same setup, and uses a free mobile to dial out? Could be possible maybe?

      --
      Warning, comments may not have been passed by the sanity department of my brain.
    16. Re:Hmm by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't be for free then, now would it?

    17. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had an idea about something like this a little while ago -- something similar to BitTorrent, where instead of people donating bandwidth, they donate a pstn-voip gateway to the system for a particular local area code.

      If you have enough people on the system, anyone on the system can make free calls to anywhere in the world (local charges notwithstanding of course). The only thing I could not figure out is how to monetize this (apart from some stupid advertising oriented play).

    18. Re:Hmm by aclarke · · Score: 1
      The thing is, how much do you pay for your land line? For that price, only one person is going to be able to use it at a time. I pay US$15/month for my Vonage box which gives me 500 minutes per month of calling in Canada and the USA. For my small monthly payment I get a more mature, higher quality and cheaper solution than what you propose.

      It would have been a great idea to implement 6 years ago, but these days with cheap, widespread, reliable and idiot-proof VOIP, it's hard to argue the value of a homegrown solution beyond its innate geek credibility and cool-factor.

    19. Re:Hmm by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      I worked for a company that offered commercial VOIP. It was a joke. Anyone that relies on Vonage, well, there's no need for me to insult you, I suppose.

      Let's just say I'm not offering a POTS replacement kind of VOIP. It's a long distance replacement. And for people like me that only make a few LD calls every month anyway, this would be more than adequate.

    20. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is already being done. Checkout Free world dialup: http://account.fwdnet.net/index.php

    21. Re:Hmm by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      In which case, as I mentioned, you are trading one limitation for another. Instead of being limited to in-network calls, you are limited to skype-to-skype calls. If you have limitations it isn't unlimited ;)

    22. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    23. Re:Hmm by Lord+Kestrel · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

    24. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't anyway.

    25. Re:Hmm by aclarke · · Score: 1
      Well that's a fair enough comment, but on the other hand I wouldn't say that I RELY on Vonage. It makes a nice supplement to my mobile phone though.

      I'm also not sure that anyone needing to rely on a particular telecommunications system would be better served relying on a network of personal computers hooked up to the internet and POTS system with consumer-grade asterisk cards. It would be a fun project, though.

  2. Interesting, but how novel is it? by moz25 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With a free mobile-to-mobile feature, you don't have to be able to make free calls, but cheap calls would be cool too. You could interface directly to your computer for a whole range of other things too. My take is that the cool part is in the interface to the computer, with free calls being one of the multiple possibilities. Once this gets popular, there may be some limitations though.

    I wonder if this method is patented... ?

    1. Re:Interesting, but how novel is it? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      One thing I've always wanted to do was have internet access on the-the-road and on-the-cheap. This seems like a possible way to do it.

      WiFi doesn't have the range, and dedicated systems are expensive. With this I could get a cell phone (which I would use to some degree anyway) and possibly use it as a cell modem to connect to my computer at home, and route through that to access my broadband internet from there. If nothing else I'd be able to retreive documents and send home pictures and stuff while out on job sites, and get maps while on the road without investing in a dedicated GPS/Nav system. Slow, yeah... but I wouldn't be playing LAN games or streaming media anyway!

      Anyone else ever try to do this?
      =Smidge=

    2. Re:Interesting, but how novel is it? by cloudspot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was doing this with Sprint for a while. I hooked my N400 cell phone to my laptop with a cord I got on Ebay and some downloaded software. it made a dialup speed connection that worked anywhere Sprint has service. At the time I worked for a City that didn't allow desktop internet access... so my laptop/cell phone combo was my only link to /. and Dilbert.....

      --
      Need professional pictures taken in the Puget Sound? Hire me!
    3. Re:Interesting, but how novel is it? by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Interesting
      With a free mobile-to-mobile feature, you don't have to be able to make free calls, but cheap calls would be cool too. You could interface directly to your computer for a whole range of other things too. My take is that the cool part is in the interface to the computer, with free calls being one of the multiple possibilities.

      IPOfC (IP over free-cellular)

      The telecom's worst nightmare. Being your own forwarder into the net from free wireless from anyplace? (Not to mention security concerns)

      But, they would quickly move to ensure that your line only carried a good enough fidelity for voice, or start charging you bandwidth costs. Either way, you can bet the telcos won't give it away.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Interesting, but how novel is it? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      That would be using a cell phones as a modem. I want to use one as a dial-up receiver. Can a cell phone be connected to a computer and set to receive incomming connections?

      =Smidge=

    5. Re:Interesting, but how novel is it? by cloudspot · · Score: 1
      You're right, I 'got it' mere seconds after posting that, I guess RTFA would have been a good response... ;-)

      --
      Need professional pictures taken in the Puget Sound? Hire me!
  3. This was done before... by nxtw · · Score: 1, Informative
    Some company did this before. They had a bunch of cell phones connected to VoIP service, and offered unlimited calls for $10-20/mo. (The phone companies weren't too happy about it.)

    I think it was on Slashdot, but I can't find the link.

    1. Re:This was done before... by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it PhoneFree.com?

      --
      -gjr
    2. Re:This was done before... by Meniconi,Nando · · Score: 4, Informative
    3. Re:This was done before... by MDMurphy · · Score: 4, Informative
  4. Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great idea. If you can marry this up with free wireless in citys too... pda based phone... nice.

  5. A new acronym? by bfizzle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Talk about a hack...

    Makes me wonder how much delay there is between talking and the other party listening with the cell to cell to skype to skype to cell to cell.

    We have a new acronym c2c2p2p2c2c

    1. Re:A new acronym? by ndansmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good point. On my Verizon service there is a noticable lag of almost one second (at times) within their network. So multiply that by send and recieve and add to that any delay in Skype, and you might have some bizarre conversations.

    2. Re:A new acronym? by B3ryllium · · Score: 1, Funny

      You would probably still sound smarter than a large number of CNN and FOX News anchors and interviewees, however.

    3. Re:A new acronym? by ndansmith · · Score: 1

      There is nothing quite like a cryptic taunting post on Slashdot.

    4. Re:A new acronym? by tolkienfan · · Score: 1
      Plus each of the d2a and a2d introduce echos which get suppressed - when it's working correctly!

      Hello, hello, hello, hello, hello, hello, hello, hello, hello, hello, hello, hello...

      Geez it sounds crowded - are you at a party?

    5. Re:A new acronym? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was simply referring to how conversations can go weird when satellite-induced lag occurs, and how the anchorpeople are fairly incompetent at compensating for it.

      Taunt!

    6. Re:A new acronym? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Funny
      Good point. On my Verizon service there is a noticable lag of almost one second (at times) within their network. So multiply that by send and recieve and add to that any delay in Skype, and you might have some bizarre conversations.

      I tried to make a tech support call to SBC internet services over Skype once. Take the Skype delay, and add the .75 second delay for the signal to go to the call center in India, throw in the inevitable "clipping" effect, plus the irregular language and hint of an accent of an ESL tech support guy (yeah, sure your name is "Mike"), and you just can't get anything communicated. I can't wait to add this to the mix!

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    7. Re:A new acronym? by ndansmith · · Score: 1

      Sweet, I love not getting taunted. BOOYAH!

    8. Re:A new acronym? by Pootie+Tang · · Score: 1

      Not just latency but lack of reliability too. The internet usually works, but I have problems reaching IP addresses much more often than I have problems going landline to landline. Cell phones are also noticebly less reliable than landlines. Combine the unreliability of two, add the latency and reduced sound quality.

      And what do you get out of it? "free" phone calls. Except you need an extra cell phone to be connected to your computer. And you can only call Skype users unless paying an additional fee.

      It's a neat "because you can" thing, but that's about it for most people.

  6. Free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    How is it free when Skype charges for calls to landlines and cell phones?

    1. Re:Free? by RJabelman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a better plan over here in the UK, where we don't have to pay to receive calls. (why you lot put up with paying for incoming calls, I don't understand....)

    2. Re:Free? by srleffler · · Score: 2

      RTFA. It apparently works for incoming calls too. Presumably their software automatically dials your preprogrammed cell number when an incoming call comes in via Skype.

    3. Re:Free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's really mind boggling is how the entire EU never managed to force flat-rate landline usage upon their telcos...

    4. Re:Free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stay in France, you communist.

    5. Re:Free? by raju1kabir · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It's a better plan over here in the UK, where we don't have to pay to receive calls. (why you lot put up with paying for incoming calls, I don't understand....)

      Because when you add everything up, it's cheaper that way.

      Remember, you don't only receive calls, you make them too (even if you personally only receive calls, there would be no calls to receive if people in general weren't making them).

      Studies have shown again and again in that receiver-pays markets (e.g., USA, Singapore, China), the total amount paid by consumers per unit of mobile phone airtime is lower.

      This is because the person who is paying for the call is the same person who has market power in the relationship with the service provider. In the caller-pays system, the person who is paying for the call has no way to express their dissatisfaction with the rate by switching to a different provider, so it is not a competitive factor. The people who pay have to put up with whatever rates are in effect, or not make the call at all.

      Caller-pays is a huge swindle, built on a transparent lie, and it's costing European consumers billions.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    6. Re:Free? by Acinyx · · Score: 1

      eh? since when can't we switch providers to get a lower rate? this happens all the time and is one of the things the providers compete on.
      The whole problem for the providers is that because all 5 networks have 99% coverage and nearly the same call quality the only thing they can compete on is price and goodies. Because of this the consumers aren't brand loyal and most people switch networks every year.

    7. Re:Free? by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, it doesn't sound like it handles incoming calls, so really what you have is a flat fee for unlimited outgoing calls.

      Most mobile network providers that I've used don't charge you for incoming calls, and all offered a prepaid plan with no monthly charge. On the other hand, I've never seen a provider that gave you free calls within network.

    8. Re:Free? by bgarcia · · Score: 1
      The plan requires two active cellular phone connections. Last I checked that isn't free.
      You aren't checking in the right places.

      I've had completely free digital mobile service on 5 phones with T-mobile going on two years now.

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    9. Re:Free? by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      The *caller* cannot switch to get a lower rate. That is to say if I call an o2 mobile, it costs a fortune whatever landline or mobile net I call from because o2 charges them a lot to do it. I cannot not use o2 because I'm not the one using o2, the person I'm calling is.

      The point the gp makes is a fair one... I have been wondering for some time why calls to mobiles are so expensive. Receiver pays may well have helped reduce prices... it still seems unnatural though as you're paying for something you have no choice in.

    10. Re:Free? by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      Of course the caller can switch. I pay a fixed rate when calling to other people's mobiles, set by my provider, regardless of the provider the callee is with. Providers compete on this.

      The only thing is that I have three different rates to pay - to fixed phones, to mobile phones of the same provider as I, and to other mobiles.

      That's using a Telfort mobile in the Netherlands.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    11. Re:Free? by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      You note though that you are charged a high rate for calling based on the highest of the termination charges. Your switching only cuts the margins of your end of the call, it won't help reduce the termination charge at the other end hence the price doesn't drop much, which is the point that was being made by the original poster.

    12. Re:Free? by kb7oeb · · Score: 1

      Incoming calls to landlines are always free, one local company offers an unlimited use cell phone, several others have free incoming calls. I think the US has the same caller pays system but the customers are insulated from it. I have been looking at a bunch of VOIP providers and almost all provide free incoming calls even if outgoing is only 100 minutes.

    13. Re:Free? by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      While I think of it... the fact they can only compete on price and goodies would mean they were cheap, you'd think, surely? However they are more expensive than in the US...

    14. Re:Free? by Acinyx · · Score: 1

      ok but how cheap is it in the US then? I just checked cingular and they have only 3 plans which all seem as expensive as the ones around here. example: cingular $55,97 plan: 450 minutes + 200 text KPN Mobile (2nd biggest here): 50,00 plan: 450 min + 900 text cingular seems to be 45 $cents per extra minute, kpn is 11 cents

    15. Re:Free? by Acinyx · · Score: 1

      damn preview button should be used :) oh and bit of a mistake on the extra min price: it's 24 cents at kpn

    16. Re:Free? by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      Maybe I overgeneralised ;) Comparing to the people I've spoken to the US is cheaper. I pay £30 (so, what, 50USD shall we say) per month for 400 minutes and 50 texts (to all UK landlines and mobiles). Something like 15p/min for extra minutes...

      Maybe it's just the UK that's expensive :) Which wouldn't surprise me. 3 is cheap though... lots of minutes there, just such terrible service and up to now a poor choice of (3g only) phones that I moved away again.

  7. And then? by daVinci1980 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are already companies that offer this. For example, metroPCS which offers unlimited calls. No minute counting.
    For $40 a month, you get unlimited local and long distance calls.

    --
    I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
    1. Re:And then? by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Free including international? Doubtful.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:And then? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Presumably it's as free including international as the best available land service can be.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:And then? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, not free including international. But good enough for most people concerned about phone minutes that live in MetroPCS's extremely limited coverage area.

      MetroPCS is not designed with globetrotters in mind.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:And then? by tolkienfan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      No, stop it!

      It's much better to:

      1. Buy an extra cell phone
      2. Hook it to the computer
      3. Pay for two cell services (they have to operate simultaneously)
      4. Install and configure IPDrum and Skype
      5. Dial twice on each call
      Plus, you get the benefit that there's 3 or 4 extra single points of failure, and you get to use twice the air bandwith when your calling from the same tower as the dedicated cell-phone.

      And I'm sure there's no degradation in quality!

    5. Re:And then? by mythosaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cricket does the same thing here. Unlimited minutes, with long distance included plans. [No international though...yet.]

      $45/mo gets you unlimited calling, including US long distance.

      $30/mo gets you unlimited local calling.

  8. Genius... or not so? by CapnGrunge · · Score: 1

    No company, at least in Mexico, gives real unlimited cell-to-cell time. Much less when they figure it out all.

    --
    I see 57005 people
    1. Re:Genius... or not so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Run for the border... there are free in network calling plans from T Mobile and Verizon...

  9. Only free to Skype users by winkydink · · Score: 2, Informative

    While it's a step in the right direction, if you want to call somebody on a landline, you still have to pay for the SkypeOut, yes?

    It seems like a lot of trouble for little savings. I guess my perspective would be different if I was a very mobile person who needed to make frequent out-of-country calls (more common in Europe, yes, I know).

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Only free to Skype users by cyberwiz01 · · Score: 1

      And what about getting incoming calls. Those would still use your cell minutes, right?

    2. Re:Only free to Skype users by msoori · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yep, thats way too much trouble to make free phone calls! Only advantage this gives you is that you can be mobile, which is the main reason I've been avoiding Skype. This will give you mobility, but then again, how good of a quality will you get out of VOIP over a cell phone? Cell phones are always cracking up and Skype is only marginally good. Add these together and I'm not sure how good it will sound.

      I've been using Packet8 for $20 a month for unlimited US and Canda for more than a year now. The service is great and they also have plan for calling Europe or Asia unlimited for $49. If you have relatives in those countries packet8 seems to be a better solution (www.packet8.net). If you are calling some one a lot in another country, you can get a second Packet8 phone for about $15, and send it over there. Get a highspeed connection and you can call all you want between those phone. Much less hazzle and no configuration problems!

  10. Interesting by gazuga · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But not very cost-effective if you're the only one using it.

    2x cheapest cell plan is still about $60-70. For that much money, you can almost buy unlimited minutes (or at least practically unless you talk non-stop) from the cell provider.

    For a family or group of friends, however, this sounds like a great deal.

    --
    "I turn away with fright and horror from the lamentable evil of functions which do not have derivatives."
    1. Re:Interesting by gazuga · · Score: 1

      Meh, Cringley mentions adding another phone for $9.99 but I've never seen it that cheap unless you are already spending a decent amount in the first place.

      And you gotta factor in the cost of another handset, although used ones go for pretty cheap...

      --
      "I turn away with fright and horror from the lamentable evil of functions which do not have derivatives."
    2. Re:Interesting by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      1. I use around 1600 of my 2000 minutes a month on my phone. And that's with careful use of the free calls within network and after 9pm. I'm paying a lot more than that to get those minutes, too.

      2. For a family or group of friends, there are far better deals out there. You can buy a big plan and share minutes. You can get Verizon or Sprint (or many others) and have free calling between the phones (IN Network, PCS-to-PCS).

      3. Overage fees can cost you hundreds each month if you're not careful. A solution like this could save you thousands each year.

    3. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cingular is always $9.99 for a new line.

    4. Re:Interesting by barawn · · Score: 1

      2x cheapest cell plan is still about $60-70.

      T-Mobile's Family Time plan is $49.99, and includes 2 lines and unlimited mobile-to-mobile.

      Bing, $50 unlimited cell usage.

    5. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget to include the cost of the internet connection, probably DSL or cable.

    6. Re:Interesting by Yavi · · Score: 1

      $14.99/line as of June 1st. If you already have $9.99 you keep it.

    7. Re:Interesting by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      He says he and his wife already have phones. Verizon offers $9.99 for lines after the first two pretty much everywhere, as far as I know. Likewise with Sprint and T-Mobile. Cingular is a bit more expensive at $14.99.

      As for additional handsets, a lot of us have those around as well. I get a credit towards a new phone every two years. Nothing wrong with the old ones, but not worth enough for me to bother selling, so I keep a couple around as spares in case one of the new ones dies.

      That being said, his proposed hack is (as he admits) pretty kludgey, and cell phone charges are probably low enough for noone to care about the extra hassle and unreliability, coupled with having to pay Skype in the end anyways (though possibly at a lower rate).

      I agree that traditional telephone service is doomed in the long run. As high speed untethered internet access becomes more prevelent, I'd expect straight wireless VoIP to become a player, rather than any weird hopping scheme like Cringly posited.

  11. Phone Phreaking! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I didn't know that Captain Crunch whistles work on cell phones.

    1. Re:Phone Phreaking! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If you don't like my website, why do you keep visiting? What's wrong with sharing pictures with friends and strangers? What's wrong with having a positive attitude about life?

  12. Feeding the troll. by gardyloo · · Score: 2, Informative
  13. Voice compression hell by Strom+Carlson · · Score: 5, Informative

    By running from Skype to a mobile phone, you use two fairly crappy codecs: iLBC at 13 kilobits per second on top of GSM at 12 kilobits per second. On their own, each one is marginally tolerable, but I would rather gouge my eardrums out with a dagger than listen to the two codecs combined.

    1. Re:Voice compression hell by Mr2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the US, you'd more likely be using one of the CDMA voice codecs instead of GSM, which are usually higher bitrate as well as higher quality.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    2. Re:Voice compression hell by Strom+Carlson · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've got a GSM phone, and it still sounds horrid. Less horrid that CDMA, mind you, but still horrid.

    3. Re:Voice compression hell by RJabelman · · Score: 1

      Try listening to music being played down a GSM phone. That's just bizarre.

      (Before someone points it out: yes, I know the compression's optimised for voice.)

    4. Re:Voice compression hell by Pengo · · Score: 1

      How is iLBC crappy?

      From my experience with it, it only sounds crapy when it's being transcoded from a bad source. iLBC => iLBC sounds great.

      On that same note you could say that g729 or ulaw is crappy, but it's all depending on how your creating the stream.

      iLBC is a GREAT protocol, as can be heard on a skype->skype call (which uses iLBC).

    5. Re:Voice compression hell by jmcharry · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that you are cascading lossy compression systems. Each step throws out part of the information, until you end up with a kind of "homeopathic soup".

      Some combinations of chained codecs are better than others, but they all cause degradation.

    6. Re:Voice compression hell by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Informative

      " In the US, you'd more likely be using one of the CDMA voice codecs instead of GSM, which are usually higher bitrate as well as higher quality."

      GSM EFR (used by T-Mobile USA) is actually quite good, on par with or better than the CDMA voice codec used by Verizon.

    7. Re:Voice compression hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I don't think the streams would be cascaded. I would expect that the iLBC would be strictly used for the Skype portion of the call and that your cellphone would be responsible for vocoding into GSM/CDMA.

      Unless it is a datacall. If it is a datacall, then you wouldn't need anything other than iLBC, but I don't think it is a datacall, because you are listening on the other end. When you listen on the other end, your network provider's vocoder must encode voice from you and decode voice to you.

      Granted, you will lose some bits here and there, but these things are definetly in serial, not in parallel.

    8. Re:Voice compression hell by raju1kabir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I haven't been impressed. I don't know if it's the codec, or something else about Skype, but the quality is underwhelming.

      I live in Asia, and have non-mind-blowing DSL (1024/384, with 300ms ping to the USA). I use VoIP providers via Asterisk on a colo box in the USA to place and receive calls via a Sipura SPA-1001. Most people I talk with in Europe or the USA can't tell that I'm using VoIP or on the other side of the planet.

      However, whenever I use Skype (from here or elsewhere) there's this sort of cycling effect, about 1Hz, where the quality of the sound changes from "wide" to "narrow" and the volume pulses as well. Dropouts are frequent. This is over the exact same connections that work fine with the Sipura box (and the people I've Skyped with are very well connected).

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    9. Re:Voice compression hell by hhghghghh · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually, I don't think the streams would be cascaded. I would expect that the iLBC would be strictly used for the Skype portion of the call and that your cellphone would be responsible for vocoding into GSM/CDMA.

      Unless it is a datacall. If it is a datacall, then you wouldn't need anything other than iLBC, but I don't think it is a datacall, because you are listening on the other end. When you listen on the other end, your network provider's vocoder must encode voice from you and decode voice to you.

      Granted, you will lose some bits here and there, but these things are definetly in serial, not in parallel.

      Dude. It sure doesn't help the qound quality when you're talking out of your ass.

      Cascading is when you serially link lossy compression - since codecs use different psycho-acoustical models (else they'd be the same codec) they'll drop different aspects of the signal; you'll end up with only the sounds where both codecs overlappingly decide those frequencies are important, and both codecs will introduce their own artifacts.

      The joyful bit is where artifacts that are particularly noticeable are most likely to be amplified by the second codec, since it's likely to figure noticeable sounds are psychoacoustically significant (which they are).

  14. Investing in Phone Numbers by podperson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He goes on to suggest that investors should move their money away from phone companies to NeuStar -- a company that vends telephone numbers.

    Cough.

    It seems to me that the obvious place to converge points of content would be email addresses -- which will make phone numbers obsolete as well.

    1. Re:Investing in Phone Numbers by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      And make spam that much worse.

    2. Re:Investing in Phone Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cringly's a retard on this one.

      In a matter of a couple of paragraphs NeuStar goes from selling phone numbers to a VOIP company.

      Heard yeah... sure did!

    3. Re:Investing in Phone Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Which will make phone Numbers OBSOLETE."
      ummm no they won't.

      Don't believe the hype, don't believe the hype
      it's all Lies.

      I should know, I am a lier.
      Slashdot, ads for nerds.

      Overhyped Stuff that dosen't matter.
      ~DV~ TB.

      and no, I don't have any funny diseases.

  15. Sure it's free, you just ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... have to pay $60/month minimum for two-phone wireless service and 2c a minute to termine the call at a real phone.

    You've met "free-as-in-speech" and "free-as-in-beer" -- now meet "free-as-in-really-expensive"! Yayyyy capitalism!!

    1. Re:Sure it's free, you just ... by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's the same free-as-in-"I built this server for free, and I'll show you how you can too... err well you already need to have the server and the time to set it up" that is showing up more often here on Slashdot.

    2. Re:Sure it's free, you just ... by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah, you can get a 2-phone plan for 49.99 and unlimited VOIP for 19.99 (not from skype). At least you could when I came up with this idea six months before Cringley (actually inspired by one of his articles though. Also, turns out other people had the idea too). Truly unlimited domestic minutes along with super-low VOIP rates on international cell-phone calls could actually be worth $70 for really heavy users (big plans can get up in the $100s, plus international charges on top). Also, you might be able to save more by going for a family plan with more phones. You could do two people with four phones, or three people with six. I wouldn't want to be the guy setting up the PBX, though.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  16. I'll pass.. by Geekenstein · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, it sounds good on the surface, but starts getting a little muddier when you get into it.

    How much does your average cell phone provider charge for a month of service? Let's be generous and say $30, plus $10 for the "in network" plan. So, $40 right there.

    Next, you add the regularly poor quality of a cell phone call, with its drop outs in sound, etc. to the equally (if not moreso) poor quality of a VoIP call, and you end up with a lot of "huh? what? can you hear me now?" in your conversations.

    People who tend to spend so much time on their cell phone that they go over the costs associated with having the second phone line value value their ability to communicate and won't tolerate the kind of frustrations with this "cheap" solution.

    1. Re:I'll pass.. by muhgcee · · Score: 0

      VOIP quality is rather good, at least when talking to another VOIP user. Well, my only experience has been with Skype-to-Skype, but it still sounds quite good, almost like the person is right next to you.

    2. Re:I'll pass.. by ronchie02 · · Score: 1

      Actually, VoIP quality is quite good (at least in my experience with SunRocket). Cell quality is a whole other matter, though. And yea, this reminds me of the story about the "cheap" air conditioner on Slashdot the other day. It's an interesting idea, but in practice, it really isn't that feasable to most users.

    3. Re:I'll pass.. by xstein · · Score: 1
      Next, you add the regularly poor quality of a cell phone call, with its drop outs in sound, etc. to the equally (if not moreso) poor quality of a VoIP call, and you end up with a lot of "huh? what? can you hear me now?" in your conversations.
      Out in Asia, this becomes less of a problem with newer wireless technologies, such as 3G which provides much greater bandwidth.

      Of course though if that sort of infrastructure is in place, wireless companies are also wise enough to jump on the VoIP bandwagon for international calls before the rest of us are, or at least enough to prevent us getting excited at running out to purchase these tacky cables. GSM wireless plans start at US$9/mo for 500mins up to US$38/mo for 5000 mins, and beyond, before an optional $5/month plan for unlimited international calling to 23 countries in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australasia.

      Commercial VoIP exists beyond Skype, using greater bandwidth than our home DSL lines, and for these GSM is Good Enough as you're not going to get a whole lot more bandwidth on the receiving end anyway. It's only countries lacking in competition in the wireless carrier industry that you're missing out on this.

      Just another example of us consumers losing out in more socialist economies where the government wants to pitch in to subsidise, of all possible stupid things, infrastructure.
  17. FREE cell phone calls?" by matth · · Score: 1

    I now have to pay for *2* cell phones instead of just one.. sounds MORE expensive then just using my minutes!

    1. Re:FREE cell phone calls?" by Sir+Pallas · · Score: 1

      In the article he says that he has a family plan where he gets a second "family plan" phone for $10/month, certainly not as expensive as a second plan.

    2. Re:FREE cell phone calls?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yabutt, if you want to call another PHONE, you need to subscribe to SkypeOUT which adds anohter layer of cost http://www.skype.com/products/skypeout/rates
      Still not as expensive as a second plan, but FAR from "free"

  18. why is this modded down? by fallendragon · · Score: 1

    i have to agree - there's a big difference between 'free' and 'unlimted': i think the difference is usually called marketing or something like that. obviously the cost tends towards zero the more you use it but it's never going to reach zero in one month. cue geek response: cost per minute for constant use...

  19. Free? by Blindman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The plan requires two active cellular phone connections. Last I checked that isn't free. Sure, it will be cheaper than actually making direct calls, but that is not the same as free. Furthermore, it doesn't sound like it handles incoming calls, so really what you have is a flat fee for unlimited outgoing calls. This doesn't sound particularly free.

    --
    I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person that I'm preaching to.
  20. Link to Microsoft.com? by gsperling · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is it possible that this is a hoax? When you click on the "Order Online Now" link, it goes to microsoft.com ....

    1. Re:Link to Microsoft.com? by NetNifty · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're using Firefox I guess? If firefox doesn't recognise a url entered as a url it does an "I'm Feeling Lucky" google search on the "url" entered. The link is broken and is starts with "http" and the first result on searching for http (and thus the I'm Feeling Lucky link) on Google is Microsoft.com.

    2. Re:Link to Microsoft.com? by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that info. A certain message board I often use always prepends http:/// to any https:/// links, and the links always take you to paypal. Now I know why.

    3. Re:Link to Microsoft.com? by jdunck · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a job for Greasemonkey.

  21. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your not first post, you jackass...wait thats me!

  22. Not the point.. by Sir+Pallas · · Score: 1

    Even though it isn't the core of the article, the Cell+Cell+IPDrum+Skype idea is more about circumvention than savings. Dividing it up: (1) Adobe is powerful. (2) The way phone companies work not only is changing but must change. Now, I thought both of those things were obvious.

  23. Cost?? by RapmasterT · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So instead of paying for cell phone minutes, I pay for cell service on two phones and an Skype account.

    Seems like you'd need to be spending a LOT of time calling international to make this worthwhile.

    1. Re:Cost?? by Limited+Vision · · Score: 1

      Cingular charges 60 cents per minute to call CANADA for god's sake... Don't have to make too many calls for it to make a difference.

      You will say, "Hey, you can pay an extra fee each month to have cheaper international calls!" Ooookay, so that drops it to 20 cents a minute. This still sucks. Cingular is ripping me off. What, am I calling freakin' Ghana or Ascension Island? I get Canada for free with Vonage.

      I'd love to be able to route or do some sort of bounce or callback so I can leverage my Vonage account from my cell. Oh well, one day...

  24. Need a Bluetooth link by MDMurphy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A cable between the phone and PC running Skype is too narrow of a focus. The "home version" rather than someone trying to make a service buisness out of sounds better.

    Give me a bluetooth adapter than plugs into my POTS phone jack and communicates with the phone. This could be a regular phone line, or VOIP like Vonage. Then I can call out via link, or have incoming calls get transferred as well. As far as the cell company is concerned, I'm making a bunch of calls to the wife.

    Incoming should be fairly easy, all incoming calls to the home line get sent to a pre-configured number in the home cell phone. Outbound might be trickier since you'd have to tell the home cell phone what number to dial out.

    I'm sure it's coming soon, but a Skype-only solution that takes a cable, that's not all that exciting

    1. Re:Need a Bluetooth link by rjhall · · Score: 1

      easy...
      Get yourself a Sipura SPA-3000. Set it to fwd the incoming POTS to the VoIP line.
      Get yourself a VoIP account with unlimited minutes to wherever you need to get to (lingo/broadvoice etc. for intl, prolly vonage for domestic US+).
      No bluetooth, but no hassle either.

      Add asterisk to taste.

    2. Re:Need a Bluetooth link by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

      This kinda misses the point. Connecting a VOIP to a POTS doesn't do anything to get your cell phone calls connected.

    3. Re:Need a Bluetooth link by PatOBan · · Score: 1

      A quick Google reveals this discontinued product and this software. If you're going to get free calls you may as well be able to sit in an armchair.

  25. Depending upon gaming the system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Coming up with a money-saving scheme that depends upon gaming a system is not a great idea when the rules are not under your control and can be changed any time.

  26. This is how long... by fishlet · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Just how long till someone does this on a large scale, by overselling the dedicated lines, and starts selling true unlimited cell plans?"

    Just longer than it takes for some shady lawmakers to sneak in a law to prevent that.

  27. Re:I just tried this! Here is a transcript... by zztzed · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, cool, it's an English to Klingon translator!

  28. No international by Stiletto · · Score: 1


    Anyone here run a communications company?

    The first company who can give me a single, flat monthly bill for local, long-distance and international calls (be it landline, VOIP, or mobile) gets my business. I don't care if it totals a little more than I am paying now. I hate all those silly plans with different payment structures, different hours costing different amounts, long distance (sometimes including across town) costing more than local, strange rates per country for international, etc. etc. etc.

    No per-minute charges. No per-call charges.

    Is this really that much to ask for?

    1. Re:No international by kryptx · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at BroadVoice? They have an unlimited international plan for $24.95 monthly.

      --
      Mods: Do you disagree with me? Go ahead and mod me down. Meta-mods will sort it out. Good luck!
    2. Re:No international by houghi · · Score: 1

      In short, yes.

      International is the easiest to explain. They work with different prices THEY have to pay. If they would charge one price they will take the one that is most expensive, otherwise people will abuse it.

      Different hours is there because of competition. They want to give you the lowest rate while still making money. The reason these hours exist is because those cheaper hours, less people call if the prices are the same.

      Depending from company to company this can be different. A specific payment system with all one price (and be sure you will pay the most expensive call possible) will not attract enough customers to make it a good investment.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:No international by thinkliberty · · Score: 1

      Broadvoice http://www.broadvoice.com/ is pretty close to what you are asking for..

      Unlimited calling to 35 countries including the United States:
      Australia Netherlands Austria Norway Belgium Singapore Canada Spain Chile Sweden China Switzerland Denmark Taiwan France United Kingdom
      Germany Ireland Vatican City
      Italy Argentina Luxembourg Brazil Malaysia Czech Republic New Zealand Finland Poland Greece Portugal Israel Japan South Korea

      Calls to cellphones to some of the above countries cost money though.

    4. Re:No international by paramendra · · Score: 1

      Not much to ask for at all. Or everyone you need to talk to could sign up for MSN or Yahoo Messenger. The new one has audio that sounds like a phone. http://www.geocities.com/paramendra

    5. Re:No international by sporktoast · · Score: 1
      I suspect the International stuff is the hardest part to work out. So many different parties to deal with trying to stabilize a flat rate.

      Speakeasy OneLink comes close enough for me. $88/month for 1.5/384 ADSL, static IP, servers are fine with TOS. NO local analog line needed, bye-bye SBC! That plus VOIP with unlimited US & Canada including voicemail, callerID, call waiting, forwarding, 3-way, etc. I don't call outside the US, so I'm not even sure what those rates are. It hit my sweet spot. It may come close enough for yours.

      --
      In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
    6. Re:No international by pokka · · Score: 1

      The first company who can give me a single, flat monthly bill for local, long-distance and international calls (be it landline, VOIP, or mobile) gets my business

      The problem is that the communications companies themselves have to pay varying rates.

      Even the wholesale rate to dial certain mobile networks can exceed $1/minute. That's about $43,000 per month. Do you expect them to offer this at $100/month and hope that no one will abuse it?

      Of course, you can add restrictions or additional billing for certain networks, but then the communications network no longer meets your requirements.

    7. Re:No international by JRock911 · · Score: 1

      I dont think youre going to see international anytime soon however Suncom already offers unlimited local and US and Canada long distance for $69.00 which includes all taxes and fees. When you get the bill, it's $69.00. Their coverage is "okay" and I heard rumors that T-Mobile was looking into buying them out.

    8. Re:No international by CharonIDRONES · · Score: 1

      Ha, I know what you're talking about exactly! When I was looking for a new phone (I'm in Salt Lake City, Utah) there is a provider in our area called Cricket

      They basically offer unlimited everything for 'bout $45 and some change from taxes. And its all under no contract at all. I have unlimited local, unlimited long distances, and unlimited text and pix (which I use to send free ringtones to myself :)).

      Oh, they might be in your area too, because they are a subsidiary of Leap Wireless.
      Thats my two cents.

      -Brandom

    9. Re:No international by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Yes. In many countries, charges for international phone calls are a major source of revenue. They aren't going to give that up without a fight.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    10. Re:No international by toolo · · Score: 0

      Lingo Works great, $20 a month. Free calling to Western Europe.

  29. numbers wrong by igotmybfg · · Score: 1
    Flash is installed on more computers than any other program. Not only does Flash have a market share that dwarfs Windows and Java,

    This guy cannot possibly be serious!

    1. Re:numbers wrong by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      perhaps he meant .NET and java.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:numbers wrong by WoTG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not too far fetched, although I'd agree that "Dwarfs" is a little extreme.

      What's the Windows desktop market share? 95%?

      The vast majority of Windows and Mac systems have Flash player installed. I'd wager on 95% or more. And probably more than half of Linux and other OSS workstation boxes have Flash too.

      Now if you add in non-PC's, it's probably wrong. Java runs (albeit probably too slowly for voice) on a LOT of phones... and PDA's? Does Flash run on PocketPC yet?

    3. Re:numbers wrong by theoneknuckles · · Score: 2, Informative

      Flash has been on PDA's and PocketPC's for a few years now...

      http://www.macromedia.com/mobile/supported_devices /pda.html

  30. Investment by Morosoph · · Score: 1
    I'm guessing he has made an investment, too.
    Before he made the prediction, no doubt.

    I wonder if he still has this investment?


    Hmm. Maybe I'm just getting cynical in my old age...

  31. Read the ToS carefully.. by Myself · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You might find that connecting the cellphone to the bridge device contradicts some term in the contract. If they figure out that this is what you're doing, they might decide to hit you with $0.50/min for all the "breach of contract" minutes, or something similarly evil.

    The mobile-to-mobile minutes are free for two reasons. First, they don't have to pay a termination fee for moving the call to someone else's network. Second, it's a sales tool to get your friends to sign up. By doing this, you sabotage the second goal, and they'll try everything possible to make your life miserable.

    1. Re:Read the ToS carefully.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly would they find out?

  32. I'm freakin sorry.. by Iloveyouguam · · Score: 0

    But this would have been cool about 10 years ago. If you look around, there are many cell companies offer exuberant amounts of minutes for dirt cheap.

    Free minutes, pfff...thats nothing..

    I once ate a whole bag of habanerno's while traveling the Gobi desert with four blind Elvis impersonators, looking for some freaking buried treasure that an old Mongolian shaman oathed to me for marrying his hermaphrodite daughter-thing. Needless to say, the habanerno's didn't do the job and I ended up killing two of the Elvis impersonators over an argument about whether "Do the Clam" was Elvis' worst song in history. Freakin crack smokin monkeys. Cleavland Hotplate!

    Double moneys!

  33. Easy Solution by darjen · · Score: 1

    Just how long till someone does this on a large scale, by overselling the dedicated lines, and starts selling true unlimited cell plans?"

    I think the real question is, "Once somebody does this on a large scale, how long will it take for the cell phone companies to ditch free mobile to mobile?"

  34. The Opportunity Here by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The opportunity here is not for you to have a second phone tethered to your computer, but for some person to set up a bank of phones tied to broadband for each mobile phone carrier. If this person can manage to charge you less money and trouble than setting this up on your own, he (or she) has a new business opportunity.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  35. No good business model goes unpunished by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Technology seems to be increasing the economic efficiency of the marketplace by supporting a type of business model arbitrage. If somebody offers something for less than it really costs or is really worth, people use technology to quickly find a way to exploit it.

    For example, cell companies offer free in-system minutes to encourage friends & family to recruit new customers -- a nice little viral marketing ploy and something that, I'm sure, reduces stress in friends & family cell phone conversations. But it also creates an opportunity because those free in-system minutes are worth something if they can be somehow converted to out-of-system calls. Hence the motivations for this little hack.

    Or consider the case of the single-use video camera. The unit is offered at a subsidized price (less than the true price of the camera) with the expectation that the consumer will return the camera and pay for the DVD conversion service. With a bit of hacking, though, a person can get a low-grade digital video camera for only single-use price of about $20.

    Technology allows people to exploit these situations (and publish the results), much to the chagrin of the businesses that use these models. I wonder if this will drive businesses to a true pay-for-what-you-get mode of operation. No cell minutes will be free because it will be too easy to abuse free minutes. No single-use device will be as cheap -- it will require a deposit for the value of the asset.

    That technology allows people to use products and services in unintended ways will force companies to change their products or business models to either lock-out unintended uses or build in a charge for the cost of those uses.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:No good business model goes unpunished by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      That is a good insight.

      Though, it's not really that new. I remember back when AOL sent out free AOL kits that included a floppy disk, I wrote a script using macro.exe that would submit the kit request form a few hundred times.

      Sure enough, they mailed me a few hundred free floppy disks. Yes, peeling the labels off were a bitch.

      Not suprisingly, a month or two after that, they put a limit of something like 5 kits per month.

      I guess it's the same reason why sweepsstakes disclaimers are so long these days. Got to cover all those loopholes people found in the system.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:No good business model goes unpunished by claussenvenable · · Score: 1

      A good point.

      Worth noting:

      The consumer can't hack the PureDigital single-use video camera by a longshot.

      The guy who got the video off one did it by DESOLDERING the FLASH chip. Most EE's can't do that without destroying the chip, and virtually no one else can. Plus, the camera remains single use -- how many solder/desolder cycles is that chip gonna survive?

      The hacks on the old Dakota Digital cameras were great, since all you needed was a cable and some software. I have a few.

      But notice that those cameras remain on the market even with the attrition. It was almost in the noise financially speaking.

      The video cameras are obviously higher cost-of-goods, and are obviously better-protected. Dollars to donuts even the talented Mr. Maushammer will not successfully crack the video camera, nor even the still-camera-with-display. Meaning "he will not make it a *marketable* hack." Which is all well and good. It's simply too tough to be worth the trouble.

      Personally, there's no way I'd bother picking up a camera like this to "hack" it if the hack couldn't provide me with good functionality -- if I have to use a soldering iron to see my "free" videos, I'll pass.

      Kudos to Pure Digital for taking the RIGHT economic approach to preventing this kind of arbitrage:
      Instead of pursuing the obnoxious, expensive avenue of weak protection and litigation (a la DVDJon), they simply make it expensive enough to hack that it's just not worth it.

    3. Re:No good business model goes unpunished by farble1670 · · Score: 1
      companies do not care if their technology is exploitabl, as long as it's painful enough so that the average person won't exploit it, then no problems.

      in the case of your single use digital, nobody cares if 0.01% of the cameras get exploited. they aim to sell so many that it's insignificant.

    4. Re:No good business model goes unpunished by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suspect the opposite will happen, and they'll stop counting minutes altogether. Where I live, the cell cartel ($120 for 90 min/mo avg.) fell apart once the POTS phone company started offering unlimited wireless minutes for $50/mo (not including long distance, but I'm on an island so any long distance is international by definition). Once they crossed the line, the rest of the companies followed suit.

      I can't prove, but highly suspect, that per-minute calling is nothing more than milking the customer. I suspect that the reason there are free nights/weekends isn't because it's cheaper for the phone companies, but because the (cell)phone companies are extorting the fact that businesses and many people must be available during business hours, and have no choice but to pay per-minute fees. If unlimited-minute companies can get a foothold, or if even one major provider starts offering unlimited minutes, game on.

    5. Re:No good business model goes unpunished by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For example, cell companies offer free in-system minutes to encourage friends & family to recruit new customers -- a nice little viral marketing ploy and something that, I'm sure, reduces stress in friends & family cell phone conversations. But it also creates an opportunity because those free in-system minutes are worth something if they can be somehow converted to out-of-system calls. Hence the motivations for this little hack.



      Actually, they like getting an upfront fee in exchange for use of the network - the marginal cost of the minutes you spend talking for "free" to friends and family (n network) is negligable- they have teh capacity and it costs nothing to go form 70% to 99 % use. even if the use exceeds capacity they just drop or do not complete calls. The real cost is the large fixed cost of maintaining a network - leasng a tower costs the same wether or not it carries any calls. So giving you those minutes in exchange for an upfront fee is a good deal for them - any long distance is gravy. of ocurse, they've convinced customers that minutes should be sold by the batch - so they get some incremental income and are not likely to give that up - even if MetroPCS sells unlimited minutes for a fixed fee.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    6. Re:No good business model goes unpunished by Detritus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Telephone rates have been traditionally based on business use, which determines the peak usage and the cost of the switching system and number of trunk lines. The system is designed to provide a specified quality-of-service during peak usage. Since the business users determine the system cost, they get hit with the highest rate. Residential users use the capacity that was paid for by the business users.

      Usage patterns have changed over the years and the costs of switches and trunks have declined considerably. For a cellular system, the major cost is going to be the construction and maintenance of cell sites. Since the number of cell sites is driven by peak usage, we are back in the situation where those who use the system during peak usage periods are going to pay the highest rate. Nights and weekends can be cheap or free because of the unused capacity of the system during off-peak hours.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    7. Re:No good business model goes unpunished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The service cell companies actually have to offer is cell-based wireless network access. They mostly don't sell that service because consumers have no idea what it would be useful for, it's as if the mom and pop ISPs of this world had tried to sell "Subscription based point-to-point IP connectivity" instead of "the web" or "the Internet". So your cell company sells crazy stuff like the ability to make telephone calls at certain times of the day, or to send short text messages.

      However consumers are becoming more educated about buying basic network service. Five years ago few people knew that they wanted flat rate Always On internet access at home. In ten years time no-one will remember why they paid for "voice minutes" or "cross network minutes" on what is clearly a mobile outpost of the Internet. The poor will have PAYG one Mbyte = ten cents pricing, and everyone else will pay a fixed contract rate for say 100kbit/s subject to contention. (And yes, this means the rich will pay ten times as much and get only a marginally better service, as ever).

      Cell operators will compete on independently measured cell contention ratios ("Our newest cells in th Downtown area promise you less than 2:1 contention, or we'll give you $10 cash ** See service level brochure for details") and mobile devices will compete on ability to deliver in hostile environemnts (e.g. prefer fast over reliable during a live call, then do best effort to relay a higher quality version if the user wants to review what was said/ shown)

    8. Re:No good business model goes unpunished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "weak protection and litigation (a la DVDJon)"

      If you are referring to CSS, it was actually quite strong protection that took a breach by Xing to make the first breakthrough. It was brittle, but strong.

      To this day most DVD copiers prefer to have you use legitimate licensed software to play the DVD while the copying software snarfs the signal.

      You do DVDJon discredit when you say it was 'weak' protection. Adobe's pathetic DRM in the Elcomsoft case is a much better example of weak protection followed by overly strong response.

  36. or... by darp · · Score: 1

    the carriers can start offering free mobile-to-skype service...

  37. And that's the way it should be by galtenberg · · Score: 1

    Free when you physically jack in to the network, pay when you roam wirelessly. Sounds about fair.

  38. Another way by eugeneiiim · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Another way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap, you're laughing, but i'm so drunk right now I thought that's actually what this was about. As soon as I saw the name "Cringley", i was like, yup. this is going to be retarded.

  39. thank you at&t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already have an unlimited plan, thanks to an AT&T promotion when they first started doing gsm phones...

  40. Re:Wtf Lunix? by say__10 · · Score: 1

    Nice use of Something Awful to troll, +1 to something.

    --
    Home of the midwest loser - www.say-10.net
  41. +1 True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skype is 'cheap', but it is NOT 'free'.

  42. pssst...don't let the supreme court know.... by lanced · · Score: 0

    Hey, do you mind. With the Supreme Court rulings today (what did the doctors give Rehnquist anyway? I want some too), you keep talking like that and they may take away everyone's access to the internet AND ban our cell phones for the infringing use. Heck, they may even want to take away Fido because he was the reason you wanted to call home.

    Never doubt the creativity of a cheap computer geek with need for an expensive service. Hackers of the world unite...under the table!

  43. free? by justforaday · · Score: 1

    So "free" means I need to have two cell phone plans and a VoIP plan? Sign me up!

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  44. The potential is there. by kryptx · · Score: 2, Informative

    Working for an upcoming VoIP company, I can see where things are headed. Vonage is already connecting customers with WiFi phones. This means you have phone service, and you can use this phone anywhere there is a WiFi connection -- your office, Starbucks, or whatever.

    Since this upcoming VoIP company is an offshoot of a Wireless ISP, we also get to hear all the talk about WiMAX. Intel and Nokia are teaming up to implement it on a massive scale. Assuming that the frequency licensing does not become an issue, consumers will be able to purchase true nomadic high-speed connections (with speeds probably in the vicinity of today's mid-range DSL) for roughly the same price we pay today for our broadband.

    The obvious combination of these ideas is a phone that connects to a VoIP network over a nomadic WiMAX connection. $200 hardware, $50 for your internet connection, and another $25 a month for the phone service that you can take anywhere. As I posted above, at least one VoIP provider is offering unlimited international calling. Even if the rates for VoIP increase considerably, this is still well below the threshold for cost benefit.

    --
    Mods: Do you disagree with me? Go ahead and mod me down. Meta-mods will sort it out. Good luck!
  45. Verizon already prohibits this in their T & Cs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Verizon has a condition in their T&Cs of the service contract that prohibits a large amount of calls originating from any one cell site. I do not have the exact language infrom of me, but I recall it because it looked like they wanted to prevent the kind of issues that some GSM operators have in Europe with people buying accounts/GSM chips, hooking them to a specialized channel bank and reselling the call time to wholesale carriers.

  46. VoIP to GSM gateways exist everywhere by anticypher · · Score: 1

    There are a number of companies selling VOIP to GSM gateways, you can see them all over the GSM world (which is everywhere except the U.S.). The boxes hold from a single GSM phone, up to a 19" rack which holds 32 GSM phones.

    These boxes are the bane of every data centre in Europe. You walk around and see a cabinet with a few of these boxes, a single VOIP router, and hundreds of magnetic car mount GSM antennas around the inside. Any data comms equipment with 10 meters gets huge numbers of errors because of all the induced RF, servers nearby tend to randomly reboot, people who work in the data centres tend to have serious migranes, etc. When you get a few of these operators in a data centre, local GSM coverage is eliminated as they overwhelm all the local sites.

    The economic model makes sense, though. To terminate international calls on a mobile phone, the GSM provider tends to charge a huge amount of money, like US$0.75 per minute. One of these GSM gateways can hold many SIM cards per phone, and then the calls appear as if they are local. If the operator has a good bucket plan, like 1000 minutes for $10/month if your call is on the same operator, or free on nights and weekends, then the numbers start to add up quickly. One 19" rack box with 30 active phones can terminate 20,000 minutes per month, which at US$0.40 per minute profit is quite a nice paycheck.

    This is nothing new, but now someone has figured out a simple system for the stone-age american market.

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    1. Re:VoIP to GSM gateways exist everywhere by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "ou can see them all over the GSM world (which is everywhere except the U.S.)"

      Well, other than the fact that the largest wireless company in the US is GSM (Cingular), and the fact that nearly half of cellular users in the US use GSM, and the fact that the US is T-Mobile's 2nd largest market, I guess you're right. Having more GSM users than any European nation certainly doesn't qualify the US as part of the "GSM World".

      "stone-age american market"

      Are you talking about the "stone age" American market where there are two national 3G networks (CDMA2000)? Or are you talking about the one which has national EDGE coverage? Or the one which will be CDMA2000 1xEV-DO covered nationally by the end of 2005?

      "To terminate international calls on a mobile phone, the GSM provider tends to charge a huge amount of money, like US$0.75 per minute."

      That's why no one does this in the US - because we pay to recieve calls, the provider doesn't charge anything at all to terminate calls. It's like calling a normal phone.

      Not to mention that it's considerably easier to call within the country when you have states that are larger than most European nations. The US isn't as big as the EU, but it's considerably larger than any of the EU's member nations.

      Economics seems to be a good reason not to deploy a rediculously circuitous system, but what the hell - maybe we don't do it because we use "stone-age" GSM system that Europe uses.

  47. It's been done... by william_w_bush · · Score: 1

    This is news? I've been doing this for months with asterisk, bluetooth, and broadvoice sip. $50 a month for Tmobile 2 line service and you end up with unlimited nationwide and some of europe (wife is swedish).

    Is handy for when she's at school, but who wants to call that much from a cell? Especially considering quality, it's not really worth it for most people who don't run around that much, and tmobile's reception is spotty. Will be a lot better when companies start setting things like this up so cell's become roaming pbx extensions, they'll actually use the minutes.

    --
    The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
  48. I appreciate the ingenuity, but by jessecurry · · Score: 1

    ...Nextel offers unlimited everything for $200 a month, that's probably not too much more than the service for the two phones, plus it's much more convenient than having to go through Skype.

    --
    Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
  49. bah by macaulay805 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bah, I've been doing this for years. Two applications:

    1. Calling my Asterix box and having it forward to regular numbers
    2. Calling my Dial-Up Server and surfing the internet

    Although the DUN Server is a little slow (9600 baud), it still serves it purpose of retrieving email. I used to have unlimited text messaging on my cell plan, I could just send commands (ie shutdown -r now) to my servers, but that option got removed.

  50. The real way for free calls is... by VirusNamedCyrus · · Score: 1

    The real way for free calls is to wait other people call you.
    And don't forget cell phones can cause dain bramage...

  51. well, it's already been done basically, by your cp by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

    "Just how long till someone does this on a large scale"

    your cell provider already does this, prolly not w/ skype, but the same concept.

    The difference is they still charge you for the usage.

    pretty soon verizon will (be able to) own microsoft.

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  52. Misleading title but interesting idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of /.ers here don't seem to see the point.

    I'm French but live in the US and I use SkypeIn (with a French number) and SkypeOut which allow phone calls both ways for a very cheap price.
    This method would extend the concept to even receive and give phone calls to France (and in fact anywhere in the world) from my cell phone (= from almost anywhere in the US and without internet connection neither my computer) for the extra fee of the extra cell phone. A lot less than the price of a communication from a landline in France to a cell phone in the US!

    Of course, the problem so far would be the quality...

    1. Re:Misleading title but interesting idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A lot less than the price of a communication from a landline in France to a cell phone in the US!"

      I meant "a lot less compared to what I would pay for these calls directly to or from my cell phone" and not only ONE call, of course...

  53. for fucking real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how much is asshat.org paying this jagbag for his lowly opinions? i dont give a fuck, nobody gives a flying fuck. fuck you cringely.

  54. Re:I just tried this! Here is a transcript... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats nopt gibberish, thats portugese!

  55. Re:Per-minute charge? by vkirub · · Score: 1

    I guess the whole point of this sytem is being missed.

    Consider these....
    a) Not all countries charge for incoming calls.
    b) This system gives the cheapest way of POTS to POTS communication by using a VOIP bridge in between, thus taking out the most expensive piece.
    c) Cost of one Call now is
    (c2c cost one)+skype cost+(c2c cost two)
    c2c cost one, technically is free if planned properly
    skype cost, technicaly is also free
    c2c cost, technically can be free if planned properly

    There are quite a few limitations of this system, but is definitely a good start.

    d) Voice quality and Lag will definitely be a challenge
    e) There are legal challenges, in a few countries it is *illegal* to connect PSTN to IP network.

    --------------
    Are you sure a mile is only 1.6 km?

  56. Vonage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.vonage.com

    unlimited calls $25

  57. unlimited minutes by pontifier · · Score: 1

    I have an unlimited minute plan with Cricket for $35/month.
    I rarely call outside the state I live in, so I don't pay for long-distance on my phone. $5 extra give unlimited US calling. a few of my friends have the same plan and we laugh when we hear people complain about minutes or getting charged extra fees. our phones basically work like land line phones, and I know exatly what my bill will be every month.

    since I started using Cricket over 5 years ago I havn't paid a cent more than what I agreed to pay every month, and havn't had any problems at all. I will never go back to Sprint or AT&T, or get another limited minute plan ever.

    --
    -John Fenley
    1. Re:unlimited minutes by scforth · · Score: 0

      you wont be going back to AT&T Wireless because it doesnt exist anymore.

  58. Easy by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Until the Direct Connect (as Nextel calls it) system overloads and breaks down. It's already flakey during peak hours. More pie in the sky ignoring the limitations of a resource.

  59. Uh... Sip anyone? by weeeeed · · Score: 1

    What's up with that Skype hype? It's a proprietary protocol with lousy quality over crappy lines.

    Dedicated Cellphones.... skype... uh...
    How about using SIP and one of many subscription-free VoIP providers (FWD, Sipgate), an old box and Asterisk@home?

    You can not only call your VoIP friends, but also make cheap calls to regular phones, setup several VoIP providers in Asterisk.. you can buy a sub $20 modem card for connecting your home line to Asterisk and have voice mail and fax too...

  60. c2c2p2p2c2c = 16c^4p^2... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... I think that is the formula for crack, which Cringely must be smoking if he thinks this will be useful...

    I could be wrong about that formula.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  61. Even less free by mblase · · Score: 1

    Furthermore, not every carrier has free mobile-to-mobile; my Sprint PCS account only has free calls to other Sprint phones on the same family plan. And since that second phone costs $10 per month, not counting the cost of the plan itself, it's merely cheaper, not free.

  62. Unlimited Cell Plans!!! Wow!... by Caeda · · Score: 1

    How long? Um... I'm guessing about 3.5 years... IN THE PAST. Unlimited regional cell phone plans cost about $45. Some even give you roaming minutes for the rest of the country if you travel...

    --
    ~~ Please keep your arms, legs, and outright stupidity inside the ride at all times. Thank You ~~
  63. Other tricks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can drive around to different gas stations and claim the soda machine ate your $.50. You can take used batteries back to Walmart and claim they were dead when you bought them. You can eat half of your dinner at a resturant and claim it was bad. You can drive behind the grocery stores and get the aluminum cans from the almost secured trash area and return them for money again. You can call a grocery store and claim the milk you paid for was not in the bags. You could drive really close behind a large truck and save gas. You can share or split your internet connection with your neighbor.
    I consider these about the same caliber as his noted money saving tip and proably most of them would work better and net a larger gain for less effort.

  64. true unlimited calling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know i find it funny that he eludes to there not being any unlimited cell companies out there. when i used to live in sacramento there were 2 of them. 1 of them is in san francisco also and if expansion keeps on the way it is it may end up here in los angeles area in the next couple years. its also available in atlanta georgia and miami florida for those who live there. MetroPCS.

  65. sounds good to me by Heisenbug · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this will drive businesses to a true pay-for-what-you-get mode of operation. No cell minutes will be free because it will be too easy to abuse free minutes. No single-use device will be as cheap -- it will require a deposit for the value of the asset.

    If they also stop vastly overcharging for other services, I'd be all for it. Back-of-the-envelope, GSM voice bandwidth can send 60,000 characters per minute -- why does a 20 character text message cost the same as a minute of voice? Because that's what we'll pay ...

    If there was a cell provider who came out and said, we'll let you do anything you want with your phone, and charge you in direct relation to how much it costs us to provide that service, I'd sign up with them in a second. I'm tired of arbitrary overcharges, undercharges, weird marketing entanglements ... just let me do whatever I want and tell me how much it actually costs.

    Can this be done by Friday?

  66. GSM Player by tepples · · Score: 1

    Try listening to music being played down a GSM phone. That's just bizarre.

    Only because the phone runs the GSM Full Rate codec at too low a bitrate. Crank the bitrate up to 30 kbps, and music starts to sound decent. For example, I took a Smile.dk song, encoded it, decoded it, and got this. In fact, a popular homebrew application for Game Boy Advance uses GSM audio at 30 kbps.

  67. SmartMedia by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    Plus, the camera remains single use -- how many solder/desolder cycles is that chip gonna survive?

    Depends. The chip is electrically identical to a SmartMedia card, so (provided you can successfully desolder the chip) why not just solder on a SmartMedia socket?

  68. Not new idea.. just implementation... by sjs132 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We used to do this in the old school modem days with 3 way calling... you have no LD... Call a friend who did and wanted brownie points.. 3way modem to the latest hot download BBS... Or maybe it was the call forwarding... Anyways, been done before, its just a new implementation to use it with the Cell phone & then over IP..

    --
    --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
  69. how is this useful? by BobVila · · Score: 1

    SkypeOut costs money. Your cell phone basically just becomes an extension of the free level of Skype service. And on top of that you have to pay money for the cell phone. You are better off just using the cell phone as it was intended to be used. That is unless you are going to do something coll with the Skype part like AOTS's DittyBot.

  70. Already here, man by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    http://www.lingo.com/

    * Unlimited US, local and long distance calls
    * Unlimited to Canada and 17 countries in Western Europe
    * 26 calling features like Voicemail, Call Forwarding and 3 way calling
    * Keep your phone number, Emergency Calling Service and more...

  71. Weekly /. Features by hunterx11 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's really great to read about what Cringely has to say. But I think I also need to know what Dvorak thinks about this.

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  72. Skype to VOIP - Gateway by n01 · · Score: 1

    Actually a few weeks ago I was thinking about writing a Skype to VOIP gateway. That's because of an offer of 1und1.de of a calling 'flatrate' for around 10/month to any landline in Germany.
    If I had such a gateway, I would offer people free calls to numbers in Germany, maybe asking them for a small donation if they use it a lot, so I can cover my expenses.
    However, I didn't find any OS or free (as in beer) configurable VOIP client to connect this to... I've lookep a bit into the Skype API, and it seems connecting to Skype should work (one problem being that Skype needs to connect to a soundcard, so I would also need a 'virtual' soundcard, if I don't want to connect two soundcards together).
    What do you think of this idea, would you place a call through a Skype-VOIP-PSTN gateway (privacy implications...)?
    Maybe you know of a solution already?
    Kind Regards, Florian

  73. Red Box? by scovetta · · Score: 1

    Isn't this a form of a red-box? (or blue box, or cyan box, or whatever the color of it is?)

    Ahhh, nostalgia.

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  74. true unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Miami, and there's a company offering true unlimited for around 35 bucks.

    http://www.metropcs.com/

  75. why use cell to cell minutes? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

    join the free calls to your home phone number, and just setup a asterisk server routing over skype/vonage/iaxtell/whatever.

    Guess I already got this, I have asterisk at work, and a password to use the Companys toll free vonage line for all calls.

  76. Re:Just got a Cell phone by UCFFool · · Score: 1
    I don't care if my landline is tied up most of the time, I have a cellphone finally (just got my first a few months back)


    I'm sorry that the highpoint of your day after having a home ASTERISK setup is getting a low quality box to hold to your ear and generally inspire poor driving and useless conversation.
    --
    "The more pity, that fools may not speak wisely what wise men do foolishly" - Touchstone,Shakespeare's "As You Like It"
  77. Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So to get "free" calls, you need TWO cell phones, both of which you are paying minutes and connection on.

    I already get free long distance from cingular. In fact, since I got rid of my landline phone my phone bills are lower than they've been for years, as I don't use all my minutes, have free long distance and no roaming in two states.

    This sounds like selling dog food over the internet to me.

  78. You mean this by greyranger · · Score: 1
    1. Re:You mean this by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      No, that's what NoMoreNicksLeft means. What I mean is, take fwdout, except instead of people donating their phone lines they donate money (or internet connectivity at the node location). That money is used to pay for internet connectivity and a business line with multiple outgoing lines in the target city.

      See, my idea is to centralize it (per city).

  79. Might not be bad for cell companies by jgoemat · · Score: 1

    The reason they offer unlimited in-calling is because it is inexpensive to keep calls within their own network. When calling even local number, they have to access a trunk to the phone company. They don't have to do any work if someone wants to do this, and they get paid for two plans a month. Cell companies can only offer these plans though because the average use really isn't that much. At a company I worked for we offered an unlimited local calling plan that was a huge success. The only problem were a very small minority of customers that would actually use their cell phones up to 20 hours EVERY day. Maybe they were using them as baby monitors while they slept, or as phones in call centers, we don't know... Can you imagine the size of the tumor from 20 hours/day of use?

  80. Re:Per-minute charge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not sure how this creates anything but something stupid. This sounds like the biggest con ever??

  81. Re:No Data by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
    Don't Forget per kb data access billing.

    Those Bastards. I refuse to join these cell phone companies as long as they charge by the bit.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  82. As it should be by jtgd · · Score: 1
    I've long felt that cell phones should be nothing more than links to your home(*). I already pay $50/month for unlimited phone calling at home, so why should I pay again? I would do this, but instead of Skype, just use my regular phone. Makes perfect sense to me. In fact I'd say the cell phone comanies should support this feature.

    Oh...right...they're out to make as much money as they can. Darn.

    (* and I should be able to listen to my MP3 collection at home through my cell phone :)

    --
    J
  83. skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The VoIP is crap. When you do not say anything then it sounds like the other party has hung up. When in a busy area then background noise makes it very difficult to hear.

    Skype is a nice thing but it is not applicable outside w/ all the bqackground noise. Skype is a hype. I guess they are aiming for a IPO.