Slashdot Mirror
Google Launches Google Music
George Meyson writes "Google has launched a new service known as Google Music that will allow a person to search fast links to song lyrics, musical artists and CD titles on the main search results page. The user can type in the name of a band, artist, album or song in the main Google search bar special, and results will appear at the top, accompanied by icons of music notes. Items that can be purchased will have links to merchants for online ordering or downloading. Initial merchant partners include Apple Computer's iTunes service, RealNetworks Rhapsody, eMusic and Amazon.com." From the Google Blog: "A few of us decided to try to make the information you get for these searches even better, so we created a music search feature. Now you can search for a popular artist name, like the Beatles or the Pixies, and often Google will show some information about that artist, like cover art, reviews, and links to stores where you can download the track or buy a CD via a link at the top of your web search results page."
RIAA sues Google
Hasn't the RIAA issued cease-and-decist letters to lyric websites before?
Their response will certainly be interesting. Do I detect a brawl of the titans coming?
Do multiple searches, and you could string enough icons of music notes together to get a free song.
I guess I'm set in my ways and all but I'm just not a fan of this. I realize Google has to make money and this is one way of doing it but I'd rather just enter the name of a band or part of a song and find out the lyrics, cover art, etc the old fashioned way... With the great results Google used to return.
Now, with this, I'm going to be inundated with more advertisements. I already knew that I could go to iTMS, Amazon.com, allofmp3, etc to get my music after I found what I was looking for. Why do I need Google to tell me?
I was raving about GMail, Google Maps, in the past but with the last two "additions" which were Web Clips in GMail and now this, I just can't say I'm impressed. It was fine the way it was.
Apple Computer's iTunes service, RealNetworks Rhapsody, eMusic and Amazon.com
:-)
I wonder why Yahoo Music Unlimited (the best deal around) isn't in the list.
The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
is a service where I type in some lyrics and the song information pops up. I admit I simply cannot keep up with the music my kids listen to, and the radio stations don't tell me what artist or song they are playing. I want to know who the artist is and so forth so that when I am talking to the kids they will "think" I have some clue. Now, there is this Clarkson girl and I've seen pictures of her, so, at least that much has registered in my brain! I know you can sort-of do this already, but, if the engine that did this was not just some 'bot that went to the lyric sites but something that worked better ... anyway, let's see how this "plays out"
(sorry)
Intitle:"Index of /" nameofartist nameofalbum mp3, I'm feeling lucky
Just to clear up confusion, it will not be the RIAA that would sue Google. The RIAA is responsible for protecting copyrights on recordings, not published music (sheet music, lyrics, etc...). The National Music Publishers Association (NMPA), or more specifically, their legal arm, the Harry Fox Association, is responsible for enforcing these copyrights, so that is most likely from whom Google will be hearing shortly.
Insomniak`: Stupid fucking Google
Insomniak`: "The" is a common word, and was not included in your search
Insomniak`: "Who" is a common word, and was not included in your search
Here. More comprehensive too.
C'mon guys, at least include a link to the SUBJECT of TFA:
Try searching for "good music" and "crappy music"http://www.google.com/musicsearch
This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
Anyone who has ever taken a stab at playing guitar or another instrument that can be tabbed out knows how unreliable most online tabs are. Sometimes I cannot believe how wildly inaccurate they are, and I have a nearly dead ear when it comes to telling one chord from another with the exception of a few power chords. The groups that complain about this stuff ought to be snickering and saying, "if you want to actually, well, LEARN the song you have to buy us for the reliability that only we can provide."
Besides, here's a little shocker for them: most CDs have the lyrics inside the jewel case. Yes, fancy that. Anyone who is a good singer can listen to the rhythm of the vocals and pick it up, thus making it practically pointless to crack down on this when the bands and record labels are actively "enabling piracy" by giving away the lyrics as part of the package. Stick to the tabs, people, stick to the tabs for enforcement if they're blatant rip offs.
I never understood why the record labels don't see themselves at war with these publishing groups. The record labels should be actively encouraging local bands to cover popular songs as a way to not only discover new talent, but promote existing songs. Think about it, if a local band can cover a very big song very well, aren't they worth investigating? The label might have their next big act right there, and the songs that sell well are excellent benchmarks.
If the record labels were smart, they'd forget about the few million $s they could be making by licensing sheet music and instead be pushing free sheet music for popular songs as a way to promote their albums.
Click here or a puppy gets stomped!
For a while now, lyrics have been a popular search on the internet. From what I've seen, most to all of the lyrics websites contain a bajillion advertisements, spyware, etc., and sometimes I can't find what I want.
I wish Google would index the lyrics in their own database. Then I'll have a common, reliable source of lyrics goodness that doesn't threaten install spyware on my machine.
Just when we're hearing that the Music Publishers' Association is demanding jail time for folks who put up lyric sites, we get Google blithely putting up...a lyric site index. I know they're claiming that their partner sites are providing these, but my first hit was on lyricsfreak.com, which I suspect is hardly legal. It's like Google is daring folks to sue them. Awesome.
Track times.
This is extremely important when we're, ahem, looking for these songs and we don't want to confuse it with live versions, covers, etc.
If Google puts that in there, I no longer have to use AllMusic.com to look album information up.
it even has Beatles in the summary, it was just asking to be submitted by him.
Wake me up when they have a music search where I can whistle a few bars into the mike, and the software comes back with matching songs.
If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
That's all well and good, but what about phonetic searching of songs?
You know, that song that goes "da da da. da da. da da da. whirrrr!"
Will Google fight the suit (when it comes) or cave in?
ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
I think you might be talking about Shazam
In law this is known as the "800 Lb Gorrilla effect" If you have enough money and the balls to go with it, you don't worry about being sued. You'll still be sued sometimes, but you don't worry about it.
Question: Where does an 800 Lb gorrilla sit?
Answer: Anywhere he wants to.
All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
More than ever, it looks like Google is ready to link together all these recent conepts into a cohesive web platform for All Things Information. They're not replacing books, but allowing you to search them more in-depth, same with music, etc.
I'm not sure it'll sell, but it should be an interesting product. I like that they've started with real innovation on searching, cateloging, etc, instead of just branding alone. However, in the end the market will leapfrog, it always has.
Compare their lineup to, say, the world of MSN or AOL, which was attempting to brand existing behaviors "email" and "search" and "shop" done pretty much as you have it elsewhere. Yahoo added customer references, then Amazon adds one-click and historical records/you-created-this-page nonsense. Google will probably have as much of all those products, but tied into a dashboard of widgets.
Sadly, nobody has come up with a better concept on ads. Crazy-bad moving ads on a static page of text are the bane of internet viewing. Google's putblished test-only ads, which I like, but perhaps only by their integrating their paying advertising into their lists (with a deliniation for showing such) can we drop this.
Unless these new products are kept simple, users will again migrate to the "meat and potato" sites like craigslist and similar for simplicity. Google's biggest risk is it's newfound audience, and the push to throw ads at them everywhere. The day we see Punch the Monkey on Google, we've pretty much seen this behemouth ready for an undercut.
Did you mean: 'scuse me while I kiss the sky
Cool!
That's the first thing that jumped to my mind. I wonder if Google will be the next target, or are they partnering with the RIAA in this? I guess you could argue that Google is stimulating sales of legitimate media by directing people to iTunes, etc.
Will google index other types of audio content with their music service (say like audiobooks or audio training)?
For example, I am currently working on http://www.developeradvantage.com/, which is creating audio training modules specifically for software developers. So far, there is really nothing else out there in terms of professional, high-quality audio training modules. On amazon.com, you can find over 2000 Java books, but, if you search for audio content, you will find zero results that are technical java books (maybe a few on indonesia though). Same with audible.com, they have no technical content for software developers.
It would be great if I could go to a search engine, type in, say Java, and find some great training modules to listen to while exercising or commuting to work (or perhaps even while working on other stuff at my desk!).
FREE - Java, J2EE and Ajax Audiobooks for Software Developers - www.DeveloperAdvantage.com
Google buys RIAA.
Fractured Element
The website you want is AllMusic
You have to register to be able to search by song (it's free, or you can use BugMeNot), but you can search by group anonymously.
That already exists thanks to Alexa opening up their API: http://www.musipedia.org/
I'm mean googles. Will my usual searches for Britney Spears be somehow disrupted by this new music search engine?
[steps away from tee...]
This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.