Slashdot Mirror


Mandriva Fires Founder Gael Duval, Who Plans to Sue

Otter writes "Mandrake Linux founder Gael Duval has confirmed that Mandriva has let him go." A few hours later, Newsforge (owned by the same company that owns Slashdot) did an exclusive IRC interview with Gael in which he said he plans to sue his former employer for "abusive layoff." This is a sad day for Mandriva -- and for GNU/Linux in general. Gael was the founder and heart of the original Mandrake (now Mandriva) project, which was the first Linux distribution designed to be easy for non-technical users to install and administer. There is plenty of consternation in the Mandriva Club Forums about whether the company will go on supporting individual desktop users as strongly as it has in the past.

63 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. OSS immunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well of course being open source. We're immune from situations like this.

    1. Re:OSS immunity by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well of course being open source. We're immune from situations like this.

      Well, if not immune, at least less vulnerable.

      After all, suppose you spend ten years creating your Magnum Opus, the thing that's going to change the world. Then the managers you originally hired to handle the boring business stuff turn around and fire you. If your work is proprietary, that's it. Find a new life's work.

      Within open source, you go to the spare bedroom, pop the source CD's, and open up a new sourceforge project. Your employment agreement might be a bit of a hurdle, but with any luck it's written with proprietary software in mind. "Uh, your honor, I'm not selling any products that compete with my former employer."

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:OSS immunity by slapout · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next move could be interesting

      Yes. He could go back to work for them in a few years and create an open source hardware mp3 player! And a music store too! (ManTunes? DrivaTunes? DuvalTunes?)

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  2. This is truly a sad day by Winckle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I sincerely hope this does not affect the course of the distro, and that it continues to remain as user-friendly and true to it's founding values, but I'm beginning to think Ubuntu has replaced Mandrake/riva as the No 1 user-friendly distro.

    1. Re:This is truly a sad day by madaxe42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What about Gentoo? Wonderful community. And you end up with plenty of time to get to know them all, while you wait for it to build!

    2. Re:This is truly a sad day by ryants · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I sincerely hope this does not affect the course of the distro, and that it continues to remain as user-friendly and true to it's founding values, but I'm beginning to think Ubuntu has replaced Mandrake/riva as the No 1 user-friendly distro.
      I've been a Mandriva Club silver-level member for 2.5 years now, and I'm going to let my membership lapse in a few weeks. I downloaded the Ubuntu appliance from VMWare a while ago, and it is far superior to Mandriva for ease-of-use, ease-of-administration. I'm just waiting for the next version of Ubuntu in April to dump Mandriva from my desktop.

      When I moved from Slackware to Mandrake, it was great, but Mandrake/Mandriva have not really kept up, IMHO.

      --

      Ryan T. Sammartino
      "Ancora imparo"

    3. Re:This is truly a sad day by ryants · · Score: 5, Informative
      Should I look at Ubuntu or Kanotix? One thing I really like about Mandr* is the PLF packages
      I'm a soon-to-be former Mandriva Silver Club member, and I'm looking at Ubuntu.

      I believe the Ubuntu equivalent to PLF is the Multiverse.

      --

      Ryan T. Sammartino
      "Ancora imparo"

    4. Re:This is truly a sad day by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've tried out Mandrake/Mandriva a number of times in the past. (I even did a review on version 10 here.) While they gained a lot of good will for being "user friendly", I always found them to be not worth the effort. The desktop feels nice and all, but the system always had some sort of problems that could never quite be resolved. It's hard to say why Mandrake always was so difficult to work with, but if I were to take a guess, I'd point a finger at their bleeding edge software. They are infamous for always packing in the latest and greatest. That same bleeding edge mentality is what got them in trouble with version 9.2.

      Bye bye, CD Drive.

    5. Re:This is truly a sad day by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like both Ubuntu (in Xubuntu form) and Kanotix, so I suggest you burn the live CDs of each and check them out.
      Kanos Script Page has some useful install scripts for handling what you want, and the people on the forums are helpful.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    6. Re:This is truly a sad day by Vrejakti · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This isn't the first time that a founder of a Linux distribution has left the project or taken a lessor role, but it certainly is surprising how the founder of the distribution was forced to leave.

      Back in 2003 when I bought my cutting edge PC hardware, I was having little luck getting into the Linux world. I was a noob, with poorly supported hardware in Linux. Specifically a ICHR5 S-ATA controller on my ASUS motherboard. Slackware failed to boot, Fedora Core failed to boot, as did Debian. One distro did work however, and that was Mandrake. To this day Mandrake has had the best support for my hardware, with a consistently easy set up process. However, it was never the right distro for me.

      When I finally got Fedora Core working I noticed many improvements over Mandrake. It just had a feel like it was more polished, more professional. Shortly after getting used to Fedora, I dropped it for Gentoo, and I've never looked back. ^_^

      Any who, I hope Gael Duval gets things settled with Mandrake. It was his company, surely they should let him go on far better terms!

      PS. This post doesn't have a point, but please feel free to mod me Underrated or Interesting. :-D

    7. Re:This is truly a sad day by Colonel+Angus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I converted to Ubuntu a few weeks ago after a few failed attempts to move over to Linux. There was always *something* that kept me from keeping it. Poor sound support and other basic hardware problems were experienced with everything from Slackware to Fedora to Mandrake. So I gave up for a while.

      I'd been hearing a lot of good things about Ubuntu and decided to give it a shot.

      I'm impressed.

      For the first time, I've installed a Linux distro where *everything* worked out of the box. There are some minor annoyances that I've encountered but the Ubuntu community is among the most helpful I've seen. There are countless Ubuntu-specific HOWTOs in Ubuntu forums. I'm thrilled to finally have this.

      Kudos to the (k/edu/x)Ubuntu team for a really great product.

    8. Re:This is truly a sad day by codemachine · · Score: 2, Informative
    9. Re:This is truly a sad day by DrXym · · Score: 2, Insightful
      but I'm beginning to think Ubuntu has replaced Mandrake/riva as the No 1 user-friendly distro.

      I disagree. I disagree because because my experience of Mandrake is that the user experience has been far worse than its rivals and if you asked me what the No.1 User Friendly distro was a few years back, it certainly wouldn't be Mandrake. Red Hat perhaps, SUSE probably not, but no way Mandrake. The "Drak" tools were consistently buggy, marred by horrible usability issues, not very task oriented and were slapped onto the side of the desktop with the finesse of tractor welded to a car. User friendly implies usability and I recall Mandrake tools couldn't even get simple things right like the order of buttons on message boxes. I used it from about 6.3 to 8.0 and my experience was that each progressive release got buggier and buggier and I finally gave up on it. I revisited it for 9.1 and 9.2 and it was just as bad - worse even since the fundamental issues with the usability never seem to be fixed.

      The only thing in my book which set Mandrake apart from Red Hat, SUSE or whoever was a larger number of packages on the CD and bleeding edge version numbers. I wouldn't hold SUSE's config up as an example of usable either, but it was at at least reliable and consistent. It's even almost pleasant to use in SUSE 10, assuming you run a KDE desktop.

      I do like Ubuntu though. I think the shitty brown theme is horrid, but the integration and use of GNOME tools makes for a seamless and very pleasant desktop experience. That's what Linux should be like and its about time that it is. Now distros are paying attention to usability, Linux may finally start to appear on a few more desktops.

    10. Re:This is truly a sad day by Wylfing · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I sincerely hope this does not affect the course of the distro, and that it continues to remain as user-friendly and true to it's founding values, but I'm beginning to think Ubuntu has replaced Mandrake/riva as the No 1 user-friendly distro.

      I've been a Mandriva Club silver-level member for 2.5 years now, and I'm going to let my membership lapse in a few weeks. I downloaded the Ubuntu appliance from VMWare a while ago, and it is far superior to Mandriva for ease-of-use, ease-of-administration. I'm just waiting for the next version of Ubuntu in April to dump Mandriva from my desktop.

      I will echo that. I paid for my Mandrake Club and support contracts in my day. At the time (a few years ago) it was really the best out there for usability. There was always something they didn't get right, but less so than anyone else. But these days I run Ubuntu on the desktop and straight-dope Debian on the server. I was blown away by how well Ubuntu worked out of the box. Networking, including wireless, graphics, sound, everything just worked. (In all fairness, I did have to tweak xorg.conf one time to get the uberhigh screen resolutions I wanted, but that's it.)

      Now, all that said, I did highly value Mandrake in its day. Obviously, since I paid for it for 2 years. They vanguarded things like doing a gamer edition, which is something someone should revisit, seeing how good Cedega is at Windows games these days (I've been playing Morrowind under Cedega without incident for a few weeks now). I'm sad to see them take a blow of any kind, in the same way I am sad to see Dreamcast go under and Infocom disappear.

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    11. Re:This is truly a sad day by g2devi · · Score: 3, Informative

      > I believe the Ubuntu equivalent to PLF is the Multiverse.

      Actually, the Ubuntu equivalent to PLF is the PLF:-)
      http://wiki.ubuntu-fr.org/doc/plf

  3. His own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you start the company, you dictate the policies. If he gave up his power to someone else (and for profit, likely), he should have expected this possibility. Still a dick thing to do, though.

  4. Many have bailed on them already though. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    at the local LUG many users bailed on t hem after the mess that was Mandriva 2006. It is buggy and has problems compared to the Mandrake version just before it. That started a flocking to Ubuntu and Gentoo at the LUG (A 100 pack of Ubuntu Cd's coming in that month did not help matters either.

    They really dropped the QC on the distro they released right after the Mandriva change and that really hurt them.

    Now the management is making changes inside as well.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Many have bailed on them already though. by johnlenin1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To add another anecdote: I've used Mandr[ake|iva] since v. 7, and was just about to bail on them after the "2005 LE" version. I even let my club membership lapse. I put Kubuntu "Hoary Hedgehog" on my work desktops and found it to be superior in many respects, and "Breezy" even more so.

      However, I recently tried Mandriva 2006 Free on my MythTV box at home, and it was a breeze in every respect. I was up and running hours quicker than with Kubuntu on the same machine. Mandriva also seemed more polished and stable for me, the first Mandriva distro in years that didn't regularly crash inexplicably on this computer.

      Still, too bad about Gael, though.

    2. Re:Many have bailed on them already though. by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

      And on the other hand, I have a minimal install of Ubuntu that's the only distro I found that will detect and use my HD3000 card right out of the box, and works wonderfully with MythTV 0.19. Anecdotes prove nothing.

    3. Re:Many have bailed on them already though. by ReinoutS · · Score: 2, Informative
      Too bad they kept Openoffice.org 2 out of their latest free release, saving it for the club members.

      The key word here is support. Mandriva 2006 had a release schedule. Had they included OO.o2, they would have had to support a hardly tested pre-release version of it for years to come. They've been bitten before by including RC-quality software (KDE 2.99 iirc) and I think it's very understandable they don't want such a disaster to happen again.

      Yes, OO.o2 is now available on the Club, but it is still unsupported.

  5. Reminds me of Caldera by RLiegh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Caldera had a semi-decent mostly commerical OS out there, and then when they were bought up they slowly but certainly dropped any pretense of being interested in the home/enthusiast market. Of course, Mandrake had much more of a tie with the community; but it seems their tie to the community just walked out the door, didn't it?

    Let's hope Mandriva doesn't suddenly decide that its' IP is in the linus kernel!

  6. He should fork it... by R2.0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Call it TruMandriva or somesuch, and all his adherents will follow him.

    Let the legal goodness commence!

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:He should fork it... by weierstrass · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He should call it Mandrake.

      --
      my password really is 'stinkypants'
    2. Re:He should fork it... by jejones · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why bother when there's already PCLinuxOS? texstar does very good work...

    3. Re:He should fork it... by smchris · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why not Gaelinux? Hell, Debian flew.

  7. Maybe not bad by Life700MB · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Mandrake was my distro of choice before seeing the Light and converting to Debian, and I remember that it was a great distribution... but somewhere they lost the path and starting falling to the ground: the LG drives fiasco, the name change, the bloat, the battle with Ubuntu for the easy-to-use-linux crown...

    Maybe Gael has now the oportunity to create from zero a great new distribution without the inherents problems of Mandrake/Mandriva!

    I sincerely hope so.


    --
    Superb hosting 20GB Storage, 1_TB_ bandwidth, ssh, $7.95

    1. Re:Maybe not bad by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Maybe Gael has now the oportunity to create from zero a great new distribution without the inherents problems of Mandrake/Mandriva!

      Maybe Canonical (Ubuntu) can hire him.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  8. Potentially good by cheinz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm going to go out on a limb here, and say that this may not be such a bad thing. Mr. Duval may now start another project, and build something good again. Mandrake(driva) had really started to fall off a few releases ago in my opinion. Many people I know are using Fedora now that used Mandrake in the past. I certainly feel bad that Mr. Duval is now unemployed, but perhaps we can build something positive out of this. Mandrake used to be the distro I told people to start with, lately it's been Ubuntu. Perhaps this can be a day remembered as the day a new distro was born, and it was also today that Mandriva lost a great asset. Just trying to remain positive.

  9. You gotta be kidding me. by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What is happening to the right to fire? We're not even talking non-union workers here. A company, public and private too, ought to be able to fire in accordance with that sole law of maximizing shareholder wealth for public companies -- If the given employee is not helping an organization pursue that goal, that should be cause enough.

    1. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Varitek · · Score: 2, Informative

      At-will employment maybe the norm in the USA, but that isn't the case everywhere.

    2. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which makes the USA the best place in the world to start a small business as well as wealth creation.

      Small business and startups have an insane near %90 failure rate 2 years after they open. Bad employees will make it much higher. If your retirement savings and home were used as equilateral for the loan for your business then you lose that too and perhaps your marriage if it fails due to a couple of bad apples that you need to fire.

      Capitalism is the most efficient system around and this is coming from someone who is considered a liberal and left wing nut by those in US.

    3. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by stinerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many places in Europe, IIRC, you can't just fire anyone for any reason.

      While there may be a legal right to terminate employees, one I certainly don't agree with, for any reason in the USA, it is ultimately counterproductive due to decreased worker morale. I know I'd think twice about working for a company who fires their employees on whims. I'd also do poor work if I had to continuously worry that today might be my last day.

    4. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by mooingyak · · Score: 2, Funny

      I usually don't bother people much over typos and whatnot, but this one kinda caught my eye:

      If your retirement savings and home were used as equilateral

      Presumably collateral?

      I'd work up something funny based off of what you said, but it just doesn't jive in any way I can think of.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    5. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Jason+Hood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To me, that is a scary thought.

      If I own a business, I have the right as theowner to discontinue paying them for their services at anytime for any reason unless I have signed a contract with them stipulating otherwise. To think that I cannot fire an employee for poor performance or bad decision making sounds absolutely insane.

      Mandriva has every right to terminate his employment for _nearly_ any reason.

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
    6. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Jason+Hood · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I know I'd think twice about working for a company who fires their employees on whims. I'd also do poor work if I had to continuously worry that today might be my last day.


      And thus the system self regulates. Due to the deep complexity of the US economy, this model works. Employees can quit and move on to another company. In smaller markets, this may not work since there may not be acceptable substitutes but in the US economy, it works very well.

      Just look at EDS, its a shadow of what it once was because of firing on a whim management policy (Dick Brown you suck). Morale dropped, good employees left, then many of their customers left. Microsoft, may suffer the same fate. Their current policies and environment are very similar to EDS 4 years ago. As long as the economy has the ability to normalize itself, At-Will employment works and works well.

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
    7. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by OppressiveGiant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. The company is more than one person there are probably hundreds of people working there. As management it is your job to make sure that the people there continue to get paid. If one person is making it impossible(or harder) to do that then you're doing a disservice to those hundreds of other people by not letting that person go. If your options are Paying 501 people for a couple more months or paying 500 indefinately the decision is simple. That's more than likely a gross exageration of the situation, but we don't know the details at all. It's silly for us to be arguing without knowing anything and if he really feels he was wronged, it will be settled in court.

      --
      i could not think of anything clever.
    8. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Funny

      >>If your retirement savings and home were used as equilateral

      >Presumably collateral?

      >I'd work up something funny based off of what you said, but it just doesn't jive in any way I can think of.

      You're just not coming up with the right _angle_. _Try_ harder, you'll get there by degrees. Or just make an acute observation.

    9. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, no, not actually...you also have to abide by the Laws of the United States, and the State in which you do business. Firing someone for "poor performance or bad decision making" isn't so much a problem, though, as firing people because they are brown or black, or firing people who don't go to the "right" church.

      I believe it is true (or so they taught in International Business) that in Europe it is much more difficult to fire someone, including applying for permission with the government prior to firing the person.

    10. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What is happening to the right to fire?

      There's no such right. Before you criticise, consider this: do you have the right to fire a worker for not sucking you off in your country? No? Then your "right to fire" has limitations too. Whether you can legally fire somebody depends on the circumstances.

      The real question is why he was fired. If, as you wildly speculate, he was fired because it's more profitable for the company that way, then sure, they should be able to fire him. But you only have their word for that. It does seem to be a bit odd that they have been hiring in 2006, are firing the very person that created their core product, and yet deny having any problems with him.

    11. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Many places in Europe, IIRC, you can't just fire anyone for any reason

      Correct. And this being France, there are some very strict laws about when someone can be fired. The net result of this is that lawsuit about being fired are common, companies are afraid to hire people, and companies can't weather downturns or adapt by firing people. Gee, and the French wonder why their economy isn't as strong as they want it to be.

      Before anyone says anything - I actually grew up there and still have family there. Which is one of the reasons why I'm so pissed off about this situation. They're shooting themselves in the foot and don't want to realize it.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    12. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Urusai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, corporations are permitted to exist because they are perceived to increase the public good. When they don't, then they have violated their mandate. I've got news for some people, capitalism is not an ethos. It so happens that it seems to be of greater public benefit than competing systems. When you start justifying your means to the detriment of your ends, you've lost your ethical compass, and it's time to recalibrate.

    13. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Tim+Browse · · Score: 3, Informative
      including applying for permission with the government prior to firing the person.

      The UK govt. doesn't get involved (and I doubt any other European govts do either) with people being fired on an everyday basis - I mean, how would they ever get any work done?*

      In the UK, there are such things as industrial tribunals, where you can go and argue that you were unfairly dismissed - i.e. there was no good reason to dismiss you (to the poster who worried that they wouldn't be able to fire someone for poor performance or bad decision making - of course these are grounds for dismissal in the UK - but some guy putting sugar in the boss's coffee by mistake when the boss is having a bad day is not).

      What you might have been told about is that when a company makes people redundant (downsizing), if they let go more than a certain number of people, they have to warn the govt. in advance. If you let go of more than 25-30 people, you have to give a month's warning, and there's another threshold for 3 month's warning. I'm guessing similar arrangements may exist elsewhere in Europe.

      * Leave it.

    14. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by beru777 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Mandriva has every right to terminate his employment for _nearly_ any reason."

      Not in France, certainly not. You'll end up in court and having to prove that the person was doing something really wrong.

    15. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by jlarocco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Legally and economically, I agree with you completely.

      But unless the person is doing something illegal or blatantly against the rules, I don't think it's in their best interest to fire such a high profile employee. The drop in overall employee morale will probably cost them a lot more than keeping the guy on, and the public perception that they need to fire the founder to stay afloat will probably hurt them even more.

    16. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You may be the owner of the business and the one paying the salary, but you are also asking your employee to make an investment in you and your time. For the same reason as you'd generally require them to give notice and so forth - and most contracts only allow the employer the right to pay in lieu of notice, and not for the employee to leave "at will". Not saying you shouldn't be allowed to employ who you like, as you like, but if you require a commitment from your employees, they should be able to require a commitment from you. It ain't (or shouldn't be) a one way street just because its your signature on the cheques.

  10. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by manifoldronin · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Employers have the right to fire people on spot for any reason at all. The reason why I am agaisnt suing is because its unfair that blue collar workers such as myself have no right at all and get paid 1/5th what the upper middle class white collar workers do which do sue for wrongfull termination. We have no rights at all and have to sign contracts making us employed at will.
    I'm confused by your reasoning there. It seems to me that, if you don't have any right to sue while some others do, you should strive for your right to sue, rather than asking others not to.
    --
    Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
  11. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Most states are right to work so they can do that.

    France, where Mandrake was based and where his employment contract was signed, is not a state of the United States of America.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  12. Say what, now? by DysenteryInTheRanks · · Score: 5, Funny
    The "exclusive IRC interview?" Not exactly Mike Wallace or Sam Donaldson, is it?

    Seriously, though, the White House press corps should pick this up. "Next on NBC Nightly News, our exclusive IRC interview with the president."

    * PublicistLackey has joined #whouse
    * StonezzzPhilipsNBC has joined #whouse
    * W has joined #whouse

    [StonezzzPhilipsNBC] Prez, why r u h8ing on detainees @ Gitmo + Abu?
    * StonezzzPhilips kicked from #whouse
    [W] Next question?

  13. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by A.K.A_Magnet · · Score: 4, Informative

    As you may be aware, there are other countries with their own laws. Mandriva being based in France, which has laws to protect employees against abusive (ie, not motivated by repetitive mistakes of the employee, and a bunch of other factors) layoffs, Gael can sue Mandriva. Then some particular kind of judges (called "juges des prud'hommes") will decide if it's ok or not, and of course, if it's not, they won't force him back into Mandriva, but Mandriva may have to give some indemnities.

  14. but the product declined by b17bmbr · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was a dedicated drake user for years. And yes, I bought their product. I bought 7.0, 7.2, and 9.2. It always recognized all my hardware, was easy to upgrade, and had all the necessary tools, etc. Then 10.x kinda sucked, and the latest incarnations were poor. Hardware recognition slacked, it didn't install on the same system that 9.x installed on, and now, they have subscriber support only for some wifi cards.

    I installed ubuntu and never looked back. it recognized all my hardware (even the USB wifi), and apt-get is far superior. It's a sad day for sure, but they only have themselves to blame. They made poor financial decisions and it hurt their product. Now, I do confess to having been an iBook user for a few years and haven't used linux nearly as much. Most of my development is LAMP, java, python, etc., and it's all the same on OS X or linux. OO.org runs great, and so does GIMP, and with fink/darwinports, I don't "need" linux. So, I haven't used a "PC" in quite some time, but that doesn't diminsh the fact that my one remianing PC at homeruns ubuntu not mandriva.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  15. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by jgc7 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Most states are right to work so they can do that.

    "Right to work" has nothing to do with termination rules. It basically means that a worker isn't required to join a union. Many union factories require that all blue collar workers are part of the union, but in "right to work" states, these policies are outlawed. Hence the term "right to work(without joining the union)".

    --
    70% of statistics are made up.
  16. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Xzzy · · Score: 4, Funny

    France, where Mandrake was based and where his employment contract was signed, is not a state of the United States of America.

    A regrettable oversight. We'll get to you guys once we're done with Iran.

  17. 'abusive layoff' by weierstrass · · Score: 3, Funny

    In France, a country in Western Europe (near Belgium), they have such a thing as 'licenciement abusif'. This is a standard term of employment law.

    'Licenciement' is French (the language spoken in France, and other countries such as Belgium) for layoff. 'Abusif' is French for 'abusive'.

    HTH. HAND.

    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
  18. Ouch. by ninjaz · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been using Mandrake since 2001, when I switched from Debian to get a version of X that would support my new video card. At the time, it was was flourishing, engaged the community surrounding it, and was hiring developers who were working on projects that were making crucial advances for Linux. One that comes to mind was the developer of a partition resizer that would work on NTFS back when when all the other distros were instructing their users to use Partition Magic.

    Of course, all that great work had a price tag attached to it, so when Mandrake Club was announced, I was first in line to join. The idea back then was that it was a voluntary donation with no extra benefits other than supporting continued development.

    Unfortunately, once the club started to take off, they started closing things off to the public one by one to drive membership numbers higher. Now it's to the point where standard members can't even download the full set of CD images for their $60 yearly membership fees.

    Something seems to have really changed in a big way since the Connectiva merger, though. With the release of Mandriva 2006, they've been focusing on marketing deals like that with Skype. Then, there was the worldwide Mandriva party, where the locations weren't announced until the night before... until then, there was just a form to fill out for organizations to get corporate schwag.

    Also, I was reading on the Mandriva forums earlier that the reason their cut of X.org doesn't work with my ATI Radeon 7500 is that they "chose the wrong X.org" and are staying with it due to an Intel marketing agreement. Luckily, seerofsouls.org has working RPM's, but needing to depend on a third party to provide core components of the distribution is not exactly ideal.

    Anyway, it looks like their management has decided that it wants to be Red Hat or Novell. I wish them good luck with that. I've seen it mentioned that PCLinuxOS is trying to be what Mandrake was, so hopefully they will provide a good upgrade path from Mandriva so I can get off this sinking ship without getting my clothes too wet.

    1. Re:Ouch. by ReinoutS · · Score: 2, Informative
      Now it's to the point where standard members can't even download the full set of CD images for their $60 yearly membership fees.

      Of course, the fact that you can download any missing packages by adding a random public FTP mirror to your urpmi media makes that a non-issue.

      Luckily, seerofsouls.org has working RPM's, but needing to depend on a third party to provide core components of the distribution is not exactly ideal.

      A version of X.org that works with your graphics card, too, is included in the distro updates that are downloaded right during the installation procedure. Have you tried running MandrivaUpdate?

  19. Abusive Layoff by duffbeer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Google returns effectively 1 hit for this term. Can anyone elaborate? What exactly would constitute an abusive layoff?

    --
    "This wound is beyond my ability to heal. We need Elvis medicine!"
  20. Just deserts by Black+Art · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now he knows how all those Americans he fired felt when he closed down all the American operations for Mardrake a number of years back. (Just for being Americans.)

    Could not have happened to a more deserving fellow.

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
  21. Ulteo copyright infringers? by Bogtha · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Duval's future plans -- in addition to the lawsuit -- involve a new open source project called Ulteo.

    Ulteo seem to have ripped off Mozilla.org's web design. They even use the same class names. If you view their stylesheets, you'll see:

    /* mozilla.org Base Styles
    * maintained by fantasai
    * (classes defined in the Markup Guide - http://mozilla.org/contribute/writing/markup )
    */

    If you read the Mozilla.org site licensing policies, you'll see:

    The rights in the trademarks, logos, service marks of the Mozilla Foundation, as well as the look and feel of this web site, are not licensed under the Creative Commons license, and to the extent they are works of authorship (like logos and graphic design), they are not included in the work that is licensed under those terms.

    Seems to me that Mozilla.org want their text copied, but not their site design, which is the exact opposite of what Ulteo have done.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  22. Yeah, sure by Omaze · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the US we have a better end-run around that sort of thing. We just place unreasonable goals and expectations on our employees, underpay them, and ride them as hard as we can. Then when they begin to come apart at the seams (and begin to manifest the personality traits of someone who's being driven to the edge of their sanity) we can label them as underperforming, or bad behavior, or anti-social. If they don't acquiesce to the subsequent managerial flogging we can then terminate them. The company documentation will, of course, read "behavioral issues".

    No. We don't fire on a whim. What we do is create the situation and then blame the victim.

    --
    The government itself is not stealing your liberties. Their new programs are enabling criminals who will.
  23. I for one am sad by Dollyknot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    For me computers have always been a hobby, I started out around 1983 with a TRS80 then a BBC micro, taught myself assembler, in Z80 then 6502, then I had to leave my hobby because my job as a truck driver meant I was away most of the time. Then around 1995 I came off the road and took up my old hobby again, a 286 running 3.1 then '95 then '98 then ME, finally the penny dropped.

    I realised how immoral a closed source operating system is and decided to give Linux a try.

    This was around the year 2000, Suse to be precise, could not get on the net with it, could not get Xserver to work. Then I tried Coral linux, Xserver worked fine, could not get dialup to work, then I tried Redhat that did not work either.

    Then I heard about Mandrake (probably on Slash :) at last I had an open source OS that seemed to work with hardly any hassle.

    Gael Duval, opened the open source OS door for me and for many others I would imagine. What the organisation that Duval started, solved was the driver problem, for this he deserves respect and support from the Linux community and I hope the Slashdot community.

    Regards

    Peter

    --
    It's called an elephant's trunk whereas it is in fact, an elephant's nose, a nose by any other name would smell as sweet
  24. Another end run by Omaze · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can't be done. Once the company is through running their employees out the door they label them as bad in HR databases. Don't give me that crap about wrongful dismissal or slander claims. Lawyers don't give a rat's ass unless you already have a pile of money to donate to them.

    No. Here in America we've got our own little system for fucking people over. If you've got it good well then more power to you. Don't act like your lucky lot in life is the same for everyone.

    --
    The government itself is not stealing your liberties. Their new programs are enabling criminals who will.
  25. Underlaying issue is revenue by viking2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a software engineer, it is frustrating to see how hard it is for software companies to find a profitable business model.

    I have actively tried to find work with companies where the core product is software. The reaon is simply that of opportunity. In a hospital, at an attorneys office etc, a software developer can never be the strong voice in corporate meetings. It is the attorney and physician respectively. The SW engineer can not advance to the top of the corporate ladder.

    The closest I have found is engineering companes like Cisco where engineers are paid well. Although an engineering company, the focus here is still not software, but hardware.

    Most High tech companies sell boxes and software is used by the sales department to land the deal. Often discounting it 100% at "no charge".

    It is then hard to fight with the HW group for resources when you have little revenue to justify your departments existence.

    We all love to hate Microsoft, but they are one of the few companies that have been successfull and profitable as a software company.

    How should a company like Mandrake structure their business model so they can be consistently profitable, and not have to go through bankruptcies and tough layoffs?

    I need to be able to have a well paying stable job so I can put my kids through college. Any solutions out there?

  26. Not flaming, just curious... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Insightful
    That's strange....I can have a Gentoo GRP up in under 40 mins. You must be doing something wrong...

    AFAIK, Gentoo compiles "everything" when you install it. So how is it possible to get a complete install in under 40 minutes?

    • You have a really powerful computer?
    • You only installed the strict bare minimum?
    • It's no longer true that Gentoo compiles everything, but nowadays it has pre-compiled binary packages just like everybody else?
    • The wonders of the mysterious mighty magic penguin?