Slashdot Mirror


Google: The Missing Manual, Second Edition

Graeme Williams writes "In thinking about Google: The Missing Manual, Second Edition it occurred to me that the Google search box is like the Tardis -- there's a lot more inside that little box than you expect. Writing a manual for Google must have felt a little bit like writing a Manual of Everything, and I'm not sure I'm qualified to review Everything. However, I did read the book, and found a lot I didn't know about Google and using it. You will too." Read the rest of Graeme's review. Google: The Missing Manual, Second Edition author Sarah Milstein, J.D. Biersdorfer, Matthew MacDonald pages xv + 446 publisher O'Reilly Media rating 9 reviewer Graeme Williams ISBN 0-596-10019-1 summary An excellent overview, although understandably going out of date in real time

Google: The Missing Manual, Second Edition adds two new authors, 151 pages and two chapters, Google Analytics and Gmail, to the first edition. One comment about the authors: Rael Dornfest, one of the two authors of the first edition, is included as an author in the online O'Reilly catalog entry but not in the actual paper book.

The first part of the book presents two related topics: searching and the search box. Because it's cumbersome to distinguish between searching for "blah blah blah" and "blah blah blah" (no quotes), I'll use slashes to delimit the text that goes into the search box: /"blah blah blah"/ versus /blah blah blah/.

The authors mention that a long time ago other search engines had pages that were slow to load, then Google introduced a fast loading search page with almost nothing on it, and partly because of that, it became popular. They single out Yahoo! as having a slow and bloated front page. But now Google has an alternative front page with more content, and Yahoo! has an alternative search page with less content. The comparison wouldn't be fair even if this was a book comparing Google and Yahoo!, and it isn't.

The book covers searching clearly and thoroughly, I'd be flabbergasted if you didn't discover something you didn't know. The book also presents nine other things you can type into the search box, such as /define:syzygy/, or /phonebook:white house washington dc/. You can find a list on the Google Web Search Features page. I think it's great that the authors included this section, although some of the "features" seem more robust than others.

The book explained one thing about searching I should have realized: the order of search terms matters. /red frog/ will give you slightly different results than /frog red/. For that example, the difference is small, but it's greater the more complicated the search. The authors would like more people to use the Search within Results feature: "Google has a great feature for helping you narrow down your results to find the really relevant pages, although almost nobody uses it". Almost nobody uses it because it's not all that useful. All it does is add the new term(s) to the end of your previous search. But to the extent that the order of search terms matters, maybe you want the new search term added to the beginning of the search. Or if you're searching for a phrase, perhaps the additional words should be part of the phrase, inside the quotes.

Here's one hack that's missing from the manual. Instead of enclosing a phrase in quotes, /"to be or not to be"/, you can replace the spaces with periods, /to.be.or.not.to.be/. This example turns out to fail, because Google thinks you're looking for a web site in Belgium, but it works most of the time. As a typing-impaired person I like it because it saves having to find the shift key.

The second part of Google: The Missing Manual is the largest part of the book, and the hardest to categorize. It's almost 200 pages long, and covers all the user features other than GMail and the basic search box. Depending on how you count them, there are over a dozen different services described, including desktop, image, news, and print search, shopping with Froogle, Google Local (which has absorbed maps), Groups, Answers, and the wireless and SMS interfaces. Browser features include searching from the sidebar, address bar, toolbar, Googlebar, buttons and bookmarklets.

When the book was written, the Google Deskbar was a search tool for the web with some useful specialized searches such as UPS and USPS, as well as the data indexed by desktop search. It had a miniviewer which I quite liked for looking at search results without opening a full browser window. The miniviewer has since disappeared, and the deskbar has morphed into the Google Desktop, which can appear either as a deskbar or a sidebar, and in the latter incarnation can be configured with multiple pop-out panes. There are other, less significant changes as well. If you have a Google account, your choices for personalized news are stored in your account, and news alerts is out of beta, and they're stored in your account as well. These changes affect the screenshots in the book more than the explanatory text.

Overall, the material in part two is very useful, even as it goes out of date. Just like other parts of the book, I'm sure you'll learn things you never knew, or have forgotten. During an excellent introduction to Froogle, Google's search-powered shopping service, the book reminded me of Google Catalogs, the service for searching catalogs.

The third part of the book is for webmasters, starting with a good introduction to the legitimate ways to structure your site to improve its ranking, as well as using a robots.txt file to hide some or all of your site from Google's spiders. Google: The Missing Manual also explains the two complementary programs for Google ads: Adsense is the service where Google provides ads for your site; Adwords is the service where you can advertise your site on Google, or on sites that have subscribed to Adsense. Finally, Analytics is a service for tracking visitors to your site. It integrates with Adsense but doesn't require it. At the moment, it's available only by invitation. Obviously, these services are of less general interest than the other parts of the book – you can't put Adwords on your MySpace or MSDN Spaces page.

The fourth part of Google: The Missing Manual describes Gmail. As with other parts of Google, there are new features that just don't appear in the book, like mailing lists or the built-in chat, as well as features that have moved around, like the new button for "Delete". Also, you used to need an invitation to sign up for GMail, but now you can sign up if you have a cell phone that can receive a text message from Google with a code in it.

The book mentions the fact that GMail includes a "standard HTML" mode for older browsers, but implies that this mode has limited functionality. I suspect that Google has improved the interface since the book was written, since I couldn't find any significant difference between the two modes, although the book does mention one difference: the lack of a spell checker in standard HTML.

The book confuses new messages, which Google doesn't keep track of, and unread messages, which are counted and displayed in bold.

The authors acknowledge (p 8) that between the time the book was written and the time it was published, Google will have introduced new services, such as Google Finance or Google Pages, as well as changes in existing services. Since it's not realistic to expect the book to describe the features Google put in yesterday, it might have made sense for the authors to mention when the contents of the book were frozen. It's sort of unfair, but a lot of this book will be ancient history in another year.

Despite the fact that some of the material in the book is out-of-date, I think everyone will find this book useful. When we get into a rut using programs and services in the same old way every time, we need a hard push to explore new features, and Google: The Missing Manual is just the thing to help learn more about Google. If you don't use Google, you should read it to find out all the neat features you're missing out on. If you DO use Google, you should read it to find out all the neat features you're not taking advantage of."

You can purchase Google: The Missing Manual, Second Edition from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

155 comments

  1. Scanned? by crazyjeremy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder if Google will scan this in their "Book Search Project" http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/15/01 9251

    1. Re:Scanned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and a portion the scanned 2nd edition will be specially featured in the 3rd edition.

  2. Slightly OT - Google Notebook by nytes · · Score: 3, Informative

    Did anyone notice that Google Notebook has gone live?

    --
    -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    1. Re:Slightly OT - Google Notebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yesterday morning

    2. Re:Slightly OT - Google Notebook by Who235 · · Score: 2, Informative

      OT or not, I have to weigh in on this.

      I am already a fan, mainly because of the "note this" feature it adds next to searches which is huge AFAIC.

      Anyway, I think it rules.

    3. Re:Slightly OT - Google Notebook by Xichekolas · · Score: 1

      If by 'anyone' you mean everyone on slashdot, then yes. (There was an article on Google Notebook and some other new betas a few days ago.)

      --

      Self-referential Sigs are cool on /. these days...

      54

    4. Re:Slightly OT - Google Notebook by athena_wiles · · Score: 1

      i'm hoping it's going to turn out to be useful (as a college student, I do a lot of internet research as very preliminary work on essays etc, in order to get a feel for a topic or whatnot). i've been messing around with it for the past day or two - here are some preliminary thoughts:

      so far, I really like the ease of adding notes to the notebook (it's nice that it's as simple as hilight and right-click with the firefox extension installed), but there are some things I'd change about the options for actually organizing notes within the notebook. i'd also appreciate some sort of comment feature on public notebooks - ie. what if I'm doing, for example, research on possible sites for a family reunion and want my family to be able to give feedback?

      on the whole, though, i'm pretty happy with it as a brand new service, and i'll be interested to see what improvements they make on it in the future...

  3. The Missing Manual.... by IflyRC · · Score: 1, Funny

    Or "How Google Is Helping You To Help Google Rule The World"

    1. Re:The Missing Manual.... by boater+rich · · Score: 1

      Or "How I learned to stop worrying, and love google"

    2. Re:The Missing Manual.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I might need some help when Google wants me to helpGooglehelpmehelpGoogle rule the world

  4. 404 File Not Found *Missing Manual?* by infinityxi · · Score: 2, Funny

    The requested URL (books/06/05/17/1347228.shtml) was not found.

    If you feel like it, mail the url, and where ya came from to pater@slashdot.org.


    Way to get literal on me Slashdot.

    --
    Turn based strategy game that runs over XMPP. Phalanx
    1. Re:404 File Not Found *Missing Manual?* by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 1
      The requested URL (books/06/05/17/1347228.shtml) was not found. If you feel like it, mail the url, and where ya came from to pater@slashdot.org. Way to get literal on me Slashdot.

      This happens in rare cases when the article appears on the front page but the page it is linking to hasn't been created yet. I've never seen it take longer than 30 seconds to resolve.

    2. Re:404 File Not Found *Missing Manual?* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In rare cases? I see it happening nearly 50% of the time I browse new articles on Slashdot...

  5. Gmail by DarthChris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The review says the book includes Gmail. Last time I checked (admittedly a few months back) Gmail was still in beta and invite-only. Has this changed?

    --
    Don't you just hate it when people reply to your signature?
    1. Re:Gmail by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked (admittedly a few months back) Gmail was still in beta and invite-only. Has this changed?

      Hmm... no, and I have a couple of invites to sell you. interested?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Gmail by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Gmail is still in beta, and still invite only. HOWEVER if you have a cell phone that is SMS capable, you can get a free invite sent to your phone (like you dont have one...)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re:Gmail by east+coast · · Score: 2, Funny

      Last time I checked (admittedly a few months back) Gmail was still in beta and invite-only.

      Yeah, it's still beta but considering how much things change on google why shouldn't it be included?

      As for the invites? They're a dime a dozen. Infact I have enough invites right now to give 2 mail accounts to every Chinaman.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    4. Re:Gmail by HoboMaster · · Score: 1

      And on top of that, every gmail account is given more invites than we know what to do with.

      I think it's to stop gmail from being used for spam.

      --
      Remember kids, tin foil doesn't work, so use LeadHat.
    5. Re:Gmail by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Actually I don't have a cell that has SMS, nor do I have a gmail account. I intend to never have either, though you could change my mind about SMS.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    6. Re:Gmail by ElderKorean · · Score: 1

      Gmail is still invite only, but they say that is to stop spammers from signing up heaps of accounts.

      You can (providing you've got a mobile phone) get an account without any friends - Google SMS you an invite code.

      https://www.google.com/accounts/SmsMailSignup1

    7. Re:Gmail by junir · · Score: 1

      Any chance of gettin' one of those invites??

    8. Re:Gmail by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Gimmie an email to send it to.

      --
      Why not fork?
  6. The Manual of Everything... by crerwin · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is right here. You'd think that would have turned up in a Google search, sheesh.

  7. TARDIS! by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Informative

    For the dwindling class of people who don't get the ref, the TARDIS is Doctorr Who's time machine, which is bigger inside than it appears from outside. Graeme Williams gets several hundred bonus nerd points.

    1. Re:TARDIS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely "Doctorr Who" would use a TARRDIS?

    2. Re:TARDIS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except he spelled it "Tardis" instead of TARDIS -- it's an acronym.

      Half bonus.

    3. Re:TARDIS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're all a bunch of re TARDIS , Star Trek's not real!

    4. Re:TARDIS! by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      There's a new Dr. Who series going on you know.

    5. Re:TARDIS! by Main+Gauche · · Score: 2, Funny

      "the TARDIS is ... .
      Graeme Williams gets several hundred bonus nerd points."


      Excellent; we're finally narrowing in on that elusive exchange rate:

      several hundred bonus nerd points == 5 Karma Whoring points

    6. Re:TARDIS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      And you lose several thousand bonus nerd points for not knowing that the character is named 'The Doctor' while the show is titled 'Doctor Who'.

      Unless of course you're referring to the title character of the 1960s American movie "Doctor Who And the Daleks", of course, which might make sense considering that 'Doctor Who' travelled around in the 'Tardis' which wasn't an acronym like TARDIS is.

    7. Re:TARDIS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the dwindling class of people who don't get the ref, the TARDIS is Doctorr Who's time machine, which is bigger inside than it appears from outside. Graeme Williams gets several hundred bonus nerd points.

      Reading his review, he's definitely a TARD, anyway.

    8. Re:TARDIS! by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Informative
      And you lose several thousand bonus nerd points for not knowing that the character is named 'The Doctor' while the show is titled 'Doctor Who'.

      True, but at the end of the show he's usually credited as 'Doctor Who' rather than 'The Doctor'.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    9. Re:TARDIS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      He was credited as "Doctor Who" up until Peter Davison (the Fifth Doctor) took on the role in the early 1980s at which point it changed to "The Doctor"

      The first season of the new series reverted it to "Doctor Who", however the second series has corrected this.

    10. Re:TARDIS! by Stephen+Maturin · · Score: 1

      Only if he were a pirate. Ot if it were talk-like-a-pirate day. TARRRDIS indeed, matey! Otherwise it's just TARDIS. And Doctor, for that matter.

      --
      Non tam praeclarum est scire Latine, quam turpe nescire
      -- Cicero
    11. Re:TARDIS! by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      In the middle of this increasingly divergent thread...is it true the BBC plans to introduce a new Doctor every season? Or, another way of putting it -- is there a new actor playing the Doctor in the second series?

    12. Re:TARDIS! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The first Doctor introduced himself as Doctor Who a few times. Mind you, a lot of things that were established in his timeframe were later overruled.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:TARDIS! by bri2000 · · Score: 1

      The second season saw David Tenant replacing Christopher Ecclestone (and, after some concerns in the first episode doing a damn fine job of it). Media over here have been reporting that Ecclestone is signed up for a second season so there won't be any more regenerations for at least another year.

    14. Re:TARDIS! by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Christopher Ecclestone left after only one year; apparently this was planned from the beginning, although when word got out to the media they made a great fuss about it and gave the impression that there'd been some great row.

      David Tennant (cf: Blackpool, Casanova) is the new Doctor, and he's already signed up for another year. Shows no signs of leaving, and is apparently a fan of the show from way back... I imagine we'll get a fair bit of mileage out of the Tenth Doctor.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  8. Re:I don't trust a book that lies in the title by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 0

    I'm assuming your post was supposed to be a joke. But if it wasn't, the point behind the "Missing Manual" series is that these are substitutes for the manuals that don't come with software anymore.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  9. Wow I know something else by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's one hack that's missing from the manual. Instead of enclosing a phrase in quotes, /"to be or not to be"/, you can replace the spaces with periods, /to.be.or.not.to.be/.

    And, if you replace the periods with dashes, behold... IT WORKS TOO!

    Who needs a book on Google eh? just Google it, it's cheaper...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Wow I know something else by L7_ · · Score: 1

      /to-be-or-not-to-be/ actually returns the correct thing without any errors but /to.be.or.not.to.be/ does not. why would the reviewer mention something that doesn't work is beyond me.

    2. Re:Wow I know something else by kalirion · · Score: 1

      The reviewer just didn't think things through. I've never heard of this type of search before, but it seemed common sense that adding another period to the end would make it work. And it did. /to.be.or.not.to.be./

    3. Re:Wow I know something else by yertle38 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And since when is hitting the period between every word easier than finding one of two of the large shift keys on the keyboard? Shift and Space seem large to me for a reason, but that's just me...

    4. Re:Wow I know something else by mensan · · Score: 1

      Yeah I've been using the undocumented periods.for.spaces feature for two- or three- word searches for over eight years. I can't remember where I learned it though. It's interesting that it's still undocumented. Did you know about asterisks? Try /all**are born**equal in**rights/. Each asterisk is a word wildcard. The dumbest Google search feature is currency conversion. Try /100 USD in EUR/. The disclaimer even says the information Google gives you is worthless.

    5. Re:Wow I know something else by mensan · · Score: 1

      Yeah I've been using the undocumented periods.for.spaces feature for two- or three- word searches for over eight years. I can't remember where I learned it though. It's interesting that it's still undocumented.

      Did you know about asterisks? Try /all**are born**equal in**rights/. Each asterisk is a word wildcard.

      The dumbest Google search feature is currency conversion. Try /100 USD in EUR/. The disclaimer even says the information Google gives you is worthless.

    6. Re:Wow I know something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I've been using the undocumented periods.for.spaces feature for two- or three- word searches for over eight years. I can't remember where I learned it though. It's interesting that it's still undocumented.

      Did you know about asterisks? Try /all**are born**equal in**rights/. Each asterisk is a word wildcard.

      The dumbest Google search feature is currency conversion. Try /100 USD in EUR/. The disclaimer even says the information Google gives you is worthless.

  10. Most rimmed company in teh world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google or Apple?

    1. Re:Most rimmed company in teh world by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think it's NTP.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  11. New (To Me): Discography, FedEx Tracking by SydShamino · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe these are just new to me, but two features I've found and use are how Google interprets searches and provides links to their own database, or directly to the deep-linked page I'm looking for.

    For example, search for "U2 Joshua Tree Discography" and the top hit is for Google's own music CD database, giving me exactly what I wanted in a clean, efficient, fast-loading manner. (I know, this keeps me on their site, seeing their ads longer, but I'm still happy.)

    The second feature is package tracking. Just type in the package number (for example: "736805130363") into the box and search. There is only one link - directly to the FedEx tracking page for the package. Given that I have a Google search box in my browser, this saves typing "fedex.com", waiting for it to load, then finding their own tracker search box.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    1. Re:New (To Me): Discography, FedEx Tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man your package arrived today! Interesting that you posted a real tracking number...

    2. Re:New (To Me): Discography, FedEx Tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tracking is also VERY usefull for me at work when I may not know the sjipping carrier. There are very few that Google can't identify.

    3. Re:New (To Me): Discography, FedEx Tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition to FedEx, this also works for (at least) UPS and USPS; likely more.

    4. Re:New (To Me): Discography, FedEx Tracking by Ciarang · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this is a side effect of all the Dr Who talk, but according to the fedex page your package travelled backwards and forwards in time frequently during the journey.

    5. Re:New (To Me): Discography, FedEx Tracking by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      The page didn't give away where I worked, so I wasn't worried.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  12. I bet it doesnt talk about death rays... by kusanagi374 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    or how they try to use it while not doing evil...

  13. Re:Tardis Analogy by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Funny

    42

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  14. hmm by flynt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's one hack that's missing from the manual. Instead of enclosing a phrase in quotes, /"to be or not to be"/, you can replace the spaces with periods, /to.be.or.not.to.be/. This example turns out to fail, because Google thinks you're looking for a web site in Belgium, but it works most of the time. As a typing-impaired person I like it because it saves having to find the shift key.


    Blank stare...

    1. Re:hmm by phasm42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Shift key for the enclosing quotes, which are not required when using dots.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    2. Re:hmm by teeseejay · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because I'm not "typing challenged," but I can't fathom how it's easier to replace spaces with dots than to "find the shift key" twice to enclose a phrase in quotes. And for a bonus, demonstrate the "dot-technique" using an example that doesn't even work. Priceless. Maybe the 3rd edition will have a chapter about avoiding the pesky space- and shift-keys, but till then, the reviewer should maybe stick to the Google-stuff that's actually in the book.

    3. Re:hmm by noidentity · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Blank stare..."/I.

      Don't.you.mean."blank.stare"?

    4. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use single quotes... no shift key involvement.

    5. Re:hmm by pilkul · · Score: 1

      Um, I just tried and single quotes don't do anything. Google just ignores them.

    6. Re:hmm by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Don't.you.mean."blank.stare"?

      The whole point was to avoid using the shift key. How did you type the question mark?

    7. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S.T.F.U.
      ;)

    8. Re:hmm by zokum · · Score: 1

      It's not the shift key itself that is there problem you clueless idiot, it's the act of pressing down one key while using another. Let's say you had only your right hand, can you not see how this.would.be.easier than "this would be easier". A lot of keyboard layouts have the . right next to space, making it very easy to type, while " is a lot harder to reach on most. If you still don't get this, try imagining you only had 1 hand with 1 finger on it, good luck using " in an easy manner then, and no, sticky keys are not "easy".

      --
      Rest in peace Malin "looxn" Kristiansen. We miss you...
    9. Re:hmm by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. I also used the shift key to type the capital letter and the two quotes. I was hasty and should have let someone else execute the joke better:

      don't.you.mean.blank.stare.

      or.something

    10. Re:hmm by Kieckerjan · · Score: 1

      You can also omit the last quote of a phrase: /"to be or not to be/

      --
      Being well balanced is overrated. -- John Carmack
    11. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, because all the one handed, one fingered web browsers out there were BEGGING for a solution. hey, it sounds to me that you might be the "clueless idiot", because if you only had your right hand (banning any unfortunate, four digit amputations), you could easily hold shift with your middle finger and type the quotation mark with your index. jeez.

      honestly, no it's not easier. it's a poor solution and an even worse example since the one cited did not function.

      yes. i have too much time on my "hands".

    12. Re:hmm by epee1221 · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, some people have harder lives than yours. Is it really that difficult to understand that some disabilities might cause people to have trouble typing?

      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
  15. Re:Tardis Analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When are we going to stop this madness?!?!

    Not for at least 2 million zymes!

    May you run out of gleek sooner than that!

    MUHAHA!

  16. Re:Tardis Analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    BS Dr. Who ran for almost 30 years. Even without its resurrection it would continue to be referenced due to its geek factor. So smeg off before I drop you in the eye of harmony!

    Looking for really good sunblock,
    Omega

  17. Re:Tardis Analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have a closet at work that has been dubbed "the tardis" for over 20 years, so you're wrong. Dr Who has suffered since that fag-lord brought it back, even the mid eighties trash was stellar by comparison.

  18. Useless book by DerCed · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't really understand why one should read such a book and why the reviewer rates it so high. The features of google are clearly described on their website and there are hundreds of books about the usage of search engines on the internet.

    Useless?

    1. Re:Useless book by MrNougat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't really understand why one should read such a book ...

      It's for people who want to read about Google and its uses, not for people who want to use Google.

      A few years ago, between jobs, my wife bought me a "how to get a job" book produced (or at least endorsed) by the people at Monster. Equally useless. I needed to get a job, not read about how to get a job.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    2. Re:Useless book by wired_parrot · · Score: 1
      Useless?
      I tend to think not. When I did my undergraduate degree a mandatory course for all freshmen was a short 2 hour course on finding material at the library, and it helped me immensely. It seems simple enough, but most people I talk to don't know how to carry out basic research on the web. With Google's increasing role as a starting point for research online, I think a simple course on searching with it is equally important. Even obscure words can turn up millions of hits on Google, so knowing how to properly limit your search is extremely important. Unfortunately too many people's idea of searching on the web is to type in a single keyword on google and see what comes up.
    3. Re:Useless book by h4ter · · Score: 1

      The features of google are clearly described on their website

      But what if the internet is down? Huh?... oh wait.

  19. Shameless OT plug! by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

    Well, if you're looking for Buck Rogers, I have an article about him for you right here. There's no nudity or anything, but the language may be NSFW.

    Anyway, the proof is - some of us DO remember the old stuff.

  20. Please be Taking Remedial English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dwindling doesn't mean what you think it does.

    1. Re:Please be Taking Remedial English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dwindle" means "to become gradually less until little remains" and he was using it to refer to the shrinking group of people which get a Doctor Who reference; how do you figure that he's using it incorrectly?

    2. Re:Please be Taking Remedial English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One more who needs to learn how to read. Notice the word "don't" in the original message? He says the group of people who _don't_ get the TARDIS ref is shrinking.

    3. Re:Please be Taking Remedial English by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      Which is because there's a new series on.

      By the way, I'm assuming you're the same AC who originally complained about the use of the word dwindling, which incidentally was spot on. If you aren't, then you could probably mitigate that kind of confusion. I've heard there's a way to uniquely identify yourself when making a comment on Slashdot.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    4. Re:Please be Taking Remedial English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      'I've heard there's a way to uniquely identify yourself when making a comment on Slashdot...'

      Yeah... Just type your posts with correct punctuation, grammar and spelling. Your posts light up like a christmas tree..

    5. Re:Please be Taking Remedial English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, I just need to get over that pesky trick in humans of seeing what you expect to see and not what's actually there. Pattern recognition can be a bitch sometimes.

  21. How valuable is this? by MudButt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With a shelf life somewhere between milk and bread, this book would have to be pretty darn cheap for me to buy it.

    1. Re:How valuable is this? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Reminds me a bit of those books listing "cool" web site links when the dotcom bubble yet had to burst.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:How valuable is this? by Itninja · · Score: 1

      I remember buying the 1st edition of the "Internet Yellow Pages" back in 1994 (I think) at Costco. It even had a listing of "all" the Usenet newsgroups in the back. I still have it...

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    3. Re:How valuable is this? by DerCed · · Score: 1

      Well, 24 Euro seems reasonable. But still a bit too much if you ask me. The author had better sold his content to some print journals.

    4. Re:How valuable is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh no! you're not going to buy it :(

      We are all devastated

  22. Re:Tardis Analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Tip:
    Douglas Adams Wrote and Edited for Dr. Who for a couple of seasons under a pseudonym. City of Death is one of his works.

  23. Re:Tardis Analogy by tepples · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No one is making any Red Dwarf analogies

    Until some movie studio hires a bunch of some short native American actors for its next high-fantasy movie.

    or continuing to reference Star Trek

    On the KHAN-trary...

  24. Re:Tardis Analogy by JPribe · · Score: 1

    What's a matter??? You lose your cat???

    --

    Why go fast when you can go anywhere? O|||||||O
  25. omfg stop humping googles legs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    this is just sick.

  26. My favorite google search by Kaenneth · · Score: 2, Funny

    My favorite google search is "sqrt(-1)"

    1. Re:My favorite google search by quincunx55555 · · Score: 1

      That's cool! I like the:

      /160 pounds * 4000 feet in Calories/

      search even better ;)

    2. Re:My favorite google search by pisces22 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Narcissus.

    3. Re:My favorite google search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that "e^(pi*i)" actually works makes me cream repeatedly.

    4. Re:My favorite google search by lgw · · Score: 1

      The "e^(pi*i)" search is much cooler. Still the closest thing to an entertaining equation math has to offer.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:My favorite google search by SEMW · · Score: 0

      My favourite is:
      /the answer to life, the universe and everything/

      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    6. Re:My favorite google search by CFrankBernard · · Score: 1

      I believe Douglas Adams claimed he came up with the answer 42 while staring at his garden. Perhaps he had his alleged favorite Earl Grey # 42 in hand as well.
      42 = for tea two = tea for two: http://www.cafepress.com/42_tea_for_two
      "So the best advice I can give to an American arriving in England is this. Go to Marks and Spencer and buy a packet of Earl Grey tea." --Douglas Adams Salmon of Doubt

    7. Re:My favorite google search by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >sqrt(-1)
      We're sorry. Your search cannot be completed as dialed. Please rotate your query string ninety degrees and try your search again.
      >life, the universe, and everything
      If you search for the meaning of life on Google, you get to a not-bad philosophy page.

    8. Re:My favorite google search by Repton · · Score: 1

      Hmm, intriguing: tan(pi/2) = 1.6e16. Even my calculator has a bigger infinity than that!

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    9. Re:My favorite google search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, with a name like "Google", you'd think they'd at least go to e100.

    10. Re:My favorite google search by SEMW · · Score: 0

      >If you search for the meaning of life on Google, you get to a not-bad philosophy page.

      Search for the exact phrase:
      the answer to life, the universe, and everything

      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    11. Re:My favorite google search by syrrys · · Score: 0

      "i hate google" tic toc tic toc

      --
      "Patience is not a virtue, it's a waste of time."
    12. Re:My favorite google search by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      e^(pi*i) + 1 = 0 is better cause then you get zero and one in there.

      --
      Why not fork?
    13. Re:My favorite google search by lgw · · Score: 1

      I've always thought that was plain silly. The fact that e to the pi i is -1 is amazing, mysterious, and cool. Writing that out in some obfuscated way into order to "get 0 and 1 in there" is just mathturbation.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:My favorite google search by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Once you cross over to the point about how "cool" it is, I pretty sure you're already mathturbating. I just like to stroke it a little harder.

      --
      Why not fork?
  27. Re:Tardis Analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't like Doctor Who? Where are you from, Cypress Corners or something?

  28. Just Google it... dangerous! by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny
    Who needs a book on Google eh? just Google it, it's cheaper...

    Won't that cause a tear in the space-time continuum?

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Just Google it... dangerous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the word you're looking for is "anomaly," as in "There's an anomaly in the space-time continuum! We need to modify the main deflector array to modulate a tachyon stream!"

      You need to watch more ST:TNG.

  29. Calculator by Z1NG · · Score: 0

    It is a pretty basic feature, but people are amazed when I show them that google can act as a scientific calculator by simply typing into the search bar.

  30. Missing? by fak3r · · Score: 1

    It's always in the last place you look.

    1. Re:Missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen this post before, but it's never more apt than when the review is of those terrible 'Missing Manual' pieces of junk.

    2. Re:Missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course! Why would you continue to look for it after you found it? :)

    3. Re:Missing? by booch · · Score: 1

      When I find something I'm looking for, I keep looking -- sometimes in case I might come across a better result, and sometimes just disprove that silly saying.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    4. Re:Missing? by PurpleWizard · · Score: 1

      Or if you are lucky in the first place you look....

    5. Re:Missing? by fak3r · · Score: 1

      > Or if you are lucky in the first place you look....

      But that would also be the last place you look too!

  31. Punctuation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, with google, how do I search for the difference between the following LaTeX commands:
    \circle
    \circle*

    Google's dropping of all punctuation is quite annoying, and makes some queries impossible, as /LaTeX \circle \circle*/ is the same as /latex circle/, which is completly different.

    1. Re:Punctuation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, that sucks. I also hate that google returns results which don't even have the words you're searching for when I'm doing an exact quote search.

    2. Re:Punctuation by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      So, with google, how do I search for the difference between the following LaTeX commands:
      \circle
      \circle*

      Google's dropping of all punctuation is quite annoying, and makes some queries impossible, as /LaTeX \circle \circle*/ is the same as /latex circle/, which is completly different.

      Just search for "latex circle" (sans quotes). You'll find plenty of results on the first page that answer your question. You don't need to be that precise.
    3. Re:Punctuation by rsadelle · · Score: 1

      You don't need to be that precise.

      Except that sometimes I do. Checking popularity of two-word versus one hyphenated word constructions is difficult. For example, is the adjective "low income" or "low-income" and who uses which one?

    4. Re:Punctuation by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty niche requirement. And a little contrived, if you ask me.

    5. Re:Punctuation by $sjfsjf · · Score: 1

      I've noticed this as well, it's incredibly frustrating. Are they doing this on purpose?

    6. Re:Punctuation by waveclaw · · Score: 1
      So, with google, how do I search for the difference between the following LaTeX commands


      Have you tried Koders, Codebase or even the OSS Gonzui? Source-code specific search enginers are nothing new. (However, the ones I listed are limited to C and C type languages. And I'd hate to be a STFW troll, but if you spent < 5 minutes at Google looking for, say, "latex source code search engine" you might get lucky.)
      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
    7. Re:Punctuation by shreevatsa · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It would be nice if we could search such things on Google, but
      1. You should be looking up such things in a grammar or style book, anyway.
      2. What more people use is not an indication of what's correct.
      Anyway, the answer to your question is this: When a noun phrase is used to qualify another noun (i.e, used as an adjective), hyphenate it. Thus, you would say "I have a low income", but "Theirs is a low-income family". (Similarly with 'stainless-steel knife', etc.) This rule isn't very rigorously applied these days, so don't take it very seriously, but when it doesn't hurt to use a hyphen there, why not use it?

      Besides, in issues of grammar, my personal preference is to ignore grammar rules and instead pick whatever is logical and leads to the least ambiguity. Thus, 'stainless steel knife' is ambiguous (is the steel stainless or the knife?), so use 'stainless-steel knife'. To delete a line in vi, type "dd." is ambiguous (typing "dd." will delete two lines!), so put the dot (full stop / period) outside the quotation marks — To delete a line in vi, type "dd".
    8. Re:Punctuation by mike2R · · Score: 1

      Well for that example Google Trends will give you useful info: clicky

      The answer seems to be the two word, not hyphenated.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    9. Re:Punctuation by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      Yes. And in some countries, latex is banned!

  32. Re:Tardis Analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be afraid; fear is the mindkiller. Fear is the little death that brings total oblivion...

  33. GBook by certel · · Score: 0

    I would think this would be a good read. Could add some insight to some new ways of utilizing some of Googles services.

  34. I bet I sound like a troll in saying this but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Here's one hack that's missing from the manual. Instead of enclosing a phrase in quotes, /"to be or not to be"/, you can replace the spaces with periods, /to.be.or.not.to.be/. This example turns out to fail, because Google thinks you're looking for a web site in Belgium, but it works most of the time. As a typing-impaired person I like it because it saves having to find the shift key."
    The reason it is missing is because it must be the stupidest "hack" ever devised. The shift key is less than an inch away from the period key, not to sound insulting but, are you retarded or something? This is as bad as the time some twits thought that by increasing the number of characters used in a |\/|3554g3, they could somehow save time. Damn wannabes.

  35. Gwigle by ornil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One really cool way to explore the advanced google features is to play The Gwigle game. If you could get through the entire thing in less than a few hours, I'd be really impressed. The last problem is particularly cute.

    1. Re:Gwigle by cwernli · · Score: 1

      The painter's name is revealed by searching for "french impressionist painter" - it helps of course to know the general style of the paintings, which cannot be taken for granted.

      The question of the stock price is actually easier: the price displayed is for Friday 4:00 p.m. - that's the closing price, so an appropriate search reveals it quite easily.

    2. Re:Gwigle by asavage · · Score: 1

      The stock question was actually easier then that. If you searched for incorporated public nasdaq it was the first result. For people familiar with most google features the whole thing should only take around 20 minutes.

    3. Re:Gwigle by Eil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks, I was actually supposed to work today...

  36. Another interesting Google feature by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

    A feature I found a little while ago relates to real estate. Google seems to have (silently) upload many of the US Multiple Listing Service (MLS) databases for residential real estate. Try searching:

    san francisco real estate

    You get an option to "refine your search" - if you use this interactive tool, you can search the MLS database in San Francisco for properties with specific characteristics. Who needs realtor.com anymore?

  37. Re:Tardis Analogy by Tsunayoshi · · Score: 1

    Committee for the Liberation of Inter-Terrestrial Organisms and their Reintegration Into Society

    --
    "Get a bicycle. You will not regret it, if you live." - Mark Twain, "Taming the Bicycle"
  38. Save $9.25! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Save yourself $9.25 by buying the book here: Google: The Missing Manual, Second Edition. And if you use the "secret" A9.com discount, you can save an extra 1.57%!

  39. MOD UP PARENT by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

    Why buy the book when you can Gwigle?

  40. Meta-view. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've read the reviewed book, as well as Amazon and Firefox hacks. The thing that got me excited was the possible meta-layers one could create on top of these and other services. The future is going to be aggregation, and its benefits.

    BTW O'Reilly has a book on Game Physics.

  41. Re:Tardis Analogy by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm mildly annoyed by all of these Tardis, K9, and Doctor Who analogies. No one would be making them except really, really hard-core science fiction fans if the show hadn't been resurrected after its 1989 cancellation and 1996 television movie.

    In other words: fewer people would be talking about Doctor Who if it wasn't currently on TV. Wow. Insight into the human condition there.

    At any rate, even if there were not new episodes being aired, TARDIS analogies would certainly not be dead. Perhaps in the US the show was all but forgotten until the appearance of the Ninth, but in the UK its cultural impact was far, far greater. Anything which is deceptively small, and which is larger inside than you might have originally expected, can and will be compared to the TARDIS, and not just by geeks but by anybody.

    The fact that the TARDIS was bigger on the inside than on the outside was probably the most remembered thing about that show. Hotly followed by 'the special effects were awful', 'hiding behind the sofa', 'scarf', and 'you're safe if you run up the stairs'.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  42. If Google uses the same technology as the Tardis by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    then it must use the same principle of Dimensional Transcendentalism which, as any Who fan knows, just means that it's bigger on the inside. However, Tom Baker's Doctor Who once commented that he felt there was something fundamentally wrong with DT, so Google had best be careful.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  43. Re:Tardis Analogy by mongus · · Score: 1

    Bdbdbdbd.

  44. cut some slack-age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a real hard time hitting the shift keys as well. When I was younger it wasn't that bad, but now my hands are..well, older, same as me, and pretty slow and stiff. I frequently hit the key, but then I notice it wasn't hit hard enough, no shift. A major PITA and pain in the hands for no result.

    In other words, don't be so hasty to negatively label someone based on possibly erroneous assumptions.

  45. Attn : Google Fanboys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is no longer the 'little' darling company anymore.

    They had good technology; implemented it well; went public; made gobbs of money; now they are a public company, trying to prop-up a sliding stock and trying to explain quarterly profits to Wall street.

    So can we please stop oohing and aaahhhing about Google.

    Stop already. Jeebus!

  46. another useless feature by black_widow · · Score: 3, Informative

    if you type in an aircraft's tail number, google shows an airplane icon at the top and shows a link to the faa's aircraft registry

    http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&lr=&neww indow=1&q=n244cg

  47. yeah, uhm, ok by qzulla · · Score: 0, Troll
    Finally, Analytics is a service for tracking visitors to your site.

    Adblocked. 'Nuff said.

    qz

  48. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  49. why did you resign? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  50. Google hints online here by Mad+Dog+Manley · · Score: 1

    The features of google are clearly described on their website and there are hundreds of books about the usage of search engines on the internet.

    Specifically, you can find more information on Google Search tips on this page here:

    http://www.google.com/help/features.html

  51. "Get a life!"? What's that? by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    He was credited as "Doctor Who" up until Peter Davison (the Fifth Doctor) took on the role in the early 1980s at which point it changed to "The Doctor"

    The first season of the new series reverted it to "Doctor Who", however the second series has corrected this.
    My god.
    Do you even know what a female human looks like?
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  52. hmm by rkulla · · Score: 1

    it's always worth learning something new about google so i'd check it out