Slashdot Mirror


British Soldiers Get Germ-Fighting Undies

Ant writes "Yahoo! News reports that British soldiers will be getting germ-fighting underwear. The antimicrobial underpants have been introduced by the Ministry of Defense as part of a new desert uniform for soldiers. They are the first undergarments issued to British troops, who traditionally have had to supply their own. Military officials said Thursday the unisex trunks were made from artificial fibers for comfort, with silver particles woven into the material to prevent sweating. "It is coated to prevent bacterial infection, and we have tried to arrange the seams so that they don't chafe," Col. Silas Suchanek, who led the team that procured the new equipment, said Thursday."

280 comments

  1. Ok, they now have pants.. by Nairoz · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... how long til they get the rest of their equipment?

    The British army is woefully underequipped... but hey, as long as they've got pants and tea, they'll be fine!

    --
    Just another harmless drunk
    1. Re:Ok, they now have pants.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Scottish regiments were on the point of mutiny when asked to wear underpants - any underpants that is ...

    2. Re:Ok, they now have pants.. by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      And to make sure they have plenty of tea forever, I suggest we start a "Teabag the British" volunteer campaign.

    3. Re:Ok, they now have pants.. by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      ... how long til they get the rest of their equipment?

      Indeed, I would petition for six day underwear (scroll down).

      Three leg holoes. Rotate once per day, then turn inside out for the next three. Go a couple times between washes and you've got nearly a fortnight!

    4. Re:Ok, they now have pants.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good show, I say. Jolly good show!

    5. Re:Ok, they now have pants.. by boisepunk · · Score: 1

      so these new undergarments are not completely unlike briefs?

      --
      main(0)
    6. Re:Ok, they now have pants.. by thewiz · · Score: 1

      Unlike the Brits the Scottish always have all the equipment they need, even without underwear!

      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    7. Re:Ok, they now have pants.. by Ithika · · Score: 1

      Scottish regiments subset of British regiments.

      Now, try that again, and this time make sense...

    8. Re:Ok, they now have pants.. by Haydn+Fenton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh.

      TBH though, I think the majority of people on /. need these pants more than the British soldiers. [rimshot]

    9. Re:Ok, they now have pants.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They, because they're SCOTTISH need less to do the job than Brits. And they don't need the underwear at all. Get It Now?

  2. Sand? by NullAgent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well do they keep out sand?

  3. Umm.... by kcbrown · · Score: 4, Funny
    Don't us Slashdot types (myself excluded, of course. ;-) need this more than soldiers do?

    *ducks*

    --
    Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    1. Re:Umm.... by boisepunk · · Score: 1

      Well, it'll keep their nuts from radio wave radiation, cell-phone traffic, and wifi traffic. Maybe we'll see an increase in fertility in the British military.

      --
      main(0)
  4. Underpants Gnomes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The underpants gnomes finally figured out the missing part of the plan.

    Step 1. Steal underpants.
    Step 2. Sell to the military (ta-daaa).
    Step 3. Profit!

    1. Re:Underpants Gnomes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our shiny underwear overlords.

    2. Re:Underpants Gnomes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean STEEL underpants

  5. Ministry of Defense by a.different.perspect · · Score: 5, Informative

    Really, we should defer to the UK's right to name its own institutions and call it the "Ministry of Defence", just like Pearl Harbor should not be "Pearl Harbour" or "Perl Harbor" (as I've been admittedly prone to think).

    1. Re:Ministry of Defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll do that the moment that the Brits stop using "Nasa" over "NASA".

    2. Re:Ministry of Defense by kfg · · Score: 1

      We'll do that the moment we stop using it as an acronym ourselves.

      KFG

  6. unisex trunks by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2, Funny

    unisex trunks

    ...nuff said.

    1. Re:unisex trunks by kfg · · Score: 1

      The photo is underexposed black.

      The question remains, do the women have put up with having a fly for no particular reason other than logistical ease, or. . .

      do the men have to, ummmmmmmmmmmmm, "go" without.

      KFG

    2. Re:unisex trunks by nuntius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's why they issue the combat knife.

    3. Re:unisex trunks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmmmmmmmm sex. good point

    4. Re:unisex trunks by jangobongo · · Score: 1


      Interesting that they are black... Why is that I wonder?

      Is that so that the wearer can't see how, uh... soiled... they are after wearing them out on patrol for long stretches? Another good reason to make them anti-bacterial, I guess.

      --

      Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    5. Re:unisex trunks by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Interesting that they are black... Why is that I wonder?

      Most likely because the antibacterial silver particles they're impregnated with are black (small particles of silver are what makes the black in B&W photographs).

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    6. Re:unisex trunks by markw · · Score: 4, Funny

      interesting that they are black... Why is that I wonder?

      stealth.

    7. Re:unisex trunks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep!

      One size misfits all!

      AC.

    8. Re:unisex trunks by MorePower · · Score: 1

      When I was in the U.S Army (1991-1996) the army-issued underwear was brown. It probably still is today. I always assumed your reason was the real reason it was colored like that.

  7. I, for one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our artificial fiber silver particle infused anti-bacterial non-chafing seam underwear-wearing British overlords.

    Oh, wait, I'm in the USA, which means I *don't* welcome them as overlords! We still like them though, in spite of that bit of unpleasantness in the 1770's and 80's. And that whole War of 1812 thing.

  8. Biological Agents by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, it's another development in our war to eradicate biological agents in our war on terror.

    If you locate a hazardous bacterial sample, simply find a British soldier and drop it down his pants.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    1. Re:Biological Agents by Jeff+Molby · · Score: 0

      If you locate a hazardous bacterial sample, simply find a British soldier and drop it down his pants.

      I like the way you think, but personally, I'd find a female British soldier.

    2. Re:Biological Agents by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1, Funny

      I like the way you think, but personally, I'd find a female British soldier.

      I like the way you think, but sadly, all female British soldiers look like Camilla Parker Bowles...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  9. More money down the drain... by ampmouse · · Score: 0

    Doesn't the British government have something better to do with their citizens money then make germ-fighting underwear?
    Then again, how else would they get a front page story on slashdot...

  10. Oh yeah... by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Funny

    Then the germs evolve and become resistant to silver and we're in REAL trouble.

    1. Re:Oh yeah... by TelJanin · · Score: 1

      The silver is just to reduce sweat. That's not what make it antibacterial.

    2. Re:Oh yeah... by king-manic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then the germs evolve and become resistant to silver and we're in REAL trouble.

      As long as the werewolves don't become resistant I think we'll be okay.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:Oh yeah... by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, silver is antibacterial. They've started putting silver in elastoplast.

      http://www.allcures.com/shared/product.asp?id=8532 6

    4. Re:Oh yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you even considered the possibility of were-germs? Have you? No? Tsk, tsk. How irresponsible.

      Me, I don't want to spend one night every month being one-trillionth my normal size, and splooshing around infecting people. You probably don't want to either, so I would suggest treating this subject with a bit less levity.

    5. Re:Oh yeah... by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      If you plug "silver antibacterial" into Google Scholar, you'll get enough reading to entertain you for a while. Basically, it's a heavy metal that binds with sulfide groups, inhibits lipid biosynthesis, and may gum up the DNA replication network.

      Silver particles on activated carbon are used for water purification, silver nitrate drops in infants' eyes to prevent infection, and silver sulfadiazene for burns.

      Seriously enough, the germs can evolve a resistance to silver, just as various protozoa are becoming resistant to antimony and arsenic-based therapeutics. The main mechanism is over-expression of glutathione, which complexes the offending metal ion and removes it from the cell. Metal sequestration machinery is pretty good in most organisms, so resistance to silver should be expected given the number of products relying on silver particles for activity

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  11. Where can I buy these? by Aminion · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, war even drives innovation when it comes to clothing fashion. Seriously, these underwear seem to be really great. I wonder if the British Army will open up their own Yahoo! store and sell these underwear...

    1. Re:Where can I buy these? by WordNA · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you'd buy them for fashion.
      Then again, if they were shiny...
      I guess they'd be nice for travelling though.

    2. Re:Where can I buy these? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah, dude, if I had mod points I would mod you up. Bad underwear seriously can be a problem, and if these help with sweating and chafing, I approve.

      If I ever go into the jungle or desert, this is the way to go. If I ever leave slashdot. If I ever get out from behind my computer. If I ever leave the basement. If I ever.........oh never mind.

      --
      Qxe4
    3. Re:Where can I buy these? by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. This technology has already been on the market for quite a while in the athletic clothing stores. Adidas and Hind come to mind. I know there's some stereotypical geeks here, but the runners and cyclists should recognize this fabric.

    4. Re:Where can I buy these? by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      That's why there are Army/Navy Surplus stores.

    5. Re:Where can I buy these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are made for Soldiers who don't have daily access to showers.

      You should wash and change your undies more often if yours accumulate sweaty, bacteria infested crap.

  12. Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a riot.
    I never change underwear!

    I mean the anti-bacterial stuff is useless, they might as well have developed 'cool undies', which when reaching a certain temperature automatically chemically react cooling that person.

    What will they think of next?

    1. Re:Ha! by donscarletti · · Score: 1
      Why would you want cool undies? I think most men would go for warm undies that maintain a constant high temperature so that their contents are always at their most impressive whenever the pants are removed.

      Plus, if they maintain a constant temperature of 40 degrees celsius, they would provide decent contraceptive abilities as well.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  13. Tangentially... by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...with silver particles woven into the material to prevent sweating.

    Uh oh, one more thing the colloidal/ionic silver idiots will use in their come-ons to turn people blue.

    Luckily, like most scams these days, I'm guessing the majority of the victims will be pathetic wannabes and the scammers themselves.

    --
    Fuck it
  14. It's almost worth it for the underwear by DrIdiot · · Score: 4, Funny
    Join the Army!
    No? Well... now comes with complimentary free underwear!

    If the number of British army enlistees suddenly skyrockets in the next month, we'll all know why.

  15. Now.. if they could only prevent crotch rot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. then I'd buy them.

    slashdot secret code: damned
    (i kid you not)

  16. Infertility by xor.pt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Considering testicles don't like high temperatures, (it's one of the reasons we have them in a sack outside our body, and why everyone should use boxers) what are the chances that these new undies will cause damage to the soldiers testicles since they are stoping them from properly regulating their temperature by sweating, in a desert no less?

    1. Re:Infertility by RollingThunder · · Score: 3, Informative

      It doesn't cause permanent damage.

      It just makes the sperm currently being produced less effective. Go back to boxers, and you're fine within a 'production cycle' which I think is something like 30 or 45 days.

      I doubt soldiers in a warzone are particularly interested in maintaining maximum fertility.

    2. Re:Infertility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's all part of the worldwide effort to control population growth. what's that you say? that's a patently ridiculous bad idea? that's nice, but this is the british government we're talking about, and specifically the british military. you know they'd do it.

    3. Re:Infertility by DuckofDeath87 · · Score: 5, Informative

      For one thing, these look like boxers. For another, wearing breifs prevent your testicles from moving so much. This prevents Testicular torsion (yes it is real). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testicular_torsion

      Though, I do wonder if the heat problem is as bad as you say. Any one have any reliable websites?

    4. Re:Infertility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be honest, I really appreciate the kind of support that briefs or bikinis provide as opposed to boxers. Whenever I wear boxers I end up with testicular pain by the end of the day.

      Cheers,

      Adolfo

    5. Re:Infertility by fsterman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Weird, my 'production cycle' is about 5 minutes.

      --
      Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
    6. Re:Infertility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I end up sitting on my wang all the time if I wear boxers.

    7. Re:Infertility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your support of sweaty balls is noble, but I'll have to vote the opposite.

    8. Re:Infertility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try googling +testicles +heat

    9. Re:Infertility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering testicles don't like high temperatures, (it's one of the reasons we have them in a sack outside our body, and why everyone should use boxers)

      I can attest to the fact that even if you wear tight little briefs that are one size too small, and dip your testicles in hot water before sex, that you will *STILL* get a woman pregnant. The whole "everyone should use boxers" argument probably is marketing from a boxers-making company more than fact.

    10. Re:Infertility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dip your balls in cold water. Watch them shrink and go closer to your body.

      Take a warm shower, watch it expand and move away from your body.

      Could this be related to the temperature? I'll let you in on a secret: yes it could.

    11. Re:Infertility by Murasaki+Skies · · Score: 1

      At least it's better than someone boxing your wang.

      --
      Waiiii!!!!!! I have bad karma!
    12. Re:Infertility by SargeantLobes · · Score: 1
      The temperaure thing is a myth, yes it is true that placing the scrotum against the body will make it slightly hotter. However the underpants (wich look like boxer-briefs to me), have silver woven into the material, which is an excellent (the best) conductor for heat.

      Also the effect of the slightly higher heat on the sperm production is minimal. If people with only one testicle can have children, wearing briefs shouldn't be a problem .

      --
      I do love "!" but not as much as I love "..."...
    13. Re:Infertility by still+cynical · · Score: 1

      I think it's an error. Adding silver to clothing will give it anti-microbial properties, which is very desirable. I have never heard that it reduces or prevents sweating, which would be a bad thing in any climate, let alone a desert. All of the commercial high-end undergarments advertised for this sort of thing claim to wick moisture away from the skin, increasing the efficiency of sweating, they do not stop it.

      --
      Ignorance is the root of all evil.
    14. Re:Infertility by cosmol · · Score: 1

      Somehow I think that cavemen running after a wooly mammoth weren't wearing briefs. I assume that humans have evolved with males not restricting natural movements of their scrotums. Stopping that may reduce the risk of some maladies, but cutting of your arms will also reduce your risk of developing carpal tunnel.

    15. Re:Infertility by Macdude · · Score: 1

      Considering testicles don't like high temperatures, (it's one of the reasons we have them in a sack outside our body, and why everyone should use boxers) what are the chances that these new undies will cause damage to the soldiers testicles since they are stoping them from properly regulating their temperature by sweating, in a desert no less?

      No lasting damage is being done wearing briefs it's just lowering (slightly) your sperm count. Wearing boxers is only an issue if you're trying to get a chick pregnant. If you really want to maximize your sperm count go commando in a kilt.

      --
      "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
    16. Re:Infertility by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dip your balls in cold water. Watch them shrink and go closer to your body. Take a warm shower, watch it expand and move away from your body.

      "But teach, Suzie and I were just doing *science*"

    17. Re:Infertility by dustmite · · Score: 2, Informative

      Could this be related to the temperature? I'll let you in on a secret: yes it could.

      It could, but not for the reason you imply. It's simpler than that. When cold, the muscles responsible for this naturally contract and become tense, and when warm they expand and relax ... but this happens naturally with most muscles in your body, and has absolutely nothing to do with trying to control the temperature of your nads. Jump in a cold pool and I promise you most of the muscles in your body will tense up as soon as you're in the water. Part of the reason is that your body is converting stored energy into heat to make up for the heat loss, but this is NOT to regulate the temperature of your balls, it's to save you from going hypothermic and dying. Honestly, your balls do not need such quick reactions to temperature changes, firstly because warm temperatures pose no risk to fertility unless sustained for months or years, and secondly because even then, the infertility effects are generally only temporary, i.e. once your balls are back to a few degrees below the rest of your body, you'll be producing again.

      But thanks anyway for "letting us in" on that "secret".

    18. Re:Infertility by Behrooz · · Score: 1

      Dip your balls in cold water

      No, thank you, we're British.

      --
      "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
    19. Re:Infertility by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      >Dip your balls in cold water

      No, thank you, we're British.


      That's right. British people dip them in tea.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    20. Re:Infertility by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      HA!

      My production cycle is about 20 minutes and a nap ;-)

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
  17. A cure... by Ecko7889 · · Score: 0

    Now we have a cure for STDs.

    --
    $sig$
  18. Silver threads & golden werewolves by tashammer · · Score: 3, Funny

    The silver threads in the knickers are a good idea. That means if a werewolf bites him/her on the arse or crotch that the soldier will be protected.

    I didn't know that the British armed forces were into the occult and supernatural.

    It aint a reassuring thought.

    1. Re:Silver threads & golden werewolves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all because of a new directive from the Ministry of Magic.

    2. Re:Silver threads & golden werewolves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't seen Dog Soldiers ?

    3. Re:Silver threads & golden werewolves by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      If you havn't, make sure you get the unedited DVD version, not the crappy 15-cert one they very badly hacked.

      (eg. at the end, a werewolf attacks with a sword sticking through him.. they cut the scene where the sword was implanted. That and a few others really made the cut version terrible to watch)

  19. Unisex? Hello! by tbo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    WTF? I can understand unisex "outer" uniforms, but the idea of unisex underwear is plain stupid. Is the British Army trying to pretend that men and women are exactly the same, even "down there"?

    From the picture, the underwear look like standard men's boxers, except without the front flap. Why leave out the front flap in men's underwear? Probably because they had to make a concession to these being "unisex", and a flap is clearly a male-only feature. Also, what about guys who prefer briefs?

    The end result is that men will have a harder time freeing willie to irrigate the desert, and women will be forced to wear what are essentially men's underwear (and, I would imagine, are less comfortable for women--correct me if I'm wrong).

    1. Re:Unisex? Hello! by Mal-2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually they look stretchy, like bicycle shorts. This means they should be able to accommodate either a cameltoe or a buck-knuckle.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    2. Re:Unisex? Hello! by LiNKz · · Score: 5, Funny
      ...women will be forced to wear what are essentially men's underwear (and, I would imagine, are less comfortable for women--correct me if I'm wrong)...


      This is just a dodgy attempt at getting a random geek-girl to talk about her undies ;)
      --
      Proceed with Format (Y/N)? Y
    3. Re:Unisex? Hello! by axis_omega · · Score: 1

      IANAW (I am not a woman) But why would it be less confortable for women? Should they create antigerms G-strings then?
      I would welcome that idea any day. Thinking of it, I'm gonna propose that idea right now.

      --
      It's funny how I make sense to others and not myself...
    4. Re:Unisex? Hello! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The front flap probably chafes, so they eliminated it.

    5. Re:Unisex? Hello! by Jeff+Molby · · Score: 2, Funny

      SHHHHH!! Whose side are you on?

    6. Re:Unisex? Hello! by Jeff+Molby · · Score: 1

      I don't know what things are like in Britain, but I would imagine that anyone who has made it through basic training has already gotten over such superficial issues (and the army wouldn't care if they hadn't). I'm sure that the decision to forgo the flap was a functional and/or cost decision.

    7. Re:Unisex? Hello! by Donniedarkness · · Score: 1
      Actually, a lot of the women that I know seem to PREFER boxers (3/4 of the month, anyways).

      Agreed on the front flap. women don't seem to mind them, so why not just keep it?

      Guys who prefer briefs are screwed.

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    8. Re:Unisex? Hello! by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Well, if they're anything like boxers... chicks will love them.

      You have no idea how many girls wear boxers to bed cause they're more comfy.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    9. Re:Unisex? Hello! by fbjon · · Score: 2, Funny
      Guys who prefer briefs are screwed.

      By the women with boxers?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    10. Re:Unisex? Hello! by fnord_uk · · Score: 1

      Actually, this isn't the first set of underwear issued to the British army. You are forgetting about the long johns, which have been issued to both sexes for decades. They had y-fronts.

      --
      In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.
    11. Re:Unisex? Hello! by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      and a flap is clearly a male-only feature.

      It is certainly percieved to be so, but there's this little device: http://cranialcavity.net/archives/000053.html
      I wonder how /. tech news missed this? Or did they?

  20. Silver?? by Flower · · Score: 1

    Well we now finally know how the underpants gnome wind up at "PROFIT!"

    --
    I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  21. The dangers of bacterial infections in the crotch by t0qer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The site I have the pictures on is down, but hopefully I can give a detailed enough explanation of what happened to me last year to make folks realize the importance of anti bacterial undies.

    I was sittin on the toilet one day and noticed a swollen ingrown hair to the right of my right testicle. I tried to pluck the hair out, followed by squeezing the little bastard. Nothing was coming out, so I said, "fuck it" and just left it at that.

    During the week, it developed from an ingrown hair to a very painful boil. It got to the point where I could hardly walk anymore and had to see the doctor.

    Soon as the doctor saw it, he said "We're going to have to lance it". Kaiser usually doesn't give out painkillers if they can avoid it (once had a broken toe and they refused me pain meds) Luckily I had a male doctor, and I think that fact made him more sympathetic to my pain.

    He numbed the spot up, then poked the spot with a scalpel, probably going in about 2-3 centimeteres, followed by some very painful squeezing to get all the crap out of the bacterial playground that had formed next to my nutsack.

    I thought that was it, but nope. The doctor said "We have to leave a wick in there so it heals right" A wick? WTF? Basically a wick is a peice of cotton gauze stuck in the hole where the boil used to be. This prevents the opening of the wound from sealing up, and allows the hole to heal from the bottom up.

    For the next month, I had to make daily trips to kaiser to have the wick removed, and replaced. The first wick was over a foot in length! Every week the wicks got shorter and shorter until they finally told me it no longer needed a wicking.

    I can totally see these types of bacterial infections knocking out a soldier for a month. For me, I could not walk without popping 2 or 3 vicodin after they inserted the wick. At least I had the luxery of my house, high speed internet, and cable TV (not much interneting during this ordeal, as it was very hard to sit)

    --toq

    OH Ps, im typing this live while i'm at work at the karaoke bar, watch the live stream here and say hi :) http://www.scvi.net/activex/tv19.htm

  22. Re:Slashdot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    On the plus side, we've descovered the illusive "2: ???" step...

    1: Collect Underwear
    2: Sell Silver
    3: Profit!

  23. no.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO, this can NOT be used as a condom or classified as safe sex!

  24. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please mod parent -1 Eeeuuuwww...

  25. Re:Slashdot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the inverse side, the first headline on Fark at this moment was on Slashdot yesterday, and on other sites the day before. The fuck is your problem?

  26. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Mornelithe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sweet Jesus, man! That's the worst story I've heard in months! I'd recommend keeping that to yourself.

    Don't anyone dare modding this man up. Think of the children!

    --

    I've come for the woman, and your head.

  27. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Raynach · · Score: 1

    Times like these call for a mod -1: too much information.

    --
    - A
  28. but does it run... by briancurtin · · Score: 0

    does this mean no more swamp ass?

    --
    My UID is a palindrome, that must be good for some type of prize.
  29. I was under the impression by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    that silver had antibacterial properties. A silver based antibiotic mixture was inserted INTO a friends wound to help sterilize it and I thought the reason people used silverware was for similar reasons. (Although I could just be buying into urban legends or making wrong assumptions... I don't recall ever reading that in an official tome somwhere...)

    1. Re:I was under the impression by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      Colloidal silver is an excellent antibacterial and oxidising agent, either as a very dilute solution or in gel form. I had most of the skin ripped off my left forearm by a compound bow string (the last time I'll ever forget my armguard!) and colloidal silver gel healed it up within a couple of days.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
  30. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by t0qer · · Score: 4, Informative

    I hate to comment on my own comment to bitch about moderation, but I noticed a few comments below mine stating that it should be downmodded.

    Look, this is what happened to me. Like it or not. The comment came from my heart, formed by my own personal experience. Sure, it's gory, sure it's detailed, but this is exactly what happens to folks when bacterial infections happen. Boils form on the skin, and in the crotch area, this makes for a very debilitating condition. Like I said, I had the luxery of my house, soldiers in Iraq don't have the same immenities that I have.

    Just a follow up, after this happened my wife and I started buying anti bacterial soap. Since then, I haven't had so much as a zit on my legs. Before the boil, I showered every day but with regular old soap. Regular soap just isn't enough to prevent this from happening. Just one juicy bit of info I read on antibacterial soaps, you have to leave them on the skin for at least 2 minutes for the active ingredient to work.

    So please mods, don't downmod my parent post. It was completely on topic and showed the dangers of bacterial infections of the crotch. Thank you.

    --toq

  31. Research by cozziewozzie · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well, that's money well spent. It's wonderful what taxes are used for nowadays.

    1. Re:Research by Soko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      STFU.

      That translates to "Shut The Fuck Up", you moronic troll, just to make sure you understand. No, your sarcasm was not lost on me.

      Anyone who is willing to put thier life on the line so I can drink Gin, sit in my basement and flame Slahdot trolls can have whatever the fuck they need to get the job done.

      Comfortable undewear that prevents what is at the least an uncomfortable skin condition and at worst is a medically dangerous condition - namely boils and necrosis - are cheap compared to having more trained, competent professional people ready to take military action. These people work in situations that would have me soiling those silver boxers.

      I may not agree with why those people are over there, but I sure as fuck want then to come home alive, healthy and able to enjoy the quality of live they were defending, you short sighted skinflint.

      I'm not happy about most taxation either, except when my money goes to a good cause such as this.

      Bah, I could go on, but flaming a troll like you is too easy. Think before you post, Mr. Reagan.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:Research by cozziewozzie · · Score: 1

      Wait, my comment was troll, and this pile of self-indulgent holier-than-thou shite was "Insightful"?

      How about spending money to help improve education, to help the poor, to improve the safety of the people at home so innocent people aren't shot in the face when some cop goes to have a leak? How about spending money to save the fucked-beyond-belief NHS? How about fixing the pension system? How about using it for something more useful instead of chasing fucking ghosts in Iraq, NOW WITH SILVER UNDIES!

      I think these are all more important than you and your fucking gin, you reactionary git.

  32. In a word: by AntiCopyrightRadical · · Score: 1

    Commando

    But more on topic, These are boxers, and I think the idea was that the silver will help cool the body, so you don't sweat so much. (Maybe the design helps the sweat evaporate faster)

    I don't think it's possible to make clothes that actually stop you from sweating when you are hot.

    --
    Abolish Copyright. Restore Freedom.
    1. Re:In a word: by xor.pt · · Score: 1

      I'm not questioning if the undies are boxers or not, but the sweating preventing action it carries. You may be right though, it may not stop the sweat, but prevent it, by keep the testicles cool. Silver is known to be, as gold, a very good conductor, so it may just be conducting the heat away from the skin, and that way preventing it from swaeting.

    2. Re:In a word: by L.Bob.Rife · · Score: 1

      The reason silver is being used is because silver works great as an anti-microbial agent. Thats why water filters used to have silver in them. Various waterborne pathogens die after coming into contact with silver. The unfortunate side effect is that some of the silver might get into your water, and ingesting silver is bad for your health.

  33. Substitute "They'll". . . by kfg · · Score: 1

    for "We'll."

    Substitute a brain for my tapioca while you're at it.

    KFG

  34. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by zojakownith · · Score: 0

    the problem people are having isn't that this post came from your heart, rather people are having a problem with the fact that this story came from your testicles.

    --
    I have bad karma....

    Open source is heavenly, Microsoft is the devil, SCO is going to hell

  35. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok time for the immature slashdot posts, sooo thats how you beat the clap.

  36. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by t0qer · · Score: 1

    Dude you just totally made me crack up at work :D

  37. I enjoy my silver underwear! by Rejemy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got my silver underwear from REI several years ago for mountaineering. What sold me was mostly the reduction of odors, since when you're on a mountain, you're wearing that sweaty underwear for two days of solid work! Highly recommended.

    1. Re:I enjoy my silver underwear! by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      no need recommending. It is part of the Counterstrike routine.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  38. Resale value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Years ago, a British military group enjoyed their leave at our local skihill in British Columbia. They were easily identified from a distance by the black and grey ski suits supplied by a local vendor; the suits were later sold off by the truckload.

    ...I don't think this particular article of clothing will maintain its resale value.

  39. err silver?? by wolvie_cobain · · Score: 3, Funny

    hey! thinfoil underwear!!

    HORRAY!

    1. Re:err silver?? by frinkacheese · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's to protect their child-creating equipment from them new fangled microwave non leathal weapon things. Last thing you want when fighting an unpopular in the mid-east is a couple of sweet loafs.

  40. Yeah, but dude.... by Jeff+Molby · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Alright, it's a relevant story, so in the interest of fairness, I propose a compromise. Repost the story as follows and we'll all try to talk the mods into upping it.

    <T0qersHell Version=2>
    The site I have the pictures on is down (You didn't want to see it anyways), but hopefully I can give a detailed enough explanation of what happened to me last year to make folks realize the importance of anti bacterial undies.

    I was sittin on the toilet one day and noticed a swollen ingrown hair. [Yes, it was where you think it was]. I tried [several things]. Nothing was coming out, so I said, "fuck it" and just left it at that.

    During the week, it [got really bad: doctors, needles, etc].

    I can totally see these types of bacterial infections knocking out a soldier for a month. For me, I could not walk without popping 2 or 3 vicodin [for awhile]. At least I had the lux[u]ry of my house, high speed internet, and cable TV (not much interneting during this ordeal, as it was very hard to sit)
    </T0qersHell>

  41. Let Me Be The First To Say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This... is Britain's... finest... hour. Err gonch.

  42. On a serious note... by vivin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How long before the US Army follows suit?

    I enlisted four and a half years ago in the Army National Guard, and in two weeks time I'm actually leaving for Iraq. As per the regulation, we are supposed to wear the Army issue briefs. That's what we did during Basic Training - but God knows those things aren't made for comfort. They chafe, and once you've been in the field for a few weeks - well, let's just say that the risk of infection increases. Which is why it pays to carry a lot of baby wipes and Gold Bond.

    I actually wear boxers instead of the standar-issue briefs now and it is definitely more comfortable. But anyway, now that I'm headed for the desert, I wouldn't mind having this nifty new underwear - I hope the US Army takes up this good idea. You don't realize how much you take the little things for granted until you're out in the field and out of clean pairs of underwear.

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
    1. Re:On a serious note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're in the f'in Army. Go commando. Quit being a pussy.

    2. Re:On a serious note... by vivin · · Score: 1

      ;) You'd be surprised how much protection a pair of boxers offer!

      --
      Vivin Suresh Paliath
      http://vivin.net

      I like
    3. Re:On a serious note... by uprock_x · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I enlisted four and a half years ago in the Army National Guard, and in two weeks time I'm actually leaving for Iraq.

      Don't get the joke why you were modded redundant, but I think dirty briefs are the last thing you have to worry about. Try DU, experimental army vaccines, being asked to pose with tortured and murdered prisoners and the legitimacy of the occupation.

    4. Re:On a serious note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usually wear a pair of soffe running shorts, underwear is freakin retarded.

    5. Re:On a serious note... by handsome_rob · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "How long before the US Army follows suit?"

      You know how the army is; it'll take them a couple years if ever. I'm 9 months in the desert right now (so close to coming home!) and it's really cooking. I use Under Armour boxers and they work great. They're kinda expensive (around $20), but it's the best thing you're gonna get atm.

    6. Re:On a serious note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how much money do you make each month? how much have you been spending? (on what)

    7. Re:On a serious note... by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1
      Wow, that's madness! Must be the difference between Army and Air Guard or maybe your unit. In the Air Guard, the last time I was issued undies was in Basic Training and I've been responsible for the resupply since then.

      Underware, T-Shirts, and socks are my top priority for a deployment... especially when the laundry facilities are unknown. Boxer-Briefs all the way.

      Mostly I'm responding to say good luck on your deployment and get home safe.

    8. Re:On a serious note... by pizero · · Score: 1

      I hope the US Army will at least learn the lesson that the Ministry of Defence seems to have forgotten. During the Falklands war British navy sailors were issued polypropylene underwear. When the ships were attacked, sailors near fires had their underwear melt causing additional injury.

      The article says the new underwear is made from artificial fibers for comfort, lets just hope it has a melting point much higher than polypropylene does!

    9. Re:On a serious note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You troll! Growl!

    10. Re:On a serious note... by handsome_rob · · Score: 1

      If you mean how did I afford $20 underwear well I didn't. I bought like 2 pair myself the rest people bought for me. I'm just a specialist so I'm not exactly bringin in a lot of cash, so when family members back home ask me what I need I just ask if they'd get me a pair of UA boxers and that's it. I have 6 pair now and 5 UA brown t-shirts. The polyester really keeps me dry and the looseness really helps the boys. I'd really recommend them for anyone coming here to Iraq. Plus they're good for at home; my girlfriend likes em ;)

      Oh I hardly spend any money at all. I'm the cheapest person you'll meet, ask anyone. I bought an iPod before I came over, and I guess that was my last big purchase. I bought a lamp...haha. When I first got here I spent a lot getting my room set up. I've been a few months only spening maybe $10

    11. Re:On a serious note... by bburton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In reality, most people in SWA don't follow the apperance regulations fully. Unlike being stationed back in the States, in Iraq it's business first; or at least that's the way it used to be during the initial stages. The last trip I was on the Wing Commander didn't like that people were hanging sunglasses on their flight suits, lol. I hate stupid regulations, just let me do my job. Who the fuck cares if I hang my sunglasses on my uniform? Or roll up my sleeves? (not that I'm bitter or anything)

      This all coming from an Airforce guy (3 trips to the desert). We got to wear civilian clothes off duty, which was nice. At least until the SECAF came to visit the base, and saw people running around with their non-conservative bling-bling and sagging pants. He made a little comment about it, and wa-la, now everyone wears the PT uniform off duty! I can't make this stuff up.

      Typical military-style: one person fucks up, everyone pays the price.

      --
      Slashdot = ((Technology + Politics) / Trolls) % Grammar Nazis
    12. Re:On a serious note... by amper · · Score: 1

      Vivin:

      You might want to invest in some higher-quality underwear before you ship out. I'd recommend Smartwool or Ibex wool skivvies. There's a reason why desert-dwellers wear a lot of wool.

      If nothing else, if you run into any Brits that don't like the new issue stuff, you might be able to trade. I'd also try the Fox River X-Static silver-threaded anti-bacterial socks. I've been using them for years, and they work very well.

      Also, believe it or not, baby diaper rash ointment is a great thing to keep around. I prefer the Burt's Bees brand, myself.

      Oh, and good luck Over There. Come back alive.

    13. Re:On a serious note... by uprock_x · · Score: 1

      Ah the mod was right, I spoke out of turn. It's a noble thing to do to serve in the armed forces. It was never my calling but I have friends who serve in some well known British regiments and they tell me all about it and how they felt in the lead up to the Iraq war and about WMDs and about all kinds of stuff.

      What motivated this guy was probably what motivates a lot of Americans; when Saddam's henchmen drove those planes into the twin towers on that terrible day it struck a chord in the US psyche.

      That Cindy Sheehan, she's obviously a twisted democrat anyway, her mind warped by Michael Moore and other pinko commies. And I say this, all this talk that Neocons used to be communists is very damaging and distinctly un-American.

    14. Re:On a serious note... by Phil-14 · · Score: 1

      I think I remember reading that some US forces in Afghanistan actually have these sorts of undergarments.

      I don't remember the details, though, other than that silver was interwoven with whatever other material was in the clothing.

      --
      (currently testing something about signatures here)
    15. Re:On a serious note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are an idiot! What is un American about telling the truth? Iraq had nothing to do with 911. Iraq was a secular state and an enemy of the islamist fanatics. 911 orignated with Saudis. Follow the money and see who benefited from 911. You and your feeble minded ilk have been manipulated. Get over it, swallow your stupid pride and been honest for once.

    16. Re:On a serious note... by uprock_x · · Score: 1

      Seems I've baited my own team.

      AC it was sarcasm, and deliberate misinfo about Iraq reflecting that some huge proportion of Americans believe(d) that Iraq was responsible for 9/11.

      Read it again, we are on the same side. For the record, if I'd managed to goad a brainwashed Neocon out instead as was my cunning plan then I would have explained how people I know in the UK armed forces knew only too well what a shocking crock of shit this war was/is and what it was really for.

    17. Re:On a serious note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out Mike Sparks EXCELLENT combatreform.com website for useful info on gear and much more.
      http://www.geocities.com/paratroop2000/surviveiraq gearlist.htm

    18. Re:On a serious note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your service. Be safe.

  43. Nothing can ruin a battle faster than chafe ... by joelsanda · · Score: 1

    "It is coated to prevent bacterial infection, and we have tried to arrange the seams so that they don't chafe,"

    Nothing can ruin a battle faster than chafe from underwear seams.

    --
    The Luddites were ahead of their time.
    1. Re:Nothing can ruin a battle faster than chafe ... by trmcdougle · · Score: 1

      Curiously the french when trying to excuse Napoleons defeat by the Duke of Wellington at Waterloo often say he was off his form that day because of his piles!

  44. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You took pictures if an infected ingrown hair on your testes? That takes a lot of balls.

  45. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    The site I have the pictures on is down...

    Oh Sweet Jesus, miracles still occur!

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  46. Re: Horray for tinfoil undies by waltznumber3 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Only stops them from reading your thoughts if your head's up your ass.

    --
    If you just took anything I said seriously, read it again.
  47. Do you suppose Soldiers Get Germ-Fighting Undies by confused+philosopher · · Score: 2, Funny

    Suppose we could get a pair of these knickers to the goatse guy? Looks like he could use some germ fighting action in that area of his body.

    --
    Why slashdot? Why not?
  48. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Wow, that is the greatest story I've heard on Slashdot in a long time. I don't know if I am more grossed out or more amused. I haven't laughed so much all week.

    Seriously though, having had a few boils myself, cleaning yourself carefully is good advice.

    --
    Qxe4
  49. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, me and 10 of my friends are watching this karaoke bar, and it's the best thing we've ever seen on the internet. So funny. Thank you. I think I see you, if that's you up front. Nice to put a face behind the scrotum. =)
    [ euphorica at gmail dot com ]

  50. yeah yeah by pintomp3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    but do they have an anti-skid feature? it would be a shame to have u'r silver undies look like a shiny drag strip.

  51. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You link to a site that requires IE? This is /. ya know.

  52. War of 1812 confuses me. by donscarletti · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, the war of 1812. What I don't get is that Americans seem to be pretty pissed off about it still, but if a bunch of English and Canadians went and burned down the White House right now, most Americans I know would buy them a round of beer. This would be especially true if they blocked the exits first. Oh well, It's just that time is meant to heal all wounds but it seems to be making things worse.

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    1. Re:War of 1812 confuses me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, I think you have a misconception about American opinions on the White House. Sure, we might cheer if an American sets fire to the place (and the Capitol for good measure), but we'd certainly be pissed if a bunch of foreign English and Canadians tried to burn the place down. Rallying around the flag and all that. :-)

      (Incidentally, burning the occupants alive is just excessive.)

    2. Re:War of 1812 confuses me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it would make the rest of the world happy too. Similarly, us Canadian would like the favour return in the Parliment while in session.

    3. Re:War of 1812 confuses me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah,right,and while we are at it,bring the Guys home,let the Jews fight their own Enemies,after all they made them.
      No more need for silver underwear.

    4. Re:War of 1812 confuses me. by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      I think human nature confuses you. Just because someone bitches about something doesn't mean they actually care. You'd be hard-pressed to find someone who actually does still have a War of 1812 grudge. Hell, with a random sample of 20 or so, you might not even find anyone who knows the White House was burned down during the War of 1812 (Or ever, maybe).

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
  53. in other news.... by tloh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Victoria's Secret announced the imminent launch of their new "Patriot" line.

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    1. Re:in other news.... by fbjon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Those are expected to be popular among the higher-ranking officers...

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    2. Re: in other news.... by gidds · · Score: 1
      ...in Wome?

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    3. Re: in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a vewy gweat fwiend in wome.

    4. Re: in other news.... by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      You really remember 'Up Pompeii'?

      With Frankie Howerd, released around 1974.

      Or were you quoting something else?

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    5. Re: in other news.... by gidds · · Score: 1
      I do remember it slightly -- I'm too young to have seen it the first time around, but I've seen the film, and caught a few of the episodes they've shown since.

      But I'm afwaid I was quoting something a bit wacier, though of a welatively similar vintage. The speaker was addwessing a huge cwowd, bewating them for making fun of his fwiend, a vewy impowtant Woman who commanded a cwack legion, and who had jutht been of thome athithtanth in a thudden crithith: Biggus Dickus himself.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    6. Re: in other news.... by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      I thought you were harking back to Frankie's: He ranks as high as any man in Rome.

      How old was I then? Young enough to find it sewiously amusing.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
  54. It's the silver! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silver ions stops microbs from burning O2. cool now I don't have to take a shower for a month!!!

    1. Re:It's the silver! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People in N.A. old west would put silver coins in their canntines to stop the water for going bad.

  55. mo info... by wilsoniya · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't know about the rest of the ./ crowd, but i'm not one for driving. Just not a fan of trying to stay alive in fear of soccer moms driving 30,000lb SUV land yachts I guess... but really I was thinking the other day about driverless highways, and I guess there is actually some movements being made in that direction. read about it.

    There's some cool shit in that link about maximizing efficiency by having cars drive only a few meters apart to minimize air resistance and the like. I'm all for it.

    --
    I can't remember the last time I forgot anything.
    1. Re:mo info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf are you talking about, this isnt about underwear fag

    2. Re:mo info... by briancurtin · · Score: 0

      do these soccer moms wear germ-fighting underwear?

      --
      My UID is a palindrome, that must be good for some type of prize.
    3. Re:mo info... by Mazem · · Score: 1

      /. threadhopping bug strikes again!

    4. Re:mo info... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      Cor, driverless highways. Aren't they called railways/roads?

    5. Re:mo info... by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

      I agree. We need underwear that is only a few meters apart. To minimize air resistance, yknow?

  56. Re:First cubic polynomial post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, in AD 2101, war was the 31337^3.

  57. First ones issued? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "They are the first undergarments issued to British troops"

    I don't think that's quite true. Atleast, in WWI they were issed with them (with buttons in them too).

    1. Re:First ones issued? by thesymbolicfrog · · Score: 1

      But the real question is how you know details about British underwear used in World War I. :)

  58. Will we see this go retail? by Kelbear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Athletes will probably enjoy anti-chafe undies as well. At the moment the best alternative is the UnderArmor brand's line of underwear. The difference in comfort is considerable. After 2 or so hours of running I'd normally come back with painful rashes, 3 hours and they may even bleed slightly. The sleek underarmor fabric keeps things sliding painlessly and kept this from happening, as opposed to normal cotton boxers.

    The problem is the $20 dollar pricetag per pair! Even if it isn't really better than the UnderArmor, at least it'd provide some competition to drive the prices down a bit for performance underwear.

    1. Re:Will we see this go retail? by Circlotron · · Score: 1

      You could always wait till they become available second-hand at some army disposals store :-P

    2. Re:Will we see this go retail? by 32771 · · Score: 1

      I understand your plight. DefenseReview wrote about competition to UnderArmor lately. You still have to read the other company's homepage but this is a good direction: http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News &file=article&sid=710

      --
      Je me souviens.
  59. Hunky soldiers in tight silver undies ? by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    mmmmm... I do find the idea appealing. A few disco balls, a bit a of sweat... I'll provide the RnR...

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  60. Flap? by EvilMidnightBomber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why leave out the front flap in men's underwear?

    Not trolling, but seriously, does anybody actually use that thing? When I go to a public urinal, I want speed and stealth i.e., a commando raid. The last thing on earth I'm looking for is to get caught playing fabric origami just to access the plumbing. Or is the purpose actually to act as a squeegee during retraction to minimize the chances of..er..having to shake your leg afterward?

    1. Re:Flap? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Damn right I use it! The last thing I want to be doing is faffing about pulling my boxers down at the front, especially when drunk as that carries with it the risk of spring back... *shudder*

      I have a single pair of boxers without flap or buttons, and while they're lovely to wear (nice material, good fit, etc), they're a pain to visit a urinal wearing.

    2. Re:Flap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed. I hate the flap. It's much easier to just pull the elastic waistband down a little and pull out my wang to pee.

    3. Re:Flap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that I've started wearing slightly large and roomly boxers over briefs, I've come to appreciate the flap recently a little bit more. Easier to use now, and without the tug of elastic. What I still can't work, however, is the fly on a standard pair of jeans without unbuttoning. While it's quite a time saver if you're wearing a belt on loose pants or for dress, it's far too tight and stiff to use routinely.

    4. Re:Flap? by SargeantLobes · · Score: 1

      I don't use he fly either, except when I'm wearing a suit: Pulling down the waistband would mean digging under the shirt and messing all my clothes up, using the fly keeps things neat.

      --
      I do love "!" but not as much as I love "..."...
    5. Re:Flap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I still can't work, however, is the fly on a standard pair of jeans without unbuttoning.

      ??? I always unbutton my fly - you kind of have to? Or do you think people have penises so tiny they fit out between the buttons or something? Peeing out of a fly without unbuttoning it. Great superpower, Micro-Penis-Man!

    6. Re:Flap? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 0

      Pull the *waistband* *down*? Perhaps if you're hung like baby that might come in handy. I've always pulled one of the little pant legs *up and over* to use a urinal.

    7. Re:Flap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't use the flap, score another vote for elastic band vaulting.

      Also, since I don't use the flap, I can wear men's briefs and trunks that don't have them. Woot.

    8. Re:Flap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think (and hope) he was referring to a zip fly. :)

    9. Re:Flap? by EvilMidnightBomber · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I'm replying again to this same topic let alone my own post, but after seeing the responses, I feel like I'm watching a hungry dog try to get to the food on the other side of a door by headbutting it, trying to claw through it, or wedging a paw underneath when all he needs to do is turn the knob. I'll admit I have no experience with boxers (tight briefs not only lower sperm counts, they lower testosterone production, which helps to stem the hair loss tide), but pulling the top elastic down? Is this even possible with your pants up? This sounds more difficult than trying to thwart the defenses of a screw-type vending machine protecting its bottom-row snickers. Doesn't anyone else just grab the legband and open the curtains?

    10. Re:Flap? by Secrity · · Score: 1

      From my experience, with briefs and stretchy boxers, it is easier to use the leg band than to use the fly; with non-stretchy boxers it is nearly impossible to use use the leg opening and one must resort to using either the fly or the waistband.

    11. Re:Flap? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      and whose bright idea was it to put dozens of tiny metal teeth there anyway?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    12. Re:Flap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with that approach is that you have to push the boxer leg back into your pants after you're done. Although, if you wear really short boxers, this might not be a huge problem. Pulling the waistband down, on the other hand, doesn't disrupt the legs at all, and I can't imagine it being terribly inconvenient due to length unless you're well over 7" flaccid.

    13. Re:Flap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A woman.

    14. Re:Flap? by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      Oh, pish-posh. There's showers and there's growers. Showers pull aside crotch, growers pull down waistband. Blah blah blah.

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  61. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I like you - you've got balls".
    "I like balls".

  62. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Kelbear · · Score: 1

    The moral of the story is to squeeze yank and pull at any swollen growth in the pelvic area. It's for your own good.

    Can't say as much for the kittens though.

  63. Same thing all over... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If you ever go climbing or hiking, you will know how much of a difference really good underwear and socks makes. You can wear anything else - I do climb mountains wearing jeans and sweatshirts, much to the goretex brigade's horror - but if you've got your socks and your boxers right, all the rest will follow.


    Conversely you'd be amazed how miserable chafing underwear and sweaty socks can make you, and how quickly.

    1. Re:Same thing all over... by teneighty · · Score: 1
      I do climb mountains wearing jeans and sweatshirts, much to the goretex brigade's horror

      As an active climber and mountaineer let me assure you that the 'Gortex Brigade's horror of what you wear is well-founded. Cotton kills. When it gets wet, it loses its insulating properies and you become vulnerable to hypothermia. Technical fabrics breathe better, dry faster, are much lighter, are more durable and are warmer when they do get wet.

      Technical fabrics have revolutionized outdoor sports. People are now able to be out in conditions far more adverse than was possible in the past. Of course, you don't need technical fabrics for a short day hike, but for serious climbing and mountaineering where you're out there on your own in the elements, it's dangerous (not to mention heavy and uncomfortable) to wear typical street clothes.

    2. Re:Same thing all over... by plnrtrvlr · · Score: 1

      I climb myself, and I've found that a combination of fabrics works the best: silk long-underwear is a must, and synthetic outerwear is a must. For bush-whacking and slumming around camp, jeans and a cotton sweat-shirt with a gore-tex jacket -most synthetics do NOT have near the durability as jeans do, even though jeans aren't the best when wet. Nor are most synthetics nearly as comfortable to actually wear as a pair of jeans and a good cotton sweat-shirt. The trick is to know where on the mountain to cache them away until your return and layer on the other synthetics in your pack. It has the added bonus of being able to change back into something dry and comfortable when you make it back, even hollow-fill feels like crap when it's wet, no matter how much better it dries or insulates.

  64. You are wrong by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    (and, I would imagine, are less comfortable for women--correct me if I'm wrong)...

    Jesus, I wish that were the case. My GF keeps stealing my underwear to wear when all hers need to be washed. If some guy could invent underwear that is comfy for men, but uncomfortable for women, I'd buy fifty pair.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:You are wrong by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      On the other side, many a Slashdot geek would be so lucky to have a girlfriend (real one - the bot from UT2004 doesn't count) to steal his underwear...

  65. This should have happened long ago by sita · · Score: 2, Interesting

    An infrastructure for supplying the troops with clean underwear, silver magic or not, is second in importance only to supply of food and ammunition (well, communications and...well, it is quite important).

    If you don't change underwear regularly you are bound to get very nasty rashes in just a few days (which will put you out of any useless service). If you leave it to the individual serviceman to supply his own trunks, then there is a high risk some won't change them often enough.

    I would guess that underwear lasts longer in desert climate than in more temperate climates due to that the sweat evaporates faster and leaves less time for the germs to grow, but all the same anti-germ underwear seems like a good idea. You increase the underwear changing interval which means you can cut back on the supplies organization (and the individual soldiers don't have to carry as many pairs of underwear).

    1. Re:This should have happened long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are supposing that Bush and his administration actually supports the troops.

      They don't, by their actions you shall know them.

  66. I suppose... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    I suppose that the price/value ratio of military underwear with silver content is better than $100 hammers? :D
    But this may DEFINITELY be bad for POWs. So far the captors didn't find any value in there...

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  67. And, on the other side of the channel.... by Duhavid · · Score: 3, Funny

    German soldiers get Brit-Fighting undies.

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  68. They need undies that stop inbreeding by John+Seminal · · Score: 0
    and buck teeth. and big ears. but the damn sexy accent gets me every time. it is an instant turn on. no matter how ugly a british person is, people will always be attracted to their proper pronunciation of the english language.

    Or I should say the royal family need the undies to stop inbreeding. I guess 1000 years of marriying cousins to keep power concentrated is a bad thing. For those who don't know history, you would be suprised at how many cousins married cousins in british royal family history.

    [/joke]

    I wonder how many soldiers get infection because of dirty underwear? Wouldn't it make better sense to give soldiers a couple of individually packaged wet wipes instead?

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:They need undies that stop inbreeding by ettlz · · Score: 1
      I guess 1000 years of marriying cousins to keep power concentrated is a bad thing. For those who don't know history, you would be suprised at how many cousins married cousins in british royal family history.

      Well, there's always electioneering! After all, when one is an extraterrestrial blood-sucking shape-shifting lizard, one can be hard pushed to find a suitable breeding partner. It's not like you can go on Blind Date.

  69. This can prevent friendly fire mishaps by Muhammar · · Score: 2, Funny

    The metallized silverfoil undies will show up on radar.

    --
    I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    1. Re:This can prevent friendly fire mishaps by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      No, these are stealth technology undies. Their radar footprint is smaller than a bird, i.e. ...a cock...maybe a monkey... at most. Definetly not as big as a torpedo, though

  70. Re: Horray for tinfoil undies by benna · · Score: 1

    Or you think with your penis?

    --
    "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
  71. Willie for women by fullon604 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have just the solution for the female soldier on the go -- http://www.shenis.com/

  72. No chafe hey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    and we have tried to arrange the seams so that they don't chafe,

    So, they're wearing them inside-out then.

    Coincidently, I do this half the time in my underwear 4-day rotational schedule (forwards, backwards, inside-out forwards, inside-out backwards).

    *scratch scratch*

    Now, where's that stench coming from?

  73. O/T by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

    Can I mod your sig insightful? Where'd you get it from, or is it your very own?

  74. Are germs really a problem? by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I would rather see underwear that is prone to limit the growth of fungus. Socks, pants and (for our female military, bras.)

    Athlete's foot is one of the more common problems while infections may occur as a result of untreated injuries. (untreated fungal infections may also lead to bacterial infections if not properly treated.)

    You actually don't want to get rid of all bacteria, since some bacteria are actually good for you and helps keeping the bad bacteria out.

    Another issue is that there is a risk of getting multi-resistent bacteria that is harder to treat if you expose bacteria to antibiotics for a prolonged time. This is one reason why you shouldn't treat virus infections with antibiotics - it has no effect on the virus.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  75. In other news.... by sillybilly · · Score: 3, Funny

    More like ask the female soldiers to send their used underpants to your prison inmates.
    Little do they know you just want those panties for your massive silver extraction operation!

    That reminds me the joke:

    I'll do anything

    A man was sitting at a bar enjoying an
    after-work cocktail when an exceptionally
    gorgeous young woman entered. She was so
    striking that the man could not take his
    eyes away from her. The young woman noticed
    his overly-attentive stare & walked directly
    toward him.

    Before he could offer his apologies for
    being so rude, the young woman said
    to him, 'I'll do anything, absolutely
    anything, that you want me to do, no
    matter what it is, for $100 on one
    condition.'

    Flabbergasted, the man asked what the
    condition was.

    The young woman replied, 'You have to tell
    me what you want me to do in just three
    words.'

    The man considered her proposition for a
    moment, withdrew his wallet from his pocket &
    slowly counted out five $20 bills, which he
    pressed into the young woman's hand.

    He looked deeply into her eyes & slowly,
    meaningfully said, 'Paint my house.'

  76. This is actually a great invention by Mensa+Babe · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's a picture on Wikipedia. It stops a lot of germs. Impressive.

    --
    Karma: Positive (probably because of superiour intellect)
    1. Re:This is actually a great invention by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      NSFW!

    2. Re:This is actually a great invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSFW!

      I don't know Where do you work that pictures of underwear with no nudity are not suitable, Mr. Nounderscores... Or should I call you Father Nounderscores?

    3. Re:This is actually a great invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the underwear was a chastity belt!

    4. Re:This is actually a great invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the germs are able to defeat it with the use of a ballpoint pen. Err...Germ Carriers...

    5. Re:This is actually a great invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah? So it's even MORE appropriate then. Because it means NO SEX!

      Get a life, dude. Seriously. Here in Europe we have naked boobies and butts on billboards and children don't seem to be killed by them. If they did, I'd be the first one to lobby against breast-feeding!

  77. US Forces by ThoreauHD · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most US Forces use Under Armor underwear. It doesn't have silver to prevent bacteria, as far as I know, but it seems to last forever and keep sweat and chaffing away. I think they wash their clothes in the US, so maybe silver particles were not on the top of their list.

    http://www.underarmour.com/

    1. Re:US Forces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do the US forces tend to wear under armour tactical boxer briefs or the compression shorts?

      Or something else?

    2. Re:US Forces by kikta · · Score: 1

      All my friends and I wear the boxer-briefs (and that's what the exchange sells). I'm assuming the compression shorts would be similar (haven't worn them), but possibly tighter on the legs and the crotch. That would be bad, because you need *some* air circulation down there. Otherwise, you'll have a killer case of crotch-rot after being in the field.

  78. -1 disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't want to see the pictures sicko.

  79. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ordinary soap should be enough if you remove ingrown hairs before they get infected. I don't like antibacterial stuff since chances are that bacteria has become resistant when I really need it.

  80. To quote Windsor Davies: by ettlz · · Score: 1
    ...but hey, as long as they've got pants and tea, they'll be fine!

    SHUUUUT UP! ...Er, lovely boy...

  81. The idiots are taking over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can attest to the fact that even if you wear tight little briefs that are one size too small, and dip your testicles in hot water before sex, that you will *STILL* get a woman pregnant.

    Dear God! Please tell me this was not your method of birth control.. and if it wasn't, what the hell were you doing dipping your testicles in hot water before sex?

    1. Re:The idiots are taking over by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      what the hell were you doing dipping your testicles in hot water before sex?

      He probably misunderstood the term "teabagging."

      --
      ± 29 dB
  82. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by mdfst13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Just a follow up, after this happened my wife and I started buying anti bacterial soap."

    Yep, so now you are breeding bacteria that are immune to anti-bacterial agents. Eventually, you will have just as much bacteria as when you started, but you will no longer have the option of applying an anti-bacterial agent when you need it. E.g. when you have an open sore that needs to heal.

  83. USMC issue by Ja�ana · · Score: 2, Informative

    I, along with many many other Marines in Iraq, was recently issued something that sounds very similar. I actually haven't even worn mine yet favoring the Under Armour I purchased myself before deploying. A note on the silver fiber, though. First, judging from experience of the others who have worn it, nothing in it prevents sweating. And second, according to the tags, at least, the silver is what prevents microbial growth.

    --

    -- Napalm sticks to kids.

  84. Any info on toothbrushes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have British soldiers been issued toothbrushes yet? Now that would be something they truly need!

  85. Thats just plain wrong by szaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't believe everything you read in the tabloids. I serve with the British Army, and when it comes down to it, we get what we need, and what we do get is damn good.

    1. Re:Thats just plain wrong by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      You mean The Sun lied to me? Well I never...

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  86. Simpsons flashback: Electric underpants... by MCRocker · · Score: 1

    The headline gave me a Simpsons flashback moment... fade to grey...

    Homer sees Lisa reading Wired magazine, grabs it and goes on about how much he likes 'Weird magazine', thinks GigaBytes is some kind of joke, then discards the magazine when he realizes it isn't 'Weird', but 'Wired'. The cover had a picture of a strangely Bill Gate-ish character wearing, what the headline claims are 'Electric Underpants' - 'Virtually Wedgie Proof' - 'Do we really need them?'

    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  87. Mr. Tinfoil Hat, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like you to meet Mr. Silver Underpants.

    So, we wont be suprised by the decrease in English Fertility later, now, will we?

  88. Ohh nice by springbox · · Score: 1

    So now a potentially life threatening event is signaled by music. Think of the poor pilot who doesn't know if they should try to regain control or start dancing.

    1. Re:Ohh nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Owned.

    2. Re:Ohh nice by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

      So pilots now wear silver underwear while dancing? Fascinating, really.

  89. Try Bathing by The+Other+White+Meat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Maybe if they washed their uncut limey cocks every once in a while they wouldn't need the high tech underwear...

    --

    --- Generation X: The first generation to have SIG lines inferior to their parents... ---
  90. MMORPG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, now I can hunt in that dragon cave in my favourite MMORPG (Massive Multiplayer Online Roleplaying Game) for several days without have to change underwear or taking a shower.

    I will make millions of experience points and improve my character level alot!

  91. Now all they need to do is fix their teeth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they'll start to join the human race...

  92. Boxers or Briefs by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    It's mithril mail, for their privates! And officers too, I expect. Bed and breakfast in Isengard!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  93. How about toothbrushes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have British soldiers been issued toothbrushes? They most surely need them.




    This is the second time I've posted this. The first one was deleted for some strange reason.

  94. Churchill by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight them in our under-pants.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  95. that's a different anti-bacterial agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no reason to think that bacteria developing a resistance to triclosan will also be simultaneously developing a resistance to cyclosporin.

  96. in addition by fbartho · · Score: 1

    All the Royal Families in Europe interbred...

    Haemophilia was started in England by One of the Queens. She was a carrier and had a great number of children, most of whom were either afflicted or carriers of the defective gene. They bred with many of the other Royal family leading Haemophilia to be considered a royal disease...

    I did a HS Biology project 5 years ago trying to trace they gene as it made its way around all the Royal Families

    --
    Gravity Sucks
  97. very real - visit the Scrotal Safety Commission by Fmuctohekerr · · Score: 1
  98. Scots? by epcraig · · Score: 1

    So, I take it that Highlanders are exempt?
    Or are kilts just for dress uniforms?

    --
    Ed Craig "Who cares what you think?" George W. Bush, 4th of July 2001
  99. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by johansalk · · Score: 1



    I recall a summer that I commenced by indulging in bowls after bowls of pears that were sold cheaply at a nearby supermarket. Unknown to me at the time, till I read it later on in a book, my avid consumption of this fruit caused me to have a candidal infection that soon got so bad the skin on my scrotum was not only red, insanely itchy and painful but was also peeling off. Chocolate too had a similar effect, worsening the itch. I could hardly walk, and on some days I couldn't at all, with all I could do being just to apply some cream and lay in bed all afternoon and evening. Oh and the cream didn't work! Whatever creams I was given by doctors just didn't work for any longer than a few hours and then the itch would all return. I washed frequently, changed underwear twice or thrice a day with each application of the cream, and yet it didn't, despite trying different creams for weeks or months even. Eventually what did work was this one time the pharmacy ran out of the cream i was prescribed and they offered me the same medicine but instead of a cream as an ointment - an ointment is oil-based instead of water-based. Remarkably, this worked! Same medicine that didn't work as a cream, worked as an ointment!

    So if you get a candidal infection in your scrotum, get an ointment, not a cream!

    Also, I recently had a candidal infection on my side, due to a habit of having to cover myself with a duvet or a blanket otherwise I can't fall asleep. This was fine until this day I showered and then went to bed on a warm summer evening, covering myself with a winter duvet, and woke up with an itch that I know was a candidal infection. Tried the cream or powder, same thing, works for a few hours but then the itch returns, and eventually when I ran out of both I tried some vinegar from the kitchen on a cottonbud and applied to the sore skin. Two applications, and it completely killed the little beasts!

  100. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Xiaran · · Score: 1

    OK fair enough. This is what happned to you. I think tho you should have prefaced it with a warning... but thats just my opinion.

    On a related note... in university I knew a nursing student. She was full of interesting information such as yours. She once talk to me at length about colon surgery. To cut to the chase, if you ever need to have any form of colon surgery do *not* let the doctor explain what they are going to do. Simply tell them to knock you out before the operation and afterwards just say weather it worked or not. Thats what Im doing if fingers crossed I ever have to. Trust me on this one.

  101. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Xiaran · · Score: 1

    The site I have the pictures on is down...

    Also. Am I the only one to wonder why someone would have a site detailing such a thing?

  102. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Could be worse, he could have posted pictures. Count your blessings.

  103. I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Col. Silas Suchanek, what do you do for a living?"

    "I design underwear"

  104. Going commando by Infonaut · · Score: 2, Funny
    Actually, the only time I ever wore undergarments was when we were out in the cold, and I had to go with polypropelene leggings and undershirt. The rest of the time we did all go commando. The trick to staying comfortable is to not develop moisture and the resulting chafing. When you're running around constantly getting sweaty, going commando is the only way to go.

    Anecdote: Our battallion was in the middle of a training rotation at the National Training Center in the desert that is Ft. Irwin, CA. At the conclusion of each mission, we would have a rather scathing after action review led by our evaluators. These AARs were filmed. We had just completed a pre-dawn assault on an enemy position that was protected by a *lot* of concertina wire. As a result, more than a few of us had torn our BDUs. We were tired and sort of spaced out.

    We all sat on the side of a wadi, upslope from the Army camera crew that was setting up to film the AAR. My buddy Jim was sitting next to me, and I happened to glance over at him. His nuts were completely exposed from a six inch rent in his trousers, and he was sitting on his butt with his legs spread wide and his elbows on his knees, so he was giving the camera crew a view they didn't necessarily appreciate.

    Jim, being Jim, just shrugged and put some 50 mph tape (basically green duct tape) over it. He was the same guy who forgot to button his trousers after taking a leak one January afternoon on a training exercise at Ft. Drum, but that's another story.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Going commando by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone else find it interesting that any time you talk to a soldier, they will volunteer a story that has the words "his nuts were completely exposed" somewhere in it?

      I'm just sayin', is all.

    2. Re:Going commando by Infonaut · · Score: 1
      Does anyone else find it interesting that any time you talk to a soldier, they will volunteer a story that has the words "his nuts were completely exposed" somewhere in it?

      I think that means my friend Jim has been on a lot of deployments. I feel sorry for all those people who have seen his nuts.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  105. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

    Tip: refrain from rubbing unwashed pears on ballsack prior to consumption.

    wtf!?

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  106. Y2K jelly, inappropriate technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing that puzzles me about the original post is that the underwear was synthetic. That is a really bad idea for crotch rot. Now if they were wearing a thin synthetic under cotton underwear to hold the moisture away from the sking, that would be one thing but that doesn't appear to be the case (and it wouldn't work well where the groin meets the legs without a fold over flap). Seems like the silver is being added to counteract the fact that the underkegs were made out of a synthetic fiber instead of a natural fiber as they should have been. I have read about the US military making heavy use of synthetics in uniforms due to lobbying of the Man Made Fiber Producers' Association. So, it looks like high tech (silver) has been used to counteract the adverse affects of the inapproriate use of high technology (synthetic cloth).

    KY jelly or surgilube is actually more effective in treating fungal infections than the commercial preparations. It is cheaper than the alternatives particularly if you buy it at your local medical supply house (the non-sterile packages sold to consumer in drugstores cost about 4 times as much). The preservative used, chlorhexidine gluconate, is the same (though lower concentration) as the active ingredient in surgical scrubs (hibiclens, etc) and is effective against fungi at even low concentrations. The moist gel helps heal skin but normally moisture encourages fungal growth. This works on althletes foot, vaginal infections, schmega cheese, infection between the groin and leg or other places of skin on skin contact, in the rectal area, and even in the mouth. Clean and dry the area, apply jelly, and leave on overnight (socks or underwear can be worn over it). Oil or petroleum jelly based ointments actually trap in moisture and keep out oxegen, both of which are detrimental as they promote the growth of anerobic organisms. In the case of the uncomforable hard flaky skin pealing that can accompany (crotch or toes) fungal infections, the jelly helps soften the flakes which can be sloughed off with a little elbow grease. 100% Aloe vera gel is also somewhat effective. Neem leaf and Tea tree oil can help.

    Some doctors will actually recommend KY for various skin conditions but most don't think to do so because there is no marketing campaign behind it.

    Eating yogurt or kefir and avoiding carbohydrates is also helpful if you are dealing with an internal infection. Eventually, too much yogurt can tip the balance of intestinal flora in the other direction and cause similar symptoms such as excessive gas. External infections may be a sign of an internal infection; when the body is busy fighting yeast internally it can let yeast grow externally.

    If the infection is really bad no single treatment, not even KY, is sufficient by itself.

    I have used baking soda with some success just as you have used vinegar - the andromeda strain principle. Stings like the dickens. I don't recommend repeated use.

    Men: KY used recreationally is quite effective at preventing the growth of schmega cheese.

    1. Re:Y2K jelly, inappropriate technology by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

      Men: KY used recreationally is quite effective at preventing the growth of schmega cheese.

      I was circumcised when I was 22. I love it so much.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  107. bacteria can trade resistances by Somegeek · · Score: 1

    They don't have to develop multiple resistances simultaneously because bacteria can and do trade genes for different types of resistance with other strains of bacteria. We are not fighting just one single organism here; your triclosan resistant bacteria can meet my cyclosporin resistant bacteria and 'learn' each other's resistances, and pass both resistances on to their next generations.

    (Or something like that. Damn it Jim, I'm a Geek, not a Doctor!)

    Also, is there some rule that you can only be attacked by one strain of bacteria at a time?

    I will not use products that contain anti-bacterial substances and don't believe that anyone should unless there is an urgent medical need. I would even support a law that forbid commercial products that contained anti-bacterial agents.

    --
    And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
  108. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only reason you got that problem is because you indulge in homosexual acts. Fucking faggott Die Already

  109. So its germproof... by gorkhal · · Score: 1

    but can it still protect a guy from a kick in the nads??!! what a waste of research.

    --
    Sig Under Construction
  110. Equipment... by Palal · · Score: 1

    So the privates will not have all the equipment they need, even if they themselves lack it.

    --
    -Palal
  111. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

    ha!

    your story reminds me of don't shave down there.

  112. Difficult finding it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand the difficulty... are you having a hard time finding something when using the flaps?

  113. Circumcision? by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

    That's what we did during Basic Training - but God knows those things aren't made for comfort. They chafe, and once you've been in the field for a few weeks - well, let's just say that the risk of infection increases. Which is why it pays to carry a lot of baby wipes and Gold Bond.

    Yah, but there's another issue here, which is gonna get me modded down as a troll. But it's relevent, especially in a desert climate.

    Think about it: the Jews and the Muslims, both desert people, have two things in common that the "middle brother" (Christianity) has abandoned as a religious requirement: circumcision, and avoidance of pork.

    First the pork. Pork spoils quickly and nearly indetectably (by smell/taste) in a desert climate.

    A quick study of desert societies of all continents will show that most of them are circumcised - Aussie aboriginals, Saharans predating Islam, etc.

    Perhaps religion was merely used as a tool to promote the avoidance of these risks?

    Note that circumcision has been embraced culturally in most of North America, but not in most of Europe. Most American soldiers will therefore be circumcised, most British will not.

    I actually wear boxers instead of the standar-issue briefs now and it is definitely more comfortable. But anyway, now that I'm headed for the desert, I wouldn't mind having this nifty new underwear - I hope the US Army takes up this good idea. You don't realize how much you take the little things for granted until you're out in the field and out of clean pairs of underwear.

    Indeed. But I had myself circumcised at the age of 22. In cold weather, no big deal. In warm weather, I definitely feel cooler and more comfortable. Remember, mankind did not evolve wearing pants of any sort; the protective benefits of the foreskin have been eclipsed by its liabilities.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Circumcision? by typical · · Score: 1

      Perhaps religion was merely used as a tool to promote the avoidance of these risks?

      Do you have any evidence that religion today is anything other than a simple pragmatic organization that uses what irrational hooks it can to sell itself to people?

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  114. Re:The dangers of bacterial infections in the crot by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Doesn't regular soap kill most bacteria anyways?

  115. Learn to wash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I guess, they are british. A bit much to expect them to know how to clean themselves!

  116. good for slashdotters too! by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Both slashdotters and soldiers at the front dont change their unmentionables more than once week, though the latter have a good excuse.

    (Have a sense of humor, moderators!)/

  117. Cool, Shiny Underwear! by KnarfO · · Score: 1

    ...to match my tinfoil hat!

    :-P

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
  118. Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is neat stuff.