Slashdot Mirror


Battlestar Galactica Season 2 Premiere

fanblade writes "As if slashdotters needed another reason to stay home on a Friday night, the 20-episode second season of Battlestar Galactica premieres tonight at 10/9C on the Sci Fi Channel. The series, a 're-imagining' of the original 1978 TV series by the same name, made history as the highest-rated original Sci Fi Channel program ever. The first episode of the second season, 'Scattered', won't be televised in the UK until October, but I seriously doubt that will be a problem for the show that 'killed broadcast TV'. There's also excellent coverage on Wikipedia for those eager to brush up or catch up on the first season."

63 of 492 comments (clear)

  1. Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative
    Don't forget to tune in at 8/7C for the start of Stargate SG1 and Atlantis as well! SciFi is running THREE FULL HOURS of rockin' new shows today! From their site:
    08:00 PM STARGATE SG-1 (SEASON 9) AVALON - PT 1
    09:00 PM STARGATE ATLANTIS (SEASON 2) THE SIEGE - PT 3
    10:00 PM BATTLESTAR GALACTICA (SEASON 2) SCATTERED
    And if you miss it the first time, you can tune in immediately afterwards to catch the same linup again!
    11:00 PM STARGATE SG-1 (SEASON 9) AVALON - PT 1
    12:00 AM STARGATE ATLANTIS (SEASON 2) THE SIEGE - PT 3
    01:00 AM BATTLESTAR GALACTICA (SEASON 2) SCATTERED
    My only question is, what's up with the Friday slots? Aren't those slots where shows usually die?
    1. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 3, Insightful
      My only question is, what's up with the Friday slots? Aren't those slots where shows usually die?

      I think it depends on the demographic you are after. I don't think they are shooting for 18-24 year partiers;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Atlantis sucks...
      the acting is on par with B-movies like "The Toxic Avenger"


      Are you kidding me? How can you not like Dr. McKay or Dr. Zilenka(sp?)? Especially when McKay gets on Sheppard's case about playing "Captain Kirk" with the alien ladies? Or when Zilenka gives his whole speech (in Polish, no less!) about Atlantis rising from the deep? ("You didn't say anything classified, did you?" ... "Classified?")

      Atlantis is great entertainment! Sure, it's not a gritty drama like BSG, but that's okay. Too much drama makes one depressed and boring. Try enjoying the lighter side of entertainment every once in awhile. :-)

    3. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by angrist · · Score: 4, Funny

      It works out great for me at school:

      8:00 - SG-1 starts, sit down and crack a beer
      8:30 - Commercials, order delivery for diner (mmmm dumplings), beer #2
      9:00 - Atlantis starts, food arrives, beer #3
      10:00 - BSG starts, throw leftovers in fridge, beer #4
      10:30 - Commercials, change into 'outside' clothes / brush teeth, etc. beer #5
      11:00 - Sci-Fi friday over, full stomach, nice buzz, ready to hit the town

      All in all it's not a bad routine for a friday, not that much in the party scene at school gets going before 10:30 - 11 anyway.

    4. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

      I watched BSG once. Perhaps I just caught a bad episode, but the pseudoscience was running really thick. The ships were on a desparate and mostly futile search for water, checking starsystem after starsystem for it; it was the plot of the entire episode. You know, H2O - the third most common compound in the universe (after H2 and CO), made of the most common element and the third most common element, which both in spectral observation of other star systems, direct observation of our own star system, and all theoretical models lies on the outside of almost every solid surface of every solar system, from the tiniest of comets to huge icy moons to even the cores of outer gas giants (not that the latter case would be useful, but just goes to show how common it is). About the only place in the universe where water *isn't* is inner planetary systems, which are often too hot for it to remain solid (or, rarely, liquid), in which case the planet may or may not be able to prevent it from losing the water vapor to space. Of course, even in such situations, oxygen is abundant in Fe*O*, SiO*, CO*, etc, and hydrogen is everywhere, and you merely have to burn the two at a rate of your choosing...

      But ignoring the difficulties of separating oxygen, you don't need to; water is everywhere that's not too close to a big star, abundantly, on the surface of bodies of all sizes, extending miles deep or all the way through.

      --
      "/etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit is a gimp plugin and must be run by the gimp in order to be used."
    5. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 4, Funny

      That depends. Is your fiancee a robot?

      And if so, does she use her powers for good or for awesome?

    6. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I watched the first Star Wars movie too, and maybe I caught a bad 5 minutes, but the space ships that fly like airplanes was really thick pseudoscience.

      (never mind that the story doesn't depend on how the spaceships move).

      Give BSG a chance. It's the best SciFi that I've seen this DECADE.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    7. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Funny
      My only question is, what's up with the Friday slots? Aren't those slots where shows usually die? I think it depends on the demographic you are after. I don't think they are shooting for 18-24 year partiers;-)

      Well, back when I was 18 to 24. I didn't leave the HOUSE until 11pm. Now that I am older and wiser, I have trouble staying awake past 10pm.

      Oh, Sci-Fi Channel, Why do you do this to me???? Change the time slot to 9pm! Then I can stay awake.

    8. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by PreviouslySeen · · Score: 3, Informative

      11:00 - Sci-Fi friday over, full stomach, nice buzz, ready to hit the town

      Sounds like an ideal evening. However, at my age, I substitute "bed" for "town", and add "If I can get the toddlers to bed before 8 at the beginning". :)

      --
      Meet the new sig, same as the old sig
    9. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by millahtime · · Score: 3, Funny

      Geeks don't have social lives and tend to stay in and watch these shows. I am one of them :-)

    10. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      NO, the plot of the episode was mainly about Sharon wrestling with the realization that she might be a Cylon, and that she might have bombed the Galactica. It's also about the Sharon #2 back on Caprica going back for Helo. Both are clearly Cylons, but the viewer is quite in the dark about why Cylons are doing altruistic things, and displaying evidence of conscience.

      Oh, and by the way, they're thirsty too.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    11. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by fimbulvetr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Could it be argued that they were looking for water in mass quantities, and they needed it soon?
      They had about 50,000 people that needed water. I don't disagree that water is common, and it could have been manufactured, but is harnessing some water from, say, one comet going to be enough for the 50,000 to replace their tanks of 60% they lost.

      To quote TFS:
      "Baltar: I've calculated that the rate of consumption regarding basic foodstuffs for the civilian population, this is based on information available to me at the time. The current civilian population of 45,265 will require, at minimum, 82 tons of grain, 85 tons of meat, 119 tons of fruit, 304 tons of vegetables and... 2.5 million jps of water."

      According to TFS, that's per week. Galactica lost 10million jps from the explosion. I don't think comets or even manufacturing could have cured the thirst.

      P.S. I don't know what a jps is, or even if it's a real term. I assume it's fake and that it's roughly equivalent to a gallon.

    12. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by the+unbeliever · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, but we have the facilities to do so and we're not being hounded by a race intent on our imminent demise.

    13. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by hazem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, you have to remember, this is a fleet of whatever ships that happened to survive, with a flagship that was about to be retired. Equipment for water processing is somewhat a limited resource - note how many of the ships relied on Galactica for water replenishment.

      So, sure, water in some form is abundant in space/planets, etc. But they need water "now", and probably dont' have facilities to collect hydrogen/oxygen to make water, or to do a "moisture vaporator thing" - they had to support some 45,000 people - they had to get it fast, and worry about being caught by cylons on top of all that.

      Hell... the colonel was upset that the water they found was salty - aparently they couldn't deal with even that.

      So now you're on a search for potable water - and that has to be much more rare than water in any form. And it has to be in large quantities - and somewhat accessible in a quick manner.

      I mean, imagine you're just 100 people, crashed in eastern Afghanistan, and you're being hunted by Taliban. Oh yeah, and you don't have enough water to get anywhere. So, sure, you could set up all kinds of ways to collect water - even in an erid environment. But, few of those will lend themselves well to being on the run and resource-poor.

      It's really not that much of a stretch.

    14. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by captain_craptacular · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know you're on a rant and I hate to slow you down but I'll try anyway. The galactica uses old fashioned phones with wires quite on purpose as a low tech but highly effective answer to technological warfare. It's much much harder to jam/intercept/alter a signal that runs through a shielded wire than one that transmits via radio wave. I bet if you go look at a modern navy vessel it will also use hard wired communications onboard ship.

      Second, about the water. I hear what you're saying about water being plentiful, but there are any number of reasons why a large, relatively pure liquid body of fresh water is imensely preferable to what you'd find in asteroids etc... For one, it's one stop shopping. They don't have to spend precious time which they have none of to locate and mine H2O from a myriad of astral bodies. They don't have to mine squat actualy, just drop a hose and suck. It's very concievable that they didn't have the facilities avalable to extract H2O from any but the most simple source.
      Think of it this way: When people first started extracting oil from the ground they looked for shallow sources of "clean" low sulphur low byproduct oil. Because the technology wasn't available to locate, extract, and refine anything else. Today they can drill miles vertically and horizontally and modern refineries can extra useable product from the nastiest of crude. The same can be said for water. Without sophisticated extraction and filtering equipment we wouldn't be able to use a large % of the water we use now because it's located miles underground in aquifers and needs to be cleaned by high-tech ultra efficient filtration systems. Now imagine that Galactica didn't get lucky enough to rescue a Britta(TM) FilterShip(TM) when they were running from the cylons in the first episode...

      In other words, they needed easy water because they hadn't the time or the equipment to deal with the hard water...

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
    15. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by tm2b · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't need to lecture me on how common water is. I have a freakin' degree in physics with a focus on cosmology.

      That's not the point. Again, you didn't pay attention.

      They needed an atmosphere to support the manual labor they needed to operate the cobbled-together systems - they didn't have the automated equipment. That is what put them in the risky political situation of having to convince the convicts to cooperate and provide a labor force to purify the water before they put it into the ship filters, which were designed only to remove human-generated pollutants.

      It's not about the water per se, it's about the labor-intensive processing pipeline they were stuck with and the water being in the environment they needed into order to support that pipeline.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  2. The classics preventing innovation? by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Lately there has a been a resurgence of classic sci-fi shows, such as this and Dr Who. While it is great to see younger audiences exposed to such fantastic television programming, I have to wonder what effect this will have on new sci-fi shows. Will we just keep rehashing the old (but classig and very good) series, or will new ideas and new series be able to develop? Will enough resources be spent by the networks and studios to promote the creation of new series, rather than just cloning the previous ones?

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:The classics preventing innovation? by Wubby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I generally agree your point about rehashing old shows into todays fodder, and not just scifi. Movies can't seem to come up with anything new either.

      BUT (huge but)

      This show is the exception. After watching this, seeing the old show would be like watching a disney version of "A Clockwork Orange". The new BSG is so much more than the old show. I'm sorry, Glen Larsen had great ideas, but the production never lived up. This is how the show should have been done from the beginning! Dramatic, epic, lots of intrigue and suspense.

      And I don't think Dr. Who is a remake. More of a continuation. There have been, like, a bajillion of those guys. I think the BBC just took it out of mothballs and brushed it off. Kinda like what "Enterprise" was to "Star Trek".

      --
      Sig
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars
    2. Re:The classics preventing innovation? by Golias · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to mention that the Chicago vistas (presented as "Gotham City") are a great alternative to the constant New York/Time Square vistas we always see in movies.

      Reading the old comics, I always imagined Gotham as a Great Lakes city along the lines of Detroit or Chicago, rather than New York. I think there was a reason why DC chose to use fictional cities like "Metropolis" and "Gotham." I never thought they were supposed to be nearly as directly analogous to LA and NYC as some people choose to think.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:The classics preventing innovation? by xstonedogx · · Score: 5, Funny

      don't know what I will do without Richard Dean Anderson's (Jack O'Neil) comedy :-(

      It's O'Neill. Two L's.

    4. Re:The classics preventing innovation? by JWW · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Kinda like what "Enterprise" was to "Star Trek".

      Yeah, except Dr. Who doesn't suck.

  3. Favorite complaint by Magnusite · · Score: 5, Funny
    My favorite complaint about the series (I haven't seen it) came from a friend of mine the other day.

    "Starbuck is supposed to be a womanizing man, not a womanizing woman!

    1. Re:Favorite complaint by angrist · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Starbuck is supposed to be a womanizing man, not a womanizing woman!

      The problem with that change being .... ?

    2. Re:Favorite complaint by WAR-Ink · · Score: 3, Funny

      I am firmly in favor of equal rights. We should not discriminate due to race, gender or sexual preference. You should be more open minded.

      I also believe in our right to watch it on film.

      Maybe with that blonde Cylon chick...yeah...

    3. Re:Favorite complaint by jmelloy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Katee Sackhoff has said that if the ratings ever flag, she's willing to do her part by getting in a fight with Six in a bikini.

  4. Nothing new under the sun... by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Did you hear that Shakeswhatever fellow is remaking the "Tragicall Historye of Romeus and Juliet"? And that was already a remake of "Mariotto and Gianozza", fer chrissake.

    I wish these London playhouses would spend enough resources to bring in some truly creative people and get some new ideas rather than just rehashing the same old stories over and over and over again. I mean, really, how many more beatings can this dead horse really take?

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  5. Tape Atlantis, so you can skip the bad parts by FirstNoel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Atlantis is much better if you don't have to sit through all the dreadful acting. You can usually cut out half a show or more and still get the general idea of what happened.

    I'm waiting till about season 3, if the crew hasn't gelled by then it will be off my list completely.

    Sean

    --
    "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
    1. Re:Tape Atlantis, so you can skip the bad parts by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Had I mod points, you'd be getting one of the good ones. But the acting isn't as bad as the writing. It's just lazy most of the time. Someone comes up with a somewhat interesting plot idea, then they hand it off to someone painfully boring to write filler around it. I could write better dialogue if I hadn't slept in days.

      Also, the Wraith are the most boring bad guys ever. They're entirely, "Aargh, we're miscellaneously evil! Aaaaaargh!"

      Sadly, they occasionally spit out a pretty good episode, so I can't give up on it entirely. Also, I have nothing else to do.

    2. Re:Tape Atlantis, so you can skip the bad parts by OS24Ever · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The thing I dislike about both the stargates is they take 50 min to build up the 'problem' and have a quickie 10min solution at the end. I hadn't watched the stargates in a while until Atlantis premeried and I was interested in the premise.

      I've watched season 1 and whatever seaon it was of SG1 and after 20 episodes or so of it that was the conclusion I came too.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  6. Podcast commentary by tycage · · Score: 5, Informative

    Also, don't forget the Podcast of commentary that is available for the episode.

  7. Friday night at 10?! by mapmaker · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's almost like they want us to download the torrent instead of tuning it to watch.

  8. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    this site really is news for nerds!

  9. am i the only one? by djdavetrouble · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Season 1 was so dark and depressing that I could only make it through the first 3 episodes. Thankfully I found dr who to fill my sci-fi fix. Also the 'verite' style camera work didn't work for me.

    --
    music lover since 1969
    1. Re:am i the only one? by mbrewthx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well when your entire civilazation is decimated it tends to be dark and depressing, or maybe I could be wrong.

      --
      __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
  10. Galactica 1980 by topgeek · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't wait for the "reimagining" of Galactica 1980...oh wait, yes I can.

    --
    Geek Of The Day, "A geeky place for geeky faces."
    1. Re:Galactica 1980 by Flounder · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if they have the bikes. Can't have Galactica 1980 without the bikes.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  11. Who Cares? by eno2001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I Won't be happy until I see the new series of Doctor Who premiered in the U.S. Canadians are lucky because they've already seen Doctor Who 2005 series 1 and they're slated for series 2 as well. We have to suffer the crap that our networks spew at us and SciFi is certainly no saviour. They program the worst SciFi (all action masquerading as science fiction) I've ever seen in my life. I mean, come on!!! Mansquito? Give me a f*cking break! Where is the thinking man's SciFi channel? I'm sick of all these macho programs that SciFI puts on claiming to be science fiction. Science fiction is not about wars, and guns and action. It's about using your mind and technology to solve problems in a world that is almost but not entirely like your own. Philip K. Dick did the best science fiction and SciFi repeatedly shits all over his stuff.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  12. vivid memory of childhood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That night in 1978 that Battlestar Glactica premired, they were showing the movie King Kong on another network. It was a very big night for tv when I was kid. But then disaster struck:

    They interrupted both shows because Isreal and Egypt were signing a peace agreement. And my mom sent me to bed.

    Egypt and Isreal had been fighting for hundreds of years... couldn't they have waited one more day? Think of the children.

  13. It almost makes me want to watch TV again by gearmonger · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "As if slashdotters needed another reason to stay home on a Friday night..."

    Ouch, that hit kinda close to home.

    Of course, with TiVoToGo, "watching TV" is just another label for me sitting in front of my laptop. *sigh*

    But seriously (?), the new show is excellent -- give it a try if you can find the spare hour here or there.

  14. Dammit! by cavemanf16 · · Score: 2, Funny

    My frickin' MythTV box isn't up and running yet!!! I've still got to recompile the kernel three times, reinstall lirc drivers twice, and then wipe the drive and reinstall Gentoo all over again before I can successfully record BG for my Saturday morning viewing pleasure!!

  15. Can I pick this up... by Skynet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Without having seen the first season (yet)?

    I've heard nothing but good things about this show and I want to start watching it!

    --
    Execute? [Y/N] _
  16. Wikipedia Page Trashed by excyl · · Score: 4, Interesting
    /. flamebait have already trashed the wikipedia page linked in the news post. It now contains an attempt to spoil the latest Harry Potter book for those that care.

    Maybe we should try locking any wikipedia pages before actually releasing the news post into the /. wild?

    --
    --Excyl
  17. Re:Season 2 SPOILER WARNING! by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 2, Interesting
    (whispering): Adama is a Cylon! ...

    PS: I think the Cylon meant Apollo.


    I think the Cylon meant either Zack (Apollo's brother) or Bill Adama's wife (Apollo's mother). I would expect that either would screw with a few heads.
  18. Friday's are throw away slots by hellfire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A lot of factors go to the social makeup of who watches TV throughout the week. I think however the factor that sci-fi tapped into that's not sociological is the fact that all the other networks put crap on friday anyway.

    On the other days there might be good shows a geek wants to watch. Don't make me pick between galactica and CSI, that would kill me to have to chose only one or the other. CSI wins out over stargate in my mind too, so why pick a fight you can't win?

    So given a choice between crap and a fine sci-fi show, I'll pick sci-fi thank you. It makes the choice as to what to watch a lot easier for sci-fi fans who actually like more than just sci-fi.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Friday's are throw away slots by maxpublic · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't make me pick between galactica and CSI, that would kill me to have to chose only one or the other.

      Good geeks know of this mystical device called "the VCR", which can record one show while you watch another. In fact, just about everyone knows about the mighty VCR, and owns one to boot!

      But even better geeks know of "BitTorrent", for those times when you forget to set the VCR. Or for catching up on shows that you didn't clue in on until the second or third season. This is how my wife and I got up to speed on West Wing, Alias, and yes - even CSI! Without BitTorrent to provide the seasons we'd missed (not big TV fans) we'd never have watched the shows on regular TV. We hate jumping into shows mid-stream.

      Of course, we didn't bother with BitTorrent until BSG aired in Britain. That was the straw that broke the camel's back for us. But once we took the leap...well, there's really no going back. We watch more TV now than we have in decades. If we happen to miss an episode, so what? We can always catch it with a download and be on track again before the next week's episode airs.

      No doubt the network goons will soon be kicking in my door for these public admissions. It won't matter that we watch MORE TV now, only that we've used BitTorrent in acts of "piracy"....

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  19. Budget by 1ivewire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If only Stargate had a budget like Galactica, then we would really see some great sci-fi. As it stands, we have to watch a show that must conserve their gate splash scenes to cut costs.

    It still doesn't get any better than Sci-fi Friday.

  20. A Geek's Wetdream... by h2d2 · · Score: 2, Funny
    • 2 Stories Bashing MS
    • 1 Story Bashing SCO
    • 1 Story Commending OSS Unity
    • 1 Story (Unrelatedly) Linked Star Wars

    All we needed was one on Battlestar Gallactica... thanks Slashdot!!!

    --
    Mozilla stole tabs from NetCaptor. So what? Right?
  21. The Weapons are realistic by dmh20002 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One thing I really like about BSG is that the weapons are realistic and the visual effects are outstanding. The missile salvos are really really cool. Unlike Star Trek, Star Wars and SG-1, the BSG folks use guided weapons. In those other shows, in the future, the engineers have forgotten how to make guided or tracking weapons. They just shoot stuff randomly and most of the time they miss. The Stargate Atlantis finale from last season was a prime example. The marines show up with 'rail guns' that they are so fracking proud of. But then they just spray out into space with no radar tracking or anything else, hitting nothing. Jesus, a 20th century Phalanx is way better than the crap they have.

    Oh, Babylon 5 was one of the few good ones also. The way they tracked the beam weapons and sliced things up was believable and cool.

    1. Re:The Weapons are realistic by CompressedAir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmmm... because every SAM fired at an aircraft always hits? Because the radar guided AAA in the Gulf or Vietnam brought down a plane with every shot? There's such a thing as countermeasures, you know. If the Wraith have the technology to decoy your guided missles, which they certainly do, you are better off using weapons that at least go where you point them.

    2. Re:The Weapons are realistic by I8TheWorm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just for clarification, Star Wars was A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  22. Re:Confused about the HD version...? by BillBrasky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I re-watched an episode in HD on Universal HD.

    The problem I had with the HD version was that the '3-rd person' camera effect they use to simulate the viewer 'spying' on the action is too shaky to watch on a large screen!

    Seriously, I was getting dizzy watching it on my projector (about 110"). I never noticed it at all on the 27" low-def screen my TiVo is hooked up to.

    Well, maybe it's more of a function of large screen than HD per se, but I haven't justified replacing the small TV with a hi-def unit yet :)

  23. Galactica is a bit better (SPOILER-Season 1) by katharsis83 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually prefer it this way.

    I've watched some Stargate Atlantis, but could never stick with it. There's no moral ambiguity in the show; the main character, the Colonel, responds to everything with a clear-cut moral choice. Everything has to be done based on principle - no compromise with reality, and it always seems to work out in their favor.

    Battlestar Galactica portrays things in a much more "gray" way, forcing characters to make terrible choices where there's no morally superior answer (i.e. in "33" when they blow up the Olympic Carrier). This, mixed in with the Cylons looking like humans, feeling like humans, makes the entire of the show even more amigious, which is what sets it apart from most of the other shows on TV. There's no clear cut enemy - no clear "us" and "them," and thus, much more realistic. Even with the advanced technology/sci-fi nature of the show, it manages to portray human behavior/moral dilemmas much more realistically than the mainstream shows set in the present time on Earth.

    I'll paraphrase a quote I heard from somewhere, "I'd rather watch plausible human behavior in an implausible setting than watch implausible human behavior in a plausible setting."

  24. DVDs at Best Buy by stagolee · · Score: 2, Informative

    For some reason it's not too well publicized, but the Season 1 DVD should be available in about 2 weeks from Best Buy. Link to Best Buy

  25. Re:Is it on in Canada??? by BrianMertens · · Score: 3, Informative

    Good news, everyone! BSG Season 2 will be on in Canada, starting January 14th, 2006.

    That'll be just fine, as long as everyone on the internet promises not to talk about BSG on any forum or blog until then... okay?

    Arrgh. I think BitTorrent is about to become much more popular in Canada.

    --
    Why do I need a sig? I never post.
  26. Re:Proof there is life after ST- DS9 etc. by DudeTheMath · · Score: 2, Informative
    Sid has been working on the other side of the pond, including a guest spot in the second season of MI-5. Catch that series in the states on A&E.

    --
    You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
  27. Re:Timeslot by Dragon218 · · Score: 2, Funny

    that's easy:

    unplug it... oh, wait...

    --

    "It's the little touches that make a future solid enough to be destroyed" --William S. Bourroughs
  28. Reasons by BaudKarma · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't need a reason to stay home on Friday nights. I need a reason to go out on Friday nights, and there just aren't any.

    Besides, I'm this>close to getting my Tauren Druid up to level 34!

    --
    It's the land of the brave, and the home of the free
    Where the less you know, the better off you'll be.
  29. Re:Proof there is life after ST- DS9 etc. by ak_hepcat · · Score: 3, Informative

    (sorry, voice work isn't acting)

    Uh, as an actor who has done TV, movies, and radio, let me tell you that the people who do voice-only work _well_ are definately acting.

    In fact, they're often far better than people who don't do VO work. why? because the people who do it are used to telling the entire story, and showing the entire range of the character with... get this! ... _just their voice_.

    Hard to believe, but it's true!

    Just ask some real actors...

    --
    Support FSF: Stop thinking with your wallet, and think with your imagination. (cc/non-commercial)
  30. A Note to the "I HATE BSG" Crowd... by MrMagooAZ · · Score: 3, Informative

    Many of the more thoughtful notes that come under the heading of 'I hate BSG because...' seem to revolve around issues of not understanding certain basic concepts that were laid out in the mini-series. THE MINI-SERIES IS REQUIRED VIEWING! If you're willing to give it another shot, check out the mini-series on DVD first. It explains a lot of things. Also know that this is really complex TV. Some episodes leave me mentally exhasting when I think of the things they are talking about and how they relate to today's world. If you are looking to be spoon-fed, you might want to go elsewhere.

  31. Re:Dark and Gloomy by MrMagooAZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course it's dark and gloomy. For me, that's part of what makes it so great. It's REALISTIC in that reguard.

    In the show timeline they are only something like a month out from the END OF THE WORLD as they knew it. Try and put yourselves in their shoes. How much fun are you going to be having if your entire world has been destroyed, billions of people killed, and you're running for your very life from beings bent on destroying you?

    This is serious TV. I was left mentally exhausted by many eposides last season. They dealt with so many issues that have relevance to many topics in present day life.

    BSG is the best thing on TV, period.

  32. Re:Dark and Gloomy by MrMagooAZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow. I'm not even sure how to respond to that. If the world thought as you do, there would be no literature...no television...no fables...no dreams...nothing of any real value.

    There is a quote that goes something like 'the only thing new in this world is the history you don't know'...I think it's from Harry Truman.

    That can be exteneded to fiction. It gives us the opportunity to think 'what if' about a number of scenarios. You get to try things out, see an example of how people might react, see how it might play out. In the case where it applies to a real world scenario, you may have already seen the effects of what not to do, and take a different path.

    It's entertainment and it's educational all in one shot. How cool is that?

  33. Re:Podcast commentary == MP3 by Wheat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Podcast != MP3

    Podcast == Audio(mp3 or aac or ogg) + XML (RSS)

    The difference being that the podcast was automatically downloaded and synced to my iPod when I put it in the cradle last night.

  34. Not even science fiction by macraig · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not: it's science fantasy. The script is awash with mystical references that make me wanna puke. They might as well have reanimated C.S. Lewis and put him to work in a darkened back room writing script for it, and I don't care for the result any more than I did Lewis' books when I was a kid.

    Network TV will probably never have anything resembling SF ever again, but if this is the flagship that the Sci Fi Channel has to offer, I'll do without television altogether, thank-you-very-much.