Slashdot Mirror


Replacement for Jewel Cases?

PsychoBrat asks: "I'm surrounded by jewel cases at work and at home, and although most of them are still holding together to some extent, a lot of them have either cracked fronts, broken hinges or snapped teeth. Slim cases generally annoy me because I can't tell them apart by looking at their spines, and wallets take too long to sort through. What do you use in place of the standard fragile jewel cases to keep all your discs organized?"

240 comments

  1. You mean.. by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

    they make cases for these things?!?

    1. Re:You mean.. by patiodragon · · Score: 1

      People still use discs?

      This is going to be like a cassette or 8-track tape thread in 3 years. Set your ripper to 256 kbs and don't look back.

      -KB

    2. Re:You mean.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahahahaha comedy gold 5 golden manbabies to you good sir

    3. Re:You mean.. by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      ?? 256 ?? At 160Kbit VBR, I can't tell the difference from the original .wav!!

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    4. Re:You mean.. by Jaruzel · · Score: 4, Informative
      I have 300+ music CDs.

      I have 'ripped' them to a 250GB USB2 drive.

      'Ripped' isn't really the right word. 'Copied' is more accurate. Each track is copied as an uncompressed WAV file. Each CD consumes approx 400mb of disk space. The WAVs are the same bit rate as the CD Audio; Nero will just copy them back without any conversion if I was to burn an audio CD.

      The folder structure is as follows:
      L:\Music\
            Artist Name\
                Album Name\
                    01 Track Name.WAV
      There is also an XML file with all the album info in it including the CDDB query ID in case I need to requery CDDB without needing the actual CD. Additionally both .m3u and .pls playlist files are auto created. Finally a album cover photo (from Amazons XML feed) is auto downloaded and placed into the folder as folder.jpg

      Why did I do it like this ? I'm lazy. I don't want to re-rip my collection. Ever. As disks get bigger, at some point ~7mb 256k mp3s are going to look tiny. On a good system ($2000 amp + speakers) mp3s DO NOT sound as good as the original CDs. My WAVs however, sound identical.

      For my portable mp3 player (see, I'm not totally anti-mp3) I have an ActiveSync-type tool which converts selected albums from the Music Library to 256k mp3s. If I decided I want 384k or even 160k mp3s instead, I can just alter a setting in the tool, and batch re-encode to the player. As part of the mp3 encoding process the folder.jpg album cover is embedded into the mp3 using the IDv2 tag 'APIC' (my mp3 player displays these on screen).

      For ripping the CDs originally, I wrote a tool that rips at the max speed of your optical drive. In my system it rips a CD in about 3 minutes. I can run 2 copies of the tool, and have each one ripping from a different drive simultaneously, although I think this saturates the IDE channel, as rip speeds decrease. This tool can also defeat 'most' DRMd CDs (not the latest batch tho).

      Overall the system works great, this is the first time I've written up how it all works, so apologies if bits aren't clear. If anyones interested in the tools I use, feel free to contact me.

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    5. Re:You mean.. by GregWebb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why not rip to FLAC? Half the size, same quality.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    6. Re:You mean.. by Jaruzel · · Score: 3, Informative

      I considered FLAC, but went with WAV because everything can play it, and as a hobbyist coder, WAV is easier to program for (built in APIs in Windows etc).

      As the code is mostly my own, I can always update and convert the master library at a later date. So if FLAC or Lossless WMA (LOL!) becomes a better standard, I'll switch to that.

      What I forgot to mention was the complete app list and it's dependencies.

      Ripper: My Own Tool, CDRipper.EXE
                            -Querys CDDB
                            -Querys Amazons XML feed
                            -Uses Windows API for CDA control and track ripping
                            -Can run 'hands free', pops the drive tray when done, plays a sound, waits for new cd.

      mp3Encoder: My Own Tool, MusicSync.EXE
                            -Internal code to work out what to sync.
                            -uses cmd line encoder (LAME at the moment*) to create mp3s
                            -uses AudioGenie.OCX (google it) to embed ID3 tags including APIC

      (*I'm looking for a command line WMA encoder - does anyone know of one?)

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    7. Re:You mean.. by bn557 · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/howt o/articles/AutomatingEncoding.aspx

      That's microsofts page on how to batch windows media 9 encoding.

      --
      Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
    8. Re:You mean.. by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that. Exactly what I need. I had looked on MS's site before, but for some reason I never found that page.

      I'll mod you up, on one of your other posts.

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    9. Re:You mean.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious about your playback hardware.

      On a good system ($2000 amp + speakers) mp3s DO NOT sound as good as the original CDs. My WAVs however, sound identical.

      On a good system, I would expect the difference between mp3 and redbook CD or uncompressed wav or whatever to dissappear in the digital noise of your average computer audio output. Some fancypants audio cards make an effort to be good, but I don't know how well they succeed. If I wanted really quality audio out from my computer I think I'd have to look for a digital out, and an aftermarket d/a - and then figure out how to isolate the power supplies for the two. Or perhaps other solutions exist.

      This is not to say that I don't listen to mp3's from my computer over my stereo all the time. You sound as if you've put together a fairly comprehensive solution, however, so I wonder if you have addressed this aspect. How do you get quality analogue output from data stored in a computer?

    10. Re:You mean.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nero will just copy them back without any conversion if I was to burn an audio CD.
      No, it will not. Do you think CDDA uses WAV format? CDDA does not use WAV format. Do you think it is possible to make an 1:1 copy of a CD by ripping wavs and burning them to a CD-R? It is not possible to make an 1:1 copy of a CD by ripping wavs and burning them to a CD-R.
    11. Re:You mean.. by beef+curtains · · Score: 1

      Duuuude...my mind is, like, blown, man. ;-)

      Seriously, that's an impressive setup. Have you considered packaging it all up, slapped on a snazzy GUI, and turning it into a money-making enterprise (or a free-as-in-beer release out of the goodness of your heart, if you're into that sorta thing)?

      --
      Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
    12. Re:You mean.. by fish+waffle · · Score: 1

      Why did I do it like this ? I'm lazy. I don't want to re-rip my collection. Ever. As disks get bigger, at some point ~7mb 256k mp3s are going to look tiny. On a good system ($2000 amp + speakers) mp3s DO NOT sound as good as the original CDs. My WAVs however, sound identical.

      I've been using plain .wav files (exact same directory structure) and ignoring mp3's and other lossy and/or drm-laden formats for years; glad to see i'm not the only one, most of my friends thought i was being silly and wasteful. The trend to larger storage seemed pretty obvious many years ago, and committing to degraded information or usability just to keep things as compact as possible just felt short-sighted.

      On the other hand, the older i get the more i think worrying about lossiness in audio is moot. :(

      There is also an XML file with all the album info in it including the CDDB query ID in case I need to requery CDDB without needing the actual CD. Additionally both .m3u and .pls playlist files are auto created.

      I wrote a custom (java) application that aggregates all the music info together along with various custom categories on a per-song level. I use that to edit, display and generate playlists by filtering and stochastically combining different categories. All data i keep in a basic .csv file so i can also manipulate it with simple text processing (awk/sed etc) and/or in spreadsheets as well. Entering that incrementally over the years has been painless, and is just about perfectly-tuned to my needs at this point. That also unfortunately means that the application interface (gui) is a bit of an idiosyncratic hack, so i haven't released it, but maybe someday...

      Finally a album cover photo (from Amazons XML feed) is auto downloaded and placed into the folder as folder.jpg

      That's the only part i haven't done. Couldn't really see the need, given that mostly when listening to music i'm either not physically near my computer, or if i am i am absorbed in something else. Not to mention finding album covers is not an entirely trivial effort (cd covers are easy to scan, but scanning takes time. Vinyl i've ripped is more of a pain---too large to scan easily, stuff on the internet is low-resolution, and seems to mainly exist on pretty crappy websites i'd rather avoid).

    13. Re:You mean.. by DanQuixote · · Score: 1


      The secret /. handshake consists of the thumb placed over the Alt key,
      the index finger curled under to hit the Ctrl key,
      and the middle finger reaching out to get the Delete key.

      When you become a 5th level /.'er, you simultaneously cup a left-handed mouse.

      I would tell you more, but then my account would have to be killed for my indescretion.

      --
      "We think people rightly feel that once they buy something, it stays bought," --Suw Charman, Open Rights Grp
    14. Re:You mean.. by jzono1 · · Score: 1

      You won't get bit perfect rips that way. You *NEED* something with offset correction and noncached mode for that.

    15. Re:You mean.. by renehollan · · Score: 1
      I was gonna suggest FLAC (which is what I use on some 240 CDs), but I see your reasons for rejecting it.

      Still, I thought WAV <-> FLAC translators were rather common.

      In my case, I needed the space saving FLAC offered, though, if I had the room, I'dve probably used WAV for simplicity.

      FWIW, I also transcoded to .mp3, rather like an "audio thumbnail".

      --
      You could've hired me.
    16. Re:You mean.. by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, the older i get the more i think worrying about lossiness in audio is moot. :(

      I hear that!

    17. Re:You mean.. by dal20402 · · Score: 1

      How do you get quality analogue output from data stored in a computer?

      I'm not the OP, but this is a problem that's bedeviled me as well.

      Analog outputs from motherboards or even from high-quality soundcards are useless for hi-fi audio purposes. The environment inside a computer is just too cramped and electrically noisy. There is always some small amount of noise that varies with computer activity, which is infinitely worse than constant noise when you're trying to listen to music.

      The solution is to go digital. My PowerMac G5 and MacBook Pro have built-in S/PDIF outputs. These days, most decent sound cards have them as well. Depending on just how much of an audio snob you are, you can rely on a receiver or preamp to do the D/A conversion, or even buy a strategically overpriced 30-lb. separate D/A converter with an unobtanium power supply and contacts made of a rare metal that scores of foreign workers had to die to extract.

      Actually, my own solution is a little different: never do a D/A conversion. I feed the S/PDIF signal to a Sony ES digital amp, which converts it to a very high-frequency 1-bit signal that, after low-pass filtering and amplification, drives the speakers directly. Those amps' sound is considerably more technical and less "warm" than many analog amps -- and, since "warm" applied to an amp instead of a musician is just a code word for flattering distortion, I'm happy that way.

    18. Re:You mean.. by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      and, since "warm" applied to an amp instead of a musician is just a code word for flattering distortion, I'm happy that way.

      At times it does, but often this also refers to things like behavior under overload. This is pretty much irrelevant when talking about a purely digital setup however since the condition should not occur ever. That said, its practically impossible to make a digital recording without the use of a limiter/compressor, while thanks to the 'overload behavior' of esp. valve based analog equipment, you can do without.

      Which gives a better overall sound depends a lot on what you are recording and the quality of your sound and recording engineers, but generally spoken a good analog recording played back through (consumer grade) analog means usually has more distorition as 'consumer grade' digital equipment while providing more natural dynamics. Which of the 2 is more important depends on what you are playing back.

      Of course 'consumer grade' is quite vague, what I mean with this is not high-end audiophile or studio grade equipment, rather the things you can buy in the typical consumer orriented electronics shop. Price range? as long as the price range you look at for digital and analog equipment is similar, it doesn't really matter much.

    19. Re:You mean.. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
      The folder structure is as follows:
      L:\Music\
      Artist Name\
      Album Name\
      01 Track Name.WAV

      Looks like someone's looking for a visit from Creative's patent laywers!

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  2. 150 CD book by Dark+Coder · · Score: 3, Informative

    Get one of those nylon cloth book with a thick spline and over 150 plastic pocketed pages that holds 8 CDs each in plain view.

    1. Re:150 CD book by jehdro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Against jewel cases, books are an even trade or worse. Frequently-played CDs are doomed from the constant friction of being pulled in and out (despite the protective pits, dust and debris do get in and do some damage); not a lot of artists clearly label the CDs themselves these days; and if you actually fill one of those books they begin crumble under the weight of the CDs. I struggled with books vs. jewel cases vs. slim cases for years. The only viable solution I found was made by Apple and cost more than my stereo reciever.

    2. Re:150 CD book by bfizzle · · Score: 1

      The clothbooks are horrible on CDs that are used often. However for some system restore cds you never touch it isn't a bad option. Just be aware of the scratching problem before use.

    3. Re:150 CD book by sconeu · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFS. He said that a wallet wasn't an option.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:150 CD book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an eight-up book is not exactly the same thing as a wallet.

    5. Re:150 CD book by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      He actually excluded everything that holds CDs, so the only option is to convince him that one of those things isn't that bad.

      However, the actual solution is: Use less CDs, and actually spend the minute it takes to put them back where they go.

      Anyway, I store my CDs in three different places:

      I have a 100 disc book for my original CDs and drive backups. I use this about twice a month, and the rest of the time it is safe on my shelf. I never take it out of the house. I'm actually considering getting a fire safe for it along with some other stuff, as soon as I can find one that actually will keep CDs from melting. Sounds silly, but it's probably 2000 dollars worth of stuff, total, and my backups.

      When I get a CD, I make a backup. I keep all my backups, and movie rips, in other disc books. These go in and out all the time, but, hey, I can always make another backup.

      I keep all my downloaded TV series and some large multi-CD backups that I don't use that often on different spindles.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    6. Re:150 CD book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I purchase those huge legal three ring binders which hold over a hundred CD inserts. So that's eight hundred to a thousand CDs per notebook, which fit on a little shelf instead of taking up six large CD/DVD racks. I keep a few spare jewel cases to use when I loan out media to friends etc. and the rest go in the trash.

    7. Re:150 CD book by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      Burn everything to DVD's, you can fit roughly ~13 or so cd's onto one. Then stick the dvd's in a much slimmer wallet.

      --
      I got nothin'
    8. Re:150 CD book by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      Hate to reply to my own post, but this applies to the dual layer discs that are out... just don't want to get flamed prematurely ;)

      --
      I got nothin'
    9. Re:150 CD book by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to use one of these. Unfortunately, in high temperatures (say, left uncovered in the car in ~65f outside temps in the sun) the backing screws up the CD's. I've seen this several times from lots of different folks. Get a hard plastic case or a case entirely cloth instead.

      --
      Unpleasantries.
    10. Re:150 CD book by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      I do that on things that can obviously handle it, and I even back my music CDs up by ripping them to FLAC first.

      But some stuff is just too much a hassle, and I'm not entirely sure why I should care enough to figure out how to merge a dozen CDs together.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    11. Re:150 CD book by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      I'd be in favor of sticking with the jewel cases and just replacing them as they break. It's not like they're expensive and having the label in the spine does make them easy to scan when they're stored on a shelf.

      Of course, I personally listen to most of my music from my hard drive, so I just keep the discs safely out of the light in a box as backups and proof that I legally own it (or at least stole it old school). I also make copies of most of my discs to play in my car (cursing the fact that my head unit won't play MP3's so I can condense things further), so I don't have to sweat wearing out the original or getting it stolen.

      The ultimate solution: stash the originals someplace safe and have a central media server on your home network. Then work out a way to seamlessly access sound files on your stereo and video on the TV via ethernet.

  3. Storage by z3r0n3 · · Score: 3, Informative

    100 Capacity CD-R spindles for the cheap guys, and the huge super-100 capacity cd/dvd binders. You can get a nice binder for $15 these days. Both ways are very efficient and save much more space than jewel cases.

    --
    We are but a pixel in the JPEG of life.
    1. Re:Storage by Wolfrider · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    2. Re:Storage by MonoSynth · · Score: 1

      That's 450GB (at most!). I'd rather pay a bit more and have 2 250GB harddisks.

    3. Re:Storage by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      As regards the first one you referenced at :
      http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtool s/item-Details.asp?EdpNo=548251&sku=B600-2004&CMP= EMC-TIGEREMAIL&SRCCODE=WEBNPR226

      What I want to know is, why don't they have these with a reader drive built in?

      With the stackable function, with the auto-eject on cue function, with a multiple o/s capable interface?

      I mean, is this too much to ask? If I don't find one of these in the next three years (that is, before I get through school and know "all there is to make one for myself") I will make and market something like this for around $80-100 because, as admins, wouldn't it be easier to have some of these that you could lock away that people couldn't make off with so you could have all the time fingertip access of media without risk of damage?

      And for AUDIOPHILES:
      Or, and this is what is needed, so you could have all of your CD's at fingertip access without having to have multiple 200 disc players, if you could just have a stack of these connected to your reciever, with either a sort of jukebox style disc changer, or just feed them all together, ala DJ or karaoke whatever could blend songs together.

      I think this crowd gets the idea

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    4. Re:Storage by Jerom · · Score: 1

      If you make one for cheap, you can count me as a customer.

      J.

    5. Re:Storage by b00stA · · Score: 1

      They already exist, but you're most likely not going to like the price since they're enterprise solutions.

      What you're looking for is called a CD/DVD jukebox.
      http://www.disc-gmbh.com/

      --
      Stop making that big face!
    6. Re:Storage by crossmr · · Score: 1

      or up to 127,000 CDs by stacking multiple units..
      did they even think that through?
      thats 1270 units, or a height of 237.49 meters...

    7. Re:Storage by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      > What I want to know is, why don't they have these with a reader drive built in?

      +1 Insightful

      --I've often wondered about that, myself. ;-)

      --You make one for ~$120 that's linux + OS/X compatible, comes with its own database and .ogg ripping software, and the world will knock down your door with orders -- including me!

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  4. Rip them all?? by riprjak · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do away with physical storage beyond backups of your library... Ok, thats a little facetious; but it *is* the solution I selected.

    As an aside, where the hell did the name "jewel case" come from. Its cheap arse polystyrene with some coloured paper and a lump of polycarbonate and aluminium inside. There is nothing even vaguely jewel-like about it?!!?

    err!
    jak.

    1. Re:Rip them all?? by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Informative

      From Wikipedia:

      Origin of the name: the case does not derive in any way from containers for jewelry. Instead, the name apparently originates from watchmakers' use of the term jewel to refer generally to a polished hemispherical bearing used in a mechanism (high-quality mechanical watches and clocks commonly use gemstones, typically rubies, for such bearings because of their low friction properties). A jewel case has two moulded hemispherical plastic bearings, in its hinges, hence the use of the term "jewel".

    2. Re:Rip them all?? by kfg · · Score: 1

      In other words, they pulled the term out of their arse for marketing reasons.

      KFG

    3. Re:Rip them all?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marketing reasons? Are you really that dumb, or do you just act like that on Slashdot?

    4. Re:Rip them all?? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      polystyrene? polycarbonate? aluminium?

      What kind of jewel cases have you been looking at?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    5. Re:Rip them all?? by riprjak · · Score: 1

      AFAIK : The polyer used to make the "Jewel case" is PolyStyrene.

      I DEFINATELY know that the material used to make CD's is PolyCarbonate (ok, occasionally PMMA) and that the back is an aluminium mirror... unless Im wrong :)

      And thanks for the wikipedia reference earlier!! I really should have thought of looking there if it bothered me so much :)

    6. Re:Rip them all?? by xwipeoutx · · Score: 1
      DEFINATELY
      I always read that spelling as defiantly...
    7. Re:Rip them all?? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      My mistake, I'd thought we were just talking about the case alone.

      I should have clicked when you said polycarbonate that you were including the CD.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    8. Re:Rip them all?? by toleraen · · Score: 1

      Despite how much the man tried to keep this knowledge from him, he resisted the stranglehold, and was able to get that information. Definitely an example to all those in favor of true information freedom!

  5. Paper Sleeves by azrane2005 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use different colored paper sleeves. Those packs of 50 in 5 colors from Memorex are great and disposable

    1. Re:Paper Sleeves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine has thousands of discs and she uses those paper sleeves too. They are neatly arranged like index cards were in libraries.

    2. Re:Paper Sleeves by rishistar · · Score: 1

      Added advantage is that paper is much more environmentally friendly than oil burning plastics. I've started using card in cases for demos that I send out from my band for this reason.

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    3. Re:Paper Sleeves by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      I do this for my movies...

      Red = Action (blood)
      Orange = Drama
      Green = Sci-Fi (matrix)
      Blue = Anime / Cartoons
      Purple = Comedy
      Black = Everything else

      Because it's easier to pick a movie based on what mood I'm in.

    4. Re:Paper Sleeves by azrane2005 · · Score: 1

      I do it for just about everything. Except for my games, oddly. If I had access to another colored sleeve, I'd use it for games.

      Red = Applications
      Blue = Music
      Orange = Movies
      Green = File Backups (Usually everything that doesn't fit elsewhere)
      White = Driver CDs and whatnot
      Yellow, I just use for giveaways, short movies like Red Vs. Blue, copies of my music mostly (I make music). Really because I don't like the color yellow.

    5. Re:Paper Sleeves by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Cool -- been looking for a color coded system for software. Thx for the idea.

  6. Don't try to be too smart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Use CD cases for CDs, and jewel cases for jewels.

  7. Quaint little plastic disks? by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Quaint little plastic disks? by Shook18 · · Score: 1

      But does Alcohol 120% work for all cd's? I.E. doesn't copyright protection negate the effectiveness of it for certain discs??

    2. Re:Quaint little plastic disks? by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Why not Daemon Tools, which is free (although I'm a bit disappointed to learn that the latest version is adware, although you can select to not install the adware portion).

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:Quaint little plastic disks? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Only if you have a StarForce protected disk. And God help you if you have a system-related CD or a music CD protected with THAT monster.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    4. Re:Quaint little plastic disks? by Daedone · · Score: 1

      Sadly, its not just for CD's anymore! While trolling around on fileplanet for a FPS to try out the other day, i found a demo for Bet On Soldier http://www.fileplanet.com/98316/0/section/Bet-on-S oldier

      This little beauty had StarForce right in the freakin multiplayer demo.

      I did what was neccisary obviously, and uninstalled the demo, deleted the installer, and formated the partition ;)

    5. Re:Quaint little plastic disks? by iwan-nl · · Score: 1
      I did what was neccisary obviously, and uninstalled the demo, deleted the installer, and formated the partition ;)

      Too late man! It already nested itself into your hardware! I'm afraid you'll have to burn your computer ASAP!

      --
      I'm trying to improve my English. Please correct me on any spelling/grammar errors in this post.
    6. Re:Quaint little plastic disks? by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      AFAIK they do that to stop people using the demo executable to make a no-CD crack, so that the 'l33t h4x0r' never has access to an unprotected EXE.

      Not going to get into a StarForce discussion though because it ends up with me wanting to blow up Russia.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  8. Depends on ... by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 4, Insightful

    what it's for. If it's DVDs for the kids it goes in a folder. If it's essential backups they go in hard cases. If it's one of the zillions of other backups I make I simply title them, date them, and drop them right back on a spare spindle. They take up less space, they are as protected as any other method, and I know before hand that chances are I wont ever need to look at them again, but just in case, I've got them.

    --
    "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    1. Re:Depends on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had the shiny layer on cheap cd-rs stick right to the disc on top of it in a spindle. I'm sure the 100% humidity here doesn't help, though.

    2. Re:Depends on ... by rhendershot · · Score: 1

      I'm going to start using your spindle idea. thanks.

      You can make an impromptu sleeve out of a piece of discarded printer paper.

      1. fold along the longer horizontal in thirds.
      2. place the disk in the pocket and fold from the left and right into the center.
      3. scotch tape
      4. decorate as necessary

      Also, if you put two disks into one standard jewel case, it tends to get cracked less easily. The space being filled seems to help. But I wouldn't drive my car over it or something. ;) That works out for me since a full backup takes 2 DVD's, when I include opt and share that is.

    3. Re:Depends on ... by Osty · · Score: 1

      I've had the shiny layer on cheap cd-rs stick right to the disc on top of it in a spindle. I'm sure the 100% humidity here doesn't help, though.

      Nothing a little ingenuity can't fix. Go buy yourself a roll of parchment paper (silicone-impregnated paper used for high-heat cooking where wax paper would melt or aluminum foil would react with acidic foods, available at grocery stores everywhere). Using a CD as a template (the clear plastic top "disc" of most spindles would be perfect), trace out a number of CD-sized circles, cut them out (a hobby knife or other sharp knife would be best, as it'll be difficult to cut out the centers with scissors), and sandwich them in between each disc. No more sticking!

  9. Spindles! by Chrismith · · Score: 5, Informative
    Personally, I use CD-R spindles...the big ones can hold 50 or 100 discs each. Sometimes more if you take out those little foam things they use as padding.

    It makes for efficient storage, but when you actually need to find a CD, it's even worse than thin cases or binders, because you have to shuffle through a huge stack of discs to find the one you're looking for...and that's assuming that you know which spindle it's on in the first place.

    So...basically, for ease-of-location, spindles are a bad idea.

    1. Re:Spindles! by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      OTOH, if you have, say, a bunch of TV shows ripped to DVD, that would be ideal for a spindle or two.

      Of course, if you're storing a bunch of unrelated and hard to order CDs on a spindle, you could always just arbitrarily number them 1-50 or whatever, with the number written clearly in the same place on each CD, and then write down in your computer what each number is.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    2. Re:Spindles! by Agripa · · Score: 1

      The problem with spindles other then actually finding one disk is that if you twist them, the CDs or DVDs tend to get scratched axialy which is the most difficult orientation for the error correcting code to recover from. This is the same reason they recommend cleaning them in the radial direction.

    3. Re:Spindles! by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      CDs (and DVDs) have a ridge near the spindle hole that keeps stacked disks separated by about 1mm. This is why blank manufacturers can get away with bulk packaging blank disks (which are more sensitive to damage) in spindles. In fact, the industrial bulk packs for CD blanks is a stack of 100 disks, with an uncoated disk on the top and bottom, all shrinkwrapped together without a spindle.

      But yes, do be careful not to get an axial scratch on a disk.

    4. Re:Spindles! by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Just looked. It does look like there's a little space there, but its definitely less than a 1 mm (0.1 mm?). It also explains why the spin so easily, because i would really expect the friction to keep them from spinning as easily as they seem to.

    5. Re:Spindles! by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I used to store CDs that way when I ran out of jewel cases but lost an entire spindle once to dust scratches even with the little ridge. I am sure it helps when the disks are packaged in a clean environment and shipped to you but afterwards I found it to be inadequate compared to sleeves or separate cases.

    6. Re:Spindles! by Deluge · · Score: 1

      Well, you beat me to it. I was going to suggest the same thing. I don't want to spend a bundle for a fancy huge RAID5 setup, and this way I've got almost 250 DVDs on 50 disc spindles and a simple text file with a full listing of the contents. The individual DVDs are only labeled with a number.

      And I've got some spare spindles left over from my CD days so I can shuffle the DVDs around quite easily to get at one in the middle of the stack.

  10. I feel your pain by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Informative

    I feel your pain, man. I've moved several times in the last 5 years and jewel & DVD cases have been big problems for me. Here's a couple of things I've done:

    1. Ive purchased a few of those Nylon CD case thingies at Best Buy. Okay, I'm an idjit for not knowing the proper name for them, but hopefully you get the idea. I intentionally bought ones that are very different in design so I could tell them apart. I have a grey one that I keep the DVDs in and a black one for backups. I also have a blue one for some of my PS2/Dreamcast games etc.

    2. I have a big hard drive that I've copied a number of the CDs to. Nearly all of my driver and application installs are there and I can just browse to the folder and get it started. I've also downloaded cracks for a few of my games so I could do that as well. (I love how that makes me a pirate even thoug I own the game.) Every year or so I buy a new hard drive and move the data over. Lately I've been using external drives so that this process would be a little more laptop friendly.

    Eventually I'm going to rip my DVDs and do the same little trick I mentioned in step 2. I have a DVD +RW DVD burner that my DVD player happily plays, so on movie night I can just get a burn going and play it. (More specifically, start the burn the night before... but you probably get what I mean.)

    With hard drives as big as they are these days, physical media is becoming more and more of a nuisance. Netflix is looking awfully good to me right now.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    1. Re:I feel your pain by Calmiche · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Regarding # 2

      I've actually taken this a step farther. I've pieced together a RAID 1 array, using an old computer, stuffed with a high powered power supply and lots of 400 gig harddrives. (They are cheap. Yes, I know there are bigger drives, but I can afford $150 out of a paycheck easier than $400+.) I have about 2 terabytes so far, but I figure that with PCI expansion cards, I can get up to almost 3 terabytes, with fairly secure data, easily. If you want to ommit the redundency, you can hit 6 terrabytes+.

      I've got it hooked up on my LAN, where all my computers in my house can access it. I've ripped about half of my 300+ DVD collection so far using Nero Recode. I've got subtitles, alternate language tracks, and extras.

      Coupled with a couple of fairly simple little sub $300 computers hooked up to my televisions, I've got access to my entire colletion anywhere in the house.

      I've done the same thing with much of my software and CD's. (Daemon tools is your best friend!)

      What's nice about this system is that it's cheap and you can buy in installments. The computer I use is a VERY low end system. All it has to have is the ability to network share. I've got an old Pentium Celeron at 1.0 ghz. Buy one hard drive and you are in business. As you need space, buy more. Hard drives are getting cheaper and more spacious every month.

      I'm going to upgrage systems again and turn my current computer into a second server. Maybe then I'll get the rest of my DVD's ripped.

    2. Re:I feel your pain by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      That's neat! Ever thought about getting a wi-fi enabled PocketPC with VNC and making a remote?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:I feel your pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coupled with a couple of fairly simple little sub $300 computers hooked up to my televisions, I've got access to my entire colletion anywhere in the house.

      Sounds interesting. What OS and software are you using? How do you use your system?

    4. Re:I feel your pain by scum-e-bag · · Score: 1
      I've actually taken this a step farther. I've pieced together a RAID 1 array, using an old computer, stuffed with a high powered power supply and lots of 400 gig harddrives. (They are cheap. Yes, I know there are bigger drives, but I can afford $150 out of a paycheck easier than $400+.) I have about 2 terabytes so far, but I figure that with PCI expansion cards, I can get up to almost 3 terabytes, with fairly secure data, easily. If you want to ommit the redundency, you can hit 6 terrabytes+.


      Redundancy and growing an array is now possible with RADI5 under linux. The cost is minimal and diminishes with more disks as you only require one spare disk to provide the redundancy.

      Link here
      --
      Does it go on forever?
    5. Re:I feel your pain by bn557 · · Score: 1

      When I'm setting up a cheap raid 51 under linux, I'll build my raid like:
      (
        3 160gig WD drives in raid 5
        1 160gig Maxtor Drive as a hot spare
      )
      (
        3 160gig Maxtor Drives in Raid 5
        1 160gig WD drive as a hot spare
      )

      it seems weird, but the 1 time I built a raid 5 with a hot spare that was the same brand, 3 drives ended up dying in just slightly longer than a full backup took. This way, I'm not putting all my eggs in 1 vendor.

      I guess I could go to 15 and mirror pair WD to Maxtor, but it's easier to migrate from 5 to 51 than from 5 to 15.

      --
      Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
    6. Re:I feel your pain by k_187 · · Score: 1

      that's a great idea. I had plans to do something similar once I"m out of school and have money, only using my ibook. A PPC or something like it would probably work better.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    7. Re:I feel your pain by BAKup · · Score: 1

      Try looking at Sailing Clicker. It turns most cellphones and PDAs into a remote for the computer, using either Bluetooth or WiFi. I've been using it on my Mac Mini, and it works great.

    8. Re:I feel your pain by trantjd · · Score: 1

      Try feeling my pain...not only do I have a ton of jewel cases laying around my computer room but just three days ago, I was walking to my computer and stepped on the corner of a case and sliced up my toe quite a bit...Damn jewel cases not only cause emotional/organizational pane, but physical pane as well! Well, to keep this a bit more on topic, I will definitely be switching to spindles for my TV shows as suggested above...Thanks for the topic!

    9. Re:I feel your pain by Slaughter'em · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a great idea. I'll have to consider going that route.

      But for now I've got CDs and DVDs all over the place. In binders, on spindles and some still in jewel cases. I had all of my audio CDs in a Pioneer 300 +1 jukebox changer at one point, but decided to get rid of the disks I no longer wanted and ripped the rest to my hard drive.

      I've got an extra MB, Processor and case laying around so I might have to invest in a new PSU and attempt something similar to your setup.

  11. as cheap as a piece of paper by shack420 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.papercdcase.com/images/cd.pdf Can knock em out in 30 seconds once you get the hang of it. Good for mailing and scratch protection, maybe not so great for rough environments.

    1. Re:as cheap as a piece of paper by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Would be nice to get a version of that that doesnt assume that you already know origami (For instance, wtf is the 'Fujimoto technique'? Or a 'mountain fold'?

      It also seems like it would be easier if there was an 8 1/2 x 11 PDF that was actually a template for the folding, you know with lines and whatnot on it.

    2. Re:as cheap as a piece of paper by Black+Acid · · Score: 1

      Try the Connelly Case (with pictures!)... I've been making them for all my CDs and DVDs since I came across that site in '04 and have been very satisified with the results.

  12. It Depends by hahafaha · · Score: 5, Informative

    It depends on two factors:

    1) How many CD's there are
    2) How often you expect to use them

    If there are many CD's, your choices are either thich jewel cases or the circular stacks with the pole in the middle, that come with a bunch of CD's. If you expect to look through them, you should buy the thick jewel cases (or a binder, actually). If you do not, storing them on the large circular things is great, because it does not take up too much space. Essentially, if you want to have it, *just in case*, go with the smallest, least obtrusive method. If you want to use them, then go with something that is easy to look through.

    Having said that, I suggest you stop using CD's. Buy a large USB disk, create a backup directory with a bunch of subdirectories, and use that instead. Or even buy an external hard drive for backups. If it's really that important to you, it's worth the cost. Also, consider backing up over a network to another server, as opposed to physical media (or along with physical media).

    1. Re:It Depends by bergeron76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For smaller CD arrays, we use a used CDR spindle. Once the CD's are gone, it makes for a nice holding area for discs. That said, don't put your only copy of your most valuable disc (which you shouldn't have... - ...[the single copy, that is]) on it. When seeking a disc, you just dump the discs into your hand and shuffle through them. It's not as efficient as a CD case, but it's the smallest form factor you can get.

      86 the Jewel cases. Unless you're shipping a CD, or using it in some other light industrial environment (ex. a labeling requirement) they are crap.

      Your best bet is to get a decent sized CD wallet, and just take the time to flip through the discs. Using a decent briefcase sized storage wallet, you can [humanly] "read" 8 discs per page turn. It really doesn't take that long to find a disc.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    2. Re:It Depends by 6ULDV8 · · Score: 1

      "Also, consider backing up over a network to another server"

      That's exactly what Bittorrent is for. Isn't it?

      --
      Pull my finger for my public key.
  13. CD-single cases by piranha(jpl) · · Score: 1

    Own any CD-singles? These come in a slim package similar to jewel-cases. Unlike most "slim" cases you find CD-Rs in, these have an enclosure for J-shaped paper inserts, designed for titles to show through the transparent spine.

    So, versus jewel cases, you gain saved space, keep the ability to scan through a stack of them for the right disc, but also keep the fragility of plastic.

    I can't imagine you'd find any enclosure system not based on a plastic package that lets you scan through a stack of them.

    A manufacturer.
    Google.

    1. Re:CD-single cases by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      i've seen those but don't like em because they don't seem to have anything in place to keep the CD away from scraping on the box, nor do they seem to grip the CD very well.

      Slimline CDR jewel cases while not as good from a labelling point of view seem far more substatial.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  14. Identify constraints by horn_in_gb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think it helps to think about this problem and identify some basic constraints:
    1. You want to organize a great number of physical items. This means you simply need a proportional amount of space, unless you use a more efficient (i.e. physical volume per byte) storage medium
    2. You want a system that allows for easy access and identification of these items. This will require even more space, unless you offload access and/or identification to magical computer land.

    Just writing those two things out has led me to think of a number of possible solutions outside grappling for some magical panacea to CD storage:

    As for constraint #1, consider buying a hard-drive and migrating CD contents to the drive.
    As for constraint #2, there are a couple of ways to go. You could buy/build some sort of system that stores and retrieves CDs for you. Then you wouldn't need a bulky jewel case, just a bar code. In a similar but simpler vein, just make a database of all your CDs. There is a surprising amount of information present in the cases, which is why you want full view of them. But get that information in a database and you can use a simple UID to identify CDs. Then you can store CDs in small cases or even a binder.

    In fact, if you go to a UID system, you can put all your CDs in one of those big binders. If you keep them ordered by UID then you can access via binary search -- get your big O down to log(n)!

    1. Re:Identify constraints by terry · · Score: 2, Informative

      Either print the barcode directly on the disc with an inkjet or use the Avery labels for CDs. They even make printable labels that go on the little portion of the CD in the center (not the hole).

      I went the no-tech and lazy way. I bought a bunch of the tyvek sleeves. I don't write on the sleeves, but I write directly on the disc with a marker. I throw the CD in any available sleeve, and put it in some reasonable order. I can usually find something quickly, but sometimes it takes a while.

      Unless you're some sort of clean-o-maniac who lives for everything to have a place, realize it's a crappy media for storing in bulk and do something that gets you most of what you want. If you take 40 hours over a span of time to organize this stuff are you ever going to recoup that time? I don't know how often I've gone overboard for this stuff.

  15. Replacement for jewel cases? by reklusband · · Score: 1

    Bittorrent. Thumb drive.

  16. Incredible by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just incredible. Over a dozen posts, and not a single person has stated the obvious.

    Amaray DVD Cases

    They come in regular size and super-slim. You can place artwork inside that covers the front, back, AND spine. If you don't want artwork, you can get them in clear form. They fit on a standard bookshelf. They're made of durable, flexible plastic so they won't wear to anywhere near the same degree as CD cases. They can hold manuals, and other materials on the inside. You can get them in forms that hold multiple disks. Etc., etc., etc.

    Basically, they're the nearest thing to a perfect case.

    1. Re:Incredible by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Excuse me Mr. Moderator, but how can the first person to suggest the use of Amaray DVD cases for CDs be "Redundant?" Yeash.

    2. Re:Incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In terms of quality, this is probably the way to go.

    3. Re:Incredible by Myself · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've never understood how "fit on standard bookshelves" was a feature of DVD cases. They're bulkier than jewel cases, which fit just fine on bookshelves and in a variety of other places that DVD cases do NOT.

      I'm not trying to defend jewel cases here, they're obnoxiously brittle and the little disc-hub latches don't work very well. But when people talk about DVD cases fitting on bookshelves like it's something new, I want to smack them.

    4. Re:Incredible by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I've never understood how "fit on standard bookshelves" was a feature of DVD cases.

      Simple. They don't just fit on bookshelves, they fit on bookshelves well. When you pack a large number of CDs next to each other, the weight and friction places a great deal of strain upon the cases. This dramatically reduces their life-expectency, and may lead to scratching, chipping, and cracking. Even worse, the edges of the CD cases can cause even more friction when trying to add or remove a jewel case from the shelf. This friction is translated to all the cases in the row, often causing damage to their brittle cases.

      With Amaray containers, they're designed to be somewhat flexible (like books) so that they can absorb many forms of pressure or friction without damage. In addition, all the edges have been smoothed out to reduce the amount of "catching" and extra friction caused by adding or removing the case from the shelf. In fact, a DVD case should never "catch" on its neighbors in the same way a Jewel Case does.

    5. Re:Incredible by iainl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not that they need to be Amaray ones. Personally, I prefer Alpha's locking mechanism, as I've had fewer discs pop out in the mail.

      But yes, DVD cases are better than CD cases because the plastic isn't as brittle. They even make them at CD height, for those that don't like the "looks good on a bookshelf" thing.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    6. Re:Incredible by fluxmov · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. Where is that friction supposed to come from? Or are you filling your shelves using a hammer?

    7. Re:Incredible by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Where is that friction supposed to come from?

      I take it you've never packed CD cases together? Jewel Cases have a "lip" on the edge that is intended to make it easier to open the case. In addition, the rear edge of the case protrudes a bit above the plastic door. The side edges are generally ribbed, presumably for extra traction while holding them.

      Now if you pack CDs tightly together, not only does the lip and rear ridge catch, but the doors tend to be compressed against each other. The result of removing a CD is that your motions are translating torque to the entire stack. The ribbing can also cause extra torque on the case if the surface you're sliding it out of isn't smooth.

      These problems are noticably reduced when the CDs are in their shrink wrap (this provides a smooth surface for them to slide more easily), but outside the shrink wrap, the cases are extremely vulnerable to damage. Even just having a pile on your desk can lead to scratching, chipping, and breaking.

    8. Re:Incredible by fluxmov · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your extensive explanation, I see now which effect(s) you mean. But can't nearly all of this be avoided by not stacking the CDs so tightly?

    9. Re:Incredible by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      But can't nearly all of this be avoided by not stacking the CDs so tightly?

      Of course. That's what those metal storage frames are for. The metal bars force a bit of spacing between the Jewel Cases. (Also prevents them from knocking against each other, which is another common source of damage.) But that's not really the same as putting them on a bookshelf, now is it? :)

    10. Re:Incredible by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Heck. Just tell Earthlink and AOL that you're "real interrested in there services, and could you send a bunch of them CD things for your frends". Take out the paper crap once the cases arrive. Take out the CD or DVD crap that'll be in there, too (whatever those are). Bingo. Nice archival cases for your CD/DVD media.

    11. Re:Incredible by cogg · · Score: 1

      IMHO: To those with less than perfect vision, or not looking too closely, a row of dvd cases on a book shelf look like a row of books; a row of cd cases doesn't have the same effect.

      --
      "Never 'clear the air'. Instead, investigate all the subtle nuances of the word 'fester'." - R. Candappa
    12. Re:Incredible by cs · · Score: 1
      You write: Simple. They don't just fit on bookshelves, they fit on bookshelves well.

      Bah! DVD cases are the size they are because that's the size VHS tapes are; it's a consumer acceptance thing, not ergonimic design! If your bookshelves fit VHS tapes well, they fit DVDs well. You'll notice that neither is the same size as a standard paperback book, the archetypal storage unit for a bookshelf.

      <rant>... and don't get me started on book sizes and publisher behaviour... I'm still putting off buying Harry Bloody Potter^W^W^WHalf Blood Prince because it's not out in standard small paperback form, long long after release...</rant>

      --
      Cameron Simpson, DoD#743 cs@cskk.id.au http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/
    13. Re:Incredible by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      You'll notice that neither is the same size as a standard paperback book, the archetypal storage unit for a bookshelf.

      Doesn't anyone buy hardcover anymore? Must be just me. :(

    14. Re:Incredible by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      given that they are on a shelf and given how unstable they are when standing alone on end its a pretty safe bet that they are going to end up either packed tightly or leaning on each other. so no pack them less tightly is not a soloution as they will still end up touching and catching.

      using a specially designed rack is an option but this both increases the cost (though possiblly no more so than using DVD cases will) and means you can't mix them with other items on the shelf.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  17. www.newegg.com by Borgschulze · · Score: 1

    Go to www.newegg.com, order a 750gb 7200.10 HDD, that should hold more than enough music, and it's all contained in a 3.5" Chunk of metal.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Linux compiles you!
    1. Re:www.newegg.com by jrmcferren · · Score: 0

      Yep, for this much data you need to get perpendicular.

      --
      sudo mod me up
    2. Re:www.newegg.com by Borgschulze · · Score: 1

      Well, we wouldn't want our CD's laying face down, now would we?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Linux compiles you!
  18. A Few Solutions by miyako · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are really a few solutions, depending on how many disks your trying to keep track of and how often you actually need to get to them.
    If you are talking about a relatively small number of disks that you are going to access often, then the best solution is probably just copy the disk images to your hard drive. It's pretty simple to mount an image under Linux, and I believe there are programs available to do it under Windows too (though some games I think break this programs to prevent piracy). I'm not sure about OS X, since I've never actually had to do it.
    If you don't feel like (or can't) rip disks to your hard drive, and are still working with only a couple hunderd disks, then you might consider one of those holders that hangs on the wall. Not sure what they are called, think geek was selling them a while back. Basically, it's a big thing you hang on the wall, and put your disks in them so they face out. These work best if you don't have a bunch of disks that look the same (though you could always use a bit of tape and marker to label them).
    If you have a lot of disks that you need to get to occasionally, then the best solution is probably just to buy replacement jewel cases. They are pretty cheap in bulk and you can just transfer the liners into the new jewel case when the old one busts. This scales pretty well and you can just stick them on a shelf and quickly find what you need.
    Finally, if you have things that you almost never need to get to, or if you need to get to a bunch of cds at the same time (say, an OS disk, plus all driver disks, and software) then CD spindles seem to take the least amount of space. Just group the disks by task or category, then label them.
    If you go the replacement jewel case route, you might just consider getting DVD cases. I find that they are a bit more sturdy than regular jewel cases, and still fit well in rows on shelves.

    --
    Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    1. Re:A Few Solutions by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about OS X, since I've never actually had to do it.

      The OS X disk tools make it incredibly easy to rip disks, then use the virtual media as if it were real media. For example, the Super Wing Commander disc I acquired was in serviceable condition, but I wouldn't trust it to continue operating for the long haul. So I ripped the disc, and stuck the physical media into storage. Whenever I want to play a game, I simply double click on the disk image to mounts it and go.

  19. Ejectors by squisher · · Score: 4, Informative

    They are slim cases, but otherwise they are really great: Ejector CD cases. I don't know if they have them in full jewel case width though, probably not, but that's the best I'm aware of.

  20. Depends on ...Extras. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Something to keep in mind. DVD's need to go into cases made for them. The holes will crack easier on a DVD compared to a CD. Now onto cases. There's the question of any documentation or other material that needs to go with the DVD(s)* BTW you can also get hanging plastic pages that go into file cabinets that hold 4 CDs and CD-size inserts on the back.

    *FEAR Directors edition comes with two DVD's on one hub. and two pieces of documentation.

  21. A disc carousel by agm · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Re:A disc carousel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      yes I have a couple at work. The mac discs go in one unit and the pc discs in another.
      The database could be much better (it isn't afull borrowing library solution and is MS Access based). I'd just to see them make a model that includes a dvd reader so it could scan the info it without you haven't to use an internal drive - also that would stop you hopefully returning the wrong disc.
      The construction is a little suspect - I've had to reset it and had to open it up when it allowed two discs into one slot. Also you can't transport the unit around with discs inside...Still it is better than a bunch of scratched up discs..

    2. Re:A disc carousel by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "A disc carousel?"

      Why, oh why, won't someone come out with a disc carousel with a CD/DVD ROM drive integrated into it.
      Something like Sony's 400 CD/DVD changer, but that will handle CDROMs too.

      Load up your CDROM game disks into the thing and never search for the CD again when you want to play,
      and don't have to hassle with game cracks. Seriously, how hard can that be?

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    3. Re:A disc carousel by Chelloveck · · Score: 1
      Load up your CDROM game disks into the thing and never search for the CD again when you want to play, and don't have to hassle with game cracks. Seriously, how hard can that be?

      Rip 'em to your hard drive and mount 'em with something like Daemon-Tools or Alcohol. (I'm assuming Windows 'cause of the mention of games, which we know don't exist commercially on any other platform... :-) Seriously, almost all copy-protection techniques can be defeated, even games which try to detect a virtual CD drive at run time. Without resorting to cracks.

      This technique is indispensible when you have small children who don't know how to handle CDs. (Yeah, it's a learning experience for them, but explaining over and over that "You scratched it, it's gone" gets old really fast.) And it's damned convenient for us grown-ups, too. I almost never touch a physical CD more than once any more, to make a copy. After that it goes on the backup shelf and I mount the image.

      Though a 400 disk CDDA/CDROM changer would be sweet...

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    4. Re:A disc carousel by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      You know....hmmm.

      That carousel is slot-load, auto-eject. It appears to eject the CD pretty far...far enough, in fact, to successfully insert a CD into a slot-loading CD/DVD-ROM drive if the slots were lined up carefully. And when you clicked "Eject" on the slot-load drive, it would slide into the carousel slot and be pulled back inside.

      Voila. A totally hands-free 100 disc ROM jukebox for about $200.

  22. My method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I use big (bulky) boxes for the music CDs and anything which needs to be in a jewel case. The CDs are indexed and the index is online (of course).

    For movie DVDs which I burn, I have a folder with a capacity of about 150. That's so I can get to them easily. I don't bother with indexing this one.

    For CDs and DVDs which I burn containing data (backups, etc) I index each disk and add it to my current spindle. I have a few spindles of 100 discs and the rest are 50 discs each. It works fine because I have a spare spindle, so when I empty a spindle of blanks, that spindle gets filled later with burned discs.

  23. Spindles by MikeDawg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have more spindles laying around my work and home than you can imagine. They are cheap and plentiful, and I have a million of them. The only bad side comes to the true organization of CDs. If you are somewhat good with "poor" organization, you can keep different CD/DVDs in different spindles.

    --

    YOU'RE WINNER !
    Another lame blog

  24. This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  25. CD Filing Cabinet by labal · · Score: 1

    I use a little filing cabinet type thing I picked up from a department store near where I live. There was a pretty wide variety of sizes and shapes. The one I have hold 100 CD's. Basically you file each CD into a number sleeve, then use the provided index to catalog what's contained with in. Easy to use, and far more efficient that stacks of CD cases.

    --
    hellboy1975 http://www.foutheye.net
  26. Awesome! by NineNine · · Score: 1

    That is just awesome. I'm buying one.

  27. Fellowes:150 CD book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a fellows hard-shell case that addresses this problem. The CDs attach to a double-sided split plastic plate, four to each page, 8 pages.

  28. Clamshell cases! by bassgoonist · · Score: 1

    http://www.meritline.com/neracoclcddv.html these are perfect, as a test I chucked one of these with a cd in it against a brick wall from 6 feet at full force...the case it self was scratched, but not broken, and the cd was fine. worked for me but I wouldn't suggest it on a regular basis as ymmv.

    --
    You can tell I'm an aries because of my ram.
    1. Re:Clamshell cases! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say they're "perfect". I use them to hold otherwise loose CDs that I don't place a very high value on. (e.g. CDs included with books, demo discs, compilations, just about anything in a paper sleeve, etc.) If the disc is worth protecting, though, I try to either replace the Jewel Case (not that hard, but time consuming) or place it in an Amaray DVD Case.

  29. What did you do? by LittleBigScript · · Score: 1

    How come the cases are snapped or broken? Do you want to put all the CD's and DVD's in a big envelope, or would that be at risk to be damaged as well?

  30. Jukebox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  31. RAID is the solution. by scum-e-bag · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm in the process of disposing of all my CDs as everything I need is safe on my RAID5 back-up server.

    To find anything just required a quick search function. If the item is an audio CD ripped to FLAC then I que it up, if the item is an data CD then I mount the image file... My storage space has reduced from several large bookshelves full of CDs down to one small box... As for power consumption, I live in a cold sub-zero-celcius environment and any extra heating is welcome!!!

    --
    Does it go on forever?
    1. Re:RAID is the solution. by Loconut1389 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      RAID is PART of the solution. The problem with RAID is that it doesn't account for Operator Error (deletion), Operating System Error (corruption at the filesystem level), Virii, etc. RAID is a great online-storage mechanism, but should be only an intermediary to tape/dvd/'permanent' media.

      While permissions, ACLs, etc, can reduce the risk, RAID still doesn't protect your data from the more immediate threat.

      Also note that RAID does not account for fire, flood, lightning and other things that may irreparably screw over the drives. Last I knew, Ontrac and others still charge by the size of the drive, and if you're using big disks, you'll pay a fortune. With RAID, generally the platters inside the disk must be relatively unharmed (no gauging, cracking, corrosion, etc) since you cannot do a recovery based on the file allocation tables since you don't have all of the data on the one disk. If they can transplant the platters into a happy drive, you may be ok, but I wouldn't bet my inheritance on it.

      Now, if you can afford to create two RAIDs and keep one (if one is bigger, the bigger one) offline except when copying things that have changed in, you're in better shape- and even better shape if that is located in a different building or even locality.

    2. Re:RAID is the solution. by dwater · · Score: 1

      Indeed. With s/w RAID, you can get one big slow disk that is the same size as the RAID partition (or just bigger) and do a RAID0 onto it - then fail it and take it away to some other safe place.

      --
      Max.
    3. Re:RAID is the solution. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      The word you may be looking for is "viruses." "Virii" is not correct.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    4. Re:RAID is the solution. by jbarr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Great point, but could you please elaborate on the 'permanent' part of your statement, "but should be only an intermediary to tape/dvd/'permanent' media"? I am looking for a 'permanent' solution to store large quantities of data, specifically video and music files. My understanding is that burnable CD's and DVD's don't have the longevity that was originally thought. What are your suggestions for 'permanent' storage?

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    5. Re:RAID is the solution. by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pair of large HDDs placed in a banks safe deposit vault.
      That's what I do, one drive is at home and once a month I rotate in the other drive.

      Mind you I don't keep MP3s and AVIs on those drives, I keep family photos, scans of important documents, my wife's masters thesis and supporting material (last thing I want is to answer to her when hundreds of hours of work goes *poof*).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    6. Re:RAID is the solution. by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was going to post.

      I've purchased (online where I can get them cheap) a large number of cases. I rip/copy everything to the fileserver I finally finished (yay!) and then stick the original in the shelf with its friends.

      My life is slowly becoming more sane (although there is the little matter of sorting the terrabyte of data that I've collected up till now), and no worries about the original media!

    7. Re:RAID is the solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to archive, use tape. Most of the tape (and film) Hollywood has generated is stored in dark rooms, and it's still viable after 60 years, even without re-copying it.

      You can't beat tape. I say store your information in a portable archive format (tar, gzipped tar, zip--tar or tgz would be the most future proof because of the amount of documentation, implementations they both have), and make parity volumes with a program like par2 that will fit on your tape format of choice, or put the parity volumes on another tape all together... That will be totally bullet proof.

      To be really future-proof, copy those old tapes to newer high denisty formats when they become cheap enough.

    8. Re:RAID is the solution. by sofar · · Score: 1


      Heh, that's where I store my nuclear-powered always-on 300-Tesla degausser too!

    9. Re:RAID is the solution. by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      exactly- tape, while expensive is one of the most durable, recoverable and safe long-term storage mechanisms (in the right storage environment). (this for the person you replied to)

    10. Re:RAID is the solution. by Daravon · · Score: 1

      This is a backup of a bunch of CDs for quick access and reduction of space consumed. This isn't a backup of important accounting data. Mounting images of the CDs from a server is just as good as using the CD itself (sans Copy Protection). After that, you put the original CDs into a few large bookless with some sort of label indicating the general contents and toss those someplace safe. If the RAID fails or something is corrupted or deleted then you just remake the image from the original CDs.

      --
      I traded all my mod points for these magic beans.
    11. Re:RAID is the solution. by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      That's an excellent point, I suppose I lost track of the original intent.

      Speaking of which, does anybody know a relatively inexpensive RAID5 based NAS unit?

    12. Re:RAID is the solution. by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah?
      Well I wrap my drives in mu metal...
      So double dumbass on you :-)

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    13. Re:RAID is the solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did the parent get modded up to +5 insightful? Do I use a different definition of backup then everyone else?

      Raid is for availability and in some case speed and expandability but not for backups. A single mistype or an accidental mouse click and your data will be gone forever. Depending on the raid solution you went with, the same exact controller and/or drives may be required if one of those fail.
      You basically have one and only one set of data and that set also happens to be your live file system.

      Of course you did state "RAID5 back-up server" so maybe you do have that second copy.

    14. Re:RAID is the solution. by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      You don't need to afford two, just make sure your friend across town can afford the same RAID as you. Then just allocate half to you, half to him and setup a nightly sync. Just make sure each system has a hotspare...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  32. Tell ya what I do by svunt · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use catalogs and cases. For my 1300 data-filled dvds (legitimate backups, honest!) I use a nifty app called SuperCat which lets me browse all of my discs in an explorer-like interface, and is fully searchable. My discs are all in label order, so on average it takes me 30 seconds to find what I'm looking for in SuperCat, find the disc, and get it in the drive. For proper audio CDs or film DVDs, duh, store them alphabetically, in wallets or slimlines, or use another of many available catalog apps.

    1. Re:Tell ya what I do by WuphonsReach · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed, SuperCat is a wonderful program. Each index for a CD/DVD is a standalone file so it's easy to put them on a shared LAN drive and move them around as needed.

      I use the 128/192 CD binders that hold (4) CDs per page in a 2x2 grid (8 CDs per leaf). Each binder holds a category / classification and I simply store them in calendar order (these are data archives where the disks are named SYS2005[ABC] or BKP0512[ABC]). Works fairly well and lets me pull data off the shelf behind me in quick order but without taking up lots of space.

      For Music CDs... rip to FLAC and store the CD in a box. My car has a CD/MP3 player so I just convert the FLACs to MP3s for use there. At home, I mostly listen to music on the laptop while working so FLAC (actually 256Kbps MP3) works well.

      DVDs are another issue. My current solution is getting two "chests of drawers" made by a local furniture maker. I'll be storing the DVDs, spine-up, inside each drawer. The drawers are about 16" deep inside (holding 16 linear inches of DVDs) and wide enough to allow me to fit 4 columns across. Add it all up and each piece of furniture holds 256 linear inches (4x16 x 4 drawers). Getting the rear-most DVD out of a column might be tricky, but only if I over-fill a particular column.

      I think it will look very nice and I won't have huge shelves filled with DVDs lining the walls. I'm not worried about the browse ability because I know what's in each drawer already. And it will be a lot less obvious that I have a large DVD collection until I start pulling open drawers looking for a movie.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  33. Read the question. by scum-e-bag · · Score: 1
    wallets take too long to sort through

    The poster doesn't want binders...
    --
    Does it go on forever?
  34. Univenture by smilinggoat · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to DJ for a college radio station and I found my CD's would get scratched using a big binder because of tiny bits of dirt would make holes in the data layer from the weight of all the other full CD pages on top of each other.

    Now I swear by the Viewpak XG by Univenture (bottom of the page). They are heavy duty vinyl slips with a soft backing for 1 CD/DVD, a slip for the front cover of the album, and a back slip behind the CD for the back cover of the album.

    They have packages without the artwork slips if you don't need them.

    These things are real slim, robust, and if you need to order alphabetically or whatever, it's very easy to add or subtract from your collection without having to mess with everything (ie, in a binder).

    They also sell Storage Boxes that are just the right size for the packs, or course you can just use shoe boxes or home-made wood crates like me.

    Univenture has at least one customer for life. Long live physical media!

  35. Digital Backup way to go by Dilpo · · Score: 1

    The route I chose to take for this situation is rip images of all my CD/DVD's and store them on one of three 300gig hd's wich I keep nicely tucked away in staticproof bags and the little supports they come in. Then I take all my CD/DVD's and organise them by music/movie/software and put them in seperate boxes further organising them alphabetically in their respective box which gets stowed away. Then for whatever I need at that current moment be it a game that requires the CD (if I cant find a no-cd crack but then again I give up easily) I just burn to a CD/DVD and keep that out in those pesky jewel cases so I can actually read the label I write on it. If I beat a game, get bored with it, overwatch that DVD or the CD/DVD just gets to scratched and I cant be bothered to burn another one it just gets thrown out. Installing software I try to avoid burning a cd just to install it once but you get the idea, you have two backups one is digital for easy access and the other is the originals just incase.

  36. Caddies, or a big changer/jukebox by ecloud · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you have the old caddy-type CD drive, a big pile of caddies is a good storage option. That way you never touch the discs themselves, so avoid the scratches and fingerprints. But those drives are getting hard to find. Personally I got a lot of caddies on ebay, but have had too much trouble with the drives (and besides, SCSI is its own hassle). I also got a rack-mount box with 8 caddy-type drives in it, and my plan was to put a low-end motherboard inside and use Linux to serve up individual NFS and Samba exports; but then I would have to deal with issues like automounting/unmounting on access, and a software eject mechanism that works across the network. I haven't gotten around to it so far. By the time I do, CD's may be obsolete.

    I also got an NSM 100-CD jukebox on ebay. It has SCSI for the drive, and RS-232 to control the robot. I managed to find specs for the control protocol on the net, so wrote a program to control it. At one point I had an automount lashup that would automatically load the right disc when it is accessed, but it didn't work quite right, so I was going to reimplement it using FUSE. I haven't gotten around to that project, either.

    Nowadays hard drives are just too cheap. Might as well consolidate all those discs in one place.

    1. Re:Caddies, or a big changer/jukebox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you want more caddies?

      Seriously, if you do, post some contact method or mailing address...

  37. OT: Game CD cracks & piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've also downloaded cracks for a few of my games so I could do that as well. (I love how that makes me a pirate even though I own the game.)

    Right there with you brother.
    I started downloading the game cracks to avoid the hassles of the CD checks. With the CDs off in some never never land & the pirate checker on, I could never just play a game on a whim. I had to go dig the actual CD out of whatever plastic bin (toddler proofing)I put it in.

    The problem is once I learned to download the crack, I had also learned where to download the game. Add to that I felt I got burned by being a early purchaser of some sequels that disappointed (I felt ripped off). Now I download the game and the crack. If I like it and play it, I'll buy the Original/Expansion combo that usually comes out 3 months after the Expansion hits.

    So, in trying to avoid piracy, the publishers annoyed me to the point that I ened up learning how much easier it was to just pirate the game. Good move guys.

    Almost the same with DVDs. They put so much ad crap in the DVD before the movie (Disney) I learned to rip the DVD, remaster it, and make a new DVD. Once you learn how to do that, you might as well get the DVDs from the library and make your own copy. Why buy the latest Pixar when you'll have to remaster your purchased copy anyhow? Just remaster the library's copy. Once again due to annoyance I learned how to be a pirate. You guys are doing great.

    1. Re:OT: Game CD cracks & piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in trying to avoid piracy, the publishers annoyed me to the point that I ened up learning how much easier it was to just pirate the game. Good move guys.
      Once again due to annoyance I learned how to be a pirate. You guys are doing great.

      You know what's best? If we catch you, we'll have you sent to prison, so you can meet the experts and learn how to commit some real crimes. :)

  38. Better than RAID by plover · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A friend of mine has a rack in his basement that has 48 SCSI CD-ROM drives mounted in it. He just keeps them all on-line 24x7. Never has to touch them!

    --
    John
    1. Re:Better than RAID by slack-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow thats like having 48 diffrent televisions all tuned to a diffrent channel, completely overkill. teach him to copy the CD's to a hard drive.

    2. Re:Better than RAID by Wolfrider · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting. I just created a Vmware virtual ISO/CD Server appliance that will share (21) ISOs as drives E -> Y out of the box. (Linux host and Win2k guest.)

      He could copy all his stuff to HD, run mkisofs, turn off all the CDROMs, and save a bundle on electricity + wear and tear. :)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    3. Re:Better than RAID by plover · · Score: 3, Funny
      He could, but he's big into the retro-computing image. He's got a metric buttload of ancient hardware up and operational, and likes to be surrounded by Hollywood quantities of blinkenlights.

      I sometimes wonder what would happen to his house if someone sent him an email virus that caused all his computers to attempt to calculate the last digit of pi. Would his sound cards start singing "Daisy, Daisy"? Would some of the old boxes emit puffs of smoke and a few showers of sparks?

      Actually, I might suggest he install a flashpan with a few serial-port-ignited pyrotechnic charges, just to wake up the gullible non-geeky visitors. Tuck it all behind a CD-ROM faceplate designed to blow open on detonation, that sort of thing.

      --
      John
    4. Re:Better than RAID by axjdo · · Score: 1

      where is mention of this software on your webpage ??????????

    5. Re:Better than RAID by GreggBz · · Score: 1

      I used to have a similar set up. 364 disk scsi array rsynced over an OC/3 to an offsite 3TB RAID 5 Array in Pasakastan.
      Then the GF complained that the lights dimmed every time I loaded a new playlist. So I bought a pleather 300 cd-flip-file at Kmart.

    6. Re:Better than RAID by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      I agree. I just have an old, old iMac DV running iTunes and a big hard drive. Ripped all my CDs using a lossless codec. Hookded the iMac to the stereo, plugged in a remote control, and I'm set. My entrie collection ready to go with the added ability to burn mix CDs to take in the car.

      Its just too cheap and easy to do with a Mac or PC and and the old computer sitting in the corner.

    7. Re:Better than RAID by wordsofwisedumb · · Score: 1

      I remember websites that would make your CD tray go crazy a few years back. Imagine the insanity when he visits one of those.

  39. Looks like an ad (OT) by OldMiner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm wagering the reason you're getting no love is that you linked directly to a page to buy the thing. There's a fair bit of anti-commercialism on Slashdot, and some might feel you're sort of astroturfing.

    And, sometimes, "Redundant" is the best way to mod down a post if "Troll" and "Flaimbait" and so on don't work. It comes with the added bonus you're a lot less likely to get hit on M2 with it, because who's going to read all of the comments to see if you're really and truly redundant?

    --
    You like splinters in your crotch? -Jon Caldara
    1. Re:Looks like an ad (OT) by armb · · Score: 1

      More likely just a careless mod. "Overrated" works better for "this isn't really a troll or flamebait, but I don't like it, and I don't want to suffer in metamoderation".

      --
      rant
  40. Paper by value_added · · Score: 5, Informative

    Inexpensive, biodegradable, and easy. Also helps you rid yourself of the notion that CDs/DVDs are anything more than bits of plastic that somehow merit being displayed on a shelf.

    I went through this a couple of years ago. I had just under 2K CDs and spent a few weeks investigating storage alternatives which included everything from the consumer oriented 100-CD display racks for your living room, to large capacity wooden shelving, to painfully expensive specialised office cabinets. Complete waste of time.

    Now, everything gets put into a paper window-less sleeve. Each CD gets a number, the relevant info is keyed into a database, and a simple label is applied to the outside of the sleeve. I figure it takes me about 20 seconds for each CD. Compare that to the time and expense of designing/printing/cutting up inserts for jewel cases (slim or otherwise), and you get the idea. If a database isn't your kind of thing, grepping a simple list should work just fine. As a side note, I entertained the idea of printing on the sleeves directly using a LaTeX template, but decided against it and use simple adhesive labels exclusively. Note that I opted for window-less sleeves to avoid having to design and print and insert for each CD.

    As for "storing" all the CDs, I just modified a drawer by sectioning it off so that each section would hold exactly 100 CDs. The CDs are stored upright (to protect the CD) and arranged front to back, so finding and retrieving, say, CD number 0983, is quick and easy. Two drawers == 2K CDs. Easily expandable.

    As for the old jewel cases, well, they were in mint condition so I gave them to a friend that collects music. Last I heard, he gave them away to a friend of his. I've reclaimed a huge amount of space in my office, and the clutter is gone. I have no "dusting" or similar nonsense to contend with, and made my life is a bit more sane by sticking a few plants on the shelves that were once reserved for CDs. Knowing that my CDs are protected in a cool dry place doesn't hurt, either.

    You can buy sleeves directly from any paper manufacturer. There's plenty that offer specialised CD selections that will be happy to sell to you. Alternatively, you can buy a box of 1K from a reseller on eBay for just a few bucks.

    As a final note, you may want to investigate something similar ready-made in the form of small metal or plastic boxes that resemble miniature hanging file folders; you can find these in most office-supply stores. The problem I've found with that approach, however, aside from the price, is that each hanging insert is prenumbered (a problem if for large collections) and requires you to squeeze 2 CDs into each. Hardly a safe approach considering how tightly they fit, not to mention that if you remove the entire insert from the box, you'll be carrying around 2 CDs instead of just the one you wanted.

    YMMV.

    1. Re:Paper by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Now, everything gets put into a paper window-less sleeve. Each CD gets a number, the relevant info is keyed into a database, and a simple label is applied to the outside of the sleeve. I figure it takes me about 20 seconds for each CD. Compare that to the time and expense of designing/printing/cutting up inserts for jewel cases (slim or otherwise), and you get the idea"

      Um, you could just give the case a number and not print that stuff, like you do for the paper sleeve.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  41. Hard plastic boxes by eric76 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I buy the hard plastic boxes that hold 10 cds each from rima.com, Hard Plastic Box for 10 CDs, 20-Pack. Of course, I put each CD in an individual CD sleeve.

    In some cases, I put the device driver CDs together in boxes. In other cases, I'll put the various CDs for a particular CD in a box. And just slap a label on the front.

    They take up a whole lot less room than individual cases and are much better at grouping things together.

  42. Go back to vinyl? by MBMarduk · · Score: 1

    LOL, well guess that's not an option for data CDs and DVDs no. But I can't recall ever having "broken" LP sleeves.

    For DATA (original or otherwise) I use the (spray-paint color-coded/marker-written) cakeboxes where my empty CD-Rs and DVD+Rs come in and a few of those nylon book-type thingies from Case-Logic.
    Also; my dad seems to have tons of those slimline CDR cases but these come already in lotsa purdy colors. Should be available empty just like the regular sized ones also come in colors.
    As for my music/movies: I have all original CDs and DVDs and like keeping them prominently on display next to the HiFi, TV, whatever. Home-made, wall-anchored wooden racks for me. I have special cases for transport when needed.

  43. Here's what I do: by Zadaz · · Score: 1
    • Music CD's: Spindle in the closet.
    • DVD's: Case Logic 320 CD case. (which you can get refill pages for and put in more than 500 easily. See 8 disks on a page removable pages make it easy to keep them organized.)
    • Backups, software disks, etc: Spindle in the closet.
    • Disks I use regularly (Game CD's for copy protection, PS2 games, etc): 5 inch trigger cases.
    I love the trigger cases, keep extra ones on hand to send when clients need CD sent to them. Paper sleeves don't protect in the mail, and jewel cases get broken too easily.
    1. Re:Here's what I do: by wklam · · Score: 1

      I haven't done this yet but I am planning on this for CD/DVD backup disks:

      1) Put each individual CD-ROM/DVD-ROM backup into CD envelope http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00005S8L3/104-01 76049-7127947?v=glance&n=172282 [Amazon]
      2) Then put sets of these into Double Guard Ziploc bags (TM) http://www.ziploc.com/?p=b2 [Ziploc]
      3) One can put a piece of paper in front or just use permanent marker on the ziploc bag to label the package.
      4) Put all ziploc bags into plastic shoe box.
      5) Lock them up in attic!

      -William

  44. Library CD cases by rapjr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Library supply houses have a variety of improved
    CD cases. Demco (http://www.demco.com) used to
    sell polycarbonate ones (i.e., bulletproof glass)
    which were fantastic, though expensive,
    but don't seem to carry them any more. They do
    have a selection of polypropylene ones that are
    still better than the usual polystyrene (enter
    "cd cases" in their search engine). This
    site has links to a few other vendors:

          http://www.dansdata.com/discsavers.htm

  45. Build a cabinet by eric76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the punch card days, you could buy cabinets with drawers that were made for storing punch cards. They were just the right size for punch cards and not much use for anything else but storing punch cards.

    I've thought about building a cabinet for storing CDs along the same lines as the punch card cabinets. Build drawers that are just the right size to store jewel boxes.

    Right now I just stack them up in file cabinets. A CD cabinet would be a whole lot better.

  46. The solution you can't get any more. by Animats · · Score: 1

    When CDs first came out, there were some very low cost breadbox-like plastic boxes with slots for jewel cases. I bought about twenty of these boxes, for about $35 or so, and still use them. Then came all those more-expensive ways of storing discs; padded cases, flip racks, and other overpriced dreck. Try to get low-cost boxes for dead storage now.

  47. suspension file! by redcane · · Score: 1

    I have cd suspension sleeves in a "suspension file" box. You can flick through the CDs, see the titles on the top of the sleeve, and stick on labels that stand above the level of the other cds to seperate sections. Plus you can sort/reorder discs by just popping them in where they go, unlike a wallet/spindle where you have to move all the other cds out of the way first.

    1. Re:suspension file! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I use several of these 300+ boxes and just catalog what's on each disk in a spreadsheet as well. So if i know i'm after a movie i search for it in the spreadsheet and it tells me Box1Row3Disk65

      yes it is annoying when people don't put'm back in the right spot.

  48. In praise of univenture by David+Jao · · Score: 2
    I have no relationship with Univenture except as a satisfied customer. Like the parent poster, I strongly recommend Univenture products for CD/DVD storage.

    The main advantage of Univenture disc sleeves is that they don't scratch the disc. This holds true whether you leave the discs in the sleeves for a long time or constantly take the discs in and out of the sleeves. I have been actively using them for YEARS with no visible disc scratching. In addition, their disc wallets have paper labels on the spines, which means (unlike other CD wallets) you can label the spines and thereby easily tell from looking at the spines which wallet a particular disc is in -- and yes, the spines are wide enough to hold disc titles for every disc inside, although you may have to write small.

    The Univenture disc wallets have plastic outer shells which are considerably more durable than standard jewel cases. In terms of space consumption, they are comparable to spindles, because of the thinness of the sleeves. The only real drawback is the cost -- on a per-disc basis they literally cost more than blank media. Still, compared to the value of the data that I keep on my discs, the cost of providing good storage for the discs is well worth it.

  49. ext3 by dcapel · · Score: 1

    Title says it all.

    This is serious advice; using it.

    --
    DYWYPI?
    1. Re:ext3 by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Why?

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  50. Origami CD Case by Inmatarian · · Score: 1

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=origami+cd+ca se&btnG=Google+Search Make a lot of Paper cases to hold all of those CDs.

    1. Re:Origami CD Case by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Some of the sites suggested that you could MAIL a disc in one of these paper cases.

      It would be inappropriate for me to mention my employer, but a word of advice - if you want to mail a disc, and you want it to get where its going unscathed and in one piece - put it in a HARD CASE, taped shut with shipping tape. (You can re-use a case an AOL CD came in, even - some of them are quite sturdy) Then print an address label and stick it on. I would highly advise not to mail discs in anything less, ever. (And I will point out that Netflix and Blockbuster care more about saving money on postage than they do about the discs themselves)

      (Oh, and as for why AOL uses tough packaging, and Netflix/BB use flimsy envelopes - AOL can send the sturdy stuff cheaper by Standard mail [fka Third-class] becuase it sends the same exact item in bulk to LOTS of addresses - since Netflix/BB are sending unique items individually to different folks, they have to use First-class mail [Oh, and the timeliness of arrival is also a factor - AOL is continously shoveling entire pallets of signup CD's out, and doesnt care exactly when they arrive, nor do the recipients - obviously NF/BB customers want their disc to arrive quickly)

  51. A good place to ask by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to find the CD storage case in the CSI episode "Random Acts of Violence" where a man is killed by a single blow to the head (by what turned out to be a hammer falling through a vent overhead) in the server room of his company.

    Anyone seen that episode and know who makes the disc holder the victim owned?

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  52. Switch to HDD by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

    If your discs are valueable to you, then you should make backups of them in any case. And for these copies of discs that you will need to make, HDD space is cheaper and more convenient to use than plastic CDR's and DVDR's.
        Mount the disc images from your HDD - you can easily sort them there - and put your original discs in storage, you won't need to access them often.

  53. Answer by ceeam · · Score: 1

    a) If you have several dozens CDs then go with those CD-bags (I don't know what you properly call them) with book-style leaves inside where you put in those shiny discs.

    b) If you have several hundreds/thousands of CDs/DVDs then just store them on spindles - those usually transparent cylindric boxes they sell blank media in. Keep a database though so you have some chance to find what you need! :)

    I also have a dozen or so empty slim cases for moving things in and out.

    1. Re:Answer by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I don't like spindles because they are sequential access. For the slim jewel cases I use the database / numerical location technique. Even regular size jewel cases are a pain when it comes to finding them because it isn't a lot of fun scanning the titles on the spine. For disks that I don't access very often I use binders that hold about 500.

      Again these are indexed in a database.

  54. vinyl sleeve with spot for spine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use the Univenture Poly Jewelpak Expanded Spine Standard (in black, which is not listed on their site but last time I talked to them could be ordered over the phone for the same price).

    http://www.univenture.com/acatalog/Polydiscsleeves .html

    Converting to the Jewelpaks took me hours and I only did a fraction of my CDs-- the ones I used to DJ with. The spine slot is narrow and it can be difficult to get the spine of the cd cover into the slot without folding it (in a bad way). You get better at it the more you do. If you dedicate some time to it, it becomes an automatic process. To use the spine slot you will have to rip the spine off of the CD cover, which is usually easy but could ruin its resale potential. Also, since the sleeve is sized to match the CD and front cover, the back cover of your CDs must be folded to fit into the slot. In my experience, however, most CDs have back covers with track listings flush right, flush left, or centered. Any of those will work fine. Track listings in a large circle or flush bottom don't work so well when folded.

    The cool thing about the spine slot is that the edge by the CD bends easily, so you can actually flip through the spines to find what you want. And the spine slot is on both sides at the same end, so you can flip in either direction. I recommend standardizing to a certain direction so your CDs all face one way with the text all facing one way as well. Once you get the spine into the slot, its' not coming out again so you'd better get it in there the right direction the first time.

    They are awesome. It's slim scalable CD storage. But you have to buy in bulk. The site lists sleeves in boxes of 5000.

  55. DIY by salec · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Slim cases generally annoy me because I can't tell them apart by looking at their spines,
    You can colour-code them, using coloured stickers or permanent markers. Other thing that comes to my mind is to DIY a device similar to slide-projector feeder (in line, not drum) that prods up one case a time so that you can see that half-inch wide clear part of case that can hold a paper ribbon with info on it. That way you would operate the lever and vrrrr, fast browse thru them (it is assumed that holder is horizontal, i.e. in a drawer ). Or, even simpler, if the rack is made such that it could be tilted back (or if bottom of the back of rack could be pulled forward so that only the back is tilted), to force cases form a staircase, you could see them all at once.
  56. Go away nerd lightweight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The answer is obvious - duct tape.

  57. Only one option. by Eideewt · · Score: 1

    Truly this is the only way to go.

  58. Flight cases by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    I use "flight case" style boxes for storing CDs. You can get ones made for CDs, with plastic inserts to put them in. Then you can flick through quickly. Good ones have a bit of paper in the lid where you can make an index.

    I use CD Index 2 for keeping track of all my DVD-Rs, BTW: http://home.so-net.net.tw/minghsiu/

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  59. The same place I got the cd-r from: by WgT2 · · Score: 1

    The packaging spool.

    Since almost 100% of my current CDs are CD-Rs, I just stack them right back where I got them... well, where I got the previous batch from: the packaging spool.

    I do have a question of my own: what do you do with too many jewel cases?

  60. It should be obvious... by RedOregon · · Score: 1

    ...a beowulf cluster.

    --
    Skivvy Niner? Email me!
    HEY! Look left just ONE MORE TIME!
  61. Sleeves plus different, ABC use of Jewel Cases by sciencecneisc · · Score: 1

    As someone who used to own 2000 CD-R's ;) I've had experience. UniKeep CD Safety-sleeves are my current choice. I was happiest when I put them in a Keepsake plastic rubbermaid thingy and divided it alphabettically with a real jewel case for each letter of the alphabet and one for the #'s category. Yes you said no thin sleeves but this is a mix. I use the Nylon albums for my CD's but moving and re-ordering them is too much work. You can try to space out extra for each letter if you go by letter but it's still a guessing game. With sleeves and dividers by letter everything fits in a reasonable amount of space IMO.

  62. Flight case by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

    Get a DJ's CD flight case. They have an index and thumbs so you can quickly find what you're looking for, and they're roadie proof, so your discs will be plenty safe enough. Leave the silica gel in there to help stop condensation ruining your precious discs.

  63. telling me those paper inlay& covers do NOT br by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Those vinyl paper inlays are the most fragile you can have in your box of records ; they rip easy, the glue dissolves after a time, leaving you a unfolded 24" cardboard as protection for your vulnerable nude 12" record; to not even talk about when it goed wrong when you try to put the record back in the cover and its stuck *inbetween* the glue lines.

    CD covers are stronger, because they are made out of plastic and not paper which can rip in many circumstances; although; I still lack faith in their robuustness protecting their valuable audio as it is price-set today. I found out those soft plastic DVD boxes or those CD covers with a push-the-cd-out mechanism (without hinges) are one of the better/stronger/smaller/more flexible jewel cases out there; although the ones I got do miss some space for a decent inlay.

    Those nylon books, I do not know what to think about them, I've got about 2500 cd's stored in such books and I see they do fail faster than they did when they used to be in their original jewel case; probably when you don't move such map a lot you won't get the same problems of wear (and tears for some of my cd's)

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  64. Paper is bad, mmmkay? by RedBear · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use different colored paper sleeves. Those packs of 50 in 5 colors from Memorex are great and disposable

    Paper is made of wood fibers and will scratch CD and DVD coatings. If you keep discs in paper sleeves you can end up "fogging" the disc with micro-scratches to the point where it won't be readable anymore, at least not without being repaired by something like this. (Just for reference I have had great results from that particular unit, and it doesn't leave radial lines like the "Skip Dr." units.)

    Instead of paper sleeves, use non-scratching Tyvek (the same stuff they put on houses):

    Pack of 100
    Pack of 1,000

    Just to stay totally on topic, the original poster may want to check out the complete Cyberguys catalog. They have a large number of different CD/DVD holder/case options, from quad CD jewel cases to CD/DVD carousels and other alternative storage possibilities. (Note this part of the quad CD jewel case description: "The durable, translucent polypropylene case will not break or shatter like ordinary plastic jewel cases". Interesting.) Something like this may actually be what the original submitter is looking for. No breakage and saves space but still has a readable index to make it easy to find things.

    Cyberguys' prices are great on almost everything in their inventory and they have tons of "neato" geeky items that always make me wish I had more money. For basic computer items like network cables, adapters, cases of various types, testers and such, they have become my supplier of choice. For bigger stuff like hard drives, CD/DVD burners, monitors and such I still go to Newegg though. No, I don't work for them or get any kickbacks for the links, unfortunately.

    1. Re:Paper is bad, mmmkay? by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Instead of paper sleeves, use non-scratching Tyvek (the same stuff they put on houses):"

      Highly reccommended. My house has no scratches at all.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  65. Repeat after me.... RAID IS NOT BACKUP! by jbridges · · Score: 2, Informative

    After almost loosing (TWICE) my entire ripped CD collection (EAC Secure TEST/COPY into FLAC), I finally really heard what I had been told over and over but never believed.

    RAID IS NOT BACKUP!

    If you think having a parity drive makes your data safe, you WILL regret it. Even RAID1 won't save you when your power supply fails violently trashing multiple drives.

    My solution? I built up a new RAID server with higher capacity drives, and leave the original server turned off as a mirror that I sync once every month or two. I occasionally compare every file to ensure no data corruption. It takes days to compare terabytes over a LAN, but then I know ahead of time about bad/failing hardware.

    1. Re:Repeat after me.... RAID IS NOT BACKUP! by Harinezumi · · Score: 1
      Two RAIDs, one of them offline most of the time (or better yet, off-site) definitely seems like the way to go.

      The problem with CDs/DVDs/tapes is that they tend to degenerate with time and there's no quick and easy way to check data integrity, not to mention the fact that they're a pain in the ass to use if you're dealing with significant amounts of data. I've lost count of the number of times I've tried to get something from an old CD-R only to find that half of its data layer has flaked off.

      With RAID, you can know immediately when a drive fails and checking data integrity is a matter of executing a script. And with an off-site RAID your data can easily survive a catastrophic multi-drive failure or large-scale natural disaster.

    2. Re:Repeat after me.... RAID IS NOT BACKUP! by avronius · · Score: 1

      Interesting thought here...

      I have my collection of CD's ripped to disk, as well as having most of them sitting in my Sony jukebox.

      I only have one location (my house). I don't feel comfortable paying co-location fees to store my music collection... BUT, I would feel more comfortable with a copy of my music sitting elsewhere...

      Here's what I'm considering...
      I'll offer, at no charge of course, to store an "archive" copy of my brother's music on my system, if he'll offer to do the same for me. It's a sure fire way to ensure that I'll always have access to my music, while performing the same service for my brother.

      Here's the impending problem with that idea...
      It's illegal. Sure, I'll never listen to his collection (including Marilyn(sp?) Manson and Emminem), and he won't listen to my collection (Mozart to Ella Fitzgerald to Green Day), but the law is the law. Peer 2 Peer file sharing of copyrighted material, even for the purpose of protecting ASSETS that I have a right to, is illegal.

      Damn.

      - Av

    3. Re:Repeat after me.... RAID IS NOT BACKUP! by jbridges · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But is it illegal if you take that 2nd copy of your music, and leave it at a friends house, offline?

      What if you fill up a few 500GB drives (the sweet spot (on sale) if you consider the side costs of drives, hot swap bays, controllers, power, percentage of server cost), and just keep them at a friends home, sitting on a shelf. How can that be illegal?

      Consider:

      1. It's not illegal to make up your own mix cd.
      2. It's not illegal to keep that copy in your car.
      3. It's not illegal to drive around with that copy in your car.
      4. It's not illegal for others to listen to that cd in your car.

      So it is legal for someone to listen to your physical copy that you still own, in least in some cases.

      1. It's not illegal to copy CDs you own to an iPod.
      2. It's not illegal to carry that iPod around and listen elsewhere.
      3. It's not illegal for others to listen to your iPod.

      What if you loan that iPod to someone? Is that illegal? If not, how is that different from keeping a harddrive full of music (where you still own the harddrive) at a friends home.

  66. Spindles -are- great, just get organized by Animaether · · Score: 1

    I use spindles myself, and the very basic supercheap trick I use is to cut out some CD/DVD-sized pieces of paper with a 'tab' on it to write a genre/series title/whatever - you can even color-code if you want to get fancy like that. Furthermore I have three different spindles: one for movies, one for all computer software, and one for photo archives+recorded TV shows+whatever else.

    So if I'm looking for e.g. War Games, I merely have to grab the Movies spindle, open it up, look for the SciFi tab, and it's only a quick search between 8 or so discs, instead of all 80+ in the spindle.

    That said, retrieving the disc in question is still a hassle (lift off all those on top, retrieve disc, place the rest back)... but the worst thing is - You cannot buy these damn spindles separately. So if you buy a spindle - great, now you have storage space. But wtf are you going to do with the 100 CD-Rs that came with it? %) Not to mention that you paid for all those CD-Rs.

    1. Re:Spindles -are- great, just get organized by toleraen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do something similar...I use multiple DVD spindles to hold movies/tv seasons, but I just keep them in alphabetical order. I made up a spreadsheet with a listing of all the movies I've got, followed by sections for location (dvd rack for retail, spindles for uhhh movies without cases, cabinets for VHS), format (actual dvd, divx, etc), then genre and sub-genres. So when I want to watch a comedy, just use the auto-filter deal in excel to show only comedy movies.

      This way saves on digging through spindles which saves some disk wear and tear trying to remember what you've got. It also gives you a nice way to inventory your movies (no more "I swear I had that movie"), and if you let a friend borrow a movie, you can mark down who has it. Great for sending to a friend if you want to swap movies for the weekend too.

  67. the best solution i've seen: by schwal · · Score: 1

    i've had good luck with these

    --
    -schwal "Hanging is too good for punners, they should be drawn and quoted"
  68. polypropylene sleeves by farquharsoncraig · · Score: 1

    What I've done (at least I've done for a trial 50 CDs) is replace the jewel case with archival photo polypropylene plastic. The jewel case is an awkward size and yet I wanted to keep the back paper because it contains useful track information that I can refer to easily. So far I've been very happy with the solution although I'm thinking now that thicker plastic may be better.

    In order to get the plastic sleeves to the correct size I bought a food bag sealer and 25 binder sheets of 5"x7" photograph plastic pages which I cut in half. Next I made a jig for the bag sealer to trim the 3rd side down to just large enough to fit the jewel case back paper (about 153 mm) which can be done by quickly tearing off the plastic from the front of the sealer while the seal is still hot. At first I wasn't sure how this system would work but the sealer when the plastic is torn off makes a very clean edge, so much so that I sealed the other two sides as well leaving the top open. Finally, I put each CD in its own envelope between the front booklet and the back paper.

    For my next batch I'm thinking of buying a box of these.

    For the first 50 jewel cases that I've replaced with these photograph sleeves I've saved nearly a meter of shelf space even though more than a third of those jewel cases were single width but double hinged, therefore containing two CDs. Although the side tabs on the end papers are not as easy to glance across as with jewel cases when on the shelf they are still moderately visible and it's definitely a tradeoff worth the space saved.

  69. Re:Steps with no fancy origami by kbrosnan · · Score: 1

    This will produce a different case than what is described in the pdf. I have been using these steps since 1997 or so to make quick CD cases.

    1. Orientate the paper so the short edges are at the top and bottom (portrait).
    2. Place CD/DVD centered along the top short edge.
    3. Fold the extra paper on the left and right over the CD using the left and right edges of the CD as a guide. This is a straight vertical fold.
    4. Create a horizontal fold at the bottom of the CD. Use this fold to cover the CD
    5. You should have a bit of paper at the top that overlaps the top edge of the CD. Fold this extra paper horizontally using the top edge of the CD as a guide, I find this works best if you fold towards you.
    6. Bend the flap created in step 5 back up and tuck the flap into the two folds created in step 3.

    This should give you a pocket that a CD slips in and out of nicely. While it is not as fancy as the steps in the .pdf I find it easy to remember and simple to teach in person.
    --
    These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based upon the order I joined. -Homer Simpson
  70. ironic solution by yagu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's kind of surprising, but the cost of storage per disc can be less by storing them in a carousel cd-changer than in any shelf designed to hold cds (or any other shelf for that matter). For a long time I had two, both capable of holding 400+ discs. Each player cost less than $250, and for shelves capable of holding that many cds I found those to be typically more expensive. Kind of weird, but true.

    And, even though you may not be playing discs anymore (assuming you tote your music around as mp3 or some other non-cd format), these carousel players typically support display information about each disk (though mine required typing the info in via a keyboard), so you can easily get to specific discs.

    I don't know if these changers are still made, but I'm betting you can find them on ebay for an even better price anyway.

  71. A spoonful of Fujimoto technique here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad your got all whiny and sulky about that. I would have gone looking otherwise, and discovered (within a minute) something really cool. Get off your lazy arse. You don't need everything spoon fed to you.

    Oh since I found it, here's another spoolful. Don't dribble...
    http://www.envelooponline.com/nan/archives/easy-li fe-through-practical-origami-fujimoto-explained

  72. Silicon wafer carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I happen to work in an environment that handles wafer carriers, among other things. Occassionally, due to the industry's very high cleanliness standards, a few may be doomed to the dumpster (this is very rare in my workplace, btw).

    Since the vast majority of /.ers never deal with these things, here's a typical example.

    5" carriers are a perfect fit.

    These things are much more expensive than most options suggested so far, therefore I don't recommend this to anyone that doesn't have access to discarded samples. The only other disadvantage is that they occupy a bit more space than the others.

    The benefits to such an assembly are: clean, self-stackable, sturdy, and each CD is easily accessible/indexable (try finding a CD within a spindle). Since these things are built to be used in ultra-clean environments they are excellent at contamination protection, especially since they only come in contact with the edge of the disc.

  73. I'm surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...nobody's mentioned automated, robotic jukeboxes. :-) (You know, the ones with mobile arms that zip around the collection on rails.)

    It's a silly solution, but if you're archiving the Library of Congress on CD for some crazy reason, there are few better solutions than letting a machine change your CDs for you.

  74. Discgear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Discgear stuff is pretty nifty. You get rid of jewel cases but yet retain a sane way of finding things.

  75. Two solutions by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
    Use a jukebox for the disks you use regularly: http://www.cyberguys.com/templates/searchdetail.as p?productID=4667

    For the less frequently used, replace the hard jewel cases with more pliable plastic ones that still have a spine and can either take the CD insert/back label or can be labeled: http://www.uline.com/AdvSearchResult.asp?view=ALL& SubGroup=5164&Source=20&BrowseGroup=87&Method=BROW SE&desc=Square+Plastic+CD+Cases

    My company uses the cases and stores them in a large 4 drawer, 500 CD per drawer, media cabinet. I wish we had a jukebox.

  76. Holy Grail... by bluesk1d · · Score: 1
    I had the same dilemma, a growing collection of DVDs/CDs. The answer is this my friends: http://www.meritline.com/cd-dvd-510-holder-wallet- holders-wallets-ehj510.html

    It easily and compactly holds over 500 disks and is no bigger than a brief case (a little taller). The key feature is that the sleeves are in no way attached. They hang like a file cabinet, allowing for extremely simple alphabetization and additions. When the lid is closed, they are not able to slip off the rails. They also have smaller and bigger versions.

  77. Century CD by JackStrife17 · · Score: 1

    I use the Century CD organizer which is available from http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTool s/item-details.asp?EdpNo=548251&CatId=44. One unit hold 100 CDs and is controled from your PC via USB or Serial. The included software isn't the greatest, but it does get the job done, and an upgraded software package will be out soon that allows you to view/search the contents of each disc. I have 3 at home and the work wonders for me - especially since the software keeps track of who I lend each disc out to, so I know who to hunt down if something goes missing.

  78. Keep most of them in the original package by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 1

    I store the CDs in the spindle they came in.
    It is a very compact storage. They are messy to search in, though.
    I do keep an ID on every disc, and I could build an index indicating spindle id + position, I haven't done that yet (though I could, automatically at any time). I keep them hashed and I keep a second copy of the whole archive side by side, so in case of bit rot, I can rebuild the originals unless I'm very unlucky.

    I think you're asking the impossible here. You want something compact, strong and easily searcheable. I'd say you cannot have all of them without some investment from you part. Why not keep the cds in folders with pages prepared to store a CD (I think you were calling that a "wallet", not sure if it's the same, but you should get the idea). Then you should make an index detailing folder number + page.

    Having an ID on every CD helps a lot, though. You could just insert each CD in the drive once and have a program make a catalog for you, but even if you do it manually, you should be able to solve the searching problem, and then you can concentrate on durability and compactness.

    Something else: take the most used CDs from your archive, make a copy and dump them in your computer desk top (the real one, not the virtual one). When you start using them, you'll make a least recently/frequently used cache without knowing. Since you're using copies you should have no problem with scratches, you'll get fast access, without compromising the main archive durability.

    In any case, keep some empty jewel cases, you might need them to transport some CDs (even if they are only copies)

  79. Why not make better jewel cases? by belmolis · · Score: 1

    Why are jewel cases so prone to cracking? For many people jewel cases would probably be just fine if not for the fact that they are so prone to cracking. Couldn't they be made of a more flexible plastic?

  80. VarioPac by JamesF1 · · Score: 0

    http://www.variopac.de/english/Products/variopac.h tml

    These are great, I have a few of them. They're thin, simple, come in a range of colours, and just work if you want to keep things safe, but don't need paper inserts, or spines, to identify things by. They also do a great job of protecting CDs from when you end up sitting on one...

  81. disco look by deviceb · · Score: 1

    I got theses sheet style holders from Urban Outfitters.
    They have 7 rows, 5 columns
    A couple sets of these with the CDs in label facing in looks nice i think.
    I keep a sloppy archive of "B,3 or A,5" software stored on them. I stopped keeping the archive active as most of my CDs get tossed out after i transport the data. -but it did work good for a couple years.
    I wonder which effects the earth more, 1 cd or its weight in paper.

    --
    Kill your TV
  82. Nice utility on that site by dandman · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be nice if there was some sort of resource where we could look up terms we didn't understand, so everyone in the world could have access to that sort of information? ... Oh, wait.

    Wouldn't it be nice if the website called 'papercdcase.com' contained more than just one pdf file, and also had an actual downloadable, printable template? ... Oh, wait.

    3. ????
    4. PROFIT!

  83. DiscSox and Spindles by balamw · · Score: 1

    I use DiscSox http://www.discsox.com/ for my audio CDs and spindles for most of my data discs. The DiscSox are so much more compact and light than jewel cases (even slim) to you can put a lot of discs in a small space. They are easy to flip through like old LP bins. B

  84. This may sound like spam but.... by bigmike_f · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to work for a company called Discgear. This is what they were really good at. Try looking at their selector 100 FX. http://www.discgear.com/

  85. ~ 1 TB of music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My aunt has a huge collection of music (~1300 CDs), and she decided to rip it as WAV files. Three 250 GB USB2 drives later... It's a pain for her to make sure that all the drives are plugged in, powered on, detected properly, and then to make sure that Windows Media Center finds and indexes all of them so they can appear on her ROKU. I took her drives, converted everything to 192 MP3's, and they all fit on one 250 GB drive with room to spare. A bit (no pun intended) of a sacrifice in terms of the music quality, but the managability tradeoff is well worth it. Now to get MusicMatch and iTunes to work well together :)

  86. wallets by foxxygirltamara · · Score: 1

    I use wallets. I have two big Rubbermaid tubs, one for Videos and the other for everything else. In the first box, I have one 256 CD case for general movies, three 100 CD cases for anime, cartoons and TV shows, two 48 CD cases for misc videos and pr0n. In the second box, I have one 100 CD case for actual music CDs, another for Linux-related CDs and a 48 CD case for Windows-related CDs (incl. games and drivers -- smaller because I haven't used Windows for several years). I also have three 100 CD cases being used as temporary holders for various backups currently being processed.

    So we are probably talking on the order of 500+ discs, some CD-Rs, some DVD+Rs. If all were CD-Rs, that would only be 350 GB and it would be doable to keep a server online of that. If all were DVD+Rs, it'd be over 2 TB. My own estimation is about 1.5 TB.

    These nice Case Logic faux-leather cases are rather pricey (at $40 for 256, $20 for 100, and $10 for 48, I have about $200 in just cases) and sure it takes up more space and is slightly more awkward than just having one copy online. However, it's nice to have my movies on discrete, transportable discs (often DVD+Rs I can watch on someone else's TV) and I don't have to worry about deletion or file management. I can add another 215GB (50*4.3GB) for about $25 (TY DVD+Rs) + a $10 case = $35. Where else can you get $0.16 / GB?

    Sure it'd be nifty to have a 2TB LaCie NAS or a homemade server with 10 250GB hdds in RAID 5 but this is about 1/3 the cost.

    Note, this is just my home storage system so I don't mind swapping discs to watch a movie or play a game.

  87. He has to leave... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ballmer smashed his chair.

    god that was awful.

  88. I just go out and buy more. by douglaid · · Score: 1

    And I throw out the broken ones. I agree with you that the slim ones are no good (but two will take the place of one in a standard CD rack.) And like you, I find that wallets are inconvenient.

  89. USB CD Carousel by sergent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.i4u.com/article2485.html

    USB CD Carousel

    USB CD Carousel
    For people who have to many CDs lying around the USB CD Carousel might be the solution.

    The device manages up to 150 CDs. The Carousel can spit out a CD via the desktop software or the keypad on the CD Carousel. Multiple CD Carousels can be hooked up together.
    There are two models available. The newer one has a keypad and a USB hub built-in.

  90. Are you sure what you verify? by leehwtsohg · · Score: 1

    Do you make sure disk cache is empty when verifying files? Best is probably to turn everything on and off before verifying. I once had a problem that caused files that I was backing up across the network to have errors. I added verify, and files still ended up having errors without triggering error on verification - it turned out to be a cache problem - .i.e. linux was comparing the files to what it had in its disk cache, not to what was in the disk.
    I really wish there was good way to verify files. Is there?

    1. Re:Are you sure what you verify? by jbridges · · Score: 1

      > Do you make sure disk cache is empty when verifying files?

      Err.... I don't have many machines with 1+ TB of memory it would take to cache the data!!

      I don't do the compare as it copies, I do it after the entire copy is complete.

      As for a good way to verify as it goes? No. Not that I have seen.

      The only truely reliable way is to copy everything, reboot both machines, then compare everything.

      Next best thing is to build a set of checksums (MD5 should be ok) on the source machine, and then occasionally verify the source and destination against the checksums.

    2. Re:Are you sure what you verify? by sylvandb · · Score: 1

      linux was comparing the files to what it had in its disk cache, not to what was in the disk.

      Last I checked the source, linux did not attempt to preserve disk cache across filesystem unmount. Currently observed behaviour indicates this has not changed.

      In other words, copy the files, unmount the source and destination, mount the source and destination, compare the original and the copy.

      It still is not as sure as copy, power off, power on, compare, but it is a lot easier to script!

      sdb

  91. Jewelboxing by Freaek · · Score: 1

    Check out jewelboxing.

    They're like regular cd cases with a serious case of awesome going on. :)

  92. You are joking right? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    You mean that by now you haven't seen any of those 'zipper packs' that hold anywhere from 25 to 250 in something that resembles a 3ring binder with 'sides'.. They are sold *everywhere*.. even in damned gas stations..

    If you want it electronic, get one of those 'carousels'.

    For a super low-tech DIY storage device, get a dowel rod, some wood and some pvc pipe and a sharpie.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  93. Wallets aren't that bad. by angle_slam · · Score: 1
    I think you dismiss wallets too quickly. They aren't that hard to sort through if you pre-sort them. E.g., I had classical CDs in one binder. Jazz in another. Roughly alphabetical. The biggest problem is that wallets are rough on the CDs, despite what manufacturers say.

    I'm sure that you've read a lot of the responses that say hard drives are the answer, so you may get tired of hearing it. But I'll say it anyway. All my CDs are on an external hard drive now. Nearly instantaneous access to any song in my collection, easy to backup (get another external hard drive.) Easy to listen to portably (get an iPod or other portable MP3 player.

  94. Why not use lossless compression? by bigtrike · · Score: 1

    Why don't you zip them, you'd save a lot of space and not lose any quality. Also, you will start to get errors at higher speeds of ripping on audio cds, as they don't have the checksum data contained on data cds.

    1. Re:Why not use lossless compression? by KingEomer · · Score: 1

      That sort of compression does not work well with binary formats. The data is too random; huffman compression, LZW and similar algorithms rely on patterns within the file.