Slashdot Mirror


Building the Godzilla of PVRs

EvolvedHumanoid writes "In a blog post, Percy Bell of SnapStream Media details how he built 'Godzilla', an 11-tuner PVR machine with HDTV support using off-the-shelf components. At $4284.90, the end result sports 1TB storage for recorded content and has to be one of the coolest PVRs ever built."

318 comments

  1. One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by Caspian · · Score: 5, Funny

    With all that hardware, I'd guess that it is, in fact, one of the hottest PVRs ever built! ;)

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
    1. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, they make a big point about wanting it to be cool enough to eliminate HTPC fan noise, then choose the latest Intel dual core CPU. Perhaps that part needs a little rethink?

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    2. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd guess that it is, in fact, one of the hottest PVRs ever built!

      Not to mention over 1TB of recorded shows, and STILL nothing to watch!

    3. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      What kind of CPU do you think they'd need to encode 11 video streams into MPEG-4 at the same time?! A 486?!!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by rwise2112 · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it!

      I probably can't even name 11 shows worth watching, let alone need enough tuners to record 11 shows at once.

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    5. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about something from AMD that is comparable in terms of prcessing power, while while generating far less heat?

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    6. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by JDevers · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The shows are saved as MPEG-2 and at least the internal cards do the MPEG-2 encoding in hardware. I don't know anything about the USB tuners, but even if they were software encoders, that is a hell of a lot less processor load than you describe. There are no currently available single CPUs that can encode 11 HDTV resolution video streams into MPEG-4 (even ASP, much less AVC) in anything approaching realtime. I'm not actually sure if there is a single CPU that could encode just ONE 1080i video stream into MPEG-4 ASP in real time, but I'm not positive on that (and it is getting close even if not...).

    7. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I only need one TV tuner. Just set it to SciFi on Friday and hit record. Go to bed, and you should have all the TV that's currently worth watching the next day. Of course, if I could get BBC(3?), I'd need another tuner for the good Doctor.

    8. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      How about a decent PICMG backplane, so you can have more than a handful of slots? (Mine has 18 32bit pci slots, but there are more expensive ones that have just as many pcie)

      Why not a DVB-S tuner?

      Why not have the hard drives external to the case? You'd have more power for those cards that demand it, less heat to cook your CPUs?

      Anyone that uses USB, even USB2 for something like this makes me laugh. Just sad. Why not bolt on some lame parallel port tuner from 1997, and claim that it's 12 tuners?

    9. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by Mr.+Competence · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never watched Monk on USA.

      --
      Those who open their minds too far often let their brains fall out.
    10. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      the USB tuners were likely selected for their ability to render the data in the final compression format over usb2.0 i don't know if you noticed, but 11 streams of mpeg-4 compression in HD resolutions takes well more horsepower than a single dual core P-4 can crank out. OTOH each of these usb tuners can have a nice, dedicated encoder chip that pipes the stream relatively raw, and the only task the cpu has is handling the data routing. true back plane cards could have the same chip, but then the higher bus speed capabilities of pcie aren't needed. since the card/USB device itself is doing the encoding.

      External USB 1.0 devices were a joke, but there are some very nice external usb 2.0 tuners out there now, especially if you desire an output stream of mpeg-4 (divx, etc) as the native.

    11. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Yeh. If I desire to have a million little doodads hanging out the back of my computer. Usb2 is to firewire what ide is to scsi.

    12. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      What kind of CPU do you think they'd need to encode 11 video streams into MPEG-4 at the same time?

      The analog inputs have hardware-based MPEG-2 encoders on them (didn't know they had those for PCI Express, but), and the HD inputs just capture the already-encoded MPEG-2 stream. You can just dump all of those streams to disk as-is, so why would you want to recompress to MPEG-4?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    13. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by Slayback · · Score: 3, Informative

      BeyondTV does use quite a bit of CPU just to do the commercial skipping scan after a program is recorded. If you have 11 shows recording at once, it'll take quite a bit of CPU to scan through all that content to remove commercials. I have a P3 and while everything works great, the comskip scanning gets behind after a while because the CPU can't keep up.

    14. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but will it run Windows MCE?

    15. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      why does every detective show have to solve murders every episode? Can't they solve broken marriages or lost kittens from time to time? I mean, jeez i'd hate to live in a small town that had more than 24 grisly murders a year.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    16. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by object88 · · Score: 1

      Usb2 is to firewire what ide is to scsi.

      A good standard that will eventually relegate the other to a small niche market?

    17. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      or do you mean like betamax was to VHS.. technically superior, but economically useless?

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    18. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Bingo!

    19. Re:One of the coolest PVRs ever built? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      firewire is actually very common on consumer level DV cams, as well as some profesional high resolution ccds. I even have a firewire ide bridge card, and an old external scsi drive cage to house it in... because at the time usb 2.0 was nowhere to be seen, and firewire was at least available in notebooks and as add on cards etc. you can find firewire versions of motherboards for very cheap of course they ALL have usb 2.0. but yeah, firewire is well entrenched as the standard for dv cams, so it's continued existance is viable.not to mention you can with a single normal firewire cable hook 2 pc's together for data sharing etc. and there is no need to have special cross over cables(or the new auto crossover ports) etc, as with ethernet

  2. Mindless overkill... by FalconZero · · Score: 5, Insightful
    four Seagate 250GB SATA drives for storing our BTV recordings and two Seagate 160GB SATA drives for the OS and other applications.
    320GB for OS and Applications?!?!? - I know Windows is a bit bloated but why the hell would you want 320GB for Apps? Thats 68DVD's worth of application! And I only know of a handfull of apps that are DVD sized. And before anyone says "maybe they've got lots of (big) games" this thing is specifically (and clearly obvious from the hardware) a PVR.
    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    1. Re:Mindless overkill... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I haven't RTFA yet but unless it says otherwise it's probably a RAID 1.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Mindless overkill... by havardi · · Score: 1

      Probably Raid 1, and 160GB drives are pretty cheap anyway... why not?

    3. Re:Mindless overkill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they want the OS and Apps on diffrent spindles for speed?

    4. Re:Mindless overkill... by FalconZero · · Score: 1

      Probably not, they specifically mention that the 'data' drives (the 4 250gbs) are raid 5, and say nothing of the 160s. Anyway, since this is intended to be a PVR why bother with mirroring? Why not just install all of the (supposedly enormours) applications, and dump the drive to tape?

      --
      Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    5. Re:Mindless overkill... by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Having a mirror means no downtime, which means never missing a show (or, perhaps, 11 shows) because your PVR is down. It's excessive, but it's not without reason.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Mindless overkill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's okay. Really.

      It doesn't make you any less of a man.

    7. Re:Mindless overkill... by FalconZero · · Score: 1

      From the article, they're $95 each. And as for why not, because adding extra unneccesary bits doesn't make it better. They could strap a cheesegrater to the side, and it wouldn't make it a better PVR, just a more expensive PVR (with the ability to make grated cheese for nachos while watching films.)

      --
      Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    8. Re:Mindless overkill... by FalconZero · · Score: 1

      I suppose so, I'm just so used to upgrading a drive before it dies. I can't remember the last time one of my drives (at home) failed.

      --
      Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    9. Re:Mindless overkill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I don't get is 11 tuners but only 1 TB of space. I've got 2 Hauppauge PVR-250 cards in my backend system and 600GB of space and the only time I've ever come across an instance where it would've been nice to have 3 tuners was when football ran long pushing Cold Case back and causing it to conflict with Desperate Housewives and Law and Order Criminal Intent. But 11 tuners? WTF is this guy recording where he has that many conflicts in scheduling? I'd check on the site but his site is slashdotted. And 1 TB of space isn't really that much these days, especially with HDTV content. I record at about 1.6GB per hour in standard format and after a few years I'm to the point where I've got around 480 GB of stuff I absolutely cannot delete (it's my "favorite show archive") so I really need to buy some extra drives at this point.

    10. Re:Mindless overkill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, the 4 250gb's are striped, which is how they got 1 TB out of the whole array with 4 drives and not 12:

      We configured the four 250GB drives as RAID 0 (striping) and formatted them with NTFS and 64k blocks to increase the disk size and performance.

      Seems silly - if one drive goes, the whole array dies - and on a beast like this, heat is likely to SERIOUSLY degrade the life of those drives...

    11. Re:Mindless overkill... by kalpol · · Score: 4, Funny

      >ability to make grated cheese Fondue, you mean to say.

      --
      12:50 - press return.
    12. Re:Mindless overkill... by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Actually... strapping a cheeseburger to the side would _most definitely_ make it a better PVR!

    13. Re:Mindless overkill... by kalpol · · Score: 0, Redundant
      >ability to make grated cheese
      Fondue, you mean to say.

      don't you hate it when you forget a break tag and it ruins your lame-ass joke that you were kind of hoping would get moderated +5 Funny? My day is ruined now.

      --
      12:50 - press return.
    14. Re:Mindless overkill... by cloudmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And before anyone says "maybe they've got lots of (big) games" this thing is specifically (and clearly obvious from the hardware) a PVR


      Yeah, because it makes no sense to play games on the kick-ass PC you just built and hooked up to your best TV / media distribution system. Probably better to put the games elsewhere.
    15. Re:Mindless overkill... by NerveGas · · Score: 2, Informative

      In building several-terabyte arrays from IDE drives - with dedicated fans blowing right over the drives, and HUGE fans ventilating the case - I've found that when you're talking about nearly a dozen drives, it's not long before you're going to have a failure. In large arrays of Maxtors, Seagates, and Western Digitals, I have yet to go a year without at least one drive failing.

      In fact, just a couple of days ago, one of my Western Digital RAID edition drives started hiccuping, and got dropped out of an array. That particular set of drives has only been in service for about 4 months.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    16. Re:Mindless overkill... by ichimunki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's what I was going to say, eleven tuners and only 1TB of HD? And the HD is only RAID0 to boot (and the primary reason for RAID0 here is performance because you are going to need fast disk I/O if you get 11 tuners all trying to work at the same time). In this situation if one of the four drives goes down, you lose a lot of data. I'd rather see multiple PVR backends managing the tuners, each tuner with its own dedicated drive. Double the number of drives and go to RAID1 and then you don't have to worry about a drive failure much either.

      I mean, can you imagine a beowulf cluster of PVRs? ;)

      --
      I do not have a signature
    17. Re:Mindless overkill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    18. Re:Mindless overkill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Applications=Porn

    19. Re:Mindless overkill... by wwwillem · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Seems silly - if one drive goes, the whole array dies - and on a beast like this, heat is likely to SERIOUSLY degrade the life of those drives...

      OK, so you loose couple of hours of 'Desparate Housewifes' .... who cares, just wait for next week's episode. :-)

      Seriously, the data you store on the drive of a PVR is not really "mission critical". So, I can understand if someone makes the trade-off for capacity versus redundancy.

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    20. Re:Mindless overkill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I hate to be a pain here, but it really seems like this guy has alot more money than sense. There are several strange design decisions that have been made, and it seems to show someone who really isn't knowledgable.
      • Using a massive chip - For what, exactly? As long as you have a reasonable video card, the need for a fat cpu for videos is very minimal. I suppose its possible that HDTV may require faster speeds, but i doubt this. AFAIK, win32 currently doesn't really take advantage of dual core.
      • Using RAID 0. - Is he trying to get a drive burnt out?
      • Using NTFS - This is where it gets strange. I think that if you were fucking around with 1TB of data, you would want to choose your OS primarily by filesystem. Hell, I would. NTFS is one of the least stable, worst performing filesystems around. I would probably want to use XFS (it has this tendency to stack writes to the RAM before making them, reducing drive wear - I forget the name) and noflushd, so as to keep hd wear to a minimium (considering that there are gonna be long periods where no writes are done). Eventually, you could feasibily switch to ZFS to keep space use high.
    21. Re:Mindless overkill... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Using a massive chip - For what, exactly?

      Video compression.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    22. Re:Mindless overkill... by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because it makes no sense to play games on the kick-ass PC you just built and hooked up to your best TV / media distribution system. Probably better to put the games elsewhere.

      I have an "old" computer, It's an AMD Athlon XP 3200+ with a gig of ram and a GeForce 6800, it can hardly play multiplayer Quake 4 with the lowest detail settings but it'd probably do it better than this guys system. I also have a 1U dual Xeon server next to me with 4 gigs of ram and two 160gig SATA drives. It'd destroy this guys computer in most benchmarks, but it's no gaming rig since it just has built in video. This guy has a great system for encoding videos, but with his video card being a GeForce 6600, and the dual core CPU (which most games won't take advantage of), the rigs not really designed for gaming.

    23. Re:Mindless overkill... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      In that overcooked case? Wouldn't be surprised if both drives failed simultaneously. This was built for the showroom, not sunday drives.

    24. Re:Mindless overkill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't care about it, why do you need 1TB of storage?

    25. Re:Mindless overkill... by suprchunk · · Score: 1

      Actually the specifically say the the 4 250GB, notice the large G and B, are RAID 0. Dump the drive to tape? Do tell how that would make the viewing better, as it is used to actually playback if you so desire. I just need enlightening on the use of sequential media to get to something quick.

    26. Re:Mindless overkill... by anarchyboy · · Score: 1

      video compression??? then what are those massive drives for??

    27. Re:Mindless overkill... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Using a massive chip - For what, exactly?

      Compressing videos. 1TB fills up pretty quick with uncompressed HDTV (heck, it fills up pretty quick with Xvid).

      AFAIK, win32 currently doesn't really take advantage of dual core.

      "Win32" - by which you presumably mean Windows - has been SMP since the day it was released.

      NTFS is one of the least stable, worst performing filesystems around.

      From someone who doesn't even know Windows supports SMP, I'll take your filesystem criticisms with a grain of salt. All I'll say is that I've lost a hell of a lot more data on various Linux filesystems than I have on Solaris, FreeBSD, OS X or Windows filesystems.

    28. Re:Mindless overkill... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Why not just install all of the (supposedly enormours) applications, and dump the drive to tape?

      Another hard disk is probably cheaper (and a hell of a lot easier) as a method of protecting against drive failure.

    29. Re:Mindless overkill... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Most anything can run 800x600 just fine, if not 640x480, and that'll look pretty darned decent on your typical TV screen - especially since it only has to get 23fps (at 320x240) to look as good as anything else he'll see on TV (well, 29.9fps, I suppose).

    30. Re:Mindless overkill... by carl0ski · · Score: 1

      thats strange My HDTV , didnt have trouble recorded HD streams on my Duron 1ghz with crap ram.
      not to mention little CPU usage
      hardware mpg2 is more common than you seem to believe


      the guy who made this system is


      an Idiot

    31. Re:Mindless overkill... by Surt · · Score: 1

      I suspect that 2x160 is essentially just the cheapest raid solution they could get for performance reasons.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    32. Re:Mindless overkill... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Let's be kinder. Let's say he overdesigned it to make really, really sure it wouldn't fail for lack of processor power. Engineers used to overengineer everything in the Olden Days; locomotives, building structures, cars. Those old trains still roll, buildings are sought after for quiet and saftey, and those old 30's cars STILL RUN, if you keep them maintained.

      Stretching the metaphor, okay. But then again, in a couple of years it'll be a AMD multicore processor array, 20 terabytes of hard drive and a terabyte of superflash memory, and it'll be in a smaller case and cost half as much. Gonna toss this system into the toxic landfill like all the other plastic unt metal anyway.

    33. Re:Mindless overkill... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      He's selling SnapStream. Last I checked, there's no SnapStream for Linux.

    34. Re:Mindless overkill... by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      On the Hauppague cards, the compression is done via hardware, but I can't readilly speak for the other cards. It's DEcompression he's going to have to worry about. With a two-tuner system, one would need ~800mhz of processor power. Perhaps this box will be a media server, and he expects to watch a bunch of shows at the same time.

      For my personal PVR, I went with slightly less storage, opted for lots of RAM, and kept processor power down around 2.8ghz, as I expected to watch up to four shows at the same time, if guests were staying over.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    35. Re:Mindless overkill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dual-processor != dual-core, assface.

    36. Re:Mindless overkill... by Jonner · · Score: 1
      I mean, can you imagine a beowulf cluster of PVRs? ;)

      You mean, like an OpenMosix cluster of MythTV workstations?
    37. Re:Mindless overkill... by rho · · Score: 1
      The article mentions running compression on existing saved video streams (to save disk space, I imagine), and to do it concurrently with other operations, such as recording and displaying video.

      Is it overkill? Possibly. But the article implies that the processor runs pretty hot, which I imagine means it's likely getting used.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    38. Re:Mindless overkill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, only +4 funny instead of +5 funny? you better kill yourself right away.

    39. Re:Mindless overkill... by clutch110 · · Score: 1

      Windows NT has been SMP capable. Win95/98/98SE/ME have no SMP ability.

      From Windows 2000 on, with the exception of Windows ME, all version are Windows NT based. Windows Vista is the next OS from Redmond to take a huge derivation from past Windows root.

      I'll agree, NTFS is not a horrible filesystem, Windows is not a horrible platform, and if this was done by someone other than a rep from SnapStream, I wonder if they would have used MythTV and Linux or Windows XP MCE 2005?

      The biggest problem I see is RAID 0, for a small cost premium, RAID 0+1 may have been a more prudent way to go to keep speed and redundancy.

    40. Re:Mindless overkill... by timeOday · · Score: 1
      the primary reason for RAID0 here is performance because you are going to need fast disk I/O if you get 11 tuners all trying to work at the same time
      Not really. At 4 mbit per stream, thats 44 mb or 5.5 megabytes per second. That's only 20% of what a single drive can do.
    41. Re:Mindless overkill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so you loose couple of hours of 'Desparate Housewifes' .... who cares, just wait for next week's episode. :-)

      Learn to spell... sheesh, what a looser.

    42. Re:Mindless overkill... by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      "...the processor runs pretty hot, which I imagine means it's likely getting used."

      Excellent point, but I believe that was when they were load-testing the unit. Consider it a worst-case scneario.

      I would certainly hope that this unit is meant to be used in a bar, small office, or a large or multi-family's huge house as a media server. If this is meant for a family of four, and it's hooked up to only one TV (it does have only one video out), someone is going to be pretty disapointed.

      Hm. Would using this in a bar be considered a re-broadcast? If so, you'd have to scratch that off the list.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    43. Re:Mindless overkill... by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Taking the time to transcode the video you want to save turns the 112 hours of available space to 900 hours.

    44. Re:Mindless overkill... by $ASANY · · Score: 1
      Yeah, you need that overkill since you've got four Seagate drives in a RAID 0 configuration. Makes for speedy access, but that cuts MTBF by 75% for the array over what you'd get with a single 1TB disk. Maybe they think they can mirror the more interresting stuff to the other array which should have at least 300GB available?

      I think someone using MythTV would have made radically different choices.

    45. Re:Mindless overkill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an "old" computer, It's an AMD Semperon 2.0Ghz, whatever that means in AMD speak. It has a with a GeForce 6600, it cost me $200 about six months back. It also has a gig of ram, and a half TB of storage, and it was upgraded from a previous machine, who's guts now lie in another case. It cost me, oh, probably $600 for all the rest of the machine, which was bought a little more than a year ago, discounting the monitor, which is going on ten years old--and serving me quite well, I have to say. Of course, it's got an SGI badge on it, so that means it has a big set of cohones.

      I'm happy to say that it runs Quake4 at 800x600, with decent detail and quite nicely. It's too bad that the game sucks big sweaty bull balls, though... So I really haven't felt the need to torture myself with that game extensively. If there are ever any cool mods that come out, like they often do for Quake games, I'll be tempted to upgrade a little sooner than I currently plan to do now. It's also played every other game that I've thrown at it, and as happy as can be. It was a huge leap over my last "gaming" system, which lasted me a damn long time, and played HL2 about as well as this one plays Quake4... Well enough, but not the prettiest.

      Sure, there's lots of room for improvement, nobody can deny. I could go out and blow three thousand like some of the jerkoffs out there like yourself who feel that they've got to have the latest and greatest to have fun... And to that, I say bullshit. Computer game geeks are worse than camera geeks, I say. At least camera geeks might have something tangible as a result of their investments.

      Personally, I'll upgrade to some dual core goodness when the time presents itself... But I have a rule that says that I must never spend more than $1000 a year on a computer for gaming... I think I'll extend that a bit though, because I'm going to go with an AMD 64 dual core, 4GB of memory (why not, it's cheap enough, plus it's drewl inducing), and probably a GF 6800, which will probably run around $1700 with water cooling, new power supply. Not too bad. Maybe later I'll upgrade to a 2TB+ SATA RAID... But I think I'll put that on my current computer, stick a Gb ethernet card in it, and make it a PVR system to cug along in an isolated spot whilst another computer acts as the TV display.

    46. Re:Mindless overkill... by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 2, Insightful
      eleven tuners and only 1TB of HD?
      That's the part that leapt out at me, too. I've got a TB on this computer; and while only about half of it is available for video, it's a constant struggle keeping enough space free.

      A single English Premier League football match, recorded at even medium quality, is a 3.5 GB dump from our ReplayTV. A single episode of Nova, recorded at high quality, is 2.5 GB. If I use my computer's ATI tuner instead, I can get a decent (SVCD) quality episode of Nova in for about 1 GB; but still, all of those 1 and 2 and 3 GB recordings add up rather quickly if you actually keep them around (and isn't that half the point of a computer-based PVR solution -- the ability to save programming so that you can stream it around the house later?). I love the convenience of being able to pick up our remote control in the living room and watch any one of hundreds of episodes of dozens of series (or dozens of movies) at the press of a button; but even with deleting all of the "watch-once" shows and transcoding like crazy to make the "keepers" smaller, I'm bumping up against my storage ceiling. If I had eleven tuners feeding the beast, I can't even begin to imagine how quickly one measly terabyte would get filled up.
    47. Re:Mindless overkill... by Znork · · Score: 1

      It's a grossly flawed design based on old PVR concepts. A more modern system wouldnt put that many tuners in a single case; you'd distribute them over your LAN. You wouldnt have disks in a frontend system; it's more or less impossible to keep that many disks cool and (longterm) silent in a single case. You wouldnt need a fast CPU, again, post-recording compression would be distributed over the LAN.

      But I suspect those decisions may have something to do with having to use SnapStream...

    48. Re:Mindless overkill... by Creepy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some defense of choices:

      Dual Core/Dual CPU - any thread or process can be split off onto the additional cores (ok, with some OS limitations), so having multiple of them is a good thing to handle writes and reads from all those tuners. Disk reads/writes are one of the worst processor eating functions (though caching helps), as they have one of the longest pipelines and tend to stall it. Windows itself doesn't do threading well (at least to use up extra CPU/cores), but extra processes will benefit from the additional CPUs.

      RAID 0 - is fastest. yes, for safety I'd probably favor RAID 1+0, but for raw speed RAID 0 is best.

      file system... er, yeah I'd probably choose something other than NTFS personally, but if the apps depended on Windows, NTFS is the best choice.

    49. Re:Mindless overkill... by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing that out. It caused me to think more deeply about the matter and learn more about drives and video signals than I knew when I made. if performance is not a problem, I have to wonder why bother with RAID0 at all then? As I understand it, RAID0's only real benefit is better performance.

      I still think they used RAID0 here for performance. My own tuner card can crank out video streams at up to 12mbit/sec, which, if we plug 12 into your calculation instead of 4, would swamp the drive, or come really close, right? HDTV quality, as I understand it, is 15mbit/second... so a 12mbit maximum would still entail a loss of quality over a direct signal to screen feed. I'd have to assume in this case that the owner of the PVR would not want to degrade the signal any more than necessary (since the summary mentions they have HDTV capability) and that they really are maxing out their tuner cards whenever possible.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    50. Re:Mindless overkill... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      You actually bring up a good point...although probably didn't realize it. The point is...are PVRs used primarily for temporary storage of shows/movies? Or are they used primarily as permanent media storage? While I tend not to watch a series over and over...there are a few I do occasionally rewatch (Scrubs anybody?). For now, since I download all my tv, I just burn to disc...but I'm curious what peoples thoughts are on permanent video storage for this sort of thing. Is a beefy PVR really the best way to go for easy access and long lasting storage?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    51. Re:Mindless overkill... by RelaxedTension · · Score: 1

      "it's more or less impossible to keep that many disks cool"

      It's actually not that bad. The drive cages have fans mounted in the front of them, keeping constant airflow between the drives. This works quite effectively to cool them. I have servers with 10,000 rpm drives in this configurtion and it works quite well.

      It would get noisy eventually though, and the fans would need to be replaced every once in a while.

    52. Re:Mindless overkill... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Just out of curiosity...I'm interested in setting up a system to stream around the house with the touch of a remote...preferably all wireless...so what kind of setup are you using, and can you recommend one for my needs?

      I don't really know linux or how to program, so I'm looking for a somewhat easy to setup system.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    53. Re:Mindless overkill... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Another very simple reason to use RAID0 is simply to pool several drives into one really big partition.

    54. Re:Mindless overkill... by KermitJunior · · Score: 1

      Although immediately after posting this, the parent heard a strange grating noise....

      --
      There is a Universal Life Value Check it
    55. Re:Mindless overkill... by Znork · · Score: 1

      "It would get noisy eventually though, and the fans would need to be replaced every once in a while."

      Yep, hence the (longterm) :). In my experience you'd have to eventually replace both some of the drives and the fans, and the wear on the mechanical components would be worse the more thermal dissipation you need as you'd probably get varied thermal expansion in different places. It would be fine for a server, especially if it was in a relatively dust-free environment, but not the kind of thing you'd want in your livingroom.

    56. Re:Mindless overkill... by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Ah, thanks. Another thing I wasn't thinking about.

      --
      I do not have a signature
  3. Uh...not so godzilla... by bassgoonist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pentium EE...dual core with htt...bad combination...very silly choice. FX-60 would be more impressive.

    --
    You can tell I'm an aries because of my ram.
    1. Re:Uh...not so godzilla... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention a 6600...not enough balls for hd...

    2. Re:Uh...not so godzilla... by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      last I checked the P4 still works the athlon in video encoding... call me crazy but I have a feeling that may be what he'll use this for.

    3. Re:Uh...not so godzilla... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      No. He he made the right choice. The dual-core CPUs smoke the single-core, high-hertz CPUs when it comes to tasks that can be properly threaded or broken into tasks. Like, I don't know, media applications. This guy knew what he was doing, and didn't go for the silly "My Gigahurtz is bigger than your Gigahurtz!"

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    4. Re:Uh...not so godzilla... by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      The FX-60 is a dual core FX-58 (I think its the 58).

      Though with 11 streams he probably should of gone with dual core opteron

    5. Re:Uh...not so godzilla... by bassgoonist · · Score: 1

      wow...read...the problem I'm stating is that its dual core AND HTT. you pay several hundered more to get the htt on dual core...and the problem is some software doesn't know the difference between the physical cores and the logical cores...so a dual core without htt would've been a good choice...and the fx-60 is a dual core fx-57.

      --
      You can tell I'm an aries because of my ram.
    6. Re:Uh...not so godzilla... by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's Godzilla. Godzilla breathes fire. He needed the Pentium EE to do that. Darn AMD and their efficient design! Though I suppose he could have overclocked...

      (Seriously, for that much coin I'd have gone for a dual processor, dual core Opteron system. Four REAL cores, none of this HypeThreading crap.)

    7. Re:Uh...not so godzilla... by bradleyland · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was thinking, only not exactly. Har har.

      I was thinking that more cores would be more beneficial than two really hot, really fast cores. He could have purchased two dual-core Athlon64 X2 3800 processors, overclocked them a bit, and still have a cooler system that will have four cores to dedicate to all that content.

  4. Manufacturer's Warning: by rob_squared · · Score: 3, Funny

    Manufacturer's Warning:

    Not suitable for resale in Japan.

    --
    I don't get it.
    1. Re:Manufacturer's Warning: by identity0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I know you're joking, but really, it wouldn't work - because they already have kickass PVRs. That Sony beast has 11 tuners (1 sat, 10 analog broadcast), 1 Gig RAM, 1 TB HDD, built-in streaming server (WLANa/g, LAN), DVD+-R/RW/RAM - all for 27,9800 yen, or $2,421.88. Oh, and it has an Intel Pent-D 820 and GeForce 6200(256MB).

      Or This thing, which I think is a pure PVR with no PC, 8 tuners, (Cable and broadcast), up to 2 TB HDD, $776.95.

      Somehow, I doubt they need to import giant jerry-rigged American PVRs.

      oh, and why is it that Japan makes products that are *so* much more attractive looking than American ones? Only Apple seems to match them in aesthetics...

    2. Re:Manufacturer's Warning: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there any non-Sony PVR's ?

  5. Speed record for slashdotting? by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

    Only two comments posted, and it is slashdotted already.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:Speed record for slashdotting? by Psykus · · Score: 1

      It was already on Digg, that's why.

    2. Re:Speed record for slashdotting? by bjd145 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he should have put some of that 4 grand to a better ISP. Maybe 10 turners instead of 11

    3. Re:Speed record for slashdotting? by FalconZero · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to use mirrordot.

      --
      Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
  6. Over kill by Belseth · · Score: 4, Funny
    an 11-tuner PVR machine with HDTV support using off-the-shelf components.

    Is there 11 channels of porn?

    1. Re:Over kill by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is there 11 channels of porn?

      Haven't you ever seen Spinal Tap? 11 is just better than 10

    2. Re:Over kill by jnunoferreira · · Score: 1

      just don't go there...

    3. Re:Over kill by iphayd · · Score: 1

      Only if there are six (or more) females.

    4. Re:Over kill by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Well, let me check.

      My cable provider, Time Warner, has five Pay-Per-View porns, Playboy, and Playboy en Espanol ("Si! Si! Si!"). So there's seven. If we include the various Cinemaxes and TMCs, you could probably, on occasion, fill up 11 tuners with porn.

      Not that I've tried...

    5. Re:Over kill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on how you define "porn", you could have something like: HBO (East/West/Espanol) MAX (East/West) Spice HotNet HotZone PPV x 3 Playboy ATOS PLAT That comes to 10. If you had a C band dish, you could likely get all of these plus some.

    6. Re:Over kill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but couldn't you just make those 10 channels more hard core? I mean, instead of adding an 11th channel, you just make these 10 more intense.

  7. The Software by dch24 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Who else thinks that Beyond TV 4 Server, at $69.99, is a really great price for software that can keep all those eleven tuners busy at once? !!

    Is this the result of open source driving the price of software down? If this were a Microsoft product, just the word "Server" on the package would cost you an additional $300 or more.

    1. Re:The Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could use MythTV, which can also keep all 11 tuners busy at once....in fact, if you want to build a 40 tuner card PVR, you can put tuners in multiple computers. (Beyond TV may be able to do this also, I don't know)

    2. Re:The Software by thebosz · · Score: 5, Informative
      If you'd like a free PVR, I personally like GB-PVR. It can handle as many tuners as your machine can handle plus it has a bunch of additional features. Beyond TV, Sage TV and Microsoft MCE all cost money, but none of them do anything that GB-PVR can't.

      It's not open source, unfortunately, but has a very active development guy and a very good plug-in architecture.

      My PVR is an AMD Sempron 2200+ with 768MB RAM, 360GB Hard drive space, two Hauppauge tuners (250 and 150-MCE) running in a small case on a Chaintech 7NIF2 board running Win2000. Everything works flawlessly and my wife loves it! She records all her shows and watches them whenever she wants. I've got about half of our DVD collection ripped and converted to Xvid sitting on there, ready to go (those discs aren't getting anywhere near the kids!) and everything is awesome.

      When we move into our house, I'm going to run network through the walls and have a Hauppauge Media MVP as a small, quiet front-end in the bedroom.

      The PVR itself is fairly noisy, but when the TV's on, you can't hear it so it doesn't really matter. When I do an upgrade, I might get another MVP and put the main server into the closet.

      I originally tried MythTV (using KnoppMyth), but after a week of hassle and wrestling with it, I gave up and tried GB-PVR. I haven't tried MythTV since. I'd like to have only open-source, free software running, but I couldn't get it to work. I hope to be able to switch over in the future, but for right now, we're quite happy.

      --
      The Kerr Divine: My wife's battle with a mysterious illness.
    3. Re:The Software by ClamIAm · · Score: 1
      (those discs aren't getting anywhere near the kids!)

      Hey, I still have this problem!

    4. Re:The Software by Tarwn · · Score: 1

      I had been planning on trying Myth for a while and just got around to doing so. It went extremely smoothly for the most part. I did have some minor isues with the haupauge remote (buttons in LIRC config file needs to be remapped, not a big deal) and my GeForce 2 that I was trying had some issues that would have been solved a lot quicker if I had noticed the NTSC jumper on the card :P

      I'm using the KnoppMyth distro. As long as you have an internet connection when you install, and enter the right time difference in the setup screen before downloading the listings, it's fairly quick. Your haupauges should work out of the box. You didn't mention your video card, so I wouldn't know. As long as you pick an Nvidia you should be good. I'm planning on picking up an Nvidia 6200 (fanless and capable of HD) for $53 for video out. Right now my CPU maxes at about 22% usage with simultaneous recording on the 350 and playback to the antiquated GF2 MX400.

      Plus I'm looking forward to the next release, as it looks like they will be making the MAME emulator section a lot more dynamic as well as including an N64 emulator. My MS Sidewinder pad was awesome last night when I was playing the SNES Mario Kart last night :P

      --
      Whee signature.
  8. Fan failure? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's a whole lot of heating being generated. Exhaust fan failure=lots of dead harddrives?

    What about heat on the TV tuners? Or the video card?

    Methinks one would be much better serviced by a rack of systems, this thing would run WAY too hot.

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    1. Re:Fan failure? by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      Methinks one would be much better serviced by a rack of systems, this thing would run WAY too hot.

      You still run into heat issues even with racks. But I agree, split it up into a HD rack, and a pvr rack, and you'll likely avoid much of the heat issues they're having.

      Of course, in rackmount you don't have a whole lot of room to work with, and I don't know how possible it would be to get the four PCIe cards into a rackmount system.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    2. Re:Fan failure? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't you have room to work with in a rackmount case? They make 4U ones, you know....

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Fan failure? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Maybe something like this?

      Or even this?

    4. Re:Fan failure? by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

      And TV Tuners get VERY HOT. You can easily cook an egg on that metal shield surrounding the tuner circuitry.

    5. Re:Fan failure? by lakin · · Score: 1

      Heat would definatly be a problem, but I dont think youd need to put it in a rack. Just put the HDDs, tuners etc in a case hidden away somewhere so it can be noisy with extra fans incase of failure. Then just have a quiet near fanless machine for your tv.

      Their way seems silly to me. They tried to make it quiet, which failed (I count six fans including the psu). They tried to give it a big capacity, which is working now, but they will be complaining when that raid0 fails. And they tried to give it lots of tuners (no doubt picking 11 just because its bigger than the last one they did), but kinda cheated because 4 are external. Heck, connect 1 usb tuner and a 1TB NAS box to their previous one and they have virtually the same thing.

      I dont know about beyondtv, but mythtv supports using more than one machine as a backend, so you build say 3 machines in different rooms each with 4 tuners and a single hdd for storage (or all using a common NAS box) to produce basically the same thing, but each machine could be near silent and in smaller cases.

      --
      Paul
    6. Re:Fan failure? by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      At 4U x2, or even 4U x1 + 1U x1, why not just get a bigger case?

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
  9. Impressive but useless. by gasmonso · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I always love to hear about stuff like this. However, good luck finding enough content worth recording. I have a PVR with 1 tuner and I struggle for stuff to record. Most of TV is crap except for Battlestar Galactica of course and Family Guy :)

    http://religiousfreaks.com/
    1. Re:Impressive but useless. by RickPartin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What does religiousfreaks.com have to do with your post? Your Slashdot profile has an option for a sig like myself and many others use.

    2. Re:Impressive but useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least on my cable system, there are at least 11 channels of religious freaks -- more if you include all the news networks. :)

    3. Re:Impressive but useless. by geeber · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that it can record more tv than it is physically possible to actually watch.

    4. Re:Impressive but useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget The Daily Show.

    5. Re:Impressive but useless. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      However, good luck finding enough content worth recording. I have a PVR with 1 tuner and I struggle for stuff to record.

      My Media Center PC has one tuner also, and I run into about a dozen schedule conflicts per week. Most of the time it's not important, since one or the other of the conflicting shows is likely to be rebroadcast soon afterward at a time when it doesn't conflict with anything else.

      Having more than three tuners in a PVR just doesn't seem practical to me, unless it's for an appliance that's going to be used by a family of 7 with eclectic tastes or something like that. This machine just has eleven because it's one better than ten, innit?

    6. Re:Impressive but useless. by ross.w · · Score: 1

      It's supposed to watch all that boring TV for you so that you don't have to.

      Next up, according to Douglas Adams, is the Electric Monk.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    7. Re:Impressive but useless. by rho · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Who has time to watch all that TV? If you do, you need to find a hobby, or get a second job. TV's okay for killing an hour, maybe two. Beyond that, it's just junk.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    8. Re:Impressive but useless. by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Having more than three tuners in a PVR just doesn't seem practical to me
      This would be a very cool device for a dorm hall to share. People don't haggle over programming it, because everything from the past 48 hours on the 11 best channels is right there, all the time. People watch from their own rooms. Your own little on-demand TV network.
    9. Re:Impressive but useless. by Inigo+Montoya · · Score: 1

      A practical device would be an external standalone box about the size of a network hub, each one having 1 cable connection, 4 tuners and 4 hardware DV or MPEG-4 compressors, hooked to the main PC via Firewire-800. (FW-400 would actually be close but sufficient for 4 MPEG or DV compressed streams)

      Plug 1 or more of these boxes into your PC, preferably each one on separate firewire controller cards, to get as much streaming video into your box as you need.

      Use 1 box at home, 4 at the dorm for your video-on-demand server.

    10. Re:Impressive but useless. by engagebot · · Score: 1

      Somewhat true.

      But I came to realize one important thing. When TiVO and the like first came out, I thought "Dang, thats for people who watch way too much tv and care way too much." But it's really not. Its really for the people who DON'T watch alot of TV, and don't give a crap about 99% of whats on.

      I never just sit down and watch tv. Thats because chances are there's nothing that interests me right then. But i can scan through the listings in Sage and queue up a crap-load of movies that will play over the course of the month. Not to mention your regular Family Guy, Futurama, and all that. The other big thing? Music. I love when the *actually* play music videos on MTV and the like, but it hardly ever happens. Now I can queue up and record all the hard rock music videos over the entire month. How about stand-up comedy? I can keep a constant look-out for Eddie Izzard and Dane Cook.

      But then again, I can get everything i want out of the PVR i built, and its only a single-tuner, 900mhz Athlon with a Radeon 9500 pro. Spare parts. I think 11 tuners goes back to that whole 'people who watch WAY too much tv and care WAY too much' thing.

      --
      Han shot first.
  10. Mine is bigger by killercoder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My Setup:

    2.6 Terrabytes of Disk Space (2x Raid 5 array's in 2x chassis').
    6 Tuners - 2 SDTV, 2 HDTV, 2 Digital Cable (QAM256)

    MythTV is very powerful, supports alot of tuners, and ALOT of folks out there have small-to-large setup's. 2005 was the year of the PVR - this article is simply a mine is bigger statement that can't be backed up.

    1. Re:Mine is bigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a Terrabyte? Is it a byte the size of the Earth?

    2. Re:Mine is bigger by OverlordQ · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yea, but isn't Myth a PITA to get setup correctly? Much less getting linux drivers to work with some hardware.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    3. Re:Mine is bigger by nagora · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yea, but isn't Myth a PITA to get setup correctly? Much less getting linux drivers to work with some hardware.

      On Gentoo Myth was no sweat, just a normal install. The hardware I'm using is a USB DVB tuner I bought for 50 quid. 2.4.13 Kernel already had support built in so it was plug-and-play! Myth has actually been the easiest hardware upgrade (apart from new harddrives) I've ever had on Linux.

      I did have some problems with the programme guide, but only because I was greedy and wanted two weeks in advance instead of just one.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    4. Re:Mine is bigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yep, MythTV is a breeze. I did a full gentoo install and got mythtv setup and working in about a day and a half - and most of that time was spent setting up gentoo (first time gentoo/linux user, been using unix for a few years now thou)

    5. Re:Mine is bigger by whmac33 · · Score: 1

      I have Myth too, but am unable to record digital because I just have PVR 250's. Does your QAM card only record the clear unencrypted channels? If so, are there many channels on your cable system that aren't encrypted?

      I have 4 tuners, and they all get used at the beginning of the season when my wife wants to check out all the new shows. Towards the end of the season I don't think all 4 get used very often. I currently have 250G of storage, but we don't retain stuff that we have already watched. If anything I'll burn shows to DVD's to never be watched again :)

    6. Re:Mine is bigger by cloudmaster · · Score: 0

      Yes, and if you don't care about TV tuning, merely wanting to organize your DVDs and music on one electronic mecha-machine, MyTH is a waste. Why do I have to configure a TV card and add channel listings to even use this program again? I use Freevo, since it's easier to set up (IMHO) and doesn't asume that its main purpose in life is to record stuff. Heck, Freevo lets you remove the "watch TV" entry (and most anything else) from the main menu - and I think the interface is as nice / nicer than Myth's.

      As an aside, I'd be more impressed if the guy had one tuner that could handle multiple channels. With GnuRadio I can use a single tuner to record several radio stations effectively simultaneously - and the machine isn't burning the house down. Nyah. :)

    7. Re:Mine is bigger by elmegil · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was using KnoppMyth. For some reason, the function of "don't record if the disk is full" has never been turned on, or else never worked. I sure couldn't find docs about it, and queries to knowledgeable Myth Advocates were mostly responded to with "just update to the latest CVS" which...is not what I'm looking for. After the most recent round of "I don't have enough time to watch everything I record" filled up the partition AND trashed the database, I gave up. TiVo is in my future.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    8. Re:Mine is bigger by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      I have the same question. :) What card are you using for the Digital Cable, and do you have any links on getting it set up?

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    9. Re:Mine is bigger by janic · · Score: 1

      Try running just "mythfrontend". It's quite capable by itself...

    10. Re:Mine is bigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear sir: 'alot' is not a word, and you do not understand how to use the apostrophe. Please learn... it makes you look stupid.

    11. Re:Mine is bigger by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      That's what I was doing - it still insisted that I set up a bunch of crap. Maybe I was using an old version or something - but it's sucked like that each time I've thought "I'll give Myth another try"... Eh, I don't wanna record TV, so using "MythTV" probably isn't ideal anyway. :)

    12. Re:Mine is bigger by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      2.6 Terrabytes of Disk Space (2x Raid 5 array's in 2x chassis').
      6 Tuners - 2 SDTV, 2 HDTV, 2 Digital Cable (QAM256)


      Not to quibble, but I'm afraid your post is simply a mine is bigger statement that can't be backed up. Either.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    13. Re:Mine is bigger by rthille · · Score: 1

      Willing to talk specifics about your system? I've got a friend who's thinking about building a similar system and keeps pestering me about the best way to go about it...
      Does your system handle DVD's (in their native MPEG2)? Since that's a big concern of his.

      Thanks,

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    14. Re:Mine is bigger by spisska · · Score: 1

      Yes, and if you don't care about TV tuning, merely wanting to organize your DVDs and music on one electronic mecha-machine, MyTH is a waste. Why do I have to configure a TV card and add channel listings to even use this program again?

      With MythTV, you need to run the setup scripts for TV tuning initially and you need to run the filldatabase command for program listings, even if you have no tuners installed and no channels configured (NOTE: you do not need a capture device to run MythTV, only to record television). These steps are neccessary for properly setting up the MySQL database.

      Once you've done it once, mythbackend will work, which means mythfrontend will work. Playing media is just a matter of pointing to the proper location from the interface's Setup menu and populating the database.

      I ran MythTV for music and films for 8 months or so before I started using the PVR functions. It plays just about anything you can throw at it, although it does choke on some non-standard .wmvs and .asfs.

      I haven't seen this $4300 Godzilla box at work, of course, but you could set up a whole house with MythTV for that budget and still have enough left over for nice projector.

      As for this thing, I'd like to see Mr. Snapstream actually capturing over all 7 cards in that case (3x PVR-500, 4x HD card) with 6 HDDs. If he can keep them all running for 2 hours without causing serious problems to his hardware, heck even if he can keep his HDD temperatures below 50 C . . . well, I guess I'd buy him a beer.

    15. Re:Mine is bigger by Darby · · Score: 1

      Why do I have to configure a TV card and add channel listings to even use this program again?

      You don't. Then it really is that easy.

      USE="frontend-only" emerge mythtv mythvideo mythmusic mythweather etc. etc.etc.

      I have one backend with every other computer in the house as a frontend.

      It works really well, I haven't tried Freevo though.

    16. Re:Mine is bigger by gatzke · · Score: 1


      What tuners are you using? I have a PCHDTV card, but I thought it didn't do QAM?

    17. Re:Mine is bigger by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it can be. Lots of flexibility though.

    18. Re:Mine is bigger by Minwee · · Score: 1
      Stick a disk in the drive, select "Play DVD" from the optical disks menu, and don't ask too many questions about exactly what "non-free" software was installed on your computer to make it happen.

      It just works.

    19. Re:Mine is bigger by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      You know, I didn't try it on a Gentoo box - just Ubuntu and RedHat (and probably SuSE at one point). If I wasn't in the process of phasing Gentoo out on my home network...

    20. Re:Mine is bigger by rthille · · Score: 1

      Actually, what my friend has in mind is ripping all the DVDs he's got (~350) to a large RAID array and being able to select the DVD from a menu.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    21. Re:Mine is bigger by WatertonMan · · Score: 1

      A day and a half? Only to a Linux user is that a breeze.

    22. Re:Mine is bigger by makomk · · Score: 1

      The trick is to set it up to automatically delete old shows to free up space (I can't remember how exactly; it's in one of the settings screens somewhere). That works fine on the latest stable version (0.18.1). I don't think it actually broke anything when I forgot to enable this; stuff just didn't record once the disk filled.

      Unfortunately, I think KnoppMyth is currently using a CVS snapshot (and an outdated one at that) so YMMV.

    23. Re:Mine is bigger by elmegil · · Score: 1

      With mine, every single time the disk filled, myth spent all it's time complaining into the /var/log/messages file, which fills up root, which causes the machine to crash badly. For whatever reason, this last time, it also opted to delete the last third of the DB files for MySQL, including the settings table. That was my last straw.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    24. Re:Mine is bigger by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Then what your friend wants is the "Import DVD" option on the same menu.

  11. Heh by aftk2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While this is mostly a solution in search of a problem, it would be kind of cool to have in a dorm room environment. You could install it, and then have some sort of signup process through which users reserve specific chunks of time, for their various shows. While it's doubtful that one person would ever want to watch 11 programs that were on simultaneously, 11 different people might.

    --
    concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    1. Re:Heh by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      Instead of users reserving time, it might be easier and fairer to prioritize on how many people requested each show.

      Set a cutoff date a couple days before airtime so that someone whose program was voted out can make alternate plans.

    2. Re:Heh by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that seems like a lot of effort, but it's probably worth it. If only college students had computers of their own, and cable in the dorm rooms...

    3. Re:Heh by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Shoot, I just posted the same thing about a dorm room installation above. Instead of some time reservation scheme, though, I simply suggest offering the previous 48 hours of 11 chosen channels, and avoiding the scheduling problem entirely.

    4. Re:Heh by gumbo · · Score: 1

      It's not so much a solution in search of a problem, as it is a giant advertisement for BeyondTV in search of a lot of links (or a good Slashdotting) to try to sell some copies of BeyondTV. At least they don't try to hide it, they put it out in the open by putting it on BeyondTV's official domain, but still.. it's all just an advertisement. Can I get Slashdot to link to my next ad for free if I do something a little bigger than anyone else? By the way, I've had one recording conflict over the past 4 months with only 2 tuners, and that was just something that my girlfriend was "kind of interested in seeing but it's not a big deal."

  12. Re:WHY?!? by Caspian · · Score: 1

    RTFD (Read The Fine "Department").

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
  13. The Coral Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here it is, it works great.

    No, I'm not a karma whore. I'm posting as an Anonymous Coward and won't get any karma for it. I just want people to be able to actually read the article, because it is pretty neat and I want one. Have fun!

    1. Re:The Coral Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "No, I'm not a karma whore. I'm posting as an Anonymous Coward and won't get any karma for it. I just want people to be able to actually read the article, because it is pretty neat and I want one. Have fun!"

      Sounds like Mr. Obvious needs some (more) therapy.

  14. It's a giant ad! by rsborg · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Ok, absurdity of 11 tuners aside, I noticed some serious warning signs that this project really didn't seem all that well thought out, and instead seems like a huge AD for beyondTV, Intel, and pretty much all the "high end" components you need for your media center type beast.

    "Heat is the biggest enemy when building a quiet HTPC system. "
    Uh... sure. Agreed.

    "You have to sometimes sacrifice a quiet HTPC so the machine can cool itself efficiently. "
    Hmm... so it supposed to be quiet, but not really.

    "We choose the Intel Pentium D 840 "Extreme Edition" Processor!"
    Ok, quiet is RIGHT OUT now, and what a way to add to your heat problem :-)

    "While trying to push the Godzilla PVR to its limit we experienced an overheating and fan noise issue. "
    LOL. Stopped reading right about there.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:It's a giant ad! by Amouth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      my favorite is the first pics.. al the hardware layed out.. on carpet... carpet. not a table but carpet.. that has to be good for all that stuff

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    2. Re:It's a giant ad! by dildatron · · Score: 1

      My favorite was choosing RAID 0. Damn idiots. Raise your hand if you like to lose a TB if one drive fails... and with as much heat as that thing makes, one drive WILL fail.

      Raid 5 would have performed well and given some redundancy so they don't lose their entire collection of Oprah.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    3. Re:It's a giant ad! by 42Penguins · · Score: 2, Funny

      In that case, I sure hope he's using Monster cables!

    4. Re:It's a giant ad! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      It's a giant ad!

      You mean somebody posted a "blog" about using BeyondTV right smack on the middle of BeyondTV's website? Somebody should let them know so they can remove it immediately. Good thing you spotted it, or who knows how long they might have gone on inadvertantly advertising their products!

    5. Re:It's a giant ad! by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

      Why didn't he go with a multi-core motherboard? This seems like a good application for a multicore/multi CPU motherboard, (with a lower per CPU clock) and it would run a lot cooler than a high GHz single core.

      --
      My rights don't need management.
    6. Re:It's a giant ad! by Minwee · · Score: 1
      An earlier version of the article, rife with phrases like:

      "Not being a complete dumbass, we seperated the recording and playback functions so that we could put the big disk array and all the tuners in another room and drop an absolutely silent, network-booting, passively cooled box based on a VIA EPIA board next to the TV to handle all the playback."

      and

      "By using cheaper, more suitable parts from manufacturers like AMD and high quality freely available PVR software we were able to keep the entire project well under budget"

      was rejected because it somehow failed to please the advertisers.

  15. Latent heat to... by IAAP · · Score: 2, Funny

    make popcorn! And then, get a soda machine or beer keg, catheter for, well, you know and...voila! The ULTIMATE home enterainment system.

    1. Re:Latent heat to... by s4ck · · Score: 1
      This is fire hazard!

      have you heard this machine run? sounds like it's about to blow up!

    2. Re:Latent heat to... by ClamIAm · · Score: 1
      catheter for, well, you know

      Watercooling?

  16. Mirrors by alexhs · · Score: 2, Informative

    Blog already slow (database connection error at first try), following mirrors had time to do their job :
    MirrorDot
    and nyud.net

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
  17. That's The Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cost is the problem with all DIY PVR machines. As soon as you buy a PC with enough CPU or Video horsepower, you have already spent more than double what an off the shelf unit would cost. Then there are the issues with size, noise, heat, aesthetics...

    Until you can buy a two tuner PC with a highquality video card for under $300, DIY PVR's make no sense.

    1. Re:That's The Problem by NerveGas · · Score: 2, Informative

      They do if you already have hardware laying around. For instance, I have a couple of AthlonXP 1800's sitting around, so I'm considering building a PVR out of them. The fact that they're on NForce2 motherboards with SoundStorm and SPDIF out doesn't hurt, either.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    2. Re:That's The Problem by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

      It is not the in destination, grasshoppa, but the journey that we discover fulfillment.

      But in seriousness, you're right. DIY HTPCs aren't cheap, but for some people it's a "this way I know what I'm getting/how it works," sort of thing. A lot like commercial vs. home-build PCs. There are a number of other justifications one might make, but if all you're looking for is !/$, off the shelf is definitely the way to go.

      --
      This sig rocks the casbah.
    3. Re:That's The Problem by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As soon as you buy a PC with enough CPU or Video horsepower, you have already spent more than double what an off the shelf unit would cost.

      But what does that doubled cost get you? You get a machine that works the way you want, instead of one crippled for end users. If a component goes bad, you can replace it with off the shelf parts. You can manage your massive collection of tv shows with the standard unix tools. Plus, you can play arcade games while not watching tv. Also, do any commercial DVRs come with RAID5?

      So there are several ways in which home built DVRs are superior to off the shelf DVRs. Whether they're worth the extra cost is up to you.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:That's The Problem by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Additionally, you don't have to pay a monthly fee just so some company can make money collecting and selling data concerning your viewing habits, and you can skip commercials to your heart's content without anyone giving you grief about it, or having to press a half-dozen buttons to do it.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  18. 11 Tuners ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the post appears to have been slashdotted already, can anyone shed some light on how he got so many tuners into a computer ?

    There has to be some USB connected boxes there - I haven't seen any motherboards that can handle that many PCI cards at once.

    1. Re:11 Tuners ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all of its components installed, the Godzilla PVR had little room to breath. Using the Intel D955XBK motherboard we could fit two PCIe x16 cards, three PCI cards, and one PCIe x1 card. We installed three Hauppauge WinTV-PVR-500s and one PowerColor PCIe x1 Theater 550 Pro based on the ATI Theater 550 chipset. The Theater 550 Pro card from PowerColor is one of the few PCIe TV tuner cards on the market. Since all of our available PCI and PCIe x1 slots were taken up we had to USB HD tuners. We installed four DVico Fusion HDTV5 USB Gold tuner cards. We wanted to install an ATI X850 video card, nVidia GeForce 7800 or even a pair of PCIe cards in SLI mode, but the Godzilla PVR would not allow it. Most of these high end cards are longer and required power adapters to power the card not allowing them to fit inside of Godzilla. We resorted to installing a passively cooled NVIDIA GeForce 6600. This barely fit in the case, with only millimeters to spare.

      ta da
      Watch/listen to the video of before the heatsink upgrade, was a noisey beast to say the least!

    2. Re:11 Tuners ? by sootman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Snapstream built a box with 10 tuners a while ago. http://www.snapstream.com/Community/Articles/hydra /default.asp They used five Hauppauge PVR-500MCE cards which each have two tuners.

      These guys used an odd mix: 3x Hauppauge WinTV-PVR-500, 1xAnalog PCIe Tuner: PowerColor, and 4x Digital HDTV Tuners.
      So I guess the 3 analog cards are 2 tuners each, then the other analog tuner, and 4 HDTV via USB = 11.

      Spinal Tap would be proud.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    3. Re:11 Tuners ? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      Nah, I built a similar box, but instead of using the lame GeForce 6600 he did, I used an ATI All-in-Wonder 2006 card which has a TV tuner built into it!

      "It goes to 12"

      (a poof of smoke goes off in the background while we lose another drummer)

    4. Re:11 Tuners ? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      "These guys" are SnapStream too.

  19. Remote control by msbsod · · Score: 1

    I would add a decent remote control, like the Logitech Harmony 890 for about $400 (that's right!), merely 10% of the total cost. ;-)

    1. Re:Remote control by MrPeavs · · Score: 1

      If you want a descent remote, sure, go with a Logitech Harmoney 890.

      If you want a amazing remote, go with a Philips Pronto NG or better yet the ProntoPro NG or way better yet the iPronto.

      I have the Pronto NG and for $200, it is a steal, not to mention a killer remote to end all remotes.

    2. Re:Remote control by msbsod · · Score: 1

      Cool! The iPronto (Philips TSI6400) plus one obligatory Network Extender (Philips NTX6400) cost only $1400. Just what the Godzilla of PVRs needs. Thanks!

    3. Re:Remote control by plover · · Score: 1
      Actually I just bought a Harmony 880 last year, and I am sure pleased with it.

      The entire setup process is fully automated. I didn't have to hunt for files on the web, I didn't have to figure out or create long lists of macros, I just had to plug a USB cable into the remote. It launched a web page where I entered my model numbers, tied a few inputs to outputs, and it did all the macro creation for me. And it knows full codes for every random old piece of hardware I own.

      I've looked at the Pronto's programming environment before, and I know I didn't want to go to that much work to define remote screens for each device, and then train them. And yes, I could have gone hunting for all the right CCF files. But why? Everything for the Harmony is automatically downloaded just by my entering a model number. And it then creates the sensible macros magically: Watch TV, for example. I didn't have to pick "Power on amp, power on TV, set amp input to Audio1, set TV input to HDMI, set internal channel changing device to cable box". The Pronto looked like it was still going to require me to figure out and assemble a half-dozen macros.

      I also thought about using Neo-Pacific's remote software for one of my old Palms. But they were even worse to set up than the Prontos (even if you could import them from CCF files.)

      The other big advantage to the Harmony is actual keys. I can feel where the mute button is in the dark, or volume up/down, or skip ahead/back, or channel up/down, or power, or aspect ratio. The Pronto has a finite set of hard keys, and what are the chances they support all the stuff I frequently use?

      The only bummer I have right now is that I'd rather have had the 890. I had to spend another $$$ on a Niles remote extender because I hid all my gear in a closet. I tried several different brands of those RF IR extenders, but they all had extremely poor IR detection range -- sometimes were eight feet or less! I had no place to mount the little pyramids that close. So I mounted the Niles receiver in the wall behind the TV, and it works fine, but at a price. RF would have been a much better option.

      --
      John
    4. Re:Remote control by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 1

      I use the Firefly remote and its actually pretty good. But I'm not trying to control my home stereo with it though. I just use Beyond TV on my computer.

    5. Re:Remote control by MrPeavs · · Score: 1

      You are making the Pronto software sound worse than it really is. The software can leave a little to be desired, but it holds a huge list of codes for remotes out there. It allows you to create a preset screen with the codes for you, this is already built in and not CCF files out on the internet. Plus, having it learn commands is a snap, much easier than MK2000i learning remote that came with my Marantz receiver.

      As far as macro's, I personally rather set them up. How is a remote going to magically know if I have my DVD player hooked up to a input on my pre/pro or directly to my TV? The macros couldn't be easier to create, all you need to know is how you do it manually and then just replicate that in the software.

      The Logitech Harmony is just the Average Joe Six pack remote, it is geared to be easy, which also leaves it limited. Sure it can do more than your average learning or programmable remote, even compared to what I sue to think as a amazing remote, the Philips MK2000 remote that came with my Marantz receiver. The software interface makes it nice and much easier to setup, but it simply cannot beat the sheer customizability that the Pronto line up offers you. I have completely customized how my Pronto works, I have created my own screens and buttons. I can even replicate the layout of all the remotes I have, which comes in handy for when you get used to a remote.

      As for the hard buttons, I don't see it being a big deal. The hard buttons it has cover all the basic things you would do while watching TV or a movie. Even that, the touch screen lights up and emits enough light for you to easily use the remote even under pitch black conditions. Plus the indigo like glow is pretty!

      The Pronto does have some short comings, like we talked about, but what remote doesn't? But when you are talking about a remote that can be totally customized in every aspect, look no further than the Philips Pronto line-up. No remote, with in reason (like those home automation setups), can come close to what the Pronto can do. Besides, when we are talking about going balls to the wall and overkill like this Godzilla PVR, would you really want to include a limiting remote?

      I was in the same situation with you with hiding my equipment. However, not buy choice, the fiancée demanded it. I guess the price I have to pay for true love, though it isn't all bad, the cabinets that they went in look amazing. Anyways, I caught a break with IR extender. My Mitsubishi TV comes with IR extenders built into the TV. When I first bought it, I thought it was stupid and pointless, needless to say, I don't think that now.

      Unfortunately, I will be in your boot before too long. The TV is going to be hitting 4 years old this May, that isn't exactly the problem, it is still a great looking TV. The problems lies in that I got it 1 year before DVI really hit the market. Which if you know anything about HD-DVD or Blu-ray (I really hope Blu-ray goes the way of the dodo and Betamax), they are forcing us to use HDCP either via DVI or HDMI. The early adopters like me are left high and dry, well that is unless the $300 devices that can remove HDCP come down in price in the next year or so. Most likely, I will be buying a new HDTV, which isn't all bad. We will be moving once more in about a year into a house, the 300 lbs+ HDTV doesn't make for a easy or friendly move.

    6. Re:Remote control by plover · · Score: 1
      Just as I'm not familiar with the current state of the Pronto's software (I last looked at it about two years ago), I can see you're equally not familiar with the Harmony. Everything you suggest is not only possible, but designed-for up front and made easy for everyone. The big advantage is: I didn't have to do nearly that much work to get more functionality than I thought I could get, including precise control when I need it.

      How is a remote going to magically know if I have my DVD player hooked up to a input on my pre/pro or directly to my TV?

      The software knows from your model number that your TVs has certain audio and video inputs, that your cable box and DVD player has specific audio and video outputs, and that your VCRs, DVRs, video switches and post-processors (such as equalizers, filters or whatever) have both inputs and outputs. It applies rules to whatever combination of gear you've entered, and figures out things like "if you have a cable box and a TV set you might want to set up a 'Watch Cable TV' macro." Once it's come up with the list of tasks that you should be able to do with your equipment, it presents you with that list and prompts you to set each activity up.

      Once you click "set up the 'Watch Cable TV' activity", it then assumes that one of your cable box's outputs would be plugged into the TiVo, and that your TV is connected to your TiVo. For the 'Watch Cable TV' activity, it might prompt "To watch cable channels on your TiVo, which input on your TiVo do you have to select?" and gives the exact list of inputs that your model of TiVo has. It then asks "Which input on your TV do you have to select to watch TiVo?" And that's literally all that's required for the setup process for each activity. From there, the web page will assemble the IR codes, build up macros, and download a configuration file which is then sent to the remote.

      I answered at most a dozen or two carefullly scripted questions, at which point my remote was fully functional. But since I'm me, I wanted to play around with it so I added another "activity" to support another set of functions. It was almost as easy as the pre-scripted ones.

      On the remote, the "activities" are displayed on the 8 "soft" keys. (They are actually hard buttons surrounding the non-touch LCD display screen.) It has hard keys to bring up activities, devices, media and help. And the help is also very intelligent. The remote keeps track of your current context (it knows if you are trying to watch cable or if your system is supposed to be off, for example) but if your TV input gets changed, or it gets out of sync because your DVD player missed the "on" signal, pressing the "help" button will ask you a series of questions that will get everything back in sync. "Is your TV on? [no] *blinky-blinky* Now is your TV on? [yes] Did that fix the problem? [yes]"

      The media button is a context-sensitive "favorites" list. For the "Watch TV" activity, it's a list of favorite cable channels. For the "Listen to radio", it's a list of frequencies or presets that you'd have on your tuner. For a DVD carousel, it could be a disc selector.

      If you want to do something that's not pre-scripted, hit the "device" button and select the specific device from the soft keys. The remote is then configured to send commands exclusively to that one device; all the hard keys that make sense are supported (menu, up/down/left/right, 0-9, volume, etc) and any keys that don't have hard analogues are supported in the on-screen soft keys.

      The web side is designed so that a hard-core geek can set or tweak anything, while the handhold wizards will walk even Joe Sixpack through the process with a minimum of knowledge. Their database holds a record of absolutely every obscure device I could find to play with. This remote not only scored a WAF of about 98 (would have been 100 except for the price), it's even easy enough to use that it passes the "Aunt Judy" test. While I set one up for her, I did not have to train her how to

      --
      John
  20. Slashdotted by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 5, Funny

    Too bad they didn't build the Godzilla of Servers to go with it.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    1. Re:Slashdotted by romper · · Score: 1

      Then use the Coral mirror.

      --
      Right is wrong when left is right.
    2. Re:Slashdotted by mattmacf · · Score: 1

      They did. It just overheated.

      --
      I only mod funny =D
  21. Extreme Edition? by grahamdrew · · Score: 1

    "What makes the "Extreme Edition" processor different from a regular Pentium D processor? A regular Pentium D processor has two cores which Windows XP sees as two physical processors. The Extreme Edition processors adds hyper-threading to each core! This allow Windows XP to run 4 simultaneous threads at once!"

    Maybe someone can correct me on this, but I though the difference between the regular Pentiums and the Extreme Edition was a fuckton of cache. Does Intel intentionally disable hyperthreading on the non-Extreme Pentium Ds?

    --
    // Dumps core here
    1. Re:Extreme Edition? by pnglvr · · Score: 1

      The Pentium Extreme Edition 840 that was used in this project is just a normal Pentium D but with hyperthreading enabled, this and the unlocked multiplier for unhindered overclocking are the only differences between the two. The original P4 EE for Socket 478 was a repackaged Gallatin core (used in Xeons) with 2meg of L3 cache.

    2. Re:Extreme Edition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Intel intentionally disable hyperthreading on the non-Extreme Pentium Ds?

      Yes.

  22. But why? by GweeDo · · Score: 1

    I have a dual tuner PVR (Dish Network 522) and am really happy with it. I have yet to run into an issue where I want to record three programs at once. Do I just not watch enough TV or do these people watch WAY to much?

    1. Re:But why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rarely want to watch/record more than two shows at a time. Add in a wife who likes all those "Extreme Makeover" shows, and we're constantly fighting over the available tuners.

      What I want to see (in a set-top box) is a DVR that is capable of communicating with/coordinating multiple DVRs in the same house. One in the living room, one in the office, one in the bedroom, etc - wherever there's a tuner available, use it - and make the recordings available to any other DVR in the house. Basically distributed but shared resources.

    2. Re:But why? by raehl · · Score: 1

      Do I just not watch enough TV or do these people watch WAY to much?

      They're probably just married.

    3. Re:But why? by kosmicki · · Score: 1

      It comes up with three people who all like different things. But normally it is easy to work around, as one of em is usually on later that night. Now if it was just me? Two would work out great most of the time.

      If I were to build my own PVR, I would have to go with four tuners. The capability is there for those rare times when you need more.

    4. Re:But why? by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

      Do I just not watch enough TV or do these people watch WAY to much?

      No, they probably don't watch much more than you.
      They just have small penises, that's all.

      :-P

      --
      This sig rocks the casbah.
    5. Re:But why? by slim · · Score: 1

      I have an old series 1 TiVo, and I very seldom find it a problem that I can only record one thing at once (although I rigged up a second set top box so I can watch one thing while TiVo records another).

      However, one of the cool things TiVo does that other PVRs don't, is auto-record suggested shows for you, just on the off-chance you might be interested. How cool would it be to have /everything/ from /every channel/ for the last --say-- week available to you, not so you could watch it all, but so that you had a complete choice and could cherry pick the best bits without having to think about setting the recorder in advance.

      Based on standard def and DivX compression rates, I don't think it would be unrealistic at today's HDD prices to keep a one week buffer of (say) your favourite 10 channels; 99% of which you'd never watch.

  23. Hmm, wonder what's going to be on the box?!? by egriebel · · Score: 1
    1TB storage, $4k, 11 tuners? Ok, there's no way in Hell that you are married! (can't rtfa as it's slashdotted)

    And, since you are not married, is it going to be stuffed with only Sci-Fi Network shows, ripped movie DVDs, and top-quality pr0n?

    --
    ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
    1. Re:Hmm, wonder what's going to be on the box?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, there's no way in Hell that you are married!

      I think this is concrete evidence that he *is* married.

  24. Just what I've been waiting for, by Grue_Food · · Score: 1

    a PVR with enough storage space for all my favorite shows and movies, plus an alternative heat source!
    It'll add the realism of being able to actually cook marshmallows in front of that recorded fireplace video!

    1. Re:Just what I've been waiting for, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's missing is the alternate energy source to power the corn popping sucker

  25. He should run his site on that machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wordpress fall down, go boom.

  26. hmm... by Nissmo · · Score: 0

    for $4200.00 I'd rather buy a new biger TV

  27. New king of the losers... by Duncan3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    We have a new winner...

    The old king was a 45 year old 350lb man who spent his days in his parents basement watching porn and playing WoW pretending to be a 16 year old girl.

    But these guys that built an 11 tuner PVR becasue they just couldnt get enough porn blow right past 11 on the loser scale.

    Please find your nearest suicide booth, ASAP.

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    1. Re:New king of the losers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you here?

    2. Re:New king of the losers... by King_of_Losers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The old king was a 45 year old 350lb man who spent his days in his parents basement watching porn and playing WoW pretending to be a 16 year old girl.

      you hit the nail right on the head.

    3. Re:New king of the losers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The old king was a 45 year old 350lb man who spent his days in his parents basement watching porn and playing WoW pretending to be a 16 year old girl.

      Wait... I was the king? And you never told me ?

  28. Re:WHY?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFD (Retrieve the Fire Department)?? Yes this device may require them.

  29. Confusingly unuseful by heatdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I used to live in a house with 7 people, and we had a DVR that had 2 tuners. (so, you could record on one, and watch on the other)

    Occasionally we would have conflicts with someone recording a movie during a regularly recorded TV show, and someone else was bored and wanted to surf channels - but even with 7 people, 3 or 4 tuners definitely would have done it. 11 is so overkill it's not even funny.

    However...technology for technology's sake, I suppose.

    --
    I'm sorry. The number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again.
    1. Re:Confusingly unuseful by Not_Wiggins · · Score: 1

      I think the idea behind such a device is to get it closer to recording *all* tv, so you can go back and watch stuff you didn't even know you were missing. While in the US this is not very likely to happen (too many channels... too much to record), in some places (like the UK), the choices are limited enough that one *can* record all broadcast channels. I think it might be 8 channels in the UK, but that's just some (probably wrong) factoid I have floating around in the back of my head.

      I suppose in the US, you could have 1 (or 2) streams dedicated to whatever channel you happen to be watching (pause live tv) and have the other 9 or 10 set to channels you frequently watch content on to record everything (like in the scenario just presented).

      Still... I agree with you on it not necessarily being useful. With the advent of "On Demand" TV from the cable companies, why roll your own solutions when, theoretically, the cable company is already working on storing/serving up all your shows on demand? Not here yet... but definitely on the way.

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying, "Nice doggie!" until you can find a rock.
    2. Re:Confusingly unuseful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it might be 8 channels in the UK, but that's just some (probably wrong) factoid I have floating around in the back of my head.

      I can confirm that is definately wrong.

      There are 5 analog terrestrial channels. Up to 30 free digital terrestrial channels (according to www.freeview.co.uk). Many more are also available on satellite or cable. I'm not sure if there are any HD channels yet though, but I beleive they are due sometime soon.

  30. umm....no. by rhesuspieces00 · · Score: 1

    catheter + pr0n = bad times

  31. What's that smell? by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

    Mmmmm, the blog server smells like burning.

    --
    Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
  32. Hmmm? by darmey · · Score: 0

    What's a PVR anyway? Pathetic Virgin Russian? No, thanks, I've been living in Moscow for 5 years and I'm tired of them already. And now the Godzilla comes...

  33. Meh... by benjamindees · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Look at me, I can spend money...

    More interestingly, does anybody have any suggestions for cheap hardware to get started playing around with GnuRadio and what I can use it for? FM or shortwave radio would be nice...

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    1. Re:Meh... by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      Dude drop the sig - I am not sure how CNN is classified as Jewish media. It's just plain anti-semitic.

    2. Re:Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. No one asked you.

    3. Re:Meh... by Detritus · · Score: 1

      He thinks that anyone smarter than himself must be a dirty Jew. Therefore, the Jews control CNN, the media, the banks, and the local liquor store.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    4. Re:Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      smarter than himself

      smarter than he

  34. waste $ on h/w won't pay for content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't get this geeky thing where you'll spend godawful amounts of money on hardware (and create a huge electricity bill and cooling problem to boot) but take a hissy fit about paying for a DVD or a CD you want to enjoy. It reminds me of clients my law firm had who'd spend gobs of money for us to fight their personal tax assessments.

    At $15 each, you could buy 285 DVDs. I can guarantee that when you pay for entertainment you're a lot more choosy about what you watch. It reminds me of software pirates who spend so much time and energy collecting software (or porn fanatics, too, I guess) but never actually enjoy what they've collected.

    1. Re:waste $ on h/w won't pay for content by Ignignot · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, you could have 8 at a time unlimited rentals from netflix for about 87 months... and I doubt that this hardware will last long enough to survive that long without replacement, not to mention its electricity bill!

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
    2. Re:waste $ on h/w won't pay for content by m50d · · Score: 1
      I don't get this geeky thing where you'll spend godawful amounts of money on hardware (and create a huge electricity bill and cooling problem to boot) but take a hissy fit about paying for a DVD or a CD you want to enjoy.

      Hardware is sold for about what it cost to make. I can get a blank CD for 20p, yet I don't see music CDs being sold for anything like that.

      It reminds me of software pirates who spend so much time and energy collecting software (or porn fanatics, too, I guess) but never actually enjoy what they've collected.

      Don't you have a collection you never use? You can enjoy collecting things for the sake of collecting them.

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:waste $ on h/w won't pay for content by Paul+Carver · · Score: 1

      I'll pay for DVDs. I've bought lots of them. I just wish I could get them all into a single player so that I can choose a DVD to watch as easily as I pick a show off of my Tivo Now Showing menu. I haven't yet been able to get Mythtv or anything else to do that.

    4. Re:waste $ on h/w won't pay for content by MoxFulder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, doesn't make too much sense to me. If you use all 11 TV-tuners at once, are you actually gonna be able to watch everything you record???? I don't have cable, and I don't think I even get that many channels.

      And the electricity bill, oof. I don't think a lot of people realize how much energy a computer uses. A typical desktop PC, idling, uses 150-200 W. That's like 2-3 typical incandescent bulbs or 8-12 typical compact fluorescent bulbs. Not so good for your wallet, or for the environment.

      What do I know anyway... I don't even like TV. Perhaps I would if I built myself a PVR, but then again that's the reason I probably shouldn't :-)

    5. Re:waste $ on h/w won't pay for content by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "I don't get this geeky thing where you'll spend godawful amounts of money on hardware (and create a huge electricity bill and cooling problem to boot) "

      Nerds have been doing that for ever. It's what they enjoy. How much money do you spend on your hobby?

      How much on golf?

      "but take a hissy fit about paying for a DVD or a CD you want to enjoy."

      Seperate issues. This is not about the money. If you don't understand that, I got to ask:
      What the hell are you doing here?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:waste $ on h/w won't pay for content by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      I don't get this geeky thing where you'll spend godawful amounts of money on hardware (and create a huge electricity bill and cooling problem to boot) but take a hissy fit about paying for a DVD or a CD you want to enjoy. It reminds me of clients my law firm had who'd spend gobs of money for us to fight their personal tax assessments.

      Both examples look like matters of principle to me.

    7. Re:waste $ on h/w won't pay for content by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      a) It's a proof-of-concept built by the people who sell BeyondTV (a point most people seem to have missed).

      b) Nobody's going to spend $4,500 for an HTPC; at least not any of the same people who are going to bitch about the price of DVDs.

      c) Most TV isn't available on DVD, and what is available isn't typically released until well after the season is over.

    8. Re:waste $ on h/w won't pay for content by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "At $15 each, you could buy 285 DVDs. I can guarantee that when you pay for entertainment you're a lot more choosy about what you watch. It reminds me of software pirates who spend so much time and energy collecting software (or porn fanatics, too, I guess) but never actually enjoy what they've collected."

      Part of the point of this, and the reason why illegal downloading of video content has taken off (and music too I guess) is that people don't want to be FORCED to be choosy about what they watch simply because of financial contraits. Many people, myself included, enjoy sampling all the random media out there in hopes of discovering a gem that we would not have otherwise found if we had to plop down $15 to sample it.

      Now, to your other point about collectors...did you ever stop to think that many the act of collecting itself was enjoyable for them? I mean, why limit it to software and porn...people all around the world enjoy collecting things, often times just for the sake of collecting. And while I try not to collect things that I haven't viewed or enjoyed...as a packrat, I can easily see why someone else would.

      So while I follow your logic in your post, I have to say I find it a bit trollish since there are plenty of reasons someone might find it useful to spend godawful amounts of money on hardware and electricity. It seems as though you just wanted to take a jab at people who choose not to pay for their media rather than try to really address the point at hand.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    9. Re:waste $ on h/w won't pay for content by multiplexo · · Score: 1
      At $15 each, you could buy 285 DVDs. I can guarantee that when you pay for entertainment you're a lot more choosy about what you watch. It reminds me of software pirates who spend so much time and energy collecting software (or porn fanatics, too, I guess) but never actually enjoy what they've collected.

      Actually you can get DVDs for less if you're willing to wait until Hollywood Video clears their shelves of new titles. The Hollywood Video by my house regularly sells used DVDs 3 for $25, you might have to wait three months after it comes out on DVD to have your own copy of "Batman Begins" but hey, you can use the money you saved to purchase one of the new Sony 400 disc DVD changers with DVI output.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  35. come on, be mature by jeffmeden · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The correct question is:

    Are there 11 channels of porn?

  36. MOD Parent UP - please by IAAP · · Score: 1

    To +5 Insightful!

  37. You sir, by modecx · · Score: 1

    You sir, are a genius. I bet you hear it all the time! This has got to be the best invention since, well, whatever Ron Popeil last invented. It's simply outstanding, because not only can you grate your cheese, you can melt it over your tortilla chips at the exhaust side of all of those hard drives. In fact, it may be ideal to have a nacho conveyor that would simply do it all for you!

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  38. The biggest enemy when building a quiet HTPC by lildogie · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Heat is the biggest enemy when building a quiet HTPC system."

    With _noise_ a close second?

    1. Re:The biggest enemy when building a quiet HTPC by m50d · · Score: 1

      Noise will be irritating. Heat will destroy several hundred dollars' worth of hardware. I think heat takes a higher priority.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:The biggest enemy when building a quiet HTPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heat = Noise

      They're the same thing. Like matter = energy
      Why do you think computers are noisy?
      To remove the heat!
      Duh!

    3. Re:The biggest enemy when building a quiet HTPC by ColdDimSum · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Heat = Noise*mach(1)^2 :)

    4. Re:The biggest enemy when building a quiet HTPC by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

      No, they mean that if you want to control heat, you might have to add noise (extra fans).

    5. Re:The biggest enemy when building a quiet HTPC by sootman · · Score: 1

      Like the racers say, "If you want to finish first, you have to first finish."

      Priority #1: make it last (i.e., solve heat problems.)

      Priority #2: make it quiet. After all, you could always just put it in another room and run some wires to your TV and sound system.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    6. Re:The biggest enemy when building a quiet HTPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With this setup, my bank account is my biggest enemy...

  39. Mod parent up by FalconZero · · Score: 1

    Quote corret, and needs modding up IMO (Re: Drive failure destroying array)

    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
  40. Re: carpet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    In that pic they are trying to use the static electricities to loosen up the electrons. With the electrons loosened they can tranfer the datas faster. They said when the electrons are too tight only 10 of the tuners can be used at a time.

  41. From a SnapSream Employee by Daedius · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Haha, holy sh!t, you all just slashdotted and digged us at the same time ;P

  42. Pre-recorded Hard Drives? by Eightyford · · Score: 1

    Is there any place where someone can buy a 250GB hard drive that is pre-loaded with movies or Simpsons episodes? If not, then maybe I should start a little black market business...

    1. Re:Pre-recorded Hard Drives? by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      Enjoy pound me in the ass federal prison then. That sort of things leads to extended vacations at Club Fed.

    2. Re:Pre-recorded Hard Drives? by Eightyford · · Score: 1

      Enjoy pound me in the ass federal prison then. That sort of things leads to extended vacations at Club Fed.

      Not everyone is so lucky to live in the "great" USA, where anal rape accepted as part of the justice system.

    3. Re:Pre-recorded Hard Drives? by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      Well I am pretty sure prisons suck not matter what country you are in. Except for Canada - of course :-)

    4. Re:Pre-recorded Hard Drives? by corrosive_nf · · Score: 1

      So the whole horror of a turkish prison, or the french fire island was just made up? Or do you just assume that you onlty had bad shit in the us

    5. Re:Pre-recorded Hard Drives? by Eightyford · · Score: 1

      So the whole horror of a turkish prison, or the french fire island was just made up? Or do you just assume that you onlty had bad shit in the us

      Yes, that's exactly what I wass saying...

    6. Re:Pre-recorded Hard Drives? by drxray · · Score: 1

      A guy I know used to resell blank DVDRWs (making money via the bulk discount), and AFAIK he'd sometimes put warez on them for free.

      And no, file trading between friends does not lead to prison.

      --
      Slashdot - Mutual Assured Discussion
  43. NOT first post by helmutvs · · Score: 0

    Off topic and even if you took credit, you're the 2nd post. [chuckle sound] But to put this thread on topic, this PVR sounds like if it is left unattended, it could become the Godzilla of melted balls of plastic and metal! Ahh... I love the smell of burning PCBs in the morning.

    --
    There are no uninteresting things. There are only uninterested people.
  44. Congrats by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    Well congrats to him, he must have some serious talent and patience. (Coming from a fairly technically savvy person who spent a whole day gettng LIRC to work with a Dish Network receiver on MythTv. Sigh...)

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  45. How do you feed 11 tuners? by pLnCrZy · · Score: 1

    This might be a stupid question... but where does one get the source feeds for 11 tuners?

    Granted, I haven't used digital cable in years, but last time I had cable they told me they couldn't support more than 4 tuners in my home due to bandwidth issues.

    I currently have DirecTV (DirecTiVo) and I would need 3 dishes to feed 11 tuners.

    1. Re:How do you feed 11 tuners? by nsayer · · Score: 1
      I would need 3 dishes to feed 11 tuners.

      No you wouldn't (granted, you'd need to daisy-chain a pair of these to get to 11 drops, but I'm sure they make 5x16 multiplexers for apartment buildings and the like).

    2. Re:How do you feed 11 tuners? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Dude, everything on digital cable is broadcast over the wire... you could have as many tuners as there are channels. Lord knows what the technical issues are that would prevent it, but it's not bandwidth.

      And no, you wouldn't need 3 dishes, you'd use the same one you have now, with diseqc switches. Duh.

    3. Re:How do you feed 11 tuners? by magicchex · · Score: 1

      In my last house we had 11 housemates and everyone had their own digital box/TV as well as sharing cable internet. There were no problems, we simply had a couple amplifiers and some cable splitters.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    4. Re:How do you feed 11 tuners? by not-real-sure · · Score: 1

      Actually no. To feed 11 tuners with Direct TV you would need 2 triple LNB dishes and 2 8 port multitaps. FYI

      --
      My Doom. The gift that keeps on giving
  46. 11 Tuners? Why? by Pedrito · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a two-tuner TiVo with my DirecTV. I record TONS of movies. Most of it I capture and write DVD. I very rarely have a conflict where I'm trying to record more than 2 things at once, and even when it has happened, I've always been able to find at least one alternate time among the three movies to reschedule one. 3 tuners, and I'd NEVER run into the problem. 11 tuners? Who the fuck needs 11 tuners? Sorry, but this article goes into my "Waste of time and money" bin.

    1. Re:11 Tuners? Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Some of the tuners are needed because they are not multipurpose. For example, the HDTV tuners cannot tune into basic cable and vice versa. So if you wanted to record 3 shows, they could be HDTV only at that particular instance (over the air) or analog cable, so you would need 6 tuners, despite using only 3 at any given time.

      Further, news or science junkies that also happen to want to watch regular shows might hae a use for this. For news: CPAN, CPAN2, CPAN3, weatherchannel, CNN, FoxNews, MSNBC, CNBC, Headline News, NASA, PBS (shows BBC International), PCN (Pennsylvania Cable Network, shows German news), 2 or 3 for your regular shows.

      On the news ends, I'm not a news junkie, but several times, I've heard of something that occurs afterwards that makes headlines, such as an interview that got out of hand (i.e. Ann Coulter had one I think with an NBC interviewer), that I learned after the fact and wish I had recorded so I could see what really happened instead of watching parsed replays and edited commentary after the fact.

      I'd been thinking about building something like this for 2 reasons really--one to have a 24-72 hour store of news channel material. Also, sometimes I've found myself wanting to compare ongoing live news coverage, which would require multiple tuners for later comparison of simultaneous recording of coverage.

      The other to use as a security camera recorded (you can usually feed directly into a PVR card and if not, tune a security camera into a channel with a modulator).

      Granted this is more niche stuff, but I could see myself building a 7 analog and 3 HDTV tuner, although I think I'd use a network of machines that I could power up and down as needed.

  47. S/N by Atraxen · · Score: 1

    The server's already as hot as the PVR must get, so I don't know if it answered my musing... What kind of signal quality is it getting? I can't imagine the owner sprung for digital cable x11 lines, so there must be some kind of split. I'd like to see how the signal-to-noise is being held up. Ok, I'm done musing.

    --
    Be careful of your thoughts; they could become words at any minute...
  48. why not... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    Dual Xeon w/ dual core w/ hyperthreading.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  49. It's easy to understand when you realize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I don't get this geeky thing where you'll spend godawful amounts of money on hardware (and create a huge electricity bill and cooling problem to boot) but take a hissy fit about paying for a DVD or a CD you want to enjoy.

    The hardware doesn't have this pernicious notion that we should have to agree to 800 page downs worth of legalese in order to use it. Nor does the bit of legalese it generally comes with ("limited warranty--if it breaks you get a new one") compare to the legalese we're starting to get with CDs and DVDs (e.g. Sony's "we 0wn you, bi0tch" EULA + rootkit combo).

  50. Self Plug: BYOPVR by enrico_suave · · Score: 1



    Build Your Own PVR Community Site for news, reviews, howto, tips, and forum.

    also see HTPCnews as well.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  51. HTPC CPU Choice by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

    Even better would be a mobile-ish setup with a Centrino or Turion. If you're looking for cool and quiet without sacrificing too much speed, that's really the way to go.

    Just my $2.0e-2.

    --
    This sig rocks the casbah.
    1. Re:HTPC CPU Choice by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I think the CPU is being used to encode the shows here. At least that's why I'm guessing he needed such a beast of a CPU. Encoding 11 streams at once can't be easy. I'm guessing that's why he need such huge system disks too, to buffer the video while his CPU chugs like crazy encoding it.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:HTPC CPU Choice by Vorondil28 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm, that starts to make me wonder when you move nearly everything but the pretty case into another room (because doing it the 'Godzilla' way obviously doesn't scale well).For not much more cash you could take all the contents of this PVR, put it in a case that will let it breathe, and stick it in the office/basement/etc for it to make as much noise as it wants. You run a fiber to carry the audio/video output from the server to the viewing room. Then you build a cheap, slim, sexy, dumb terminal of an HTPC that sends commands to the server over a network. All the storage and encoding power you want with none of the bulk or noise in the viewing room. :-)

      --
      This sig rocks the casbah.
    3. Re:HTPC CPU Choice by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      The encoding, at least on the Hauppague cards, is done via hardware. The decoding, however, takes about 800mhz of processor power. I assume that he expects to view multiple streams at once, like a media server.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    4. Re:HTPC CPU Choice by timeOday · · Score: 1

      My HTPC is built on a Celeron 566 overclocked to 850, and I can tell you it runs pretty close to full throttle just on a 640x480 video stream. A 1080 line high-def signal would have 5 times the pixels! In fact my Pentium-M 1.6 GHz laptop only gets 15-20 fps on 1024x768 video in the MSMpeg-4 codec.

    5. Re:HTPC CPU Choice by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      You know, I hadn't figured in the HD signal. But my 800mhz PVR does fine decoding a standard Satellite TV signal while encoding (via hardware) and recording two signals to disk. I never have any lags or jags as long as I give it a theraputic reboot every week or so, and keep my 3 year old off of nick.com.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    6. Re:HTPC CPU Choice by timeOday · · Score: 1

      My son plays web games too. But I nice'd his desktop so the PVR takes preference :)

  52. Maybe if they hosted the blog on the PVR... by LightStruk · · Score: 1

    Maybe if they hosted the blog on the PVR, the blog would still be up.

  53. Damn, I thought of an app for this... by kabocox · · Score: 1

    O.K. Although, I agree with the folks that state that this just didn't seem well thought out, I have an app that could make use of more than 11+ video capture streams. Home security. During Christmas, I signed up for some "home automation" catalogs. I don't buy any of the stuff because its way out of my price range, but I was startled to find some cool things listed. Apparently several companies are selling a 4 camera setup, with 80 GB HD PVR for I think somewhere $1500-2000 for home security. They said that it would record 4 weeks of video. (I'm not sure if that is 4 weeks with 4 camera or 4 weeks with one camera though.) I keep thinking to myself that it seemed like a cool product, but I'd want alot more than 4 cameras, but I wouldn't want to just buy multiple systems. I'd want a HD solution that had several TB in RAID5 and designed to record as many camera feeds as possible. I'd want to have security camera feeds storaged into a nice very lockable cabinet that should survive a burglary.

    1. Re:Damn, I thought of an app for this... by u16084 · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, But no email listed for ya, http://www.dedicatedmicrosus.com/products/p_ds2rs. asp/ check this out for your home security needs/recording/dvr thingie :)

      --
      -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
    2. Re:Damn, I thought of an app for this... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      The link to your specific page didn't work, but I was able to browse http://www.dedicatedmicrosus.com./
      I wouldn't say that it is off topic. ;) Other than security cameras what the heck are you going to use 11 video feeds for? I liked the devices listed, but I don't have any money ;( to spend on these nifty toys. Have you ever seen the movie I think the name was Sliver (1993) about a rich guy putting video cameras in all the apartments and hallways of the apartment building that he owned? After seeing that, I always dreamed of wiring my own home and yard up like that. Call it peeping on the visitors. Nah, that wouldn't work cause the only person that visits us is my mother-in-law and I don't want to look at her. But the idea of recording everything that happens on and around my property and being "in control" is just so alluring.

      Heck, I've also always wanted a castle with secret passages. I'm just not going to ever afford to play with any of these neat toys!

  54. What if you are only interested in ... by GSwarthout · · Score: 1

    the Mothra of toaster ovens or the King Ghidorah of filing cabinets?

    --
    It is the 21st century and the time for Klax has passed.
    1. Re:What if you are only interested in ... by DorkusMasterus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      THIS is the Mothra of Toaster Ovens. aaaaaand, THIS is the King Ghidorah of filing cabinets. /me bows.

    2. Re:What if you are only interested in ... by halltk1983 · · Score: 1

      I would have thought that Ballmer could afford a better house...

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
  55. Intel CPU...?? RAID-0...?? Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either these guys know very little about hardware, or they got a big fat check from Intel. AMD CPUs costing 30% less will run circles around the Intel CPU they picked, and produce half as much heat. Also, why RAID-0? With all those drives, the space lost to RAID-5 would be minimal, and it would give them actual redundancy (which is what RAID is all about). Maybe they know a lot about PVRs, but clearly they don't know much about setting up a server / workstation...

  56. Well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Republicans hate the working man. They will destroy the middle class.

  57. OT: nano-ITX in a Silverstore LC-08 case by renehollan · · Score: 1
    At the other end of the spectrum, I FINALLY got a compatible LC08 case from Silverstone (it was a show demo unit I begged and pleaded to purchase -- lead time for "real" ones is about 4 weeks) for my nanoITX mobo, and put it together last night. Took lots of pictures (including showing the diffs between the old and new LC08 case), and plan to write something up and post it online.

    FC3 and Lindows run fine on it, but I have to get the accelerated CN400 (H/W HD MPEG2 decoding) drivers, and build MythTV for it.

    --
    You could've hired me.
  58. 11 tuners - ridiculous by vux984 · · Score: 1

    So assuming he finds 11 items to actually simultaneously record, and given that practically nothing scheduled is less than 1/2 hour in length, this thing running for 1/2 hour gives him 5:30 worth of TV to watch. (Assuming that all he watches are sitcoms with 8 minutes of commercials each, he's still got a minimum of 4:02 hours per 0:30 hours of recording ... and probably more because he's likely recording a movie or seven in their too.

    4 hours of TV a day is already getting high - if the PVR runs for a full hour, it becomes a full time job just to watch all that TV. If the PVR runs for 3 hours at capacity daily he will be recording far more content than he can possibly ever consume.

    1. Re:11 tuners - ridiculous by brxndxn · · Score: 1

      That's the whole point of Tivo/ReplayTV/or any PVR!! What is so tough to understand about recording more than one could possibly consume?

      I have two ReplayTVs (180 hours total).. They record tons and tons of stuff. I would never have a chance to watch all of it.. So, I get to pick what I want whenever I want. And, I discard what I don't want. Is that wasteful? Well.. considering there's no physical materials involved, it doesn't seem so.

      11 tuners seems ridiculous, imo, though.. If you really want a show recorded and your one or two tuners didn't get it, you could always download it from newsgroups or bitorrent sites..

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
    2. Re:11 tuners - ridiculous by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Who says he's the only consumer? With ethernet, it could be farmed out to several viewing devices and viewers.

    3. Re:11 tuners - ridiculous by vux984 · · Score: 1

      What is so tough to understand about recording more than one could possibly consume?

      11-tuners is like living inside a grocery store because your not sure what you'll want for lunch.

      I have an HD dual tuner PVR myself -- I can already easily record more than I can watch. Once a week I scan the movie channels for stuff I might want to see, along with a selection of regular series recordings.

      I can't keep up with it *now*; adding 9 more tuners is just pointless. I mean I see your point that having the ability to pick and choose and discard -- and that's cool -- but if you know you are only going to watch less than 5 hours of TV a day you really don't need to be capturing 200 hours a day; any reasonable person could 'short list' that 200 hours down to a much smaller selection of say 10 hours worth that they might actually want, knowing that in the end they'll be lucky to watch even half of that.

      The only real advantage to additional tuners would be conflict resolution. But in the last year I've only had two or three 3-way scheduling conflicts, and in every case I was able to easily find one of the programs in another timeslot; although if I'd had to conduct triage on the spot and just give one up that would hardly have been a problem.

  59. DIgital Cable, by u16084 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did I miss something about the Digital Cable issue?
    In My area, TWC mirrors 95% of the analog channels on the digital tier.
    So in order to get my Dig channels i would have have 11 Dig boxes?
    Sure everytime you split the cable you lose 3.5 to 7db depending on which leg of the splitter you branch off, nothing a Cable Amplifier cant fix, digital channels are fine to about -15db to -20db, what im wondering is where the Cable Card support?

    --
    -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
  60. Godzilla... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...meet Slashdot.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  61. The device has glitches though... by chrae · · Score: 1

    During testing, the PVR had an issues with audio/video sync. Both audio and video were working, but the test movie which contained screams of frightened Japanese never matched up. They're still working on the issue.

  62. S-ATA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time S-ATA comes up, some jerk says "but hard disks don't even saturate the bandwidth of parallel ATA, so S-ATA is useless!".

    They always seem to ignore the fact that S-ATA cables are much, much nicer to work with. Can you imagine building Godzilla with ribbon cables?

  63. Loud? by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

    This thing has got to be LOUD! Even if they put a decent quality CPU cooler in, you still have 3 92mm fans to cool the case, and SIX 7200 RPM hard drives, which have to sound like a jet engine, even if they are mounted on washers. I wouldn't want this in my living room, so it kinda defeats the purpose. I built a media center PC (that I'm using now) with all 120mm fans (except for the CPU cooler, which will eventually be replaced) software controlled for low RPMs. It doesn't have the monsterous specs of that machine (only dual HDs, dual tuners, and a Pentium D 820), but you can barely hear it 4 feet away, which makes it much more practical for actually watching TV.

  64. (DO NOT) Mod parent up by mr_stinky_britches · · Score: 1

    they needed speed, so raid0 was the way to go. if reliability was their primary concern they wouldve done things differently.

    --
    Censorship is obscene. Patriotism is bigotry. Faith is a vice. Slashdot 2.0 sucks.
  65. PVR? More like PVA by sallymetharry · · Score: 0

    Now I call that a PVA (Personal Video Archiver)!

  66. One example where this may come in handy by DrewCapu · · Score: 1

    is recording a football game where they have multiple cameras in the stadium, each camera being broadcast on a different channel. Once the game is over, you can cut-up your own highlights from various angles and just about anything else you want to do as a producer.

    I believe this was done at some college football games this year. I don't know if halftime was included. I'm sure some marching bands wouldn't mind recording some of their shows from mulitiple angles.

  67. Re:Mine is bigger [OT] by rzebram · · Score: 1

    Offtopic, I know, but I thought I might point this one out: http://www.angryflower.com/aposter.html .

  68. damn he really loves tv by kendoka · · Score: 1

    he must need it to record all the CSI shows coming out.

  69. Don't those guys read /.? by chinton · · Score: 1

    The world is facing the end of copper and they are wasting it by cooling CPUs in a PVR?!?!? Oh, Gaia is crying!!!

  70. A real PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just put together a 1TB PVR for a customer for $999.
    For less than $100 it could have had 4 tuners instead of 2 (but why?).

    It used AMD chips to run much much cooler and have better video performance.

    If I removed the disks, I could build 3 of them (with 12 tuners all together) for under $2K. They would each run pretty quiet and cool. Then I could spend about $2K on a 3TB storage server with RAID5 and super fast disk speeds.

    For a little less $$ than these folks spent, would I have the coolest PVR around? No.

    I would have some ridiculous monstrosity, probably named Ultraman just so it could beat up Godzilla.

  71. means testing by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

    I swear to goodness, you want to means test, stress test, or otherwise find weak points in some techno gadget, post it on /. In short time you will find more opinions, suggestions, mods, and corrections then you ever would in a year of testing.

    This is what I love about this site. Next time NASA wants to start project X, have them post the basics on slashdot. Built something but not sure how to improve it? /. it! In one day a poster will have found more holes, or more improvements then they could have in a life time of boring walkthroughs or brainstorm sessions. Now there could be IP ramifications "Hey, that was my idea you made millions on", but if it betters the world is that not the prize?

    This is Open Thought in action and I really enjoy...and learn from it!

    --
    Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
  72. makes Intel look bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When choosing the processor to go in Godzilla we thought to ourselves, "What CPU should we choose to power the 'King of all Monster PVRs'?" We choose the Intel Pentium D 840 "Extreme Edition" Processor! What could be beating in the belly of a beast like Godzilla but the best processor Intel makes?

    A run of the mill AMD chip?

    An Athlon 64 3200+ runs $160.
    The Intel Pentium D 840 EE runs $1010.

    Q: Which one is cooler? A: AMD
    Q: Which one is quieter? A: AMD
    Q: Which one uses less electricity to watch a movie. A: AMD
    Q: Which one uses less electricity to record 11 movies simultaneously? A: AMD
    Q: Which one is capable of displaying 11 movies simultaneously from 11 onboard tuners? A: AMD
          (Witness the melting of their PVR, and the deafening noise of half a dozen fans at full speed.)
    Guess which one can handle 11 TV tuners?

  73. OURS goes up to Channel 11 ! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I definitely record more than 11 show episodes a week on Tivo, but that's counting some things I record daily, like The Daily Show, Leno, and Olberman's news show. And it would occasionally be useful to record two shows at once, or very rarely 3 shows if there's a good movie on. But mostly that's too much television.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  74. Convert to MPEG-4 in Non-realtime by billstewart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The video cards are already converting to MPEG-2 - if you want to squash that to MPEG-4, you don't _have_ to do it in realtime, you just have to have some spare disk space for scratch. You'll almost never be recording 11 shows at once except to be silly - if you can keep up with 2-3 simultaneous recordings, that's almost always enough for realtime, and if you've got too many, you can convert the rest later - or watch them unconverted, if you're in a hurry.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  75. The Matthew Broderick of PVRs by DasBub · · Score: 1

    Godzilla, sure.

    What I'm looking for is an actor-well-past-his-prime-and-forced-to-do-crappy- movies-like-Inspector-Gadget-probably-because-he-m arried-that-horrid-looking-Sarah-Jessica-Parker PVR.

    Or maybe a Bobcat Goldthwait PVR. Something to use in my Evening At The Improv shrine.

    Come on, engineers. Give us something we REALLY want.

  76. OT: 20 inch dubs on my new Nissan Sentra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously in the ultraviolet end of the spectrum, I FINALLY got my LowenHart 20" rims (20" x 9" + 37 offset) for my '99 Nissan Sentra (tough to find with that offset, I had to jack them off a Mercedes SEL down on Vine after like, weeks of looking). Took lots of pictures (including diffs between old 19" and the new LowenHarts) and plan to write something up and post it here on /.)

    Car rides like a steamroller now, but I have to get new springs for it and maybe bushings (Hyper-Flex performance polyurethane).

  77. But fundamentally: Why?? by jonskerr · · Score: 0

    I mean come on, what on earth would anyone ever need to record 11 shows at once for? When would anyone have time to watch them all? This was made sheerly for Tim Allen's grunting "More power! Owh! Owh!"
    This guy needs to get off the couch.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  78. should be Customer's Warning: by DuctTape · · Score: 1
    That Sony beast has 11 tuners...

    And I betcha it comes pre-rooted.

    DT

    --
    Is this thing on? Hello?
  79. How many cards/channels can a desktop machine... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    How many cards/channels could a midgrade desktop machine handle in a PVR capacity? Specifically, like a 2GHz Pentium with PCI (not PCI-X)? I know it's less than 11, but where are the bottlenecks with PVRs? PCI bus or DiskIO or CPU?

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  80. How should I mod the grandparent?? by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    Can we go over this again?

  81. Parent should have a FUD warning by Zen+Programmer · · Score: 1
    All I'll say is that I've lost a hell of a lot more data on various Linux filesystems than I have on Solaris, FreeBSD, OS X or Windows filesystems.
    I love how XFS gets grouped as "various Linux filesystems". The parent doesn't even specify which Linux filesystems, so he may have never lost data with XFS. If you're going to take the NFS criticsm with a grain of salt, then I'm going to need a salt lick to see past your argument that "well, I've lost more data, so Linux filesystems are worse than other filesystems". File systems are judged on design and statistical data. Some are better for some applications, others are better other applications. NTFS is not at the top of any of its classes (home, business uses, etc.). XFS would be an appropriate choice for this application, for the reasons stated by the grandparent.
  82. Somewhat umimpressed.. by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

    I have a meager MythTV box that I built out of $800 worth of parts and some stuff I had lying around, and it specs out about the same as this guy's. CPU is a bit slower and I only have 5 tuners (3 regular, 2 digital cable) but I have a TB of disk space (is that even impressive anymore?) and it records everything I've ever wanted.

    I've also had this setup for 6 to 9 months. Do I get a slashdot article on me? This is just some guy dropping way too much money on an overpowered CPU (I use an Athlon 64 3500+ and have never, ever had speed problems, even when transcoding 2 shows at once and watching another.)

  83. Linkbait, although successfull by fredr1k · · Score: 1

    No more than a successfull PR-trick from Snapstream. However, If they decide to use these 11-channel-godzilla-mammoth to P2P-TV-SHARE Desperatre housewifes for me, I will probably shut up :-)

    --
    "Never EVER mess with a jumper you don't know about, even if it's labeled 'sex and free beer'." - Dave Haynie
  84. Re:How many cards/channels can a desktop machine.. by NerveGas · · Score: 1

    I'd be surprised if a 2GHz P4 couldn't handle at least 5, and maybe 10 simultaneous streams. As long as the tuners are doing the encoding in hardware - and you aren't running commercial-detection or other jobs while that's happening - all the CPU is doing is routing data to the hard disk.

    The PCI bus won't be much of a limitation, most of these cards encode at a maximum of 10 or 12 megabits/second, which at 10 streams comes out to 120 megabits/second - or a measly 15 megabytes/second.

    Now, if you want to watch some of those as you're saving them, doing pause/rewind operations, then I can't really say - but remember that some of the commercial DVRs which can do live pause/rewind have a measly 33 MHz CPU in them. Of course, the encoding and decoding on them is done in hardware, but there's no reason that can't be the case in your machine as well.

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  85. Digital Cable and DirecTV by neuromancer2701 · · Score: 1

    I don't know if somebody touched this but If you have Digital Cable or DirecTV you have to have a receiver for each card espically if you wanted to record non-air broadcast HD channels or if you just did not want to mess with an antenna. Then each card would have to be tried into the receiver to make the receiver change Channels. Is there going to be a solution for this in the future ie a receiver with 2 or 3 outputs? Now that would cool, but I would think that networks would nix that in a hurry, wouldn't want us to skip those commericals.

    --
    "If you like Battlestar Galactica, you're probably a huge nerd." -Stephen Colbert
  86. The should partner this with an Ampzilla amp ... by PhiltheeG · · Score: 1
    --
    -Phil
    Shoot questions, first ask later...
  87. No No No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what does that doubled cost get you?

    At that point you have a bare PC. There is no operating system, no drivers, no PVR software, nothing. You have spent double acquiring hardware alone. Your journey, as an earlier post called it, has only just begun. You now have to install and properly configure all of the software.

    After days or weeks of fiddling (that's no exaggeration, it's not easy even when using KnopMyth), you have a big, ugly loud, HOT PC in your entertainment center. Also, you can't use this device with most HD cable systems as they require special converters or cable cards.

    Meanwhile, $250 - $300 gets you a fully functional P/DVR that is quiet, much cooler, much much smaller. The unit requires that only a couple of cables be plugged in for you to be up and running. If you get the one form your cable company you can use it for HDTV from your cable. There's also a warranty on it so if anything happens to it for the next year, you are handed a new one.

  88. depends by xmodem_and_rommon · · Score: 1

    How easy or not Myth is to set up depends on your hardware. In particular, TV card support is a bit dodgy in Linux,and if you don't have a compatible card, good luck. Also some cards require extensive configuration to be done and still don't work right. If you do your research beforehand and buy a card that is supported you should have very few problems.

    You also might experience any of the other standard configuration difficulties with linux - video, soundcard, etc. But again, if you have compatible hardware it shouldn't be a problem.

    And if you're wondering who I'm going to lay blame to for the configuration mess, it's the hardware manufacturers, but NOT for lack of support for non-Windows systems. It's because every single manufacturer has to use a different method of communication between the card and driver. HELLO - It's a TV card. How big a deal of it is it for them all to standardize on one interface?