Slashdot Mirror


The Future of Outsourcing in India

aaditeshwar writes "Economist has an article on the current and projected state of outsourcing IT and other business processes to India. The biggest problem seems to be that the talent pool of skilled workers will not able to keep up. Currently there are about 700,000 people working in IT and outsourcing, which is likely to grow up to 2.3 million by 2010, but only 1.05 million new graduates will qualify from local colleges in the next 5 years leading to a shortfall of 500,000 workers! All this despite the fact that almost 2.5 million students graduate in India each year." From the article: "In IT the growth in Indian exports is expected to come both from the software market, and from 'traditional IT outsourcing'--such as the remote management of whole systems, a market now dominated by the big global IT consultancies. This is expected to rise from 8% of Indian sales now to about 30% in 2010, while software-development's share will fall from 55% to 39%. In business-process-offshoring, the big industries will remain banking and insurance. But rapid expansion is also expected in other areas, like legal services."

274 comments

  1. Eastern Europe? by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Eastern Europe has a lot of IT/programmer types.

    Since some of them aren't employed, they're part of the burgeoning spam/trojan/virus/worm market that has been growing over there. Organized crime too.

    Once the Companies have run out of Indian workers to shift jobs to, they'll move to Eastern Europe sooner or later.

    And by Eastern Europe I mean former Soviet Block countries & their neighbors.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Eastern Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indian workers have the knowledge of English going for them. That's about it. Eastern Europe is much better in terms of real talent, and not just some resume cheaters.

      Outsourcing is overhyped, in general, and Indian "IT talent", in particular.

    2. Re:Eastern Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I got DDoSed by a Latvian botnet run by this kid named "Areems" from Talsi, Latvia.

      I tracked him down and he is now an exchange student in Auburn, NY.

    3. Re:Eastern Europe? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that India and China have the numbers. Once these places are tapped out because of increasing internal demand the cost advantages are going to dry up and then we will *really* hear the whining from business who don't want to pay a real salary to their technical professionals.

    4. Re:Eastern Europe? by big+tex · · Score: 1

      That, and health insurance.

      Here's another bonus to that:
      MS responds to market & industry pressure, not regulation and government. Example: Firefox driving IE future upgrades and development. MS needs to have a product that is 'good enough' to maintain their market share.
      MS obviously does not respond to government; see the antitrust thing.

      Organized crime stifles market forces, preventing overall economic progress. It is conquered through government intervention.

      Me, I'm going to bet with the markets over the government long term.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    5. Re:Eastern Europe? by GnuDiff · · Score: 1

      Types, eh?

      Hmm, I wonder if you could direct me to the nearest burgeoning worm market in my former Soviet block country? I am sure I'd like to get to know somebody from organized crime, if I happen to lose my job. Gee, they might even pay me well, and maybe provide me with some cement shoes gratis.

      Honestly, have you seen too many Holywood shit? You do sound a bit like as if you were thinking bears walk in the streets down here.

      Even more than "a lot of IT/programmer types", Eastern Europe currently has jobs for them. Down here it seems to be almost as bad as one can read about other places -- you gotta hire people who are underqualified, simply because there isn't anyone better available - many of the decent ones moved to the other places of EU where the pay is better.

      So it wouldn't be that easy to find a decent unemployed programmer. If the "burgeoning spam market" has to rely on the currently unemployed E-Europe programmer, I can, but feel pity for the organized crime.

    6. Re:Eastern Europe? by croddy · · Score: 1

      Actually, in command economies, organized crime tends to be the driving force behind the so-called "grey market" that operates a layer of competition and free exchange atop the withering state economy.

    7. Re:Eastern Europe? by JanneM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eastern Europe has a lot of IT/programmer types.

      Yes, and they are riding the outsourcing wave as well (and good for them!). But they are focusing regionally - the eastern European states are mostly getting work from west European companies, and the Baltic states are working with Scandinavian companies. Skype was started by a couple of Swedes and has/had a lot of their developemnt in Estonia, for example.

      I don't think there is that a large surplus pool left over for, say, American or Japanese companies when they're already part of the huge European market.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    8. Re:Eastern Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now you make him a corpse in Auburn, NY.

    9. Re:Eastern Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now you make him a corpse in Auburn, NY.

      Fucking right on. I used to be a sad corporate geek. Then I got into the whole "spam" business (mostly finding valid email addys by hacking and monitoring mail spools) and now have quite a bit of disposable income. I use it to buy expensive hotels and cheap escorts along with wine and cocaine. It is fun and I feel like a character out of an early William Gibson novel. If someone got in my way I wouldn't hesitate to pay some two bit thug to erase them.

    10. Re:Eastern Europe? by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1
      Once these places are tapped out because of increasing internal demand the cost advantages are going to dry up and then we will *really* hear the whining from business who don't want to pay a real salary to their technical professionals.
      Or they might stop whining altogether. At that point, they might just realize that there isn't any large source of cheap labor they could get at if only they could convince the gov't/some other group to let them go after them. No convincing could make people appear from nowhere.
    11. Re:Eastern Europe? by mildgift · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was under the impression that the US had pretty much tapped India for all its talent years ago. We were getting to the more 'normal' workers.

      Face it. Programming has gotten only so much easier. The demand for software increases. As more software is produced, it acts less like a machine, and more like 'media'. That predicts high demand for programmers for a long time. The pay won't be as high, but the demand will be there.

    12. Re:Eastern Europe? by big+tex · · Score: 1

      Very true.

      However, the organized crime is, in and of itself, a monopoly on that "grey market," hindering true competition, and brings about real bullets and the bloody crime.

      I'll take the other kind any day.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    13. Re:Eastern Europe? by kraada · · Score: 2, Funny

      And by Eastern Europe I mean former Soviet Block countries & their neighbors.

      Translation:

      In Soviet Russia Companies Outsource YOU!

    14. Re:Eastern Europe? by gr8dude · · Score: 1
      Thoughts about outsourcing

      Q: Why outsourcing to Moldova is better than outsourcing to India?
      A: This is another interesting question, in fact, I believe that any answer to this question will be a biased one, though I will try to come up with a solution.

      There are several aspects that have to be taken into account:
      1. Cultural
      2. Economical
      3. Technical



      [1]. Thruout history, Moldova has always been at the intersection of various cultures - the place where East met West; the place where Christianity confronted with Islam during the Turkish invasions, etc. The roman and slavic influences made it so that almost everybody in Moldova speaks two languages 'by default' - Romanian and Russian. Moreover, during the years of the Soviet Union, this country was in the lead when it came to the number of university graduates. A consequence is that in addition to the two 'mother' languages, almost everyone is rather skilled in French or English. In other words, it is a common thing for a moldovan to speak three languages. The educational system of today puts some more pressure on the linguistic capabilities, therefore it is not THAT difficult to find a programmer that has mastered several programming languages, as well as several human languages.

      The advantages are the following:
      - a moldovan programmer is a flexible person, able to easily integrate into a team of foreign programmers; being less likely to be the 'bottleneck' of the team.

      - the written code is easily readable - reasonable variable names, error messages, function names, and so on. Moreover, the code turns out to be well-commented.

      So, the source code can be easily maintained, this is critical, those who have had the 'honor' to update foreign code will certainly support this argument. Often the conversion of 'bad' code to 'good' code takes the most significant part of the assigned time (and money). To get a better idea of how bad things can be, read some comments related to the following article: "How to write unmaintainable code"

      After looking through the comments, you will be convinced that any sane programmer will choose "well-commented code" over "fantastically optimized but entirely obfuscated and non-commented code".


      [2] Economically, both Moldova and India are countries that have a long way until they become trully prosperous. So, both states are still in development, and both need foreign investments, and will seek ways to attract foreign capital.

      Geographically, Moldova is a much smaller state than India is, therefore it takes less resources to support the economy of the smaller country, therefore the country [meaning 'the entities located in this country'] is more likely to settle for lower prices. Another argument which backs that statement up, is the difference between the GDP of each state:

      $ 3,319,000,000,000 [India]
      $ 8,581,000,000 [Moldova]

      The relationship between quality of life and average prices is simple: the more advanced a country is, the more money a citizen needs in order to live a decent life [because needs evolve along with the resources]. This argument proves that outsourcing to Moldova can be a good fund saver; while the first one shows that moldovans are, in theory, going to produce better-mantainable code (as the comments of the article point out, this will eventually save a LOT of money too). I have to emphasize, that long-term investments might not be that attractive, but in the long run, they are more efficient.


      There are bright minds in India, and there are bright minds in Moldova - there is nothing in this world that can convince a reasonable person that this is not true. So, this issue requ

    15. Re:Eastern Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this was the best joke of the day: comparing moldova to india. I really cudnt stop myself. You are comparing bicycle to a Bus.

    16. Re:Eastern Europe? by gronofer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Many of these countries have either joined the EU or are trying to join. Their brightest IT/programmer types are then just as likely to move west, for jobs with western salaries, then to stay in their home countries.

    17. Re:Eastern Europe? by Jules+Labrie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      BS. The whole east of Europe (new EU members) have less IT graduates (~10000-11000) each year than Germany does (~12000). Do you consider it a lot? Take a look at the numbers about India first...

    18. Re:Eastern Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the bicycle is used by an environmentally-friendly, hard-working individual, whereas a bus is full of talentless opportunists.

      Perfect analogy.

    19. Re:Eastern Europe? by Knuckles · · Score: 1
      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    20. Re:Eastern Europe? by GnuDiff · · Score: 1

      Hehe, got me :)

      You did have to search a bit.. I mean: 2001-11-25?

      And then again, we may find some towns/cities in the US where this happens too:
      http://www.igorilla.com/gorilla/animal/

    21. Re:Eastern Europe? by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Actually I found it pretty quickly, but yes, I was determined :)
      Anyway, I'm not in the US, but currently in Berlin (before that in Vienna), so I have some idea about reality in Eastern Europe. On the other hand, the company I work for has opened several offices in Easten Europe in the last decade, and my colleagues that worked there setting up operations had some pretty scary stories to tell about mafia interference and what not, so the sentiment that was expressed (botnets, etc.) is not -completely- off it seems, at least not everywhere.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  2. Why lump " IT and outsourcing" together? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Interesting
    700,000 people working in IT and outsourcing

    It is ALL outsourcing. Why separate IT from, say back-office banking, insurance and other tasks...

    Heh, or are they trying to distinguish "IT" from trivial paper-pushing.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Why lump " IT and outsourcing" together? by mcg1969 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that the point they are making is that India has demand for IT workers internally; that is, not originating from a foreign company. Obviously, every IT worker that works on an outsourced job is one unavailable for "internal" use, and vice versa.

  3. One factor that might explain the shortages? by blue1 · · Score: 0

    A lot of these graduates are also coming to the US for graduate school, and then taking up jobs here. And then losing them because their responsibilities get outsourced, but still.

  4. Next Target by Tiberius_Fel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When they run out of people to hire in India, or when workers in India are expensive relative to workers in some other country, they'll move on to that other country - it's pretty much as simple as that. The quest for the most effective labour for the lowest price will never end.

    --
    Join the Empire! http://www.empirereborn.net/
    1. Re:Next Target by blue1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      An friend in India was telling me about how his company outsources Software Engineering jobs to the Philippines. Maybe that's where this will go next.

    2. Re:Next Target by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry to remind you that this will at some point end because there are only so many people in the world, and the population is expected to stabilize soon. Once globalization is through with Africa, there will be no other place to go. And what comes after that? Dunno, maybe the People's Revolution? Big world war? But something is gonna happen. This sort of "water flowing downhill" approach (which is the basis of the global economy) can take you far, but not farther than the valley.

    3. Re:Next Target by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Big world war?

      More likely less wage disparity between countries.

    4. Re:Next Target by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      The quest for the most effective labour for the lowest price will never end.

      Not till it gets to, say, Somalia.

    5. Re:Next Target by pstudent12 · · Score: 0

      Indians speak Indo-European languages (72% of India, all the
      north and central areas), same languages spoken in Europe. Therefore no trouble speaking english (another Indo-European language, same as Hindi).

      Indo == India

      I doubt you'll find any africans or middle-easterns speaking any
      Indo-European language or even understand Indo-European culture.

    6. Re:Next Target by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      less wage disparity between countries.

      BINGO!

      The upshot of increased freedom of trade, is increased wealth overall. As other countries become wealthier, they also become customers. IT work goes to China and India, and so do Boeing airplanes. As their middle class expands, so does their ability to buy goods from the USA and Europe.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    7. Re:Next Target by JanneM · · Score: 1

      The quest for the most effective labour for the lowest price will never end.

      The lowest price doesn't stay low, though. Seen from far above, what is happening now is very good, and something we should all be happy for, in the long term. Income levels are growing smaller - and it is happening by a combination of wealthy nations growing less wealthy and poorer nations growing wealthier. Yep, it means the buying power of the wealthy will decrease (and decrease more the wealhtier a nation is), but it also means a lot of poor people increase their power. In the end, this is a good thing. And in the end, it means that those companies who have been using these stark income differences as the way to leverage their own earnings will have to change or disappear.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    8. Re:Next Target by kesuki · · Score: 1



      you're missing the point, building more industy in nations that are 'less developed' increases their productive capabilities, and thus the 'wealth' (which is really just a measure of the global productive capability) but 'free trade' only 'creates' or contributes to wealth when it allows people to work harder doing what they enjoy, and having what they produce exported to markets where it's desireble to import those goods.

      the only monitary sense where free trade 'creates' wealth is the aspect to which the government is not confiscating wealth simply to prop up artificially high prices.

      we're working from a finite resource base with a lot of wildcards like how 'motivated' and 'inspired' one nations work force is to work hard for the same compensation. economies are limited in their growth by technologies to better exploit the finite resource base we have.

      What parent meant is right now the 'hot' market is to go in and develop less developed nations(in this case by exporting jobs, which increases the money flowing into the local economy, which leads to the formation of a middle class, who create a need for a working class to sustain the 'middle class lifestyle' etc.. increasing economic growth rapidly) in an effort to find increasing bottom lines and greater profits etc. once every nation has been as technologically developed as it can be, there is no more room for 'expansive' growth, barring improved technologies.

      although arguably if you consder post war japan, ceompletely rebuilding an industrial base leads to a vast leap in productive efficiency until the equipment and locations begin to wear down again.

    9. Re:Next Target by stinerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The upshot of increased freedom of trade, is increased wealth overall.

      Up to a certain extent. First, many countries we outsource to have little to no labor laws. Workers are forbidden to collectively bargain with their employers, which gives employers the upper hand in dealing with "problem" employees who say that working 80 hrs/wk for $.50/hr just isn't cutting it.

      Second, with increased wealth comes increased demand for energy, as energy consumption directly correlates with wealth. Everyone always likes to say that globalization and freer markets will allow people in all corners of the world to have the same quality of life as Americans. As of now, we don't have enough energy to allow everyone to live like those of us in 1st world countries. Hell, we can't even find a way to feed everyone, much less generate electricity for everyone. Of course, one would hope we can find a way to meet the world's increasing energy needs, but oil production is nearing its peak, and we've not found any viable alternative. Even if nuclear fusion came on-line tomorrow, the fact that Wal-Mart sells $10 t-shirts is because of suppressed wages in the countries that make them. To put it another way, how much more do you think your new P4 processor would cost if it was fabricated in the USA?

    10. Re:Next Target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The upshot of increased freedom of trade, is increased wealth overall.

      The down side to globalization is shared poverty. Yes the average wages in the third world go from 50 cents an hour to $1.50 an hour, but the average first world wage drops from $15.00 per hour to $5.15 per hour. Then the question becomes, does it matter that I can get a TV for $79.99 at Walmart if I am living in a cardboard box ?

    11. Re:Next Target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IT work goes to China and India, and so do Boeing airplanes.

      That's great as long as you don't work in IT. I guess we're the textile workers of the new millenium. It wouldn't have been so bad if it was a slow transition, but many of us were promised a solid career for studying this industry. Too bad, so sad...

      Yes, I have a pretty decent job in IT and live in the U.S. However, I also see the writing on the wall. And I sure as hell am not getting what I was promised by my professors, but I can't complain for the most part (right now). I am afraid of my future in this industry, however.

    12. Re:Next Target by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      This is why I cannot understand the reason why Socialists oppose Globalization. It comes closer to achieving their goals of worldwide economic equality than anything else. I suppose they oppose Globalization because corporations benefit from it. Guess they care more about hurting corporations than helping people.

    13. Re:Next Target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indians speak Indo-European languages...Therefore no trouble speaking english

      It wasn't until I worked with several Indians that I realized the impact of the fact that English was a *second* language for them.
       
      They may have "no trouble" *speaking* English, as long as native English speaking listeners are willing to go to a fair amount of effort to *understand* what they're saying.
       
      This also gave me a renewed appreciation for the value of overheard conversations when doing technical work...when much of it did not take place in English. Clearly English wasn't "no trouble" for them, because it was apparently "less trouble" for them to carry on business in their native toungue.

    14. Re:Next Target by mildgift · · Score: 1

      This is why I cannot understand the reason why Socialists oppose Globalization.

      You don't understand because you're ignorant. Socialists are concerned with the working class. Corporate globalization benefits capitalists more than anyone else.

    15. Re:Next Target by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Once globalization is through with Africa, there will be no other place to go.

      South America is largely untapped. Although they may not have the English education tradition that India has, they do have a time-zone advantage in that their daylight hours match the US.

    16. Re:Next Target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're greedy. If some action benefits the working class but also benefits someone else, they'd rather no one benefited? Sounds like my definition of greed, dog-in-the-manger style. If they can't have it all, they're going to make sure no one gets anything.

    17. Re:Next Target by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      We oppose it because it impoverishes people in rich countries without doing much to improve the living standards of those in poor countries (India being the exception before you start jumping up and down). Fair and well-managed globalisation would be fine, destruction of people's lives and exploitation of people's abject poverty is not that.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    18. Re:Next Target by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Considering the whole purpose of Socialism is to equally distribute poverty, I'd say globalization (or globalisation for the Euros) accomplishes this just perfectly. That's the real reason why socialism won't advance: it's supporters don't recognize what would really help them. All they want to do is "fight against the establishment".

    19. Re:Next Target by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      Except that when socialism was rationally applied in the US, UK, western Europe, Japan and Australia everyone got a great deal richer not to mention healthier, better educated and having access to a range of technology unimaginable even 100 years ago.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    20. Re: Next Target by consonant · · Score: 0

      Considering the rate at which the Indian population is increasing, I suspect it will be the latter than the former...

    21. Re:Next Target by Monkeyfarmer · · Score: 1

      "Hell, we can't even find a way to feed everyone"

      Not true. It's not a problem of production, it's a problem of distribution and corruption.

    22. Re:Next Target by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Where in that sentence (Hell, we can't even find a way to feed everyone) did I say anything about production?

    23. Re:Next Target by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      I really don't think that can happen without being accompanied by something very dramatic. The end of the wage disparities is what enable outsourcing are the basis of our prosperity. I honestly find it unimaginable that in the future, things would be the same minus our prosperity. For sure, we will start wars to bring back some of the disparity between countries, but of course, this will also not go on forever. It really will be a fascinating how this plays out.

    24. Re:Next Target by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      As of now, we don't have enough energy to allow everyone to live like those of us in 1st world countries

      The problem here is that you lump Europe and other "1st world" countries in with the US, then take the US's insane per capita energy consumption as the baseline. The US uses more than 4 times as much energy per capita than the other G-7 nations, while the actual quality of life is very much comparable.

      This can mostly be contributed to simple waste of energy. The details are on Google, but let me share a personal anecdote: on a business trip to NYC in June, the highrise airconditioning didn't ramp up quickly enough for a warm weather period. So the first 2 days it was terribly hot in the office. Then it grew colder until on the 4th day it was freezing cold. The people working there were already prepared and whipped out their radiant heaters, which from then on ran full throttle to combat the building's air condition that also was running on what seemed maximum power (the hallways, without radiant heaters, were too cold to stay there). When I returned in October, the same situation still prevailed.

      So, simply by behaving like the other G-7 nations, the US could cut 80% of their energy consumption without any loss of quality of life. And this is although in Europe there is also a lot of wasting going on, and estimates here say that we could easily half the consumption, again without any loss of quality.

      I think we could provide comparable qualities of life to the whole world, if the US (and to a lesser extent the rest of the "1st world") would stop acting as if it all belonged to them.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  5. their market is red-hot by BigGerman · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I recently interviewed several people in India for senior (US equivalent of 100K+) position with outsourcing department of big big US company. Those people were ok but they were JUNIOR (in experience, soft skills, everything). However, overseas headhunter warned the company that even these people will not be available for long and it is almost impossible to find more.

    In my opinion (14 years of consulting), the India craze did cause a significant dip in rates for US people but even couple years ago we already were scratching the bottom of the barrel. I think the shortage of programmers is a global thing and caused by primitive immature tools and processes and outsourcing is not a magic bullet. My typical client cannot coordinate people across the room let alone across the ocean.

    1. Re:their market is red-hot by quarkscat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From the parent poster and TFA, it would appear that India will not be able to keep up with the demand for IT workers. The prevalent theory about agrarian societies driving demand for larger families (as opposed to middle class tradesmen) would appear to be contrary to the best interests of India. Perhaps the next generation of Indians that have grabbed the IT "brass ring" will produce larger families, if only to help their country meet demand for IT workers.

    2. Re:their market is red-hot by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 0

      This has been my experience as well. In fact, many large companies have raised there wages due to huge amounts of turn-over in India. The latest rate that I've seen is about $40,000 USD per year for a Java programmer. This is a fully loaded cost including management, hardware, etc. At this rate, it is actually cheaper to hire a contractor which we can get at about $60 - $80 per hour and we don't need to keep them on the payroll. The quality of American programmers and system admins is MUCH higher as well. I think we're really hitting an inflection point here. On top of the competitive nature here, outsourcing oversees is increadibly time consuming. If we weren't worried about outsourcing all the time, we could really focus on issues that are important like improving product quality. As it is, we mostly have to focus on managing people in complete opposite timezones and getting at least somewhat near the quality we had expected in the past.

      --
      No Sigs!
    3. Re:their market is red-hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's interesting that you said this. Iam part of senior management at a firm here in India. One of the first things that I look for in a resume while recruiting for senior positions is how long they stayed at any one place. Half the people I interview will show a long list of short term assignments with companies. I am left wondering whether they have been able to learn anything. An even larger part of the people who come in recommended are usually there because he or she is related in some way or are good friends with the person who recommended, and might not have any talent at all. I used to work for a Fortune "5" company until recently, and all i can say is that their ranks are filled with such "recommended" people. The ones who were good enough couldn't tolerate the place. Yet the firm still wins contracts from some big names abroad, executes them at 6 times the average market rate and manages to survive. While I was there I could not climb into senior management, despite having the experience, even as a large bunch of housewives made it into the top. They now run the place and Iam elsewhere.

      The true reason why people dont stay is the absolute lack of talent, creative thought, and problem solving abilities among senior management. Consequently, you have fidgety youngsters running all over looking for similar favors, assignments, get in with their own groups to promote, etc. And they dont stay.

      Show them bright people they will be working with, and many will stay.

    4. Re:their market is red-hot by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1

      So we, people in IT, should keep the tools as primitive and immature as long as possible. Imagine a future where programming is only about concept, i.e. the Star Trek cliche, "Computer, make me a program that does this and that." Perfection is bad. Bill Gates was right all the time!

    5. Re:their market is red-hot by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Perhaps the next generation of Indians that have grabbed the IT "brass ring" will produce larger families, if only to help their country meet demand for IT workers.

      I don't think there's any need for that. India has no shortage of people - what it needs is more well-educated, well-trained people. i.e. more university places in IT, better access to education, etc.

    6. Re:their market is red-hot by alex.v.koval · · Score: 1

      > The quality of American programmers and system admins is MUCH higher as well.

      Someone who gets $30/hr in India will be equivalent experience person to someone in U.S. getting $300/Hr. So, I do not think that direct comparision works here

      > outsourcing oversees is increadibly time consuming

      For some products, thats right. For some, outsourcing is not time consuming. As any methodology, outsorcing should be used with care.

  6. I long for the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    that they start outsourcing journalism to india

    1. Re:I long for the day by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm longing for the day when HR is being outsourced to India, so all those drones can find out what it's like.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:I long for the day by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      They already have. I've gotten recruiting calls from companies in Chicago, St Louis, and New York that were using HR people in India judging by the time of the phone calls and the accents of the people on the other end of the phone.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    3. Re:I long for the day by gmajor · · Score: 1

      I think they've already started. On CBS Marketwatch, I noticed several articles about US company earnings were written by reporters in Bangalore.

  7. Lot of assumptions in prediction of "short fall" by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As far as I know (from cousins, friends, and general chat from India), there is still a strong demand for the outsourced jobs. Almost tens of resumes per open position, so the prediction of "short fall" looks to be based on shaky ground. There are so many factors involved: there is a large pool of current workers, not all positions require an "IT" degree, and that many jobs may not be created (may move to other countries, or be simply automated).

    The unemployment rate in India is still staggeringly high, and the couple of million jobs that *might* be created will be quickly gobbled up.

    I suspect that the industry agenda is to continue to have a huge surplus of applicants (or even increase the applicants to positions ratio), so that they can put a downward pressure on the salaries. I'd call it Walmart-ization of the IT (and non-IT) outsourced industry.

    S

  8. Meanwhile, Bill Gates by Travoltus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    complains about the lack of programmer graduates from the US.

    Does anyone wonder why few Americans want to take up programming any more as a career? There's no jobs for them - the corporations crying about a lack of programmers refuse to look to the US to hire any.

    And when BPO hits the banking sector, you can kiss the security of your identity goodbye.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To add insult to injury, Americans companies are not willing to train people on the job. There is no job training, nor employee loyalty in the US tech sector.

      American companies would rather hire someone already working, causing that worker to betray the company they are working for, than hire someone not working and willing to be loyal to the company they work for. Dice's advertisments here on Slashdot encourage this kind of behavior, telling workers that their boss is being unfair,and that they should get a new job. Loyalty means nothing in a business climate where the "suits" are people who do not understand programmers, and are more insterested in short-term profits than in the long-term survival of their company and the economy as a whole.

      I'm disgusted with the tech industry. I'm leaving the country and teaching English to foreigners (one nice perk: I can actually get a date there, unlike the US where computer people can't get dates) until I figure out what do do with my life.

      Thanks for letting me rant. I think you understand why I am anonymous.

    2. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by Travoltus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      [To add insult to injury, Americans companies are not willing to train people on the job. There is no job training, nor employee loyalty in the US tech sector.]
      Oh, that is very true. I've interviewed many people to work for me and my boss has ordered me to turn them down in favor of waiting for more experienced people to come along. When that doesn't happen, THEN we hire the best inexperienced one in the bunch.

      But now, as far as I've seen, this is true of all sectors.

      Any job, even retailers like Target, demand years of experience first. Even if you have a degree, they want experience, too. Having a degree only means you are more competitive with other experienced workers.

      No job except the lowest end of food service will ever hire someone without experience now.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    3. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First of all, thank you for your feedback.
      No job except the lowest end of food service will ever hire someone without experience now.
      The difference between the tech industry and, say, being a lawyer or a teacher is that what constitutes experience in the tech industry changes more frequently than women's sense of fashion. Just five years ago, as just one example, Solaris was the word to have on your resume if you wanted a sys admin job. People would not hire you if you had Linux instead of Solaris. Today, people don't really want Solaris experience; they want Linux experience. So, the person with five years of Solaris is now someone who has no experience.

      If you are a teacher, that teaching experience stays with you for the rest of your lifetime. If you are a programmer, you experience only matters when whatever language you happen to be programming in still matters. Then your experience becomes useless.

      And, by the way, unlike the tech industry, the teaching profession has an entryway for people with no experience: They are substitute teachers until they can get a full-time teaching jobs. There is no equivalent of this in the tech industry, with the possible exception of unpaid open-source software development.

      On a more personal level, my foot in the door a decade ago was a combination of knowing the right person and working as tech support until I impressed my department enough with my programming chops to get a development position, even though I was listed on the roster as tech support and paid tech support wages until I left the company. After this, a friend of a friend hired me and that was my gateway to me being hot on the job market. This all crashed when the dot-com bubble exploded, at which point I decided to get a degree until the economy picked up. Well, here I am, and all of my friends who do have jobs in the tech industry say that they hate their jobs; you're either out of work, or slave-driven by your boss in today's economy.

      Again, thank you for your feedback.
    4. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by bladernr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There is no job training, nor employee loyalty in the US tech sector.

      I'm not sure if you meant to write employee loyalty, but you hit the nail on the head.

      I'm a junior executive in the telecom industry (a bit over 300 staff, and a total budget well over US$100M), and as every person with financial responsibilities can tell you, year end is budget season. I attempted to increase the amount of my training budgets to "grow" more talent internally (both technical and management), rather than always looking outside. HR cautioned me against it, even though I can well afford it: here is why.

      If I train people, I raise my cost of employment, and therefore will not be able to pay as high of salaries as my "labour competitors" do. So I go and train up my people, and they use that training to jump ship to a higher paying company with a much worse training programme (doesn't matter: they have already been trained).

      The fact is there is no total-good/total-bad in the current state of the professional labour market: there is plenty of blame to go around. I remember admonishments from my father about "in his day" he didn't worry about pay - just working for a good company for a lifetime. Now there is no loyalty in either direction.

      The problem is that the group (employees or employers) that show loyalty first will be the biggest losers (see the example of me increasing my training budget and perversly losing employees). You have employees with a sense of entitlement (anyone who's done labour relations will tell you all about that) and employers who now feel different from their workforces.

      How do we get out of this mess?

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
    5. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      American companies would rather hire someone already working, causing that worker to betray the company they are working for, than hire someone not working and willing to be loyal to the company they work for

      Betray?

      Dude,

      A company is not a country. When you work for a company, you're making a free exchange of your services for their money, and either of you is fully entitled to stop that relationship whenever you want, unless there are additional contract terms that apply.

      If the main thing that you have to offer is "loyalty", well, I'll hire the guy with skills over you, every time.

      I can actually get a date there, unlike the US where computer people can't get dates)

      I suspect that your difficulty both with dating and employment stems from your sullenness.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. the security problem has occured here in Australia already. Please have had their identity stolen though staff in foreign call centres. What do you expect, when these company hire call centre staff through the lowest bidder and then the call centre hire the cheapest labour with little or no security checking.

      ~AC

    7. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      [A company is not a country. When you work for a company, you're making a free exchange of your services for their money, and either of you is fully entitled to stop that relationship whenever you want, unless there are additional contract terms that apply.

      If the main thing that you have to offer is "loyalty", well, I'll hire the guy with skills over you, every time.]

      Why can't a person be both skilled and loyal? Going by your morality, a person skilled enough to work for you, might instead start their own company, hire people away from you, and put you out of business. And if your response is, "I don't care if I get run out of business" then you're either a fortune 500 CEO planning to cash out big from a sinking ship, or someone utterly clueless about owning a business. Me? I'm betting you're not the former.

      Oh and thank you very much for demonstrating to us how some people want morality and humanity to be stripped from business.

      Contrary to your demonstrated labor-as-commodity approach to things, business cannot survive for long without morality - including loyalty. This is why companies are not loyal to the country and the workers that made them, customers cannot afford to be loyal to you, and so on. Your ideology is part of what is poisoning this country, from end to end, destroying the entire fabric of loyalty in what is now becoming a mad race to the bottom by a bunch of mice fighting over a rapidly dwindling share of the cheese.

      When you poo poo loyalty in one area, you're a total fool to believe it won't spread to everything else. Our nation is suffering because of a collective ignorance of that fact.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    8. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by jcr · · Score: 1

      Oh and thank you very much for demonstrating to us how some people want morality and humanity to be stripped from business.

      Oh, for Christ's sake. Morality says you do what you've agreed to do, you don't steal, you don't commit fraud, etc. This has nothing to do with any assumed duty of "loyalty" that isn't in the agreement.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    9. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      [Oh, for Christ's sake. Morality says you do what you've agreed to do, you don't steal, you don't commit fraud, etc. This has nothing to do with any assumed duty of "loyalty" that isn't in the agreement.]

      You're totally wrong about that. Loyalty is important in all aspects of things. It is a cornerstone of honor and personal integrity. Sadly, all you care about is contracts and dollars. Once the world of business - employment included - degenerates to that, you have descended into a level of decadence that is irretrievable.

      There's more to life, and business, than just agreements. Go look up "social contract" and get back to me.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    10. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >How do we get out of this mess?

      Stop treating your workers like shit! Seriously,
      if you want to keep people all you have to do is do this:

      1. Make anything other than 40-hour weeks very rare.

      2. Make chronic bad project planning and missed deadlines
      result in the termination of the management staff.

      3. Never threaten an employee's employment in front of their peers.
      You might as well ask them to stop working and concentrate on finding
      a new job.

      4. Give regular reviews, at least every 6 months. Rate each
      attribute on a scale of 1-10. Terminate employees who score low
      and make that part of the initial employment agreement. Never keep
      poorly peforming employees on staff - it kills morale.

      5. As a direct manager, never let anyone in the company, including HR,
      give direct instructions to an employee. All, and I mean ALL direction
      goes through the direct manager -- no one else.

      6. Hire only employees who are residents of the country in which
      the company was founded. Sorry, but anything else is just demoralizing
      and tends to evoke #3. If you want to have an office in India go ahead --
      just don't expect US peer employees to train them -- this is management's job.

      7. Never force employees to work on a major holiday. Ever.

      8. Pay the market rate and never ask an employee or consultant to
      take a pay cut.

      9. Never swear or otherwise verbally abuse an employee. This should be
      grounds for immediate termination.

      10. Never ask an employee to work when they are obviously ill.

      I am sure there are many more but the above would be a good start.
      Right now there is no call for employee loyalty. Companies do not
      show any loyalty towards employees (Google Layoff).

    11. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by dormant25 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know who modded this parent upto a 4 Interesting,but this is really stupid. Sorry!

      "There's no jobs for them"

      You mean there's no job for "scripters/programmers in Java/Perl/VB.NET (for fun)/gamers/hackers/*nix lovers etc" who don't have the fundamentals of computer SCIENCE right. Programming is NOT computer science. Bill Gates wants more computer SCIENCE graduates. Not programmers!

      You think just because you can program you have an edge?! I can guarantee you IQ for a programmer isn't necessarily high; its like comparing plumbers and electrical engineers; Programmers PROGRAM; There are theoretical/analytical/creative avenues in computer SCIENCE that need more people to work on.

      Hell, it would take anybody to take a "--- for dummies" to start off on Perl/Java. What's missing is people who know how a compiler works or the intricacies of algorithms; or the graph theory; or AI; or what not!

      Computer SCIENCE is now mature enough to make distinctions between programmers and scientists just as engineers do (a la engineer and a mechanic).

    12. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by jcr · · Score: 1

      Sadly, all you care about is contracts and dollars.

      Rather presumptuous, aren't you?

      Go look up "social contract" and get back to me.

      If you're going to toss off a term like that, try finding out what the means, first. I've read Rousseau, and he never said that anyone was obligated to stay in a job if they found a better one elsewhere.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    13. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by rossifer · · Score: 1

      Dude,

      A company is not a country.


      But a company can be a community. In my informed opinion, a company that is also a community has a much better shot of long-term success than a company made up of unmotivated loner mercenaries.

      Skills being equal of course. At the end, you can only be a great employee if you both have the skills and can be a member of the community (a good culture fit).

      Regards,
      Ross

    14. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine tells me that he was looking for a basic construction job, manual labor, and even for that they required FIVE YEARS of experience. Nobody wants to have entry level employees.

    15. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by lidocaineus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you really that clueless? The person who gives you the most loyalty more often than not IS the person with the most skills. Why? Because if you did it right, you helped to increase their skill level through training, and through their increased skill level, rewarded them with adequate incentives, such as a good salary, job perks, and plenty of benefits, not to mention at that point, they should have developed a good work related comraderie with the people they most often work with. THIS is why in the past, many people wanted to work for a company for a LONG time. Jumping ship to another company would have them starting out the whole cycle all over again; while they may start out a decent pay, the whole other aspect of re-developing work rapports and all that has to start from the beginning.

      Unfortunately, companies these days want the shortcut of just getting someone with experience and skills into the job. People are treated as a commodity, and while there *is* validity in that, it completely negates the human aspect of the position. In other words, you can get the greatest and most skilled employee in a position, but if they are condescending and other people who've been there longer can't get along with them, employee satisfaction drops, and productivity drops.

    16. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thank you for letting us know how it looks from the other side. I agree that we're in a vicious cycle here. I agree that there are employees that will screw over their boss in a New York minute--I know, I was one of them. I once screwed over one boss so bad he refused to hire anyone else from the staffing agency that I got hired through.

      But, let me tell you, I am paying dearly for that. The skills I had which were hot stuff five years ago don't mean anything today--the job market and the skills have changed just enough that I became essentially unemployable in today's job market.

      I have a friend who had a job at a company where he was making less than half of what I was making at the height of the dot-com madness. When the dot-com party ended in 2001, I was laid off and he wasn't. When no one could gets jobs in 2002, he still had his job and I didn't. He is probably still working at that same place to this day. No, he's not making a zillion dollars, but he's making enough to pay the rent and doesn't have to worry about where he will find his next job.

      So, yes, a lot of people you train will end up working somewhere else and screw you over. But I think some employees will be faithful, especially the ones with wife and/or children, as long as they make enough to pay the rent.

      This is a case of the Tragedy of the commons. Basically, loyal, long-term employees don't benefit a company only looking at the quarterly returns as much as constantly hiring young workers. It costs more to have older workers, in terms of higer health premiums and things like pensions. However, there are benefits to a company with a long-term loyal staff of hard workers: There is not the constant expense of getting new workers up to speed and having unproductive employees (you don't know if that new worker is going to be productive or not until they work for you).

      It's a difficult situation, and one which I think will ultimately cause America (or Europe) to no longer be the most wealthy nation in the world. I can see the problem, but finding a solution is a lot harder.

      Thanks, again, for your input; it's nice to know how the person on the other side of the interview desk feels.

    17. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a right to speak your mind; however you have personally insulted two different posters here on Slashdot and, IMHO, haven't contributed anything meaningful to the conversation. Resulting to personal insults usually indicates that you don't have a reasonable argument. I hope that you grok that a number of different posters have replied to you, criticizing what you are saying. This hopefully clues you in that you're not being very civil.

      I remember companies run by people like you during the dot-com rush; it was the companies with your attitude that were the first roadkill when the dot-com party ended. I know: I used to be as arrogant as you are. I screwed over a lot of good employers by leaving jobs within three months in my rush to get the job paying me as much as possible. I just hope you don't have to go through, getting laid off and being unable to find a job because the skills have changed just enough that your resume is garbage, before you realize the errors of your ways.

    18. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by greenrd · · Score: 1
      You have employees with a sense of entitlement

      Bloody hell - God forbid that people who have worked for you for X years should feel any kind of entitlement to anything! They should take their scraps and crumbs and be grateful, gosh-darn it!

    19. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      Sadly, it takes nothing short of this kind of calamity to cleanse some people of their he-man wannabe ways.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    20. Re:Meanwhile, Bill Gates by jp10558 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A company is not a country. When you work for a company, you're making a free exchange of your services for their money, and either of you is fully entitled to stop that relationship whenever you want, unless there are additional contract terms that apply.

      The problem with that is really two fold. One, you have employees who *don't care* about the company. They are more likely to cut corners, or tell potential customers that they might get a better deal elsewhere, or just slack off.

      Heck, where I currently work, I do what is in my contract by the letter. It's a retail position, so it often means my standing around in my department, even when nearby departments are swamped. I'm happy to stand there and be paid, and otherwise just talk with other employees or watch other employees work.

      Heck, it's not in my contract to help them in another department. And, my manager is fine with this, because it's what his contract stipulates...

      Now, if I cared about the company, felt that it succeeding meant anything to me, I might go help out the other employees - and make the company do better as a result. When it's slow, I might do other work so the company doesn't need to, say, hire another person to do stocking or something.

      But they don't pay me enough, or offer any benefits, or any real chance of advancement, so I really don't care. I can find hundereds of retail jobs, so if they go under, it really doesn't matter to me.

      Two, if someone hired me at another retail store, I'd be more than happy to tell them some ideas based on where I currently work. Wal-Mart loses managers all the time to other stores and the other stores get the benefit of Wal-Mart training... None of this is against my contract, I don't have a non-compete in a line retail job...

      The point is you won't get very much out of employees if all you want is by the contract, and you don't care about community or loyalty. You'll have a bunch of people who will stand around doing nothing for hours getting paid till the manager comes and tells them to go home early or the store closes. And you'll have people who do the minimum necessary to not be fired because they don't care.

      And for all sorts of reasons I'd think you'd at least want your employees to care if your company stays in business.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  9. The job turnaround time is very short in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have heard that the job turnaround time in India for these jobs is very short, on the order of weeks, maybe months. Basically, the employers are slave drivers who burn out the employees very quickly. more information.

    As an aside, there is no shortage of programmers in today's environment. Yeah, there may be a shortage of "Object-Oriented Perl" programmers out there, but, sheesh, do you really think it takes that long to re-train a "Scripting Perl" developer to be an Object-Oriented Perl developer--especially if the developer in question has Java or C++ on their resume.

    The fact of the matter, which PHBs plain simply do not get, is this: A good programmer can become up to speed in a new language in a matter of days. You don't need five years of "Objected Oriented Perl" to be a decent OO Perl developer. Someone with two years of scripting perl, and two years of Java can learn OO Perl in under a week if they are a decent programmer.

    1. Re:The job turnaround time is very short in India by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I don't know how true it is, but I've heard that to some extent the managers aren't at fault in insisting on previous experience. They'd be glad to train. They write up requirements including, "I'd like it if the applicant had some experience with Object-Oriented Perl." HR "translates" that to "Must have Object-Oriented Perl experience." It's easier that way because then they don't have to think, and most of them don't know how to.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:The job turnaround time is very short in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      That's why it depends upon where the results funnel before they reach "the right party."

      Whether it's an ad on Dice|CareerBuilder|Monster or a headhunter as the primary contact [or not], if I'm sent into an "interview" and I'm handed an application to fill out, I excuse myself and that company+headhunter are blacklisted. And I do take the time to call the headhunter and let them know that someone with 25+ years experience doesn't walk into the door and fill out paperwork. If they're that anal-retentive, there will be something like timesheets + status reports where you account for your time and filling out the paperwork will likely become an entry in the paperwork.

      The [FBI] "profile" (age independent) of those who enjoy coding for their professional lifestyle (and only code) have nothing to do with more than three or four years ago: "3+ years C# or VB.NET, .NET (why they list that as a separate item baffles me), SQL Server or Oracle, good team skills, excellent written and verbal skills". All which remains is the pay scale, which differs geographically.

      IOW, if all you want to do is code....

    3. Re:The job turnaround time is very short in India by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      HR "translates" that to "Must have Object-Oriented Perl experience."

      And then the PHB's in charge of HR translate it to "Must be a Black Belt(tm) in Object-Orientated(tm) Perl process methodologies."

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:The job turnaround time is very short in India by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna have to disagree with you there. Someone with two years of perl scripting and two years of experience with Java who doesn't do OO Perl is lying about something.

      Perl is all about making things easier on you. So is OOP. So someone steeped (i.e. two years of experience) in an OOP language is going to immediately start using that approach in perl.

      If they're not, then:

      1) They don't really get the point of using OOP, so they're not really going to use it in such a way that other people can use it too down the line.

      2) They haven't really been programming in Java that long. They lied about the amount of Java they've done. They've done very little of it in those two years, so they're not very comfortable with OOP.

      3) They haven't really done anything major with perl, so they haven't needed OOP with it. So they were lying about that part.

      Its possible that if you've gotten that experience that you're looking at a PHB backed by an engineer such as myself - who uses perl and java as his primary two languages - and who knows that a non-OOP-only perl programmer who uses Java regularly has something fishy about him.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    5. Re:The job turnaround time is very short in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, how would you treat someone who has two years of scripting Perl followed by two years of Java who wrote large Java programs and the occassional small Perl script at their last job?

      There are clueless HRs and PHBs who would throw out this person's resume if the job needs "Object Oriented Perl" even though it is obvious the worker could get up to speed in OO Perl within a week.

    6. Re:The job turnaround time is very short in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " The [FBI] "profile" (age independent) of those who enjoy coding for their professional lifestyle (and only code) have nothing to do with more than three or four years ago: "3+ years C# or VB.NET, .NET (why they list that as a separate item baffles me), SQL Server or Oracle, good team skills, excellent written and verbal skills". All which remains is the pay scale, which differs geographically."

      That wins my vote for the least informative/comprehensible paragraph in this topic.

  10. I don't get it... well I do, but I don't by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Here is the problem. All the "big" companies are stating that there is an "IT shortage" for workers. There isn't. What there IS a shortage of are "dirt cheap" IT workers in the USA. Really, think about it, the companies mis-quote left and right the number of graduates from the US and compair them against numbers from India and even China. Numbers that just simply do not corolate to each other. Compairing "degrees" from 4 year accredited colleges/universities against 2 year trade schools. Is there a portion of the numbers that will corolate, yes, but the counting system used for getting those numbers from India and China do not make a distinction between an accredited degree and one from a trade school.

    Are there fewer and fewer students entering accredited universities in the US studying IT fields? YES. And you know what, the reason just might be because the big companies are outsourcing the jobs. There is a direct relation to the expected number of jobs available in 5 years to the number of students entering those fields of study. By saying that they will be outsourcing the positions, the companies create the very lack of qualified personnel that they cite they need to fill the positions in the first place.

    Now here is what I get. Everyone wants to make a buck. The companies want to save money and still keep the same quality "product" that they have now. The people in the field who understand the science/technology want to be paid a fair wage for their work and knowledge. They have invested upwards of $100k into learning that knowledge, and want to be compensated appropriately for it. This basically turns into a "cost of living" issue when you get down to it. In the US, it costs more to gain that education, thus the people with it demand more compensation for the knowledge. In some other contries, that same education may not cost nearly as much, and as a result, the people with that education do not demand as much compensation for the knowledge.

    What I do not get is why. Labor is just another commodity to be traded. As such, how much longer will it take for all non-physical labor to be traded at the lowest going rate? As a result of this, how much longer until the economic crash of the school systems in areas that charge higher then other institutions for a degree on a global scale?

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    1. Re:I don't get it... well I do, but I don't by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      That crash will never happen because labor isn't "just another commodity to be traded". Labor is millions of people with lives, hopes, dreams, possessions, rights, bodies, souls and aspirations. Many of these hopes, dreams and aspirations involve a decently-paying job and do not involve moving to India just to go to college on the cheap. Therefore, these people will continue to pay for high-cost edumacations (how much do they really teach people in IT and CS programs, nowadays?), and the schools which provide said high-cost edumacations will never crash.

      Also, if the price of labor ever really drops as low as you think we'll be witnesses to a real, live Leftist Revolution. Not everyone is as complacent as the USA. Not everyone puts up with having your work priced down or having no income because you won't work an order of magnitude lower than you need.

    2. Re:I don't get it... well I do, but I don't by rewinn · · Score: 1
      A funny thing happens when you PHBs the very same question about the economics of X:

      If X = "oil" or some other physical commodity: There will never be a shortage of oil because the price will simply rise to meet demand; the market balances itself.

      If X = "programmers" or some other laborer: There is a huge shortage of programmers because we don't want the price of programmers to rise until the market balances itself.

    3. Re:I don't get it... well I do, but I don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correlate, not "Corolate" "Compairing"? No wonder they are outsourcing, at least Indians have an excuse

    4. Re:I don't get it... well I do, but I don't by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Its stabilizing. I for one would be happy to work for $25k a year doing jr programing and administration work and many senior level unix admins are happily working in Canada for the US equiliviant of 34k a year. Its the new standard and only a little more than an Indian.

    5. Re:I don't get it... well I do, but I don't by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Its nothing compared to the 19th century when workers worked 90 hours a week and still needed 4 roomates to share a 1 bedroom apartment due to the low pay.

      But of course they did not rebel in the US. If other countries rebel then the companies will move everything to the US or be %100 based in India and they can save even MORE money.

    6. Re:I don't get it... well I do, but I don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A crash won't happen in education - getting an education in the US or western Europe as a foreigner is already incredibly expensive, yet there are tons of foreign students. It's all about the prestige, plus learning good English(/other western language) whilst getting a degree.

    7. Re:I don't get it... well I do, but I don't by woolio · · Score: 1
      only a little more than an Indian.


      If you made 25k USD/year in India, you could make some PHB's in the US jealous with your lifestyle... Yes, it isn't much by US standards, but in India, you wouldn't be paying US prices either.... You could easily afford multiple maids/cooks/etc... Can you do that in Canada on 34k/year??? I think not.

      If you made 25k USD/year in Canada, you might be able to eat fast-food once in a while... (if you only pick the extra-value-meal)

      BIG DIFFERENCE! BIG DIFFERENCE!

    8. Re:I don't get it... well I do, but I don't by dormant25 · · Score: 1
      Are there fewer and fewer students entering accredited universities in the US studying IT fields? YES. And you know what, the reason just might be because the big companies are outsourcing the jobs. There is a direct relation to the expected number of jobs available in 5 years to the number of students entering those fields of study. By saying that they will be outsourcing the positions, the companies create the very lack of qualified personnel that they cite they need to fill the positions in the first place.


      Actually its the other way round. BECAUSE there aren't enough graduates people outsource. I am sure you haven't researched this, but I am pretty sure of this, and even in my university which has more than 10,000 students, companies have trouble matching up their demand!

      This really would be surprising (and insulting) but this is the hard truth.
    9. Re:I don't get it... well I do, but I don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will always be demand for skills. To simply put it, You cannot sell crap and stay in business

      If you pay crap, you hire crap, they produce crap, and you then sell that crap... And the profits you make turn into crap!

      Microsoft was trying to sell crap 5-15 years ago. In all fairness, their products got lots better in the last few years, but many IT pros will still not touch their stuff with a six-foot pole.

      Because Microsoft branded itself as a pusher of crap in the past, their bottom line will suffer into the future.

    10. Re:I don't get it... well I do, but I don't by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      The parent poster REALLY DOES "get it". Globalization is truly the corporate world's race to continuously seek their least expensive labor, regardless of the negative economic and social impact upon their nation of origin. Unfortunately, most politicians gravitate their attention towards those constituents that provide the greatest amount of funds needed for re-election. The real solution to the ravages of globalization will only come with either (1) offshore outsourcing corporate management, which will provide corporations broader prospective, or (2) a revolution by the displaced working classes against the political system that is attempting to economically enslave them.

      I would like to point out that the IT industry is not alone in the effects of globalization, the amoral behaviour of corporations, and the immoral behaviour of politicians. The Dubya regime's failure (through claims of poverty while waging the costly, immoral & illegal Iraqi war) to enforce existing laws regarding the influx of illegal aliens, and against the employers that hire them, has resulted in downward wage pressure in the domestic labor market for everything from carpenters, electricians and plumbers to construction workers and auto technicians.

      Free enterprise in a regulated and lawful society would predict that in-demand labor skills in short supply would drive labor costs up. Dubya's "wild, wild west" corporate free-for-all regarding enforcement of existing laws has turned that premise on its' ear. Perhaps some other /. reader could explain why the minimum wage has not changed in 10 years, or how education, health care, and fuel costs rising at double digit rates has so little effect upon the consumer price index.

      My personal opinion is that the politicians and their statisticians have "cooked the books", not unlike census data including illegal aliens being used to determine the number of Congressmen per state in the House of Representatives.

      There are "...lies, damn lies, and statistics...".

    11. Re:I don't get it... well I do, but I don't by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Actually, $25k is less than a company would end up paying altogether for a typical outsourced job. When all is said and done, studies have shown that companies only save about 15% on large scale deployments of Indian outsourcing. 25k is far more than 15% lower than IT industry standard.
      Of course, not all of that goes to the Indian worker. Most of it goes to greedy Indian management companies, and the poor Indian sap who ends up doing the work gets more than a typical Indian market job, but not much percentage of the whole take.
      The same thing used to happen in the U.S. I was working for a large consulting company that billed me out at $400 an hour, while I was paid only $30 an hour.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  11. One would hope by astyanax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...that current outsourcing trends slow enough due to a competent IT worker shortage in India (for what piddling amounts the US companies are currently willing to shell out for outsourced positions anyway), such that the US labor costs can drop slowly. This would allow existing US IT workers can continue to find *some* work and do nice things like FEED THEIR FAMILIES until the global economies even out. This will likely take years though, so I'm not holding my breath.

    At the megacorp where I worked we tried filling a Perl/sysadmin type position to work from India for a YEAR. I know those poeple are out there, they just need to pay them more $$$.

    1. Re:One would hope by bladernr · · Score: 1
      that current outsourcing trends slow enough due to a competent IT worker shortage in India

      You may not realise how right you are. I've been doing some variety or other of work between the western world, India, and China since 1998. I hate to say it, but it is true: the good engineers from India and China move to the West where they get paid a lot more, live a hell of a lot better lifestyle, don't have to bride government officials to get a drivers license, and generally chase the "dream." The ones that can't make it stay home.

      I'm sure I'll get completely flamed for this, but it is true. I am a Westerner who spent a cumulative year in India in different IT companies. Some of the best programmers I've known are Indian, but I met them in the UK, the US, and Canada. All the ones in India I've met were usually not good, but at best were building experience to qualify to go "onsite" from "offshore."

      That is why I think wages won't crash. Sure, work migrates to lower cost, but labour migrates to higher pay.

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
  12. Im a programmer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    And I've recently decided that my management was too expensive so Ive outsourced it to India.

    1. Re:Im a programmer... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      That was a waste of money. You should have just fired the manager completely, as most IT management is redundant, since most IT workers already have enough management skills to manage themselves.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  13. Re:Lot of assumptions in prediction of "short fall by Texodore · · Score: 2, Informative

    I want to say this will be the case, but it's worth noting that computers just aren't affordable for the average person. The average salary is about 15-25% of an American equivalent in the IT world, and that's astronomically high for India. That may or may not get you a car.

    My point is it's not like the US where someone can sit at home, get a computer, and learn computer skills quickly. Someone in India has to take the time to learn computer skills somewhere. I'm not sure where the qualified applicants are going to come from.

    Completely offtopic, I'm astounded that after all of these India posts on /. and related places there aren't more people chiming in about their experience in India. I mean, some of us have been over there to train people. Collectively the IT folks in America are getting more impressions of experiences in India. Hopefully more of those impressions will come to light as discussion continue.

  14. Re:frsy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unfortunately nope, you'll die unhappily just like the rest of us.

  15. Education? by digitalamish · · Score: 1

    All this despite the fact that almost 2.5 million students graduate in India each year.

    This leads me to one thing I've been very curious about. How are companies checking the credentials of people overseas? I know there are quite a few people (some I've had to deal with), that I can't beleive they got any more than a 'boot camp' type training. With all the movement between companies over there, I can see how people would get lost in the shuffle and keep working.

    It's not quantity of IT workers I see as the problem over there, but quality.

    1. Re:Education? by kanad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was an IT worker in India. I am Indian. Indian IT companies recrit all sorts of engineer i.e civil, mechanical, electrical, chemical etc apart from comp sci. Since most engineering students have atleast a common denominator of traits like analysis, rigourous coursework, maths etc. the IT companies know that they can train them in sofwtware with relative ease. Of course the CS grads get the more better technlogy to start with (says database. java etc) while the non - CS ones may have more maintenance, mainframe, testing kind of job to begin with. Most IT companies take grads and subject them to 1-3 months intensive introductory software training courses just like a mini college course. Check for example the infosys global education centre Also large Indian companies are in turn opening offices in China , Hungary etc to outsource the outsourcing.

    2. Re:Education? by DustCollector · · Score: 1

      I hear that IT companies in India go for all sorts of certifications -- CMM, Sigma 6, ISO 9000, etc. -- and that helps them win U.S. contracts. In contrast, U.S. developers see these certs as dubious, and don't embrace them as quickly, if at all.

      Yeah, I'm one of those that question the value of the certifications toward software development. I prefer to abide by "The Mythical Man-Month", but that doesn't help me win contracts. :-P

    3. Re:Education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, you didn't answer the actual question: "How are companies checking the credentials of people overseas?"

  16. On the plus side... by vistic · · Score: 1

    ...if you're an Indian and you graduate and go into IT, you won't have trouble finding a job in India.

    1. Re:On the plus side... by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1

      Ha! I love it. All of these American slashdotters hating on the fact that IT is booming in India (at the expense of the USA)! The funny thing is most /.ers have socialistic democrat leanings and are always pining away about how we should help the less priviledged in the world. Then when a lesser country finds a niche and starts competing with the evil USA they don't like it.

      See people, a person can help themself if they will only learn the wonderful concept called Capitalism. There's no need for the government to engage in wealth redistribution to help underpriviledged people out.

      Learn a valuable trade == get a job. It's that easy.

      Great post, man! I love the refreshing perspective.

    2. Re:On the plus side... by DoTheRightThing · · Score: 1
      I agree with you on the point that /.ers have MPD. They talk 'left' among themselves and 'right' with others (3rd world countires).

      But i cannot agree with you on capitalism being wonderful concept and all that.Capitalism is gonna kill india. Who is benefitting from the outsourcing? .You think indians.NO.The corporations and the middle men. The american companies are screwing up the americans (no jobs) and sodomizing indians by exploiting them.(less pay and labour work). Remember the mexican brothers.

      The oursourcing is going to create huge gap between poor (mostly lower caste) and upper-middle class(mostly uppercaste) and the rich gets extremly rich.You know what that means.WAR.

      What pisses me off (more often these days) is that the /.ers (being left leaning and all that crap) are not critisizing their own american corporations for outsourcing but instead pissing on the wrong indian asokha tree.

      They are like these jealous american wives, instead of kicking their husbands, they blame on sexy brown ass indian (uptight though) girls.

      There are lot of things i like about america but the extreme form of capitalism is not one among them. This form of capitalism destroys america (and the world) just like the Roman civilzation. Proof: Capitalism needs iraqi war and it breeds sep 11 and that leads to water gate and what next....i guess Dr.Strangelove...i digress.

  17. Re:Lot of assumptions in prediction of "short fall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is this modded interesting...the person is using anecdoatal evidence...you people are morons.

  18. A slightly different angle by djupedal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We're in the process of hiring 100 Engineers from both India and Pakistan, with the plan being to bring them into Mainland China to work in the telecom industry.

    During our recruiting so far, we're seeing a yield of approx. 5% after all interviews and testing, but that is prior to them coming into the PRC. We've gone thru nearly 4,000 candidates since Sept.

    For the record, I'd source domestically, but mgmnt. wants to curry favor with the home countries, so the burden to fit them in is on me. At least the bonus program is in my favor :)

    1. Re:A slightly different angle by shawb · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd think the people you are trying to hire are better at curry than you are. Mmmm... curry.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    2. Re:A slightly different angle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >curry favor

      how appropriate

  19. Re:Lot of assumptions in prediction of "short fall by RevMike · · Score: 4, Insightful
    As far as I know (from cousins, friends, and general chat from India), there is still a strong demand for the outsourced jobs. Almost tens of resumes per open position, so the prediction of "short fall" looks to be based on shaky ground.

    I go through at least 40 or 50 resumes in the US (Metro NYC area) to find one person worth hiring. And these are resumes that have been supposedly pre-screened by headhunters. Resume counts mean nothing if those tens of resumes represent poorly skilled people.

  20. Next Target-Excessive Medical Costs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the main reasons companies outsource is high medical costs in the US. GM pays more for medical, than it does for steel.*

    *Yeah, yeah. Blame the insurance companies, but they're not really the ones to blame. We are, with our "save me at all costs" medical system.

  21. Not many countries left by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    There actually aren't that many other poor places they can go. Not in terms of number of people, anyway. India and China are about 1/3 of the world population,and 1/2 of the poor world. Once they have joined the rich world, there's only so many poor nations left.

    This doesn't mean that the quest for the most effective labour for the lowest price will end, of course. It just means that that lowest price will rise.

    1. Re:Not many countries left by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2

      Seems like that will benefit the most people in the long-run.

      --
      Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  22. slashdot needs spell checker... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    If they cannot code it, outsource the dev work to india dude.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  23. Depends by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I dont trust these numbers, IT numbers leave out IS and other comp-sci, engineering people who also do the same programming, dba, systems/network engineering.

    I think a few things will happen.

    Government will have to figure out how to tax those people, the outsource loophole, the company doesnt have to pay insurance, workers comp or benefits. The biggest problem is we outsource work for one of the high end middleclass sectors and drop the pay in 1/2 to 1/3 when the cost of living stays the same in the US. While those people offshore dont pay local taxes. When enough people start feeling the money crunch, expect some laws passed.

    Software programming will be cheap, you can buy custom software quickly. I know some web developers who work with a couple outsource groups who just send the specs, and the company sends the completed software. While its not perfect, its cheaper and only takes 20-30 days. Good enough for first generation software.

    And last, there will be some scandles about IP issues and copyrights.

    1. Re:Depends by tftp · · Score: 1
      The biggest problem is we outsource work for one of the high end middleclass sectors

      And so they are not high end middle class any more. Problem solved.

      Government will have to figure out how to tax those people, the outsource loophole, the company doesnt have to pay insurance, workers comp or benefits.

      I think you don't understand who tells the government what to do.

    2. Re:Depends by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      Want to end outsourcing? Tax the business hiring outsourced labor the amount each and every worker would make if they were in the US. If there's no cost benefit in outsourcing, they won't do it.

      --
      I don't get it.
    3. Re:Depends by JanneM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Government will have to figure out how to tax those people, the outsource loophole, the company doesnt have to pay insurance, workers comp or benefits.

      They do pay the taxes, insurance and other benefits in the country they outsource to. And with a very hot labour market over many years, and the countries growing wealthier, those costs are increasing and faster than in the stable industrialized countries the companies are based in.

      In any case, all todays large companies are largely borderless. Most do not have a plurality of activity in any one country, and frequently their larges market is not in the same area their head office happens to reside. Outsourcing is not only to get cheaper development - it is also about having a prescence in very fast-growing markets.

      Make it too difficult for them to service other countries and you may see just how quick it is to move the head office and postal adress to Britain, say, or Ireland, or any number of other feasible countries where thay probably already have a heavy prescence.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:Depends by AgentPops · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with all of this. Many things will have to be sorted at these many levels of the social machine. Also to be considered is the cultural barriers posed with dealing business with in the context of an Indian mindset. Their fatalistic disposition can leave many of the more conscientious feeling at a loss for how to hope for the future in a joint venture. Even my limited experience with doing business within the Indian infrastuture leaves much to be desired in regard to honesty and integrity. The culture is and has been rife with corruption for decades. Bribes are the order of the day when gaining government approval for any transaction. I would even challenge the idea that the first-rev of a software project would be reasonably functional and ready for the first major tweaking by the Western workforce that knows what a conscientious work ethic looks like. Without constant monitoring, the Indian group would be tempted to convey a rosey picture of progress to the Western entity-in-charge leaving important items unaddressed.

    5. Re:Depends by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      In any case, all todays large companies are largely borderless. Most do not have a plurality of activity in any one country, and frequently their larges market is not in the same area their head office happens to reside. Outsourcing is not only to get cheaper development - it is also about having a prescence in very fast-growing markets.

      Some aspects of companies are borderless, like support. But then if companies want to do business in the US, we can always put tariffs on them for playing foul.

      Last I checked, our colleges are a resource that India uses. We can cut student visa's when outsourcing becomes a problem.

      We want to talk global community, but in reality, we need to look after our needs before other countries. Its free trade, not give them everything, bend over and lube up.

      But then, we are a short sighted society, if it doesnt pay now we dont notice until its too late. Kyoto is a perfect example.

    6. Re:Depends by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Some aspects of companies are borderless, like support. But then if companies want to do business in the US, we can always put tariffs on them for playing foul.

      Last I checked, our colleges are a resource that India uses. We can cut student visa's when outsourcing becomes a problem.


      Well, put tariffs on foreign companies, effectively distorting the market in local companies' favour, and other countries do the same to US companies. Everybody loses - and, in the end, it doesn't actually stop the trend of lessening economic differences, it just makes the adjustment more painful for everybody.

      And if you see your colleges as a resource used by other countries, are you planning to recompense those other countries for the health care and schooling those graduates received before coming to, and staying in, the US? Now that would be an "interesting" system if nobody could move or work in different countries unless the countries very carefully adjust every perceived cost between each other: "well, mr. Smith did receive a third place ribbon, at a cost of $3.50 to the school, for his science project in the third grade; we'll need to add that to the adjustment charge, of course, before we allow him to move."

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    7. Re:Depends by silverbyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People who come to the US to study, get advanced degrees and stay back in the US to work as highly skilled and specialised engineers/doctors/scientists.

      The ones who work in the BPO sector or the IT sector are basic code monkeys.

      Those who do make it into all those MS/Ph.D programmes are genuinely skilled - cutting them out will only ensure that R&D programmes experience a shortfall. And that one-advance-in-AI-to-make-outsourcing-redundant, that becomes so much further off.

    8. Re:Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Their fatalistic disposition"


      Sure sure. We're fatalistic. Not at all like the nice americans here, and here, and here.


      "Even my limited experience with doing business within the Indian infrastuture leaves much to be desired in regard to honesty and integrity"


      and even the limited experience of this humble Indian living in America for three years, paying off redneck flatfoots for speeding tickets for going 15 mph in a 20 mph zone, paying off car-towing scams, insurance scams, internet scams and every other kind of scam from every major government or large scale corporate agency imaginable leaves much to be desired in regards to honesty, integrity and just plain sanity.

    9. Re:Depends by AgentPops · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. The scurviest humans are only after one purpose; and that is to ascend at any cost leaving (possibly) the less shrewd beneath them. The scurviest can sometimes be those we'd least expect. My experience ANYWERE has always led me to know that the most untrustworthy are those who sometimes where the biggest smile and best clothes. There's an old saying about showey people related to farming days: If you meet someone who shouts too loud on Saturday night (at the bar) and prays to loud on Sunday morning, go home and lock your smokehouse (pantry) immediately. I hope you don't let it keep you down. I assume you are here to take advantage of opporunities that may not have been afforded you in India. Maybe not, but I am glad there is a country, any country, that helps people to do better than where they may have left. The best to you!

  24. Meanwhile, Greetings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Does anyone wonder why few Americans want to take up programming any more as a career? There's no jobs for them - the corporations crying about a lack of programmers refuse to look to the US to hire any."

    And here I thought it was the elitism (Get out of my profession, you damn dirty, "doing it for the money" whore!) attitude displayed by members of the profession? Why would anyone want to go into a career, knowing some members felt that way? Even most McJobs don't get that kind of greeting.

    NewMcEmployeeone: Hi I'm the new grill cook.

    OldMcEmployee: Well welcome new trainee*

    *thinking*
    Damn competition. Bet he read "Learn burger flipping in 24 seconds" He's doing it for the money instead of the love of flipping. Get out of my profession and become a lawyer or something.

    1. Re:Meanwhile, Greetings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Wanting to pay the bills. What a pathetic motivation!

      Outsourcing has made me a fan of the RedHat CEO's nihilistic words. He said he wanted to change IT from a multibillion dollar industry to a multimillion dollar one with free software.

      Well heck, why not let Open Source severely undercut all commercial programming projects, if remotely possible? Companies want that stuff for free any ways, so give 'em their wish.

      Outsourcing is largely irrelevant in that scenario. And everyone who programs will do it for the love of programming! Yippee!

  25. Other countries as well by clearcache · · Score: 2, Funny

    I understand there are other countries that are catching up as well in the area of skilled IT workers and solid educational facilities to prepare budding technologists for the market. Infrastructure is almost there, although cell phone capabilities aren't quite on par with the rest of the world. There are also some rolling power outage issues as well in the western corner of the country. But, it's only a matter of time before the salary dfiferential makes outsourcing to this country attractive.

    They seem anxious to have a recovery in domestic employment market growth. They haven't seen significant growth in the domestic labor market for hundreds of years. The pieces seem to be almost in place for the Nacirema to start benefiting from IT outsourcing just like India and other parts of the Far East.

  26. Gee, how about hiring people in the US? by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is this concept so foreign to them now? These are US companies.. how about hiring US employees? Why does everything have to be freakin' outsourced?

    There's plenty of geek talent in the US for the hiring. I wish these companies would hire in the US and help the US economy instead of throwing the money overseas.

    Arrrgh.

    -Z

    1. Re:Gee, how about hiring people in the US? by tftp · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why does everything have to be freakin' outsourced?

      Because it's cheaper, maybe?

      There's plenty of geek talent in the US for the hiring.

      Will you work for $5K per year, no holidays, no vacations, on a 60 hours per week schedule?

    2. Re:Gee, how about hiring people in the US? by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      In many cases, these companies aren't US companies anymore; they're multinationals, who happen to be headquartered in the US. Hippies used to talk about wanting a "world without borders", and in the end, they got it. Pity it's the version thought up finance guys who can afford to live in gated communites, while the peace, security, and community stability version (doesn't contribute to next quarter's numbers, so who needs it?) remains the province of folk songs.

      (and yes, I believe in the whole free-market, optimize the economic system for the greatest benefit, etc, but if outsourcing is so great, why don't we outsource upper-management rather than engineering, manufacturing, and sales/support?)

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    3. Re:Gee, how about hiring people in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't a "world without borders" if workers are not free to cross those borders to seek work. In our world capital is free to cross borders but most workers are not. In a "world without borders" most workers would move to where they could get the most money for their work and outsourcing would only bring very short term cost savings. You would see a rapid equalization of global wages (for better or worse).

    4. Re:Gee, how about hiring people in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when the US company wants to sell its products then it's ok to remember there's a world out there?

      If you want Indians to consume American products (and you do) they'll want you to buy what they have too. And what they're selling now is labour, for a much better price. Suddenly the idea of a free market doesn't sound so good to Americans, it seems...

    5. Re:Gee, how about hiring people in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it ever occur to you that just being an American does not entitle you to a job in an American company?

      The companies are not obligated to giving you a job just because you are from the U.S. You need to deserve the job in order to get it - think education, learning, skills, hard work and dedication.

      People who have these qualities get jobs, irrespective of where they are located.

  27. cast aside like a used condom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in about 10 or 15 years, capitalism will not be able to afford the high price of labor and pull out of the economy. It will be interesting to see what is left of india after that.

  28. How was it working out though? by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every outsourcing story I've heard has ended in disaster, overrun budgets, wasting thousands of dollars sending employees to India for months at a time, and unmaintainable code ... all the while not being cheap enough to justify any of it.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:How was it working out though? by deKernel · · Score: 1

      What you hear is true. I have experienced this first-hand. Every single project failed miserable by all accords. Unmaintainable code, poor performance, multitude of show-stopping bugs, and those are just the top three!!!

      There might be some success stories out there, but I haven't seen or heard about one that turned out good. Management will try to spin it, but they are just usually out-right lying to make bonus and such. Am I cynical? You bet because I have been burned copious times.

    2. Re:How was it working out though? by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every outsourcing story I've heard has ended in disaster, overrun budgets, wasting thousands of dollars

      Actually, that's the case for most development projects, outsourced or not.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:How was it working out though? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Of course, that's the same kind of story you hear about every in-hose development as well.

      Perhaps because decently working, on-time no fuss deployments aren't anything exciting to talk about?

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:How was it working out though? by CthulhuDreamer · · Score: 1

      But from an accounting viewpoint, it still cost less than doing it in-house. The company is therefore saving money. Even if the outsourced project stalls or fails, it's still a smaller expense than a successful project using local labor. I've seen outside projects green-lighted even after they were proven to be headed for failure because it was still cheaper than starting over using internal staff (and then terminating internal staff to save even more money as the outside project collapses).

    5. Re:How was it working out though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's definitely an issue of cost versus skill. If my job can be done just as well by someone in India for a fraction of the cost, then I need to change the way I'm doing my job (or change careers altogether). However, if my job is NOT going to get done just as well by someone in India, then the US company that feels like that is the best option is only going to weaken itself. This should open the door for new companies to hire the cast-off better employees, and beat that former company into the ground. Competition is a wonderful thing. If another product is superior, the market will choose it. New companies are born everyday.

  29. Outsourcing is a success for many companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outsourcing has been successful for many companies. People in India and China can work as good as anyone else and once a chance was given they have proved that they can do better. The fact that companies continue to outsource projects to these countries proves that the ground reality is different from what is projected here by the 100$-perhour-obsolete-us-programmer-who-canonly-ra nt-here-but-is-a-coward-to-accept-thefact-that-he- is-no-better-than-anyone-else-in-the-world!

    1. Re:Outsourcing is a success for many companies by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It is a myth that the only way out of poverty for a country is lopsided exports. Everyone's doing it because it worked for Japan and China, however, there is no evidence that it is the only way out. Encouraging (local) entraprenuers is one technique. Besides, the US has a huge trade gap that is gonna bite us one way or another. We cannot keep playing this game.

    2. Re:Outsourcing is a success for many companies by barefootgenius · · Score: 1

      No, you can't keep playing this game. The problem is (as far as I can see) free markets. In a totally free economy you have to balance up between countries. Which in actual terms seems to mean that the rates of pay in richer countries have to fall until you can bring the poorer countries rates up. Then both countries business's go somewhere else with lower rates and both coutries rates drop until they can compete there, etc, etc....
      But then I'm not an economist. I'm just old enough to remember my countries 40 hour week with good pay rates that became the 50 hour week. Then the other spouse had to work. Now its both people in a relationship working 50 hours. Looks good on paper I suppose. But where the hell are the kids?

      --
      /. bug #926803 - Why I can post.
    3. Re:Outsourcing is a success for many companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you guys invented this game :-)

      In the rest of the world, Asia in particular, the focus was on spirituality, frugality, and harmony with nature. People took from Nature what they got and consumed only what they needed.

      Obviously, these societies were defeated when the smarter and greedier Europeans came to Asia and Africa (and the Americas) in the 15th to 18th centuries. In the last century, U.S. took this idea forward and implemented a newer version: control the sources of energy all over the world and have its multinationals capture all the world markets. Together Europe and US invented mass production, overconsumption, big cities, greenhouse emissions, working couples, no kids and dog-eat-dog competition.

      Now the Asians understand this game and they are beginning to play it. Hey, they have almost given up their original ethos and are becoming "Western" - you should be glad about that!

      Even today U.S applies a lot of pressure on Asian governments to globalize and open up their markets. Yes, globalization is a good thing, but it is also an equalizer, and it works both ways. Reluctantly Asia gobalized. Now, sometimes their companies beat up those from the US and Europe. Some part of U.S. industry is facing the heat and running for cover!

      The middle class of the West is being made to compete with the poor labour from the East, and the result is obvious - to some extent, there will be equalization of standards of living. In the meanwhile the owners of corporations will become even richer due the arbitrage of labor. It's a part of "free markets".

      Wasn't that exactly what you had asked for?

    4. Re:Outsourcing is a success for many companies by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that exactly what you had asked for?

      No. You see, big corporations have too much influence in politics. They get their way by contributing to politicians that see things their way. In other words, it is a partial breakdown of democracy. It is as if big corporations get about 1/3 of the vote.

  30. but you just said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and once a chance was given they have proved that they can do better."

    Thus implying that the "obsolete" us programmer is worse by that statement.

    What you clearly miss is that the bottom line is quite simply THE BOTTOM LINE!!!!

    When India is too expensive, move to china, when china is too expensive, eastern europe, africa..

    But no, all this outsourcing is because western programmers are stupid!! hahah they so stupid what with believing they need enough money to be able to afford food.

    And $4,000 a year is a damn good wage in india..

  31. This is good news for USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where will they fill up the shortfall from?? Global trade is good ... in the long run everyone wins even though my life may get screwed up for a while ...............OMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

  32. cost vs benefit by AgentPhunk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm the network engineer for a company considering setting up an engineering / design shop in India. I just got pricing for a DS3 Internet circuit there. HOLY SPANDEX, BATMAN!

    A straight E1 circuit (2Mbps) to the Internet is about $4000/month, and about $3000 to install. (All prices in US dollars) Not cheap, but not bad.

    A 2xE1 (4Mbps) jumps to over $10,000 per month.

    Once you hit DS-3 which is scalable in the sense that once you have the circuit installed ($17,000 one-time fee), you can go from 0-3 Mbps to start all the way up to 45Mbps, your rates go from $16,000/month for the 3Mbps up to over $80,000 PER MONTH for the 45Mbps.

    Depending on what you're doing there, the straight E1 isn't that bad, but you really can't pump that much data through it. The ds3 prices are through the roof. Plus, I've been told that the infrastructure there is so bad that shit fails /constantly/, so you'd better plan on two of everthing for redundancy.

    Now if you're truly outsourcing all of this and therefore feel that you don't eed to worry about the sunk costs, fine, but when you pick the cheapest-of-the cheap bid, that most likely means that they have a crappy DSL out to the 'net that goes down at least once a week for 24 hours at a stretch. "sorry, couldn't {manage your network | take your callcenter calls | upload those CAD files you REALLY REALLY needed by 8AM the next morning} because our local loop was down because some dude running a backhoe trying to upgrade our highway system just yanked our a thousand strands of fiber."

    Oh yeah, there's also the problem that India gov't managed-monolopy telcomm says that you can't terminate out-of-country VoIP calls into the Indian PSTN. So now you need either two phones on every desk, or softphones, or ??. Again, two infrastructures for them to manage. (If, of course, they feel that their wageslaves^H^H^H^H^H employees need to be able to call locally while at work.)

    My guess is that as these hidden 'costs' start to surface, and as the cost of labor increases in India, people will start to move on to the next cheap area. Lather, rinse, repeat, wait a few years, and everything balances out (or so the economists in the group would say??)

    1. Re:cost vs benefit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My current company was trying to set up a new development team in India to replace everybody in head office (Hong Kong).

      But I see they're failing, because:

      1. Current structure is like a mexican army: too many "senior" managers who know nothing (not from IT themselves) and highly paid, only a few good developers.
      2. They can't keep good people.
      3. They complained that they cannot hire people (those they hired left soon after discovering how messy the managers are) and they have to increase pay tremendously so that the remaining few good people would stand their crazy management style.
      4. Although it is easy to hire slightly less experienced people in Hong Kong for quite cheap, the management cannot train them up because of their own poor experience.
      5. They hear that some consulting companies from India can do everything for them without them knowing anything, just too good to be true. So they decided on outsourcing.

      In summary, there was not a lack of good developers in here, there was a lack of good managers.

    2. Re:cost vs benefit by TheSync · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And you are experiencing "reformed" India. It was much worse before 1980, in the days of the "Permit Raj".

  33. Old Boys Bring India into the Club by Quirk · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    The Old Boy network headed up by Britian and the U.S. has officially brought India into the Club (nuclear, economic, military). After the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and in the face of China's rush to prosperity, the Old Boys have made it evident that India is their choice to embrace and extend into the East.

    "Together at last", reads a headline from the Economist in July of this year. Britain and the U.S. have made it clear of late that India is their boy in the East and, no doubt, trade and military agreements will follow to insure India's economic and military position becomes, as much as possible, preemminent.

    The offshoring of IT to India is just a drop in the barrel compared to what will follow in a show of hegemonic, power politics.

    Google turned up a few marginal, but interesting sites that suggest an Anglosphere spin on the spate of recent announcements. I don't doubt that India's success as a rising star in the aftermath of the British Empire will serve it well.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  34. Paying Indian servant peanuts = immoral by cshay · · Score: 1
    Your post forced me to reply even though I have mod points...

    I hate it when people talk about how many cooks/gardners/servants you can afford in India for very little money as an example of the quality of life there. Upper class IT types from India are always bragging about how they live like kings when they go home.

    The thing is, these servants, etc, are BARELY FEEDING THEIR FAMILES on the salary they are given. Not to mention their teeth are rotting out and they are unhealthy. True, they are grateful to not starve, but if you have money, gleaning quality of life on the backs of starving peasants is just wrong.

    Upper middle class Indians who come to the US should be ashamed of themselves for exploiting their peasant brethren like that and then bragging about it. Just because you can live like a king on their backs, doesn't mean you should.

    1. Re:Paying Indian servant peanuts = immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an ethnic Indian who has grown up in the states, but with a lot of family still in India, and with a fair share of my time spent there, I'd like to expound on what I think is the idiocy of the "live like a King" mentality.

      Assuming you make enough money to live luxuriously in even the most cosmopolitan areas, with the servant and driver lifestyle, your home may be just dandy. However, the minute you step outside your abode, you are absolutely 100% immersed in the third world. With all the pollution and sanitation problems, poverty, local corruption, and so on. How fantastic can it really be to have that sphere of "luxury" extend to just your own home?

      Indian nationalists, and friends of mine that have "returned to their roots" by spending a lot of time in India, get angry with me when I point out all the crappiness right outside their front doors. But it is reality and denying it only makes it harder to fix the underlying problems.

      I don't mean to imply the "western" lifetyle is the "correct" one -- in the u.s. there's a lot of selfishness, unnecessary sprawl, and a general lack of the family and cooperative living dynamic that is so common in more humble cultures. However, I enjoy being able to walk anywhere within reason and not have to worry about the pollution or pretend I don't see the pathetic beggars, etc.

    2. Re:Paying Indian servant peanuts = immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree.
            I'm an Indian working in the US, and this is how most Indian workers here think. Earn money in dollars, take it back home (where it turns into a lot), and live like kings without thinking twice about the heartbreaking poverty 2 miles away from their new apartments.
            At least the US citizens are blissfully unaware of all the misery outside their burger-eating, beer-guzzling 50 states.
      -yours AC

    3. Re:Paying Indian servant peanuts = immoral by woolio · · Score: 1

      I am in complete agreement with your reply... You make many good points.

      I mis-read your original message to indicate that you didn't consider the cost of living difference between the two countries (e.g. only the wage difference). I was only trying to point out that a modest salary (by US standards) isn't necessarily so modest in other parts of the world...

  35. more shortage talk by Wansu · · Score: 1



    It's a different angle on the same old labor shortage song and dance. As another poster pointed out, if India can't supply the labor, another country will and they'll do it cheaper. There's still a vast supply of labor in the world.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  36. Re:Lot of assumptions in prediction of "short fall by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm astounded that after all of these India posts on /. and related places there aren't more people chiming in about their experience in India

    I've only spent a week in India myself, but I grew up in SE Asia (Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia). When I was there in the 1970's, Singapore had a rapidly expanding economy, Indonesia was just beginning to cash in on their oil resources, and Malaysia was a pretty sleepy kind of a place, where the average worker had no hope at all of sending his kids to high school, let alone college.

    Today, Singapore is certainly a fully industrialized nation, Malaysia and Indonesia are pretty close, if they're not there yet, and I'm thrilled to see India following suit after about fifty years of stupidly trying to follow the Soviet model of centrally-planned squalor, while the infrastructure the Brits left behind slowly crumbled.

    The people I met in Bangalore, Delhi, and Agra want a better life, and they're willing to work harder to get there than nearly anyone I've ever met in the USA or Europe. They impressed the hell out of me, and I wish them all the prosperity they can achieve.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  37. U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff.. by FeralTitan · · Score: 5, Interesting
    and here are my thoughts
    • 1.Education in India is not 2 year boot camps it is usually 4 years for an education in IT. Also, the reason most of these folks are better than there US counterparts is because the Indian Education System is very difficult.Also, some of the worlds best technical institutes are in India. Ever heard of 'Asok' in Dilbert strips, he was from Indian Inst. of Tech. and he could blow up your head by just concentrating ;)
    • 2.There are really 2 kinds of outsourcing, IT and ITES (or BPO) IT outsourcing is about programming and is called so because it was the first wave well before BPO. When the BPO wave came they decided to call it BPO so that one could differentiate between the two, so folks like you and me could talk about it intelligently.
    • 3.If you cant find people in India, its your head-hunter who is usually to blame. Also, this whole exercise is more complicated than you might at first imagine. For example most Indians don't like to relocate to a different city - they prefer staying with thier families and usually their parents are old and need care.Also, like someone mentioned it is very easy to retrain programmers on other languages etc.
    • 4.This whole discussion is dominated by 'IT' the 2.5 million folks who graduate arent all IT and a lot more than IT is getting outsourced to India now.Trust me it will suprise you what new work is getting outsourced, everything from lawyers to doctors to mathematicians and tutors and ...
    • 5.One of the basic reasons that a US programmer is expensive is because the education is expensive. Why do you want to make knowledge so expensive and inaccesible? Shouldnt education be cheap - bad US govt. policies? Arent you te folks who invented all this free knowledge thingy? Open source and Wikipedia and what not? Well, some advice make it cheap to get trained in the US and do it fast.
    • 6.Employees are not slave drivers in India - most companies have decent office culture and practices.Very uninformed opinnion!
    • 7.I believe that once Asia and Africa are done with, the work will go back to the US - it will be the developing country then. In the next century Asia will completely outrun the US in every walk of life.
    • 8.Someone mentioned that every outsourcing story they heard was a disaster - obviously they havent a clue! :)

    Anyway what do you folks say? ------- Apologies for typos and bad formatting - NO TIME.
  38. A free market needs freedom to work. by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The upshot of increased freedom of trade, is increased wealth overall. ... As their middle class expands, so does their ability to buy goods from the USA and Europe.

    It all depends of freedom.

    Everyone in the USA and Europe already buy all their stuff from China. Unless you count a second rate OS and other increasingly made abroad IP, I'm not sure what there is to buy from US anymore. I wish it were different. IP is a tenuous export at best, but it's a bogus one when it's based on imported research.

    All the money in the world won't really standards of living in China because they are not free. People making goods there will continue to be abused by their owners who pocket it all.

    It only takes one non free country to screw everything for everyone.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:A free market needs freedom to work. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Everyone in the USA and Europe already buy all their stuff from China.

      Nope. Nearly all of the food I buy, for example, is grown or raised in the USA. China isn't an oil exporter, so they're not supplying the gasoline I buy. My car is from a Japanese company, and it was built in the USA. I buy chocolate from the Netherlands. I have dishes that were manufactured in France, and German cutlery. My kitchen appliances are American, and my furniture comes from at least a dozen other countries.

      It only takes one non free country to screw everything for everyone.

      Where did you acquire this habit of proclaiming absolutes like this? It certainly doesn't indicate much of an understanding of economics on your part.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:A free market needs freedom to work. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem with all systems like what China has is that distortions of the free market system due to excessive buraucracies always lead to a collapse of the monetary system. There are signs of this in China already with huge amounts of dead loans. IMHO there will be a huge banking collapse in the next 10-20 years leading to a big change in the government.

      It is only a matter of time and how hard it will hit the rest of the world economies.

      When it is over China will finally be a free nation.

    3. Re:A free market needs freedom to work. by jcr · · Score: 1

      When it is over China will finally be a free nation.

      I'm sure they will, and I hope they get there with a minimum of bloodshed.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:A free market needs freedom to work. by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure what there is to buy from US anymore.

      I should have thought that was obvious - the only two thjings America exports are Gangsta rap and Hollywood movies

      That is why your government is prepared to bend over and let the *AA give it to them.
      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    5. Re:A free market needs freedom to work. by Descalzo · · Score: 1
      "I buy chocolate from the Netherlands."

      You should try Mexican hot cocoa. Try Ibarra. It should be in the foreign foods aisle at your grocery store. You know, by the Mexican soda pop and stuff.

      --
      I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
  39. Remember Japan by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would opine about how India and China are going to become giant behemoths and own everything but I remember Japan. Remember movies about Japan in the 80s? Then remember the Japanese recession?

    China and India are different. I'm just talking about India here.

    Let's be brutally honest: we only outsource to India the dumb shit of life. They are like the Migrant Mexican workers, picking our vegetables or mowing or lawns or making the beds in the hotels: it's just some dumb shit we don't want to do. Calling to dink around with your account or reschedule your flight is just some other dumb shit we don't want to do, so we give it to cheapies cause, you know, what the fuck.

    So, if I was India, I would be extremely scared, because one significant advance in artificial intelligence means everything in India gets re-outsourced to robots. Let's face it, there's nothing an Indian can do that you can't do yourself on a website, barring mere technical limitations.

    Dig it?

    1. Re:Remember Japan by dormant25 · · Score: 1

      So what makes you think you are qualified enough not to be working the dumb shit others are passing around? You think you have an edge over the Indians? And don't talk about Migrant Mexian workers like that, it makes YOU uneducated. You are an immigrant too, even if you are white; you gathered British shit once upon a time (or your parents/grand parents did). You are not capable of doing a good job here, that's why there are people over in India capable of doing it better. I presume you to be a hard-core gamer or a Perl scripter or a *nix hacker or some sort of non-computer science junkie without the bare essentials. If you indeed are not, I apologize. American education system is the dumb shit here; (although the undergraduate system is extremely good - although the computer science department in every university starves to get more intakes/graduates from existing intakes. ) Indian school and college education makes a good graduate - and in numbers that you can't imagine. You probably can't concentrate for two hours straight or think deeply about a problem for a long stretch. That's why you are posting to /. (So am I). So think about what you talk before you post. People like you alway strengthens my views about Slashdot: bunch of sysadmins/gamers/*nix 'lovers'/Microsoft haters/simply-to-prove-they-are-geek, with no fundamentals in computer SCIENCE, let alone programming (which is not *nix hacking nor perl SCRIPTING). And Slashdot serves uniquely to my distaste; feeding me with insensitive comments that make my day up. I hate to reply to moronic posters, but in this case I had to.

    2. Re:Remember Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Indian school and college education makes a good graduate - and in numbers that you can't imagine. You probably can't concentrate for two hours straight or think deeply about a problem for a long stretch.

      The only things Indian undergraduates learn is

      • how to find the one (and only) person in the class who does the homework, and
      • how to copy the homework without being too obvious.

      Am I saying that the Indian universities are bastions of cheating, that 99 of 100 Indian graduates spend most of their time bullshitting with their classmates, almost no time studying, and only a few hours a week copying the already-solved homework problems from 1., above? Yes, I guess I am saying that.

      At least that's how all my Indian roommates described the situation.

    3. Re:Remember Japan by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I would opine about how India and China are going to become giant behemoths and own everything but I remember Japan. Remember movies about Japan in the 80s? Then remember the Japanese recession?

      Most of the predictions *did* happen. It is just that other countries out-Japaned Japan. Manufacturing has been decimated and foriegners own a lot of our realestate. I guess we stopped being alarmed when it became 5 countries doing the gutting instead of 1.

    4. Re:Remember Japan by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Japan had a recession not because of any lack of educational level, technology prowess, or entrepreneurship, but instead because of non-market policies in several key areas.

      Keep in mind that it would not be difficult for the US to adopt non-market policies and go down the same path as Japan or France and into a position of low economic growth. Look at all the anti-Wal-Mart fervor.

    5. Re:Remember Japan by dodobh · · Score: 1

      When you build the AI, let us know, please.

      It is far easier to build manufacturing robots, than to write a decent AI.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    6. Re:Remember Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto with my coworkers. If you act all casual about it and keep the shock off your face they'll open right up.

    7. Re:Remember Japan by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      As long as there is no protectionist policies - what's wrong with people refusing to do business with a private company? I mean, if people are willing to pay more because they dislike Wal-mart for whatever reason, isn't that basically capitalism in action?

      Either Wal-Mart will write off those people, change some things they do, or do some different marketing to try and get them back.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  40. Supply and demand by jd · · Score: 1
    The law of supply and demand requires that demand will always rise to the point that supply is incapable of meeting that demand to such a degree that prices rise to the maximum that the market will bear at that time. If supply exceeds that value, you will get undercutting, which will lead to an artificial inflation of demand until undercutting is no longer feasible.


    In other words, a shortfall is not a product of a particular society or of outsourcing, it is a simple product of economic forces. Or, at least, those forces that lead to stable economies. Most economies are highly unstable, which means that instead of reaching a dynamic equilibrium, they are highly chaotic. Indeed, much of what is known about chaos theory comes from people studying economics, so there have been fringe benefits.


    The instability largely comes from political corruption, monopolies of any kind, insufficient worker protections, price gouging, accounting fraud and other such elements, where the normal feedback mechanisms cannot work or are even actively prevented from working. What you end up with is a positive feedback loop, which leads to the whole boom/bust system that America in particular is infamous for, and which India is likely to lurch into, because it has absolutely no comprehension of the kinds of controls you need to keep the system sane.


    The problem with America is that Government regulators are largely financed by the corporations they regulate. This is like having a computer virus scanner asking a virus if it is present. You think it's ever going to tell the truth?


    India is in a worse mess, because bribes and back-handers are common practice on the sub-continent. That's like installing a computer virus AS the virus scanner. And sooner or later, jobs will migrate to ever more opaque, ever less accountable, ever more corrupt systems, because those are cheap - in the short-term, at least. Corruption is always expensive in the long-term, just not necessarily for the ones guilty of it.


    The only way for India to build a stable economy out of the outsourcing is to have the Government conduct strict, well-defined oversight in a 100% independent fashion. However, that will drive up costs considerably. It will also drive up standards, but accountants don't include standards on the balance sheet and it's the balance sheet that matters. Stability in India will, therefore, effectively end outsourcing there. Which means that India must choose between being popular or being viable. It can't be both.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Supply and demand by TheSync · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The instability largely comes from political corruption, monopolies of any kind, insufficient worker protections, price gouging, accounting fraud and other such elements, where the normal feedback mechanisms cannot work or are even actively prevented from working.

      The most screwed-up economies are the ones that are the most regulated. India's economy before 1980 was very regulated and very screwed up. It would take a year to get a permit to import a computer, thanks to trade protectionism. Now India's economy is only slightly screwed-up as regulation begins to be lifted.

      Regulation always sounds like a great idea. "The market has failures, let's regulate it." Unfortunately, the track record globally is that more regulation tends to damage the working parts of the market more than regulation fixes the failing parts of the market.

      Government regulation has proven to be an incredible tool of corruption, and unlike private corruption, you generally can't get away from government corruption.

  41. Re:U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a difference between a university and a college in the US. It is fairly apparent that India still hasn't embraced a balanced education yet. There is more to learning than focusing solely on your field of study. Well rounded graduates know things like the language they will be using *cough*

  42. It's all about money by Bhrian · · Score: 1

    In a company all-employee meeting last week, a director told us they could get three or four developers or scientists from India for the same cost as one of us. He then proceeded to tell us to expect 'restructuring' in the next six months. At least he was honest. Time to look for a new career...

    1. Re:It's all about money by RembrandtX · · Score: 1

      I had a boss tell once, stupidly, infront of several other folks in our department, [and this was at a fortune 500!] That we were all replaceable, and for far cheaper - we should be GLAD to have jobs, that we should thank her - and if people didn't start doing more overtime to get these [pet] projects done, she would just outsource our jobs overseas.

      2 months later, Her department had gone from 10 people to 6. [all of us that left, had over 5 years exp there.] Three days after I left she was given a 'Promotion' to move from the development team, to a 'special project' involving people-soft. Reports say she couldn't stop walking around the office talking up her new promotion - never once realizing that she was moving from a [formerly] 10 seat department, to a 0 seat department.

      2 weeks after her 'promotion' she suddenly left the company, of her own will of course.

      Apparantly the exit interviews of her former IT staff were not kind, especially the .wav recording that one employee had of her threats to outsource our jobs if we didn't start doing more overtime. Sucks to work in a cube-sea of techgeeks with fancy toys like archos-recorders.

      --

      --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
    2. Re:It's all about money by hughk · · Score: 1

      Sounds a bit like Carly Fiorina, bu on a bigger scale.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  43. universal by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No matter where you come from, where you were educated, if you don't have the two brain cells rubbin together to form innovative solutions to REAL problems people have, you won't get/hold a solid job.

    Simple as that.

    I don't care how many degrees from whatever school you have. If you can't see past the quick buck to real problems and their solutions you're just a tool in my eyes. People look down on Indians and Chinese because they're a dime a dozen [literally and figuratively] but what makes you think your neighbours in your comp.sci classes are any more competent to do productive work?

    I'm all for making money but only off things of value. Otherwise you waste a lot of time trying to sell [re: market] things of substantially lower value [re: intel processors] just to make sure you can stay in business [re: partner with Dell].

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:universal by RembrandtX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      having, in the past, worked with indian call centers, [IE flying to india, and training staff to answer the phones for a previous employer.] The reason I consider Indians a dime a dozen is because they were.

      Literally, we had 10 staffing agencies give us over 10k people to screen. The requirements were as follows :

      Must speak english fluently,
      Must have a degree in computer science,
      Must have call center experience.

      out of the 10k that showed up .. EVERY SINGLE ONE had certificates that said they met all three requirements. [IE Language skill schools certification, degrees, resumes listing years of call center work.] Around the 700th interview, we figured out something was wierd ... the people who had passed english fluency exams, couldn't answer simple questions asked them in english, like 'how old are you' or 'what is your name'. The people with degrees in computer science, had trouble turning on the test PC we had set up, the ones that could turn it on, had problems opening up ACT, or answering a list of simple technical questions we had: [how can you tell if a cat-5 netword card is working, how do you start up a web browser, how do you ping another computer] let ALONE any programming questions. The ones that had call center experience, were having problems transfering a call to another phone, putting people on hold, and dialing another country.

      All in all .. we were mystified, but skeptically drudged through more interviews, somewhere around the 1200 mark, I personally got a guy who spoke decent queens english, was technically compatent, but had only 1 call center job. I asked him, politely, to tell me why i should hire him over the 1200 people i had spoken to so far. His answer was simple :

      'I am actually fluent in english, and I really have my degree - I may only have 1 call center listed on my resume, but I actually worked there - and you can call this number [which was in the UK] to verify that I was employed.' He then went on to tell me that he was SURE that lots of people had impressive references, and said they had degrees etc, but that in India - there was a whole black market of places that would sell you certification for whatever you needed to get a job.

      out of the 10k people they sent us, we barely got 50 .. thats FIFTY .. people who could pass all the tests. [we had been expecting to get 1k easily]

      My personal favorite was a guy who MUST have been 80, who repeated 'Yes, I am perfectly fluent in English.' over and over, no matter what we asked him. [Including when we told him he could leave the interviewing room.]

      The impression we got from the people we hired, was that we were paying very well for a call center, and that many people figured that we would be hiring like any other call center - basically, anyone that breathed. So they just did what they always do, get papers that could be attached to a form that is sent to the US showing they were qualified, and apply for the job.

      Apparantly MOST US and British companies don't actually do what we did. They just hire a local guy to staff their centers for them. Who normally train folks to just read a set of scripts. Anyone will do. [Normally this fellow will take bribes from people desperate for work - to give them the priveledge of working.]

      So when you ask what makes me (personally) think that a guy in a US college class would be more productive, My answer is that at least I have a very high certainty that he really is trained in what his degree is in, and if I am skeptical, I can verify the college is accredited, and call them to check his facts. I can call his previous employers, and although leagally they can't tell me if he was a crappy worker, they can at least verify that he DID work there, and the dates he worked there, how much notice he gave, and what his salary range was.

      He may not work as hard, as some guy in india who REALLY needs the $2 a day, and he may not be as cheap .. but at least I know he speaks english, really has his degree, and could actually DO the job.

      --

      --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
    2. Re:universal by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      hehehehe interesting story.

      I'm not disagreeing that most indian call centres are useless [well actually most call centres period]. Point is though you don't have to look that far to see disappointing employees.

      Having recently [well a year ago] been through the college circuit I can safely say most of my peers are not really working comp.sci jobs at the moment.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  44. Re:U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff by dormant25 · · Score: 1

    I agree with all of the points except for the 7th one. US will not be a "developing" country and Indian will not be a developed country, so to speak - in the future;
    Unless Indian politicians learn to LEARN; and educated people start themselves in the politics; Unless this happens, which is very very far ahead, thanks to idolism and what not, India will not be a developed country;
    I can't see how China can become a developed country, with communism as its foothold; I am not sure this is an accurate statement, but aren't all communist states that suppress free thought doomed to death?
    However all of your points are great, but still you should know that American undergraduate system is one of the best in the world (at least in the university I am studying). I am a transfer student, and I know for sure if my friends over in India had this same education, India would be a super power in another 3 - 6 months.

    Problem is, not many in America are willing to take up the challenges (even simple ones like SAT/GRE/GMAT - sorry to say, I am sure many will reply to this saying they are difficult). People grunt to take up challenges in math/science. However this same problem has allowed other venues: creativity, art, and free thought. This is the strength and disadvantage of the American edu system.

    You would be surprised to know that the computer science demand/supply (in America) is that there is 50 times the demand than the supply. I am not talking about the people who script/hack/program a game; I mean the supply in terms of real computer scientists.

  45. Watch out for the responses: by Travoltus · · Score: 2, Informative

    "ID theft happens far more often in the US/Australia than at some foreign call/data center."

    "Internet ID theft is far more prevalent"

    etc.

    Just so you're well armed for these responses...

    Here is the tale of two data centers, one in Australia and one in India.

    In Australia, a data center manager and its employees are paid more than people overseas; consider what it would cost to bribe them a year's salary. And moreover, they are under the relatively watchful eye of law enforcement. If they steal personal information, they're within the jurisdiction of people who can arrest them and put them away for a long, long time. This makes bribing these workers a lot harder.

    In India, a data center manager and its employees are paid a fraction of what Australians get paid for the same work; consider what it would for the Russian Mafia or Al Qaeda to bribe them a year's salary. And moreover, they are not under the relatively watchful eye of Australian law enforcement. If they steal personal information, they're not within the jurisdiction of people who have any reason to arrest them. This makes bribing these workers a lot easier. Plus, it is easier for a bribed worker to disappear within India, or even move out of the country, than Australia. (Aside from the water surrounding Australia, India's borders aren't exactly locked up.)

    Now some people will tell you that India data center workers aren't allowed to bring in potential tools for stealing data. But here's the kicker. I can memorize your name, SSN and mother's maiden name, and tell it back to you in a day. If I can do it, others can probably remember several for a long period of time. It's nothing for the mafia or Al Qaeda to train people to do that. And again, if you're paid a year's salary to cough up so many names, and you're a low paid shill in a piece of shit job, you'll do it for that kind of money. And if the data center manager gets tapped, all security is moot. You can also bribe the security workers, considering how poorly they're paid. Once they're paid off, anyone can walk in and out of there with tools to steal data.

    The problem here is, the price for owning the person who has the keys to a data center's hidden treasures, is very low.

    Thus, you now not only have domestic ID theft, internet theft, and dumpster diving, but you can also add offshore theft - which is far harder for your country to prosecute - to the mix.

    How many straws can a camel carry on its back?

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  46. Outsourcing lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I think that most states require those that practice law in court to have passed the state's bar, and the standards for the bar include arbitrary requirements to prevent inexpensive offshore competition. Thus only paralegal work can usefully be sent offshore.

    This is a situation that really ought to be fixed. Outsourcing lawyers would likely be a tremendous boon to the US economy. It would discourage some of our most talented college graduates from pursuing a career which is of marginal (and possibly negative) benefit to society, and reduce the strength of the lawyer's lobby in the US which keeps many of our legal codes too complicated to be understood without plenty of expensive legal assistance. Finally, it would make our businesses more competitive by reducing the "lawyer tax" they pay for doing business here in the United States.

    Unfortunately, the people we'd have to convince to make this happen tend to be lawyers themselves.

    1. Re:Outsourcing lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestly, lawyer is not considered a prestigous career in India. Lawyers setup booths along the streets in busy markets just like food vendors.

    2. Re:Outsourcing lawyers by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Here is how it works.

      One US "face".
      20 foreign lawyers trained in the states laws prepare the paperwork.
      The US "face" presents the paperwork in court.

      It is decimating the paralegal profession.

      XRay analysis is another area.

      I have no problems with this. The PROBLEM is that while our XRAY analysis should drop and our legal bill should drop, they keep charging US rates while paying indian rates for the work.

      IT's like the way we pay 20 dollars for the same DVD they sell in china for 2.50.
      At some point, it WILL even out.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re:Outsourcing lawyers by aneeshm · · Score: 0

      Funnily enough , my grandfather , now a retired judge , was , once upon a time a lawyer , and he never had to set up a booth on the side of the road . Nor do any of the lawyers I know . In fact , I have never seen a "lawyer booth" in my life . Nor has anyone I know .

      Finally , I conclude - you're bullshitting . I do not like such stupid lies spread about my country .

    4. Re:Outsourcing lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in North America we DO have lawyers who setup shop at the side of the road. And in malls. And hospital waiting rooms. Heck, the term "ambulance chaser" originated somewhere. Not to defend the OP gerneralizations though. He might've been talking about dentists.

  47. wonderful employment news by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    all the $10K/year, no-benefits programming jobs any country could every want and then some!

  48. No limit to greed!!! the latest injoke. by DoTheRightThing · · Score: 2, Funny
    One day, three consultants, each one from WIPRO, INFOSYS and IBM, went out for a walk.

    They were old buddies from Engg college, and they were together for a college reunion..

    For no apparent reason, they went into this zoo and passed a monkey.

    Being in the same business and from the same college, there was a little bit of a peer competition going on between themselves - they couldn't resist testing themselves against each other -

    especially the Infosys guy said to the others: "Why don't we prove who is the best among ourselves?". Why not, said the other two.

    The Infoscion said "Let's have a test. Whoever makes this monkey laugh, works for the best firm".

    By mutual agreement, the Infoscion took the first turn. Being a pure logical strategist, the Infoscion tried to make the monkey laugh by telling jokes. The monkey stayed still.

    As a more practical consultant, the Wipro guy tried to make funny gestures... no good, the monkey stayed put...

    Now, comes the IBMer... being the practical guy he was always trained to be, he whispered something into the monkey's ear, and it burst out laughing at him.

    The other two were astonished. How did this IBM guy manage to beat them?

    No way they were going to accept defeat so easily. So the Wipro guy said "OK, let's take another test. Let's make this monkey cry! !"

    So there they went again, applying! the same methods as before.

    The Infosys guy narrated sad stories, the Wipro guy made sad gestures,and they failed again... Then, the IBMer again whispered something into the monkey's ear and lo! It started crying, patting the IBMer's shoulder!

    The other two just could not believe their eyes! So the Infoscion said "OK, you've won twice. If you can win just this one, we will bow to you. Let's make this monkey run". And he barked at the monkey and ordered him to run. Of course, it stayed where it was.

    The Wipro guy, true to his type, pushed and prodded the monkey - still No go.

    So...here comes our IBM guy, again, and whispers into the monkey's ear. The monkey just takes off! It runs and runs as fast as it can, as if it was scared to death!

    The other two surrendered. Said they: "OK, we give up.You're the best among us, and you work for the Best firm of the three.

    But please, please tell us your secret," they begged him.

    "Well", said the IBMer, "The first time I made it laugh, I told it I work for IBM.

    The next time, I told the monkey how much I get paid...so it started crying.

    And finally I told him that I was here for recruitment.

  49. Re:Lot of assumptions in prediction of "short fall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thus the interesting mod instead of insightful or informative.

  50. Re:U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    China isn't meaningfully Communist any more, and hasn't been for some time. It's totalitarian-capitalist -- and as much as those of us who live in (more or less) capitalist (more or less) democracies might like to believe otherwise, totalitarianism and capitalism can get along perfectly well together. The deal is, basically, "We'll let you make money as long as you keep your mouth shut; otherwise we'll have to kill you."

    Conclusions about the convergence of China and the US are left as an exercise to the reader.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  51. Re:Gee, way to be completely redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And not say anything meaningful.

    Just a bunch of whining and pointless appeals to nationalism. Fucking foreigners.

  52. True For Some Languages, But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A good programmer can become up to speed in a new language in a matter of days.

    Obviously you've never tried to learn Prolog!-))

  53. Re:U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1.Education in India is not 2 year boot camps it is usually 4 years for an education in IT. Also, the reason most of these folks are better than there US counterparts is because the Indian Education System is very difficult.Also, some of the worlds best technical institutes are in India. Ever heard of 'Asok' in Dilbert strips, he was from Indian Inst. of Tech. and he could blow up your head by just concentrating ;)


    I disagree. I've run into a few very good engineers (yes, they were from IIT) but I've also run into hundreds of worthless engineers from lesser known educational institutions. Stanford, MIT, etc and our neighbors up there at Waterloo aren't exactly standing still. If you want the best engineers around, the Eastern Europeans make Indian engineers look lame in the areas of software and mathematics. There are a number of state schools such as Purdue, Michigan, Chicago, etc that have good programs.

    8.Someone mentioned that every outsourcing story they heard was a disaster - obviously they havent a clue! :)


    Oh really? I wouldn't say every outsourcing project has been a disaster, but two Fortune 100 companies in my area are moving quite a few (>1000 on two projects) jobs back to the states since Indian software teams (and US management) couldn't seem to get it together.

    Everybody conveniently forgets that India, like all countries, has problems. Never mind the fact that a shitload of them still subsistence farm, have no safety net and live in poverty. Just forget that they still have a caste system with endemic corruption that makes Bush/Diebold look like Mary Poppins. Just let's drop the fact that they're still fussing with Pakistan and that both countries are nuke armed yet don't have nearly the level of early warning systems that the US and Russia had during the cold war. They can't even stop breeding like rabbits over there!

    Outsourcing will continue.. but every time I hear somebody bleating about the Indian "SuperEngineers" I have to laugh. They're people, that's it. I know US engineers who are just as dedicated, and surprise, they're all employed.

    7.I believe that once Asia and Africa are done with, the work will go back to the US - it will be the developing country then. In the next century Asia will completely outrun the US in every walk of life.


    Riiiight. That will happen as soon as India gets down to a sustainable population. In other words: never. China has the balls to control their population growth. India would do well to learn from this.
  54. Idea by Sterling2p · · Score: 1

    IMHO I would like to see the US try minimum wage for other countries with companies who outsourced jobs. When a company can hire me, or someone in a less developed country for only like $1 less than I make, then we will see what happens. That might put an end to the sweat shop overseas mentality.

    The people who are worth it over there, will get the job and the money they deserve with witch they can improve their home country.

    Another problem that I see, is that the products that we work to produce here in the US, who can offord them outside of the top few countries with the prices that are charged?

  55. Are you feeling motivated now? by The+Mutant · · Score: 1

    That "director" sounds like a dork.

    Everyone at that company who can will immediately find another job, and they'll be left with the dregs, probably the very people they didn't want to keep in the first place.

    I wouldn't go so far as to find another career. Just find a company that values you as an employee, and doesn't rub your face in the obvious (engineers are cheaper in India).

    What a clueless fuckwit that guy is.

    1. Re:Are you feeling motivated now? by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 1

      We just had an all employee meeting in tech support. Some high level assface came to town, and told everybody that we're toast.

      The point was, that no matter what skill level we possess, our customers won't pay for it. If we could get a ferret to answer the phone, and do it for cheaper than India, we'd do that.

      I personally believe the point is to make customers stop calling, because no calls is cheaper than crappy calls.

      The arrogance that the customer will buy on cost, no matter how they're treated, is amazing.

      We asked, is our company interested in retaining the skills that we have? Nope. You're too expensive. Take an 80% paycut, and you become cost competitive. But, we don't want you, even if you COULD take that pay cut.

      Oh, and no raises. We don't want you to think that we value you. Please quit, it's cheaper than paying severance packages.

      --
      My mom says I'm cool.
  56. Re:Lot of assumptions in prediction of "short fall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Walmart-ization of the IT (and non-IT) outsourced industry"

    sisaukapalli1, you just had the smartest idea on /. today! Damn, man, it's not every day I learn a novel concept. It's so freaking obvious now that you said it.

    Insightful posts like yours make me read slashdot.

    Come pick up a medal!

  57. Re:Lot of assumptions in prediction of "short fall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as I know (from cousins, friends, and general chat from India), there is still a strong demand for the outsourced jobs. Almost tens of resumes per open position, so the prediction of "short fall" looks to be based on shaky ground.

    It is your argument that appears to be on shaky ground. A majority of those resumes likely come from already employed workers looking for a better deal, which is exactly the kind of behavior one would expect if there is a short fall of qualified workers.

  58. Cute, but obtuse. by UncleRage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First things first: Your micro-rant, while cute and seemingly poignant is actually nothing but a simple troll. And while I realize it's best not to feed the trolls, not everything blatantly stupid should go unanswered.

    When dealing with something as complex as economics, nothing is quite as simple as "So, how do you like it now?". Outsourcing of jobs from the United States to India doesn't just mean more money in India, period. What it actually means is less income in the United States to afford the products that many of these (outsourced) jobs in India were created to support.

    Understand?

    By moving a sizable portion of middle income generating positions to another country, we are not spreading any wealth; only distributing new vistas of poverty to our own people.

    Do you get it?

    Fewer dollars generated in the United States does not mean secure fiscal longevity for another nation. What it means is that when the United States becomes a middle classless society, India will go back to where they were before the mass corporate migration: one billion odd people struggling to find a place in the global economy.

    You simply cannot build a solid economic base on cheap labour alone.

    --
    #SickNotWeak
  59. In other news .. by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    In another news item, the Economist reports that in 2050, there will be 8 billion Indian IT workers employed.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  60. The numbers do not lie by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1
    Go see for yourself, direct from IEEE:

    "2004 saw 220,000 fewer employed U.S. electrical engineers than in 2000, despite falling unemployment, according to BLS data." http://www.todaysengineer.org/2005/Sep/pulse.asp

    Notible things are that the US Department of Labor statistics which are stating that there are more engineering jobs are really not tracking that. They are tracking that a person who has an engineering degree and worked as such until he/she was laid-off simply has a "job" (any job, flipping burgers, parking cars, clearing tables, etc.), so the data there can only simply state that these engineers have found a way to gain some form of income, nothing other then that.

    The only area where I can say that a US engineering job is secure is in the defense sector where the engineers are required to be a US citizen to obtain a security clearance. If you are working anywhere else, well, you are replacible by a H1B or off-shoring of the department.

    Now speaking about the department of labor:

    "Employment of materials engineers is expected to grow more slowly than the average for all occupations through 2012." http://stats.bls.gov/oco/ocos034.htm

    "Employment of aerospace engineers is expected to decline over the projection period." http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos028.htm

    "Employment of civil engineers is expected to increase more slowly than the average for all occupations through 2012." http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos030.htm

    "Employment of electrical and electronics engineers is expected to grow more slowly than the average for all occupations through 2012." http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos031.htm

    " As with other information technology jobs, employment growth of computer software engineers may be tempered somewhat by an increase in contracting out of software development abroad." http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos267.htm

    "Computer hardware engineers may face competition for jobs because the number of degrees granted in this field has increased rapidly and because employment is expected grow more slowly than average." http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos266.htm

    "Overall engineering employment is expected to grow more slowly than the average for all occupations over the 2002-12 period. Engineers tend to be concentrated in slow-growing manufacturing industries, a factor which tends to hold down their employment growth. Also, many employers are increasing their use of engineering services performed in other countries." http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos027.htm

    Now, why don't we start this conversation again. The jobs for US engineers are simply not there. The companies that can off-shore, have been doing so, claiming that there are not enough US engineers. The IEEE charts show that there are about 120,000 EE's over the last 4 years out there who are not employed as EE's anymore. Yes, a portion of that may have died, gone to management, etc., but I would suggest that there is probably 50% of that number who would still work as an EE if the job opertunity was there... This is the reason why their salaries have not increased as "demand" increases, because the demand is false.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    1. Re:The numbers do not lie by dormant25 · · Score: 1

      You are talking about EE people, talk about sincere science people.
      Here is the definitive link: http://oea.cs.utexas.edu/pdfs/us-jobs-3.pdf

      Yeah this is a single University's external affairs office's report; but google "Demand for CS students exceeds supply". It really is true! Your point is valid considering other fields though, in engineering; for e.g. electrical/electronics/aeronautical.

  61. "We don't want another India" by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 1

    I was just in a meeting where we were told that India wasn't going to stay competitive cost-wise.

    So, we need to find companies to outsource to in countries that won't have a lot of competition.

    They didn't mention telecom costs. In India, everybody wants the stuff, so they can charge what they want. But if you go where there are no companies to compete with, you bring new jobs, the government will pay for your telecom.

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
  62. From a purely monetary sense, they'd be crazy to. by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 1


    Disclaimer: I hate this situation with a passion. I've trained the outsourcer that replaced my friends, stuck on conference calls with people that have no interest in the product, just getting more business.

    BUT

    From a money-only view, the US manager's job is only to cut costs. It's where their bonuses come from.

    Therefore, they COULD hire from the home country, and be expensive. OR they could get an outsourcer to do it, and get a huge bonus. AND if you're smart, you hire a middle-of-the-road outsourcer this year, and then begin pushing it to the cheaper one next year to show how good you are at cutting costs.

    There is no loyalty to anybody. Their shareholders expect higher rate of return, which means more profit from lower costs.

    These guys know their jobs are going to disappear at some point, so they're collecting bonuses and stock options.

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
  63. IT Jobs, dead and cold in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA based IT jobs will essentially leave the USA for India and other cheaper countries. Only a few network cable pullers, at $8 an hour, will be left in a few years. Just about any job paying 1.5x over India basic IT wages will go to India. $20,000 US is about what the remaining USA based IT jobs will pay.

  64. Re:U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff by comradTaco · · Score: 1
    Employees are not slave drivers in India
    While India's growth makes it an economic and political player to watch in the next decades, the country remains desperately poor. Almost a quarter of India's 1.1 billion people live on less than $1 a day; 700 million more live on less than $2 a day.
  65. hypocrisy? by mayhemt · · Score: 0

    To the overlords who claim outsourcing to be bad...ask this yourself .. if walmart has 300GIG hard drive for 10$...& circuit city has the same shit for 100$? where would you buy? Obviously walmart..right? but you know walmart has low technical expertise when it comes to harddrives & other geek stuff? But you are compromising yourself on walmart's customer rep's expertise becos 10$ sounds sweet to you & u r confident that you can play with jumper settings & cables. Do you think about circuitcity executive who will be out of work becos John Doe decided not to buy from them? same example, replace stores with countries, harddrive with labour, you will get the point. second, whos responsible for driving companies to outsourcing business? they fear bankruptcies & legal complications from employees & most importantly **COST**.. kill the hypocrisy & buy harddrive from walmart. i understand some modders see this as flamebait/offtopic as well..go ahead..i couldnt stand the hypocrisy..

    1. Re:hypocrisy? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      In your example, the hard drive costs ten times at citcuit city as wal-mart. In the case of outsourcing, the overall cost of outsourcing saves only 15% on large deployments, and much less on smaller deployments. It can even cost more to outsource than to have local workers in smaller deployments. Plus you have the headaches of trying to support a remote operation with little control over who you are dealing with.
      Think about this, would you rather pay $100 for a hard drive at Circuit City, with a known support network, or $90 at Wal-mart, with nothing but a return policy?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  66. Re:Lot of assumptions in prediction of "short fall by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Resume counts mean nothing if your job requirement is 5 years experience adminstering Windows XP.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  67. Re:U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the basic reasons that a US programmer is expensive is because the education is expensive.

    I'd have to disagree. The basic reason that a US programmer is expensive is that the standard of living in the US is a lot higher, especially in the locations where most corporations have setup shop. This is hardly surprising, given that in the past programmers were a relatively rare commodity and so they developed rather exaggerative salaries (dotcom bubble). Further, companies had to be in larger metrapolitain areas to be take seriously or cities virtually grew around many corporations that clustured together. As a result, the communities they live in/move to have gained rather distorted salary demands due to property rates. Simply moving a corporation to the middle of nowhere would greatly reduce salary demands of the *many* people who are interested in a job. This is the basis for calls to "outsource to rural America".

    It sounds like in India it is the case that many people are unwilling to move from where the live but the population density is so high that one can basically go anywhere and find enough people to form a development team. As a result, there isn't a sharp rise in salary demands because the excess spending money of these programmers ends up being distributed around the country instead of a few hotspots.

    A similar idea could be constructed in the US by simply locating a broad area with programmers and setting up multiple development houses spread out across the area. Think of it as software franchising. Such places would then be capable of meeting the demands of one or more companies in projects--whether it'd be better if each franchise only served one company or was effectively a contractor isn't clear to me. This alone would greatly reduce the rates of development costs in the US. In the end, the greater wealth of India and shortage of programmers there (long-term ones, I mean) will require some means of utilizing the relatively untapped multitude of individuals who need not live in the most expensive parts of the US. I think outsourcing to both areas is a good idea.

    --
    Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  68. Head West young man by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    New US IT graduates may be able to find programming jobs in India. If the "glamour" jobs all go to the multinational firms there, then perhaps local governments etc. will have a hard time competing. If India allows reverse H1B's (B1H), then perhaps a newbie can get experience in such a shop. Sure, the pay might suck, but you gotta start somewhere.

  69. Putting all eggs in one basket by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I think it is a mistake to put all your economic eggs into IT. Lack of diversification has kicked many economies and many peoples many times. India should push for more accountants, legal experts, graphics specialists, etc.

    Not only will that offer career diversity, but make it possible to use such skills for the home market as well if foreign markets go south.

  70. Re:U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont agree with a few of these points. For the record I wnet to grad school in the US and worked there for a few years before deciding to move to India.

    People here ARE willing to re-locate. I live in Bangalore and this city is nothing like it was a few years ago. Bangalore was a predominantly South Indian city a few years ago but today there is a wide variety of folks living here - Bengalis, Maharashtrians, Punjabis, Oriyas...etc. So many people are willing to move

  71. PHB + H1B = SOL by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I suspect that the industry agenda is to continue to have a huge surplus of applicants (or even increase the applicants to positions ratio), so that they can put a downward pressure on the salaries. I'd call it Walmart-ization of the IT (and non-IT) outsourced industry.

    Just like the H1B lobby did here in the US. India, welcome to "free trade". Capitalism does NOT guarentee equality. If it happened that way in the past, it was because we were lucky.

  72. Re:Lot of assumptions in prediction of "short fall by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I go through at least 40 or 50 resumes in the US (Metro NYC area) to find one person worth hiring. And these are resumes that have been supposedly pre-screened by headhunters....

    Let me guess, you are looking for somebody who knows all your company's languages, knows all your company's methodologies, and thinks exactly like you do.

  73. Re:U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    these folks are better than there US counterparts is because the Indian Education System is very difficult.

    That is hogwash. Most software developers don't do stuff they learned in school anyhow. I learned most of my early programming writing hobby games.

    I believe that once Asia and Africa are done with, the work will go back to the US - it will be the developing country then. In the next century Asia will completely outrun the US in every walk of life.

    Perhaps, but at least us IT'ers won't be treated like agricultural workers anymore.

  74. Sex, Drugs, and Rock-n-Roll by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    How long before western junk-pop influences screw up the population of India? When they start sipping from the Goblett of Globalization, the final destination may not be what they expected.

  75. Re: you dont get it... reaaally!!! by azmeith · · Score: 2, Informative

    Honestly I am sick and tired of people ranting about '4 year degrees' from India and incompetent or unqualified programmers/workers from India. The very same people whose ideas about India are pretty much restricted to the Taj Mahal and Bangalore in spite of the fact that they could not point out both their locations on a map of India the size of the empire state building with both places marked in 2000pt arial black.

    4 year degrees in India are _not_ like 2 year boot camps, they are quite focused, well designed and well executed programs, and I did not even go to an IIT or a tier 1 school in India! Education in India is quite difficult, simply because of the extreme competition every student faces from the 100 million other students, the fact that the coursework is tougher does play some part though. Parents are focused on education and education only, hence the complete insignificance of college/university level sports and/or other activities. The problem you guys face is that its too damn expensive here. My entire college expenses, including living away from home was approx. $1200. As a result almost anybody who can make the cut can afford it. So dont blame the Indian education system for the lack of a job inspite of your expensive education.

    Regarding incompetent, inexperienced workers, well considering the large number of qualified workers produced, per the law of averages quite a few will be bad programmers, and stating that its an Indian issue, is not only unfair, its blatantly uninformed. The same statistics apply everywhere. The number of absolutely incompetent American/western programmers I have seen is quite unbelievable considering their '$100,000' education. At least Indian universities do not charge that much for a job screwed up (well some do, but they are usually reserved to educate Indians residing in the US).

    Re: Only drudge work gets outsourced, of course on /. you only hear about programming/IT outsourcing, but if you actually watched some 'news' instead of relying on a bunch of bloggers alone, you might realize that its not just call centers and programming shops, a whole bunch of financial analytics work, medical diagnostic work, even Hollywood animation stuff gets outsourced to India. And oh btw re: the comment about paralegals and drudge work, find out how much a paralegal with your experience makes, and you will realize the futility of your chosen vocation to provide you with a reasonable income.

    I agree that quite a few outsourcing projects failed miserably. However AFAIK in most cases they fail not because of incompetent Indian workers but simply because the it being applied to the wrong fucking problem. You cant just use a tool/process willy-nilly because its inexpensive and expect it succeed. On the other hand I know of quite a few that succeeded in spite of that. Go figure!

    The comment regarding the infrastructure issues are correct, however that does not seem to have stopped organizations from delivering. BPO providers have usually figured out ways to deal with government incompetence, and will continue to do so until the Indian govt. gets off their lazy asses and does something about it. Fortunately or unfortunately we have a _real_ multi-party democracy which means things get done slowly but when they get done they get done right.

    Finally you might be surprised to know that there are Americans interning in India:
    http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/08/10/business/in tern.php
    http://www.uh.edu/ednews/2005/nytimes/200508/20050 810india.htm
    http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,47435,00 .html

    So before you go off on India and Indians take step back and actually bother to find out wtf you are talking about, even if you are posting on /.

  76. Ind by sujies · · Score: 1

    For all those who think indians are fit for backoffice jobs

    Find out the percentage of indians in NASA who are scientists

    Im from bangalore and the social standing of these BPO workers is not very great they are seen as losers except may be by their own parents

    Everything is not rosy in a BPO job,, ive seen many who got Diabetes, Blood Pressure, Mentally disturbed, Chain Smoke, Discontinue Studies, become obese etc a by-product of the Late-Night life and Stressful job

    1. Re:Ind by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Everything is not rosy in a BPO job,, ive seen many who got Diabetes, Blood Pressure, Mentally disturbed, Chain Smoke, Discontinue Studies, become obese etc a by-product of the Late-Night life and Stressful job

      Welcome to the American way :-)

  77. Re:U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think that you are outright lying, or are very misinformed.

    I am Indian and I currently live in the US, but I visit there every 2 years. My uncles have very prestigous positions at Indian universities (BHU, IIT Bombay, IISC) and one family member is a principal of a local college that has a specialization in "IT". I am well informed and well connected.

    I also have a degree in EE with several years of hardware/software design and I've worked "IT" for many years as well. This means I can tell first hand if someone knows what they're talking about or not.

    I can tell you first hand that the Indian education system *IS NOT* what you make it out to be. The Indian pre-college education system is pretty rigourous, but it also HEAVILY emphasizes memorization and not learning. Indians are excellent at math, but the ratio of creative thinking Indians is low. Getting into colleges means years of "preparing" for various exams which emphasize memorized learning.

    Engineering and problem solving requires out-of-box thinking, and that's why Indians frequently don't excel at anything non-theory.

    I want to refute a few of your points:

    #1 is just plain wrong.

    I visited a few colleges that have IT progams and I saw people memorizing lines of code to recite them for exams. Some of these people were in CS programs and hadn't even written a program on their own. They could sure tell me if an algorithm was O(n) or O(n^2) but they couldn't tell me how to debug hardware or software.

    When I tried to cajole them into learning things that weren't in their cirriculum (like learning Apache or Linux system administration), I got blank stares and poked fun at. Yeah, who'll be laughing when your Microsoft IIS server gets rooted? Think everyone with a paper degree gets a job? Not when 10 guys are competing for the same job.

    If the Indian education system is so awesome, why do all the professors at the *TOP* Indian universities all have Masters + PhDs from *US* institutions?

    #5

    US programs are "expensive", because among other reasons, we don't live in a shithole, plain and simple. We have environmental laws, a sanitary standard of living, standards of business ethics and so on. It isn't acceptable for people here to just piss on the walls of our college, but you see that daily, even at IISc! (Yes, I saw this and even took pictures I was so blown away by it).

    India has enormous health issues with a lot of resource scarcity (which will only get worse). In the US we can breath for the most part, in India, everytime I go, I have to wear a mask to keep out all the air pollution. Water pollution is just unspeakable, if you don't drink boiled, filtered water (or buy bottled water) you'll be sick for a week. Even when I was extra cautious, I managed to get sick several times my last visit.

    #6

    As far as outsourcing goes, the only people who aren't being slave driven are the ones doing the slave driving. I've seen first hand heard of how companies burn and churn (I've talked to people who run the companies and people who've left them). When you do someone else's dirty work, it's still dirty work.

    With all the bribe taking that happens there, it's a miracle anything gets done.

    Many of the Indians I know that have migrated from India to the US tell me they hate it when they go back, they now realize how bad the infrastructure there is. That infrastructure is only going to get worse.

    In ten years I wonder what kind of life people in India will have. You may have jobs, but if you have no resources left, what kind of life will it be?

  78. Re:U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most of what you say is true.

    I've worked with indian programmers and they are decent to good.

    Couple points.
    1) Yes the indian system is so hard that many commit suicide. The japanese used to do this to, once their standard of living came up they got lazy like americans and said, Why are we sacrificing our children to advance- we have advanced far enough.
    2) Yes the indian system is hard, so we are seeing the best and brightest- there are only so many best and brightest- as a result wage increases of 18% were observed last year.
    3) At that rage, we see loss of savings in 4 years and wage PARITY in 12 years or less.
    4) The u.s. will not be a 3rd world country in 12 years.
    5) Asia is not going to continue advancing forward without some kind of a setback. And the last time they had a setback in China, they killed about 95% of the people with any kind of education.

    So...
    Wages will rise there (yea!)
    India will have to deal with hyperinflation- taxes will skyrocket, the cost of kheer will go through the roof (It'll be 5 bucks a serving like it is here).
    Some programmer jobs will continue to require american programmers and american business is going to have to face up to the fact that they are destroying that class of jobs- when they need them back, they'll be expensive to fill - and it won't get better because our population of workers is dropping now and will continue to drop for the next 15 years. After a mild recession next year and a harsh recession in 2010, 2011, it's going to be pretty nice for about 5 years.

    6) Indian companies engage in very blatant age discrimination- so I expect they'll start dumping their guys as they approach 40 or 45 just like americans do.
    ---
    But he is right- outsourcing works often. But it is sold as saving 50% of cost sand it is looking like it is really saving 15% as projects are being delivered- still a huge amount but very little inflation will close that gap.

    And finally- business is lying it's ass off to american programmers- the line is "You be the senior and they will do the code" but any fool can see, in 3 years business things "and then you'll be gone and they'll be the senior coders.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  79. Re:U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Last year's average wage inflation in india was 18%.

    I would call that a "sharp rise" if I got that on my salary.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  80. Re:U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The indian education system is still a fairly pure meritocracy.

    For example, in the US, we might allow folks who make an "A" to go to a special school.
    And once enough "A"'s had applied, the school would be full.

    In India, you would take a test, and the top 70 scorers get to go- even if 180 of them made A's. Not first come first serve- the top.

    I have been told that that concept starts early- by the end of highschool you are either going to a trade school, going to college, or ineligable for further education- all the basis of testing.

    It's very harsh and a lot of high school students commit suicide when they realize their life is over before it started (they should probably come to the US instead of killing themselves- here if you have drive you can always succeed).

    But that means, that the people who make it through college, are smart and exceedingly driven compared to a similar groups of americans who were not culled so severely.

    But it's like a mono culture vs a sexual culture.
    If the environment is well defined, they can master it. Once we are thrown back into an undefined environment, it may be different.

    But do -not- under estimate indian programmers- a lot of them are competent and they are getting experience now.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  81. Chennai by murali_tj · · Score: 1

    Economist is wrong in one way. Chennai is not a second tier city. It is now among the same league as the first tier cities in India. Check out this http://www.tidelpark.com/index.asp

  82. Mod parent down by mlewan · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There is nothing interesting there.

    That there among 100 million East Europeans are different kinds of IT people can hardly be any surprise.

    That some of them are unemployed is hardly surprising, considering that there are unemployed people all over the world. That this is the cause for a statistically higher amount of virus production is just a wild guess.

    That companies would turn to Eastern European workers only when there are no Indian workers left is blatantly false. There is already outsourcing going on from Western to Eastern Europe. Besides, the Indian market is unlikely to ever run out of workers. They may temporarily run out of workers with the right skills, but as long as the skills are well defined, they have the resources to teach them to millions of new students each year.

    The only interesting thing in the post is the strange definition of Eastern Europe as being former Soviet Block countries and their neighbours. This would inlcude Finland, Germany, Turkey, Afghanistan and China, just to mention a few.

  83. . . . . . but don't forget Indian history by aneeshm · · Score: 0

    What you say is true from a purely factual point of view .

    Yet again , I advise you to remember Indian history . Turning what you call shit ( funnily enough , Bill Gates ( in spite of any other flaws he may or may not have ) had once said that these same things are not "shit" , they are called opportunities ) into the purest gold is that India has historically been good at . India has a rich history of monopolising ( due to advantages of scale ) the markets with the highest value-addition ( such as fine textiles , and other luxury items of the times ) . As an interesting aside , the lotus , which is considered a sacred/holy flower in India , is representative of the Indian tradition of making even brackish water and mud noble , and being untouched by the dirt around you .

    These low-end things are only considered a stepping-stone to past glory . A highly trained workforce can be easily turned to industries of higher and higher value addition . That is the workforce this BPO boom is providing us with . Soon , we will move up the value chain .

    Of course , it is unfortunate that , knowing human nature , the real backlash against outsourcing will begin only then - when upper management realise that Indian corporations which rode the crest of the BPO wave are now not content with just business processes , and are looking to remove the P from BPO .

    But by then , it will be too late to remedy the situation , as India will have sufficient capital , infrastructure , and highly-skilled labour ( all provided to us by the kind countries who outsourced their "shit" to us ) to make the backlash irrelevant .

    But then again , this is only what I can foresee based on what we did in the past .

  84. Re: you dont get it... reaaally!!! by loveguru · · Score: 1

    >> So dont blame the Indian education system for the lack of a job inspite of your expensive education.

    The question is not about blaming.The question is about the wastefulness of the Indian education system.Dont say I dont know.I have had my so called education from an IIT and I know what indian education is like.Yes,I understand there is heavy competetion -but for what.For proving yourself as the best idiot.Yes,I mean every word of it.

    Regarding incompetent, inexperienced workers, well considering the large number of qualified workers produced, per the law of averages quite a few will be bad programmers,

    And for outsourcing.the only reason is this - You can get indian labour at 1/50th the wages that an average american demands.And they meekly will be at your feet.This is the only reason for outsourcing to India and nothing else.

  85. An unbiased experience with offshoring ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I manage a 20 people programming team, and about 50% of it is in India. We pay quite well there by Indian stds. Tell you what, there is barely a difference in the productivity of the people here and there.

    Here as the facts from my experience:

    - Indian grads from decent schools are quite good at CS knowledge. Yes, they are getting expensive though. The cost difference is currently around 50% and shrinking.

    - It is much more efficient and economical for me and my company to get the work done there. (Whether I like it or not is my personal issue, and I don't let that affect professional decisions.)

    - Those guys are initially not good at non-technical parts like business communication, requirements etc. But if you choose smart people as links between the two teams, things work out very well.

    - 3 to 5 years back, it used to be that senior programmers from here would drive the technical work and junior programmers in India did the grunt work. Now most of the offshore team is still the same and they know the system better than we do here. So they now drive a big chunk of the work.

    - I see many of the senior guys here now acting just as communication channels and most of the design/coding/testing work being done by the team in India. Eventually the guys here become "overheads"

    - In India those guys are hungry for good work and willing to work much harder to learn new stuff. When some new work comes up, I have to find people here willing to do it. Over there, there is a rush to pick up work. Makes me worry...

    - In another 3 years, most "programmers" here will be rusted and totally useless for technical work, and I might be totally dependent on India team.

    - Most of the offshoring projects we do are successful. The percentage of success at both places is very comparable. But then we treat both the teams equally well and treat people as individuals and not as resources.

  86. Re: you dont get it... reaaally!!! by evanism · · Score: 0

    Azmieth is absolutely right.

    What I am reading here in this entire discussion is outright racism, pure and simple. Indian education is no worse than any other system in any other country, and claiming the US system is "superior" is simply rubbish.

    Why is it rubbish? Because if there wasn't parity with quality, ragrdless of price, then US companies wouldn't be outsourcing its people... or are all here saying US companies are OK with receiving crap? (be careful here, because if this is your answer it means "you" must have been the most tollerable crap for the "old" price...)

    As for price, isn't this the determinate of a strong competitive economy? Competitive... for an industry that is barely 15 years old... think about how dynamic this is!!!

    Think of every industry.. cars, manufacturing, the very computer you are using, the shoes you are wearing... this competition keeps the costs down, but I'd bet you didn't buy locally made shoes...

    --
    Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
  87. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wish I had some mod points. I know I, and probably you too, will be modded offtopic, but your post was really insightful.

  88. MOD PARENT UP II by BerntB · · Score: 1
    Insightful.

    The reason the world is becoming a better place is IMHO that democracy works better than dictatorships.

    Otherwise, there would be no reason for democracy to spread, since the people at the top levels of the oppressive regime would rather destroy the place than change it. Now those countries don't have a choice, since they get more and more behind.

    What scares me is that China's 1984 model of political control and economic freedom works. I don't lose sleep over some religious criminals that blows up civilians, even if they should get a nuclear bomb or two.

    --
    Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
  89. Re:Not true! - A national embarrassment by evanism · · Score: 0

    Heavy MetalMS, you are a fool. I will take the liberty to point out why I'd hire an Indian outsourcer in capitals rather than you.

    "I have first hand KNOWLEDGE of this. We had EXCHANGE STUDENTS from India at my Uni and OMFG (Yeah, like, oh my god, you know?) . They WERE on THEIR 4TH year they WERE at the the level we WERE 2 weeks in at year 1. Example: If there is a short on the WIRING board you do not use the current limiter to regulate the voltage. THAT'S like putting the PEDDLE to the floor and using the BRAKE to CONTROL the speed."

    15 spelling errors. Like, OMG, duh, you know....

    I officially classify you as the village idiot, and you should hang your head in shame at your ridiculous and lame assertion. If you are in 4th year, you should withdraw not before you ruin the bottom 5th percentile.

    --
    Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
  90. Re:Lot of assumptions in prediction of "short fall by RevMike · · Score: 1

    Nope. Just looking for someone with good SQL skills in any of the 4 major platforms, and is decent in Java.

  91. I see a lot of stretched necks in the future by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    Hoprefully, Americans will someday wake up and realize that that CorpGovMedia elite betrayed them by allowing outsourcing, by encouraging it. By CorpGovMedia elite, I mean the politicians, elite media and CEOs and lobbyists, and think tankers who pushed this outsourcing treason on us.

    And maybe Americans will join me in call for these CorpGovMedia traitors to be tried for high treason, and if convicted of such in a court of law, then to have all these sellouts publicly hung. All in accordance with the rule of law and due process of course.....If we need to change some laws to allow this injustice to be corrected, then let's do that.

    STRETCH THE NECKS OF THE CORPGOVMEDIA OUTSOURCING TRAITORS!

    There...that wasn't so hard, was it?

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:I see a lot of stretched necks in the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sink or swim. Why should you be paid 100k/year and some guy in Asia only 5k/year? Just because you happened to born in USA? If you want 20x salary than others, you need to be pretty damn good at what you do. That's the way capitalism works.

      Don't like CEOs getting paid so much? Don't buy stock in such companies! Shareholders ultimately deside what company does.

  92. Re:U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I asked a friend who worked in India many years his sage advice on opening a BPO:
    --

    What I may say below could be construed by some people as not politically correct or intercultural insensitive by some. This is based on facts and observations from living there and not reading about it...So, fuck them....

    Hyderabad is OK but you have a much better level of people in Bangalore..
    but you must never ever be talked into Calcutta, Madras, Delhi or Bombay as they are shit holes that are continually under some form of religious, political or just union strife in which they tends or riot for a few days and kill a few of the opposition off... Never enough in my opinion...

    Never ever allow the boss under boss or anyone who actually has or even thinks he has power from hiring a relative as its the beginning of corruption on a grand scale... NO EXCEPTIONS...

    Don't bring in anyone from out of the area to run the place... he has to be local and speak the local dialect....

    Try for a few Christians in key positions as they will not be swayed by the religious horse shit that manages to pervade all levels of the workforce...

    Never ever try to be smart mouthed or even think you can get around the local politicians including the police as they are vicious bastards to a man and will hold a grudge forever so just be nice but don't let your local boys get into the bribery business as it tends to take on a life of its own... I punched out the local postman early on and got amazing respect with a spot of fear from half the town. (not an advised method)

    Its hard to find but a smart Indian woman is worth ten men.. Look for a good independent woman..

    Try at all costs to avoid Indians returning home from the US or UK as they are looked on as "Brown Sahibs" and tend to act a bit superior .... Maybe 10% may work out....

    If you have any ex-pats working there tell them not to bonk any of the workforce as she WILL TELL so its best to have a favorite among girls at the local hotel... She will also tell but it wont cause a problem...

    Finally because people tend to be respectful and some very deferential does not mean that they aren't trying to cheat you, steal from you and generally smile politely while they are fucking you...

    The Sage words to ALWAYS remember...

    Its not good for the Christian health to hustle the Asian Brown;
    for the Christian riles,
    and the Asian smiles
    and he weareth the Christian down;
    and the end of the fight is a tombstone white,
    with the name of the late deceased,
    and the epitaph drear,
            "A fool lies here, who tried to hustle the east"............. Rudyard Kipling

    Not a lot has changed from the days of the Raj
    if you don't think first
    if you back down to easily
    if you are not seen as the boss
    if you have bad manners....

  93. In a country with a billion people.... by drn8 · · Score: 0

    Now will see the folly of the Caste system. Talk about shooting onws self in ones own foot.

  94. snapping of the rope, the dancing of the feet by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    I say hang 'em, hang 'em high.

    All in accordance with the due process of law, of course. And if we need to change some laws to do this, then we need to do that.

    But as for myself, I say, HANG the free traitors. Hang 'me publicly. Sell hotdogs, sing hymns ("shall we gather at the rivet, the beautiful, the beautiful river..."), and watch the outsouring CorpGovMedia traitors HANG. Hear the rope snap as the trap door opens, see their feet jerk and dance at the end of the journey.

    THey are traitors, guilty of treason in an economic war. THey sold out their country in a time of war. And I say they should pay for this crime by having their necks stretched. And in accordance with the rule of law and due process. Of course. But Hang 'Em....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  95. The solution is simply more outsourcing by grikdog · · Score: 1

    India's problems are (to put it mildly) not IT's. While English-speaking outsources may be hard to find, the evolving clientele is less anglotaxonic. Look for the next "Indias" in Mexico and southern China.

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  96. outsourcing for management survival? by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    do the U.S. managers (I'm assuming managers, bean counters, and consultants, not techies) who recommend & execute outsourcing plans get their own jobs outsourced?

    or are they doing it to save their own scrawny asses?

    while Microsoft, Motorola, HP, etc openly have overseas campuses to complement their US staff, many other big co's do it to eliminate U.S. staff, and they do it secretly - you can't get them to talk about this in the open, they say it's a 'trade secret'.

    the truth is, if they did admit it openly, they'd face not only the publicity but also the chance that some pissed off lonely geek will take justice into his/her own hands.

    Cowards.

  97. Re:Lot of assumptions in prediction of "short fall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm thinking that he was making a ratio correlation, I.e., 10 applicants per opening in a position times 100 duplicate positions means 1000 applicants for the same job, just to fill the 100 spots.

  98. Oh no by Mathness · · Score: 1

    OMG the twonkers who wants to fire their own skilled workers, can't find replacements in India. This is a sad, sad day for profit for the CEOs/stockowners/... *cries*

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  99. outsourcing does not repeal supply and demand by technoCon · · Score: 1

    i've been writing software since Carter was president and i've noticed a subtle shift in the Indian programmers with whom I've worked. When I first started working with Indian guys they were invariably college graduates from prestige Indian universities augmented with a Masters degree from someplace like U of Mich. In other words, smarter than me. After a few years I noticed the Indian guys just had Bachelors degrees but were still plenty advanced. Today, I work with a really great Indian guy, but his skillset is entry-level.

    It doesn't take a Harvard MBA to figure out the appeal of hiring an Indian guy for $400 a month over there versus hiring a guy just like him for $4000 a month here. And this appeal will remain until you run out of smart guys over there. (Or the smart guys there figure out that a big payday is only a plane-ticket away.)

    as a working engineer i see outsourcing as a knife held at my throat. but i'm also a Reaganite free trader, so I don't gripe about it. (and the knife is a good thing, it helps motivate me.) the market tends to balance things out. if america is too rich and her engineering graduates too stupid, the work will go overseas until india runs out of smart guys who'll work for cheap or america runs out of money.

    and this won't happen. things will balance out. rich spots like the US and Western Europe will outsource work to 3rd world hell-holes until those hell-holes are filled up with cash. After that the idealist in me hopes that whoever works smartest and hardest will win on an even playing field. yeah, i'm an idealist, but i figure it's a better form of "foreign-aid" than anything the UN or the State Department is doing.

    (call me a troll for being on the right of Karl Marx.)

    1. Re:outsourcing does not repeal supply and demand by longdistancepaddler · · Score: 1

      I would have to say that you are not so much idealist as you are short sighted. One of the biggest problems with outsourcing is that it reduces the tax revenue in Countries like the US and Australia. It also gives our children absolutely no incentive to get an education because the jobs that they need an education for are being done somewhere else by someone who will work for a lot lesss than they will. The corporations that send all of our jobs to places like Bangalore and Shanghai don't seem to understand that if if everything is made somewhere else then there won't be enough people here with enough money to buy the goods anyway. When product are made by cheap labour the price doesn't go down, the profits just go up.

    2. Re:outsourcing does not repeal supply and demand by ghoul · · Score: 1

      No what you dont understand is that 90% of the money in the US is in the hands of the top 5%. The American Middle Class is a myth . It doesnt exist. It was a myth created to fight the cold war. To demoralize the Russian scientists by showing them what a high standard of living techocrats have in capitalism. Now that the cold war is over we can return to the natural state of capitalism where you have the very rich(nobles) and the rest who work all day to survive(the peasants) Things will be produced as the nobles will buy them or give loans to the peasants to buy those things. Then they become serfs to the nobles. In debt for all their lives. Very soon expect the abolishing of bankruptcy laws and the making of debts transferable to children on death. Sure you would still have the vote but most people would be too tired making ends meet to have time to evaluate candidates so they will just vote for the Party their dad voted for. Doesnt really matter does it ? I mean Bush and Kerry were cousins. All the candidates will be from the nobles. Sure you can be born a peasant and become a noble but you would have to work really hard , be really lucky or really beautifull or sleep with a noble. Does this sound familiar?

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  100. That is why... by jd · · Score: 1
    ...the regulation has to be independent. Government regulation doesn't work, in general, because Governments are frequently corrupt and corrupt regulation simply increases positive feedback. However, to be effective, the regulators need the powers of a Government.


    If there was a "simple" solution to this problem, it would have been solved by now. Nonetheless, I do believe that the problem is solvable and that the solution does involve regulation mechanisms. I suspect that the solution must involve some sort of "blind" element (a jury pool system, for example) so that it is not possible for any particular side to know who to bribe. It must also have people with the necessary knowledge but who are unlikely to have been drawn into the system so far as to have become corrupt themselves. The only way you'd get that combination is to introduce a mix of recent graduates and the self-taught. The remainder of the regulatory body should be directly elected as per any other representative, only using a proportional representation system to prevent domination.


    It still wouldn't be perfect, but the randomness of one component, the youth of another and the capricious nature of PR elections would make most efforts at corruption extremely difficult and VERY expensive, and therefore probably much reduced.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  101. Re:U folks have talked about so much(little) stuff by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But what is the standard deviation? My point was more that there aren't hotspots with overly inflated prices, like Tokyo, Silicon Valley, or Redmond. Prices in Silicon Valley, a prime example, are insane compared to where I live (the Midwest). A simple example is that the median price of a house in Silicon Valley is around $700,000 (http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/13 422709.htm). In comparison, the price of a house in the Midwest is in the $100,000-$200,000 range as median.

    With a little math (ie, assuming a 30 year morgage), it's possible to show that one has to pay 3.5x as much in Silicon Valley for the house alone (ie, ~$1400 more per month). Take into account things like property tax and higher prices for food due to high property rates or driving farther, hence using more gas, to go to stores that aren't on high cost real estate, and clearly there's a price premium for living in a specific location when there's no real sign that it's even worthwhile (if it were, India outsourcing wouldn't make sense; New Delphi outsourcing might).

    Now, if a lot of businesses started hiring across the US, I'm sure wages would increase. But it'd be a more uniform increase without massive spikes over land prices; companies could just move if a county/state was trying to shaft them. And in the end, more uniform hiring across a country does end up improving the whole country, instead of hot spots (like California) having federal funds be the method of redistributing wealth. So, it's great news that average India wages are increasing. There's room to hire in the rural US as well.

    --
    Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  102. Is no one worried about... by timberw0lf · · Score: 1

    The apparent ticking cultural time bomb in India? They're developing so rapidly, can they truly sustain themselves? So many Indians that I've met over the years have told the same story of the conflict between a very traditionalist culture and a new global paradigm. Hell, I would be worried about the social issues on the horizon over there. Gender, spirituality, religion, civil rights...India is trying to cram 500 years of 'European development' into about 50.

  103. Re:P4 processor cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... how much more do you think your new P4 processor would cost if it was fabricated in the USA?"

    Probably about the same as it costs being produced in Israel. Just because the current P4 is fabricated in Israel doesn't mean that the new ones will be. If it was strictly about cost, they'd be producing the chips in China, or Malaysia where regulations are lower and labor costs are far lower - but it isn't that simple. The Israel fab was probably just the cheapest to convert for producing the new chips.

    In fact, the newest technology will be produced right here in the good ole USA in Arizona. In the USA there are more than a handful of Intel fabs:

    from http://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/manufacturing/ manufacturing_qa.htm#1

    How many factories do you have worldwide, where are they located and what percentage of your workforce do they employ?

    Intel has 11 fabs worldwide today. The company also has six assembly and test sites worldwide. Intel has 15 manufacturing sites worldwide. Sites within the United States are located in Chandler, Ariz.; Santa Clara, Calif.; Colorado Springs, Colo.; Hudson, Mass.; Rio Rancho, N.M.; Hillsboro, Ore.; and Dupont, Wash. Sites outside the United States are located in Shanghai, China; San Jose, Costa Rica; Leixlip, Ireland; Jerusalem, Israel; Qiryat Gat, Israel; Kulim, Malaysia; Penang, Malaysia; and Cavite, Philippines. Approximately half of Intel's 78,700 employees work within Intel's Technology Manufacturing Group.

    From http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx? i=2592:

    "Intel has announced that it has reopened its Fab 12 facility in Arizona and is preparing to produce the latest in processor technology at this location."

    It may come as a surprize to find that there are many other fabs in the USA that are not Intel and are in fact making inexpensive chips. Some of them are overdemand facilities that get contracts to produce chips when the manufacturer can't meet demand by themselves. Not every, inexpensive chip is fabbed overseas, just as not everything from the USA is expensive.

    It costs many millions to build a new fab so chips are not always produced in the place where most people would think that it costs the least. In many cases, the production is in the place where it costs the least to convert the equipment since the cost of building a new fab from the ground up can actually be greater than the labor costs of operating the fab over the life of the fab (3-5 years in some cases).

  104. Bycicles and buses by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    You would be right if my intention was to find a replacement-country for the entire outsourcing industry. However, if you look at things from the point of view of an average company that looks for additional labour-force, even Vatican would be good, as long as they offered programmers :-)

    + I am biased towards the country I love, what's wrong with that?

  105. No Vacation ?? Bull Shit by ghoul · · Score: 1

    I used to work for a company in Europe. We had 90% of the US market outsourced to us. I got 4 weeks of vacation. 16 holidays a year which I could add on to my vacation days if I worked on those days and upto 1 month of paid sick leave. My second year at the company I tore my knee ligament playing soccer and I was off for 6 weeks and when I came back I still had 4 weeks of vacation which I took to go visit Egypt. My brother works in San Jose and gets a piddling 2 weeks of vacation a year including sick leave. American society drives people too hard. It is just a myth that life is easier in the US. Its just easier for the top 5% who are fabulosly rich . The rest of the people are slogging like crazy to just afford a house and car. Most software engineers could ahve much higher standards of living by moving abroad.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**