Slashdot Mirror


Google Techs, Webmasters Mingle

Steve Nixon writes "Free-flowing beer, live music, karaoke and arcade games kept the party raging at the Googleplex the other night, but the real action was unfolding inside a sterile conference room at Google's headquarters. That's where the cunning internet entrepreneurs who constantly try to manipulate Google's search engine results for a competitive edge were trying to make the most of a rare opportunity to match wits face-to-face with the company's top engineers."

86 comments

  1. Wow by cybrthng · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another google story?

    Cool as it is, it just aint that cool.

    Mod me down if you want, call me biased but there is tons of other "news for nerds" besides some corporation who is after your dollar.

    For some cool search news, Nutch .07 just came out - http://nutch.org/ - i'm loading it up on mozdex through next week :)

    1. Re:Wow by xmas2003 · · Score: 1

      I agree ... Google had a PR/Marketing event, everyone had a few beers, listened to some music, talked business, and generally had a good time ... like most companies do periodically ... so not so big of deal ... but Google is on one heck of a roll, so all the power to 'em. I was disappointed that GoogleGirl didn't show up - maybe I'll invite her to my next birthday party ;-)

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happy birthday!

    3. Re:Wow by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is just the nature of the beast- Throw in a tech company and a normal story about a company PR/Picnic event becomes tech news. This same story, but at GM or Toyota would be in an automotive trade journal. A normal small town library event that would usually be relegated to page 10 of a small town weekly newspaper ends up in political magazines if a politician shows up. It is just the way it is.
      It is an interesting story for me, even if I would never ever admit it, because secretly, I would like to party at the googleplex. But I would never admit it. The same way most men would like to party at the Playboy Mansion, many nerds (like me) would love to party at the googleplex. And the Playboy Mansion.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    4. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny on the homepage how it says, Search this site with google.

    5. Re:Wow by daniel_mcl · · Score: 1

      Yeah... did you happen to notice the little "Search this site with Google" box on the Nutch homepage? I'm a *little* wary of a search spider that doesn't even index its own homepage!

      --
      I used to read Caltizzle. I was a lot cooler than you.
    6. Re:Wow by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      I dodn't think that VA Software would mind at all if Google bought them out. Sourceforge and all...

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  2. Plagiarism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Steve Nixon writes
    No, Steve Nixon didn't write any of that. The Associated Press did, and Steve Nixon copied and pasted it into the story submit box.
  3. Site was slow by tourettes · · Score: 3, Informative

    Site was slow when i tried to load it, here's the copy:

    MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. -- Free-flowing beer, live music, karaoke and arcade games kept the party raging at the Googleplex the other night, but the real action was unfolding inside a sterile conference room at Google's headquarters.
    That's where the cunning internet entrepreneurs who constantly try to manipulate Google's search engine results for a competitive edge were trying to make the most of a rare opportunity to match wits face-to-face with the company's top engineers.
    Google's code-talking experts, despite putting on a show of being helpful, weren't about to reveal their "secret sauce" -- Google's tightly guarded formula for ranking websites.
    But that didn't zap the energy from the "Google Dance" -- an annual summer party that's become a metaphor for the behind-the-scenes twists and turns that can cause websites to rise and fall in Google's search results. For the millions of websites without a well-known domain name, those rankings can mean the difference between success or failure because Google's search engine drives so much of the internet's traffic.
    "Being on the first page of Google's results is like gold," said website consultant Gordon Liametz, one of the roughly 2,000 guests at this year's party, held earlier this month at Google's colorful corporate campus.
    The webmasters and their consultants paid particularly close attention to Google engineer Matt Cutts, the company's main liaison with the webmaster community and this party's star attraction.
    "That's the Mick Jagger of search!" exclaimed e-marketing strategist Seth Wilde as he strolled by Cutts and his audience of webmasters.
    Cutts, who has worked at Google for five years, sees it differently. "I feel more like the Rick Moranis of search because I end up dealing with so many quirky and weird cases," he said.
    With so much at stake, low-ranked websites spend much time and money trying to elevate their standing, even if they must resort to deception. The tactics include "keyword stuffing" -- peppering a web page with phrases associated with a specific topic such as "laptop computers" in hopes of duping the software "spiders" that troll the internet to feed Google's growing search index.
    It's a risky strategy because Google and other search engines penalize websites that get caught gratuitously repeating the same word. In the worst cases, the offending websites are deleted from the index so they don't show up in search results at all.
    Sometimes webmasters collude to populate their sites with a large number of incoming links from other sites. This approach makes a site appear more authoritative and popular than it really is and thus rise in rankings.
    Such dirty tricks pollute the search results with websites that have little to do with a user's request, frustrating consumers, diminishing Google's credibility and threatening to undermine the company's profits by driving users to its rivals.
    Not surprisingly, Google works hard to thwart the mischief makers, sometimes branded as "Black Hats" because of their subterfuge. Engineers frequently tweak the algorithms that determine the rankings, sometimes causing websites perched at the top to fall a few notches or, worse, even plunge to the back pages of the results.
    Google's reshuffling raised so many anxieties that webmasters in 2002 began to name the changes after hurricanes and infamous events. One particularly unpopular change Google rolled out in 2003 was dubbed "Florida" after the muddled ballot count in the 2000 presidential election.
    Hoping to ease the tensions with webmasters, Google hatched the idea of its "dance" party during an annual search engine convention held in Silicon Valley, just a few miles from Google's headquarters. The company invited some of the Black Hats, effectively welcoming the foxes into the hen house.
    "Google realized it was never going to get rid of these (Black Hats), so it decided it may as well work with them," Chris Winfield, a Google Dance party veteran who runs 1

    --
    tourettes
  4. Simple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your friends have space on servers, have them post lots of links to your site. If possible, put up a few splopgs with links. Even pay money for people to put up a few links. The google engine works by numbers of links, so... yah... thats how to googlebomb.

    mmm, and fr15t p05t.

  5. Awww Crap, Google again!!! by dongshu · · Score: 1

    Didn't many people request to restrict G news to just 4 a day.

  6. If I were google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Identify search engine manipulators
    2. Invite them to a party
    3. Poison their drinks
    4. optional - Cut them open, staple their guts to their forheads, take pictures and send to their moms.
    5. Profit.

  7. Clusty by superpulpsicle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's why I like www.clusty.com. Everyone is concerned about elevating their website so that they are the first page/topranking of Google's results. For example the word "RAM", is memory, animal and technically sex related.

    Clusty would have split into 3 separate cluster trees. In google it would just be out of balance.

    1. Re:Clusty by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      And don't forget, automotive as in the trademark of one of the largest corporations in the world... Dodge.
      http://www.dodge.com/ram_truck/ram_truck_flash.htm l
      Hard to believe Diamler Chrysler couldn't get it in the top ten of a Google search for Ram.
      http://www.google.com/search?q=RAM&sourceid=mozill a-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client= firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
      One must wonder, now that computers are a home appliance for the masses, if the majority of Americans searching for Ram are looking for a truck....

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    2. Re:Clusty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Google is doing an inconsistent job lately of associating trademarks with their owner companies. I was looking into espresso machines a few days ago, and noticed that when I looked up "La Pavoni" on Google, the actual company website at lapavoni.com was nowhere to be found among the usual flood of reseller spam.

      It looks like the recent GoogleDance has corrected this particular problem, though, since it's now the first non-sponsored link. But I've seen the same problem before when trying to use Google to find a company's website, rather than those of twenty million identical-looking resellers.

    3. Re:Clusty by Paul+Carver · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just searched Google for dodge ram and every single result related to Dodge Ram trucks. The official sites were at the top, including sponsered links, and there were lots of other relatated sites. Nothing non-truck related on the first page.

      Looks to me like Google functions flawlessly in this case. If a person can't be bothered to type dodge when it's a Dodge Ram they're looking for that sounds to me like PEBKAC.

      That would be like going to any of the mapping web sites and typing in your street name without city or state. Just dumb. Names get reused, deal with it, be specific.

    4. Re:Clusty by LordNimon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      He was talking about searching for "RAM", not "DODGE RAM".

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    5. Re:Clusty by jxyama · · Score: 1
      guess what? a lot of people can't be bothered. they are the majority of users and most importantly, they are the majority of paying users.

      yes, a lot of users could use some lessons in using the search engine. but, no, it's not the right attitude for the SEs to sit on a high chair and demand users get smarter when users are the ones paying their bills.

    6. Re:Clusty by magicchex · · Score: 0
      And he was acknowledging that.
      Looks to me like Google functions flawlessly in this case. If a person can't be bothered to type dodge when it's a Dodge Ram they're looking for that sounds to me like PEBKAC. That would be like going to any of the mapping web sites and typing in your street name without city or state. Just dumb. Names get reused, deal with it, be specific.
      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    7. Re:Clusty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the link to clusty.com. I was not familiar with it, but it looks like it will be a very useful asset.

    8. Re:Clusty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      duh! you missed the point completely. searching for RAM, not dodge ram, which only means one thing to everyone.

      In most cases you cant be more specific without knowing what you are looking for before you look. G falls flat nowadays because of all their filtering. But go ahead, blame the user for being to stupid to know what they are looking for before they look for it.

    9. Re:Clusty by Sahib! · · Score: 1

      Mods, why is the parent post at -1? This is very interesting and informative to me. I've never seen the G clustering results.

      > Coincidentally, I just discovered this. I queried Google for 'Sarkar' (which is an Indian name and also the name of an Indian movie) and I got clustered results.

      > http://www.google.com/search?q=sarkar

      --

      I prayed about it, and God said, "Don't do it!" But I thought, "I know better."

    10. Re:Clusty by tdubya · · Score: 1

      Are you high? RTFP, he mentions NOTHING about trucks or Dodge.

      You can mod me down, but how does this reply get a "4" for Informative?

      --
      I read /.! I like seeing how misinformed, short sighted, and downright stupid some people are.
    11. Re:Clusty by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      "Just Dumb. Deal With it"
      Uh, Ok.
      If a person can't be bothered to type dodge when it's a Dodge Ram they're looking for that sounds to me like PEBKAC.
      What if someone is looking up who makes a Ram, because they don't know the manufacturer. I hate to tell you this, but people who make a lot of money and have good products, realize that users aren't experts, and cater to them.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    12. Re:Clusty by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      What if someone is looking up who makes a Ram, because they don't know the manufacturer.

      Luckily, a search for ram truck also gets you the Dodge web site as the first result.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    13. Re:Clusty by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      "Hard to believe Diamler Chrysler couldn't get it in the top ten of a Google search for Ram."

      It's not hard to believe at all - that's a stunning example of empathic myopeia.

      Walk up to ten people at random on the street and say "Ram. What am I talking about?".

      You'll get answers like "sheep", "computer memory", "to push" and "I don't know - what the fuck are you talking about". I guarantee not one person will say "an obscure model of truck made by Dodge".

      Jesus - even if they've ever heard of a Dodge Ram (which most people outside of the US won't have), they won't assume you're talking about that because it's so bloody obscure.

      "One must wonder, now that computers are a home appliance for the masses, if the majority of Americans searching for Ram are looking for a truck...."

      No, of course the majority of americans won't necessarily associate "ram" with computers. However, I'll bet you the majority of people (not "americans") who own a computer, and are on the internet, and search for "ram" are looking for RAM, and not male sheep or the verb "to push".

      It's not hard to add another keyword to increase search specificity. Tell you what - next time people are amazed by search engines' lack of relevence, try thinking what would happen if you asked a random person the same query. Why should a bunch of unintelligent, statistical algorithms be held to a higher standard?

      I mean, try to improve the technology, sure, just don't act surprised when it doesn't do freaking telepathy.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
  8. It's the yahoo tech news feed by DavidNWelton · · Score: 4, Informative

    As seen here:

    http://news.yahoo.com/i/528

    a fairly good percentage of these go on to appear as slashdot stories.

    1. Re:It's the yahoo tech news feed by JPriest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They also have an RSS feed and for Klipfolio users, the Klip is here. You can click setup in the Klip to get just yahoo tech news. Not a bad site.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:It's the yahoo tech news feed by Spoing · · Score: 1
      a fairly good percentage of these go on to appear as slashdot stories.

      While the rest come from BoingBoing and other similar sites.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    3. Re:It's the yahoo tech news feed by jrockway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In case you haven't noticed, Slashdot is like Playboy -- you're missing the point if you read it for the articles. You can get links to news stories anywhere; Slashdot is worth reading because of the comments. Nowhere else do I notice such a high concentration of interesting commentary, and because of that, I read it every day.

      If you don't like it, just read BoingBoing and comment there. The Slashdot community can probably live without your complaining.

      --
      My other car is first.
    4. Re:It's the yahoo tech news feed by Spoing · · Score: 1
      In case you haven't noticed, Slashdot is like Playboy -- you're missing the point if you read it for the articles.

      (Looks at user ID for jrockway (229604))

      (Looks at user ID for Spoing (152917))

      Nope. I didn't miss anything.

      If you don't like it, just read BoingBoing and comment there. The Slashdot community can probably live without your complaining.

      I do, though, have no clue what you're talking about.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    5. Re:It's the yahoo tech news feed by maw · · Score: 1

      Are we reading the same comments?

      --
      You're a suburbanite.
    6. Re:It's the yahoo tech news feed by evilviper · · Score: 1
      In case you haven't noticed, Slashdot is like Playboy -- you're missing the point if you read it for the articles. You can get links to news stories anywhere; Slashdot is worth reading because of the comments.

      Irrelevant, pointless articles lead to a dull conversation about nothing at all.

      You just about always have to have a good and topical story posted before you'll find any good comments.

      When was the last time you saw an insightful technical comment attached to a slashvertisement story?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  9. But... by BuddyJesus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What were the actual results of them going face to face? I mean, it's great to talk about all of that free beer and arcade games, but I think at the very least people here on slashdot would like to know how Google vs. Exploiters turned out.

  10. Evil? by codeshack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So apparently "don't be evil" doesn't explicitly prohibit consorting with evil, inviting evil over for cocktails, having a few drinks with evil and in a moment of passion revealing heretofore unknown details of PageRank... If Google's livelihood is contingent on destroying these people, I hope they put something in the fruit punch...

    1. Re:Evil? by SuperBanana · · Score: 1, Interesting
      If Google's livelihood is contingent on destroying these people, I hope they put something in the fruit punch...

      More like they're trying to convert people to buy adspace, I suspect.

      Funny how they'll throw these people a kegger, but they won't answer emails from "small" webmasters like me. We've been using Google search for a couple of years, and we have almost a decade and a half worth of email archives. We're the oldest internet resource for owners of a certain brand of cars, and we are widely considered one of the best resources.

      That said- when I contacted Google's CR people asking why, for over a year, nothing new had been indexed on our site- Google's answer was a form letter "if you don't like how we index your site, that's just too bad". They didn't even bother to read my email all the way through- I specifically said I DIDN'T care about ranking, I DIDN'T care about complete indexing. I DIDN'T care about regular re-indexing. I just wanted to know why NOTHING new had been indexed in quite some time- almost 2 years.

      They're about one install of htdig away from a big "fuck you" in the form of a complete block via robots.txt, a redirect on any hit with a google referral, etc. We've been around longer than they have, and we'll probably outlast them as well. I've long since stopped recommending Google to people. Now I point them to, among other things, Teoma.

    2. Re:Evil? by jedo · · Score: 1

      Ummm...
      Keep your friends close,
      and your enemies closer?

    3. Re:Evil? by wasted+time · · Score: 1

      keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.

      --
      The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
    4. Re:Evil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried google sitemaps? You're not totally out of options, you know. How many other search engines allow webmasters that kind of control of spidering?

    5. Re:Evil? by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      They're about one install of htdig away from a big "fuck you" in the form of a complete block via robots.txt, a redirect on any hit with a google referral, etc.[1]

      [1] See also: cutting off your nose to spite your face.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  11. Say What? by hawkeye_82 · · Score: 5, Informative

    What exactly is this article about?
    I mean, it reads like a random collection of thoughts about Google.
    IMO, not one iota of useful information.
    News for nerds? Very debatable.
    Stuff that matters? Certainly not.

    --
    hawkeye

    1. Re:Say What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You must be new here :)

      It is about GOOGLE, google, google, google .. don't you get it. Until google buys slashdot we will keep doing it.

    2. Re:Say What? by __aajqwr7439 · · Score: 1

      Minor correction:

      It is about GOOGLE, google, apple+intel, google, google...

      DN

    3. Re:Say What? by arbitraryaardvark · · Score: 1

      Free-flowing beer, live music, karaoke and arcade games kept the party raging at the Googleplex the other night, It's about free-as-in-beer, man.

    4. Re:Say What? by Frankie70 · · Score: 4, Funny


      I mean, it reads like a random collection of thoughts about Google.


      For a moment, I thought you were describing slashdot in general, not this particular article.

    5. Re:Say What? by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1

      I think the point of the article is that attendees of the SES Conference were invited to the Google Dance. I was there as a Googler - and it was alot of fun. Honestly, I don't see why this is newsworthy, everyone was there to have a good time.

    6. Re:Say What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has a google quota, they need to post at minimum 10 google stories a week (although sometimes it feels like a hundred). They've been slow to meet their quota this week and since it's already Sunday, they had to post *something*.

  12. At some point... by confusion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...does google's popularity start to wane? There's a growing sense of frustration with them, and I've found that many other search engines yield better results, so it is a matter of time before internet users at large start using something else?

    Granted, I think the reasons that their results are not good is that there are SO many of these black hats trying to pollute their index, so in a sense, they are falling victim to their own success.

    Jerry
    http://www.cyvin.org/

    1. Re:At some point... by __aabwba5127 · · Score: 1

      Google's popularity is certainly not waning, their proportion of all searches went from 48% a year ago to 56% this year (for july at least), they're rolling out google earth, gmail, froogle, orkut, search history, video search, google maps, and a myriad of other services. Their only notable mistakes were
      a)the web accelerator debacle
      b)certain recent enhancements to their search algorithms which seem not to have affected the searches visibly.

      Google, as a public company, certainly cannot be 100% good. Their "do no evil" moto has become relative, they can't avoid at least a bit of mingling with "evil". Looking at the solidity of google maps and gmail amongst others, I hardly see them as "coming down". Are any other replacements anywhere close to where google is standing? MSN? no. Yahoo? a bit. Altavista? Belongs to yahoo. Excite? uh, they still exist? lycos? bought over by some spanish ISP... webcrawler? impopular! astalavista.box.sk? no comments on that one...
      Clusty? Not bad... Other startups? Nowhere close. So for the time being, they still seem to be the kings of the hill and I don't see anything in their recent history that would make me think otherwise.

    2. Re:At some point... by eison · · Score: 1

      Oh really? Name one. Prove it.

      --
      is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
    3. Re:At some point... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      There's a growing sense of frustration with them, and I've found that many other search engines yield better results, so it is a matter of time before internet users at large start using something else?

      I find just the opposite.

      I don't really like gmail. I barely ever use froogle. I can't remember the last time I used Groups or the Directory. Maps is nice but it gives me completely wrong directions from time to time.

      The only reason I like google is because it's a very good search engine. All the other search engines will give you a link to goatse before slashdot, and will return thousands of completely irrelevant results before the useful ones.

      I've tried clusty, vivisimo, and I'm sure I'll use them some day in the distant future when a quick search on google doesn't turn up what I'm looking for. However, that hasn't happened in a long time.

      Sure, sometimes you'll see a lot of spam results, but in my experience, that's only because you've search for some obscure terms, or misspellings, and google just doesn't have anything else to give you.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  13. Pointless by hexi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What is the point of the article? What is new in the article? Why is this on slashdot? What the hell?

    1. Re:Pointless by ozric99 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Taco has google stock, duh.

    2. Re:Pointless by BitHive · · Score: 1

      The /. editors make the tacit (and, admittedly, probably valid) assumption that we all wish we could go party at the Googleplex. Fluff stories about "insider" events at Google are like MTV Cribs for nerds.

    3. Re:Pointless by lolocaust · · Score: 1

      1. It's Google
      2. It's Google
      3. It's Google
      4. It's teh Google

      --
      Why does my post history abruptly stop? I want to laugh at the stupid things I posted as a kid.
  14. You love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Of course this news post mattered, and you liked reading it. If you logged in this morning and there was no new news story, you would be upset. If there was a slew of interesting news that happened between last night and this morning, then this story would not have been posted. Because nothing happened, we get this. And I thank /. for giving me something to read with my morning coffee.

    If this story was so stupid, pointless, and a waste of time, then how would you describe your comments to it? When I get to articles that don't interest me, and I think are wasting my time, I sure as hell don't waste more of my life telling others how much I didn't like reading it.

  15. server troubles lately by supernova87a · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Free-flowing beer, live music, karaoke and arcade games kept the party raging at the Googleplex the other night..."

    is that why gmail has been down for the last two days?

    1. Re:server troubles lately by hotdrop · · Score: 1

      The google staff had a hangover the next day so the mail server was out of wack as well :)

      --
      http://www.uwarfare.com the Best Seattle Counterstirke Community
    2. Re:server troubles lately by DrHanser · · Score: 1

      It's been up for me. Just slow.

      --
      What is humor if not pain tempered by time?
    3. Re:server troubles lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A somewhat-related annecdote:

      Back in 1999 before the crash of the internet economy when everyone fully intended to be retired before the age of 40, I was working at one of the poster-children for the internet revolution. The day of the IPO, the lead sysadmin made some router changes intended to make it more difficult for persons outside the company network to access company servers. He ended up making a mistake that resulted in much of the production network being inaccessible from the office network.

      In all the joy, champaigne and revelry of everyone becomming an overnight millionaire, no one noticed this until there was a problem with the service later that evening, well after the IPO party had started. However, by the time it was noticed, the sysadmin was too drunk to stand up and the two other people in the company with the knowledge necessary to fix the issue were unavailable (one was going on a ski vacation and could not be reached and the CTO was off doing what, if I heard the story correctly, ended up getting him and the company sued for sexual harrassment).

      So the end result was that we ended up having a pretty severe outage for about 36 hours because of a company party. I seriously hope that Google stays on top of things better than we did though.

  16. Adsense by gkozlyk · · Score: 1

    Maybe with all the partying, that is why my adsense questions haven't been answered.

    --
  17. So I guess Google really is... by NMZNMZNMZ · · Score: 0

    Free-flowing beer

    So I guess Google really is free as in beer.

  18. Don't link to Tired by Animats · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wired doesn't have "stories" of their own any more, since they laid off all their reporters. This story is from the Associated Press. So don't link to Tired.

  19. MODS ON CRACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even the mighty slashdot can't take on wired.com

  20. Nutch and Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nutch is very cool. Ironically (considering your argument), parts of Nutch (the NFS, MapReduce) appear to be based on well-known Google papers (GFS, MapReduce).

  21. Some pictures by obli · · Score: 0

    Some blogger found pictures of the party hosted on google's own servers. looks like they haven't come around to releaseing them yet...

    http://obli.net/item/168

    http://google.com/googledance2005

  22. Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a fairly good percentage of these go on to appear as slashdot stories"

    That's not true, a fairly good percentage of these go on to appear as TWO slashdot stories.

  23. A better headline by Chiisu · · Score: 1

    Google Mechs, Webmasters Tingle

    1. Re:A better headline by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      Only if the party was revealed as a secret test of their new Google-branded bipedal weapons platforms, and they'd chased down and electrocuted all the SEOers with voltage-whips.

      If so I, for one, welcome out mech-riding electro-whip weilding Google overlords.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
  24. A better story by mparaz · · Score: 1

    Here's a better story from "Jensense", one of THE contextual advertising bloggers.

  25. Mod Parent Up Insightful by magicchex · · Score: 0

    Thank you for saying what I was about to.
    Nobody forces them to read this.

    --
    How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
  26. Google Dance 2005 by j_philipp · · Score: 1

    And here are the pictures of the Google Dance 2005: http://www.google.com/googledance2005/

  27. Moaners by mporcheron · · Score: 1

    If you don't like Google go to another website, but sooner or later you will realise that Google is god when it comes to internet search, despite Yahoo! claiming to be bigger.

    Why hate Google?
    Too Slow (unlikely),
    No results (people are constantly looking for a 1 resulted search GoogleWhack),
    Bad GUI (it's clean and simple),
    No custom page layouts (check Google IG).

    Come on people, Google has everything you need and more, why hate it?

    1. Re:Moaners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't get a job there?

    2. Re:Moaners by mporcheron · · Score: 1

      do they emply 14 year old hypocrits? I wasn't aware...

  28. Search http://lucene.apache.org/nutch with Google by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

    But in the top right corner there's still a "search this site with google" (http://lucene.apache.org/nutch/).

    How cute!

  29. hip hip hooray. by jmchilton · · Score: 1

    well hey. thank you there /. editors for another article that really doesn't tell us anything. i'm enticed by the link you threw in there as well.

    1. Re:hip hip hooray. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok,

      I HAD nothing against Google , its founders nor it as a company but i have found myself over the last week or so getting tired of them,.

      Not sure what the editing process on slashdot is but to get 1 google story a day on average is abit excessive . I DO NOT WANT TO READ EVERY LITTLE THING GOING ON INSIDE GOOGLE !!

      Seriously im sure their are plenty of other tech related stories out there .

  30. yeah by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    I find Dial doesn't dry my skin like Ivory soap...

    someone asked didn't they?