Slashdot Mirror


The Internet — Enabler of Guilty Pleasures

Carl Bialik from WSJ writes "'Sure, the Internet has revolutionized the spread of information and all that high-minded stuff, but its combination of reach and anonymity also makes it the greatest enabler of guilty pleasures ever invented,' Jason Fry writes in the Wall Street Journal. 'Indulgence is just a click away, and nobody needs to know, except you and some server somewhere.' For example: Fry, a rock snob, has a double secret life as a pop-music fan (secret no more, of course). From the article: 'If your secret love of "Save a Horse (Ride a Cowboy)" has caused it to creep into your iTunes list of 25 most-played songs, a simple right-click will let you reset the play count. If you want to hear Fall Out Boy, but would rather do so in secret, you can command Last.fm to ignore that the song was played — or delete it from your charts if you forget. Viewed from the standpoint of cool logic, this behavior is at least mildly insane. But who needs things that remind us of who we really are, as opposed to how we want others to see us — or how we'd like to see ourselves?'"

206 comments

  1. Oh so true by lixee · · Score: 4, Funny

    I caught myself watching MTV's "Wanna come in" few minutes ago and gave myself a slap.

    --
    Res publica non dominetur
    1. Re:Oh so true by MoonFog · · Score: 1

      Isn't this kind of like the stupid reality shows and tabloid magazines which people will never acknowledge reading/watching, yet still has a great knowledge of? Nothing new, the scenery has just changed and now the one who knows is the IT guy, not the clerk behind the counter.

    2. Re:Oh so true by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Last night at the bar it was "Cartoons and Shows from the 70's". We were pretty stumped on some (Goldar, Silvar, and...Steve?). Then someone whipped out the Treo and hit Google ("Space Giants" - never did get the last one)

      Good times, goood times...

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    3. Re:Oh so true by myth24601 · · Score: 1
      Last night at the bar it was "Cartoons and Shows from the 70's". We were pretty stumped on some (Goldar, Silvar, and...Steve?). Then someone whipped out the Treo and hit Google ("Space Giants" - never did get the last one)

      Wasn't it Gam?

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    4. Re:Oh so true by tehwebguy · · Score: 5, Informative

      i think the point is that you can be more secretive.. it doesn't take the kind of balls to do something online it might take to do in front of a store full of people (or even just one guy behind a counter)

      --
      -- lol pwned
    5. Re:Oh so true by RackinFrackin · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It was Gam. Also, it wasn't a cartoon, it was a live-action sci-fi show.

    6. Re:Oh so true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Once, I was on vacation to Virginia to visit some friends, and we ended up at Suncoast Pictures. So I went to the back, grabbed the first tentacle rape hentai DVD I could find (Twin Angels, I think it was), walked up to the counter, slapped it down, looked the (cute young female) clerk right in the eye and said in my best slightly-above-indoor voice, "I'd like to buy this tentacle porn."

      Probably my finest moment.

      (I guess the point is that no everyone is afraid of what other people think.)
      (Then again, I'm posting AC...)

    7. Re:Oh so true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I bet you missed your face with that slap and queued up "can't touch this" in winamp.

    8. Re:Oh so true by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1
      (Then again, I'm posting AC...)

      ... and not willing to do it in your own hometown. heheheheh.

    9. Re:Oh so true by severoon · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes. When I think of indulging "guilty pleasures" on the Internet, I too cannot come up with a better example than listening to Fallout Boy on loop...

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    10. Re:Oh so true by turgid · · Score: 1

      i think the point is that you can be more secretive.. it doesn't take the kind of balls to do something online it might take to do in front of a store full of people (or even just one guy behind a counter)

      Oh, I don't know about that.

      Time's cruel weathering of the soul, an abundance of pre-middle-age cynicism, and maybe two or three pints of strong lager can permit (dare I say it, "encourage") a casual stroll into Harmony on London's Oxford street.

    11. Re:Oh so true by ivow · · Score: 1
      And plus, they require pants at public places.

      http://www.nopantsday.com/

    12. Re:Oh so true by RalphSleigh · · Score: 1

      You mean you dont use that store as a central London meeting place?

      Ah crap

      --
      Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
  2. how pop? by justkarl · · Score: 3, Funny

    FRom TFA:

    Given such freedom, hipsters can let their inner dork out for a romp, extolling the virtues of the Arcade Fire by night and retreating to their headphones by day for a Hanson or Boston fix.

    I think that Boston and Hanson are two totally separate things. Boston can be filed quickly under Classic Rock, but any god fearing man who listens to hanson even behind closed doors, in my book, might need a psychiatric evalutation.

    1. Re:how pop? by deafNewt · · Score: 1

      We all have our dark sides that we want to keep secret, but Hanson -- the horror! the horror!!

    2. Re:how pop? by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      . . .any god fearing man. . .

      If God wants take issue with me he come on around and I'll mmmmmmmm bop 'im.

      KFG

    3. Re:how pop? by Frymaster · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Given such freedom, hipsters can let their inner dork out for a romp, extolling the virtues of the Arcade Fire by night and retreating to their headphones by day for a Hanson or Boston fix.

      and the internet is necessary for this how? waaay back in the days when the bbs ruled the earth you could still listen to dorky music in the privacy of your own home, away from the judgemental eyes of your peers. if anything, the internet makes this sort of clandestine pleasure harder. last.fm, filesharing &c make the music you have and are actually listening to visible (and audible) by a way larger audience.

      add to that the semi-permanace of an online life and things get worse. in the internet age, your tastes can leave a near-indellible electronic trail -- poorly thought out blog posts, last.fm entries &c. you used to be able to say that you were into such-and-such band 'before they sold out' or whatever and people would just have to take your word. nowadays you have to have a suitably-dated myspace post to back it up!

    4. Re:how pop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you download a Hanson track, that's one thing. But if you actually have to walk up to the counter at CD Whorehouse and buy it.... well, imagine all the underbreath chatter amongst the peanut gallery. Sure, you'll stutter, "I-i-it's for my c-c-cousin. Yeah, that's it. C-c-cousin." They'll really know what's going on. And besides, even if it was for your cousin, would you want to admit being related, and encouraging that behavior?

    5. Re:how pop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think that Boston and Hanson are two totally separate things. Boston can be filed quickly under Classic Rock, but any god fearing man who listens to hanson even behind closed doors, in my book, might need a psychiatric evalutation.
      Well, this is nice and dandy, except for:
      • Hanson isn't doing mmmbop no more. Their newer material is very enjoyable, and not in a "teenage bubblegum pop" way, but more like a "classic rock/folk influenced lite rock" way.
      • Hanson actually puts on a really solid live show. I'm a musician myself - took my kid sister and her schoolmates to a Hanson concert (nothing like trying to get a troop of 15yo girls to behave to give your nerves a jog) and was very much impressed. They also did a Cream cover - it was funny as hell, you could see a bunch of older brothers/fathers/grownups who had taken all the kids to the concert doing a double take while the kids had those blank looks of "huh? What song is this?"
      • Hanson actually funds a small label (they split from Island) and helps upcoming local bands - that's VERY respectable, even if you aren't into three-way pop vocal harmonies :D
      Anyway, the bottom line is that I've found a lot of really enjoyable music lately that I used to think of as "off limits" due to stupid prejudice - now my collection spans from Death Metal to Tango...
    6. Re:how pop? by needacoolnickname · · Score: 1

      If you really care what the "Im so rebellious that I wear exactly what the rebellious people wear" clerk at Tower thinks of you then you have many more problems above and beyond the CD in your hand.

    7. Re:how pop? by Jamil+Karim · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, it's good to see that the absence of your "stupid prejudice" has enabled you to no longer worry about how others might think of you, Anonymous Coward. =)

    8. Re:how pop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hanson is definitely a guilty pleasure. I despised them for the whole Mmmm Bop thing but their last album (Underneath) is actually really good; the band has matured considerably.

    9. Re:how pop? by alpha_foobar · · Score: 1

      Hanson have a mature album? They are no longer 10?

    10. Re:how pop? by notaspunkymonkey · · Score: 1

      I agree.. The kids who work at these store all dress the same - they think that they bring something unique to the store and fashion in general - go to the next Independant record shop down the road and there is a clone dressed in the same outfit.. unless they make their own clothes (which to be fair some of them may - they look badly made enough!)

    11. Re:how pop? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      If God wants take issue with me he come on around and I'll mmmmmmmm bop 'im.

      Wow, gives new meaning to "Oh God, Oh God". =)

      Unless, you meant a bop on the nose of course. ;-)

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  3. Guilty pleasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    If by "guilty pleasures" you mean jacking it to man-on-man pornos while refreshing slashdot in another tab, well ALL ABOARD THE SLASHDOT EXPRESS!

    1. Re:Guilty pleasures? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Funny

      "If by "guilty pleasures" you mean jacking it to man-on-man pornos while refreshing slashdot in another tab, well ALL ABOARD THE SLASHDOT EXPRESS!"

      Speak for yourself. I visit Digg, too!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:Guilty pleasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Wow, you mean that Digg was not that gay porn site?

    3. Re:Guilty pleasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon Barnard, exactly why are you posting anon, we all know it's you.

    4. Re:Guilty pleasures? by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      Only on slashdot would this be modded Insightful.

      I look around me now, and I am scared.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  4. Wasn't it easier to do these things decades ago? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How does any of the write-up make sense? If I wanted to listen to New Kids on the Block without letting my Metallica friends know, I'd just go out and buy the tape and hide it in a different place than my regular tapes. The only person who'd know is me and the record store guy, and he cares less than some server somewhere since he probably doesn't keep records of every customer and every tape they bought. Whereas now, who cares if you could reset the play counter? Your friends are still gonna know if you have an N'Sync album on your iTunes because it's all there on the list.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  5. pleasures! noo! by s388 · · Score: 3, Funny

    yes, it's revolutionized the spread of information, BUT

    BUT! it's become the greatest enabler of pleasures ever invented.

    horrible.

    everybody get back to your miserable farmwork!

  6. Guilty Pleasures by LordPhantom · · Score: 2, Funny

    True enough..... I caught myself tapping my toes to Nickleback's "Savin' Me" until I saw....

    BSG Season 3 promo

    Some blogger far more witty than I commented that "The only show that could make them sound -good-". That's now my excuse. Yes, that's it.

  7. Not just "mildly" insane by blueZ3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First off, people who care that much about what others think about their taste in music (or food, clothes, whatever) are in need of serious psychological help. If you don't have the self-confidence to like what you like, and the hell with the rest of the world, you are (in my book) suffering the deepest kind of herd mentality that deserves disdain at every level.

    But more to the point, who in the world has other people looking at their iTunes playlist? If someone is looking at my PC and browsing my iTunes library, I suspect that they probably know me well enough to know of my love of 50's car songs (Jan and Dean & The Beach Boys) and penchant for listening to Weird Al's Starwars songs.

    I have to ask what type of paranoid thinks that the whole world is trying to ferret out their listening habits...

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by greg_barton · · Score: 5, Funny
      If you don't have the self-confidence to like what you like, and the hell with the rest of the world, you are (in my book) suffering the deepest kind of herd mentality that deserves disdain at every level.

      So, what you're saying is, "If you don't defy the herd, the herd should enforce herd defiance behavior!"

      Welcome to the herd, bubba!
    2. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, people who care that much about what others think about their taste in music (or food, clothes, whatever) are in need of serious psychological help.

      Because everyone who goes to the opera does so to enjoy the music! This is just part of natural human behaviour, and has been since the first person said "I know, let's put some fat bird in a dress and make her sing in a language no one understands!"

    3. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by Otter · · Score: 1
      First off, people who care that much about what others think about their taste in music (or food, clothes, whatever) are in need of serious psychological help.

      I think that column is supposed to have a hefty tongue-in-cheek element that's gone over pretty much everyone's Furious Nerd head...

    4. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by AndersOSU · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bullshit

      Everyone cares what there friends think, it's just that there is a recent trend to cultivate the image that you don't care what people think - but it is still an image, and you are still trying.

      Think about it this way, what are the odds that the emo kid shows up to his friends party wearing abercrombie, or the comp sci geek gets a Ryan Seacrest style suit?

      The whole world doesn't care (I know I don't), but your friends might raise an eyebrow if they found Justin Timberlake's entire audio career (or something else uncharacteristic) right next to Jan and Dean.

    5. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by FooAtWFU · · Score: 5, Insightful
      First off, people who care that much about what others think about their taste in music (or food, clothes, whatever) are in need of serious psychological help. If you don't have the self-confidence to like what you like, and the hell with the rest of the world, you are (in my book) suffering the deepest kind of herd mentality that deserves disdain at every level.

      Slow down, tiger. To some extent, this sort of behaviour (especially at, say, the high-school-ish age level) is part of a search for belonging, and (some people more so than others) are unfortunate enough to be surrounded by a shallow sort of a society where the price of belonging is to maintain certain superficial things - tastes in music, for instance. Some people, if they were found out to like certain things, would be soundly ridiculed, and possibly alienated. Not everyone has the strength to stand up in the face of social isolation. Some people might already be somewhat ostracized. Do they "deserve disdain at every level" for seeking the approval - or even the begrudging acceptance - of peers? I don't think so. The search for belonging, approval, acceptance... that's a basic human impulse.

      I'm not saying that it's spectacularly noble, or healthy, or The Thing To Do, but just... something as vehement as "disdain at every level" is too much.

      Now, excuse me Slashdot, pop psychology mode off as I return to listening to Enya...

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    6. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1
      "I have to ask what type of paranoid thinks that the whole world is trying to ferret out their listening habits..."
      ... Jan and Dean... hmmm, the Beach Boys... um, Weird Al's starwars stuff...

      <scribbles>

      Eh? What? Oh, nothing...

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    7. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The respect of others creates real economic and political benefits that can't simply be written off with a sweep of the "if they don't like me, damn them, I'm me!"

      The "herd mentality" doesn't arise from simple moral weakness and the desire to be loved, it arises becuase we are social beings in a social world. You can build rapport with people and get better service, a better chance of being hired for the job, a better deal on your new car, a more beautiful wife...

      That rapport consists in large part of sharing likes and dislikes or at the very least not radically contradicting the personal prejudices and preferences of those whose favor you hope to gain.

      I'm not saying you should kiss ass always and pretend to love everything the boss loves in order to get a raise. Far from it, I'm more the type to speak my mind and suffer for it later, while watching someone else climb the ladder in my place, sometimes with regret, sometimes not. I don't make a value judgment about that or try to wear it like a badge of honor, my point is to say that the construction of personal cool isn't simply a neurosis that happens in a vacuum, it's a deliberate strategy based on the specific network of social relationships and interaction that surrounds a person, and each person would do better to consider it as such rather than to simply take a position in the "Either you're a member of the herd or you're a rebel!" dichotomy and stake it out like dogma, though of course your position on the "herd mentality" is also another such social marker that will endear you to some and not to others as well.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    8. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First off, people who care that much about what others think about their taste in music (or food, clothes, whatever) are in need of serious psychological help.

      Of course, this is completely backwards. Normal human beings seek the approval of others and do so by bonding with like-minded individuals who they can easily please and can be easily pleased by.

      I doubt you're any different. The only people who really do eschew the opinions and feelings of others are mentally ill individuals suffering from anti-social disorder, anxiety disorders, depression, etc. Even in the last two cases they still DESIRE such approval, they're just unable to seek it out due to mental problems that prevent proper, healthy interaction.

      Such opinions are unfortunately common. I always wondered how it became an accepted idea that we should encourage the utter tripe that other people's opinions aren't important rather than encouraging people to express healthy criticism and support so that social groups could bond easier and meet natural human needs for social interaction.

      After all, what sense would it make to encourage healthier communication that people need when you can just pretend that the communication isn't even important, right?

      Regarding the music habits, I don't know about "ferreting them out", but I can certainly think of where listeing to the Dixie Chicks or gangsta rap could have bad consequences depending on the type of people who happen to notice what's on your playlist.
    9. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by kfg · · Score: 1

      Everyone cares what there friends think, it's just that there is a recent trend to cultivate the image that you don't care what people think - but it is still an image, and you are still trying.

      I fooled him, Grandma. I alienated all of my friends.

      KFG

    10. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What have you people done to me - I used there instead of their...

    11. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "The search for belonging, approval, acceptance... that's a basic human impulse."

      There are people whose approval and acceptance are important to me. Maybe ten or so. I'm marrying one of them next month. The rest of you are welcome to your opinion, because it's irrelevant to me.

      I think that people who get their identity from outside affirmation are unhealthy people.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    12. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by hcob$ · · Score: 1
      Because everyone who goes to the opera does so to enjoy the music!
      From my experience, women go to the Opera cause they like the music. Men go to get laid... Or they are gay... and sometimes both.
      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    13. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by PoderOmega · · Score: 1

      Heh... you goth served him

    14. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by Derosian · · Score: 1

      People who don't care that much about what others think are in serious need of psychological help. If you can't be considerate enough to not make your friends go through listening to your crappy songs, you are in my book suffering the deepest kind of anarchist mentality that deserves disdain at every level. The type of person who spray paints walls because, hell you like spray painting walls, to hell with the rest of the world not liking it, to hell with the person who owns said wall having to spend money to have painted over.

      Alright so in reality I don't truly care, but now you know how much of an alarmist you sound like. I agree with the rest of your post though.

    15. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by danpsmith · · Score: 1
      So, what you're saying is, "If you don't defy the herd, the herd should enforce herd defiance behavior!" Welcome to the herd, bubba!

      I understand the remark was in jest, but honestly that wasn't what he was saying. He was saying like what you like without shame. It's a small subset of the larger "be yourself" point. Many people preach this shit without really believing it or doing it. If I liked the backstreet boys I'd ruin everyone else's ears with them by playing them loudly in my car as I drove past. You can't be ashamed of yourself, it's a ridiculous high school "cool police" mentality that you are supposed to grow out of once you grow ball hair. But I guess some people never get there.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    16. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by quisph · · Score: 1

      Someone who claims not to care what other people think, posting a list of some of his favorite musicians on slashdot -- with the karma bonus, no less.

    17. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by greg_barton · · Score: 2, Insightful
      He was saying like what you like without shame.

      Sure, he said that. He also said that if you don't do that you, "deserve disdain at every level." The purpose of disdain is to apply social pressure to conform to a desired behavior. In other words, "If you don't like what you like without shame, you should be ashamed of yourself." :)
    18. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by dswensen · · Score: 1

      This is one of those times I wish moderation went to +6.

    19. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by Woldry · · Score: 1

      "You're all individuals!"

      "We're all individuals!"

      "Excuse me, I'm not!"

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    20. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by crabpeople · · Score: 1
      "Do they "deserve disdain at every level" for seeking the approval - or even the begrudging acceptance - of peers? I don't think so."

      Sorry, I agree with the grandparent, they do. If you don't even have enough courage to say what you believe you are a coddled baby. Should racists just keep it all inside? Fascists? Ace of base fans (OF WHICH I AM PROUD TO STAND AMONGST).

      Be proud of everything that is you. Anything else and you won't lead a very happy life. It makes me sick to think that I should be responsible for someone elses entire feelings when I tell them that their love of enya is quite gay.

      toughen up ya pansies! its just fucking music! If you cant take that kind of criticism, lord help you in the workplace, relationships and generally the rest of life. Acceptance breeds conformity. Life takes place in the margins.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    21. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by leoboiko · · Score: 1

      You know, a few years ago I used to talk exactly like you, in the same bitter tone. I was of course pissed of that people kept picking on me for my habits, but the hole was deeper than I thought; later I realized I was struggling too much to be accepted by myself.

      Because I think it's stupid to discriminate against people based on tastes, I convinced myself that I shouldn't care about what the other, stupider people think about me. Problem is, I cannot help but caring. The fish live with the fish, humans live with humans. It feels bad to be rejected; it feels bad to be flamed on the net, to have derogatory signs pasted to your back, to feel your acquintances slowly distancing themselves from you thanks to hearsay. For I long time I struggled with the problem of how to avoid feeling bad, but it was the wrong problem. I was, in fact, being exactly like them; I was giving myself a moral commandment against human nature, a "shouldn't", "thou shall not care about other people's opinions", a commandment as logically flawed as religious people trying to not like sex, and then blaming myself for failing to fulfill it.

      As soon as I figured this out, I stopped trying to pretend I don't care. Yes, I do care about what others think about me, I care a lot and I always did. Only I will not let that be a source of self-censorship. After all, it's not like being hated by some jerk is the end of the world, especially if you're not in denial about your emotional hit. Do your things and, if you feel bad due to the backlash, go listen some blues, drink vodka, party heavily, stare at the lonely sky writing emo poetry or whatever fits your bill. I think of social sadness as a physical, bodily function. Sooner or later the hormones go away and you go on with your life.

      Oh, and there was something else too: a thinly-veiled pressure to conform to the elite herd, which means a moral pressure to avoid anything stereotyped into being lowly and herdy. For example, friends from youth couldn't understand my taste for cult European and Asian movies, but when I finally involved myself with fellow movie bluffs they despised me for liking the things I watched earlier (say, kung-fu flicks or cartoons). The movies accepted as "good" in one circle would be taken as "guilty pleasures" in another. Countless situations like this convinced me that those who brag about going against the masses often are just swimming along with a "better", lesser-known current, and are as hostile to different ideas than those in mainstream.

      --
      Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
    22. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, I was going to say something similar.

      Being sociable isn't on my top 3 list of things that I enjoy (I'm not phobic, it just makes me tired). However, I SUCK IT UP and do it anyway because of the very real rewards for doing so.

      It may be easy for older people with tenure (or whatever) to scoff at people networking, but for college students like myself it's quite neccesary.

    23. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Guy walks into a bar. Bartender says, "What is this, some kind of a joke?"

      And the guy says "Don't be ridiculous," and sets his 12 inch pianist on the bar.

    24. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by Phleg · · Score: 1

      Bullshit

      Everyone cares what there friends think, it's just that there is a recent trend to cultivate the image that you don't care what people think - but it is still an image, and you are still trying.

      Not really. There are people who go to great lengths to present the image that they don't care what others think, mostly to impress others like that. But there do exist people who simply don't care. They know the friends they have aren't so petty to care, either. Of course, these people like everyone else revel in "showing off" occasionally, but there's a difference between simply deriving pleasure from it and either surrounding yourself with those who demand it of you or having an emotional dependency on doing so.

      --
      No comment.
    25. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but genuinely not caring about others opinions is rather severely anti-social; they have very few friends to begin with, and likely have trouble holding jobs or functioning in society. I am not a psychologist, but if someone really doesn't care at all it seems to me it falls into personality disorder

      Think about it, why do you take a shower everyday, or put on deodorant, or get your haircut, etc.? Basically, in order to be a functional social animal you have to care.

      Now clearly there is an issue of degree, someone who doesn't care what others think of his music is different than someone who doesn't care what others think of his animal torture are two different things. But they are related.

      I noticed that you used the word petty, implying that caring about others opinions is a bad thing. While I'd probably agree that it would be petty if they laughed at his music (not that I haven't given some of my friends a hard time for listenign to, say, Amy Grant), but would it be petty if they told him to buy some less threadbare clothes? Clean his apartment? Eat right? Take a shower? Stop doing drugs?

      At some point it is healthy to seek conformity.

    26. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      I have to ask what type of paranoid thinks that the whole world is trying to ferret out their listening habits...
      You must be new here.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    27. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      That's bullshit. Human-beings are social creatures. We have social needs which means that we must make personal sacrifices and compromises to make others happy or to at least get along with others. People who completely disregard how others feel or think of them and do only what they want are considered sociopaths.

      If you didn't care what others thought of you, then why bother spending money on clothes, or buying cologne, or getting your hair cut, etc. Why care how you look at all? Even if your preferred look is considered "unique" you're still trying to convey a certain image to others.

      It's natural for people to try to look good for the opposite (or same) sex and try to attact them by having a certain image. There's nothing shameful about that. The only reason I wear cologne, I dress a certain way, and I do my hair a certain way isn't because I really care about how I smell or look. When I'm at home and don't plan to go out I'll walk around my apartment in my boxers and I won't bother doing my hair because it's more comfortable. But if I want to attract girls, I need to make myself more presentable, which means following certain fashions. This isn't selling yourself out or not being comfortable with who you are.

    28. Re:Not just "mildly" insane by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1
      From my experience ... men go to the opera because they're gay.
      Thanks for sharing.
      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
  8. Is this song...? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Funny
    "If your secret love of "Save a Horse (Ride a Cowboy)"

    Hmm...is this song from the soundtrack of Brokeback Mountain?

    No wonder he wanted to hide that one....

    :-)

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  9. Clerks 2 by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think they put it best in Clerks 2:

    "What's the point of having an internet connection if you're not using it to look up weird fucked up pictures of dirty sex you'd never have yourself?"

  10. FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow and I suppose the gas stations I go to that sell porn, booze, and have poker machines don't enable guilty pleasures. When all else fails, use the internet to make yourself look better WSJ.

    1. Re:FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, it's amazing that more people don't hang out at gas stations. I think I'm gonna go fill up my tank right now...

    2. Re:FUD by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      Wow gas stations selling liquor. now theres a *GREAT* idea!

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  11. Anonymity? by HugePedlar · · Score: 5, Funny

    'Indulgence is just a click away, and nobody needs to know, except you and some server somewhere.'

    Tell that to those AOL users. ;)

    --
    Argh.
    1. Re:Anonymity? by Not+Anonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      You, the server, your ISP's, AT&T's, the non-existant broom closet at said AT&T's, Carnivore Jr's servers, Carl Jr's servers (yes, $6 burger lo-carb please), Microsoft's, Apple's, Pear's, Fark's and SlashDot's server.

      And Kim Jong Il's private servers, so he can get his freak on!

      --
      [VODAK - Apply Directly to the Mouth!] [VODAK - Apply Directly to the Mouth!] [VODAK - Apply Directly to the Mouth!]
    2. Re:Anonymity? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      'Indulgence is just a click away, and nobody needs to know, except you and some server somewhere.' ...and Alberto Gonzales.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  12. There's a bigger discussion to be had here by Yocto+Yotta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The first thing that came to mind when I saw the title of this article was pornography, of the general and more dubious types. I was surprised to find no mention in the article. Under the same context as the music references in the article, is there a danger in making stuff like child pornography and beastiality readily available to anyone who knows where to look? Or does that fall into the "they were fucked up to begin with" category that we already apply to subjects such as violence in videogames?

    --
    A B A C A B B
    1. Re:There's a bigger discussion to be had here by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was surprised as well that they declined to mention those ... baser ... guilty pleasures, which we all know the Internet is just so accomadating of.

      As to the "dirty porn" question, my personal feeling is that the cost to society of censoring certain types of content are greater than the questionable benefits of not having it out there. I've never seen any really good analysis showing (with some proof of causation, not just corellation) that the availiability of internet porn has caused more real-world crime; lacking that proof I think that there's no legitimate mandate for censorship of any kind.

      Personally, if I was the one in charge of regulating smut, I'd probably start by looking at pornography that promotes or exemplifies unsafe sex practices in terms of STD risk, since I have to believe that the effects of that are probably greater than the small number of individuals who are actually driven to commit crime because of porn (and wouldn't have done something anyway in its absence).

      I think deviant individuals will probably always seek out whatever is taboo in their society; if it was one where porn wasn't allowed, they'd be ogling the Sears catalog. I see no reason why limiting access to particular media really changes an individual's tendency towards antisocial behavior.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:There's a bigger discussion to be had here by thebdj · · Score: 1

      Alas, we cannot really regulate "smut." I mean porn is an art form, or I am sure a great many would argue. I do know it is an instructional video for many a teenagers and college students.

      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    3. Re:There's a bigger discussion to be had here by KermodeBear · · Score: 1
      I think deviant individuals will probably always seek out whatever is taboo in their society


      I can tell you from personal experience that this is true. I was deviant way before I saw and pictures, videos, text, etc.; Before I even had access to the Internet.

      That said, I can tell you that the Internet has allowed me to find others like myself and come to terms with how I am and accept it. I know that a lot of people would consider me to be an immoral person, and I used to as well until I was able to do research on the Internet - this kind of material certainly isn't available in your local library.

      Whether this is 'good' or not I don't know, but I DO know that I feel better and have a much happier life now.
      --
      Love sees no species.
    4. Re:There's a bigger discussion to be had here by radtea · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The first thing that came to mind when I saw the title of this article was pornography, of the general and more dubious types.

      The biggest effect of the 'Net hasn't been as an enabler of guilty pleasures, but as a means for the rest of us to know just how weird we all are.

      There were a number of mid-20th-century artistic movements, like the Dadaists, that claimed to be exposing the absurdity, hypocrisy, and perversity of the bourgois, but none of them came close to the sort of thing you can find apparently ordinary people doing on the 'Net. The imagination of the writers and artists fell far, far short of the reality.

      For example, type "* fetish" into Google, where * is any word, and you'll find the most remarkable array of strangeness. Presumably all of this has been going on since time immemorial, but now anyone can find out about it. I just tried it for "slashdot fetish" and got a hit on a site that defined it as "the desire to be publicly flogged for multiple posts of a news item." How guilty a pleasure is that?

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    5. Re:There's a bigger discussion to be had here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      is there a danger in making stuff like child pornography and beastiality readily available to anyone who knows where to look?

      Of course! But that's not the real issue - Where do you put the limit of censorship in a world where different cultures have vastly different opinions of what's cosher. US: Basically anything, so long as it's not underage (18 years). In Denmark that limit is 15 years, and I'll bet there's somewhere else where the limit is lower. Or how about all the countries where homosexuality, BDSM, or other sexual practices have been outlawed for hundreds, or even thousands of years? How can you solve something like that? Least common denominator? Sorry, that'll just create an underground market where the limits are even more blurred.

      Consider also the illogical way sex vs. violence is treated. So maybe you don't like your kids walking in on you f*ing your wife's brains out, but you sure as hell don't want them seeing another person getting blown up, run over, shot, stabbed, or anything similar. So could someone please explain why even boobs, which everyone has seen from age 0, knock the rating up to 18 years, while Tom and Jerry are legal for all ages, and drive-by shootings are OK at 13? WTF is wrong here?

      (Posting as AC to avoid visits from paranoid "think of the children" delusionals. This is one topic where one cannot possibly have a rational discussion nowadays, and that probably hurts more than it helps.)

    6. Re:There's a bigger discussion to be had here by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      if I was the one in charge of regulating smut, I'd probably start by looking at pornography that promotes or exemplifies unsafe sex practices in terms of STD risk
      Er, dude, that's all the really good stuff.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  13. pr0n by Tx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    pr0n, and flaming people as an Anonymous Coward - chief guilty pleasures of most slashdotters (of course I'd never do the latter). In all seriousness though, I'm not sure what the point of that article is. As the author hints at, the "social" aspects of sites like last.fm actually make it harder to keep your musical tastes secret, and we regularly discuss here how all these "social networking" sites in general make information about people more public.

    So actually it seems to me that the opposite is true, the internet makes it harder to keep your guilty pleasures secret. Reductio ad absurdum, before the net, sure the guy in the shop might know you bought a Britney album, but the rest of the world would have no chance of finding out. With the net, however, you have to try to hide it.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
  14. That one chick from Hanson is really hot! by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

    (Family Guy reference in case you didn't know)

    Peter Griffin - If you could have any woman in the world, who would it be?
    Quagmire - Taylor Hanson.
    Joe Swanson - Taylor Hanson is a guy.
      [Pause]
    Quagmire - [Laughs] You guys are yankin' me. "Hey, let's put one over on old Quagmire."
    Peter - No, he's actually a guy, Quagmire.
    Quagmire - What? That's insane. That's impossible.
      [Pause]
    Quagmire - Oh god. Oh my god. I've got all these magazines. Oh god.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:That one chick from Hanson is really hot! by bickerdyke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now let's talk about "Tokio Hotel"...

      --
      bickerdyke
  15. Yeah by dtfinch · · Score: 3, Funny

    You wouldn't want anyone to know if you're into this.

    1. Re:Yeah by phasm42 · · Score: 1

      WTF was that!?! My head asplode

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    2. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I survived 59 seconds of that. My only hope is that you will suffer for an eternity watching this and this over and over and over and over again.

    3. Re:Yeah by 1010110010 · · Score: 1

      They're two of the girls from Morning Musume... I think being a JPop fan will get you a certain amount of flack anywhere outside of Japan. :P (Some people take it to weird extremes though, like having blogs dedicated to this shit...)

    4. Re:Yeah by tenton · · Score: 1

      I'm covered. All my J-pop is tagged in Japanese. ^_^

      (I acutally don't really like Morning Musume or any of the Hello Project stuff...but I'm sure I enjoy equally wacky things).

    5. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, don't worry, liking Morning Musume and not being a 12 year old girl will get you flack in Japan, too.

    6. Re:Yeah by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Ok, that is fantastic :D I loved it

      But I love a lot of weird japanese stuff :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  16. The internet is really really rad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Porn!

    1. Re:The internet is really really rad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely unfunny. Shame on you.

    2. Re:The internet is really really rad! by ahsile · · Score: 4, Funny

      The internet is for porn!

      http://youtube.com/watch?v=eMs_OjoBRcY

  17. We All Have Our Little Secrets by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now excuse me while I wipe my cache of slashdot pages and cookies, don't want my friends finding out...

  18. I know what they mean by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 3, Funny
    I'm guilty of this myself. Sure, by day I wear an button with Elan and Banjo on my ESD lab coat, hang up pictures of my fiance and I dressing up like Pompey and Vaarsuvius (from the same comic) outside my cube, and reading Linux Kernel Device driver books for fun. But by night, when no one is looking, I'm over at sportsdot and playing fantasy football.

    *cries*

  19. Except ... by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    Except Facebook, of course. Your secret life will be woefully exposed in blow-by-blow detail, there!

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  20. Re:Wasn't it easier to do these things decades ago by kfg · · Score: 1

    The only person who'd know is me and the record store guy, and he cares less than some server somewhere since he probably doesn't keep records of every customer and every tape they bought.

    I have this thing called a brain which it was in my interest to keep full of records which records/tapes you bought, since I wanted to be sure you bought the next N'Sync album, from me.

    Just so you know though, everyone who worked for me laughed at you as soon as you left the store.

    KFG

  21. Ancient guilty pleasures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note the quote at the bottom of the page:

    People humiliating a salami!

    Are we having fun yet?

  22. Quite true by also-rr · · Score: 1

    My website contains things like a guide to optimising animations on Linux rather than, say, a guide to breeding monkeys videotaping the results and raking in a fortune on selling the results because if I go for job interviews guess what one of the things they look at is?

    Anything on the internet that has your real name on it is probably fair game, and because this is not limited to the internet we all self-censor all the time at home and at work. It's part of being an effective human being - if you always follow every impulse you have then no one would want to be around you. Part of the reason the internet has been so popular is because people *don't* have to put their real name to everything they do and can let out some of their being a jerk with few repercussions.

  23. i have no shame. by joFFeman · · Score: 1

    i don't write for the WSJ, but i've always felt that if you like crap, there's no shame in it. why try to conform if you have to compromise what you actually feel? why lie to yourself? on last.fm, young man, there's a place you can go.

    --
    "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
    1. Re:i have no shame. by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      Young man,
      There's a place you should go, I said
      Young man,
      There's a place you should see, I said,
      Young man
      There's a place you should be, just type
      Ell, Ay, Ess, Tee, Eff Emm!

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
  24. Why not be honest? by gosand · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Seriously, why not be honest with yourself? You'll be happier. Personally, I like diversity in my music. So what if I like some of Kelly Clarkson's songs? Or Enya? Sometimes I am in the mood for that. But sometimes I need to hear Clutch, Pantera, or Megadeth. And everything in between. Really about the only thing I can't stomach is country, but I can do a little Hank Williams Jr or Johnny Cash every now and again.


    Now that doesn't mean that I haven't let a friend of mine live down that he once said he really liked Hanson. :) But I used to listen to lots of crap. So what? Live, learn, and for crying out loud, evolve! Try different things, allow yourself to honestly try to enjoy something for what it is. There are going to be people who listen to one kind of music their entire lives. That's OK I guess, but I just don't get it. I think diversity makes things interesting and builds creativity.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Why not be honest? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I think this is exactly the way people should live their life. Do what you enjoy doing, and don't worry about what other people think about it. I mean, who cares if you think Crossroads is a good movie. Teenagers care about this kind of thing, but I think that most people get over it, and realize that it's more fun to just do whatever you enjoy, rather than trying to do what people tell you you should enjoy.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Why not be honest? by ahsile · · Score: 1

      Enya is a wonderful artist. I thank my great Aunt for introducing me to her music. I listen to many other things as well, and I don't give a crap:

      http://last.fm/user/ahsile_ii/

      I made a comment this morning about not liking the dixie chicks, but it's all a farce. Ever since I heard their rendition of landslide, I've been hooked.

    3. Re:Why not be honest? by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      I find it quite funny that Muse released a single which sounds extremely (uncannily even) similar to Britney Spears...which a lot of Muse fans are either disowning or trying to wave away. Interesting.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    4. Re:Why not be honest? by 1010110010 · · Score: 1

      Slightly off-topic.

      Really about the only thing I can't stomach is country

      I don't like the country stuff that plays on actual country stations and what-not, but one of my favorite bands (it's actually really only one guy most of the time) is Songs: Ohia. It's country-ish, but it's depressed and moody country, not bullshit about trucks and dogs.

    5. Re:Why not be honest? by gosand · · Score: 1

      Dude, I thought you were referring to this Crossroads .

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    6. Re:Why not be honest? by Toba82 · · Score: 1

      Damn right.

      I'm at http://www.last.fm/user/notaste/ and I have no problem admitting what I like.

      --
      I pretend to know more than I really do by mooching off google and wikipedia.
    7. Re:Why not be honest? by ahsile · · Score: 1

      Cool. I added you to my friends... And I went searching for a /. group today and found one. Also cool.

  25. I'll say what the net enables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    idiot monkeys with nothing else to do but to sit behind their computer all day in their mom's basement jacking off to porn and the latest star wars novel (how many are there now, 10,000?) Everyone else enjoys the sun and gets laid.

  26. It isn't "Beastiality" by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

    The correct spelling is "Bestiality".

    I'm not quite sure why, but it might have something to do with the first four letters of the word.

    Oh wait - crap - that was supposed to be an 'anonymous guilty pleasure'...

    --
    Love sees no species.
    1. Re:It isn't "Beastiality" by Miniluv · · Score: 1

      It's interspecies erotica fucko.

    2. Re:It isn't "Beastiality" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In light of a previous post quoting clerks 2...you're both wrong. It's "inter-species erotica!"

  27. The internet itself can be a guilty pleasure by moore.dustin · · Score: 1
    While people may hide some small, insignificant things online like music tastes, others hide the fact the use the internet as much as they do. I did for years and I know several who still do. I am what I refer to as a "closet geek" in that I am a product/child of the internet age. Being almost 22, I have been connected to the internet for about 10 years now. It started with games of course, and gradually moved into severe geekdom. By 14 I was hooked and I have never looked back, but that is not the point.

    While I went home and played StarCraft, messed with and tags, and trolls forums - nobody even knew I used a computer. For 3 or 4 years I did not tell anyone but a few friends whom I had to tell so we could play quake 2 together after school. I kept my social life together and nobody had an idea till my senior year when I started to not care.

    At that point I knew I was going to college for Computer Science and I was missing classes for game tournaments. I thought, screw it, why keep this under wraps like an idiot. So after missing some classes for a computer game tournament (War3 and yes, I was nothing great) I just told everyone where I was going. They thought it was awesome, so I ran with it. I let my geek out and it was embraced by everyone without question.

    People just did not care. They knew me already so they were well beyond the phase where you judge people. Some were interested while others were indifferent, but all in all, I got few jokes tossed my way, nothing more.

    It goes to the point that people worry to much about what others think. While it is nice to be able to control what some people see/know about you, what you are really doing is allowing them to not know the real you. So what, you like Fall Out Boy, I might pull out a "You know how I know you're gay" joke, but it is not like I will "defriend" you or it.

    1. Re:The internet itself can be a guilty pleasure by cherokee158 · · Score: 1

      I'm all for embracing your inner geek...but I would advise you not to let the inner geek ruin your future career prospects by skipping classes. College is an expensive learning experience, and those who profit most from it are the ones who invest their time taking advantage of the opportunities it offers. A Starcraft tournament is about as much of a learning opportunity as a midday kegger.

  28. Re:Wasn't it easier to do these things decades ago by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    If I wanted to listen to New Kids on the Block without letting my Metallica friends know, I'd just go out and buy the tape and hide it in a different place than my regular tapes.

    What is this "tape" you speak of? Are you into bondage? On the internet? With kids?

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  29. Fear not upright moral citizen!!! by Churla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Our brave US Attorney General is trying to get congress to make ISP's track every website you visit so you can go back to avoiding things you don't want others to know about.

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
  30. while funny, and insightful... by zaddikim · · Score: 1

    TFA is rather amusing, but there's nothing in my *.m3u that shames me at all.

    As a musician, I suffer from a form of ADD. It's called "getting bored with listening to the same old crap". It doesn't matter what kind of music it is, as long as there's passion behind the making of it, rather than a "contractual obligation" to make a recording

    .

    So, if I've got a hankering for David Lindley, or the Kleptones, dammit that's what I'm gonna listen to. Sure, I've got tunes that I might get mocked for, but if you've got a narrow taste in music, I couldn't care less if you don't care for country.

    --
    Keen idea man lynches
    1. Re:while funny, and insightful... by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Exactly. A passion, not just 'Let's produce something to sell'.

      I also like people who can actually sing, instead of having their voice 'fixed' by computer, and people who can play an instrument. People who write their own music are a bonus.

      Right now I'm listening to Aimee Mann a lot. I have no idea how cool or uncool that is. Barenaked Ladies are fun, too, although I've overlistened to them so I'm taking a break.

      OTOH, sometimes I throw on the Pussycat Doll's version of Tainted Love or Wang Chung's Everybody Have Fun Tonight. Whatever.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  31. In other news... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your guilty pleasures are a subpoena away from being public knowledge.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:In other news... by TeamSPAM · · Score: 1

      So the new weapon for terrorist would be to use steganography on pr0n sites. That way all your traffic would put you in the pr0n addict bucket instead of suspected terrorist.

      --
      Brought to you by Team SPAM! where we believe: "Information in the noise!"
    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legal process? That's so pre-9/11. Don't worry, the Three Letter Agencies already know all about your sick habits.

  32. The internet lets the stupid out by rabtech · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The internet also allows people with insane viewpoints to find like-minded nutjobs, with which they can circle jerk about their common opinions all day long and never need to expose themselves to an alternate viewpoint or way of life.

    Do you believe we never landed on the moon? Do you think horse-fucking is A-OK? Would you like to find someone to kill (with mutual consent) via erotic asphyxiation?... or worse, do you think sexually abusing little kids is acceptable behavior? No problem! The Internet has a message board or newsgroup just for you, that way you never need to think about your thoughts, actions, or obsessions.

    There is no such thing as deviant behavior on the internet!

    --
    Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
    1. Re:The internet lets the stupid out by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      The irony of you taking the trouble to provide examples to support your first sentence is delicious.

      In a Slashdot post no less!

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    2. Re:The internet lets the stupid out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would prefer that the pedophiles "circle jerk about their common opinions all day long" to each other rather than my kid.

    3. Re:The internet lets the stupid out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The internet also allows people with insane viewpoints to find like-minded nutjobs, with which they can circle jerk about their common opinions all day long and never need to expose themselves to an alternate viewpoint or way of life.

      See also DemocraticUnderground, DailyKos, and the whole lefty blog culture.

  33. Alchohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alchohol is the greasest enabler of guilty pleasures. The 'net just lets you do it semi-anonymously. Alchohol let's you do it and just blame the drink, and usually at the time you are doing it, you don't care who knows anyway, and you tend to be a lot less inhibited and willing to try even *more* 'guilty pleasures'

  34. No-So-Divine Intervention by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 3, Funny

    The new defense for the evils of all mankind:

    "The internet made me do it."

    Guess this means the devil can resume his duties as President of the United States now.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:No-So-Divine Intervention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About time.

      The country has been falling apart with his stand in calling the shots.

    2. Re:No-So-Divine Intervention by dodobh · · Score: 1

      resume?.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  35. An amusing flash apropos by Vicegrip · · Score: 1

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5430343841 227974645

    "The Internet Is For Porn" ... A Warcraft animated musical.
    (very funny)

    --
    Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
    1. Re:An amusing flash apropos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The song is actually from a musical and has nothing to do with WoW. There have been many, many versions of the same song made by different communities.

  36. Internet, both cause and facilitator of my vice by Too+many+errors,+bai · · Score: 1

    As long as I don't let anything slip, no one's ever gonna find out I'm jacking off to furry porn.

    1. Re:Internet, both cause and facilitator of my vice by Too+many+errors,+bai · · Score: 1

      (and before anyone gets any ideas, yes that was a joke. you never know how serious people take things on the internet.)

    2. Re:Internet, both cause and facilitator of my vice by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      You can't cover your slip that easily.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    3. Re:Internet, both cause and facilitator of my vice by nytes · · Score: 1

      You can't cover your slip that easily.

      Why? Is his skirt riding up in the back again?

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  37. Re:Wasn't it easier... still easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's still easy. Tapes might be harder to come by but it is still possible to buy CDs...

  38. Dumb joke comes to mind... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    Q: What do you call a dedicated internet appliance?

    A: A Pornograph!

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  39. Re:Wasn't it easier to do these things decades ago by soft_guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I wanted to listen to New Kids on the Block without letting my Metallica friends know, I'd just go out and buy the tape and hide it in a different place than my regular tapes.

    What is this "tape" you speak of?


    He's posting from 1986.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  40. Welcome to the real world by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, read some books on anthropology and you'll discover that it's more common and pervasive than you'd think. It's, in fact, so pervasive, that any poll asking people anything about themselves will basically get a bunch of more socially-acceptable lies, rather than the truth.

    Actually, let me rephrase that: it's also not about consciously deciding to tell a lie, or actually being paranoid that someone will rummage through your computer. It's that humans have their own ideal of "what I _should_ be like", and from there use selective confirmation to "filter" the real "I" into fitting that ideal. It's not even as much for the benefit of others, as for one's own benefit. People need to believe that they're, basically, better than they really are.

    If you will, it's sorta how every good Christian believes that someone else will go to Hell, but noone believes that he'll personally go there. If someone defines himself as a good Christian, he will distort his perception and memories to see himself actually fitting that ideal. He'll remember the time when he did something good and in line with God's commandments, but conveniently forget the times when he did nasty stuff that goes right against those commandments.

    And I'm not just picking on Christians there, as the same applies to everyone and everything else. Good citizen, upstanding pillar of the community, patriot, charitable, top-notch computer expert, l33t h4xxx0r, teen rebel, good parent, whatever. If you define yourself as X, you'll distort your perception and memory to see yourself fitting the X ideal more than you actually do.

    And, just for your entertainment or enlightenment (whichever you choose), here are some RL examples picked by anthropologists:

    E.g., when asked to define themeselves, most members of a tribal community all claimed to be hunters and warriors. In reality, they had in the meantime turned mostly into peaceful agricultors. (Civilization can creep up on someone like that.) Extremely had actually used a weapon in years, or even owned one any more. But their culture was so biased towards hunters/warriors, that everyone basically kept viewing themselves as one even long past the point where it had become a lie.

    E.g., a community defined itself as a shiny-happy model of cooperation where people help each other all the time, even help each other build a house and work together in the fields and everything. And everyone would cheefully tell you that they're still like that, and help each other all the time. The only problem is that the last time anyone helped another build a house was IIRC in the 50's, and they weren't helping each other work the fields any more either. But somehow kept believing that they do.

    E.g., during a crisis where meat prices went up, they polled the people in some communities about what will they do. And everyone said basically "screw this, I'm not paying this much. I'll eat less meat until prices come back down to normal." The problem? According to both the sales data _and_ sifting through people's thrash to see what packaging they're throwing away (yes, they actually did that), people were buying _more_ meat than before. Go figure.

    It may seem illogical to you (and maybe even is), but that's what humans do and how human society functions. In other words, welcome to the real world.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Welcome to the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, welcome to the real world.

      Fuck! I took the wrong pill!

    2. Re:Welcome to the real world by klenwell · · Score: 1

      Insightful post. A label and another RLE (real life example) to back this:

      the label: fundamental attribution error

      see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attributi on_error

      the data point: sexual behavior data among teenagers identifying themselves as virgins

      ''We're seeing more evidence of anal sex in cultures with a high value on technical virginity, and it often causes lacerations and microabrasions that can lead to infections,'' said Ms. Alexander of the American Social Health Association. ''You have to worry about AIDS. And we have heard that some girls use muscle relaxants, which can also be risky.''

      source: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0 6E0D81239F93AA25751C1A9669C8B63&sec=health&pagewan ted=print

      --
      Innovation makes enemies of all those who prospered under the old regime... -- Machiavelli
    3. Re:Welcome to the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I encourage you to learn more about Christians and about having a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. Being a Christian means accepting the fact that WITHOUT CHRIST you will go to hell no matter how you act or what you may do in this world. A Christian is supposed to accept the fact that people, by nature, are full of sin. Once you accept Christ into your life, it means you will try everything that is possible to live without sin. If you do sin, which you will, you acknowledge that you have sinned, and pray for forgiveness. This is Slashdot, so most people like to read books - try checking out the Message Bible, the New Living Translation, or the New International Version from your local library. You will begin to understand. I know you said that you weren't picking on Christians, but it just seemed like a good opportunity to let you know that Jesus died so that we could live. Those people who conveniently forgot about past sins only called themselves Christians. If you knew someone with a personal relationship with Jesus you would know that they are a Christian. (Posting AC to avoid OT Mods)

    4. Re:Welcome to the real world by Moraelin · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I encourage you to learn more about Christians and about having a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. Being a Christian means accepting the fact that WITHOUT CHRIST you will go to hell no matter how you act or what you may do in this world. A Christian is supposed to accept the fact that people, by nature, are full of sin.


      I know all about being a Christian. I was one, I have relatives which are, basically, fundies, I've read and memorized the bible, etc. Heck, my aunts were so big on this Christ thing, I grew up basically imaginning what I'd look like with wings. Yeah, it's sick to get a kid aged 6 to think of _death_ to that extent, but hey, that's how it works. At any rate, I'm not that much of a stranger to the Bible, you know?

      A Christian is supposed to accept the fact that people, by nature, are full of sin. Once you accept Christ into your life, it means you will try everything that is possible to live without sin. If you do sin, which you will, you acknowledge that you have sinned, and pray for forgiveness.


      Very true and insightful and all, but my point stands: people like to imagine themselves as having commited a lot less sins than they actually did. They'll pray for forgiveness for some, but quickly forget it, and remember the good stuff they did instead.

      Or like to imagine that a lot of _their_ own sins really had an acceptable excuse, and really don't count as sins. That "thou shalt not kill" intrinsically includes "unless it's an arab or other sort of heathen." That in that context it's not just not a sin, but outright a virtue. That "thou shalt not commit adultery" really means "unless she's a willing hottie with DD cup breasts." That "love thy neighbour" really means "as long as he's your friend, but you can hate him if you think he's an asshole", and that "turn the other cheek" means "for now, until you can pay it back."

      You will begin to understand. I know you said that you weren't picking on Christians


      And indeed I'm not. I'm "picking" on the whole human species. Christianity may have even hammered some good ideas into some humans, but on the whole it can only do so much. Humans will be humans, in the end.

      Well, not even really "picking" as such. That's how it works. There's no use either rebelling against it, or looking down at it. It's no more use than rebelling against gravity. Might as well accept it as it is, really.

      This is Slashdot, so most people like to read books


      Well,as I was saying, I've read the Bible already. And the Khoran, for that matter. And a bit on the history of other religions.

      Those people who conveniently forgot about past sins only called themselves Christians.


      True enough, I suppose, but in the end they're the majority. That's really all I was saying. That's how humans tend to work. And indeed that was really the whole point. It's not about Christians or Christianity, it's about humans. Well, most humans, anyway. Christian, Buddhists, Hindu, Muslim, whatever. The vast majority don't actually live to their ideal, but basically pad their resume for the benefit of their own conscience.

      And it applies to non-religious stuff too. TFA, for example, is an example of someone who resets his own playlists and statistics so he can still think of itself as a "rock fan". So he resets the statistics of anything which isn't rock, so he doesn't have the counter-evidence right before his own eyes in the player. Go figure. But that's how humans tend to work.
      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    5. Re:Welcome to the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I couldn't let that 'Christian' comment pass.

      You obviously have no understanding of Christian beliefs if you are going to make such a misguided and horrendously inaccurate example as that!

      "...how every good Christian believes that someone else will go to Hell, but noone believes that he'll personally go there."
      If you knew your Bible, you would know that a Christian is one who believes in Jesus, and that nothing he or she does can get them to heaven. Only Jesus can. You believe you will get to heaven because of the promise, which is given by God through His Word the Bible.

      "If someone defines himself as a good Christian, he will distort his perception and memories to see himself actually fitting that ideal."
      Any Christian worth their salt (pardon the pun), knows that they fall far short of the desired standard, which is to be 'Christ-like'. Anyone who believes that they are 'there' is seriously misguided. That's the kind of thing that starts cults...

      "He'll remember the time when he did something good and in line with God's commandments, but conveniently forget the times when he did nasty stuff that goes right against those commandments."
      It's called forgiveness and mercy, however alien these two concepts may be to you. Unlike a non-Christian, the very definition of a Christian is one who acknowledges that they have sinned and fallen far short of the ideal. They are to beg forgiveness (routinely, and even as a Christian). The Bible states that God forgives those who repent and washes it away as if it never happened. There is nothing convenient about it - Jesus died on the cross to allow this to happen by taking all the sins of the world upon His shoulders. A Christian who obsesses over his sin is in as much trouble as one who refuses to acknowledge it (in fact, if as person refuses to acknowledge that he/she is a sinner, I doubt very much that they can be called 'Christian').

      As usual, I expect this post to be massively ignored/modded down by the humanist and/or atheist nazis.

  41. I'm so glad I'm not cool. by Moofie · · Score: 1

    "But who needs things that remind us of who we really are, as opposed to how we want others to see us"

    I just don't understand the mindset where those two things are drastically different. Sure, there are things about myself that I keep private, but I've never been overly concerned about others' opinions.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    1. Re:I'm so glad I'm not cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't care what you mom will think when she finds out you like to look at naked migit clowns who have sex with shaved sheep?

    2. Re:I'm so glad I'm not cool. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Shaved sheep?

      That's just perverted!

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  42. Easy in Firefox... by Kozz · · Score: 1

    Tools > Clear Private Data (Ctrl + Shift + Del)

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  43. Euphemism by mypalmike · · Score: 2, Funny

    The article is about how the internet enables "guilty pleasures". I believe the author is using the term "pop music" as a euphemism for porn.

    --
    There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
  44. How in Firefox? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Does that require that you have some extension installed? Or is it specific to the Linux version?

    I'm using FF 1.0.7 on Windows (woe is me) and that option doesn't exist in the Tools menu, nor does that key combination do anything.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:How in Firefox? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      You'll need to upgrade to at least 1.5. In fact I recommend you do so, there are some really nifty features (and there will be more nifty features in 2.0 as well).

    2. Re:How in Firefox? by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1

      The Clear Private Data menu command was added in FF 1.5.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:How in Firefox? by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Well, the option has existed in the 1.5x versions for some time now. 1.5.0.6 and 1.5.0.7 for Windows have this option. Maybe it's time to upgrade? :)

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  45. Greased up garbage bag? by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Melon with a hole in it, heated in the microwave.

    Dustbuster with corner attachment.

    I didn't understand the question!

    --
    Blar.
  46. It's not the stuff on my machine that bothers me by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

    It's the stuff in my head. Two weeks ago, I went to the mens room at the movie theater, and the Muzak got a disco-era BeeGees song stuck in my head for four days.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  47. Chilling effects on pleasures innocent and guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They say laws make honest people honest. That goes for your public reputation too.

    Lack of anonymity is a chilling effect on human behavior - it encourages conformance to social and legal norms.

    If you think you can do {insert pleasure here} and get away with it without any of your friends or the law finding out, you may feel free to do it.

    Have friends who think alchohol is the drink of the devil? I bet you don't let them see your liquer cabinet. Your boss thinks gambling is a sin? I bet there's no football pool in your office. Live in a country that outlaws child porn and plans to track web usage? Bet you don't surf for it without taking precautions.

  48. Re:Wasn't it easier to do these things decades ago by ghyd · · Score: 1

    Beside, this tape was for my sister.

  49. Grow some Huevos by stealie72 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously, how much of a wuss are you that you can't fess up to what you listen to, or silly sites you go to? My iTunes top 25 is probably embarassing as hell, but I don't care.

    Now, if TFA was focused on ministers that surf hotjapanesetenticlerape.co.jp every night, that would be a different story.

    --
    I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem
  50. You are who you are by decep · · Score: 1

    This is really only a problem if you define your self-image/worth by what others think about you (which we all do to some extent). Unless you hang out with a bunch of 13 year olds, most people will not ostracize you just because you like something that is not a mutual interest. If you are not being yourself, then you are clone; a "poser," if you will.

    All of this hinges on the fact that your interest is morally/socially/legally acceptable.

  51. If we can't even admit what music we listen to... by urbanradar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why should we always have to be so fake? It's insane. If we can't even admit to our friends what music we listen to, I think there's something wrong that has nothing to do with the internet being involved or not.

    Example from my own life: Most of my friends listen to metal, some of them to old-school hip hop, with random bits of jazz, world music and electronica thrown in in some cases. Basically things which don't get in the mainstream charts all that much (or only in watered down form), and carry certain associations of snobbism with them. Now, although I enjoy most of these styles of music myself and listen to them once in a while, I also listen to lots of stuff a lot of people would automatically turn their nose up at because they'd consider it so extremely mainstream. For example, I'm a reasonably big fan of Phil Collins.

    But tell me - why should I be hiding that? When I like something, I like something. Why should I be having hour-long conversations about the virtues of metal and jazz when I'm among people and only be listening to my copy of Face Value secretly?

    All my friends are roughly aware of what music I listen to, the bits they approve of as well as the bits they don't. And you know what? Although they largely detest Phil Collins, I still get respect from them, just for being the person I am, doing the things I do, saying the things I say, treating people the way I do. MY FRIENDS JUDGE ME ON THE BASIS OF WHAT SORT OF PERSON I AM, AND NOT ON THE BASIS OF HOW HIP I AM AND HOW ALTERNATIVE THE MUSIC I LISTEN TO IS.

    That doesn't just go for friends - I don't try to hide myself before people I've only just met, either. Because frankly, people that would only be interested in me as a person if I listened to The Mars Volta but not if I listen to Genesis are not the sort of people I want to be around.

    End of rant.

  52. Me personally... by aliendisaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    I show off my guilty pleasures. There's nothing funner than driving down around the mall looking for a parking space blasting "Mmmmm Bop" or "Safety Dance" as loud as possible. All the lil "I'm so emo. I'm going to go buy some black clothes" teenagers just look at you like WTF? It's hilarious.

    --
    Freedom is a state of mind. A mind is a state of being. Stay the fuck out of my mind and my being. - Corporate Avenger
    1. Re:Me personally... by TomMorrisey · · Score: 1

      Around campus (MSU), I sing along with my iPod no matter what comes up on shuffle. That includes "Sleigh Ride" by the Ronettes, in September.

    2. Re:Me personally... by Whatistehmatrix · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, i love doing that, espically if the language isnt english. Nothing like getting looks when your karaoking to music that's not even in the language they know :p

      --
      visitor from www.slashdot.jp
  53. Now is Creepy. by twitter · · Score: 1

    The only person who'd know is me and the record store guy, and he cares less than some server somewhere

    Sure, now your non free software vendors know you better than you know yourself. That's one of the reasons I don't use non free software. When Fry pushes the counter reset, Apple takes note that something bothered you about yourself. What books I read, where I go on the internet and what I read there, how much I paid in taxes, all of these things I'd rather keep to myself.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Now is Creepy. by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1
      That's one of the reasons I don't use non free software. When Fry pushes the counter reset, Apple takes note that something bothered you about yourself.

      If iTunes uploaded your playing statistics to Apple, you'd have a point. But it doesn't, so you don't.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
  54. Re:It's not the stuff on my machine that bothers m by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Funny

    If that's the most disturbing thing that happens in your local theater's men's room, then things have really changed since I last went to the movies.

  55. Awesome! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't care who knows. That was incredible. Camp, yes, but beautiful for what it was. I loved those dancing icons in the background. Stil, it was missing something, or it was too long. It started off good, but it needs to turn it up to 11 to give it that extra kick. Let me know if you find any more of those.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Awesome! by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      They're former Morning Musume members who go by the band name "Double You".

      They haven't released anything this year because one of them was caught smoking at age 18, and the legal smoking age in Japan is 20. They work for "Hello! Project", and their boss is also their songwriter, so he can suspend/punish them like that.

  56. You sick bastard by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

    "Farmwork"? Kinky....

    --
    -
  57. Re:Wasn't it easier to do these things decades ago by danpsmith · · Score: 1
    If I wanted to listen to New Kids on the Block without letting my Metallica friends know, I'd just go out and buy the tape and hide it in a different place than my regular tapes.

    Are you still in high school? I hope so, because having hidden tastes that you are ashamed of is pathetic. Who cares what the hell you like to listen to. They don't have to listen to it so screw them and anyone else that wants to judge you for such petty matters.

    If you are a metallica fan and like new kids on the block and are openly admitting it, that's an odd choice I must say, but more than likely if your friends are your friends they might make jab smart ass remarks from time to time, but they aren't going to banish you from their ranks. And if they would, they can screw off anyway.

    --
    Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
  58. Nice list. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Do you believe we never landed on the moon? Do you think horse-fucking is A-OK? Would you like to find someone to kill (with mutual consent) via erotic asphyxiation?... or worse, do you think sexually abusing little kids is acceptable behavior? No problem!

    You forgot money laundering and drug dealing, but the rest of the things you think about are interesting. Who put those ideas into your head? What is a circle jerk? What does this really have to do with an electronic network?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Nice list. by HoosierPeschke · · Score: 1

      It's like token right... except friendlier...

      --
      Mr. Universe: "They can't stop the signal, Mal. They can never stop the signal."
    2. Re:Nice list. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well willy, a circle jerk is somewhat like what you do with your "friends", where you crack "jokes" about "Windoze" and "M$" and everyone thinks you're supremely funny. Outside of your basement the world is much different, so you can only enjoy your utopia with the three people who think like you. Hence "circle jerk". It's like when you and your internet friends masturbate in unison to a picture of Richard Stallman and make $1 bets to see who sticks up the keyboard more. Anyway, you get the idea.

  59. Thank You. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Those are great. Don't make fun of me? While they are doing that? Hillarious. And No, I really think its their problem that this happend. Let's go dutch! Do you think people would undestand me If I did that in Japan?

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  60. /. doesn't have the cojones for the Real Poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the real poll /. will never ask:

    "How many times a day do you rub one out to internet pr0n?"

  61. You suck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > pr0n, and flaming people as an Anonymous Coward - chief guilty pleasures of most slashdotters (of course I'd never do the latter).

    You suck!

    (Sorry, I just had to!)

  62. Re:Wasn't it easier to do these things decades ago by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

    I was just making an example and relating the story summary to around 15 years ago when those bands were both popular. The summary makes a point of people being ashamed of what they're listening to, and I ran with that concept.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  63. Internet lets us forget that we have "standards" by Stanza · · Score: 1


    When I grew up, everyone listened to either punk and metal, or hippie music and reggae, and not too much overlap between the groups. There were several people who listened to other things, but we all worked at a radio station, listened to each other's shows, but for the most part music was segregated by who you hung out with. Sure there was "fitting in" and such that other comments talk about but for the most part, music was homogeonous.

    Napster rocked my world. I got into raver music--something I halfheartedly got into while I was at the radio station, but not like now. Bands like Aqua, Toybox, Captain Jack were fun! Napster rocked my world further! Turkish pop bands! Dutch rap bands! Gabber! Rai! Reggaeton! Klezmer! Gamelan! Worlds of music I had never heard of!

    It's not just that the internet allows anonymity in what you are checking out at three in the morning. It lets you privately check out new ideas, and not deal with someone looking at you funny because you are merely curious. A Metallica fan can download the NKOTB albums and it's not the same investment as it would have been to explore before the world of downloadable music. If you don't like it, delete it, if you change your mind, it'll be out there on the internet somewhere again.

    I guess what I'm saying is that it is not just "guilty pleasures" to listen to music that other people around you don't listen to. It is also the accessibility of music. I had pretty much stopped listening to music before Napster came around--it didn't mean anything to me.

    Yes, yes, I know Napster is no longer that Napster and it has been replaced by Kazaa, Gnutella, eMule, etc, and it opens up people to lawsuits from the RIAA now, but kids still swap mp3 collections like they used to make cassette tapes for each other, and there is a wealth of freely-downloadable music (see irate.sf.net) for people to listen to in all genres. And when it only takes a click to listen to a new song, why not? It's not the $15 CD or $10 tape that it used to be! Why (and for many people, where) would I buy a fado tape or CD by some artist I've never heard of, and how do I know I will like it? But now with a little googling I can listen to fado and decide if it's awesome or not with little investment.

    And I only feel guilty when depriving poor starving artists of some income.

  64. Shocking news! by BiggusJimmus · · Score: 1

    >The Internet -- Enabler of Guilty Pleasures
    Guilty pleasures?? On the internet?????

    On behalf of myself and everybody else who has only used the internet for e-mail and the occational trip to Mapquest, I thank you for bringing this to my attention.

  65. not exactly by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    >If you will, it's sorta how every good Christian
    >believes that someone else will go to Hell, but
    >noone believes that he'll personally go there.

    Slightly OT, but no. A good Christian believes that
    he does indeed *fully deserve* to go to hell (as do all
    sinful, fallen men, like himself), but through the
    miracle of God's grace in Christ he will not.

    But more interestingly to most, probably, is to ponder this phenomenon you describe. People do indeed feel that there is a standard to be lived up to. People are indeed troubled if they don't see themselves living up to it. People do indeed feel as though they are being watched and judged from without, even when they are apparently not.

    So, why is that? Maybe this Christian thing is worth looking into after all ...

    1. Re:not exactly by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      Sorry, got very sick off the guilt sandwich and chucked it.

      People, this is anthropology. Paint a lead monkey green to see if the tribe is colourblind, and you'll get the lead monkey torn into bits. People lie about their tastes to survive, and the result is a very average list of what's tasteful. Trust your feelings -- you're better off listening to Obi-Wan.

      Fallen men? Geez, nobody's infallible, not even the Angels (check their record

      Gosh, I'm so worried about my karma...

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  66. Sure by blorg · · Score: 1
    To some extent, this sort of behaviour (especially at, say, the high-school-ish age level) is part of a search for belonging, and (some people more so than others) are unfortunate enough to be surrounded by a shallow sort of a society where the price of belonging is to maintain certain superficial things - tastes in music, for instance.
    Sure, I completely agree, but this guy isn't a high-schooler, he's a journalist for the Wall Street Journal.
  67. Three Words... by Vollernurd · · Score: 1

    ... "Bachman", "Turner", "Overdrive".

    You ain't seen nothing yet. Great mate.

    --
    Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
  68. Insightful? by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    Gay moderators speak for yourselves please, and do not mod up comments written entirely in bold text because that's just rude.

  69. ah yes preverts by crabpeople · · Score: 1
    "I think deviant individuals will probably always seek out whatever is taboo in their society"

    Guano: Colonel! Colonel, I must know what you think has been going on here!
    Colonel: You wanna know what I think?
    Colonel: I think you're some kind of deviated prevert. And I think General Ripper found out about your preversion, and that you were organizing some kind of mutiny of preverts.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  70. I admit it! by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1

    I sing along to Meat Loaf's "Bat Out of Hell" album when I'm doing circuit layout!

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
  71. Re: Commodore by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    I think I heard that Q-Link first really got rolling on the Commodore 64/128. Would that be the dawn of internet guilty pleasures, with the lovely text files out there?

    New

    Ready.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  72. Re:Wasn't it easier to do these things decades ago by cb8100 · · Score: 1

    Only a New Kids on the Block fan would still be buying tapes...

    --
    My lack of God, it's Trotsky!
  73. Can't be all *that* bad... by juan+large+moose · · Score: 1

    Legendary guitar great Richard Thompson has done covers of "Oops!". If you don't want to be caught listening to Brittany, you can download a free copy via Thompson's site.

  74. You don't own sanity, dude by fm6 · · Score: 1
    First off, people who care that much about what others think about their taste in music (or food, clothes, whatever) are in need of serious psychological help.

    Oh please. Our economy and culture are built on the assumption that people care about what others think. There are a zillion words for it: fashion, trends, branding, making a statement, memes, peer pressure...

    Not that I'm endorsing all the cultural trends that strike me as pointless and lemminglike. But I'm not arrogant enough about my own lifestyle to label those who don't follow it as "in need of serious psychological help". Nor do I suffer the illusion, as you apparently do, that I'm totally indifferent to how I appear to others. Nobody who belongs to a social species can make that claim.

  75. Yes and no by Moraelin · · Score: 1
    But more interestingly to most, probably, is to ponder this phenomenon you describe. People do indeed feel that there is a standard to be lived up to. People are indeed troubled if they don't see themselves living up to it.


    Yes and no. The point is that everyoe basically has a different standard and judges himself. There is no one standard that everyone strives for. Some people want to be a teenage rebel, some people want to be a l33t h4ck3r, some people want to be a warrior, some people want to be an insidious grey eminence, etc. Heck, some even strive to be a perfect psychopathic asshole. Each one tries to be something different.

    Heck, TFA presents someone who, basically, wants to be a "rock fan". It has nothing to do with religion or morals or whatever. He just wants to define himself as strongly biased towards rock music. God knows why, but he does. And ends up doing all sorts of silly tricks, like resetting the play count, to maintain that illusion for himself.

    People do indeed feel as though they are being watched and judged from without, even when they are apparently not.


    Umm, nope, that wasn't really the point. Most people basically watch and judge themselves.

    So, why is that? Maybe this Christian thing is worth looking into after all ...


    That may well be, but that's completely irrelevant to the point here. Unless you're trying to tell me that Christianity is why that guy defined himself as a "rock fan". But I don't remember the Bible saying anything along the lines of "thou shalt buy all Black Sabbath records", really.
    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  76. Avenue Q! by Roger+Wilcox · · Score: 1

    This song is from a quirky musical called "Avenue Q." If you can, check out the entire soundtrack (or, better yet, go to new york to see the show) - the music is good and some of the lyrics are hilarious.

  77. Where will it end? by rubies · · Score: 1

    It starts that way - not worrying so much about what you listen to any more. Then you're not fixing your hair before you leave the house. Then you start leaving the house in track suit pants instead of jeans, and not bothering to find a clean shirt.

    It's called growing up.

  78. Let Down by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    We've got "guilty pleasure" and "Internet" in the summary, and the examples end up being about music artists he's embarrassed to admit to listening to?

  79. Re:If we can't even admit what music we listen to. by ThJ · · Score: 1

    Music snobs always say Phil Collins is bad. Then Pandora offered me some songs. I dig them! There's an art to creating a polished 80's rock sound too, you know... I'm actually a musician myself and I like trying to mimic those sounds. All this pop snobbism makes you forget one thing: music should sound beautiful. So what if it's embarrassing?!

  80. Re:Internet lets us forget that we have "standards by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

    When I grew up, everyone listened to either punk and metal, or hippie music and reggae, and not too much overlap between the groups.

    I hope none of them ever heard The Clash doing reggae and punk at the same time. Hehe.

  81. Re:Wasn't it easier to do these things decades ago by gordgekko · · Score: 1

    Back in the mid-90s I interviewed the drummer from Cannibal Corpse and he told me his favourite artist was Alanis Morissette. Who gives a rat's ass if someone likes NKOTB and Metallica? On my computer Kylie Minogue shares hard drive space with KMFDM...life goes on.

    --
    You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
  82. Re:Wasn't it easier to do these things decades ago by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

    In a sense, I think this is why the discussion is rather weak. It's not so much the music that is the indulged pleasure here, but social and sexual things. It's easier to loudly proclaim your love of bondage when you're just words on a screen to people you may never meet. The risk of it blowing up in your face seem lower.

    The internet lowers the barrier, as it really is less stressful to check out that naughty website from your home PC than it is to sneak a look at that smut mag in the convenience store, much less buy it. Online, there's enough "free" content that even the stress of purchasing, of parting with your cash isn't felt. It's the old story of being invisible, of not having to face consequences.

    Now, please note that I don't want to imply that there aren't any consequences, but I do want to say that we aren't as aware of the possibility of consequences. Online, we get more of a *sense* that there will be no consequences. We don't see the clerk, we don't see the other people millling around, ready to click their tongues in disapproval.

    DISCLAIMER: I tried to read TFA, but was rebuffed by a dumb, dumb firewall that blocks the WSJ but not Slashdot. *shrug*

  83. Re:Wasn't it easier to do these things decades ago by morie · · Score: 1

    it figures. Metallica were friends back then.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  84. Secrecy by phorm · · Score: 1

    Nah, it's just that if he hides it in a tape, even if it was discovered nobody would know WTF it was nor how to play it :-)

  85. Right on the mark by figa · · Score: 1

    I remember clearly when I first compiled the scrobbler plugin for xmms and installed it. After about a couple days, I checked on last.fm, and I immediately cleared my stats. I found myself thinking, "What will the neighbors think?" On last.fm, you literally have neighbors, and you're matched by what you listen to, so if you want to be linked with other poseurs like yourself, you have to be careful. After clearing my rankings, I made sure to seed my account with a few days of selected tracks before I let any of my real listening habits creep through.

  86. Tokin'...er, Token Ring by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1
    No no ... that's totally different.
    I experienced P2P token ring back in college. Here's how it worked: a group of peers arranged in a circular manner would pass around a named pipe. Each peer would hit the pipe, a process known as token. After a while, the pipe would be cached, and a designated peer reloaded the pipe.
    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  87. It may be doing just that. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    That all depends on whether you have the iTunes MiniStore enabled or not. If it's turned on, then it definitely does upload your playing statistics to Apple.

    Granted, after people freaked out about it initially, they changed it to be opt-in:
    http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=1473

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:It may be doing just that. by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1

      MiniStore only reports an identifier for what's selected and/or playing at the time. It doesn't transmit statistics like play count or last played date. According to Apple, that ID is only used to determine what similar tracks to display in the MiniStore view, and is then discarded.

      For the record, MiniStore was opt-out when it was introduced in 6.0.2, but was changed to opt-in in 6.0.3, and has been opt-in ever since.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.