Slashdot Mirror


Two Legged Robot Sets Speed Record

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers in Germany and Scotland have made the fastest two-legged robot yet (for its size) called RunBot. It is controlled by a simple program that mimics the way neurons control reflexes in humans and other animals. From the article: 'We wanted to show that a very simple system with a simple neuronal controller could walk in a natural manner - and fast,' says Florentin Wörgötter, from the University of Göttingen in Germany. The story also features couple of videos of RunBot in action."

149 comments

  1. How is it fast compared to a human? by klack · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How many leg-length per second can the "average" human achieve?

    1. Re:How is it fast compared to a human? by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 4, Funny

      How many leg-length per second can the "average" human achieve?
       
      A lot less than this thing once its perfected and turned into a meat-powered robot.

      What the hell are thoses scientists up to? Why don't we just go ahead and program them to bat us around a bit before they eat us?
       
        Sheeesh.

    2. Re:How is it fast compared to a human? by lovedew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Human can walk at an average of 4km per hour, that's about 1.11 meter per second.

      A leg is about 1 meter long, so maybe the average human can do about 1-2 leg-length per second?

      --
      Got Game/Music/Movie? In NZ? Swap Them Here
    3. Re:How is it fast compared to a human? by bartyboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wrong.

      One leg per second is equal to a football field multiplied by a VW Beetle, divided by a fortnight per Library of Congress.

      Sheesh. What do they teach in schools these days?

    4. Re:How is it fast compared to a human? by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Taking my 34" inseam, 3.5 leg lengths/s would be 3.02 m/s or a 9-minute mile. Easy long run pace.

    5. Re:How is it fast compared to a human? by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      i don't really care how fast this robot runs, it's more important if it can run linux

      and now imagine a beowulf cluster of running robots, uyeeee ...

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    6. Re:How is it fast compared to a human? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and now imagine a beowulf cluster of running robots, uyeeee ...

      That would be a marathon!
  2. Cheetah by mnemonic_ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I would like to know if it can outrun a Cheetah.

    1. Re:Cheetah by x2A · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, the famous two-legged cheetah... probably yeah.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    2. Re:Cheetah by jollyroger1210 · · Score: 1

      Well, it is only 30 cm high, so now. It MIGHT be able to beat a scaled down cheetah, but I doubt it.

      --
      Purple, because ice cream has no bones.
  3. Leg lengths per second? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've heard of feet per second, but legs?

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Leg lengths per second? by slughead · · Score: 1

      I've heard of feet per second, but legs?

      replace the word "legs" with "about 27cm" (from the looks of the thing).

      Also, from the video (which is kind of silly), it looks like it's attached to a pole, which may mean it can't stand or walk on its own (certainly not without power or instruction, but maybe also not without physical guidance). I donno, neat toy at any rate.

      PS, I mirrored the video here. Yeah I'm taking it down in 24 hours.

    2. Re:Leg lengths per second? by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > I've heard of feet per second, but legs?

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of...

    3. Re:Leg lengths per second? by kevmo · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks leg-lengths per second is a misleading measure. Sure, the shorter robot has a better leg-lengths per second, but it's legs are shorter, so it's actually going slower in regular units/second.

      And before someone says "but it has shorter legs, so you have to compensate", I will say this: Why not compensate for the fact that a longer leg means more torque is necessary to move it? All it takes is looking at humans: people with shorter legs tend to move their legs much faster than people with longer legs, but don't always end up moving faster.

    4. Re:Leg lengths per second? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new robotic millipede overlords.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    5. Re:Leg lengths per second? by WiFiBro · · Score: 1

      Don't they want to say step-length?

    6. Re:Leg lengths per second? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have only 1 foot per leg. Does this robot do better?

  4. Runnin' by filtur · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll feel safe as long as I can still outrun our robot overlords.

    1. Re:Runnin' by quokkapox · · Score: 1

      And if you can't outrun them you can just kick them and they'll fall over. Oh wait...

      --
      it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    2. Re:Runnin' by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      No, just outrun the other people you are with! :)

    3. Re:Runnin' by leoxx · · Score: 1

      Nah, you don't have to be faster than the robots, you just have to be faster the other people nearby.

    4. Re:Runnin' by Tsaot · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this, but dressing up as The Flash will not make you faster.

    5. Re:Runnin' by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      As long as we can still destroy them with a homemade pipe bomb, I'll feel safe. ;-)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    6. Re:Runnin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new robot overlords.

      (Someone had to post it ...)

    7. Re:Runnin' by Tordek · · Score: 1

      I couldn't stop wanting to say this about your sig...
      You can't imagine anyone who needs more than 1 bytes of ram?

      --
      Tordek, Dwarven Warrior - Juegos de Rol en Argentina
    8. Re:Runnin' by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      Yeah... but... after they finish off eating your friends, who do you think they'll come after next for dessert?

      Let's face it, we're all screwed. We might as well start basting ourselves with the finest spices.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
  5. videos by mcguyver · · Score: 4, Informative

    Two mpeg videos show RunBot (4.9M) walking at a steady speed and (15M) gradually learning to walk more rapidly.

    Get'em while they're hot, ;)

    1. Re:videos by MustardMan · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you're going to karma whore with video links, at least fucking coralize them.

    2. Re:videos by DextroShadow · · Score: 0

      Get them while they're hot? Oh they are going to be hot alright... this is slashdot, after all.

      --
      My karma makes buddha cry.
    3. Re:videos by d0hboy · · Score: 1

      I was half expecting something cool like a mechanized ED-209 (a la robocop) but instead it looks like something out a 30's stop-motion animation or a charlie chaplin skit.

    4. Re:videos by Mgns · · Score: 1

      Ah.. The impressive running speed of a slashdotted toy..

    5. Re:videos by m0nstr42 · · Score: 1

      Bipedal robot with neurologically-based control. We've mastered that.

      A simple camera design mounted to the boom so the @##@$@# picture doesn't keep jumping... now THAT is difficult.

    6. Re:videos by savorymedia · · Score: 1

      The best part is at the end of the one video where the bot hits the box and falls flat on its "face." I'm sure I probably disturbed one of my neighbors' sleep cycles with my cackling. :)

      --
      1 is the square root of all evil.
    7. Re:videos by Yvanhoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I ackowledge the achievement of a robot that 'learns' to walk faster, I am disapointed that it has no balance. In the video it only hangs to a rigid tube, it can't fall on the side, hence the cheap leg structure.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    8. Re:videos by zCyl · · Score: 1

      The best part is at the end of the one video where the bot hits the box and falls flat on its "face." I'm sure I probably disturbed one of my neighbors' sleep cycles with my cackling. :)

      For greater amusement, watch this in slow motion. :)

    9. Re:videos by Jru+Hym · · Score: 1

      Those videos go well with techno music. Very Herbie Hancock

      --
      This lobster was alive when it hit the frothy, boiling water.
  6. what time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    so, at what time do those legs open? :D

    1. Re:what time? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "so, at what time do those legs open? :D" ... It'll be the best prom EVER!!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  7. It's a start, but.... by Giant+Ape+Skeleton · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...I won't be impressed until a two-robot team wins a three-legged race.

    --
    The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.
    1. Re:It's a start, but.... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 4, Interesting

      i think a human-robot team would be more impressive, because you can probablly program a robot to synchronize with another identical robot easier than you can program it to synchronize with a human being.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    2. Re:It's a start, but.... by Morkano · · Score: 1

      It would actually be easier than two humans trying to synch. The robot can just pick a fairly low speed within the human's maximum, and run that fast. Then leave it up to the human to synch up, and gradually increase speed until the human can't do it properly anymore.

      --
      Victory or awesome!
    3. Re:It's a start, but.... by Sky+Cry · · Score: 1

      The problem would be synchronizing the human.

    4. Re:It's a start, but.... by Ruie · · Score: 1
      ... a human-robot team ...

      You mean an exoskeleton ?

  8. First video by cejones · · Score: 5, Funny

    I love how it busts right at the end of video 1. They should have a sensor on its head to sensor when the head touches the ground.. . That should trigger a Homer-esque "D'oh!"

    1. Re:First video by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Is it wrong to laugh when a robot trips and falls? I found that funny enough to watch the video again.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  9. yes, by Proof_of_death · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    but how fast can it run from the cops?

  10. How fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Slashdot posts a story saying somebody made a robot that runs really fast, why the heck doesn't it say how fast the thing runs in the summary? Eh? EH???

    1. Re:How fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      betcha that made you RTFA! :P

    2. Re:How fast by Eightyford · · Score: 1

      Slashdot posts a story saying somebody made a robot that runs really fast, why the heck doesn't it say how fast the thing runs in the summary? Eh? EH???

      If it was a Roland Piquepaille link, I'd say Google ads. But, it was probably just lazyness.

  11. video? by colmore · · Score: 0

    anyone have a video of the little guy in action?

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    1. Re:video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you not read the article, not read any of the comments, or both?

    2. Re:video? by MustardMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait, so now we have to replace RTFA with RTFC? Jeez, no wonder geeks are all so unhealthy... look at how lazy we are!

  12. Um, does anyone else see the rod? by eldavojohn · · Score: 1, Interesting
    RunBot currently walks around the edge of a circular room and is connected the centre of the room by a boom.
    Yeah, you see the boom in the videos.

    It can walk but can't maintain verticality? Is it there to stabilize it? That's pretty lame if they don't even have to worry about keeping its center of balance ... that's the hardest thing to figure out about fluid bipedal motion!
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Um, does anyone else see the rod? by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Informative

      It can walk but can't maintain verticality? Is it there to stabilize it? That's pretty lame if they don't even have to worry about keeping its center of balance ... that's the hardest thing to figure out about fluid bipedal motion!

      Probably just to stop the experiment needing a shitload of space without worrying about explicit turning. Of course, you could have just quoted the entire paragraph (two sentences) - bold face added:

      RunBot currently walks around the edge of a circular room and is connected the centre of the room by a boom. But Wörgötter plans to develop a freestanding version next, and thinks it should be straightforward because the boom has only a small influence on its ability to walk.

      Doesn't seem quite so problematic now, does it?

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    2. Re:Um, does anyone else see the rod? by ydrol · · Score: 1
      It can walk but can't maintain verticality?

      I was trying to think of some +5 Funny about this made up word .. but found out it was real.

    3. Re:Um, does anyone else see the rod? by Illserve · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But Wörgötter plans to develop a freestanding version next, and thinks it should be straightforward because the boom has only a small influence on its ability to walk.

      Well what do you expect him to say, that this approach is hopelessly limited?

      This isn't the first time we've seen great mobility from tethered robots, but somehow these guys never manage to produce the untethered version. Getting power and proper balancing to an untethered robot seems to be the critical stumbling block and I would be shocked if this one doesn't hit the same issues.

    4. Re:Um, does anyone else see the rod? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Nah. They've had stand-alone walking robots for years. It's not that hard.

    5. Re:Um, does anyone else see the rod? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Balance is a very complex issue. These guys are just focusing on the walking motion itself, and they've found a simpler and more effective way to do that.

      And that's good, because let's face it: that big, shuffling, passive balance robot from Sony looks like crap.

    6. Re:Um, does anyone else see the rod? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      test

    7. Re:Um, does anyone else see the rod? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      another test

  13. Not Quite. by pavon · · Score: 1

    This is a cool little robot - a nice example of how much you can do with a simple design. However, I think it is a bit premature to declare that it has set any biped records, seeing as how it can't balance on two legs yet.

  14. On a related note by Z1NG · · Score: 3, Funny

    The two women who actually read /. are hoping scientist don't put so much effort into their robots finishing quickly when they produce a three-legged bot.

  15. A first: a clueless MIT researcher by rossifer · · Score: 1

    "but it may not scale up - but I'll be interested to see if it does." -- Russ Tedrake

    The approach may not scale up?

    Has the guy heard of humans? Ostriches? Kangaroos? Bipedal locomotion doesn't scale indefinitely (square-cube problem unfortunately), but biological approaches to controlling two-legged walking (and running and bounding) will definitely scale up to lots of "useful" sizes.

    And if he's criticizing their current algorithms... of course they won't control a robot 10x larger, but that's just being pedantic. You'll need the bigger robot to figure it's own algorithms out (thus, their actual approach of an adaptive robot).

    Regards,
    Ross

    1. Re:A first: a clueless MIT researcher by misleb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think he's just saying that our robot overlords won't be much larger than a human. Relax. It's good news.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    2. Re:A first: a clueless MIT researcher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dynamics do not automatically scale in a simple fashion. For instance, a 100 meter cockroach might not move as well proportionately as an ordinary sized one.

    3. Re:A first: a clueless MIT researcher by AJWM · · Score: 1

      The approach may not scale up?

      Has the guy heard of humans? Ostriches? Kangaroos?


      Small stuff. Think tyrannosaurs...

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:A first: a clueless MIT researcher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, you've figured out what the parent was referring to when he mentioned the "cube-square problem." Did you also happen to notice the several examples he gave of human-sized bipeds, including humans? Did it occur to you that bipedal motion can work on a human scale?

      Idiot.

  16. Not all that impressive by MustardMan · · Score: 1

    This thing walks in a circle and is connected to a boom - it can't walk freely. All the legs have to worry about is front/back balance, and not side to side. Of course, making that obvious in the headline or summary would make the article seem much less interesting, and we couldn't have that, now could we?

    1. Re:Not all that impressive by Tipa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could be worse. On Digg, the title would be "All Humans Will Walk With Bionic Legs By 2007!!!!"

  17. Remember kids... by vertinox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You don't have to be faster than the killer robot.
    You just need to be faster than that any other humans you happen to be with.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re:Remember kids... by LetterRip · · Score: 1

      [QUOTE]You don't have to be faster than the killer robot.
      You just need to be faster than that any other humans you happen to be with.[/QUOTE]

      That only works if the killer robot can't catch up with you after killing the other humans :)

      LetterRip

    2. Re:Remember kids... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        What, is it going to be satisfied with eating, uh, killing only some of us? ;-)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    3. Re:Remember kids... by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      You never know, it might hit its preset kill limit.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    4. Re:Remember kids... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        A preset kill limit would mean leaving survivors who could end your existence. It's illogical programming :-)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    5. Re:Remember kids... by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      Eh, they can always build more killbots.

    6. Re:Remember kids... by fferreres · · Score: 1

      Unless he's chassing....YOU!

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
  18. Linguo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hello. I am Linguo, the grammar robot. Here is what your post should have looked like:

    They should have a sensor on its head to *detect* when the head touches the ground.

    1. Re:Linguo! by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      hi Linguo :)

    2. Re:Linguo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Hi Linguo.* :)

      You are overloading my circuits.

    3. Re:Linguo! by Somegeek · · Score: 1

      Wierd. My brain apparently fixed that sentence while reading it and I didn't even realize that anything was wrong with it until I read your post.

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    4. Re:Linguo! by AgentSmith · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I call your Prologue and raise you . . .

      Twilight

      The visions dancing in my mind
      The early dawn, the shades of time
      Twilight crawling through my windowpane
      Am I awake or do I dream?
      The strangest pictures I have seen
      Night is day and twilight's gone away

      With your head held high and your scarlet lies
      You came down to me from the open skies
      It's either real or it's a dream
      There's nothing that is in between...

      Twilight, I only meant to stay awhile
      Twilight, I gave you time to steal my mind
      Away from me.

      Across the night I saw your face
      You disappeared without a trace
      You brought me here, but can you take me back?
      Inside the image of your light
      That now is day and once was night
      You lead me here and then you go away.

      Twilight, I only meant to stay awhile
      Twilight, I gave you time to steal my mind
      Away from me.

      (You brought me here, but can you take me back again?)

      With your head held high and your scarlet lies
      You came down to me from the open skies

      Twilight, I only meant to stay awhile
      Twilight, I gave you time to steal my mind
      Away from me.

  19. It's tethered. by BigZaphod · · Score: 1, Funny

    OMG that's so totally cheating!!!!1!11one!1!!

    1. Re:It's tethered. by PurpleButter · · Score: 0
      Cheating? What is this, a math test?

      It's merely one step in an overall process of engineering design.

      We are lucky as readers to watch this in the middle of the design phase, rather than having to wait another few years to be wowed by the end result. Are Ford and Chevy cheating when they show us really cool concept cars at the auto shows , even though they can't drive off the stand under their own power? Nope. Just a part of the process of engineering.

      --
      Look at the whole picture, not just the hole in the picture.
  20. The Wrong Trousers by Bloater · · Score: 1

    Hah! In the first video it sounds exactly like the wrong trousers.

    1. Re:The Wrong Trousers by M0b1u5 · · Score: 1

      I concur. They're the wrong trousers indeed.

      --
      How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
  21. Paint it black and find out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A comment on police racism, not a slur on black folks.

  22. Runbot by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Althought called "runbot" it's actually a speedwalkerbot. at least that's all the videos show. At no point are fewer than one foot on the ground.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:Runbot by MickLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, I know that the dynamics of running -- one leap after another -- are possibly more complicated than, and definitely different than the dynamics for walking. Nonetheless, I always used to like our cross-country club races (when I did run CC, and later when I'd watch my brother run) in the Shenandoah Valley. There were a few "English walkers" who would outwalk quite a few runners. That includes me. It's just a little embarassing to be struggling along, still leaping from leg to leg in that slow hobble that we call "long distance running", and have somebody breezily walk past you (same direction) and offer a little how-do-you-do.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    2. Re:Runbot by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      You were using too much of your energy to push up, rather than forward. Your feet may leave the ground, the trick is to not have to let most of your weight change height too much in any given stride (up too high, you have to catch it on the way down. Down too low, gotta push it back up). Saves lots of energy.

    3. Re:Runbot by AGMW · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You were using too much of your energy to push up, rather than forward. Your feet may leave the ground, the trick is to not have to let most of your weight change height too much in any given stride (up too high, you have to catch it on the way down. Down too low, gotta push it back up). Saves lots of energy.

      Tell that to the Kangaroos! They have one of the most efficient bidepal locomotion stratagies because as they land they stretch two massive tendons and store all the kinetic energy, which they then use to bounce themselves aloft once more.

      From the linked page ...
      Running is a strange means of locomotion that involves bouncing up and down, as well as moving forward. This bouncing is aided by the elastic nature of the Achilles tendon at the back of the foot, which acts like an elastic band, stretching when we put our foot down, and then pulling back to its relaxed length to propel us upward. This conserves a considerable amount of energy during running, raising the energy efficiency from 25 to 40 percent or more. And training increases the elasticity of the tendon, whereas aging decreases elasticity, making running less efficient. Kangaroos are the ultimate masters of this pogo stick effect, which enables them to increase from 5 to 20 kilometers per hour without using any extra energy -- just more bounce.

      I, for one, welcome our robotic bouncing kangaroo overlords.

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    4. Re:Runbot by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The kangaroos are storing the energy on coming down, and releasing most of it coming back up. A human doesn't have the same kind of mechanical advantage, and relies on muscle power to do the up and down motion. Therefore, it's more efficient for a human to keep vertical motion to a minimum so that the majority of the energy can be devoted to forward locomotion. The achilles tendon does help with humans, but it's not to the same extent as in kangaroos. Besides, if you watch a kangaroo when it's just moving at a good clip across open ground, their bodies and centers of mass actually don't move vertically very much, it's just their legs.

  23. Re:IT depends.... by Proof_of_death · · Score: 1

    Luckily, robots can spell Switzerland correctly.

  24. Qurio's the runner? by M0b1u5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Didn't Qurio claim to be the world's first "running" robot?

    I always thought Qurio was great: push him over and no matter what orientation he ends up in, he can get back to his feet again. I think it's not too far away that after they get up off the ground, they come over and slap you for pushing them over...

    As to the whole walking thing - it's a fascinating topic I think:

    1) walking is a controlled fall, the only thing preventing you from going face-first into the pavement is that next foot fall.

    2) Maximum cruising speed is attained in a single revolution. No other animal or engine can claim the same (AFAIK).

    --
    How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
    1. Re:Qurio's the runner? by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1
      2) Maximum cruising speed is attained in a single revolution. No other animal or engine can claim the same
      I'm really unclear how you can claim that human walking/running is achieved in a single revolution. Certainly, there is a huge curve of surge in the first revolution, but nothing as grandiose as you claim.
      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    2. Re:Qurio's the runner? by M0b1u5 · · Score: 1

      Not running: walking.

      1) stand still.
      2) begin walking.
      3) measure speed after single step.

      speed = cruising speed.

      ipso facto: 1 revolution = cruising speed.

      And in fact, it's more like HALF a revolution, because two steps is a full revolution.

      Other animals can claim to achieve the same effect for their walking gait, but none can claim the efficiencies of the human gait, in terms of calories expended per kilogram carried per kilometres traveled.

      (Only a fully laden 747 is more efficient than a man on a racing bicycle at the very top end of the graph.)

      It's this sort of efficiency which enabled us to span the globe in a very short period of time. And when we talk about efficiency, we mean the level of difference which is expressed as "less than the calories contained in a packet of cookies spread over a single year".

      Those sorts of differences are the difference between living and dying - and its our fortune that we have been fortunate in this regard.

      --
      How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
  25. 1 question by hurfy · · Score: 2, Funny

    How is it a 2-legged robot?

    Without the boom it will fall over, nor could it walk.

    Of course it can't even STOP , that might be a minor issue for usefulness ;p

    Hurfy
    Fastest man on 2 legs...while running down the aisle of the airliner anyways...

  26. Tethered? by Pedrito · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Call be back when it's untethered, has arms, and can stand itself back up after it trips. Then I'll be impressed. Until then, it's no more impressive than a bot on wheels.

    1. Re:Tethered? by nizo · · Score: 1

      And please warn everyone before you start making them come standard with built in weapons.

  27. Oblig. Simpsons by MaXiMiUS · · Score: 5, Funny

    C:\DOS
    C:\DOS\RUN
    RUN DOS RUN

    --
    It's never just a game when you're winning. - George Carlin
    1. Re:Oblig. Simpsons by aurb · · Score: 1

      I don't get it.

    2. Re:Oblig. Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is to bad the +5 funny will do nothing for your karma problems.

  28. Original paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    without all the advertising and click tracking from NS

    http://www.ijrr.org/contents/25_03/abstract/243.ht ml

  29. That's for the dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dang newbies.

  30. Amazing..! by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And this is what Kevin Kelly says in his excellent book Out of Control (The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems, and the Economic World). Start with small and dumb machines, follow nature and gradually build up the complexity. The efforts of creating one machine which does it all is going to fail.

  31. YES BUT by popetty · · Score: 2, Funny

    They need to change run, to dance. Also, they need to include that it was rocking out to Mr. Roboto. DOMO ARIGATO MR ROBOT *FUUEEEEEWWWW**FUUEEEEEWWWW*

  32. I, for one... by metroplex · · Score: 3, Funny

    welcome the lack of any obvious "I for one welcome our new two-legged running robotic speed record breaker overlords" jokes so far. :P

    --
    "Words of wisdom: drop that zero and get with the hero" -- Vanilla Ice
  33. It isn't that groundbreaking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20050806/bob8. asp

    Tad McGeer has been making similar walking robots since the eighties. I wonder if these guys did a proper literature search.

    Another name that comes to mind is Mark Tilden. He was one of the first to point out that by mimicing natural processes, you greatly reduce the processing power needed. His robot insects use the music chips from greeting cards to control them.

    1. Re:It isn't that groundbreaking. by waldo2020 · · Score: 1

      however none of Tilden's robots walk. The insects all craw, and robosapiem shuffles. The bd card trick is merely using the tone chip as a sequencer, which could have easily been a counter/decoder or PLD. Other 'walkers' use his ~inverter neuron~ for sequencing, but this simple R/C linear amp trick cannot control a dynamically balanced walker.

    2. Re:It isn't that groundbreaking. by Kaptain_Korolev · · Score: 1

      I completely concur,

      Tilden's work is impressive but extremely limited in scope. It has found much use in Toy manufacture but it is not useful in controlling complex systems.

      The 'nervous nets' are the best example of this. He paints the picture that they are intelligent adaptive networks while in truth they are nothing more that a chain of self-stabilising bi-stables.

      What annoys me the most about him though is the way that he overly trumpets his own work as being much more important than it actually is. In the past he has compared his Robosapien, which walks with a static shuffling gait, to Sony's QRIO and Honda's Asimo which walk dynamically using limbs with multiple DOFs similar to other bipeds in nature like human beings.

  34. Scary by kraksmokr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That is teh creepiest freaking thing I have ever seen.

    1. Re:Scary by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Obviously you didn't watch the video of the four-legged mule robot developed by DARPA. It looks like some took two emaciated humans and encased them head to head, bent over, inside a metal framework. Combine that with the noise it makes and I spent the entire time watching the video feeling pity for the new creation and wishing someone would allow me to end its torment.

      This just looks like a gumby stop-action reject.

  35. yes but... by Tsaot · · Score: 1

    ...will it run on Linux?

    In all seriousness though, in the video it looked like the robot wasn't balancing itself. Instead it was attached to an arm coming from the center of the circle the robot was walking in to keep it upright. I have to say that this will be a lot more impressive when they can pull this off without having to hold the robot's hand.

    1. Re:yes but... by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 1

      and how long will it be before somebody sues them for infringing their "method of forward locomotion" patent.

  36. Is it me? by croto · · Score: 1

    I am already getting bored with all these articles about robots, isn't there anything worthy going on in the IT world besides robots that can do human-like things?

    I mean, my problem is, slashdot is getting boring! I need something to read about while I'm at work! How am I gonna be productive like that? Oh, wait...

  37. Machine Learning by z1234321 · · Score: 1

    IANA roboticist, but after I RTFA, it seemed like the point was to implement neural networks into more complex aspects of robotics. It seemed to be demonstrating that coding a (relatively) simple machine learning system allowed the robot to develop even an better walking algorithm than those written entirely by humans. As such, it was successful even with the rod.

  38. sci-fi by Z34107 · · Score: 1

    If you build it, it will eat you. Anyone who who's even heard of "Science Fiction" knows that.

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW
  39. Scotland + Germany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, since it was developed by Scots and Germans, one has to ask:

    Can it highland dance, and does it goose-step? /Anonymous Godwin

  40. How is this better than Asimo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't check the actual leg length/speed ratio for the "world record" thing... but is this really more impressive than Honda's untethered Asimo? Check this video:

    http://world.honda.com/HDTV/ASIMO/New-ASIMO-run-6k mh/index.html

    The good news is that I think I can still outrun it. For now.

  41. Diesel Sweeties by Loktar+Ogar · · Score: 0

    Women don't like three legged robots?

  42. Robot Sues! by Tsaot · · Score: 1

    ...And in the news of the bizarre, a robot is suing the entire human race for infringing upon its patented method of forward locomotion. While the ruling on the case is still up in the air, officials are suggesting people purchase Segways or wheelchairs, just in case.

  43. Gromit! by jpellino · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's the Wrong Trousers!

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  44. Lousy name. by butterwise · · Score: 1, Funny

    RunBot? Please, who came up with that? Shouldn't it be called GoBot?

    --
    If a baby duck is a "duckling," why would anyone want to eat "dumplings?"
    1. Re:Lousy name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but they plan do develop a whole line of robots. The next one planned is the RowBot.

  45. not always.... by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    It could also be called...

    FARMING.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    1. Re:not always.... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        Exactly! :-)

        Ever read Niven?

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  46. The million-dollar robot by Kingrames · · Score: 5, Funny

    But can they build him faster? stronger?

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  47. Gait generation, White paper by m0nstr42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This thing walks in a circle and is connected to a boom - it can't walk freely. All the legs have to worry about is front/back balance, and not side to side. Of course, making that obvious in the headline or summary would make the article seem much less interesting, and we couldn't have that, now could we?

    Accepted. But that wasn't really the point of the research. If you RTFA and RTFWP (white paper), these guys are more interested in neuroscience. So what they did was design a simple mechanical system and a simple controller that both mimic the actual physical/physiological function of human legs. Balancing has alot to do with the structure of the foot and our ability to shift weight and is more of a dynamics issue. What these guys did was gait generation, which sounds simple (one foot after the other), but when you sit down and start trying to work out the details, its not so easy.

    A similar (theoretical) study which actually addresses balancing (this time for insects with six legs):
    J.E. Seipel, P. Holmes and R.J. Full (2004) Biological Cybernetics 91, 76-90. Dynamics and stability of insect locomotion: a hexapedal model for horizontal plane motions.

  48. Other Uses by Ikalta · · Score: 1

    I'm curious why no one brought up other possible uses of this idea. While it is obviously far from perfected this might be a nice technology for the disabled or injured to have. Being able to appear to walk normally and move about would be really nice. I know that there have been a lot of injuries in Iraq involving legs and other movement impairing injuries.

    1. Re:Other Uses by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 1
      While it is obviously far from perfected this might be a nice technology for the disabled or injured to have. Being able to appear to walk normally and move about would be really nice.



      And who is going to follow the disabled around proping them up with a stick? This thing can't walk. Wörgötter claims the boom maintaining vertical stability only has a small influence on the system. But I would wager that maintaining vertical stability is the most difficult thing to simulate in this sort of excersise.



      More to the point I seriously doubt that if I were disabled and lost the use of my legs, I would want something that just simulated the ability to walk, it would really be quite useless. The only possible way I could forsee it being used is if you hung the legs on the side of a wheel chair *shudder* how degrading.

  49. Yes but can it moon walk? by wubboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes but can it moon walk? Though I am not sure I want to see moonwalking again anyway.

    --
    Sit... Speak.... Shake.... Good Dog!
  50. Miss Stepping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So far, just about all the posters have missed the point- and a good deal of the information.

    The point of the exercise isn't to make something that'll fetch your slippers and run to the store. It's simplifying things to something closer to the basics and emulating nature. Two sensors, simple leg servos, some rather simple, clever programming, and it walks. In fact, it can actually "learn" how to speed itself up as it goes. Compare the complexity of most any of the other of the walking robots, which require sensors and servos up the wazoo -- and a hefty amount of computing -- to do their tricks; like walk in a straight line without falling over.

    RTFA before you complain about how it's cheating. If you'd bother to watch the video, you'll see the boom isn't holding it up. It trips over a block and falls flat on its CPU at the end of the first mpeg.

  51. Not impressive by lamp540 · · Score: 1

    "RunBot currently walks around the edge of a circular room and is connected the centre of the room by a boom. But Wörgötter plans to develop a freestanding version next, and thinks it should be straightforward because the boom has only a small influence on its ability to walk."

    This whole thing is not impressive. That thing would never walk on it's own if it didn't have that arm holding it up. I think I've seen things like that made out of wood and sold at craft fairs...

    1. Re:Not impressive by {tele}machus_*1 · · Score: 1

      My sentiments exactly. I look forward to a free-standing version that can use a simple pseudo-neural program to walk on two legs. I can see from the video that they have a long way to go before they can build a free-standing one. At the very least, it needs articulated ankles and hips.

  52. Re:IT depends.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Luckily, robots can spell Switzerland correctly.

    But once arrived in Switzerland, they can't go fast anymore, because there is a self-righteous slowpoke driving in the left lane holding up all the traffic.

    oops, wrong thread...

  53. sadly no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but you should see it toss the "caber"

  54. In the words of the great... by Elitist_Phoenix · · Score: 2, Funny

    Härter. Schneller. Geh ans Limit. Übertriff dich selbst. Lerne, deinen Arsch zu meistern.

    --
    "I'm going to f***ing bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f***ing kill Google"
  55. So it runs.. by someguyfromdenmark · · Score: 0

    So what? I think, what the majority of Slashdot-users would like to know is, Does it run Linux?

    --
    I change my sig often.
  56. DAMN YOU!!!1!!1oneone by fernandoh26 · · Score: 0

    ARG!! You beat me to it! *shakes fist*

    --
    Chums up, let's do this!
  57. RoboPig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And to think RoboCop was the ultimate in walking, talking and human beating when it comes to robot tech.

    P.S
    Don't you just love how Zoidberg pronounces "robot" - robutt ?!!

  58. The Video by lancelotlink · · Score: 1

    Oh, God! I watched that little thing go and all I could think of was Wallace & Grommit's "The Wrong Trousers". I laughed and laughed and laughed and, oh, all right, I know, that's enough.

  59. 4 leg robot by maxxpower5000 · · Score: 1

    Here is a video of a 4-leg robot made by Bosten Dynamic, it is clearly better than any 2-leg robot. http://www.bostondynamics.com/dist/BigDog_Feb-26-2 006.wmv

  60. Re:Bah... Give us a more common measurement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but how many library of congress lengths per half-hour is this?

  61. Well by Kittie+Rose · · Score: 1

    I won't be impressed by "fast robots" until they build Quickman.

    --
    EpiAdv - if you like Pokey the Penguin, try this comic!