Slashdot Mirror


Are Hard Disk Warranties Worthless?

1984 asks: "Earlier this year I returned a Hitachi 2.5" drive under warranty, and got back a replacement which died after a week or so of light use. More recently a Seagate 200GB desktop IDE disk flaked after a few months use, so I sent it off and received a replacement under warranty. The replacement wouldn't even format. So I RMAed that and got another dead replacement. All the replacement disks were 'refurbished', and I see many instances of similar problems with refurbished replacements when Googling. So I'm asking, what experience are people having with getting replacement disks that work, and continue to do so for something approaching the expected lifetime of the original drive? Are current warranties just a sham?"

187 comments

  1. Wow by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

    You sure have bad luck with drives. Even in the late 80's, when capacity was measured in the tens of megs, I didn't have this kind of problem. Sure, drives died after a year or three, but that was when this was a frontier technology.

    But as for warantees - they are a joke unless you are a mass buyer.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But as for warantees - they are a joke unless you are a mass buyer.

      Yep. And if you're a mass buyer, chances are very good that you have a shelf with a dozen or so spares ready to be swapped out. When your warranty replacement drive shows up, it just goes back up onto that shelf.

    2. Re:Wow by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      When your warranty replacement drive shows up, it just goes back up onto that shelf.

      Actually, back in the win9x days, that is what I did in the company I work for. 15 computers, when one died, replaced with another off the shelf, sent it back, put the replacement back on the shelf for the next failure. Just rotating them. Unfortunately, Windows XP has succesfully made it very difficult to do this.

      Now we do the same with computers from Dell. Keep one back, if one dies, take the computer off the shelf to replace, put the replacement on the shelf for the next failure. Replace every computer when it dies out of warranty. Fortunately, we have good luck with the inexpensive Dell boxes, and the 3 year warranty is about right for upgrading. It costs more money for me to work on one that to buy another cheapo from Dell. Mainly from the time to reinstall XP, patch/reboot/patch/reboot.........

      If I could get us to move to Linux on the desktop and not just the servers, it would be a lot easier, however, and recycling would be possible again.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:Wow by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      Agreed -- you're having a terrible run of bad luck with drives. But I wouldn't say the warranties are worthless. I once got a DeskStar drive with bad sectors. I returned it, got a replacement in three weeks and the replacement is still working fine. This was in 2003 and DeskStars are supposed to suck. I have a 20 gig Seagate from 2001 that is also still working fine. My neighbhor has me beat on that; she has an OLD 7 gig Seagate that still works perfectly. These days, I mostly get Western Digital drives and I've yet to have a problem with any of them (knocks on wooden desk).

      Considering the bad luck you're having, I recommend you buy from Newegg.com and avoid any drives marked with a 30-day warranty only. You might even consider getting the service plan with it ($14.99 for 1 year & $19.99 for 2 years). I'm not a schill for Newegg though, so if anyone knows of a place that beats them, please post it. I'd really love to know.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    4. Re:Wow by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      So we used about a hundred deskstars in a simutanious install. I noticed that all the units from Turkey were great, while the asian country of origin drives (don't remember which one) sucked ass. When it came time for RMA's I requested that all the replacement drives be turkish. Also, (I think being a large company helped) we only had to send in the serial number sticker from the top of the drive (We drilled holes in the drives themselves).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:Wow by Forge · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't know how true that cost is. Even with my chosen methodology of keeping a disk image of each unique system installation.

      Physically replace the hard drive -: 5 to 10 minutes.
      Restore disk image -: 3 to 90 minutes (depending on NIC speed and configuration size)
      Patch and reboot -: 30 minutes.

      Too bad the Dell techs only replace the hardware and enough software to make sure it work. Which means that if your hard disk dies, they would just format and load on io.sys and the other core DOS files.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    6. Re:Wow by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

      Too bad the Dell techs only replace the hardware and enough software to make sure it work. Which means that if your hard disk dies, they would just format and load on io.sys and the other core DOS files. Company policy, in many cases. When I was a contractor tech, I would spend more time helping a customer since it was the right thing to do. After I was hired as an employee tech, though, my time was no longer my own and bare-minimum service was de rigeur if I wanted to stay employed. Sad.

      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    7. Re:Wow by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      We drilled holes in the drives themselves

      You must have the luckiest interns on Earth.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    8. Re:Wow by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add one more bit of time: Creating the disk image, and it is spent even if you never use it.

      The last time I had a Dell tech replace a hard drive, he installed XP home, which I didn't immediately notice, so it added about 15 more minutes of "wtf" until I realized what he had done. I spent more time waiting for him to show up, late, than I would have by doing the job myself.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    9. Re:Wow by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Nah,
      I did that job myself :-) Learned something as well: The platters in those drives are glass.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    10. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Physically replace the hard drive -: 5 to 10 minutes.

      Sounds Right.

      Restore disk image -: 3 to 90 minutes (depending on NIC speed and configuration size)

      There is something wrong here. I work for a major retailed, and I support store systems from 200mhz Pentiums with 10mbps network cards to P4's with gigabit cards. The slowest Ghost-over-LAN is about 25 minutes, and that's on pitifully slow register systems. What are you loading, 3-4 Gig images??

      Patch and reboot -: 30 minutes.

      SHouldn't your images already be patched?

    11. Re:Wow by Forge · · Score: 1

      What are you loading, 3-4 Gig images??

      Short Answer. Yes.

      Long answer, Image sizes vary a lot. Depending on what software is on the particular desktop. The largest image we dealt with included 2 OS,s: a full blown Suse instalation and Windows XP With MSOffice, Visio and some grphics stuff. (Both CAD and DTP).

      It weighd in a 25 GB and loaded in 27 minutes on GB ethernet. In the lung run including all the sample files, templates and extras _saved_ time and network resorces (Image load is done on an el chepo Switch in my lab, that's not conected to the LAN at all.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  2. Lemon Law by joshetc · · Score: 4, Informative

    In some areas (of the USA) the "Lemon Law" applies to more than just automobiles. One thing it may apply to is computers and computer components. I'd check your local law and see if it applies, if it does then ask the company for a NEW replacement otherwise you'd like a full refund. If they don't oblige you can simply mention that law. (generally 3 faults requires them to give you a full refund or a completely new replacement)

    1. Re:Lemon Law by joshetc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Extremely sorry, I forgot to include a link.

    2. Re:Lemon Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah -- what I want is a DOA or a "dies within 2 (or 3) weeks law". The Lemon Law didn't help me a bit. It only helps you after they've made 3 attempts to fix your product. But, if doesn't say anything about how long a single attempt can last.

      A couple years ago, I bought a new car. I had it for 3 weeks before it started blowing smoke/steam/etc, the check engine light comes on, it barely stays running. They end up towing it to the dealer. The dealer apparently didn't have anyone who knew how to fix it. They told me it was a bad thermostat. Uh huh. So they replace that and when they crank it, the engine seizes. They end up flying someone in to work on it. Weeks go by. During all this time, I get no loaner or free rental. In the end, they have my car over a month, and I find out they lied to me (and probably other related people/organizations) a bunch. My car may or may not have a new engine at this point. I asked to see old & new serial numbers. They claim they don't track serial numbers of replacement engines. Uh huh. It was the biggest bunch of bullshit I've ever experienced. :(

    3. Re:Lemon Law by LiquidRaptor · · Score: 1

      Actually most Lemon Laws also contain exceptions for x number of days in y period of time. For example, in AZ if a car is in the shop for more than 30 days in the first 2 years it qualifies under the lemon law.

    4. Re:Lemon Law by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      About 3 years ago, I replaced a Maxtor under warranty. The replacement died after four months. When I RMA'ed that one, the Maxtor customer service rep asked if I wanted him to specify new rather than refurb. Needless to say, my answer was yes.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    5. Re:Lemon Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, that doesn't seem to be the case in Texas.

  3. Seagates and WDs RMA'd: results fine by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've RMA'd about three drives over the past six years and the replacements have been fine.

  4. Buy it retail by ryan89 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I bought a WD drive a few years ago at Best Buy. It had a three year warranty and died at about 18 months. I brought it back to the store with the receipt and they still carried the same size of drive so they just swapped it out for a brand new drive.

    1. Re:Buy it retail by Psychofreak · · Score: 1

      That's called "good customer sevice" It's becomming rare.

      My last hard drive experience was several years ago. It was a nightmare. The M-board in the computer I had was only capable of 4.2GB, I bought a 4GB drive which shortly failed. I sent it in for a replacement and recieved a 13.6GB drive in exchange! I then learned about the Promise UDMA33 controller, and still use the drive and computer today. It is an effective Linux box.
      Phil

      --
      Laugh, it's good for you!
    2. Re:Buy it retail by Sandman1971 · · Score: 1

      I always buy my computer parts from local mom & pop computer stores. Most of the local stores carry a 1 year store warranty on all parts. The few times I've had failures in that time period, all it took was a quick drive to the store, and 20 minutes later I had a brand new replacement in my hands. Heck, I had some RAM blow 18 months after I bought it and they still replaced it free of charge, without my receipt (hooray for customer databases). Their prices are usually equal to or just a tiny bit more expensive than what you could get for buying online, at least in this area.

      --
      It's better to burn out than to fade away
    3. Re:Buy it retail by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Grandparent: "I bought a WD drive a few years ago at Best Buy."
      Parent: "That's called "good customer sevice" It's becomming rare."

      Wow! I've never seen anyone accuse Best Buy of having good customer service. The things that come out of Slashdot users.

      On a side note, looks like we registered w/ Slashdot about the same time.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    4. Re:Buy it retail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "On a side note, looks like we registered w/ Slashdot about the same time."

      Dinner & a movie?

  5. Most hard drives work fine for me by nxtw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've had 4 failures out of approx 20-25 purchased or obtained new drives since 2000.

    One 30 GB drive crashed within 10 days of purchase, a 160 GB died 10 months after purchase (possibly because of power loss/surge), a 20GB iPod drive damaged by contact with a large magnet (because iPod integration and subwoofers were being installed at the same time). Someone I know had a 40GB that randomly returned corrupt data without any obvious signs of disk failure -- just Windows bluescreens that would normally indicate corrupt RAM.

    Of those drives, the first three were repaired via warranty. The 30GB was replaced with a new drive, and guessing by its capacity, is not still in use. The refurbished 160 GB drive is still working today, about 22 months later. The replaced iPod is also still working today.

    The 40 GB drive was out of warranty and was replaced with the same model and is still working one and a half years later. My oldest drives were probably made in 2002 and have been working fine. They've been running constantly for the past few years.

    I have had a laptop hard drive fail gradually -- it came from a phyiscally abused laptop. The drive worked (slowly) at first, long enough for me to copy the data off of it. Within a few more hours of use, it died.

    1. Re:Most hard drives work fine for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Someone I know had a 40GB that randomly returned corrupt data without any obvious signs of disk failure -- just Windows bluescreens that would normally indicate corrupt RAM."

      This likely indicates a faulty or loose ATA cable, not a faulty hard drive.

  6. Is it the drives? by archer,+the · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know of several folks who've recently replaced drives under warranty. The replacements have worked well. Is there any chance something other than the drives is causing the failures? Bad power? Too little cooling?

    1. Re:Is it the drives? by portmapper · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Is there any chance something other than the drives is causing the failures? Bad power? Too little cooling?

      Inadequate cooling will really shorten the lifetime of the harddisk. Using a modern power hungry graphics card(s), an Intel CPU , a power
      hungry motherboard along with an inefficient and overdimmensioned PSU will generate a lot of heat. Without an extra fan for the hard disk
      it may be too hot.

    2. Re:Is it the drives? by legoburner · · Score: 2, Informative

      As I understand it, heat is very bad for the lubricant in the drive, so when HDDs get too hot, the lubricant (eventually) dries out and vastly shortens the life of the drive. I might be mistaken, so does anybody have real experience with this?

    3. Re:Is it the drives? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Bingo. I deal with warranty issues (not for hard drives but other sensitive electronics) every day. Its rare for a defective unit to make it to the field. Its even rarer for a defective unit to be sent out to replace a defective unit. If you get a third such defective unit... stop what you're doing and go to 'Vegas. The fact is, defects are very rare and if you keep seeing failures, ITS YOU!!!

    4. Re:Is it the drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      The "Easy Bake Oven" case mod may be the problem with your frequent hard drive problems.

    5. Re:Is it the drives? by portmapper · · Score: 1

      The electronics needs to be cooled as well, and are prone to failure if it is too hot.

    6. Re:Is it the drives? by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1
      The "Easy Bake Oven" case mod may be the problem with your frequent hard drive problems.

      Amusingly phrased, but possibly true. I got a huge case running with 5 fans in it right now and have no overheating problems. As the posters above me, said, cooling is very important. But some cases are bad when it comes to coolig; you don't just need more fans, you need something roomy enough for the air to circulate. As another said though, getting a good PSU is also important. A bad PSU can fuck your hard drive, motherboard, you name it. If it's bad enough to be screwing parts up like that it could also catch fire -- Sony batteries aren't the only dangerous power supplies.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    7. Re:Is it the drives? by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      Some hard drives are too damn HOT! I try to find out in advance which ones to avoid, my server has 2 8gig and 2 4gig EIDE drives, the oldest is at least 10 years old, they turn slower than the newer drives and don't get hot at all. You can still get older cool running drives on Ebay. Do we really need enormous HD's for everything?

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    8. Re:Is it the drives? by pla · · Score: 1

      Is there any chance something other than the drives is causing the failures? Bad power? Too little cooling?

      I have to strongly suspect so... I know the occasional "bad batch" of drives makes it out the door, and certain specific models fail at a high rate (ie, the legendary "deathstars"), but honestly, I've never personally had a drive fail on me. At my current job, babysitting somewhere around 50 computers in a fairly harsh industrial environment, I've had only three drives fail ever (and two of those lived in laptops, an environment known for eating even the best of drives).

      You can call my sample statistically insignificant, but I just find it nearly unbelievable that anyone could have multiple drives fail on them in a short period of time, without some environmental factor (not necessarily the "fault" of the owner, but not an inherently defective drive, either) speeding those drives to the grave. Heat, shock (impact), poor power, something must have caused the problem.

    9. Re:Is it the drives? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Yeah, inadequate cooling is just death to hard drives. It doesn't help that most cases have absolutely terrible cooling for the drives. I really think it's the biggest problem with cases today.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    10. Re:Is it the drives? by Psychofreak · · Score: 1

      I know brown-outs will cause the life of the m-board to become short. The same dorm I lived in with the heat problems also had some electrical issues. The computer I started school with lost both drive controllers and had a crippled video card before I upgraded to what I have now. Amazingly I gave the machine to a friend who used it till I graduated. It was little more than a glorified word processor by that time though.
      Phil

      --
      Laugh, it's good for you!
  7. I've never had a problem by Coopjust · · Score: 1

    As far as RMA'ing drives goes, I've never had a problem with Seagate. The drives have all carried the warranty of the original and none of the refurb replacements have problems.

    Now, WD drives...I don't want to rant, but 6 drives in 18 months (2 new, 4 RMA'd replacements) is too much for me.

    I don't think drive warranties are worthless; they protect the buyer and give peace of mind. Seems like bad luck on your side to me.

    1. Re:I've never had a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first hard disk drives I worked with were 30 MB Seagates (yes, I said 30 MB - and they were 5.25"s, too). Four out of four failed the first two years, while other brands (20 MB) seemed to be running very well (the 30 MB drives used pretty new tech back then; they were mechanically the same as the 20 MB drives, but the controller formatted them differently, and I think it was too much stress on those drives). That soured me on Seagates for years, and I used all WDs. Nowadays, though, the WDs seem to have a much higher failure rate than I remember, so it's back to Seagates, which seem more reliable. (Don't get me started on DeathStars).

    2. Re:I've never had a problem by froschmann · · Score: 1

      Seagate is the best. I've dumpster dived their drives and gotten RMAs on them! This works with Maxtor too, because it all goes off the serial number on the drive, not the receipt!

    3. Re:I've never had a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a 300GB SATA drive from Seagate go bad on me in under 2 months. The replacement was refurbished, and I transferred the data over. That was less than a year ago. Last night, the replacement drive began to die.

      The nice thing about the Seagates is that they make this signature "I'm dying" sound as they start to go. If you're using it, there's a pause in what you're doing, then a tick sound like a tiny hammer in the drive just hit something, and it starts running again. Once this begins, it's still possible to save your data. Continued use once you first hear it lessens your chance of easy data recovery.

      Of course, it costs $25 to get an Advance Warranty Replacement with 2-day shipping.

  8. Personal data is more important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They are indeed worthless but for another reason, I had two hard disks that died under warranty before, but I didn't send them back for replacement because I wasn't sure what would happen to them next, sure, there are tools for wiping hard disks, and it's extremely unlikely that someone would go through all the trouble of restoring data from a wiped hdd, but I prefer to destroy the hard disk physically myself, and sleep well at night, rather than risk exposing my personal data.

    PS: First reply with "paranoid" in it gets a free hat.

    1. Re:Personal data is more important by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your paranoid, and I'd like my hat in a fancy silver color.

    2. Re:Personal data is more important by alienw · · Score: 0, Troll

      Let me guess: you're a child pornographer.

    3. Re:Personal data is more important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should look into using Darik's Boot and Nuke. It is very easy to use and works great - just boot up off the disc, select which drive/partition you want to wipe out, select the method, and it does everything else. Takes awhile to completely wipe out the drive, but the time it takes is worth it. At the place I work, when we occasionally have to deal with problem laptops, even if it has nothing to do with the hard drive, I still send it back with everything (minus the battery). HP suggests taking the hard drive out, but I would rather just leave everything there incase there is a problem when shipping it back to them. Even if there might not be sensitive data on the drive, I still completely wipe it out with Darik's.

    4. Re:Personal data is more important by loraksus · · Score: 1

      If you call the company and make your concerns known, they usually have a program where you can send back part of the drive (usually the top cover) and get your replacement without actually sending the platters in.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    5. Re:Personal data is more important by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I prefer to destroy the hard disk physically myself, and sleep well at night

      If your personal info is that dangerous in the wrong hands, you should maybe look into encrypted filesystems.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    6. Re:Personal data is more important by pedalman · · Score: 1
      You should look into using Darik's Boot and Nuke [sourceforge.net]. It is very easy to use and works great
      That is incumbent on the fact that the drive still spins up. He said the drive was dead. I don't know what his definition of "dead" is, but if it is clicking/banging, can DBAN still do its work? If it is a controller problem, the same question is raised.

      Don't get me wrong. I use DBAN at work (80-seat computer lab). But if you can't access the drive, you can't wipe it.

      --
      Friends don't let friends line-dance.
  9. Seagate RMAs work for me by bullok · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the last 4 years or so, I've bought about 30 Seagate drives. Two died during the warranty period. In both cases, the RMA was quick and the replacement drives worked ok. One of the replacements was refurbished, the other was new.

    One of the failed drives was shipped via UPS, and the package was pretty roughed up. The drive worked initially, but failed within a week. I suspect that many failed drives haven't failed due to manufacturing defects, but due to abuse during shipping. Of course, this means that they should be using better packaging (and more conscientious shippers). I'd gladly pay a couple of extra bucks for a better shipping container (or better shipper) to avoid the occasional beat-up drive.

    1/15 does seem like a high failure rate to me, but it's a pretty small sample size, so my numbers alone don't mean much.

    1. Re:Seagate RMAs work for me by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      We recently got an RMA back from Seagate, it was embedded in about a cubic foot of closed cell foam.

      It was so well protected that we actually took the drive out, put something heavy in there and dropkicked the box around the room some to see what kind of damage the box would take... it stood up very well.

      It's really amazing packaging they are using now.

      (Unlike fucking newegg which ships OEM drives wrapped in bubble wrap which sucks.)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  10. Maxtor Hell by mrbcs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I returned 3 Maxtor drives about two years ago within one week. All three were nfg. These were also brand new replacements for the original drive. The wholesaler told me that he thought quality control was shut down because of all the bad drives he'd seen in such a short time. This was also about the time that Maxtor dropped their warranty to 1 year. On my third trip to the wholesaler, I saw two other guys in there with boxes of the damn things. Last Maxtor drives for me. I have a Seagate now and it's been perfect for over 2 years.

    --
    I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    1. Re:Maxtor Hell by Burz · · Score: 1

      All 3 Maxtor drives I've owned have failed within a year. I won't buy another.

    2. Re:Maxtor Hell by ionpro · · Score: 1

      Maxtor was recently purchased by Seagate, just FYI.

    3. Re:Maxtor Hell by ionpro · · Score: 1

      and, of course, my linking skills suck. Here is the actual link

    4. Re:Maxtor Hell by NotQuiteInsane · · Score: 1
      Thankfully they're keeping the two brands separate (for now).

      I've had Maxtors before - a %DEITY-knows-how-many-years-old 7850AV (850MB), a 90845D4 (8.45GB DiamondMax series) that died after about six years' heavy use but was resurrected by a trip to the freezer (but still got 'sledgehammered' once I found out it was out of RMA), a 5T040H4 (40GB DiamondMax 60+ series) that had intermittent startup issues and a 6L080J4 (80GB DiamondMax D740X series) which was the RMA replacement for the H4. I've got 19,000 hours on the '080, and it's still chugging along. It's also from one of the drive series they bought from Quantum... hmm...

      I've got a pair of IBM DeskStars (a DeskStar 75GXP with the microcode patch and a 34GXP) with >10k hours on them, a 40GB Seagate Momentus in the laptop and a brand-new Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 SATA in the desktop. Oh, and there's the 6GB Medalist in the RiscPC. And the 4GB U4 in the backup server. Hm.. I don't think I've ever seen a Seagate drive die...

    5. Re:Maxtor Hell by Reziac · · Score: 1

      When Seagate bought Conner, they rebadged the remaining Conner drives and sold 'em under the Seagate label -- but they didn't flash the firmware, so they still betrayed themselves as crappy Conners.

      You've Been Warned...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  11. Well... by DanielNS84 · · Score: 1

    I had a 60gb ATA100 5400RPM Maxtor desktop drive a while back that died after 2 years so I went through the RMA procedure. I got a package from them a few weeks later and to my surprise I discovered an 80gb ATA133 7200RPM drive which I still have to this day (2 years or so now). It still works great and it's the only drive I've gotten through RMA so my experiences have been good.

    1. Re:Well... by p!ssa · · Score: 1

      We recently purchased 50 IBM Xseries 226 servers for a pilot project that were deployed accross the states, each server had a RAID 5 array using the Maxtor drives. 36 of the 50 servers all sufferd drives failures in the first 2 months and about half had multilpe drive failures that made the arrays unrecoverable. So out of 200 Maxtor hard drives about 80 of them failed (these were all heavy use edge database servers). I will never purchase anything with Maxtor drives again, the mgt. was so pissed when we finally rolled out all 800+ servers they were replaced with SCSI HDD's about a years ago, we have had 3 drive failures since the rollout (and all arrays were recoverable). So to all those people considering using SATA/ATA HDD's in servers for the cost savings you really need to think again. IBM replaced the drives quickly but when you factor in all of the down time, tech staff etc. the few thousand you will save on drives, you will pay 100x more in support etc.

    2. Re:Well... by DanielNS84 · · Score: 1

      Aren't better drives usually chosen for that type of application? I would think a 15k RPM SCSI U320 drive would be the standard since they are rated for constant usage. I've had home use drives die before in heavy usage situations but never a server class drive.

    3. Re:Well... by p!ssa · · Score: 1

      Yes, but when mgt. hears the latest pitches from the vendors on how it save them so much money...

    4. Re:Well... by Technician · · Score: 1

      later and to my surprise I discovered an 80gb ATA133 7200RPM drive

      Funny thing happened to me. I have an older HP PC with an IBM drive. The drive died in warranty. HP sent me 2 replacements. Somehow my request got duplicated in the system. I was honest and sent one of the new drives back after contacting them so the new drive shipped back wouldn't be scrapped as defective. All shipping costs was on their expense. The new drives came with UPS stickers for return shipping.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    5. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exact same thing happened to me.
      My 60GB drive died after two years (still within warranty) so Maxtor sent a replacement drive that was 80GB.
      I regret not trying the data recovery techniques floating around the net but the warranty was pretty good.

      Similar thing happened with my Lexmark Z25 printer from Futureshop that had an extended warranty.
      That's when I learned NEVER BUY AN INKJET LEXMARK PRINTER, the lower end models are meant to gouge you when you need inkjet cartridges.
      Six months after purchase the printer wouldn't print so I went to Futureshop and got a
      HP Deskjet 5740 for free when they couldn't fix the Lexmark.

      Kinda funny that one form of evil, extended warranties, helped me against other form of evil, cheapo inkjet printers.

  12. Short warranty on Dell computer drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I just had a drive die in a DELL desktop that was just over a year old. If purchased direct the disk would have had something like a 3 year warranty. When purchased as part of a Dell computer you get just 90 days warranty in this case, I think the base warranty on other Dell product lines may be longer.

    1. Re:Short warranty on Dell computer drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you can still try and see if you can get the RMA on the drive.
      A few years ago (about 7 now IIRC) we had a drive fail in one Dells we used, we just contacted the manufacture of the drive and they confirmed that it was still under warranty, didn't get in touch with Dell at all. (Actually funny thing about the replacement: the Dell drive we sent in was a 3GB drive and we got a 4GB drive back).
      Same idea: friend had a drive die in his Creative Nomad Jukebox (you know, the MP3 player with a 6GB hard drive that came out before the iPod), the device itself was out of warranty, but the drive was not, he got the hard drive sent in and got a new drive for his mp3 player.

      Of course, things might have changed since Fall 1999 for the Dell drive, and 2003 for my friends Jukebox drive.

    2. Re:Short warranty on Dell computer drives by kenh · · Score: 1

      OEM Drives these days have different serial numbers than "retail" hard drives with Mfg. warranties.

      OEM Drives are sold at a discount to the (computer/device) Mfg. and in return the Mfg. assumes responsibility for the drive warranty. The discount can be in the form of a reduced price or an increased shipment that includes extra drive to compensate for the number of drives expected to fail in the shipment (say, 100 extra drives in a shipment of 1,500 drives).

      Most Mfg. have websites to check on your warranty for a given drive.

      Personally, I've had great luck with RMA drives, even one I scorched - it was a Maxtor (now Seagate ;^) drive that was powered up when I moved it to a location where a protruding piece of metal shorted outthe circuit board and caused a small fire on the board. I just played dumb, wrapped the drive up well (original packaging from earlier RMA drive) and sent it in. My 200 Gig HD returned as a 300 Gig HD, apparently brand new.

      Warranties are not useless, I think the answer lies outside the drives for the original poster.

      Ken

      --
      Ken
    3. Re:Short warranty on Dell computer drives by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      The ethics of some people here are fantastic. "Oops, my ... 'roommate' knocked the drive off the top of the tower I put it on and it fell five foot to the ground. So I RMA'ed it under warranty", or "Through my own carelessness, I shortcircuited the drive to the point that it caused a small fire. I played dumb and RMA'ed the drive."

      Hint: warranties are for manufacturing and operational defects, not user abuse and/or incompetence.

    4. Re:Short warranty on Dell computer drives by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yep... when I moved, one of my HDs headcrashed, and thereafter had the creeping crud. It was still under warranty, but it wasn't losing data (just had a growing area of locked-out sectors) so didn't seem worth the bother... I nursed the thing along for a couple years, finally had to retire it at age 5 (about when one might expect EOL anyway). -- Besides, W.D. has been good to me, so no need to screw them, and maybe not have that good RMA service when I need it for a genuinely defective drive.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  13. Its Luck... by loony · · Score: 1

    Or lack there off in your case... We have more than 800 ide disks in the systems I maintain. We have a very low failure rate - and if something fails its likely a ibm/hitachi disk.

    Anyway, we used to test all drives when they came in... We quickly stopped that and didn't look back. We only have a couple of failures a week (if that) and all our RMA replacements except one came in just fine.
    WD seems to be the best there - I only got one drive labeled as remanufactured, all other rma drives we got from them were brand new.

    Peter.

  14. Bad Power Supply by crow · · Score: 4, Informative

    From my experience, repeated drive failures are the result of a bad power supply or some other external factor. This doesn't include DOA drives, of course, but otherwise when your drives keep failing, you need to check the operating temperature and power supply.

    1. Re:Bad Power Supply by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You hit the nail on the head.

      In the course of past jobs, I've probably returned about 200 drives under warranty (out of probably 4000-5000 drives installed). The failure rate for the replacement drives was never above average for the replacement drives with the exception of two models. One was an old Quantum low-end 3.5" model in the 2-4GB range that I can't remember the name of, and the other was the notorious version of the IBM deskstar. However in the deskstar case, the second round of replacements were a far superior drive, many of which I still have in use today.

      On the other hand, I have seen machines that seemed to eat hard drives for lunch, and in the end a few minutes with a scope always showed unstable voltage from the powersupply during bootup.

      Generaly I'd say my hard drive warranty experience has been positive; especially since, more often than not, I have received either faster or higher capacity drives as replacements.

    2. Re:Bad Power Supply by WedgeTalon · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, is there any brand you have come to prefer and any that you steer clear from?

    3. Re:Bad Power Supply by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 1

      The drive I recall being the biggest issue in one of my past jobs was the Quantum Bigfoot. They were actually 5.25" hard drives, but they did come in those capacities.

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
    4. Re:Bad Power Supply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about the old ~6 to 8GB Fujitsu drives. There was even a class action lawsuit for those! I've seen hundreds of those gone bad. Otherwise you're mostly right.

      Brand wise, I'll buy anything except Western Digital. We've got tens of thousands of desktops at work (across a few sites). We've got HDs of basically every mfg out there. The one I've seen fail the most - not only by total number but also in percentage (# gone bad/total # of said mfg in use), Western Digital leads the pack, by FAR. I'll buy Seagate, Maxtor, Samsung, IBM, Hitachi and ANYTHING else before a WD.

      Heck, when we purchase new PCs (batches of several pallets), we make sure they don't use WD drives.

    5. Re:Bad Power Supply by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

      One was an old Quantum low-end 3.5" model in the 2-4GB range...

      Quantum Fireball perhaps? I remember an extremely high failure rate on those, usually just out of the 1-year warranty on the computer, with normal usage.

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    6. Re:Bad Power Supply by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, it's models and not brands that make the difference. Every brand has a series of drives that just don't cut it. There were a few years back in the late '90s when Western Digital drives were particularly crappy, but that doesn't seem to be true anymore.

    7. Re:Bad Power Supply by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 1

      One was an old Quantum low-end 3.5" model in the 2-4GB range that I can't remember the name of,

      Fireball? I don't know what the deal is, but over the last year where I work, across several separate buildings with 2 different computer models, it seems like I've had one of those die every few weeks, and it's always the same thing: slow-but-steady increase in bad sectors, until it gets to where they just won't work. Luckily, I've been replacing whole computers at a fast enough clip that I got them all taken out of use by last month before any more had a chance to fail, but the consistency of make / model and failure type, with no other consistent factors, was just amazing.

      --
      Unpleasantries.
    8. Re:Bad Power Supply by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I can't say I've ever used a fujitsu drive...

      Western Digital used to suck, but their quality has inproved signifigantly the last few years as they have tried to move into the enterprise storage market. Just make sure you buy the ones with the 3 or 5 year warranties.

    9. Re:Bad Power Supply by julesh · · Score: 1

      I had horrendous trouble a couple of years back with Maxtor 40GB "DiamondMax Plus 8" half-height drives. Had three of them fail within three months of each other; two of them were a RAID-0 pair where the second failed before I'd had time to replace the first drive. Replaced them with 80GB drives from the same range, and everything has been fine since.

    10. Re:Bad Power Supply by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Nah, it wasn't a fireball.

      It sounds like you have lots of drives. After a drive has been in service over a year, failure rates of 8-10% per year are not that uncommon. Your Fireball drives are at least that old, since after the Maxtor buyout, Quantum branded hard drives were no longer sold. If you've got 250-300 machines with older hard drives, you should consider a drive death every couple weeks as normal.

  15. Refurbished hard drives? by Threni · · Score: 1

    How do they get the hard drives to refurbish and sell to you in the first place? Someone who's had a pc for a while, beaten it around, perhaps had trouble with it, then traded it in for something else that worked, to abuse? Or someone who's had it, cared for it for a few weeks or months, then said "that's fine, but I want another drive now"?

    Just buy a new drive, man. They're pretty cheap, and if there's a problem there's no need to arse around with warranties (at least, not in the UK) - just take it back and get a replacement or a refund. If you're getting more than one or two problems with consecutive drives from a respectable manufacturer such as Seagate or Quantum then you're just very unlucky.

    1. Re:Refurbished hard drives? by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      Quantum sold their hard drive division to Maxtor in 2000.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    2. Re:Refurbished hard drives? by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      And now maxtor is owned by seagate - so you've only recommended one manufacturer :)

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    3. Re:Refurbished hard drives? by Threni · · Score: 1

      Wow - then the company I worked for until quite recently must have had quite a stock of old Quantum drives! Anyway, it goes to show how reliable modern hard drives are, compared to, say, DVD writers (and disks, come to that) - at least in my experience.

  16. You may be just unlucky by jackb_guppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have drives working for years. I do mean YEARS! I have 2x 173M still running and working quite well in a firewall (486 computer at that).

    I did have 2 big failure last year when I was going to 250G drives, less than 6 months old. But both were replaced with new drives and no problems since.

    Now, all my equipment in on UPS amd NEVER turn off may make their operating enviromwnt very stable, except for cat hair.

    1. Re:You may be just unlucky by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 1

      My experience suggests that luck is more important than stable environment: I've had a 60G Seagate for about 5 years, and a 120G Seagate for about 3, no problems with either, and that's with shutting down every night and my box on nothing but a surge protector.

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
    2. Re:You may be just unlucky by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Make sure the total of INTAKE fans is always equal or greater than the number of fans blowing out; that keeps the air pressure higher inside the case, and prevents cat hair from drifting inside. Also keeps out most other dust and lint.

      I have cats and live in the desert, so I get my full share of both cat hair and dust. Even so, my machines set up this way stay almost white-glove clean inside.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:You may be just unlucky by Nerd4News · · Score: 1
      I have drives working for years. I do mean YEARS! I have 2x 173M still running and working quite well in a firewall (486 computer at that).

      I've got an old CDC 5.25" full height 10 meg drive that still works after 20+ years. I ran the hell out of it (database stuff) for the first 10. I last accessed the data on it a year ago and it worked fine. Don't use it much now except to heat my house.
  17. Maxtor 8gb drive by lothos · · Score: 1

    I had a Maxtor 8gb drive, back in 1998, when it was pretty much the largest drive you could get retail. It failed within a year, and I RMA'd it for a replacement. The replacement died within a year as well. I've stuck with purchasing WD and Seagate drives since then, and I've had no further issues.

  18. HDD Warranties have never let me down... by HaloZero · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...infact, it's a prime purchasing point for my choice of hardware.

    Late last year, my RAID array failed - 2 160gb Western Digital SATA drives went. I checked the WD website, RMAed them both, and recieved two replacements. They're still functioning today, better than the first two.

    We run a device at work that features six SATA2 320GB Seagate disks. The leverage for purchasing those devices was dependant on the 5-year warranty(, and the presumption that we'd never have to purchase a replacement for a bad disk).

    If you're having continually bad experiences with disks, you might want to examine their environment; are you using them at relentlessly high altitude? Is the power supply you're connecting them to bad? The lead from the PSU to the disk? Does your controller need a firmware update?

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
  19. No, the warranties are a Godsend by maynard · · Score: 2, Informative

    Where I work we regularly ship back dead Seagate IDE and SATA drives after RAID failures. Without these long warranties we'd lose far more money than is the case. Further, since these longer warranties have become standard, the MBTF and hardiness of consumer IDE drives have increased dramatically. I used to expect consumer disk to die within a year or two of regular (personal) use. In a heavily RAID array, they would often die within six months to a year. Now, they last much longer. Often, a year or two.

    Of course, commercial SCSI / fiberchannel disks still last a good five years of hard constant use. So, as is always, you get what you pay for. But, as it happens, these days you get more reliability on the consumer side than previously. I mean, who remembers the IBM disk fiasco a few years back? The warranties have helped.

    1. Re:No, the warranties are a Godsend by davecb · · Score: 1

      My personal and work SCSI disks gave superior service, with 3 year on-site guarantee and 5 years return-to-depot.

      We used the on-site replacement just once, out of many many disks, about a week after purchase. My personal backup drive was replaced last year, at (or beyond) the end of the 5-year warranty period, which wasn't unusual. The replacements were new, not refurb, and have the same warranty starting with their "purchase" date.

      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
  20. Sounds like the poster had bad luck by enigma48 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've done warranties for nearly all the major manuafacturers with no complaints. Maxtor's advanced replacement program came in handy (that replacement drive was installed 5 years ago and still works), no problems with WD's drives (again, installed years ago and still working).

    Get on the phone and start complaining - ideally, write a letter first (registered ideally). So few people do this that this puts you in a very small group of customers, and these customers are often the ones that know how to cause problems for the copmany. Having a paper trail also makes it a little harder for companies to shrug you off like a random complainer that just dials in every now and then.

    But before blaming the company, give them one last try. Inform them of your previous trouble with replacement drives (use dates and serial numbers). The odds of a drive dying are low, the replacement drive being DOA are low too. Then again, people win the lottery - sounds like you've just won the back luck kind. As another poster mentioned, look into the Lemon Laws in your state/province.

  21. Cooling! by Psychofreak · · Score: 4, Informative

    You have a good point about cooling. I had terrible luck with a removeable disk drive. I had it replaced at least 3x. The company folded so I had no recourse. I concluded that the drive was overheating as the ejected cartridge would be untouchably hot. People now call me a little crazy about cooling. I atribute the very long life of my curent computer to it sounding like a vaccume cleaner with it's 7 fans. That's 2 regular case fans, two midgit fans in a HDD cooler, one slot fan against the video card, and two processor fansin a dual p-pro system(overclocked of course).

    As a side note the dorm I lived in would top 100F regularly. I saw this alone kill many classmates machines.
    Phil

    --
    Laugh, it's good for you!
    1. Re:Cooling! by Spazmania · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are correct. Almost no modern hard drive should be warmer than luke-warm while running (or immediately after being turned off). If it is, your case has inadequate cooling and your drive will die soon. Not might; will.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    2. Re:Cooling! by __aawdrj2992 · · Score: 1

      At first I read that: ...and many classmates.

      Will someone PLEASE think of the children???

    3. Re:Cooling! by antdude · · Score: 1

      Wow, where is this? I thought my room was bad enough (can go up to 90F degrees in heat waves).

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:Cooling! by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      I always thought basements (parents' or otherwise) were relatively cool places.

    5. Re:Cooling! by antdude · · Score: 1

      I wished I had a basement. I am upstair so that's even worse. :(

      At my former dotcom employer, we had a basement. It was nice!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re:Cooling! by igb · · Score: 1
      We dropped the temperature in my machine room to a target of 18C. We've got ~400 hard drives in there, ranging from spiffy new 144GB FC and 500GB SATA in EMC and similar arrays, down to sub-1GB SCSI drives in elderly Suns. I think the oldest drive is a few hundred megs of ATA in a ~100MHz PC that has the GPS reference clock attached to it. I reckon that we lose perhaps five a year (sadly, we've not kept accurate stats) and the newer drives have a experienced MTBF of upwards of twenty years.

      However, a few months ago our aircon failed. The electricity supply company dropped one of the phases for a few seconds, which put the aircon units into a `locked' failure state until manually reset, while the UPS and generator kicked in. We caught it within about 20 minutes, but the temperature exceeded 30C ambient for a few minutes, hotter in some of the cabinets.

      We lost a drive in each of the EMC arrays during the following month, the first we'd seen go since early-life failure in the first few months of operation.

      ian

    7. Re:Cooling! by Psychofreak · · Score: 1

      Four words:
      Steam heat.
      No thermostat.

      Phil

      --
      Laugh, it's good for you!
    8. Re:Cooling! by mwilliamson · · Score: 1

      100 degrees in your dorm? Where'd you go to school? There is only one place I can think of in the South with a dorm that hot...Walton Hall at A&M.

  22. Well, of course. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    That's because drives were a lot more reliable when data densities were lower. I still have the old 40MB drive from my second computer, and it still works perfectly. Every other IDE drive I've had since then, with the exception of the two in my desktop right now, either developed bad sectors or failed catastrophically.

    1. Re:Well, of course. by alienw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's just a good drive. I've had plenty of 40 meg drives fail and I had plenty of bigger disks that didn't develop issues. It really mainly depends on how many hours you put on the drive -- if you don't use the computer very often, the hard drive will last a long time.

    2. Re:Well, of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought spinup and spindown caused the most wear on a drive. If you have it running and constantly spinning (a la servers), it'll last far longer than if you powerup and powerdown the drive all the time.

    3. Re:Well, of course. by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember a lot of probelms with early drives (not early as in when they started, but when they kind of took off for home use). Especially with Seagate drives. After they started getting into the several hundred meg range, up into the less than 100 gig range, I think those drives are more reliable than the 100+ gig drives.

      Maybe not 100. Maybe 80, may 120, but somewhere right around there, I think desnity just got too high, and I'm afraid to replace my 80 gig drive before I get some kind of full backup system in place (aside from just backing up the irreplaceable stuff on CD/DVD)

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    4. Re:Well, of course. by alienw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Spinup/spindown are actually not significant as far as wear is concerned. An otherwise worn-out drive is more likely to fail during a spin-up or spin-down, but those actions don't actually cause any wear. My understanding is that most failures are caused by spindle bearings wearing out, which is directly proportional to how long the drive has been powered on.

    5. Re:Well, of course. by alienw · · Score: 1

      Nah, there's no trend there. I've actually had far fewer problems with my 100 and 160 gig drives than I had with the ~10-20 gig stuff. I had only one 100 gig drive fail, and according to SMART it had about a hundred thousand hours on the clock, which was way past its expected lifetime. Even then, it didn't fail completely, just got extremely slow. I was able to copy all the data off of it, although that took about 15 hours. Western Digital seems to make pretty damn good drive controllers.

    6. Re:Well, of course. by eric76 · · Score: 1

      All the ones I've had trouble with were 200 GB and larger.

      I've had several 120 and 160 GB drives without a problem.

      I've noticed that the reviews on disk drives on NewEgg list increasingly more problems with drives that are DOA or that fail in relatively short times when the drives are bigger than 160 GB.

      Of the four SATA drives I've bought, all 200 GB or larger, two have failed. I've already replaced one of them, but not the other.

    7. Re:Well, of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drives may have been more reliable back in the day, but I remember that when you purchased a hard drive, especially the larger drives of the day (back when 170 megs was more than you could use, and a 1 gig drive cost over $2000.), drives came nonfunctional right out of the box. There are quite a large number of drive manufacturers who went out of business for having such a high failure rate..A local shop went through 100 microsciences 120meg drives, and had about 7 that actually worked. Granted, they may have just received a very defective batch.. But, the reliability of drives has gone way up in recent years, even as density has increased. As far as the warranty, I think the warranty is useless. Would you buy a car, discover a severely critical defect, and expect them to replace the defective parts with 'refurbished' parts? Most dealership warranty repairs on cars are done with new parts.. Hard drives should be replaced with 'new' drives, and refurbs should be resold as S&D..

    8. Re:Well, of course. by BrianRaker · · Score: 1

      according to SMART it had about a hundred thousand hours on the clock

      You do know that 100,000 hours is a shade over 11 years, right? Remember the IBM 60GXP-series Deathstars? That was in 2001, about the time when 100GB+ drives were getting hot and bleeding edge on the market. My math tells me that's only been 6 years at most.

      I could possibly buy 50,000 power-on hours (5.8 years continuous uptime), but not around 100,000.

      --
      As I walk through the valley of death I fear no one, for I am the meanest sonova bitch in the valley!
    9. Re:Well, of course. by alienw · · Score: 1

      You're right, I think it must have been around 40,000 hours. I just remembered that it was close to a round number. The drive was one of the first 100GB IDE drives out there, and it was running pretty much 24/7.

    10. Re:Well, of course. by Not+The+Real+Me · · Score: 1

      "I've had several 120 and 160 GB drives without a problem."

      The most reliable IDE drives I've got are the 80GB and 120GB drives that spin at slower speeds. I've got a bunch of dead 7200rpm 80GB IDEs but all the 5400rpm (80GB, 120GB, 160GB) drives are alive and kicking.

    11. Re:Well, of course. by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > If you don't use the computer very often, the hard drive will last a long time.

      Is *that* why I've had such terrible luck with hard drives lately? Hmmm...

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    12. Re:Well, of course. by alexdw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suspect that your problem here is cooling. 7200RPM drives run much hotter than their 5400RPM equivalents. Although it requires more case real estate, you should provide proper spacing between drives, and some active cooling (a fan or something more fancy).

      --
      Deliver yesterday, code today, think tomorrow.
    13. Re:Well, of course. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Actually, the biggest factors in HD lifespan aren't number of hours in service -- rather, what takes the life out of them are a hot environment, being powered on and off multiple times a day, and being hooked to bad power supplies. Being thumped around is also a factor, especially if a desktop machine is moved while it's powered on.

      But given a stable environment, most decent HDs will run perfectly for a bit over 5 years, and often longer.

      Frex, in my 3 everyday-use machines that always run 24/7, their four current HDs have a combined in-use age of over 25 YEARS (two are over 8 years old). This isn't at all unusual... at least for Western Digital. Your brands may vary. :)

      I still have a few working HDs of the 40mb era, tho I can't imagine any earthly use for them :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  23. Works for me by mmurphy000 · · Score: 1

    I've RMA'd a few Maxtor drives, and their replacements haven't died yet. I haven't had to RMA any from other drive manufacturers.

    So, Maxtor is a mixed bag: (apparently) less-reliable drives, but with decent-quality replacements with a straightforward RMA policy.

  24. All warranty repairs are refurbs... by sarkeizen · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...and this seems to extend beyond the hard drive market. Virtually every computer component I get repaired has some refurbished part. Seagate has recently started labeling their refurbed drive. The branding sticker on the one I most recently replaced had a green border and read "Seagate Reconditioned Drive" at the top. I wonder if this is to stop people from selling them outright.

    My Advice:

    1) If you can, buy from a store with a good return policy (best buy, etc) - although often I find those stores only carry the boxed drives which tend to have lower warranties. If it dies in a very short period - return it and get a new one. Don't let them scam you into getting a warranty exchange.

    2) Before you buy check out the MTBF on the various models of drive. Some differ significantly.

    3) Back up religiously and/or use a RAID. My RAID 5 is composed of seven drives and I lose a drive probably every 18 months or so but it's virtually a no-pain situation. Pull the drive - send it out for repair - take the refurbed drive and assign it to the RAID as a hot-spare. RAID rebuilds itself.

    But to answer the question: "Are the warantees worthless?". My last drive I exchanged to seagate was 200G they replaced it with a 400G! Not bad IMHO.

    1. Re:All warranty repairs are refurbs... by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      Before you buy check out the MTBF on the various models of drive. Some differ significantly.

      The Seagate drive the poster refers to has a published MTBF of 600,000 hours, almost 70 years. MTBF numbers are baloney.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    2. Re:All warranty repairs are refurbs... by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      Nah, MTBF's are based on the failure rate you can expect from a large chunk of drives, not the expected lifetime of a single drive. A MBTF of 600,000 hours means that if you have, say, 600,000 drives within their 5-year (generally) design life, you can expect about 1 drive to fail every hour, or a yearly failure rate of about 1.5%.

    3. Re:All warranty repairs are refurbs... by pyite · · Score: 1

      A MBTF of 600,000 hours means that if you have, say, 600,000 drives within their 5-year (generally) design life, you can expect about 1 drive to fail every hour, or a yearly failure rate of about 1.5%.

      You're assuming a very dangerous thing... that the distribution of failures is flat. It's not. It follows the bathtub curve.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    4. Re:All warranty repairs are refurbs... by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      I didn't say anything about the distribution of failures, just the average failure rate, since that's what the MTBF gives; the Mean Time Between Failures.

    5. Re:All warranty repairs are refurbs... by Kyril · · Score: 1

      MTBF only applies after the initial period and only for the duration of the designed lifespan, i.e. the bottom of the bathtub. And don't forget to divide by the duty cycle: 30,000 hours MTBF with only a 5% duty cycle means an average of one failure per 6,000 hours of actual device use.

      As to the OP, however, given how long even an advance replacement takes and given how long drives last for me, a drive failure usually means it's time to buy a new pair of disks, mirror them, and make hand-me-downs or external drives out of the survivor and the replacement.

  25. it's just you by grapeape · · Score: 1

    I havent found reliability going down, actually I have found just the opposite. I have had one in the past 5-6 years. In the past my clients would have at least a couple a year.

    Im rather fond of Samsung they have a longer warranty than any other drive manufacturer at the moment and its pretty much no questions asked.

    1. Re:it's just you by kinzillah · · Score: 1

      Better than the seagate 5 year warranty?

      --
      Douglas P. Price
  26. Return Under Warranty (UK) by KyrBe · · Score: 1

    I'll take it, as you haven't said, that you're in the US. Here in the UK I've never had a problem with warranties. The product fails, I return it to the supplier and get a new replacement. On the few times I've had to return something to the manufacturer, it's also been replaced with new (and not refurbished). Although thankfkully I've not had to return a drive to the manufacturer yet, only the retailer. In the UK your contract is with the company you purchase from under The Sale Of Goods Act, and not who made the product (ok it's not quite that simple after a certain period of time). There are a number of excellent guides online covering the UK - I'll leave that as a googling excercise for the reader

  27. 4 years of dealing with RMAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the past 4 years I have been dealing with RMAs for a medium size institution with ~1300 workstations and two large SAN systems. One of my tasks is to maintain our replacment parts inventory, pershipped warrenty parts. Our technicians are certified from the vendors for most of our systems. Over the past 4 years probably about 30 Hard Drives have failed under warrenty when I have gotten the RMA replacment it hase been a refurbished drive, never once have I gotten a DOA Drive. the vast majority of drives are segates.

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Never send your hard drive by Eric+Pierce · · Score: 1

    I've always thought hard disk warranties are worthless.

    I don't care if the manufacturers offer a 100 year no fault protection. No person in their right mind should ever send their hard drive off in the mail which contains their personal data on it.

    Well, with that said I guess the only exception would be if you _absolutely_ need to retrieve lost data from the hard drive.

    Backup... backup... backup...

    1. Re:Never send your hard drive by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      it's a catch 22 - do you destroy the drive so your data can't be read from your defunct drive, or do you send it in and hope the facility you ship it to erases the drive well enough after they referb it to prevent your data from being shipped to someone else?

      Answer - use disk encryption or at least file level encryption strong enough to make the take next to impossible to read your tax files or pr0n stash.

    2. Re:Never send your hard drive by Student_Tech · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was an Ask Slashdot on a similar thing a few weeks ago. The comments answer to that seemed to boil down to:
      1. Contact manufacture about your policy concerning drive with data on them
      2. Most seemed to accept just the face plate once contacted
      3. Send in face plate
      3.5(opt) Destroy rest of dead drive
      4. Get replacement drive

  30. Go to a new store by Codename46 · · Score: 1

    Quit buying all your crap from Fry's Electronics. Problem solved. =)

  31. Never had a problem with any by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    Although, I cool the hell out of my systems. So much apparently that I've never even had trouble with WD, which had a stretch of some pretty notorious drives.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  32. Maxtor by spoonboy42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    To be honest, I've had drives from every major manufacturer die. By far the best warranty coverage came from Maxtor, however, who would send out a replacement drive before requiring the old drive back (for a drive which was starting to show bad sectors, I would take it offline, wait for the replacement, then transfer my data over directly). As long as you send the defective drive back within a month, you're golden.

    In my case, the new drives were always actually new, and performed very well. Recieving them basically "reset" the warranty to day 0, as well. Finally, the RMA process is completely automated, not requiring you to wait on a phone line. Just download and run a little diagnostic tool which will give you an error code, enter it in on the website, and you can handle the whole business without having to talk to anyone at a call center.

    In short, having a drive die sucks, and as I said, it's happened to me with most major manufacturers (Western Digital, Seagate, IBM, Toshiba, Hitachi all come to mind), but Maxtor had by far the best warranty coverage.

    --
    Anonymous Luddite: "What do you think of the dehumanizing effects of the Internet?"
    Andy Grove: "Not Much."
    1. Re:Maxtor by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I have salvaged HDs of every which brand, but due to experience with longevity and warranty, I only *buy* Western Digital. I have about a dozen in use at the moment (the oldest in everyday use has been running 24/7 for over 8 years now).

      W.D. does the same cross-shipment as you describe with Maxtor -- they send you a new drive, you have 30 days to copy over your data and return the dead drive in the Handy Shipping Container that the replacement came in. In practice, the 30 days is usually more like 45-60 days (there's a "use by" date on the RMA slip that's generally the end of the month following the current month), and some replacements are refurbs. The last such refurb I got has been running 24/7 for 4.5 years now and is still 100% perfect, so I can't complain.

      One distinct advantage of W.D. is that they don't just die without warning -- at the very least they'll produce strange noises. And sick WDs can usually be nursed along for a LONG time before they die for good.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  33. It's probably your power... by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 1

    I suggest that if you do not have a proper UPS/power conditioner that you look into getting one. A lot of electronic problems come from bad power.

    --
    (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
  34. The Warranty Lottery by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 1

    I quite agree.

    I've had to return two drives over the years; both were of course replaced by refurbished drives.

    I'm assuming "refurbished" means someone else returned the drive, no fault was found, and now you've got it.

    Problem is, some drives are returned because of intermittant errors, or subtler faults which may not be regarded as faults by the manufacturer, such as elevated noise.

    So the warranty, really, is a risk - you may get a drive back which is okay, but you may get a bundle of trouble.

  35. When a HD warranty *is* a sham by fastgood · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Nobody knows better than the engineers what their MTTF rate is, and they should set time limits on the known data.

    Western Digital put out a 12 month drive (they best know their own product quality) plus an optional $15 insurance plan.

    You either build a more expensive, higher quality unit that can stand on its merits for 3 years, or you decide to build junk.
    But don't let Marketing dictate quality, where 12-36 months out, you pray for less than one in six returns for a break-even.

  36. So much BS. by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    Have you read the MTBF rating on that 200 gb Seagate drive? They claim 600,000 hours. That's like 70 years of continuous operation. "Mean" time between failure; that means that half of those drives should still work after 70 years.

    Is there anyone out there who owns a hard drive they seriously expect to be in operational condition 70 years from now? Anyone?

    Its like Tobacco's claims that their product was safe in the face of blatently obvious proof that it wasn't. Someone should file a class-action.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:So much BS. by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      Have you read the MTBF rating on that 200 gb Seagate drive? They claim 600,000 hours. That's like 70 years of continuous operation. "Mean" time between failure; that means that half of those drives should still work after 70 years.
      No. That is not what MTBF indicates. MTBF does not measure lifetime, it measures random failure rates during the expected lifetime of the drive. A good explanation can be found here
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:So much BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GP probably still has a point that it's a somewhat misleading metric, though. It's more like if you have 600,000 drives, you can expect one to fail in an hour. But that's not very useful to most people who don't have 600,000 drives.

      Me, I don't pay attention to the MTTF/MTBF stat. It's completely useless, as far as I'm concerned. I simply buy drives from manufacturers I've had good experiences with in the past, and figure they'll last long enough for my personal data storage.

    3. Re:So much BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you honestly believe that your hard drive will last 70 years, then you deserve your fate just as people who claim to have not known that cigarettes could be bad for you, use some reasoning skills people. Ok, rant's over.

      Every hard drive has a "useful lifetime". This can be shorter than the warranty, but sometimes they do coincide. What the MTBF is talking about is that if you replace the drive with the same model of drive (new) everytime you hit the end of the "useful life" of the drive you will most likely not experience a drive failure for the duration of the MTBF.

      Also, most companies only publish the MTBF on their enterprise level drives. Note that this does not necessarily imply SCSI or the like. They do make enterprise IDE and SATA drives, they just cost a little more than their regular counterparts. Their warranties are usualy longer than the standard drives as well.

      In response to somebody higher up, RAID is not a replacement for backing up. What happens if something gets accidentaly deleted, or you get infected with a virus, or somebody gets pissed off at you and throws your computer into a woodchipper? RAID is for uptime only, not to replace having your data duplicated elsewhere.

    4. Re:So much BS. by jrvz · · Score: 1

      No, they're claiming that if you always replace each drive at the end of its warranty period, then you'll experience a failure on average every 70 years.

  37. Be an educated buyer... by Fishbulb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having been a SCSI-drive user since my Amiga 1000 days, you need to understand MTBF (Mean Time Before Failure) and the difference between IDE/SATA drives and SCSI/FiberChannel drives. Remember that the profit margins on consumer electronics is razor thin, so any manufacturer is going to put any device it can't find a problem with back into service (eg: your RMA'd drives).

    Here are some articles I dug up in a few minutes:
    http://www.bqr.com/faq/faq.htm
    http://www.atruereview.com/Articles/scsi.php
    http://www.driveservice.com/bestwrst.htm (a bit old, but has useful info)

    To answer your qeustion:
    Caveat Emptor!

  38. The Internet Archive does this for their disk farm by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Internet Archive has an ongoing effort to measure disk drive reliability. They have several thousand disk drives for which they are collecting data, and for the year 2005, about 2% failed. This is better than previous years; a few years back they were experiencing 6%/year failure rates.

    They send them back for warranty replacement, I'm told.

  39. Warranties = Profit Margin by texaport · · Score: 1
    When someone clicks a banner ad for a $349 computer from a large online retailer, does anyone really think the system builder will change parts based on the consumers' last minute decision to purchase protection?

    Like swapping out the one year warranty HD for the same manufacturer's more expensive three year hard drive, because the consumer upgrades the coverage on their bare-bones lossleader whitebox to 24 months instead of the minimal 90 days?

  40. HP "warranty" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an HP Pavilion zv3160us notebook that I purchased 10 months ago. It came with an 80 GB Seagate Momentus 5400 RPM ATA100 drive. The Seagate drive has developed bad sectors on the drive (bunches) and when I called HP to see about getting a new/replacement drive, the clowns at HP told me that my drive was a 4200 RPM unit. I told them NO, it's a 5400 RPM unit. They told me that their "database" says that my model only shipped with 4200 RPM drives. I took a photo of the Hewlett Packard branded OEM drive with the stinking HP part number and HP logo plastered on the Seagate drive at their request and afterwards they told me that their magic 8-ball database still says that I got a 4200 RPM drive with my machine. So, now I'm not only looking at a bad drive, but HP is in essence calling me a liar. Newegg has the drive new for $75. I tore the HP corporate representative a new a*%^$@# on the phone just to get my money's worth and will likely end up keeping the drive as a reminder to steer all of my clients away from HP in the future.

    I think I'll gut my laserjet and turn it into a litterbox.

    1. Re:HP "warranty" by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Call the escalation department / "corporate operator". It's a call center staffed with english speaking folks who can be very helpful if you have issues. If you call their main number, error the ivr to get a person and ask to be transfered.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    2. Re:HP "warranty" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the advice-

      This was actually the person that I vented on. The issue was escalated at my insistance when I first got wind of their database showing my zv6130us shipped with a 4200 RPM drive. No matter what I say or do they have tunnel vision about what their database tells them came in my machine despite me even photographing the drive and emailing that to them.

      Kind of reminds me of how my wife hooked us up with Dish Network with 2 rooms years ago. I came home from work and 2 boxes were in the house and a dish was on the roof. I checked out what she signed up for and both of the boxes had no functionality to set up a timer to record shows. Dish Network was offering another deal where you'd pay a bit more a month and get 2 boxes with timer functionality and more channels. I called Dish Network up and asked if I could upgrade. They said NO, because I had a contract. I reminded them that I had 30 days in which I could have them just come and get their stuff but I'd rather just upgrade to a better service. They again said NO. I went upward and onward through 3 more levels of customer service and I got the same canned speech from them all, so I cancelled my service contract. They even sent pre-paid shipping cartons to ship the receiver boxes back to them. I kept the dish. The next week I went out and bought my own DirecTV boxes and had them activated. Then I started getting phone calls weekly from Dish Network and I loved telling them all about the totally blind way they dealt with me and how I already purchased my own hardware for DirecTV.

      Same now goes for HP. These lamers can't perceive how I got this drive so I must be lying. My guess is that the janitor in their Kung Pow facility must have picked up a stray Seagate Momentus 5400 that fell on the floor and dropped it into the wrong bin, only to be stuffed into my computer or they ran out during a production shortage (more likely). I try to explain what I have to the C.S. reps in Biafra that use an Ouiji board with the magic 8-ball upgrade and I can literally hear the blank stares over the phone. When I get the call escalated and talk to someone here in the States I get the same tripe repeated to me. Likewise with their email support. No problem. I'll just drop the folding green someplace else and continue to let other people know what kind of knuckle draggers HP has in their employ. At least I know that if I become mentally handicapped that there's still hope for employment - I can get hired at HP.

    3. Re:HP "warranty" by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. Guess you had a really bad experience. I know I got bumped to a ~$500 camera because I got 3 doa units in a row on the (much) cheaper camera I had.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  41. What they're not telling you by regular_gonzalez · · Score: 1

    The dirty little secret of the electronics industry is that the vast majority of "replacements" that are sent out were themselves previously RMA'd and then tested and found not to have anything wrong with them -- at least, in theory. In reality, hardware can have problems that only crop up under certain circumstances; perhaps that video card one gets as a replacement was previously returned because it locked up after an hour of intense gameplay, or only during certain types of graphical rendering.

    Of further concern are hard drives. That drive you sent in for an RMA might get shipped out to someone else as a replacement. One hopes that any data left on the drive was completely obliterated, but all too often it's just a quick fdisk and then it gets shipped back out. Be sure to eliminate all traces of any sensitive data on hard drives if at all possible before RMA'ing them.

    The best way to ensure you don't get someone else's return as your replacement product is to ask to speak with a manager and explain your concerns. Your first shipment, in my experience, will still probably be a previously RMA'd item, but if that one fails then supervisors tend to be rather sympathetic and I've generally gotten a pristine, factory-sealed replacement after that.

    --
    Due to circumstances beyond my control, I am master of my fate and captain of my soul.
  42. Maxtor Warantee gave me multiple bad replacements by SamNmaX · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had a Maxtor drive flake out on me with the click of death. So, I sent in for another, and it worked for a little while, but then it wouldn't even spin up. My current Maxtor drive, while it sort of works, often has trouble unparking the drive head when I first boot up. I have decided to stop wasting my time trying to get replacements, and have stopped wasting my time with Maxtor altogether. Maxtor certainly isn't the only company that makes flacky harddrives. I've had Western Digitals and Quantums (now owned by Maxtor) die on me too. However, Maxtors drives seem to be consistently bad, and after getting 3 bad hard drives from them in a row, I make sure to avoid them at all cost, and let me friends know to do so as well.

  43. I have only ever had one of my drives fail... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    It was nearly 10 years ago. It was a 1.2GB WD drive. When it died, I RMA'd it. Western Digital sent me a 1.6 GB replacement. That drive worked fine for years.

    It seems that you have just had a bad run of luck.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  44. Hard Drive Warranties Have Hidden Costs by repetty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's actually more economical to ignore hard drive warranties -- go out and purchase a new hard drive if you experience a failure.

    When I joined the large engineering company that I currently work for about two years ago, they were replacing four hard drives a week under warranty. When I realized that all of the warranty replacement hard drives were refurbs, I changed that little policy: we started throwing away the bad drives and began purchasing replacements.

    Failures have been reduced to fewer than one a week.

    So, now we are spending about $80 to buy new hard drives when a warranty replacement would have been free.

    HOWEVER, we saving a heck of a lot more than that. Now the sysadmins are fixing other things and our users' downtime has been greatly reduced. We're saving hundreds of dollars per failure by installing new hard drives instead of warranty replacements.

    Money is a truthsayer.

    1. Re:Hard Drive Warranties Have Hidden Costs by PoderOmega · · Score: 1

      I think instead of throwing away drives you could work out a donation deal or a deal where you get a little money back for the drives. Someone out there is willing to spend the time and take the risk with refurbished drives. When you buy the drives the warranty isn't free you know, its built into the cost.

    2. Re:Hard Drive Warranties Have Hidden Costs by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      ...and are you going to pay for his paperwork costs to process a drive replacement? Particularly if its a tech salary processing the transaction, and not a clerk's salary? The poster already decided to eat the warrantee costs ($$$ new replacement drive + money factored into defective drive) to save on processing time (15+ mins paperwork + drive reinstallation & evaluation time).

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    3. Re:Hard Drive Warranties Have Hidden Costs by PoderOmega · · Score: 1

      What I am suggesting is instead of dropping it a trash can, drop it a box and give it to someone who DOES NOT WORK FOR THAT COMPANY will take the time. For example, I had a hard drive die and I bought a replacement immedately. I gave the old drive to my brother who is in college and said if he wanted to go through the RMA process to get a refurbished drive, go ahead. He did, and got a much bigger hard drive for next to nothing.

  45. Maxtor's RMA site "maintenance" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Friday morning I tried to put in an RMA for a Maxtor which is developing the Click-of-death. Their site claims to be down for "system maintenance"

    Strange how the maintenance covers the entire last 2 days of the month - also the last 2 days of many people's warrantees. Funny, huh?

    1. Re:Maxtor's RMA site "maintenance" by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Not "Interesting". That makes no sense at all. Your warranty lasts 12 months from your date of purchase, not "12 months, rounded to the end of the nearest calendar month".

  46. No problem here. by jsdcnet · · Score: 1

    I've owned a few dozen drives and RMA'd maybe 3-4. All the replacements worked fine. Recently someone on a tech mailing list offered to give away a fairly new 200GB drive because it was broken and he didn't want to deal with RMA process. I took it and got myself a nice replacement drive for free.

    --
    no longer working for cnet
  47. Re:Seagates and WDs RMA'd: results fine by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

    I"ve RMA'd 2 seagate drives, ever (out of about 15 that I've purchased) and both times I got back new drives. shrinkwraped and everything.

    The cause of one drive's death was a 5' fall to the floor. I had it on top of my G5 and my roommate was getting something from behind my desk and knocked it off. The computer didn't even see the drive after that. Seagate replaced it in about 3 days.

    the other one just stopped spinning up after a couple of days. Seagate took longer with that one (this one happened about a week after I RMA'd the first one), but they did send me back a new drive.

    I've had pretty good luck with drives in my life. I've only lost 8 drives, total, ever. 4 Maxtors (all 3+ years old), 1 IBM Deskstar, and one Western Digital (after 6 years of use).

    i've still got drives from 1998 in active machines... although I'm toying with the idea of replacing them since newer drives apparently have new features and are a good deal faster.

    --



    ...spike
    Ewwwwww, coconut...
  48. good experience by murphotronic · · Score: 1

    Only drive I ever had crash was a Western Digital 74GB Raptor which died after 1-1/2 years of 24/7 on time. Having a five year warranty, WD overnighted me a replacement at no cost (just had to return defective drive). Been working great ever since.

  49. Buy it retail-Buyer beware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Heck, I had some RAM blow 18 months after I bought it and they still replaced it free of charge, without my receipt (hooray for customer databases)."

    Except for one mom and pop (more pop than mom) that I dealt with. They replaced the memory under the lifetime warrenty BUT they first wanted to send the original back, I'd wait, and then get my free replacement. Unfortunately my machine would have been down during that time. So I requested a replacement a bit sooner. They said yes, but I would have to pay $5 to send the original back, and they give me a replacement. I've checked with other shops and they do a straight swap, no money involved.

    What's the motto of this story. Make certain you get all the stores policies IN WRITING! And ask a LOT of questions.

  50. If not IBM/Hitachi, then whom do you recommend? by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 1


    We have more than 800 ide disks in the systems I maintain. We have a very low failure rate - and if something fails its likely a ibm/hitachi disk.

    If not IBM/Hitachi, then whose drives have worked well for you?

    Thanks!

    1. Re:If not IBM/Hitachi, then whom do you recommend? by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      Hi,

      I work for a campus maintaining over 3,000 systems, mostly in warranty from the majors. We probably replace a few drives a week on average. Half the drives we get back from RMA are refurbished, but typically don't cause a problem. The majority of failures we must replace are Maxtor (now defunct) and IBM/Hitachi. It is rare that a segate or WD drive goes out within the first year, but after 2 or 3 anything is possible and you are guaranteed failures in a significant percentage.

      WD and Segate are the only brands of drives that are reliable. Some will tell you that WD is crap, but those people haven't installed a hard drive since 1998. In today's world, if WD and Segate were making shit, they would be out of business by now, as their RMA costs would be through the roof. WD and Segate outsell the competition several times each and if yield were that bad the price of drives would be double.

      When it comes to actually getting warranty replacements, WD is the best in the industry as far as service, on the other hand, Segate has the longest warranty on their OEM drives (5 years). Over the last 6 years I have worked here, the trends have been about the same, with IBM/Hitachi getting worse, maxtor always having been average/unreliable, and Segate getting better, from my perspective. I have found that the old Maxtor drives are having their labels covered up by segate labels. I know these models still have the same problems maxtor always had. I am unsure of the future of segate drives coming out of Maxtor designs, but I have read insider reports that they are cleaning up their act. Will not know if this is true probably for a few years when we have had time to see the standard 3 year cycle complete.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    2. Re:If not IBM/Hitachi, then whom do you recommend? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'll second mp3phish. I see a lot of HDs of random age and usage history, and Western Digital are by far the most reliable (and the only ones I've bought for the past 12 years). Seagate next best, tho theirs tend to run slower/hotter than comparable WD models. Maxtors are the worst, and are most likely to simply die without warning (whereas WD will usually make odd noises or give other clues of impending death). Samsung, IBM, and the other minor consumer brands also seem to have a high failure rate.

      If a WD or Seagate HD survives its first month, it will run reliably for at least 5 years. Conversely, Maxtors often fail shortly after one year.

      And now, beware of rebadged Maxtors masquerading as Seagates, at least until the old Maxtor stock runs out. Seagate did rebadge Conner's shitty HDs when they bought Conner, but didn't alter their firmware, so they could still be ID'd.

      If you buy enough HDs, you WILL see failures in every brand, it's just the nature of the beast. I've had no trouble with WD warranties -- they cross-ship and only once have I received a refurb (and it's still perfect 4.5 years later).

      As to spates of HD failures that you sometimes hear about, they're often not the HDs at all, but rather something else that mimics HD failure. Some that I've heard about or experienced: bad RAID controllers (some will fail by writing garbage to the HDs); data wrapping bug on FAT32 partitions larger than 32GB; bogus power supplies.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  51. luck of the draw.... by smash · · Score: 1
    ... unless you're dealing with large quantities of drives, personal experience is just that.

    I've had a couple of seagates die on me and they've been replaced under warranty. Does this mean they're unreliable? Not really considering the vast majority of drives I buy/use are seagate. One of them was even replaced with a larger capacity drive (several years ago) as that was the smallest capacity they sold at the time of replacement (though this could have been the vendor's doing, as i returned to a vendor rather than direct to seagate).

    On the other hand, I still have a notoriously unreliable model hard drive (IBM Deskstar 13.5gig aka the "Deathstar" for their high failure rate) that has been working flawlessly since 1999 or so :)

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  52. Sham? Not in the good old days by owlman17 · · Score: 1

    A 4GB Seagate HD that came with my system that I bought in September 1999 died literally just a few days before the warranty expired three years later, around August 2002. I had already lost the receipt long since but they replaced it with a brand new 20GB HD, no questions asked. A lot of shops these days have shortened the warranties from 3 to 1 year, and even then, make it hard for you to collect. (No scratches, etc.)

  53. WD = good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they will be refurb drives. Why would you get a new one? Your drive was used when it died so it is replaced with a used but tested drive. Not sure what's to not understand there. WD has been good to me with RMA's. Fast shipping both ways and replacement drives before I send mine in. I have never had a problem with them, only with maxtor have I had any sort of issue.

  54. The problem is testing by the OEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have been repairing computer for a living for years, and this is how I see it.
    Here are the problems:

    1. Some hard drive companies have both a QA & QC issue that stats with the Hard drive design.
    Prototype Hard drives are generally tested in a room that is about 70 degres F.
    Operating specs are theoretical and not actual or tested in realistic environments.

    2. A lot of Hard drives are made in clean rooms in other countries, other then US.
    These clean room are anything but clean and do not measure up to the quoted clean room standards.
    This is not picking on other countries because Korea has some of the best on the planet, and China has the worse.
    (I know I helped to design them in the 80's when they were first getting started. In china their workers were smoking in the clean rooms when putting them togather. Heck their techs were known to be smoking while cleaning bell jars during operations)

    3. Post production testing can be as little as does a mother board read it correctly, to can we boot an OS.
    Some companies do real stress testing but they seem to be few and far between.
    The less time they spend on testing the more they increase in profit.

    4. Return testing is almost non-existent.
    (Stock people not techs test return goods, if they think it is ok, they slap a refurbish sticker and send it back out)
    I am Compaq certified and all they use to do was test the return hard drives with a bios test.
    After many complaints they up the testing to see if it would format.
    And they would always complain that the hard drives I turned in were good and send them back out as refurbished.

    Stay away from the following HD companies:
    Maxtor (loses packets and read/write arm issues last between 6 months to a year)
    Seagate (Over heats easily with out extra cooling and then loses packets or not longer read/writes last about a year)
    Hitachi (other then death star issues I have had good luck with them so far)

    As far as warranty's go, if they make a 5hit hard drive, you can bet they are going to send you a 5hit replacement

    Tetalon

  55. WD400 by mmu_man · · Score: 1

    I had a WD400 that died long ago (had bad sectors, managed to save everything though), RMAed it to germany (I'm in france), they sent back a refurbished one. It's still working, mostly, but since I got it it sometimes locks up and makes funny noises. So I only use it to store video and mp3s as I don't want to risk data on it. I should really have sent it back right away.. now it's long since warranty has passed.
    I had to buy a WD800 to backup this one when it died, but I'll definitely not buy WD anymore.
    But then again, it seems every other brand does the same. Anyone knows better ?

  56. Speaking as a PC repairman... by spywhere · · Score: 1

    For me, hard disks are The Weakest Link. I work on a few thousand PCs per year, so I see way too many failed drives. Sometimes I can recover the data, sometimes it's way too late. Some of these drives are long out of warranty, some are a few months old.
    The customers often have a warranty from the PC manufacturer, especially if it's a Dell: they do the best job of selling extended coverage. When they do, I encourage the customer to arrange warranty repairs directly. (About half of the customers would rather pay me for the repairs than deal with the manufacturer).
    I encourage customers who need a hard disk to buy it themselves. I would rather spend the few minutes necessary to identify the right drive for them than provide it through my company.
    When I do sell a hard drive, I buy it locally, give the original store receipt to the customer, and sell it at exactly my cost. I make it clear -- verbally and in writing -- that the warranty on the hard disk is between the customer, the seller, and the manufacturer, and that my company offers no guarantees on the part or labor.

    I also explain hard drives to all of my customers in exactly these words:
    1. Your hard drive is a complex system of parts moving at extremely high speeds.
    2. Every hard drive will fail, including yours.
    3. Some will fail tomorrow, some will fail in 2039, and nobody knows when yours will fail.
    4. When your drive fails, you will lose all the data that you didn't back up.

    This speech often results in profitable backup system design jobs...

  57. Or maybe he's like me by Shadowruni · · Score: 0, Insightful

    And develops confidential code and 0-day exploits...

    Perhaps he does lots of finance work...

    Maybe he just values his privacy...

    To assume someone with something to hide is simply wrong. Not to be offtopic but your reply is similar to the government's arguement that warrantless wiretapping is 'OK'. "If you're not hiding anything, you shouldn't care that we're listening."

    --
    "Chinese Amazons, power armor, laser swords.... things just meant to be." - Shampoo, A Very Scary Bet
  58. wow by AnXa · · Score: 1

    wow, I must be very lucky with my oldest Harddrive still working. I bought it 1995 and it's about around 800megs of size.

    --
    -Seeing the problem is ½ of solution-
  59. Re:Seagates and WDs RMA'd: results fine by NotQuiteInsane · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Let me get this straight, your 'roommate' broke the drive, then you sent it in for a warranty replacement?

    Am I the only person here that still believes that if you break something by dropping it you should cover the cost of replacement? Breaking a HDD by knocking it off the top of a PC, then RMAing it sounds incredibly unethical to me.

  60. The correct way to handle this by a-freeman · · Score: 1

    Don't bother with a warranty return. Go buy an identical drive from a local or online retailer with a decent return policy. Then, the following day, return your dead drive in place of the new one for a full refund.

    Make sure you tell the store that the drive is dead. The store will then send it back to the drive vendor for a credit or free replacement, costing the drive vendor the full shipping costs.

    1. Re:The correct way to handle this by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

      Most drives have serial numbers. People should deal with a vendor with a reasonable exchange policy... if the vendor wants to be in business they should offer some sort of added value to justify their markup. Even a grocery store will typically replace a borken egg.

  61. Re:Seagates and WDs RMA'd: results fine by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

    yeah yeah yeah... well, I needed a drive and didn't have the $ for one. Plus, it was the first day I had it. My roommate offered to replace it if seagate didn't.

    When I got my first iPod (the 5GB one like 5 years ago), I was opening it as I walked out of CompUSA, and being confused by the packaging, the unit slipped out of the box and hit the sidewalk, poping in half and coming apart... so I walked back in and showed them and they replaced it. I was quite happy.

    --



    ...spike
    Ewwwwww, coconut...
  62. Re:Seagates and WDs RMA'd: results fine by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, what next, he buys a laptop, drops it in the car park while juggling it to get the car boot open, and then says "It was like this when I got it"? Bleh.

  63. Mod Parent Informative by Reziac · · Score: 1

    So that ballparks at what, about 98% still working at 5 years old? That would be consistent with my experience -- HDs that survive their first month usually run reliably for 5+ years.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  64. refurbished?!? by stry_cat · · Score: 1
    All the replacement disks were 'refurbished'...
    If you bought a "new" drive they should give you a "new" drive to replace the faulty one. You should only get a "refurbished" drive if that's what you bought in the first place. And if you bought a "refurbished" one in the first place, well you deserve the trouble you're having now. There's a reason the "refurbished" ones are usually a lot cheaper than a new drive. You get what you pay for.
  65. my experience is fairly positive by Roger+Wernersson · · Score: 1

    I bought a 60 GB USB WD drive for personal use. It broke down after three days. I sent it back (expensive) and they sent me a 120 GB drive. Nice, even though I spent more than I hoped.

    --
    temporarily sigless
    1. Re:my experience is fairly positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a similar experience. Bought a 160GB Maxtor drive at Staples which crapped out after a few months of use. RMA'd it, got back a 250 GB under the conditions of the warranty that state they'll replace with equal or higher capacity depending upon availability. It's been a year or two now and no problems with the replacement.

      The best part is that they'll send you the drive, then give you a period to send yours back without being charged that way you can at least attempt to restore/copy data to the new drive.

  66. Re:not I by vhfer · · Score: 1

    In the US, (well, my experience is pretty much limited to the Midwest) don't ship via UPS. Demand FedEx ground. I've never had stuff arrive in ragged torn busted up boxes with FedEx, but I have with UPS- numerous times.

  67. Re:Seagates and WDs RMA'd: results fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A penny saved is a penny earned. Good job, stick it to the man!

  68. i blame shipping and CowboyNeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I have only sent back ONE HDD ever! When the package comes, it gleamed like it was packaged by an angel it was so perfect...then i open the box to reveal my replacement hard drive THAT LOOKS LIKE IT WAS CRUSHED widthwise in a hydrolic vice! i sent it back since i didn't have any 3.1243 inch hard drive sslots. Second RMA was brand new and still kicks.

    I have had a major videocard manufacturer replace my RMA with somebody else's (obviously by mere visual inspection) broken card that actually had more problems than mine!

    And now finally the most expensive mouse made by the most major mouse manufacturer is 3 weeks old and in a constant state of 'something is wrong, allow me to reset myself'!

    $210 HDD
    $550 VID CARD
    $100 High End Gaming Mouse

    I include _Just_ this year and not including the hardware at the major cable company i'm an IT Admin for.
    i take great care of my machines, several are on UPS and i never overclock anything.

    There is absolutly NO reason for all these failures, yet even the most 'elite' 'flagship' 'glorious' 'hyped' 'solutions' are all showing signs of being nothing but deluxe piles of shit!
    When is the absurdly high price of equipement going to manifest itself in the form of long term, consistant performance as promised?????

  69. This would make a good poll. by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    This would make a good poll. I have had several Maxtor drives fail and have had no problem getting them replaced. I had good luck with them even to the point of taking the charred electronics off an old drive and recovering it and then transfering the data to the replaced drive and electronics. Life expectancy of the replaced drives has been good, I'm still using one from 10 years ago.

    I used to run a scan of a new drive and tested them for bad blocks with a variety of patterns in a registered shareware program I had. When the drives broke 2 gig that is not very damn easy to do any more. Even writing 1s to it verifying and writing 0s takes too damn long.

    If the data was critical. I'd run a raid with every disaster recovery option I can think of or invent.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty