Slashdot Mirror


The Portable Linux Based GP2X is Here

An anonymous reader writes "Today sees the opening of the Official GP2X Site where you can see the new console from Gamepark.com, who last brought you the GP32 a fantastic console for homebrew developers. This console is a major step up with Dual 200Mhz cpus and is basically a Portable Linux handheld that can easily do ports like Quake, Doom and Emulators like Mame. Its Open Source SDK gives all amateur and commercial Developers the ablity to release software on a brand new console like the old Amiga/Commodore 64 days. More screenshots of the GP2X can be found at GP2x news."

167 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. Pre-orders are already being taken... by BluhDeBluh · · Score: 5, Informative

    UK pre-orders for the machine are being taken at GP2X.co.uk (formerly GBAX) at £125 for the machine. It's shipping in October :)

  2. I will buy one... by Nichotin · · Score: 1

    ... just because Gamepark actually encourages people to make homebrew apps, unlike other manufacturers.

    1. Re:I will buy one... by Jeffv323 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I am curious how open the hardware is to the developers. Could one conceivably replace the dashboard (for lack of a better term) with a port of, say, Xbox Media Center? I would be hard pressed to find a better application for that software, besides Xbox of course.

      I am picturing filling a 1gb card with a couple movies and music, and jumping on a 3 hour flight. I imagine games will also come in SD format.

      --
      I'm a minister!
    2. Re:I will buy one... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      "Could one conceivably replace the dashboard (for lack of a better term)"

      I can't be the only one wondering, "WTF is a dashboard" in the context of a game console?

    3. Re:I will buy one... by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      My question is, is it the "GP2X" or the "GPX2"?

      http://www.gp2x.co.uk/

      Look at the actual device, it says "GPX2" on it, yet the rest of the site and everyone else is calling it the "GP2X"... O_o

    4. Re:I will buy one... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I'm kind of wondering the same thing, but based on context and the photos of the device, I think he means its "desktop" type file manager / graphical OS. Like the Finder on a Mac, I think.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    5. Re:I will buy one... by KillShill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Gamepark just doesn't STEAL your access to your own hardware.

      "homebrew" is a red herring. other manufacturers block access to your property through legal and technical means.

      arbitrary code execution = "the right to read". that's the logical conclusion.

      over the next 2-3 decades, DRM/Insidious Computing will creep its way through society (it's international) and will become more and more generally accepted.

      enjoy these carefree days because your children won't be able to, not without paying a per-fee for everything.

      want to take a picture of the run-down Statue of Liberty? sure, that'll be 20 bucks err credits. (why print worthless money when you can have worthless electronic credits instead).

      being in the Eye of the Storm, it's hard to see where you are or where you're headed.

      enjoy your DRM/Insidious lifestyle... unless you keep fighting back.

      in the words of John Connor " there's no fate but what we make for ourselves". if you like having these artificial restrictions, then just keep it up. if on the other hand, you are reasonable, intelligent and have a lick of sense, you'll oppose it in all its forms.

      no one is even remotely going to tell you that in the coming years we'll get LESS DRM. no, it will ONLY INCREASE. that is certain unless we fight those greedy sons of bitches who want to turn back the tide of property rights to the feudal age.

      the most important first step is simply being mindful of the implications. it's virtually impossible to avoid DRM/Insidious Restrictions in this modern age unless you happen to live in a cave. so for now, enjoy the gadgets/computers/music/videos you already own. to deny geeks shiny electronic things is heresy and punishable by death. but i merely ask that you keep these matters in your immediate consciousness. when you buy that next gadget/shiny thing/etc try to remember what you are owed and what you are really getting through legal and technical restrictions imposed on you by the manufacturers.

      that's the first step. knowledge and education is key. so pass on some information you have gathered from online resources to your friends and family. you don't have to sell it to them, just help them become aware of the sitauation a little bit more than they are. god knows the mainstream media won't tell them why DRM and Insidious Computing are not in their benefit.

      http://www.eff.org/IP/DRM/

      http://www.drmadness.com/

      remember, ALL DRM is about preventing the owner of the property in question from exercising their rights and preventing full access to what they legally and ethically own.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  3. Capacity? by Sorthum · · Score: 2, Informative

    What kind of storage can you realistically get on SD cards? I have to wonder, given that most XBox/PS2 games are now pushing the 4-5 gig range. Quake was good, but a smidgen outdated.

    I do realize there are games that are less than a gig, but does this have a realistic chance of becoming a mass market item?

    1. Re:Capacity? by crwl · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can now get SD cards with at least 2 GB of capacity, and they're getting cheaper all the time. I wouldn't worry about the storage.

    2. Re:Capacity? by Nichotin · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do realize that this is a handheld console? The storage capacity of SD cards should be enough for a lot of apps (emulators), some music, maybe an episode of American Dad, plus tonnes of snes, nes, and gameboy ROMS.

    3. Re:Capacity? by romiz · · Score: 4, Informative

      What kind of storage can you realistically get on SD cards?

      The theoretical limit of the format is 4 GB without formatting. Nowadays, it is commonplace to find 1 GB flash cards, or even 2 GB cards, but quite pricy (~60 $ per GB). Read-only cards, when produced in large quantities, would probably be less expensive.

      I do realize there are games that are less than a gig
      The size of a game doesn't make its quality. And we're still talking about portable games, where the UMD is the largest format to date, with only 1.8 GB...

    4. Re:Capacity? by Malor · · Score: 1

      You can get 2 gig cards for around $140 now, and they're dropping fast. SD is a really good format... still thick enough to be tough, but easily tucked into a wallet or other small carrier. CF can store a lot more, but the cards are much less convenient.

      Realistically, SD sizes aren't likely to be a drawback. As an example, my entire Thief2 installation, including the unofficial T2X mod (which is a bit uneven, but really amazing for a fan remake), weighs in at about 1.8 gigs. That's voice, movies, and everything. The T2X directory itself is about a gig, and that's about the best fan-made product I know. I doubt you'll see anything homebrew that's *better* anytime soon.

      Remember, the Gamecube's disks only hold 1.8 gigs, and they've done some seriously amazing stuff with that machine.

      Many other possible issues with the GP2X, but the size of SD cards isn't one of them. :)

    5. Re:Capacity? by donscarletti · · Score: 2, Informative

      Roller Coaster Tycoon 3 was far less than a gig (about half of one) and managed to have some pretty cutting edge content. Oh, and one must remember that the gamecube disks don't fit much more than 1 GB.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    6. Re:Capacity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I agree that CF cards are inconvenient. They are so much bigger than the SD cards. My camera uses CF and I have to call my neighbor to help me lift it out of the camera when I want to transfer files to my computer.

    7. Re:Capacity? by merreborn · · Score: 1

      Hah, $60/gig pricy? I payed $100 for a 32 meg of flash in 1999.

    8. Re:Capacity? by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      You would be supprised what everthing has now. UMD is 1.8GB, Nintendo DS cartiridges vary, but are well into the 100's of MBs. The thing is, the stuff that takes up lots of space is video textures. These tiny consoles don't have the power to display tons of texures, hence less need for space. I don't think any developer right now is whining about the limits of either format.

    9. Re:Capacity? by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      I remember trying to save $1600 for 16 megs of ram. Better than one of those $10000 10 meg harddrives my dad had.

  4. Borked link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Working link here: GP2X

  5. Battery Life by Jeffv323 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With two processors and a screen as big as it is, how long will 2 AA's last I wonder?

    I think it would be fantastic to see this take off, perhaps it could jumpstart open source games. (yeah yeah insert comment about Tuxracer)

    --
    I'm a minister!
    1. Re:Battery Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the site:

      "It takes 2 AA batteries, but gives you 6 - 10 hours from them. No need to worry about having to recharge when outside. Everywhere has AA batteries."

    2. Re:Battery Life by bersl2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      At six times the lifetime per battery, at least it's better than the Game Gear.

    3. Re:Battery Life by Zoidmann · · Score: 1

      According to the official site:

      It takes 2 AA batteries, but gives you 6 - 10 hours from them.

    4. Re:Battery Life by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      The GameBoy DS has two processors too. And two screens... Just to create a relation...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  6. No wifi ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The description page is quite very short. Is the controller analogic ?

    Also, there is no wifi ? That would be a great feature.

    1. Re:No wifi ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      they said wifi could be possible with a wifi-SD if someone develop linux drivers for the card

  7. um.. by metricmusic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    seems in some ways a downgrade.

    they went from a 4inch screen to a 3.5 inch one. screen res went down and they took out the wireless.

    --
    http://www.livejournal.com/users/metricmusic
    1. Re:um.. by metricmusic · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm look at this page (http://www.gp32x.com/gpx2xgp.php) which compares the two handhelds. Is there another page I should be looking at?

      I like big screens too. I read a review the other on the gb micro that just came out and while the guy said the screen is a lot nicer rpgs are difficult becausethe text is too small. I mainly play rpgs so I think I'll be giving that one a miss and sticking with the sp. the gp2x looks appealing though.

      --
      http://www.livejournal.com/users/metricmusic
    2. Re:um.. by mangobrain · · Score: 1

      I think the parent was talking about it being a downgrade compared to the original GP32, not the XGP (the "other" console on the link you posted), which is an entirely different, also new handheld. I don't know the details, but the original Gamepark is now split into two companies, each releasing a different product.

    3. Re:um.. by geekmule · · Score: 1

      If you dig rpgs and screen size matters, you should check out the Nintendo DS now. I held off buying one until last week, but now with the release of Advance Wars DS, and everything that's being released over the next few weeks for the DS (Castlevania DS, Lunar, Touch Memory, Trauma, etc.), and with the price drop to $129, I broke down and bought one. And I'm very happy I did. Advance Wards DS is awesome, even better than the earlier AW games for the GBA. Nintendogs is also a lot of fun.

  8. Re:Many of these arrive? by Nichotin · · Score: 1

    Uhm. I will have to guess what you mean by your post. If you are referring to the amount of available units, I'd say that Gamepark did pretty well with the supply for the GP32. GBAX.com did run out of stock a few times, but there were never any critical shortage of units for a longer period of time.

  9. Awesome by rm999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow, this looks really cool. I especially like the AA batteries. I have about 10 rechargeable AAs and could easily pack them with me on vacation and keep this thing going for a long time. Not something you can do with proprieatary batteries

    1. Re:Awesome by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      Yeah...'cause keeping extra AA batteries around is far more convenient than plugging your gaming device into an outlet when you're sleeping or driving...

      Oh, wait...no it isn't. Why is it better, again?

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    2. Re:Awesome by bufalo_1973 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Think about going to a place where there is no power plug (remember: cities don't cover the whole Earth), maybe for a weekend. With 4-8 hours each pair, taking 8 batteries lasts until you come back home. And more important: what if you have your console running well in 2015? If it uses AA batteries you can buy other pack and play. If it runs with a propietary battery you are out of luck.

    3. Re:Awesome by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      What is the point in going to places where there is no power plug if you're going to lie in the tent playing some electronic game?

      --
      resigned
    4. Re:Awesome by rsborg · · Score: 1
      Wow, this looks really cool. I especially like the AA batteries.

      Damn, this does look cool... but Actually, I'm not so hot for AA's, since standard AA's aren't recylable, and NiMH rechargeables have bad power curves and frequent charge requirements.

      However, if the AA case happens to support CR-V3 batteries, then I could add a rechargeable CR-V3 Lithium-Ion... which would probably take the battery life to stratospheric heights... not to mention the incredible shelf-life of lithium.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    5. Re:Awesome by rm999 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking specifically of airplanes. I frequently make 30+ hour one-way plane trips (obviously including layovers). Airplanes often don't have outlets.

      Also, my car doesn't have an outlet. And I don't neccesarily want to buy and carry around a car adapter for all my electronics.

    6. Re:Awesome by bufalo_1973 · · Score: 1

      Maybe because you have to go with your family but you don't like the place? Or maybe you go to the beach and instead of reading a book you want to play a game?

  10. support by martin_lovick · · Score: 1, Troll

    .....and where is the commerical support and release games?.....NEXT

  11. And I thought the PSP was cool... by Gizmoguy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This makes the PSP look like a C64 when compred to the GP2X. Can the PSP play Quake? Well, sure, it's got Wireless, but you can't really program for the PSP as it's not a well known architecture or OS, whereas the GP2X's Linux means virtually anyone can program it. Basically, the GP2X is a potable PC.

    --
    -- There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, And those who don't.
    1. Re:And I thought the PSP was cool... by another_mr_lizard · · Score: 1

      well you better tell that to the folks in the homebrew PSP scene.....

      --
      "My parents were strict, but they never pitted me against livestock" - Doug Stanhope
    2. Re:And I thought the PSP was cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, you better tell any kid running the PSP 2.x firmware (which is the default in Europe now) who tries the homebrew stuff in vain...

      Face it - the PSP is not open and never will be. Sony is out to keep the PSP a closed system, they will do so by forcing updates.

    3. Re:And I thought the PSP was cool... by rmdir+-r+* · · Score: 1
      Basically, the GP2X is a potable PC.

      I really doubt that. Most gaming systems were never meant to be consumed.
    4. Re:And I thought the PSP was cool... by subjik · · Score: 1

      It should be "This makes the GP2X look like a C64 when compred to the PSP." since looking like C64 is a compliment.

      Anyway I'll pre-order one of these from Seoul :)

  12. Resolution by Jeffv323 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a bit miffed on the resolution of the device. The big bold text claims 720x480, while the specs say 320x480. I am going to guess that it's the latter, as 720 on a 3" screen would be a really expensive lcd.

    --
    I'm a minister!
    1. Re:Resolution by saldek · · Score: 5, Informative

      And a bit further on :

      Yes that's right, this handheld can connect to the TV, console style. Watch your DivX movies on the TV. Play emulated classics on the TV. Try big screen Quake. Or just play them all on the GP2X's large 320*240 backlit screen. You get the best of both worlds.

    2. Re:Resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      the LCD has 320x480 resolution but the machine can play divx files upon 720x480.

      For example, as divx players for the TV, they cannot manage every resolution, they have a top one.

      You'll see the films and games in 320x480

    3. Re:Resolution by magli · · Score: 1

      The big bold text is referring to the fact that it can play videos in this format, which is why it has "Divx, wmv, ac3" written under it. seemed quite clear to me.

    4. Re:Resolution by net_bh · · Score: 1

      You might want to check out the Nokia 770 which has a 800x480 res at approximately the same size.
      Disclaimer: I am associated with its development

      --
      There is no patch for stupidity

      Visit my blog

  13. Dual 200Mhz, is it enough? by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    I'm curious if twin CPUs is enough to handle the likes of Doom and Quake full speed. I'm using a Sharp Zaurus (Linux PDA) with a 400Mhz+ ARM processor. On it, Doom is a bit jagged around the edges. A Gameboy Advance ROM barely gets off the ground. I'm sure the likes of a Commodore 64 is possible though, but I'd hope the thing is fast.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:Dual 200Mhz, is it enough? by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Informative

      When Quake was originally released, my housemate had a PC with 64MB of RAM and a 200MHz Pentium Pro, and I remember Quake running just fine.

      Of course, when he later downloaded GLQuake it ran like an aboslute dog without a 3d accelerator card, but that's a different story...

    2. Re:Dual 200Mhz, is it enough? by mike_sucks · · Score: 2, Funny

      A bit rough around the edges? Have you tried turning AA on?

      --
      -- "So, what's the deal with Auntie Gerschwitz et all?"
    3. Re:Dual 200Mhz, is it enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, that's plenty of horsepower. See e.g. the Doom port for the (current) GP32 which runs perfectly at fully speed and the new Duke3D port to the Tapwave Zodiac also perfect on a single 200 MHz ARM CPU.

      The GP2X has two of these...

    4. Re:Dual 200Mhz, is it enough? by metricmusic · · Score: 1

      I had an s3 at the time and had the same problems. :) I wish there was a port of the Mechwarrior series to handhelds.

      --
      http://www.livejournal.com/users/metricmusic
    5. Re:Dual 200Mhz, is it enough? by bani · · Score: 4, Informative

      your ppro has 256k (or more) l1 and l2 cache. it can also issue and execute instructions out of order. the strongarm has none of these features.

      the cache alone makes an enormous difference, the out of order execution on top of that results in a cpu which is about 50% faster than the strongarm right off the bat.

      not to mention -- much of doom was hand coded x86 assembly. the zaurus arm port obviously can't use that, and afaik no arm assembly equivalents have been written so the doom port uses straight C.

    6. Re:Dual 200Mhz, is it enough? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      > I wish there was a port of the Mechwarrior series to handhelds.

      And how would you control the game?

      I remembered using the joystick for the feet, the keyboard for the commands and modes AND the mouse for the torso. And i still could turn the head with a coolie hat on the joystick.

      There's no way i could imagine *such* a handheld-controller! ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    7. Re:Dual 200Mhz, is it enough? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      some GBA(not spectacular yet, but theres no well made emulator for it yet)

      Which goes to my idea. An ARM virtual machine. Should work fine, seeing as this has an ARM9-class CPU, which supports all of the instructions of the ARM7 in the GBA, IIRC.

      So, only the graphics hardware, controls, and I/O would be emulated. The processor wouldn't be emulated at all.

    8. Re:Dual 200Mhz, is it enough? by runderwo · · Score: 1
      PPro has 8k instruction 8k data cache, and 256k-1MB of full speed L2 cache.

      As for running Quake, I have a P120 laptop which does that just fine. No, not GLQuake, but at 320x240, who cares?

  14. Re:So what? by mike_sucks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Your cellphone runs Linux? It comes with a free SDK so you can make your own games? It has a SD slot and USB? It has a 3.5" screen?

    --
    -- "So, what's the deal with Auntie Gerschwitz et all?"
  15. Harddrive? by Fusen · · Score: 1

    Now that harddrives are becoming so small and the price isn't that bad, I reckon they are really limiting their device by just supporting SD, especially when they try and flog it off as a portable movie player. I'm sure if they stuck in 20gb hdd and had to add a tiny bit onto the overall width people wouldnt moan and you'd probabaly get more sales out of it

    1. Re:Harddrive? by tpgp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now that harddrives are becoming so small and the price isn't that bad, I reckon they are really limiting their device by just supporting SD, especially when they try and flog it off as a portable movie player. I'm sure if they stuck in 20gb hdd and had to add a tiny bit onto the overall width people wouldnt moan and you'd probabaly get more sales out of it

      1) HDDs have moving parts and are prone to failure in portable devices.
      2) HDDs have moving parts requiring more power - a nono in a portable device.
      3) SD == expandable - need more storage? Buy another card. You will be able to buy a 4Gig SD card next year for next to nothing.

      Frankly, I think the lack of a HDD is a good thing - I would kill for a mp3 player with a CF slot....

      --
      My pics.
    2. Re:Harddrive? by Maqueo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would kill for a mp3 player with a CF slot....

      Here you go. I want my mother-in-law dead. Make it painful and slow.

      Kidding aside, I've had one of these for about 18 months and I'm very happy with it.

    3. Re:Harddrive? by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      You're right, no major company would dare to put a hard drive in a portable device.

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    4. Re:Harddrive? by Fusen · · Score: 1

      yet all major mp3 players and more specifically portable movie players have harddrives in them... I do not want to have to keep buying storage, even a 5GB harddrive would be better than having to fork out $$ for enough sd cards to sufficiently fit all my movies, mp3's and any games on them.

    5. Re:Harddrive? by jamesangel · · Score: 1

      Yep, and my iPod HD failed as soon as the warranty was up.

    6. Re:Harddrive? by tpgp · · Score: 1

      You're right, no major company would dare to put a hard drive in a portable device.

      *shakes head*

      Do you Apple Shills have some sort of rule that states every time there is a discussion about mp3 players you have to mention the ipod no matter how irrelevant?

      Just so you know, HDD ipods are all but useless for jogging/mountain biking/any other sport with a bit of rough & tumble.

      Most people I know with an ipod use it to carry their entire music collection to a party or whatnot (and plug it into a wall socket). They have a shuffle or some other sort of player for for real portability.

      Furthermore, it looks like Apple is moving away from HDDs and onto solid state.

      --
      My pics.
    7. Re:Harddrive? by tpgp · · Score: 1

      Thanks very much Maqueo, that does indeed look like what I'm after...no ogg - but flashable firmware, so maybe one day!

      Looks they sell them in Europe too :-)

      --
      My pics.
    8. Re:Harddrive? by tpgp · · Score: 1
      Frankly, I think the lack of a HDD is a good thing - I would kill for a mp3 player with a CF slot....
      Here you go. I want my mother-in-law dead. Make it painful and slow.

      Well I didn't say who I would kill now did I? To clarify:

      I would kill the first person to mention an ipod in reply to this comment for a mp3 player with a CF slot.... :-)
      --
      My pics.
    9. Re:Harddrive? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      even a 5GB harddrive would be better than having to fork out $$ for enough sd cards to sufficiently fit all my movies, mp3's and any games on them.

      There's a reason SD cards are random access, not write-once.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    10. Re:Harddrive? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      why do you want a CF slot? How about the MyMusix? It's only 50% bigger than a CF card and as thick as four. Uses one AAA battery. Has backlit LCD screen and comes with a 1GB SDcard. Has USB and presents the card as a USB thumbdrive.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  16. DS games are only 256MB max by _KiTA_ · · Score: 2, Informative

    IIRC, DS games are only 128 Megabytes (1 gigabit) in size, max. So, pretty darn big. I may be off -- it may be 1 Gigabyte (8 gigabit), but still... SD cards aren't exactly 1.44 meg floppies, ya know. ;)

  17. I think someone needs to get out more... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    The `screenshots' in the link look more like photographs than captures of the device's screen. I think the article submitter might need to spend some time away from the computer, and realise that not everything in the world is displayed on a screen...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  18. Lame video by sucker_muts · · Score: 1

    I hoped to see a great video with some actual footage of the handheld in action, but alas it's just a guy rotating the device in front of the camera. Bummer.

    video link

    --
    Dependency hell? => /bin/there/done/that
    1. Re:Lame video by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      And more's the irony, with all their talk about open formats, they release a video that's a WMV.

      What the hell -- are they not capable of producing an MP4? Or how about a good old AVI?

      The one saving grace is that they don't use that abominable WMV3 codec, but still, the use of the format is completely unnecessary.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  19. No open source drivers by bug1 · · Score: 1

    It says it uses SD storage, that almost guarantees there wont be open source drivers.

    Usually SD slots can be used with open mmc cards.

    Poor choice of storage...

    1. Re:No open source drivers by Malor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What crack are you smoking? I've been using SD cards with Linux for years. If you don't have a device that uses the security features (nearly all of them), then it just works like any other flash device would.

      It might be possible to lock content on an SD card so that it wasn't accessible from Linux, but one you purchased blank and formatted yourself isn't going to give you any problems.

    2. Re:No open source drivers by bug1 · · Score: 1

      And you have open source drivers for the SD card reader ?

    3. Re:No open source drivers by bug1 · · Score: 1

      "If you don't have a device that uses the security features (nearly all of them), then it just works like any other flash device would."

      You mean it works as an mmc card, you can get open source mmc drivers, not open source sd drivers.

    4. Re:No open source drivers by Malor · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use a 4-in-1 reader and it just works. With everything. I don't have it handy right now to look at, but it was a $25 or $30 job at Best Buy. (I *think* the brand name was ImageMate, but that could easily be wrong.)

      Support's built right into the kernel. Plug it in, wham, it works. No hassle. Each slot looks like a different SCSI device. I've used it for both CF and SD and it works fine.

      Via VMWare, the built-in card-reader on my monitor also works perfectly with OpenBSD and with Linux, both for CF and SD. I presume it would work if I plugged it straight in, as well, but I don't run Linux directly on this machine.

      I've had NO problem using multiple SD cards with Linux for years. I don't know where you guys are getting your info (and/or your readers), but there's no reason whatsoever for it to be difficult. It's such a no-brainer that I am completely confused why we're even having the conversation.

    5. Re:No open source drivers by Malor · · Score: 2, Informative

      It JUST WORKS. Plug it in and you're good. You don't have to think about SD or MMC, you just get a universal reader, plug it in, and off you go. The SD encryption features aren't used by any device I know of. You can argue semantics about it "being used as an MMC card", but no normal human cares about that. They want to plug it into the computer and have it work. If you buy an SD card, that will happen. That's all that matters.

      SD is better than MMC anyway... the MMC cards are so thin they're pretty fragile. SD is quite robust. I have been carrying a card in my wallet for the last two years, and it's none the worse for wear. And you get a nifty write-protect tab, which I like very much.

      If I understand your anti-SD objection correctly, you're upset about something that's totally irrelevant.

    6. Re:No open source drivers by bug1 · · Score: 1

      From wikipedia

      "Like most memory card formats, SD is covered by numerous patents and trademarks, and licensing is only available through the Secure Digital Card Association. The SD Card Association's current licensing agreement does not allow for open-source SD drivers, a fact that generates a fair amount of consternation in the open-source and free software communities. The usual workaround is to develop an open-source wrapper for a closed-source SD driver available on the particular platform, but this is far from ideal. Another common workaround is to use the older MMC mode, which all SD cards are required to support by the SD standard."

      "This means that SD is less open than CompactFlash or USB flash memory drives, which can be implemented for free but require licensing fees for the associated logos and trademarks, but far more open than xD or Memory Stick, where no public documentation nor any documented legacy implementation is available."

    7. Re:No open source drivers by Malor · · Score: 2, Informative

      So all SD cards must support MMC mode. MMC mode works. Therefore....(left as an exercise for the reader).

      I did say, if you notice, that nothing uses the encryption capability of the card anyway. It doesn't *matter* what the internal protocol is, as long as it works to do what we want, which is store and retrieve data. I can take an SD card, plug it into an SD slot, and it just works. That's all I really need. You can think of SD as MMC in a better package, with a write-protect tab.

      If they change the rules at some future time, and start shipping SD cards that don't support MMC mode, we can switch formats to something else. All our existing cards will keep working. It's not like they're going to wave a magic wand and remotely disable the ones we already have.

      And:

      A) It's exceedingly unlikely that they would be able to force all the manufacturers to stop supporting MMC mode;
      B) Even if they COULD, the screaming would be so loud that SD would be destroyed as a standard. They're not likely to do that.
      D) Linux users, relatively speaking, buy lots of hardware. SD's manufacturer may not want us to have access to the encryption stuff, but we have better software to do that anyway. Why would they blow off a big chunk of the market by changing the rules when they didn't have to? They've got it nailed now... the cards work in vanilla mode for everyone, and encrypted mode for people who have paid for a license. That's a great setup. Why on earth would they change?
      C) Real MMC works in SD slots anyway, so if they DO pull a boneheaded move and try to shut us out, we can just buy native MMC.

      I don't see any possible downside here. Do you?

    8. Re:No open source drivers by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on everything but point C. Real MMC cards were pretty much killed by the switchover to SD cards. I don't know of anyone that's manufacturing them anymore.

      I believe the deal was that no plain-vanilla MMC cards would be manufactured with a capacity greater than either 128 or 256MB. I don't know if that was a tacit agreement on the manufacturers' parts, or if that was just the point in the product's life when they switched over to SD ... but I've never seen a large MMC card.

      On the MMC Association website's FAQ, there is a line regarding capacity which states:
      Q: What is the largest amount of memory I can buy in a MultiMediaCard today?
      A: MultiMediaCards with up to 128Mbytes of memory are available now. 256Mbytes version will be available in 2003.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    9. Re:No open source drivers by iburrell · · Score: 1

      You two are talking past each other. His card reader is USB. Linux talks USB Mass Storage to it and it handles talking to the SD card. The USB Mass Storage driver is definitely open source. You are talking about drivers for an integrated SD/MCC slot. These use a completely different driver. The open source ones only talk MMC mode, but they can still read SD cards but not use the fancy features. There are companies which sell binary Linux drivers for SD and SDIO.

    10. Re:No open source drivers by alanh · · Score: 1

      I have a 512 MB MMC card in my cell phone right now. It came as a deal with a Palm Zire 72.

      --
      - AlanH
    11. Re:No open source drivers by KillShill · · Score: 1

      you can also not financially support DRM by not buying inSECURE digital technology.

      compact flash is cheaper and more robust and is free of Insidious Computing Inside. (pronounced icky).

      so you support OPEN source but not OPEN hardware.

      maybe you can change your alignment at a local shrine. i hear they don't charge for first timers.

      it's not wise to prop up the rope companies who are looking to hang you.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    12. Re:No open source drivers by Malor · · Score: 1

      But they don't really have any power over me. The fact that this gizmo has extra functions I can't use is pretty much irrelevant to me. I don't care about those functions. And they're not going to be turned on against my will. They don't have a magic wand that will suddenly lock me out of my own data.

      I just don't see what the issue is here. This isn't Bitkeeper, where I'm using the product at the sufferance of an asshole. They can't take my cards away or make them stop working... so what's the problem? What potential drawback am I facing by using this format?

    13. Re:No open source drivers by KillShill · · Score: 1

      you make it possible, in a small way, for them to continue making DRM-crippled products.

      i'm just saying, in these, the DRM dark ages, we must be ever more vigilant. we have to make it far too costly for the DRM industry to keep making digital handcuffs.

      every little bit helps but what helps the most is education. tell you family and friends, if given a choice, take compact flash over SD or sony "magic gate" type products. i mean you are certainly being charged for having those "features" in there yet you will never get any benefit from them. so ultimately it's just best not to donate money to your own lynch fund.

      the key is to make people automatically choose non-DRM crippled products given a choice. a shift in the way people think can be achieved if word gets out but the mainstream media is unwilling to do their part. just tell one or 2 people about the basic drawbacks of DRM.

      that's all.

      thanks for reading.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  20. How does the XGP compare to this... by mangobrain · · Score: 1

    ...in terms of media support and homebrew development? The GP2X supports Ogg Vorbis and DivX amongst others, and possibly even XviD (correct me if I'm wrong; I'm sure I read about it somewhere, just can't find a reference on the new site). It's a very tempting piece of hardware.

    However, the XGP - comparitively ugly as it may be, if you ask me - has a larger screen and supports OpenGL ES, tempting to me as a developer. But I have no idea whether it's intended to be an open platform; or, if it's not, whether it has decent codec support (WHY are there so few portable ogg players?).

    1. Re:How does the XGP compare to this... by FithisUX · · Score: 1

      Excuse me I am not an expert, what is XGP ???

    2. Re:How does the XGP compare to this... by oneandoneis2 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Ok, it's like this:

      GamePark created the GP32. It didn't do so well, so they open-sourced it. Then it did pretty well, selling to hackers.

      So then Gamepark wanted to make a successor. They argued over whether or not to make it open-source again.

      They couldn't agree, so they split up into Gamepark & Gamepark Holdings.

      GP went on to develop the XGP, a closed-source, high-powered console. GPH created the GP2X/GPX2, a less-powerful but open-source console.

      They're both successors to the GP32, but very different concepts, made by two different companies.

      Hope that helped. . .

      --
      So.. it has come to this
  21. Re:Storage by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    Its got USB 2.0. You can attach a harddrive pretty easily that way and it would be plenty fast for loading games or watching movies.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  22. More pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A series of larger pictures greater detailing the unit's expected packaging can be found here, as well as relative size comparisions: http://aog.2y.net/korea/gamepark%20holdings/

  23. This does not make any business sense by godIsaDJ · · Score: 1

    Ok, karma, there you go... :(

    I'm afraid this is hopeless. It costs 120 punds in the UK, well the PSP is 50 pounds more and it looks os much better it hurts! Plus it's got the whole marketing hype behind it. Plus they advertise the PSP on their own site: what's wrong with them??

    I think it's totally hopeless, and although it runs linux this will not make any difference. What does a kid care about the OS? He wants something cool to play with!

    1. Re:This does not make any business sense by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You buy this and can play a lot of (admittedly "old") games on it, I'd love to take Sam 'n' Max on a plane journey! This clearly isn't aimed at the kid who "wants something cool to play with", it's for people who know that this really is something cool to play with/work with/develop for. I have a friend who is really into the previous console and I believe has one of these pre-ordered, he makes them sound very cool and useful. However, personally I'd probably rather have a PSP. I can play most of these games on my PC after all.

    2. Re:This does not make any business sense by aliquis · · Score: 1

      They probably do it because they can, not because they can compete over Sony. And the GP32 was reasonable successful as I've understood it, and I read they sold 30.000 of them, and that isn't that much..

    3. Re:This does not make any business sense by delire · · Score: 1


      "What does a kid care about the OS? He wants something cool to play with!"

      Show me the game you made on your PSP; 'Fun' and 'Making' are not mutually exclusive.

      I think you've missed the point of this device - the successor of the hugely popular GamePark 32.

    4. Re:This does not make any business sense by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 1

      True, but I was speaking for myself. The reason I don't own a handheld is because I almost never take long journeys unless I'm driving in which case I probably shouldn't be playing a game :P

    5. Re:This does not make any business sense by arevos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This system seems more aimed at a niche market, so they're not directly competing with the PSP. Also, it appears that their previous product, the GP32 was profitable enough.

      Personally, I'm more interested in this console than a PSP. An affordable handhold Linux system with USB and twin 200MHz processors does sound tempting. Shouldn't be too hard to get a terminal on this thing, and the USB connection opens up the possibility of buying a small keyboard for it.

    6. Re:This does not make any business sense by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      As other people have noted, this device doesn't compete with the PSP.

      Although the markets might have some overlap, they're not the same; the PSP has a fairly wide audience and is going to be sold in large numbers, its capabilities for the price are determined by a huge economy of scale. This device is aimed not at "kids," but at people who have a big interest in computers and Linux in general -- basically script kiddies, hackers, people who read Slashdot, etc. The numbers they seem to be going for in terms of sales are big for an open-source product, but they're a drop in the bucket for Sony.

      Also, I think it will appeal a lot to people who otherwise have no interest in a handheld gaming system. Speaking just for myself, I have no interest in a PSP. Perhaps if someone gave me one for free I'd play around with it, but it doesn't interest me all that greatly. (Moreover the prospect of giving any amount of money to Sony is a disincentive.) However this thing does appeal to me, because I can see a lot of old emulated games being made available for it, as well as non-game-related hacks and modifications.

      I'm only one person, but I don't think I'm that uncommon a consumer, in an admittedly narrow demographic.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  24. Name issues by Neeex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Should we tell them they've plastered "GP2X" all over the website, but the device clearly has "GPX2" written on it?

    --
    All those who believe in telekinesis, raise my hand.
    1. Re:Name issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The machine was renamed to gp2x some time ago. promo pics still have the old name on them.
      Additionally the model sold is black, although the pictures show the white model.

  25. Not enough by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

    I think it's not enough. Its lack of 3D hardware is another nail in its coffin. Can it compare with PSP in gaming? No at all.

    1. Re:Not enough by Haeleth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its lack of 3D hardware is another nail in its coffin. Can it compare with PSP in gaming? No at all.

      Bear in mind what a lot of people are saying about the PSP: "Okay, there's no games on it apart from half a dozen identical racers, but it's really cool for running homebrew software! I hope I don't have to upgrade to firmware 1.50 and break all my emulators!"

      This GP2X? It's half the price of a PSP, and while it doesn't have the racing games, it does have the cast-iron guarantee that the company that makes it is not doing everything it can to destroy your homebrew experience and prevent you using your hardware to do whatever you like - unlike Sony, who tighten their grip on their platform with every revision.

      Can it compare with PSP in eye-candy? Not at all, not even close. Can it compare with PSP in emulation and homebrews? Well, let's see - it's half the price, it runs Linux, and it's explicitly marketed at the homebrew scene. Hmm, I wonder.

      So maybe it's not your thing. That doesn't mean it's crap, you know?

    2. Re:Not enough by KillShill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      calling it "homebrew" does a disservice to people who try to own their own property.

      it's called Arbitrary Code Execution.

      you wouldn't call programs written by non-corporate people as "homebrew", would you?

      they're all just programs but full access to those devices are willfully denied to you, the true owner of the product. using legal and technical means to remove property rights is immoral and unethical.

      if you want to rent devices, then call it renting and treat it accordingly. but if you sell something then after the fact prevent full access to it, that by definition is stealing. it should be illegal to engage in this disgusting business practice if it weren't for those meddling lobbyists and their pet congresscritters.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  26. Re:Storage by myc_lykaon · · Score: 1
    I'd rather have a HDD, or a method of attaching a HDD. SD cards just aren't enough for movies.

    Remember that the device native resolution is 320x240 and it supports DivX. After re-encoding, I'd be surprised if a full length movie occupied more than 350M. On my phone, I have 3 movies encoded on a 512M SD stick. The screen isn't much smaller than the GP2X and it's OK quality.

    On the other hand if you were using its device to TV link to play movies, I'd agree that a 2G stick isn't going to hold many movies, assuming it can output at 640x480 native. Probably about 4 movies max.

  27. Mmmmm by ewe2 · · Score: 1

    tasty.

    --
    insecurity asks the wrong question irritation gives the wrong answer
  28. rofl, what a waste of an opportunity. by Dimble+ThriceFoon · · Score: 1

    http://www.gp32x.com/gpx2xgp.php

    they went from a 4" widescreen capable of 480x272 to a 3.5" 3:2 screen capable of 320x240................

    why?

    i won't buy a PSP because they cripple video playback, and now a completely open platform comes along....... but with a crap screen. :(

    1. Re:rofl, what a waste of an opportunity. by Dimble+ThriceFoon · · Score: 1

      actually, i was mixing up the GXP32 (?) with the as yet to be released XGP. the design of the XGP is hideous, if only they could make the thing in a standard handheld format.

    2. Re:rofl, what a waste of an opportunity. by Dimble+ThriceFoon · · Score: 1

      that link doesn't explain why 320x240 is better than 480x272........ on the other hand, higher res and widescreen is much better for watching videos.

  29. Regent Street by Giant+Robot · · Score: 1

    I walked by Regent street yesterday

    Is this the same gadget that they have a store devoted to promoting? There was even a night club beneath the store with bouncers

    portable PS is pretty big in the UK for 200 quid, don't know how well this thing will sell here...

    1. Re:Regent Street by Tiersten · · Score: 1

      Nah. That's the Gizmondo.

    2. Re:Regent Street by Giant+Robot · · Score: 1

      yeah you are right mate got confused... they look similar

  30. Re:Mame on *that* ? Jolly good idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Take a look here:

    (Mame for GP32) http://www.talfi.net/gp32_franxis/

  31. Re:It's a scam by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Insightful

    well whoever makes them... I want one... I was going to get an Ipod for Xmas and stick Linux on it, but this beastie is far more usefull and cooler than an iPod... iPods.. every Tom, Dick and Harry's got one... far too common...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  32. Linux console? by mangoo78 · · Score: 1

    How come there is a Linux console, when there are nearly no games for Linux?

    1. Re:Linux console? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      if you build it, they will come?

    2. Re:Linux console? by oneandoneis2 · · Score: 1

      Well, in the case of the GP32, because it ran emulators of all the old computers that have hundreds of games. . .

      --
      So.. it has come to this
    3. Re:Linux console? by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      portable nethack!!! and when you get tired of that, portable freeciv!!!

  33. WI-FI anyone??? by jpkeisala · · Score: 1

    It seems to be very nice with Linux and all but I am not going to buy it if I cannot surf and check my mails with it.

    1. Re:WI-FI anyone??? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      It mentioned somewhere on the site (I believe in the FAQ) that it is capable of WiFi via a SD-to-802.11b adaptor, but there are currently not any Linux drivers for these.

      So the answer is currently no, but it seems that if the device sells well, that it won't be too long before someone comes up with a driver for the adaptors.

      I admit, integrated WiFi in an open source type device like this would really be killer.

      I wonder whether you can plug a bluetooth adaptor into the USB port and use that? In some older games it's not at all inconceivable to do multiplayer via BT.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  34. Re:So what? by pcgabe · · Score: 1

    Your cellphone runs Linux? It comes with a free SDK so you can make your own games? It has a SD slot and USB? It has a 3.5" screen?

    You mean yours doesn't?

    --
    Don't put advice in your sig.
  35. Re:Storage by ksenos · · Score: 1

    I gues that this is a USB 2.0 device port. It is used to connect the GP2X to the PC and not the other way. I hope I am wrong...

  36. wrong Analogy by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    The Analogy is wrong, a better Analogy is comparing a ps2(psp) to a commodity linux PC(GP2X). As for leaps and bounds. The specs speak for themselves

  37. Come on guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All of you folks (myself included) that push for open standards and open hardware need to put our money where our mouths are.

    Bonus 1 - the device runs linux

    Bonus 2 - the architecture is open

    Bonus 3 - the creators say they won't ruin homebrew

    What if we code games/apps for this in a platform portable way? That could mean a bunch of new games (albeit old-style, but what's wrong with that?) for Linux.

  38. For Sale??? by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 1


    "Firefox users any problems please use Opera or Internet Explorer."

    Jeez!

    1. Re:For Sale??? by mangobrain · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about it. I just pre-ordered one (yay!) from FF with no problems - the actual card details are entered on a seperate, SSLed site, which then drops you back to the gp2x site and gives you your order number. They're just covering their backs.

    2. Re:For Sale??? by splint3r · · Score: 1

      Actually they fixed that bug now. So ignore that message.

    3. Re:For Sale??? by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Here is your order summary, including shipping costs and any taxes.

      Items in cart: 2 x GP2X Console Value Pack
      Total Items cost: £ 249.98
      Shipping cost: £ 17.5 (International)
      Total cost with shipping: £ 267.48
      To pay please click proceed.

      Firefox users any problems please use Opera or Internet Explorer."

  39. Re:It's a scam by n3owj · · Score: 1, Interesting

    We presented our device and business plan to a large Korean company. They invited GamePark to see it. They copied our description and device except for an ARM processor instead of the 1gHz AMD we used, because the Korean company makes ARM processors under license. If you send me your email offline, mine is in my sig, I'll forward it to someone who can send you more details.

    --
    gsm@mendelson.com Jerusalem Israel
  40. US Pre-orders? by OpenGLFan · · Score: 1

    Anybody have a link for US pre-orders? I've just figured out what I'm getting my MAME-crazy brother for Christmas.

  41. Linux Console Screenshots by Justin+Top · · Score: 1

    For you all linux geeks on here, I found some.. sort of interesting screenshots playing with probably a GP2X developement kit..
    http://www.ibiblio.org/paulc/gp2x/

    1. Re:Linux Console Screenshots by Justin+Top · · Score: 1
  42. Peripherals by OpenGLFan · · Score: 1

    I've looked all over the site and can't find any mention of this, which is sad. Apparently you can hook it up to the TV and double your resolution, which is AMAZING -- but are there any other interface ports on this machine? Do you know how much fun I could have with this thing and some Palm-based accessories? A little roll-up keyboard? A little USB laptop mouse? I know it's not the target use at all, but the Linux kernel has good USB peripheral support, so all the coding is done for you.

    1. Re:Peripherals by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Just order it from Craig in the UK using the (corrected) link above. He's a good guy and does game dev on the machines too. I got my GP32 from him with no probs.

  43. official website??? by PePeBoTiKa · · Score: 5, Informative

    :-O

    That's not the official GP2X website. That's the GBAX website, an online GP2X distributor. Hardcore-gamer is the distributor on spain.

    Here is a list of official distributors.

    The official website is still www.gpx2.com

    The console will be released in october/november

  44. Re:The real question is.. by serialdogma · · Score: 1

    I think we all know that someone, somewhere will make it run windows under bochs.
    It might not be a usable speed (who am i kidding, who has ever known windows to run at a usable speed), lack a keyboard but it will run.

  45. Can't wait... by EvilMonkeySlayer · · Score: 1

    To get my hands on one of these, i've got a Gamepark 32 here and it is an excellent piece of hardware with the exception of the controller.
    The GP32 has a fiddly little joystick type thing which would frankly be better if it were a joypad instead.

    Other than that stuff like ScummVM and all the ports are really suited to this, Doom is quite nice.. :)

  46. Doom? The game from the 386 era by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    I should it would run, it ran pretty good on a machine that was 40mhz. How could it not run on a 2x200mhz machine?

    Quake might be a little bit different but lets not also forget that this screen is an awfull lot smaller then even my monitor was at the time. Still I had some pretty good matches on a 90mhz pentium and that was with bloated NT sucking up resources in the background.

    No 2x200mhz is a lot of power for old games. Wether it can equal the PSP I am not going to debate. This thing is a lot cheaper and not a DRM nightmare.

    It all depends I expect on your expectations. I am not a person to be put off by framerates at around 20 in a game. Guess at my age my eyes ain't fast enough to really notice anyway.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Doom? The game from the 386 era by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Doom was a little slow on my 16MHz 386 but ran fine on a 25MHz 486. Quake ran okay in 320x200 (the default resolution) on a P100. I'm not sure how much either of these will get from a second processor - they are both single-threaded - but a 200MHz ARM chip should be fast enough for either.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  47. price that low? I doubt it by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    If you don't believe me then check out HD based portable movie players. They retail for 2x-3x the price of this gadget.

    The secret is that this device comes with only a 64mb card. Those are practically given away for free now. if you want more, you need to put up some extra money but it allows them to keep the machine itself pretty cheap.

    Sony pulls the same stunt with the PSP, want to really play movies on it? Well then fork over an other 100 euro for a 1gb memory stick.

    So I think that a lot of people would moan if they had added a 20gb drive, they would moan about extra weight, they would moan about extra vulnarability, they would moan about reduced battery live and they would moan about the high price.

    Sure portable movie players sound hot but look at the sales figures of the ones that are out there, they ain't to hot. Either they are extremely expensive, even above the price of an i-pod or require you to use memory sticks. Believe me I been looking very closely for a good player.

    The "best" at the moment might be the DVD players with divx capabilty. Sadly because of the spinning disc they lack battery life. And are big and heavy, not good in a device you got to hold in your hand.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  48. All this talk about linux.... by kermitthefrog917 · · Score: 1

    ... and the videos on the site are in WINDOWS media video (wmv) format.....

    --
    I may be wrong but you're downright ugly!
  49. Re:The real question is.. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    Supposedly, Windows CE runs on the GP32 - the predecessor to this device.

  50. Re:WWRD? (what would RMS do?) by PePeBoTiKa · · Score: 1

    It's worse than that: The device has DRM The System-On-Chip used is closed-source. You have to firm a NDA to know the low-level specifications. So it cannot be open source :-( Richard Stallman could be very dissapointed cause of that.

  51. Re:WWRD? (what would RMS do?) by mangobrain · · Score: 1

    Well its predecessor - the GP32 - existed, sold, and didn't cause the company to get sued into the ground. Just to point out that these people have a track record.

    Also, if you don't use WMV or WMA formats at the moment, why does it matter to you personally whether and how the device plays then? Even MP3 is patented. I'm more interested in the claimed Ogg Vorbis and XviD support. :)

  52. Re:WWRD? (what would RMS do?) by Justin+Top · · Score: 1

    Well, in fact, the player in the GP2X is a Mplayer ported from Linux to.. Linux ;)

  53. Nearly no games? by hummassa · · Score: 2, Informative

    Every single game I know (Ok, I'm old-school) has a linux version or runs in a console for which linux has a working emulator... approximately 1000 games.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  54. Re:proprieatary batteries? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    Proprietary batteries most definitely DO exist.

    Got a cell phone? Open the battery compartment. Does it have AAs, or is it a proprietary battery form factor?

    Got an SP or a DS? Ditto.

    Got an iPod? That's one of the worst cases.

    Laptops are bad about this, too.

    NiMH AAs all the way for simple consumer electronics... (preferably with a built-in NiMH/NiCad charge circuit, though, so I don't have to take them out if I don't want to)

  55. Where is it? by hummassa · · Score: 1

    How can I associate with its development?
    How can I get an emulator and, if possible, a developer preview?

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:Where is it? by simeonbeta2 · · Score: 1

      I am anxiously waiting the release of the 770 and would like to buy a dev preview my self!

      Anyways, the open source ui effort is called Maemo and you can download the dev platform and check out contribution options at http://www.maemo.org/community/getting-involved.ht ml

  56. dual 200MHz cpus? by Kludge · · Score: 1

    Your cell phone has 2 200MHz cpus?
    I doubt it.

  57. Linux Inside but not a penguin by stoicio · · Score: 1

    There's a linux inside logo that shows the skeleton of Tux.

    It appears that Tux is not a penguin. It must be some kind of alien thing. That's not a penguin skeleton at all. Not even close to a bird.

  58. Things aren't that simple... by Man+In+Black · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gamepark actually encourages people to make homebrew apps, unlike other manufacturers.

    You might want to be a little careful of this statement... You see, the company that you knew as Gamepark that made the original GP32 has since split up into two companies: "Gamepark Holdings" is the company that is working on the GP2X (Or GPX2, as some references call it... there was a contest to decide on a name, so there is some ambiguity). However the other company, known simply as "Gamepark" is working on a completely different handheld system called the XGP. From what I've heard, the XGP is likely going to be quite a bit powerful, with hardware 3D accelleration (basically a Korean PSP)... however, everything I've heard about it indicates that the XGP will NOT be an open platform in the way the GPX2 is striving to be.

    So in other words, "Gamepark Holdings" is encouraging the homebrew community... "Gamepark" is not. At least, not yet.

    --
    -"One machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man." -EH
  59. Half-Life 2 by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    A little less than a gig, last I checked.

    Most XBox/PS2 games I've played have very nice pre-rendered cinematics. HL2's "cinematics" are all very simple and animated real-time.

    I'm guessing it's got to do with resource management.

    Oh, and by the way, if it's supposed to be portable, why do you want to play more than Quake on it?

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Half-Life 2 by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Check again. The GCF files for HL2 are 3.3GB.

      They could have saved some space by compressing assets, however uncompressed files lead to faster loading and lower CPU usage. On a PC game, this is an acceptable tradeoff.

      Textures and sound account for about 2GB out of that 3GB, so if we assume that texture and audio compression would have netted a 50% size reduction, the game would indeed cut down to 1.3GB, which would fit on a 2GB SD card. However, it is important to keep in mind that the GP2X has a slow CPU (200MHz), and does not have any hardware 3D acceleration. All 3D rendering must be done in software, which is why gbax reccomends the Quake 1 engine for all 3D development; it is about as advanced as you can get with the available power.

      I would be much more excited about the XGP, depending on what degree of homebrew support they have. The GXP has a higher resolution screen, and a 400mhz processor; it looks to be similar to the PSP in capabilities, though there isn't any info about it's 3D support.

      Anyhow, with Quake 1 level graphics 2GB is way more than we'll ever need. Quake 1 took up what, 40MB?

    2. Re:Half-Life 2 by fbjon · · Score: 1
      40MB finally, but 80MB during installation. I still remember it...

      "Where are we going to free up 80MB (!) just to install this thing!?"

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  60. Re:proprieatary batteries? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
    NiMH AAs all the way for simple consumer electronics

    NiMH is vulnerable to the memory effect, but that's probably not a problem for a game system that you charge then fully discharge. They also have less energy density than lithium ion or lithium polymer. They also have a serious size limitation. A lithium polymer battery can be made any shape you want - an AA battery is a fixed size and shape (and a lot of the volume is casing). I'd much rather go with built-in lithium-polymer batteries with the option of an external battery pack containing AAs - something like the iPod, in fact.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  61. Re:So what? by bitspotter · · Score: 1

    Does it cost USD$226 ?

  62. Re:proprieatary batteries? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'd prefer LiIon or LiPoly AA cells, but nobody can actually [b]DO[/b] that, it seems...

  63. Show me the schematics! by queazocotal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I can't seem to find more details than are on the webpage, just a short list of features, and nothing else.

    Where can I find details?

    Some questions that arise: Is that 'USB2' port just a cardreader for the SD card, in which case I'll probably leave it on the shelf, or is it a full USB2 host port that I can connect (externally powered) keyboards/mice/hard drives/... to?

    Can it supply any power?

    What's the power consumption idle with screen on, idle with screen off, idle with external screen on, playing mp3, or playing movies?

    What does 'ebook' mean?

    html, lit, rbf, pdf, ...

    Can it show encrypted .lit et al?

    Mention has been made of wireless using a wireless SD card, which is pretty useless if you've got to swap it for your storage.

    Is there any likelyhood of an enhanced model with wifi?

    How much ROM/RAM is there?

    Is there a URL for the SDK, before buying?

    1. Re:Show me the schematics! by RealTobriand · · Score: 1

      Well, you'll find the stats to some extent at www.gp2x.com. At least if its working. Certainly they were there for a long while. Roughly speaking, the chip is the MMSP2 one from MagicEyes. That means it has an Arm920t core and an Arm940t one both at 200MHz. Also has a few other controllers for various crizzle but I can't remember them all. Uses SD cards, has 64Mb RAM proper, and 64Mb NAND flash memory (which is still open debate over whether its either possible or sensible to store stuff in on account of likely limited writes) despite being perfectly fast enough to use as ROM storage. USB2 is, I think, Unpowered Host. If it does host, of course, which I'm fairly sure it does; just not with any power being supplied. If your devices are externally powered, this should still be OK, I imagine. No idea about ebooks, sorry. The SDK on release is said to be SDL. I assume there will be some extensions to allow better use of the second core, but I honestly don't know - but SDL is the primary thing which people'll be starting with. IIRC a wonderful guy called Mr_Mirko is also going to be making his own SDK (can't be open because MagicEyes insist on coders signing an NDA before giving them access to the lower level stuff), which I would hope will definitely be designed with 2 cores in mind. He's made a wonderful SDK for the older GP32 (I was actually able to do more then "Hello World" with it - I'm not a good coder lol). Of course, it isn't made yet, so kinda hard to give it to you :P. Hope that's helped a little -- Toby

  64. Re:So what? by mike_sucks · · Score: 1

    Sadly, no. Mine is more like: Symbian, Free SDK, Memory Stick Duo slot and faux USB, a 1.5x2" screen.

    --
    -- "So, what's the deal with Auntie Gerschwitz et all?"
  65. Re:WWRD? (what would RMS do?) by pruss · · Score: 1

    mpeg4 (the standard behind xvid) and mp3 are also patented. As far as I know, Thomson doesn't ask for payments from people who distribute mp3 decoders (only) for free, but they do ask for them for people who distribute decoders for money. MPEG LA requires licenses for all mpeg4 decoders, free or not, but doesn't charge any royalties to a licensee if one distributes less than 50,000 or maybe 100,000 copies (I've actually become a MPEG LA licensee so that I could have legal copies of xvid and tcpmp for personal use; there are potential GPL Section 7 issues with this, but since I'm only copying for myself, it should be OK, since Section 7 applies to distribution).

    These folks have two choices, as far as I know (IANAL). (1) They can license the patents and use commercial or homebrew non-GPL codecs. (2) They can license the patents and use GPL codecs BUT pay the copyright owners of the GPL software for a non-GPL license (otherwise GPL Section 7 MIGHT be a problem).

  66. Re:It's a scam by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

    "They copied our description and device except for an ARM processor instead of the 1gHz AMD we used"

    Fly away, troll. The GP32 already did all this with ARM, and it's not using any of your AMD architecture.

    I don't know how that comment received an "interesting", because it's certainly not grounded in reality.

  67. Re:It's a scam by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

    No, they did not. I have been told by them not to mention any more here, but if you would email me, I can put you in touch with them.

    No one is going to e-mail you because this is the most transparently obvious and least skillful troll that Slashdot has ever seen.

    That is not your e-mail address - if it exists at all it is probably the address of somebody you are stalking. This kind of shit has been tried for years, mostly on Usenet. But you're too fucking dumb to use a Usenet client so instead we get stuck with your bullshit.

    There are easier ways to flood someone's inbox if you're not chronically retarded.

    For fucks sake, you're not even clever enough to open a new Slashdot account. Or have you not noticed that all your posts start at zero? That means you have been officially designated as a "fucktard". A fucktard is like a troll but without enough skill to actually annoy anyone.

    In summary, you are an attention seeker who has failed to attract much attention.

    Don't assume that this reply is attention. I am merely trying to encourage a higher standard of trolling. You have failed it so badly that your posts provide excellent examples of how not to do things. I hope they might serve as a warning to others.

  68. Price by inkysplat · · Score: 2

    I spose the PSP and GP2X markets over lap, but i believe the GP2X will always be cheaper. If we take linux as an example, about 85% of all software for linux is open-source based, this same trend would naturally continue on the GP2X, even tho Game Park Holdings have included the DRM feature to help and encourage commercial games. Take a look at the PSP, it costs what £179 on play.com/amazon with a memory stick OR 1game, with case and headphones. Each game will cost about £29.99 as well as the UMD DVDs. Whereas because the GP2X is based on Linux it would hopefully attract alot of Linux user's attension and thus there would [hopefully] be a open-source gaming market for it. My point is, get a PSP and you'll be forever buying games, and accessories. Get a GP2X and rip your CDs or Torrent a Video/album/Movie (questionable leagality tho), and then play an fun Open-source game. ableit Tux Racer or Plane Shift, or a Quake/Doom variant.

  69. Yes, Yes, and More Yes by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1
    Hi there, I'm the proud owner of a vintage GP32, and I would be extremely confident at the GPX2's ability to run Doom and Quake full speed.

    My GP32 *already* runs Doom II at full speed (60fps), and it can play Quake at maybe 5-8 fps. That's with a single CPU @ 166MHz.

    This new one has 2 x 200MHz ones. :)

    Some other things the lowly GP32 could do:

    Near perfect emulation of NES, Genesis, TurboGrafix16, and numerous others. Playable (but somewhat slow) SNES emulation. Many other systems emulated to various degrees( C64, Atari2600, ColecoVision, GB/GBC, MAME, etc) DivX / XVid playback (I was able to get 320x172, 24fps to work), plus Ogg/MP3 playback, image viewing, and document viewing (!Reader can handle PDFs and HTML, including ZIPPED, with inline images).

    The GP32 was a brilliant little gem, and was perfect except for a few wishes:
    • More storage capacity (GP32 has 8MB RAM, and SmartMedia which is limited to 128MB)
    • Faster CPU
    • A couple more buttons (to better play SNES games.. GP32 only had 6 total: A, B, R, L, select, start)


    The GP2X addresses all of these. I am ordering one immediately. :)
    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson