Slashdot Mirror


Reducing Plant Stress Leads to Martian Farms

Saint Aardvark the Carpeted writes "NASA is looking for ways to get plants to grow on Mars -- and surprisingly, reducing their stress is a good first step. By splicing genes from Earth-bound extremophiles into seeds whose descendants are destined for the red planet, scientists hope to breed plants that can handle the wide range of temperatures (pdf) that will be found on Mars."

152 comments

  1. SIGN ME UP! by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 1

    for some martain chronic, JEAH BOI!

    --
    time is a perception of a being's consciousness
    time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
    1. Re:SIGN ME UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, thats the first thing i thought of too. Great FP.

  2. Gibberish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is it just me or did that summary look like complete gibberish?

    1. Re:Gibberish by The+Lerneaen+Hydra · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the factualoty of the article in question, the use of Comic Sans in the diagrams does not instill much hope.

    2. Re:Gibberish by irtza · · Score: 1

      Maybe it would make more sense if the summary had within it this question?

      Yeah, but can the martian plant's run Linux?

      Maybe it didn't make as much sense because it had little to do with computers or censorhip... Topics that seem to dominate slashdot (not a complaint, just a statement of fact).

      --
      When all else fails, try.
    3. Re:Gibberish by EZLeeAmused · · Score: 1

      I don't know, it looked like a perfectly crumpulent paper to me.

      --
      Some see the vessel as half full; others see it as half-empty; We pour it out on the floor and laugh
    4. Re:Gibberish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant the slashdot post above.

      If I got that as an email, I'd assume it was Viagra spam.

    5. Re:Gibberish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posted by Zonk

    6. Re:Gibberish by drsquare · · Score: 1

      No it's just not a very good article. How about before working out how to grow plants on Mars, those scientists work out how to actually get people to Mars, or even the Moon. Or even a reusable spaceship which isn't falling to bits.

    7. Re:Gibberish by ediron2 · · Score: 1
      Um, given the zillion ways that a mars mission currently could/would become a death-trap, I think that
      1. doing this research, then
      2. launching a few unmanned craft that plant usable stuff on part of Mars
      seems a helluva lot easier than the prospect of watching/hearing the next Niel Armstrong whisper his dying words from 100M miles away.

      (now, let me my science and ethics hats back on, since I took 'em off to completely ignore the 'but what about the bad science or bad ethics of lazily overwriting an entire planet of exotic lifeforms just because we got all Johnny Appleseed on it'.) How about we work on both of them. I mean, instead of billions on better killing machines.

    8. Re:Gibberish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The imfamous "instead of scientists doing X, why not do Y" argument. Instead of wasting money on a bunch of Mars-related experiments, why not use the money to feed starving poverty-striken people here on Earth?

      Way to completely miss the point of science.

    9. Re:Gibberish by hedge_death_shootout · · Score: 1

      How about before working out how to grow plants on Mars, those scientists work out how to actually get people to Mars, or even the Moon. Or even a reusable spaceship which isn't falling to bits.

      YES - Work Smart - do everything in series, and get the biologists to design the spaceships.
      Pure genius!

  3. Does that mean they will start growing... by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

    the red weed???

    --
    I got nothin'
    1. Re:Does that mean they will start growing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Next day, the dawn was a brilliant, fiery red and I wandered through the weird and lurid landscape of another planet, for the vegetation that gives Mars its red appearance had taken root on earth. As man had succumbed to the Martians, so our land now succumbed to the red weed.

      Wherever there was a stream the red weed clung and grew with frightening voraciousness, its claw-like fronds choking the movement of the water. And then it began to creep like a slimy red animal across the land covering field and ditch and tree and hedgerow with living scarlet feelers, crawling, crawling.

    2. Re:Does that mean they will start growing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, that already exists.

    3. Re:Does that mean they will start growing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very true, I'm smoking some now...

  4. Solution doesn't need to be scientific... by RootsLINUX · · Score: 3, Funny

    I heard that singing to plants helps thenm grow and reduce their stress levels. Now all we need to do is to perform some experiments and figure out what type of singing/music genre provides the best stress relief. I'm thinking reggae would do the trick personally... >_>

    --
    Hero of Allacrost, a FOSS RPG for *NIX/*BSD/OS X/Win
    1. Re:Solution doesn't need to be scientific... by Shin+Chan · · Score: 1

      Something more along the lines of this came to mind:

      Little flower, I see
      You know the very place you must be
      Right there, blooming at my feet
      Perfect and complete
      Innocent and bright
      Each day you give yourself to the light

      You sway in any gentle wind
      And you bring such pleasure to my eyes
      You drink your fill of summer rain
      And I know this vision will not die
      Watching you bloom peacefully
      Sweet little flower
      You know where you must be

      Little flower, I pray
      That I may be like you one day
      So pure, the earth below my feet
      Perfect and complete
      Innocent and bright
      Each day I'll give myself to the light

      I'll learn to dance in any wind
      I will grow stronger and more kind
      I'll bless the sunshine and the rain
      Living on - and when I say goodbye
      Somewhere I'll bloom peacefully
      Sweet little flower
      I'll know where I must be



      Okay. Fine. I admit it, I Googled that.

      --
      Proud owner of BOT2K3 [ bot2k3.net ]
    2. Re:Solution doesn't need to be scientific... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking reggae would do the trick personally...

      Yes! Certain varieties of cannabis are very hardy. We could crash a satellite full of genetically-modified extremophile marijuana seeds on Mars. Then, when we finally get people there, paradise will surely await them! Brilliant! Sign me up!

    3. Re:Solution doesn't need to be scientific... by HazE_nMe · · Score: 1

      You should check out SonicBloom.http://www.sonicbloom.com/ They sell a foliar feed mixture that works best with a CD playing that they give with the fertilizer. The CD has a bunch of soft music playing with a constant high pitch noise that sounds a lot like a squeaky swamp cooler or crickets chirping. They have supposedly done some research with that sound and its effects on the stomata on the plants. Supposedly that sound will stimulate the plant to open the stomata wider than normal and absorb more foliar feed. A friend of mine has a greenhouse that he has been using SonicBloom in and he has noticed a significant increase in his production since using the SonicBloom CD. He is no longer using their foliar feed, but continues to use the CD. The noise is a little irritating though, so I wouln't use it for normal houseplants.

    4. Re:Solution doesn't need to be scientific... by future+assassin · · Score: 1
      Thats because you exhale co2 and speed up the plants metabolisim because it just absorbed the co2 from your breath. This could possibly hurt a weak or diseased plant even more since the plants metabolisim is sped up. So any disease or nutrient difficiences will show up quicker.

      Also plants produce Co2 at night and since Mars has high co2 levels we would have to design a plants that gives of less co2 at night?

      Or even better if we could clone some prehistoric plants they might grow better on Mars since earth probably had more co2 in prehistoric times.

      http://www.cannaculture.com/

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    5. Re:Solution doesn't need to be scientific... by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      Should also add that plants absorb oxygen through the roots. They will up take as much as you can supply it to them. To experiment take a fish tank airpump with and airstone, fill a bucket with water and submerge most of the roots in the water. Leave some of the root out as you coudl drown the plant. You'll see that the plant grows fine and it grows a humongous root system.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    6. Re:Solution doesn't need to be scientific... by banuk · · Score: 1

      reggae? smoking the plant doesn't help it grow

    7. Re:Solution doesn't need to be scientific... by ediron2 · · Score: 3, Funny
      I'm thinking reggae would do the trick personally...

      Yes! Certain varieties of cannabis are very hardy. We could crash a satellite full of genetically-modified extremophile marijuana seeds on Mars. Then, when we finally get people there, paradise will surely await them! Brilliant! Sign me up!

      ... and the astronauts won't care if they're stranded.

      ... and astronaut-volunteer rates will soar.

      ... ensuring mars will *never* attack us.

      ... the planet's residents will promptly petition for a namechange, from Mars to Eros.

      ... upon the colonial-ship's arrival, all communication stops abruptly. When it restarts, only two words come to Earth, repeated ad infinitum: "Send Munchies!"

      ... a haze quickly forms planetwide, CO2 levels soar, greenhouse effects kick in, and Martians-For-Global-Warming cheers lazily.

      ... Bob Marley's headstone takes off earth, self-propelled, and navigates toward Mars. Very 2001, mon.

    8. Re:Solution doesn't need to be scientific... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      lol... all excellent points!

    9. Re:Solution doesn't need to be scientific... by Associate · · Score: 1

      Guess it wouldn't be the red planet for much longer.
      But think about it. One hundred million miles away from any and everyone AND you can smoke up all day long.

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
  5. Martian-ijuana by VeganBob · · Score: 0

    So... they want to grow marijuana on Mars?

    --
    Being funny is my sig nature.
    1. Re:Martian-ijuana by ZeroZen · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you read the PDF, it says a bunch of students dressed up in NASA labcoats want to grow tobacco on mars.

      TOBACCO. Can anyone else see how this is going? NASA gets brought down by the republicans, Phillip-Morris buys the SpaceShipOne outfit, and grows tobacco on mars!!!!

    2. Re:Martian-ijuana by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      Philip Morris is now called the Altria group. What a lame way to escape responsibility of a tainted image. Well, not so easy, I'll go around being a loudmouth making sure everyone knows the new name. What's in it for me? Well, some things are just not right, and if nobody speaks up, then what happens?

  6. Until the Reds start a war... by Pacifix · · Score: 1

    ...splintering the first 100 and causing the transntaionals to crack down. And don't get me started on the great Earth flood. I think stressed out plants on Red Mars (or Green Mars or Blue Mars) is the least of our worries...

  7. Kudzu by Reverend528 · · Score: 4, Funny

    We should send a bunch of kudzu to mars. That stuff will grow anywhere.

    1. Re:Kudzu by phpm0nkey · · Score: 1

      If the human race has any sense of responsibility, we'll blow up the earth before letting our kudzu escape to other planets. That stuff's worse than the Flood!

  8. possible priority question? by CdBee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not criticising.. but surely research into plants that can take extremes is of more short-term utility in creating species which can suck up and withhold pollutants as part of a clean-up operation for Earth than in sustaining the "great-post-armageddon-earth-bug-out" destination?

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:possible priority question? by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "...but surely research into plants that can take extremes is of more short-term utility in creating species which can suck up and withhold pollutants as part of a clean-up operation for Earth"

      Who's to say the research won't find its way in that direction? It's not NASA's job to rid the world of pollution. Funny thing about research is that the more diverse it gets, the bigger toolbox this civilization has to fix other problems.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:possible priority question? by Zackbass · · Score: 1

      I'll make sure to get your suggestion to the single scientist working in this obviously neglected field of study.

      --
      You gotta find first gear in your giant robot car
    3. Re:possible priority question? by vidarh · · Score: 1

      See, it is actually possible for 6 billion people to focus on more than 1 thing in total.... And besides, if you RTFA, you might have noticed some of the other uses for their work: Breeding plants that can handle more extreme conditions on earth, such as surviving longer in drought stricken areas. I think the people living in sub-Saharan Africa for instance would put that as far higher priority than withholding pollutants.

    4. Re:possible priority question? by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

      I'd like to talk to you about your sig but there isn't any other way to contact you but this one. Sorry everybody...

    5. Re:possible priority question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not criticising..

      Except you are...

    6. Re:possible priority question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't support Apartheid in S.Africa so why should I accept it in Palestine?

      You're confusing apartheid with ethnic cleansing. What the Israelis are doing is much more like what the Serbians did than what the South Africans did.

    7. Re:possible priority question? by ndogg · · Score: 1

      You must be of the "let's merge KDE and GNOME" camp.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    8. Re:possible priority question? by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      I'm not criticising.. but surely research into plants that can take extremes is of more short-term utility in creating species which can suck up and withhold pollutants as part of a clean-up operation for Earth than in sustaining the "great-post-armageddon-earth-bug-out" destination?

      I'm not criticising ... but that isn't the job of NASA.

      As far as what you are talking about, it is called phyto-remediation and is done by *gasp* companies/agencies that specialize in cleanup activities. Do some searches on phytoremediation for more information.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    9. Re:possible priority question? by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      This is a significant article - in 100 years time it could well be one of the first postings on the net for the creation of forests that now carpet mars ( ok these forests may consist of large purple leathery leafed things 2 cm high - but forest sounds much more interesting).

      Not to mention the fact that in 400 years time we live in bioengineered tree houses and 75% of our food is grown in the ocean - as this has the least deleterious impact on the environment.

      This is a tremendously exciting direction for research to be going - it has no connotations of screwing up our existing environment and it looks like Mars has little existing biology going on on it - so why not create an ecology on Mars? Fantastic!

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    10. Re:possible priority question? by -kabammi- · · Score: 1

      This research is already part of a massively well funded body of life science research going on today. Plants, fungi and bacteria are all being engineered to act as biological cleaning agents to:

      a) extract lead, cadmium and copper from soil
      c) extract oil from water
      d) extract heavy metals from water
      e) extract air pollutants from air

      The potential for companies to generate plants to clean up their own "acts" as well as after-market plants which perform these jobs to other companies and even the general public is massive. Imagine pitching a rose which just looks nice, or a rose that looks equally as nice - but also is better for the environment because it breaks down carbon monoxide or breaks down CO2 twice as efficiently, helping the greenhouse emission problem?

      Those decisions make financial sense, and that sense has been inacted now for over 10 years. Genetic engineering using exactly the same techniques as used here (with Agrobacterium used to generate transgenic plants expressing particular genes), or selective breeding for specific genetic traits, are two methods being used to generate plants that act as growing living biological cleaning agents, and this is already bearing "fruit" (pardon the pun). There are a number of well published studies in Nature journals which show factually that plants which have been generated using these technologies can (for example) remove lead and cadmium from soil:

      Song, W.Y., et al, 2003. Engineering tolerance and accumulation of lead and cadmium in transgenic plants. Nature Biotechnology.

      http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v21/n8/full/nbt8 50.html
      http://www.nature.com/nbt/index.html

    11. Re:possible priority question? by DecoDragon · · Score: 1
      Who's to say the research won't find its way in that direction?

      Exactly. Towards the end of the first section the article says: "To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the production of an archaeal protein in plants." So, there work is a starting point, or a peice of basic research, that could go off in a multitude of directions. It looks like the Mars angle keeps it interesting as 1) a starting point to look for investigative angles, and 2) a way to keep things interesting in an under grad class room.

  9. Mars Hills Are Green... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Plants will grow if their stress levels are reduced while astronauts die from being exposed to cosmic radiation. Somebody must love plants.

  10. stress affects humans too!?!? by myowntrueself · · Score: 2, Funny

    If this stress thing applies to people too... how are they going to have any IT staff on Mars?

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  11. Cold tolerance by demachina · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think if you are engineering life for Mars you need to be developing cold tolerance, more than heat tolerance which is what this experiment seems to be doing. The concept is the same but you have to wonder why they they made their choice of extremeophiles. The averge surface temperature on Mars is around -55C. The hottest you see is 27C which is a very warm summer day. Developing tolerance for 4-100C doesn't quite fit.

    You wonder why they aren't working with extremeophiles from the Arctic, Antarctic and high mountains instead of ocean vents.

    --
    @de_machina
    1. Re:Cold tolerance by vidarh · · Score: 1

      I think the point is the range of temperatures it can handle. Perhaps the available extremeophiles from cold areas aren't capable of surviving over as large ranges, and perhaps they believe it is easier to later extend the range downward than expand the range of the other available extremeophiles.

    2. Re:Cold tolerance by UnapprovedThought · · Score: 1

      Valid question, and we could also ask why the tobacco plant was used instead of something edible, but the heat tolerance was just the first phase. It was purely meant as a proof of concept that an extremophilic gene of any kind could be introduced to a plant without killing it due to any toxicity. They were successful. As a double-bonus, you may be able to grow tobacco in Texas now, though you may want to look up the property values in hell first.

      That being said, and as I'd rather be insightful than funny, the research could still be useful on the trip to Mars by allowing more sunlight to hit the plants without killing them. This could reduce the shielding requirements, or possibly make the orbital farms maintenance-free and less likely to fail on the long trip. (Note that you could send unmanned orbital farms out there ahead of time and watch the plants grow with cameras. Then, if all goes well, send the crew on a an express flight, and they won't have to load that down with as many supplies.)

      To grow stuff on Martian soil would seem to require some precipitation as well, right? Conceivably, you could get algae to grow directly in ice, but anything beyond that and you need to use some sort of greenhouse system that melts the ice so that the plants (and soil bacteria?) can grow.

    3. Re:Cold tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we could also ask why the tobacco plant was used instead of something edible

      Tobacco is just one of those well-understood species in the geneticist's toolbox, like fruit flies and zebrafish.

    4. Re:Cold tolerance by Salis · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, if they grow the plant in a greenhouse on Mars then the ambient temperature will be pretty high. The sunlight on Mars is not filtered or blocked by a strong atmosphere and, just like greenhouses here on Earth, the energy will be mostly trapped inside. They can control the temperature by exposing un-insulated portions of the greenhouse to the cold outside (~-40 deg C in sunlight).

      The biggest difficulty is getting enough water.

      -Howard

      --
      Favorite /. tagline: "On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN." And it was good.
    5. Re:Cold tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_organisms

      The short answer is that tobacco is the standard specimen for experiments focusing on plant cells.

    6. Re:Cold tolerance by __aaltii7299 · · Score: 1

      I really want to believe Mars will be settled in my lifetime, or at least before senility wipes away my appreciation of the event. But I just don't see it happening.

    7. Re:Cold tolerance by demachina · · Score: 1

      Well I guess that is a good explanation but reinventing biology to solve this seems a bit strange. I would think you could:

      You could probably build infrared filters to block the heat. This has been done in greenhouse on Earth though not sure how hard it is or would be to do on Mars and you need a way to regulate the filtering since you really need some of the heat there.

      Not sure I would go to Mars without a couple nuclear power plants so there would be plenty of power for air conditioning and heating.

      The extremeophile thing is more interesting in trying to engineer moss and lichen's that can survive outside on Mars presumably near ice, to start terraforming.

      "The biggest difficulty is getting enough water."

      You mean inside a greenhouse. I would assume the base/colony would be near a known ice lake like the one recently discovered in a crater by Mars Express.

      --
      @de_machina
    8. Re:Cold tolerance by Salis · · Score: 1

      Well, true, but there's a lot more than temperature resistance that could be engineered into plants.

      The biggest benefit would be to reduce the dependency on certain nutrients that may be scarce on Mars. Things like nitrates, sulphates, etc that would be difficult to bring along in sufficient quantities.

      I think nuclear power is a clear necessity, but it has (so far) been a political brick wall. Absolutely no space ship has so far used nuclear fission. The fear is that the space ship will explode and rain down radioactive isotopes. (Of course, there's a lot of engineering that can prevent any catastrophic situations, but people don't care about that.) The closest thing is nuclear heating, which uses small quantities of radioactive isotopes to generate ~1kW of energy. Any Mars trip needs a few MW to do all of the things that need to be done.

      --
      Favorite /. tagline: "On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN." And it was good.
    9. Re:Cold tolerance by Shadowlore · · Score: 1
      Well given that the reasonable expectation is that we'll be using nuclear power on Mars, there will be plenty of very hot water. Combine this with agri-domes which have a natural "greenhouse" effect, it is not unreasonable to see heat being an issue.

      Since they are working on greenhouse oriented crops, it makes sense to target the likely temperatures there, as opposed to the martian atmopshere and "native unprotected" conditions.

      Naturally, reading the article would have led you to that knowledge. ;)

      That's a swing that could match what plants experience in a greenhouse on Mars.
      -- TFA
      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    10. Re:Cold tolerance by demachina · · Score: 1

      "Naturally, reading the article would have led you to that knowledge. ;)"

      I read the article and I saw the greenhouse reference, I'm just skeptical that you would engineer plants to solve the problem. IR filters or some form of heat exchanger seemed like better solutions. Keeping something cool really shouldn't be that much of a problem on Mars except in the height of summer at the warmest part of the planet. I think most of the water tends to be near the poles so I suspect you are going to be in cold parts of the planet at least early on, and wanting all the heat you can get out of the greenhouses to heat the habitat, melt water or heat the greenhouse over night.

      --
      @de_machina
    11. Re:Cold tolerance by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Absolutely no space ship has so far used nuclear fission.

      Wrong, quite a few Soviet and at least one US satellite have had true fission reactors on board. On a more nitpicky side, the natural decaying used by RTG's is fission as well.

      At least three of those Soviet reactors have fallen back to Earth, and one of those three did rain down radioactive isotopes. Unsurprisingly enough, world didn't end, nor did it turn Canada into uninhabitable wasteland (well, more so than it already was, at any rate).

    12. Re:Cold tolerance by Salis · · Score: 1

      The RTGs (which I mentioned) do not undergo the same reaction that nuclear fission power plants use to generate energy. It's not uranium or plutonium and the output is miniscule in comparison. That's what I meant.

      Unsurprisingly enough, world didn't end, nor did it turn Canada into uninhabitable wasteland

      If people get 10% more radiation than normal, get cancer, and sue the government for $2 billion, then the world won't end, but we'll have sooo much fun dealing with the consequences.

      --
      Favorite /. tagline: "On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN." And it was good.
    13. Re:Cold tolerance by juhaz · · Score: 1

      The RTGs (which I mentioned) do not undergo the same reaction that nuclear fission power plants use to generate energy. It's not uranium or plutonium and the output is miniscule in comparison.

      The reaction is indeed different and output is miniscule, no doubt about that, but the fuel is plutonium (Pu-238) in vast majority of cases. It's not the same isotope as the bomb/reactor material, however.

      If people get 10% more radiation than normal, get cancer, and sue the government for $2 billion

      Background radiation varies much more than 10% worldwide, I highly doubt even 100% difference would cause any real increase in cancer rates,
      but then again, I suppose that's irrelevant for the suers.

  12. Growing Plants on Mars by MutantHamster · · Score: 1

    Otherwise known as the most elaborate and contrived undercover marijuana operation ever.

    --
    My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
  13. Contaminate? by CypherXero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wouldn't this contaminate the soil of mars, by introducing lifeforms from another planet? I mean, we still have a lot of research left to do on mars, and I don't think putting plants to grow on mars is going to help at all.

    1. Re:Contaminate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it will contaminate mars.

      Why not? Its not like there is anything there to preserve. We could really use another planet, and frankly I think we matter more than whatever is there.

    2. Re:Contaminate? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Yes, it will. No, that isn't a good reason not to do it.

      *IF* there is life on mars, it's microscopic. We can safely ignore it.

    3. Re:Contaminate? by vidarh · · Score: 1

      This program is likely going to take years. It's not like they're ready to start shipping seeds tomorrow...

    4. Re:Contaminate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, we're not even there yet and there are Red Mars nuts.

    5. Re:Contaminate? by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

      I kind of agree. What if we don't make it there for a few hundred more years yet? Could something like this allow biological agents like viruses, bacteria, etc to evolve into forms we won't have a natural defense for once we actually do arrive in person?

      --


      8==8 Bones 8==8
    6. Re:Contaminate? by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
      ...in the meantime, we should be able to learn everything there is to know about Martian life. Perhaps we will learn one of the following:

      1. There is none.
      2. It is not resistant to invasive species.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    7. Re:Contaminate? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      True. After all, we're humans. We were created in God's image, and therefore we are better than all other lifeforms. We have the *right* to be arrogant. And anybody who stands in our way is a terrorist.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    8. Re:Contaminate? by Sage+of+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Great, the red mars movment is already starting.

    9. Re:Contaminate? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      We're living creatures. So are the microbs. But the way of life is not pacifist acceptance of what comes--it's to seek out new habitats and adapt to them, to spread and survive as best we can.

      There is no moral value in defending microbs. No ethical constraint against colonization of a dead planet.

    10. Re:Contaminate? by BorgHunter · · Score: 1

      You've been reading War of the Worlds too much. Not that this is a bad thing, mind you, but the science is a bit outdated now.

      Viruses are certainly no problem. If they evolved, they would not evolve for human DNA until humans got there. Bacteria are a bit tougher to figure out, but it's unlikely that they would kill us something bad either, as we're not there for them to evolve to reproduce well on us. If they did, it would be coincidence. I think your worry is probably unfounded, and if it's not I would be surprised. I will grant you that it's possible, but I don't think the "superbug" scenario is likely.

      --
      "Excuse me, did you say 'Trekker'? The word is 'Trekkie.' I should know; I created them." -- Gene Roddenberry
    11. Re:Contaminate? by coastwalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well said. I nominate anyone who has scruples about squishing a few inadequate martian microbes with our super strong bio-engineered armour plated vacuum growing mega-sunflowers .. I nominate them for being both spoil sports and as candidates for a Darwin Award.

      No Realy - Having said that it annoys me intensely that the churches taking advantage of our religious memes are so primitive that they havent got much further than a set of worries about 1st centuary Palestinian social mores - when they could be focusing on our collective impact on the environment which would appear to be an ongoing concern since the industrial revolution. In fact if you are looking for the most modern and relevant religion it would probably be environmental fanaticism. Having said that I've never liked goatee beards and I am not going to stop eating steak anytime soon myself.

      A proper understanding of what lifeforms are already on mars and an effort to ensure that they are conserved would also be in our interest because they will already have the most usefull genes for surviving in the Martian environment - even or perhaps especially if they are rare and difficult to find.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    12. Re:Contaminate? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Having said that it annoys me intensely that the churches taking advantage of our religious memes are so primitive that they havent got much further than a set of worries about 1st centuary Palestinian social mores

      Trust me--if you can say that, you haven't had a very through religious education.

      The most popular religions in America today have a thoroughly modern list of opinions, and a view that is remarkably different from that of 1st century Israel. (this was pre-diaspora, remember?)

    13. Re:Contaminate? by Merovign · · Score: 1


      I'm sorry you're not comfortable with your position at the top of the food chain.

      But this really is something you have to deal with yourself. You could go swimming with sharks or play with a tiger, for example.

      The rest of us have work to do, you know, like ensuring our survival. Sometimes that means skipping over things that we'd like to do to get things we need to do done.

      If it makes you feel any better, think of these plants as a new place for Martian microbes to live and feed.

  14. Uh? by guilhermesa · · Score: 1

    How could we possibly want to live in a planet filled with holes from meteorites? That's the question!

    1. Re:Uh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same way live here on Earth, a planet full of meteorite holes?

    2. Re:Uh? by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      By building a titanium dome/bubble, from the raw materials found there, using sunshine/present nukular minerals as an energy source. This tripple layer titanium dome with spring loaded fish-scales, just like your matress has it, will bounce off most meteorites hitting it, since the atmosphere is too thin to burn them the big meteorites up. If you are unlucky that a really big meteorite falls on your dome, well, tough luck. You can't live life by never taking a walk outside, in fear of getting hit by lightning, though if you're even remotely related to boy-scoutism, your chances of getting struck by electricity or lightning go up astronomically.

  15. Just come to Ottawa by pcb · · Score: 4, Funny

    scientists hope to breed plants that can handle the wide range of temperatures that will be found on Mars.

    Just come to Ottawa (Canada). Minus 35 C in the winter, plus 35 C in the summer! And I see corn growing across the street. Why am I living here again...might as well move to Mars.

    PCB

    --
    'Men never commit evil so fully and joyfully as when they do it for religious convictions.' B. Pascal
    1. Re:Just come to Ottawa by RevengeOfPoopJuggler · · Score: 1, Funny

      No national health care on Mars

    2. Re:Just come to Ottawa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true, but also no Canadian healthcare system. I'd have to lean in favor of Mars.

    3. Re:Just come to Ottawa by RevengeOfPoopJuggler · · Score: 0

      Touché

    4. Re:Just come to Ottawa by Empty+Yo · · Score: 0
      What Ottawa have you lived in? The Ottawa I lived in hit +25C during the summer on the rarest of days and never got below -15C in the winter. The local myth said that the humidity made those values *seem* worse, but compared to Edmonton, where I grew up, Ottawa was a breeze.

      The year I left Edmonton, there was a three week spell where the daytime hit hit a balmy -35C, so the low was -45 to -50C at night. We regularly hit +30C for at least a few weeks during the summer, too. If you can get plants to grow here, you can grow them anywhere.

      --
      I'll tolerate anything except intolerance.
  16. They shoud start with apple.. by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should start with apple(not Apple). After all, they too deserve their own sin.

    1. Re:They shoud start with apple.. by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1
      Or, from another religious point of view, their own seed of life?

      Don't want to start a huge argument over this but please... don't drag religion into this. Unless you are going to make fun of it. Then it is funny and ok to do so.

  17. Terra form by keepr · · Score: 1

    Let the Terra Forming begin, what is the idea behind this? Are the plants going to release oxygen?
    I 'm curious about this but I know nothing about the subject someone please enlighten me.

    --
    Slashdot taught me how to use the preview button!
    1. Re:Terra form by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let me preface, that I among with most of the replies this thread will generate, know nothing about the subject either. But, from what i've read about mars, they believe the core isn't active like our planet. It may not be able to hold on to an atmosphere like our own.

    2. Re:Terra form by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Let the Terra Forming begin, what is the idea behind this?

      Plants are the source for all life here on earth in every way: the water, the air, food, and raw energy. You kill all the animals on the planet, life continues. Kill all the plants: life will end. We (and all other animal life) are dependent in every way on plants.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
  18. Stupid fucking potheads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    grow the fuck up, get a damned job, and start pulling your own weight. ...and pull up your fucking pants, too! Do you know how really fucking stupid that looks?

    1. Re:Stupid fucking potheads... by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 2, Funny

      dad?

      --
      time is a perception of a being's consciousness
      time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
    2. Re:Stupid fucking potheads... by Fyre2012 · · Score: 0

      and put that stupid fucking tongue ring back in your mouth...

      how about martian flavoured coffee?

      --
      This is not the greatest .sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
  19. What is the use by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

    Have plants, but the air will stay to thin to breath anyway. Harvest oxygen from outside air to live under domes, or hope to find that alien air making machine buried under a mountain (to be activated by Arnold only).

    --

    My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
  20. plants provide... by Gherald · · Score: 1

    > food, oxygen, companionship and a patch of green far from home.

    1,2,4 are a given...but companionship?

    Come on, plants are just plain ordinary. I'd much rather live with a pet martian rock than a pet plant!

    1. Re:plants provide... by xilmaril · · Score: 1

      ever lived in your own apartment? potted plants are most of the companionship many people get. and it's good for your mental health to be nurturing something. no sarcasm here, btw.

    2. Re:plants provide... by Gherald · · Score: 1

      > ever lived in your own apartment? potted plants are most of the companionship many people get. and it's good for your mental health to be nurturing something.

      Yes, and no one on this floor has a plant AFAIK. In fact, AFAIK there are no plants in the entire building.

      Can't computers be `nurtured' ? I sort of feel healthy every time I upgrade a component or apply the latest security updates ;)

    3. Re:plants provide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a bonzai pot plant back when I used to smoke... it lived in a cup of coffee for several weeks before I finally found a home for in my bamboo pot. It was kind of cool to watch it grow, get it's water leaves and all that... but I could get dhcpd set up on it. Linux is much more fun to nurture, but I would like to try bonzai again... this time with a perennial so it doesn't die after one year.

  21. I can forsee this happening. by elgee · · Score: 1

    Your local dope dealer will be pushing Martian "Red" and saying "Yhis shit is out of this world."

  22. This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you have to modify life in order for it to exist in certain conditions, then it wasn't meant to live there to begin with.

    Where will it end? With the genetic modification of people to survive the temperatures and atmosphere of Mars?

    Also, just because you modify plant life to survive in the conditions of Mars does not mean it will multiply and flourish. These species of plants were not meant to grow in those conditions.

    1. Re:This won't work by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Stop moaning. We've using Intellegent Design rather than waiting to get something to evolve to suit the conditions.

      What, is God the only one allowed to do that? I thought ID was competely secular?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:This won't work by jacks0n · · Score: 1

      Case in point: Los Angeles

  23. Hmm, stress reducing plants... by 2010 · · Score: 0

    Of course, cannabis is the answer!

  24. mythbusters' plant-growing experiment... by rly2000 · · Score: 1

    they actually performed an experiment with plants growing next to a boombox. The ones growing to hip-hop did the best ... that'd probably be a fairly cheap way to destress the plants over there. bring a bunch of hip-hop cd's to mars and play them 24-7 for the martian plants to under. :)

    1. Re:mythbusters' plant-growing experiment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        they actually performed an experiment with plants growing next to a boombox. The ones growing to hip-hop did the best ... that'd probably be a fairly cheap way to destress the plants over there. bring a bunch of hip-hop cd's to mars and play them 24-7 for the martian plants to under. :)

      As I recall, it was Death Metal , not hip-hop, that did the best.
    2. Re:mythbusters' plant-growing experiment... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's so hardcore that what we call death metal, he calls hip hop.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  25. Growth rate? by FridayBob · · Score: 1

    Okay, so with these genes the plants won't shut down due to stress and will continue to grow anyway. But how fast can you expect any plant to grow at -20C or lower, or with hardly any atmosphere?

    1. Re:Growth rate? by Quadraginta · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you're confusing basic research with late-stage technology. Your concerns are not trivial, but the fact that they haven't been addressed in the pre-alpha stage of the basic research isn't very important, or interesting.

      They're at very early stages, here. They're just trying to stick extremophile bacteria genes in a plant to see if they can use these genes to tailor the plant's genome at all. You have to understand this is a pretty radical mixture of genes. You're trying to cross a soybean with a deep-sea bacterium, after all. They might as well be crossing a human with a redwood tree to improve the height of the former. If plants can be tailored in this way successfully, then the sky's the limit, and your problems are likely to be easily addressed.

      Point 1, the only thing special about -20C is that pure free water is frozen, which is inconvenient for water-based life. But temperatures that fall well below freezing for substantial periods of time are hardly unique to Mars: just spend a winter in North Dakota or Siberia. Indeed, it is more the rule than the exception here on Earth that temps are well below freezing for substantial parts of the year. Nevertheless, plants thrive here. They just go dormant when the temperature is too low, and grow when the temperature rises. Temps on Mars are above freezing for plenty of hours in the year.

      Point 2, you have to remember that what plants really care about in an atmosphere is CO2, because that's where they get the carbon atoms to build proteins and so forth. The Earth has an air pressure of 1000 millibars, but only 0.036% of that (0.4 millibars) is CO2. Mars has an air pressure of only 7-10 millibars, but that's almost all CO2. So from a plant's point of view, the air on Mars is actually richer than it is here.

    2. Re:Growth rate? by FridayBob · · Score: 1

      Hey, just the kind of reply I was hoping for! :-) Very informative.

      "...you're confusing basic research with late-stage technology."

      Yeah, but the researchers must have some idea of how they plan to tackle those problem, or else why bother?

      "... Temps on Mars are above freezing for plenty of hours in the year."

      Really? I thought it was always below freezing on Mars. How far above 0C can it possibly get and for how long? Also, a PPCO2 of over 7 mbar is indeed a lot higher than here on Earth, but if the total barometric pressure is so low that liquid water always boils, how can even a plant built like the toughest cactus hope to exchange gases with the Martian atmosphere and not dry out?

  26. Fitting Futurama quotes by Zoidmann · · Score: 1

    Taken from the "Mars University" episode. Fry: Very impressive. Back in the 20th century we had no idea there was a university on Mars. Farnsworth: Well back in those days Mars was just a dreary, uninhabitable wasteland, uh much like Utah. But unlike Utah, it was eventually made livable, when the university was founded in 2636. Leela: They planted traditional college foliage: ivy, trees, hemp. Soon the whole planet was terraformed. Fry: Does that mean it's safe to breathe the air?

  27. Not reducing stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The proposed research isn't reducing the plants' stress, but making them more tolerant of the stresses.

  28. D'oh! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    If you want to reduce their stress, don't send them to Mars!

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  29. Going back to alchemy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By splicing genes from Earth-bound extremophiles into seeds whose descendants are destined

    What? Having destined descendants has effect on the outcome of your intermediate test results? Science replaced be self fulfilling theorems?

  30. Funding by plehmuffin · · Score: 1
    They probably first attempted to get funding for breeding plants which can survive in earth deserts(which could, you know, feed people), but that line of justification didn't have enough cachet.

    So they went to NASA, cuz they'll fund anything.

  31. Lame headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A recent study be me found that it is easier to get people into orbit on a space elevator if they are lighter. I'm going to submit this with the triumphant headline:

    Reducing bodyweight leads to SPACE ELEVATOR!

  32. Without nanotech it might be useful... by bradbury · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    The technology is only going to be useful if robust nanotechnology is *impossibly hard* -- Why? Because if it is possible it is highly probable that Mars *will not exist*.

    Why? Because the probable time to disassemble Mars is 12 hours once the asteroids have been developed into an array to harvest the entire solar power output of the sun. [1]

    So any work to "develop" Mars is either (1) assuming that nanotechnology is impossible -- which seems to fly in the face of physical laws as well as much NASA funding; or perhaps (2) that it will take a very very long time to become available (which would imply the people at NASA are *not* following the Moore's Law data...; or (3) that for some romantic reasons decisions will be made to not disassemble Mars -- and this is the realm of politics and requires a mandatory behavioral enforcement dictate unlike any humanity has been able to develop or dictate over thousands of years.

    I for one would like to see the carefully reasoned and thought out discussions that Mars will still exist in 30-40 years. For NASA to be funding efforts involving growing life on Mars points out how short sighted they are and how poorly they are educating the students they are educating.

    Instead of enzyme studies which will be pointless -- how about some studies of more advanced methods that might be used to disassemble Mars more quickly?

    1. Life at the Limits of Physical Laws

    1. Re:Without nanotech it might be useful... by GenKreton · · Score: 1

      Here is the first result from the new Martian Canibus...

    2. Re:Without nanotech it might be useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post makes me think there should be more research into Schizophrenia.

    3. Re:Without nanotech it might be useful... by Shihar · · Score: 1

      There are a few things you need to realize.

      First, Moore's law is not a law. It is a damn good correlation. It has held true so far, but things are about to start getting funky in the world of transistors. That isn't to say that we will not overcome it, but I wouldn't be surprised to find Moore's law get broken in one direction or the other in the next 20 years when we really start to enter the world of quantum mechanics.

      Second, I am guessing you are a Kurzweil fan. The thing you need to realize about Kurzweil and people who agree with his predictions it that they are based upon current knowledge. The easiest thing to question in his assertions is that human like intelligence can be broken down into transistors with the numbers he gives. Kurzweil assumes that a single transistor is roughly equivalent to a single neuron. This probably is not the greatest of assumptions. He could be offer by a massive order of magnitude. Hell, we don't really understand intelligence. It could be that all of what we consider to be intelligence takes place in the world of quantum mechanics, in which case he could be so far off in his predictions that his world doesn't come to pass for hundreds of thousands of years.

      Finally, you need to wipe the idea of breaking Mars down with nanotechnology out of your head. As someone who works in the nanotechnology field, let me assure you that the nanobot that pulls apart molecules and reforms them is in a realm of fantasy that belongs beside warp drives and transporter beams. It might be possible, but we sure as hell don't even have the slightest clue as to how to do it. You can not physically grab an atom and pluck it off a molecule. Quantum mechanics just don't work that way. If you want to see atoms being plucked and move, see a chemical reaction.

      So, now comes the big question, what do we do with these predictions? I say have a healthy intellectual debate, be vigilant of coming singularities in a potentially futile attempt to control them, and pretty much keep on chugging along as we are without paying much mind to them. We truly are blind to what the future holds, and that goes doubly so if a singularity is around the corner. Don't get me wrong, I love Kurzweil and mulling over the possibilities, but I don't think it is sound enough, especially on the time table, to decide that long term projects are not worth while because the singularity is coming anyways.

    4. Re:Without nanotech it might be useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, of all the moronic posts that this article brought, this one takes the cake.

      This clearly shows that software engineers should NOT be scientists.

    5. Re:Without nanotech it might be useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a total load of crap. By your reasoning, north america is a dead continent, because it was possible for us to sterilize it with nuclear weapons, so of course we had to do it.

      (1) Why exactly will we dissassemble mars? We already have plenty of sand on earth.
      (2) Do you really believe every bit of stupid hype you read about nanotechnology? Do you see flying nuclear powered cars where you live? No? Well every educated person in the fifties *knew* these would be all over the place by the 21st century, along with rayguns and casinos on the moon. The laws of physics said (and still say) that these things are "possible".
      (3) You really think nanytes could turn the entire asteroid belt into a dyson sphere within 30 years? I call bullshit. There isnt't even enough material there to do that. Even using all the planets there's probably not enough. And it would take longer.
      (4) Exactly how much NASA funding is centered on nanotechnology? Last time I looked, they spent like 99% of it on aerospace research, manned space "exploration", and robotic exploration.

      Learn the difference between hype and reality. Technology rarely develops, or gets applied, or impacts us, in the way that its critics or its boosters say it will. Predicting the future is hard.

    6. Re:Without nanotech it might be useful... by Merovign · · Score: 1


      I think on the balance Mars is of more use as an alternate or additional habitat than as raw material, unless you're assuming that by then we'll already be working on a Dyson sphere (or ring).

      Mercury, Venus, the moons of Jupiter all seem better candidates for raw materials than Mars... though the Asteroid belt is obviously the first choice.

      Of course, afore we go removing any planets, we might want to spend a little time on Gravity and Resonance first, just to comfort ourselves.

  33. ...Huh? by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else have a question mark above their head after reading this?

    --
    Sleep is futile.
    1. Re:...Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, its like the asteroids are going to disassemble mars with solar panels and stuff.

      I even found this somewhere else online (surprise surprise) called Matrioshka Brains http://futurehi.net/planetp/mbrain1.html. A quick wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrioshka_Brain brings me the following quote:

      "A Matrioshka Brain (or MB) is a hypothetical construction of immense computational and physical resources using a star (usually at its centre) as a power source. It is conjectured but not proven to be physically feasible. It is reasonable to assume that such a construction under currently known laws of physics would be valid."

      I am still left feeling confused, and even more so that some people have wayyy too much time on their hands.

    2. Re:...Huh? by dahlek · · Score: 1
      yeah - a BIG "?" - wtf?

      I don't get it...must be a scifi reference that escapes me?

  34. Re:Exactly as seen on Fark this morning by Irashtar · · Score: 1

    Hm. Some of us don't go to Fark.
    1. Blocked because of ads and certain links.
    2. Same as above, exept volentarily.
    3. Prefer the sorting/longer descriptions of /.
    4. ????
    5. The in-jokes of /.
    6. Um, profit?
    Oh who am I kidding?

  35. crumpulent Dictionary Term by infonography · · Score: 1

    Crum pu lent: as in needing to be crumpled, round file (the garbage can) or otherwise dispose of.

    Not to be confused with Subgenius Ranting.

    Also refered to as;
    Spam in paper form.
    Drunken ranting
    Meaningless usenet posting
    Slashdot article

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    1. Re:crumpulent Dictionary Term by EZLeeAmused · · Score: 1

      D'oh! I meant crumulent.

      --
      Some see the vessel as half full; others see it as half-empty; We pour it out on the floor and laugh
  36. Timelines to a Dyson sphere != terraforming by count0 · · Score: 1

    You seem to suggest that creating a Dyson sphere is possible in the same timeframe as very early terraforming...given that we don't have any tech. capable of the kind of thing you're talking about, but that we do have genetic splicing for extremophile organisms, I think you're optimistic.

    More on Dyson spheres:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere

  37. Start with the root-less variety by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

    Until we get some beneficial soil-based baterias introduced, no root-based plants can take life on Mars unless potted.

    Maybe, those 1000-year old pine tree (Joshua) may cut it in such a hostile environment (takes a little potted soil to get it started altho).

    Mosses, popping misteltoes, and fungus have the best anchor in such a hostile environment.

  38. Super plants - then wait for Martian invasion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finding species that survive martian weather is easy task. Predicting how the species influence future Mars exploration by human race is not.

    Just look what rabbits did to Australia. Imagine that rabbits are stress tolerant and can survive radiation, deep freezing, boiling, lack of oxygen and eat anything that is available, especially protein rich candies wrapped in space suits.

  39. sicklepod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just don't send up a batch of sicklepod and you will be fine I should think...http://www.cbu.edu/sciences/biology/Debbie UM/sld022.htm

    1. Re:sicklepod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get a 403 when I try to access that link.

  40. Now that this world has been Trashed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like thay've done enough damage here!

    So, what is the motivation behind growing GMO infested "plants" on Mars? Seriously. This is not a retorical question.

  41. one word... by ctar · · Score: 1

    hemp

  42. Dandelions by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    One would think that the earth has good enough weeds already. Just take some dandelion seeds to Mars. I'm sure they will grow beautifully...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  43. Or we could try natural selection. by bohemian72 · · Score: 1

    Just throw a bunch of weeds and other plants up there and see if any adapt and survive? If not, we'll then we've got some organic material to try to plant then next batch in. ;-)

    --
    The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return.
  44. Wrong (well partly) by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Plants need oxygen too. On earth, they produce more oxygen than they consume, but they still need to be submerged in a sea of oxygen to function. If all the oxygen they produced was sucked away by osmotic pressure, the plants would die pretty quickly. Or did you think plants made glucose for you.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:Wrong (well partly) by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      No, they don't need it. Photosynthesis relies on CO2 and water, so these two are an absolute must. Free oxygen is nice, because it allows oxidative respiration, by far the most efficient way to power your cell. But it isn't absolutely necessary: there are a variety of anaerobic respiration pathways used by organisms in various low-oxygen environments.

      Presumably someone tailoring organisms to thrive on Mars could design in anaerobic respiration, because it exists down here already. But there is no way to design a carbon-based organism without a carbon source.

  45. Echinacea's good for colds by billstewart · · Score: 1

    (Actually, recent research has shown that it's pretty much useless, except that echinacea tea fits into the "drink lots of hot liquids" set of advice just like hot tap water does.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  46. We know what plants your friend is growing by billstewart · · Score: 1

    see previous articles about reggae...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  47. Teach your plants to meditate.... by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Of course, anybody who's trying to teach their plants to meditate has probably been smoking some of them first...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  48. This research is a crock of ....... Arabidopsis by GAATTC · · Score: 1

    As a practicing plant molecular biologist with friends on the NASA Mars pork barrel train, I feel qualified to call the spin on this research bogus. We sit around at meetings drinking beer and lauighing about how much money NASA gives us for stupid ideas which will never be realized because radiation will kill any astronauts long before they get to Mars (see story ~3 days ago). The shielding required to protect humans for this trip weighs too much for this to ever really happen. The enzyme these researchers put into plants only functions down to four degrees celcius. Boy, that will really help on Mars. The results they get will be that you may be able to enigineer plants to survive stress using this enzyme. There are many existing ways of doing this. This kind of research is routine and the normal goal is to produce hardier plants for here on earth. I'm all for funding basic (plant biology) research, but who are they trying to fool with this kind of ? The undergrads in their class?

  49. worthless research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, IAAPP (plant physiologist). I have a considerable amount of critics on this work. Some of which i will mention here:)
      What they did was move some genes from an archaeon into tobacco cells. wow. Big deal. This is just some fancy molecular biology. But it does not _in any way_ do something to let a plant become more stress tolerant.

    First of all, its is Nicotiana tabacum, not tobacum. But of course, they wouldn't know. They probably did not ever see the plant growing at all. Yep, that's right, they use a suspension culture. Imagine putting this gene into some human stem cell line. How close to a stress tolerant human will you be?

    Secondly, what they put into a plant is a gene encoding for superoxide reductase. This gets rid of free radicals in some thermofiles. This is nice, but of course, plants have there own _very complex_ systems to get rid of oxigen radicals already. The advantage here seems to me that the archaeon protein is heat stable. Well, to me it seems not very useful on a planet with an average temperature of below 0.....

    But the real point I want to make is against the idea that you can use a bacterial system for improving a plant. It is not that simple. Much more could be learned from actually studying the specific environment for which you need plants, and then find a similar habitat on earth. Find out how plants in that habitat cope with that environment. And move that system into the plants of your choice.

    Moving a few heat stable proteins into tobacco is not going to make it heat resistant. There are to many systems in that plant that would need heat stable proteins. And even then, there is more than just proteins. Many chemical processes are going to act completely out of normal parameters at T>50. Your plant will die quickly, even with a 100% Archaeon certified (TM) proteins.

    This work is useless. If you want to do this, find people who actually understand plants.

  50. Re: Kill the bugs!!!! by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    There is no moral value in defending microbs. No ethical constraint against colonization of a dead planet.
    Dear Ugly Bag of Mostly Water:
    That depends on your point of view.
    However, morality aside, there may be practical (e.g., biological and/or economic) reasons for trying to preserve microbial life.

    P.S. If there are microbes there, then the planet isn't really dead, now is it?
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  51. In re Mars by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but the researchers must have some idea of how they plan to tackle those problem, or else why bother?

    Well, I hazard they probably do have some ideas, but that they're vague speculation at best. The goal of creating organisms to live on Mars may be an ultimate goal, but I read their comments as saying they don't propose making that touchdown themselves -- they feel they're just moving the ball down the field a bit.

    I thought it was always below freezing on Mars.

    Oh no. It gets up to 60-70F or so. Well above freezing for most of the day in the lower latitudes, I believe.

    [I]f the total barometric pressure is so low that liquid water always boils, how can even a plant built like the toughest cactus hope to exchange gases with the Martian atmosphere and not dry out?

    Well, plants generally do actively dry in this way on Earth. That is, the liquid water they take in through the roots generally exits as vapor through the leaves, and often at quite a high rate. This isn't because of the low total pressure, but because the partial pressure of water in the atmosphere is often well below the vapor pressure of water. In other words, as long as the relative humidity is less than 100%, liquid water will evaporate from plants.

    IIRC massive transpiration is actually necessary for tall trees to hoist nutrients via sap flow up to the crown. As the water evaporates out of the leaves it pulls the sap column up the tree.

    Anyway, the key to not drying out is to take in as much liquid water via the roots as you're losing via the leaves. Hence the necessity for liquid water in growing plants on Mars. But a low atmospheric pressure, and a low vapor pressure of water, don't seem to mean much more than that transpiration is maybe faster than it might otherwise be.

    Remarkably, there seem to be few to no Earth organisms that are capable of pulling water directly out of the air. Even the lichens and bacteria that live in the driest conditions seem usually to simply wait around until liquid water briefly appears and absorb that, then husband the stuff very carefully. There are supposedly some high-altitude lichens that might pull water directly from air, but this hasn't been fully confirmed as far as I know.

  52. Stress Free Plants! by Sylven_1969 · · Score: 1

    I would have to say that plants don't get much more relaxed and stress free than the one and only, mighty "Sticky Purple Punch" Plant!

    *snickers* *coughs* *grins widely* *goes looking for brownies*

    --
    Jay Dale "If you're not living on the edge then you're taking up too much space!"