Slashdot Mirror


The Time for Women in Games

VeeCee writes "Next Generation has an interesting article on why few women are game developers, why it should change, and how." From the article: "Fulton then cited workforce statistics, showing that in 1950, 30 percent of women worked, compared with 70 percent six years ago. 'We're rapidly becoming equal players in the larger workforce. More women are playing games.' Citing a study that showed women outnumbered men as players in the 24 to 35 year-old demographic, Fulton granted that casual games were a factor. 'However I think there's an appetite there. As we get online, as the games start getting more interactive, more social, women are getting more and more interested in what it means to play games.'"

96 comments

  1. Wonder why? by suso · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Re:Wonder why? by SpecialAgentXXX · · Score: 1

      OMG PONIES!!ONE11!!

    2. Re:Wonder why? by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      Team leader: "So, today we are going to discuss why so few women are working in the industry, but first, lets hear some reactions on the latest artwork for our upcoming Tomb Raider game."
      Programmer A: "Good lord, what is wrong with Laura's breasts!? That's only triple D cups, max!"
      Team leader: "Ok, note to art team...'bigger breasts'. Check. Ok then, why no girls in the gaming industry?"
      Programmer A: (Scratches head)
      Programmer B: "No idea."
      Programmer C: "Perhaps they aren't any good at it?"

      I can't remember where I read this, so I can't link to it. Penny Arcade, PvP, Dork Tower, VG Cats...?

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

  2. Perception by foundme · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think in more developed countries, game-playing women are perceived as nerds, hence reducing their chances of finding mates.

    In less developed countries, game-playing women are perceived as lazy, hence reducing their chances of finding mates.

    Honestly, I'm surprised Ms Fulton titled her keynote "The Best Defense... Why Gender Doesn't Matter (As Much As You Might Think)". If gender really doesn't matter, then why would the general public care of 10% or 99% of the game developers are female?

    --
    Please stop entering code 2,2,7,6,6,4
    1. Re:Perception by Flimzy · · Score: 1

      The article says that women are more "casual" players. I know a lot of women who play games, but are perceived neither as lazy nor nerds. They just play different games. The Sims comes to mind. As do "trinket" games like solitaire, mah-jongg, and tetris. Maybe women aren't involved in game development because these games they play don't require much developing. Most of them (with the exception of The Sims) can be made in a highschool visual basic class.

    2. Re:Perception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think in more developed countries, game-playing women are perceived as nerds, hence reducing their chances of finding mates.

      No, it just means that they find their mates in different parts of the population ;)

    3. Re:Perception by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      Funny, I play tetrisDS, yet i still get negative labels. Maybe it is because i play for hours at a time, and claim that I will "pwn" people on wifi. Who knows.

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    4. Re:Perception by some+guy+on+slashdot · · Score: 1

      How pithy. However, the article is talking about women as game developers, not as game players - a profession somewhat on par with technical arts such architecture. To answer the question of why there aren't more women in game development, it might be wise to first ask why we see a minority of women in the computer sciences.

    5. Re:Perception by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      I think in more developed countries, game-playing women are perceived as nerds, hence reducing their chances of finding mates.

      Reduce their chances? What do you think the chances of a gamer girl being picked at E3? In fact, their game playing would add to their attractiveness.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    6. Re:Perception by exick · · Score: 1

      If gender really doesn't matter, then why would the general public care of 10% or 99% of the game developers are female?

      They don't.

    7. Re:Perception by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I think in more developed countries, game-playing women are perceived as nerds, hence reducing their chances of finding mates.

      Reducing? I'm pretty sure there are plenty of single male nerds looking for a woman. Or hoping for a woman, at least. Perhaps that's the problem.

    8. Re:Perception by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 1

      If gender really doesn't matter, then why would the general public care of 10% or 99% of the game developers are female?

      Because there are three types of discrimination/racism/sexism -- positive, negative, and nonexistant. Negative discrimination occurs then the person perceived to have the upper hand is of a group designated as "the aggressor" (usually white men) as opposed to "the victim" (usually !("the aggressor" || "overachieving Asians") ). Positive discrimination occurs when a policy of active discrimination is used to right a perceived act of negative discrimination; this is the good kind of discrimination, and is therefore not usually refered to as such in order to not confuse the proles. Everything else falls in the nonexistent bin. Capisci?

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    9. Re:Perception by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Can you please turn some of those poor, unfortunate female gamers who can't find mates my way? I'd consider it a bonus, not a negative.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    10. Re:Perception by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      Or how about engineering in general.

    11. Re:Perception by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I actually had a co-worker randomly come up to me today and ask if I had my DS with me so he could play TetrisDS with me. I've played DS games via download play with total strangers on buses too, and nobody even gave me a weird look. I haven't noticed any normal people (with the obvious exception of Jack Thompson and his ilk) labelling me negatively just for playing games, but then again, I currently work as a co-op programmer at a game company, so I'm surrounded by fellow geeks and gamers most of the time :)

    12. Re:Perception by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1

      Heh, I agree. I'm a single female nerd, but I'm only single by choice. Ever since I left highschool, I haven't had any problems finding dates. There are a lot of guys who find me at least conceptually hot purely because I like long, romantic walks through Ironforge as my level 55 undead rogue.

      Unfortunately, it is indeed the whole "hoping" for a woman bit that makes it hard for a lot of nerdy guys to find a real life female nerd -- a lot of us (myself excluded at present) are busy "hoping" for a hot male nerd to come along too, so if nobody makes the first move, nothing can happen.

    13. Re:Perception by Xaositecte · · Score: 1

      A female on Slashdot?

      !!!!

      The End is surely near! Make peace with whatever gods you worship and beg forgiveness for your many sins! AIEEEEEEEE!!!

    14. Re:Perception by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      Thats pretty sweet. I was just kidding, most of my friends own DSes (after I let them play mine a bit :)

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    15. Re:Perception by mjhacker · · Score: 1

      I think in more developed countries, game-playing women are perceived as nerds, hence reducing their chances of finding mates.

      No. Because game-playing women are going to want a mate that shares their interest. There are more than enough "nerdy" men who would date a "nerdy" girl in a heartbeat. How do you think I met my wife? We've been gaming together for years now.

    16. Re:Perception by Star+Stealing+Girl · · Score: 1

      I'm a female gamer, and I started when I was about 6 years old.

      When people (especially guys) found out I was into gaming, the responses I got were positive. I wasn't labeled a "nerd" and I haven't had problems finding a "mate". I also have a degree in computer science. By your generalizations, I should be living in a basement somewhere, cast away by society. Hate to tell you, but I'm happily married with friends and a happy, well-rounded life that includes gaming on a regular basis.

      --
      All my money went to Nigeria and all I got was this lousy sig. . .
  3. ...In shooters, at least... by smaerd · · Score: 1

    ...sit my girlfriend down with a bejeweled type game and we may not see her for a few days (well, hours at least). Also, that girl could play the Sonic Collection for years without stopping.

    Most of the women I know can't stand shooters or most RPGs, but give them puzzle or platform jumpers and they're as happy as me with Oblivion.

    1. Re:...In shooters, at least... by thos_thom · · Score: 1

      I see that my female friends (not all but some) sit near me while the others ridicule my game playing habits (including shooters), not too near, mind. They watch out of the corner of their eye, i'm sure that it is their own perception of gaming that stops her having a go and having some fun.

      My girlfriend maintains she cant stand stand RPGs, she tells me the story and gameplay is dull and slow. But after a couple of beers she gets intrigued.

      "kill that one" she will say,

      "I cant kill him just yet because of [game constraint x+y]" I reply.

      Suddenly she gets intrigued and starts problem solving, and playing the game. I see her have trouble getting into games, especially the ones where you have to actually read the manual. Anything thats not too fast paced that I can walk her through the first few levels she gets good at and really enjoys. Too fast she cant learn it quick enough and gets irritated with it.

  4. Social != Gamer by payndz · · Score: 1
    as the games start getting more interactive, more social, women are getting more and more interested in what it means to play games.

    Sadly, long-term gamers are the exact opposite of 'social', so still no sex for them.

    --
    You must think in Russian.
    1. Re:Social != Gamer by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 1

      You, sir, fear no flame. I agree with you, but the audience will hate it. My bottom is still recovering from the last time I said sports may indeed have more benefits than videogames.

      --
      If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
  5. Girls aren't interested in programming by SpecialAgentXXX · · Score: 3, Funny

    I should know. I'm sitting in an office full of men. The only women we've hired were for Sales & Marketing, booth babes, etc. Haha, reminds me of when college recruiters came to my all-boys high school and didn't know it was single-sex. "Oh, it's only guys here. Great! You'll feel just at home in our CompSci classes." It was right then and there I decided not to major in I.T.

    1. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1

      I always thought 'Real Men Program in Assembly Language'. But my Assembly professor is a woman :O

      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
    2. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      Hm, not in the Comp.Sci dep. here in Aachen. The quotient isn't 50:50, but there's tons of female students (and many of them better than the males, because they informed themselves about comp.sci beforehand, while many males still made the mistake of trying to study "something with computers" :-P)

    3. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by stanwirth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The little light-bulb went on for a friend of mine when his sister with a Ph.D in computational physics was hired by a high-end as "a fukin' booth-babe! A Demo Dame! What kinda sh** is that?!" as he'd say with considerable outrage in his voice. And quite right too -- when you help put your sister through the best schools, she gets the degrees and demonstrates the prowess and formulates important (physics/math) problems and writes the code and brings in the grants and gets the postdocs and --- then the best job she can get is basically not much better than a conventioneer's whore -- not only do you start to wonder why the hell you and she bothered, but your family is humiliated and if she doesn't like being a booth babe, she can bloody well quit and go on welfare. If she has kids, she'll be outright fired and wind up on welfare. with a PhD.

      That's what it was like 15-20 years ago. Which is why you just don't see any ongoing culture of technical women aged 35-65, and certainly few mentors beyond a few managers who specialize in managing not code-writing, these days. It's why the percentage of women in many fields actually declined despite tons of programs to promote their participation -- they knew how they'd be treated in an all-male environment: like a mother to be fired, or a whore to be used and then fired. Better off going to nursing school.

    4. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by pla · · Score: 1

      The little light-bulb went on for a friend of mine when his sister with a Ph.D in computational physics was hired by a high-end as "a fukin' booth-babe! A Demo Dame! What kinda sh** is that?!" as he'd say with considerable outrage in his voice.

      Rage that his highly-educated sisted TOOK a job as a booth-bunny?

      You fail to see this from the "business" angle. People don't get hired because of their skills - They get hired because their skills can make the company money

      In the case of a software dev environment, you have three or four major conventions. If your friend had a "hot" sister, the company could best use her skills not by stuffing her in a cubicle, but by parading her around in a skimpy outfit. Four weeks out of 52 "lost", but sex sells.


      Now, why not just hire an uneducated bimbo to do the trade shows, and keep the Ph.Ds in cubicles? Simple - After attracting a drooling predominately male crowd, the booth bunnies need to understand the product enough to convince the droolers that they need it. I've attended a few trade shows - You have FAR too many booths that suffer from one of two problems:

      1) Bimbo attracts visitors, who leave amazed that she can even tie her shoes. Not future customers.

      2) Bimbo attracts visitors, male sales rep pulls a bait-and-switch. Possible customers, but theey leave feeling dirty.

      Replace both of those with "Bimbo attracts visitors, then shames them with her superior knowledge of their own jobs", and you have a sure-fire recipe for a sale.

    5. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm the only female programmer (technically just a co-op, but I'm on a work term as a programmer) at a small game company, but we're still just a startup, and quite honestly, I generally don't even notice that I'm in the minority unless somebody points it out.

      I obviously can't speak for other girls, but I'm in this field because I like it. I get to dress casually (long skirts, tall socks, and comfy shoes!), play with code, and game or read Slashdot during breaks. I won't claim to be a particularly good coder -- hey, I'm still a student here -- but I've never found myself thinking that having a little something extra between my legs would make my job faster or easier.

      It does, however, irk me when people (not you specifically, but far too many others) repeatedly bemoan or otherwise find occasion to rant about how few women there are in IT. If more women want to get into the field, they're welcome, but going on and on about how terrible it is for us poor little girls who actually have to *gasp* work with or even *double gasp* talk to male colleagues is just going to scare people of both genders away. Why not just shut up about it? Why not just let people choose what they want to do and leave them to it? A few more pairs of breasts around the office may be a welcome sight to the average guy, but if the girls don't want to be there, maybe they shouldn't be.

    6. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Based on the PhDs that I've met, I'm not terribly impressed with your sister. Maybe she oughta just go all the way and start selling her snatch.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    7. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by tepples · · Score: 1

      If your friend had a "hot" sister [with a Ph.D in computational physics], the company could best use her skills not by stuffing her in a cubicle, but by parading her around in a skimpy outfit. Four weeks out of 52 "lost", but sex sells.

      So then why doesn't the company put her on the product's physics engine team for 40-odd weeks out of the year and just have her do the booth bunny thing during the cons?

    8. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The little light-bulb went on for a friend of mine when his sister with a Ph.D in computational physics was hired by a high-end as "a fukin' booth-babe!

      Is she hot? The fact that a person can do one job (difficult physics) well doesn't mean they can't also do another (be a model). Due to the free market, supply & demand for different jobs can vary. I have a number of brilliant friends with PhDs in high-energy physics who can't get jobs in their field because the field is very tiny, and no one is building big particle accelerators. They currently work in IT.

      Cindy Crawford & Margaret Thatcher were both good in chemistry (my field). They were both far more successful in other fields.

      then the best job she can get is basically not much better than a conventioneer's whore -- not only do you start to wonder why the hell you and she bothered

      There's quite a difference between being a model and a whore. Incidentally, many male grad students/post docs/PhDs are in the same boat. They spend a lot of time & money getting an advanced degree, and can't get a job in their field.

      That's life. Not all types of education will increase your likelyhood of getting employment.

    9. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here in Aachen. The quotient isn't 50:50, but there's tons of female students

      Are they hot?

    10. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by Malkin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh. Mah. Gawd. We aren't interested in programming? What have I been doing with my life? I knew I should've become a hairdresser! Maybe it's not too late! Somebody get me the number for the nearest cosmetology school! Why, here I was, all about to accept another game programming job offer, when I could be perming hair! What was I thinking!?!

    11. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      Some, I'd say that quota is about average. But I may be biased here, I have a thing for nerd-girls, glasses and all :-D

    12. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

      Why not just shut up about it? Why not just let people choose what they want to do and leave them to it?

      Because they can make a living by saying that.

    13. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by cgenman · · Score: 1

      The company that I work at is about 25% female, which is an exceptionally good number for the industry.

      Only one of the programmers is female. But quite a few artists, sound engineers, and producers are. Some of them come from traditionally female-strong fields like Art and Web Development. Others came in through their strong project management skills. Still other just got jobs in QA like the rest of us, and worked their way up.

      And in fact, far less than half of the company consists of coders.

      There are other jobs in the gaming industry besides programming.

      I have my theories about why women don't get into gaming as a career, and in fact why both men and women leave in droves after brief stints, but both of the above should be obvious by now.

    14. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by Sofalover · · Score: 1

      Amen.... I am sick to the back teeth of hair shirt wearing women, telling people who have no natural interest or ability in IT in general that some mythical gender balance has addressed. Like someone else mentioned is now an industry in itself, other women and manginas telling women what they must do for the sake of political correctness. Every single job, college place and training course I have ever attended has had positive discrimination in favour of women. At the end of the day things sort themselves out, if a women wants to code she will and be far superior than another who gets railroaded along an unsuitable career path. True equality is based on ability, this is something those pushing for more Y in X will never understand.

    15. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by reachums · · Score: 1

      As a fellow female in the CS/IS industry I have to agree, while I'd love to have more girls in my field, I don't feel discriminated against. I took a gender studies class in College, as a girl in a male dominated field I was the center of attention, "Do you get treated differently?", "Are you the only girl in some of your classes?", "Don't you get tired of their male chauvinism?" When in reality the place I felt the least judged or discriminated against was in the computer lab. everyone was just CS/IS in there, in fact, we would all gather together and stare at the math majors who HAD to take one programming class and we would whisper about how they didn't belong. Guys would ask to see my code if they were stuck, I would ask to see theirs.

      I was discriminated against in other places; in the Library I'd offer to help some one with their power point and I'd be given the "don't worry honey, I'll figure it out" *pity smile*. I volunteered to do slides for a church and the pastor actually said to me "It's ok sweetheart, we want someone who knows what they are doing, there are plenty of boys in the church who can do it" I was so taken aback by the comment I didn't even know what to say.

      The place I felt the most accepted and the most appreciated was in the CS/IS department. Guys normally appreciate a girl who can talk about code and processors, plus it gives them some contact with the allusive sex, they even asked my advice several times on girlfriends/engagement rings/dating.

      --
      "Just call me Girly Blank"
    16. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by Grab · · Score: 1

      Too right. If you don't want to do a job, then you shouldn't be there to make up numbers. I can't imagine anything worse than a positive discrimination position where you find that you weren't the best candidate, you were just hired to improve the male/female ratio.

      Grab.

    17. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why she's a professor. If she were a Real Man she'd be doing, not teaching.

    18. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by Star+Stealing+Girl · · Score: 1

      A PHD is a pretty worthless degree unless you're going into teaching for a living. If she didn't make the right connections to get that academia job, it's really her own fault for wasting so much time in school doing the wrong things.

      --
      All my money went to Nigeria and all I got was this lousy sig. . .
    19. Re:Girls aren't interested in programming by stanwirth · · Score: 1

      and maybe you get your ideas of what women should do for work from your mother?

  6. Brenda Laurel, bring back Purple Moon! by spun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The time is finally right for a female-centric game company. Don't know who Brenda Laurel is? You should. The woman is a freakin' genius and a pioneer in the field of human-computer interaction.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Brenda Laurel, bring back Purple Moon! by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 2, Informative

      I tend to think Roberta Williams is more of a pioneer here. "King's Quest"? The founding of "Sierra"?

    2. Re:Brenda Laurel, bring back Purple Moon! by spun · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, hells yeah. When I was a kid and played her games I always fantasized about marrying a geek chic like her. Roberta was more influential in gaming, but she didn't write particularly girl friendly games. Blue Moon, Brenda's game design company, wrote games (maybe only 'a game,' I can't remember) with a social interactive slant that was aimed at girls. But besides that, Roberta is a fairly talented but mostly self taught game programmer while Brenda is a genius computer scientist who has researched some very deep issues that impact nearly all areas of computing. She wrote a book analyzing computer-human interaction in terms of Aristotle's Poetics that I would consider an absolute must read for any UI designer.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:Brenda Laurel, bring back Purple Moon! by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1

      How exactly were Roberta's games not girl-friendly? As a proud owner of not one, but two X chromosomes, I devoted many hours of my ill-spent youth to puzzling my way through King's Quest and other such games. There were no "Boys Only" stickers on the box, and I never found any puzzle that required either the use of a penis or any intimate knowledge of the male psyche. Seriously, they were pretty gender neutral as far as I could tell, and there really wasn't anything about them that might discourage a girl from playing. Well, nothing that wouldn't equally discourage a guy anyway :)

    4. Re:Brenda Laurel, bring back Purple Moon! by spun · · Score: 1

      Gender neutral, yes. I'm not saying they weren't girl friendly, even. Just not to the same level as Blue Moon's games, where there was no quest or overall goal, just lots of characters to interact and develop relationships with.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:Brenda Laurel, bring back Purple Moon! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Blue Moon, Brenda's game design company, wrote games (maybe only 'a game,' I can't remember) with a social interactive slant that was aimed at girls.

      Yeah, and Blue Moon promptly went under. Maybe she should have taken her cues from Roberta instead.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  7. What's your point? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

    Seriously... what are you trying to prove? You took part 4 of a 6-part series. So right away I'm not sure what you're trying to prove. That girls don't play games because guys make fun of their OMG!!! PONIES!!!111! mods? That girls don't play games because guys think they have OMG!!! PONIES!!!11 mods?

    What?

    My one question is this: why is it always an assumed premise that if there's a statistic in which girls or boys are over-represented:
    1. it's automatially a bad thing
    2. it's automatically a bad thing for girls

    Am I allowed to ask that question?

    -stormin

    --
    The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    1. Re:What's your point? by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1

      You mean "treat women as equals"? Hahhahahha! You can't do that, you have to bend over backwards to 'fix' whatever problems there are.

      Women not represented equaly in every facet of existence? Holy crap! We need more female Nascar drivers, stat!

      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
    2. Re:What's your point? by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My one question is this: why is it always an assumed premise that if there's a statistic in which girls or boys are over-represented:
      1. it's automatially a bad thing
      2. it's automatically a bad thing for girls


      Not true. Nobody seems to be concerned that men outnumber women in suicides (in developed countries, with the exception of Chine -- if you count them as developed), or that men outnumber women as drug users, or that most of the people in jail are men, or that most garbagemen (garbagepeople, sorry) are men, or that most coal miners (or any other crap job) are men. If only there was some sort of conclusion we could draw from all of this...

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    3. Re:What's your point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Girls don't play games because they're in the fucking kitchen where they belong.

    4. Re:What's your point? by Das+Modell · · Score: 1
      Not true. Nobody seems to be concerned that men outnumber women in suicides (in developed countries, with the exception of Chine -- if you count them as developed), or that men outnumber women as drug users, or that most of the people in jail are men, or that most garbagemen (garbagepeople, sorry) are men, or that most coal miners (or any other crap job) are men. If only there was some sort of conclusion we could draw from all of this...

      I think the conclusion might be called feminism.
    5. Re:What's your point? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      Thanks for providing an example of what real sexism is so the rest of us can continue to question modern feminism (aka "the other sexism") without any body getting confused.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    6. Re:What's your point? by turnipsatemybaby · · Score: 1

      The only conclusion I can draw is putting together random isolated statistics as if they somehow relate to one another is foolish and stupid. It's even worse when you try to use them to prop up your thinly veiled misogyny.

      Regarding men in jails, what are the statistics over many decades, or centuries for that matter? Haven't men *always* been the majority? How is this suddenly new now?

      WRT jobs, welcome to social conditioning. There very few women who do garbage. There are also comparatively few who work in hard science, or software development, etc. But there are relatively few men who are in nursing, or secretary positions. How many women CEOs are there? Virtually none. High ranking political figures? Very few. How many men take Aerobics classes? Very few. At any point in time was it illegal for men to vote? Not that I can recall.

      Society itself has defined what men an d women should and should not do. And it takes a great deal of effort to break that programming. There used to be virtually no women doctors, and male nurses were unheard of.

      So don't give some sob story about how only men are getting shafted. Yes, men have problems in some areas, but overall women have been shafted a LOT harder and for a lot LONGER than men.

    7. Re:What's your point? by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Please explain. Are you saying that it's because of feminism that most garbagepersons are men?

  8. Just have female characters by Oldsmobile · · Score: 1

    Well, how about starting by simply having a choice of male and female characters for games? It seems almost every game features the adventures of "generic caucasian guy".

    Especially in online games (BF2, CS Source etc) a female character would NOT be hard to do at all.

    Not a solution, but a start.

    --
    Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
    1. Re:Just have female characters by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1

      But if I played a female character, how would I tea-bag?

      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
    2. Re:Just have female characters by Oldsmobile · · Score: 1
      --
      Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
    3. Re:Just have female characters by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1

      A female character doesn't make sense in every game. Many of the army sim games, for example, are based on a reality in which women don't serve on the front lines.

      Also, in single-player games, the protagonist is often meant to be one specific person rather than a fully customizable hero. I don't see people begging for the option to play a male version of Lara Croft in Tomb Raider, so why should there be a female option in other, similar games?

      I mean, I like being able to choose the gender of my character if it makes sense in the context of the game, but if it doesn't, I don't want a perfectly good story ruined purely for the sake of political correctness.

  9. Casual means casual by Lewisham · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That statistic is BS. Sure, I watch girls play games all the time. They play Sudoku, Solitare, FreeCell. They like puzzle games, and that's cool. But it's almost always going to be on a casual basis.

    Being casual does not make you that bothered. I ride bicycles, but I don't want to be a bicycle engineer. I would even say I love cars, but I don't care about their engines past how loud they are and how fast they can go. That's a casual relationship too.

    Why would girls who play Sudoku care in any way shape or form about programming Sudoku games?

    We can run around these circles all day about why girls play games or why they don't, why they program or why they don't, but the end result is the same. Unless someone can fundamentally change the nature of programming, or indeed, development, they aren't going to do it.

    I have stopped caring about how many girls play games or how many girls develop games. It's not a big deal.

    1. Re:Casual means casual by shalla · · Score: 1

      Sure, I watch girls play games all the time. They play Sudoku, Solitare, FreeCell. They like puzzle games, and that's cool. But it's almost always going to be on a casual basis.

      You obviously don't know the women I know. :) We're obsessive gamers, though mostly RPGs (pen and paper or MMORPGs). My mother would have been a gamer if she hadn't had two kids and a lot of work to handle. Twenty-some years ago, after several days straight of playing Space Invaders on the Atari and no food being cooked or laundry being done, she had to swear off games.

      I think a great many women would game more than casually if 1) they had the time, and 2) they were introduced to a game and had the access to play it regularly.

      Unless someone can fundamentally change the nature of programming, or indeed, development, they aren't going to do it.

      That's just silly. I'm not saying most women are going to want to program, but that's because most people (men OR women) don't want to program. I was lucky in that my parents bought a TI-99 for my brother and me and some old programming magazines, and from those, we worked out how to write basic programs in BASIC. But while there are a large number of parents who might think to buy their son a computer and books on programming, I think there are a lot less who would think to do that for their daughter. They might get her a computer, but I'd bet they'd choose a lot different games and books to go along with it. And generally, an interest in coding doesn't spring from nowhere.

      It's kind of a nasty self-perpetuating circle. Women aren't interested in coding because they aren't introduced to it. Women aren't introduced to it because they aren't interested in it.

      I have stopped caring about how many girls play games or how many girls develop games. It's not a big deal.

      You know, I'm with you on this one. I mean, I care, but I also care about global warming, and I know which one concerns me more. Women game. More women would probably game intensely if they had time and access. Woooo. Now can we stop with the articles overanalyzing things? I just wanna get my magister's gear.

  10. True equality requires complete equality by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder why we never hear people complaing that women are not 50% of the criminal "workforce".

    From the UK: "Men outnumber women in all major crime categories. Between 85 and 95 per cent of offenders found guilty of burglary, robbery, drug offences, criminal damage or violence against the person are male. Although the number of offenders are relatively small, 98 per cent of people found guilty of, or cautioned for, sexual offences are male"

    Or how about garbagemen (garbagepeople) or coal miners? Why are people never concerned about women not making headways there?

    Riddle me that, Batman.

    --
    Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    1. Re:True equality requires complete equality by onkelonkel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As an interesting exercise, let us substitute $men for $women and $female_dominated_profession for $male_dominated profession. Example: nursing for engineering, and lets see how the rhetoric sounds.

      "It is self-evident that the low number of men in nursing is the result of systematic discrimination against men by the sexist women who dominate the profession. Without affirmative action, the entrenched and dominant female hierarchy will never allow men to compete as equals. Hospitals should stop hiring female nurses until the number of men and women working in the profession are the same."

      Does that sound odd to you?

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    2. Re:True equality requires complete equality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because feminists want the good without the bad...they don't want equality, they want a complete takeover in all intellectual or otherwise 'important' fields.

    3. Re:True equality requires complete equality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure to wear a hard hat when all those feminazi built castles in the sky start falling down. These hairy lesbo's make me laugh, to hear them talk about their assumed superiority and their estrogen soaked arguments about why they are better than men. Thus they short circuit their own rhetoric by being sexist towards men in general.

  11. Business Situation by McD!ck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I work for a rather large software company, and I am one of the many engineers. In the 6 years I have worked here I have worked with a total of 3 women. Most of them were VERY competent programmers. In contrast I cannot count how many men I have worked with, sure enough the number would be in the hundreds.

    Back in college (6 years ago), we had similar ratios in all the CS classes, and even in the upper division physics classes. However, my upper division social classes were DOMINATED by women.

    I don't want to sound sexist or mysognistic, but I don't think we need more women in engineering any more than we need more male social workers. I think we need more people doing exactly what they want to do; if that fits a pattern, so be it; just as long as we don't restrict people from being in any profession.

    McD

    --
    People who are against human cloning must be bitter they are not good enough to be cloned.
    1. Re:Business Situation by Shadarr · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This whole "statistical equality at any cost" meme needs to die. In my experience, women are not being prevented from going into IT, nor are they confronted with a hostile work environment if they do choose to. Instead, they're choosing not to go into it because they find it boring. What are we supposed to do, press-gang them into programming? Tell any girl who scores in the 90th percentile in math that they have to major in CompSci whether they want to or not? Give me a break. Nobody whines about the lack of male nurses or primary school teachers.

      This whole thing derives from two issues. 1) the erroneous assumption that if there is a statistical imbalance in one sector of employment, it must be the result of sexist hiring practices and 2) the slightly less erroneous assumption that videogames are targetted at teenaged boys. The fact of the matter is, girls are already playing games, and games that appeal to both genders, such as WoW, The Sims and Kingdom Hearts, sell like gangbusters. However, those games never get any press. The media perception of games is tied to male power-fantasy games like Doom, Halo and Grand Theft Auto. This perpetuates the myth that the entire gaming industry is made up of those types of games. Games like Harvest Moon and Animal Crossing get completely ignored.

      The simple truth is that girls are playing games already. The outcry about the supposed lack of games for girls is really a call to eliminate games for boys. They may be saying that there need to be games for girls, but that can't be what they mean because there are games for girls. What they really mean is that there shouldn't be any games that aren't for girls.

    2. Re:Business Situation by Xiroth · · Score: 1

      Bingo. The gender imbalance in programming jobs is really a non-issue. The real imbalance is that the majority of designers and artists in the industry are also male which, quite frankly, doesn't make a lot of sense given that I've never noticed a creativity bias to either gender. Fortunately, those are also the two key areas for righting the imbalance in game player gender as well, so fixing that imbalance might cause that much sought expansion in market size.

    3. Re:Business Situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, just hit the nail on the head.

    4. Re:Business Situation by kthejoker · · Score: 1

      While I agree completely with your comment, there seems to a point you're missing, which is that more and more games are incorporating complex sociological and psychological paradigms into the game. Adding female minds (since they DOMINATED your social science classes) to the gaming industry could aid in this.

      I think one avenue that has clearly not been approached and promoted enough is combining sociology and psychology successfully with game programming. Will Wright seems to get it - I bet The Sims family of games are most popular among female games - and if we could encourage some of those psych/education/sociology-driven female students who view Comp Sci and game design with disdain and/or trepidation to take on the challenges of AI, in-game character psychology, and the other less technical aspects of gaming, we could make huge new inroads into things like MMORPGS, adventure and real-time strategy games, and even sports games, FPSes, stealth/action games, etc.

      And of course if a girl wants to get involved in the technical side, creating player graphics or collision detection modules, the more power to her.

  12. Who Cares Who Makes the Games? by Primis · · Score: 1

    I don't. I only care if the games are good and fun, and worth my bucks.

    If women don't want to make games, that's fine by me and I don't see the problem. I, as a consumer, care only about the end-result product.

    1. Re:Who Cares Who Makes the Games? by OldZombie · · Score: 1

      I think the people that care the most are the big companies they are losing out on all the money that these women (15 to 34???) are spending on other things. Not satisfied with getting guys to spend their money (agreed they do enjoy the games) they want the women too! So now their thinking is if there are women workers maybe we will be able to lure them to play games...I dont know how far this will succeed but lets wait and watch. Somebody mentioned Brenda Laurel...how about Brenda Braithwaite she was part of the team that did Playboy the Mansion

      --
      This is not a signature...no seriously!
  13. Try it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, part of the reason girls don't get hired is because HR managers of companies dismiss them based on their looks or age. Like OMG a girl wants to be a programmer nerd, she will distract all the male programmer nerds, we can't have that loss of productivity, nooo!

    I mean really, the real solution is just to have a women run and managed games company that builds games that they want to play (which aren't all that different from games males want to play)

    MMORPG's are fairly popular with women because they can pick what they look like and can go along undisturbed and undistracted by picking male or female characters depending on how social they want to be.

    A lot of my female friends find sim-type games really fun, between Sims/Sims2 and Princess Maker 2 (look it up), to side-scrolling fighting games (Capcom vs SNK and such).

  14. All in whats cool and not cool by Drakin030 · · Score: 0

    Well it seems to me that back in the 90's games were geared towards nerds. Playing a video game was not the "Hip" thing to do. Now comes the 2000's. Now there is a game out to entertain just about anyone. From your casual D&D nerds to your typical jocks wich sports games.

    It seems that now there are games out for anyone, the thought of video games aren't so "Nerdish". As more and more begin to look at video games as being popular, more and more females will jump on it because thats what everyone does and its not so nerdy.

  15. You are forgetting one important thing by 246o1 · · Score: 0, Troll

    There IS systematic discrimination against women, as well as several other factors that contribute to the way some of these careers work out. For instance, nurses. Many women become/became nurses rather than doctors because:
    a) they are not expected to support a family alone, but are more likely to spend several years at home, so such an investment of time and money is less worthwhile
    b) it is extremely difficult to take maternity leave for a year or whatever in the middle of med school or residency, whereas men are rarely expected to take time off for the birth of their child, and have no physical limitations during pregnancy, obviously
    c) women are (to a much lower degree now) encouraged to take over caretaker roles rather than the "in charge" role of doctor.

    Jobs like garbagemen, construction work, etc. are dominated by men for the same reason they are crappy jobs. They require a great deal of physical labor, something that men are genetically predisposed (through stronger upper bodies, more muscle mass in general, etc.) to be more fit for.

    As far as men making up a greater number of criminals, that is mostly because men commit most crimes. Furthermore, there is a sexist tendency to not give women the death penalty (in barbarous places that still have it, like my homeland) which is commensurate to the racist tendency to give it more often to black defendants and explains a little bit the skewed demographics of death row.

    Of course, the greatest inequality in society is between the rich and poor, but it seems naive to pretend that sexism is dead.

    --
    Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
    1. Re:You are forgetting one important thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They require a great deal of physical labor, something that men are genetically predisposed (through stronger upper bodies, more muscle mass in general, etc.) to be more fit for.
      So if men are different from women in one aspect, why can't they be different in another? Say for instance, the desire to be a programmer?
    2. Re:You are forgetting one important thing by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      I see.

      Few women in engineering = systematic discrimination against women.

      Few men in nursing = systematic discrimination against women.

      Huh?

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    3. Re:You are forgetting one important thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it hilarious that, in a discussion about sexism on a male dominated web site that focuses on a male dominated industry, that when someone writes a criticism of sexism, it gets modded down as troll?
      There's nothing unreasonable about this post, and yet, when a post like this one[http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1840 29&cid=15200200] gets labeled 4 Insightful. The only thing insightful about it is that you get keen insight into the posters ideology that the only thing women want in life is to find a mate. I'm not going to comment on how I feel about the article, I'm just merely pointing out that the attitude here seems to build a case for feminism rather than make it seem unreasonable.

    4. Re:You are forgetting one important thing by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 1
      FWIW I don't think your post should be marked 'Troll,' but I did want to respond to couple of things.

      First, even though another reply to your post says
      Few women in engineering = systematic discrimination against women. Few men in nursing = systematic discrimination against women.
      I agree with you that discrimination against women could (not saying it is) be the reason for both those things. It's not inherently impossible for one thing (discrimination against women) to have multiple effects...

      I also agree that it's possible that more men are garbagemen/coalminers/whatever because, in general, those jobs require physical strength and, in general, men are stronger than women. However, I do think it's worth noting that those are also jobs which, for whatever reason, are more socially acceptable for a man to hold that a women. Not gonna guess why, but there it is.

      One thing I did have issue with, however:
      As far as men making up a greater number of criminals, that is mostly because men commit most crimes.
      Um, what? "There are more male criminals, because more men commit crimes." Well, yes. Saying "My walls are white because the paint I used is white" is true but not very informative. I'm not gonna try and guess why there are more male criminals than female (or even say if that is true - I'm guessing it is, but don't have statistics in front of me) but saying it's because "mostly men commit crimes" isn't giving an explanation, it's just restating what we already know.
      Furthermore, there is a sexist tendency to not give women the death penalty (in barbarous places that still have it, like my homeland) which is commensurate to the racist tendency to give it more often to black defendants and explains a little bit the skewed demographics of death row.
      That I wholeheartedly agree with you on, although it's somewhat OT. But again, the fact there are vastly more black men than white (or black or latino or rainbow) women on death row is, in part, due to the fact that (to my understanding) more black men commit crimes eligible for death row than white males. Again, I think there is racism and sexism in the criminal justice system in addition to the skewed demographics of those who actually commit the crimes, but there's a skew there as well.

      Just some thougts.
      -Trillian
    5. Re:You are forgetting one important thing by 246o1 · · Score: 1

      The point I was making was that there is discrimination, PLUS OTHER FACTORS, and I then went on to talk about the OTHER FACTORS. I am sorry if I wasn't clear, but I was not trying to prove that there is discrimination, which I think it obvious to any rational observer (of American society, anyway), but rather discuss some other factors that contribute to the dichotomy of male/female jobs etc.

      --
      Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
  16. There will be more women developers when... by patio11 · · Score: 0

    ... you can figure out a way to make the proposition "completely give up any hope of having a family to get a salary which is significantly less than what you could get at any non-gaming firm with your same degree and a 40 hour workweek, in exchange for the opportunity to work on games you largely don't enjoy" sound attractive for women.

  17. Did anyone else read it as... by Bieeanda · · Score: 2, Funny
    "That time for women in games" and shudder at the implications?

    "Lara, you're going to have to swim through this shark infested water to get to the next ruin."
    "I certainly hope not. Blood attracts sharks quicker than anything else."
    "My god, you're injured? Don't you have any medical kits l-- oh."
    <icily>"Quite."

  18. From inside the games industry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I work for a smallish MMOG startup company in a major urban area - I'm the only female software engineer, and the only woman outside of the support staff in an office of ~20 people (including coders, artists, and management). It's quite lonely - the main problem seems to be a lack of qualified female applicants for job openings. We've done the standard craigslist thing, but maybe 1 in 10 of the applications are from women, and all of them so far have been mediocre. As much as I have an axe to grind about lack of diversity, taking someone who's not qualified for a position in the interest of affirmative action is not a realistic or beneficial choice.

    1. Re:From inside the games industry... by neonprimetime · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of my undergrad ... a smaller state school in the midwest ... there were like 2 computer science female majors while I was there ... and believe me, every cs major new who they were!

  19. I know a lot of female gamers... by kria · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know a lot of female gamers, but maybe that's because I am one. Programmer, too. But I'm a slight anomoly - most of the women gamers I know are tabletop gamers, while I play both, in nearly even amounts. So for players, I can buy the viewpoint that far too many games drive away women with big boobs and scanty costumes. Female armor in most MMORPGs, for example, tends to get a lot of jokes, just like really bad fantasy novel covers.

    Regarding women as programmers, I think that there are two things to consider:
    a) programmers are geeky and particularly at the moment, teenagers frown on people being smart, as the opposite of cool. Women tend to be more socially aware (or socially malleable) than their male counterparts in high school, so while they may quietly get good grades, they probably won't choose a geeky path like CS in college.

    b) there are still, believe it or not, teachers who discourage women from fields related to math or science. I was lucky enough not to have that problem in high school (now a fading ten years in the past), but I have heard plenty of first hand stories on the subject.

  20. Funny sense of Deja Vu by elrous0 · · Score: 0
    You know, I could SWEAR I've seen this story on /. before. In fact, I seem to recall seeing it again...and again...and again...and again...and so on.

    You know, if women spent half as much time actually designing games as they do bitching about the lack of women designing games, we wouldn't have this problem. But, then again, I guess they're used to having someone do everything FOR them.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Funny sense of Deja Vu by hanako · · Score: 1

      As I've said every time this nonsense comes up - the people who write these bloody articles tend not to bother looking for the women who DO write games to talk to us, either!

      Heaven forbid we get in the way of their preconceptions. It might make the articles take longer to write.

    2. Re:Funny sense of Deja Vu by kwoff · · Score: 1

      It does start to get tedious, eh?

  21. MOD PARENT UP by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

    Mod up

    --
    Don't quote me on this.
  22. The problem lies elsewhere by hanako · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The mainstream games industry sucks. What sane person would want to be trapped in there?

    So girls aren't keen to join? That's probably because they have too much SENSE to join the world of perpetual crunch time and all the other misery we always hear about. :)

    Girls who love mainstream games are perfectly capable of getting in there themselves. There's no point in trying to force others into it. I'm a female game designer and programmer and I would be thoroughly MISERABLE if you tried to hire me to work on your FPS.

    The problem comes earlier, really. The problem, as I see it, lies in schools and preconceptions. I've been in plenty of places with girl gamers who think games are cool - but have been conditioned to believe that programming is really hard and impossible to understand and they couldn't possibly do it, so they will never try. Even though there are tons of tools out there to make programming easier and help newbies make at least small, crap games with very little experience necessary. The girls are too convinced that programming is beyond them to even LOOK for tools. So they just sit around and talk about games that "it would be cool if someone made" rather than doing anything about it themselves.

    Do any high schools bother teaching simple interactive creation tools like Flash? Show more little girls that they can MAKE something cool if they just TRY and a couple more of them might come and join me. :)

  23. Why does it need to change? by Tweekster · · Score: 1

    Women have the oppurtunity to join the IT workforce but have chosen not to. For a while there was a big push to get women in IT, I have to ask why?
    Why promote a sex into a certain field. Women have obviously chosen that IT is not a field for them. In a very generalized sense women do not dig IT. So what? Many women do not appreciate that field while many men do. Is this a problem, no it is not.

    Women and men are different, maybe it is how they are raised, but in the broad sense the case can be made that men typically gravitate towards some things, while women gravitate towards other things. That isnt a discouragement for crossover, it just how the chips fall.

    The oppurtunity exists, but the demand by women is simply not there. As long as people have the oppurtunity, why should anyone be encouraged to go into a certain field simply because of their race/sex. Equal oppurtunity means the oppurtunity to not choose something also.

    --
    The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  24. whats with the stupid assumption women should play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    games could be said to be a waste of time. there are so many things to do in real life..to be really productive. i don't see it as a big loss that women aren't interested in wasting their time. if they really wanted to play they'd start their own companies and make their own. they'd know what they'd want to play. no ones trying to avoid making money from 50% of the population you know. no conspiracy.

    the hours spent gaming could be better spent reading books. yes you know...to attain knowledge:P

  25. Re: The pastor by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

    You should have smiled politely and then, with all your might, kicked him in the balls. (What the hell, he's not using them anyway.) Some people just need to have things explained to them in a language they can understand.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.