Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates' Taxes Require Special Computer

NightWulf writes "News AU claims Bill Gates said in an interview, his fortune is so big, that the IRS needs a special computer, because a normal one can't handle the numbers. The IRS must have had to switch from PC's to Macs just for Gates."

84 of 428 comments (clear)

  1. At last, I have something in common with Bill... by Osrin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Except the special computer that the IRS use for my taxes is an Altair.

  2. I tell you what would be news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the press could discern an attempt at a joke. Now THAT would be news.

  3. Money Fight! by ma11achy · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I was Bill Gates, I'd go home and have a money fight with wads of thousand dollar bills.

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines
  4. Its not the numbers by NiteShaed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its not that the numbers are too big, its that the EULA he staples to his tax forms require it be processed by 100% MS software.

    --
    Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
  5. I don't buy it by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has to be BS. There are very lareg corporations with financials much more complex than Gates' taxes.
    This sounds ridiculous. Do Warren Buffet's taxes need the special computer also?

    --
    And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    1. Re:I don't buy it by Roj+Blake · · Score: 2

      Without seeing the interview I don't know the context of the remark. But I have to assume it was just a lame joke.

      --
      Auron may be different, Cally, but on Earth it is considered ill-mannered to kill your friends while committing suicide.
    2. Re:I don't buy it by briancarnell · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes but large corporations don't have the sort of long-running mismanagement of IT that the IRS has. The story here isn't that Gates' fortune is so large but rather -- assuming the story isn't a hoax -- that the IRS is so mismanaged that it cannot deal with exceptional cases like Gates.

      The IRS is apparently still using a computer system that became operational in 1967 (see this announcement for example).

    3. Re:I don't buy it by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Informative

      I highly doubt it. Billy may be the richest man in the world, but the IRS - frequently - deals with large numbers ranging in the billions and trillions. Considering the IRS does consolidation reports to report to their bosses - so their bosses can say "This year, Americans earned XYZ dollars". Billy G is a drop in the hat...yea larger then what we put in the hat...by an insane amount....but still a drop in the bucket.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    4. Re:I don't buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "There are very lareg corporations with financials much more complex than Gates' taxes."

      Yes, but corporate taxes are probably held by a different division than personal taxes.

      I worked for a year at the IRS in the early 90s and things are BAD. I wouldn't be surprised if he had to have his personal stuff moved over to the corporate computers.

      Think about it this way, if you are running on older databases on older computers -- you have specific field sizes. Its hard to retroactively recode these without possible killing a large number of other items (I worked on modernizing some code at my department -- it was a pain in the ass). And beyond that, just because 0.00001% of the population needs a field size of a few hundred digits to calculate a value -- this will mean EVERYONE gets the same value size and require the same sorts of calculations slowing down the whole process and requiring a lot more memory (on computers that are no longer manufactured or were custom pieces -- because when I worked there, it was the battle of the lowest bidder and they ALWAYS made sure that just because they were lowest, it didn't mean they didn't make up for this fact a few years down the road with purposely propriatary parts they never told anyone about even though it was against the original spec sheet).

      So I wouldn't be surprised to know a few dozen billionaires had their own computer system and were managed by a single individual (where as a single individual might manage a few million from a data perspective otherwise). And when you think about it, as much taxable income that man is bringing into the gov't -- it makes PERFECT sense that they'd put a $30k employee on to manage one guy that is chipping in a hundred million a year in taxes...

      I could say more, but I won't because I still have security clearance with the IRS...at the same time, I'm going to post this anonymously even though I didn't give out any information that was secret (or even all that interesting).

    5. Re:I don't buy it by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This story is 100% plausible.

      Bill didn't say that his tax records were the *only* one on that special computer. It is very likely that Mr. Buffet's records are on that computer too, as well as the records for any high net worth individual with complicated tax situations. I completely buy the story. I work in estate and gift tax planning and at least from that perspective, there are myriad of complicated structures (ie LLCs, FLPs, trusts, promissory notes) that require incredibly intense accounting. And I'm not even exposed to the more esoteric tax issues.

      I did some work for a billionaire with only a *fraction* of Bill Gates' fortune once and I had to invent a whole new set of models for keeping track of the spider web of entities. The guy's accountants had it even worse, because they had to keep track of transactions in hundreds of entities by and among various family members...I just had to track the data for one individual. It was my understanding that if this particular family ever underwent a Section 754 Election, where the cost basis of the underlying assets is adjusted to market value (or something like that), the cost in legal, accounting and IT resources could run into the millions.

    6. Re:I don't buy it by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Billy G is a drop in the hat...yea larger then what we put in the hat...by an insane amount....but still a drop in the bucket.

      sooo...... you wear a bucket as a hat?

    7. Re:I don't buy it by drew · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm inclined to believe it. About four years ago, I did a little consulting work with a guy whose full time job was working for the US Treasury Department on a project named "System 89", so named because it was originally scheduled for completion in 1989.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    8. Re:I don't buy it by hey! · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exxon-Mobile just posted a quarterly profit of 10^10$, up from 9.9x10^9$ in the prior quarter. Each of these figures was a record setter.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:I don't buy it by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a secret how the taxes are calculated? That's fucked up.

      Yep- and it's because the IRS does not have the job you think they have. Collecting taxes is the minor, unimportant job. The important job is catching people who cheated on the Earned Income Tax Credit, and other low-income loopholes.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    10. Re:I don't buy it by megabeck42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      there are myriad of complicated structures (ie LLCs, FLPs, trusts, promissory notes) that require incredibly intense accounting.

      I have a new purpose in life, I will direct all my efforts to becoming an extreme, hardcore accountant.

      Bring it on.

      --
      fnord.
  6. W.ealth O.verload P.lanned R.esponse by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    There is only ONE computer that could possibly handle these calculations.

    I have an idea, if your fortune gets to be so large that even the IRS can't figure it all out, you should be required to give some of it away to the poor until they can do the necessary calculations.
    That being said, I will accept cash and postal money orders only please.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:W.ealth O.verload P.lanned R.esponse by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can sneer at his wealth all you want but he has already founded the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, the world's largest charitable foundation. That's a good thing.

    2. Re:W.ealth O.verload P.lanned R.esponse by falzer · · Score: 3, Funny

      > There is only ONE computer that could possibly handle these calculations.

      WOPR? A mere abacus. Mention it not.

    3. Re:W.ealth O.verload P.lanned R.esponse by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last I checked, 'evil Bill Gates' does give quite a bit of money away to the poor. Certainly he is no pauper for it, but he is socially conscious. Now, before you flame this post, please seperate your opinion of his firm's software with what he does with his money. He may the head of a lousy software company, but he is also a good philanthropist.

      --
      If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
  7. Pure fluff by MustardMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd love to see some more detail on exactly WHY they would need a different computer. It's not exactly like 47 billion is a hard number to handle. If it's even true (questionable) I'd say it's probably because their SOFTWARE has some sort of limitation, using low precision numbers or the like, so they had to set up one machine where the software was modified to have higher precision

  8. Is this the Intel Math bug??? by affinity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well bad part about it is that the rest of us tax payers pay for it...ha ha ha

    --
    no sig yet
    1. Re:Is this the Intel Math bug??? by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So Billy boy has $47B and earns 1.5% average return on his money (any excess is given away).
      Bill's salary is given away.
      Bill's home mortgage (if it exists) does not exist.
      He earns roughly: $705,000,000 per year.
      That quite certainly puts him in a high tax bracket:

      If taxable income is over-- But not over-- The tax is:
      $326,450 no limit $88,320.00 plus 35% of the amount over 326,450
      (So he pays $705M - $326,450)*35% + $88,320
      246635742.5+$88,320 =

      $246,724,062.50 in taxes
      Since we don't use the cents collumn in fed tax does anyone know whether the .5 rounds up or down in this case :-)

      I make about $42K a year.
      So dear billy pays in taxes what I make in over 5 _THOUSAND_ years.
      Yeah, I'd say your guess was conservative alright. We haven't even figured in state taxes and I think he earns more than 1.5% in interest and divadends per year.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:Is this the Intel Math bug??? by jgc7 · · Score: 2

      Not quite right. The tax rate on dividend income is capped at 15%, and the portion of "his" $47B given to the charity is not taxed. The MSFT dividend is approximately 1.3%, and his salary is $1M which he likely donates. So his approximate annual tax payment is on the order of 20B * 15% * 1.3% = $39 mils.

      --
      70% of statistics are made up.
    3. Re:Is this the Intel Math bug??? by Flummox · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is no state income tax in Washington... so no worries there.

  9. Re:At last, I have something in common with Bill.. by operagost · · Score: 5, Funny

    They do mine on a napkin with a red pen.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  10. Oblig. Simpsons Reference by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Moe: "Say, Barn. Uh, remember when I said I'd have to send away to NASA to calculate your bar tab?"

    Barney: "Oh ho, oh yeah. We all had a good laugh, Moe."

    Moe: "The results came back today."

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  11. I've got negative money! by SillySnake · · Score: 2, Funny

    I haven't RTFA, but when I read the blurb, it made me think of all the old games and software that would let your money/score/whatever roll over to zero if it got too high. Nothing like having one billion, wait, negative 500 million doll.. Ah CRAP!

    And now that I've RTFA while I waited for ./ to log me in.. I wonder why they needed a special computer.. if it really was because thier system can't handle numbers that large, of if there's some sort of other reason.. I wonder if Warren Buffet has the same problem/bragging rights as well..

  12. Funny story, but... by Manuscript+Replica · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps this is more of a statement about our tax code than about Gates's fortune.

  13. IRS Computers. by Jaywalk · · Score: 4, Funny
    The IRS must have had to switch from PC's to Macs just for Gates."
    The IRS's computers have been in the dark ages from time immemorial. It's more likely that they had to switch from an ENIAC to a UNIVAC.
    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
    1. Re:IRS Computers. by dangitman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, I run a toy company and we just got an extremely large government order for Etch-a-Sketches.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  14. Right by suso · · Score: 2, Funny

    They need a Linux computer

    1. Re:Right by Dragonshed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only on slashdot would the parent be funny.

  15. Begging by dupup · · Score: 3, Funny
    his fortune is so big, that the IRS needs a special computer, because a normal one can't handle the numbers

    "Oh, please, please, Mr. IRS Man, please give me the latex glove audit."

  16. One of the MS Money Editions might suffice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    MS Money.
    MS Money Small Business Edition.
    MS Money Enterprise.
    MS Money Multi-national Edition.
    MS Money Dr. Evil Edition.
    MS Money Dr. Evil Edition with Laser Beams.

  17. You can't be serious. by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have an idea, if your fortune gets to be so large that even the IRS can't figure it all out, you should be required to give some of it away to the poor until they can do the necessary calculations.

    Part of the problem is likely that Gates gives so much to the poor already. He's the richest man in the world, but name someone that gives more money to the poor than he.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:You can't be serious. by demigod · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...name someone that gives more money to the poor than he.

      Name someone who has as much money to give as he has. If I had half as much money as Bill, I'd give more than he does.

      I don't think it would be hard to find lots of people who give a larger percentage of thier wealth to the poor.

      Some people give 'tell it hurts. I don't think Bill fells the pain.

      I do remember Ted Turner giving $1 Billion over ten years to the UN (a little less than a third his net worth at the time). The UN is not exactly "the poor" though.

      Andrew Carnegie gave away 70% of his fortune

      Don't get me wrong. I'm glad to see Bill give any money to charity, but one has to wonder with so much more money than he can use, why he doesn't give more.

      --
      "The last thing I want to do is deal with a bunch of people who want something."
      Major Major
    2. Re:You can't be serious. by KaLogain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should he have to? Its his money not the publics, he should decide what happens with it.

      --
      Life's a bitch, then she kills you.
  18. A joke? by goodben · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone else consider that Bill was attempting a joke, but the interviewer couldn't tell? I mean only nerds get nerd humor, right?

    1. Re:A joke? by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's an old one out there about Nelson Rockefeller, whose dyslexia was so bad that papers had to be numbered "Page One, Two, Three" etc. When asked how he filed his tax returns, he laughed and said "son, I have five floors of accountants just for that." ...granted, I imagine there's more literal truth to that story than this one.

  19. They still can't calculate my taxes. by slashbob22 · · Score: 5, Funny

    and never will, unless they can effectively divide by 0.

    In other news, Steve Balmer threw a chair at the IRS computer so he could also claim they needed a new "special" one for him too.

    --
    Proof by very large bribes. QED.
  20. Reminds me of.. by MaGogue · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ah well this reminds me of the story that claimed that a Cray computer has been used to design the new Apple Mac (I don't remember which one).

    When Seymour Cray was told this he supposedly replied with "That's funny, because I'm using an Apple computer to design(the Cray supercomputers)".

    1. Re:Reminds me of.. by MaGogue · · Score: 2, Funny


      One needs tools to make better tools to make ..

      One also has to break tools to make room for new ones. That's what I do.

  21. But I thought... by Megane · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...640K was enough for anybody?

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  22. I wonder by guspasho · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does this special computer run on Windows?

  23. Re:At last, I have something in common with Bill.. by pb9494 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I need Microsoft Money 64-bit edition to handle my personal finance...

  24. I don't buy it either. by crovira · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This article is pure BS because I seem to remember something like 15 digits of precition on either side of the decimal point (999999999999999.999999999999999). These machine and their algorithms are PRECISE. There isn't any rounding float error because they don't really round. So its not the software or the hardware.

    They do segregate some accounts because of the sheer volume of transactions but the database systems and transaction handling systems are on separate 'farms'
      of machines so this article seems to be utter fabrication.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:I don't buy it either. by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would you use floats/doubles at all? Since there's a smallest unit of currency (a dollar if you round, a cent otherwise), why not just use integers?

  25. Separate System by ltbarcly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My guess is that the IRS segregates the really big fish into a separate system for closer scrutiny. If they are off a tiny bit on a "regular" tax return they might end up plus or minus $50. If they make a tiny mistake on Billy-o's taxes it could be millions of dollars. Plus they probably have an actual team of people going over it, so they may need to let more than one person access a record at a given time, which is likely not the case with their standard system.

  26. He's not Chuck Norris, because... by mcho · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...when Chuck Norris sends in his taxes, he sends blank forms and includes only a picture of himself, crouched and ready to attack. Chuck Norris has not had to pay taxes, ever.

    1. Re:He's not Chuck Norris, because... by bk4u · · Score: 2, Funny
      Unless you actually ARE Chuck Norris...which would be way cool.

      If he was actually Chuck Norris, we would have all been roundhouse kicked by now.

      --
      Remember kids, with great power comes great opportunity to abuse that power
  27. Re:At last, I have something in common with Bill.. by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr. Simpson, this computer can process NINE tax returns per DAY. Did you really think you could fool it?

  28. Re:At last, I have something in common with Bill.. by lbmouse · · Score: 5, Funny

    You must be raking in the dough.
    They send mine to this fellow.

  29. Re:I want my money back by NtroP · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...if this story were about Steve Jobs, all the replies would be bitching about how much press he gets.
    I thought he only got a $1 salary? Can't be that hard to do the taxes on that. I'd say roughly half as hard as mine...
    --
    "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
  30. Re:Funny by 0siris · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or iPenis if they did switch to Macs.

    Hmmm, can Apple sue over a translucent dildo?

  31. Say what you will by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Gates's fortune is put at $US47 billion ($62.88 billion), according to the latest list of the world's rich published by Forbes magazine.

    The couple's Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has a $US29 billion ($38.8 billion) endowment making it the world's biggest charity.

    So BG is putting more than half of his money into the Foundation (assuming he's the sole contributor). We may all not like him, but at least he's trying to do some good with the money he's fleeced from us. I just wish I still had the money so I could donate it and get the tax writeoff!

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. Bill Gates' tax computer by VAXcat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yah, they hadda build one with dials that go to 11.

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  34. That taxes requires a computer at all is a shame by FellowConspirator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My finances are not very complex, but apparently enough that I'm relegated to the long-form return. I've got to search various forms for fields labelled with numbers to copy out numbers and add them together, copy those to other numbered fields into another form, add them together, altogether having to read an instruction for each field that often reads: "refer to IRS document X to see if this applies to you", or "complete worksheet X and if you get a number between -100 and 325, ignore this line". PLEASE, GOD, WHY?!?!

    In my wife's home country, all taxes are collected at whatever transaction takes place. At the end of the year, you get a receipt to review. If everything seems in order, you are all set.

    Personally, I'd like to see the entire body of personal tax law reduced to 2 pages. If you can't fit it in 2 standard-size pages in 10-pt type, you can't tax it. Further, taxes should be collected at transaction time (payment, sell investment), and the rate ought to be flat and without deductions. Do that, and Gates taxes would look like this:

    Salaries: 1,000,000
    * 0.15 = 150,000 tax
    Realized gains on investments: 2,000,000
    * 0.15 = 300,000 tax
    Interest earned: 900,000,000
    * 0.15 = 135,000,000

    Total tax: 135,450,000
    -- paid in full, thank you for your support of the USA.
  35. Re:What a liar... by muyuubyou · · Score: 4, Funny

    $64.0 billion ought to be enough for anybody.

  36. I think what the comment meant was... by Dixie+Flatliner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The IRS has a department for handling corporate taxation, a small sub-department of which is for handling personal taxes for large income/asset citizens. It seems the mix up's occur when the normal tax departments process some of his holdings, and find on their local department network records that no taxes have ever been paid on the holdings, and send out some notices. There's never any names attached to the accounts at processing level, so it probably happens relatively often.

  37. Merrill Lynch, 1987, payroll system had same thing by gelfling · · Score: 2, Informative

    We had to modify our payroll system in 1987 to be able to cut a check with 8 digits to the left of the decimal for one broker.

  38. WHO by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't forget the enormous amount of money he donates to the WHO, not to mention paying for immunizations for hundreds of thousands of American kids. The Gates have become world-class philanthropists, and yet they get almost no credit for it. Humility in charity is an impressive thing.

    1. Re:WHO by sjf · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have plenty of problems with Bill Gates, but I applaud his charitable giving. However, I can't accept your accusation of humility: it is called the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation after all, not AFAIK (Aid For Africa In Kind) or something more anonymous. And, anyone who has listen to NPR knows that BMGF is a regular sponsor. There's no humility here: this is about Bill's image. On the other hand, that's fine with me, I don't doubt that he's doing some good at the same time.

  39. Re:I'm sure he means ... by cluckshot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just for kicks and grins,... Has anyone noted that those ordinary computers he is talking about run on a common OS?

    Because of the fact that some people on this forum moderate anything intelligent as troll, I will leave it to the readers to guess which OS those computers run on. This has to be the funniest thing all day.

    --
    Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
  40. Steve Ballmer on Taxes... by BlueScreenOfTOM · · Score: 2, Funny

    Aggrivated by false "failure to comply" notices, Gates confided in one of his best friends, Steve Ballmer, about the issue. Ballmer has since vowed to Fucking Kill(TM) the IRS, stating that he's "Done it before and he'll do it again". He then chucked a copy of Microsoft Money 2006 in the general direction of Washington DC.

  41. That's how a geek knows by ralphclark · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that he's arrived - he has a 64-bit fortune.

  42. Re:At last, I have something in common with Bill.. by layer3switch · · Score: 3, Funny

    They do mine with one liner shell script.

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  43. Isn't this just a rehash of the old joke? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Barney, remember how I said we'd have to send away to NASA to calculate your bar tab? Well it came back...."

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  44. Nah, this is BS by sjf · · Score: 2, Funny

    It has to be. Even Bill Gates does not get letters of apology from the IRS. No fricking way. Never happened. Chuck Norris on the other hand...

    1. Re:Nah, this is BS by failedlogic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your answer IS BS.

      Your answer presumes that Chuck Norris pays taxes. He is the only American that is able to scare the tax man away, simply by scaring him down. I hear Chuck doesn't even get mail (let alone the tax form delivered to his house). They have to use one of those remote controlled police SWAT robots to devlier his mail.

      Too far? Yeah, I know. But Chuck doesn't know where I live..... (hope not!!).

  45. You are an idiot. MOD PARENT DOWN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I had half as much money as Bill, I'd give more than he does.

    It's just too bad for the world that you aren't smart and motivated enough to amass any significant amount of money. Because, if you were, look out world! You'd be one hell of a philanthropist. As it stands now, you'll just criticize other people that are smarter and more motivated than you. That's far easier to do.

    I'm glad to see Bill give any money to charity, but one has to wonder with so much more money than he can use, why he doesn't give more.

    $29 BILLION DOLLARS isn't enough for you? That's the size of the endowment in the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation. It's the world's largest charity. How freakin' dumb are you? Unfortunately though you're probably fairly smart. Smart enough to be jealous of good works that others do but dumb enough to not be able to do anything significant yourself. Except complain. Oh, I bet you're a first-class complainer. You're probably just itching to hit Reply and complain. Or maybe you'll take it out on the next waitress that doesn't bring your fourth free Sprite back to your table fast enough for you.

    What a dork you are.

  46. (Hint:) The OS on this computer is reliable by eldoo77 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This computer requires a special OS known as "Linux" that able to perform complex mathematical calculations without requiring the standard operating procedure on most computers known as "Blue-Screening". Mr. Gates was quick to point out that for the average taxpayer Windows XP was accurate for calculating federal taxes +/- 100%. He was also quick to point out that Microsoft is not liable for any tax penalties that may be accrued due to tax preparation with MS Windows.

    1. Re:(Hint:) The OS on this computer is reliable by netsharc · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's probably in the Windows kernel somewhere, "if (SSN==Bill's_SSN) { TaxOwed = 0; TaxPayback = "$1 Billion"; }"...

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  47. In the news... by Frazbin · · Score: 2, Funny

    MICROSOFT founder Bill Gates, the world's richest man, said today the pants office in the US has to keep his penis in a special harness because his member is so vast.
    "My johnson has to be kept in special trousers because normal garments can't deal with the numbers," he said at a Microsoft conference held in Lisbon.

    Thank you, Mr. Gates!

  48. Half accountant, half philosopher... by TCQuad · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bill's home mortgage (if it exists) does not exist.

    Whoa, man, you're blowing my mind!

  49. Huh?? by SolidAu · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The IRS must have had to switch from PC's to Macs just for Gates" ... because they have trouble with more than one button on their mouse???

  50. Re:Bistromathics by NotTheNickIWanted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well that would certainly explain the mysterious nonabsoluteness of the relationship between what the Tax Man says I owe, and that which I am prepared to pay!

    --

    unsigned int question = 0x2B | ~(0x2B)
  51. Your Shell Script by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny
    And here it is:
    read INCOME ; echo "Your total tax bill is: $INCOME"
    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Your Shell Script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hi, fellow Canadian?

  52. Re:That taxes requires a computer at all is a sham by bigpat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, GOTO programming is alive and well in the IRS tax forms.

    Except you are the computer and errors in your memory will cause heart pounding letters from the IRS.

  53. Re:That taxes requires a computer at all is a sham by caudron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Further, taxes should be collected at transaction time (payment, sell investment), and the rate ought to be flat and without deductions.

    I used to agree with you, but I've since found the that picture isn't so simple.

    Taking taxes at transaction time means pushing a situational-tax only system. In other words, pay tax on a sale of goods or services or the such, which pushes a larger percentage of the tax burden farther down the economic ladder (remember that everyone has to eat and buy things). The richer you are, the lower the percentage of situational tax with respect to your income/net worth. That's not good. Thus, income and estate taxes are pushed as a way to readjust the percentages to make the wealthy pay a larger percentage of their net worth than the poor per annum. Additionally, speaking as someone who was there, taking even 15% of my income when I only make $10k or $20k is pretty onerous, if not simply not possible. But taking even 30% of my income now that I make six figures would pinch, but is far more doable. Speaking as the hypothetical Bill Gates, taking as much as 45% of my $50B, leaves me with enough cash on hand to own a small nation and still manages to do an amazing amount of collective good for the nation.

    Also, deductions are an absolutely necessity of the system. Let me explain by example:

    If I own a business and that business brings in $100k in gross profit, without deductions, I pay tax on $100k. However, looking at the bigger picture, If my business is anything like the norm, only about 30% of that gross stays in my pocket. That means, I had to pay employees (who are taxed on that pay), advertising (which is taxed on the service provider), and office supplies (which were already taxed at the OfficeMax counter). I have to be able to deduct business expenses otherwise the remainder of the gross that I hold in my hand after business expenses will go, in total, the IRS and I end up having run a business that did $100k in profit and I, as the owner, have exact $0 to show for it (if I don't end up oweing.

    Deductions of the other sort exist to encourage charity. There are those who would give to charity out of kindness, but to the same extent? As frequently? What about the rest. We can't forget that charity write-offs really work. Americans give a tremendous amount to charity every year. How much who those charities get if there were zero benefit to the giving? Not nearly as much. Sure, those who give anonymously would still give, but as for the rest, the numbers would drop drastically.

    Al Gore---not my favorite guy in the world---had a great idea. Tax breaks for people who make beneficial environmental choices (buy hybrids, use solar, etc...) to encourage people to lessen our dependence on foreign fuels. His ideas never came to full fruition (a real shame, regardless of whether I like him or not), but they would only work if the tax base can claim deductions as incentive.

    Brevity is not my strong suit, so sorry for the long ramble, but you get the idea. :)

    --
    -Tom
  54. Re:That taxes requires a computer at all is a sham by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 2, Informative

    Because flat taxes with no other means of compensation make the rich richer and the poor poorer, and a strong and well populated middle class is the base for any stable political system.

  55. Re:At last, I have something in common with Bill.. by thegameiam · · Score: 2, Funny

    quit beating a dead horse!

    --
    Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
  56. I work with the IRS for comptuerized taxes .... by vtechpilot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... and let me tell you, they don't have a clue. Did you know that more than half of the 1040's that get electronically filed, get sent to the IRS computers by Z-Modem? I'm serious. Z-modem inside a telnet session pumped through an SSL connection (the system sorta evolved that way from the pre-internet dialup system they used to use.) Now the new thing they are working on, MEF (or Modernized E-File) includes forms 1120 and 1120S which is income taxes for Corporations and S-Corporations. In an 1120 tax return you can actually send scanned PDF files, which I assume some human at the IRS has to then read. What was the point in developing these huge specs for XML based tax returns to allow automatic processing, if you can just send in a bunch of documents that require human intervention? Thats just bad design, but they also have problems with implementation. The acknowlegement files we get for the form 1120 also have broken XML schema locations. (I've been on them for about a week to fix this.) Of course the real interesting bit about MEF is that its basically a glorified file transfer system. They basically designed a whole new file transfer system that runs on SOAP and HTTP. The banks that we deal with in comparison do have a clue. The banks use Secure FTP, Which has worked flawlessly for the last 6 years.

    The icing on the cake? The company that has been contracted to build the MEF system? IBM.

    --
    Slashdot is an anagram for Has Dolts, and I am Dolt number 468543