Slashdot Mirror


Dealing with Digital Music and Vendor Lock-In?

rahuja asks: "Buying and using digital music is a far from easy decision today - there are various competing and incompatible formats, stores and players out there in the market, primarily Apple (AAC + iTunes + iPod), Windows (WMA + various stores + WMA-compatible players), and Sony (Atrac3 + Connect.com + Walkman). How do you then ensure that the music and player you buy today will not be incompatible with your player, online store or the OS?" "Burning to audio CD and ripping back is always possible, but it is a painfully slow process and all tag information (song, album, artiste) is lost in the process.

In the past, I've used Sony Connect [Ed: IE 5.5+ only] (thanks to a $10 card I got with a Sony CD Walkman), which locks you in to Sony-only devices, and later, WMA with MSN Music and a Creative Muvo Micro N200. My player just died, and I'm too scared to lock myself into a new player/format/store now. iPod doesn't have an FM tuner yet, and my WMA tracks will be useless if next year I switch to Mac once the new x86 Powerbooks come out. I'm not sure how real Real's Harmony is, and JHymn doesn't support iTunes 6 yet.

In an ideal world we'd all have OGG-based players with FM tuner, and access to DRM-less music, or at least a universal, compatible format.

How are you dealing with this issue? Or is it just me?"

87 of 612 comments (clear)

  1. Duh... like... by MouseR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I burn an audio CD out of iTunes and voilà?

    No worry there.

    1. Re:Duh... like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      First post ...check.

      Non-obvious-troll post ...check.

      Seemingly on-topic post ... check.

      Pithy and correct post ... check.

      Proper use of accented vowel ... check.

      Okay, who are you and what have you done with the real Slashdot?

    2. Re:Duh... like... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Almost! Except for cheaper-than-iTunes, I buy USED CDs, and have an original, uncompressed copy that sounds better than any iTunes 128Mbps-compressed tune.

      And the types of music I listen to (Classical, "Western Art Music", Jazz, Opera) aren't served well by iTMS anyway.

    3. Re:Duh... like... by PeterChenoweth · · Score: 4, Informative
      WAV-encoded CD's are less efficent than MP3's, that's for sure, but I think the point the original author was trying to make is that you use the CD's as a temporary medium. In my case I just use a CD-RW, so there's no ongoing media cost. I tend to purchase an artist's entire CD at one time, rather than just a few tracks, that makes things much easier.

      1.Buy & Download from Napster|iTunes|whatever.

      2.Use their software to burn a CD of what you just bought, put the tracks in the same order that they are on the real CD. Napster likes to reverse the order, so you have to manually adjust that before you burn the CD. iTunes usually keeps them in the correct order.

      3. Rip all of the music back off the CD using your favorite CD-ripper & encoder.

      4.If you bought all of the tracks from a specific CD, and if you set up tracks in the right order, most of the time your ripping software will pick up all of the Artist & Track information automatically from CDDB or Gracenote, so you don't have to manually tag everything. Otherwise, you now have to re-tag/re-name files.

      5.Erase CDRW.

      6.Enjoy your DRM-free audio files.

    4. Re:Duh... like... by belly917 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Simple.. do your research to live in a DRM free environment

      Digital Audio Player
      I researched around for an non-cripled (no DRM) player that would mount as a hard drive, allowing access to the music files without the use of any software.

      Result:iRiver iHP-120 (which has better audio fidelity, plays more formats, and has many more options than the iPod [digital optical out/input, FM radio, etc.]) Not to mention I'm running rockbox on it so it's a wonderful experience

      Music purchases
      I buy CDs! I can rip everything in the FORMAT & BITRATE that I choose, and if, God forbid, I lose or destroy my DAP (& the duplicates on my computer) I can re-rip something. Also, if you search around, you can get CD's online for cheap & without tax.

    5. Re:Duh... like... by ZephyrXero · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can also buy music from stores that sell their music in DRM-Free MP3 and Ogg formats like AudioLunchbox, Mindawn, or MP3Tunes ;)

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    6. Re:Duh... like... by lorenlal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What are the legal implications of going through that process?

      I'm pretty sure that JHymn, and iRevolt, etc, are all DMCA violators... But to use a functionality that's built into iTunes to essentially remove the DRM from a song... Is that okay?

    7. Re:Duh... like... by croddy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      or AllOfMP3.

      Of course, if you want to ensure compatibility in the future, you need to purchase songs that don't rely on proprietary restrictions management or encoding formats. the question of "which DRM" is a silly one to ask -- if you're purchasing cryptographically restricted music, then you should not have any expectation of being able to use it freely, either today or in the future.

    8. Re:Duh... like... by bluephone · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except your end product has now been twice compressed, and thus has lost even more data, and sounds worse than the DRM copy you originally bought - er, licensed. While I did exactly what you describe for the "Come And Get It" EP that I was allowed to download for free when buying Liz Pahir's self-titled album a couple Januarys ago (It came as one big WMA, so I had to DL the WMA, burn to CD, import as WAV, chop it up, then re-encode it), I was still displeased about the lack of MP3 or OGG support, and would never have paid money for the WMA. The only reason I went through that process is because it was free, and the music was good.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    9. Re:Duh... like... by bobdinkel · · Score: 4, Informative
      Second of all, use your brain, open the preferences and set the importing prefs to 160 kbps or greater.

      I think he was referring to the iTunes Music Store. And to the best of my knowledge the iTMS only offers 128Kbps AAC files.

      --
      A publicly traded company exists solely to make profits for shareholders.
    10. Re:Duh... like... by PeterChenoweth · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Have you done back-to-back comparisons with the files to see if you can actually hear the differences? I have, and most of the time I can't. If the point is academic, I completely agree, as data is being lost as the decendant generations are created, and that eventually those losses will become audible, but in practice can you actually tell the difference on just the third generation? Digital artifacts that I can (and do) hear in the original DRM files are not any worse in the copies. For all intents and purposes, most of the time the files sound identical to me.

      Besides, most of the stuff I buy online is more for driving in the car or working out at the gym, places where I am not super concerned with sound quality. When sound quality is paramount, I'm at home in my listening room with my SACD's. ;-)

  2. Drink the Apple Kool-aid... by losman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    iPod, iTune, iTunes Music Store, and MP3 is your best bet - period!

    The player is both Windows and Mac compatible. It allows you access to largest and well known music stores in existence. It allows you to access music, video and TV episodes. It allows you to use MP3 from CDs you own or from other sources - wink..wink..

    My wife has her iPod with all of our music and she loves it. We have the airport express with air tunes and play all our music to our stereo system, very cool!

    I have my iPod, my wifes old iPod and I use it for the office and the car. I have a 1gb iPod Shuttle that I use when walking around, snow boarding and any other time I want to be portable.

    --
    Q: I am short, useless and provide no value. What am I? A: a sig
    1. Re:Drink the Apple Kool-aid... by Pxtl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Similar here - MP3 and iPod. Just rip the CDs to high-bitrate MP3 and forget the details. Sure, I eat it a bit when it comes to compression efficiency, but it saves trouble - my wife uses a Nano while I have various pieces of equipment that play CDs of MP3s, so MP3s are the universal standard. Just use a mainstream, standard encoder and avoid the esoteric options and your MP3s will work on anything.

    2. Re:Drink the Apple Kool-aid... by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple and iPod look cool and all that, I'm just not big on paying their premium to be cool as it were. Instead I got the same basic product for $100 less.
      60 gig iPod - $400
      60 gig Creative Nomad zen - $300.

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    3. Re:Drink the Apple Kool-aid... by timster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't you think "same basic product" is a little bit of a stretch, when the Apple product has the advantage of a color screen, video playback, and charging over USB?

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    4. Re:Drink the Apple Kool-aid... by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 2, Informative

      well, there was no color screen or video playback ipod when I bough mine, and pretty colored song titles wasnt a big selling point for me either way. Video playback? Maybe. I dont know a whole lot about how it works, but I dont really use my mp3 player in situations where I can concentrate my focus on it. I listen to my mp3 player while walking to my apt, or when I was walking to class (or occasionally while I was in class) usually, if I want to watch a video I'll go to my tv or computer with bigger screens. The charging over usb sounds attractive, but I went with the Nomad because it has a detachable battery, and I can buy a new one for less than $50. Plus the thing has been durable. My girlfriend dropped it down a sewer and it still works fine. I have no regets about my decision.

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
  3. compact discs by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Insightful
    i buy cds.

    solution provided.

    1. Re:compact discs by JCY2K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Haven't you been paying attention? Rootkit... soon that provided solution will be nothing but a fond memory. /tinfoil hat

    2. Re:compact discs by dslauson · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "i buy cds. solution provided."

      Yeah, but if you like listening to CDs on your computer, you're going to be butting heads with DMA before long.
    3. Re:compact discs by ozydingo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Right, because CDs never have anything related to DRM...

      (Just to list a few)

    4. Re:compact discs by generic-man · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I buy Compact Discs which conform to the Red Book standard, not DRM-encrusted audio discs.

      Always look for the CD logo before you buy a useless plastic coaster.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    5. Re:compact discs by BushCheney08 · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...you're going to be butting heads with DMA before long.

      That's why I use PIO. : p

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    6. Re:compact discs by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Ooh. Aren't you l33t? I have to get by with deading it with an SEM and hand-toggling the bits in with a switch. :-)

      But seriously... DRM on CDs? Not effective DRM. Not unless the content manufacturers manage to convince everyone to throw away their existing CD players.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    7. Re:compact discs by crimoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Even better, buy used CDs. Same music, 3/4 to 1/2 of the price AND you can almost always sell it back (although at a lower price).

    8. Re:compact discs by wiredlogic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Plextor still produces sensible CD-ROM drives that have bulletproof digital extraction and will ignore any of the multi-session based DRM tricks.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    9. Re:compact discs by pla · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, but if you like listening to CDs on your computer, you're going to be butting heads with DMA before long.

      You say that as though:
      A) Circumventing DRM actually took some effort, and/or
      B) I cared about obeying laws bought-and-paid-for by corporate interests.

      As neither of those holds true, I'll second the GP's response. I deal with attempts to lock me into vendor-specific formats by buying uncompressed media either with no DRM or with losslessly removeable DRM (which currently means CDs), and ripping it losslesssly (to FLAC).

      I can then transcode to whatever format my current player prefers without incuring serially degraded quality from using lossy compression (as much as I don't care for MP3, everything currently supports it so it makes a good choice). When my current player dies, I can get another and at worst (if it doesn't support old-player's-preferred-format), I'll need to let my PC run overnight transcoding from the original FLACs to the new-player's-preferred-format.

    10. Re:compact discs by DaveCar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Amen.

      I work for a fairly big independent music distributor. We provide digital distribution as well as physical.

      I wrote some scripts for ripping from CDs (with cdparanoia & friends) and entering metadata in XML which feeds into our, er, really advanced content management system.

      Then we just encode out to AACs, WMAs or raw WAVs for delivery to retailers.

      I've visited other digital services people who do just the same (for example, if you want your stuff on MusicNet you either provide them WAVs and metadata or give them retail CDs to rip. Ditto with iTMS and their iTMS Producer app).

      Just buy CDs, because that's what you're getting your AACs, etc. from anyway - trust me it really is!

      Oh, and if you're having problems with the "copy protection" then get a Real operating system ;)

      If you object to rootkits on your CDs then don't buy the CD. Write to the record company and artist telling them why you are not buying it. If you buy the CD anyway because it won't harm your Real OS write to them anyway telling them they are dorks.

      If they are not giving you what you want then don't buy it and tell them why you don't want it. It's not like it's basic foodstuff or anything. You *can* live without carrying around 10 billion tracks with you all the fricking time you know.

    11. Re:compact discs by bluephone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh come on. We all know CD DRM is useless. If you're on Windows and still have AutoPunish - er, AutoPlay turned on, just hold shift while you insert the disc. Then use your favorite CDR or CD-ripping software to grab the PCM audio. CD-DRM is the most useless and ill-aimed DRM ever, as it TRULY only punishes those users who are too uninformed to know better. ANYONE with moderate PC knowledge can get around it. And if you're on a Mac or Linux, you're home free without any workarounds.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
  4. WMA won't be useless. by Blapto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    WMA won't be useless under OS X. There's always window media player for OS X, and if you don't mind some chance of quality loss, you can convert WMA to MP3 using free tools.

    1. Re:WMA won't be useless. by QuaZar666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you used Windows Media player for OS X ? Its one of the worst designed programs out there, doesn't follow common [de-facto] keyboard shortcuts (i.e. command-F for full screen), and doesn't really feel (or look) like any other mac application. In fact all of Microsoft's products for the mac look out of place.

    2. Re:WMA won't be useless. by Daedala · · Score: 2, Informative

      Windows Media Player for Mac OS X is not a useful solution. I am on a number of Mac fora, and I can't count the number of times I've seen posts about it not working, not playing particular files, etc. When it does "work," people are tearing their hair out at it....

      --
      What I say does not represent the views of my employers, my friends, my cats, or myself.
    3. Re:WMA won't be useless. by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When it does "work," people are tearing their hair out at it....

      I would agree. There is something with the player that most movies don't like. The files are choppy and for some reason don't play as well as they do on a comparable PC. However Quicktime files and other files that I run through the VLC player work fine.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  5. Easy by Eightyford · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just buy a digital audio player that supports mp3 or ogg, and don't buy from the vendors that lock you in.

    1. Re:Easy by tpgp · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Exactly.

      Just to expand on that, it is just as trivially easy to buy a CD online, pop it into your CD-ROM when it arrives & rip it to the format you prefer.

      End result:

      • You can fit loads of low quality files on your portable device (if that's your preference)

      • You can sacrifice quantity for quality on your music player (if sound quality means more for you)

      • You have music in a format that is guaranteed to be around for years to come (the CD)

      • You get a booklet with lyrics, etc.

      Although I can see some of the appeal for the itunes store/the various wma stores/sony's online stores, frankly I think they're occupying a rather dangerous middle ground between the (free) high quality tunes you can get from torrents/donkey and the (far better value for money) CDs you can buy.
      --
      My pics.
  6. How is this different? by mtec · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Than buying an 8 track and then they come out with tape, CD etc?

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
    1. Re:How is this different? by oldmacdonald · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But digital _IS_ different. The promise of digital data of all sorts is that you should be able to keep it around forever. You might have to transfer it to your new holographic 20 terabyte drive at some point, but that should just copying files over, which is trivial provided you do it before your obsolete hardware fails. To believe that this is just like any other "format war" is to buy into the premise of DRM.

  7. Buy /Borrow CD, rip CD by gatzke · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Unless you keep everything as a mp3 or some other format without DRM, you are doomed.

    You want it easy(iTunes, DRM whatever) you get locked in. Eventually, things will go south and you will lose that investment.

    I have hundreds of CDs that I should be able to rip again and again. Maybe someday I will upgrade to 256k rips, or maybe I lose my HDs and have to re-rip... Either way, I own the CD and it is mine to do with as I please.

    Five copies and you can't move it again? WTF? Crazy that you even bought into that stuff.

  8. I don't buy music by davidwr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't steal music, but I don't buy it either.

    It's my way of sticking it to the RIAA.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:I don't buy music by Saige · · Score: 3, Informative

      Last.fm is a great way to expand your musical horizons, and introduce yourself to new artists that you're very likely to find enjoyable.

      I've been using the site for a year, and not only finding great new music, finding it on smaller labels (such as Projekt), and even independent artists (Hungry Lucy, Collide). In fact, I'm finding a lot of these artists that I like better than just about any RIAA crap, because the ones recommended to me are very tailores to my tastes by the site.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
  9. All of.... by wpiman · · Score: 5, Informative
    allofmp3.com allows you to pick whatever format you desire.

    I choose mp3 because it works everywhere.

    1. Re:All of.... by pomo+monster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Allofmp3.com says to me, "I don't give a shit about doing the right thing (supporting the artists), so long as I'm on the right side of the law." Personally, I think that's even more disgusting than outright piracy, since then at least you'd have the balls to risk getting caught and punished for your blatant freeloading. But to each his own, I suppose.

    2. Re:All of.... by gurutechanimal · · Score: 5, Informative

      You know, all this talk of voting with your wallet is completely true. I was once a very large consumer of music; my CD collection stands at over 2000 legitimate, store-bought discs. But ever since the RIAA started taking a very aggressive, anti-consumer stance with their products, I have done a few things:

      1) I stopped buying new music discs from stores.
      2) I increased my used CD purchases.
      3) I increased my concert attendance to give my money directly to artists.
      4) I started downloading music.

      What does all of this have to do with allofmp3.com? In the last 3 months, I've spent over $250 of my money with them. They provide exactly the kind of service that I would expect from an online music retailer: large selection, choice of format, reasonable pricing. It has totally eliminated numbers 1, 2, and 4 from the above list. It's the perfect solution (although I still buy used CD's when I can't find them on allofmp3).

      People are bitching that allofmp3 is:

      A) Unethical because the artists don't get paid: Well, they don't get paid when I go down to mall to buy a CD, and they don't get paid when I buy a used CD. Speaking as someone who at one time was under a major-label contract, artists don't get paid from record sales, unless they're already huge.

      B) Run by the russian Mafia: the record industry here is run by the mafia, or at least run LIKE the mafia. No sympathy here; at least if allofmp3 is run by the mafia, they don't pretend otherwise. Here, our record labels act like they exist to serve the artist...what a load!

      Look, the bottom line is that allofmp3 has it right. LARGE SELECTION, FAIR PRICES, CHOICE OF FORMAT, and EASE OF USE. I know they're doing it right, because I'm finally buying huge amounts of music again. It's everything a music store should be. And its far out of the reach of US law, thank God!

      --
      Governments are not necessary.
    3. Re:All of.... by almostmanda · · Score: 2, Informative

      Can I get some documentation of this being "illegal to use" ? Also, I haven't checked lately, but last I looked, allofmp3.com accepted Paypal.

    4. Re:All of.... by mythosaz · · Score: 2, Informative
      From Wikipedia

      AllofMp3 claims that it is legal in Russia and that the music it distributes is licensed.

      The legality of AllofMP3 continues to be argued in Russia. According to a report in The Register, a preliminary Moscow City Police investigation resulted in a February 8, 2005 recommendation that AllofMP3 be prosecuted. The IFPI (International Federation of the Phonographic Industry) also filed a formal complaint on February 8. However, IFPI's Russian legal advisor, Vladimir Dragunov, admitted in an interview with The Register that because of the structure of Russian copyright law, successful litigation against AllofMP3 appears unlikely.

      In March 2005 the Moscow City Prosecutor's office decided that Russian copyright laws do not cover online distribution of creative works, and refused to bring a criminal suit against AllofMP3 because of the lack of corpus delicti. The copyright holders can still file a civil suit, though. [1]

      The full wikipedia article is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allofmp3

  10. Easy... by InvalidError · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Simply do not buy into proprietary DRMed format and stick with plain MP3/OGG/AC3/etc. players.

    This would pretty much restrict people to smaller online stores, P2P downloads and CD-ripping but at least these formats are freely transcodable and transportable.

  11. you don't go with any proprietary format by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you pirate

    companies exist to serve the consumer, not visa versa

    until companies figure that out, you don't use them

    you pirate until the companies figure out that trying to own you is a turn off

    and if they never figure that out, then fine, they die

    the point is: you are the consumer, you are king

    don't agree to any arrangement that makes you subject to something proprietary

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you don't go with any proprietary format by Dr_LHA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really, you're saying piracy and copyright infringment as some sort of political statement against DRM. In reality you're justifying not paying for stuff you want.

      The real way to "stick it to them" is not to buy stuff *and* not to pirate it.

      Its bad enough that record companies seem to treat dropping sales as entirely due to piracy, rather than the fact that in realty they are not providing a valuable product. If you go ahead and pirate anyway, you're just proving them right, and the legislation and criminalisation of fair use will come about because of it.

  12. Err...don't buy into it by Charcharodon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a simple solution really, don't buy into any of the 3's "unique" solutions schemes. If you absolutely must have that one hit wonder song and don't need the rest of the cd then after you have given over your $.99 to the devil then simply convert the song to a more open file type and move on.

  13. OT: Is Vorbis dead? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I drank the Ogg Vorbis Kool-Aid and ripped hundreds of CDs in that format, fully believing that it was the Format Of The Future (tm). I'm having a lapse of faith, though: you have to jump through hoops to play them in iTunes (like installing barely-supported Quicktime plugins), and forget about listening to them on an iPod or any random piece of consumer hardware.

    Does Vorbis still have a place in the world, or would I be better off re-ripping my music to MP3 - even if I still think Vorbis is technically superior?

    I know this isn't completely on-topic, but since we're discussing vendor lock-in, it feels like I've managed to lock myself into a Unix-only format.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:OT: Is Vorbis dead? by cagliost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it's that difficult to play in iTunes, then just download some software for which it's easy.

      Vorbis is not dead, just not well supported. I've seen generic music players that support it, but if you insisted that it was essential you'd be restricting yourself quite a bit.

      In the future, I think we might see players being more customisable (i.e. open source firmware). For now, you'd have to install Linux on your iPod.

    2. Re:OT: Is Vorbis dead? by virtualXTC · · Score: 3, Informative

      Frugal results for ogg turn up plenty of devices:
      http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=ogg&btnG=Searc h+Froogle&hl=en&show=dd

      Winamp 2.7 plays ogg just fine - why go for the itunes bloat?

    3. Re:OT: Is Vorbis dead? by Tepar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've done the same thing. Started when I got my Neuros (an ogg-compatible player). I still think that Vorbis support is something that'll eventually be standard in devices. Because it takes more CPU to play an ogg (very hard without a floating-point CPU, I understand), vendors still have to go through hoops to support it.

      As various devices become more powerful, I think we'll see vorbis support become more prevalent, even if it's so the vendors can tout that their product supports another format. Once you've got the processing power, there are really no barriers for them: the codec is free, the xiph code is free, so they don't have to license anything from anybody or pay any exhorbitant fees to support it.

      I guess all of this is to say that I'm trying to be patient. Right now, you can find a handful of players out there that support it, and that's enough for me (though I'd love it if my car CD player supported oggs as it does mp3s).

    4. Re:OT: Is Vorbis dead? by Eq+7-2521 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm in the same situation. Ogg was/is fine for computer and SqueezeBox play. I've used it for years and I still play what I have in that way. It's the non-computer bound devices that are the problem for me. An earlier reply to your post noted the iRiver offerings that play Ogg (which I've considered), and there are many others as well. Unfortunately, I've not yet found a portable player (let alone an in-dash car player) that meets all of my other (admittedly strict) requirements. I've sent many emails over the last couple years to various companies urging them to support the format (or one of my other requirements) in the hope that others were as well, to no avail.

      So I've given up, but just for the moment. I'm in the process of re-ripping my collection as both low quality/filesize MP3 (for the car/portable) and FLAC. If a player comes along in the future that supports what I want, allowing me to encode even lower filesize (but equal quality) OGGs, I'll just write a script to do so using all my FLACs as a source.

      --
      At my age I find coming up with a witty signature too exhausting.
    5. Re:OT: Is Vorbis dead? by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's why I encode all my CDs to FLAC. It may not be the way of the future, but at least i'm not losing data. I can always convert it to the format-du-jour from flac, and keep the original files. If you go from OGG to MP3 to VFQ, you end up with a file that's got a lot more loss then going straight from the CD to one of the formats.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:OT: Is Vorbis dead? by Castar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ogg is really popular in Asia, especially Korea. So all the players coming out of there (which is a lot of players!) support Ogg playback. You really have a lot of choices for portable players, but you might have to buy them online - not a lot of US brick-and-mortar stores carry weird Korean import hardware. The good thing is, since there's no licensing fee and the player chipsets are just going to keep getting better and better, there's no obvious reason for any manufacturer that supports Ogg to drop it. Even if it becomes a marginal format everywhere, there's no extra cost in keeping it around.

      There's also good news that Sigmatel, a major supplier of chips to DAP makers, is producing reference chips based on the Rio Karma, which had a lot of advanced features that no one else has caught up with yet, including Ogg playback. Sigmatel provides chips for the Shuffle, even, so there's an infitesimally slim chance that even Apple could provide Ogg support in the future.

      However, like a sibling said, rip to FLAC and then transcode for whatever player you happen to have. No quality loss and it's future-proof.

      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
    7. Re:OT: Is Vorbis dead? by DWIM · · Score: 2, Informative
      I drank the Ogg Vorbis Kool-Aid and ripped hundreds of CDs in that format, fully believing that it was the Format Of The Future (tm). I'm having a lapse of faith, though: you have to jump through hoops to play them in iTunes (like installing barely-supported Quicktime plugins), and forget about listening to them on an iPod or any random piece of consumer hardware.

      I don't really understand why you want to play anything through iTunes. Why not just use xmms or Winamp? Either will play ogg vorbis and plenty of other codecs.

      Also you should check out Rockbox http://www.rockbox.org/. They are even working on a port of that to the iPod now. This is my answer, coupled with buying CDs. Rockbox supports multiple codecs, so I am not hamstrung by the vendor's proprietary firmware. And it's open source so you can contribute to making it better if you have the desire and skills.

    8. Re:OT: Is Vorbis dead? by alpharoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      Speaking as an owner of an iRiver ifp795 player, I'd be wary about buying an iRiver player especially for the vorbis support. I did exactly that, and found that the entire ifp7xx and 8xx series have ogg support problems such as:

      - Any .ogg file plays at a noticeably lower volume than MP3s. If you mix oggs with mp3s in your playlists, you'll spend most of the time with your finger on the volume knob.

      - Only ogg files of 96kbps average and above are supported. If you want to save storage space by playing low-bitrate ogg files, this is not your player. And if you save a lot of stuff below vorbis quality 3, you'll have to reconvert them.

      - Older models may skip, play noise or crash the player if the ogg file drops below 96kbps at any point. This is not the case for my player.

      I know there are some iRiver models that play oggs without any of these restrictions (especially the HD models), I'd avise a thorough check on the Internet before buying one. I didn't, and ended up with an ogg player that is so minimally useful for my purposes that I just use it for MP3s.

    9. Re:OT: Is Vorbis dead? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ``Because it takes more CPU to play an ogg (very hard without a floating-point CPU, I understand), vendors still have to go through hoops to support it.''

      That's not true and hasn't been true since the Tremor codec was released (and it was created exactly to make it easier to do Vorbis in hardware). FYI: Tremor is an integer-only Vorbis codec.

      I think the issue is much rather that vendors won't support the format, because it costs them extra effort and hardly anybody is demanding Vorbis support. Even on Slashdot, many people swear by MP3, or perhaps AAC or FLAC. That kind of goes to show how little mindshare Vorbis has...

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  14. Just say no by ankarbass · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just say no to DRM, it doesn't get any simpler.

    --
    Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
  15. The easy way. by jhallum · · Score: 2

    Just buy a player and CDs and rip the music yourself. You have your CDs as a backup and you can rip them to whatever preferred format you want. It may be more expensive than most of the other models, but I have a format I can use to shift into any other format anytime I want.

  16. Easy by Hatta · · Score: 4, Informative

    How do you then ensure that the music and player you buy today will not be incompatible with your player, online store or the OS?"

    Easy, only buy music from people willing to let you listen to it. Places like emusic and magnatune sell completely unrestricted music files. And shit, archive.org gives away thousands of hours of music for free.

    Vote with your wallet. If DRM is unacceptable, don't buy from people who would push it on you. There's plenty of music out there that's not DRM'd, and it's mostly better than the RIAA crap. Good musicians can afford to give music away, there's plenty more where that came from.

    If you were treated the same way in a physical store that Apple or Napster treats you online, you'd storm out angrily and never shop there again. Why should online stores be any different?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  17. What more do you want? by kc8jhs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think your real question is not about why you can't convert music from DRM format to non-DRM format. Honestly the fact that DRM music exists is what makes the only online music purchase possible. Did you expect the recrod companies to publish the music in any other way in our changing world. I forsee a time when CDs are phased out, because they can be copied easier than DRM music downloaded from an online store. Originially CDs and albums weren't that easy to copy when they were first introduced.

    I guess your real question is why isn't there an open standard for DRM? Beats me. I think it is ultimately very self defeating for companies to maintain closed standards.

    I work in the field of live pro audio, and there standards are openly published and manufacturers readily adopt them because a) it is a selling point by itself and b)in that industry its widely assumed that your company doesn't make the best product of everything an end user needs. In other words, they know that you are going to be using ABCs product together with XYZs or Blah company's product. Therefore they must adopt open standards in order to even be a consideration.

    I guess in the computer industry that attitude doesn't exist and everyone thinks that their product is the shit or whatever. Frankly that needs to change, and what its going to take to execute such a change, I do not know.
     
    -Mikey P

  18. Only Buy Compact Disc by nathanh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And not the copy-protected variety. When new albums come out they are typically priced at $29.99 or $34.99. If you wait 6 months they're $25. Wait another 6 months and they're $20. Eventually they're $10, sometimes even $5. There's still plenty of good music to choose from and there's no rationale to owning the disc when the music is less than a year old; the radio will be playing it to death anyway.

    The benefit of disc is you can create mp3, ogg, atrac, whatever you damn well like, If you rip it first to ALAC or FLAC then you don't ever have to touch the disc again but you've got a reliable archive just in case you lose the digital rips.

    The online purchasing of music doesn't appeal to me until it's FLAC, it's cheaper ($1.69 a song is pure robbery), and it has no DRM. For $8.99 I can get a 20-song disc delivered to my workplace within 24 hours, so paying $33.80 to get a crappier version with no cover art or disc really isn't attractive. Your priorities might vary but hey, this is Ask Slasdot, I'm telling you what I'd do. Stick with disc and don't give legitimacy to second-class crippled music formats.

    1. Re:Only Buy Compact Disc by foo+fighter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where are you buying your new CDs, that they cost $30-$35?!

      The only time I ever payed close to that was for a special 4-disc set of a Classic recording.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
  19. The Mac is not transformative (Re:Drink the Ap...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, but did the Apple experience turn you into one of these--i.e., an intelligent, well-rounded aesthete with a sense of style? My guess is no. You've either got it or you don't. So if you weren't born with that special je ne sais quoi that makes a Mac user a Mac user, don't even bother trying, because in the end, Macs are for different thinkers.

    * * * gallery updated Nov. 5, 2005 * * *

  20. Magnatune by Gubbe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I buy from Magnatune, Audio Lunchbox or one of the many other sites that sell open, non-DRM music in MP3, OGG Vorbis and FLAC formats.

    Why should I buy things from people who don't have respect for me and my wishes as a customer?

    No major label will ever again get a single penny from me until they say "screw DRM" and mean it too. If they don't, that's just fine with me. They can just wither and die for all I care.

    Solution provided.

  21. Not technically legal, TOTALLY legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They pay the fee for the music. The police in Russia checked their licenses in response to an RIAA complaint and they're all in order.

    Globalisation doesn't just work for corporations importing cheap shoes, it works for you too.

    1. Re:Not technically legal, TOTALLY legal by MooUK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You ever bought a pair of trainers? Try that one again.

  22. A couple of players by ValentineMSmith · · Score: 3, Informative
    Maybe I'm a little old fashioned, but I generally don't buy individual songs from a subscription service. Instead, I buy the CD's and rip to Q6 OGG for my (and my wife's) players. She has a Neuros 1 20 gb player and I have an iAudio X5 20gb. Both players have internal FM receivers, and both support OGG. Both also report as mass storage USB 2.0 devices. Although the Neuros requires the use of a synchronization application, they're both good players.

    Neuros Audio is very community oriented and has been mentioned quite a bit on Slashdot recently, and are known as being very friendly to open source.

    IAudio isn't quite as friendly to open source as Neuros, but having a player that had USB Host functionality and would play OGG, FM stereo, Video, and (if I feel the urge) WMA 10 based files from Rhapsody or Napster was too good to pass up.

    Bottom line, if there is any music I hear and want to keep, I go to the used CD store, buy it, rip it, and move it to my player. No DRM, no loss of audio quality as part of a conversion, and, since both players report as mass storage devices, OS compatibility is not a problem.

    --
    Karma: Chameleon - mostly influenced by bad '80s New Wave music
  23. Re:Existing solution by Saige · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I buy CDs, but I would NEVER throw them away. Why? Because I like the ability to go back in a few years and re-rip everything at higher sampling rates as storage space increases. Why get locked into a 128/160/192kbps version when you may find yourself with room for 256/320kbps later? Or heck, when storage gets cheap enough that you can rip CD's in straight-up WAV format? Only when every single bit of data is copied off the CD would I ever consider actually getting rid of them.

    --
    "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
  24. It's simple by JasonKChapman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I buy CDs. I rip them to FLAC and then make copies in ogg-vorbis. If my Rio Karma dies and I have to get a player without Vorbis support, I just go back to the FLACs and run them through LAME. What's the big deal?

    And no, I don't buy downloadable music. If I wanted pop slop in a crappy-sounding format I'd just get a $5.00 portable radio. I'll consider buying downloadable music when I can get unencumbered FLACs for half the price of the equivalent CD.

    --
    Sorry, I'm a writer. That makes you raw material.
  25. pirating & civil disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personally, I own hundreds of CDs and all my iPod music is 100% legally ripped from them. Many of the CDs are used, many are greatest hits compilations, both of which save money, and I've purchased them over many years. I also buy my ipods when the new version comes out and the old version drops in price so I get a good deal.

    If you want to "pirate" to "make a point" the only caveat is this: any time you commit civil disobedience (breaking the law to embarrass the legislature into changing it) you have to be willing to face the consequences of breaking that law (fines and jail) in order to make your point. Remember, Gandhi insisted on being jailed (I think it was for making his own salt) in order to embarrass the government. In Canada, Mortgentaler went to jail repeatedly to uphold the right of women to abortion. In your own country, Doctor Death did the same.

    Otherwise you're not a crusader, you're just another whiny punk who wants everything for free immediately. Considering you could do what I do, there's an obvious alternative to pirating to avoid DRM.

  26. Two major choices by Otto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's only two real choices nowadays: WMA or AAC. Microsoft or Apple. That's pretty much it, really. Each has advantages and disadvantages...

    With Microsoft, you have the whole enforced compatibility thing with their "Plays For Sure" initiative.
    -Pros: Yes, this stuff does actually work, and fairly well at that. There's a few minor functional problems, but they're really minor. The integration with Media Center PC's is nice, as is the complete XBox integration if you have one of those. As long as you stick to Microsoft products, and Plays For Sure compatible player devices, you won't have any problems.
    -Cons: You cannot use anything that isn't Plays For Sure compatible, not with the online stores or subscription services. Want to play those Napster downloaded songs on an iPod? No dice. Microsoft is very vocal about blaming Apple, but the fault is not Apple's, it's Microsoft's *incredibly* restrictive Janus DRM licensing. Not only would Apple have to implement WMA, but they'd have to implement a secure methodology such that the files cannot be copied back off the the player *at all*, and an expiration methodology such that if you failed to sync the player to the computer for a time period, the files would expire and/or delete themselves. Apple's not willing to go there, and frankly the hardware design of the iPod precludes some of that capability anyway. Oh, and Microsoft's DRM has yet to be cracked in a good way/

    Or you can bite into the Apple for your music. They have the iTunes Music Store and the most popular music player devices.
    -Pros: High quality AAC music support (AAC is much better than WMA, anyway). A pretty lightweight DRM that's easy to work with and somewhat easy to work around if needed. MPEG 4 support becoming very standardized. Apple is (mostly) sticking to open standards, basically, which is always nice.
    -Cons: Drink the Apple cool-aid only. iTunes works with iPod's, but not with anything else. iPod's do have lots of other support though, from Real and many free and/or pay programs. Even the XBox 360 will support them, in a sense. You also pay the Apple tax, as everything Apple is a bit pricier than the competition. But this stuff is popular for a reason, you know.

    In the long run, it seems more likely to me that Apple will win this war. They've been awfully stingy with licensing their FairPlay DRM, making it difficult for vendors to add support for iTunes Purchased Music, but that hasn't stopped them from being the only music store to show a profit. The subscription model (ala Napster) doesn't seem to be picking up a lot of adherents in the long term. People bought CD's at stores and didn't much like CD clubs either. Same principle, really. Not to mention that the evilness of the Microsoft Janus DRM is readily appearant if you make the mistake of buying into it and using it for a while. And vendors seem to be falling all over themselves to add iPod and iTunes support to their gear, even if they can't play iTMS purchased music. MPEG 4 is also the wave of the future, as the standard becomes better defined. Divx and Xvid and other variants will eventually fall off the map, as Apple has a fairly solid base system going there, and everybody is going to be rushing to be compatible with it. I expect a device more dedicated to video than the iPod Video is to be introduced by Apple within a year. Maybe they'll partner with Sony for video support on the PSP. Dunno.

    But WMA is dying a slow death, and with the death of Microsoft and Blu-Ray, they're being left behind, really. WMA might be the format used on the next new disc format somehow, or Microsoft might have a hand in it, but Apple is getting into the digital distribution business over the internet in a big way and ignoring the business of data on physical medium. Apple's moves seem smarter to me.

    Oh yeah, there's also the Sony option, where you buy nothing but Sony equipment because all Sony's stuff *only* works with other Sony equipment, but frankly that option has no pros to speak of, so it's just best avoided.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  27. Re:The Mac is not transformative (Re:Drink the Ap. by richdun · · Score: 2, Funny
  28. AllOfMp3.com by Trevahaha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    http://www.allofmp3.com/ lets you buy DRM-free music and instead of paying per song, you pay per bandwidth... you choose your format that you want and you choose the compression rate. It's pretty sweet. It's based out of Russia and is legal to buy from.

    1. Re:AllOfMp3.com by lemkepf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. I've used them for a few months now and i dont have any complaints. (well except you have to pre-pay for the music... but that is a very small complaint).

  29. Re:Private copying by JediTrainer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I second this. Being in Canada, I love to take advantage of this when possible. I do not download music at all (either paid or pirated, unless it's free like the Harvey Danger release recently). Rather, I have ripped all of my own CDs to MP3. Nowadays I still buy the occasional CD (which gets immediately ripped), but I also borrow original CDs from family and friends which also get stored as MP3s, and I can even borrow from the local libraries as well. I can make copies for personal use all I want, but I cannot give the copies away (fair enough). But the original disc can be passed around and each person can make their own personal copy.

    We do pay a levy on blank CDs which sucks, but with decent fair-use laws that make everything I mention above perfectly legal it feels to be a reasonably fair arrangement.

    --

    You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
  30. Re:legal question by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You are legally and/or morally confused. However, you begin to understand the horror of the society based on DRM concept paradigm. You will end in jail for any illegal download, even if you buy 10000 of another copies of the same song.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  31. Our business model... by ndtechnologies · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The easiest way to prevent the consumer from being locked in to anything, is to offer as many formats as possible. With our music store, we use Ogg Vorbis currently, but in January we will have MP3 and AAC support (with NO DRM). The difference is that we are an indie music provider. However some people don't like indie music, and that is perfectly fine for them. There are way too many mainstream music providers that all do the same thing, and we want to offer something different. Because we are an indie music provider, our business model is also different. Our bands get 40% of the net sale right off the bat. Also if a band sells more, they earn more. The system really does work. I wish the major labels (and the RIAA for that matter) would get a clue and realize that things can be done differently and be profitable for both sides.

    --
    I have nothing clever to put here...
  32. Re:Decompression is lossless by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 2, Informative

    "1. Start with an MP3
    2. Decompress and burn
    3. Rip and undecompress to reproduce the original MP3

    As you can see, there is no lossy compression step in this sequence -- no information is discarded.
    "

    There exists no way to "undecompress" an MP3 or other lossy file in the way you describe. If you disagree you are invited to link to software that actually exists that can do it, or even a paper decribing how to do it.

    --
    I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
  33. avoid DRM - encode yourself by spatenbrau · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just buy CD's and encode all the music myself with grip. Grip is pretty good about adding in the track names and other vitals automatically. If it can't find them it prompts you.

    One large advantage of encoding it yourself and using a non-DRM player is that you can play the same file from {Linux,{Free,Net,Open}BSD} and from the portable player. They player I have is a Digital Minds DMC 500. It isn't the smallest player in the world, but it plays mp3's and oggs and takes a normal laptop 2/5" drive. That means you can easily slap a 100G drive in there and carry a few weeks of music on you.

    After a 3 years of recording 9 hours of radio shows a week I've finally managed to fill the disk. Unfortunately the disk drive capacities haven't really gone up as much as I'd hoped.

  34. better yet... by zinc.anode · · Score: 2, Insightful

    buy vinyl. steal the mp3s off the internet. that way you have a physical, high quality analog copy that nobody can mess with, an mp3 file that has no vendor lock in, and the artist and his or her label get paid.

  35. Re:MS has an answer... by yeremein · · Score: 2, Informative
    In a Microsoft world, you just make sure to look for the Plays for Sure logo on everything you buy! Then you can sleep safe and sound at night knowing that your music can be played anywhere and anytime.

    I realize you're being facetious here, but for the benefit of the uninformed: "Plays for Sure" would be better entitled "Plays for Now", since you'll lose your music when you upgrade your computer or reinstall the operating system more than twice:
    You can restore your licenses on a maximum of two unique computers. If you replace hardware components in your computer or reinstall the operating system, Microsoft considers the changed computer to be a new unique computer.


  36. even more easierer by ShinGouki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    just get tunebite and re-encode your "locked-in" format into mp3, ogg, wav, whatever you like.

    i'm 3/4 of the way through a total re-encode of all my (70 gigs or so worth) napster .wma files into the more portable .mp3

    it basically plays the file using wmp or itunes or whatever and records the audio off your sound card. the best part about it is if you have a card that supports it, you can dub at 4x speed so that 70 gigs or so has taken me about two weeks instead of two months :P

    --
    -dk
    Dream with the feathers of angels stuffed beneath your head.
    1. Re:even more easierer by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's like taking some lossy jpgs, printing them out on paper, laying them down on the floor, taking digital photos of the paper photos, and keeping THOSE lossy jpgs.

      WTF?

  37. What a coincidence by tkrotchko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I typically don't buy "used" CD's, because 90% of them are from people doing something wrong"

    Oddly enough you could make the same argument for new CD's, because 90% of the record companies are doing something wrong (i.e. screwing the public and the artist, payola, buying lawmakers, refusing to pay artists royalties due to them, etc), and so by that argument you can never buy a CD because hardly any of them don't come with some sort of legal or moral baggage.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  38. Re:poor support for classical by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Informative

    A classical work, such as a symphony or a concerto is composed of several individual pieces of music called movements-- each of which can stand alone.

    You're going to hate me ;)

    A lot of rock music, like Pink Floyd and Queensryche have the very same property, and I want it for my stuff.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"