Slashdot Mirror


Linspire Announces Freespire Distribution

LinuxScribe writes "Is the world ready for another community Linux distro a là Fedora and openSUSE? We're about to find out, as Linspire used the Desktop Linux Summit to announce a community-driven version of Linspire, to be called Freespire. But here's the twist, Freespire will come in two flavors: a completely open source version and a version that includes all of the fully-licensed proprietary apps, drivers, and codecs in Linspire."

223 comments

  1. *~shudder~* by showardkid · · Score: 4, Funny

    You mixed that up, man. There's an accent on 'a' and not on 'la'. It's "à la". Yes, I'm a Foreign Language nazi.

    --
    Do, do not, or delegate to someone else: there is no try.
    1. Re:*~shudder~* by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, I'm a Foreign Language nazi.

      But I thought that à la was French, not German... :-/

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:*~shudder~* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP would be referring to the term "Grammar Nazi"...

    3. Re:*~shudder~* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking dumb ass. My keyboard doesn't have that key.

    4. Re:*~shudder~* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he may have been joking

    5. Re:*~shudder~* by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

      You are correct. "a là" means "belonging to there" whereas "à la" means "in this style." Quite different.

      --

      You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    6. Re:*~shudder~* by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      Oh, hey man. Is your bro Godwin here yet, I heard he wanted to say something?

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    7. Re:*~shudder~* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, "a là" is ungrammatical in any context. If it had a meaning, it would be as you said, but it never arises in French. (I'm a native French speaker.)

    8. Re:*~shudder~* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better capitalize that "N" then.

    9. Re:*~shudder~* by Inner_Child · · Score: 1
      But I thought that à la was French, not German... :-/
      What a difference a few months could have made.
      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
  2. Re:now more than 500 distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First post and most useless post. Even the trolls will have something more constructive to say.

    There is nothing wrong with choices
    There are only a small few popular distros really
    Linspire, though not the most popular, has been around longer than many, such as ubuntu.

    Mext time try and let your little brain's cogs turn a few fractions of a radian before posting.

  3. Free as in capable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm curious if this will end up with a more Windows-replacement centric Linux system or just one that departs from the Free Software Foundation's picture of what the GPL should embrace.

    Second, I always felt that a good Web browser at its core should just be a simple file viewer but it has departed pretty far from that - it would be nice to have my Linux partition able to use/open/view as many or nearly as many types of files that my Windows machine can.

    1. Re:Free as in capable by slugstone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have always found any linux/unix system can read more types of files and file systems. Playing games does not count as a file.

  4. To beat an analogy to death by uberjoe · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should call them Beerspire and Speechspire.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

    1. Re:To beat an analogy to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Slashdot, dead analogies beat YOU!

    2. Re:To beat an analogy to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure you beat that analogy to the pain, not to the death.

    3. Re:To beat an analogy to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beerspire

      The name alone will get supporters.

    4. Re:To beat an analogy to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The name alone will get supporters.

      No, you're thinking of Jockspire

  5. I wonder what's up by Illbay · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Fedora was established as the bleeding-edge benchmark for development of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

    Linspire, in contrast, is rather staid and unadventurous. One questions whether a "bleeding edge" is even required for that distro.

    So what is the purpose of "Freespire"?

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:I wonder what's up by linvir · · Score: 1

      Linspire doesn't want to be all smelly and corporate. A little bit of embracing the 'community' is welcome, as it makes them a lot more Open Source.

    2. Re:I wonder what's up by soupdevil · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course, the purpose is to get us talking about them again, since much of the buzz lately has been about Ubuntu and Fedora. And with simple scripts available to add proprietary codecs to Ubuntu, there are few to no reasons to pay for Linspire, and pay again for access to their library of OSS apps.

    3. Re:I wonder what's up by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
      So what is the purpose of "Freespire"?
      I have always thought Linspire was trying to position itself as the Linux easy enough for grandma to use. Whether they had succeeded, and whether they were the only valid option, is arguable. What is clear is that, by asking for money up front, they were putting themselves as a disadvantage, compared to such desktop distros as Ubuntu, Mandriva and Slackware.

      Freespire is designed to get Linspire onto people's machines so they can sell their CNR service. I reserve judgment on whether it will work, but it seems a plausible business plan.

    4. Re:I wonder what's up by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

      "embracing the community" is a good way to get smelly.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    5. Re:I wonder what's up by Kangburra · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Mandriva


      are always asking for money. If you want package you must join our club, today you can join for just $99
      --
      Common sense is not so common
    6. Re:I wonder what's up by SavvyPlayer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And with simple scripts available to add proprietary codecs to Ubuntu, there are few to no reasons to pay for Linspire, and pay again for access to their library of OSS apps.
      Few reasons, but good reasons: Freespire will have done its due diligence to ensure your codecs are properly licensed, whether free as in speech, beer, or crack. 'Free as in Beer' may yet prove the gateway drug of the software world.
    7. Re:I wonder what's up by the_point · · Score: 1
      So what is the purpose of "Freespire"?
      Compeeting with Ubuntu.
    8. Re:I wonder what's up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, can we stop bashing people just because "they are *gasp* trying to make money"?

    9. Re:I wonder what's up by DrXym · · Score: 1
      The question concerning these scripts, is why doesn't Ubuntu offer to install codecs during installation? Even if the codecs don't reside physically on the CD, that doesn't mean that Ubuntu can't add an extra source or two to its package list and offer to install anything it finds there as the last step of installation. That could include Sun's JDK, Nvidias display driver, codecs etc. etc.

      Trying to get these things is a huge pain in the butt, and doubtless confirms to many people that Linux is "hard". When in fact Linux is merely as "hard" as the distribution is unhelpful. Ubuntu is meant to be a friendly distro so it doesn't have much of an excuse.

    10. Re:I wonder what's up by harrkev · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the leaders at Ubuntu have taken a hard-line stance on both the GPL and not doing anything that would get them or any of their users in any sort of legal trouble (including DMCA and patents).

      And this is why Automatix was born. It works well and turns Ubuntu into something truly usable on a day-to-day basis.

      I wish that Ubuntu was more pragmatic, and included the "Automatix" stuff on a 2nd optional CD. If you don't want the CD, then don't download it an burn it. But Automatix does essentially the same thing, and the worst problem is that all of the packages have to be downloaded (instad of being included on a single .iso), which can take over an hour for an install even on a fast cable connection.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    11. Re:I wonder what's up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the reason is they are not allowed to even include a link to the packages which are illegal (in the US or wherever else it might apply). I think the best solution is to have two install cds, one with without the packages that are illegal in some countries, and one for the countries where those packages are okay to use.

    12. Re:I wonder what's up by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      Most interesting stuff is that Dapper includes now perfectly working Gstreamer 0.10, which includes gstreamer-plugins-bad and gstreamer-plugins-uggly and ffmpeg-gstreamer, which enables play divx/wma/quicktime prioritary stuff. Enabling them is very easy for advanced user and could be improved with giving a choice to enable those codecs when user can't play them.

      Most of Automatix stuff is not needed anymore.

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    13. Re:I wonder what's up by DrXym · · Score: 1
      For a very long time, crypto was supposedly "illegal" due to US export controls. It didn't stop the likes of Debian & Linux kernel (or rather overseas volunteers) from hosting crypto packages overseas so they were easily obtainable. I would argue that this situation is little different. For example Videolan.org bundles just about every codec (and decss) into a single downloadable. Apparently it's okay since videolan.org resides in France. What's to stop Ubuntu from linking to a site that also resides in France? Or linking to a site which happens to redirect to a site in France?

      Ubuntu doesn't even need to mention codecs or anything else by name. They're merely linking to a 3rd party site and reading a manifesr. If someone happens to put codec packages in that manifest, how is Ubuntu infringing? They're not even linking to copyright / patented files. They're just loading a package list.

    14. Re:I wonder what's up by mellon · · Score: 1

      The problem is that if _you_ download a decss library, _you_ are theoretically in trouble. _You_ are theoretically violating the DMCA. The Ubuntu guys don't want to expose you to that risk unknowingly. So they make you jump through hoops to do it. Which is as it should be, until at some point in the (hopefully not far-distant) future the DMCA is repealed.

  6. As in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    these shots?

  7. All Priase the Great à la by fmita · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Infidels! It's à la, not a là.

  8. I don't get the point by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Yet another community-maintained Debian-based distro? Why in the world would I want to choose this over (U|K)buntu? Debian based, but with a bastardized broken KDE... sounds super!

    And before anyone says anything about CNR (click and run), I will point you to klik - free open and wonderful, and not tied to any distro.

    Enough said.

    1. Re:I don't get the point by Bruha · · Score: 1

      What's broken about their KDE.. last time I checked it worked fine. Please elaborate.

    2. Re:I don't get the point by jambarama · · Score: 1


      I think the neat thing here is that it'll have everything by default. (K)Ubuntu is about as easy as anything gets, unless you want to play an mp3, dvd, or anything covered by the w32 codec pack such as wmv. Then you have to grab additional software.

      Yes it is really easy to get that software - if you know what you are doing (or you know how to google). But a lot of people don't. This distro is novel in that it will include support for all that stuff by default (OpenSuSE and Fedora don't include support by default either).

      I feel totally comfortable with my grandma (or other non-techie user) using an easy distro like (K)Ubuntu - IF I set it up. If I can't set it up for them, I'm going to start suggesting Freespire - rather than Ubuntu plus all the apt-get (or synaptic) commands you need to run to get a fully functional desktop.

      PS This isn't to bash other distros not including this stuff. I wouldn't include it either either if I decided what goes into them, this stuff is expensive to give away for free.

    3. Re:I don't get the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My main concern is to get ALL the wmv codec..s
      This means wmv-9 which is not part of gthe mplayer repository.

      Does Ubuntu have that - I mean CAN you download it?
      Does Linspire?

    4. Re:I don't get the point by brunes69 · · Score: 1
      Seems to be there for me:

      jasonk@bigslick:~$ ls /usr/lib/win32 | grep wmv wmv8ds32.ax
      wmv9dmod.dll
      wmvadvd.dll
      wmvdmod.dll
      wmvds32.ax

      This is Ubuntu Dapper.

    5. Re:I don't get the point by mikefe · · Score: 1

      Are those files in a package from Ubuntu?

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    6. Re:I don't get the point by flosofl · · Score: 1

      Are those files in a package from Ubuntu?

      Yep.

      I just installed Dapper Beta last night and installed them from the "Multiverse" repository. You do have to select the channel in "Install Media" in the Software Properties, but they are there (along with mp3). You can also uncomment the appropriate lines in /etc/apt/sources.list

      Last count, there are 18000+ packages available thru synaptic with the Main, Universe, and Multiverse(binary and source)

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    7. Re:I don't get the point by FST777 · · Score: 1

      Why in the world would I want to choose this over (U|K)buntu?

      I don't know what Kbuntu is, but you might want to choose Freespire because it uses KDE instead of Ubuntu's Gnome. Or you might want to look at Kubuntu.

      Some people might go with Freespire to check out the features of Linspire. I'm pretty sure there will be an upgrade path somewhere. It could well be that there are non-geek humans out there that want to try Linux, but also want corporate support backing it. Novell (SUSE) and RedHat have had reasonable success since they brought a community-driven version on the market (allthough that's not the point of Fedora, but hey...).

      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
    8. Re:I don't get the point by cortana · · Score: 1

      Those files are not part of Ubuntu.

      You can find out which package they came from with "dpkg --search /usr/lib/win32/wmv9dmod.dll"; then find out where that package came from with "apt-cache policy packagename".

    9. Re:I don't get the point by brunes69 · · Score: 1
      They come from the cupherfunk repo

      ftp://cipherfunk.org dapper/main Packages

      This is the same place anyone with Debian gets their w32codecs package. And since the GP specifically mntioned that it doesn't ship with w32codecs, I assume he has it installed....

      Maybe it is only in Dapper and not Breezy yet or something.

    10. Re:I don't get the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um.. Why doesn't klik have firefox?

    11. Re:I don't get the point by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      The point is that Linspire is the only distro that acknowledges that Linux should be more friendly towards commercial software.

  9. Mod Company -1: Troll by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's not forget what we're dealing with here. This is a company with a known history of pulling whatever attention getting stunt it can, including starting with a name of "Lindows" that got shot down by MS. All along, their goal has been simple: try to find a buck out of distributing open source software, including making their "Click and Run" store of mostly freely available apps.

    This is about as newsworthy as a paid-software vendor announcing a free trial edition that replaces all the "good stuff" with reminders to buy the full version.

    1. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Actually, they *won* the MS battle- they were paid several million to change their name.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Yup. Their business model seems to go like this.

      1) Come up with a brand name.
      2) Sell a bunch of stuff that's already free.
      3) Profit.

      Now they've added.

      1) Come up with a brand name.
      2) Sell a bunch of stuff that's already free.
      2.5) Get people to update what little value added we put in there for free.
      3) Profit.

    3. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by linvir · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't get it. Why do people always piss on Linspire for selling Free Software, when so many others had already been doing it for so long? Is it because of a perceived lack of contribution back into Open Source on the part of Linspire? From a slightly biased Wikipedia article:
      Linspire has contributed millions of dollars in direct funds and contributed code to several open source projects. For a company of Linspire's size, their contributions have been quite admirable. With very few exceptions, all code that is developed by Linspire is contributed back to the open source community. Linspire is also the lead maintainer for important projects such as Nvu, Lsongs, Lphoto, and an important contributor to other projects such as Mozilla Firefox, Gaim, Reiser FS, and many others.
    4. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by chris_eineke · · Score: 5, Insightful
      try to find a buck out of distributing open source software
      Yeah, like Redhat, SuSE, Mandriva, etc.

      Tell me: When has selling Free / Open Source Software become a sin against humanity?
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    5. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that it's really easy to use apt as normal and they don't try to stop you doing it at all. And click-n-run apps are tweaked versions which have been worked on by Linspire to make the GUIs more consistent / user friendly etc. It's a legitimate service aimed at non-geeks, does have some value, and they don't force you to use it.

    6. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      1) Come up with a brand name.
      2) Sell a bunch of stuff that's already free.
      2.5) Get people to update what little value added we put in there for free.
      3) Profit.

      And that's different from any other vendor (exclusing support only vendors) that sells an Open Source product how?
    7. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      I have to admit, it's not much different. At least RedHat has full-time programmers and adds something to the scenario.

    8. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I didn't mean to sound that rude about the matter.

      Keep doing whatever it is you guys do, Linspire :-D

    9. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now I'm running windows, but my main computer's running Fedora 4. Not dual boot.
      What kind of asses mod the post
      "Actually, they *won* the MS battle- they were paid several million to change their name."
      a troll?
      The kind of asses that don't know it's true, I hope.
      I bought my bro Xandros at CompUSA to support the community and support OSS on my Windows machine. But let's not squash the truth when someone tells it, even if you don't like Linspire. Come on.

    10. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by Arker · · Score: 2

      There's nothing wrong with selling free software. There IS something wrong with confusing proprietary mushware, like the drivers and codecs they distribute, with free software. Big difference.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    11. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by taupter · · Score: 1

      Kopete is benefited too. Linspire hires Matt Rogers to work on it.

    12. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by linvir · · Score: 1

      Why? Do feel free to explain.

    13. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by Redwin · · Score: 1

      Tell me: When has selling Free / Open Source Software become a sin against humanity?

      In early 2007 when it is classed as supporting terrorism and hurting big businesses. :-p

      --
      Warning, comments may not have been passed by the sanity department of my brain.
    14. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linspire has 20 full time software engineers.

    15. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by rhendershot · · Score: 1

      Troll??? Good Gawd, Man... where's your sense of humor? Not only the funniest thing I've read in this article so far, but possibly prophetic.

    16. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I don't know, it sure looks like linspire contributes to OSS to me.

    17. Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by crossmr · · Score: 1

      "Click and Run" is honestly not that bad of a deal, and not a bad value for someone who isn't that familiar with Linux.

      Remember the target audience. One of the big things that keeps many people away from Linux, including myself in the beginning, was the fact that you couldn't just install stuff as easily as you could with Windows.

      Having a bunch of easily accessible pre-built applications that you can access with a single click is a huge plus for many people, and for only $20/year. If you purchase any try and by applications under Windows, thats only a single app.

      I admittedly did not have a great experience with this the first time around, but when they release their next big update, I may check it out again and see if it fairs any better. I'd have no problem recommending this to the less-than-literate computer users I know if it shapes up.

  10. Hmm... Nice by Psykechan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looks like Linspire is planning on giving away the razor and trying to sell the blades for $20 a year.

    On the other hand, at least the "creating a user account so you don't run everyhing as root" step isn't optional in Freespire. This "new" distribution is something that might be a good first step for newbie Linux users that want certain features (DVD/MP3 playback) immediately after install.

    1. Re:Hmm... Nice by LocoMan · · Score: 1

      I have to say I agree with that of a good first step... at least I know I would have liked for this one to be available a week ago after spending the last 4 days trying to get the nvidia drivers working on ubuntu (just got them working about an hour ago.. but I won't claim full victory until it keeps working tomorrow night, wouldn't be the first time I get them working only to die the next day... :) ). This is my first post from within linux, anyway... :)

    2. Re:Hmm... Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, at least the "creating a user account so you don't run everyhing as root" step isn't optional in Freespire.



      Interesting. This was my main gripe against Linspire, so maybe this Freespire will be worth looking at after all. Any idea why they have made this change? I suppose the real question is why they did it the way they did in Linspire in the first place.

    3. Re:Hmm... Nice by rajafarian · · Score: 1

      good job! no, really, I mean it.

  11. Oh My Gosh by cosmotron · · Score: 2

    On DistroWatch, there are around 600 distributions, how can people want to make any more?

    --
    Ryan - http://www.thecosmotron.com/
    1. Re:Oh My Gosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah. There should just be one, really good distro. I'm gonna go over to Distrowatch and start a new "one-size-fits-all" distro to combat this too-many-distros problem.

    2. Re:Oh My Gosh by linvir · · Score: 3, Informative
      Man, every time I think Slashdot has moved on from this, it pops back up.

      If there are 600 distros, surely you have to accept that people are finding plenty of reasons to create new ones? Surely you don't think you can just declare that they are only faking this need or that they shouldn't do it?

      It's easy (if a little arrogant) to look at the total and dismiss the effort as needless, but it's much harder to go through each distro and show that it doesn't fulfill some niche or need.

      I picked a load of unpopular ones at random:

      • FeeSBie
        An Italian FreeBSD group who wanted a personalizable FreeBSD LiveCD.
      • Aurox
        An internationalised Red-Hat derivative with better multimedia support.
      • Helix
        An improved Knoppix LiveCD for network security testing and forensics.
      • AGNULA
        A completely free Linux system, coordinated by the EC and devoted to multimedia work
      • Nonux
        A Dutch LiveCD/install cd designed to integrate easily into Windows-based offices.
    3. Re:Oh My Gosh by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      If anyone didn't understand that, most of the distributions are for localization. This is a good thing. What does Freespire bring to the table in regards to this? Nothing. I'm glad we cleared that up.

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    4. Re:Oh My Gosh by linvir · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to read the article, that's fine. But at least read the summary. It's a community distro that "includes all of the fully-licensed proprietary apps, drivers, and codecs in Linspire". So far community distros generally haven't had the balls to do this.

  12. No offense but... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Insightful

    weren't the add-ons the ones that gave Linspire the viability to ACTUALLY replace Windows? Without them, Linspire is naked, and I don't think they have the experience to handle a "plain vanilla" distro.

    So if I had to choose between Freespire and say, Ubuntu Dapper, I'd choose Dapper all the way.

  13. Nice... by advs89 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think I'll be the first to say that I like this idea.





    Well, I don't actually... I just thought it would be cool to be the first to say that.

    -Advs89

    --
    Rirelobql xabjf gung EBG-13 vf gur yrnfg frpher rapelcgvba rire, ohg jbhyq lbh jnfgr lbhe gvzr npghnyyl qrpelcgvat vg???
    1. Re:Nice... by muszek · · Score: 1

      almost like a first post :)

  14. It's non-standard by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Last time I looked at Linspire, (which, given, was a year ago), their KDE was non-standard, modified like nuts. This caused numerous problems when building your own packages from source against theirs.

    1. Re:It's non-standard by linvir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To build apps from source in Linspire is to miss its point completely.

    2. Re:It's non-standard by Blackbrain · · Score: 1
      To build apps from source in Linspire is to miss its point completely.

      Ummmm....then the point of a community supported Linspre is what again?
      --
      Where would we be if Wheel had hid her round rock in a cave instead of showing everyone how it rolls?
    3. Re:It's non-standard by Kangburra · · Score: 1
      Ummmm....then the point of a community supported Linspre is what again?


      To make them seem more friendly and of course get more publicity for their commercial products.
      --
      Common sense is not so common
  15. Re:now more than 500 distros by llamaluvr · · Score: 1

    Dude, I'll take the huge pile of manure any day. I can avoid the big pile; but I'd keep stepping on the little turds and messing up my shoes.

    --
    Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
  16. This is good by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    More distributions is better. I think that if every distro does one thing right, with a thousand distros, we're in great shape. Linus's Law of "With enough eyes, every bug is shallow" also works on features. If one distro does a feature really well, then everyone else can adopt it. That's the beauty of the GPL, LGPL, and BSD licenses, anyone else in OSS can copy it or re-do it. Therefore, adding another distro or two is good.

    Confusion is not really an issue, because anyone looking at Linux will be getting a friend who has a favorite distro, or will have a computer vendor with only one or two choices, which will likely be a choice between Freespire and Linspire or Fedora and Red Hat

    1. Re:This is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "...if every distro does one thing right, with a thousand distros, we're in great shape..."

      Not if they're all also doing whole lot of things wrong. If someone really wants to do a useful new distro, one that just collects the *good* parts of the other distros and dumps all the cruft and bloat would be pretty cool.

  17. I don't know about you ... by alienpeach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... but I'm actually fairly interested in this. Personally, I've wondered when I'd be able to use a both free and legal DVD player in the US.

    1. Re:I don't know about you ... by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > Personally, I've wondered when I'd be able to use a both free and legal DVD player in the US.

      Exactly. While all the FSF absolutists will flame away I say it is about darned time. Of course I wouldn't switch distros JUST for the DVD player or any of the other closed bits, but if I could buy em and run them on my preferred distro I'd get a P.O. to em.

      You see, it is only by being willing to compromise (the minimum I can get away with) on the Free principles have I been able to deploy a linux based desktop into a public library setting. Just one example, we use Crossover Office to get IE running. IE isn't negotiable, the only question is Crossover, VMWare or which other method I was going to use to get it running. Too many sites just don't work any other way. For example, assume I'd brazened my way past all the other objections and deployed without IE. Last year wne the Katrina refugees flooded in and discovered they couldn't file an application with FEMA from our labs I'd have been tasked with getting XP installed on am post haste. Especially when Rita hit us directly, making it OUR patrons that we wouln't have been able to help get disaster assistance.

      We don't have much of a need to play video DVDs thankfully, but it doesn't go down all that well when I explain that it would be illegal to do it. People just can't believe it and I really don't have the time to explain the complicated legal probems involved. At home I use libdecss and say "screw em if they don't like it." Hell, I have even mentioned it in protest letters to elected officials. But I won't deploy it at work, the legal liability is just too great. This isn't a problem Free Software can solve. We already HAVE the code but there isn't any path to lagalizing it. Same for Windows Media, Real, etc.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    2. Re:I don't know about you ... by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I've wondered when I'd be able to use a both free and legal DVD player in the US.

      As long as the MPAA is around, your chances at such a player are slim to none. :)

    3. Re:I don't know about you ... by Cthefuture · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know what should be illegal? Making a public site for refugees that only works on one OS and Browser. That's should be criminal.

      Buy Microsoft and run IE or we won't help you. Holy crap, my taxes pay for this?!

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    4. Re:I don't know about you ... by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Making a public site for refugees that only works on one OS and Browser. That's should be criminal.

      Well the flames they got over it has caused them to finally correct their site. But that is just one down and thousands to go, all too many of them government agencies that have idiot MCSE types designing web portals. The point is that we have to be able to provide a solution that allows patrons to get to IE only sites. It just isn't something that we can compromise on. So a 100% Free Software stack isn't possible. And once you admit that you can go for what you can actually do. Linux on the desktop can work if you are willing to drop in several closed parts. But things are getting better, it was only a couple of years ago that Office was just as much a 'must have' item.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    5. Re:I don't know about you ... by TechOgre · · Score: 2, Informative

      I only use IE for Windows updates and FireFox for everything else. I've never had an issue accessing any Canadian Federal, Provincial, or Municipal web site. AFAIK, government web sites (here in Canada, anyway) are legislated to be cross platform (i.e. not use any browser specific code).

      --
      We may, indeed, share 98% of our genes with chimpanzees, but then, we share 47% with cabbages.
    6. Re:I don't know about you ... by bmalia · · Score: 1

      Bubba: Whaddaya in fer?
      James: I made a public website that only worked for one OS and browser.
      Bubba: Huh? You sure do have a purdy mouth.

      Covering 90+% of the browser market in a pinch isn't criminal. FEMA, like all goverment agencies, has a lot of red tape and EVERYTHING must be approved before it goes public. I am sure someone just decided to concentrate on IE first and do the other browsers later. Katrina refugee's would have bitched a lot more if they had to wait around for a web application to be tested to work on every OS and Browser.

      --
      There's no place like ~/
  18. Re:now more than 500 distros by abscissa · · Score: 5, Funny

    The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

  19. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a good thing. One of my major gripes with Linspire was the fact that they did not have any option like this.

    I do not see how this is a bad move at all.

  20. Plan 9 is better by bizzynut · · Score: 4, Funny

    Plan 9 offers a completely usable, modern desktop. So there is no need for Linspire.

    1. Re:Plan 9 is better by linguae · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Plan 9 offers a completely usable, modern desktop.

      Plan 9 is a research operating system. I like Plan 9's architecture, file system, and many other ideas. Plan 9's goal is to further extend the notion of Unix's "everything is a file" idea. Everything, even the windowing system (rio), is a file. Plan 9 also vastly simplifies systems programming (compared to Unix). Plan 9 is a wonderful research operating system that I would love to tinker with and explore.

      However, it isn't a desktop replacement for Windows/OS X users or even for Linux or BSD users. There is no office suites (or even a word processor unless you love text editors and TeX or troff), no browser on the scale of Firefox or Konqueror, no music/video players, nothing that 99% of the world uses with a computer. Besides, I'm pretty sure that users are more comfortable using this desktop, these desktops, or especially this desktop before they use this desktop. For even the most ardent *nix hackers or computer scientists, Plan 9 would be something they played with on the side (kind of like Minix or an operating system that they're working on), and Linux/BSD is their main OS.

      I like Plan 9, but it isn't a desktop OS; it's a research OS. However, Plan 9 is a very innovative operating system; I wish that the major OS sellers (I'm talking to you, Apple and Microsoft) would be a bit more cutting-edge in the architecture of their OSes rather than just appearances (even though Apple has done very well since the bought NeXT; they have a hybrid kernel, for one). Plan 9, L4, the MIT exokernel project, and other projects look very interesting, and I would like to see them in use.

    2. Re:Plan 9 is better by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      I find your ideas intruiging and i wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    3. Re:Plan 9 is better by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Here, I have a riddle for you. What's the difference between a softball that hits you square in the face and that joke?

      Got it yet? No? Here's the answer:

      The joke went over your head.

      Sorry.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  21. And what if they hadn't changed their name? by bflong · · Score: 3, Funny

    Would that give us freedows?

    --
    Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
    1. Re:And what if they hadn't changed their name? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I guess that would make Michael Robertson the "Freedow Bandeedow".

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:And what if they hadn't changed their name? by tourvil · · Score: 1
      Would that give us freedows?

      And more importantly, does Code Monkey like Freedows?

    3. Re:And what if they hadn't changed their name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it surprising that nobody has yet mentioned that there actually was a windows replacement project called freedows several years back... I believe the reactOS people even exchanged some code with them...

    4. Re:And what if they hadn't changed their name? by Shadyman · · Score: 1

      Mmm... Cornchips!

    5. Re:And what if they hadn't changed their name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guys, its already there: www.freedows.com

  22. openSUSE by houghi · · Score: 1
    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  23. Evolution by the+darn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lindows -> Linspire -> Freespire
    So, if they hadn't been forced to change, would this new distro be called Freedows? The mascot could have been the Freedow Bandido!

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un post.
    1. Re:Evolution by linvir · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone else remember when someone made a distro named "freespire"? There was some confusion with Linspire, so Linspire gave Five-Oh away for free for a while and Freespire had to change their name (I think they called themselves "squiggle"). Whatever happened to SquiggleOS?

    3. Re:Evolution by ndruw1 · · Score: 0

      Code Monkey like Freedows

    4. Re:Evolution by crazyprogrammer · · Score: 1

      didn't they change it to Linxxxx for a short spell before changing again to Linspire?

      --
      "the fax machine is nothing but a waffle iron with a phone attached to it." - Grandpa Simpson
    5. Re:Evolution by Godji · · Score: 2, Funny

      What, are you suggesting they call the community version "Freexxxx"? But that already exists! It's all over the Internet!!

    6. Re:Evolution by lord_rob+the+only+on · · Score: 1

      Lol :) Wish I had modpoints

    7. Re:Evolution by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      Well, there is a "Freedows" here in Brazil. It is a distro whose main purpose is to imitate windows. And it does it very well. It runs (or at least used to, when I read about it) IE under wine as its default browser. As root.

  24. *yawn* by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    YAFLD... Dime a dozen at this point.

    If it survives a year, then we can talk about it.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  25. Not everything is available binary.... by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many of the hottest and newest apps on SourceForge and Freshmeat don't have binary releaases. And if they aren't popular enough to get packaged by Linspire themselves you're SOL and have to make due with a shitty equivalent, or even worse nothing at all.

    If I wanted to put up with sub-par software selection I would just use windows.

    1. Re:Not everything is available binary.... by linvir · · Score: 1
      Like I said, you don't get Linspire. You're trying to judge it on terms in which it doesn't aim to compete at all.

      I did like the joke that you ended on though. Very clever.

    2. Re:Not everything is available binary.... by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      linspire is "a shitty equivalent".

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  26. Here's the twist... but it's not a new twist by Ankh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Freespire will come in two flavors: a completely open source version and a version that includes all of the fully-licensed proprietary apps, drivers, and codecs in Linspire

    Well, maybe, but they're hardly the first to do that: Mandriva (Mandrake) has been doing it for a long time, with the commercial version including extra drivers as well as applications. Probably others have too.

    What makes a community effort stand or fall is how well the outside people are integrated, and how much voice they have.

    One reason I the distribution I do is that it attracts both seasoned programmers and newcomers, and there's a good chance I can show my laptop to people and say, here, this is what it's like, you can use the same as me. It's not clear that I'll be doing that with Linspire, nor that a community-based version that's not as good will in fact help me. Who will it help?

    --
    Live barefoot!
    free engravings/woodcuts
  27. Ubuntuspire... by blankoboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Too little too late. Linspire sees Ubuntu becoming the popular girl at school so now she'll sleep with anyone for free.

    1. Re:Ubuntuspire... by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can I have her number?

    2. Re:Ubuntuspire... by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      And the sad thing is, geeks still won't get laid.

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    3. Re:Ubuntuspire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with anyone but YOU.

    4. Re:Ubuntuspire... by KingJoshi · · Score: 2, Informative
      Can I have her number?

      I'll do even better, I'll give you her address! Right now, she's sleeping with a lot of people though. They're making sure she's clean so if you're worried, you can wait a bit :p

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    5. Re:Ubuntuspire... by morie · · Score: 1

      sorry, but the "she" seems to refer to Linspire.

      Please try again.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  28. Freespire = give up your freedom for a driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Freespire: A Linux Distro For When You Couldn't Care Less About Freedom (http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060424 164142296)

    ---
    Stefano Spinucci

    1. Re:Freespire = give up your freedom for a driver by maxume · · Score: 1

      Anybody claiming to support the ideology expressed in that article probably shouldn't be using a (modern?) computer at all. Neither of Intel or AMD is up to the standard.

      Also, all seven people that actually adhere to that ideology by never watching or listening to anything should just go start their own society and let everyone who thinks DRM is silly but don't really care about it(DVD watchers in other words) get on with not caring about it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Freespire = give up your freedom for a driver by jb.hl.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look, for the last friggin time, desktop users don't care about high falutin' ideas of freedom. They want to watch DVDs, play MP3s and watch those oh-so-funny videos of people falling over on eBaumsWorld. Going on a rampage against such functionality because it isn't under the GPL is bullshit, and yet another example of certain sections of the Linux community placing ideology above functionality.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    3. Re:Freespire = give up your freedom for a driver by mellon · · Score: 1

      More to the point, if you really care about freedom, you want as many people as possible running Linux, because when Linux becomes mainstream, it gains clout. Vendors start to *care* about Linux. Right now they don't care very much. This attitude of "I want everything my way, now," is understandable, but not effective.

  29. This is a good thing. by MsGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For people who are used to the Windows way of doing things, the deliberately simplified Linspire way of doing things is a very good thing. It's good that they are "getting religion" about the inadvisability of running as root. And the ultimate best thing of all might be CNR technology being opened up. Imagine alternative Free CNR repositories! With CNR 100% opened up, there will be no stopping people from creating a F/OSS-only CNR repository that people who might not want to get chained to Linspire, Inc. might use instead. This was something the Lycoris community was trying to do with IRIS, Lycoris' answer to CNR.

    With Lycoris by and large a dead issue, a Freespire might be just the ticket for folks who are just not ready for Ubuntu/Kubuntu yet.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:This is a good thing. by linguizic · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...a Freespire might be just the ticket for folks who are just not ready for Ubuntu/Kubuntu yet.

      Who are these people? I would like to meet one of them. I love Ubuntu and it's my distro of choice, but let's face it: it's almost the fisher price "my first distro" of distros. The only reason why someone wouldn't be ready for it is b/c the name "linux" attached to it scares them.

      --
      Does this sig remind you of Agatha Christie?
  30. Mod parent +1 funny!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was a good one.

  31. Re:Plan 9 is better - rioutous!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How can you not mod this one as completely hilarious!!! Plan 9 http://cm.bell-labs.com/plan9/&e=9797/ doesn't have a functional web browser. "The best way to get a fully supported web browser under plan9 is to use the vnc client to connect to a linux or Windows box. This performs very well if used over a fast network connection." The bunny logo is amazingly cute.

  32. I really miss Lindows by r00t · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I so wish this had gone to trial, especially since the appeals court ruled that the jury would get to decide if "windows" was a generic term back when Microsoft first started using it. Killing the Windows trademark would be lots of fun.

    Not that I'd want to see "Macrohard Windows", "Slack Windows", "Brown Dog Windows", "iWindows", "eWindows", "Turbo Windows", "IBM Windows", "Debian GNU/Windows", "Windows for Playgroups", "WindowsBSD", "ClearWindows", "Sunny Windows"...

    Aw, yes I would. :-)

    1. Re:I really miss Lindows by hawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It predates the web, so I haven'tfound it by casual searching (and am not interested enough in proving it to spend the needed time with paper), but at the time, Microsoft made a big deal about the trademark being "Microsoft Windows" rather than "Windows." Both the Apple II (at memory locations 12-15, iirc) and the TRS-80 (for its speech sy
      nthesizer, and possibly others), and I presume others that I don't recall (had Star been shown off by then?), used "windows" to describe a section of the screen. At the time of Windows 1.0, A trademark for "windows" *could not* have issued, as the term was already in common usage for the same concept (as well as the basic problem that a single common word cannot become a trademark)

      hawk, esq., an attorney but not giving legal advice

  33. There are some differences by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Many of the comments so far are to the effect that Freespire is just another "me too" free distro. I think a careful review shows that this is not quite true. The most important difference is that it comes, out of the box, with proprietary software when necessary because there is no viable free alternative. One can argue whether this is a good thing, but it is a difference.

    The indications are that they have thought this through quite thoroughly. The initial announcement and the web site are quite well done, I think. Considering it is still four months until the first beta, they have a good FAQ (here) which is worth a read. I intend to at least give it a try when the time comes.

    1. Re:There are some differences by Kangburra · · Score: 1
      Many of the comments so far are to the effect that Freespire is just another "me too" free distro. I think a careful review shows that this is not quite true. The most important difference is that it comes, out of the box, with proprietary software when necessary because there is no viable free alternative. One can argue whether this is a good thing, but it is a difference.


      It's not free, it's $20/year for the CNR system to install them.

      This is just like Mandriva and their club, didn't do much for them either.
      --
      Common sense is not so common
    2. Re:There are some differences by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
      It's not free, it's $20/year for the CNR system to install them.
      Read their announcement carefully. Much of the proprietary stuff is provided as standard and does not require the $20/year CNR system to download. I know such things as binary only drivers are not welcome, but to most users they are far better than nothing, and it seems Freespire is making such drivers directly available in their new distro.
    3. Re:There are some differences by Kangburra · · Score: 1

      "Freespire won't ship with software to allow DVD playback, though Carmony says users can buy it through Linspire's Click and Run (CNR) service."

      Quoted from here

      --
      Common sense is not so common
  34. Re:now more than 500 distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mext time try and let your little brain's cogs turn a few fractions of a radian before posting.

    damn, you were so close to making sence to. Oh well, Mext time you should do what you preach.

  35. Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asspire and Perspire

  36. Re:now more than 500 distros by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I say the more the merrier. Everybody keeps saying "oh why don't all the distros just come together and make a superdistro."

    I hate to break it to some, but a lot of the people working on improving the distros (as a hobby or a job) wouldn't be doing so if there was only 1, 3, or even 7 ultra-distros.

    Especially the hobbyists. They'd feel like their voice wouldn't be heard, that they are just another cog in the machinery, or the distro doesn't go in the direction they want (can 1 distro satisfy the goals of LPS or Gentoo or Ubuntu or DamnSmall and an Embedded linux all put together?) - and out they'd be out the door, working on something else that interests them.

    If someone wants monolithic, go Windows or MacOSX. For me, complaining about the amount of distros is like shitting on someone elses work...

    Though I can sympathize sometimes:)

  37. Han Solo: I've got a bad feeling about this... by suitepotato · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That sums up my take on this. It's like an Object Desktop version of Windows ME. Glitzy to start, but under the hood... (insert blood curdling newbie scream here...)

    I really don't see people who use this only because of nebulous dissatisfaction with Windows XP who don't even know what DOS and Windows 3.11 were (or even ME) learning to get under the hood and tinker and learn Linux. CNR sounds nice, but ultimately the bag of hammers Unix lineage cannot be avoided and will hit them in the face like a 2x4. Back to Windows.

    I think it is nice that they want to do this. I also think it is a sign of desperation. And an admission of how far Linux has to go before any sort of real desktop adoption. It took Apple to get a *nix OS on the desktop, not insignifigant backing. It's going to take the same sort of chutzpah and power and polish and support to get Linux out there. I don't see these people bringing that, Red Hat and Novell are rabidly corporate, and who's left to address the desktop?

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  38. Well, you see, this works... by hackwrench · · Score: 4, Funny

    French is a foreign language in Germany, too!

    1. Re:Well, you see, this works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol very nice

  39. First Beta in August 2006? by Merlynnus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    WTF? From their FAQ:


    30. When will Freespire be available for download?

    The first beta download for the community will be available around August, 2006.


    They're announcing a Linux distribution that won't be available for download in BETA for another 4 months?

    1. Re:First Beta in August 2006? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2, Funny
      They're announcing a Linux distribution that won't be available for download in BETA for another 4 months?
      Why not? We've been hearing about UserLinux every couple months for a few years, from a distribution that hasn't produced anything useful.
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:First Beta in August 2006? by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      You could probably miss off that last word of your comment, and it'd still be correct...

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  40. Re:now more than 500 distros by yoyhed · · Score: 1
    damn, you were so close to making sence to.

    What was that?

    --
    WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
  41. Very supprised by D0M1N8R · · Score: 1

    This is a great move IMO on Linspires part and I really dont understand why its being recieved so negatively. Use your preferred distro and be happy with it. Does everyone really feel a need to go bashing on another distro simply because its not the one that they use? To top things off Linspire is a big sponsor of a lot of the major open source projects but no props for that either. Most people seem to be pretty good at nothing but bashing. Please show me some big support coming from Ubuntu for some major open source projects.

    1. Re:Very supprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Your right. Distro bashing is unnecessary, but fun sometimes. ;-) So while your bashing Ubuntu about giving "big support" for "major open source projects", I'll let you in on a little secret. The Ubuntu developers are also the same Debian and Gnome developers. Whatever code they build upon in Ubuntu goes right back to Debian and Gnome and the OSS community at large. They don't throw money at projects, they are the projects. Oh, and by the way, Linspire is built on top of Debian, which is built by the Debian developers who are also the Ubuntu developers.

  42. Survive? by dhasenan · · Score: 1

    How can a Linux distribution fail to survive? Become unmaintained, with a negligible userbase and no package repositories active? That's the closest possible, and even then, someone could restore it. FLOSS is quite difficult to kill.

  43. not *all* the codecs are included... by hex1b · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...only the cheap ones. This was asked by a member of the audience and answered by the CEO during the presentation where the announcement was made today in San Diego. Specifically, no DVD licence.

    --
    Computer scientist, Software engineer.
  44. How many PCs can this crash? by crossmr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Linspire the only distrobution to lock up both VMware and the host system.
    I think that really says all that needs to be said.

    1. Re:How many PCs can this crash? by Homestar+Breadmaker · · Score: 1

      All that says is that you have bad hardware.

    2. Re:How many PCs can this crash? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Thats awful presumptious of you. Somehow when I've tried 3 or 4 distros in VMware and Linspire is the only one to even remotely have a problem, I'm going to blame Linspire.
      Not to mention just running it did something awful to my network which required the restarting of my routers. Never had a problem before or since.

      All that says is you're an ignorant troll.

    3. Re:How many PCs can this crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats awful presumptious of you. Somehow when I've tried 3 or 4 distros in VMware and Linspire is the only one to even remotely have a problem, I'm going to blame Linspire.

      Thus confirming that you're a twit.

      Not to mention just running it did something awful to my network which required the restarting of my routers.

      Riiiiight. It hosed your routers. Sure it did. Get a fucking clue.

    4. Re:How many PCs can this crash? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      After running it, I was getting absolutely terrible network performance. I ran ethereal and discovered both routers had suddenly begun flooding that PC with a ton of junk packets (TCP Window Zero) that seemed to mostly have to do with error control. I was getting 40-50 packets a second from each router. I never touched the linspire Virtual machine again and never had a problem again. Never had it before either.
      In the world of troubleshooting that points to a very clear problem with Linspire.
      Someone needs a clue, and they need to grow a set and stop posting as AC.

    5. Re:How many PCs can this crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sure. Didn't it eat your kitten as well?

    6. Re:How many PCs can this crash? by Homestar+Breadmaker · · Score: 1

      "In the world of troubleshooting that points to a very clear problem with Linspire."

      No, it points to a very clear problem with your "routers". Get a clue.

    7. Re:How many PCs can this crash? by Homestar+Breadmaker · · Score: 1

      And when I install linux and it kernel panics, even though win98 "worked fine", that means linux is the problem right? It has nothing to do with the bad RAM in the machine does it?

      Just because you only happened to trigger your problem when you had linspire installed, doesn't mean anything. The ONLY way for an OS running inside of VMware to cause the host OS to have problems is either a serious bug in the host OS, VMware, or hardware problems. It has nothing at all to do with the guest OS, and anyone with any common sense can see that.

    8. Re:How many PCs can this crash? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      When the problem only presents itself for a single time while Linspire is running and the network icon on Vmware is going off like some kind of spastic strobe light, there is clearly a problem with Linspire. Do you have something of value to add, or are you just trolling?

    9. Re:How many PCs can this crash? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      You're comparing apples and oranges. When I install FC5 and run Knoppix and Kanotix and none of them cause a single issue, yet as soon as I install Linspire its a gong show from the beginning, then yes there is a problem with Linspire.

      Especially considering Linspire is supposed to be "so easy your grandmother could run it". during the first install, something happened to the CnR application and it failed to initiliaze or update properly. It locked up Linspire before I could even try it. I reinstalled it and this time it updated, but while trying to explore the various software it caused the machine to lock again this time the whole deal. On reboot, I couldn't get any network access on this machine (others were fine) and found that both routers were slamming this PC with endless packets. It required a restart of both routers. That speaks very clearly to a problem with Linspire.
      Pull your head out of their ass.

    10. Re:How many PCs can this crash? by Homestar+Breadmaker · · Score: 1

      I don't give a rat's ass what you think your linspire box did, under no circumstance should your routers flood it with packets (you are making this bullshit up btw), that would be a flaw in the router. Duh?

    11. Re:How many PCs can this crash? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      I'm not making anything up. It seems TCP Zero window packets are used for error control. From the get-go I noticed that the network icon for Linspire in VMware was extremely active compared to say FC5 or any of the other distros I ran under it. Its obvious that Linspire was for some reason throwing garbage out onto the network which neither of the routers liked. After I restarted I had limited to no connectivity at all. Pages were constantly timing out, yet the laptop I had sitting beside me could access everything fine. I fired up ethereal and the packat count was skyrocketing for a PC that couldn't access anything on the network. Examining them showed hundreds of the packets hitting the machine. From both routers. It would be highly unlikely for both routers to behave in such a manner sine they're not the same model nor do they have the same firmware installed. But you keep Linspire up on that pedastel, I'm sure they appreciate the one fan.

      I'm not saying Linspire isn't a good idea, I'm saying it needs some work.

    12. Re:How many PCs can this crash? by Homestar+Breadmaker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, good strategy. Pretend I am a linspire fan because I have pointed out your blatent and obvious stupidity. It must be that I love linspire so much, and couldn't possibly be that I just have common sense. Linspire isn't a good idea, its a pile of crap. That doesn't change the fact that you are an idiot, your router story is utter nonsense, and if your host OS crashes, IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE GUEST OS.

    13. Re:How many PCs can this crash? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Obviously because you have to seem to make wild stretches to try and blame something else for the behaviour. All the eratic behaviour occured solely when Linspire was running and ceased once it was killed and the system restarted. The behaviour never presented itself before or after.

      Thats pretty hard to try and blame on some random hardware issue. You're trying to blame two different routers for producing identical behaviour and not Linspire which was clearly demonstrating odd network behaviour.

  45. No... since no one will use their distros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... they'll be named Widows

  46. I thought France was just occupied Germany! by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    I wasn't the first to say; someone or somthing(likely origin is France) known as "Guy Montag" said this.

    --
    without prejudice
  47. What about the hardware? by mikefe · · Score: 1

    If it wasn't for Linspire, there wouldn't be any cheap hardware available in large stores like Frys. Also by buying linspire computers you are supporting linux developers. What's wrong with that?

    Their latest ones are quiet low power (think Watts) AMD Geode based machines. Who else is fighting against the MS tax in the large stores?

    --
    There: Something at a specific location.
    Their: Owned by someone.
    Please make sure your english compiles.
    1. Re:What about the hardware? by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      So don't buy from the large stores? You could ALWAYS purchase an OS-less computer at a local non-corporate computer store.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:What about the hardware? by mikefe · · Score: 1

      So don't buy from the large stores? You could ALWAYS purchase an OS-less computer at a local non-corporate computer store.

      The point is that Linspire is moving people away from Microsoft that otherwise may not know about an alternative.

      The attack on MS needs to be done on all fronts, including the retail side that Linspire is targetting.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
  48. There's no market for more than 3 linux distro's by postmortem · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And two are clearly RedHat and SuSE. Third.. Debian or other uber-geek version. Today there are hundreds or thousands of Linux distributions. It is like hippie movement from 60s: every a**hole can make their own OS and put it on public servers. They got downloaded (new stuf!! check it out) and forgotten within week. IMO they better apply for jobs in RH, SuSE and bring in their ideas, and help Linux (that matters) as whole gain share. With years things just are going worse: more and more "unique" distros pulling in different directions. Quality over quanity. RedHat makes money - small distro companies don't.

  49. Shouldn't we just..'uhm, put bags on our heads? by NRAdude · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Workers of Earth, I bring you good tidings...of Peanuts and Beer."

    -- Hitch-Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy

    --
    without prejudice
  50. Blasphemy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone that uses ClearWindows is obviously is opposRe:I really miss Lindowsed to the security brought by our closed Windows(TM) product.
      Baal Gates of Microsoft Corporation.

  51. It's à la? by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    Greetings and blessings!

    It's à la, not a là.

    Are you certain that it's "à la", and not "à la" is He?

    God isn't an it. He made man as male and female. An it is below the standing of man; for example a human, roman, german. Did He not call them Adam?

    Drink and be filled with the Holy Spirit.

    with love,
      Gregory-Thomas

    --
    without prejudice
  52. Re:good! by agent_no.82 · · Score: 1

    Have you tried Kubuntu? All the advantages of Ubuntu with a solid KDE. My current system.

  53. Re:now more than 500 distros by gui_tarzan2000 · · Score: 1

    It is one of the easiest and slickest out there too. I have tried many different versions and keep going back to Linspire.

    --
    Have you hugged your penguin today?
  54. Re:To beat an analogy to death Word play? by davidsyes · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well if this project gets really COLD, it'll be FREEZEpire.

    If it gets really HOT, it'll be FreesPYRE.

    If it sucks the life from other distros, it'll be VAMpire.

    If it flat-out dies off, it'll EXpire.

    If it continues to live, it'll REspire.

    If it has a kernel panic, it might PERspire.

    If it woos it's intended audience, then may it TRANCEpire

    But, hopefully, it'll be really NEAT, and good things will TRANSpire...

    (C) David Syes, 2006-04-24 2025

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  55. Re:now more than 500 distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The early worm gets the bird.

  56. The question is.. by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

    Will it encourage people to add users or encourage to just have a root user as it is now?

    --
    That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    1. Re:The question is.. by crossmr · · Score: 1

      When I installed it in Vmware before it first crashes, and then locked up the machine, it came up with a page encouraging people to create a user before it even let them have direct access to the root account.

    2. Re:The question is.. by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      That's encouraging, especially if they'll add that to Linspire. It just kind of scary that they want to roll out as a desktop linux distro and they don't really notify of the danger as being root full time and the founder has argued that the separation of root from normal users is essentially not relevant, given that Linspire PCs are single-user systems, and not multiuser servers. He also claims that once an intruder has gained access to your machine under any account, your data has been compromised and the point is moot. Linspire also claims that this should be the user's choice, not Linspire's. (Copied from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linspire#Criticisms.)

      I don't know about other households, but I do have a differnet accounts on my windows boxen. I don't live alone.

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
  57. Re:To beat an analogy to death Word play? by poopdeville · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Fuck off. That was really lame.

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
  58. Re:now more than 500 distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheese covered in the rotting, orally-ejected intestines of the first mouse.

    Yummy.

  59. All about the money by jesusfingchrist · · Score: 1

    Ya Suse , RH , Mandrake (whatever) all try to make money as well but it's always struck me that Linspire's (whatever) primary goal from the word go was "money" where as RH, Suse , etc wanted to make a distro and needed to make money to support that idea. That may not be the case at all but that's what it seems like. Short story : I dont like Linspire cause it seems their heart isn't in it, just their wallet.

    --
    "Freedom and Justice for All" is a registered trademark of The United States Govt Inc. Not available in all areas.
    1. Re:All about the money by linvir · · Score: 1
      I'm going to reply to this to pre-empt other potentially more aggressive replies. But I'm not going to rehash the information that I already got some karma out of last night, so instead here's a link the comment.

      While I can understand where your impression comes from, especially given the collective mistrust of Linspire here on Slashdot, wrong is wrong.

  60. Re:To beat an analogy to death Word play? by buswolley · · Score: 0, Troll

    I second that. MOD that fucker out of existance.

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  61. Re:To beat an analogy to death Word play? by davidsyes · · Score: 0

    I guess you wooley and pooper really need to go find some s-c-e-x or a hobby... Why r u so uptight? I'm not ATTACKING the distro, since obviously it's under the thread "wordplay"! I s'pose there's no point reasoning with or expecting humour out of you two...

    Obviously /. could use a "dry humor" tag...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  62. So what do you do? by XanC · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I run a public library's computers also, so this is more than idle curiosity. What do you do about the w32codecs? It sounds like you don't have them installed, so if that's true, do people complain about not being able to watch videos on news sites, or movie trailers, or the online defensive driving course they're taking?

    If you're telling these people it doesn't work and to take it up with the publishers, then wow, you're a better man than I.

    I really think that DRM and proprietary codecs are completely antithetical to the entire idea of a public library, more so than censorship and law enforcement accessing records. Librarians, on the whole, don't seem to understand that yet. If we could get them, as a group, to denounce DRM and proprietary codecs, we might prevent a Right to Read scenario...

    1. Re:So what do you do? by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > What do you do about the w32codecs?

      It is a total bitch. Realplayer helps a little, the Crossover plugin gets us a few others, including Quicktime. Since Fraunhaufer doesn't seem to be chasing decoders I took a chance and deployed a version of xmms with mp3 support enabled.

      The problem is most of the interesting (to the kids in the labs anyway) content isn't in html, it is in flash, windows media and such. You either find ways to deal with a fair percentage of it or the calls to install Windows will grow out of control. We do offer patrons NFS mounted homedirectories and they really like that, which helps. I can explain that we could never afford the CALs to offer that sort of thing, plus many remember the horror of the lab we had for a while that the Gates Foundation setup. So locked down they can't even set a cookie, no floppy/cd/hdd access at all, etc. (And they still have the 'GLF model' in the neighboring parishes, one exposure and people stop complaining about a random java glitch/etc in our lab.) While everything might not work perfectly in ours, we have unlocked systems with Crossover Office installed so they can actually get a lot of stuff working. They idea that they can download and run programs is shocking to people who move into the area and see it for the first time.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    2. Re:So what do you do? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Librarians, on the whole, don't seem to understand that yet

      If you want librarians to understand DRM, get them to read The Well of Lost Plots. As well as being entertaining fiction, it does a good job of placing DRM in the context of books. It's also worth reading for any geek, since it is packed full of oblique references to areas of the tech industry.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:So what do you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good News: As a result of Lindows/Linspire's settlement with microsoft, Linspire has a license to the wma/wmv codecs.

      Bad News: With "FreeSpire" four months away it appears that Linspire also licensed microsoft's vaporware announcement technology.

    4. Re:So what do you do? by XanC · · Score: 1
      That's a good idea, to come up with some feature they'll really find useful but can't find anywhere else.

      Still, I'm wondering about these codecs... Is it any more "legal" to install Quicktime on Crossover than to just take the codec and plug it into mplayer? Also, if the hardware came with Windows, that might be a pretty good defense on running the Windows codecs. It may be against the EULA but it's a lot harder to call it "piracy". Did your machines have OEM Windows or did you avoid the MS tax?

    5. Re:So what do you do? by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Is it any more "legal" to install Quicktime on Crossover than to just take the codec and plug it
      > into mplayer?

      I'll leave that argument to Apple & Codeweavers and their lawyers since Crossover featured a one click download & install for Quicktime and several other helpful things, including IE. It would be hard for US to end up paying a settlement, which is all I cared about.

      > Did your machines have OEM Windows or did you avoid the MS tax?

      Oh yea, we had a build party. Not only do you avoid the Microsoft Tax you avoid the Dell crap hardware by rolling your own. Plus, had we bought full PCs we would have been forced to bid them out and either take whatever crap we got or spend weeks gaming the bid system to write a bid that could only give us exactly what we had picked out. Instead we bought parts from Newegg.com and other such deep discounters in batches, fairly low spec but SOLID hardware that I knew would work with Linux. Radeon 9250 video cards, AMD64 processors, VIA chipset motherboard, decent power supplies, etc. And it all does work and we have only had a couple power supplies (meaning I should have bought one more notch up the food chain) and hard drives (that is what RAID and storing all user files on a server are for) crap out so far. So we got better systems and saved the taxpayers a few thousand dollars.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    6. Re:So what do you do? by XanC · · Score: 1
      Wow, that build party sounds like fun! Where I am, we have a lot of flexibility since we're our own taxing district, and can order PCs without all the red tape. I guess that cuts us out of having a nice build party, though, since the librarians are enamored of the three-year warranty. But they came with Windows, so we should be able to run the Windows codecs.

      I'm thinking of trying out LTSP, actually, and offloading the heavy lifting to a big server. It should make sense, because it's rare that more than one machine is doing anything too intensive simultaneously, so if we upgraded all the workstations there'd be a lot of CPU going to waste. I'll have to pilot it and see if it's usable. AFTER we finish our catalog conversion, of course!

      It would be fun to check out your setup. I don't know if you're anywhere near I-10, but I'm through there not infrequently visiting family in New Orleans and/or Ocean Springs from Austin.

  63. Re:Linux is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Linux may be dying, but BSD is dead. Netcraft told me so.

  64. Notes from the Freespire announcement by twasserman · · Score: 3, Informative
    I am attending the Desktop Linux Summit where Kevin Carmody (Linspire CEO) made the Freespire announcement. (Side note: he's a very good speaker.)

    I thought that his positioning of Freespire and his reasoning behind it are worth sharing with Slashdotters. Linspire is, of course, a purely commercial effort, with the goal of selling a shrink-wrapped OS that looks externally as much like Windows as possible. His target audience is not the Slashdot crowd, but rather the people who buy their computers at Wal-Mart. Really! For them, it's all about the out-of-the-box experience, starting up a computer with preinstalled OS and apps and just using it. As someone who has recently installed Mandriva, Fedora 5, and Ubuntu Breezy on various machines, I think that the experience is much better than it once was, but still falls short of the "Wal-Mart" or even the Windows experience.

    To listen to Kevin Carmody, Freespire is offered in the spirit of recognizing the contributions of the open source community, and giving people the opportunity to stay "pure", i.e., without licensed and proprietary pieces, or hybrid, where the user can choose to download and perhaps pay for the licensed and proprietary pieces. He gave an analogy with food, where the choices were Junk Food (Windows and proprietary software), Healthy Food, and Vegan. Open source vegans, of course, are those who would never want music in the proprietary MP3 format or images in the proprietary JPG format.

    His belief is that most consumers and business people would like Healthy Food, which is some mix of Linux and those proprietary formats, plus some drivers for graphics cards, etc.. He and his company are actually going out to Fortune 500 companies and talking to them about why they should consider a move to something like Freespire rather than suffering the pain and expense of migrating to Windows Vista (if and when it ever ships). This is a fairly brave, not to say crazy, thing to do, and I think that they deserve some credit and support for their evangelism, even from people who don't care for the whole Linspire business. Getting 3-4% penetration of Linux (any flavor) on corporate desktops would be quite an achievement, and it won't come from Linspire on its own.

    Carmody also said that they are going to open source Click N Run because they think that it is the best updating program, and are offering it to others for the taking. If I were responsible for Ubuntu or other Debian-based distros, I would be very tempted to take them up on their offer. I've done enough "apt-get"s.

  65. Lindows, freedows, freeblows? by thephydes · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Actually I dont give a flying F**K what they call themselves or what their motives are, or for that matter how many friggen distros there are. Give me a viable, easy to use alternative to m$ crapware is all I ask. The key words here are "easy to use" I use OS X at home M$ at work and FC4 for my server. IMHO, OS X rocks, M$ sucks and FC is somewhere in between. I also don't give a F**K what you think about my opinions by the way, so any flames wont be responded to. In general Linux distros are too different to M$ to attract new users - unless they are like me and read/digest/think about viable alternatives. Come on guys .... get into the real world and ask yourselves why the linux distros have not taken off ...... they are too efffin different to M$ shitware. And M$ is what we are being fed. As soon as linux distros "lookand feel (whatever the hell that means)" familiar, and are easy to: install new software/ play the latest shit game/install the latest and newest usless piece of crappy software, then we may be getting somewhere. For f**cks sake, give linspire a go. At least they are attepting to make the user experience consistent and friendly. Jeez its good posting to Slahdot whith a skinfull under my belt ....... Yours in the spirit of inebriation TimTheTosser

    1. Re:Lindows, freedows, freeblows? by linvir · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Tim you daft Tosser, there's a reason Linux desktops behave the way they do. Their purpose isn't to replace Windows, but to be good Linux desktops in their own right. There are many scores of happy happy Linux users for whom the Linux desktop is already familiar and friendly.

      Even so, I'm not disagreeing with you. This is exactly the reason that Linspire is so good. By hacking up KDE to make it more Windows-like, along with all that other stuff they do, Linspire means that the rest of us have even less reason to care about pretending to be like Windows! It's already being taken care of!

      I'm pretty damn glad that someone out there is scratching that itch, because otherwise I'd be concerned that the KDE in my Slackware might slowly turn into the Vista interface!

  66. Re:To beat an analogy to death Word play? by sunwolf · · Score: 1

    You should consider submitting those to Piers Anthony.

  67. Re:There's no market for more than 3 linux distro' by linvir · · Score: 1

    Quick! You'd better email them at their office and tell them that all the money they've made is only phantom money. They'll be glad that someone with a bit more insight was able to warn them in time!

  68. People don't seem to get this by BeardsmoreA · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Everyone complaining about 'yet another distribution', and saying 'why this over Ubuntu / Fedora /... doesn't seem to understand (or are conveniently ignoring) a couple of points:

    • Ubuntu etc. cannot legally play a DVD
    • cannot legally play an mp3
    • and countless other examples

    ... at least in the US. I haven't even looked into the legalities in the UK, where I am, as I frankly don't care for home use, but this stuff really stops people using Linux in a lot of situations.

    I think it will be interesting to see how they integrate the proprietary stuff, (and how it's paid for, free as in beer is a big attraction of OSS, whatever the principles at stake).

    1. Re:People don't seem to get this by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      MP3 - the patent holder has stated that the only royalties are needed if more than 10,000 units are distributed. This means that Red Hat (for example) does not distribute the codec, but it is legal for you to drop it in later.

      DVD - no copyright violation in applying code that plays this on your Linux box. The right (under Copyright, at least in my jurisdiction) is that if it is NECESSARY it is legal. I believe (please correct me) that the DMCA contains a similar clause. This does not give protection for you if a patent infringement claim is made (and I am sure that there are patents involved as well). On the other hand, you could raise the argument that SINCE the DVD was sold to you, an implicit use of the patent was also sold (presuming orthogonality between encoding and decoding).

      Ratboy

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  69. Groklaw responds to Freespire - PJ's take is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=200604241 64142296
    Freespire: A Linux Distro For When You Couldn't Care Less About Freedom
    Monday, April 24 2006 @ 06:36 PM EDT

    PJ is 100% exactly correct.

    PS - Anonymous Coward's take...

    "Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose.

    Nothing don't mean nothing honey if it ain't free, now now."

                                * JANIS JOPLIN -- ( Me Bobby Mcgee Lyrics )

    Freedom today in technology, is Freedom of Speech, period!

    What percentage of communication today is done by some kind of computer? The
    lines are not blurred anymore they are as black and white as the lyric.

    I remember when I first heard Janice Joplin sing those lyrics, the context was
    plain as the day that they emerged, the days of a different struggle, those
    words were powerful then, and they are just as powerful today.

    "But I'd trade all of my tomorrows for one single yesterday"

  70. Re:good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >I have stuck by gnome for years...but I am weary of it, just weary

    Weary doesn't even begin to descibe how I feel about GNOME. I just simply cannot understand the mentatility of the project and their continual removal of features. The end result of the GNOME project is going to be a GUI that consists of a single button which takes up the entire desktop.

    Every time I try a Linux distro it's GNOME that always ends up driving me back to Windows. It may be a bug riddled, security nightmare, but at least it has the basic functionality right. Consistent copy & paste between programs, consistent menus, consistent window behaviour, consistent right click menus in the file manager, buttons in the right order, the ability to set file proerties on more than one file at a time, the abilaity to process objects recursively... In other words the features that allow you to get on with doing your work etc. etc. etc.

    In contrast GNOME is an unusable mess which seems to be based on 20 year old *very bad* design paradigms. Using GNOME makes me feel I'm back in the 1980s and using an Atari ST.

    It makes me very, very weary too.

  71. Re:To beat an analogy to death Word play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nice but still...

    i'll continue to use my LesBian Unstable with her wonderfull slut-get package manager, genitoo is nice also with his erect package manager.

  72. Re:To beat an analogy to death Word play? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    LOL!!! Well, if it's a hard-core slut, then it'll be more than a "manager"; it'll be a MAN AGER!!! Age the hell out of the hapless man who gets into her dragnet...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  73. ATI Radeon drivers work? by VGfort · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well if those drivers work in the Freespire with all their codecs and stuff, I'll give it a try. I've yet to get those to work in anything but Windows so far.

  74. My problem with Linspire.. by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

    It by default runs as root. WTF. That is one of the worst parts of Windows, why bring that to Linux? Especially when under Linux it's not necessary (ie, properly designed applications). It does seem that Freespire will create a regular user by default, though.

    IMHO, the Mac OS X and Ubuntu approach of disabling root is the best idea. I set up all my Fedora desktops to behave the same way. Hopefully that will become the standard for desktop systems.

    --
    "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    1. Re:My problem with Linspire.. by D0M1N8R · · Score: 1

      Wow I cant believe after about 4 years of trying to clear this rumour out people are still stuck on it.. Linspire has never forced anyone to run as root by default. Upon first boot you are introduced with the option to create a user account. Freespire will do this as part of the install step. Linspire has always had the option to create a user account and boot from it. Jeesh get it out of you heads. Are you also stuck on the idea that Linspire is suppose to run Windows apps too? =\ from what I understand there was only 1 release from linspire which used root as default and it was one of the first (if not the first) iso's they made and was a experamental release which was never a official public release.

  75. WTF: Copyright a public posting?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There! Now I've violated your "copyright". So sue me.

    dumbass. It wasn't even all *that* funny....

    ---
    Well if this project gets really COLD, it'll be FREEZEpire.

    If it gets really HOT, it'll be FreesPYRE.

    If it sucks the life from other distros, it'll be VAMpire.

    If it flat-out dies off, it'll EXpire.

    If it continues to live, it'll REspire.

    If it has a kernel panic, it might PERspire.

    If it woos it's intended audience, then may it TRANCEpire

    But, hopefully, it'll be really NEAT, and good things will TRANSpire...

    (C) David Syes, 2006-04-24 2025

  76. Re:To beat an analogy to death Word play? by towsonu2003 · · Score: 1
    (C) David Syes, 2006-04-24 2025
    In the European Union, analogies copyright you...
  77. From the point of J Random Newbie by Slithe · · Score: 1

    Okay, so how do I play my WMV files or my Quicktime files on my new Kubuntu box?

    I heard that Quake 4 was supported under Linux, and I want to play it, but the program says it will not run without "3D acceleration", so I go to ATI's site to download their drivers. First, I am not sure which X I have, so I just pick the first one on the list; I am sure Ubuntu supports XFree86 4.1. It takes me a while to figure out how to open an RPM file; I have to google all over the place, and several minutes later, I find a forum post that says I have to type in some wizardly commands "rpm -ivh ~/fglrx_4_1_0-8.24.8-1.i386.rpm". I then search through the KMenu through the K menu for a little while, and finally I click on the Terminal icon, and a little white box pops up, and it looks like it wants me to enter something. I then type the wizardly command listed above, and it appears that the first part of the command, rpm, was not found, bu I just typed it in. How stupid can you be Linux?

    In frustration, I navigate back to ATI's website, and I come across the ATI installer, and then I read the instructions, but it says that only Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Suse are supported. So it appears, that I have used the wrong Linux operating system. My Suse 10 CDs are curently in route to my house, and I should be installing them any day now.

    --
    ---- "XML is like violence. If it doesn't fix the problem, you aren't using enough."
  78. Re:To beat an analogy to death Word play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    (C) David Syes, 2006-04-24 2025


    You copyrighted *that*? Please, use your power as copyright owner, and don't ever let anyone repeat it ever again.

    Man I hate puns.
  79. Re:To beat an analogy to death Word play? by buswolley · · Score: 1

    Usually I am quite nice. I apologize. It just came out of me.

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  80. Re:To beat an analogy to death Word play? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Apology accepted, sir. (Thank you, too. I admit, however, I do expose (and sometimes espouse, I suppose) some quite weird/unorthodox opinions and ramblings...)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  81. Placing ideal before comfort. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The real bastards.

    Who would have thought there would be such immoral people....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  82. Re:now more than 500 distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PCLinuxOS is the most stable and up-to-date Linux distribution out there IMHO. http://www.pclinuxos.com/