Slashdot Mirror


Typo Found in Kryptos CIA Sculpture

SimuAndy writes "Elonka Dunin, game developer at Simutronics and author/editor of the new book, 'The Mammoth Book of Secret Codes and Cryptograms', reports that what everyone had thought was the answer to part 2 of the CIA's encrypted Kryptos sculpture, wasn't. Sculptor Sanborn announced this week that everyone had gotten it wrong, because of a mistake on the art piece. For more info, check out the Wired story, or the Kryptos Group announcement."

99 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. Sevfg cfbg by MarkByers · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sevfg cfbg

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
    1. Re:Sevfg cfbg by bwcarty · · Score: 1

      Or if you're an Italian mob boss,

      Iulvw svrw

    2. Re:Sevfg cfbg by charlesnw · · Score: 1

      Ha Ha Ha I like it.

      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
    3. Re:Sevfg cfbg by Poltras · · Score: 1
      Dude, anyway your own rot13 don't make any sense. From your rot13:
      s <=> m
      t <=> m
      p <=> m
      t <=> q
      You've got to decide what's m and what's t, dah!
  2. Elonka sucks, Ceren for ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ceren will never be beaten as the most desirable geek chick ever!

    1. Re:Elonka sucks, Ceren for ever! by WarForge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Really? I was under the impression that Asia Carrera was the most desirable geek chick ever... incredibly hot porn star who builds her own computers, makes her own UT maps/mods/models, is a Linux geek and will wipe the floor with anyone here in a UT2004 deathmatch... personally, I do not need to know any more b/c I do not think that combination can be beat.

      -Squirrelmaster out

    2. Re:Elonka sucks, Ceren for ever! by caffeination · · Score: 1

      Meh, perhaps if she wasn't a porn star... (I'm dead serious)

    3. Re:Elonka sucks, Ceren for ever! by JWtW · · Score: 1

      I don't know who I love more. Asia for being her bad-assed self, or you for posting the link? Either way, thanks!!!

    4. Re:Elonka sucks, Ceren for ever! by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      24's "Chloe" will always do it for me....

  3. CIA mistakes... by Mister+White · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I doubt it, the CIA is *NEVER* wrong. ...wait...

    --
    "Crime fighters fight crime. Fire fighters fight fire. What do freedom fighters fight?" -George Carlin
    1. Re:CIA mistakes... by cly · · Score: 1

      Did it occur to you that the typos are put in there on purpose to make decrypting harder?

  4. Got It! by MudButt · · Score: 4, Funny

    No wonder I couldn't figure it out! Gimme a second... Okay...

    Be sure to drink your Ovaltine

    Aw man!

    1. Re:Got It! by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Careful kid, you'll shoot your eye out!

      *warning - off topic wondering follows*

      on a side note, i wonder if A Christmas Story was the first example of having a 3rd person Narrator voice over using the grown up voice of the main character who is a kid... and, did the producers of The Wonder Years and currently Everyone Hates Chris have to pay a royalty fee for using this 'treatment' since such things can be copyrighted?

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  5. I bet it's all a hoax... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    ... and that it doesn't say anything at all. Just the output of a zeta function, with the seed string 'OMGJOORSOSTOOPID' or something like that.

    I mean, it's happened before.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    1. Re:I bet it's all a hoax... by Feyr · · Score: 1

      i wonder how many will get the allusion :)

    2. Re:I bet it's all a hoax... by Bromskloss · · Score: 1
      i wonder how many will get the allusion :)
      Yeah, that's a clever one. I guess most people won't get it... like me for example. :-(

      *thinking* _A_ zeta function? Not _the_ zeta function? And with a seed?!
      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    3. Re:I bet it's all a hoax... by Grab · · Score: 1

      Cryptonomicon...

  6. Is this legal... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't a crypto book be in violation of the DMCA?

    1. Re:Is this legal... by SapphoComet · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a crypto book be in violation of the DMCA?

      It is likely that that particular law is in place to protect distribution of codes that actually protect something of value or interest to law enforcement or government agencies. While no one really cares about the codes that are created by kids on a playground, the PGP fiasco a while back was a bigger problem because people outside of the US could use it to encrypt data that the US government couldn't access.

      Another possibility is that the book may just have codes in it that are already considered cracked and therefore "obsolete".

      Since it's a code specific to that statue, does it really matter?

    2. Re:Is this legal... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Since the CIA is reclassifying documents, they could reclassify the statue if they wanted to and the book will then have to be classified as well.

    3. Re:Is this legal... by Harry+Coin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except that in the US all creative works are copyrighted by default. I think that the hidden text in the Kryptos statue would qualify, as it's "protected" by the cryptography. I know that the DMCA wasn't written with this situation in mind, and I don't think it's right, but a twisted attorney could spin it that way. Bad laws are often like that.

      --
      That's pre 7-11 thinking....
    4. Re:Is this legal... by Whafro · · Score: 1

      The US Government can't hold copyrights by statute... if it's a government production, it can either be classified or it is freely available for use. If a work is a "work for hire," basically meaning that it was commissioned by someone else, then that someone else who commissioned the work owns the copyright. If the US Government paid the sculptor to make this, then it would be a work for hire, and would not be copyrighted.

      Not sure if this is the case with Krpytos, but I'd suspect that it is.

    5. Re:Is this legal... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Bad laws are often like that.

      Actually most laws are like that. Run into the street to pull a kid out of harms way? Too bad you just jaywalked. That's why we have courts to interpret the law and juries to, theoretically, apply them sanely.

  7. Wait, rot13 by suso · · Score: 1

    Oh wait, I'm dumb or just hungry right now. The text was rot13'd and then he mixed up the middle characters of each word.

    1. Re:Wait, rot13 by Walenzack · · Score: 1

      Dude, (s)he just rot13'd the classical "Frist psot"... You may be suffering a "geekiness overflow"...

      --
      English is not my native language. Corrections are not only welcome but encouraged. Thanks.
      -Walenzack.
    2. Re:Wait, rot13 by nettdata · · Score: 1

      Marki Post was all goodness back in the day... her friends called her "Mark" for short.

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
  8. How was this wrong? by VorpalRodent · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Everyone had it wrong, because there was a mistake on the art piece? Tell me how that makes the people who decrypted it wrong.

    I would think that if they decoded it properly, the answer they got was correct, regardless of what the intended message was.

    If I make a typo and Rot13 it, you can Rot13 it and get my typo back, and it doesn't make you wrong. It means I can't spell.

    I haven't RTFA, but the summary makes it look like I can correct others for my own mistakes. Cool!

    --
    Take it to the limit, everybody to the limit, come on, everybody fhqwhgads.
    1. Re:How was this wrong? by TigerNut · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's wrong because the sculpture encodes four puzzles. The solutions to the first three parts are required to solve the fourth part.

      --

      Less is more.

    2. Re:How was this wrong? by twms2h · · Score: 1

      where are my mod points when I need them? ...

    3. Re:How was this wrong? by monoqlith · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Wired article says that the first three parts of the puzzle contain clues to solve the fourth and final part. So, while they decrypted the message correctly, the mistake that was made has prevented them from figuring out how to decrpt the entire message correctly. So, yeah, it was the artist's mistake, but it was an incorrect decryption because it doesn't provide any meaningful clues about the fourth part of the puzzle.

    4. Re:How was this wrong? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      This happens in real life. Sometimes the operators of crypto gear make mistakes. Sometimes these mistakes make it easier to decrypt the intended messages, sometimes it make it so hard that even the reciever can't make sence of it.

      It's common to add garbage to the front and end of an encrypted message just to make it harder to know what the real message was for an attacker. Sometimes this garbage causes confusion in the correct recipient.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  9. Embedded Advertising by Potor · · Score: 1

    No, this Wired thread was brought to you by Mountain Dew and Easter Jellie Bellies.

    1. Re:Embedded Advertising by XenonOfArcticus · · Score: 1

      Actually, they were generic Sam's Club 4-pounds-a-bag gourmet jelly beans. But it was real Mountain Dew. The clone stuff doesn't taste right.

      --
      -- There is no truth. There is only Perception. To Percieve is to Exist.
  10. huh? by sentientbrendan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The problematic part is at the end of part 2: "... forty-four seconds west. ID by rows." On April 19th, sculptor Sanborn contacted one of the Kryptos Group moderators to say, "No, that last part is wrong." He also indicated that there was a missing character on the sculpture, probably something that would have resulted in a plaintext "X" before that section. He said that he had thought that with the missing character, the section in question would have come out to be an unintelligible scramble. Instead, he was astounded to see that by sheer chance, the resulting random text had turned out to be apparently intelligible English, "ID BY ROWS", although that was not what was intended.

    what are the odds of that?

    1. Re:huh? by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      Instead, he was astounded to see that by sheer chance, the resulting random text had turned out to be apparently intelligible English, "ID BY ROWS", although that was not what was intended.

      what are the odds of that?


      Precisely 100% - because that is exactly what happened.

    2. Re:huh? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 4, Funny
      what are the odds of that?

      It's a million to one shot. But as we know, they come up 9 times out of 10.

    3. Re:huh? by nyri · · Score: 1

      what are the odds of that?

      Some kind of upper limit is 15%. The more probable value is around 0.05%.

      To get 15% I used following assumptions:
      Number of letters is 26. This means that there is 26^8=208827064576 possible strings. Every one of them is eqaully propable.

      Nuber of different words by their length is (fetched from /usr/share/dict/words):
      n1: 26
      n2: 160
      n3: 762
      n4: 3070
      n5: 6350
      n6: 10691
      n7: 14296
      n8: 15223

      Different settings of words are (I have removed all of them that contains 3 or more words with length of 1):
      8 letter word -> n8 sensible strings
      7 letter word, 1 letter word -> 2!*n7*n1 sensible strings
      6, 2 -> 2!*n6*n2
      6, 1, 1 -> 3!/2!*n6*n1*n1
      5, 3 -> and so on
      5, 2, 1
      4, 4
      4, 3, 1
      4, 2, 2
      3, 3, 2
      2, 2, 2, 2
      2, 2, 2, 1, 1

      The number of all different sensible strings is 31782293607.

      The real number of ensible strings is smaller. The usage of "words" with the length of 1 is questinable. More over we calculate "ASLETTER" Two times as "A S LETTER" and "AS LETTER".

      Now, if we don't allow word settings with words of length 1 and remove two letter acronyms (by arbitrarility lowering the number of two letter words to 40) we get 0.05%.

    4. Re:huh? by Grab · · Score: 1

      Is that you, Terry?

    5. Re:huh? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      NO. THIS IS SOMEONE ELSE.

    6. Re:huh? by Elonka · · Score: 1
      Those are some interesting numbers! Would you like to join our Kryptos brainstorming group? If so, send an email to kryptos-subscribe@yahoogroups.com .

      Elonka :)

  11. Translation: Frist psot by JPriest · · Score: 5, Informative

    Above is ROT-13 (rotate 13 places) for the text Frist psot.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    1. Re:Translation: Frist psot by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it actually shows that he has what you truly lack...

      a sense of humor.

    2. Re:Translation: Frist psot by billcopc · · Score: 1

      I hereby declare your sig YOINKED! :) Couldn't have said it better.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    3. Re:Translation: Frist psot by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      Oh, man! How about a spoiler warning next time?

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
  12. That must be... by DustyShadow · · Score: 1

    one hell of a typewriter...

  13. DMCA protects "cracked" algorithms by MarkByers · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The DMCA was designed to protect weak algorithms. If an algorithm is secure you don't need a law to stop people cracking it.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
    1. Re:DMCA protects "cracked" algorithms by JohhnyTHM · · Score: 1

      But if its strong and gets cracked, is it automaticaly considered weak and under DMCA ?

  14. Re:New Encryption Algorithm? by JPriest · · Score: 1

    Yes U did! I mailed it to a scrambled combination of your user name and UID.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  15. Still not English by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    >undergruund
    >desparatly
    >the remains ... was removed

    Still some work to do.

  16. complexity by PresidentEnder · · Score: 1
    Looking at the history of the sculpture, it's been seen that most of the information and methods considered have been unnecessary or incorrect. For instance, there should be somewhere to find the key words, but they weren't needed. Is is possible that in decoding part 4 (still unsolved) we're missing the forest for the trees? Maybe the final decryption won't have much to do with the typo in part 2.

    Then again, maybe someone will have the solution two days from now and I'll look like an idiot.

    --
    I used to carry a bottle of whiskey for snake bite. And two snakes. -Nefarious Wheel
  17. Re:4:20 by julien+dot · · Score: 1

    Hey, it's my birthday too ! I turned 19 today.

    --
    Julien C.
  18. Publius Enigma by inKubus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This reminds me of another interesting public puzzle, the "Publius Enigma", which was/is a puzzle connected with Pink Floyd's 1994 album The Division Bell and some anonymous postings made to the newsgroup alt.music.pink-floyd coinciding with their 1994 tour of the same name.

    Numerous, interesting sites are out there, and people have been trying to solve the thing for over 12 years.

    Quite interesting, especially if you like the music and want to add a "new dimension".

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  19. Can anybody tell me what's the parent post about? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    I've seen these posts earlier, but what algorithm do they encrypt with?

  20. Douglas Adams by inKubus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Also, it is rumored that Douglas Adams had something to do with the puzzle, since he was friends with the band and actually came up with the name for the album.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  21. Alternate Plaintexts by jd · · Score: 1

    There are forms of cryptography which rely on the same message decrypting to potentially equally valid plaintexts, but this is the first time I've heard of an incomplete encrypted message decrypting to an equally valid plaintext. It's not that different, in concept, but it's definitely unusual and suggests that the algorithm is faulty. I suggest having the crypto lounge report this as a known attack.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Alternate Plaintexts by chihowa · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's not that different, in concept, but it's definitely unusual and suggests that the algorithm is faulty./blockquote> Faulty? I'd consider that a feature. If all crypto could be decrypted to a number of 'valid' plaintexts you'd have perfect plausible deniability. That is: presuming (as was verified) that "ID BY ROWS" wasn't the correct plaintext.
      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    2. Re:Alternate Plaintexts by chihowa · · Score: 1

      grrr.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  22. Bad Title by MaceyHW · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's not a "typo". According the wired article, Sanborn decided to leave out a single charater (an "x" serving as a "period") for asthetic reasons and this led to a faulty decryption of one phrase of the message.

    1. Re:Bad Title by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1
      The artist seems like a massive jerk...

      He said that he had thought that with the missing character, the section in question would have come out to be an unintelligible scramble. Instead, he was astounded to see that by sheer chance, the resulting random text had turned out to be apparently intelligible English, "ID BY ROWS", although that was not what was intended

      So basically he thought it would be impossible to solve all this time but never told anyone?
      If I had been working on this puzzle I would feel a massive urge to go beat the crap out of this guy.
      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    2. Re:Bad Title by Detritus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In real-life, the intercepts that cryptanalysts work with often have missing or garbled characters.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  23. Re:Can anybody tell me what's the parent post abou by froggero1 · · Score: 1

    They use one-time pad... wiki link

    --
    ~/.sig: No such file or directory
  24. Nice .sig by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Or a lot of species ....

  25. Hmmm by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 4, Funny

    In an unrelated story Sculptor Sanborn went missing last night...

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  26. 4th Part Decrypted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It says: 'All Your Base Are Belong To Us'

  27. Location? by sab39 · · Score: 1

    From the article: "The entire passage was previously decrypted to read: This was his last message: x Thirty-eight degrees fifty-seven minutes six point five seconds North, seventy-seven degrees eight minutes forty-four seconds West. ID by rows."

    This seems very clearly a set of geographical longitude/lattitude coordinates. Presumably whatever's actually at that location would be necessary context for the "layer two" to make sense. So what location does that set of coordinates refer to? One of these cryptography buffs must know... but the article doesn't mention the answer.

    1. Re:Location? by encoreres · · Score: 1

      try google earth. high res shot, puts it in a parking area.

    2. Re:Location? by Kredal · · Score: 3, Informative

      That location is at CIA headquarters, about 150 yards south of the actual sculpture. So.. was that the original intended spot for the sculpture, and it was moved, or is there something hidden that close (in layer two?) that would help solve the next section?

      Only time will tell.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    3. Re:Location? by Chriton227 · · Score: 1

      A little Google-Fu reveals the location to be CIA Headquarters in Langley, VA.

    4. Re:Location? by gfolkert · · Score: 4, Informative

      The location 38.9518N, 77.1456W It is in the CIA Complex located in Northern Fairfax County Virginia. Right by the Langley Fork Park and Near the GW Park along the Potomac.

      Out in the CIA yard

      As if nobody can use Google anymore...

      --
      greg, REMEMBER ED CURRY!!!
    5. Re:Location? by Hawkxor · · Score: 1

      Well, it's pretty hard the say since you aren't allowed to just go digging up CIA headquarters.

    6. Re:Location? by Bromskloss · · Score: 1

      Perhaps "layer two" means "second floor", or "second layer in the crust of earth" or something. A third coordinate, the height.

      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    7. Re:Location? by sam1am · · Score: 1

      I wonder if "layer two" has something to do with the plaintext "typos" (ie iqlusion).

      With palimpset as a key to K1, that might point to something that's been written on multiple times, with the previous writing still poking through.

      Probably not, but it's interesting how that could possible refer back...

  28. Re:Can anybody tell me what's the parent post abou by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 1

    Well, I hope you corrected the article.

    Seriously, what reason is there to believe it's a one-time pad? Might as well be random noise. What would be the point?

  29. Already done... by XenonOfArcticus · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://kryptos.arcticus.com/

    Please, don't everybody click on it at once, it's only a P100 webserver on DSL. Use a cache if it dies:

    http://kryptos.arcticus.com.nyud.net:8090/

    --
    -- There is no truth. There is only Perception. To Percieve is to Exist.
  30. Re:It's so obvoius by charlesnw · · Score: 1

    Good one.

    --
    Charles Wyble System Engineer
  31. CIA now humbly requests... by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The CIA has followed up the public announcement that there is a typo in the encrypted message by asking people to stop sending them their old hi-fi speakers for recycling since the decrypted message does *NOT* read "all your bose are belong to us".

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:CIA now humbly requests... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      stop sending them their old hi-fi speakers

      Speaking of typos, you spelled low wrong..

  32. geeks by identity0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heh, it just goes to show how obsessed some geeks get. I loved this last part:

    "I've been drinking Mountain Dew and eating Easter Jelly Bellies to sharpen my mind," he says.

    He says the new information was the equivalent of throwing a steak into shark-infested water. "There's going to be a frenzy of action around this for months because it's the first real bit of data we've been able to get. We don't know what it means. But it's very exciting."


    Yeah, sharpening his mind with Jelly Bellies and going into a frenzy because someone added an 'x' to a cyphertext... nope, no dorkyness here...

  33. Re:New Encryption Algorithm? by magicchex · · Score: 1

    So since it arrived in my mailbox, is it really my PhD now?

    --
    How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
  34. Giggity! by mojotooth · · Score: 1, Funny
    From the Kryptos Group article:

    The exact method used in K2 is polyalphabetic substitution, known as a "Quagmire III variation" of a Vigenère cipher. The keyed cipheralphabet and plaintext alphabet both use the key of KRYPTOS, and the indicator key is the word ABSCISSA.


    And for some reason, every cipher determined by this method comes out "GIGGITY GIGGITY"
    --
    -- Mojo Tooth : exploring our world as only an idiot can.
  35. Did you people even read the article? by Gnpatton · · Score: 1

    If you RTFA then you'll notice that the END of the 3rd part (3 of 4) had a missing null character. Making the last 8 characters spell out idbyrows (ID by Rows) instead of what they should have been: layertwo (Layer Two).

    This isn't such a big 'everything was broken' as you may seem to think that it is. The original key still works. So the original people who cracked the 3rd part are still considered the first.

    This is an important revilation because it is believed that part 4 (which has not been cracked) is solved via clues in parts 1-3.

  36. Uncorrected error by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    "All your base are bleong...

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Uncorrected error by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Geeezz....I got: "All your booz are bilge"

  37. This is big news by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Informative
    IIRC, some journalist/cryptologist/someone sweet talked the CIA into letting them onto the grounds. They did a pencil impression of the sculpture and then they got to wander around.

    The reason they went wandering around was to try and make sense of this piece of section two:
    Does Langley know about this? They should: it's buried out there somewhere. x Who knows the exact location? Only WW. This was his last message: x Thirty-eight degrees fifty-seven minutes six point five seconds North, seventy-seven degrees eight minutes forty-four seconds West. ID by rows."
    If the text was actually supposed to say "... forty-four seconds west. x Layer Two". then that should change their interpretation of whatever they saw on the CIA grounds.

    Someone much nerdier than I analyzed the coordinates, but all this was done under the previous understanding of what Section 2 said.
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:This is big news by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Since the correction is that "ID by rows" isn't supposed to be anything (it's random padding at the end to make the block in the sculpture line up and to conceal the true length of the message), and it only looks like words by chance, after the sculptor removed the final punctuation of the actual message for aestetic reasons without checking that the random padding wasn't now shifted into decoding to something, that site, which doesn't use the "ID by rows" line at all is just as accurate as ever.

  38. Didn't Marshall decrypt this in ALIAS? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Assuming you watched last night's ALIAS episode, didn't Marshall decode this successfully? [grin]

    P.S. I assume this is the same code that was shown.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  39. This is actually interesting. by 222 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although my involvement with the Kryptos project has lessened due to time constraints (Its not World of Warcraft if thats what you were thinking!), this is actually right up my alley.
    I created a 3d replica of the statue in 3d studio max (It should still be available in the yahoo group file section) and this talk of layer 2 talk may imply the folding of the statue. Elonka mentioned this to me a few days ago, but I didn't realize it was this important of an update.

    Installing 3d studio max now, there goes my sleep for the next month O.O

  40. Slashdot by segfault7375 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot reporting on a typo? Oh the delicious irony! :)

  41. Actually... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    Part two indicates coordinates that would be in the symmetrically opposite place in the courtyard- interesting to say the least. But what does "layer two" refer to? We're missing something in the decryption here... :-)

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  42. Elonka co-hosted on Binary Revolutions radio by sdfad1 · · Score: 1

    Check out Episode 78 on Crytography at binrev. There a lot of other stuff on that as well (it's an hour or so of just standard radio show stuff, then some juicy bits on Elonka's exploits, and also a "dummy's guide to crypto and terminology" type intro near the end (well, I think they come in that order).

    1. Re:Elonka co-hosted on Binary Revolutions radio by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      For the correct order youd have to ID them by rows

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  43. Heh! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    So much time was wasted by so many individuals trying to figure this thing out, and so many reams of paper were published about the darn thing, and then it turns out that there is a TYPO in the darn thing?!??!!?!

    That's ridiculous!

  44. Nice job on the sculpture by Wuhao · · Score: 1

    "Ilqusion?" "IDBYROWS?" That's some real qwality work.

  45. We!come by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I far one welcome our craptic overlards.

  46. Reminds me of the time... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Interesting

    .. when I was taking Operating Systems II, and our first homework questions was to decrypt the encrypted assignment once we wrote a public-private de/encryption program, using the public & private keys we were given. Shortly after I got my program written & debugged, I figured out that the teacher had used/given out a wrong number (!), meaning the assignment couldn't be decoded, so I told my buddy who was also in the same class with me before the weekend so he didn't have to waste his time as well.

    The following week in class the teacher announces the correct public & private keys, and most of the class flipped out since they had spent the time trying to figure out why their program wasn't decoding the encrypted assignment. (I guess those students never used a test case to verify that their program _actually_ was working correctly!?)

    I guess it pays to pay attention to the expected data. ;-)

  47. 38 57' 6.5"N, 77 8' 44"W by payndz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey! I put those co-ordinates into Google Earth, and it crashed! Damn CIA spooks will do anything to protect their secrets...

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  48. Typo by wildsurf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cryptographers of the world, untie!

    --
    Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  49. Don't have to be there by glengineer · · Score: 1

    During an interview, the sculptor specifically stated that you do NOT have to visit the site to solve the puzzle. He said that you only need the letters of the encrypted text, and that is widely available online.

    --
    Evil Overlord Rule #86. I will make sure that my doomsday device is up to code and properly grounded.
  50. define "wrong" by amigabill · · Score: 1

    Sculptor Sanborn announced this week that everyone had gotten it wrong, because of a mistake on the art piece.

    Did everyone really get it wrong? Seems they may have all have solved the problem they were presented with, even if this wasn't the problem which was intended. So they may not have solved what was intended, but Sanborn's mistake doesn't automatically make everyone else a failure... If I take a math test that asks me what 4 * 7 is and I answer 28, but they say "oops, we really meant to ask what was 12 / 3", is my answer to the question "wrong"?