Slashdot Mirror


Linux Hardware Looks at Core 2

Penguin Lover writes "Linux Hardware has just posted a new story on how Intel's new Conroe performs under Linux. From the article: 'Now is a great time to be CPU shopping because no matter which side of the isle you look on, you have great choice for both CPUs and motherboards. Along with Intel's chipset offerings, keep in mind that NVIDIA has the nForce series for Intel CPUs which would give you SLI support for all your Quake Wars and UT2007 gaming needs.'"

192 comments

  1. which side of the what? by njvic · · Score: 4, Informative

    Isle? Come on /. editors! It's aisle!

    1. Re:which side of the what? by chrismcdirty · · Score: 4, Funny

      Give them a little bit of credit. Maybe they live on a small island, and the only computer shops are on either side of the isle.

      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    2. Re:which side of the what? by njvic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually now that I have RTFA, I see the spelling error is in the story, so the /. editors (or Penguin Lover) should then add [sic] to the quote.

    3. Re:which side of the what? by skoaldipper · · Score: 5, Funny
      Give them a little bit of credit. Maybe they live on a small island, and the only computer shops are on either side of the isle.
      I heard the Skipper is trying to pass off the boat radio as a computer at his shop, while the Professor is selling a sweet beowulf coconut cluster running linux on the other.
      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
    4. Re:which side of the what? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're assuming that Taco&Co actually have any real editorial experience and even know what [sic] means...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    5. Re:which side of the what? by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've always preferred shopping on the windward side of the isle. The leeward side of the isle always seems to have higher prices.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    6. Re:which side of the what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I ask someone what it means, I get a blank look. What does [sic] mean?

    7. Re:which side of the what? by matthew5 · · Score: 2, Informative
    8. Re:which side of the what? by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's Latin for "such" or "thus". If you quote something with an error or otherwise weird construction, you write "[sic]" to indicate that the quote appears that way in the text you're quoting.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    9. Re:which side of the what? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Also note that it's placed within square brackets. These are typically used for editor's notes.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    10. Re:which side of the what? by Gospodin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they're writing from the UK...

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    11. Re:which side of the what? by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 2, Funny
      ..."how Intel's new Conroe performs under Linux"

      Internal Server Error

      so... not so well?

    12. Re:which side of the what? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Maybe they're writing from the UK...
      It's spelled "aisle" in the UK as well.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    13. Re:which side of the what? by Gospodin · · Score: 1

      Whooosh!

      Sound of a jet-powered joke flying past your head.

      FYI: the UK is an isle.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    14. Re:which side of the what? by Frightening · · Score: 1

      Either you're wrong or they changed it. Copy-paste:

      Now is a great time to be CPU shopping because no matter which side of the aisle you look on, ..

    15. Re:which side of the what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI: the UK is an isle.

      A pedant writes:
      UK means United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. So the UK is one large island, plus part of another large island plus an assortment of various smaller isles.

    16. Re:which side of the what? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Dude, those aren't prices..

      They're dunes.

  2. Bang for the buck by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Core2 E6600 seems to be a nice bang for the money as it is right around the middle of the currently available speed grades and is the cheapest iteration with 4MB of L2 cache. It also seems to be competitive with dual core AMD products (my usual choice) that are substantially more expensive. It's definitely a buyer's market these days...let the price war begin! :)

    1. Re:Bang for the buck by the_humeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Depends on the usage I guess. I can pick up a 1ghz duron at my local university surplus for next to nothing, and it will run MS Word and Mozilla just as well as the latest octa-core processors.

    2. Re:Bang for the buck by slowbad · · Score: 1
      The Core2 E6600 seems to be a nice bang for the money

      That's what the Dell phone rep told me about their laptop. First time in years it turns out that a salesman wasn't lying about a product.

    3. Re:Bang for the buck by subsolar2 · · Score: 2, Informative
      The Core2 E6600 seems to be a nice bang for the money as it is right around the middle of the currently available speed grades and is the cheapest iteration with 4MB of L2 cache. It also seems to be competitive with dual core AMD products (my usual choice) that are substantially more expensive. It's definitely a buyer's market these days...let the price war begin! :)
      Actually if you include the motherboard price AMD X2 chips are more competetive since my looking around show Intel Core2 compatible MB costing $50-100 more than similar AMD socket AM2 boards with socket 939 being cheaper yet.
    4. Re:Bang for the buck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The core2 is pin compatible with the first gen core processor. Chances are that all you need is a bios update and you can use a core2 in any available core compatible motherboard. So I think your "but wait when you include the motherboard price" argument is somewhat irrelevant.

    5. Re:Bang for the buck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you have proven you know nothing of the current motherboards. Very few are compatible with the old chipsets. I can only imagine the reasons, and many more do not support the higher DDR2 speeds, if you decide to go all the way to DDR2 800.

    6. Re:Bang for the buck by qortra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course it won't run them as well. Clearly, you've never tried to open a large document (100+ pages) with pictures, tables, and indexes using Word (or especially OpenOffice which saves more money than a hardware upgrade would cost). It's a nightmare; imagine trying to drag an 18 wheeler with a Geo Metro. Even webpages can be a bit taxing these days. A sufficiently complex flash animation (yes, I hate flash too), or even AJAX webapp can bring a 1Ghz duron to its knees, especially when the rendering gets complex; Google fortunately has fairly simple AJAX pages, but others are not so kind.

      Moreover, there is nothing like using an SMP system: either two processors or a single dual-core (hyperthreading is exempt from this comment). Having all those piddly little background tasks on one core means that the second core is available just to obey your whims. The latency in executing business and web apps with a dual-core is unparalleled.

      Clearly you're cheap, and I can respect that (heaven knows I'm almost as poor as they get). Perhaps you have a point that the $350 processor that the grandparent spoke of is not in the optimal point of the price/performance curve, but even for people that just use Word and Firefox, you can't claim that a new $150 dual-core won't run stuff significantly faster than Duron; and you don't even have to blow that extra imaginary money on an octa-core[sic] processor to get the extra horsepower.

      In either case, I consider your minimalist elitism offtopic.

    7. Re:Bang for the buck by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      It's relevant to people who don't happen to have a Core processor and motherboard lying around.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    8. Re:Bang for the buck by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I've had problems playing certain videos with a 1GHz Duron - some of the "project offset" videos for example.

      Looks like soon would be a good time to replace that machine...

      The Core 2 is a better performing CPU than the X2, but I'm not too confident about the chipset or the first release yet...

      --
    9. Re:Bang for the buck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they'd have an AMD X2 and motherboard laying around, right?

    10. Re:Bang for the buck by subsolar2 · · Score: 1

      The core2 is pin compatible with the first gen core processor. Chances are that all you need is a bios update and you can use a core2 in any available core compatible motherboard. So I think your "but wait when you include the motherboard price" argument is somewhat irrelevant.


      Well unless you bought a brand new socket 775 MB less than three months ago, your odds are not good that you will be able to put a Core 2 in it even with a bios flash. If your like me with an Pre Socket 939/AM2 or Socket 478/early 775 system you will have to purchase a new MB & Memory to go with the CPU. For me a 939/AM2 Athlon 4600 X2 looks better than an Core 2 E6300/E6400 when you throw in the price of the MB. Now I will agree the Core 2 E6600 starts looking better than the 5000 X2 or FX-62 on an over-all price stand point.
    11. Re:Bang for the buck by camperslo · · Score: 1

      In wanting the highest performance while maintaining a great bang for the buck, I'd agree that the E6600 looks great, performing well as-is, and also being great for overclocking (especially with added cooling). However I wonder if the quad-core chips reportedly coming next year will be drop-in compatible. If that is the case and there is a strong likelihood of upgrading again so soon, going with the low-end E6300 now seems more cost effective. The E6300 is a good overclocker too, but it does have the smaller 2MB cache. IIRC, the low end chips also lack Hyperthreading. I don't know if that is more or less significant than the smaller cache. The cache size might be of more importance to Mac users than Linux users due to the large effect cache has on emulation performance. I haven't seen any studies showing the performance impact for PPC emulation on Intel yet, but cache certainly turned to be very significant during the Mac 68k to PPC transition.

      It would be interesting to see a review where the high end chip is run at a reduced multiplier setting to match the clock rate of one of the lower-end (2 MB cache) chips to directly show what is gained from Hyperthreading and the larger cache under several OSes. (since it may not be easy to alter speed settings on Apple hardware, tests with an unauthorized/patched copy of Tiger on generic hardware would be useful). It would also be interesting to see how Linux (and other OS) speeds compare on Conroe machines versus Apple's Mac Pro dual 51xx Xeon systems (four cores).

      I suspect that the benchmarks are understating the eventual advantages of the new chips for some uses since it is unlikely that they took advantage of the newly added SSE4 instructions.

    12. Re:Bang for the buck by Dwedit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hyperthreading is only found in the Pentium IV series of processors, the Architecture of core 2 duo can't support it.

    13. Re:Bang for the buck by ozbird · · Score: 1

      It also seems to be competitive with dual core AMD products (my usual choice) that are substantially more expensive.

      Based on prices here in Australia, I assume you're talking about AMD FX or Opteron processors. The Core2 E6600 is listed at around A$500; the Athlon64 X2 5000+ lists for around A$50 less.

    14. Re:Bang for the buck by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Virtual environments are where multi-core processors will really start to shine. One processor running the VM(s), other processor running the Host.

      --I've ben running Vmware Workstation 5.x for a couple of years now on a 900MHz Amd Duron with 512MB RAM, Linux host (mostly Knoppix/Debian, but also Ubuntu.) Just upgraded to a Pentium-D 2.66Ghz dual-core with 2GB RAM, and it's night and day. Even with Gig Ethernet, the thing just flies.

      --Trying out XUbuntu 64-bit ATM; seems pretty nice so far, altho I've only had the new box since Monday. Still have to test how well bzip2 runs; on the 900 it took HOURS for multi-gig files. Better off running gzip on $older-hw.

      --I highly recommend anyone with a half-decent system spec try out Vmware Server; it's Free-as-in-beer and did well with a Win2kpro guest even on a dual-200MHz (yes, two hundred) box with 768MB RAM.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    15. Re:Bang for the buck by Emetophobe · · Score: 1
      The Core2 E6600 seems to be a nice bang for the money as it is right around the middle of the currently available speed grades and is the cheapest iteration with 4MB of L2 cache. It also seems to be competitive with dual core AMD products (my usual choice) that are substantially more expensive.
      AMD products that are substantially more expensive? What have you been smoking? (Mind sharing?)

      I'm going to compare the 2.4ghz E6600 to the 2.4ghz X2 4800+. Let's look at some prices shall we:

      E6600 $369.99
      X2 4800+ (939) $307.00

      ASUS Core2 Nforce4-SLI Mobo: ASUS P5N32-SLI Deluxe $269.99
      ASUS 939 Nforce4-SLI Mobo: ASUS A8N32-SLI Deluxe $169.99

      So for a X2 4800+ and mobo you pay $476.99
      And for an E6600 and mobo you pay $639.98

      How exactly was the Intel offering cheaper again? Not to mention the 939 uses cheaper DDR1 and the Core2 uses DDR2, that'll probably set you back even more.
    16. Re:Bang for the buck by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just searched for "core 2 compatible" boards on newegg and got 5 results ranging in price from $50.99-$119.99. So the motherboard premium that's being bandied about seems to be largely nonexistent. Also, an E6600 is likely faster than an X2 4800 for most (all?) tasks. In order to step up to similar performance you need the X2 5000 or one of the faster AMD FX processors.

      If I was buying a system today, I'd probably lean towards the Core 2 Duo. A few weeks ago, I'd probably have gone with an Athlon64 X2. I'd have to agree with the OP and say that the competition has been great for the buyer.

    17. Re:Bang for the buck by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      Of course it won't run them as well. Clearly, you've never tried to open a large document (100+ pages) with pictures, tables, and indexes using Word...
      Maybe he hasn't tried to do that, and maybe it's perfectly OK that he hasn't tried to do that -- and maybe that's a perfectly valid reason for him not to spend $2000 rather than $200 on a computer.

      A pretty reasonable strategy is to buy cheap, low-end hardware, and then choose software that is written well enough so that it feels fast on that hardware. CPU's were fast enough to run a word-processor back in the early 1980's, when clock speeds were measured in MHz. Personally, I got in the habit of using emacs and fluxbox because they were nice and fast on the $200 Linux boxes I was using ~5 years ago. But these days, you can build an amazingly fast system these days for $300 -- I built one last week with a 3 GHz P4 and 1 Gb of memory, which I would consider ridiculously fast for desktop stuff. (It would have been more like $350, but I re-used a hard disk.) On that machine, Gnome's performance is pretty decent, although I still use fluxbox because it works for me.

      Being a hard-core gamer is a perfectly good reason to spend $2000 on a computer, but that doesn't mean that all desktop users need that kind of performance.

  3. Re:Apart from gaming by fabs64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To run a decent sized lcd at native resolution would be a start... but in all seriousness for anything other than gaming you're right, there's no real need to keep up with the cycle

  4. the isle by Anoraknid+the+Sartor · · Score: 5, Funny

    which isle would that be?

    Penguin Isle?

    Isle be going now...

    --
    Find Japanese addresses in English on Google Maps Japan: http://diddlefinger.com/
    1. Re:the isle by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1
      which isle would that be?

      Isle of View, man.
      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    2. Re:the isle by Anoraknid+the+Sartor · · Score: 1

      Ugh!

      Isle O'Thpuns.?

      --
      Find Japanese addresses in English on Google Maps Japan: http://diddlefinger.com/
    3. Re:the isle by curmudgeous · · Score: 1

      "...Isle be seeing you...in all the old familiar places..."

    4. Re:the isle by Thrakamazog · · Score: 1

      Punguin Isle? Sounds like an Infocom game for Linux.

  5. Re:Apart from gaming by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Compiling anything, encoding video, ripping CDs to MP3, large relational database queries, scientific computing, etc.

    Oh, you meant for reading email and surfing the net? Yes, your hardware is fine.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  6. Dontcha just love... by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like the "NOW is a great time to buy..." argument for anything that improves steadily over time. Can you point to a time in recent computer history where "NOW" wasn't the best time to purchase a new rig? It can't possibly be news to readers here that the processor-power-to-dollar-ratio is at its best point ever, can it? It would be like saying "NOW is the best time to buy a new car", as if there has been a point in the last 20 years where the general trend of car quality has dropped, but even more ridiculous because of Moore's Law.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    1. Re:Dontcha just love... by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know a friend of mine got burned when buying his rig about 2 years ago, PCI-e had just come out, and he didn't expect it to kill AGP in a matter of days. So, I'd say that was a bad time to buy a midrange system. (PCI-e was at the expensive end at the time)

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    2. Re:Dontcha just love... by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      386sx, 486SLC, P60-wienie-roaster-edition, early Intel-EM64T. I think those were points not to "Buy Now".

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    3. Re:Dontcha just love... by Konster · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah... 4 weeks ago the AMD 3700+ was $200.

      Now it's $99.

      NOW seems to be a pretty good time to pick up on decent processing power. NOW I can get a decent CPU for $99, a 320 GB drive for $95. ...and the list goes on. Silent 7600 GS for $110. Top name DVD recorders all day long for $28.

      I just built that system for less than $600 and it uttlerly vaporizes the box I built last year at double the price.

      But you are still on a 486 waiting for the right NOW time to upgrade.

    4. Re:Dontcha just love... by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      The time where I bought a 16MB dimm for 400 Euro's and two weeks later they were selling at 50 Euro's in the same store? But that was so long ago that the Euro didn't even exist yet.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    5. Re:Dontcha just love... by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess I wasn't calling 1993 "recent". I had a similar experience, buying a $3000 Macintosh 68040 just before the PowerPC came out.

      There is always bad hardware out there, but the prices for existing stuff have consistently trended down. When the P60 came out, it was expensive as all hell, but that was a great time to buy a 486 machine - there was serious competition between Intel, AMD, and Cyrix. The prices were at historic lows. Yeah the Prescott with 64-bit extensions was crap, but that didn't make it a "bad time to buy", just a bad product to buy. It would not have been a bad time to buy an AMD 64-bit rig.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:Dontcha just love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Can you point to a time in recent computer history where "NOW" wasn't the best time to purchase a new rig?"

      The day before AMD slashed it's AM2 CPU prices by around 50%. Is that recent enough?

    7. Re:Dontcha just love... by MightyYar · · Score: 0

      LOL, thanks for proving my point with numbers for me. Yes, NOW the chips are $99 and last month they were $200.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:Dontcha just love... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Actually, I always say the opposite to my friends and family -- if you can do without it, don't buy it till you need it because it will be faster & cheaper by then.

      Don't need that new hard drive right now? Wait a little and you might get a 500GB drive for what you would've paid for that new 200GB one. Ditto on CPUs, etc. If you think you might like it later, buy it later. It'll be better or at least cheaper by the time you get it.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    9. Re:Dontcha just love... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      And what was it about the day before AMD slashed it's prices that made it worse than any time in history before that?

      NOW will always be worse than LATER (that was my original point), but you have to buy sometime.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    10. Re:Dontcha just love... by Snorpus · · Score: 1
      I think the $1K I spent on a 425MB HD for my '030 Mac IIsi was perhaps sub-optimum... even for 1992.

    11. Re:Dontcha just love... by Iamthefallen · · Score: 2, Funny

      But the Now two months ago was a pretty crappy Now to buy a computer in compared to the Now, that's well, Now.

      Now is also not as good a time as the Now that will be in just another month or two when Core 2 motherboard prices drop. That Now is close enough to Now that it's probably worth waiting until then, ehr, the Now then.

      Hmm, sounds familiar...

      Dark Helmet: What the hell am I looking at? When does this happen in the movie?
      Colonel Sandurz: Now. You're looking at now sir. Everything that happens now, is happening now.
      Dark Helmet: What happened to then?
      Colonel Sandurz: We passed then.
      Dark Helmet: When?
      Colonel Sandurz: Just now. We're at now, now.
      Dark Helmet: Go back to then!
      Colonel Sandurz: When?
      Dark Helmet: Now.
      Colonel Sandurz: Now?
      Dark Helmet: Now!
      Colonel Sandurz: I can't.
      Dark Helmet: Why?
      Colonel Sandurz: We missed it.
      Dark Helmet: When?
      Colonel Sandurz: Just now.
      Dark Helmet: When will then be now?
      Colonel Sandurz: Soon.
      Dark Helmet: How soon?
      Video Operator: Sir!
      [Dark Helmet has becomed far too confused and everyone now ignores him even though he's center screen]
      Dark Helmet: What?
      Video Operator: We've identified their location.
      Dark Helmet: Where?

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    12. Re:Dontcha just love... by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I probably sent my IBM account rep to Aruba on Opteron purchases at that time, as opposed to Xeons or the new EM64Ts. On the other hand, there was the intial changeover to SATA drives if you want a more recent example; good hardware now that drivers are everywhere, but kind of expensive and difficult when new. That was a case of much better to wait six months, and put off other purchases because of the promise of the new technology once the first wave of bugs were squashed.

      Of course, a truly bad time to buy was when that semiconductor plant that made memory chips caught on fire. That was a good time to be consolidating old equipment to get memory. When Everyone was shipping IBM DeathStar drives, wasn't such a good time either. (I spent a lot of time with a screwdriver in hand during that period).

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    13. Re:Dontcha just love... by dc29A · · Score: 1

      I like the "NOW is a great time to buy..." argument for anything that improves steadily over time. Can you point to a time in recent computer history where "NOW" wasn't the best time to purchase a new rig?

      Plenty of times. Usually when new architectures are coming out, Socket 754, 939, 775, AM2 and whatnot. During these times the generation of sockets before the "new" one is pretty cheap. Also the new socket might be a transitional socket like 754 that won't last for long time.

      Now is NOT always the best time to buy a new rig. ;)

    14. Re:Dontcha just love... by FellowConspirator · · Score: 1

      Well, there really are "NOW is a great time to buy..." moments. It's not when the vendor's say it, and not necessarily when a reviewer says it either.

      It's a great time to buy when: at least one competitor is under scrutiny for investors to show performance (incentive to do anything to boost sales), when product quality and features reach a level of parity (price becomes dominant deciding factor in purchase), when volume sales approach parity (more price pressure plus looking for new market angles), and as a product matures (prices decline with product age).

      Now is a good time to buy because you really do get more value (based on what's available) for your money because there's strong economic pressures that favor the purchaser over the vendor. That's not to say that just before the next quarterly report it won't be a better time.

      But you are right, the market swings quite a bit. If one player becomes dominant, or if a clearly superior product evolves, or development slows, then price pressures relax and the value you receive diminishes.

    15. Re:Dontcha just love... by cnettel · · Score: 1

      Uh, what about a Pentium D a month ago? (before the most recent price cuts)

    16. Re:Dontcha just love... by MightyYar · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I hate to burst your bubble, but not only do we agree - we are saying the exact same thing :) My original point is that the statement "NOW is the time to buy" is absurd because a. Now is almost always better than yesterday, and b. It will be cheaper tomorrow. In any case, it shouldn't be news to the Slashdot crowd that now is a better time than ever to buy a processor. The same thing was true a month ago, a year ago, and a decade ago. It will be news only when the curve starts to go the other way.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    17. Re:Dontcha just love... by ashayh · · Score: 1

      Last month AMD chips were expensive and it was well known for a few months that Intel would bring new chips and AMD will drop prices. So the last few months were definitely NOT the right time to buy.

      For another eg. the X2 3800 939 was 280$ for many months, I bought it some days ago for 147 after the price drop. I bought AMD as I didnt want to upgrade my MBoard and RAM. For someone who wanted to go Intel, the past few months were an even worse time to buy, as the new Intel chips overperform and are reasonably priced.

      There have been, and will be many such times in the industry when it is not the right time to buy.

    18. Re:Dontcha just love... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      And so you think that these processors are "bucking the trend", and that if you don't buy them now you will miss the boat? If that is your opinion, then back it up by hoarding them. If they are more expensive next year you could make quite a bit of money. Personally, I believe that processors will continue to get cheeaper and faster, and that there is nothing special about "Now".

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    19. Re:Dontcha just love... by psicic · · Score: 1

      I still think the £125 I spent for an extra 512k of RAM for my ST was good value!!!

      --
      Concrete analysis...
    20. Re:Dontcha just love... by Danse · · Score: 1
      I know a friend of mine got burned when buying his rig about 2 years ago, PCI-e had just come out, and he didn't expect it to kill AGP in a matter of days. So, I'd say that was a bad time to buy a midrange system. (PCI-e was at the expensive end at the time)

      Yep, I'm currently living that. I got stuck with no real upgrade path that didn't involve ripping out pretty much everything in order to upgrade my cpu and vid card. So now, on top of the cpu and vid card, I also have to buy a new motherboard, RAM, and possibly power supply. PCI-e just didn't seem like it was worth the extra wait and investment at the time, but it sure took off quick. I was planning to buy already, but decided to wait for the Core 2 Duo chips to be released. Now I'm waiting for the nForce 590 motherboards to hit the streets so I can get one of those, hoping it will have fewer problems with the new chips than the current crop of boards.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    21. Re:Dontcha just love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider the following: suppose there is a round of price cuts every (e.g.) six months. We have just had a round of price cuts. So now is a better time to buy than five months time, because you get the same product for the same price plus five months use.
      I.e. sometimes now *is* better than later because the prices are a step function, not a smooth curve so the time to buy is always when the price drops a 'step'.

    22. Re:Dontcha just love... by HawkingMattress · · Score: 1

      Can you point to a time in recent computer history where "NOW" wasn't the best time to purchase a new rig?

      Of course i can !
      For example do you think buying an AMD X2 just before Jully 24th of this year was a good idea ??
      Their price was announced to be cut by half at this date so clearly buying one the jully 23th, or even one or two months before would have been a very bad move, don't you think ? We're talking about a $200 price cut for a X2 3800+ (very approx converted from euros).
      Also that's the day the Core duo 2^Twins or whatever they are calling it went gold, and even with the AMD price drop they're a real bargain compared to X2s.
      So yeah, NOW isn't always the best time, you ought to do your research a little if you don't want to lose $200 or $300 just because you didn't wait one more day...

    23. Re:Dontcha just love... by Gnavpot · · Score: 1
      LOL, thanks for proving my point with numbers for me. Yes, NOW the chips are $99 and last month they were $200.

      Yes, and before that they had probably dropping really, really slowly down to $200 for quite some time as processor prices has been stagnant for the last 1-2 years. People who bought these processors just when prices stagnated have had them almost "for free" until a few weeks ago. People who bought them a few weeks ago have already seen the price of their new processor cut to half.

      Which of those two groups do you think are most satisfied with the timing of their purchase?

      Please understand that when price reduction tend to follow a stepped curve rather than a linear curve, some times are better than other times for buying.

      I just googled (ha, take that, Google) to find some evidence on the net to back up may claim that processor has been stagnant for 1-2 years before the recent price drop. I did not find any curves showing 2 years, but I did find one showing 6 months for one particular processor: http://anandtech.com/guides/showdoc.aspx?i=2782&p= 4. That curve is completely flat - or perhaps even rising a bit - for 3½ months until prices recently dropped 50% in one day.
    24. Re:Dontcha just love... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Consider that in the next 12 months we will have 2 new chip releases: Intel's slapped together quad and AMD's next gen quad on 65 nm near as I can tell. The next gen chip will also be coupled with a new socket (AM3) which, according to AMD, will be socket compatible with AM2.

      So, buy a cheap AM2 CPU now, with RAM, or go budget and get a 939, skip the RAM (I have 2GB on my desk) and update in 6-12 months. Intel's approach appears to have some issues - the Mac Pro's seems to have memory limitations from the first reviews I've seen, which indicate that the slapped together quads will suffer the same flaws, since those 4 cores will share 1 FSB.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    25. Re:Dontcha just love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It would be like saying "NOW is the best time to buy a new car", as if there has been a point
      > in the last 20 years where the general trend of car quality has dropped

      Clearly, you've never owned an eighties-era car. Especially early 80's.

      A/C

    26. Re:Dontcha just love... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Yes, and before that they had probably dropping really, really slowly down to $200 for quite some time as processor prices has been stagnant for the last 1-2 years. People who bought these processors just when prices stagnated have had them almost "for free" until a few weeks ago. People who bought them a few weeks ago have already seen the price of their new processor cut to half.

      You can also pull data like that off of pricescan.com for individual parts (but not overall). For example, the Athlon64 X2 3800+ was ~$350 in Oct 2005 and only dropped to ~$300 by Jun 2005. The X2 4200+ started around $500 in Aug 2005 and was only down to $400 by Jun 2005.

      Which was a bit annoying from the consumer-side, because the prices never dropped like we hoped they would after the initial rollout. (Heck, we still haven't seen price breaks on the Opteron lines. And I think those are now overpriced compared to the Intel Core 2 Duo chips.)

      Still, I've heard rumors that there's another round of price breaks coming from AMD within a few months (October). But that only seems to be on the Turion mobile chips and the low-end Sempron chips.

      A price of $80 for the X2 3800+ would be nice after all this waiting... the $150 price is pretty good, but more is always nicer.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    27. Re:Dontcha just love... by Stellian · · Score: 1

      We're playing that game again?
      OK, I think 666$ was a great price point for a 4KB computer!

    28. Re:Dontcha just love... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that would be why I made the 20-year remark. Even then, there were well-built cars on the market in the 80s, just not American. You were WAAYYYY better off with a 1980 Toyota then a 1975 AMC!

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  7. Constant Battle by DarkNemesis618 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This only extends the constant battle between AMD & Intel. Intel comes up with something better than AMD...shortly thereafter, AMD comes up with something that beats that out...and so on and so on. While I have not personally tested any of the Conroe chips, I do have 2 linux boxes, one using an Intel P4 & the other an AMD Athlon64. Both run Ubuntu perfectly. Pretty much what I'm trying to say is simply that in a month or two, or when AMD comes out with their next line of CPUs, the discussion will just restart.

    --
    What's the matter, James? No glib remark? No pithy comeback?
    1. Re:Constant Battle by skoaldipper · · Score: 1

      What discussion? Linux, nForce + nvidia card, AMD64.

      Q.E.D.
      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
    2. Re:Constant Battle by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the significance of the Conroe is that it is an entirely new architecture and it caught AMD off guard as their new architecture won't be out until next year. Because of this newer better chip by Intel selling at a moderate price and AMD has no product to counter it, the only defence they have is extremely reduced prices. Reduced prices means that it is a better time to buy, say an AMDx2 4200+ now than it was say, 3 weeks ago. I imagine that Intel is reducing prices on their current lines to counter AMD's counter, thus it is a better time to buy a computer now.

      I imagine things will balance out once AMD releases the 4x4, and the difference in competitive performance is smaller.

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    3. Re:Constant Battle by DarkNemesis618 · · Score: 1

      pretty much just the competition between AMD & Intel

      --
      What's the matter, James? No glib remark? No pithy comeback?
    4. Re:Constant Battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely right. Thanks for pointing out the obvious!

    5. Re:Constant Battle by fitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You realize that a 4x4 machine with cost several thousands of dollars (USD) and that there are only a couple/three games that are multithreaded, right? Not only that but from everything that has been released so far, the 4x4 looks like a panic stricken kneejerk reaction to Core 2 Duo and seems to be nothing more than a (potentially cheaper) dual socket, dual core Opteron that uses unregistered memory on a motherboard with two PCIe x16 slots on it... these already exist except for the 2xx(x) Opterons that use unregistered memory. In other words, 4x4 is just a marketing brand for something that is very expensive to entice rich fanbois to buy their kit.

    6. Re:Constant Battle by fitten · · Score: 1

      There have been exceptions... P4 with RDRAM? expensive (more expensive than other solutions) and dead end. Maybe you're too young to remember the DRAM shortage from a decade or so ago where DRAM of all kinds got expensive for a little while (until the resultant production ramp up caused the glut). That was not a good time to buy either.

      But generally, yes, over longer periods of time, prices on mainstream kit drops.

    7. Re:Constant Battle by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Caught off guard? Um, try again. Just because a company doesn't releae a new core every 8 days doesn't mean they're not cooking something up. A big part of my job at AMD is performance analysis. We do a lot of studies which get fed through various channels to better optimize the final design.

      I've known about Core 2 for at least the better part of this year now. I suspect [*] that AMD mgmt knew about it as well, just a hunch.

      I have to object to the "no product to counter it". Aside from the shared L2, Core2 actually SHARES a lot of the design with the K7/K8 design. The shared L2 is a mixed blessing. There are applications for which it is good and applications for which it is totally bad. That and when you [ever] get into multi-processing HT is the way to go. Front side busses are a bit lame nowadays.

      Tom

      [*] My opinions are my own, yada yada.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    8. Re:Constant Battle by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well currently the X2 seems to lose most benchmarks to the Core 2 Duo (in all sorts of apps too). And this is for the same clock speeds.

      Any significant new architecture lined up for AMD cpus in the near future? I don't see signs of any. Going quad core would be reducing the X2 advantage of higher memory performance per core. I don't think the volume market is going to snap up quad cores at prices that will make AMD happy.

      Unless the X2 can clock WAY higher than the Core 2 Duo, it's going to be a slower CPU in comparison. And the Core 2 Duos sure look like they can be clocked pretty high...

      So what is AMD's answer to the Core 2 Duo? Seems to me they can only cut prices and hope for the best...

      If they have some top secret CPU, it better be really good!

      --
    9. Re:Constant Battle by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, see, the exceptions are the news. When RAM prices went UP, man, that was news. Processor prices coming down don't deserve space on the front page of Slashdot.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    10. Re:Constant Battle by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well clearly I can't comment about future plans from AMD. Just that the next revision beyond F will address some of the Core 2 specific optimizations.

      But also keep in mind benchmarks can say anything. You think Core 2 is the better processor? Ok, drop 8 of them in a HPC system and run 50 independent tasks on them from researchers all over the world. You think your 4MB cache helps when you have so much pollution? There are applications where K8 is STILL the better choice by far.

      Most benchmarks Intel picks are for very local applications on a single processor [die] setup... I wonder why...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    11. Re:Constant Battle by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      I see. . . Though you can still look at it from a consumer standpoint. . . Intel releases new next-gen cpu x (c2d), AMD releases same gen cpu y (am2). Some people who don't know any better will buy the Intel cpu simply because it is newer without any consideration as to which processor they need/can afford.

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    12. Re:Constant Battle by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      I'm just saying that Intel has this shiney new processor and AMD doesn't have one to compete with, so until they release one, they have to cut the price in an effort to get the people who want a decent machine for low price.The only one we know about is the 4x4, I assumed that since it is the only new processor from AMD, that it would be (or have a model directed at) made for consumers.
      I don't understand your argument that only a couple games are multithreaded. If this is your argument against multicore, why does it not stand for Intel aswell? It seems like you're having a hostile reaction (read: fanboyish) to an incorrect assumption about my sentiment that AMD has a major issue on their hands.

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    13. Re:Constant Battle by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Agreed. However, releasing a new cpu more often also carries costs and risks. Ramping up production of a processor costs a lot of money, if the processor doesn't live long [core 1] or is a flop [IA] then you lose money. Worse, because you're spending less time on testing you have the increased probability of fatal non-workaroundable errata. Not that AMD processors are perfect but I don't really any bugs in AMD processors that can't [or aren't] fixed with appropriate BIOS updates.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    14. Re:Constant Battle by fitten · · Score: 1

      Not at all. I love my X2 3800+ even for games that are single threaded. One core can handle OS overhead issues while the other plays the game, at the minimum. However, the fact remains that few games are multithreaded so even two cores isn't a huge benefit. If games can't make use of two cores other than passively (interrupts/OS/etc can use one while the game burns on the other) then four cores, regardless of who makes it, is kind of silly, wouldn't you think? And AMD is pushing 4x4 as their super-duper high-end solution for gaming?

    15. Re:Constant Battle by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      The thing is though, dual cores have just started to become the norm for gamer's despite the fact that "not many games are multithreaded." 4x4 is due out in about a year, no?
      Back in the single core days it was fairly silly to do multithreading right? Now that there's dual core, it makes a little more sense? the Xbox360 and the PS3 both have multi core architectures and they will both be available around christmas and it is necessary for developers to write multithreads in thsoe games right? The 4x4 will be coming out just as multiplatform games start to crawl out, right?

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    16. Re:Constant Battle by fitten · · Score: 1

      True, but the fact remains that you can have 4x4 now as long as you go dual-dual-core Opteron with dual-SLI. It's just really expensive (and still will be a year from now). 4x4 offers nothing except the use of unbuffered DIMMs. XBox360 has already been out since last Christmas and the PS3, well... is supposed to come out by Christmas but it's still a paper release for now, not to mention that the PS3 will be a bit different from your normal multithreaded application (in concept it's similar but in practice it's going to be a bit more complicated and different). Multiplatform games have been around for a long time so I assume you mean "multithreaded games" and those are already just starting to come out and hopefully there will be quite a few more of them by the time 4x4 comes on the scene a year from now. On a tangent, it'll be easier to port an XBox360 game to 4x4 than a PS3 game. Personally, I think 4x4 will be a flop and a dead-end and those who get one of those systems will be mocked for having more money than sense, but that's just my opinion.

    17. Re:Constant Battle by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I hardly ever bother considering benchmarks that Intel picks. So far the apps used by most PC users seem to bench better on Core 2 than on the X2 - seems it even compiles stuff faster - odds are it runs perl and python faster too. I doubt Intel has bought everyone doing those benchmarks.

      As for HPC system. I can't remember when the last time a company I worked in bought an 8 or 16 way HPC system. Not even sure if any of them bought a 4 way system - maybe by mistake or ignorance. IIRC even google was sticking to mainly dual CPU systems. Not sure what they do now given the new dual or multi core stuff.

      Yes, no doubt there are applications where the K8 is still the better choice by far. But that argument sounds a bit like Itanic talk ;). And I doubt that's where AMD wants to go.

      I might still replace stuff with K8 instead of core 2, but it'll be because of price (and concerns that the core 2 and chipset might still be a bit "rough" at the edges).

      Since you do stuff for AMD maybe you can answer this one. Do the new revisions of the X2 handle the TSC thingy differently? Any links/urls? The original X2s had significant TSC divergence so my current workaround is idle=poll on Linux (not sure if it is a problem on Windows). The TSC thing was not really such a big surprise when you think about it, but it is an inconvenience if you do want fast check time functions.

      --
    18. Re:Constant Battle by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I think the significance of the Conroe is that it is an entirely new architecture and it caught AMD off guard as their new architecture won't be out until next year.

      Conroe isn't release, IMHO, until they are on shelves, and I can buy one. Intel likes to do paper releases like this all the time, releasing with a vastly insuffient number of CPUs, so they can pretend they were much further ahead than they really are.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    19. Re:Constant Battle by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      well by multiplatform I mean games that come out for PS3, Xbox360, and PC which are designed with multiple cores in mind (thus making the 4x4 somewhat useful). I should have been more clear by saying something like "multithreaded multiplatform."

      I've never been arguing the success of the 4x4, I've just been saying that it seems to be the only product AMD has in line to deal with the Core 2 Duo. I was under the original assumption that 4x4 was a single quad core processor. If what you say is true then heres to hoping that AMD has an ace in its sleeve!

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
  8. Re:Apart from gaming by eddy · · Score: 2, Funny

    > ripping CDs to MP3

    Might be true, LAME isn't exactly a speed monster in high quality mode. On the other hand, oggenc/lancer is so fast it's almost silly. Upgrade to Vorbis, save money on hardware :-)

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  9. Back and forth by LaughingCoder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There was one really important point at the end of the article that should not be overlooked:

    Also keep in mind that AMD has yet to go to a 65nm manufacturing process.

    AMD remains competitive with Intel, even though they are still at 90nm. Speed goes up and power goes down with die scaling! Now, clearly the Core2 is the fastest processor you can buy today, and Intel is (smartly) offering speed grades in the mid-price range in order to try and "buy back" the enthusiasts. But AMD will get a nice speed bump when they bring 65nm on line. Of course Intel is not standing still either, as they are aggressively moving towards 45nm.

    I love capitalism.

    --
    The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    1. Re:Back and forth by LaughingCoder · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I knew my capitalism comment would bring a reply refering to the "sacrifice of Humans" or some other such dogma. /. is so predictable. And as is also usually the case, the reply comes anonymously.

      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    2. Re:Back and forth by MrFlibbs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A good point, but keep in mind that the performance and power differences between Prescott (90nm) and Cedarmill (65nm) were decidely underwhelming. The greater leakage current in Intel's 65nm process ate into most of the gains from the smaller process. It did make the die smaller and thus cheaper, but not much better in either performance or power consumption.

      Perhaps the AMD/IBM SOI process will do better at 65nm in controlling leakage current and provide the needed performance boost. Intel plans to release the 45nm Penryn in 2H07, and claims to have greatly improved the leakage current situation. AMD needs to leapfrom Conroe's performance with their 65nm part to remain competitive. Schedule is critical here: if Intel is late, AMD will regain momemtum; if AMD is late, Penryn will make the 65nm AMD part unattractive.

    3. Re:Back and forth by MancunianMaskMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      as someone from a related industry, I know thatr what intel calls '65nm' by virtue of gate length, is not 'as small' as your next fabber's '65nm'. It serves to impress the shareholders, though. Take these numbers with a grain of salt.

    4. Re:Back and forth by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      I remember reading in the one of the Analyst Day presentations Hector specifically said that 65nm wouldn't bring huge speed benefits. The main benefit of the 65nm is that you can fit more chips on a wafer making them cheaper to produce. Probably also it will be easier to increase the cache (currently the Conroe has double the cache size of AMD chips)

    5. Re:Back and forth by Mark+Gillespie · · Score: 1

      "AMD remains competitive with Intel". Not sure where you got that from. 30% more power, 30% less heat from a Conroe compared to a AM2 chip. I put that down to the move to 65nm, something that AMD should also get when they move to the same process. However you imply that they will get more.

    6. Re:Back and forth by fitten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't forget also that there are plenty of people who are getting 3.6GHz and higher on Core2Duo on standard air coolers (some hit 4GHz) and all this is on 65nm processes. Intel has clearly and obviously launched these at competitive speeds (just enough to trump AMD parts) while still having lots of headroom. As soon as AMD launches their 3.0GHz or 3.2GHz parts, Intel will release 3.33GHz Core2Duos... just enough to stay a little ahead of AMD. Intel has enough headroom to do this for the next year with current cores on their current process (65nm). The move to 45nm will just give them a little more headroom to continue the game.

    7. Re:Back and forth by Mark+Gillespie · · Score: 1

      It matters not, the performance of Conroe speaks for itself. I don't care if it's on 180nm process :-) My E6600 is a speed demon to anything else I have built.

    8. Re:Back and forth by MightyYar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And he's following the writings of a something a guy named Silvio Gesell wrote in 1891... Discredited economic theory from a non-economist. The main flaw, in my non-economist opinion, is that he advocates seperating money from power. All that would do is make money worthless since people really just want power. For an example see the Soviet Union or Mao's China.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    9. Re:Back and forth by novus+ordo · · Score: 1
      Speed goes up and power goes down with die scaling!
      This isn't automatic. Intel basically changed their whole architecture and that IS a big reason why the power went down. They used Pentium-M's core low voltage design, and since power is the square of voltage (P=V^2/R) reducing voltage a little bit will tremendously reduce power dissipated. If anything, keeping power a constant and reducing area will decrease heat dissipated, and you can now cook 2 eggs instead of 1. Anyway, changing manufacturing processes requires a new multi-BILLION dollar factory and I doubt anyone likes making that decision. Reducing a die size does increase yields meaning you get more processors per wafer. And I wouldn't count on higher speeds in the future but on lower power and more parallelism(cores). (ahh threading *head asplode*)
      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    10. Re:Back and forth by Sangui5 · · Score: 1

      OTOH, Intel consistently manages to make smaller SRAM cells at a particular process size than anybody else--which was a godsend to their cache hungry long pipelines. So yeah, their logic may be bigger than you'd expect, but they can really pack in the cache to make up for it a bit.

    11. Re:Back and forth by LaughingCoder · · Score: 1

      I put that down to the move to 65nm, something that AMD should also get when they move to the same process.

      Ummm, I think that is exactly what I said. They are competitive because 20-30% is about what a die-scale can buy you, both by virtue of smaller geometries, as well as giving you the ability to add logic, caching, and pipelines with the extra space. No, simply scaling down to 65nm probably won't allow them to pass Intel, but tweaking the design along with 65nm will go a long way towards closing the gap. My central point was there is one big advantage (65nm vs 90nm) that Intel enjoys *at the moment* that is a big factor in their better performance, and that advantage will vanish soon as AMD brings up their 65nm fab (it is already producing chips, as I understand it, but has not yet ramped to full production).

      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
  10. Re:Apart from gaming by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

    The new CPUs may be great, the motherboards available now are good and fairly cheap, the video cards are as expensive as ever, but memory has went up in cost by $20 or more just in the last month. Now is not the time to upgrade to the latest & greatest. Get last year's (or even the year before that) best Linux-friendly hardware and buy used memory.

    --
    I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
  11. Re:Apart from gaming by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Funny

    "save money on hardware"

    Especially iPods!

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  12. Re:Apart from gaming by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    You'd buy generation-old hardware to avoid spending an extra $20?

    We live in different universes. I think that I've been working too long or something and forget what it's like being poor.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  13. 965 chipset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Anyone got the SATA drives hanging off the 965 controller to be visible with Linux? I have tried Abit and Gigabyte Conroe boards with 965 (ICH8) controllers and neither show the SATA drives. And the PATA port isn't seen either :(

    1. Re:965 chipset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anyone got the SATA drives hanging off the 965 controller to be visible with Linux? I have tried Abit and Gigabyte Conroe boards with 965 (ICH8) controllers and neither show the SATA drives. And the PATA port isn't seen either :(


      You and I are in the same boat. Currently I'm using FreeBSD, which seems to work fine.
    2. Re:965 chipset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hi,

      I have a gigabyte ds3 mobo with core 2 duo 6600, using kernel 2.6.17-gentoo-r4 and patch from http://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2006/7/11/493/1 both the 4 x sata piix 2 x sata jmicron work fine, pata does not work at all, it is a known issue and should be fixed in 2.6.18, see lkml and mm trees for more info.

      And a damn fine machine it is too.

      AC

    3. Re:965 chipset by notanatheist · · Score: 1

      The guy is anonymous but informative. Mod him/her up. That SATA is recogonized by Slackware when booting with the "huge26.s" kernel. I've got a customer jumping through some hoops to get his Intel DP965LT working properly. Alot of it has to do with the fact the PATA isn't an Intel chip.

      On the other hand, my D975XBX works absolutely beautifully. I have the E6400 running at 2346Mhz with no issues. Onboard sound works suprisingly well though I'll be dropping an Audigy back into the box. One thing I can assure you is it does fly! My poor old 3Ghz P4 is left in the dust.

      That be all.

    4. Re:965 chipset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I've got an E6600 with the gigabyte 965P-DS3.

      Using Fedora Core 5 (2.6.17-1.2157_FC5smp kernel)

      the Gigabyte SATA ports work well, the Intel one's work but not well (about 10x slower using hdparm -T) and the Gigabyte PATA ports not at all.

      A work around for the PATA port problem was to get PATA --> SATA adapters for the optical drives and plug them into the Intel SATA ports where the speed problem is less relevant.

    5. Re:965 chipset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check that the SATA ports are set to IDE mode in the BIOS - depending on the variant of ICH8, the ports can operate in one of either IDE (normal), AHCI or RAID mode. AHCI basically just enables NCQ and hot-swap. Both AHCI and RAID mode require a different driver, which for Windows variants is available from the Intel website. Not sure if there's one for Linux on the Intel site, but you could try. Anyway, most BIOSes that I have seen allow you to select the ICH8 operating mode. Operating in IDE mode would be easiest for most operating systems; in this mode, the SATA ports are legacy compatible and should work with just about any ATA kernel driver whether XP, Linux, or Windows 3.11.
      As for the PATA ports, the ICH8 doesn't have PATA (it's present in the silicon but not bonded out in the package), so PATA is provided on most motherboards via a discrete controller (for example, one from Marvell). For Linux support, you'd have to contact the controller vendor directly if they haven't provided a driver to the motherboard manufacturer. Who uses PATA any more, anyway? :-)

    6. Re:965 chipset by munwin99 · · Score: 0

      Same problem here. Tried using Ubuntu Dapper, but apparently it has known issues, that will NOT be fixed. I have an Edgy CD (which has apparently resolved this issue), am gonna try again this weekend... If this fails, I'll try Inst Linux.

      --
      What's On Your Network ??? http://www.open-audit.org/
    7. Re:965 chipset by skywhale · · Score: 1

      Thanks folks - I'll investigate the patch and await 2.6.18-final.

      --
      :wq!
  14. Yes, I can. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can you point to a time in recent computer history where "NOW" wasn't the best time to purchase a new rig?

    Say it with me now: Itanium.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Yes, I can. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Say it with me now: "Nobody bought those."

      Seriously, what was it about the introduction of the Itanium that made it a bad time to buy a PC? I mean, I don't even think it was even marketed as a consumer product.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Yes, I can. by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Even Itaniums had their place. For us they marked the end of buying big Sun servers.

      But yes, unless you lived in Duluth, Minnesota and were too cheap to pay for oil or gas heat, then there was no reason to buy an Itanium.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  15. Re:Core 2 Duo : Does it run UBUNTU ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Confession is part of redemption.

    I spanked my son the other night as a last resort. He cried and I felt terrible and I still feel terrible.

    So there you have it.

    Other then that, yeah, I am sure it will run UBUNTU but I doubt the X server will work.

  16. But what compiler flags to use? by MarcQuadra · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm going to buy an e6600-based desktop in the winter, and I'm wondering if GCC will add tuning for the Core 2 processors. My guess is that '-Os -march=pentium-m -msse3 -mfpmath=sse' is the way to do it now in 32-bit mode, but there have been enough changes in the Core 2 to make for a new DFA profile, no? I thought they radically revamped the Pentium3 core, adding execution units and such.

    I just rebuilt my Core (1) Duo laptop with the aforementioned options and it seems to get me the most bang for my buck.

    From what I've read, compiling and running in 32-bit mode is still the best choice for now, the Core 2 is a lot better than the EM64T pentium 4 at running 64-bit code, but still not as fast as just using the 32-bit code (stuff like video encoding is happening in the 128-bit vector unit anyway, and I don't need more than 4GB addressable space).

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    1. Re:But what compiler flags to use? by Agelmar · · Score: 1

      No, the way to do it is -march=nocona

      Then, if you want to do 32-bit, just do -m32, and -m64 for 64-bit

    2. Re:But what compiler flags to use? by hkultala · · Score: 1

      > From what I've read, compiling and running in 32-bit mode is still the best choice for now,
      > the Core 2 is a lot better than the EM64T pentium 4 at running 64-bit code,
      > but still not as fast as just using the 32-bit code
      > (stuff like video encoding is happening in the 128-bit vector unit anyway,
      > and I don't need more than 4GB addressable space). .. but that 128-bit vector unit has twice the number of registers when it's on 64-bit mode.

      (though usage of these extra registers makes the instruction decoder choke a bit on core2, which is propably the reason why some code runs faster on 32-bit mode than 64-bit mode)

    3. Re:But what compiler flags to use? by Agelmar · · Score: 1

      Also, you should note that in 64-bit mode, there are more registers available. If you're running a native 64-bit environment, there's a good chance the same app recompiled as a 64-bit app will run marginally faster.

      At least, that's been my experience. (Running core 2 extreme on gentoo)

    4. Re:But what compiler flags to use? by fitten · · Score: 2

      Don't forget that Core 2 Duo's SSE unit can retire an instruction per clock now (as opposed to every other clock as previous Intel chips (and AMD ones)). I'm not sure if gcc 'knows' about that, though, so it may not schedule SSE instructions back-to-back as it should (resulting in lower SSE/fpu performance than it could achieve).

    5. Re:But what compiler flags to use? by MarcQuadra · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought 'nocona' would get you all the instruction sets you wanted, but the execution core and scheduling of the Core 2 are much closer to the Pentium-M. You might be better off specifying 'Pentium-M' and using switches to enable SSE3. The Core and Core 2 are much closer to the i686 (P3) than they are to the NetBurst (P4) under the hood, even though the Core series can chew on a lot of the newer SIMD instructions and shares an FSB with some Pentium 4s.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    6. Re:But what compiler flags to use? by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      I've been looking at benchmarks and such and 64-bit is faster by a few percent, because of the extra registers and some ops fitting into one instruction rather than two, but the difference in convenience for me is HUGE. I primarily use this machine as my workstation, and I encode a fair amount of video on it. If my encoding takes a few extra minutes and I can still use the Adobe Flash plugin and VMWare Workstation 5, I'm a happy camper. Its worth staying in 32-bit mode until everything I need is 64-bit native.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    7. Re:But what compiler flags to use? by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I'm worried about. The GCC developers still allow new DFA profiles to be added during point-releases. Someone ought to write one for these new CPUs so we can get the best buck:bang ratio.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    8. Re:But what compiler flags to use? by Agelmar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I downloaded the 32-bit precompiled version of firefox, and was able to install the flash plugin into that.

      Actually, for me, 64-bit is entirely convenient. I just type "emerge mozilla" and it works ;-) Haven't tried VMWare though

    9. Re:But what compiler flags to use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      vmware server is quite happy to run on an amd64 machine

    10. Re:But what compiler flags to use? by BoydWaters · · Score: 1

      I think that "-march=pentium-m -msse3" is WRONG, as it will favor x87 instructions rather than use the SIMD vector unit. Result is that the Core benchmarks slower than the Pentium 4. WRONG!

      From the Gentoo Wiki http://gentoo-wiki.com/HARDWARE_Apple_MacBook#CFLA GS

      You're right that the Core Duo is based on the Pentium-M microarch, but it's had some major updates done to it. Fex, the SSE front and backend are completely redone. On the P-M, it took twice as long to decode SSE than X87. Core can handle up to three packed and micro-op SSE instructions at once, making using SSE the advantage. However, when you set -march=pentium-m, GCC prefers to generate x87 instructions. There's other changes that make Core more similar to Netburst than P-M when it comes to cost calculation, prefetch block size, etc., all of which are dependent on -march. Check out gcc/config/i386/i386.c and the IA32 Intel Architecture Optimization Reference Manual. -qed

      This seems to be confirmed by posts to the GCC mailing list. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2006-06/msg00080.ht ml

    11. Re:But what compiler flags to use? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Try Ubuntu 64-bit with Workstation 5.5.2 - works for me.

      http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/releases/6.06.1/ release.1/

      --I used the alternate-amd64 iso:
      http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/releases/6.06.1/ release.1/xubuntu-6.06.1-alternate-amd64.iso

      --Just be sure to check the vmware forums before diving in; there are some additional packages and libraries that have to be installed for Vmware.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  17. Vorbis-players für alles. by eddy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah definitely save the money on the iPods, the iAudios are much better anyway. I suggest the U3 if you want a good flash-based Vorbis-player.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Vorbis-players für alles. by pipatron · · Score: 1

      I can only agree to this, not to mention the support for FLAC.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  18. AMD EE and EESFF not available in retail channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yet as far as I can see. So low power AMD cpus is just a theoretical possibility.

  19. There's no good reason to use Vorbis by October_30th · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Upgrade to Vorbis, save money on hardware


    Yeah, right. Voluntarily limit how and where you can listen to your music. Really smart.

    I regret the day when I decided, in a silly stroke of idealism, to encode all my CDs with oggenc. Later, after getting frustrated by the lack of support for the format, I had to encode them all over again.

    Face it. MP3 is a de facto standard and even though it's patented, what difference does it make? Does it stop you from listening to mp3 encoded music at home? No. Does it limit your options when purchasing a player? No.

    Unless you're a flaming idealist and are willing to go through the extra mile and look for ogg-friendly players, there's no good reason to start using Vorbis.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
    1. Re:There's no good reason to use Vorbis by suggsjc · · Score: 1

      A troll it was, but sadly it was a truthful one.

      mp3 is the standard and although it has its flaws isn't all that bad. What it does have going for it is almost universal hardware support...which in my opinion makes it more "free" in that I can use it anywhere. OGG is great, but like parent stated, it can be a pain to find players (portable ones) that support it. Notice I said pain not impossible.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    2. Re:There's no good reason to use Vorbis by October_30th · · Score: 1
      A troll it was, but sadly it was a truthful one.
      A troll? And why's that?


      What I did was to express an unpopular opinion, offered a personal experience and even made some rational arguments to support my position.

      My karma is excellent and I rarely post in the front page articles anymore. That's because Slashdot's ridiculous War on Trolls has reached such a paranoid intensity that getting moderated down 2-3 times per day prevents me from doing what I still like to do on Slashdot: posting in the journals.

      If that gets me modded down as troll, I think I'll stop posting in the public articles altogether. And this comes from a long time Slashdot user with the original user ID in the 1xxxxx range.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    3. Re:There's no good reason to use Vorbis by suggsjc · · Score: 1
      I'm not saying I disagree with your points...

      A troll? And why's that?
      Probably somewhere around the flaming idealist part. I could be mistaken as to what a troll is. But terms like that are *generally* used to illicit a response...trolling.

      So, I am not attacking you, your thoughts opinions, etc. I'm merely agreeing and calling a spade a spade.
      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    4. Re:There's no good reason to use Vorbis by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This is a minor point, but technically, you're breaking the law every time you either encode your CDs or listen to your MP3s, unless you've actually gone to Fraunhofer and purchased a license.

      Not that a Patent-Enforcement SWAT team is going to break down your door, but still, the law is the law.

      Another thing you can do is look specifically for players that support Ogg. I don't see why this would make anyone a "flaming idealist", only someone who wants to both obey the law and vote with his wallet. I haven't looked lately, but I've read that there are portable players out there which support Ogg (and FLAC).

  20. Re:Apart from gaming by LDoggg_ · · Score: 2, Informative

    To run a decent sized lcd at native resolution would be a start

    A card two or three generations before that(tnt1 or tnt2) wouldn't have a problem running at a 1600x1200
    His Gforce2 probably has 32 or 64 megs of ram, plenty for even a large LCD panel.
    I'd probably be interested in upgrading that CPU before the video card, but likely have to do both as newer boards are using pcix over agp.

    --

    "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
  21. You're wrong. by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    There has been no, previous price war like this before, where the flagship products of both AMD and Intel are being heavily discounted.

    1. Re:You're wrong. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      And before this, there had been no previous price war then like the Athlon vs. Pentium 4. And before that the 686 vs the Pentium. And before that the Cyrix, AMD, and Intel 486 chips. Next year, we'll be talking about how "NOW is the time to purchase" because "there has been no previous price war like this before on 4 core high-end chips". It's just not news that processors are cheaper and higher-performance than ever before.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  22. But have you actually tried to buy one? by JustNiz · · Score: 3, Informative

    >>> 'Now is a great time to be CPU shopping... you have great choice for both CPUs and motherboards.... keep in mind that NVIDIA has the nForce series for Intel CPUs which would give you SLI support for all your Quake Wars and UT2007 gaming needs

    Umm nope. Iv'e been trying to buy the bits to make a no-compromises gaming PC and can't get anywhere at all.
    Products that have been actually reviewed, benchmarked and advertised for weeks but are still not available to actually buy include:
    * a retail core2 X6800 CPU (I want the official fan too)
    * any motherboard with Nvidia 590 sli intel ed. chipset
    * the fastest memory (corsair 6400c3)
    and finally not yet reviewed but:
    * the new Nvidia GPU that will do directX 10 (for vista comaptability)
    If you were to buy a non-directx 10 top-end GPU now you'd be crazy.

    The worst offender is Intel. I don't know why even now about a month after the core2 launch you still can't find a retail x6800 extreme anywhere. I'm guessing intel are just letting the big builders like Dell grab the entire supply still. Intel shouldn't just feed those guys without putting some out on the street too.

    1. Re:But have you actually tried to buy one? by StarHeart · · Score: 1

      Actually, retail x6800 extremes at least the easiest to find. They were avaliable a week before any of the others. But then the price was $1200+.

      I personally bought a OEM E6600 on August 7th. The store, MicroCenter, only had four of them.

      --
      Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
    2. Re:But have you actually tried to buy one? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Update:
      For the last month of I've been searching all the online stores, froogle, and anantech RTPE every day.
      Ironically, right after writing the comment above I did my usual daily search and found newegg now have actually got some in stock (at least according to their website).
      woo hoo! order placed.

      Now all I have to do is find the rest of the stuff :-)

    3. Re:But have you actually tried to buy one? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I don't know why even now about a month after the core2 launch you still can't find a retail x6800 extreme anywhere. I'm guessing intel are just letting the big builders like Dell grab the entire supply still.

      Intel has long been the master of paper releases, and I was saying so back when the first benchmarks were cheering about Intel being back on-top.

      Intel always uses tricks to be on top, at least on paper. They like to put together some piece of crap that they never sell to anyone, anywhere, and call it the first released dual-core x86 CPU. They produce a P4 chip that does spectacularly well on benchmarks (Extreme Edition) and hype it for months, before they tell anyone it's going to sell for 10X more than it's competitors. They produce fast chips, advertise how incredibly cheap they are going to sell them for, but then only produce a small number, and do so on a release date LONG before they have any number of those chips to sell, just so it looks like you can actually get a better, cheaper chip from them, when you really can't.

      This is just par for the course. When AMD releases their 65nm chips that trounce Intel's offerings, you can bet that they will do so in quantity. If Intel had waited until they had sufficent quantities produced, you can bet their actually release date wouldn't have been until shortly before AMD's, but Intel doesn't want the competition. Release early, and get some positive marketing on the float, so to speak.

      And for the record I'm no AMD fanboy. I'm a pissed-off Intel customer...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  23. Not yet, but (closed source) drivers are coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drivers are needed to effectively use this under Linux, and Ubuntu is included. Ubuntu is a kid-version of Linux, mind you, so it's the last to get updated.

    1. Re:Not yet, but (closed source) drivers are coming by notanatheist · · Score: 1

      What drivers do you need? Really? I'm running an Intel D975XBX, Core2Duo E6400, 2GB DDR2, and a Geforce 7900GT. Guess what? It all works!! As a matter of fact, it flies! It's running Archlinux and I'm quite happy with it so far (trying not to go back to Gentoo).

      The onboard high-def sounds is respectable, the Gigabit ethernet is Intel so of course it works, the 250GB SATA II drive is flawless, and my DVDRW works just fine with cdrecord and Nerolinux.

  24. povray & oggenc single threaded? what? by t35t0r · · Score: 1

    These programs may not fork() but they probably pthread_create() so I wouldn't go around saying that they are single threaded, esp the ray tracer.

    What I found to be the most interesting finding is the performance of athlon64 and core2duo in 32 vs 64bit mode. Athlon64 have better 64bit performance/price even if they have slightly slower benchmarks. Also I think we need more benchmarks for low cost processors, you know the ones that average users purchase. I'm sick of benchmarks of ferrari's vs lamborghini's if you know what I mean.

  25. Re:Apart from gaming by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    I just checked the prices in Pounds Sterling at crucial.com/uk, and found that it had gone down since I last checked, a couple of weeks ago (when I noticed that it had also gone down from a couple of weeks previously. Your comment, therefore, surprised me. I finally tracked down the answer. The US Dollar fell sharply in the last month (the graphs against other currencies show similar pictures). The memory prices were probably the first to be affected, because those prices have a habit of fluctuating quite widely so suppliers tend to keep their inventories low.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  26. Re:Apart from gaming by NsOmNiA91130 · · Score: 1

    You don't game on Linux? I have Steam running under WINE. And RCT3. I still use Windows for Eve Online and BF2 though.

  27. Yeah but.. by yamamushi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is nice and all, but when is nvidia going to release drivers for X.org 7.1? I've been without real graphics drivers for about a month now, its getting old fast.

    --
    - Aetheral Research -
    1. Re:Yeah but.. by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      What's forcing you to not just use 7.0?

  28. Think ahead. by eddy · · Score: 1

    That's not how the smart kids do it; we encode to FLAC and then to whatever target format and quality level we need. Since oggenc2 supports FLAC as input, including the transfer of tags, it's all very comfortable. The safety of bit-perfect backups with the comfort of being able to pick and chose bitrates for the portable player. Golden.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Think ahead. by October_30th · · Score: 1
      I'm not a kid anymore, but that's exactly how I did it after the ogg debacle - sort of.

      I've got everything ripped in raw format and wrote scripts for generating copies - on demand - in whatever format I want. Throw enough CPU power and hard drive space at a problem and it's fixed. ;)

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
  29. It would be even nicer by labratuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if all Core2s didn't have built-in TPM.

    'fraid that rules it out for me.

    --
    Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    1. Re:It would be even nicer by FuturePastNow · · Score: 2, Informative

      TPM is built into motherboards, not processors. And very few motherboards have it.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:It would be even nicer by labratuk · · Score: 1

      Ok, fair enough, it's not "TPM", but it ("LaGrande Technology") is a system that is chiefly aimed at enabling TPM.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  30. Offering Porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, the only porn on the whole island is from the millionaire's wife!

  31. Except quality, speed, freedom and great players. by eddy · · Score: 1

    >mp3 is the standard and although it has its flaws isn't all that bad.

    The same thing can be said about Internet Explorer vs Other Browsers. "Bohoo, IE isn't all that bad. Installing alternative browsers is a pain (notice I said pain, not impossible). Bohooo, life is so hard, I might have to plan one step ahead, push one more mouse button, bohoo..". Man, that's just fucking lazy. Nobody said having a sense of quality and a little fire for what's right would be the easiest way to glide through life.

    Feels pretty darn good to not be a punter of the mp3 licensing consortium though. YMMV.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  32. Seriously serious by Frightening · · Score: 1

    The difference between the flagship AMD FX and the Intel EE is a full 28 seconds for video-enconding a sample video clip. I think these results are more pro-Intel than even the windows benchmarks.

    Of course since AMD will hit back with 4x4, and Intel will surely follow up with Jet Propulsion, the only conclusion is: please move along. Nothing to see here.

    P.S The photo of the processor is very funny. It's like a map of Egypt: civilisation on one side and desert for the rest. What's the empty area, electronics freaks?

    1. Re:Seriously serious by rikkus-x · · Score: 1

      I haven't looked at the picture, but I'd guess it's cache.

  33. Re:Apart from gaming by zacronos · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't say "for anything other than gaming". For example, if you're doing software development and testing on your own system, you may (depending on what the software is) want to have a decent chunk of memory, which might even require a motherboard upgrade from what GP's system has.

  34. Judge not, lest ye be judged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that should be [sic].

  35. Re:Apart from gaming by Shazow · · Score: 1

    Just so you know, Eve Online works under Cedega (and probably Wine, too).

  36. Re:Apart from gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ripping CDs to MP3,

    If you use Exact Audio Copy in secure mode, like me, then this is pretty much a moot point. The bottleneck is the ripping speed itself, not the MP3 encoding. My AXP3200 encodes lame --alt-preset standard faster than my Plex Premium can rip.

  37. Linux takes hardware advantage by matt+me · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Using Linux we're very lucky that we can build a kernel and applications optimised to our *specific* hardware utilising any special features and experience greater performance gains compared to users of most other operating systems say windows who are stuck with a generalised kernel that has to run on a majority of hardware from the last ten years and are stuck with a single set of binaries. Even with 64 bit windows most the applications you use will have to be run in emulation32 mode, so you won't get the same performance gains in the places you really need them, not explorer but video processing etc.

  38. I'm impressed by nsayer · · Score: 1

    I have a Conroe E6600 running FreeBSD. Those of us who use FreeBSD often use the 'make buildworld' process as a poor-man's benchmark. With -j2, I am now getting 20 minute buildworlds, which is, in my view, remarkable for both the power and monetary budget of the machine.

    1. Re:I'm impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any bets that you're bottle necked at disk I/O on the buildworld?

    2. Re:I'm impressed by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Oh, one other thing. Without -j2, it's about 35 minutes, so it can't all be disk bottleneck (or else tossing in the 2nd core wouldn't do any good).

    3. Re:I'm impressed by dook43 · · Score: 1

      Try -j3! The standard rule is # CPUs + 1.

      --
      This comment was randomly generated by a school of piranhas chewing on the PCB of a Microsoft Natural Keyboard.
    4. Re:I'm impressed by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      D00d, with decent disk I/O you should be able to use -j6 even on a single-proc. Distcc also helps if you have other machines that can run the same compiler on your network.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    5. Re:I'm impressed by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I just tried it and -j3 is about a tie with -j2. Though it was slightly faster, the difference is, IMHO, within the margin for error.

    6. Re:I'm impressed by nsayer · · Score: 1
      Distcc also helps if you have other machines that can run the same compiler on your network.

      Well, yeah, but that would make the concept of using 'make buildworld' as a benchmark for your machine rather useless, wouldn't it? Did you miss that part of the conversation?

    7. Re:I'm impressed by nsayer · · Score: 1

      I tried with -j4 through -j10 as well and got just about exactly the same answer every time: 20 minutes.

  39. Intel's ahead... until September by smilindog2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

    AMD is apparently already making 65nm parts for Dell, supposedly available next month! See:

    http://www.fabtech.org/content/view/1757/2/

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
  40. Buggered in Oz again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't be the first time prices were crazy in Australia compared to the rest of the world. I just went to newegg.com which is a pretty good online retailer for pc parts. Price for a Athlon64 X2 5000 is US$639. Price for a Core 2 Duo E6600 is US$369. That's a rather wide price delta.

    1. Re:Buggered in Oz again... by ozbird · · Score: 1

      That sounds like it's the old price; AMD's Processor Pricing list has the 5000+ at US$301 (processor-in-a-box price.)

  41. Linux Computers by paaper · · Score: 1

    I'm interested in learning the linux os. I was wondering what would be a good computer to invest in to do this. I'm will be taking college classes to learn linux but i would like a head start. I also have a limited budget. So pricey ones are out of the question.

    1. Re:Linux Computers by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      For trying Linux out, even an older computer will do.
      Still, you might want the following:
      -512 MBytes of RAM (GUIs like KDE can be just as memory-hungry as Windows XP)
      -a CPU at least in the 2 GHz range
      -Graphics depends on your priorities:
        For an unproblematic Linux system, get a chip that has Open Source drivers (integrated Intel graphics, older ATI models up to 9250, don't know about older NVIDIA models offhand)
        If it should double as Windows gaming PC, you want something faster. That means later NVIDIA or ATI models, which unfortunately have only closed source Linux drivers. An extra hassle that is said to be bigger with ATI- use NVIDIA.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
  42. Re:Dontcha just love...I agree by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    Actually the next round might be in about 6 months:
    It is widely assumed that AMD will release its 65 nm parts early next year. That should trigger the next round of price cuts. In the meantime, I expect no major changes. The only reason for waiting another 1-2 months now is if you want a Core 2 Duo board with the next chipset stepping (the current one has a few bugs).

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  43. I'm still looking at AMD for my next CPU by It's+a+thing · · Score: 1

    So Intel and AMD are now tied in performance, power consumption, and heat. However, the caught-up Intels are brand new CPUs, so they cost more.

    --
    Staring at a white background [on a computer screen] while you read is like staring at a light bulb — Maddox
    1. Re:I'm still looking at AMD for my next CPU by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
      So Intel and AMD are now tied in performance, power consumption, and heat. However, the caught-up Intels are brand new CPUs, so they cost more.

      Actually no.

      Intel has surpassed AMD in all 3 categories.
      The "brand new Intels" (Core 2 Duo) are priced very affordably.

      AMD is maintaining a lower cost point on their bargain models by the briefest of margins, and are still losing in performance-per-watt/performance-per-dollar.
      Whether or not AMD responds to Intel's latest chips is another story, but atm Intel is clearly leading across the board.

  44. The 2.4GHz Intel is muuuuch faster by BlueBiker · · Score: 1

    Core 2 Duo has much higher IPC than Athlon 64. A better comparison would be the $370 E6600 to the $830 FX-62.

    There's also the Conroe-capable ASRock 775Dual-VSTA which can be had for $62 delivered. Not a top-performing board, but a great choice for a budget or transition system with support for DDR/DDR2 and AGP/PCI-E.

  45. No by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    Before they were discounting older chips as they introduced new ones. This this time Intel has discounted the newly introduced chips and AMD had to match.
    *This has not happened before.*

    1. Re:No by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Regardless of whether this exact situation has occured before, these chips that are being sold today are unbelievable bargains compared to those from a year ago. Next year you will be able to say the same thing. Last year you also could say the same thing. "NOW" is always the best time to buy when the price-performance curve is going up. Nothing has changed, and this is not news.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  46. Now it's just about $$$ by queenb**ch · · Score: 1

    Maybe now Intel will come off it's high-horse and lower it's prices. I've been buying AMD chips for a long time. Not because I wanted AMD or didn't want Intel. It's all about the $$ for me. What gives me the most bang for my buck. For quite some time now, that's been AMD and not Intel.

    I think Intel is overpriced and that they'll continue to loose marketshare until that changes. Intel...the writing is on the wall...shouldn't you learn to read?

    2 cents,

    QueenB

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/