Slashdot Mirror


The Mystery of Oregon's 'Dead Zone'

Roland Piquepaille writes "The area off Cape Perpetua on the central Oregon coast is now a gigantic crab and fish graveyard. It was first discovered in 2002, but according to the Christian Science Monitor, researchers at Oregon State University (OSU) have taken a close-up look into this coastal dead zone. And things are getting worse. A few weeks ago, the researchers measured the level of dissolved oxygen in this part of the ocean. They found that levels were 10 to 30 times lower than normal, down to 0.5 milliliters per liter, a characteristic of hypoxia. And because they have no explanations about this phenomenon, they're even envisioning a total absence of oxygen, or anoxia. Read more for additional details and pictures about this mystery."

235 comments

  1. No explanation? by broothal · · Score: 4, Informative

    " And because they have no explanations about this phenomenon..."

    Let me help them out here a bit then. The Oregon zone appears when the wind generates strong currents carrying nutrient-rich but oxygen-poor water from the deep sea to the surface near shore, a process called upwelling. The nutrients encourage the growth of plankton, which eventually dies and falls to the ocean floor. Bacteria there consume the plankton, using up oxygen.

    No - I'm not so smart that I knew the answer, but google did - first (and several more) hit.

    1. Re:No explanation? by CloudsSpaz · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't want to seem like I actually read the source article, and maybe I have the wrong definition of explanation, but it seems like "the culprit may be global warming."

    2. Re:No explanation? by drawfour · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right, because scientists in the field of study who are stumped couldn't possibly have already looked into that and discounted it? You Google'd it, that suddenly means you have all the knowledge to tell the experts what is going on?

      Right...

    3. Re:No explanation? by pipingguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I recently moved a few thousand kilometers westward and a Chinook Arch looks quite ominous and threatening to those that haven't seen it before. It's just nature, though. I always find it amusing when eco-types freak out and fret over what are natural earth processes.

      The sky is not falling, despite what the linked image above might indicate.

    4. Re:No explanation? by Gnavpot · · Score: 1
      Right, because scientists in the field of study who are stumped couldn't possibly have already looked into that and discounted it?
      Don't know. Did they tell anyone that they looked into it? Or should we just assume this?
    5. Re:No explanation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow! So "global warming" is another word for hypoxia and anoxia in ocean water. And I thought it meant the Earth's temperature rising.

      If you would have read the article you would have come across:
      But, she adds, what she and her colleagues see is consistent with projections of global warming's effects on coastal winds in the spring and summer, which drive upwelling of nutrient-laden water.

      So the parent was correct, but under the assumption they didn't come to the conclusion he googled.
      So, yes, neither of you RTFA. Thank you.
    6. Re:No explanation? by evilviper · · Score: 2, Funny
      I always find it amusing when eco-types freak out and fret over what are natural earth processes.

      Like urinating on a bald eagle...

      It's perfectly natural, guys.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:No explanation? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Is that like when Lenny blows his nose with a squirrel after talking about respecting the environment?

    8. Re:No explanation? by elljay · · Score: 1

      The same type of 'dead zone' is HUGE at the base of the Mississippi River. It has reached almost to the coast of Mexico. This is not a new occurance.

      Nitrogen/phosphorus rich waters flow down river (usually due to excessive farming and over fertilization). A nasty green algae/plankton sluge forms on the surface. Oxygen vanishes, fish die.

    9. Re:No explanation? by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's clearly yet another picture of the Nexus. You can't fool us with this Chinook nonsense.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    10. Re:No explanation? by tigheig · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yes. It was discussed. Starting in the fifth paragraph of the linked article.

      Follow the link, it's a good article.

    11. Re:No explanation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the explanation. I am sure no one at the Hatfield Marine Science Center new that. /sarcasm.

      The College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Science at Oregon State is one of the leading programs in the country. I am sure they know more than your google search will bring up.

      The problem is not exactly what is happening. It is why it is happening, and how is this going to affect the Oregon Coast environment in the long term.

    12. Re:No explanation? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that. Next time I see one sneaking over the rockies I'll have to stage such a photo. Maybe I can convince some ACs that I am a descendant of Tim the Enchanter.

      Summer lightning, thunder and nasty hailstorms here are quite impressive, especially when they happen all at once. Little kids freak out, especially the ones that are visiting from warmer climates and it's fun to watch their reactions. It's a look of true wonder and amazement.

    13. Re:No explanation? by smilindog2000 · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought, too, but then I read the full article. The first thing they say is they've refuted river-water as a source of the problem, and acknowledge the dead-zone in the Gulf. The guy who posted about "upwelling" sounds like he's got a potential answer from Google.

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
    14. Re:No explanation? by enharmonix · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hmm, we've been dealing with this in the Gulf for a while. It's recurrant - it goes away, then comes back the next year, and is caused by too much algae, which is basically fed by nitrogen rich runoff from ground water. IIRC, though, wind actually helps by mixing the water, so global warming shouldn't really enter into this picture. Not to say the article didn't quote somebody saying that, or that different climates won't affect things, but that's just what I heard. For anybody interested, there's a pretty scientific assessment of the phenomenon (in the gulf at least) here (I don't think anybody's linked to this yet, apologies if this is a dupe). Anyway, don't panic, Oregonians, you'll survive! Cheers.

    15. Re:No explanation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Make friends with any Brazillians that are new in town, just to see them react when it snows.

    16. Re:No explanation? by Metex · · Score: 1

      Ehh the article was bad at explaining the problem. What they are actually worried about is the fact that there was many yummy fish/crab in the area than they suddenly died off. They dont know why since the normal oh we dumped alot of nutrian rich X chemical in the sea cant explain it nor can a sudden surge of nutriants due to natural events. Also they discounted short term cyclical patterns since this is the first time it has happened since the area has been studied 30+ years.

      As for the lack of oxygen, that isnt so mysterious in the sence that you now have alot of dead marine life on the floor that needs to be broken down by bacteria, that uses oxygen.

      --
      Never could figure out why my girl liked my bitch tits, then I found out she was a lesbian.
    17. Re:No explanation? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      maybe I have the wrong definition of explanation
      Yep. In order for "the culprit may be global warming" to qualify as an explanation, you'd have to detail just how you think global warming would have anything to do with this.
      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    18. Re:No explanation? by DestroyAllZombies · · Score: 1

      I may have missed something, but funny clouds and unexplained oxygen-free zones in the ocean are not quite of the same magnitude. Why do all the posters assume the scientists have never read a book or realized there are other bodies of water? I don't know for a fact they are smart or responsible (after all, it doesn't "say so in the article") but these threads remind me of a bunch of old men playing checkers on the courthouse steps and dispensing their accumulated skepticism about those egg-heads who keep trying to make a big deal out of nothing.
      The only way to find out if it is a transient natural phenomenon or a symptom of a larger process is to study it. The article is a 40,000 foot view of this ongoing study. Obviously it left some things out. Tossing out anecdotal evidence is useless.

      --
      This login name for sale.
    19. Re:No explanation? by popsicle67 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You obviously don't know scientists very well. They look at the painfully obvious and thing "that's too simple". You couldn't get a scientist to say he had shit on his finger after scratching his asshole without a battery of tests to eliminate all other possibilities.

    20. Re:No explanation? by FluffyBob · · Score: 1

      Yeah those stupid "eco-types"! They're always saying "Wow that chinook arch looks really bad and evil, I better go and annoy some shut-in engineer with my imagined behaviors and ignorance". They're sooo dumb.

      What would they know about appreciating natural beauty! What, with their silly concern for nature an all; they probably dont even think about pipes and pumps and lousy web page design.

      The fools!

    21. Re:No explanation? by Chasa · · Score: 1

      Or they may have found where god squats when he has the shits; not to be confused with Coal County.
      Everyone who lives here has the zits;
      Good old Coal County sure is the pits.
      Anybody with a brain has got to split
      Cause this is where god squats when he gets the shits

      --
      Insanity is nothing more than a difference in perspective.
    22. Re:No explanation? by Max+Threshold · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sadly, many (if not most) professional scientists these days are nothing but bumbling idiots chasing after research grants, repeating one another's experiments and research not for verification, but to pass them off as original.

      In an environment of such poor scientific integrity, there's nothing wrong with a layperson hitting the books and forming their own theories. They're probably just as good as any so-called expert's.

    23. Re:No explanation? by evilviper · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's a shame the mods don't have a sense of humor.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    24. Re:No explanation? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Somehow I think "We don't understand completely why or what it means." got turned into "no explanations" somewhere.

    25. Re:No explanation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Y'know, maybe you should just read TFA, where this explaination is given:

      To be sure, the jury is still out on that connection, says Jane Lubchenco, a marine zoologist at Oregon State University who is heading up this day-long expedition. But, she adds, what she and her colleagues see is consistent with projections of global warming's effects on coastal winds in the spring and summer, which drive upwelling of nutrient-laden water.

      These effects - identified as early as 1990 by researcher Andrew Bakun, then with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's fisheries lab in Monterey, Calif. - turbocharge the upwelling. This overloads the waters with nutrients and spawns large algae blooms. The algae sink, die, and decompose, in a process that sucks oxygen out of the water and the topmost layer of sediment on the bottom, where many worms and shellfish live.


      Hey, that's exactly what the OP said!

    26. Re:No explanation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep. In order for "the culprit may be global warming" to qualify as an explanation, you'd have to detail just how you think global warming would have anything to do with this.

      Well Mr. SmartyPants, think about it.

      Have you seen any large wooden ships in the area? Seen any flags with skull and crossbones? Huh? Have you?

      Still don't see it? Man, some scientist you'd make...

      No drunken songs heard in the night? No parrots? Eyepatches?

      Good God man, it's the PIRATES! There aren't any in the area, and haven't been for a while. It's scientific fact: the absence of pirates leads to global warming.

      Don't pretend they didn't teach you this in school.

      We need a *massive* pirate infusion here. I mean, invite them from madagascar or something. Just get enough pirates in there to balance the ecosystem.

      I've sent this proposal to the President many times, and he's never even given me the decency of a reply. I'm heading to the White House this weekend and getting right up on his lawn with my bullhorn so he can see me. To drive my point home, I'm going to wave a shotgun around while I say it. This will really help me get my message across.

    27. Re:No explanation? by Capt.+Caneyebus · · Score: 1

      I learned this in my first year in Env. Science. This couldnt be that hard to figure out.

      --
      -- Yes, I work for the government, and yes I am watching you.
    28. Re:No explanation? by acsinc · · Score: 1

      Perhaps these scientists should refer to William of Ockham and his principle.

    29. Re:No explanation? by kimvette · · Score: 2, Funny
      These effects - identified as early as 1990 by researcher Andrew Bakun, then with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's fisheries lab in Monterey, Calif. - turbocharge the upwelling. This overloads the waters with nutrients and spawns large algae blooms.


      Question: where did they install the turbochargers? If the problem is warming, may I suggest installing some intercoolers? just a thought. ;)
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    30. Re:No explanation? by Luminus · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Atlanta Journal-Constitution had an article (google cache if needed) about georgia's dead zone about two weeks ago,
      and claimed that the solution in this case was actually quite obvious:

      Verity and other scientists who have researched similar changes worldwide say they can sum up the cause in a single word: people.

      As more homes, condominiums, marinas and businesses are built on the coast, pollution increases in tidal creeks and estuaries. Treated sewage discharges and storm water runoff carry fertilizers from lawns, golf courses and farms and oil and other pollutants from pavement and rooftops.

      "We need to stop what we're doing now and either mitigate or reduce [the impacts] because we're going downhill in a hurry," Verity said.

      ---------------
      Other bits of the article follow....

      For 20 years, a scientist near Savannah has taken weekly water samples from the same dock, giving him a composite snapshot of the estuary's health.
      Pieced together, the view goes from good to fair and getting worse. Peter Verity's data tells him the estuary --- where rivers wrestle with the sea --- is in trouble.
      Dissolved oxygen, the breath of life for shrimp, blue crabs, oysters and fish, is declining at an alarming rate. Within 10 years, Verity, a professor at the Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, predicts there won't be enough left for the sea life we love to eat. Those creatures will be replaced by jellyfish, which don't need as much dissolved oxygen and feed on the type of organisms that grow in a polluted estuary, he says.

      Verity's already witnessed change. Between 1987 and 2000, his sampling showed a 70 percent increase in jellyfish.

      Verity and other scientists who have researched similar changes worldwide say they can sum up the cause in a single word: people.

      As more homes, condominiums, marinas and businesses are built on the coast, pollution increases in tidal creeks and estuaries. Treated sewage discharges and storm water runoff carry fertilizers from lawns, golf courses and farms and oil and other pollutants from pavement and rooftops.

      "We need to stop what we're doing now and either mitigate or reduce [the impacts] because we're going downhill in a hurry," Verity said.

      Verity presented his dissolved oxygen research in June at an international conference of his peers and published it this month in an academic journal, Estuaries and Coasts. His bottom line: Georgia's bays and inlets, lined with tidal marshes now teeming with infant and juvenile sea life, is headed toward hypoxia, a dead zone incapable of supporting shellfish and fish.

      Hypoxia is already severe at times in the Gulf of Mexico off the Louisiana coast and in the Chesapeake Bay near Washington. An associated problem, harmful algae blooms that release fish-killing toxins, has affected virtually every coastal state, threatening human health and dealing economic blows to seafood industries worldwide.

    31. Re:No explanation? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      It's a clear sign that Gozira was here -- the lack of dissolved oxygen in the water is clearly Dr.Sarazawa's handiwork. Dive more deeply to find the bones. Bring your Geiger counter.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    32. Re:No explanation? by evilneko · · Score: 1

      Well I think it's just plain purdy.

      --
      Slashdot - where to disagree, is to be a troll
    33. Re:No explanation? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Thank you, kind sir, for lightening the mood and my day. That was, for no apparent reason, hilarious.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    34. Re:No explanation? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1
      Hey, that's exactly what the OP said!
      No, the OP just said "The culprit is global warming", and deemed it an explanation. I was pointing out that that in itself, whether a fuller explanation exists in TFA or not, does not itself constitute an explanation. He could have said "RTFA: the culprit is global warming", or said exactly what you said, quoting the article, or done a study entirely his own and drawn these same conclusions, reporting them against all standard practices in a comment on slashdot. But, by itself, "the culprit is global warming" in no way constitutes an explanation.
      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    35. Re:No explanation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was reported by the Christian Science Monitor. I have no clue of the beliefs of the particular scientists doing this research, as they're not mentioned in the article, but they don't limit their reporting to scientists who are Christian only.

    36. Re:No explanation? by werewolf1031 · · Score: 1

      Ah, we finally hit that nerve. In spite of the /. Collective's iconoclastic, challange-authority, question-everything attitude (which I happen to agree with), there is still one revered pantheon which must remain sacrosanct. Max Threshold, how dare you presume that scientists are human and are therefore susceptable to greed and pride?! Sacrilage! Heresy, I say! They can do no wrong!

      And hence, poor Max, your Flamebating.

      Look, I'm as much a science junkie as the next guy, and I firmly believe that understanding the way the universe works is critical to our survival, but this hero worship has got to stop. Scientists are human, they sometimes make mistakes, they sometimes excersize bad judgement, and yes, they sometimes do the wrong thing. It happens, deal with it. Personally, I think the greatest scientists are (were?) those who did it not for a paycheck, but for curiosity. The Galileos, the Darwins, the Einsteins, et al, were not concerned with monetary gain or fame. They simply wanted to know why some aspect of the universe works the way it does, and so they investigated, poked, prodded, theorized, crunched numbers, threw out disproved theories and came up with new ones, all for the sole purpose of understanding. Now, I'm not saying that all researchers who are getting paid for their efforts are corrupt, that would be an absurd statement. But let's be realistic, scientists are human, and when humans get involved, well... look at the world around you. It ain't perfect, and neither are the scientists. To all the many scientific researchers who genuinely want to know the truth, who want to understand why things happen, I wish them the best of luck. To all the rest, the freeloaders and leachers, well, YOU guys should be flipping burgers and scraping hard for rent money, not conducting research.

    37. Re:No explanation? by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps the so-called experts NEVER really know what's going on, and like the rest of us, can't predict the future consistently?

      "Experts" are just people too. People who've studied and lived something longer than the rest of us, but have no more skill at foreseeing the future than any of the rest of us.

      They'll monitor and observe for a while, and figure out what's going on. And then likely have no idea how to change it, and it'll change on its own and do something else "unexpected".

      That's the nature of... Nature.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    38. Re:No explanation? by budgenator · · Score: 1
      Anytime you have a phenomena who's cause could be many varied and interconnected causes; using the "global warming" trump card gets you the exposure from the lay media and a "OMG" reaction that garrentees funding for further research.
      Contrast that with
      1. humans pump oil out of ground,
      2. humans burn oil increasing global temperatures because of CO2 release,
      3. weather patterns shift slightly,
      4. new ocean currents fertilize algea,
      5. algea(up to 50% oil by weight) grows and consumes CO2,
      6. decay of algea consumes O2 in the water letting the dead oil rich algea sit on ocean bottom and become silted over,
      7. over time, pressure and heat the algeal lipid based oil converts to petrolium oil,
      8. pools of oil form for future generations,
      in the two scenarios, who gets the money and who gets moded to troll hell
      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    39. Re:No explanation? by hummdinger02 · · Score: 1

      Being a long time aquarist I have my own opinions as well. Upwelling and a combination of other factors do cause this in a variety of places globally. This is not unique to this area of Oregon. What is unique is the extremity and scale. That is what is puzzling. The news media has reported it as if this situation in whole is unheard of. It is not at all unheard of. But this scale and the extremely low and dropping Oxygen levels are unique and alarming.

    40. Re:No explanation? by bodan · · Score: 1

      Or they could simply reverse the polarity for a while.

      --
      "I think I am a fallen star. I should wish on myself."
    41. Re:No explanation? by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      Right, because scientists in the field of study who are stumped couldn't possibly have already looked into that and discounted it? You Google'd it, that suddenly means you have all the knowledge to tell the experts what is going on?

      It appears that this is exactly what has happened. Look for the post below entitled "This is nothing new" and read an article stating that this has been going on for decades, but due to changes in the way fishermen operate today, it has only recently been noticed by the scientists.

      Of course, this couldn't be right because scientists are always free of bias and are always correct in their assumptions, right?

    42. Re:No explanation? by nuzak · · Score: 1

      This article is now required reading for you. I am not accusing you of being one of these people, but you are certainly fertilizing their fields.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    43. Re:No explanation? by Drakai · · Score: 1

      I think it was clear in the article that they know how it might have happened. The question is why here, why now, why so much and for how long.

      The funny thing for me is that upon reading this I immediately started thinking of ways to 'fix' it. My first idea was to place air pumps on buoys every 100' or so that push air to the sea floor. Then I thought maybe a pipe or cable that pushed air with small leaks at regular intervals. But such interence is usually too costly and generally short-sighted.

    44. Re:No explanation? by Pope · · Score: 1

      I tellya, I soo miss the summer storms we got in Calgary when I grew up there. The hail storms in July were usually the best.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    45. Re:No explanation? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      So what we should really do is harvest the algae and make biodiesel to run our fishing vessels ....now there's a good thought.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    46. Re:No explanation? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      <sarcasim> GOOD LORD NO, why on earth would anyone want to do something so common-sensical as fixing a problem when where is funding to be had for researching it! </sarcasim>
      On of the more difficult things about algea-biodiesel is getting the algea settled out of the water when its "ripe" after that it's pretty trivial; but in this situation I'd consider TDP, thermal depolymerization, it would convert the algea, as well as any crab or fish carcasses on the bottom reducing the BOD (Biological Oxygen demand) and any toxins as well.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    47. Re:No explanation? by tkw954 · · Score: 1
      Well Mr. SmartyPants, think about it.

      Have you seen any large wooden ships in the area? Seen any flags with skull and crossbones? Huh? Have you?

      Still don't see it? Man, some scientist you'd make...

      No drunken songs heard in the night? No parrots? Eyepatches?

      Good God man, it's the PIRATES! There aren't any in the area, and haven't been for a while. It's scientific fact: the absence of pirates leads to global warming.

      Don't pretend they didn't teach you this in school.

      We need a *massive* pirate infusion here. I mean, invite them from madagascar or something. Just get enough pirates in there to balance the ecosystem.

      I'm done extensive research in this field and came to the same conclusion. However, one must be sure that there are no more than 135752 pirates, or we will be plunged into an ice age. The details and a pretty graph are at http://www.venganza.org/sighting/69.htm
    48. Re:No explanation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you suggest after we burn up all the oil and total change the climate, we just wait 100,000 years for things to go back the way they were. Who is doing the trolling?

    49. Re:No explanation? by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

      I'm not a fan of creationist pseudo-science, either. But real science hasn't been doing its credibility any favors lately. Scientists themselves aren't entirely to blame; their profession as a whole is suffering from our shitty education system and the daily media barrage of contagious stupidity. But I think it's reached the point where the whole scientific (and higher-educational) establishment is rotten through and through. It's going to take a major effort from a few brilliant minds to rebuild it.

    50. Re:No explanation? by nuzak · · Score: 1

      But I think it's reached the point where the whole scientific (and higher-educational) establishment is rotten through and through. It's going to take a major effort from a few brilliant minds to rebuild it.

      Brilliant minds like who? Scientists? You already regard the entire scientific endeavor with prejudice. God only knows what you prefer as an alternative (pun intended).

      Did you even read the article beyond seeing that it was about creationism? It points out the really deep rot in society, and that's the egalitarian view of knowledge arising from deeply rooted anti-intellectualism.

      Sorry if I'm being harsh, but "rotten through and through" really requires more specific qualification than your general sentiment.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    51. Re:No explanation? by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1
      I do not regard the scientific endeavor with prejudice. I regard the people who are currently making money at it with prejudice. Anti-intellectialism is a problem, but it's an entirely different problem from the one I'm complaining about.

      Our universities do not exist to educate. They exist for profit. Even the "research" they conduct is more often driven by greed than genuine scientific curiousity. Meanwhile, they're gouging their customers (students) and not delivering the product (an education). Most graduates are completely incompetent, not only in their chosen fields, but in general; and degree inflation can't get much worse without inventing higher degrees.

      My tuition at a state university has increased 50% in the past two years, and their programs are a complete joke. I refuse to go into debt to the point where I have to create an income for myself by kissing the government's ass for research grants to conduct pointless experiments. I'm done. The only research I conduct from here on out will be for my own personal benefit.

    52. Re:No explanation? by Hankenstein · · Score: 1

      I guess sometimes reading the article before posting is a good idea.

      FTA ---
      Unlike the dead zone that sets up each year in the Gulf of Mexico, Oregon's version can't be traced to the effects of nutrient-laden river run-off. Here, as in a handful of other coastal regions worldwide, the culprit may be global warming.

    53. Re:No explanation? by enharmonix · · Score: 1

      I guess sometimes reading the post you're replying to before posting is also a good idea.

      FMFP (you can figure that one out) ---
      Hmm, we've been dealing with this in the Gulf for a while. ... there's a pretty scientific assessment of the phenomenon (in the gulf at least) here [noaa.gov]

      The "IIRC, though, wind actually helps by mixing the water, so global warming shouldn't really enter into this picture" part, however, does reference to TFA... And isn't this discussion over anyway?

  2. It is the same with the Baltic sea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The Baltic sea also has the same issue. There are so many pollotants dumped into the sea than in couple tens of years we have totally dead sea in our hands.

    1. Re:It is the same with the Baltic sea. by Yazeran · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, but in the case of the Baltic, there is a natural bias towards a no-oxygen situation.

      In the baltic we have a higher salt concentration in the bottom parts than nearer the surface (due to water runoff through all the rivers which empty out i the baltic). At the same time, the mouth of the baltic (e.g. the Danish straits) are shallow, usually only alloowing te surface water to freely exchange with the North sea (and hence the Atlantic). In most cases there is a weak outgowing current in the danish straits and only in special weather situations do salt and oxygen containing water enter the baltic.
      The weather situations which may pump salt and oxygen into the baltic is large storms from the right direction and i recal readig that it is only about once every 2-3 years that that happens that significant amounts of salt water enters the deep parts of the baltic.

      This phenomena (heavy salt rich water at the bottom, salt poor water at the surface) is also the same which makes the danish fjords vulnarable to hypoxia or anoxia (and incidently makes them nearly ideal for small submarines to operate in as a surface ship has no chance of hearing them through the thermo/hyalocline before they are close enough to launch torpedoes, which was the reason why the soviets took the danish navy serious durring the cold war).

      There is alos other places where the geometry of the water basin results in natural anoxia (the black sea is i believe the largest). Similarly, in the geologic past, large costal water basins have been anoxic (as there is now oil there), so anoxic conditions is not by themselves some man made phenomena. It may be man made in the case in Oregon and in the case of the baltic, it surely does not help dumping all the polution from the rivers..

      Yours Yazeran

      Plan: To go to Mars one day with a hammer.

    2. Re:It is the same with the Baltic sea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Denmark has fjords? Since when?

    3. Re:It is the same with the Baltic sea. by Yazeran · · Score: 1

      Well that depends on the definition i guess (Wikipedia). Although Denmark does not have any of the typical fjords (as we have no mountains), the term fjord is used for any narrow inlet, of which Denmark has many. They are also the result of glaciation like the ones in Norway, although the lack of bedrock to make them truely spectacular (like sognefjord in Norway) make them just long narrow inlets.

      For the interested, take a look at google earth and find the east cost of Jutland (the peninsular north of Germany) for some good examples of Danish Fjords.

      Yours Yazeran

      Plan: to go to Mars one day with a hammer.

    4. Re:It is the same with the Baltic sea. by feyhunde · · Score: 1
      What rivers? It's off the Coast of Newport. That part of the Oregon Coast has rivers smaller than 20 miles headwatered in the Coast Range, anything from the Rockies or even the Cascades near there goes into the Columbia Basin, There are mountains between Newport and the Willamette Valley, with the Willamette dumping into the Columbia 150 miles north of Newport.

      There isn't any Agriculture or Heavy industry that could be responsible. Here's google map of the area, look for a river longer than 20 miles near it. http://maps.google.com/maps?oi=map&q=Newport,+OR

      --
      I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    5. Re:It is the same with the Baltic sea. by Yazeran · · Score: 1

      I think that you misunderstood my post.

      I did not claim that the Oregon case is due to polution from rivers or river induced hyaloclines (as you correctly state, no large rivers feeding water to the affected areas). I only speculated that the Oregon case may be a result of human activity, altohugh natural upwelling may also result in the observed phenomena as others have pointed out (including the article..)

      Yours Yazeran

      Plan: To go to Mars one day with a hammer.

    6. Re:It is the same with the Baltic sea. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      The Baltic sea also has the same issue. There are so many pollotants dumped into the sea than in couple tens of years we have totally dead sea in our hands.

      The Aral Sea is already dead. In part because of runoff but mostly because of the Soviet policy of diverting all of the rivers that emptied into the Aral to farms on land that never should of been farmed to begin with.

      Falcon
    7. Re:It is the same with the Baltic sea. by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      Saying there are no long rivers in this area is of course true, but it is also misleading.

      The Oregon Coast Range is one of very few temperate rain forests in the world. In the area around Cape Perpetua, the annual rainfall is 80 inches. All that water runs off to the ocean through those short rivers, as well as hundreds of smaller creeks that empty directly into the surf. Those short rivers, in the aggregate, move about as much water per year as the Willamette River, which drains the rest of western Oregon.

      Since the area has been intensively logged over the last 30 years, and since there has been some major changes in logging practice during that time, it is quite possible that human activities are somehow causing this dead zone. Consider that these are the most dense forest habitats anywhere, carrying about 900 tons of biomass per acre see The Temperate Rainforest. Then consider that a clear cut logging operation removes all of this biomass in a matter of weeks from a 20 to 100 acre tract. The raw land that is then exposed to these heavy rains is mostly clays and mudstones. It is reasonable to expect that the run-off from recently logged mountainsides is qualitatively different than it was before the logging.

      I expect that this is being looked at by the people who are studying the dead zone. There is a lot of feeling that logging in this area caused the collapse of the salmon fishery that used to be a thriving industry around Cape Perpetua.

      So call me a tree hugger.

    8. Re:It is the same with the Baltic sea. by feyhunde · · Score: 1
      68 Inches in Newport. And the big thing isn't forrestry (although to be honest not all the cutting is on the coast side of the watershed) instead I'm talking Ag and industry, which are traditionally seen as the big problems in river pollution.

      The other thing is there have been multiple conflicting plans in Oregon with respect to stream management. The idea in the 80s was that fish need moving water or will get stuck. Now we know better, but it cost billions to implement the plan ODFW had to remove trees from every tiny stream in Oregon and surround the streams with trees that rot fast in water. And then it cost billions to reverse it. The trees along the small rivers and streams still haven't fully regrown to the pre 1980 state, meaning the massive cock up is still being felt (although Japanese overfishing is also to blame).

      --
      I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    9. Re:It is the same with the Baltic sea. by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      68 Inches in Newport.

      And much more than that as you move inland. The Coast Range forces maritime air that has been at equilibrium with the Pacific Ocean for thousands of miles to rise from sea level at Newport to 2,000 - 3,000 feet in half a dozen miles. Most of the water gets dumped in the hills, not on the beaches and coves.

      I agree that Oregon streambed management is a shambles. Hopefully we are now on the right track. But Bureau of Land Management and the other involved agencies have a pretty dismal track record.

    10. Re:It is the same with the Baltic sea. by ktulu182 · · Score: 1

      > which was the reason why the soviets took the danish navy serious durring the cold war This is an obvious urban legend, because Soviets just did not consider Danish navy separately from US and NATO forces. Most of the small countries are tend to exaggerate their importance for world powers. Anyway, all Danish naval based were supposed to be destroyed by nukes with the rest of the world in the gypothetical conflict. The main task of Soviet Navy was not to fight Danish submarines in Baltic or North Seas, but to provide operations of boomers with SLBMs in Barentz Sea and Atlantic.

    11. Re:It is the same with the Baltic sea. by Yazeran · · Score: 1

      Yes in a first strike situation without any warning or political heatup beforehand to give any hint of aggresion, you are right. But in reality, the navy always left the bases at the sligihtest hint of any tension (for the exact same reason, noone expected the basses to last 30 mins into a firefight). Once the submarines left the bases, they could block the Danish straits for days simply by beeing able to hide. As you state, the bulk of the Soviet navy was in the barents/murmansk area, but they still had significant naval bases in the Baltic (Koeningsberg and Leningrad), and all the shipping in those bases still had to pass the danish straits to do any good in the atlantic..

      The surface part of the Danish navy was not any obstacle for the soviets, neither was the land forces or to some extent the air force. Denmark is just not a defendable land area when it comes to modern warfare (and this is the reason for no US bases in denmark durring the cold war, noone expected Denmark to last more than 1-2 days in a conflict and in fact Denmark only got into NATO due to the fact that the US needed Greenland and danish membership of NATO solved some political problems in that respect).

      Yours Yazeran

      Plan: to go to Mars one day with a hammer.

    12. Re:It is the same with the Baltic sea. by superflippy · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to see this story show up on Slashdot because we've been discussing it here at the university where I work for the past week. A similar hypoxia event occurred off the coast of Myrtle Beach, SC in 2004 and nobody is completely sure what caused it, so it's interesting to see a similar event in progress elsewhere.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
  3. Hi, my name is Lizzy Faire by Travoltus · · Score: 5, Funny

    If those fish that are dying out there aren't worth protection under the free market, then they aren't worthy of survival.

    Things that are truly important to humanity's survival will be preserved by market forces. Which means someone like Outback Steakhouse will take a genuine interest in their survival and will spend the money to stop these dead zones and prevent hypoxia/anoxia from happening.

    If you really want to save the fish off of Oregon's coast, then put them on the menu.

    [end right wing parody]

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Hi, my name is Lizzy Faire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now there is a (Score:5 Troll) in the making folks.

    2. Re:Hi, my name is Lizzy Faire by Erectile+Dysfunction · · Score: 0

      Ayn, I want to have your babies.

    3. Re:Hi, my name is Lizzy Faire by E++99 · · Score: 3, Funny

      President Bush Lied! Thousands of Fish Died!

      But we will never know for absolutely certain the cause of the hypoxia until Al Gore or Michael Moore make a movie about it. That being said, anyone not completely stupid, that is, anyone who watches CNN instead of FoxNews, knows that the CONSTITUTION SAYS that the Republicans killed all those poor fish. And they didn't even use all their parts, like the Indians would have done. They only killed them for their fur, the fascists.

      [end left wing parody]

  4. Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by cperciva · · Score: 4, Funny

    Quoth the summary:
    They found that levels [of dissolved oxygen] were 10 to 30 times lower than normal, down to 0.5 milliliters per liter, a characteristic of hypoxia.

    In other news, having low levels of dissolved glucose in the bloodstream is a characteristic of hypoglycaemia; having lots of money is a characteristic of being rich; and a complete cessation of brain function is a characteristic of death.

    1. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by MosesJones · · Score: 3, Funny

      and a complete cessation of brain function is a characteristic of death

      I thought it was a characteristic of a MySpace user? Or becoming US Defence Secretary.

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    2. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by RsG · · Score: 4, Funny
      complete cessation of brain function is a characteristic of death.
      No, it's a sign you're destined for a career in politics :-)
      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    3. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by SethJohnson · · Score: 5, Insightful



      Welcome to a successful Roland Piquepaille slashdot bait. He's a master of re-explaining the basic. In this case, he's speaking down to the reader from his intellectual pulpit.

      Seth

    4. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by legoburner · · Score: 4, Insightful
      a complete cessation of brain function is a characteristic of death.


      Try reading this site at -1 and you'll soon change this theory!
    5. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, /. just has a higher than average population of zombie users.

    6. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by bitt3n · · Score: 3, Funny
      Try reading this site at -1 and you'll soon change this theory!

      oh they're dead all right... what better place for a zombie than where everyone has big brains and can't run more than ten feet without getting winded?

    7. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Funny
      and a complete cessation of brain function is a characteristic of death

      I thought it was a characteristic of a MySpace user? Or becoming US Defence Secretary.

      Why the rip on myspace users? They may not have our informed, moderated sci/tech discussion, but they do have girls there.
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    8. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by popsicle67 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Or President for that matter

    9. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by NSIM · · Score: 1

      > and a complete cessation of brain function is a characteristic of death.
      Are you calling GWB a Zombie?

    10. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      per sig-
      I had a dream last night that I had an incomplete saber.
      I knew, in the dream, that [i]real[/i] jedi's would have to make it themselves.

      Now I have dreams abouts sigs!

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
    11. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by waferhead · · Score: 1

      " by Lord Ender (156273) Alter Relationship on Sunday August 27, @11:46AM (#15989677)

                      and a complete cessation of brain function is a characteristic of death

              I thought it was a characteristic of a MySpace user? Or becoming US Defence Secretary.

      Why the rip on myspace users? They may not have our informed, moderated sci/tech discussion, but they do have girls there."

      All the underage girls on MySpace are really FBI agents.
      Didn't you get the memo? ;-)

    12. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by piper-noiter · · Score: 1

      I'm a girl but I wouldn't touch myspace with a ten foot pole.

      --
      Shick's Law: There is no problem a good miracle can't solve.
    13. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the problem... they're girls ... You know... In contrast to women.

    14. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      but they do have girls there...

      What are these girls of which you speak?

      --
      That is all.
    15. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Myspace is actually quite popular among the 20-something and 30-something singles crowd. You just hear about the teenagers using it more because kids + sex = news ratings.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    16. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Well, you probably aren't in the dating scene, then. On myspace, you can do a search that is basically "show me girls in my area that are my age and are interested in dating." Try doing that on slashdot.

      Of course, finding romance on slashdot would be a hell of a story. You don't happen to be in your twenties in central ohio... ?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    17. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by piper-noiter · · Score: 1

      Nope just in my 20's in central Indiana. :P I went to school in central Ohio though. It would be freaky if I already knew you.

      --
      Shick's Law: There is no problem a good miracle can't solve.
    18. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by ToxicBanjo · · Score: 1

      ...or at Microsoft.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't.
    19. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Did you go to OSU? CIS or CSE? It is possible...

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    20. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by MisterBates · · Score: 1
      He's a master of re-explaining the basic.

      Maybe he used to be. It looks like people are taking less interest in zdnet.
    21. Re:Hypoxia is a characteristic of hypoxia? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      This is only somewhat on-subject but in humans there are (at least) three different kinds of hypoxia, only one of which is actual hypoxic hypoxia. No, seriously, that's what it's called. That's where there's not enough air to breathe. But there's also hypemic or anemic hypoxia, where there's enough air but your blood can't carry it, for lack of red blood cells or malfunctioning red blood cells, and histotoxic anemia, where your blood could carry it but the cells on the other end have something wrong with them so they're individually asphyxiating. You see these latter sorts of situations with smokers, drinkers, or people with strange diseases. Sickle-cell anemia, frinstance, is a situation where the cells change shape (to a sickle) under low oxygen pressure: a type of hypoxia.
      So while their sentence seems redundant, there are situations where just saying 'hypoxia' doesn't actually tell you what you might want to know, and doesn't necessarily mean 'not enough oxygen in the surroundings.'

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  5. Hmmn, I wonder were my ex-wife is at now? by nihilistcanada · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    She certainly could suck the air out of any room, the Oregon Coast would just be a warm-up for her.

  6. The REAL Reason by UberG�ber · · Score: 0, Funny

    I blame Christopher Walken and Anthony Michael Hall.

    --
    The Geek shall inherit the Earth
  7. volcanism by wikinerd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could this be a result of imminent or undergoing volcanism? Perhaps a volcano is about to form or explode in the near future in the Oregon-Washington region and unleashes poisonous gasses in the sea water before unleashing its lava.

    1. Re:volcanism by E++99 · · Score: 1

      While such activity definitely causes dead-zones on sea and land, that's from CO2 gas emmision, whereas this is from lack of oxygen. If anything extra CO2 would boost oxygen by increasing plant life -- unless the water was saturated with in, in which case they would have presumably mentioned that in the article.

      It's pretty spooky when that happens on land though -- CO2 will gather in a depression, then some animal will wander through it and die, and then one preditor after another will be attracted into the depression by the growing pile of free food.

  8. Gigantic crab by booch · · Score: 4, Funny

    a gigantic crab and fish graveyard

    I'd like to know more about these gigantic crab. Are they bigger than king crab? I love to eat crab legs.

    What? You mean that it's the graveyard that's gigantic? Damn you, ambiguous English language!

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    1. Re:Gigantic crab by Mekabyte · · Score: 4, Funny

      Try to hit its weak point for MASSIVE DAMAGE!

    2. Re:Gigantic crab by clowds · · Score: 1
      This comment make me laugh so hard.

      Oh my kingdom for a mod point.

    3. Re:Gigantic crab by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I get it. I've seen the video. I don't remember the guy yelling. He seems pretty bored, as I recall. Is there some version I've missed with that huge increase in enthusiasm for those last two words?

    4. Re:Gigantic crab by kinema · · Score: 1

      If you love crab I recommend staying away from king crab; it's totally overrated. Dungeness crab beats king crab any day of the week.

    5. Re:Gigantic crab by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 5, Funny

      I remember an advert for an insecticide that 'kills cockroaches for up to 90 days'. I wouldn't look forward to that army of zombie cockroaches coming after me when they come back to life in three months ...

      --
      Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
    6. Re:Gigantic crab by ofcourseyouare · · Score: 1

      should be a 5 - funny
      okay, so it doesn't really relate to the article, but it's the funniest post I've read on slashdot in a while -- nice sig too...

    7. Re:Gigantic crab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a gigantic crab and fish graveyard

      I bet someone attacked it's weak point for MASSIVE damage!

    8. Re:Gigantic crab by booch · · Score: 1

      Funny, +1

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    9. Re:Gigantic crab by ryanjensen · · Score: 1

      To go even further off topic: I remember my mom brought home some pet stain cleaner and was laughing hysterically. I asked what the problem was, and she pointed out the directions.

      "Apply liberally, sniff and retreat."

      Now why, I asked, would they need to tell you to get the hell away from the pet stain after sniffing it? Like you're going to hang out there, breathing in the sweet vapors?

      Unfortunately, my dad didn't find it as funny, since he read it as "treat again", which of course was what they meant.

    10. Re:Gigantic crab by uarch · · Score: 1
      a gigantic crab and fish graveyard
      I'd like to know more about these gigantic crab. Are they bigger than king crab? I love to eat crab legs.

      What? You mean that it's the graveyard that's gigantic? Damn you, ambiguous English language!
      Don't blame the English language for the author's mistakes. Try this: 'a gigantic graveyard of crab and fish.'
  9. volcanic ridge/rift, most likely by nido · · Score: 3, Informative

    I guess it's called the Juan de Fuca Ridge.

    This dead zone is "most likely caused by underwater volcanism along the Juan De Fuca Ridge, which is about 20% volcanic along its 500 mile length. Occassional volcanic eruptions occur along the Ridge (Rift) which can create gigantic megaplumes of hot mineral water. Could be there is very little oxygen in the plumes, it most likely would have reacted with the minerals, leaving dissolved oxygen at nil."

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  10. How did these gigantic crabs die? by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Presumably someone attacked their weakpoint (needing oxygen) with massive damage (a lack of it). I love how games help us learn!

  11. Wording by XanC · · Score: 3

    "10 to 30 times lower." What exactly does this mean? One can only guess it means 1/10th to 1/30th of the norm, but I would think a professional writer would use more precise wording...

    1. Re:Wording by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you said that, because every time I hear someone saying something like "10 to 30 times lower", it makes no sense to me whatsoever, and I start to wonder if I missed an important day in math class. I associate multiplying something by a whole number with an *increase* in the value, not a decrease.

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    2. Re:Wording by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Clearly he meant 10^30...

  12. my bedroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my bedroom gets this problem after a large mexican food binge

  13. CSM or ZDNET - Which is it? by mdm42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the article references the Christian Science Monitor, why the hell is the link to some linkjack blog at ZDNET?

    Surely the original article (at CSM) should be the one linked, and not to some warmed-over plagiarised rehash at ZDNet? Do the /. editorship actually bother to check any of this?

    --
    New mod option wanted: -1 DrunkenRambling
  14. Even bigger issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Where the hell are we supposed to get our Soylent Green from if the oceans die?

    1. Re:Even bigger issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch the movie, dumb-ass.

  15. People by Z34107 · · Score: 1

    'nuff said.

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW
    1. Re:People by Ant+P. · · Score: 4, Funny

      You may find this diagram helpful:

      Joke ---> .

                O
      You -->  -|-
               / \

    2. Re:People by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Ah, the cliche stick figure once again used in completely the wrong context. Next time, consider posting the contents of the following diagram instead:

      <diagram></diagram>

    3. Re:People by Drakai · · Score: 1

      you forgot the 'whooshing' sound :)

  16. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by DrSkwid · · Score: 5, Informative

    Lets not forget that China & India are also not signees.

    Thus the three most populous continents on earth are simply not concerned.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  17. No mystery - Polution by PietjeJantje · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the article:

    "This overloads the waters with nutrients and spawns large algae blooms. The algae sink, die, and decompose, in a process that sucks oxygen out of the water and the topmost layer of sediment on the bottom, where many worms and shellfish live."

    Fosfate/nitrate (among others) --> Nutritions for algae --> No oxygen

    The "mystery" is where the polution is coming from.

    1. Re:No mystery - Polution by canuck57 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The "mystery" is where the polution is coming from.

      It is also possible the whales, or lack of them play a part. Would say 500 missing whales eat a lot of plankton and algae? This would mean there would not be as much to fall and rot.

      Maybe oil from Alaska leaking from old rusty tankers.

      Maybe someone saved some disposal costs and dropped in 50 barrels of toxic waste.

      I have seen this on interior freshwater lakes where in 1968 the water was clear, fresh and loaded with large and small fish. In 1998 I was back to the same lake in the same place, the loads of algae made it like a slime bog and the fish were scrawny, few and small. The mine shut down in 1996 and some heavy fine laws on human waste going into the lake was enforced and the lake appears to be slowly coming back.

      Probably a combination of factors, but mankind is behind most.

    2. Re:No mystery - Polution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an excellent series on LAtimes about this and other problems with the oceans, such as neurotoxic algae, permanent floating garbage zones, etc.. read it and weep

      http://www.latimes.com/news/local/oceans/la-oceans -series,0,7842752.special

    3. Re:No mystery - Polution by E++99 · · Score: 1
      This overloads the waters with nutrients and spawns large algae blooms. The "mystery" is where the polution is coming from.
      It's really annoying how "nutrients" and "polution" can now apparently be used synonymously, and it doesn't seem to bother anyone. If a nutrient favors a worse-tasting species over a better-tasting species, then it's pollution? The same goes for calling CO2 pollution. You might as well call oxygen pollution. Let's just go ahead and say that every single molecule on the earth is a molecule of pollution. That will really simplify the job of passing laws to limit it and funding research to figure out how to elliminate it.
    4. Re:No mystery - Polution by Capitalisten · · Score: 1

      Anything will change into pollution when it starts to kill a natural habitat, be it nutrients, CO2 or even oxygen. It's not WHAT, it's the AMOUNT.

    5. Re:No mystery - Polution by oh · · Score: 1
      The same goes for calling CO2 pollution. You might as well call oxygen pollution.


      This is a valid point, the word "pollution" is relative, in a similar way to the way the word "terrorist" depends on your point of view (if you a buying or selling cell phones for example).

      Carbon Dioxide is a naturally occurring substance in the atmosphere, but the proportion of the atmosphere that it occupies has increased dramatically. The graph on this page shows the measured changes, but to be fair the graph on the top does not start from zero.

      To make an analogy, there is a difference between some one talking on a telephone quietly on the other side of an empty room, and being in an elevator with a dozen other people all shooting into their cell phones.
      --
      Democracy isn't about no one telling you what to do. It's about everyone telling you what to do.
  18. Re:Giant enemy crab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Ridge Racer. RIIIIDGE RAACER!

    BTW, what is it with Sony and crabs?

  19. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by mark99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's always easy to blame the US for anything bad. It obviates the necessity of thinking things through.

    Not that the USA is blame free, far from it. But I am amazed at what they get blamed for these days.

  20. Oh Come On by viewtouch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Informative, 5 ?

    I live real close to this area, am on vacation in Lincoln City at the moment, and I'd like to say that when they say they have no explanations about this phenomenon you should not take that to mean that the annual upwelling of cold water from the bottom just off the continental shelf here is either news to anybody here or is a satisfactory explanation for what is going on here.

    By the way, the part about the wind generating these currents, or currents anywhere, is wrong. Currents are generated by a combination of the earth's rotation, the uneven solar heating of the earth's surface and the underwater topologies of the world's oceans. Wind is better thought of as the atmospheric currents and the ocean current patterns clearly do NOT overlap the atmospheric currents.

    OK, now, with that out of the way, the point is, nobody yet knows why everything is dead out there. Not you, Not Google, Not me, Not anybody - yet.

    1. Re:Oh Come On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uneven solar heating of the earth's surface

      It should be noted that this is what causes the majority of the world's wind. Without exception, every weather process is a result of heat exchange.

    2. Re:Oh Come On by E++99 · · Score: 1
      OK, now, with that out of the way, the point is, nobody yet knows why everything is dead out there. Not you, Not Google, Not me, Not anybody - yet.
      Nuh-uh, man, it's global warming. Anyone who says it's not is a right-wing fascist who can just shut up! I bet Al Gore could tell us -- we need to get him to look at it. Come on, we can draft Al to lead the world to victory against the capitalists and SUV drivers. Then we'll execute them all, and in time life will return to the oceans!

      Ok, now give me my 5 Insightful.
    3. Re:Oh Come On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      By the way, the part about the wind generating these currents, or currents anywhere, is wrong. Currents are generated by a combination of the earth's rotation, the uneven solar heating of the earth's surface and the underwater topologies of the world's oceans.
      Not according to this article in The American Scientist, which says most currents are caused by the wind. An interesting read--it's basically about the popular "fact" that the Gulf Stream is responsible for Europe's mild climate. Turns out, it's actually the Rocky Mountains....
  21. Re:in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Is anyone else under the mistaken impression that it's "Christian" (adjective) applied to "Science Monitor"? 'Cause it's not... Christian Scientists are regarded in kind of the same light as Mormons, Adventists, and Jehovah's Witnesses by many of the other denominations.

    That said, the Monitor is usually not biased toward any fundementalist, creationist-only, everyone-else-bad viewpoint. I deride you for your blatant and closed-minded attack, sir.

  22. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just as a heads up for the nondemocratic nations out there. In a Democracy the minority are at the mercy of the majority. If 51% of the people prefer head in the sand ignorance the 49% get the blame as well. I think Kyoto was pathetic in that it is far too little too late. Our fearless leader feels it's far too radical. Since he won two narrow elections in a row we are at his and his followers mercy. If you want to blame anyone blame Democracy and ignorance based fear not the minority that want our oil based economy to switch to a sustainable one. It's an over simplification to blame all americans for what our government does. It's the dark under belly of Democracy.

  23. My scientific explaination... by H3g3m0n · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cthulhu

    --
    cat /dev/urandom > .sig
  24. A great interactive piece explains this by lunpa · · Score: 1
    A great interactive piece (complete with pictures, video and animation) on the L.A. Times website did a great job explaining this along other serious problems facing our oceans. A Great read!

    http://www.latimes.com/news/local/oceans/la-oceans -series,0,7842752.special

  25. Re:Giant enemy crab by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    They're going to put them in their mouths, of course.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  26. Gulf of mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iirc there's also a large dead area (largest uniform area in the world) in the bottom of gulf on Mexico. It's from the toxic waste and pollution by concetration of petroleum industry on Texan coast.

    Southern states, prepare for another hurricane. Your love for 10mpg SUV's comes with a price. You weep what you .. well, you know the drill. Storm alert, get some ammunition for shotgun so you can shoot food-looting african americans with national guard.

    1. Re:Gulf of mexico by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Southern states, prepare for another hurricane. Some people much smarter than me seem to think the rampant deforestion and attempts of the Brazilians to turn the Amazon Basin into a mini-Sarahra have a lot to do with the hurricanes of last year; of course that doesn't explain the lack of them this year. I guess we'll have to wait a century or two and see how the statistics work out.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  27. Re:in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is actually a good newspaper despite the name which refers to the "Christian Science" religious organisation which rejects modern medicine.

  28. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our fearless leader feels it's far too radical. Since he won two narrow elections in a row we are at his and his followers mercy.

    You must be talking about Clinton since the 95-0 vote against the treaty occurred in 1997, while Bush was Govenor of Texas.

  29. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    That's because it's probably their fault, somehow, somewhere! And if it isn't, we'll just pretend - because there's surely something else that they're not getting credit for, or something like humanitarian aide which is getting painted in a positive light!

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  30. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Erm. China and India aren't continents, nor is the United States of America. Also the US is not one of the most populous, I believe that the EU as a whole has almost double the population of the US.

  31. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but EU has signed. USA has not. Therefore USA likes to destroy our planet - money matters more to them.

  32. Re:CSM or ZDNET - Which is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is nothing new. Roland Piquepaille has been submitting stories which invariably link to his own blog (which carries a pale imitaiton of the original article) for ages. There have been accusations that he is paying the slashdot editors for the service of publishing his stories. See http://www.google.com/search?q=roland.piquepaille+ site:Slashdot.org.

  33. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously don't understand. We are NOT ignorant. We know. We just don't care...

  34. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmmmm, an area of ocean that's completely incapable of supporting life just randomly happens to be off the US coast.

    Yeah, definitely can't be the US's fault. Must be those damn Indians or Chinese! After all, they're nowhere near it!

    More and more it becomes apparent that the US needs to learn some very basic thinking skills.

  35. Our biosphere is dying ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because of greed and stupidity.

    Thanks alot, eh.

  36. methane hydrates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They just recently found out that high concentrates of methane hydrates are found in much shallower waters near there. That and the recent increase in undersea vulcanism might have something to do with it (my theory to be cussed or discussed). The shaking might be disturbing the hydrates, releasing even just slightly more gas, it takes cold plus pressure to keep it locked up as a hydrate. I'll ask the chemist geeks here, how dissolvable that methane is if it gets released like that, and what might happen to the oxygen levels in the nearby seawater.

  37. Kyoto is a joke... by patio11 · · Score: 1

    ... but "The US and China are the two of the three most populous continents" is even funnier.

    Seriously though. Kyoto was a dead letter and everybody knew it -- look at how Europe universally welched on their quotas after signing it ("Um, oops, turns out we would have devastated our economy to make that... well, can't be having that. Oh, bad Dubya bad, you're a convinient scapegoat!") About the only people really enthusiastic about adhering to it, as opposed to playing kissy-face with their domestic Greens or greens, were the Russians, because they got to compare against their old Soviet Union pollution levels and the systemic economic collapse they've suffered in the interim has made it physically impossible for them to reach those pollution levels again. Oh, and the Chinese/Indians, who saw it as a method to restrain competitors while not having to commit to a single thing themselves.

    1. Re:Kyoto is a joke... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "turns out we would have devastated our economy"

      I have always wondered why people are so quick to accept the dire predictions of an economic model as gospel but are so slow to accept any prediction from a climate model, they are both mathematical models and the economic one is far less rigorous. Besides from what I hear on the other side of the Pacific, GWB has already devastated your economy with several trillion dollars of extra debt.

      Kyoto failed because the US refused to get involved (yes I blame GWB and his oil mates), now do you have a better proposal than carbon trades/taxes or are you just bitching for the sake of it?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  38. Learn from the Lemmings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Someone needs to convince a few of those little Hydrogens to occasionally jump ship from their cozy H20 homes so the whole neighborhood remains stable.

  39. Upswell or River? by knightghost · · Score: 1

    Could this be an upswell, polution from the Columbia river, or both? When I look at the Snake river (feeds into the Columbia) all I see is a bunch of green slime where there should be water. All the runoff from unregulated dairies have turned the river into a polution zone.

    1. Re:Upswell or River? by feyhunde · · Score: 1
      It's not the Columbia. It's near Newport, which means it's off a mostly deserted section of Oregon coast with only small rivers. And by small, I mean Guinness book of records for smallest river.

      It's not normal pollution either because the large populated sections of Oregon are all in the Columbia river basin, which is 150 miles+ north of the region. Newport is small coast town that is known because it used to hold Free Willy. The run off of the Snake and Columbia valleys, that is all the agriculture of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho, along with quite a bit of industry is all Columbia based. This is no where near there.

      However, Newport is near some massive subsurface methane hydrate supplies. Those could be displacing the Oxygen as increased ocean temperatures allow them to release methane.

      --
      I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    2. Re:Upswell or River? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was due to pollution from the columbia, it somehow missed the northern oregon coast. I've gone fishing and crabbing for dungeness the last two weekends and no problems catching my limits.

    3. Re:Upswell or River? by knightghost · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Upswell or River? by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      Please see my other post about the rivers of this area. Basically, they are not as small in volume as you might think, since the basins they drain are temperate rainforests that receive 80+ inches of rain a year. Also this region is intensively logged using clearcut methods, and changes in the run-off after removal of the forest are probably happening. It is possible that the dead zone is caused by sylvicultural practices.

      Many locals in the area believe that logging practices destroyed the salmon fishery over the last 30 years.

  40. ooh i knoe1 by minus_273 · · Score: 0, Troll

    geroge bush! he's the cause just like hurricanes!

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:ooh i knoe1 by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I was wondering when the comment to McChimpy Bushaliburton was going to appear. Way further down the list of comments than I expected. Too busy DDOSing the DLC website, are we??

    2. Re:ooh i knoe1 by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      huh? the internet sucks at sarcasm. neither the mod got my post nor do i get yours..

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    3. Re:ooh i knoe1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch out. This is Slashdot. The kneejerk college kids have been programmed for liberalism. They won't notice the sarcasm, and will believe that it is true. Probably be reported by CBS, NBC and PBS by morning, with you referenced as "reliable scientists".

    4. Re:ooh i knoe1 by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      You got modded troll because you tried to present this as sarcasm.

      Next time phrase this as an accusation where Conservative principles and presidential policies have directly led to the death of countless sea creatures, even causing the extinction of a few species.

      Your +5 on that post will recover your lost karma due to overreactive and humorless mods.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    5. Re:ooh i knoe1 by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      And the thicker we layer the sarcasm, the more obfuscated it becomes.

  41. My Aquarium by Coppit · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's nice to see that even mother nature's aquarium sometimes ends up looking like every aquarium I've ever owned.

  42. That explain's Newport's dead crabs by tmh+-+The+Mad+Hacker · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, that might explain the unusually large number of dead crabs I saw littering the beach around Newport when I was there earlier this summer. I figured it was the normal wash-up-and-get-roasted population, but my wife said they were way too many, and most of them looked like they were already at least "mostly dead" before they washed up.

    1. Re:That explain's Newport's dead crabs by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, that might explain the unusually large number of dead crabs I saw littering the beach around Newport when I was there earlier this summer.

            Paris Hilton must've been in the area.

              (Yay for cheap shots!)

  43. Other Mysterious Die Offs at CompUSA. by twitter · · Score: 1

    The area off Cape Perpetua on the central Oregon coast is now a gigantic crab and fish graveyard. It was first discovered in 2002,

    I have noticed something similar next to the local mall, a gigantic device graveyard called CompUSA. It's downright spooky. The floor is covered with devices, some of which are outright broken, but all of which are dying in a money starved environment. Some people have pointed to DRM, others to vague notions of Monopoly, but the "experts" in the press seem to be stumped. All but a few give these products a clean bill of health and "must have" status, but the devices die anyway. What can be causing this disaster? The only real thing in common is a proximity to Washington state. Is Washington cursed?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Other Mysterious Die Offs at CompUSA. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      What in fuck are you talking about?

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    2. Re:Other Mysterious Die Offs at CompUSA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something that's over your head. Move on - nothing for you to worry your little pretty head with.

    3. Re:Other Mysterious Die Offs at CompUSA. by iced_773 · · Score: 1

      So, twitter, you've decided to post anonymously. Or are you WilliamSChips?

  44. I wonder by popsicle67 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is like the die-off that everybody was horrified about in the early 90's. Turned out it was El Nino altering currents and everything went back to normal a year later

  45. The fish are pining away for the fjords! by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

    ... and that's it, you know. Thanks for mentioning the fjords. You helped lead me right to this conclusion. For your assistance, I shall provide you with a daily ration of pickled herring and call you nice names like Slappy.

    --
    blah blah blah
  46. Stephen Colbert's take on this? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    So does this now give Oregon the title of Idaho's West Bank?

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  47. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by ZOmegaZ · · Score: 1

    And Africa is a big country in the middle of the world...

  48. Re:CSM or ZDNET - Which is it? by dublain · · Score: 2, Informative

    Both. The first link is to CSM. The next link is to ZD providing additional information, as the link says. Mebbe lay off the coffee/stimulants and try to be a bit less indignant and accusatory. Bitching isn't commenting. And someone modded it 5 - insightful?

  49. Popular Culprit? by C0y0t3 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ... Here, as in a handful of other coastal regions worldwide, the culprit may be global warming.
    To be sure, the jury is still out on that connection, says Jane Lubchenco, a marine zoologist at Oregon State University who is heading up this day-long expedition....


    This type of premature conclusion is, I believe, very damaging to those who want to have global warming taken seriously by the mainstream public (ie. Me). Leaping to the popular conclusion with no reason other than it being popular to blame frankly makes me doubt the professionalism of the researchers involved.

    Maybe it's the over-logging in Oregon depleting the oxygen levels ("hypoxia" was the Word of the Day May 24th, 2004), or the number of $evil_utility_or_commercial_industry dumping toxic waste into the ocean, or perhaps if the media sweetheart "global warming" doesn't pan out, they can pin it on Saddam Hussein^d^d^d^d^d^d^d^d^d^d Bin Laden^d^d^d^d^d^d^d^d^d Iran's President whatsis name.

    Whoever they are, we need to identify the culprit(s) and bring these godless killers to justice. Oh, wait, unless of course its us... in which case, market forces are sure to cause a "correction" in the system and all will be well on Wall Street once more.

    Tim
  50. They are worth protecting. by baomike · · Score: 1

    Some of the "fish" found dead were Dungeness crab. Considered by some the best variety (tastewise) (they are quite good).
    These go for $3-$4/lb in the local stores.

    As for putting things on the menu, the best item caught around here is Chinook , but very few around right now.
    Alaska salmon is plentiful but local ocean caught chinook is usually over $10/lb.

  51. It's just Roland the Plogger screwing up again by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's just a link to a Roland the Plogger blog, who doesn't understand the problem. Read the New York Times story, which has important facts the Plogger missed, like the fact that this has been happening for the past five years. The local paper, the Register-Guard, has a good story. "On the way down, the camera lens illuminates a nighttime blizzard, a flurry of broken chunks of plankton called "marine snow." This is evidence of what caused this year's hypoxia - an onslaught of nutrients brought to shallow coastal waters by wind-driven currents, whose decomposing structures suck up available oxygen."

    This is no mysterious dramatic event. It happens every year, but this year, it's worse than usual, possibly because ocean currents have shifted due to weather.

  52. That can't be right.... by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    He would have eaten them.

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  53. if 2008 is really hot, Al Gore should run ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See previous article about spring moving in Europe

  54. Thank you, Captain Obvious by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1
    They found that levels were 10 to 30 times lower than normal, down to 0.5 milliliters per liter, a characteristic of hypoxia.
    I'm not convinced. Did they find any other signs of hypoxia besides a low dissolved oxygen level?
    --
    If you can read this sig, you're too close.
  55. Better late than never, but... by paul248 · · Score: 1

    They all died of dysentery.

  56. dead zones by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hmm, we've been dealing with this in the Gulf for a while. It's recurrant - it goes away, then comes back the next year, and is caused by too much algae, which is basically fed by nitrogen rich runoff from ground water.

    The same thing happens between Cape Cod and Cape Hatteras and it's believed runoff from the factory farming of pigs may be responsible. Something I've been wondering about is runoff is responsible for the dead zone in the Gulf and it's harming fishermen out of New Orleans and other towns why don't they get together and sue the farmers upstream.

    Falcon
    1. Re:dead zones by enharmonix · · Score: 1
      why don't they get together and sue the farmers upstream.

      I think there are three problems with that: first, jurisdiction. It's hard to say what state, much less which country, the actionable offense occurred in. And if the Dead Zone is in international waters, that's not anybody's jurisdiction...

      Second, even if you solve the jurisdiction problem, you still have the problem of naming the defendents. The only farms without lawyers savvy enough to have it immediately tossed out of court are probably the independent family farms, and they're probably not even responsible. This is why agencies like the EPA exist, because it is much easier to say, "They harm the environment, that hurts everybody, so we bring The People vs. So-and-so".

      The biggest problem is that this isn't pollution, otherwise the EPA would have stepped in a long time ago. Nitrogen, nitrates and phosphates are fertilizer, which is why pig manure can cause a dead zone. I don't think anybody's going to hold a farm responsible for polluting the environment because they used manure for fertilizer, and the only difference between chemical fertilizers and manure is that the cheaper version is made of feces.

  57. This is nothing new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    From the Register Guard...

    There's nothing new about oceanic dead zone
    By Terry Thompson

    A so-called "dead zone" off the Oregon Coast is in the news again. According to reports, this is the fifth time in five years such a zone has developed. This year's zone is larger than those of the previous two years, and for the first time, a similar zone has been detected in the waters off of Washington state.

    "Dead zone" is a catchy phrase. It brings to mind images of man-caused pollution and ecological disaster. But we should be calling this a "live zone," because it's the beginning of ocean life.

    I'm basing my observations on both my undergraduate marine biology studies at Oregon State University and more than 4,000 days of firsthand experience at sea, much of it in and around the area in question. I've had several questions from people about the dead zone, about red tides, about what these two developments mean, and about whether they're related. It has convinced me that more people might be wondering about this.

    During a normal year, strong northwest winds cause cold water, rich in nutrients but low in oxygen, to upwell from the deep ocean. That water from below mixes with oxygen-rich water near the surface, causing some phytoplankton growth and providing the basis for a thriving fishery and a healthy marine food chain.

    When the wind dies back and currents are disrupted, this process is also disrupted. That causes too much phytoplankton growth and development of a "dead zone."

    The "dead zone" is really a case of too much of a good thing, sort of like overindulging in food - your body just can't effectively process it all. The same thing happens in the ocean.

    Large masses of plant growth die and decay, and in the process consume even more of the available oxygen near the sea floor. In the short term, there's too little oxygen and too much phytoplankton. The results can be dramatic and appear to be a cause for concern. Dead bottom fish litter the beaches. Crabbers have told me about pulling up hundreds of dead crabs in their gear.

    Meanwhile, unusual numbers of large Dungeness crabs are turning up in the bays. They may be trying to escape the "dead zone."

    But this is only part of the story.

    The scientists claim this phenomenon is just a few years old. But I believe it's been occurring as long as there's been a temperate ocean. The researchers are backing up their conclusions with fishermen's logbooks dating back to the 1950s. But there's a key flaw in this.

    Until recent years, crabbers weren't working the offshore waters in the summer. Until fairly recently, the salmon fleet dominated this area in the summer months, and they wouldn't have discovered any signs of these conditions. They would have simply found no fish and moved on.

    I have my own memories of the 1950s. I recall seeing whiting floating in Yaquina Bay, gasping for air. This wasn't a rare occurrence. People who lived here will remember the dead fish that littered the beaches.

    Another important thing to remember is that while there is loss of marine life in a relatively small area, the upwelling phenomenon is occurring along the entire coastal shelf. I believe it will prove to be healthy in the long run. Without it, we'd lose the building blocks of our nutrient-rich Northwest oceans. This is precisely what happens in El Niño years.

    Most of the ocean floor in the primary "dead zone" area immediately south of Newport is a mud plain, with a rocky ridge to the north and west, a formation similar to the edge of a bowl. When these nutrients fall to the bottom, it makes the mud even richer.

    In winter, following the development of the "dead zone" area, sandabs and English sole go there to reproduce. The mud is filled with little worms on which the baby fish can feed. I've observed large numbers of juvenile sole in this area in the past, and I fully expect to find abundant marine life in the "dead zone" again next winter.

    Red tide is also l

    1. Re:This is nothing new. by OSUBeav · · Score: 1

      While this op/ed piece is interesting and possible it is one guys opinion. Let the scientists work through the questions. I live in the area, sport fish / crab out of Newport. Too many people are jumping the gun for political advantage/defense I guess.

      We don't know that it isn't new yet.

      This is another case of science getting headlines way too early.

      Go Beavs!

    2. Re:This is nothing new. by treeves · · Score: 1

      So maybe they're seeing something they've never seen before simply because they're looking where they've never looked before.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  58. what gets me about people's reactions to nature by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I recently moved a few thousand kilometers westward and a Chinook Arch [wikipedia.org] looks quite ominous and threatening to those that haven't seen it before. It's just nature, though. I always find it amusing when eco-types freak out and fret over what are natural earth processes.

    What gets me is when I read how there's a report on how an alligator or shark attacked someone or their dog in Florida. When a gator or shark attacks all of a sudden there's a swarm of panic about how there's man eating alligators or sharks. If you get into the salt water in Fl there's a very good chance there will be a shark in the water as well but most of the tyme they aren't seen. However wear a nice bright watch on your arm and that watch is an attractive beacon, especially for cudas, real live barracudas not the 'cuda car. And if you live near wetlands you may bump into a gator, which are good to eat.

    Falcon
  59. Mod parent +1 Insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How short the political memories of some folks are. Kyoto dies on Clinton's watch and Bush is left holding the bag. Just like how Clinton's solution to dealing with Osama and the bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania was to lob a couple of Tomahawk missiles at a terrorist camp in Afghanistan. All Clinton did was punt the problem of international terrorism 3 years into the future, and now Bush is left holding the bag again. That's the nature of politics, though: take credit for other peoples' work, and if you fuck up badly enough just hope the next guy comes along in time to take all the blame.

  60. Green chips by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Where the hell are we supposed to get our Soylent Green from if the oceans die?

    Just wait until you see what those green chips are made from. Hope you like being a cannibal.

    Falcon
  61. El Nino by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is like the die-off that everybody was horrified about in the early 90's. Turned out it was El Nino altering currents and everything went back to normal a year later

    If you read the article you should of seen where they ruled out El Nino:

    It's pretty clear El Niño is not implicated, says Thomas Powell, a UC-Berkeley oceanographer. But, he continues, there may be other large-scale changes in average atmospheric conditions that typically occur every 30 years.

    Falcon
  62. conclusions conclusions by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    This type of premature conclusion is, I believe, very damaging to those who want to have global warming taken seriously by the mainstream public (ie. Me). Leaping to the popular conclusion with no reason other than it being popular to blame frankly makes me doubt the professionalism of the researchers involved.

    Did you see where Jane Lubchenco says "the culprit may be global warming. To be sure, the jury is still out on that connection". That is not a conclusion, it's a hypothsis. She just reported one possibility.

    Falcon
    1. Re:conclusions conclusions by C0y0t3 · · Score: 1

      Global warming was the only stated hypothesis, when in fact any number of possible reasons exist - which was kind of my point.

      When you go into it with a theory of a cause, you tend to find evidence to support your theory. Everything else you find is just stuff that doesn't support it, so unexplained... Since apparently this is a known phenomenon, and not some sudden inexplicable wierdness as it is being portrayed in the article, I'd expect a little less media spin. I can accept that global warming is a growing problem with consequences, etc. but do we really need to blame everything on it? The current Heat Wave in the US and Europe, Katrina, Tsunamis, Earthquakes, Toxic Algae Blooms, now this.

      She leaped to her "Hypothesis" purely based on the facts, and the fact that every day there's a story about global warming having yet another effect has nothing to do with it - just the facts, huh? Right...

      Tim

    2. Re:conclusions conclusions by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      She leaped to her "Hypothesis" purely based on the facts

      I don't see any leap, what I see is a statement. Never mind it says nothing about her taking a leap, she doesn't even say whether she believes it or believes something else. And scientists are supposed to take the facts they know and come up with a hypothesis, then try to prove or disprove the hypothesis. That is science.

      Falcon
  63. +4 by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    Try reading it at +4. It's even worse.

  64. Leftover from killing Godzilla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  65. fertilizer by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    . I don't think anybody's going to hold a farm responsible for polluting the environment because they used manure for fertilizer, and the only difference between chemical fertilizers and manure is that the cheaper version is made of feces.

    Actually I think that can be part of the solution. From what I understand most of the feces from the pig farms are either dumped or buried, though some gets swept away into waterways with rain. Allowing the feces to compost though it can then be used for fertilizer then chemical fertilizers wouldn't need to be used so much. Also if they were allowed freerange, they could so in one location or field one year then moved to another the following year. The second year a covercrop could be sown, then the third grains or vegetables can be growth on it, without needing more fertilizers. Actually this is how some organic farms operate but the big agrobusiness farms would probably frown on it.

    Falcon
    1. Re:fertilizer by enharmonix · · Score: 1
      Allowing the feces to compost though it can then be used for fertilizer then chemical fertilizers wouldn't need to be used so much.

      In this case, I don't think there's a difference whether the nitrates come from, and IIRC, composting actually increases this by taking nitrogen from the air.

      Also if they were allowed freerange, they could so in one location or field one year then moved to another the following year. The second year a covercrop could be sown, then the third grains or vegetables can be growth on it, without needing more fertilizers. Actually this is how some organic farms operate but the big agrobusiness farms would probably frown on it.

      Agreed. Any time somebody studies this sort of thing, it always comes back to crop rotation as being ideal. I think I read somewhere that it works because that is how ecologies work, one mix of life takes over and sets the stage for another to take over, ad infinitum. A lot of people don't realize it, but ecosystems can actually migrate. I've heard of people timelapsing a particular stretch of land and seeing, for example, a prairie "march" across a desert, or a forest "march" across a savannah. Really weird.

    2. Re:fertilizer by mdarksbane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, organic methods of farming work great as long as you have the traditional methods to handle the actual food needs of the general population.

      Most of the methods used by agro-business are employed because they increase productivity. Because of this the US produces enough food to feed most of the world. Going back to methods a few hundred years old, on a large scale, would probably have some nasty consequences that most people don't think about.

      Now, what we need to do is find something better to do with all the pig crap that is accumulated. I know that for cows there has been some pretty nice research into using the methane rising from pits of manure as an eletricity source.

      The general problem is just that there is a ton of pigs, and no management system for dealing with their waste. Even when you reuse it for fertilizer, at the first rain a large portion of it will wash off into the local river system. Finding a nice way to manage and process that that doesn't completely bankrupt the farmers would be a good step for the environment, rather than saying they have to switch over their whole farming method to being half as productive and catering to the elite who can afford to care how their pigs were raised.

    3. Re:fertilizer by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      In this case, I don't think there's a difference whether the nitrates come from, and IIRC, composting actually increases this by taking nitrogen from the air.

      Removing nitrogen from then air is a good thing. But actually it's the covercrops that fix the nitrogen so plants can use it.

      Agreed. Any time somebody studies this sort of thing, it always comes back to crop rotation as being ideal. I think I read somewhere that it works because that is how ecologies work, one mix of life takes over and sets the stage for another to take over, ad infinitum. A lot of people don't realize it, but ecosystems can actually migrate. I've heard of people timelapsing a particular stretch of land and seeing, for example, a prairie "march" across a desert, or a forest "march" across a savannah. Really weird.

      True. Some good examples of ecosystems migrating can be seen in Mexico. Many of the Aztec and Mayan ruins are engulfed in "jungle", yet when they were built the land was cleared. A problem is when the ecosystem isn't allowed to regenerate, or when like in the US great swaths of forest is clear cut. When this happens the rain causes silt to build up in waterways which then dams it or slows the flow. And it is compounded by the fact that because there is no vegetation there are no roots to hold the soil in place. In some places on the west coast land slides are the result. Much of the risk of this can be reduced or mitigated by leaving some vegetation istead of clear cutting and by replanting.

      Falcon
  66. -1, Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was a really stupid comeback.

    Here. Let me help you make a good one. If you're going to challenge me in the future, at least be witty about it.

    "Bush Lied, Fish Died!

    TEH sky is falling! Oh noes!!one!13!! It's the great hypoxiaz0r! Oh wait, the hypoxiaz0r has pwned Cape Perpetua before? Oh, never mind that! Al Gore says TEH SKY IS FALLING!!! And what about those Republican oil industry shills who said they weren't sure it was caused by global warming! That's so 100% teh suck! Call Captain Planet, he'll set them straight!"

    See? I even used the facts from the article itself.

    If I were a neo con I could easy outdo you in critical thinking. But I'm a liberal, so I can't really do Two Year Old'ese for long.

  67. What exactly is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Christian Science Monitor? It sound like it should be a group that monitors scientists activities and silences them if they are about to make any blasphemous discoveries...

  68. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So global warming isn't a global issue anymore? Whew! Guess we'll have to call it "localized warming" or something now.

  69. H2 . . . O ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "total absence of oxygen"... then it wouldn't be water anymore? Helllloooo... H2O????

  70. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by khallow · · Score: 1
    Hmmmmm, an area of ocean that's completely incapable of supporting life just randomly happens to be off the US coast.

    Ask yourself, what's likely to be within half a day's journey of an Oregon port? We also don't know the contributing factors to this die-off. Run-off from the US mainland or underwater volcanism might be a contributing factor. I certainly am puzzled that they are blaming "global warming" in the absence of considering other factors.

  71. Re:in other news... by budgenator · · Score: 1

    I deride you for your blatant and closed-minded attack, sir. I have a lot of respect for the CSM, but that was serious, coffee spraying out the nose funny

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  72. It's a good thing too by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    Gigantic crabs give me the shivers.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:It's a good thing too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Gigantic Shivers give you Crabs.

  73. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by budgenator · · Score: 1

    If the USA is ignorant for not signing the Kyoto agreement, then what can be said about the boisterous EU countries that signed it and don't have a snowball's chance in hell of meeting their agreed to obligations?

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  74. Re:H2 . . . O ? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    That's why everyone is so concerned. The huge amount of pure hydrogen there in combination with the oxygen from the athmosphere could cause a gigantic explosion that'd easily wipe out Oregon. All it'd take is some idiot with a box of matches.

    DHS has already identified this as a perfect opportunity for terrorists and has ordered the Navy to scatter the hydrogen into the rest of the Pacific by deploying high-yield torpedoes.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  75. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    Not that the USA is blame free, far from it. But I am amazed at what they get blamed for these days.

    Well, during the last couple years they have really gone out of their way to destroy their reputation, both politically and socially. During the 90s many people in Germany used to look up to the States (and the image of the States as a better place was not unheard of), nowadays many people look down on them. The USA is becoming the catch-all for blame that the USSR was during the Cold War - and much of it comes from the fact that during the past few years a lot of bullshit has come from over there.

    People like easy targets. The USA have made themselves a very easy one.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  76. traditional methods of farming by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Organic or traditional methods of farming may not produce as much food as the new methods used in the US true. But as it is now these methods are driving small farmers off their land and into cities. That's a big reason so many cities are becoming megacities throughout the world. These mega cities create even bigger stresses on ecosystems, especially on water. Mexico City was built on wetlands but because of the demand for water from the millions who live there it is running dry. In Spain along the Med coast cities have been running dry as well. So what did the government want to do before people up in opposition? The government wanted to build dams and aquaducts from the rivers to provide water. This would of harmed the farms and ecosystems that relied on the water. This is what's happening in California right now. Northern CA has enough water but Southern CA is arid. So what do they do? They have pipelines and manmade rivers to transport water from the north to LA. This is straining the ecosystems of northern CA. The same is happening in China, water is being pumped from where there is water to where there isn't any. This is having a big impact on farms that rely on the water. With farms stressed food prices will rise. If instead of driving people off farms they were encouraged to stay on the farm then cities wouldn't mushroom in size and put added stress on resources.

    Another thing is the chemical inputs used for "modern" farming. Do you know what is used to make the manmade chemicals? Petroleum. Petroleum is used to make fertilizer, herbicides, and pesticides. Then there's the petroleum needed to transport all of this. High petro prices means food price rise too. As is it the system is not sustainable.

    Falcon
    1. Re:traditional methods of farming by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      So the solution is... restrict population growth? Colonize other planets? The problems you list have little to do with farming and quite a bit to do with population pressures.

      The catch-22 is that applying capitalism to a required resource (like farming) leads to corporate farms, which leads to less personal ownership of farms and more people either working a "factory" job at a farm or heading for the cities where they can hopefully get a factory job. But socializing it has in practice led to mass famine. Famine due to misguided government ownership of farming has killed more people this century than wars or disease - look at the history of Russia, or China, or the whole african continent. How do you suppose we solve it? People aren't leaving the farms because they want to, they're leaving because farming has NEVER been a lucrative job on a small scale. Ask my grandparents who had to go to school only every other day during the winter because they had to share their one pair of shoes with their sibling.

      The only good news I think of about any of this is that history has shown that as income levels and standards of living increase (which generally comes some years AFTER the move to an urban society, as all those people who migrated to the city eventually get jobs in the new industries that spring up for the cheap labor) the birth rates decrease and level off, leading to a somewhat sustainable system. At least, that's the conservative stance, and from what I've read at least the basic premise seems to be true.

      I'm not saying that farms shouldn't be concerned about the environment, but I don't see how any of the proposed organic solutions work in any situation other than one supported by the reasonable attempt at production made by society. It's like Thoreau advocating going back to the "natural" living of his friend's back yard :P The original settlers of that area fought their way up from log cabins to civilization for a reason. We need to proceed in some fashion that preserves the environment and the farms as well, but I haven't really seen any good solutions to that yet.

    2. Re:traditional methods of farming by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      So the solution is... restrict population growth? Colonize other planets? The problems you list have little to do with farming and quite a bit to do with population pressures.

      Part of the solution is to stop driving people from farms. Actually it may get to the point where people are being driven from cities back to farms or rural communites where they can grow gardens because of the expense of food. The cost of food will rise with the rising cost of petro. Another part of the solution is city gardens or farms, farms within cities. City farms is what has saved Cubans. When the Soviets fell and Cuba lost aid from the Soviets, Cubans started farming within cities and were encouraged to grow or expand their own gardens using organic methods, they couldn't depend on petro to grow or deliver food. City farms are sprouting up in cities throughout the world now. Maybe you don't know or recall but a few months back there was that ruckus in the news about a garden on private property in LA. Years ago LA took control of the land as they had planned to build something, I don't recall what right now, but they never did. Afterwards the city let some people from the neighborhood grow gardens on the land for food. Well the owner wanted his land back and activists tried to stop the city from giving it back, at least until after the growing season was over. If I recall right one celebrity had to be removed from a tree when she, Darryl Hannah I think, was supporting the people and climbed in the tree.

      The only good news I think of about any of this is that history has shown that as income levels and standards of living increase (which generally comes some years AFTER the move to an urban society, as all those people who migrated to the city eventually get jobs in the new industries that spring up for the cheap labor) the birth rates decrease and level off, leading to a somewhat sustainable system. At least, that's the conservative stance, and from what I've read at least the basic premise seems to be true.

      True, as both China and India have found out. As people move to the cities their income increases. Part of this is because of manufacturing as you say but part is that their education increases and, for women, they have more freedom. Because their income is rising both China and India are seeing drops in birth rates. The people don't feel the need to have children to enjoy life or to take care of them when they age.

      It's like Thoreau advocating going back to the "natural" living of his friend's back yard

      Thoreau? Earlier today I picked up a book with a collection of Thoreau's writings including "Walden" and "Civil Disobedience". Though I've read "Civil" that was many years ago and I don't recall ever reading "Walden".

      Falcon
  77. Do ocean currents shift due to weather? by Petersko · · Score: 1

    "This is no mysterious dramatic event. It happens every year, but this year, it's worse than usual, possibly because ocean currents have shifted due to weather."

    That seems intuitively backwards, as if I was being asked to believe that the trees make the wind by moving back and forth.

  78. Here's an article with a good explanation: by arete · · Score: 1
    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  79. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

    China & India are also not signees.

    Bullshit

    How can utter bullshit like this get to +5?

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  80. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    hmm, that does seem convincing. I got my info from an article when I was researching my response.

    However, the link at the bottom of your Wikipedia page yields this :

    "China, India, and other developing countries were exempt from the requirements of the Kyoto Protocol"

    It is not clear in that article why the past tense is used rather than "are exempt" perhaps the situation has changed.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  81. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by treeves · · Score: 1

    Not signing a practically worthless treaty does not mean a nation is not concerned.
    Kyoto Protocol has little power to actually address the problem.
    China was asked, as the second largest contributor of CO2 emissions, after the Kyoto protocol went into effect, what measures it was going to take. It's answer? Call on developed countries (which China is not) to reduce emissions and sign the treaty.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  82. Re:USA IS IGNORANT! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

    Nations with different development statuses had different obligations & timelines under kyoto.

    But that doesn't change the fact that they signed it.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  83. Step back? by mark99 · · Score: 1

    Oh come on.

    And give up such a great opportunity to pontificate about how bad civilization, industry, people, capitalists, globalization, multinations, the Republicans, Microsoft, Bush,(what have I forgotten now...) are for the world? Just because we might not understand what is actually going on?

    Dream on. But people WILL forget it as soon as the next opportunity comes along, so maybe that is okay after all.