Slashdot Mirror


Dick Tracy's New Linux Box?

An anonymous reader writes "The Zypad is a new arm-wearable computer right out of Futurama. It can run Windows CE or Linux and has a 400 MHz CPU, 64MB Flash memory, 3.5 inch screen. The Zypad leaves the user's hands free — it has no keyboard, just a touchscreen and navigation keys. Voice recognition is 'being developed.' It turns on only when you look at it, so it saves power. It has GPS and Bluetooth/WLAN/GSM connectivity. Price: 1000 Euro." Too bad it's not yet available for sale — that screen looks more useful than the one on IBM's Linux watch from 2000.

161 comments

  1. voice recognition by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of you in search of voice recognition ware that has already "been developed" you should check out Dragon NaturallySpeaking. I got it for my boss who's paralyzed from the neck down and it works beautifully, making his life easier. Training only took 15 minutes and the accuracy is impressive. It comes with a headset mic but I recommend splurging on the Plantronics CS50-USB wireless headset.

    1. Re:voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Bet that makes a nice change from a boss who is typically paralyzed from the neck up.

      Yes, it is bad taste.

    2. Re:voice recognition by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It'd be nice if Nuance didn't have a lock on the market by aquiring the bits of all the speech companies that crashed and burned.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:voice recognition by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 1

      ... like IBM's ViaVoice?

    4. Re:voice recognition by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dragon Naturally Speaking 8 Standard

      System requirements :
      256Mb RAM (512Mb preferred)
      500Mb Free DIsk space

      1Gb > 64Mb

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    5. Re:voice recognition by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      why would he need that Plantronics CS50-USB:: what does he need one touch control for?

      *ducks*
      Thanks, I'll be here all week!

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    6. Re:voice recognition by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

      Recently, I found myself in the slightly bizarre situation of assisting a gentleman of Caribbean heritage in configuring and using Dragon Naturally Speaking. His accent started in the Caribbean, wandered through London, and took a left in Birmingham. *I* couldn't understand half of what he said, but Dragon understood him perfectly, even with him BELLOWING! EACH! WORD! Of course, he couldn't READ, so I had to dictate the on screen prompts to him, but still, I was impressed.

      (Turns out he wanted this to dictate letters to anyone he could think of - including Clare Short MP, Her Majesty the Queen, the Prime Minister and several journalists who just had the misfortune to have their name on an article that caught his eye - about the chip he believed had been put in his head. But that's another story ...)

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    7. Re:voice recognition by the_womble · · Score: 2, Insightful
      my boss who's paralyzed from the neck down


      Plenty of people have to work for a boss who is paralyzed from the neck up

    8. Re:voice recognition by unix_core · · Score: 1
      I got it for my boss who's paralyzed from the neck down and it works beautifully, making his life easier. Training only took 15 minutes and the accuracy is impressive

      Will anyone dare to open their mailbox after hearing him yell "Your'e fired!" alone in his office?

  2. Upgrade Options... by Praedon · · Score: 1, Funny

    I want the laser upgrade when I get mine...

    --
    Just me
    1. Re:Upgrade Options... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, they'll make a shark-mountable model too.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  3. Futurama, eh? by dema · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Zypad is a new arm-wearable computer right out of Futurama.

    So it's pointless, except on rare occasions when it can used for completely random tasks to fill plot holes?

    1. Re:Futurama, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you seem to have Futurama confused with Firefly.

    2. Re:Futurama, eh? by thea64man · · Score: 0

      "Bob Smith died yesterday after a firefighter's wrist computer running Windows CE returned a "fatal error" when he attempted to turn it on."

    3. Re:Futurama, eh? by Thabenksta · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you kidding? The "Wristlojakmator" can track objects using the YGW (you're getting warmer) protocol. I can also tell whether food is poisonous, namely popplers.

      Get your facts straight bub. ;)

      --
      There's nothing wrong with anything - Phillip J. Fry
    4. Re:Futurama, eh? by Man+of+E · · Score: 4, Funny

      It looks like a useful gadget ... now if only they could make it in the form of a suppository...

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig
    5. Re:Futurama, eh? by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      I imagine if your really into it you can use the current on... just gotta stretch.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    6. Re:Futurama, eh? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      They're working on it, but there's a shortage of beta testers.

      So far they've only found one, and he's known only as "Mr. Goatse".

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  4. mispronounced by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Voice recognition is 'being developed.'



    Somebody mispronounced 'doesn't work yet'.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    1. Re:mispronounced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, they said that, the voice recognition just thought they said "being developed."

    2. Re:mispronounced by Reapman · · Score: 1

      Voice recognition does work, does exist, and is in use. Our department uses Dragon Naturaly Speaking as well as a few others for some of our staff that have limited mobility. Is there still a long ways to go? Yes no doubt, but it is out there. I haven't personally played with it for about 5 years (moved to a different job), and even back then I was pretty impressed.

    3. Re:mispronounced by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      That's progress! Last week it thought they said "Eat up Martha".

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:mispronounced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's talking about voice recognition on this Zypad device not working. Not voice recognition in general.

      Stupid git.

    5. Re:mispronounced by HardCase · · Score: 1
    6. Re:mispronounced by fm6 · · Score: 1

      DNS works fine in an office environment, if you have decent microphone and the user takes the time to train the software and get used to its quirks. That's a long way from being usable where there's background noise with a basic pinhole microphone.

    7. Re:mispronounced by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Yes, DNS works. Allow me to fill in the implied context of my comment:

      Voice recognition is 'being developed (for this wrist-top computer platform).'

      Somebody mispronounced 'doesn't work yet (for this wrist-top computer platform).'

      Even DNS Mobile Edition won't fit in 64MB of flash. DNS is not relevant to the subject of this article.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    8. Re:mispronounced by texaport · · Score: 1
      the voice recognition just thought they said "being developed."

      After a month of intensive training -- every morning, seven days a week -- I can announce that the donut shop owner
      understands the subtle linguistic differences of "1-bacon-and-cheese-kolache" vs "1-bacon-egg-and-cheese kolache"

      Although my daily consistency could just mean I'd get my usual order even if I now ask her to beg-and-sneeze-a-lot ...

  5. Set Zypads to stun! by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 1

    For Euro 1000, this thing should have some sort of antipersonnel weapon built in. When the price comes down, this might be practical as a daily computer -- I know that with wireless Internet on one at a $500 price point I'd spend a lot more time out of the office.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
    1. Re:Set Zypads to stun! by a_karbon_devel_005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For Euro 1000, this thing should have some sort of antipersonnel weapon built in. When the price comes down, this might be practical as a daily computer -- I know that with wireless Internet on one at a $500 price point I'd spend a lot more time out of the office.

      I doubt it. From the description, anything you can do on this new toy, you can do (probably easier) on a PDA-Phone. No one REALLY works on PDA-phones either. You work on a LAPTOP where you can type at a reasonable speed.

      Granted, my Treo can be a lifesaver, with it's email/ssh etc. on the road, but I'd never want to spend an extended period of time typing on it. This device looks even worse!

      And my question is this, why would you use this when you can have a PDA-phone which does ALL the same stuff AND has a phone. Even if this HAD a phone, who would use it? You certainly don't want everyone hearing all your conversations!

      Looks impractical for most people.

    2. Re:Set Zypads to stun! by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming this thing is (or will be) slightly larger and more powerful than a smart phone at its eventual price point. As far as using it, about half my day consists of waiting for people to call in issues, so forward office phone to cell phone, and take a walk, relying on this thing for e-mail and remote access when an issue arises. If it's one of the rare issues I can't deal with in a minute or two, walk back to the office. Although since most days I'd do that I'd be hanging out in a coffeeshop browsing the web, a laptop might still be more useful. But dammit, the thing looks cool!

      --
      -- Old Man Kensey
    3. Re:Set Zypads to stun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You certainly don't want everyone hearing all your conversations! "

      You obviously haven't seen all those asshats walking around using their cellphones in "two-way radio mode" with all the beeping and loud talking. I can see it's usefulness in certain situations (IT workers, etc...) but nobody needs to hear some 16 year old's inane conversation from 20 feet away.

    4. Re:Set Zypads to stun! by pintpusher · · Score: 1

      These things always seem to fail, or not live up to their promise. Why? Because as the technology comes down in price to the point where it is affordable, then the technology is too dated to really impress anymore. By the time this thing (assuming it gets built) gets down to $500 the state of the art will have marched past it just enough that no one will want it. Same thing with PDA's and PDA/phones etc. They never quite do what we need/want because by the time that tech gets into those devices, our bigger devices are on to something new. The only things I think that will make any of these devices TRULY successful, to the point where they have a REAL impact on people lives/work is when reliable speech recognition makes it into these devices. That frees the user from burdensome or downright stupid methods of entering data, also, the processing required for reasonable speech rec. by default assumes more than enough processing power to handle everyday tasks that the user would expect from these devices. IANA[A:Z], just a guy who's tried a couple different pda's and decided their too much work to be truly useful.

      --
      man, I feel like mold.
  6. As worn by Duke Nukem Forever! by Shoten · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Too bad it's not yet available for sale..."

    Too bad it's not yet in existence. When I see a radically new gadget from some company I've never heard of whose press release touts multiple moves forward in different realms of technology, and all they have to show is a computer-generated graphic of the thing...well, I've never seen any such device ever show up to market. Not ever, in my memory.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:As worn by Duke Nukem Forever! by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      No, I think this computer-generated graphic is shaded differently than the last one...

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    2. Re:As worn by Duke Nukem Forever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Too bad it's not yet in existence. When I see a radically new gadget from some company I've never heard of whose press release touts multiple moves forward in different realms of technology, and all they have to show is a computer-generated graphic of the thing...well, I've never seen any such device ever show up to market. Not ever, in my memory.
      Oh, believe me. It exists. We have a couple of them in the lab here, and they work great. They have some problems with audio, but that appears to be a problem with the 2.6.16-rc3 build of the kernel they have on the devkits. They've promised a fixed version to us in the next week. We haven't done much with them under CE, except to see that it actually works. They have the basic apps you would expect -- media player, email client, browser, etc. Not much to see except that you wear it on your arm.

    3. Re:As worn by Duke Nukem Forever! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      While you have an excellent point, this thing is little more than a PocketPC with an ugly case. (could they have made it look any more stupid?) The specs are identical (with the exception of some added peripherals) to my iPAQ H2210.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:As worn by Duke Nukem Forever! by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was sort of hoping it would look exactly like Leela's wrist thingy, instead of thise euro-designed gonna-look-dated-in-three-years thing. A big bulky wristcomputer might actually be worthwhile, especially if it's ruggedized enough to handle being on someone's arm (look at the kind of abuse watches get). The one in the picture looks awfully fragile to me.

      Plus, you'd build strong arms lugging it around all day.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    5. Re:As worn by Duke Nukem Forever! by apharov · · Score: 1

      This story is kind of a dupe, and as I wrote before I've seen this device and it's not vaporware.

    6. Re:As worn by Duke Nukem Forever! by texaport · · Score: 1
      A big bulky wristcomputer might actually be worthwhile

      The real "Dick Tracy watch has a really cool trick -- if you forget to pay your yearly $64.90 MSN-Direct subscription, it turns itself off when Microsoft commands!

  7. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    does it have an ARM processor? In that case, do you need a StrongARM to be able to use it?

    1. Re:So... by Dantoo · · Score: 1

      Strongarm is close to what is needed I would think. That thing weighs 2/3 of a pound. I don't know what sort of wristwatch you wear but.........

      Imagine the sort of belt behind the ear you could give yourself if you thoughtlessly swatted at a mosquito!

    2. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hand-free p0rn browsing. Strong Arms (forearms anayways) here we go!

    3. Re:So... by IdahoEv · · Score: 2, Informative

      do you need a StrongARM to be able to use it?

      Yes, regardless of processor. The press release says it weighs 390 grams, which is 0.86 pounds.

      Go to your local sporting good store and get a 1-pound ankle weight. Try wearing in on your wrist all of the time. (Even let .14 grams of the sand out if you like).

      You'll find out it's a lot heavier than you thought, especially for vaporware.

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    4. Re:So... by G+Morgan · · Score: 1

      Given the difference between most people arms in weight is more than 1 pound I don't think it will cause much problem in the long term. It's not as if you're being asked to hold it out with your arm parallel to the floor all day.

  8. Good news, everyone! by saboola · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you were all sick and tired of having women hit on you before, I have this new device to show you!

    1. Re:Good news, everyone! by should_be_linear · · Score: 1

      You a right, each party (with girls) I was invited to I felt like having 2 of this devices on both of my arms.

      --
      839*929
    2. Re:Good news, everyone! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I Have been hearing about wearable computers for years. The closest I have seen that got any sort of popularity was the calculator wrist watch, and still it is not that popular.

      Most people already wear the latest technology called pockets which seem to be able to carry many of the smaller devices, Calculators, PDA, MP3 Players, Wallets, CellPhones, keys, etc... Plus these pockets are able obscure the devices when they are not in use.
      We assume that if technology can get small enough it will become useful as a warable computer. Today we still have some major problems.

      1. WiFi is not expanded enough. Once we can get high speed internet access most anywhere then these devices have a chance of being useful.

      2. Human User Interface. Voice Control is really not natural to a computer it makes you look like mental problems when you are talking into your arm and the computer goes beep at you back.
      Hand writting reconision is still way to poor and probably will never be good. (because people have trouble with it too) and useful keyboards are too big. And there is a limit on what pointing devices can do.

      3. Small Screens. No matter how high the res the screen will be small while the younger croud can read them as they get older it gets harder and harder to use.

      4. Price anything over $200 people really dont want to carry around unless they have too. Having a 2k computer on me for normal activity I wouldn't want.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  9. Headlines by penguinstorm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it's right out of Futurama, why does the headline mention Dick Tracy?

    --
    Skot Nelson music is my saviour / i was maimed by rock and roll
    1. Re:Headlines by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because Dick Tracy beat Futurama by about 70 years.

    2. Re:Headlines by Andrew+Nagy · · Score: 1

      Remember that huge watch Dick Tracy had? light bulb in head quickly flickers, then flashes on, then.... BOOM! it explodes... "OOOOOOOOOOHHHH!"

      --
      Yes, you can dance to Radiohead.
    3. Re:Headlines by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Inspiration for the dupe to follow.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    4. Re:Headlines by admdrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please, 1070 years. Did you see the first episode? Fry was clearly frozen for 1000 years.

  10. It's morphin' time! by Mayhem178 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now all we need are wrist communicators, an evil witch thing on the moon, and a big floating head in a jar.

    --

    "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    1. Re:It's morphin' time! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      And those spaceships with the showerhead jets all over them.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:It's morphin' time! by Urusai · · Score: 1

      I'm one out of three...well, it's not that big.

    3. Re:It's morphin' time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your tiny dick has been cut off and stored in a jar?

  11. Haven't we heard/seen this before? by Lovedumplingx · · Score: 1

    It looks cool. And it sounds like it could be cool too. But will it ever be more than a nifty gadget? We've all seen the pictures of wearable computers from different cons and shows. They've been around for a while in different forms. Why is this one different? Does anyone think it will ever become mainstream until the price drops tremendously?

  12. Is it for sale or not? by OlivierB · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Publishing a price means that I can bid the asking price and get the product. If it is not available, then the price is "announced to be" and is currently non-existant.

    Slashdot editors could learn a thing or two by spending a week in writing/journalist summer-camp. Day in and day out they write non-sensical blurbs, never mind they don't check-out the underlying articles, at least post a cohesive summary.

    --
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
    1. Re:Is it for sale or not? by saboola · · Score: 1

      Slashdot editors could learn a thing or two by spending a week in writing/journalist summer-camp. Day in and day out they write non-sensical blurbs, never mind they don't check-out the underlying articles, at least post a cohesive summary.

      As soon as they finish their two weeks at summer fat camp, we will set that up. Thanks for the advice.

      -Slashdot

    2. Re:Is it for sale or not? by Shawn+Parr · · Score: 1
      Okay, I can certainly see digging at the editors for not being the most professional editors in the world, but this is a bit silly.

      Anyone who has ever seen /. before knows that the blurbs are user submitted, and in many articles and the FAQ itself Taco has stated that the only editing they do is either in dire need or malformed html.

      As such it is pretty obvious, especially with the new quoted view with the CSS that the price information was written up by the submitter, and the mention that it isn't actually available yet was added as additional information by the editor. Is this syntactically incorrect, as a whole without context yes, but in the framework presented, no.

    3. Re:Is it for sale or not? by HardCase · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and then we'll get to hear stories that start out, "This one time at journalist camp..."

      No thanks!

    4. Re:Is it for sale or not? by 4e617474 · · Score: 1

      You think it's non-sensical this way? On my first reading I thought it said "Dick Cheney's new Linux Box".

      --
      Finally modding someone offtopic when they rant about what "Begging the Question" means: priceless.
  13. When you look at it? by whobutdrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How does it "only turn on when you look at it?" How would it know? That part just doesn't make sense to me

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.
    1. Re:When you look at it? by penguin_strut · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that caught my eye too. Who needs voice recognition when it can so obviously read you rinterest level/emotions. Maybe it reads lips as well?

    2. Re:When you look at it? by nbannerman · · Score: 1

      Probably a minature gyroscope or similar device. When it is rotated or moved beyond a certain angle the screen flicks on*.

      The motion sensor in the new Apple Macbook's is probably a good starting point; I wonder if it is possible to hack those to only turn the screen on when the Macbook is 'on the level'.

      * I admit, I could be talking rubbish here...

    3. Re:When you look at it? by Nybble's+Byte · · Score: 0

      I imagine it turns on by a flick of the wrist, the same way the old LED based Pulsar watches of the 70s worked. The display consumed lots of battery power.

    4. Re:When you look at it? by dissolved · · Score: 1

      If you're not looking at it how do you know if it's on or off? think about it!

    5. Re:When you look at it? by aiabx · · Score: 1

      Solution: like a fridge light, it's always on, whenever it senses it is being observed by anyone, including its own uptime counter.

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
    6. Re:When you look at it? by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have someone else look at it.

    7. Re:When you look at it? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      How does it "only turn on when you look at it?" How would it know? That part just doesn't make sense to me
      I'm guessing the same way my wife does, except her default setting is to turn off when I look at her.

      I keep grepping her log file to find out why, but that just pisses her off even more, and it's kind of gross.

      She tells me it's because of my TLD, I assume she means Tiny Linux Distribution... They keep calling me a n00b over at Usenet, and to RTFM -- anyone have a link to some good docs for a wife driver running on Tiny Linux???

      Oh, as to a real answer to your question... well, I don't knoiw either, but it reminds me of an old joke:
      An engineer, a physicist, a mathematician, and a mystic were asked to name the greatest invention of all times.
      The engineer chose fire, which gave humanity power over matter.
      The physicist chose the wheel, which gave humanity the power over space.
      The mathematician chose the alphabet, which gave humanity power over symbols.
      The mystic chose the thermos bottle.
      "Why a thermos bottle?" the others asked.
      "Because the thermos keeps hot liquids hot in winter and cold liquids cold in summer."
      "Yes -- so what?"
      "Think about it." said the mystic reverently. That little bottle -- how does it know?"
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    8. Re:When you look at it? by SmokeSerpent · · Score: 1

      It uses technlogy developed from "tree falling in the forest" research.

      --
      All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
    9. Re:When you look at it? by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 1

      Put your laptop on sleep mode and see how long the battery lasts

      --
      -gjr
    10. Re:When you look at it? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      How does it "only turn on when you look at it?" How would it know?
      You're overlooking the remarkable fact that this device has achieved AI.
      I, for one, welcome our new Singularity-achieving overlords.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  14. Other uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One word: both hands-free PDA porn!!

    Ok, that's five.. but seriously. especially I'm thinking, in zero G this may be really important for those of us that, uh, you know... have no zero G partner. Hypothetically.

  15. Well.. by GmAz · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would love to have one, but wouldn't dare wear it outside anywhere. Every person I know already knows I am a huge nerd, but still. By wearing that, it gives all other nerds the right to kick my @$$ too.

    --
    Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
  16. Well.... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

    This is going to make viewing pr0n interesting......

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    1. Re:Well.... by dissolved · · Score: 1

      not if you're a sickly type, prone to motion sickness. This thing could kill you!

    2. Re:Well.... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      This is going to make viewing pr0n interesting......

      Be careful of which arm you put it on, or you could get very frustrated.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  17. "It turns on only when you look at it..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, I've read about people with a "hard and steely gaze", but this is the first time it'll be a requirement. Being able to turn things off/on with a glance, man, that'll do me...

  18. It turns on only when you look at it? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    It turns on only when you look at it, so it saves power.

    I didn't see any reference to how it switches on in TFA or the PR PDF. I was wondering how it detected that you were looking at it. (Is it like the old Pulsar LED watch that you had to shake your wrist to see the time?)
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:It turns on only when you look at it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cheap Casio watch can be set to turn on the light when the watch reaches a certain angle (the one in the looking at it range)
      I turned it on once to see it work, then quickly turned it off because the (annoying) light would constantly turn on and off due to normal arm movements.

  19. Dell? by fusto99 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I just hope Dell didn't have any part in making it. Ow! My arm's on fire!

    1. Re:Dell? by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      If Dell ever did make these, that would give a whole new meaning to the term "Product Branding".

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    2. Re:Dell? by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Heh. If Dell were making it, there'd be 'consumer branding' involved.

      Gotta make sure those gateway rustlers don't steal their cattle.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    3. Re:Dell? by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 1

      Peter Griffin: Okay. We're playing Texas Hold 'Em.
      Michael Eisner: Are aces high or low?
      Peter Griffin: They go both ways.
      Bill Gates: He said, "They go both ways."
      [All laughing]
      Ted Turner: Like a bisexual.
      Mr. Pewterschmidt: Thank you, Ted. That was the joke.

      --
      -gjr
  20. 64MB should be enough for everyone by Speare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, but in 2006, anything with only 64MB of flash storage space will not, contrary to the website's hype, revolutionize the way we use computers. Unless you're talking about a rising desire for austere minimalism.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:64MB should be enough for everyone by cloudofstrife · · Score: 1

      If you were really into austere minimalism, you wouldn't get one of these.

    2. Re:64MB should be enough for everyone by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      That struck me as odd, too. I wonder why they didn't decide to use removable flash media cards like my camera uses, which hold way more than 64MB. Oh, maybe it's because you can't stick a flash card into a drawing of an idea.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
  21. I wonder... by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    'It turns on only when you look at it'
    I wish it was that easy to turn my wife on.

    Seriously though, I'm curious about the technology that makes this possible (no I didn't download the PDF yet). It would be pretty slick to incorporate this into other devices.

    It's a cool idea, but personally if I were to drop a thousand euros on one of these I don't think I'd be wearing it on my wrist. I'm kind of a klutz sometimes and am pretty hard on watch crystals so I don't think it would take me too long to crack the display.
    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    1. Re:I wonder... by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 1
      It turns on only when you look at it
      That description makes it seem much cooler than it actually is. It turns on when your wrist tilts to bring it into view, even if you aren't looking at it.
      The WWPC offers several wearable-specific innovations, according to the company, including a patented orientation sensor that can be configured to induce standby when the user's arm drops. Additionally, the device's tilt sensor can be used to detect motionless operator states, while a built-in GPS receiver and "dead reckoning" technology enable the device to serve as a location-transmitting beacon.
    2. Re:I wonder... by LindseyJ · · Score: 1

      Additionally, the device's tilt sensor can be used to detect motionless operator states, while a built-in GPS receiver and "dead reckoning" technology enable the device to serve as a location-transmitting beacon.

      Is that supposed to be a joke? If you forget to take off your computer before bed, it will alert the authorities that you've passed away?

    3. Re:I wonder... by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, I'm curious about the technology that makes this possible (no I didn't download the PDF yet). It would be pretty slick to incorporate this into other devices.

      It's actually pretty easy, and shipping in actual real products. Lot of watches have an option
      to make the light turn on when the watch is on a specific angle. It's like a tilt sensor.

    4. Re:I wonder... by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Looks like it's only for right-handed people with no easy way to switch for left-handed.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    5. Re:I wonder... by joe_plastic · · Score: 1

      No dead reckoning is a form of navigation method of estimating the global position of something by advancing a known position using course, speed, time and distance to be traveled.
      It probably means it has a inertial guidance system with a gyrocompass and accelerometers and ANGULAR RATE sensors (GYROs) etc....
      It's for when you can't get a gps signal for a while it can still figure out where you are.

    6. Re:I wonder... by LindseyJ · · Score: 1

      That's very informative, thanks. I honestly didn't know about that. But it still seems worded to indicate that in the case of an emergency (motionless operator state) it can be used to find that person to help them (location-transmitting beacon). Unless my ignorance of GPS and GPS-related technologies is making me misunderstand what TFA is trying to say again.

    7. Re:I wonder... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      I call prior art on the orientation sensor. My watch backlight turns on when I flick my wrist up to read the time...

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    8. Re:I wonder... by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      I wish it was that easy to turn my wife on
      Yeah, she mentioned your poor technique last night.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re:I wonder... by milimetric · · Score: 1

      I wish it was that easy to turn my wife on.

      maybe you were kidding, maybe not. Try calf massages (gentle), foot massages, incense, quiet remote places. Look up stuff online. Ask her what she wants in a private comfortable setting.

      Cheers

  22. Breakthrough???? by plebeian · · Score: 1

    With a little duck tape my IPAQ could go on my wrist as well. Talk about reinventing the wheel. If this thing was Shatter resistant and waterproof with a 2megapixel camera it would be a good tool for divers, but as a "breakthrough" device this thing is going to be stuck filling a couple small specialty markets. On the other hand Usable Voice recognition software for the PDA market..... that has promise!!!

    --
    "I myself am made entirely of flaws, stitched together with good intentions."
    1. Re:Breakthrough???? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      No kidding! I'm just wondering why somebody doesn't just build a [full-size, not watch-size] PDA that straps to a wrist. It could easily be done for $200 instead of $1000!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  23. Physics majors have to work somewhere by El_Smack · · Score: 5, Funny


    "It turns on only when you look at it,..."

    Looks like they have a Quantum Physics guy hiding out in R&D.

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
    1. Re:Physics majors have to work somewhere by Alterion · · Score: 1

      actually with wrist watches this is verry easy to do- my £10 watch has a backlight that only turns on when you look at it- there's a simple tilt sensor in the watch that registeres the angle chage when you turn our wrist away from its natural position

    2. Re:Physics majors have to work somewhere by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Funny

      well, it's really not on about half the time you're not looking at it. If no one ever looks at it the battery might be dead or not

  24. Leela's Armband Computer by Macblaster · · Score: 1

    Kind of makes you feel bad for her, not only did she think she was an orphan and the last of her species for circa 30 years, she's stuck using a piece of thousand year old technology... Well, at least she get's Tetris on it.

  25. Futurama Prior Art by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

    These armbands aren't right out of Futurama, they're right out of Ark II

    1. Re:Futurama Prior Art by booch · · Score: 1

      What's with those big buttons? Will people have bigger fingers in the future?

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  26. Useless/Redundant by Stavr0 · · Score: 1

    THE WRIST-WORN PC THAT WILL REVOLUTIONISE THE WAY WE USE COMPUTERS Oh for goodness' sake it's just a PalmPilot/PocketPC molded to fit around the arm.

    1. Re:Useless/Redundant by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1
      Oh for goodness' sake it's just a PalmPilot/PocketPC molded to fit around the arm

      No, this is a PalmPilot that fits on your arm. Mine's been working well for me for a while now. It even doubles as a gaming device that DOES NOT accidentally fall into the toilet (no comment, thank you). Although I admit, having a bigger screen would be a bonus.
  27. Wearable computer is not what we need by Dark_MadMax666 · · Score: 1

    - we already have a ton of them in anything from pda and cell phones to watches . What we need is wearable display ,bigger than 20x20 pixels and usable for reading and surfing the web ( my blackberry display barely qualifies for reading simple emails ,forget the web!) .And after that we need normal input , and ,no, voice recognition won't cut it . I need something usable I said - imagine even if you had perfect voice recognition but had to say every action you need perform open window->open directory ->open file ->edit at 00048h all clear out and loud and see how productive you gonna editing a trivial config file.

  28. Futurama? More like Back to the Future... by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 1

    This looks just like something I've seen before...

  29. I like this part by DrXym · · Score: 1
    "the device could conceivably serve as an everyday tool as common as the mobile phone or the palmtop."

    It could but it ain't going to happen. No one but the most extreme, purist form of nerd is going to be seen dead wearing one of these things. Might have applications in military or warehousing, but those kind of people would probably as happy to have something that sits in a holster until required.

  30. just tape a pocket pc to your arm by llZENll · · Score: 1

    seriously, you would get a VGA touchscreen, 620mhz cpu, a library of several thousand apps, you could hack it to run linux if you wanted, and would only cost you about $200-400.

  31. Re:Yes but... by Fordiman · · Score: 1

    Well, if it runs windows and linux, I would venture a 'maybe'. You know, assuming they could fit SSE3 into that little thing.

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  32. Geeky as hell for normal people/useful in industry by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

    If I saw someone wearing that, I would think they were a total goofball--beyond just geeky, into the realm of "do you realize how freaking silly that looks". Perhaps in 5 years, wearable computing won't be so odd... but right now it would look goofy.

    One opening I do see for this, however, is in industry. Just as the Xybernaut (a commercialization of Steve Mann's work in wearable computers, IIRC) is selling to workers who need easy access to computer data without the heft and inconvenience of a separate machine, this will probably sell to people who need it. I could see it replacing the handheld scanners that UPS and FedEx people carry now, or allowing utility workers (telephone, internet, electricity) to run line tests or check things without climbing down from a telephone pole or running back to their van.

  33. And the 1000-euro question... by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...can I connect my Optimus keyboard to it?

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
  34. because it's a HOAX! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gawd, linux users will believe anything.

  35. Back in the 80's I worked with handicapped people. by mmell · · Score: 1
    The one rule I figured out . . . you could make the ultimate prosthetic, aid, wheelchair, etc. - but if it's ugly, nobody will use it. That's why such a large percentage of amputees usually wear a non-functional prosthetic that looks (kinda) like their missing limb; some don't even bother with the functional "claw" type attachment at all, because they'd rather look normal than have the lost functionality back.

    This thing is pretty ugly looking - even Toranga Leela would sneer at it! I predict a dismal sales record for this toy.

  36. User interface, voice may be the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I could use is a secretary. Of course, most of my communication with the secretary is by voice.

    The closer a pda approaches the functionality of a secretary, the better the pda is. It's a pain to have to poke at a screen twenty times just so I can be reminded of an appointment. It would be much better to be able to say: "I have an appointment with Fred next Tuesday at 10 AM."

    The joy of a voice interface is that the device could be very small because it wouldn't need a keyboard. Actually, there doesn't need to be a separate device at all. One could just phone one's desktop computer. If you did it right, you could make it sound like you actually had a secretary.

    The more I think about it, the more I think I don't actually need one of those wrist thingies as long as I have my cell phone.

  37. Officer Number 1-B-D-I by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    *puts on the computer, covers one eye, and shouts "Look at me! I'm Leela!"

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    1. Re:Officer Number 1-B-D-I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh?

    2. Re:Officer Number 1-B-D-I by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Troll

      "*puts on the computer, covers one eye, and shouts "Look at me! I'm Leela!"

      *Covers both eyes*

      I'm double Leela!

      *Runs into a wall.*

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  38. Yeah, right... by waif69 · · Score: 1

    "It turns on only when you look at it, so it saves power."

    What if I am wearing sunglasses, will it ever turn on? Will it turn on for people who look at it while I am on a plane? What about animals (cats, dogs)?

    From the article press release, it seems as though someone is just thinking about making this and made a mock device for photos. I don't think we will see this in the next 10 years.

  39. awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll look cool when I wear it while driving my Segway.

  40. Left-handed model? by T1girl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm wondering if it comes in right-handed, left-handed and ambidextrous models. Being a petite-sized person with small wrists and rather short arms, I would find this clunky device rather cumbersome. It would feel like having a can of soda strapped to your arm. A larger person with beefy arms might find it too tight, although the armband does appear to be adjustable (it reminds me of a blood-ressuren cuff.) Also, the person in the picture is wearing a short-sleeved shirt. In cold weather, would you wear it over your shirt and sweater, or would you have to roll up your sleeves. I don't even like wearing an ID badge.

    1. Re:Left-handed model? by rawtatoor · · Score: 1

      I can't seem to figure out the formula for the +5 funny slashdot response here...

  41. Paradox by XMilkProject · · Score: 1

    If it turns on whenever we look at it, how can we be sure it ever actually turns off?

    --
    Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
    Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
  42. Wristmo-jackulator... by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    or whatever Leela calls it in one of the Futurama episodes. I guess they couldn't really use that name for the real product unless they wanted to advertise by showing some pasty nerd in his room watching porn on it

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
    1. Re:Wristmo-jackulator... by dohzer · · Score: 1

      But watching porn on it would probably make you motion sick :(

  43. obligatory by ClassicComposer · · Score: 1

    Great, finally birth control for men that doesn't require surgery.

  44. Emacs Bindings? by Temujin_12 · · Score: 2, Funny

    How long before the first emacs zealot creates the 3-button keybindings for this device?

    --
    Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
  45. Bar code scanner by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    It would be nice if it had a bar code scanner built in. Then they could target it to warehouses and such.

  46. If it's right out of Futurama by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

    then how come it's not called a Wristlojackimator?

  47. seems upside down by kencurry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On either wrist, you would want the keypad on the inside (medial side). If you put this on either wrist, the text (as displayed in the photo) would be upside down.

    Did marketing do their homework on the photo for press release?

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
  48. It does work! by Tribbin · · Score: 3, Funny

    They have a full working version.

    The problem is they set a bit wrong and it only works when you don't look at it.

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  49. I'm confused by JPribe · · Score: 1

    Is it a wearable computer or a NanoPC????(RTFA)

    --

    Why go fast when you can go anywhere? O|||||||O
  50. Only when you look at it? by Spleen · · Score: 1

    So the screen knows that my eyes are focused on it? This technology is very bad for me. Soon there will be a device for women, and paranoid /. geeks that will let them know when people look at them. All the women I secretly admire from afar will soon know that my eyes are focused upon them.

    Female Beach Checklist:
    1) Bikini
    2) Sunscreen
    3) Towel
    4) "Who's look at me?" device..

    1. Re:Only when you look at it? by TheRequiem13 · · Score: 1

      This is why God invented reflective sunglasses.

      --
      What?
  51. its like... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    It looks like the wrist version of those luggable computers around in the early 80's.

    I think I'll wait until wearable computers have sufficient power/memory/battery-life to be truly useful, and look like a slim writswatch.

  52. I've got a better idea... by mrraven · · Score: 1

    ...glue a PDA to a piece of velcro and wrap it around your wrist. Cost 300 bucks or 1/6th what this device costs and just as "beautiful."

    --
    Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
  53. Fast forward 10 years... by Odiumjunkie · · Score: 2, Funny

    What? People WORE those things? On their WRISTS? But they're massive! WHAT? HOW many gigahertz? Only four hundred? WHAT!? Megahertz? No way! No way, you're joking right? How could that even run voice recognition? WHAT? ...

  54. Harddisk by tijmentiming · · Score: 1

    I wonder when those bluetooth/wlan/gprs/gsm/pda/smartphones thingies have harddisks of 20 gig

  55. speaking of quantum by bigpat · · Score: 1

    if you want real wearable computing for simulation, then might as well get the real thing:

    http://www.quantum3d.com/products/Expedition/Exped itionDI.html

  56. Re:Futurama? More like Back to the Future... by Corf · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I get the feeling that it looks vaguely familiar. My parents bought me one fifteen years ago...

    --
    The pain was excruciating and the scarring is likely permanent, but that just means it's working.
  57. Need Ubiquitous Wireless Access First by TheRequiem13 · · Score: 1

    Before any product like this will ever be successful, we need to get our distributed wireless net working. The specific protocol and specs chosen aren't all that important, but there needs to be something widely availble. The general population needs to grasp the convenience before people will bite on these. They don't want to work to get it working.

    If I have to wait until I find a useful wireless hotspot, why wouldn't I just lug around a small laptop instead? I'll be waiting until I sit down at the nearest Starbucks or McDonalds to use it at this point.

    You can't sell many trains until after you've laid a few miles of track.

    --
    What?
  58. Thats Nothing - Check THIS one out! by rehashed · · Score: 1

    Its already been done, and for a fraction of the price ("free" in certain cases).
    It features complete communications capability, phone, wireless, etc.
    This one is affixed using gravity, but a circular elastic accessory (optional) can be purchased to allow a more flexible degree of positioning.
    It currently uses a cut down version of windows, but can be adapted to run linux quite easily: http://www.mediaparty.com/wristcomputer.jpg

  59. From Italy, With A Little Love by ecj+-+MAXINE · · Score: 1

    http://symblogogy.blogspot.com/2006/06/from-italy- with-little-love.html I first wrote about this three days ago and submitted it to SlashDot. Curious that, in that I used the "Dick Tracy" reference in my posting as well. Good Luck!, See you down the road.

  60. Language by wytcld · · Score: 1

    "Eurotech" "Technology for a better world" "Zypad"

    Why should we believe people who'd name a company after "Euro" and "tech"? "Euro" is so 90s, and "tech" is more a 60s through 80s thing. And the idea that "Zy" (or anything beginning with "Z" or "X") is sexy? Right out of the 50s (although currently enjoying a revival in pharmeceuticals). And that company slogan - belongs back in the 40s somewhere.

    From these clues, a good guess would be "fraud whose real aim in attracting foolish investors." Folks who really have the imagination to invent a great gadget also, far more often than not, have the imagination to name their company and gadget something that either means something specific - to help market it - or that at least stands out from the cliches. The last thing someone who's invented something unique wants is to be confused with all the me-too corporations out there; but for someone committing the same old scam of luring in investors, being confused with a thousand other "Euro" or "tech" or "better world" companies can be just the ticket.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  61. Why not innovate more? by Kouroth · · Score: 1

    What they need to do is use a flexible touch screen display that goes on your arm. Then put the bulk some where else, like on your belt. That way it doesn't take up so much room on your wrist. I don't know about everyone but my wrists are very skinny. Watches hardly fit, let alone some bulky computer. Just use blue tooth or IP over skin to connect the device with the display.

    --
    Thermal depolymerization - Lazy recycling.
  62. again? by Lalo+Martins · · Score: 1

    As usual, this has been reported before. The only change is that Eurotech is now announcing a seemingly bogus "price". But it doesn't look like the product actually exists, or will ever -- this sounds like investor-trap vapourware. Not that I don't like it; if Eurotech actually intends to produce it, which I doubt it, then I wish them all the luck and will probably buy one.

  63. MEMS Accelerometers by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how the MacBook's motion sensors work, but there have been totally solid-state accelerometers around for quite some time. The underlying technology is usually called "SMM" for Silicon Micro Machine (that may be a trademark of somebody's) or "MEMS" for Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. If you position three of them on orthogonal axes, you can make a fairly decent gyroscope without any moving parts.

    I've played with them on model helicopters (they help to stabilize it by keeping the tail pointed in the same direction by regulating the speed of the tail rotor) and they're fairly slick. I suspect it's the same thing used in the Sudden Motion Sensor.

    The story I was told about them is that they're an offshoot or descendant of the sensors used to trigger the airbags in cars. The way they work (as it was described to me) is that they have a very small "finger" or pendulum of known mass, positioned perpendicular to the direction you want to measure the acceleration in, and suspended above a substrate by a small gap. The sensor measures the changing capacitance between the 'finger' and the substrate, and determines the acceleration based on this. This would get linear acceleration; I'm not sure how they build them to determine angular/rotational accelleration, but it's probably the same principle.

    At any rate, it sure beats the heck out of the old mercury-switch arrangements for figuring out position and acceleration.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  64. more publicity for vaporware? by aztektum · · Score: 1

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/03/ 14/2056233&threshold=-1 how many more times will we see this before it's never released to the public?

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  65. But I WANT a keyboard by mlewan · · Score: 1
    The device I want is the simplest possible: a PDA with a non crashing OS, any text editor (yes, even vi), possibility to use an external real size keyboard and the possibility to write text files to an SD card.

    Writing a "non crashing OS" I exclude Palm OS, by the way.

    Does anyone know if that configuration exists?

  66. "Turns on when you look at it"? by grimsweep · · Score: 1

    There's a joke somewhere in there involving slashdotters and success with women, but I just can't seem to put my finger on it.

    Let's face it. Most people will get this for keeping smut at arm's length at all times. The real challenge for most users will be maintaining eye contact with the screen when their arm is involved in a particularly repetitive lateral motion.
  67. I read about this on March 14th... on /. no less by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

    Wow. Am I being dyslexic or have I heard this before?.
    Is it somehow different? Please enlighten me. Or, is this idea universally interesting, and it's just a coincidence that they both can run CE/Linux? The other one did exactly that, as well.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  68. Hands free? by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
    The Zypad leaves the user's hands free -- it has no keyboard, just a touchscreen and navigation keys.
    So, if the hands are free, with what do users touch the screen and press the keys?
    Oh. My. God. Get This thing OFF my ARM!
    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  69. Geek Tool by design.sound · · Score: 1

    Holy crap, that's geeky. Does it have a laser too? I'd get one in a second if it did.

  70. Cheap bastards! by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

    The purple ponytail is sold seperately.

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  71. Points to improve/add before putting it on sale by Kosi · · Score: 1

    1. Fix their damn website so it does not become unuseable without Javascript activated and shows at least the datasheet of this thing if not some real pictures and screenshots of the device in use.

    2. s/GSM/UMTS/ or at least GPRS, More memory and one or two CF slots

    3. Implement a IR device so it can be the ultimate remote

    4. Drop the price to a reasonable level of under 500,-