Slashdot Mirror


MacBook is Speedy, but no FireWire 800, Modem Ports

Lam1969 writes "Yuval Kossovsky has a hands-on review of the new 15" MacBook Pro. Besides the speed improvement with the dual-core 1.83-GHz Intel processor, he likes the built-in iSight camera, "MagSafe" power connector, and better WiFi antenna placement, among other features. But he laments the loss of the modem port and FireWire 800 connectors: '[Apple] has taken away by getting rid of the FireWire 800 connector slot and the modem. FireWire 800 was left off the motherboard of the new laptop largely because it has not achieved much a following among users. ... The loss of the modem jack may be a sign of things to come. I was told that Apple had found that 90% of PowerBook owners used the 802.11g AirPort wireless card, gigabit ethernet or a Bluetooth connection to a cell modem to get network access. So for cost and package size reasons, the modem was left out.'" Update: 01/26 17:25 GMT by P : Story and headline updated to clarify that only FireWire 800 was not included on the machine; FireWire 400 is present.

199 comments

  1. Will the PC card slot go too? by lpangelrob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For that matter, I've also never used the slot for PC cards in my PowerBook. Is the use of these slots common with other owners?

    1. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by rjstanford · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For that matter, I've also never used the slot for PC cards in my PowerBook. Is the use of these slots common with other owners?

      No - and that's why its gone too, replaced with an ExpressCard/34 slot that can theoretically take in a wider variety of expansion opportunities, as they get developed.

      The main use for an addon card in this or the previous generation of laptops would have been for one of the permanent mobile phone network cards. I'm sure that ExpressCard versions will be forthcoming, as will ExpressCard FireWire 800 ports for those few people who need them.

      Moving the modem external to the main system, and making it optional, just makes sense. Most people I know who travel with their laptops never use them, preferring to drive to a Starbucks (or local equiv.) rather than try to send massive emails over a dialup network.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    2. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it answers your question, the iBooks don't have a PCMCIA slot. I haven't missed it a bit. In fact, I'm amazingly happy at not having to worry about damaging whatever dongle is always hanging out of the stupid ports. (I lost an ungodly number of Xircom cards to bent pins. Of course, they weren't very well designed to begin with, but...) If it's important enough, it can connect via USB.

    3. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by damsa · · Score: 1

      I have an iBook without a PC card slot. I wish I had one primarily so I can stick a multi memory card reader in it like I did on my Vaio.

    4. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by lpangelrob · · Score: 2
      Risking my karma, whoever modded what happened to be the first post redundant needs to be shot. So I'll rephrase the post.

      Because (especially at the time integrated Airport came out) most everything that I could've thought of is built into the MacBook/PowerBook, including wireless internet, firewire ports, and 2-3 USB ports, what do people use PC Cards for on Macs?

    5. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with hooking up a reader via USB?

    6. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by damsa · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be as aerodynamic with a USB reader.

      Or maybe not.
      I don't like carrying a cable and it's easier to show of photos by sticking a CF card into a small laptop and then giving the laptop to your friends to look at rather than using a cable to the camera or a cable to the usb connector. It's just a personal preference. I am quite good at losing cables and destroying them.

    7. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by weave · · Score: 1
      what do people use PC Cards for on Macs
      My 12" G4 lacks one and I've missed it because Verizon won't sell their broadband wireless net access except by using a PC Card.

      What pisses me off was, through a hack, I got my e815 bluetooth Verizon phone to connect in to their broadband network just fine, but they apparently can't add the $60 unlimited package price to my account because accessing their broadband EV-DO network through my phone like that is unsupported and I hence have to buy the card and have the ESN of it authorized for it.

    8. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by chris234 · · Score: 1

      I use the Cardbus slot on my Powerbook for an EVDO card (Kyocera KPC650). Now looking for alternatives......

    9. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. Use it for EVDO cards here in the states and UMTS when abroad. No one makes these devices for the new ExpressCard slot. Will have to pass on the MacBook until some solution comes around.

    10. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      That's kind of funny. I always have the exact opposite problem. i.e. I always manage to shear off whatever is hanging out of the PC Card port. At least with a USB device, the cable yanks cleanly out if it gets caught on something. :-)

    11. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by damsa · · Score: 1

      I never had a problem with the CF reader I have, it actually remains flush against the slot. The Cardbus Wifi card on the other hand. It wasn't so pretty. Good things those things became so cheap so fast.

    12. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      So get one without cables. My card reader is slightly larger than a usb thumb drive. I can slide a card in plug it use show stuff around and eject easily. Plus I get the added bonus that I can travel with my camera and reader.

      I used the above when i went on a two week vacation. my sister and I each took hundreds of photos. When it was over but before we went our seperate ways I took all the memory cards and went to an internet cafe. I copied all the files to the computer and burned a couple of CD's of all theimages. It was expensive(a couple of US dollars a pop) but we had three back up copies of our trip that went three different directions.

      I didn't have to carry my laptop with me.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    13. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by assantisz · · Score: 1

      I use it for a Cisco Aeronet wireless network card. We have a Cisco infrastructure here and I need the Aeronet card to use the Cisco specific security features. It works like a charm.

    14. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by dborod · · Score: 1

      I've had my powerbook for 3 years and have never used the PC card slot even once.

    15. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by samkass · · Score: 1

      If you're one of the small handful of people who actually used a FireWire 800 drive, you might want a card for the MacBook with a FW800 port. Or, if you're more forward-looking, you might want a card that implements the 4x faster eSATA interface. The new slot is extremely fast, and is virtually the equivalent of putting another chip on the motherboard bus anyway.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    16. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by mindbooger · · Score: 1

      I use mine for 3 things (and it's one of the reasons I _don't_ have buyer's remorse for just having bought the 1440x960 G4 Powerbook last month):
      - CF adapter to pull the pictures off my camera (it's so much faster than USB)
      - Orinoco radio for doing wireless capture with Kismac (Broadcom support isn't as good -- you can capture data, but you don't get management packets and 802.11 acks)
      - every once in a while, for a SCSI card to pull stuff off of my ancient Zip or Jazz disks

    17. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by Golias · · Score: 1

      I find that 90% of the PC laptop owners who use the PCMCIA slot use it for one of the following:

      1. A modem
      2. An Ethernet port
      3. WiFi
      4. Bluetooth

      Since the iBook can use internal cards for both WiFi & Bluetooth, and already has a modem & Ethernet port built in, it's no surprise that most iBook owners never miss the extra slot.

      (Note: Dell and others eventually caught on to the advantages of internal wireless, and it's now fairly standard equipment these days, but Kudos to the iBook for being one of the laptops that pushed the market forward.)

      An expansion slot is needed in the "Pro" version of Apple's laptop, however, because you never know what weird-assed expansion options a professional user is going to need two years from now. With that in mind, going with the best emerging standard instead of supporting legacy hardware is nothing less than what I would expect from Apple. Those currently upset over the loss of FW 800 will probably get over it when an ExpressCard for it comes out. Correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC the standard PCMCIA bus isn't really up to snuff for that kind of bandwidth.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    18. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by Black+Cardinal · · Score: 1

      I have.

      I have an old 486DX4-100 laptop, and using a PCMCIA flash memory card is the easiest method to transfer DOS files to or from this laptop. My Powerbook's PC Card slot is very useful for this. Otherwise, I would have to rig up a serial cable which would be very slow. (This old laptop doesn't have LAN or I would just plug it into the home network.)

      I also use this same method to transfer files to or from my HP 200LX palmtop.

    19. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by great+om · · Score: 1

      can't the airport card do LEAP, or is there something else it needs to do?

      --
      ------- Oh damn.... the Sigfile escaped... -Great OM
    20. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by rthille · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong...

      I _think_ you're wrong. Well, at least about the slot in Powerbooks, since it's 'PCCard' (PCI bus based), not PCMCIA (isa based?). PC-Card slots have plenty of bandwidth to drive dual external monitors (see 'vtbook')

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    21. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by rthille · · Score: 1

      Yep, did some checking, and the modern 15" and 17" powerbooks support 32bit cardbus, which gives 132MB/s, or 1056Mbit/sec. Plenty for firewire 800, but not much left over for anything else...

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    22. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FireWire 800 cards for ExpressCard/34 slot on the way:

      We do not have an estimated release date, but we are currently working on a couple of ExpressCard solutions (1394b being one of them). We, like other companies have an ExpressCard/54 cards and all we need to do is down-size them into the ExpressCard/34 form factor.

      We expect to begin testing our cards within the next 2-3 weeks, and if all goes well, we could see production not long afterwards.

    23. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Great use if you happen to have a PCMCIA flash card sitting around (are those things even made anymore?), but to anyone else in that situation, I think the obvious solution would just be to buy a USB floppy drive. Not only can you use it to tranfer files from your 486 laptop (which I'm assuming has a FD built-in or as an external option, unless you lost it), but you can also use it to get anything that somebody might send you in the mail. Not that it's likely to happen very often, but they're handy to have around sometimes. And they're relatively cheap and easily available.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    24. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by Black+Cardinal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that would work, too, although a floppy disk is pretty small. I recently transferred some of my old DOS games from my 486 laptop to my Powerbook to run under Dosbox, and they were several megabytes each. It was a lot easier to be able to copy 10MB at a time!

    25. Re:Will the PC card slot go too? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      I haven't used the upgrade slot in my laptop for years. On older laptops I used to use it for a modem. Now that is built in. I've used it for Token Ring, but even IBM has ripped out all their TR networks. I used it for 802.11 networking but that is built in as well now. I've got built in bluetooth as well.

      I don't have a built in fingerprint reader, and I've used a PC card one, but the USB one I have works great and is a USB hub. Same goes for smart card readers.

      For many uses USB has supplanted both card slot formats. I would honestly rather have more USB slots than the PCMCIA slots on current laptop.

  2. Still could be a "prototype" by ianscot · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A couple of days back we were speculating that maybe the MacBook at Jobs's keynote was more of a prototype, a little more rough around the edges than it should have been. No battery life numbers, and so on.

    Now we get this "hands-on" review, but I'm not convinced anything has changed. He subjectively says the performance "cooks" -- but that's likely just the intel-happy finder. All he has is Apple's oddly vague words to go on about battery performance. The rest of it could have come from the press release about the keynote announcement.

    Book's still out?

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:Still could be a "prototype" by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

      If you want benchmarks go talk to the people that bought the new iMac. The MacBook is basically a portable iMac. The only unknown left is battery life.

    2. Re:Still could be a "prototype" by johndeerejedi · · Score: 1

      He only got to pick it up and play with it at the event, not take it back to a lab to benchmark it.

    3. Re:Still could be a "prototype" by DECS · · Score: 1

      Well "prototype," like "beta," can refer to a wide range of things, from barely functional to "we're being careful."

      The MacWorld demonstrators didn't use the word prototype to me, they called it prerelease hardware. The amount of room for adjusting things with shipping less than a month away is clearly limited. Optimizing battery life is a software effort that could make quite a bit of progress within a couple weeks of final testing, but it's pretty obvious that they aren't going to make any changes to the hardware, such as adding FW800.

  3. No modem! What about no floppy drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Where't the 5.25" floppy drive?

  4. Missing Tidbit by creepynut · · Score: 5, Informative

    What the article summary fails to mention is that there is still a Firewire 400 port on the Macbook. They just removed what they feel people aren't using, and that has been Apple's way for as long as I can remember.

    The modem can be taken care of by an optional dongle for the system, and Firewire 800 can be added with an Express Card. If anyone needs either, they're still available.

    1. Re:Missing Tidbit by sharpestmarble · · Score: 0

      > What the article summary fails to mention is that there is still a Firewire 400 port on the Macbook

      Except that it's visible, and even pointed out, on the pic that accompanies the article. It looks like a pic that came off of Apple's website showing the ports available

      --
      AC's modded -6. I don't see you, I don't mod you, anything you say is lost. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    2. Re:Missing Tidbit by tji · · Score: 1

      I have never actually used the FW800 port on my PowerBook. Mostly because disk enclosures with FW800 are not as common as FW400 enclosures.

      So, I have mixed feelings on the lack of FW800. It was something I had planned to use, when I found supporting devices. But, it's something I can live without pretty easily.

      I think the omission on the "MacBook" had more to do with the Intel chipsets available, and its capabilities, rather than a choice to eliminate them.

      The modem is a similar situation.. 95% of the time I use wired ot 802.11 networking. But, in a pinch I have had to use dialup. It would be nice to have in there. Their tiny USB modem is a good compromise, but it's yet another gadget to carry in my bag.

  5. Not such a big deal by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

    The loss of the modem jack may be a sign of things to come. I was told that Apple had found that 90% of PowerBook owners used the 802.11g Airport wireless card, Gigabit Ethernet or a Bluetooth connection to a cell modem to get network access. So for cost and package size reasons, the modem was left out.

    The loss of the modem isn't such a big deal. I've only ever used mine once (when I was moving) and it wasn't a pleasant experience. If I'd had a Wifi card, I probably would have gone to a local hotspot instead of bothering with the modem.

    The nice part about the modem being left out, however, is that the Wifi card is included in the base system rather than as an add-on card. IMHO, that's a fair trade. If you really want a modem, Apple has a USB modem as an available option when you order your unit. So I'd say it's a win/win for all involved.

    Unfortunately, I can't speak to the Firewire as I've never used it. Of course, that may be saying more than enough...

    1. Re:Not such a big deal by pentalive · · Score: 1

      I use my modem all the time, I am using it right now. But a USB modem would be ok.

      Instant Poll
      Subject: Your main connection to the Internet
      ( ) DSL
      ( ) Cable Modem
      ( ) OC3
      ( ) Local Hotspot
      ( ) Open Wifi
      ( ) Dial Up
      ( ) Smoke Signals or Carrier Pigeon

    2. Re:Not such a big deal by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >I use my modem all the time, I am using it right now. But a USB modem would be ok.

      exactly, if you're using a modem then you're wired down anyway. so what's the big inconvenience between
      phone->laptop , and
      phone->USB->laptop
      ?

      apart from a few dollars and taking up a bit more space in your laptop bag, it's a total non-event.

    3. Re:Not such a big deal by MountainMan101 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ( ) Cowboy Neal personally relays my packets.
      ( ) I don't have the internet you insensitive clod (will obviously get zero votes - within error)

    4. Re:Not such a big deal by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      We had both WiFi and a modem included for about six-odd months. I think if you consider what must be a very low incremental cost to keep the modem in, it seems like it really should still be included. Some people still go to places where WiFi is not yet present, and the external USB modem would be horribly easy to lose.

      On the other hand, it sure would be sweet to have the dual core processor. I could even accept a slowdown to get it, since it means that when my computer's doing heavy processing, I can still use it through the other processor. I very rarely have irritating interactive slowdowns on my G5/dual 2ghz system, but I do have them on my PowerBook G4/1.67.

      For this reason, I think the benchmarks, which I'm sure are accurate, enormously understate the appeal of the dual core processor in real-world use. If I can read my email without wincing, instead of having my photo processing application take over the whole computer, I'll be very happy indeed.

      I'm holding off for a 17" display, though.

      D

    5. Re:Not such a big deal by pentalive · · Score: 1

      Mod UP! for posting via ESP!

    6. Re:Not such a big deal by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      We had both WiFi and a modem included for about six-odd months. I think if you consider what must be a very low incremental cost to keep the modem in, it seems like it really should still be included. Some people still go to places where WiFi is not yet present, and the external USB modem would be horribly easy to lose.

      The incremental financial cost is miniscule. The design and space costs are considerably greater. Besides, you could make the same argument for a whole stack of ports (VGA, S-VHS, FW800, etc) - where do you draw the line? Especially with modems, since USB modems are readily available at pretty much every computer and office supply store (at least in the US, probably most other countries as well) for a nominal replacement fee. For that matter, this move also makes the hardware more international in that you have one less part that changes based on the local environment.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    7. Re:Not such a big deal by thsths · · Score: 1

      > The loss of the modem isn't such a big deal. I've only ever used mine once (when I was moving) and it wasn't a pleasant experience. If I'd had a Wifi card, I probably would have gone to a local hotspot instead of bothering with the modem.

      But still, the modem can be the only way to go online in some places. So the 10% or so users are going to have to buy one. Which wouldn't be so bad in itself, but Apple charges 49 bucks (!) for a simple 56k modem. This is the classical Apple way to hitting a price point: take things out of the package, and sell it separately for a lot of money.

      I always wondered whether that works. How may people are going to shell out 49 bucks for the modem? Yes, you can probably get a cheaper one somewhere else, but will it work with your Mac?

    8. Re:Not such a big deal by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      i think modem and wireless should be base. if you only go as far as local coffee shops, it won't matter to you. but a lot of travelers end up in places where modem is the only option. being a laptop, it should be designed for travelers. having to add it on is a hassle (wifi dongle anyone?) especially when it doesn't cost much to build it in. i would even go so far as to say more people use the modem than bluetooth (most still don't know what bt is). then again, some say it's a prototype so it might end up with a built-in modem. who knows.

    9. Re:Not such a big deal by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      The loss of the modem isn't such a big deal.

      well, the finder has native fax sending/receiving, and for someone on the go, that can be a real loss.

      Although faxing is kinda a thing of the past, it's still the only option for sending hardcopies of contracts/ getting them back signed, and similar.

      and about the firewire800... It wasn't adopted as quickly as the fw400, but it still had pretty wide usage. Many harddrives were shipping as either usb2/fw400 or fw400/fw800, and some even had an 800 only option. I was toying with the idea of getting a new enclosure that was 800 only (since I was going to attach it to my G5), but if apple is going to phase it out, I may just go with the usb2/fw400 version and spare myself from getting stuck with hardware I can't use (like what happened with all my external LaCie SCSI drives).

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    10. Re:Not such a big deal by aduzik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's a thought: do you suppose that Apple might be leaving the modem out because they intend an upcoming Apple mobile phone to make the perfect wireless connection accessory? With all the rumor and speculation surrounding Apple launching some kind of wireless communications service in the future, I wouldn't be at all surprised if that's exactly what they're planning. If they make it easy to use, there would be tons of people using a bluetooth modem and not even knowing it.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    11. Re:Not such a big deal by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Although faxing is kinda a thing of the past, it's still the only option for sending hardcopies of contracts/ getting them back signed, and similar.

      If you want to send a hardcopy of a document, then you need a scanner. Not too many people carry around flat-beds, methinks. :)

      Kinkos is still best if you need to send a fax. EFax can handle the recieving end much better. (Especially since you don't have to ensure that your laptop is hooked up to the phone line.)

    12. Re:Not such a big deal by KFW · · Score: 1

      I was toying with the idea of getting a new enclosure that was 800 only (since I was going to attach it to my G5), but if apple is going to phase it out, I may just go with the usb2/fw400 version and spare myself from getting stuck with hardware I can't use (like what happened with all my external LaCie SCSI drives).

      It's not like FireWire 800 drive is suddenly going to stop working. Unless you're planning on trading in your G5 soon, get the 800 enclosure. Enjoy the extra speed. You can always slap the drive in a new enclosure later.

      I'm surprised I haven't seen anyone lament the lack of a floppy drive on the new Macs as well. At least Apple moves forward with their designs instead of trying to accomodate every legacy POS that ever existed so as not to piss-off the one guy in Borneo who still has a serial mouse and 100 baud modem.

      /K

    13. Re:Not such a big deal by nbvb · · Score: 1

      Even still, with an FW800 to FW400 cable, that FW800 enclosure will work just fine with the MacBook Pro.

      Please, this is a complete non-issue. Very few devices have FW800 ports anyway; it's pretty pointless.

    14. Re:Not such a big deal by jgs · · Score: 1

      Although faxing is kinda a thing of the past, it's still the only option for sending hardcopies of contracts/ getting them back signed, and similar.

      I've done work with several different attorneys recently, and all of them were willing (happy, actually) to accept an emailed PDF instead of a fax.

      That still leaves you with the problem of scanning the document, but that's orthogonal to the modem issue. (I wonder if the built-in iSight has enough resolution to produce a legible image of a full page. Probably not but I didn't see resolution listed when I glanced at the MacBook Pro specs page.)

    15. Re:Not such a big deal by inputsprocket · · Score: 1

      So why then don't they include a USB modem dongle with the package? You know, like the DVI-VGA dongle included with all powerbooks.

    16. Re:Not such a big deal by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Who's we? My old TiBook had an airport card and a modem and it must be three or four years old.

      I haven't used the modem in ages. It's much easier to find someone with unsecured wifi or grab a coffee at a shop with free access than figure out the local access #, which don't even exist outside the country.

    17. Re:Not such a big deal by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      I'd guess one or more of two reasons:

      1) USB modems are available in many more places than DVI-VGA dongles
      2) An order of magnitude more people use VGA monitors than use modems

      When VGA monitors start coming with DVI adapters, instead of the other way 'round, they'll probably stop.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    18. Re:Not such a big deal by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      It's not like FireWire 800 drive is suddenly going to stop working.

      If I get the 800 enclosure, it's kinda a waste of money if my next machine doesn't support it. or if I can't swap it to a new powerbook (which I've been eyeing up for the last year), then I don't see the point. I should just pick up an SATA and pop it inside my tower.

      I'm surprised I haven't seen anyone lament the lack of a floppy drive on the new Macs as well.

      everyone I know who was using a mac at the time that happened was already done using floppies. I hadn't used floppies since I had gotten my Zip drive and a CD burner, and when apple finally stopped shipping macs with floppies, I didn't even miss it. I was shocked at the time, but it didn't affect me beyond that.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    19. Re:Not such a big deal by jlower · · Score: 1

      How may people are going to shell out 49 bucks for the modem?

      Everyone who needs one.

    20. Re:Not such a big deal by jgs · · Score: 1
      apart from a few dollars and taking up a bit more space in your laptop bag

      ...and being one more thing to forget when I go on a trip. Because it won't be in my laptop bag except when I'm traveling (why carry the extra junk back and forth to the office where I don't need it there).

      Unlike others who've posted about this, I do find that it's not uncommon for me to use a modem when I'm traveling, especially in the third world or even in many of the less... upscale... parts of the U.S..

    21. Re:Not such a big deal by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I think the "risk of loss" issue is not one that is necessarily important for a computer company to take into consideration. I mean, if you're going to lose your USB modem, then maybe you should consider sticking to internet cafes. There are a host of other things that you could lose instead, which would all be much harder to replace than it, and would really be show-stoppers. E.g., your power adaptor, or VGA adaptor. Or the phone cable itself.

      I don't see any reason why a person working from the road would really be that much more likely to lose their USB modem than they would any other external component -- and at least you can get a USB modem quickly. If you use an Apple laptop and you lose your power adaptor, you're looking at a hefty chunk of change for a new one.

      My work notebook, which is not an Apple (sadly), has its own small travelling infrastructure. Power cable (two parts -- computer to box and box to wall), modem cable, ethernet cable, mouse (because the trackpad sucks), VGA breakout cable, 1/8" M-M audio cable, external floppy drive. This is basically a standard loadout for someone who travels with their primary computer, and less than many people I know (who use external numeric keypads, for instance, or SmartCard readers). Would it be nicer to have all this stuff built-in? Maybe, but at a certain point the thing would be huge, and start looking like a Swiss Army knife. But the important part here is that this thing requires an insane amount of accessories, but people still buy them.

      I think Apple took a look around at the competition and realized that people seem to be comfortable with external peripherals; even then, they went and made the lowest-cost and least-used item on the motherboard external. It impacts few users, and its impact on the users that it does effect is minor.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    22. Re:Not such a big deal by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Only the top-line PowerBook had AirPort standard and the cheaper models did not until about six months ago. I had the cheaper model, which is why I remember things differently.

      D

  6. MacBook pro review by weg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everyone - including those people who didn't get hold of a MacBook so far - could have written such a review :( He really doesn't come up with anything the informed Mac fan doesn't know already. And I really wonder what it means that the new MacBook is "exponentially faster" than the last G4 version.. having only two measurements, how did this guy manage to interpolate a non-linear function??

    --
    Georg
    1. Re:MacBook pro review by Raleel · · Score: 1

      While a touch nitpicky about the exponential business, I agree with you whole heartedly that this is a pretty worthless review. I could have wrote that.

      --
      -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    2. Re:MacBook pro review by pboulang · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Thank god you didn't though.. "could have wrote that" indeed. :)

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    3. Re:MacBook pro review by Pendersempai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Obviously he is using "exponentially" to mean "vastly." Yes, you're very smart for knowing the mathematical definition, but you lose some points for feeling the need to prove it.

  7. FW + Modem not such a big deal...to me by richdun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've never actually used FW 800, but then again, my camera syncs via USB, and I'm not a pro photo or video guy, so the only time I even used FW 400 was for my 3G iPod. As for a modem, I haven't used one of these in like 5 or 6 years - for most people it'll be okay, though those few travelers who go into areas without broadband wired or wireless (there are still places like this, somewhere, I think), they could find a USB modem, or maybe someone will come up with an Express Card modem, though that seems unlikely.

  8. why didn't they try to install windows? by mu22le · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    AFAIK no reviewer that had a macbook in his hands has tried to get windows running on it, yet.

    What's up? Do they have some kind of deal with apple to hide us the fact that we can't run xp (and xp games) before we all buy it and it's too late?

    1. Re:why didn't they try to install windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This is getting tiresome. Apple never advertised these machines as capable of booting Windows. They are not being sold as XP gaming boxes. These are Macs, intended to run Mac software. There is no dark conspiracy to prevent you from running XP games on a Mac. It's simply not the intended use. Period. Apple doesn't support it and has no desire to support it.

      That said, an XP (or x86 Linux, or any x86 OS) VM would be an incredibly useful thing, and I'm sure one will be available before long. But this obsession with booting Windows is a white whale for geeks, not a missing checkpoint on the Mac features list.

    2. Re:why didn't they try to install windows? by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd have to disagree here. There are probably a HUGE amount of people out there who would switch from PC to Mac only if there was a simple way to maintain backward-compatibility with all their Windows games and programs. Right now, when you buy a Mac as your sole computer, you're basically giving up PC gaming completely (except for World of Warcraft, that is). Not to mention all the proprietary VB stuff that many companies use.

      A VM sounds nice, but I can't see how it would be any easier to make a VM for OSX than it is for x86-Linux, and the existing x86-Linux emulators (or translation layers or whatever) are far from perfect. I don't want WINE for Mac, I want Windows!

      It may have little to do with Apple's "plans" for the system, but dual-booting to Windows would be a HUGE selling point among the gamer and geek crowds. If this is a white whale, it's got some darn valuable blubber.

    3. Re:why didn't they try to install windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly, I agree.

      I have no desire to run Windows anything on my Macs. It represents another opportunity to deal with a crappy user experience which I get every day on other systems.

      I can understand that some people want to be able to boot Windows for that stupid proprietary app (or something similar) for work. Other than that, what's the point? With the architecture switch, I don't even see the point of installing Linux. I could understand wanting to run Linux on a PPC, but this is just another Intel based laptop.

    4. Re:why didn't they try to install windows? by titten · · Score: 1

      A VM sounds nice, but I can't see how it would be any easier to make a VM for OSX than it is for x86-Linux, and the existing x86-Linux emulators (or translation layers or whatever) are far from perfect. I don't want WINE for Mac, I want Windows!

      Now WINE isn't virtualization...
      VMWare, on the other hand, is. It has existed for Linux (on x86) since the beginning, and there is even a VMWare player for Syllable.

      I expect some version of VMWare for Mac OSX, I only hope it comes soon.

  9. No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Informative
    The headline is wrong. The MacBook Pro has Firewire, it just doesn't have FW800.

    It's clear Apple is downplaying Firewire, quite possibly planning to drop it as a standard feature some time in the next few years, but they haven't gone the whole way yet.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by CapnGib · · Score: 1

      It's clear Apple is downplaying Firewire, quite possibly planning to drop it as a standard feature some time in the next few years, but they haven't gone the whole way yet.

      I don't think FW400 is going away any time soon, at least as long as FW400 is THE interface for DV cameras.

      --
      Beauty is truly in the eye of the tiger
    2. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      I don't think SCSI is going away any time soon either, as long as SCSI is THE interface for scanners. ;-)

      DV cameras are migrating to USB. Firewire support can always be provided in terms of a plug-in card for the minority that (a) use DV, (b) want to import it into their computers, and (c) use non-USB version. That minority is relatively large right now but it's going to get smaller. Firewire's other applications are relatively obsolete too. Sure, it's a better way of doing much of this stuff, but it's redundant against good-enough technologies that have to be included anyway. USB2 is on all Windows PCs because it's good-enough, Firewire is usually optional because it's a little bit better.

      With Apple no longer including Firewire cables with iPods, with the nano and shuffle being USB only, with Apple actually going backwards in terms of support (800 replaced with the older USB2-speed 400), it's relatively clear they're not seeing this as a technology they're fully behind any more. I would be unsurprised if their consumer Macs drop Firewire support completely (but available via a plug-in card) next year.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by crawdad62 · · Score: 1

      And when that day comes. You know the day everything that was FW migrates to USB2 will be a sad day indeed. The reason like the op state "FW400 is THE interface for DV cameras" is because it should be. USB2 just doesn't cut it. Cut outs maybe.

    4. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by pboulang · · Score: 1

      Well, additionally as it is hugely important in infrastructure uses... booting a laptop in firewire target mode is a HUGE win in getting snapshots. Conversely, booting to external firewire drive for putting back images is not a capability of USB yet (at least on Apple hardware).

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    5. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by damsa · · Score: 1

      Firewire is mandated by the FCC. It's going to stick around for a while.

    6. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I doubt apple is planning on dropping Firewire. 99% of video cameras use Firewire and Firewire only. Very few devices have adopted Firewire 800 though, so very few people use it. Not only that, but Firewire trumps USB 2.0 in every single benchmark that I've ever seen.

      I'm still disappointed that they dropped it though.

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    7. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by CapnGib · · Score: 1

      DV cameras are migrating to USB.

      Thats funny you mention that, because my brother just got one of those FW/USB2 DV cams and guess what: we couldn't successfully transfer video at full resolution under USB2. He bought a FW card for $20 and it works great.

      The FW exclusion from iPods is a different matter in that Apple is trying to appeal to the masses, who happen to be windows users and don't have FW.

      FW800 is not compatible with FW400 and simply never really caught on. FW400 is however quite popular, although not as popular as USB(1 or 2). So the exclusion of FW800 in a notebook, where space is at such a premium, is not really a surprise. I wouldn't expect USB2 to take a hold in DV camera space, especially as we migrate to HD resolutions. FW400 might get pushed out in favor of HDMI or another high bandwidth standard, but not in 2006.

      --
      Beauty is truly in the eye of the tiger
    8. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Apple has to include Firewire in their low-end machines because of the FCC?

      Or do you just mean that high-end equipment needs to support Firewire? That's important in terms of what goes into consumer Macs as it is in the same way that my DV camera needs to support Beta tapes (ie it doesn't.)

      Don't get me wrong, I love Firewire. But I've played this game too many times in the past. I was on the side of SCSI when IDE replaced it too. I looked at IDE's inferior performance, SCSI's greater standardization (when Apple phased out SCSI, you could still get "IDE" CDROMs that required special non-standard drivers to use), and SCSI's ability to support more than just storage devices. I can see when the writing is on the wall for a perfectly good technology. When its most enthusiastic sponsor is downgrading support (and blaming Intel for FW800 being gone isn't going to cut it - it doesn't explain what's happening with iPod, and it's something Apple could fix anyway by including a FW800 card), it's obvious Apple isn't interested in pushing it.

      Look also at where the industry is heading. When Firewire was first announced, people were talking about networking all audio-visual equipment with it, consumer and pro. SPDIF is where the audio is. Video "networking" looks set to be HDMI based in the near future. Hard to see where Firewire will fit in the picture for consumer AV.

      I really, seriously, believe people are deluding themselves when they posit arguments in favour of consumer Firewire continuing to attract the support of major manufacturers like Apple. Apple is taking steps to downgrade it in the non-pro sphere. That's demonstrable fact. It's not because of Intel, it's something they were already doing well before the MacBook Pro.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    9. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      It's early. Wait for the full resolution HD video data transfers to come along. When people need to start transferring 10+ GB files, they'll come around.

    10. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by damsa · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't have to support Firewire because of the FCC mandate, but cable digital receivers need to support Firewire and I really can't see Apple not supporting Firewire for this particular purpose on low end machines. But then again Apple is reselling these shows on iTunes, so perhaps Apple will not enter the DVR business.

    11. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by shawngarringer · · Score: 0
      You can get 1080i & 720p video off DVHS through firewire no sweat.

      Maybe you meant uncompressed HD video? I'm not soure the source though as all the HD cameras today compress MPEG-2 and the only way to really work with HD is while its compressed in MPEG-2. An hour of HD compressed in MPEG-2 is roughly 10GB, I cant even imagine what it would be uncompressed.

    12. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

      Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the formula is:
      width * height * bit depth * frame rate = data rate

      So: 1920 * 1024 * 24 * 30 = 1415577600 bits per second or 168.75 Mb/s

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    13. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by 777film · · Score: 1

      Consumer video cameras are migrating to USB. At least, some of them are, and some of those tend to be the ones with radical features that may or may not take (i.e. not MiniDV.) Sony, for example, is making a big push to eliminate Firewire, but at the same time Sony is famous for radical format changes (Digital 8, DVD camcorders.) Likewise MPEG-4 cameras are USB based, but those things really shouldn't be called "camcorders" anyway.

      "Pro" cameras are and will continue to be Firewire. As are DV decks, which is the method most "pros" use to import (not a good idea to use the camera.) It's not going away this year or next... Frankly, USB 2.0 just isn't reliable enough for video. Streaming through a hub doesn't work. Of course this will change when something new comes along (and that "something new" may well have "USB" in its name) but that's not something that should concern any purchase today.

      BTW, Lack of Firewire 800 ports does NOT MEAN Firewire 400 is going away (and neither does dropping it from the iPod.) Firewire 800 never really took off-- partly because Firewire 400 works, and 800 doesn't speed up processes in video editing, most of which are done in real time. 800 doesn't speed up rendering, importing or playback. Though HD may change this?

      (I personally think (and could be wrong on this) the "MacBook" doesn't have 800 because it was rushed to market, not because Apple made a decision to drop it.)

    14. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that would be uncompressed. I don't believe that any DV cams operate this way, and over the air as well as cable HD signals are mpeg2, and top out at ~19Mbit/s

    15. Re:No Firewire *800*, not "No Firewire" by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

      The post that I was responding too was talking about the size of uncompressed HDV footage.

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
  10. Re:No modem! What about no floppy drive? by madaxe42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, damnit, how am I meant to read my core memory now???!? Also, I demand an audio cassette drive! And an LP deck. How dare they remove my perfectly good ancient tech?!

  11. Use the PC card slot to add a FireWire 800 port by dmoen · · Score: 2, Informative

    One potential use for the MacBook's PC card slot is to add a FireWire 800 port, or a modem port. I've personally never had the use for either on my laptop. The MacBook does have a FireWire 400 port, contrary to the title of the Slashdot article.

    Doug Moen

    --
    I have written a truly remarkable program which this sig is too small to contain.
    1. Re:Use the PC card slot to add a FireWire 800 port by damsa · · Score: 1

      Apple makes a USB modem dongle. Which is probably a better idea than a pc card as you are likely to also have to carry a phone cord as well as. For people that like to work on their video or audio on the road, I can see them using them to attach to high speed raid for video work, or installing a high end sound card.

    2. Re:Use the PC card slot to add a FireWire 800 port by feijai · · Score: 1
      One potential use for the MacBook's PC card slot is to add a FireWire 800 port
      I believe, but am not certain, that this is incorrect. Firewire provides power as well as data. At least on cardbus and pcmcia, there's not enough juice given for a card to provide this power. If your firewire device gets its power off the bus -- as is the case for many hard drives and high-quality video cameras -- then you're out of luck. You have to plug something in, either the device or possibly a port on the card.
    3. Re:Use the PC card slot to add a FireWire 800 port by iotashan · · Score: 1

      True, but slightly misinformed. Most high-speed hard drives (which, of course, would be the point of a FW800 drive vs. a FW 400) consume too much power to be powered off the Firewire bus. I would assume the same is true of video cameras... they would need a full wall-outlet.

    4. Re:Use the PC card slot to add a FireWire 800 port by feijai · · Score: 1
      Untrue about the video cameras. You are confusing them with camcorders I believe. I meant: video cameras -- things that take video data and route it directly to firewire, which we use for high-end computer vision, robotics, etc. purposes.

      As to the hard drives: how much data can, say, a 4500RPM drive pump out? I can say that my firewire 400 drives are slower in getting data to the Mac than my internal Powerbook drive at the same speed. So FW800 would help them, I imagine.

    5. Re:Use the PC card slot to add a FireWire 800 port by damiam · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that DV applications only required FW400, so an addon FW800 card wouldn't really be relevent.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  12. No modem port...but there are still options by fak3r · · Score: 1

    So for the single digit percentage of folks that need support for a modem they could go with an external USB modem, like Firewire 800 there's just not the demand for either of these, so it makes sense to drop them. In this vein the reviewer could bemoan the lack of a 100Meg Zip drive, a BNC connector or an AT keyboard plug ;)

    Ok, sorry, just kidding. Really though, I'd like to have a laptop where even the cdrom is option; so there would not be a cdrom slot on the system, you'd have to install via a external USB/firewire cdrom, and then not have to worry about the xtra weight that *I* never use. Again, there's a big market of folks that want a Souper-drive on their Mac's, so they're not going anywhere but for me it's just wasted weight.

    1. Re:No modem port...but there are still options by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Really though, I'd like to have a laptop where even the cdrom is option; so there would not be a cdrom slot on the system, you'd have to install via a external USB/firewire cdrom, and then not have to worry about the xtra weight that *I* never use.

      The CDRom adds only a few ounces. Given how many programs, movies, games, and music albums still come on CD/DVD, I have a hard time believing that it's something you'd "never use". (I use mine all the time.) More likely, if you got your wish you'd find yourself without the drive in a situation when you needed it most.

    2. Re:No modem port...but there are still options by pboulang · · Score: 1
      It's the same motivation that dropped floppy drives... I'd be pretty pissed if space was wasted with one.

      I'd agree with your comment regarding cd-rom/DVD drive being optional except that they have it down to such a low weight that is bears no resemblence to the heavy drives of yesteryear. Plus, by having it built-in, it "just works" as it is 100% supported.

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    3. Re:No modem port...but there are still options by damsa · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had a Sony Vaio SRX without floppy nor a built in DVD drive. It was 2.6 pounds. The newest Sony with a built in Dvd drive weighs in at 3.1 pounds. The lightest Sony full function laptop ever made was 1.8 pounds. So the built drive does make quite a big difference percentage wise in the weight of the laptop. Most computers nowadays come with an image of the software on the hard drive rather than on a disk, so for most people who never buy any software other than ones installed for them, like people who buy iBooks, I can see one day where optical drives would be optional, and you would use a dock connected to a laptop to access this optical drive. Since this would be a dual use, I propose a new name for this Apple laptop without any drives. I propose the name, MacBook Duo.

    4. Re:No modem port...but there are still options by TClevenger · · Score: 1

      I do miss the option that I had on my Pismo: a removable optical drive that could be replaced with a blank spacesaver insert, floppy drive, ZIP or second battery.

    5. Re:No modem port...but there are still options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lightest Sony full function laptop ever made was 1.8 pounds.

      Where "full function" means "no optical drive" in Sony-ese, but in Apple-ese it means "DVD burning drive". Isn't it neat how you can use any words to have any meaning?

      So the built drive does make quite a big difference percentage wise in the weight of the laptop.

      Laptop A has feature X and weighs M pounds. Laptop B lacks feature X and weighs N pounds. Therefore, feature X adds M-N pounds of weight. Please disregard the fact that laptops A and B came from different companies, had different featuresets (apart from X), were made of different materials, and had a completely different internal architecture. The weight difference is due exclusively to the inclusion of feature X.

      Well, I'm sold!

  13. How did this get modded Redundant? by aardwolf64 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How did this guy's post get modded redundant? It's one of the very first posts to the story. Sometimes I don't know about the people that get mod points...

    1. Re:How did this get modded Redundant? by damsa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think there is some guy out there with mod points that is marking everything redundant. This post will be marked redundant.

    2. Re:How did this get modded Redundant? by timster · · Score: 1

      What do you think "redundant" means? The mod is not "already posted on this story".

      The mod may be wrong, but "redundant" makes plenty of sense for some early posts at least.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    3. Re:How did this get modded Redundant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent -1, redundant. There's enough whining on Slashdot as it is...

    4. Re:How did this get modded Redundant? by damsa · · Score: 1

      My Karma will take a hit, oh well. Mod parent insightful.

  14. Data from Digital Camera cards by G4from128k · · Score: 1

    A PC slot (with appropriate adaptor) is a fast way to download data off memory cards from digital cameras. Such a system is both faster and more convenient for people that take large numbers of photos (photos on multiple cards) or who want to give the memory card to a coworker for processing (one person takes the photos while a second person uploads/processes them for the public).

    I know I'll miss the PC card slot until card makers will come up with adapter cards for the new ExpressCard/34 slot.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  15. FireWire 800 is missing because... by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... Intel's standard chip set doesn't support it.

    It's that simple, Apple had no part to play in that decision.

    1. Re:FireWire 800 is missing because... by ImaNihilist · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not quite that simple. They could have thrown in a third party TI chipset, which is what Intel uses for their FW400 solution IIRC.

      The problem is that, currently, all FireWire controllers are on the PCI bus, even the FW800 controllers. Why is that a problem? Because the FW800 controller can almost completely saturate the entire PCI bus by itself.

      It makes more sense to put it on the PCIe bus, but since no chipset currently exists, why not just leave it out so you can get an ExpressCard 34 that will have FW800 and be on the PCIe bus.

    2. Re:FireWire 800 is missing because... by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

      So, what you are saying then is that Intel chipset don't support Firewire 800. I think that it is the real reason and nothing to do with Apple grand master plan to phase out FW. Apple isn't designing its own boards anymore, pure and simple.

      --
      You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  16. Perfectly reasonable compromises by CharAznable · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't used dialup in more than 4 years, and I'm yet to see a Firewire 800 device in the wild. Fw800 is for all intents and purposes, dead as fried chicken. Starting with the retarded, backwards-incompatible connector.

    --
    The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
    1. Re:Perfectly reasonable compromises by Macrat · · Score: 1

      I've got 6 firewire800 hard drives I can show you in use.

    2. Re:Perfectly reasonable compromises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cross over cables are avalible that allow use of firewire 400 devices on a firewire800 controler.... (or vica versa) for $5 bucks...

  17. They had a part to play... by oneiros27 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They could've added their own chip, driving up costs, weight and heat, while decreasing battery lifetime.

    It probably would have also increased the time to market.

    So, they had a part to play, and in this case, they might've made the right decision -- the older laptops w/ FW800 are still on the market, and I would assume that Apple's going to push for support in the future.

    Personally, I don't like FW800, as it uses a completely different connection and cable than FW400, unlike the various USB specs, and the various ethernet specs using RJ45 plugs ... and with a laptop, I don't want to go carrying around even more cables. I would like to see FW800 on the iMac mini, though, so I can get better disk performance than the internal.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:They had a part to play... by cygnus · · Score: 1
      They could've added their own chip, driving up costs, weight and heat, while decreasing battery lifetime.
      not sure they could... that's an Intel motherboard. Apple's not making them anymore. what they could do is exert pressure on Intel to include support for fw800 in the future.
      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    2. Re:They had a part to play... by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      You are able to add a FW800 card to any PC via a PCI card, therefore is shouldn't take too much to include it in a laptop, if it was really all that important right now.

    3. Re:They had a part to play... by cygnus · · Score: 1
      You are able to add a FW800 card to any PC via a PCI card, therefore is shouldn't take too much to include it in a laptop, if it was really all that important right now.
      we're talking integrating it into a laptop... that would require Intel to redesign a chipset, unless they want to make a 1-off motherboard for just Apple (probably not).
      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    4. Re:They had a part to play... by Ster · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's not an Intel motherboard, it's an Intel *chipset*.

      It's not hard to have on-board devices that are not part of the chipset. For example, one of the embedded systems I use at work is based on the Intel Plumas chipset, and it also has gigabit ethernet via a Broadcom NIC that's on the board. Intel had no part in that. *We* came up with the specifications for the board, and *we* had it built with what we wanted. I have no doubt whatsoever that Apple could do the same.

      The reason FW800 is not on-board is what has already been said: adoption was low on laptops, so why spend the money designing it in when so few people use it?

    5. Re:They had a part to play... by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      I realize that. I just wanted to point out that it wouldn't be that difficult to accomplish.

    6. Re:They had a part to play... by cygnus · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's not an Intel motherboard, it's an Intel *chipset*.
      everything i see on the web suggests that that's not the case:
      http://www.macnn.com/articles/05/12/28/intel.power .mac.design/
      http://www.zdnetindia.com/news/hardware/stories/13 2142.html
      http://www.google.com/search?q=apple%20intel%20mot herboard&sourceid=mozilla2&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

      unless you have some other datapoint, i think it's pretty clear it's an Intel motherboard.

      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    7. Re:They had a part to play... by superposed · · Score: 1

      All the links you gave seem to support the original poster's point ("It's not an Intel motherboard, it's an Intel *chipset*."). As far as I could tell, all your links that discussed the motherboard design either cited or plagiarized an article at http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=1431 . That article seems to say that Apple designed its own motherboards for the iMac, MacBook and forthcoming iBook and Mac Mini, and contracted with Intel to develop a custom motherboard for the Power Mac.

  18. Quit giving a pass to lack of modem. by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First the modem should be there as it adds very little to the cost and is present in many chipsets. Laptops are about NOT having to carry accessories. While FW800 may be excused as FW400 is there I can't give them a pass on the modem.

    Many times I find the following situation, no wireless and no lan. This means modems. Yeah some hotels have internet I can connect to via lan but that still isn't widespread, or should I say widespread in hotels some business will pay for. Same goes for wireless.

    If I am taking a laptop on business all I should need is the laptop, the power cord, and the case to carry it. I don't want to have a section for "exceptions". If I have one of those then I bought the wrong laptop.

    This is a "PRO" model, by name it implies it will provide me everything I could use that is reasonable. That modem is far more valuable than a gimmick of a camera. Hell I already carry a digital camera around and I am sure I can use it in place of iSight (which seems more suitable to teens playing with IM and IV)

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Quit giving a pass to lack of modem. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      I have two external hard drives which are both FireWire 800. I used the modem once, but I get more speed using Bluetooth via my mobile 'phone than I do with the modem.

      My point, assuming I have one, is that the modem has been superseded by 802.11 and Bluetooth + mobile 'phone, while they include nothing that is an adequate replacement for FireWire 800.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Quit giving a pass to lack of modem. by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      If I am taking a laptop on business all I should need is the laptop, the power cord, and the case to carry it. I don't want to have a section for "exceptions". If I have one of those then I bought the wrong laptop.

      Do you carry a phone cord with you? Because, as I'm sure you know, not all hotels provide nicely detachable cables with their phones. If you don't, well, I'm surprised. If you do, simply superglue an RJ11USB adapter onto the end of it. Problem solved.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    3. Re:Quit giving a pass to lack of modem. by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      That was supposed to be:

          RJ11 <--> USB

      Le sigh. Then again, that's what I get for not previewing.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    4. Re:Quit giving a pass to lack of modem. by chrism238 · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear! I'm confident that adding (retaining) the modem chips on the CPU board adds almost nothing ($5?) to the price, weight, and complexity, while the presence of a modem adds greatly to the utility of a laptop, both on the road and when my home ADSL connection fails. I, too, don't wish to carry another device in my laptop bag, have to pay US$50++ for a modem(!), or consume a USB slot to run it. Bad decision Apple!

    5. Re:Quit giving a pass to lack of modem. by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      This is a "PRO" model, by name it implies it will provide me everything I could use that is reasonable.

      Well, PRO is debatable. A big market for PowerBooks has always been those stereotypical beret-wearing coffeshop Mac guys, especially among the early adopters that would be willing to purchase an early Intel model. I suspect Apple knows their customer base very well, and they're sure that doodad features like a webcam and a remote will be more popular than FW800 and a modem.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    6. Re:Quit giving a pass to lack of modem. by tji · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm a bit iffy on the lack of modem.. I have actually used the modem on my current PowerBook a few times. Although, the last time I used it was well over a year ago.

      If I were making the call, I would have left the modem in for another generation of the product. Maybe Internet access via cell network + bluetooth will be easy and cheap by then (probably not), and WiFi will certainly be even more common - maybe even ubiquitous with WiMax.

      But, given my infrequent use of the modem, this won't play a part in my purchase decision. I wil just pick up the USB modem, and have it available for the rare occasion that I need modem access on one of my systems.

    7. Re:Quit giving a pass to lack of modem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What's a "Modem"?

    8. Re:Quit giving a pass to lack of modem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That modem is far more valuable than a gimmick of a camera. Hell I already carry a digital camera around

      So, you carry around a camera, but you're unwilling to carry a modem? I thought it was important to you?

    9. Re:Quit giving a pass to lack of modem. by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      "This means modems. Yeah some hotels have internet I can connect to via lan but that still isn't widespread, or should I say widespread in hotels some business will pay for. "

      It's quite widespread, even at non-luxury hotels. And wireless is becoming even more common - I assume it's more attractive to hotels because they don't need to run wires and there's no equipment in the room that can be damaged.

      The last few weeks I've been staying in a $69 a night budget extended-stay hotel, and there's wireless. And I'm in central Massachusetts, not the big city. (For rate comparison, the other hotels nearby are around $100/night). I've stayed in lots of hotels in the northeast in the last six months, and I don't think I've had a single hotel that lacked internet - the only question was whether it was wired or wireless, and how much it cost.

      Anyway, if you're in your hotel, then the encumbrance of a wee small USB modem is inconsequential compared to all the rest of the baggage in your room. The case for a built-in modem is the situation where you're out in the field, backpacking or working away from your hotel, you're traveling light, and you need to connect someplace where there is only a phone.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    10. Re:Quit giving a pass to lack of modem. by pomo+monster · · Score: 1

      Pardon me for being forward, but I take it you're not a Mac user? I don't know that any of my Mac-using friends have ever used the modem on their laptops--it's all 802.11 or mobile network via Bluetooth phone. That port, and its related circuitry, are deadweight as far as any of us are concerned. Though it's true, people with Windows laptops always seem to be a few years out of date.

    11. Re:Quit giving a pass to lack of modem. by cft_128 · · Score: 1
      Do you carry a phone cord with you? Because, as I'm sure you know, not all hotels provide nicely detachable cables with their phones. If you don't, well, I'm surprised. If you do, simply superglue an RJ11USB [USB modem] adapter onto the end of it. Problem solved.

      If I had mod points you would get it. Good insight. I've actually had an RJ11 cable in my various laptop bags for the last 8 years, I think I have used it maybe 4 time, the most recent being 3 years ago. I wonder if it is still there come to think of it, I actually haven't had to look for it for quite a while.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    12. Re:Quit giving a pass to lack of modem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A big market for PowerBooks has always been those stereotypical beret-wearing coffeshop Mac guys

      Not around here, anyway. Those guys (and short-haired women, often with glasses) are always sitting around with either A) an iBook or B) a Compaq.

      The iBooks, obviously, are cool enough looking, and much cheaper, than PowerBooks, which is what matters for the demographic.

      No idea why the Compaqs are so attractive.

  19. think it's been said by wornst · · Score: 1

    "This afternoon, Apple invited some journalists at a presentation of its new products at EBC in Paris. If we weren't invited, we had some "unofficial"correspondants attending.
    And they did ask Apple about the new notebooks' battery life.
    Their answer is quite interesting: the machines that were demoed are only prototypes and the final versions are still under development. They thus don't have any hard numbers on the battery life of the final products.
    The disappearance of FW800 has also been discussed: Apple said it would have required them toi build a specific FW800 card (Intel does not support it), and that they had no plans for it [moose: well, down the drain goes Apple's autonomy to innovate.]
    Let's hope they hurry up and finalize (but not rush out) their machines before the official release date (within a month.)"
    from www.hardmac.com

    Personally, I think apple should have made a ipod pro that used firewire 800, had a bigger screen (landscape maybe) and a larger hard drive. This whole intel switch is a mess. We better get a 64 bit processor when they release the pro machines or else I'll never beleive anything Jobs says ever again. Now we have a 64 bit OS with a 32 bit processor. Explain the logic behind that?

    1. Re:think it's been said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "ipod pro that used firewire 800 ... and a larger hard drive"? Why? No hard drive that will fit in an iPod could even keep up with 400Mbps. It's also highly unlikely that your desktop (or laptop) hard drive you're trying to feed the iPod with could do 400Mbps.

      64bit OS -- Name one thing you personally would like to do on a laptop that you can't because it's only 32-bit. I dare you.

      This is just the media & the marketing departments at work. People assume that because something has more bits, it would have to make their lives better. Sun is threatening (don't hold your breath :-/) to release a 128-bit filesystem for Solaris 10. It'll have 16 billion billion times the capacity of your pathetic 64-bit filesystem. You should format your {Windows,MacOS,Linux} box now and install Solaris 10 because it has more bits! (And all those people living in the dark ages with a 32-bit filesystem, just give up now! You're not worthy!)

    2. Re:think it's been said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name one thing you personally would like to do on a laptop that you can't because it's only 32-bit.

      Upgrade the memory beyond 4GB. Yeah, I know it sounds much now. But thinking a few years ahead and you might very well need it. There are alot of computers bought when 128Mb was the norm that has been upgraded to 512mb. Now 1Gb is considered pretty much the norm, 4GB will be the norm pretty fast (like 5 years tops).

      Adding to my reasoning is that this is a fresh line for Apple, and they start out with x86 just when everybody else is phasing it out for x86-64. Is that a good move?

      I think Apples x86-32 will be fairly shortlived, and Apple to will move on to x86-64 in a couple of years. Leaving those new Macbooks as bricks when no software will be written for them.

      It's seem safest to wait until Apple gets on x86-64, they will need yet another architecture switch fairly soon.

    3. Re:think it's been said by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      This whole intel switch is a mess. We better get a 64 bit processor when they release the pro machines or else I'll never beleive anything Jobs says ever again. Now we have a 64 bit OS with a 32 bit processor. Explain the logic behind that?

      Apple has never shipped a 64-bit laptop. Someday they will.

      I expect whatever they replace the PowerMac G5 with ("Macintosh Pro"?) to contain 64-bit CPUs. Only the iMac has stepped backwards from 64-bit to 32-bit.

      Apple switched to Intel because Intel's roadmap looks more promising than the alternatives. That doesn't mean they're perfect right now, it means in the future they'll be better than the competition, so Apple is getting a head start.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  20. Mouse by andywhitt · · Score: 0, Troll

    Do we know if its a two button mouse on them?

  21. Re:No modem! What about no floppy drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Floppies come in 5.25 now? Cool these 8.5's take up way too much space!

  22. A bad choice of words for Apple's PR by chrism238 · · Score: 1

    I'me very unconvinced that an article subtitled "This baby cooks" is good for Apple's PR! After all, the temperature from the much touted G5 Powerbook was one major reason for the shift to Intel in the first place.

    1. Re:A bad choice of words for Apple's PR by travisd · · Score: 1

      ...not to mention the whole Powerbook 5300 "Firestarter" fiasco...

  23. iMac = MacBook Pro with external keyboard & mo by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

    Why bother? The iMac and MacBook Pro are essentially the exact same system. If people are turning their iMacs into bricks why risk it with a MacBook Pro unless you're some almighty hacker that can create a wrapper to get EFI to work with a BIOS based OS?

    "I tried to install XP on my MacBook Pro and it didn't work," is no more impressive than "I tried to install my XP on my iMac and it didn't work."

    --
    sig.
  24. Indeed by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Informative

    And FireWire is going to be around for quite some time.

    As long as all DV and HDV cameras and decks use FireWire for DV transport, FireWire isn't going anywhere on Macs, including "consumer" Macs, since half of iLife (iMovie, iDVD), and the continuing major selling point for the SuperDrive, rest on the ability to get DV into the machine.

    And no, USB isn't a substitute on DV cameras. USB is only included to transfer things from the internal memory card, usually still images and crappy digital-still-camera-like video. To transfer DV, you must use FireWire. (Now, could the industry eventually agree upon a collective standard mechanism for DV video transfer via USB? Will something eventually replace FireWire? Sure. But that's not going to happen for a long time.)

    And indeed, ExpressCard/34 FireWire 800 cards are on the way, for people who really need FireWire 800:

    MacBook Pro #4: FireWire 800 cards for ExpressCard/34 slot on the way

    We previously reported that Apple has opted to omit the FireWire 800 port from its new MacBook Pro line. We also noted that various firms already offer ExpressCard FireWire 800 adapters, but there's a catch -- so far the cards are only available in the 54 mm ExpressCard standard, not the 34 mm standard Apple uses.

    We've now received anonymous word from a major peripheral manufacturer indicating that FireWire 800 cards for the ExpressCard/34 slot are on the way.

    The firm told MacFixIt:

    "We do not have an estimated release date, but we are currently working on a couple of ExpressCard solutions (1394b being one of them). We, like other companies have an ExpressCard/54 cards and all we need to do is down-size them into the ExpressCard/34 form factor

    "We expect to begin testing our cards within the next 2-3 weeks, and if all goes well, we could see production not long afterwards."

    1. Re:Indeed by SloppyElvis · · Score: 1

      USB is only included to transfer things from the internal memory card, usually still images and crappy digital-still-camera-like video.

      This is not entirely accurate. The Sony Handycam models support streaming DV through iLink (Firewire) or USB 2.0. The quality is the same (to my eyes) for both methods. In fact, newer models of the low-end Handycams have moved the Firewire connection to a docking station, but left USB on the main unit. The docking station interferes with streaming DV capture because it blocks the mount and doesn't fasten securely to the camera. I interpreted this as a move away from Firewire on the Handycam, but I could be wrong about that.

      We use Firewire for our DV because there aren't enough USB ports on our laptops, but that is the only reason really.

    2. Re:Indeed by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but transferring video via USB is proprietary, and must be used in conjunction with software that knows how to receive video over USB. Of course, anything can be sent over USB within its bandwidth. But DV is a standard, and "DV"-proper travels over FireWire. That some low-end camcorders use USB for video transfer is only a response to the fact that almost all low-end PCs won't have FireWire. Perhaps this trend will continue. My only point was that FireWire is essentially the primary transport for DV, and HDV's only interface is FireWire, and it will remain that way for quite some time.

    3. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your FAQ sucks.

      # FireWire usage across the industry is increasing, not decreasing
      Not as a percentage of market it isn't. There's no evidence that its growth is outpacing that of alternatives in the same market, which is a critical factor in the market.
      # FireWire is featured on all currently shipping Intel-based Macs
      Of the two PowerPC Mac models replaced by Intel versions, Firewire has been significantly downgraded in one of them from what it was in the PowerPC equivalent. The other is unchanged and was an older, seven year old, standard anyway.
      # FireWire is required for Target Disk Mode and booting from external media; USB is not supported for these tasks
      There is absolutely no reason why this can't change. Indeed, almost all modern PCs support the ability to boot from USB right now. Target disk mode isn't supported, but could be.
      # FireWire is increasingly used as the interface of choice on modern digital video and audio equipment
      False. In the consumer market, modern digital video is moving to HDMI and was rarely, if ever, found in Firewire form. Modern digital audio has pretty much completely changed over to SPDIF. Firewire is pretty much only used for transfering video between DV cameras and computers outside of the commercial sector.
      # FireWire is the transport mechanism used by all digital video (DV) and high definition digitial video (HDV) cameras and decks
      The fact you said this means that you clearly didn't mean DV camera usage was to be included in the previous "fact". How many DVD players, video cassette recorders, high definition TVs, and TV receivers, available at regular chains like Best Buy, Circuit City, or even Radio Shack, have Firewire inputs or outputs again? This is the one fact that appears to be largely correct.

      Even so, it ignores the move towards USB by many companies. Sony already treats Firewire as an option, not a standard feature, on its latest camcorders with USB being the transport medium of choice and the people I've read say there's no practical difference in quality between the two. The nearest thing there is to a problem is a lack of a widely supported digital video over USB2 standard (note: not a lack of a standard, just the fact it isn't widely supported right now.)

      Application software and features on every Mac, like iMovie, iDVD, and the SuperDrive (DVD±RW/CD-RW), depend on FireWire to import video into the computer via DV
      False.

      iMovie will take any Quicktime feed. Quicktime will support any feed you wish via a plug-in. iDVD doesn't deal with Firewire in any form, neither does the SuperDrive (sure, you can take a video you imported into iMovie via Firewire and import it into iDVD and then burn to a DVD, but that's hardly the same thing.)

      You're batting one out of six. This is an awful argument to justify the suggestion Apple will hang on to Firewire when they've already taken steps to downgrade its use. Right now, Apple seems to see it as something useful in DV only. Given most people do not even use the DV features of their Macs, and those that do have generally invested so much money in additional equipment (even if only for a cheap, $500, DV camera), they're hardly going to balk at buying an $50 Firewire-to-USB adapter should they really, really, need such a thing.

      You give reasons why Apple should support Firewire. But the fact is they're downgrading their support for it as we speak. I love Firewire too, but let's not kid ourselves.

    4. Re:Indeed by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

      # FireWire usage across the industry is increasing, not decreasing

      Not as a percentage of market it isn't. There's no evidence that its growth is outpacing that of alternatives in the same market, which is a critical factor in the market.


      "Alternatives"? What alternatives? And all I said was that FireWire usage is increasing. It is. I don't have any figures on percentages. You also must have missed that fact that the High-Definition Audio-Video Network Alliance (HANA) has picked IEEE-1394b as its primary standard to clean up the home HD networking mess. This means more and more equipment that interact with HD equipment from both a video and audio perspective will feature FireWire.

      # FireWire is featured on all currently shipping Intel-based Macs

      Of the two PowerPC Mac models replaced by Intel versions, Firewire has been significantly downgraded in one of them from what it was in the PowerPC equivalent. The other is unchanged and was an older, seven year old, standard anyway.


      Yes. And this was a tradeoff because:

      1. One is a portable machine.

      2. One is a consumer machine.

      And if you call going from 1 FireWire 800 port and 1 FireWire 400 port to 1 FireWire 400 port a "significant downgrade", when we have a representative sample of 2 machines at that, we probably have a different definition of "significant downgrade".

      This was also a tradeoff because none of Intel's chipsets have FireWire 800 support, and Apple is trying to stay as vanilla as possible in terms of usage of Intel processors and support chipsets. Yes, it could have added its own chipset for FireWire 800 support, at the sacrifice of price, heat, space, design cost, and other factors. And for what? The extremely small penetration that FireWire 800 has? FireWire is still there. That's what is important.

      # FireWire is increasingly used as the interface of choice on modern digital video and audio equipment

      False. In the consumer market, modern digital video is moving to HDMI and was rarely, if ever, found in Firewire form. Modern digital audio has pretty much completely changed over to SPDIF. Firewire is pretty much only used for transfering video between DV cameras and computers outside of the commercial sector.


      Nope. And I also should probably say "high end" in there, too. But again, you missed HANA. And since HANA's founding members include Charter Communications, Mitsubishi, NBC Universal, Samsung, Sun, ARM, Freescale, and Pulse-LINK, they'll definitely be a force in the industry.

      And you also have forgotten that ALL HD set top boxes distributed to customers after July 1, 2005, MUST include a functional FireWire port, per FCC rulemaking. That's more and more FireWire out there every day, and FireWire is a transport that makes sense for simply handling data transport and control between many devices.

      # FireWire is the transport mechanism used by all digital video (DV) and high definition digitial video (HDV) cameras and decks

      The fact you said this means that you clearly didn't mean DV camera usage was to be included in the previous "fact". How many DVD players, video cassette recorders, high definition TVs, and TV receivers, available at regular chains like Best Buy, Circuit City, or even Radio Shack, have Firewire inputs or outputs again? This is the one fact that appears to be largely correct.


      And DV/HDV cameras/decks is a fairly, um, huge marketplace, wouldn't you say?

      And let's just pause here for a second - that so many people have settled for HDMI and S/PDIF is really unfortunate. I don't know if HANA will ultimately succeed, but they certainly have a lot of weight to throw behind fixing the current mess.

      Even so, it ignores the move towards USB by many companies. Sony already treats Firewire as an option, not a standard feature

    5. Re:Indeed by Captain+Perspicuous · · Score: 2, Informative

      You said:
      And FireWire is going to be around for quite some time

      Dave, isn't it kind of wrong if show proof of your theories by linking to a site that you have written yourself? I just have a strange feeling that something is not quite right there.

    6. Re:Indeed by gobbo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You seem to have forgotten Apple's utter dominance in the video editing arena. Even if this is but a small fraction of Apple's total userbase, FireWire will remain on various Apple hardware as an integrated item for quite some time even for those people alone.

      There's a pretty big halo effect to the pro video applications of the Mac, combined with OS X and reliable hardware.

      I and many of my fellow videographers/filmmakers got pretty hooked on FinalCut and the other DV apps for the Mac, especially at the time that running Firewire on a PC in Premiere was extremely flakey. The result? we made more money, lost less hair, insisted on the gear we needed, and infected those around us with similar software addictions. Eventually many of us completely converted our shops over. Bye bye NT etc. and super quirky device drivers! Bye bye forgetting to turn off the virus scanner and dropping frames! There was a MHz lag, the Macs were slower, but less down-time and futzing around more than made up for it, especially when Jaguar came out and we could move to OS X.

      Then I inadvertently demonstrated target disk mode to one of the IT guys: "what the hell are you doing?" "Oh, just needed to synch home folders." "Wow, cool. Woah, fast!" There were quite a few Mac orders next budget cycle. Apple relies on the "creative types" for more than just sales.

      Firewire was the key to all that.

  25. FireWire 400 by spleck · · Score: 1

    Oh Geez! No FireWire 800!!? What am I going to do... I'll have to use the insufferable FireWire 400 at ONLY 50 MB/sec.

    I can't believe there's no PCI Express x16 slot either! How am I going to install my GeForce 7800GT?

    1. Re:FireWire 400 by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 1

      The parent poster correctly said 50MB/sec. (400Mb/Sec)/(8bits/byte)=50MB/sec.

    2. Re:FireWire 400 by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      As it says in the quote, those are approximate numbers. Can't count the overhead.

      So, 400/8 roughly = 50, in this case.

      Just trying to clarify...

    3. Re:FireWire 400 by spleck · · Score: 1

      I was just illustrating that FireWire 400 is more than sufficient for most people. Since MB/sec is an easier unit to comprehend, I was simply implying that 50 MB/sec is quite capable for most uses. I wouldn't complain about 50 MB/sec over 100 MB/sec since I can't think of anything I would need it for. My DV camera uses, what, about 4 MB/sec? An external DVD burner or even a HD might not fully tax FireWire 400.

      In other words, Apple using 400 instead of 800 is hardly headline news. I'd rather go complain that my car has a speed limiter at 135 mph.

    4. Re:FireWire 400 by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      You're right, it's easier for most to understand it that way.

      Most people don't even realize that there's a difference between megabytes and megabits and think that Mb and MB are the same thing.

  26. AC needs to learn how to read! by losman · · Score: 0

    The article is right; there is no FW800 port. There IS a FW400 port but no FW800.

    --
    Q: I am short, useless and provide no value. What am I? A: a sig
  27. FireWire 800 by aduzik · · Score: 1

    It is my understanding that the reason the FireWire 800 port is absent on the new MacBook Pro is that the Intel chipset they're using doesn't support it. To have FireWire 800 support, Apple would have to provide a custom chipset capable of supporting it. Since Apple doesn't exactly have fab capabilities, it's not on the MacBook. Also, it's been suggested by others -- and quite rightly, I think -- that most customers weren't using the FireWire 800 port on the PowerBook. For the benefit it would provide, building FireWire 800 into the MacBook seems prohibitively expensive. Now the Power Mac may be an entirely different story.

    --
    If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    1. Re:FireWire 800 by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      To have FireWire 800 support, Apple would have to provide a custom chipset capable of supporting it. Since Apple doesn't exactly have fab capabilities, it's not on the MacBook.

      Of course, Apple could've always just contracted out the fabrication like they have for the chipsets on every previous Mac since the first. Seriously, did you think that the PowerMac G5 used an off-the-shelf chipset? Apple has long been in the business of custom-designing chips for their motherboards, not the least of which would be the famous Mac ROM.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    2. Re:FireWire 800 by aduzik · · Score: 1

      Not at all, but the point I was trying to make is that for the expense that it would incur, the benefit would be minimal. I guess I meant to imply that the only way they would be able to do it economically is if they didn't have to contract them out.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    3. Re:FireWire 800 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> It is my understanding that the reason the FireWire 800 port is absent on the new MacBook Pro is that the Intel chipset they're using doesn't support it.

      Finally! Amongst all this noise in this thread... someone who is actually paying attention.

      I was beginning to think I was the only one!

    4. Re:FireWire 800 by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      FireWire 400 isn't included in the chipset, either. Intel doesn't make a FireWire controller. So for even FW400 support, they had to add a PCI-device chip; just as every notebook manufacturer does. (Only the nVidia nForce chipset includes FireWire in the main chipset.)

      Putting a FireWire 800 controller in instead of the FireWire 400 controller wouldn't have been an engineering challenge at all. Apple just cheaped out. (This way they only have to provide a single, cheaper, FW400 port, saving cost on both the controller and the ports.)

      Again, FireWire isn't in the chipset anyway. Nobody has to custom produce squat. Apple could have used a third-party FireWire 800 controller chip instead of the third-party FireWire 400 controller chip, and it wouldn't have affected engineering at all. It only affects production, in the added cost of the raw parts.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  28. Re:Apple's customers by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    I know that I would never consider a laptop (especially a grossly overpriced laptop) that doesn't have a built in modem. It's not because of snobbery, but because I often have to use a modem to connect to the Net.

    Yeah, and when you're hardwired into a phone line, a very small swelling at one end of the wire is such a huge price to pay for connectivity. I mean, c'mon. You already have to supply the wire itself, what's the big deal about chipping in another $10-20 for a USB modem?

    Integrating wireless devices into the laptop makes sense. The whole point of being wireless is to be unencumbered by "clutter." Integrating a wired adapter, especially one that few people use, doesn't really add any benefit. I'd say that they could do the same with the Ethernet jack if it wasn't for the fact that USB ethernet adapters are considerably more expensive and less standardized - oh, and the fact that a much larger percentage of the population uses them.

    If you connect to the 'net over a modem at home, have you tried the Airport base station with the built in modem? We set this up for some friends of ours and it worked really well, giving them mobility and convenience without requiring broadband.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  29. Re:Apple's customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not overpriced by any stretch of the imagination. The same features from Gateway will cost you the same amount of money, if not a little bit more. Compare before you blather on endlessly about things you clearly know nothing about.

  30. Everything better on USB by addie+macgruer · · Score: 1

    There's nothing wrong with connecting a dial-up modem over USB, either. My (rev A) iMac modem died when the telephone lines outside got hit by lightning. £100 in the apple shop to get it fixed. An extra £20 on an external modem to take the shock in the first place would have been a fantastic investment.

  31. losman needs to learn how to read! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The comment was made about the headline you fucking halfwit retard. RTFH!!!! Fucking twits.

  32. Tiny USB modem by kherr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple's USB modem is tiny, smaller than an iPod shuffle. I'm sure you'll also be able to get an ExpressCard modem (so it can be "in" the machine and not an extra part to carry). Sure people still need modems, but the number of those using them is shrinking. And since there's a reasonable external solution why continue to build it into the machine?

    While many modem users may be shocked by the lack of a built-in modem, this move is probably less radical than it seems, just like ditching the floppy drive. Everyone couldn't imagine a machine without a floppy, but it didn't hurt Apple at all. I think replacing the PC Card slot with an ExpressCard slot is much more extreme, since that obsoletes hardware people have.

  33. USB however small still sticks out of the laptop by blorg · · Score: 1

    ...while a PCMCIA card reader will be completely flush. Makes a big difference, you can just leave the card stuck in there permenantly and you don't notice it at all.

  34. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, that modem is about as useful as the floppy drive.

    Get over it already.

  35. Apple's USB modem is a $50 part. by argent · · Score: 1

    Or, rather, $49. If you can afford a 'book you can afford that, and it's small enough that you can leave it connected to your phone cable.

    1. Re:Apple's USB modem is a $50 part. by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Good point. I can't afford any Apple stuff, but I'm sure that the people who can wouldn't care less about an extra $50 for a modem.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Apple's USB modem is a $50 part. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the only USB modem available. Just the smallest.

  36. ExpressCard does it all.... by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    people are lamenting the loss of the PC card slot, but they are forgetting that the MacBook is not yet shipping. at the same MacWorld where the MacBook was announced there were plenty of vendors saying they will have ExpressCard versions of stuff ready when the MacBook is. offhand Verizon was there talking about an Expresscard EVDO, and claimed it would ship by the time the MacBook does.
    i am sure there will be plenty of Expresscard adapters for camera flash memory as well. i don't know if there is a need for an expresscard modem when there is a USB dongle already available. if you have to plug in a phone line, then putting an adapter inline doesn't seem like a big deal, and you can keep your card slot open.

    i will say of all the people i personally know with powerbooks, i only know of one person that uses their PC card slot and that is for internet access while traveling (by van) around the country with his band (and still being able to work since he's online the whole time).

  37. How fast is it by tsa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder: can I see this MacBook Pro as a notebook version of the iMac, or are there significant differences in speed?

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:How fast is it by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 1

      I believe you would see the largest difference in performance in operations involving disk IO. Laptop hard drives are traditionally somewhat slower than their desktop counterparts.

    2. Re:How fast is it by yabos · · Score: 1

      But you can get a 7200 RPM SATA HD so the HD should be the same speed.

  38. No kidding by Rosyna · · Score: 1

    Yeah, even I wrote one such "review". But never said it cooked (other than maybe the extra heat...)

  39. MOD PARENT INFORMATIVE by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 1

    Everything isn't about politics. Apple's management felt the public was ready for Intel Macs, and better they beta test the new platform in its most basic form, than try to do everything at once and guarantee embarrassing press if anything fails.

    There will be power user desktop Intel Macs before there are power user laptops. This is entirely consistent with [insert computer manufacturer name here]'s history.

    The actual sadness over losing a modem port is fax functionality. I regularly file claims with the managers of my medical flexible spending program, but to put this into context I'm faxing scans of physical documents which means a desktop box hooked to a flatbed scanner (a scenario less likely with laptops).

    --
    "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
  40. Re:Apple's customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and has always catered to the very wealthy.

    Yeah. Very wealthy. There's no way someone like a college student has ever been able to afford Apple hardware. Never!

    Get a new troll, you lazy fucktard.

  41. No. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    I think they left the modem off because it was stupid to have one. The only time I used dialup since 1996 was when I visited the US in 2001, and again in 2004. It's not hard to find wireless networks to use, and broadband has been the rule of the law in Canada for many years.

    I don't want a modem on my machine because they represent an era that is over. WiFi internet, or Bluetooth to my cell phone, are easy enough to use when I want to deal with data transfers. A little ethernet cable will also connect me if only wired networks are in range. Modems transfer data so glacially slow, they're a non-issue.

    That Apple doesn't have it, means they don't have to have an engineer integrate it into the system, or provide the chipset with power, etc. I was really surprised that, as the company that went to USB so full-force, they still had the modem jack on their machines. Thankfully they've realized their mistake.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  42. Gotta have the firewire by sauge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I got a bunch of firewire 800 disk drives. If they want me to buy another Apple, they are gonna have to put the FW800 back in.

    Otherwise I will be writing a "Why I gave up on Apple" article in my blog. :(

    1. Re:Gotta have the firewire by idsofmarch · · Score: 1
      But, it is my understanding that the Express 3/4 card will allow you to have multiple ports that have their own dedicated bandwidth, thereby giving you faster data with a simple extra. Granted, the need for a card is annoying, but certaintly not worth abandoning OSX and Apple.

      Furthermore, this is only with--we assume--the laptops, while the pro machines may continue to have Firewire 800 for a long time, and the Powermacs (MacMacs?) will always have the expansion necessary to add Firewire 800.

      --
      Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
    2. Re:Gotta have the firewire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah that'll teach 'em! once steve reads your blog, fw800 will come back. they may even make a fw1600!

    3. Re:Gotta have the firewire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Otherwise I will be writing a "Why I gave up on Apple" article in my blog. :(

      It's guys like you that nobody in the Mac community is going to miss!

    4. Re:Gotta have the firewire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear ya. When you're in a significant minority of customers who care about a particular feature, you're not terribly likely to get it. It's all about tradeoffs, and the tradeoff here makes much more sense for Apple to eliminate FW800, which isn't used by 99.99% of customers. A few lost sales won't offset the savings they get.

      At least you have an option to buy an Express card. Sure, it's a small extra expense, but it allows you to have your cake and eat it too. Not so for my one and only true pet peeve with an Apple product: gapless playback. Again, 99.999% of iPod users don't care because (a) they're not music fanatics like me, and (b) they always listen in shuffle mode. And though I believe a true solution (not some kludge like importing a CD as one huge file and losing all per-song data) is fairly easy, Apple does not see the value in spending money to do it when it might only result in a tiny handful of extra sales.

      Such is life when you have very specific wants or needs!

  43. Re:Apple's customers by ClamIAm · · Score: 1
    Apple continues to narrow the segment of customers that they're catering to.

    This is the most ridiculous statement I've seen about Apple for a long time. If this is truly what they're doing, why are they selling more computers in the last few years? Not to mention the iPod.

    Now, apparently, they're only catering to customers that live in modern, urban or massively suburban areas that have wireless everywhere.

    It's been said before: you can buy a modem for the damn thing. If you can afford a $2000 computer, you can probably afford a $50 modem. Also, it's not like they cut out the ethernet port. So now Apple must be catering to urban, large suburban, small suburban, and a large percentage of small towns. My hometown is in west-central Minnesota (pop 1,000), which is 2 and 1/2 hours away from an "urban and massively suburban" area. You can get DSL there, as you can in many towns that size.

    But really, this is nothing new... Apple has really always been bleeding edge, and has always catered to the very wealthy.

    Again, ridiculous.

  44. If you want the modem, just buy it by vitaflo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apple does sell a USB modem. If you need one, you can always buy it with your MacBook.

  45. Lack of modem IS irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's why:

    a) The figures say that more than 90% of Powerbook users have broadband or WLAN access. Out of the rest, deduct anybody with a Bluetooth GSM phone. I know I haven't used the analog modem in my Powerbook in the three years I've been using one. GPRS worked fine from day one.

    b) Anybody who's whining about having to carry an extra peripheral hasn't ever seen Apple's USB modem. This is not a 1995 14.4 modem block with power supply, phone plug, and serial port. This thing weighs NOTHING, is smaller than your thumb, and disappears disappears bulk-wise in relation to the six-foot cable it will be perpetually attached to.

    Firewire 800, however, is a different matter. There is as yet no replacement that doesn't render existing gear unusable, and I know a fair number of studios running off Firewire stuff that need the bandwidth to share among several devices. A number will be able to go the ExpressCard route for FW 800, but there a plenty whose laptop-based studios rely upon both FW 800 and CardBus devices...

  46. MOD PARENT UP by GekkePrutser · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    He's asking a legitimate question so I don't see why he should be modded down as Troll. A second mouse button would be really useful for anyone wanting to run Windows on their MacBook.

    Imagine calling tech support, and them saying: 'Please right-click on my computer' :-) Whoops!

    Unfortunately, from the pictures I've seen it seems they still have only one button so there'll have to be a software solution for right-clicking or something.

  47. Re:USB however small still sticks out of the lapto by peragrin · · Score: 1

    Until of course you want to copy the files to a computer without a PCMCIA sot. Then your screwed.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  48. The modem is like insurance by AlanAudio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Having a modem is like having insurance, you hope not to need it, but when you find that you do need it, you're very glad of it.

    Now I'm the first to admit that I rarely use the modem in my PowerBook, but nearly every time that I have used it has been when I expected some sort of broad band service to have been available. If all else fails, you can get a dial-up connection almost anywhere and you can borrow a lead to connect from the local telephone point to a modem too.

    My PowerBook has to be squeezed into space with other important stuff. It's simply not practical to take all my accessories with me. The chances are that if I needed a USB modem, it wouldn't be with me, but a built-in modem is always there when you need it.

    I like the PCMCIA slots. I've always kept a compact flash reader in mine. If I take a photograph and want to see it on a larger screen, it's easy to pop the card straight onto the PowerBook, you don't need to find that strange USB adaptor lead that came with the camera. As the card reader lives entirely within the slot, you'd hardly know it was there - until you unexpectedly want it.

    An ExpressCard slot would be equally acceptable for me, a card reader would almost certainly live in there. But it wouldn't be suitable for a modem as the slot is only 5mm high and if you need to use the modem unexpectedly, the card is unlikely to have a standard phone socket, so you'll still need a special lead, which you probably won't have with you.

    I think that the lack of a modem is something that has come from people who move from home to office and on to smart hotels, with WiFi in Starbucks and GPRS for other places. They assume that users spend all their time in the city and never travel to rural areas, or even ( dare I say it ? ) travel abroad !

    For some of us who live in the real world, the lack of a modem is a very serious omission.

    1. Re:The modem is like insurance by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Because we all know that those damned "furriners" don't have anything better than dialup, right? :-)

  49. No dual layer DVD either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also missing is the dual layer Superdrive found on the latest Powerbooks.

  50. Product Suggestions: USB modem/flash drive, etc by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1


    Some enterprising company should come up with a USB flash drive that has a built-in modem. Maybe something that'd snap onto an iPod shuffle, with a passthrough USB connector.

    Or perhaps a replacement power brick with a built-in USB modem. Or maybe just a fabric power brick sleeve with a pocket for the modem.

    Or maybe a 3rd-party replacement battery for the MacBook Pro with a compartment for the modem - give up some battery life, but you'd have the modem handy at all times.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  51. 7% difference, according to Apple's Benchmarks by Rolman · · Score: 1

    If you see Apple's own SPEC benchmarks for each machine, you'll see that the MacBook Pro has SPECint_rate_base2000 rating of 30.3 and SPECfp_rate_base2000 of 25.6, compared to 32.6 (7.59% higher) and 27.1 (5.85% higher) for the iMac, respectively.

    Not that CPU synthetic benchmarks are really something to write home about. But I'd say they do show the difference is not significant. Other components such as the HDD could make the experience different, but you can also change that using a 7200 RPM drive, which could actually be faster than its desktop counterpart, given the higher density on the platter and shorter seeks.

    --
    - Otaku no naka no otaku, otaking da!!!
  52. No dual layer Superdrive!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No dual layer superdrive on the new MacBook Pros. A major flaw from what I can tell...

  53. FireWire 800 left out by Intel by gig · · Score: 1

    Intel doesn't offer FireWire 800 chipsets is why there is no FireWire 800 on the MacBook Pro. Theoretically, Intel will start to offer this feature and it will appear on future pro Macs along with the 64-bit versions of the Core CPU's.

  54. 400 firewire!! absurd!! by varanid · · Score: 1

    god damn you apple!! 400 is not fast enough for me to move around all my pr0n... guess I'll have to invest in that X-san

  55. Re:USB however small still sticks out of the lapto by blorg · · Score: 1

    The primary use for me was just to have the PC Card stuck in the slot permanently so that I could transfer pictures off my camera. Of course all computers made would have had a single memory card slot built in for the last five years if everyone could have agreed on a single memory card standard.

  56. FireWire 800 by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

    Personally I think the actual reason the MacBook Pro has no FW800 ports is simply because Intel still doesn't make onboard FW800 controllers yet.