Slashdot Mirror


RFID To Track Play of DVDs And CDs?

jayp00001 writes, "A Taiwan-based maker of DVDs and CDs for major studios is about to begin putting RFID chips in disks. The eventual aim is for DVD and CD players equipped with an RFID reader to prevent copied or out-of-region disks from being played."

237 comments

  1. Are they trying to encourage piracy by clickclickdrone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because when it starts getting that hard to be honest..
    I buy loads of CDs from other countries, mainly US & Japan and if this will stop me being able to play them then sorry guys, I'm going to start to explore other avenues..

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by NinjaFarmer · · Score: 5, Funny

      My next house will have a faraday cage.

    2. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      That'll be important to protect you from the prying eyes of the media conglomerates as they STAND IN YOUR FRONT YARD TO READ THE TAG THAT CAN'T BROADCAST ALL THAT FAR. Because it's not like you could look out your window to see anybody close enough to snoop an RFID tag in your living room.

      Give me a break. You yahoos sit here day after day praising places like PirateBay which encourage companies to take these kind of measures and then you whine when they do it. When will you just admit that all you folks want is something for nothing because you can get it?

      Maybe do yourself a favor and encourage your fellow slashdotters to stop enabling these people by defending and participating in thievery. If you don't like the business practice, don't patronize the business. It's really a very simple economic principle. If the majority disagrees with you, then they don't mind this "intrusive" new "feature" and you're SOL because that's dollar voting at work. If they don't know, educate them.

      But, no, Slashdot uses its position and its user base to encourage and excuse piracy instead, ensuring that this type of behavior will continue in an arms race between greedy businesses and common theives into the forseeable future.

      Yay for common sense. I'd order a truckload and have it delivered, but I doubt anyone on this site would be willing to sign for it.

    3. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More to the point, how is embedding an RFID chip in the disc going to prevent people playing region-encoded discs outside of their regions?

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't region-encoded discs already... well... region-encoded?

      Either people buy legit US/Japanese/whatever players (which you can't guard against with RFID chips), or they get their existing player chipped to bypass the whole region-protection mechanism - is there any reason to think this isn't going to work with the new RFID players, too?

      Of course, if the DVD players refuse to play unRFIDed discs then they'll be a bit useless for all the existing DVDs out there (nothing like breaking backwards-compatability to hurt a new product). If the RFIDed DVDs have some kind of (data) flag on the disc to turn RFID-checking it on it's liable to be trivial to reverse-engineer or omit the flag when copying the disc, too.

      Even if it does somehow "eliminate optical disc piracy in the entertainment and IT sectors", does anyone else think it's wonderful how they've finally managed to do it just about the time that broadband and bittorrent have made "optical disc" piracy obsolete, even in the mainstream?

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    4. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by NinjaFarmer · · Score: 1

      Hi Mr. High and Mighty Coward.

      I don't believe I have ever commented about the glories of piracy on the high seas, but I don't really like the idea of them ninjaing information from my house without my permission or knowledge. What's next past a few DVD players with RFID tags? Are they going to put some serious funding into TEMPEST research? I'm confident the US government as it is will just smile and nod when every DVD/CD on the shelves is broadcasting information from every CD/DVD player or computer that plays them. Then all they have to do is drive some vans down the street and mail you subpeonas later. After that its TEMPEST trojans in your email from who knows where (and the only people who can operate TEMPEST are big corporations or governments) it will go from there.

      Faraday cages are not extremely expensive, and they are future proof for the TFHs.

    5. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by GIL_Dude · · Score: 1

      I'd also imagine you could kill the RFID chip on the DVD although I'm not up to speed enough on the tech to know how. I'd guess either a large magnetic field or a high power radio signal or something should knock it out - maybe without damaging the DVD. There must be some way to kill the thing.

    6. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Maybe open the case, figure out which line the RFID reader uses to signal a successful authentication to the player, and hard-wire power to that line. I doubt they'd require an actual packet protocol from the reader to the player, but if they do then there will be a mod chip involved instead of tapping a power lead and jumpering over the reader.

    7. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      That's called concrete (with rubar reinforcement). Also works great against hurricanes. :-)

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    8. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by Turken · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why bother killing the chip? Couldn't a person just use the rfid technology against the machine? In another post around here, it was mentioned that the player may have a "check" chip embedded somewhere in the case to make sure that the player's rfid reader is working properly, and optical bits on the disc to make sure the reader looks for a chip.

      So, what I'm wondering is why not just cut a working rfid tag from a disc and stick it right in the case next to the reader? Then, no matter what disk you put in the player, if the player looks for a chip it will find one.

      Even if there is an optical bit on the disc telling the chip reader what specific response to look for, I'm willing to bet that the chip reader will have some sort of generic pass code that can be sent to it (used for debugging or testing purposes) and it will only be a matter of time before some engineers crack the system to make generic rfid chips to place in the player case to bypass the disc-embedded ones.

    9. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The next stage would be for the Cable/Satellite TV setbox to have a built in DVD player "for your convenience". Combining this with RFID'ed DVD's, and they would be able to determine what movies you had acquired from elsewhere (perhaps this could already be done using the serial numbers of the DVD).

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    10. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by Mongoose · · Score: 1

      The main reason I'm excited about Bluray is the Japan / US region are the same. I don't have to bother with working around the region locks anymore. I wanted to lend a disc to a co-worker, so they could get a feel for an art style. Guess what? I had to rip the damn disc. I couldn't transfer the ownership of that disc even if it's for a short time. Also I wonder with Bluray if some smart company will start offering rentals of Japanese Bluray in the US. I know in areas with large Japanese populations on top of otaku it's a no brainer!

    11. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      R(h)ubar(b) is tasty in pies, but you might might want to use rebar in a concrete structure. And it doesn't make for a very good faraday cage anyway. You need a solid conductor on the walls/ceiling/floor for a proper cage.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    12. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by jridley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why not just cut a working rfid tag from a disc and stick it right in the case next to the reader? Then, no matter what disk you put in the player, if the player looks for a chip it will find one.

      Watch out. You'll probably use a disc you don't care for as the chip donor, and when the player starts phoning home, you'll wind up on the demographic mailing lists of people who listen to this one Morrissey album 18 times a day.

    13. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by Neb+Namwen · · Score: 1

      The main reason I'm excited about Bluray is the Japan / US region are the same. I don't have to bother with working around the region locks anymore.

      You're excited because the industry cartel's questionable, anti-competitive tactics will be slightly less evil than last time?

    14. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On another note, what is the reason we don't have open source efforts on these technologies. From our understanding of how the computer hardware market has matured and today offers free software tied in, there will be a time when the content recorded on these discs will be completely independent of the technologies used to record these. And that is when the movie companies would be forced to sell discs people will use to program content rather than get locked onto any of these technologies. The present model is definitely not sustainable.

    15. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You need a solid conductor on the walls/ceiling/floor for a proper cage./i?
      no you do not.
      You need a conductor of a mesh size smaller that the minimum (smallest) wavelength you want to block. Mesh of 1" squares is more than adequate up to the low GHz range. Screen door mesh (assuming metal and not plastic) is good for the mid to high tens of GHz.

      You will also gain a ton more by having two 1" square meshes offset and at less than one wavelength apart (for the target of ~2.5GHz and lower) than you would for a single solid copper foil.

      natch ;-)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    16. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Damn botched close itallics tag. shoulda used priview :)

      Anyway, the concrete/rebar thing actually works quite well up to a couple hundred MHz. Think of the old 900MHz cell phones and how much trouble they were inside buildings (esp. parking structures).

      The true parinoid, have a double insulated enclosure with both a floating faraday and a grounded faraday. Each of these faradays are in a sealed enclosure, the foating faraday has Brown/Pink/White (IIRC order of preferance) noise coupled to it while the outer cage, like I said is ground. The enclosures are thus also filled with a distorting gas (SF6 or He) and pumped with acoustic noise as well.

      Finally any windows you have should be red/purple type metallic tint (uses gold) and subsequently grounded.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    17. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Don't forget signal repeaters for broadcast radio, cellphone, etc.!

      On the bright side, you won't have to worry about your neighbors using your Wi-Fi...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    18. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by iluvcapra · · Score: 1
      (perhaps this could already be done using the serial numbers of the DVD

      Exactly. You've already got the most pervasive high-density non-volatile storage medium on earth mounted in your player; why IN THE HELL would you need an RFID tag when you've got pits, lands, and a laser?

      This company is total snakeoil trying to sell something becuz it has a newfangle acronym. If someone wanted to monitor your viewing habits, they'd just have to sell you a web-enabled DVD player, not a web-enabled DVD player "Now with RFID Technology!" The DVD need not even have a serial number, the player could just hash the first minute of video and use that to identify the content with a central repository.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    19. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Well CD's are not region encoded at all. Thing of it as way of enforcing DRM on CD's that does not bugger things up, and stands a chance of working. The problem is the millions of unencumbered CD drives out there. I am sure these minor technicalities won't stop the likes the RIAA

    20. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately It could be programed in to the reader to use some data from the cd/dvd to question the RFID tag to make sure it is legit. However in order to avoid this one would just have to create their own RFID tag to answer correctly for the custom cd/dvd. Or listen to the legit media to come up with replacement RFID. If this is implemented, It would not take more then a month before a few home built project defeating it would appear. RFID is secure, however when placing both the reader and the ID itself in public hands, failure is assured.

    21. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by danpsmith · · Score: 1

      I deem media as unnecessary nowadays anyway. With the right cabling you can hook up your computer directly to your TV and skip the middle man and you'll never need media for anything you downloaded ever again. The great part about it is that not only is it better, and in some cases you can already download HD files, but it's also cheaper, easier, and they won't be able to track you with their 1984 big brother devices.

      So yes I'd say this puts another mark in the reasons to pirate column.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    22. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's an even better solution, Chuckles: Don't buy it in the first place and not only will you not have to worry about it, you won't be funding the company so they can hassle other people who DO have to worry about it.

      Heeey! Responsible consumer behavior! Who needs that when you can posture about idiotic things like "faraday cages" and still have your cake and eat it too?

    23. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by lnjasdpppun · · Score: 1

      What if the RFID serial number is the decryption key for the disk? Destroying the tag (or replacing it with a seperate RFID chip) won't work. This would make mass manufacture of disks harder since each one would be at least partially unique.

    24. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't think I'd ever buy a "Web enabled" DVD player... I'm paranoid as it is about Private information... think of the home movies that some people watch. Would you want it possible to see your fiance/wife nude because you left it in the player. If they could read a SN or RFID tag then they could read a whole lot more.

    25. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      Reasons to Hate Electronics that Phone Home #278: Being mistaken for a Morrissey fan.

      Thanks - I'll add it to the list.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    26. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      There are three cases I can see:

      1. RFID-enabled players check RFID tag before playing (otherwise-normal) DVD

      This is so stupid it's unlikely even the MPAA would release it. Trivially "hackable" by playing the DVD in a normal (non-RFID) player. As a wonderful side-effect, also completely kills the market for RFID players.

      2. Key held on DVD (data) that must match key held on RFID

      Less stupid, but all your have to do is remove the (data) key when copying the disc. Player thinks it's a normal disc and plays it without querying RFID chip at all. DVD data is software, basically making it trivial to hack and even easier to distribute tools to do it automatically.

      3. DVD data encrypted with key held in RFID chip.

      3a. Same key used for all movies
      Trivially hackable. See DeCSS.

      3b. Different key for each movie
      This is the most difficult option, and hence the most likely one they'll go for. Requires a hardware hack to get the key on a per-movie basis. However, happily, your DVD player has to be able to get the key too, so extracting the key from the RFID chip should be either unprotected, or protected by a password that's common across all brands, or at least all players of that brand. Once you have that password, you can grab the key from the RFID chip and use it to decrypt the DVD data.

      Of these options, the only worrying one is 3b - this requires a hardware (rather than software) hack to get the unencrypted DVD stream, and while it sems pretty easy from that point of view, hardware hacks themselves aren't automatable, are less distributable and require more skillz to get working.

      Of course, the whole thing's moot anyway because who's going to be stupid enough now to buy-in to another physical medium for their, uh, media?

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    27. Re:Are they trying to encourage piracy by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Why let a little thing like reality get in the way of a really good business initiative?

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
  2. hmm.... by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    and everyone pays for a more expensive RFID-capable CD/DVD player because...?

    1. Re:hmm.... by DeeVeeAnt · · Score: 1

      This is why they will run it as a loss leader. Ooh look it costs 5p less than a normal player. Guaranteed to sell like hot cakes.

      --
      Home fucking is killing prostitution.
    2. Re:hmm.... by Potor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      because i imagine that one day older technology will be outlawed by act of congress, like analogue television

    3. Re:hmm.... by Tim+C · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...because by the time your current player finally dies, that's all that's available?

      This idea is a complete non-starter in any case - are they really saying that I won't be able to burn my crappy home movies of my daughter to DVD to post to my parents?

    4. Re:hmm.... by Sagachi · · Score: 2, Funny
      and everyone pays for a more expensive RFID-capable CD/DVD player because...?
      ...because it's better! It's part of the upcoming technology revolution - Betamax, Laserdiscs, and DAT are about to reach critical mass!
    5. Re:hmm.... by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      analog TV is not being outlawed by congress. you are free to have one and watch whatever you want on it. Over the air broadcasters are just not going to be allowed to send analog signals over the same public airwaves as they have been.

    6. Re:hmm.... by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      i worry about this too, as i too have a daughter and have crappy home movies which i plan to burn to dvd to send to her grandparents.

      Probably wont be an issue though because the dvd wont actually get there as it will have been intercepted by the police who will raid my house at 4am and arrest me for distributing kiddie porn.

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    7. Re:hmm.... by gutnor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is unlikely that's all that will be available.

      There are always at least one brand that will sell a player without rfid like what happen with dezoned dvd player. In the beginning it was difficult to find one, after a while some brand started to sell some and not it is not even possible to find a player that check zone encoding on dvd.

      Off course the movie studio could use the RFID to store something mandatory to read the DVD. But that would mean making DVD incompatible with the huge park of player already existing. There is no way they will try that at the same time than they try to introduce the next generation of players ( they want people to replace their DVD player by a next generation one, not buy another dvd player )

      The only way this technology would be usefull is if you make a law that outlaw DVD player with the RFID reader, but xxAA have more juicy target for their "buy you own politician puppet" budget.

    8. Re:hmm.... by andcal · · Score: 1



      and everyone pays for a more expensive RFID-capable CD/DVD player because...?


      Maybe for the same reason everyone eventually bought a VCR with Automatic Gain Control (ensuring that scrambled television channels would be useless without the cable company's box). It became illegal to buy one without it.
      --
      --something witty
    9. Re:hmm.... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So what the fuck are you supposed to watch on it, then?

      You're letting them hair-split their way around common sense. You're part of the problem.

    10. Re:hmm.... by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

      They could always put multiple copies of the movie/music on the disc, degraded versions to play on anything, the higher quality requiring a key or something from the rfid tag. Or add bonus content that can only be access on rfid capable players. I can see being able to watch std quality video, with only 2 channel stereo on normal players, but with rfid ones, you get your dolby/thx audio, and higher quality video or something like that.

      What I find invading, is if they require that th DVD player be networked, and transmitting the data back to whomever, no one needs to know what I listen to or watch, not that its bad, but if they want to make money off of my marketting data, I want 100% of the revenue generated by it.

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    11. Re:hmm.... by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 1

      And then, the disk stops selling because you won't buy the garbage.

      --

      Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
    12. Re:hmm.... by kwark · · Score: 1

      The reality is that in a couple of European countries analog TV broadcasts will stop Real Soon Now (tm) (here in the Netherlands the date has been moved from 04-01 to 10-30 and now finally 12-11).

      The 76000 people still using it will have to switch to satelite (one time investment), dvb-t (nearly non existant coverage) or some IPTV solution. Assuming they don't have cable coverage in the first place they all require some settop box with smartcard which the company operating the service can mandate being updated to latest standards.

    13. Re:hmm.... by Renraku · · Score: 1

      Special features, man.

      Doesn't matter whether or not the features could be just as easily done on both systems..

      All you have to put on the CD is that it's for use with RFID players only, and that it differs from the standard CD because it has special tracks on it. Never mind it can be played in a regular player, I'm sure most people wouldn't try it anyway and would accept their new $200 cd player for their living room.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    14. Re:hmm.... by Dutch_Cap · · Score: 1

      ..and I suppose the OS field will be dominated by BeOS, RiscOS and AmigaOS.

    15. Re:hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you send videos of her splashing in the bath, or running around your yard in her swimsuit, that's a very real risk. If your local prosecutor is running for re-election, the risk is greatly increased.

    16. Re:hmm.... by LuminaireX · · Score: 1

      Because when their old one breaks down, it's generally cheaper to buy a new one than to repair it. If non-RFID players are no longer available, you're screwed.

    17. Re:hmm.... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Hey don't knock the Laserdiscs. We wouldn't have DEVO without them. Besides, DVD must have benefitted from the commercial flop.

  3. What a bargain by LividBlivet · · Score: 3, Informative

    Costs more, does less.

    1. Re:What a bargain by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Informative

      Costs more, does less.

      Sony ... is that you?

      Seriously, I've always told my friends to steer away from name-brand dvd players for exactly that reason. My supposedly crappy Apex is region-free out of the box, plays everything I can throw at it, and "just works". Other brands that my friends and relatives bought AFTER I WARNED THEM NOT TO just don't.

      And when I go "I told you so" they go "yeah, but its a name brand and it costs more. It SHOULD work better."

      People don't listen. The worst part ... when their name brand unit dies ... AND THEY DO IT AGAIN! Rrrrr! (And its not even Talk Like A Pirate Day until tomorrow)

    2. Re:What a bargain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Costs more, does less.

      Like the good old Circuit City DIVX days, yeah!
    3. Re:What a bargain by Name+Anonymous · · Score: 1
      People don't listen. The worst part ... when their name brand unit dies ... AND THEY DO IT AGAIN!

      Of course if they bought a better quality name brand unit, it wouldn't die. My DVD player still works and it's one the original models (but after they dropped in price).

      But I do agree, people tend to buy things for the name on it, and not necessarily what is in it. I tend to buy for both name and contents. Some brands do have better reputations than others.

      For an example of buying by name, but not fully for content - Volvo makes cars that are very safe, however the last time I checked they still had lousy repair records, so what good is a safe car if you're always bringing it in for repair?

    4. Re:What a bargain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, go Apex! It may smell like burning electronics when it is running but it has worked flawlessly for years no matter what cd/dvd I have tossed in it.

    5. Re:What a bargain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, your not driving it of course! I imagine it's awfully difficult to get into a wreck, when your not driving your car.

    6. Re:What a bargain by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      'scuse me, but I thought that's the idea behind DRM? Did I get anything wrong there?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:What a bargain by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      I always bought asian DVD players (not really for pirating or dezoning, just because they are cheaper and somehow disposable (with 10+ disks a week, they don't last 18 monthes)), until one day I chosed a 90euro Philips instead (mostly because I was working for them at that time). The thing could read MP3 & Divx just like the asian ones, but it failed to read at least half of the "real" DVD I put in it. I just love the 40euro Tokai I got instead.

    8. Re:What a bargain by mark-t · · Score: 1

      My first DVD player was an Apex.

      It performed quite well for about a year and then suddenly died _JUST_ past the warranty expiration date.

      I bought a Toshiba DVD player after that... had it for years now and never had problems.

    9. Re:What a bargain by noidentity · · Score: 1
      And when I go "I told you so" they go "yeah, but its a name brand and it costs more. It SHOULD work better."

      It does work better for the movie companies who want to limit what you can do with your player. This is a case where you rather not a well-made implementation of something that restricts you.

    10. Re:What a bargain by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      For $15-$20, I don't care how often I have to replace it (well, within reason).

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    11. Re:What a bargain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that Wal-Mart's business model?

    12. Re:What a bargain by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Pretty much... I'm on my 2nd $20 DVD in 3 years, but I'm still ahead of the game over purchasing a name-brand player, plus the newest one plays DiVX. I can fit two full-length DVD backups on a single disk with no appreciable loss in quality. It has a silly 2GB file limit, though :(

      I was in Walgreen's (not quite Wal-Mart) the other day and they had a box of a dozen light bulbs for $2... are you kidding me? Even if they last 12 seconds and cause eye tumors, I'm buyin' em! Compact fluorescents can go pound sand.

      Note that if I weren't in an apartment, I would, in fact use compact fluorescents :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  4. Warning Label by celardore · · Score: 4, Informative

    As long as they include a warning label on the CD case (like the 'copy protected' ones), so we can choose not to buy it that will be fine.

    1. Re:Warning Label by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As long as they include a warning label on the CD case (like the 'copy protected' ones), so we can choose not to buy it that will be fine.
      You give a little like that, you give a little more, and then you give a little more, and you're there. Think "slippery slope." If you allow any small amount nonsense, it is only time before the nonsense overwhelms you. This is a valuable life lesson that you need to learn.
    2. Re:Warning Label by dohzer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, until they ALL have RFID.
      Then what choice is there?

    3. Re:Warning Label by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Tomorrow is Talk Like A Pirate Day.

      Now, I'm not actually suggesting anything...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    4. Re:Warning Label by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Sure, until they ALL have RFID.
      Then what choice is there?


      Stop buying music, movies, and TV shows altogether.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  5. If it won't play in my DVD player, it's not a DVD by iainl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This means a new standard, and new players all round. It's no longer a DVD, and I'm certainly not running out and buying a new player for it.

    On another, rather important, note, they mention it for HD-DVD. HD-DVD doesn't even _have_ region encoding, so they can't tell me the disc is from the wrong one; that's why I want HD-DVD rather than Blu-Ray.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  6. The end of those stickers? by portwojc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With RFID chips embedded maybe we won't have to peel three seperate stickers off the DVD case.

    That would be nice.

    1. Re:The end of those stickers? by GweeDo · · Score: 1

      Nope, they will add a fourth with the EULA for the RFID features.

    2. Re:The end of those stickers? by Lusa · · Score: 1

      With RFID chips embedded maybe we won't have to peel three seperate stickers off the DVD case.

      There probably is an RFID sticker inside the case already :D Thankfully this absurd practice doesn't happen too often in the UK (sometimes we have one sticker). But I find it strange that when I mail order R1 discs (I'm in a R2 country), they come with three stickers. Exactly what is the purpose of these things?

    3. Re:The end of those stickers? by portwojc · · Score: 1

      My guess those stickers are there for theft in the factories / distribution points / and the store.

      RFID embedded in the disk would of course set off the scanners if not disabled. Since they have no intention of turning it off the store would just update their scanner to ignore that one as it passed by.

    4. Re:The end of those stickers? by acherusia · · Score: 1

      Oh good. When they try to sue me for breaking the EULA, I can legitimately say that I didn't have a strong enough microscope to read it.

    5. Re:The end of those stickers? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      It would be nice. But two of the three stickers are a warning that there's an anti-theft device (read: RFID-esque tag) contained within. Yeah, you thought opening the five you got for Christmas was a pain in the arse... try working in a video store where you need to open a hundred of the things in an hour (you can't even get movies in bulk without those stickers directly from the supplier). We'd all love it if those stickers go away, but it's just not going to happen.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    6. Re:The end of those stickers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they'd just shrinkwrap the box first and then apply the stickers we'd still have the warning to get rid of the tag before we try to steal it and opening the packages wouldn't be such a pain.

  7. Re:If it won't play in my DVD player, it's not a D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    HD DVD doesn't have region encoding YET, but they're planning to add it via firmware update.

  8. And how long by armanox · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Until someone figures out how to disable the chip? Or reconfigure the dvd drives to work around them?

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    1. Re:And how long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disable the chip hey? microwave!

      Although I do remember Cds and microwaves don't mix, but you'd definitely rid yourself of the RFID.

    2. Re:And how long by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 2, Funny


      Until someone figures out how to disable the chip?

      Put it in the microwave. Oh wait....

      --
      Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
      Don't believe what you read is the truth.
  9. Easy hardware fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Open up DVD-drive, cut wires to RFID-reader. Now every DVD will seem like it doesn't have an RFID-track, thus will work as a "legacy disk". Next innovation, please.

    1. Re:Easy hardware fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What should I cut??? The red or the green wire?

    2. Re:Easy hardware fix by Dilpo · · Score: 1

      While that would be really hilarious if it worked, I'd assume the DVD would tell the player "I'm a RFID DVD" and the player would go "But I cant read anything" and then give you a nasty error message.

    3. Re:Easy hardware fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The black one.

    4. Re:Easy hardware fix by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      Crap! I always get this one confused... I think you have to cut either the "burnt siam" colored wire or the "amber" colored wire. Or was it either the "butterscotch" colored wire or the "beige" wire?.

      Damn, I should have been paying attention in class instead of writing software in intercal to strip the css from the disks.

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    5. Re:Easy hardware fix by dynamo · · Score: 1

      Play it safe. Cut both.

  10. Re:If it won't play in my DVD player, it's not a D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It will play in your DVD player. It will not play in new players with a mismatching region code. When your DVD player breaks (or when you upgrade to HD), you will buy a new player. The only way to protest is to stop buying, and that ain't gonna happen. People have money to burn and they will buy to fill the void between sleep and work with entertainment.

  11. Aluminum foil over the RFID detector? Burn a copy? by Secrity · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If suspect that this crap won't go very far as I suspect that it won't be difficult to circumvent.

  12. RFID-R to the rescue! by noidentity · · Score: 1

    No problem, I'll just wait for a CD-R+RFID-R writer. Sure, the discs will cost $8 a piece at first, but the price will go down eventually.

  13. And they're gonna implement it how? by arun_s · · Score: 1
    From TFA:
    IPICO claims that its RFID tags can be read from at least six metres away, and at a rate of thousands of tags per minute. The passive chips require no battery, as they are powered by the energy in radio waves from the RFID reader.
    So they're gonna drive by each and every house in every continent with their scanners?
    Or put one in every airport, every department store, every port?
    And the cost for all those installations will end up in the DVD we buy. Great idea, jerks.
    (Oh wait, TFA also says its the DVD players that will check the DVDs and reject it if its in the 'wrong' geographical region, but why would you need RFIDs for that? Why would a player need to scan thousands of tags per minute?)
    --
    I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
    1. Re:And they're gonna implement it how? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Why would a player need to scan thousands of tags per minute?

      How many RPMs do DVDs get in the average DVD player? How often do you think the tag is going to fly by the rfid pickup? ;)

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  14. Re:Aluminum foil over the RFID detector? Burn a co by gigne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Options:-

    1) Cover the disk in foil
    2) snip the RFID reader in the player making it recognise legacy disk
    3) destroy the RFID tag in the disk using LARGE electromagnet
    4) refuse to buy one

    thinking about point 3... I have used the technique before to destroy a RFID tag on thing I purchased. Aside from the problems of small popping when the foil in the tag melts, it seems to be a good way of destroying lots of tags. A strategically placed electromagnet and a sensor and you could hit every one that passed!

    --
    Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
  15. Well, I've tried to play nice... by ProppaT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've bought thousands of cds. I also have hundreds of records and various other forms of music media. And music isn't cheap! I refuse to buy into music stores such as iTunes because I feel it's ludicrous to have to pay what adds up to almost the same price as buying the physical disc to have digital copies of music files that are encoded lower than I would have encoded it myself if I had the disc. But, I swear, the second they pull a stunt like this, I'm out. See ya. I'll still buy cds from all the independant artists I love, because I'm sure they'll avoid this like the plague. But it looks like the only option will be music services such as Yahoo! Unlimited that charge me $60 a year to listen to whatever I want. Now if only I had broadband in my car, I'd be set...

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    1. Re:Well, I've tried to play nice... by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      But it looks like the only option will be music services such as Yahoo! Unlimited that charge me $60 a year to listen to whatever I want. Now if only I had broadband in my car, I'd be set...

      In my days, we had a FM radio in the car. And we liked it! And it used to be free!! And it played music!
      Now get out of my lawn.

      --
      So say we all
    2. Re:Well, I've tried to play nice... by aug24 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But it looks like the only option will be music services such as Yahoo! Unlimited that charge me $60 a year to listen to whatever I want.

      For me, that'll mean 'Radio'. Free, and ubiquitous.

      Try telling someone aged about 16 about the 'digital music services' that're 'streamed everywhere, in real time, capable of being received and decoded by cheap chips built into modern mobile phones'. They get really excited, then you tell them it's called 'rad-ee-oo' and they get pissed off ;-)

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    3. Re:Well, I've tried to play nice... by Agent+Green · · Score: 1

      I remember those days too.

      Then ClearChannel came along, bought most of the stations and the only thing they play is shit.

      --
      // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
      // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
    4. Re:Well, I've tried to play nice... by ProppaT · · Score: 1

      Only difference, the radio's there to support the major labels that are pushing these new copy protection formats. By listening to the radio, you're just filling their pockets even more. Well, and the radio is total crap (at least in Florida). Of course, by using Yahoo Unlimited, I'm supporting DRMed WMA's, so I guess it's not much better. At least I get to pick what to listen to :)

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    5. Re:Well, I've tried to play nice... by aug24 · · Score: 1

      I'm in Britain. We have proper radio - local independent or national independent.

      As I understood it, vast swathes of the states are covered by local independent radio stations, but I could be thirty years out of date...

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  16. I don't understand by DrXym · · Score: 2, Insightful
    How does RFID stop you from using out-of-region disks? Are manufacturers expected to put an RFID into each disc that the player can read to validate? What happens for recordable media? What happens if someone whips out their dremel and just disables the RFID? What happens if I lay one of more legitimate discs on top of the player when I try to play an illegal one? What about the millions of players and discs which wouldn't give a damn about playing these "protected" disks? etc.

    This sounds like just another stupid application of RFID. For the all the effort involved it would be simpler to just embed a hidden track and read that.

    1. Re:I don't understand by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1
      How does RFID stop you from using out-of-region disks?
      And more importantly to me, why do they want to? I don't understand the point of region encoding to start with. Why does anyone care if I want to watch the French version of a movie? Is there something I'm missing about the dvd market where my ordering one online from a different country negatively affects the bottom line of the distributors/producers/whoever somehow?
    2. Re:I don't understand by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I thought DVDs had this additional track already?
      standard r/rw disks are physically incapable of recording in this location.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:I don't understand by LaughingCoder · · Score: 1

      For the all the effort involved it would be simpler to just embed a hidden track and read that.

      Well for starters, hidden tracks can be copied. I don't expect there to be blank writable media with the RFID included, so it will always be easy to discern a pre-recorded (ie store bought) disc versus a consumer-written disc. As far as disabling the RFID reader in the player, I'm sure that will be extremely difficult in these days of "system on a chip" - more than likely it will be embedded in the one-and-only IC in the player.

      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    4. Re:I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is there something I'm missing about the dvd market where my ordering one online from a different country negatively affects the bottom line of the distributors/producers/whoever somehow?

      If you live in the US, then they'd prefer that. The "money" reason for region coding (and it's only a "money" reason, nothing more, nothing less) is that they release movie X in the US at $20, and nine months later release the same movie X in Europe at the US dollar equivalent of $45.

      Region encoding is supposed to prevent the folks in Europe from ordering the $20 ($15 less) disk from the US when it's released in the US, nine months before they are supposed to be allowed to order it (for more cost) in their own country.

      That, in a nutshell, is all region coding is. A technological way to enforce higher prices in different parts of the world, and prevent the folks who have to pay the higher prices from undercutting the artificial market by purchasing over the internet from a far away land for less.

    5. Re:I don't understand by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Without wishing to appear like I'm defending hidden tracks or claiming they're crack proof... you only have to look at the copy protection on most PC CD / DVD games to know that it is possible to make discs that can't be copied by normal burners. Most crackers just Daemon Tools or similar instead to get around the protection. Commercial pirates might be able to do a bit for bit copy but then the track is still there, so that's no good, and the absence of the track might be the evidence the player needs to stop working.

      But then you could think of other ways to refine this scheme such as embedding the region code IN the content, e.g. via a watermark which even survives recoding. Watermarking would be extremely hard to remove especially if you don't know where to find it.

      Anyway, I wasn't proposing disabling the RFID reader in the player but in the media. Drill a .5mm hole where your RFID was and another on the other side for balance and the disc is now region free. Or run the disc through DVDDecrypters and play a copy. Or confuse the player with lots of RFIDs. Or buy a player without the reader. There are so many attack vectors in the concept that I wonder why they bother to propose it.

      Most of the applications for RFID that are bandied around are pretty lame and better accomplished by conventional means. I think this is one of them.

    6. Re:I don't understand by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Actually there is. I'm not saying I agreem but I understand their reasoning:
      Movies are not released simultaneously in all locations. In some countries movies are released at a certain timed schedule for maximum marketability, in another country a movie might be released on DVD while still in theaters. Region encoding is intended to prevent people from buying 5000 DVDs in one country where they've been out for a few months and cost $17.95, and shipping them off for sale in another country where the movie is a huge hit in theaters but doesn't come out on DVD for another two months.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  17. Aluminum foil over reader will nullify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DVE readers and the like will have to be able to play normal DVDs or CDs without the
    chips or older ones without. Just put a little aluminum foil over the reader and
    these RFIDs will not do anything. Reports on the net indicate the foil in a potato chip
    bag is thick enough. Aluminum paint might do too.
        Same goes of course for DVD drives should manufacturers start fiddling with those also
    (though that would be rather expensive in a device that is down to $40 or less each).

    1. Re:Aluminum foil over reader will nullify by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      That won't work. The DVD player will look at the disc information, see that it has an RFID tag, look for the tag, and then refuse to play on account of it not being there.

    2. Re:Aluminum foil over reader will nullify by madcow_bg · · Score: 1

      You mean that MY software will look for the tag. I still think that software is the running logic of the computer. And even if looking for the tag is built in the hardware, override it. If such a mandatory check is introduced, hacks will be made, mind my words.

      The only REAL problem with that is TCP like Palladium ... but I very much doubt that China and Taiwan will stop building PCs without TCP, if there is a strong demand for them. Especially by me. And by some 99% of the governments in the world...

      Really, US geeks, unite and save yourselves. You have my support.

    3. Re:Aluminum foil over reader will nullify by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Yeah. But software hacks make the foil trick redundant.

  18. Long-term impact by tygerstripes · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Okay, so most people - especially the most tech-savvy - won't bother buying an RFID-equipped player at first. However, if the industry enforcers (RIAA, BPI et al) push it hard enough this could well find its way into most players without the average consumer even noticing. It's not a certainty, but a frightening possibility.

    In that event, I have to ask a simple question:

    Will the revenue previously lost to piracy be fed back to the consumer? Will we see cheaper CDs anywhere?

    Of course not. It's basic fucking economic theory that you can charge more if you segregate a market. Piracy be damned, fair-use my arse - this is just a desperate attempt to control the market, which can only lead to higher prices for legitimate, law-abiding consumers.

    Bastards.

    --
    Meta will eat itself
    1. Re:Long-term impact by jackhererUK · · Score: 1

      Absolutely everything the big content companies are doping to "fight piracy" is actually about controlling the market or more imortantly controlling the distribution. Otherwise they would just license companies like AllOfMP3.com rather than trying to get them shut down.

    2. Re:Long-term impact by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      To bolster your argument; I can buy 3 DVD movies for $15 about a year or two after release, if they aren't top ten movies. How much more effort does it take to make a movie, than to record a CD? Sure there is promotion and such, but come on... Come On!

      I could create the equivalent of a professional, multilayered music CD on my home computer with about $4000 in hardware and software. You can't even get a good camera for that to make a movie.

      Plus, aren't we already paying a premium for every blank CD and DVD to offset the cost of piracy? Don't we already own all the stuff we steal? Ahem, some people, borrow.

      For something to get the weight of law behind it, under previous Constitutional thought, it had to have utility for the Consumer. Nobody ever brings up the notion that the "consumer is sovereign" anymore. But with the DMCA they've done an end-run around that notion. But the whole idea of region coding should not have one legal leg to stand on in a true free market.

      The only thing free about our market, is the ability to drive down wages. Everything else is to guarantee profits for things we don't want.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    3. Re:Long-term impact by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      > the big content companies are doping

      It certainly seems that way...

    4. Re:Long-term impact by jackhererUK · · Score: 1

      Hmm that was a typo, but yeah it seems to fit ;-)

  19. rfid in discs by Rulke · · Score: 1

    the application of this will most likely not be the one they named, i can imagine that public libraries can use this to track their stock of dvd's and cd's. RFID comes in flavours, like read-only, so rewriting the tag wouldn't be possible, burning the chips memory with an overdose of energy would kill it however.

  20. This is really becoming silly by gelfling · · Score: 1

    We're inches away from the RIAA/MPAA declaring that all content can only be viewed or heard on a pay per view basis at any of their convenient 'media centers'. We're taking a huge leap backwards to the days when movies were shown in dirty 5 cent halls. Maybe we should invest in good digital to analog reader-writer technology and bring back 16mm home movies and reel to reel.

  21. Not too much time... by FFFFHALTFFFF · · Score: 1

    I believe people dont wanna buy a DVD RFID reader capable, but anyways. How many days to a hack or solution for this protection?

  22. Snake Oil by tezza · · Score: 1

    This really should be in the Comedy/Entertainment section.

    --
    [% slash_sig_val.text %]
  23. Re:If it won't play in my DVD player, it's not a D by rednuhter · · Score: 1

    I am not sure how many years it has been, but I have yet to replace a DVD player and my last VHS player lasted 10+ years (different stock from todays fare).
    As the new disks can not be changed in such a way to break them on 'old' players there is just going to be 'legit' players and 'old' players, note: 'old' players can not be classed as non-legit.
    This is all based on the fact the goverments do not do something stupid on the behalf of the movie companys.

    --
    ERR 411[Max number of witty sigs reached]
  24. Could mean consumer-unbreakable protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To the people saying that a person could just "cut the wires" to the RFID reader module inside vis drive:
    Ever heard of system-on-chip?

    I can tell you right now that it is extremely doable to put the necessary rfid reader circuity inside the drive controller ASIC and connect it to a simple loop antenna by a couple of pins (remember it only needs to have a range of an inch or so).

    The controller chip could even scan for the correct impedance to prevent people from breaking the antenna trace, or (this is a good one) have a 'verification' RFID somewhere inside the drive case:
    If the RFID reader part of the controller can't read the unique id of it's matching verification RFID (remember nowadays it's possible to have a small pseudo-PROM area of an ASIC) it won't let you use the drive..

    We are seeing the end of the consumer-hackable hardware era; modern hardware can and will prevent all but the most dedicated hardware hackers with expensive logic analyzers from making unauthorized copies.

    1. Re:Could mean consumer-unbreakable protection by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Then cut the antenna.
      Its not rocket science - no antenna = no signal in or out, chip has to fall back into standard mode.
      Hell, failing all that, just add a tin foil layer between the disk and the sensor.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Could mean consumer-unbreakable protection by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but I'd imagine there will be other ways to circumvent it. Even if the DVD manufacturers do play ball, I expect there will be a software component to the system. Quite a lot of chips these days do have a substantial software component.

    3. Re:Could mean consumer-unbreakable protection by bhima · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what 'disposable digicam' folks thought and once the 'dedicated hardware hackers with expensive logic analyzers' told the world how to easily hack the camera I suppose they reviewed their business model.

      Still... I get most of my out of region movies via bittorent anyway so I can at least get English subtitles.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    4. Re:Could mean consumer-unbreakable protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming that every engineer at all the mayor drive manufacturers is incompetant.
      I think that's extremely improbable..

      The only thing they need to do to prevent analysis is not expose any debug points on the pcb, and use only BGA chips.
      Have fun trying to connect a logic analyzer to that :)

      With the current and probable future state of windows security (and the knuckle-headed practice of device manufacturers to put core logic into drivers) a hacker wouldn't need to go to all that trouble though...

      I still think that some time in the medium-range future we will see integrated DRM-PCs that protect the entire signal path from laser pickup in the drive to lcd pixel in the display ;)

    5. Re:Could mean consumer-unbreakable protection by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      and use only BGA chips.

      Is this just for tamper resistance? They're extremely fiddly to solder, but apparently it can still be done by hand.

    6. Re:Could mean consumer-unbreakable protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, the player manufacturers (except Sony) don't make the DVDs. And its not in their interests to make locked players.

      Look what happened with region coding (in the UK): Far Eastern manufacturers make a standard model, that they sell throughout the world. That has a special kepypress sequence on the remote that sets the region appropriately. And somehow, mysteriously, the sequences leaked out from the manufacturers. (When I bought mine, the shop actually gave me a photocopied instruction sheet)
        Except Sony, of course, where the region change requires a new ROM chip.

      So the new DVD players come out with RFID reading. The player region is set by the manufacturer in a byte or two of flash memory somewhere. And somehow, mysteriously, the secret reset code leaks out from the manufacturer....

      Except for Sony, where the content tail wags the hardware dog. They'll have the region hardwired and unalterable. Solution: Don't buy a Sony player.

    7. Re:Could mean consumer-unbreakable protection by morie · · Score: 1

      It will still have to play standard DVD to be accepted. I am not goint to throw away my DVD collection.

      Therefore, it will have some identification system labeling it as "a disk that should be protected". This has to be
      a) an extra code or lack of code, since you cant go back and mark the already produced legacy DVD's
      b) laser-readable, because you still have to read it on a copied disk without RFID

      Therefore, the vulnerability will not be in the RFID, but in the identification code. Rip a DVD, delete the code (this _will_ be possible eventually, its just software de/recoding), burn the DVD. illegal tapings (not DVD rips) there is no problem at all.

      The problems start once people are willing to be unable to play their old DVD's. I do not expect this soon.

      Off course, this only applies to copying, not to regioncoding.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    8. Re:Could mean consumer-unbreakable protection by Stripe7 · · Score: 1

      Cutting the antenna will not work. The RFID chip broadcasts an ID. The data on the disc says "I am a RFID enabled DVD". When the player reads the track that says check my RFID code it tries to do so and fails as the antenna is cut. It rejects the disc as a pirated copy, so once the antenna is cut all RFID DVD's will be rejected. For it to work, it reads id from the data tracks and cross checks with the RFID and if they match the movie plays. If not it says "Pirated" and ejects the DVD.

    9. Re:Could mean consumer-unbreakable protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a PCB with a groundplane on the topmost layer (with laquer on top of course), and a signal plane underneath. If you put your BGA chip onto this, using through-holes onto the second layer, connecting a modchip would require desoldering the entire chip, putting in a riser of some kind, and resoldering it.
      Extremely hard and time-consuming to do for a basement mod-shop.

      It won't stop a determined attacker, but it will prevent consumers from modding their hardware..

      (note: I just thought this example up, it may be crap. My point is that the struggle between hardware designer and modder can be trivially won by the hw designer by using technologies that require expensive precision equipment to assemble - the modder will not have access to such).

  25. Dear hollywood by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

    NOBODY WANTS REGION CODING. (except the publishers)

    . The people who actally make the films really don't care. They get their royalties if the disc is bought in the US, Europe, Taiwan or anywhere else. They really just want to make a living doing what they love.

    The end users hate region coding. It means they often have to wait, often end up with an inferior version, and basically reduces consumer choice while increasing their costs.

    The manufacturers don't like region coding. It makes their players considerably less popular. They go to considerable lengths to find ways around the region coding requirement. Multi-region is a key selling point of a player to anyone with any interest in importing discs. They're going to do the ame thing to try to get around RFID chips. Or anything else you might like to try. And they're really not going to be happy about having to increase their costs to add an RFID reader. These companies are working on tiny margins. No matter how cheap, RFID readers will eat into this.

    1. Re:Dear hollywood by Hamoohead · · Score: 1

      Look for the MPAA to propose another "broadcast flag" type legislation to be pushed through congress in the form of a homeland security bill.

      --
      "If your parents never had children, chances are you wonât either." -Dick Cavett
  26. If they can read it... by winchester · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... I can read it. If it is encrypted and my player can read it, I can still read it. No matter what they try to do, unless they can come up with some sort of scheme where the complete key management is happening over a closed network that your player is mandatorily hooked up to 24/7, there is no way that this will prevent piracy.

    What they will do is make the incentive bigger for criminals to copy these disks, and they make the incentive bigger for curious people to try and hack the protection of these disks. They will also piss the general disk-buying public off by creating disks that will more often not play rather than play.

    No winners here... is that my problem? Last time I have seen a Hollywood movie is so long ago I can't even remember.

    1. Re:If they can read it... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Last time I have seen a Hollywood movie is so long ago I can't even remember.

      They still make movies there? I thought they went the same way every business and only kept the management on site while outsourcing all the real work.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  27. Not a bad idea... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    Sure, it will eventually be gotten around, but it will probably require shady imported DVD players, a firmware update, or additional hardware for when you make the disc. Although they are a bit late. With Blu-Ray and HD-DVD already out the door, it would be _BAD_ to implement it and piss off customers who already have a device. Maybe next gen though.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  28. This won't work for long by AI0867 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    let's see, there's an RFID tag in the disk, the player won't play the disk of the RFID isn't correct, now there's a few options

    -legacy disks won't play (people won't like it, but I can see it happening)
    -legacy disks will play, the fact that RFID is needed sits as data on the disk

    both things will be fixable with a programmable RFID chip, provided their code isn't too complicated (which it can't be, since they're delevering the encrypted content, the algorithm AND the key, just obfuscated)
    you can also mod the player (I can see the US outlawing this).

    things that will work only with option 2:
    cracking the disk image before burning it or simply cutting the RFID chip in the player or wrapping it in tin foil.

    1. Re:This won't work for long by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      or the ever popular "analog" hole. Seriously, there's no way to prevent recording sound, if you allow any consumer sound recording to happen ever. Last ditch - connect recording equipment to internal speaker's wires (you know, the ones that actually drive the speaker) or place microphones in front of speakers in sound-proof enclosures. It's all analog and unstoppable. Quality will most definitely deteriorate some, but for those that think MP3s are "awesome", this will be moot.

      In the end, if people look at the numbers, they'll see that P2P has not significantly hurt sales, primarily because of the get a decent copy argument. The fact that fewer CDs may have been sold in any year is not indicative of piracy's effect, it could just as easily be indicative of the state of the economy such as less discretionary income, or the state of music released that year being far subpar (Mariah Carey and Celine Dion come to mind).

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  29. Re:Aluminum foil over the RFID detector? Burn a co by FLEB · · Score: 1

    How big are we talking? Commercially-available bulk eraser, or bigger?

    --
    Information wants to be free.
    Entertainment wants to be paid.
    You just want to be cheap.
  30. Wrap, don't cut. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    wrap the transceiver in aluminum foil (don't cut the wires 'cause then it will know it's been tampered with).

    Actually, if they're smart, they will encase an RFID tag in the housing of the player aswell. That way they'll know that the transceiver is working (reads it's own RFID tag, then the disc tag)

    And then add an optical marker to the disc so that the player knows this particular disc is supposed to have an RFID tag even if it can't find one.

    So much wasted effort.

    I wonder how long it will be before all players phone home to narc on your listening habits.

  31. Re:Aluminum foil over the RFID detector? Burn a co by AlphaLop · · Score: 2, Funny

    And rip the car keys out of everyones pockets as well as fry their credit cards! GO ANARCHY! :)

    --
    It's only paranoia if your wrong...
  32. what about backups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens when I try to legally copy my DVD (for backup purposes)?

    Ever see what a couple kids can do to a DVD? They don't intentionally destroy them, but it happens. Sometimes they just "miss" the DVD player or whatever and it ends up getting scratched up. I like to back their DVDs up so I don't have to buy them replacements.

    1. Re:what about backups? by Petrushka · · Score: 2, Informative
      What happens when I try to legally copy my DVD (for backup purposes)?

      Then you're in violation of the DMCA and may well be arrested. Have you been asleep for the last six years?

    2. Re:what about backups? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Fair use copying is _explicitly_ mentioned in the text of the DMCA as being exempt from infringement.

    3. Re:what about backups? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Since your kids are so cavalier about handling your expensive DVDs, maybe you should make copies of them first, and then only allow your kids to handle the copies. Why let them screw up the originals? Especially when many are double-layer and/or double-sided? And they have the cool artwork.

    4. Re:what about backups? by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      Ah, beg pardon. So I guess the only tricky bit is getting the tools for decrypting the DVD, is that right? You basically have to do write your own, and do all of the reverse engineering yourself, unless I've completely misunderstood.

    5. Re:what about backups? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      And that's what's so F---ing stupid about the DMCA.... it explicitly contains a clause that exempts fair usage from infringing, yet it simultaneously prevents anyone else from enabling such fair use for other people.

  33. Re:Aluminum foil over the RFID detector? Burn a co by Zocalo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And the destruction of the RFID tag is going to occur without damage to the probably even thinner layer of metal that holds the actual media content because?

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  34. Hadn't you heard? by aurelian · · Score: 2, Funny

    The chip + RFID goes in your brain - you need to hold one of the MPAA's special decoders next to your head while you watch. That way they can make sure you're watching the ads as well. Better yet, the installation (which will eventually be a legal requirement) takes only a few minutes and and should cost less than a hundred bucks!

  35. Presumably... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in return, the audio and video industries will supply the same DVD/CD selection to all regions and at the same prices, without making the discs more expensive?

    Ah, thought not.

    I don't pirate music or video at the moment, but if this comes into play suddenly that avenue becomes more and more enticing. I'm sick of having DVDs only come out in the US for certain things like TV shows, or have an album or film come out abroad with better quality sound or extra features, or find that I'm paying twice the price for the same product over in the UK.

  36. The customer is never right? by ZorroXXX · · Score: 1
    What happened to the old "the customer is always right" ideal? If people around the world wants to have film/music/whatever available to buy in their country at the same time as everyone else, then it is the job of the content producers to supply that!

    Start noticing how many arguments in favour of "free market" really translates into "no regulation of mighty suppliers allowing them to screw the customers". The litmus test of if something really supports free competition should be "does the customers really want this?". Region encoding fails this. DRM fails this.

    --
    When you are sure of something, you probably are wrong (search for "Unskilled and Unaware of It").
    1. Re:The customer is never right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If people around the world wants to have film/music/whatever available to buy in their country at the same time as everyone else, then it is the job of the content producers to supply that!"

      I believe the main idea behind region coding is that in order to maximize global sales of a movie, you need to drop the price for sales to third world markets so folks there can actually afford it, while maintaining a higher price in more affluent countries. But then this creates an incentive for folks in rich countries to import cheaper discs that were intended for the third world markets, and so they came up with region coding of the discs and players to force people to use only the discs intended for them.

    2. Re:The customer is never right? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "If people around the world wants to have film/music/whatever available to buy in their country at the same time as everyone else, then it is the job of the content producers to supply that!"

      Uh, no. You may see it as the right thing to do and I may see it as the right thing to do, but the owner of the material can disburse it as they wish. You as the customer, have one right, and one right only -- buy it or not.

  37. Article at ArsTechnica doubts if it will work by Krishna+Dagli · · Score: 4, Informative
  38. Big Claims by dthree · · Score: 1

    The manufacturer is making some big claims about this technology, for bootlegging prevention, not region-encoding. TFA states that this tech is for mass-market (stamped, not burned discs: your home videos will still be accessible) disks to prevent 3rd party mass copying and that it would "eliminate optical disc piracy in the entertainment and IT sectors." Ha! I don't know how this is possible - even if you could force the DVD player manufacturers to put this tech in all their new players, there are already millions upon millions of DVD players out in the wild.

    So, yet again, this will only tread on the fair use rights of honest people without preventing the criminals from continuing to make illegal copies.

    --
    "I forgot my mantra."
    1. Re:Big Claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFL. The third-party mass copiers will do one of two things

      1) Figure out a way to copy an RFID-encoded disk to a non-RFID-encoded disk (thus incidentally making the pirated disk work on more players than the original)

      2) Figure out how to copy the supposedly uncopyable RFID tag, just like they copy credit card holograms and all the rest.

  39. Bonus content by Eye.Indigo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they lock some bonus content out for players that will lack the RFID reader - they will definitely sell new players(they dont cost a lot more than a few CDs/DVDs anyways)

  40. Re:Aluminum foil over the RFID detector? Burn a co by gigne · · Score: 2, Informative

    yeah, that should do it.

    A place I worked at a couple years ago had problems with people "deactivating" the RFID tags on sales tags using a similar device to a bulk eraser. As long as you can induce sufficient current to destroy the aerial traces, or the silicon you are fine. I don't think it would do much for any electronics nearby though. The CD should be fine!

    --
    Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
  41. Dear USA and a couple of others.... by MosesJones · · Score: 1


    One of the reasons given for region encoding is the different standards between regions, paticularly the PAL standard used in most of the world and the completely rubbish NTSC standard used in the US. If everything was on PAL discs you'd have loads of US consumers complaining that they don't look right on their TV sets (and in the PAL world complaining about the massive drop in quality).

    If you want to get rid of region encoding we need on TV standard.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Dear USA and a couple of others.... by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Informative

      You'd still sell the different format discs, encoded for the appropriate country. Just not the region coding. I don't think it would matter though. Australia (PAL) and Mexico (NTSC) are in the same region. And Europe (PAL/SECAM) is in the same region as Japan(NTSC). There have even been a few NTSC region 2 encoded discs sold in Europe. Many people in England import US discs, and they don't complain about the drop in quality.

    2. Re:Dear USA and a couple of others.... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon, that's prolly the lamest excuse ever. Nearly everyone uses SCART or similar ways today to connect their players to the screens. Most modern TVs are (if for no other reason then for the reason that you can sell the same model all over the world) very capable of switching between color standards. Even my crappy old Grundig can do the big three standards and pretty much every sub-standard thereof.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Dear USA and a couple of others.... by ohearn · · Score: 1

      This really has quit being a nerd site hasn't it? I don't even bother with a TV. I play everything on my computer. I think most dvd player software pretty much handles the different standards pretty well.

    4. Re:Dear USA and a couple of others.... by ravelox · · Score: 1
      Most modern TVs are (if for no other reason then for the reason that you can sell the same model all over the world) very capable of switching between color standards.
      That works if you are in Europe. Having moved across to the US from the UK, I've found that it certainly isn't the case here. My HD LCD TV doesn't know what to do with a PAL signal. Luckily, I found a Philips player that will output PAL discs as NTSC with a handset hack.

      It was my (most probably mistaken) understanding that region encoding was put in place specifically to control distribution. Because most new films are released in the US before the rest of the world, the film studios wanted to make sure that the rest of the world couldn't see the films before their local release and thereby damage box office returns.

      They seem to have "forgotten" that the back catalogues they started to make available are films that had already been released years before. So the region encoding excuse becomes more to do with copyright/distribution rights at that point.
    5. Re:Dear USA and a couple of others.... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Then they should make it possible to release the movie everywhere at the same time. "Impossible"? Tough cookie. Not my problem. Yours. Make it possible or lose out. Welcome to free trade.

      At least 'til free trade was canceled by our politicians who'd rather listen to lobbyists than to what they kept telling us was the perfect market model.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Dear USA and a couple of others.... by tricorn · · Score: 1

      No, that has nothing to do with region coding. Most DVD players now can play PAL or NTSC and convert them to either. The region coding is because they want to avoid people being able to buy a DVD wherever it is being sold at the lowest price, and thus be able to price it high in one country, and low in another country, depending on local demand and economy. It is also used to manage release windows - a movie may still be in theaters or first-run TV release, and they don't want DVD sales to interfere.

      You do realize that PAL and NTSC are very similar in terms of color, right (except PAL has lower resolution for color information)? The difference with alternating phases is pretty much irrelevant when connected directly to a DVD player, and quality is much lower than with S-Video or component anyway. The other main difference is that PAL is normally used with about 19% more scan lines, but NTSC refreshes about 20% more often.

      Of course, there are differences when converting from 24-fps film, where PAL often just speeds it up a little bit. Like your films fast, do you? Converting between NTSC and PAL can lead to artifacts which can make for remarks like "rubbish NTSC standard", if the only NTSC you've seen has been converted to PAL, or vice-versa.

      With digital television, of course, you eliminate all of that. And guess what? It isn't going to eliminate region coding!

    7. Re:Dear USA and a couple of others.... by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      This really has quit being a nerd site hasn't it? I don't even bother with a TV.

      Wow!!! you watch movies from a 21 inch display? Man when I grown up I want to buy your exact same setup!. The fact is that most nerds have grown up and gotten a family and a real job. They do have some cash and are willing to spend some of it in proper entretainment.



      I play everything on my computer.

      computers are nice to work with, but when it comes to watching video you will probably want to seat on a couch and watch it on a proper screen(and no, your computer monitor will simply not fit the bill). If you really want to take the "nerdy" road and watch content off your network you will mod an Xbox and install XBMC.



      I think most dvd player software pretty much handles the different standards pretty well.

      Think again, there are lots of DVD players who will market themselves as true multiregional (region free + PAL NTSC auto conversion), but when it comes to delivering, *surprise* *surpsrise*; they will either crap themselves in their pants or simply do a half ass job.


      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    8. Re:Dear USA and a couple of others.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It was my (most probably mistaken) understanding that region encoding was put in place specifically to control distribution. Because most new films are released in the US before the rest of the world, the film studios wanted to make sure that the rest of the world couldn't see the films before their local release and thereby damage box office returns.

      It's only partly that. More of it is that they want to be able to charge different prices in different parts of the world.

    9. Re:Dear USA and a couple of others.... by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      As far as analog TV's go, nobody has made an NTSC only decoder chip for over a decade. It simply is not economic to do so. Take a look at the websites of the manufactures. Now the TV I have here is 110/240V multi standard, presumably works anywhere in the world, provided you fit the right plug. It was some cheapy from Asda (aka WalMart in the UK) and is seven years old. The manual is in about 20 languages, and talks about being setup for reception in the USA.

      Of course for HD the situation is probably completely different however.

  42. Huh? by spiritraveller · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Either it won't play old DVDs and home movies at all (in which case noone will buy these new drives), or it will have some extra track or encoding that indicates the presence of an rfid chip.

    People figured out how to get rid of CSS, what makes the studios think that this will be any harder?

    Amazing how they invest so much money in this stuff, when it's not likely to last longer than a few months.

    1. Re:Huh? by teh_chrizzle · · Score: 1
      that's why DRM (all DRM) is deffective by design. DRM doesn't work, costs the media companies money, and actively encourages piracy.

      once the piracy problem has been dealt with, here are some other ventures that media companies want to get into:
      • playing chicken with trains
      • pissing in the wind
      • arguing with brick walls
      • repealing the law of gravity
      --
      sarcasm:
      -noun
      1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
  43. Re:Aluminum foil over the RFID detector? Burn a co by gigne · · Score: 2, Informative

    The RFID destroyer would be no larger than a small matchbox. There is no need for a MASSIVE (as in size) electromagnet, only a small, strong, directed em pulse.

    The RFID-Zapper project uses a camera flash coil to induce enough current in the aerial to kill the silicon. I have tested something similar using a CCFL backlight inverter coil.

    RFID-Zapper

    --
    Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
  44. Re:The right to steal? by temcat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes - by your new definition of the word "stealing", which now includes playing out-of-region disks.

  45. Re:If it won't play in my DVD player, it's not a D by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 3, Informative

    On another, rather important, note, they mention it for HD-DVD. HD-DVD doesn't even _have_ region encoding, so they can't tell me the disc is from the wrong one; that's why I want HD-DVD rather than Blu-Ray.

    This statement needs to be changed to say that HD-DVD doesn't have region encoding now. The fact that it is not being imposed now does not mean that it won't be imposed in the future. A web search can provide some interesting comments on this.

    The thing that I find most interesting about HD-DVD is that the whole idea of PAL or NTSC discs is going away. At least so far it appears that HD-DVD's standard will be 24 fps video and it will expect the hardware (HD-DVD player and TV) to correctly display the image in whatever format is necessary.

  46. Let's look at this 'security' by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    Putting a sticker on the box 'OMG don't copy this or use it in another country': $00.00.01
    Putting a small header info on the DVD that says 'this is region, like, erm, 1': $FREE?
    Putting an RFID chip on the disc to do exactly the same thing: $national debt of the US - (national debt of the US - $00.15)

    For everything else, you can always get vencture capitalist funding

    1: take buzz word
    2: take unrelated area of 'interest'
    3: ??? O'RLY
    4: Venture Funding (synonyms: profit, new car, new wife...)

    really stupid. However you implement a feature that will tell the box you bought 'this DVD is special' someone will sell for $10 a device to make the disc box thingy think all the DVD's are special, and they will be filled with a warm fuzzy feeling.

    I named my DVD player Colin after I deregioned it, on account of its unnervingly chipper mood.

    Up Colin, UP!

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
    1. Re:Let's look at this 'security' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad name ;)

  47. that does it... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

    Well that does it. From now on I'm going to put all my new CDs and DVDs in the microwave for a few minutes first.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  48. Purely for region locks, not copy prevention by iainl · · Score: 1

    This is utterly fucked as a copy-prevention system for DVD, or even for HD-DVD and Blu-Ray.

    Right now, there are millions of people in the world with their completely legit home movies on home-recorded DVD writeable discs (of assorted formats).

    Right now, there are at least tens of thousands of people in the world with shop-bought HD-DVD and Blu-Ray movies. There are probably hundreds of millions of people with shop-bought DVDs.

    All the above people will want their discs to continue to work, even if they replace their players due to age. So these hypothetical players must have an ability to play video streams off discs without embedded chips. Which means they'll play pirate movies without chips as well.

    This only has a hope in hell of working for region-locking, and there they hit one rather serious problem. ALL the hardware manufacturers know that outside the US, you'll make a lot more money selling a lot more players if you ensure that your region-locking settings are just barely secure enough to avoid the wrath of the DVD Standards Committee, but not enough to stop it being fairly open knowledge how to disable them at home. The public want region-free, and the public get region-free.

    For instance, it's pretty much known that the "standard" Toshiba handset hack will work to disable the region locks on the legacy DVD portion of their upcoming HD-E1 and HD-EX1 HD-DVD players, and they aren't even in reviewers hands yet.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  49. Please explain to me by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How playing "out of region" DVDs is bad?

    Suppose I'm a fan of movies made in France ... but I live in Canada. Why would it be bad for me, or the producers of the media, for me to BUY a copy and have it shipped here?

    What they really should call that is "out of monopololistic control zone."

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  50. How this is supposed to work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they want to allow "new DVDs" to play on old DVD players, and old DVDs on new players, they're facing problems implementing the stuff in a way that wouldn't be trivial to circumvent in a pirated disc played on consumer players. Specifically, they'd need all DVD disks to contain a data block whose contents would be signed by secret key available only to the content owner. The block would be always verified with a public key on the player and the status of RFID availability and related data from the block. (Failure to verify that disk contents are authentic would prevent playing - obviously contents and usage of this block should have been carefully designed in the original DVD standard with DRM in mind to make it actually effective.) This data would be combined with tamper-safely stored key on the hardware to encrypt a challenge sent to crypto-RFID on the disc, would be processed, challenge sent back and verified. This would be the only reasonably bulletproof method to implement this stuff in any way I can see.

    I don't know about DVD standard in depth required here, but even if the data block with mentioned properties exists on all DVDs nowadays, there are problems. And I don't believe one exists. The protection method described here wouldn't provide any protection against fully software-driven decoding without *very* cumbersome safeguards on computer hardware. Of course, they want to push such hardware. Only way for these things to work properly (if DRM can work "properly" at all) is to design these things from scratch. Fortunately the content owners don't have the power to ban existing CD and DVD players or even phase those formats out of the market overnight... but if they had, they'd certainly do it.

    1. Re:How this is supposed to work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and of course - this doesn't prevent pirated discs that would have generated from analog (or unencrypted digital) copy of the original piece. Which makes this technology pretty trivial to circumvent with some potential loss of quality.

  51. The death of disk based distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I smell the slow, painfull death of disk based distribution coming sooner than expected. RFID will not save the industry, it will siply cost everyone involved billions of dollars. In the end, once consumers realize that they can no longer access their music or movie because the rfid tag is dead, they will abandon ship and start downloading. It may be legal services, it may be illegal means, but either way they will stop buying disks.

  52. Re:If it won't play in my DVD player, it's not a D by Name+Anonymous · · Score: 1
    This means a new standard, and new players all round. It's no longer a DVD, and I'm certainly not running out and buying a new player for it.

    I'm not buying any new players until after the HD-DVD/Blu-Ray competition is done with. Come to think of it, I'm pretty much not buying any more movies either right now. Of course this reduces the pressure on me to upgrade to an HD TV. And at this point, I probably won't get an HD TV until after the format war is settled unless my current TV dies.

  53. Re:The right to steal? by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1
    Is you not having thought things through reason enough for you to post ridicilous implications to Slashdot, as if there was a sizable fraction here stealing anything?

    Obviously, it is. It is "illegal copying", not stealing. These are materially different. These are so materially different that you should sit down and think carefully through why I'm saying the following until you get it (and shut up about the topic until you have gotten it): When you are labelling illegal copying as stealing, you cannot think clearly about it.

    See my previous comments on Slashdot if you need hints. Oh, and I'm one of those "content creators" you want to "protect".

    --
    Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
  54. Another option by mangaskahn · · Score: 1

    Another option is to make noise in the system. Use a carosel to play the first track or chapter of a disk 24 hours a day. If enough noise gets introduced, the system will be useless.

    --
    Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect.--Linus Torvalds
  55. RFID on discs and privacy by Aardvark99 · · Score: 1

    The company I work for develops an RFID system used in libraries. We use small donut-shaped tags that fit around the hub of the libraries' CD/DVDs. We've used several different RFID designs (different readers, different RFID ICs attached to different antennas) designed in house and off-the-shelf. We're lucky to get 6 inches of read range, let along 6 meters. The metal on the discs themselves often hurts performance; especially on cd/dvd boxes contain multiple discs. Multiple tags in very close proximity often cause the tags to "couple", rendering then useless. We had to develop special boxes that would keep the dics far enough apart and attach secondary booster antennas in the tray to even hope to get reliable reads and extremely short distances. Worry about RIFD tags on the boxes, not on the discs.

  56. Re:If it won't play in my DVD player, it's not a D by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

    I am in the same situation, I have my same 32" normal CRT, not even a flat screen, lasted me for years, I have no plans on getting a larger TV, or even HD till HD content is standard. That being said, although my TV currently functions just fine, as does my old no name brand DVD player, the TV is being wierd, its randomly turning off every now and then. So I may end up getting a new TV, who knows, but it will still not be an HD thats for sure.

    --
    I came, I conquered, I coredumped
  57. Hope the imbalance that results... by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    ...from the off-center weight of the chip... makes the drive hum and vibrate enough to scare consumers.

    A few damaged DVD players might put the kibosh on this scheme.

  58. Re:The Pope was right! by jackhererUK · · Score: 1

    And what exactly has this to do with RID chips in DVDs?

  59. Post-facto crippling via firmware by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'm just itching to buy into a new technology that can have its capabilities reduced after I've bought it. Remind me to sign the EULA with disappearing ink, seeing as how that's what they're using to write the feature list...

  60. MAYBE the suits will notice... by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...that the actual sales of the protected disks are not detectably higher than the sales of the unprotected disks, while the extra manufacturing costs are a meaningful nibble out of the profit.

    Of course, I have always wondered whether the push to DRM is actually driven by any clear-headed, realistic, cost/benefit analysis based on good, real data... or whether it's an irrational emotional response on the part of media executives. Or the result of very good, misleading sales pitches by the vendors of DRM technology.

  61. Re:If it won't play in my DVD player, it's not a D by Name+Anonymous · · Score: 1
    So I may end up getting a new TV, who knows, but it will still not be an HD thats for sure.

    Actually you do want to consider an HD TV at that point. Unless you think it'll be more than 5 years befoe you'll be buying an HD TV.

  62. The hardware... by Nonillion · · Score: 1

    What I don't get is why can't the people who manufacture the hardware just tell the MPAA/RIAA to just get fucked. I'm certain that the manufactures know DRM is a dead end and know customers like me hate this crap. When I buy a new player/recorder I want it to do something that adds value to my music/movie experience; not hobble it with restrictions (reduced resolution or forced hardware upgrades etc).

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
    1. Re:The hardware... by delinear · · Score: 1

      I guess for the same reason that the **AA's want this stuff to begin with. Consumer awareness is at a point where people expect their players to last years. I've owned two video players in 20 years. I have two DVD players, but I only bought one (the other was a prize so I stuck it in the spare bedroom). I'd be surprised and a little disappointed if I had to replace my DVD player before DVD's started to be replaced by the next big media fad. If the manufacturers could find a way to ensure that I bought a new player every four or five years instead of every ten to twenty years, I'm sure they'd be very happy little bunnies...

  63. It still needs a sensor by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    It still needs some way to acquire the RFID info, even if it's capable of decyphering it. If the sensor is on the chip, ok, wrap the chip up in tinfoil.

    Some way or another, it has to read the RFID chip.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  64. If they could, they already would by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    If they could somehow make you pay per view, they would. But it's more like 5 bucks, not cents.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  65. ...but it's not very likely. by jimicus · · Score: 1

    You see, the first batch to be produced will be of films which haven't previously been released on DVD - so you can't make a direct comparison (except possibly "it did so well in the cinema, how come nobody's buying the DVD? Must be the pirates....") and I really doubt there will be two side-by-side versions in the shops which are identical in every way except for the RFID chip.

  66. The customer has no choice by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The customer's role in the free market is that of the chooser. He chooses the manufacturer whose products meet his expectations and thus this manufacturer gets money, stays in business, can make better products, etc.

    This role can only be fulfilled if he has any kind of choice, though. And, no matter where you look, today, that choice is lacking. You cannot choose between the HDDVD-Player with or without DRM. It is FORBIDDEN to manufacture a HDDVD player that circumvents DRM (or doesn't implement it).

    Free market is broken. Let's hope someone realizes and fixes it before it's beyond repair.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  67. Re:If it won't play in my DVD player, it's not a D by iainl · · Score: 1

    The main quote that interests me is the one from a senior guy at Toshiba promising never to do this. So I'm not that worried. The steering committee for the format continue to discuss the idea of future players having region locking, but it's not part of AACS, so they can't force it on currently-available players.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  68. Weighting by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    How will they be addressing the uneven weighting this sort of addition will create? Unless they counter-balance it with an equally weighted "slug" on the opposite side of the disc, it could potentially render devices sensitive to disc wobble unable to read the data stored on these discs.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Weighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's exactly what they'll do - use a counterweight. RFID chips aren't very heavy, so the counterwedight won't be a significant cost.

  69. How about using this in a non-evil way? by zlogic · · Score: 1

    How about using this in a non-evil way? Like using an RFID scanner to track your CDs. You can detect if the box contains the wrong DVD (not the one written on the label). Or answer the "what DVDs are in my suitcase" question.

  70. Re:The right to steal? by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't say making copies is illegal. But I hadn't assumed that the "other alternatives" the original poster mentioned were making copies of legally-purchased ones.

    --

    One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
  71. Easily Fixed. by kahrytan · · Score: 1


    If the disc itself can withstand a EMP pulse, just build yourself a RFID Zapper.

    --
    \
  72. New Campaign by Damastus+the+WizLiz · · Score: 1

    I say slashdotters should start a new campaign against this.
    "The Terrorists will win if you buy RFID DVDs! Think of the children!"

    --
    I often have trouble remembering which way is out of bed in the morning.
  73. You are a moron, sir! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone say SLIPPERY SLOPE? Nice thinking things out before you post.

  74. duct tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    immediately after buying one of these DVD's or CD's whip out some duct tape and tape each disc case publically to show them your opposion to the RFID chip. seriously though, I agree with stopping piracy but the article also said out of region discs as well that means if you move you lose your entire DVD collection soemthing I'm not sure anyone has mentioned yet. why can't I watch a movie I've legally bought in North America in Europe?

  75. Funny thing about the free market. . . by Zenaku · · Score: 1
    What strikes me about the whole situation is how the "All Hail The Global Free Market" mentality seems to work in only one direction. If a company can manufacture its goods at a fraction of the cost by moving operations to Singapore, or hire an army of call-center workers in India to take your drive-through order at McDonalds stores throughout the American midwest, or have their software written by programmers working remotely from China for the equivalent of a few bucks an hour, that is all supposed to be well and good, and everyone who loses their job to the outsourcing or experiences a decline in wages is told that they just haven't remained competetive in the global marketplace, and need to accept their new place in the world economy. Tariffs are bad, they artificially segregate the market!

    But if the consumer can obtain that companies goods for a fraction of the cost by purchasing it in Singapore, India, or China. . . well, that just can't be tolerated! It's an act of piracy to get things from another region because they are cheaper! The government should do something!

    Region coding is one of the most transparently hypocritical piles of corporate BS there is. If the price they want to charge people in well-off nations like the US and the UK won't sell anywhere else in the world, Boo Hoo for them. They just haven't remained competetive in the global marketplace, and need to accept their new place in the world economy. If you want to make it more affordable for people world-wide, then make it more affordable for everyone world-wide. Region coding is bad, it artificially segregates the market.

    --
    If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    1. Re:Funny thing about the free market. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said.

  76. What other requirements will they have? by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Soon they will need you to plug up to a lie detector test before you can watch a movie.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  77. This is by ThePepe · · Score: 1

    stupid, stupid, stupid. I feel theres nothing else to say.

  78. As if by SixPockets · · Score: 1

    Wow.. out of all the stupid ideas out there.. lets update on a current already going out of date format by adding another minimal secuirty none realistic device to it. The main flaw with this is that the format they wish to secure is already going out of date. The main reason why it is still so big is because everybody already has hardware that enables them to play it. By using cds and dvds which are already going to brake way to blue-ray and other hd formats comming out the cd and dvd are going to go the way of the dinos. Nobody is going to be willing to buy another DVD player or CD player just to play a new CDs and DVDs with RFID tags. Not to mention the cost of equiping a DVD player or CD player with a RFID writer and reader.. ON THE FUN NOTE THO! Wouldnt it be nice to make a few modifications to your walkmen and have a mobile RFID read/writer you could make do what you want? Think of it.. The madness!

  79. I'm a housebreaker by gonzoxl5 · · Score: 1

    Hey there, this is lightfingered Lenny, your freidnly neighbourhood housebreaker, I used to have to case my joints pretty thoroughly but soon all I'll have to do is walk down the street with an aggressive RF scanner and I'll be able to see which houses have expensive consumer electronics gear in them.

    Because my reader is so adaptable, I'm also going to branch out into ID theft with my mate Frankie the Forger.

    Its a good job that people don't think too hard about security before implementing things like RF devices, otherwise I'd have to go back to working hard for my crooked living.

  80. Region Encoding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder when car makes take ideas from Hollywood and "enhance" their cars with region encoding features. For example your US-bought car would stop working when it's built-in GPS receiver would detect that you are trying to drive it in Europe. Sorry dude - this is not a Fair Use, not authorized - buy a new car ... .. how come region encoding is legal ? - I would expect the fair use clauses in US law to easily defeat it ... if not we can expect it in other products, watches, clothes, food, furniture when GPS tech will be cheap enough ...

  81. My super anti-RFID DRM circumvention idea... by merc · · Score: 1

    Not buy the player.

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  82. Disable Chip, Job's Done by edward.virtually@pob · · Score: 1

    Assuming they're not going to EOL the millions of existing RFID-free DVDs, it should be a simple matter to destroy the RFID chip at which point it will be just another DVD. Perhaps a very short (1-2 second) cooking in a microwave would destroy the chip without destroying the media? Something will be found to disable the chip, of that I am sure.

  83. Labels about to get sold down the river... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't worry too much about this. If anything, it seems like Ritek is about to sell a whole bunch of nothing to the labels via a dazzling display of techno-marketing buzzwords. So, now we just sit back, relax, and have a good chuckle as this whole thing blows over.

  84. Re:The right to steal? by pla · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is "illegal copying", not stealing. These are materially different.

    Actually, no - Failure to obey region coding doesn't even count as copyright violation. It doesn't break ANY laws (except, in just a few countries, if you circumvent the access control mechanism involved) whatsoever.

    Industry cartels (generally illegal, but somehow they've gotten away with this in the movie and video game industries) have NO authority of enforcement whatsoever. Thus the "need" for various forced region coding schemes on their part in the first place.

  85. I don't understand how this will deter copying... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    OK, I read the article and still have no idea how this will deter copying. If I place an RFID enabled movie into the DVD burner on my computer, rip the movie and then burn the result to DVD-R, how will the RFID player have any idea that I am playing a copied movie? Are they suggesting that future DVD players equipped with this technology will only play discs that contain an RFID chip, meaning all of my legacy DVD movies or burned home videos on DVD would be useless on such a player? Such a player would be next to useless and would be immediately returned to the store after the consumer returns home and pops the first legacy DVD into the player that won't play.

    If that is not the case and the RFID enabled players will play legacy/burned DVD movies just fine, then the entire RFID protection system is useless.

    The logic of how this would work utterly escapes me.

  86. Get your passports here!!! by Hamoohead · · Score: 1

    Does this mean I can use my Chinese CD/DVD collection as a US passport?

    --
    "If your parents never had children, chances are you wonât either." -Dick Cavett
  87. Re:Aluminum foil over the RFID detector? Burn a co by brandorf · · Score: 1

    I suppose it depends on where they put the RFID. I was thinking they'd put it in the central plastic hub.

    --


    Bork Bork Bork!!
  88. Exported ? by mistralol · · Score: 1

    So what happens if a large company who makes desks and things does a massive cock up and exports a whole load of desks to the the wrong country. Its all more of less flat pack build it stuff isnt it ? Hows a few guys in a wherrhouse meant to know which is for japan and which is for the US / UK etc.. when they have a whole loads of boxes that all say the same thing and contain the same thing. I am sure it will be intresting when some kid in class gets region flipped by his portable cd player. When the teacher asks whats wrong he could replay my CD player things i am in Japan etc...

  89. "prevent copied or out-of-region disks" by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    ok then. You do that, and I'll make sure your company's content doesn't get played on any of my hardware - legit or not.

  90. Re:The right to steal? by Pofy · · Score: 1

    >Their making undesirable changes to the product
    >is reason enough for you to steal it,

    Why would you ever have to do that? It would be much easier to, for example, make a copy of of it instead. In many cases that would actually turn out to be legal (as oposed to stealing it).

  91. Easy... by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    This one's easy; just put a counterweight of equal mass on the disc, opposite the chip...

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  92. and the hack for this is. . . . by jafac · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing, it involves a black magic marker. . .

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  93. Re:The right to steal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True enough. I wouldn't care what they do to DVDs for security if they were consistent in their idea that the content is 'licensed', and not bought. If they were, I could get a replacement for the disk that my kid destroyed for the price of the plastic and the postage.

    Region coding does nothing to stop piracy, and copy controls hamper fair use. What's not to like about a new layer of "protection"?

  94. What a bargain... or really? by dreamlax · · Score: 1

    Yep, it's true, brands like Teac, Tokai, S&V etc they all have cheap DVD players that all do the same thing and do it well for the price you pay. The big-brands still need to sell DVD players or they'd miss out on a huge market. Buying anything with a big-brand label on it has it's advantages:

    1. When things do break under warranty, the big-brand will carry spare parts for the model. In New Zealand, manufacturers have an obligation to provide spare parts for models they import. If they cannot fix it, they will credit the retailer to refund the customer. This quite often happens when brands like Teac and S&V can no longer source whole units. Factories in China mass produce products for brands like Teac and S&V to slap their name on it and call it theirs. If I wanted to, I could ask the factory to ship 10,000 units my way with the name "Dreamlax" on it. Once production stops, Teac and S&V look for another source, and will call it a new model. However Panasonic consumer goods are all manufactured by Panasonic by factories owned by them (or as much as you can "own" a factory in China). One exception to this is photocopiers, where they used to, but might not anymore, get Minolta to manufacture them. Even when things break outside of warranty, if you've spend big bucks on something (say an LCD or home theatre system), you'd want the possibility of being able to have it fixed.
    2. Product support for big-brand products is a must for some people. Again with Pana in NZ; Panasonic localise all instructions to either Oceania or sometimes even specifically for New Zealand. Instead of trying to understand some poorly typeset, poorly translated manual, you have a well typeset English manual. If that's still too hard, you can ring the [usually toll-free] customer support number without being redirected to Malaysia or India.
    3. Although almost everything is made in China (some of Pana's DVD-recorders come from Malaysia), factories still grade the batch quality of production. Depending on the brand you buy, you might get a piece of shit, or you might get the best of the batch. Teac, not being the cheapest or the most expensive, go towards buying the best graded batches only (I was told this by the Teac sales rep at my retailer outlet), whereas other brands might just want the cheapest batch. A big-brand's factory doesn't operate like this because all batches are to be branded the same. They have stricter quality control for this very reason.

    Yeah, I may work at a retailer, but I still buy brands like Teac. That doesn't mean that everyone else will. People aren't "stupid" for buying big brand items, but this doesn't make them "smart" for not buying Teac.

    It all depends on what you want out of what you buy.

  95. RFID? No problemo by Ice+Wewe · · Score: 1

    Vobcopy, deploy!

  96. Re:If it won't play in my DVD player, it's not a D by Sancho · · Score: 1

    The drive in my set-top DVD player is going out. [aww] Luckily it can be replaced with a standard DVD-Rom for a computer. [yay!] Unfortunately, it's pretty hard to find 1x drives these days, so the new drive is going to be pretty loud. [aww]

  97. possible workaround by hey0you0guy · · Score: 1

    all you have to do is color over the chip with a black felt tip marker...

  98. Putting a legit DVD on top of the player hack by sprior · · Score: 1

    Won't it be funny when the first RFID enabled DVD player comes out and the hack to play copied (non tagged) disks is to simply leave a legit disk on the top of the player for it to detect...

  99. Re:The right to steal? by kimvette · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Watch the next DVD ad you see on TV. Seriously.

    Do thet say "license the movie today?" No. It's "Own Lion King on DVD today." "OWN Narnia on DVD today." "Own the original trilogy on DVD today."

    Please stop parroting those idiots' (read idiots' as: ..AAs') claims that content is merely "licensed." They know better, and as a consumer, you should know your rights as well.

    They (the content producers themselves) re promoting the indisputable fact that you OWN the copy of that content. The only thing you CANNOT legally do with it is infringe on copyright law, aside from the exceptions provided for by the fair use clause.

    If the content were a work for hire, it might be a different story, depending on the basis of the contract under which you had them create the content for you. No, DVDs are commodity goods, and when you buy it, you OWN it. Period.

    $.02

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  100. Something Rotten Here by Frodrick · · Score: 1

    This whole thing has been around before. About a year ago, a similar announcement made the rounds with similar uproar. The fact that much of this proposed technology is so pointless (I mean, DVD's are already region coded, and it probably COSTS studios far more than it helps.) gives one pause.

    This whole thing has the smell of an unproven technology (remember "Dark Noise"?) and a developer who is desperate for someone - anyone - to invest in his "snake-oil", hopefully raking in as much cash as possible before the studios discover that the technology is worthless.

  101. This won't work by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    This won't work. For example, I almost always play legally owned or rented DVDs. The rest are burnt from my DVD burner. An RFID-aware DVD player wouldn't be able to tell if my DVD-R contained videos of my nephew or an illegally downloaded movie.

    Likewise, this won't work in overseas markets where pirated DVDs are common. Enterprising pirates will just manufacture DVD players that are immune to the system.

  102. Re:If it won't play in my DVD player, it's not a D by Randseed · · Score: 1

    Region encoding is absolutely worthless. Think about it: Someone buys a CD in Asia, and pirates it. Now if they do a direct copy of the CD, it can't be played in players in America. But if they rip it and reencode it, [b]which they are going to do anyway[/b], then it doesn't matter. All it does is piss of legitimate customers.

  103. Re:The right to steal? by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1

    I perfectly agree with your sentiment as to region coding, I just don't agree that was what I and the guy I replied to was talking about. Well, I can't really know what *he* was talking about, but it didn't seem to be region coding, and I know I wasn't :)

    --
    Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
  104. Re:The right to steal? by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1
    Copies of copies isn't stealing, either. Stealing involve directly depriving somebody of something. Illegal copying (no matter the number of "levels" of copying) may be neutral to, may deprive and may enrich the content owner, depending on what happens in related activity. As a such, it is very different from stealing.

    Eivind.

    --
    Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
  105. Fight back by infidel13 · · Score: 1

    Let the blacklisting of RFID players begin!

    --
    quia potentia mens mentis