Slashdot Mirror


Another Microsoft Exec Joins Google

SirClicksalot writes "CNN is reporting that Vic Gundotra, a 15-year veteran general manager at Microsoft, has left the company to join Google. Gundotra worked at Microsoft as general manager for platform evangelism to get software developers to use Microsoft's software and online offerings. The function he will perform at Google is not yet known, but he will need to wait one year before starting his new job because of a non-compete clause in his contract."

61 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. Was that... by bcat24 · · Score: 5, Funny

    the sound a chair being thrown?

    1. Re:Was that... by bcat24 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Er, was that the sound of a chair being thrown?

      [Note to self: the preview button is your friend.]

    2. Re:Was that... by OmegaBlac · · Score: 5, Funny

      Could also be the sound of hundreds of thousands of Slashdot geeks rushing to quickly type out a housand variations (there will be dupes of course) of the "Ballmer Tossing Chairs" jokes. Each starting with "And in Redmond...".

    3. Re:Was that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gundotra worked at Microsoft as general manager for platform evangelism to get software developers to use Microsoft's software and online offerings.

      Hope the fall back plan isn't Ballmer as platform evangelist: "Use Visual Studio or I'll f*cking kill you!"

    4. Re:Was that... by Frankie70 · · Score: 2, Insightful


      the sound a chair being thrown?

      Almost died laughing. That was the first time I read that
      joke on Slashdot.. .. .. ..
      today .. .. ..
      in this article.

    5. Re:Was that... by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No kidding. Bring on the meta-chair-throwing jokes instead.

      -Grey

    6. Re:Was that... by flacco · · Score: 4, Funny

      luckily for all concerned, the office got together and bought ballmer this recently.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  2. Great News by Azmodie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More people leaving MS and oining Google means more google greatness :)

    --
    Your only young once, but you can be imature forever.
    1. Re:Great News by vertinox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More people leaving MS and oining Google means more google greatness :)

      Unless of course Microsoft's plan all along was to slowly replace all Google employees with former Microsoft ones. And when the code word is leaked they'll all revolt and start a hostile takeover by Microsoft.

      Of course the plan could back fire after the MS employees have their cold hearts melted by Google's love in some sort of 80's carebare-ish type of montage at the last moment.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    2. Re:Great News by WilliamSChips · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only problem is that Google's Stargate is connected to Thor's Hammer so that all the Microsoft execs' symbiotes are killed and the hosts are allowed to regain control.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Great News by iznogud · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When they are in MS, we see them as lazy, clumsy, evil, worst programmers in the world, etc. When they switch to Google, they suddenly becomes hottest programmers, managers, whatever in the Universe.

    4. Re:Great News by laffer1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I always find it interesting how many on slashdot find Microsoft employees at google so great. Most of us regularly make fun of Microsoft for one thing or another. Quite a few of us love some open source operating system. Yet, we want google to hire Microsoft employees? Do we think google will get better? Perhaps this trend is part of the problem. Many end users find google to be great. THey talk about gmail like its a new thing. (i had hotmail in 1998 people... and i got rid of it for a reason) What about the summer of code nightmare from lastyear thats rearing its ugly head yet again. I'm sure google will change the requirements which automatically voids applications and doesn't pay out again even though the person made real progress. Google does harm, its just not as bad as some companies. Google is a company... accept they aren't some idealistic open source fantasy.

  3. ANOTHER exec leaves??? by dlawson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More jokes about flying chairs.

    --
    dot-sig.
  4. Curious statement by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We are uncertain what precise role he will play when he begins working for Google, but he has a broad range of skills and experience which we believe will be valuable to Google," Google spokesman Steve Langdon said in an e-mail statement.

    Soo... the guy is going to take a year long vacation and then Google might know what job they're giving him?

    Either Google is lying or they're poaching MS execs just to be dicks.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Curious statement by bladesjester · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, if you think about it, it makes sense for a couple of reasons. He can't actively work for them for a year. This means two things:

      1) If they had announced his position now, by the time he actually got the ability to work for them, the landscape may have changed and they will either have to put him somewhere else (to cries of "Google is teh evil" because they said one thing and did another) or keep him in the position which they origionally stated, thus keeping him out of a position in which he may have been even more productive.

      2) If they announced his position now, that gives the competition time to plan around him. This is especially true of Microsoft, because they know him best since he worked for them for so long. They know how he thinks and the kind of direction he will attempt to give Google (which will depend on the position he fills). That is not something you want your opponant to know.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    2. Re:Curious statement by Laura_DilDio · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Picking the low-hanging fruit is not being a dick.

      Microsoft is at the proverbial crossroads. Their products have stagnated -- there's been no real innovation for the consumer. The company caters to industry, even at the expense of the consumer -- they are at risk of a backlash.

      Bill is retiring, and Ballmer is viewed by many to be a goofball.

      Google is simply exploiting a competitor's weakness.

      Windows Vista had better be spectacular or Microsoft will be the next IBM. No company can stay at the top forever.

    3. Re:Curious statement by kimvette · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, that's not true. Like Beta Vs. VHS, DVD vs. Divx, or HD-DVD vs. BluRay you need to establish demand before the product sells. Many waited on the sidelines of DVD vs. Divx to see which would win before buying (the ones who bought Divx got stung). Why would one buy Vista for the DRM features when the new DRM is not even being offered by content providers? It's a chicken-and-egg situation.

      More likely, people will buy Windows Vista for two reasons:

        - Windows XP will be phased out of the market and Vista will come preinstalled on 90% of PCs
        - the new GUI and Video games (this is a single reason, coming down to essentially eye candy. "Oooh, shiny!")

      AFTER that, the content will come.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  5. 1 year vacation by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not a bad deal. I'm sure Google will end up paying him for the 1 year vacation.

    1. Re:1 year vacation by canuck57 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not a bad deal. I'm sure Google will end up paying him for the 1 year vacation.

      It really shouldn't be that way. If a company can stick a no-compete on you, then it is they that should have to pay you during the period that you cannot work in your profession. And if you do not have a job at the end of that period, they still should pay you up to two times the length of the clause.

      So if you work for a company, and have a 1 year no compete, they might have to pay you up to two years. The US and Canada being at will employment should work both ways equally.

  6. Google has to watch out though ; by unity100 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in '45, gestapo members were taken into then newly-forming cia. The next 40 years have been a period where cia was run like a watered-down gestapo.

    Google has to watch out that the microsoft ex'es do not spoil the formation of 'do no evil' they got going on at google.

  7. Eating One's Own Dog Food by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Vic Gundotra ... has left the company to join Google. Gundotra worked at Microsoft as general manager for platform evangelism to get software developers to use Microsoft's software and online offerings." Hehe. I wonder how devoted he was to the job of "platform evangelism" given his willingness to defect / commit apostasy.

    --
    Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
  8. What a visionary point of view by KarMax · · Score: 2, Informative
    "We are uncertain what precise role he will play when he begins working for Google, but he has a broad range of skills and experience which we believe will be valuable to Google,"
    This catch my attention, i dont see too many companies with that insightfull and visionary view. (IMO it's amazing).


    The link seems down here is the CC Mirror. I can grab directly from the front page (I use Slashdotter, the firefox extension).
    --
    Rock and Roll
  9. Re:the announcement by karnal · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would think you'd rather have a chair that is so heavy Mr. Ballmer couldn't HIRE someone big enough to throw the thing...

    I'm thinking 100lb cinderblocks replacing each of the wheels... You definitely don't want the wheels, because you don't want him to be able to roll the now 500lb+ chair at you.

    --
    Karnal
  10. Only on slashdot... by rogerramrod · · Score: 4, Funny

    You get modded a troll when you correct your own post.

    1. Re:Only on slashdot... by kimvette · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Question (no offense intended): why waste a mod point modding posts down, even grammar nazis or trolls, when there are so many great posts that need to be modded up to insighful or interesting to make the threshold settings actually useful?

      (Again no offense intended, I am genuinely curious why people do this)

      Aside from really racist crap I don't see the point of modding trolls down (or even just humor that some people don't find funny).

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re:Only on slashdot... by MORB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Both modding up the good posts and modding down the bad ones improve the signal/noise ratio.

    3. Re:Only on slashdot... by drsquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You do realise that if people set their thresholds at 4 no-one would read any of your posts?

  11. Re:developers by OmegaBlac · · Score: 3, Funny

    chairs chairs chairs chairs...

  12. Is it a vicious cycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean, are there more executives leaving MS because they don't have a chair to sit on? It can get hard on the feet.

  13. Non-compete? Ugh. by Wylfing · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Fine Summary sayeth:

    he will need to wait one year before starting his new job because of a non-compete clause in his contract

    That drives me insane. I had an employer once who tried to "get" me regarding a non-compete agreement, to wit he accused me of going after his customers. The problem was that no one could be excluded from that group -- he believed everyone on the planet was his customer. That's what I see when I read this. Google does not make operating systems or desktop software, they are a freakin' search company, and MS is not a search company. Yet MS identifies them as a competitor, just like they identify every company in existence as their competitor.

    --
    Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    1. Re:Non-compete? Ugh. by enclaved · · Score: 2, Informative
      Google does not make operating systems or desktop software, they are a freakin' search company, and MS is not a search company. Yet MS identifies them as a competitor, just like they identify every company in existence as their competitor.

      Google Desktop

      Windows Live Search

      I could probably go on and on about the products both companies make that directly compete with one another. MSN messenger Gtalk Hotmail Gmail etc etc.
    2. Re:Non-compete? Ugh. by martinussen · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Google does not make operating systems or desktop software, they are a freakin' search company, and MS is not a search company. Yet MS identifies them as a competitor, just like they identify every company in existence as their competitor.
      If a company is a threat to their current portfolio has never been very important to Microsoft. Remember why IE was crufted together in the first place? Netscape wasn't a direct threat to Microsoft (granted, the existence of a familiar browser on a different platform would make it much more appealing to switch), but they were the New Great Thing. And the existence of New Great Things shows people that it's possible to compete with the big guys. There are several bloody good reasons for Microsoft to fear Google. One, they are a major threat to the MSN search engine. Two, they are rapidly expanding and making substitutes for current Microsoft products, mostly web-based. It is only a question of time before the two companies are competing over the same niches. Three, Google keeps "stealing" their employees and are hiring excellent engineers who could otherwise have been making stuff for Microsoft.
  14. He'll need that year by zecg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Company policy all of a sudden not allowing him to be evil must be quite a thing to adapt to after Microsoft.

    --
    .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
  15. Re:the announcement by iced_773 · · Score: 5, Funny


    No, no. "fsck" is a *nix command. Ballmer wouldn't say that.

    Corrected quote:

    No, you won't need to move, 'cause I'm going to chkdsking KILL YOU NOW!

  16. Power doesn't come out of the barrel of a gun by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Chairman Mao's mordant quip notwithstanding.

    No.

    Power comes from the perception arising in the brains of others that you've got power.

    Even more so, it comes from the perception that you are gaining more of it in the future. It's almost as if the human mind projects the trends outward and tries to jump on the right bandwagon. I experienced this in the 80s and early 90s as people began to abandon other platforms for Windows. There was almost a sense of panic, that if you didn't get in soon enough you would be crushed.

    It follows that if the perception starts that you are losing power, you will lose it, and people will think about the consequences of tying themselves to you for too long. Lenin captured an empire pretty with little more than an audacious show of confidence in the face of deflating imperial fortunes.

    Microsoft's mind share survived the massive storm of the antitrust suit. But that was easy. But a steady trickle of news of people going over to a competitor with growing mindshare and momentum hurts them far beyond whatever those individuals could posisbly to them working for the competition. In the context of the Vista delays, a trickle of executives jumping ship tends to look the vanguard of the proverbial rats.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  17. Its "don't be evil" by ems2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The correct phrase is don't be evil. Check Google's site yourself. It is surprising how many people can get a simple phrase like this incorrect.

  18. 1 year non-comp?? by bogidu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's amazing. Many companies use this 1-year non-comp clause in their employment agreements that are usually nothing more than a way to lock employees into working for their company and effectively holding them hostage to whatever salary range that they originally agree. Only those select few individuals that make god-like salaries have the ability to quit a job, wait a year, then start with a new company.

    1. Re:1 year non-comp?? by Skreems · · Score: 2, Informative

      Typically they only state that you can't work in the exact same space you left. So if you were writing code for web browsers, you couldn't go work for Mozilla. You can still go work in another area of computers, though, and it shouldn't be hard to find one you're qualified for. It seems like Google and this exec are just being overly cautious this time around.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
  19. Dear Steve Ballmer... by Comatose51 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dear Steve Ballmer,

    At the rate Microsoft is losing executives to Google, you might be wondering how Microsoft is going to fill its ranks in the near future. Have no fear. I represent a client who have decades of managing large scale operations. His track record of coming up with complex plans for achieving great goals and his resiliency after failures speak for themselves. Most importantly, I can guarantee you that he will never, ever join Google because, like Microsoft, he too is inherently evil and hellbent on world domination.

    I give you, Dr. Evil.

    Best wishes,
    -Headhunter Inc.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Dear Steve Ballmer... by ms1234 · · Score: 2, Funny

      From the description I was expecting Darl.. :)

  20. If he chose to leave... it's his own damn fault. by mark-t · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Non-competes are often very easy to enforce the person left his earlier job voluntarily.

    They are quite tricky to enforce if it can be shown that the change in careers was not completely voluntary, however. (Either being let go for reasons beyond the employee's control, he was under duress, constructive dismissal, etc...).

  21. And in redmond... by abscissa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Could also be the sound of hundreds of thousands of Slashdot geeks rushing to quickly type out a housand variations (there will be dupes of course) of the "Ballmer Tossing Chairs" jokes. Each starting with "And in Redmond...".

    Sounds like someone is throwing a chair because he didn't get the to post the first chair joke.

  22. I'm gunna ****ing kill by DittoBox · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm gunna ****ing kill those chair jokes! I've done it before and I'll do it again. I'm gunna ****ing kill those ****ing chair jokes!!

    --
    Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
  23. POLL: Future career prospects for Steve Ballmer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Uncle Fester look-alike
    2. Furniture mover



    Cast your votes now!
  24. platform evangelism? by alexandreracine · · Score: 5, Funny
    Gundotra worked at Microsoft as general manager for platform evangelism...
    What's that? Now you have to pray for your Microsoft software to work correcly?
    --
    No sig for now.
    1. Re:platform evangelism? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Friends and neighbors, neighbors and friends: I'm here to give you the Good News about the Salvation to be found by embracing Microsoft Products and escaping the toils of the Devil Linux and its Legion of Unclean distros. I'm here to give you the facts about TCO and uptime to spare you the Hellfire of unsupported open source software!"

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  25. Re:the announcement by Blue+Trapezoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    He could always outsource the chair-throwing to India.

  26. No chairs will be thrown over this departure by melted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No chairs will be thrown over this departure. The dude was a bullshit master. And not just that, but he was managing other bullshit masters, which kind of means he didn't have much time to spout bullshit outside MSFT. There are millions of bullshit masters in the US, especially if you pay them Gundotra's salary. Chairs will be thrown if senior engineering staff (of Bosworth and Lucovsky level) departs. Those folks are harder to replace and Google should start targeting them instead if they want to piss off Ballmer.

  27. "And in Redmond..." by cp.tar · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... what? Chair throws you?

    Or should that be Soviet Redmond?

    /ducks

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  28. Worried... by Trifthen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe it's just me, but I'm not particularly excited about MS Execs being hired by Google. Do we really want Google to turn into another Microsoft?

    Please Google, for the love of $diety, please hire execs from reputable companies...

    --
    Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
  29. The plan is to sabotage Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you read the Mini-Microsoft blog you should know that the plan is to ruin Google by giving them the senior Microsoft management...

  30. Re:POLL: Future career prospects for Steve Ballmer by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2

    3. Stand-in for Peter Boyle on Everybody Loves Raymond

    Face it, Steve Ballmer is Peter Boyle's evil twin. Nobody could tell the difference ... although they'd probably have to script in a few flying chairs, just to keep Steve happy.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  31. Re:If he chose to leave... it's his own damn fault by rune-bare-rune · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A one-year non-compete agreement is not necessarily a bad thing for the individual.
    It's one year paid vacation that you can use to study in your field.

    (YMMV, at least a Google employee I know got paid in the waiting period, split between his old and new companies)

  32. In soviet Russia by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Google hires MS executives! ... wait a minute?

    Seriously, Borland tried to sue MS over this practice of luring all their good people away. Borland could not get anthing done as Microsoft's strategy was to send limo's and free lunches to Borland product managers and offer them lucrative positions at MS with cheap stock option signing bonuses. There products fell behind and Visual Studio took over.

    Now the tides have turned.

    I think this says alot about Microsoft as well. The people who are attracted to work at MS are hell bent on success and leading changes and being part of something successfull and new. Ms was king in the 90's and led the innovation and set the standards for computers and the future was bright and they were considered the wave of the future.

    Today, Google is the new and innovative kid on the block and MS is stagnating. These same kind of people who like to make differences and be powerfull to satisfy their ego's see MS as the legacy company and google as the new innovative one. My, have times changed. This is bad news for Microsoft and morale at the company. They need to focus on something new besides upgrading windows and making yet game console.

    So in the 90's MS hires your executives from YOU! Today Google hires MS executives.

  33. I predict... by OfNoAccount · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...that by 2012 Google won't be able to ship products on time.

    Why? Well MS appears to have serious problems making things happen now, but it didn't used to. So, what's changed? Clearly not the recent defections - until very recently these folks were still at MS. I suspect that the people who actually made things happen left sometime around 2001/2002, and the folks that are leaving now might be the cause of the current problems at Redmond.

  34. Re:If he chose to leave... it's his own damn fault by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Funny

    At MS, he was a "platform evangelist", which is sort of a cross between a developer liaison and a missionary. Even though Google says they're not sure where he will fit into the company, you can be sure it's some sort of missionary position. =)

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  35. Google gets MS execs, MS gets Google tech guys by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While you guys celebrate Google hiring MS execs that do nothing, Microsoft is hiring away Google tech guys that actually do something besides draw a huge salary. I refer to guys like Danny Thorpe, who grew to be a legend as a Delphi dev at Borland, went to Google, stayed for 4 months, then quit and went to Microsoft to work on their live.com stuff. (If you read between the lines of Danny Thorpe's posts to the borland.public.delphi.non-technical newsgroup (accessible from Borland's newsserver and Google Groups), you get the idea that Danny concluded that Google isn't all it's cracked up to be.)

    Also, Scoble's recent blog regarding this thread's topic says that he's met many former Google employees that now work at Microsoft, but you don't hear about them (I assume because they aren't big fat salary drawing execs, but are instead actual tech guys; and Microsoft doesn't feel the need to alert the media to such hirings like Google does (Google needs to do all it can to justify its inflated stock price)).

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  36. Strategic? by OverflowingBitBucket · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay, I'm too late for a chair joke, so I guess I'll share my other thoughts.

    Maybe Google are hiring away Microsofties in strategic positions, deliberately targeting those who have greater worth that their current compensation, partly to gain and partly to hurt Microsoft in a completely legal way?

    They do have an advantage over Microsoft that they are probably playing to their advantage; ethically compared to Microsoft, Google are freaking angels.

  37. Was Gates keeping Ballmer in check? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If what we know about their different personalities from public appearances (Geek vs. Monkey Dancer) I'd say that a lot of people in high places are happy to work for the Borg under one Locutus, but not the other. Frankly I see Ballmer as a very rich sociopath, and if were in those circles I wouldn't want to work for him either. Gates would be ok, as a person, I think. But I would be terrified of working for Ballmer, and would jump ship at the nearest opportunity. Money can only go so far in overcoming fear for your life.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  38. One less by sankyuu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Another developer has left us.
    I guess we won't be needing this anymore... *throws chair*
    (One has to be careful to leave the premises before being noticed, otherwise it becomes *throws chair at developer*)

  39. Re:the announcement by nametaken · · Score: 2

    Please consider this your formal notice...

    I will be appropriating and beating the hell out of that joke everywhere on the internet.