Slashdot Mirror


New Google Homepage Features

SecularG writes "It seems that Google has added new features to it's Personalized Home. To edit the content of your personalized homepage you click 'Add Content' in the top right, and a list of options slide out from the left. You can add your own bookmarks, select from more news feeds, and add your own RSS news feeds." Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?

51 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. Obviously... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?

    It takes less bandwidth to see a dupe headline with RSS than it does when one reloads the entire slashdot mainpage. [rimshot]

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Obviously... by Electrum · · Score: 2, Informative

      But does /. ban google for hitting its RSS too often?

      Yes. I have seen that happen at least once.

    2. Re:Obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?

      Securityfocus, blogsites, infinite matter of the universe. I think being able to have your own home page with rss feeds is great!

    3. Re:Obviously... by mhearne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use Linux, and supposedly I can make rss work, but I haven't been able to so far, and I don't really care that much.

      There is something I think you may have missed - You can search for your own entry (or enter a url) if it isn't in Google's stock list.

      Just click on "Create a Section" at the bottom of the sidebar, and you will get a search box.

      I have already used it to add "This Day in History".

      Michael

  2. Countdown until Google.com looks like by 55555+Manbabies! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    yahoo.com. What a pointless and crowded web portal.

    RSS eliminates the need for web portals entirely. You can just use the RSS functionality of Safari for a home page, or make a local page with the RSS feeds you want to see.

    1. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by vinlud · · Score: 5, Informative

      The difference is this isn't google.com, but google.com/ig, a portal you choose to visit. If you're just googling you wont notice.

      --
      Repeat after me: We are all individuals
    2. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by anaesthetica · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I agree with your distaste for web portals. Still, portals remain quite popular, and I think Google is trying to tap into that area. Yahoo! still remains quite popular because it has portal features.

      On the other hand, I don't think that Google as a whole will turn into Yahoo!. The main Google page will likely always stay simple, whereas the personalized homepage is just for people who want portal stuff. The one advantage that a Google RSS/portal has is the same that Gmail has: everywhere you go, regardless of what computer you're on, it's the same interface and setup. You don't need to configure an RSS reader on each computer you use: just go to Google.com/ig. Same with Gmail.

      Also, the dhtml sliding options pane on the left is nifty, but I can't help but think that it's going overboard a little bit.

    3. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by learn+fast · · Score: 5, Informative

      yahoo.com. What a pointless and crowded web portal.

      use search.yahoo.com for a bare bones interface

    4. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by Ieshan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Okay. I understand the hatred for portal pages, but the truth is, lots and lots of people like them. Why? Because they can't just "make a local page with RSS feeds".

      That would be like taking your car into the mechanic with a transmission problem and having him scoff at you, "Pffft. Go build yourself a new one. Moron."

      The large majority of net users don't know what RSS means. They don't know HTML. Web Portals let people click on things and have a familiar feel to them. People only need to know one little address to get to a place where they can find "everything" on the web.

    5. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by rbarreira · · Score: 4, Informative
      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    6. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by adamjaskie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least Google is mosty simple text. Yahoo is covered in flashy pictures and stuff. Though, it used to be a lot worse...

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    7. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by revery · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you made the parent post's point for him...

    8. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by iabervon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As long as they don't put junk in the results pages, it doesn't matter too much. People with modern browsers tend to put searches into the browser's box, not go to a google page, and people with obsolete browsers generally need a portal to get RSS and such.

    9. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Feh. It's going to be really hard to be an elitist techno jerk with you people here always reminding us who the intended users of the product are!

  3. Gmail by daviq · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So they are just adding more of gmail's features too their homepage.

    --
    Go to the w3.org and put Slashdot.org through the validator.
  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. sorry but your browser is not supported by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 4, Informative

    Microsoft IE 5.5+ (download: Windows)
    - Netscape 7.1+ (download: Windows Mac Linux)
    - Mozilla 1.4+ (download: Windows Mac Linux)
    - Mozilla Firefox 0.8+ (download: Windows Mac Linux)
    - Safari 1.2.1+ (download: Mac)
    Many other browsers work with Gmail's basic HTML view, including:
    - Microsoft IE 4.0+
    - Netscape 4.07+
    - Opera 6.03+

    Konqueror users are still SOL

    1. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh no!
      Lynx users are SOL too!

      Seriously though, they did manage to make sure it works with 99.5% of all the web browsers currently out there. Nobody is forcing you to be that 0.5%.

    2. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by oever · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm using konqueror 3.4.1 with default authentication and the site works very well. It's amazing what google can do with javascript!

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    3. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's a side by side comparison of firefox and konqueror.
      http://img223.imageshack.us/my.php?image=omfgx1309 ea.jpg

      I use a 21" Sony Trinitron CRT at 1400x1050 at 112hz
      Be aware that jpeg compression makes the fonts in this snapshot look *much* worse than they are when live.

      This is *after* I tweaked Firefox to use the same fonts (Suse Sans 12).. They do NOT look the same despite that they are both configured to use the same fonts at the same resolution.

      I rest my case.

    4. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by Tack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Except for the size, they look the same to me. Same kerning, same antialiasing, same ligatures (observe the "ft" in "Lifts"). The fact that Firefox is rendering fonts smaller may or may not be a bug in Firefox. But have you tried increasing the font size in Firefox until they're the same, and then comparing?

      You may choose to use Konqueror for a list of valid reasons, but in terms of fonts, I think your case is far from rested.

    5. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by RedWizzard · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If 99% of the people like to eat spinach should I too be forced to eat spinach?
      No, but you don't get to complain when someone gives the spinach eaters a free gift either.
  6. Re:Top left by yotto · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is at the 'top left' here.

    He's talking about the computer 's right.

  7. A dud? by rueger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, I played with it for five minutes and couldn't see much use. It wouldn't let me fine tune the news feed to suit my needs, or at least not in an obvious way, and didn't display the accompanying pictures from news stories.

    For whatever reason it won't display the weather for my location (Hamilton ON). I don't particularly like the way it displays my g-mail info, and would like to change the arrangement and width of the blocks.

    All in all this one actually looks like a beta - dull, uninspired, and not fully realized.

    1. Re:A dud? by mboos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm in Toronto, and I can get the weather. What irks me though is the fact that the temperatures default to Fahrenheit. The current temperature also has a Celcius value (but it's secondary) and all the long term forecasts are in Fahrenheit. There is no option to change everything to Celcius. I was only taught Celcius in school, and was led to believe that Fahrenheit was left on the thermometers to appease the old-timers.

      This is the 21st century, people! Let's start using those SI units that everybody* has agreed on.

      *The States not included

      --
      --Mike Boos
  8. Re:Google not the innovator here. by malfunct · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been using features like this on My MSN for ages (2 or 3 years now). Its not that Google hasn't created something good (since I like My MSN a great deal) its just that people shouldn't always jump to the conclusion that they are always ahead of the curve.

    --

    "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

  9. Because... by pickyouupatnine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "... Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed? ..." .. Because replies like this one make Slashdot useless from time to time, and sometimes its fun to read what other sites like The Register and The BBC have to say ;).

    --
    _Vishal www.squad9.com
  10. awesome by fender_rock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    awesome, now i dont even have to search on google for my torrents if i can add the rss feeds!
    too bad limewire doesnt have rss feeds for its files...

  11. Not updated by Tyrsenus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To bad when you add /. to your homepage the news links aren't updated real-time. This article doesn't even appear as of the time I'm writing this!

    1. Re:Not updated by comwiz56 · · Score: 3, Informative

      That would be a matter of slashdot's RSS policy (30 min between checks), not Google's fault.

  12. Slashdot feed by soboroff · · Score: 5, Funny


    It's good to be reminded that Slashdot is a Technology, not a Lifestyle.

  13. Re:Google not the innovator here. by Momoru · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course when Yahoo did it, it didn't make Slashdot news. Don't worry, in a couple of month's people will start claiming Yahoo ripped that feature off of Google.

  14. highly editorialized? by supernova87a · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not complaining about Google's choices of feeds on the personalized homepage, because I actually like what they've offered -- but I can see how someone else might be offended at their editorial judgment. For example, (at least in the previous version, maybe also this one) the news choices were NYT, BBC, and other (generally) reputable sources. Now they also have Washington Post and others.

    But I can see how someone might see this as liberal bias. "Where's my Washington Times, or Fox News feed??" And then some people will complain the other way -- "How come I can't get my Democracy Now feed on the home page??"

    Maybe I just take the position that I like their choices and to those who complain about not having their own right-wing news feeds available, I say, go and create your own Google, losers. On the other hand, is it dangerous for one company to filter the available options so dramatically? You don't have to use their homepage, but when one provider is so dominant, you can't avoid issues like that...

    ps. I believe the page now lets you input your own choice of xml feeds...

    1. Re:highly editorialized? by Ingolfke · · Score: 3, Informative

      They've got the RSS option, so you can pull any data source in RSS that you'd like into the Portal.

      Fox News (US & World) RSS Feed
      Fox News RSS List

      The Washington Times appears to offer their headlines via RSS only to subscribers.

      Democracy Now

    2. Re:highly editorialized? by Morinaga · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There has been accusations of bias on both sides, for example here they claim Google shows a tendancy towards conservative bias, http://www.ojr.org/ojr/technology/1095977436.php

      This one claims liberal bias, http://google.blognewschannel.com/index.php/archiv es/2005/05/04/google-accused-of-liberal-bias/

      The truth is that Google news simply shows results that are more left and right instead of just stuff in the middle. I like to see this approach more than a homogenized result. http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050520-1325 05

      As far as staple feeds showing bias, well you can do an RSS search (called "Create a Section" on the bottom left) an add anything you like to your news feeds such as Fox News or whatever you care for such as a specific conservative blog. It's actually quite easy and simple to use. It avoids having to use a seperate RSS reader and removes some of the technical intimidation that RSS offers an average user. Just for grins I tried Shacknews.com and instapundit.com, both feeds worked like a charm.

  15. Re:Google not the innovator here. by kpwoodr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can you believe this? Yahoo has totally ripped off this way cool feature from google! They have this thing where you can add RSS feeds to your portal to get content from anywhere. Google has had it for a week, and now Yahoo! is jumping on the bandwagon. I'm not sure what this RSS thing is but I'm pretty sure google invented it. Man, they are the greatest company ever.

    --
    This sig has been removed pending an investigation.
  16. Re:How freaking difficult is this? by badfish99 · · Score: 4, Funny
    "It's" = "It is". The possessive is "its". Why is that so freaking difficult to grasp?

    Because it's illogical: most other possessives have an apostrophe. And a short survey of modern English usage (as seen, for example, on Slashdot) will tell you that the usage is changing: quite possibly the apostrophe in the possessive "it's" will be the norm in a few years time.

    Still, I'm glad you're not pompous.

  17. Re:Selling out (again)? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nah! If Google had bought Slashdot, they would have renamed it gDot.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  18. Add RSS capability to the Google toolbar by WordUpCousin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One feature I noticed on the new personalized Google site was that you can add your own RSS feed. Google should integrate this into their toolbar (like Yahoo's toolbar), in case some users aren't really sure how to find the RSS file associated with each website. Instead, the toolbar should recognize that an RSS feed is available and a button should appear stating something like "Add this RSS feed to Personal Google page".

  19. How do you make money with this? by quark007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given GOOG stock is at all time high, my question is how does Google plan to make money with these free products?

    Google can not really commercialize this portal with the fear of getting sued by the news media.

    Or does it think that by giving away these freebies, it would attract more users to their search engine which seems to be the primary source of all their profits.

    Can anyone justify the price for google stock?

    --
    - Sh!t
    1. Re:How do you make money with this? by base3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're going to make money selling dossiers on us to corporations, governments, and the rich. Imagine what a politician could do with the Google searches of one of his enemies and all his family members. Will this somehow be avoided? I doubt it, but only time will tell.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  20. You know what would be cool ... by roubles · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... if someone could write a firefox plugin to sync bookmarks to and from the google personal page. That way all my firefox instances will have a consistent set of bookmarks.

    Currently they have a plugin that syncs to an FTP server. This is cool but not everyone has a web-accessible ftp server handy. Everyone can, however, personalize their google account.

    -- /* no comment */

  21. Wiki's by r2q2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some people have community based wiki's that they might want to be updated on for recent changes.

    --
    My UID is prime is yours?
  22. won't work with customize google ff extension by frieked · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you are running the customize google firefox extension these new features will work very poorly or not at all depending on what preferences you have set. Just an FYI for anyone having problems.

    --

    I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
    -Xenocrates
  23. No it won't by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Interesting
    quite possibly the apostrophe in the possessive "it's" will be the norm in a few years time
    It won't. A certain percentage of people have been making this mistake for at least all of my lifetime and probably for many decades longer, but the standard has remained unchanged. It takes a quite a bit of hubris to claim that the mistakes you make due to ignorance or incompetence are going to become a standard.
    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  24. Ask Yahoo! by mlk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love it. Ask Yahoo on Google.

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  25. Re:How freaking difficult is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're stupid. The language doesn't change because some idiots get it wrong.

  26. Re:Google not the innovator here. by generic-man · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yahoo! also has the advantage in that they have integrated RSS into their search. Notice that a few of the sites have "RSS: ... Add to My Yahoo!" in the search results. Very handy.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  27. Re:Selling out (again)? by MynockGuano · · Score: 4, Funny

    It may yet happen...and in the meantime, we can say we're "Waiting for gDot".

  28. Re:Google keeps doing it. by stockpicker_dude_78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's amazing how short people's memories are ... just a couple years ago, everyone was saying Microsoft knew exactly what it is doing, and before that it was Yahoo knows exactly what it's doing. The question/challenge for Google is how it will react as a company when the stock price drops and there's no money to fun these free initiatives. It's hard to "do no evil" when you are trying to figure out how to lift employee morale, report profitability and retain competitive advantages.

  29. Re:Google not the innovator here. by generic-man · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can. You can't drag the boxes around (yet) but it's far more customizable than Google's. Yes, it has ads, but Google plans to add ads to their customizable home page too.

    --
    For more information, click here.