Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Charles Simonyi to be 1st Nerd in Space

Richard L. James writes "The BBC are reporting that Hungarian-born Charles Simonyi, a 58-year old Microsoft billionaire software engineer is set to become the first 'nerd in space' on board the Soyuz TMA-10 when the spacecraft launches on Thursday 09th March 2007. Charles oversaw the development of Multiplan, Word, and Excel among many other achievements. He has launched a website detailing the 3 goals he wishes to achieve on the trip: advance civilian spaceflight, assist space station research, and involve kids in space sciences. Jó szerencse pölö Charles!"

234 comments

  1. First nerd??? by the_humeister · · Score: 5, Informative

    I thought Mark Shuttleworth claimed that title (the Ubuntu guy)?

    1. Re:First nerd??? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many scientists have been in space. Some of them probably consider themselves 'nerds'.

      Maybe I'm out of the loop with modern lingo, but 'nerd' doesn't necessarily have anything to do with computers.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:First nerd??? by 8ball629 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You haven't heard? Nerds can only be billionaire software engineers from Microsoft - the others are geeks. *end sarcasm*

    3. Re:First nerd??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Geek = good

      Nerd = bad

    4. Re:First nerd??? by Schemat1c · · Score: 3

      You haven't heard? Nerds can only be billionaire software engineers from Microsoft - the others are geeks. *end sarcasm*

      To all the geeks who will never experience space - *raises glass*

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    5. Re:First nerd??? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
      Uh-huh. If we are counting people who got rich by being geeks, unlike the very many scientists who have been to space, pretty much all space tourists belong on the list. Dennis Tito was an engineer and his investment consulting business included quantitive analysis. If we are scoring operating systems, Shuttleworth was a Debian user while building Thawte.

      Bruce

    6. Re:First nerd??? by jbrader · · Score: 1

      I usually go the other way. Nerd is a title given to people like us in a non-demeaning way. Geek is a person who bites the head off chickens in a circus.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    7. Re:First nerd??? by rblancarte · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
    8. Re:First nerd??? by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Geek = biting the heads off live chickens.

      Not so good imo.

    9. Re:First nerd??? by Gerzel · · Score: 1

      They can claim all they want. This title was taken decades ago when the space programs first started. Heck sputnic, the dog may very well qualify. And if the cosmonaughts didn't have any nerds amoung them you can be sure the American Astronaughts did.

    10. Re:First nerd??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You are wrong. Nerds are the type that live in their parents basement and have no social skills. Geeks are functioning members of society. Geek good, Nerd bad.

      I am a Geek.

    11. Re:First nerd??? by abandonment · · Score: 2

      It's all for naught...trying to get proper spelling on slashdot that is ;}

      astronaut / cosmonaut

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronaut

    12. Re:First nerd??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      As always Microsoft coming late and saying they are First.

    13. Re:First nerd??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think it is a 'First' in the same sense as 'Innovation' with respect to software. Ie, done by someone else first.

    14. Re:First nerd??? by AGMW · · Score: 3, Funny
      To all the geeks who will never experience space - *raises glass*

      Hmmm. Raises unbreakable glass substitute.

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    15. Re:First nerd??? by odourpreventer · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be "Human nerd" by the way? I thought a true nerd believed in ETs. Someone ought to have their nerd license revoked.

    16. Re:First nerd??? by jmorkel · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu beats Microsoft again. Yay!

    17. Re:First nerd??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, for sure. I'm puzzled at this. I thought about 95% of the human space population was nerds. Put a jock in space and than you've got something.

    18. Re:First nerd??? by rk · · Score: 1

      "Geek = biting the heads off live chickens. Not so good imo."

      Why not, don't you know they taste like chicken?

    19. Re:First nerd??? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      What about the Iranian woman? She does not look like geek or nerd...

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    20. Re:First nerd??? by kinnell · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was the first astronaut to start rewiring the flight controls on the way up?

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    21. Re:First nerd??? by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to Wikipedia, Anousheh Ansari "received her Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering and computer science at George Mason University and her master's degree at George Washington University." Later, she made a large donation to the X-Prize. Sounds quite geeky to me.

    22. Re:First nerd??? by mapkinase · · Score: 2, Informative

      First, wikipedia convinced me. Second, actually, it is not her education that would qualify her. It is this:

      During her eight-day stay onboard the International Space Station, Ansari agreed to perform a series of experiments on behalf of the European Space Agency. She conducted four experiments [21], including:

              * Researching the mechanisms behind anemia.
              * How changes in muscles influence lower back pain.
              * Consequences of space radiation on ISS crew members and different species of microbes that have made a home for themselves on the space station.

      She also became the first person to publish a weblog from space.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    23. Re:First nerd??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure - Mark Shuttleworth was the first nerd in space.
      A nerd is in my opinion a guy who is lives and breathes it, and Mark Shuttleworth is sure such a guy.
      He has also done MUCH, VERY MUCH for the open-source community in general and especially for Linux.

      So shame on you, for forgetting one of the noblest nerds on earth (and space).

    24. Re:First nerd??? by 8ball629 · · Score: 1

      *raises flame to melt the unbreakable glass substitute*

      +100 damage

    25. Re:First nerd??? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      BFD, Microsoft says they'll have the first nerd in space and that is the new history. ;-)

      I would have thought the BBC to be smarter about this. Must be a slow news day and/or the editors are all out for tea.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    26. Re:First nerd??? by SirKron · · Score: 1
      You forgot:

      [set of all nerds] - [set of all geeks] = [empty set]

      and

      [set of all geeks] - [set of all nerds] = [set of all geeks] U [!(virgins)]

    27. Re:First nerd??? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      She also became the first person to publish a weblog from space.
      So she extended the "blogosphere" out of Earth's atmosphere. Don't be surprised when aliens invade us in order to eradicate this menace.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  2. Yuri Gagarin by Airconditioning · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wouldn't he qualify as first geek in space? I mean, the Russians didn't send a painter up did they?

    1. Re:Yuri Gagarin by roystgnr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wouldn't he qualify as first geek in space?

      No; he's not even the first geek in space this fall.

      According to The Fine Article, the "first nerd in space" moniker is actually Dr. Simonyi's speculation about himself, not just the mistake of some clueless reporter - in fact the reporter mentioned three previous nerdy space tourists. My mind boggles - surely before deciding to spend millions of dollars on this trip, Dr. Simonyi thought to learn a little about his predecessors?

    2. Re:Yuri Gagarin by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2, Informative

      \i{I mean, the Russians didn't send a painter up did they?}

      Back on Vokhshod I. Alexei Leonov.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    3. Re:Yuri Gagarin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a Microsoft engineer. Obviously his delusions of grandeur are not limited to work.

    4. Re:Yuri Gagarin by booch · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's a Microsoft engineer. Obviously his delusions of grandeur are not limited to work.

      Nor are unfounded claims of originality.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    5. Re:Yuri Gagarin by James+Manning · · Score: 1

      You can tell by the subject that GP was referring to Yuri with the "Wouldn't he qualify as first geek in space?" comment...

    6. Re:Yuri Gagarin by The+Cydonian · · Score: 4, Informative
      He's a Microsoft engineer. Obviously his delusions of grandeur are not limited to work.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't he the guy who developed the Hungarian notation (not that developing code-standards should lead to fame, fortune and grandeur, but just sayin')

    7. Re:Yuri Gagarin by ocbwilg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't he the guy who developed the Hungarian notation (not that developing code-standards should lead to fame, fortune and grandeur, but just sayin')

      Yes he is. That's why they call it "hungarian notation". He also hasn't worked for Microsoft since 2002. Right now he's running a company called Intentional Software.

    8. Re:Yuri Gagarin by jbourj · · Score: 1

      I should just say, that between this and Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor Simonyi has made some excellent uses of his money. Enjoy space!

    9. Re:Yuri Gagarin by brtech · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he is the guy. He was originally at PARC, the Xerox think tank in the late 70s. I was there. Very intense fellow.

    10. Re:Yuri Gagarin by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      No. He was not geek. He was of "the guy next door" personality.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    11. Re:Yuri Gagarin by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      What is with the reference? What is the relationship between an Iranian space tourist and a Russian aircraft tester? I am completely clueless...

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    12. Re:Yuri Gagarin by khallow · · Score: 1

      surely before deciding to spend millions of dollars on this trip, Dr. Simonyi thought to learn a little about his predecessors?

      What do you need to know besides the safety record?
    13. Re:Yuri Gagarin by mdmarkus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't he the guy who developed the Hungarian notation

      And thereby making huge swaths of code unreadable. How much Microsoft code uses a rgs16 to store 32 byte values? Some consider Hungarian notation to be the tactical nuke equivalent for unmaintainable code.

    14. Re:Yuri Gagarin by a.d.trick · · Score: 1

      I think in the case of Hungarian notation it should lead straight to the firing squad.

    15. Re:Yuri Gagarin by timeOday · · Score: 1

      lpszHungarian dwNotation u32Sucks.

  3. first nerd in space? by motank · · Score: 5, Funny

    yeah, cos everyone that's gone to space so far has been a football jock right?

    1. Re:first nerd in space? by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well obviously! Otherwise they wouldn't have been able to jump like that...

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    2. Re:first nerd in space? by kfg · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, the first couple of batches were fighter jocks, actually, hard men with extensive combat experience; but that didn't preclude them from being geeks/nerds as well.

      The first American in space, Alan Shepard, had a Bachelor of Science from Annapolis.

      Or take the first two men on the moon (please). Neil Armstrong had a Bachelor of Science from Purdue and a Master of Aeronautical Engineering from USC (and had been accepted at MIT). Buzz Aldrin majored in Science at West Point and eventually earned a PhD from MIT.

      Jocks with slide rules. It happens.

      KFG

    3. Re:first nerd in space? by bobbagum · · Score: 1
      Jocks with slide rules. It happens.
      I for one welcome our slide rules bearing jocks overlords.... This is just like highschool
    4. Re:first nerd in space? by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I for one welcome our slide rules bearing jocks overlords....

      Beats the shit out of the nuns. Ya ever been rapped across the knuckles with a Pickett N4-ES?

      KFG

    5. Re:first nerd in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, the first couple of batches were fighter jocks, actually, hard men with extensive combat experience
      Obviously, since they are in better condition for fighting aliens.
    6. Re:first nerd in space? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Well, the first couple of batches were fighter jocks, actually, hard men with extensive combat experience; but that didn't preclude them from being geeks/nerds as well.

      Bingo. While they may not be COMPUTER nerds, you can be damned sure that fighter jocks are a helluva lot smarter than a large portion of Slashdot. They are all most certainly aviation/military geeks in the utmost sense, and you have to be quite sharp for the government to trust you being solely responsible for a multimillion dollar piece of machinery that can single handedly destroy buildings.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    7. Re:first nerd in space? by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1
      he first American in space, Alan Shepard, had a Bachelor of Science from Annapolis.


      Every graduate from the Naval Academy receives a BS, even if you major in English. Seriously.

      But back in Shepard's day, there was only one program, no majors - so the geeks and the jocks took the same classes.
      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    8. Re:first nerd in space? by Ginnungagap42 · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      In fact, most if not all of the original astronauts and cosmonauts were test pilots. These are folks who have academic training as well as real world experience with such jock-related topics as aerodynamics, structural engineering, fluid dynamics, etc. Just because they have cojones the size of basketballs doesn't mean that they don't also have brains the size of, well, basketballs.

    9. Re:first nerd in space? by spamchang · · Score: 1

      the physical requirements for the astronaut corps are nothing to sneeze at :) they were probably all in good enough shape to play football at the D2 level :)

    10. Re:first nerd in space? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Every graduate from the Naval Academy receives a BS, even if you major in English. Seriously.

      As that is what Congress has authorized them to award. I'm familiar with the phenomenon in reverse, my own undergraduate college being a liberal arts school where every graduate recieves a BA, even if you major in physics.

      But back in Shepard's day, there was only one program, no majors - so the geeks and the jocks took the same classes.

      Because the intent was to graduate gentlemen.

      KFG

  4. Sooo..... by Asm-Coder · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I wonder what all the other Astronauts have been? Jocks?

    1. Re:Sooo..... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1
      I wonder what all the other Astronauts have been? Jocks?
      Fighter jocks, at least (dunno about the recent crop of astronauts, but our first ones were fighter pilots, aka fighter jocks.)
      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Sooo..... by scd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Almost all current astronauts are engineers and/or scientists, with PhD's and such.

    3. Re:Sooo..... by AJWM · · Score: 2, Informative

      but our first ones were fighter pilots, aka fighter jocks.

      Actually they were aerospace engineers and test pilots. They may have also been fighter jocks (although some flew other types of aircraft) since that's about the only way to rack up time on high performance jets, but at the time of astronaut selection they were working as test pilots. Most (all?) of them had degrees in aerospace engineering. (Armstrong was accepted to MIT, but ended up attending a different college).

      I wouldn't call them nerds, though.

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:Sooo..... by S3D · · Score: 1
      Actually they were aerospace engineers and test pilots.

      First Russian cosmonauts were fighter pilots.
    5. Re:Sooo..... by Javaman59 · · Score: 1
      Almost all current astronauts are engineers and/or scientists, with PhD's and such.
      And how are they going pilot our starfighters to defeat the Klingon squadrons?? When the shooting starts we need jocks, not four-eyed wimps!
      --
      I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
    6. Re:Sooo..... by hachete · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Read the Right Stuff. The scientists running the first missions wanted "Spam in a Can" - monkeys would have done them, and probably would have performed better than the astronauts. However, lowering the entry qualifications *so* low meant obvious problems in recruitment, with too many people flying. So the "obvious" pick was amongst fighter pilots and aerospace test pilots. the latter soon realised they were overly qualified (as both pilots and geeks) to run a mercury or an apollo rig but that got out-balanced by the inherent dangers of the missions. The tests they took to become astronauts could easily have been done by, oh, weight-lifters, long-distance runners etc. However, there's not much glory attached to sending runners into space ...

      The Soviets went through a similar process.

      The shuttle changes things again, but I would dispute that you need to be a fighter-jock to control it. A bomber or transport or even an airline pilot would be equally, if not better adapted, to deal with the shuttle controls. If they had kept the X15 program going, then that truly was a fighter-jocks dream aircraft and we'd've had returnable aircraft flying today rather than the flying brick of a shuttle.

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    7. Re:Sooo..... by adamkennedy · · Score: 1

      Most airforce pilots do a degree of some sort. Firstly, they are officers, and secondly the Air Force has to do SOMETHING with them when they are not flying or stop flying, and thirdly, you do aero so you at least have some idea how the hell this ship your piloting works.

      And trust me, test pilots aren't merely Fighter Jocks, they're the Alpha Fighter Jocks.

    8. Re:Sooo..... by AJWM · · Score: 1

      monkeys would have done them, and probably would have performed better than the astronauts.

      There were a number of incidents in the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo series where the spacecraft or mission would have been lost if there'd been monkeys rather than humans aboard. (Gemini 6, Gemini 8, Apollo 13, Skylab -- just off the top of my head.) Of course, nobody would have cared much were it just monkeys.

      As for the aerospace engineer astronauts being overqualified, they took a very active role in the design and engineering of the Gemini and Apollo spacecraft (some too in Mercury, but those were late changes). Yeah, others may have been more expert in single aspects of the vehicles, but the astronauts probably undestood the systems as a whole better than anyone else. It was their and their buddies' butts on the line, after all. No just spacecraft engineering either. Buzz Aldrin, for example, was the expert in both the theory and practise of orbital rendezvous manoeuvers.

      It wasn't just about endurance -- certainly that was important: the Gemini launches for example subjected the crews to 8 Gs acceleration, and working in a pressurized space suit (especially the earlier designs) was something that would tax even olympic athletes -- it was also about a base of prior knowledge and experience to build on. (What does a long-distance runner know about roll, pitch and yaw, or celestial navigation? What does a weight lifter know about recognizing the effects of hypoxia or experiencing unusual +ve, -ve or sideways G forces? This is all stuff that is old-hat to any pilot even before they enter test-pilot school.)

      And any graduate of test-pilot school will be known to have both a sufficient understanding of flight dynamics and a problem solving ability and coolness of head to be in a situation where, for example, if he's testing an aircraft outside its known envelope and it starts behaving in a manner totally unexpected, he can diagnose the problem and do something about it hopefully before it kills him, all while reporting to the ground everything that is happening and everything that he's trying to do to fix it just in case the fix doesn't work and he makes another smoking hole in the desert and gets a street at Edwards AFB named after him.

      (And you're right, the Shuttle is definitely a "heavy" and not a fighter -- although most of its flight regime is supersonic and it has to dead-stick the landing. A Concorde pilot, perhaps, or SR-71 pilots. Although now computers can do the whole thing -- as witness the Soviet Buran flight.)

      --
      -- Alastair
  5. go nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nerdy? Well can he quote the Holy Grail and make you ROTFLOL?

  6. His first question to the Russians by edwardpickman · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Okay this'll get me laid, right?"

    1. Re:His first question to the Russians by PsychicX · · Score: 2, Funny

      According to his Wikipedia article, he is dating Martha Stewart.

      Clearly women are not a focus of his life.

    2. Re:His first question to the Russians by ashwinds · · Score: 1

      Nope - just high

    3. Re:His first question to the Russians by Mikkelin · · Score: 1

      "Da, comrade, most cosmonauts feel lonely in space."

    4. Re:His first question to the Russians by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      EWWWWWWWWW!

      So his real first question must have been:

      "Ok, so this will get me someone better than Martha, right?"

  7. science nerd by arun_s · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microsoft bashing aside, this is the guy who's founded the Charles Simonyi Chair in the Public Understanding of Science at the University of Oxford. Richard Dawkins is the current head. I guess that qualifies him pretty much as a (science) nerd.
    He still didn't have to put up a Flash 9 only website, though.

    --
    I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
    1. Re:science nerd by Protonk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, this is the guy who donated enough money to have a tenured position named after him. The real prevailing factors here are money and some sufficient amount of respectability--Oxford wasn't waiting around for Ghandi, but the chair wasn't to be named after Pauli Shore.

    2. Re:science nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The flash 9 beta works for me.

    3. Re:science nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a Pauli Exclusion Principle to me...

  8. they read my mind by rifftide · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've often thought, whoever came up with this convention for naming variables ought to be shut in a Russian spacecraft and sent far, far away.

    1. Re:they read my mind by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 5, Funny

      So will this make him a spcExplorer?

    2. Re:they read my mind by rifftide · · Score: 1

      Heh, guess so. Or as Charles might put it, "short ack to mission control, Copy on that".

  9. First?! by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1, Funny

    First "nerd in space"? Simonyi isn't even the first nerd in space this year! Cripes, Anousheh Ansari has barely been back on the ground a month.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:First?! by mastropiero · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly, he is as much the first nerd in space as IE7 is the first tabbed browser....

    2. Re:First?! by Dave+Emami · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, Ms. Ansari could probably get a date, so she doesn't count.

      --

      "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
  10. Self assessment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BBC qoutes Simonyi as saying he (might be) the first nerd in space. As a Microsoft employee, he must consider anyone associated with Linux not nerdy enough...

    1. Re:Self assessment by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Nah, he's just like every other Microsoft employee, totally ignorant of things that ain't happening inside Microsoft. It's a sheltered culture.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  11. Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    want to be free

  12. Termination by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Being fired is one thing ... but being fired into space?

  13. Required Star Trek joke... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Gone where no Windows has gone before... along with the anti-spyware, anti-virus and firewall and sun block.

  14. Bullshit. by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am sure, in nearly half a century of manned space flight there were many cosmonauts/astronauts that are nerdier than some rich Microsoft guy.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    1. Re:Bullshit. by Tesen · · Score: 1

      Ah! But none of them had enough money to buy and keep the title! See what money gets you? Undeserved respect, a shot at the white house (if not election as President), a garage full of cars that never got you laid... Wait a minute, I am glad to be a broke struggling Systems Analyst! Let the cold winters advance, for I shall be screwing like a bunny wabbit to stay warm! Tes

  15. Jó szerencse pölö Charles = ? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Informative

    Jó szerencse == Good luck pölö == ??? (it could be póló, which means tshirt or a phonetic version of pl, meaning "for example" but I haven't the slightest idea what did they mean to write)

    by a native hungarian in the early morning (so if I missed something obvious, it's early!).

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:Jó szerencse pölö Charles = ? by mountiealpha · · Score: 4, Informative

      Amen. WTF was that all about? Besides, it should be Jó szerencsét, Károly, no?

    2. Re:Jó szerencse pölö Charles = ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, "good luck t-shirt" is the traditional American send-off in this case. It is kinda like "break a leg", but for space flight. Tom Hanks uses the line in Apollo 13.

    3. Re:Jó szerencse pölö Charles = ? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      I love that even though Hungary is a nation of what, 10 million, you can always find at least a couple Hungarians on a tech site. Can you always find a few Slovakians? A few Romanians? A few Albanians? To be honest - I don't know. Since I lived in Hungary for two years, that's what I pay attention to.

      Here's my question, however. Who from Hungary wants to send me some decent kolbasz? Kakaos csigakok perhaps? Maybe even just some decent recipes for rakott krumpli or toltott paprika?

      I really miss Hungary...

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    4. Re:Jó szerencse pölö Charles = ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yep, that would be correct. I've also seen "minden jót" used but that's more of "have a nice day"

      Apparently, according to sztaki, pölö means "nerd". I'm not a native speaker (started learning a few months ago and am almost fluent), but I can certainly tell you that this is someone translating "Good Luck Nerd Charles" word-for-word in an attempt to sound "cultural"

    5. Re:Jó szerencse pölö Charles = ? by bocsika · · Score: 1

      pölö surely does not mean nerd in Hungarian /yes, I am native speaker/.

      "Jó szerencsét" a bit more than "good luck" in Hungarian, it is used e.g. specifically by miners when they go down to the mine and therefore a dangerous mission follows.

    6. Re:Jó szerencse pölö Charles = ? by mountiealpha · · Score: 1

      There's an importer in CA who does mail-order worldwide: http://members.aol.com/HungImprts/ Recipes can be found online; just Google. If you're in the US, you'll have to convert units from metric... HTH!

    7. Re:Jó szerencse pölö Charles = ? by GodGell · · Score: 1

      started learning a few months ago and am almost fluent

      Huh? :) You must be superman or something. I've never heard the "pölö" used as an actual word, and I have no idea what they were trying to say. Some people say "pölö" as a slightly retarded phonetic pronounciation of the abbreviation pl. (short for "például" - "for example"), but that would make no sense in this context.

      --
      [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
  16. breaking barriers by qw0ntum · · Score: 4, Funny

    I for one am glad we're finally breaking the nerd in space barrier. I mean, it's not like we've ever seen a molecular biologist or astrophysicist go into space. No, they are far too nerdy for something like that.

    --
    'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
  17. FYI by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Charles Simonyi is the Hungarian in Hungarian notation (you know, m_lpszUsrTxt and the like).

    To be entirely fair to him, it wasn't intended to make variable names inscrutable, it applied to a language with weak type checking and few real types, and it still has valid uses today if you use it to mark information about the type of data instead of the "type" of variable.

    1. Re:FYI by Procyon101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are many problems with it though. First, there is absolutely no enforcement of such typing, which means that if the "type" changes in the future, you have documentation in your code that is linked to the code itself and much more difficult to change... which actually encourages the "out of date" comment problem. Secondly, it was popularized to such an extent as to be obnoxious.. leading to things like: for(int nCount=0;nCount10;nCount++); Thirdly, it gets unweildy for the cases when it begins to become useful, for instance a struct containing a struct of 2 strings, one null terminated and one not, and an int... at that point, I'm tempted to do hungarian on my weird pointer thingie, but my code will start to look like perl.

    2. Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the stupidest invention ever to take place in computing. Just for reference, typing variables according the first letter (FORTRAN) is ridiculous but sound. This is totally insane.

      And Joel, no matter how intelligent and resourceful he demonstrates to be, has got a lot of concepts backwards -- probably from the time he was at M$. Including defending this moronic notation.

      Oh, well, what do I know? Go on and praise the guy... Good trip to him, I say at least...

    3. Re:FYI by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Yup, the excuse for bad variable names all around. Data types and variable types change, don't stick it in the name - the IDE should tell you the type, it's more reliable too. Hungarian notation can be a source of errors in this way if the type is changed but not the name. Yeah, you can change the name in some cases, and in some cases you can't (like when the functions and inputs become an API).

    4. Re:FYI by prockcore · · Score: 1
      First, there is absolutely no enforcement of such typing, which means that if the "type" changes in the future, you have documentation in your code that is linked to the code itself and much more difficult to change


      The best example of this is the proliferation of "lp" prefixes scattered throughout windows. The long pointer hasn't existed since windows 3.1
    5. Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To be entirely fair to him, it wasn't intended to make variable names inscrutable, it applied to a language with weak type checking and few real types, and it still has valid uses today [joelonsoftware.com] if you use it to mark information about the type of data instead of the "type" of variable.
      Most modern languages in wide use support user defined data types. If it's important enough to distinguish one type of data from another, then it's important enough to create new data types that can be verified by the computer. In his example, where he wants to distinguish between safe and unsafe strings, those types should be represented by different data types, and functions that require a safe string should not accept an unsafe string. This is particularly easy to do in most OO languages.

      Also, poor Joel really does not appear to understand exceptions in the least. He does a great job of beating up on straw men, though.
    6. Re:FYI by nebby · · Score: 1

      Actually there are many cases where you want to describe your intention in using a certain variable that doesn't warrant a new data type. For (a simple) example, an input or output buffer. You need two buffers, no need to declare two different types, but one is for input and one is for output. By describing your intentions of the input vs output in a clear and consistent way throughout your code, you make it much more likely you will visually catch errors. Additionally, new programmers will understand your intentions much more clearly when reading your code (once they learn the notation.)

      Again, the key thing to distinguish here is that you are not using different types of objects, but are using the same object for different reasons. I'm sure it doesn't take much effort to think of scenarios where you have no need to declare a subclass for something but clearly are using an instance of a class for a specific, describable purpose that would be useful to describe in the code itself.

      --
      --
    7. Re:FYI by tfinniga · · Score: 1

      But really, how hard is it to make them different types? Like, say, istream and ostream? If you use the type much at all, it's not hard, and then you don't need to check visually - they're strongly typed. If you don't use the type much, just rely on plain old variable names and comments. A semi-machine-readable, semi-codified system semi-solves a problem that's much better tackled in different ways.

      We've been using many, many types in a codebase I work on, and templates make multiple types very easy to use throughout the code. It has all the advantages of a hungarian system, plus compiler checks.

      --
      Powered by Web3.5 RC 2
    8. Re:FYI by nebby · · Score: 1

      Well, I think you might be misunderstanding my examples. Types and hungarian are solving two different problems. Say for example we are building a relational database system. I remember when I worked on one in college we had a Page object. Now, the Page object was a page of data on disk and had a universal set of operations and data making it a clear case for an object. However, code doing merge sorts, buffer management, etc, all used various Page objects. There is no point in creating a new class for each of the dozens of use cases for Page objects, since the cases themselves don't warrant new methods or data in the Page itself. The algorithms for manipulating pages were well factored and placed in external classes, but you still have a lot to say about the specific Pages in use within the algorithms themselves.

      So, it is useful to the programmer and others to name Page variables in a consistent way depending on how they are being *used*. For example this Page is a leaf page of a B+ Tree, we prefix it w "btl", if its the root we prefix it with "btr". So if we have a old tree and a new tree, we might have btrOld and btrNew. Once someone knows the conventions, all the B+ tree code will just make perfect sense since they will just 'know' that "btrOld" is the root B+ tree page of the old tree. You might find dozens of these canonical usages throughout many, many lines of source code. Instead of having to come up with unique names which end up actually obfuscating your intention to outsiders (and as time goes by, to yourself,) by coming to a consensus on a small set of Hungarian conventions and patterns, the intentions and clarity of the code is magnified greatly.

      As someone who has worked on large projects both with and without Hungarian notation I can confidently say that this above type of use case comes up very often. In fact, I would argue that it is much cleaner to use Hungarian notation instead of polluting your namespace with new classes just to encode this intentional metadata about variables. (Since really, according to OOP principals, they should not be different types since they do not have different methods or data.)

      Also, to address your argument about the most effective tools to be those that can be checked by a computer, I urge you to check out all the cool stuff going on with Ruby. Static type checking has it's pro's, but the con's become clear once you toy with a language that trusts the programmer a bit to keep track of types (and if you're using Hungarian, intentions.)

      --
      --
    9. Re:FYI by syousef · · Score: 2, Funny

      Charles Simonyi is the Hungarian in Hungarian notation (you know, m_lpszUsrTxt and the like).

      All in favour of shooting this guy off into space?

      The I's have it. Motion carried.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    10. Re:FYI by EvanED · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you read the link that was posted a couple comments up? Almost all of the original suggestions AREN'T putting the data type in the name. They're stuff like 'd' to mark that the variable is a delta -- x is an absolute position, dx is a difference between two points. If you see code like x1 + x2 then, that should raise your eyebrow. The linked article gives the example of using 'us' and 's' to prefix unsafe and safe strings respectively, where "unsafe" means "just came in over the network; protect against injection attacks". This is information that your IDE won't give you.

      Though to be fair, there are a number of things Simonyi suggested that *aren't* like that -- he suggests 'w' for 'word', 'b' for 'byte', 'p' for 'pointer', and maybe a couple others. 'sz' (null-terminated string) is sorta in between; it doesn't provide much semantic information, but it does provide a little, because does 'char* x' point to a single character or a string?

      Though even the ones that encode strict datatypes have a valuable heritage in BCPL, where there isn't typechecking.

    11. Re:FYI by tfinniga · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it looks like you're using Hungarian to encode meaning into the variable name. That's great - variable name is a wonderful place to put descriptive information about what the variable is, and how it's used.

      I'm saying that there are a couple of different levels at which you can do this. If you're not using the variable in a given way very much, in the variable name is great. However, I may be spoiled, but I tend to use human-readable variable names. Compilers no longer have a limit to symbol names that's shorter than what I'm willing to type. Arbitrarily removing all the vowels from variable names doesn't really help readability. But on the other hand, it's not the end of the world - after reading Joel's short primer on Hungarian notation, I think I agree that the real evil is a convention that is based on data type name.

      The other point that I was trying to make is how great having multiple types for different usages can be, especially when you use them extensively. In the code I'm working on, we're dealing with polygonal meshes a lot - we've got vertices, edges, and faces all over the place. We tried using a simple int with notational marking, but we still got a few bugs where the wrong type of index was passed to a function - for example, you send a face index to deleteEdge. Then we made three types, VertexIndex, EdgeIndex, and FaceIndex. Now, that class of bug is guaranteed to be completely gone, for those types. There's no performance penalty. The only cost is moving semantic information from the variable name to the type. Is it worth it? Well, I guess it depends on how often you use the type, and what the potential for bugs is. We don't need to wait until new programmers know the conventions - in that part of the code, it is very, very difficult to use the wrong type.

      As for dynamically typed languages, I've used Python a bit, it's pretty cool.. :). I've heard that Ruby is good, but I haven't had a chance to try it. Matz recently spoke nearby, but I couldn't make it. I'll have to give it a look.. :)

      --
      Powered by Web3.5 RC 2
    12. Re:FYI by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Most modern languages in wide use support user defined data types

      But not necessarily well. For instance, there's only one language I know of that provides language support for "strong" typedefs: D. And I don't know anyone who has ever used D. (Incidentally, this would be high on my list for additions.)

      What are you going to do then if you want to create your own string? Take an existing string and copy and paste? Include it twice with a #define string unsafe_string? There's not a very elegant solution. You can hack around a bit with C++ templates and whatnot to get a somewhat reasonable solution where you get a macro that essentially does a strong typedef, but even that's getting pretty ugly. Inheritance doesn't work. In C++, the fact that the destructor in basic_string isn't virtual will kill you. You could at best write a wrapper and implement all the methods from basic_string that just calls through to an internal object, but again, that's a lot of boiler-plate code. In Java, String I believe is a final class; you can't subclass it. Even if you could, you wouldn't have use of +. C# might actually provide a way to do it, as do many other languages. My point is just that for a large set of programs (C, C++, and Java) this is a non-trivial task.

      Actually, now that I've gone though how difficult it is, there's actually a solution that's fairly promising, which is provided by CQual. You don't define a whole new type, but rather a type qualifier. The guys who came up with this tool used it to find illegal uses of user pointers in the Linux kernel back before __user was around everywhere. (Which, BTW, serves exactly the same purpose for Sparse. However, Sparse's engine is purposely less powerful than CQual's. If you have a series of statements like "char * __user a; char* b; b = a;" Sparse will spit out a warning. CQual will just figure out that 'b' needs to be __user too, and carry on with that constraint and only complain if there's a *b later. Linus wanted to make things explicit, so he has to mark every __user pointer with the qualifier.)

    13. Re:FYI by Octorian · · Score: 1

      And you gotta love how MS manged to basically typedef/#define just about every single data type in their API. As such, Win32 C/C++ code starts to almost look like its entirely own programming language.

      Of course in my occasional attempt at poking fun at Windows programming, I like to cite two different API function specification styles I've seen. Style 1 seems to involve a function with a few parameters, each of which is a 50-item struct. Style 2 seems to involve a function that just has 50 parameters (some of them potentially being huge structs).

      One of my favorite examples is creating a new process.

      In UNIX, you need to care about using:
      pid_t fork(void);
      int execv(const char *path, char *const argv[]); (or another similarly simple variation thereof)

      In Windows, you need to read up on:
      BOOL WINAPI CreateProcess(
          LPCTSTR lpApplicationName,
          LPTSTR lpCommandLine,
          LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES lpProcessAttributes,
          LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES lpThreadAttributes,
          BOOL bInheritHandles,
          DWORD dwCreationFlags,
          LPVOID lpEnvironment,
          LPCTSTR lpCurrentDirectory,
          LPSTARTUPINFO lpStartupInfo,
          LPPROCESS_INFORMATION lpProcessInformation
      );

      And every type in that massive parameters list is a typedef. Two of those parameters are even structs. LPSTARTUPINFO has 4 members, while LPPROCESS_INFORMATION has about 17! (thank goodness I'm not a Win32 programmer)

    14. Re:FYI by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      The I's have it. Motion carried.
      Or even :

      The ayes have it. Motion carried.

      (aye)

    15. Re:FYI by Procyon101 · · Score: 1
      class Leaf : public Page {}
      class Root : public Page {}
      Now, you can still use your API for pages, and you have compiler enforcement of your conventions. Hungarian notion solves a problem that is caused by a misuse of the language. Fix the improper use of the language and the need for it goes away. This is like arguing to not use carriage returns as often so you can fit more of your common 600 line functions on the screen, or naming your classes after their locations in a deep inheritance heirarchy... they are symptoms of a bigger problem and your toy solutions don't solve anything. ESPECIALLY in C++ which has one of the richest type systems imaginable (although it pales in comparison with Haskell) you should be using the compiler for all this type enforcement.
    16. Re:FYI by majutsu · · Score: 1
      Did you read the link that was posted a couple comments up?
      Should I have? I was just agreeing with the parent poster. I can't say that any hungarian notation has provided me with the least help (though it does nicely to lengthen a variable name with a few odd letters) except for maybe the windows handle.
    17. Re:FYI by nebby · · Score: 1

      Probably beating a dead horse, but there are two problems with this approach.

      First, less importantly, it goes against OOP principals to create these stub classes like you're talking about. I've never seen this technique espoused by anyone in any OOP text or anywhere for that matter UNLESS it is a means of making a counterpoint against Hungarian. Would you actually ever do this? Fundamentally, if the class does not include different behavior than its base (different methods or overrides) then it does not warrant a new class, period.

      Second, and more importantly, again types are addressing a different problem than Hungarian. (Apps) Hungarian is simply a style of naming, that is it. Unless you name your variables using a random string generator, you have two choices when you name variables. Either you do a free for all naming style or name it in a systematic way that maximizes the expression of your intent by reusing concepts that are expressed in other parts of the code. The latter is obviously a smarter approach, and Hungarian is designed to be the logical finality of taking this approach to its limits.

      For example, prefixing an int variable with a c indicates it is a count of things (as opposed to a max value, an index into something, a min value, a limit value, etc.) Extend this concept to classes and you can understand my example above better. Hint: in a B+ tree, a Page object is sometimes treated as a root but during a split it is treated as a leaf. The underlying type of the object doesn't change and there is nothing particularly special about roots or leaves (as your class example suggests) other than their role in an algorithm.

      So, you have a choice -- do we name our local page objects root, leaf, rootPage, leafPage, etc (or pull some other names out of our ass) or do we do something precise and consistent with the rest of our code. Hungarian calls for you to prefix it so that we can look it up in a Hungarian table we will soon have memorized after working on the project. Conventions are powerful things, and (apps) hungarian is just a set of conventions to guide naming to augment the ad hoc almost all programmers currently do now.

      --
      --
    18. Re:FYI by Procyon101 · · Score: 1

      I disagree that a new class is warrented if it does not exibit different behaviour than it's base. If a class can be logically differenciated into 2, incompatible uses, then it warrants 2 classes. In this case, we can concieve of a method, parent() which can only have meaning for leaf, not root... the act of not bothering to define it for leaf is purely arbitrary, but we can still gain the logical constraint checking of the compiler by differenciating the classes. When you split the tree, your hungarian naming convention fails also according to your example, as a variable named root is treated as a leaf.. Actually, I'd argue that the root variable is treated as a Page, it's base, so there is no conflict. And really, the tree example is simplistic enough that no naming or classing convention is probably needed at all.

      Now, I'm not arguing against all hungarian notation, and you bring up some good points. char *sMyNonNullTerminatedStringPointer can make sense. It's the religious adherence to the convention that becomes annoying and worthless. There are a few, a very few in my opinion, variables that might warrent special naming treatment. Most variables however, if the code is written well, are very locally scoped and bound for such a small section of code that elaborate naming is more of a distraction than anything. Especially in languages like C++ where the type system is so strong. In C, there is more of an argument. Interestingly, in languages like Java and C#, where everything is a single rooted heirarchy and types can really become confusing, since alot of times you are dealing with Object*, hungarian is little used. In Lisp-likes, where there are no types, hungarian is rejected outright. I'm not sure why the C++ people hang onto it so in a language where it is the least valuable.

  18. Oh come on Charles... by hvnarsana · · Score: 5, Interesting

    .. do you really really think that to achieve either/or of the 3 goals you need to spend a truckload (or 10) of cash to go into space? Why not use the money to advocate better education, books, and a series of talks by prominent astronauts or the like? I find this to be a colossal waste of finances and time, which could be better utilized.

    --
    Usability Engineer, Master in Human Computer Interaction
    1. Re:Oh come on Charles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not use the money to advocate better education, books, and a series of talks by prominent astronauts or the like?

      What's stopping you? Oh, that's right. It's much more fun to tell other people how to spend their money.

    2. Re:Oh come on Charles... by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative
      Why not use the money to advocate better education, books, and a series of talks by prominent astronauts or the like?

      From Wikipedia:

      Simonyi has been an active philanthropist, establishing the Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University, the first occupant of which is Richard Dawkins. In January 2004, Simonyi created the $50 million Charles Simonyi Fund for Arts and Sciences, through which Simonyi plans to support Seattle area arts, science, and educational programs. Initial grant recipients include the Seattle Symphony ($10 million), and the Seattle Public Library ($3 million). In 2005, the Fund donated $25 million to the Institute for Advanced Study.


      Apparently if you've got something approaching serious money there isn't any reason you can't do all that and go for a joy ride.

      KFG
    3. Re:Oh come on Charles... by hvnarsana · · Score: 1

      Agreed my friend.. I take my stab back.

      --
      Usability Engineer, Master in Human Computer Interaction
    4. Re:Oh come on Charles... by kfg · · Score: 1

      S'ok. I just feel a personal obligation to stick up for anyone who in any way might be remotely construed as performing some benefit for Lady Sarah.

      How he's going to atone for his role in the creation of Word, Excel and Hungarian notation is another matter. I suppose he could start by accepting a set of my special, hand knit Tux Scarves, but I'll expect him to buy me a cup of coffee as a further gesture of good will - served in an Aston-Martin DB9.

      KFG

  19. Humour by pleasurized · · Score: 0

    Slashdot. News for when stuff happens about Nerds.

    1. Re:Humour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerds-In-Spaaaace...!

  20. 1st Nerd?!?! What a crock! by cascadefx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess the submitter (I hope it wasn't the editor's) didn't realize that a heck of a lot of physicists and astronomers and other hard core scientists have been to space way before Charles Simonyi. If his point was that he was the first somewhat famous computer geek to make it into space, he would be wrong again. Simonyi was beaten to the punch years ago by Mark Shuttleworth of Thawte and Ubunutu Linux fame.

    1. Re:1st Nerd?!?! What a crock! by David+Off · · Score: 1

      Okay how about "first purveyor of bug riddled software and daft eastern european ideas about programming" in space? Is that okay?

    2. Re:1st Nerd?!?! What a crock! by retrosteve · · Score: 0, Troll

      How about "First Nerd with Microsoft PR machine behind him"?

      It worked for
      "First window-based OS with Microsoft PR machine behind it"

      "First browser with Microsoft PR machine behind it"

      "First tabbed browser with Microsoft PR machine behind it"

      etc....

  21. Whoever cares to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The last sentences means good luck Charles.

    1. Re:Whoever cares to know by gr8whitesavage · · Score: 1

      I thought it meant "its a trap!!"

  22. Just rewards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Charles oversaw the development of Multiplan, Word, and Excel"

    I hope the ship is running MS software and when he turns on the windshield wipers
    the door opens instead and sucks him out the airlock.

  23. He invented Hungarian Notation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Charles has a lot of fantastic accomplishments to his credit. But for Christ's sake, he's also to blame for the abomination that is Hungarian Notation. Why it's a good idea to embed the type of a variable in its name has forever been lost on me. If I want to change an integer iFoo to some opaque object, I've got to rename it to oFoo? WTF? How is that a good thing?

    And don't start me on pszSomethingOrOther.

    1. Re:He invented Hungarian Notation by yo_tuco · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Why it's a good idea to embed the type of a variable in its name has forever been lost on me."

      szBeats szMe. szBut szMaybe szHis usHungarian szRoots szHad szSomething szTo szDo szWith szIt?

    2. Re:He invented Hungarian Notation by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Did you read the link? That wasn't really what he was suggesting... most of his suggestions went beyond things that the type system provides for you.

      (And it also got started in BCPL, which didn't do typechecking at all. So there something like iSomeInt or dSomeDouble would be very helpful if not essential.)

    3. Re:He invented Hungarian Notation by Chacham · · Score: 1

      Actually, Hungarian Notation is a good thing, and he should be thanked for that. The misuse of it, however, is to put the type in, and that is where things went bad.

      I have some links in my JE on the subject.

    4. Re:He invented Hungarian Notation by Chacham · · Score: 2, Informative

      Parent post is an AC.

      Anyway, in case your interested.

  24. How can I reach him? I need help! by bogaboga · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I am a fellow geek who needs help. I know he's going to spend at least 20 million dollars on this project. Meanwhile, I am drowning in debt (mainly student debt), and going no where! I need a few tens of thousands of dollars. I know he can do something for a fellow geek.

    For the record, I welcome any help from the slashdot fraternity too.

    1. Re:How can I reach him? I need help! by mrjb · · Score: 1

      I relate to your financial trouble. Sorry to burst your bubble but one of the reasons that he can afford the 20 million, is that he *doesn't* help random geeks out of debt. If he would, that would quickly drown his reserves now wouldn't it?

      You'd have a better chance of getting out of debt by asking for a raise or increasing your pay by changing jobs. If you're any good, a 500 raise should be doable. If you have a partner (of course, this is slashdot), a 250 raise for each of you should be even easier to arrange for. This should allow you to get out of debt in a few years, without need to reduce your standard of living in the meantime. I'll assume that you're already saving as much as you can. If this assumption is false, shame on you for begging- you don't need to yet.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  25. sz_Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    sz_I p_guess u_congratulations sz_are m_in p_order.

  26. "oversaw development" =??= nerd by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure many previous "rocket scientists" are more nerdy than someone that went on a software to managment track.

  27. AHA! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    He's the one to blame for Word.... :-)

    Just finished my 2nd book ... in Word ...

    My 3rd book will be in LaTeX [like my first].

    That said, who gives a flying shit about some billionaire honky in space? Personally I'd think of cooler things to do with my money. I'd arbitrarily make cool people "funded" so they could pursue research and fun projects. Just all spontaneous like. That's just for starters...

    Spending it on the big houses, cars, boats, etc is just cliche and lame. Once you get past your 1st 12,000 sq ft mansion you really don't need a second :-)

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:AHA! by ocbwilg · · Score: 1

      That said, who gives a flying shit about some billionaire honky in space? Personally I'd think of cooler things to do with my money. I'd arbitrarily make cool people "funded" so they could pursue research and fun projects. Just all spontaneous like. That's just for starters...

      Yeah. Instead of blowing his money on space travel, he ought to be funding "cool" things. Like starting companies that research and teach cool new programming techniques. Or maybe endowing the Charles Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science at some prestigious school like Oxford. Oh...wait a minute...

    2. Re:AHA! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Ok, the thing is I still have a point. If he *is* doing those cool and useful things, why aren't we hearing about it here? I'd much rather read about rich people doing actual good things [well I'd like to read about ANYONE doing good things] then just spending it foolishly.

      Generally though, starting companies is NOT cool because they usually sell out any individual sense of spirit and purpose for the almighty buck fairly quickly.

      Let's see him start companies which don't, for instance, run Windows or make products for Windows. :-)

      As for the schooling, kudos, personally I'd rather give the money to students not professors, but that's just me.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  28. Indeed. Buzz Aldrin was a nerd ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a PhD from MIT, dissertation topic: orbital mechanics and rendezvous.

    That's as nerdy as it gets.

  29. first nerd, maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He may be the first nerd in space, but he's definitely not the first pig.

  30. Geek Farm by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 5, Funny

    4 eyes good, 2 eyes bad.

    1. Re:Geek Farm by greenguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, for mod points.

      This is the best comment since... since...

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    2. Re:Geek Farm by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 1

      I just suffered the same fate as many who read that comment you linked to.
      Coke all over my screen. Damn you.

  31. Jó szerencse pölö means ... by nuzak · · Score: 2, Funny

    "My hovercraft is full of eels"?

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  32. Publicity Stunt by Garrett+Fox · · Score: 1

    The 3 goals he wishes to achieve on the trip: advance civilian spaceflight, assist space station research, and involve kids in space sciences.

    That's what struck me most about the post: our focus on putting Humans In Space doesn't actually accomplish anything in terms of getting us to Mars, or even back to Luna, other than "raise awareness." In other words, it's just a publicity stunt.

    I applaud all the private space flight ventures, but where is the exploration? I don't mean we should be focusing on robotic probes either. Right now we've got some missions that gather data about distant planets, and some that involve actual humans -- with no overlap!

    --
    Revive the Constitution.
    1. Re:Publicity Stunt by hvnarsana · · Score: 1

      Agreed my friend.. it's all hogwash. I mean, just a month odd back, I remember some lady who became the first space tourist woman or something, and she paid 20 million dollars for the honor! If you have so much money to spare as change for a fancy space vacation, do something good! I'm not saying don't go into space, but then also do some good with the rest wilya?

      --
      Usability Engineer, Master in Human Computer Interaction
  33. He'll have a new job up there by cyclone96 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work for NASA supporting the Space Station, and the irony of a Microsoft guy going up is pretty amusing.

    The crew has a network of laptops running WinXP to do non-critical support tasks, chiefly email. While they work pretty well and generally can be maintained from Houston, the crew does spend a fair amount of time keeping them working. You can often hear tales of woe with the network interspersed with operational discussions on the space to ground audio.

    For example, this is from the September 8, 2006 ISS status report posted at http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=21998

    Jeff's attempts yesterday to set up an Outlook email account for Soyuz taxi crewmember Anousheh Ansari were not successful. This is a repeat of a problem seen with previous email accounts for Soyuz taxi crewmembers. Plans are in work to give the SFP (Space Flight Participant) a regular ISS email account.

    I have the feeling that he is going to be jokingly dubbed the "new on-site IT support" by the commander as soon as he arrives.

    --
    Worst...sig...ever!
    1. Re:He'll have a new job up there by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Off-topic, but joking aside, I'm sorry to hear that much time is spent on such tasks. If I paid $20M to get to space, I wouldn't want to spend 30 minutes futzing with an email account; time is money, and not at an inexpensive rate.

      Why don't they use simpler systems that are less prone to issues than WinXP?

      Although space is a pretty complicated affair, and I can understand having complicated systems to support it, an email configuration doesn't seem to be something is interacts enough with the limitations of that environment that it should be complicated by it.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    2. Re:He'll have a new job up there by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      Wow, my organization keeps a couple of thousand people happily using Exchange and Outlook 24/7/365, and they're not even rocket scientists. Maybe NASA could use some of our expertise? I'm sure some of the junior sysadmins here would love to help in their free time.

    3. Re:He'll have a new job up there by atarione · · Score: 1

      this doesn't fill me with confidence that a control room full of NASA mission controllers and a space station full of astronauts can not manage to preform a task any MSCE can do in their sleep...

      sheesh...how many of y'all does it take to screw in a light bulb?

      --
      actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    4. Re:He'll have a new job up there by atarione · · Score: 1

      of course that doesn't mean we can type "MCSE" correctly.... jeezous Christ i gotta start using the preview function.

      --
      actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    5. Re:He'll have a new job up there by Gleng · · Score: 1

      I have a question:

      Have any of the WinXP laptops up there ever had any virus trouble? I'm just interested to know if viruses have spread outside of Earth yet. :)

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    6. Re:He'll have a new job up there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly doubt this actually has anything to do with Windows XP. It's great to see the MS bashing doesn't end where any entry level tech support person could tell you what the problem is. It's great being around a bunch of MS bashing noobs who obviously have no clue what they're talking about.

      Keep drinking the kool aid. It only gets better

    7. Re:He'll have a new job up there by goofyheadedpunk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but does your organization do it in low earth orbit?

      --

      What if the entire Universe were a chrooted environment with everything symlinked from the host?
  34. Uh, whaa? by Anubis350 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but isnt every Astronaut a nerd? How about any number of non-astro-scientists that I'm sure have been in space doing research?

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    1. Re:Uh, whaa? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Way back when, if memory serves, there wasn't really any such thing as "nerds". Even if their preferred levels of study were scientific, back in the 40s/50s, most of those who were in academics were either (a) fighting the evil Nazi scientists, or (b) fighting the evil Communist scientists.

      Beyond that, most astronauts were (at least according to "The Right Stuff", if not local lore, if not bios) in it, in those days, to be "The First". It didn't matter how low. First astronaut to orbit the Earth twice? Woo hoo! First astronaut to do a spacewalk? Woo hoo! First astronaut to piss his spacesuit? Woo -uh... Screw it, woo hoo!

      And so on and so forth. In a sense, this is kind of why a lot of human space exploration has gotten kinda boring. There aren't really any new "firsts". So in essense, the only true "nerds" in space travel, are the entrepeneurs and dreamers who're fighting red tape and whatnot, to be the first to put civilians in space.

      Ironically, something Nasa, et al, have promised for almost 40 years now.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  35. Exact translation: by Gorimek · · Score: 5, Funny

    "My hovercraft is full of eels"

    1. Re:Exact translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. That would be A légpárnás hajóm tele van angolnákkal. Why is it that everyone gets confused when Hungarian notation is involved? By the way, does anyone have a match?

  36. Why Only the Rich and Uninspired? by Miracle+Jones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can we take up a collection to send a civilian into space with the ability to translate the experience into art? Somebody like Spider Robinson, or Tom Wolfe, perhaps? How long will the most liminal and mind-expanding human experience only be the province of those who lack the passion and subtlety to appreciate it, and who cannot, therefore, sublimate it for the rest of us? "Space. Wow. It was so damn empty. Man, you can see the whole earth! Even the dark bits, without people!" If we send somebody up who has the craft to record their experience in an engaging and creative way, then it is like sending ALL of us into space. I can think of no quicker way to give the space program the cultural boost it needs to survive increasing (understandable) voter apathy. Sure, Veruca Salt and Augustus Gloop like chocolate, but they don't deserve the factory...

    1. Re:Why Only the Rich and Uninspired? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      You mean like the idea to send up a school teacher? That idea was tried but got blown out of the water. Well she was blown out of the rocket anyway.

      I don't think anyone wants to risk the same thing happening twice.

  37. Nerds in Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One small step for Nerds... one giant leap for Nerdkind!

  38. itsatrap by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    There's no telling what he'll try to do up there

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:itsatrap by fforw · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      There's no telling what he'll try to do up there
      m_lpsrcktISS
      --
      while (!asleep()) sheep++
    2. Re:itsatrap by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      "Brilliant!" said pointer-to-array-of-unsigned-long (paul).

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    3. Re:itsatrap by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1
      There's no telling what he'll try to do up there

      He'll be overseeing the deployment of Microsoft's Genuine Advantage Orbital Death Ray (tm).

  39. he isn't the first, nor the last... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once steve ballmer gets that chair throw perfected microsoft employees in space will be all too common place.

  40. Leading to the Inevidable by Dark+Leaper · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't trust him, he's from "The Company"! Ain't that right Bishop?

  41. That's lpszCharles lpszSimonyi, by melted · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's lpszCharles lpszSimonyi, thank you very much.

    1. Re:That's lpszCharles lpszSimonyi, by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Very good, I wish I had mod points.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  42. Harrison Schmitt by RichardtheSmith · · Score: 4, Informative

    This guy was really the first nerd in space...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Schmitt

    He was a geologist from Cal Tech who got to check out lunar geology
    up close up close and personal on the Apollo 17 mission.

    That's *very* nerdy, in a *very* cool kind of way. :)

    1. Re:Harrison Schmitt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buzz Aldrin was earlier, Gemini 12.

  43. could you guys fix the hungarian text in the post? by darkeye · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Jó szerencse pölö Charles!" just doesn't make any sense. If you wanted to right: "Good luck, Charles!", you would say: "Jó szerencsét, Charles!". BTW, you'd rather say: "Jó szerencsét, Károly!" - as the name Charles is Károly in Hungarian. And yes, his original name is Simonyi Károly, written in this order as per the Hungarian custom of naming.

    I just wonder how the "pölö" part came into the sentence - as it's not a word in our language. The closest I can think of that it's the pronounciation of the abbreviation "pl.", which is short for "például" - meaning: "for example". I guess you guys asked someone: "How do I say Good Luck in Hungarian?", and the answer might have been: "Jó szerencse, pl." meaning: "For example: Jó szerencsét".

    Ákos
    a native Hungarian (speaker)

  44. Flash web site by swordfishBob · · Score: 1

    well, the /. summary said something about him launching a web site.. Perhaps it should now be jettisoned..

    --
    -- All your bass are below two Hz
  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. First Question to the Russians by davro · · Score: 0

    Please tell me you are not running windows in this Soyuz TMA-10 spacecraft, Last thing we want is a crash.

  47. nerd? More like the first non-nerd. by slugstone · · Score: 1

    Come on only a BS.

  48. Spaceballmer by Analein · · Score: 0

    Would it alter the tides? I fear so. All of humanity may be doomed. Insert Terminator 2 theme here.

  49. Countdown by Verunks · · Score: 0

    10..9..8..7..6..5..4..3..2..1..LAUNCH!
    A fatal exception has occoured, the shuttle launch will be terminated Press CTRL+ALT+DEL to restart the launch. You will lose any unsaved people in your shuttle!

  50. So... by professorfalcon · · Score: 1

    OK, but does he play poker?

  51. My interpretation... by Riley+Holmes · · Score: 1

    There were definitely nerds before him. He might be the first one to which the term "nerd" can be applied to negatively. For the other ones, if you call them nerds they can say "Yeah, well I invented a spacecraft, bitch!". This guy can just say he managed the development of some software. So he's the first bad nerd.

  52. 2nd nerd in space by SIInudeity · · Score: 1

    Shuttleworth did it! Shuttleworth did it!

  53. BUZZ ALDRIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd have guessed the first nerd in space would be Buzz Aldrin on Gemini XII, the last Gemini flight. He's the one with the PhD in Astronautics from MIT; the rest had masters or bachelor's, highest. Though, all of the Astronaut Group 1 and Astronaut Group 2 and Astronaut Group 3 were pretty much really smart people who have enough intelligence to be considered nerds, one going on to head up software on Apollo.

    Not sure if Joe Walker on X-15 flights 90 and 91 (which went past 100km in altitude) should be considered nerd, even with a Physics bachelors degree.

    Not sure about the Soviet astronauts' backgrounds either, but judging from the technical school educations, I'd assume it's similar to the astronautics and aeronautics degrees. But they did not appear to have the graduate degree like Aldrin.

    1. Re:BUZZ ALDRIN by fname · · Score: 1

      Didn't Buzz Aldrin punch some guy out who claimed who never went to the moon? That eliminates him as a geek I think.

  54. Now there's no rhetorical question mark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one time that a question mark at the end of the news headline would be appropriate, since such a claim is absurd, and Slashdot editors don't use it.

    An opportunity was missed.

  55. Ahhh, the *space* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No space for you! Back! Back into your cubicle!

  56. Just admit it Slashdotters... by DiamondGeezer · · Score: 2

    ...you're all completely jealous.

    So am I.

    --
    Tubby or not tubby. Fat is the question
  57. First nerd in space by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

    Because obviously all those engineers and scientists usually in orbit aren't nerds...

  58. I just hope... by Gotebe · · Score: 1

    ... Russians didn't have to rewrite their code to Hungarian notation before he steps in!

  59. If your child is a Geek, reform through the Lord by rolandog · · Score: 1

    "I am a Geek." Lets see, according to this source, the most important factor on determining whether a person is a geek or not should be if he claims to be a Geek. Congratulations, you truly are a Geek.

  60. Obligatory Muppets quote.. by necromcr · · Score: 0, Funny

    Nerds... IN SPACE, Space, space, ....

    --
    No more I say.
  61. Nerd card revoked........ by CptnHarlock · · Score: 3, Informative

    The grammar nazi allready bashed you for the spelling so I'll take the second round.. :)

    Sputnic [sic] wasn't a dog. It was the first satelite launched into space. Sputnik means satelite but also companion, or even better "co-traveller" in russian. Laika was the first dog (living creature [not counting bacteria and the like clinging to the insides of satelites]) in space.

    Back on subject, this here Charles is definitely not the first geek/nerd in space. It's a joke to try and take the title just because he's got som media dweebs to back his claim. All true geeks/nerds know the truth anyway.. :P

    Cheers!..

    --
    $HOME is where the .*shrc is
    -- silver_p
  62. Well, I'm not jealous by gilgongo · · Score: 1

    I read a biography of Charles Simonyi once. What struck me was that he must be the luckiest man alive after Ringo Starr. As far as I could tell, he was simply in the right place, at the right time, to give us the WORST word processor or all time - and make billions in the process.

    I know that Hungarian notation is often cited as one of his great achievements, but really - what has this guy ever actually positively contributed to anything other than a superlative example to coat-tailing?

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    1. Re:Well, I'm not jealous by geekoid · · Score: 1

      He created the first WYSIWUG at xerox.

      And Hungarian notation was usefull, at its time. WHen you had 8 characters to a variable, it was handy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  63. the record by oohshiny · · Score: 1

    The article makes it sound like "nerds" should feel proud of this. I, for one, don't.

    Simonyi condemned us to Hungarian notation and decades of writing code in C, C++, and COM, and is significantly responsible for the bloatware that is Microsoft Office. The negative impact of this, both for Microsoft products, and outside, has been enormous. Simonyi's most important contribution was his creation of the first WYSIWYG editor, while he was at Xerox.

    Fortunately, after several decades of this, Microsoft is finally dumping Hungarian notation and moving away from C++. Let's hope they'll redesign Word and Excel from the ground up, too.

    1. Re:the record by gilgongo · · Score: 1

      His biography was included in a collection of influential computing people in some book I've forgotten the name of now. Compared to people like Linus Torvalds, Bill Gates, Richard Stallman and others, Simonyi came across as basically a chancer who knew enough about programming to blag his way through life, but not much more. The Xerox WYSIWYG editor was not (even by his own admission) an innovation. Lots of people had theorised such an editor - he was simply in the right place with the right resources to code it. There is no evidence of him having any brilliance or superior ability in doing that so far as I could tell, and as you say, his "legacy" for MS Office in the long term was pretty disastrous.

      Oh well, that's history I suppose. Some people just strike it right.

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  64. Laika by Doc+Ri · · Score: 1

    Sputnik was just a satellite. The first dog in space was called Laika.

    --
    617B3B7F7E7C7D7F00EOF
  65. Hid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, do I catch the pattern?.. you guys will soon have a new bridge on the M0 named the Kolbertyi Karolyi Hid?

    1. Re:Hid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly.

      It'd be Colbert Károly híd.

      But he did not satisfy the most important requirement for selection, as he is (luckily) not dead.
      But if he would be, it'd be called that.

      (I guess Simonyi left the last 'i' from his name to get as close the original pronounciation in English as he could without having to explain his name every time he introduced himself, but it's not a pattern, just his choice, and Károly is simply Charles in hungarian)

  66. The first nerd tourist was Greg Olsen by fbrehm · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Olsen

    He worked at RCA Laboratories the same time I did. I can testify that he is, indeed, a nerd.

    Fred

  67. Launch him with Windows driven systems by cheros · · Score: 1

    I mean, that's the least MS should do for their guy. After all, if he's the 'first' nerd (totally untrue if you know a little bit about Mark Shuttleworth :-) and he's been so 'influential' (right time at the right place) than MS ought to give him the best help possible and send him up controlled by a bunch of Vista systems that are naturally edge-to-edge DRM-ed to make sure he's 100% "safe".

    Buuuugs in spaaace. Oh sorry, that should be 'piiigs' :-).

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  68. The hungarian sentence is fucked up by saati · · Score: 1

    polo has no meaning in hungarian exept for a very informal way of saying for example, and it is only used in speech not writing. And "jo szerencse" means good luck, but it is in a wrong form, it would be "Jo szerencset Charles!", but that is not commonly used anymore, it was a greeting for miners, and in citys/towns where mines where present, like Pecs but i think it mostly died out. A common form for "Good luck Charles" would be "Sok szerencset Charles" (i missed out the accents, dont like them) ps: sorry for my english, i'm working on it

  69. Inspiring kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does a rich person buying their way into space inspire children? Hey kids, if you can't be a real astronaut, just become really wealthy and pay your way!

  70. TMA-10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy crap, they've found 9 more monoliths since the one at Tycho?

  71. Re:could you guys fix the hungarian text in the po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Jó szerencse pölö Charles!" just doesn't make any sense.

    Sajnálom/sorry! I submitted the article at 2:30am local time and well my Magyar/Hungarian isn't as good as a native speaker :) Still barátnm will no doubt beat me up about this later on today as I forwarded the slashdot link to her. Incidently I also wished that I had put something along the lines of "claims to be the first nerd in space" as yes I did know about Mark Shuttleworth etc. Still moral of the story don't submit articles when tired!

    Anyway please can one of the editors fix the text =)

    On a related note for those of you interested in satcom's you may want to checkout the Stereo (Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory) page on uhf-satcom.com - an interesting website which has featured on previous Slashdot stories that I and others have submitted.

    Thanks Richard

  72. Launch Manuever Name Change by lbmouse · · Score: 1

    During launch will the Soyuz TMA-10 perform a "Hungarian Rotation"?

  73. Oops, you may be right by roystgnr · · Score: 1

    My interpretation of the top post was that it claimed Yuri Gagarin was the first *nerd* in space (because any astronaut is likely to be a bit of a nerd), whereas Dr. Simonyi would be the first *geek* in space (using the distinct "computer geek" associations of that word); so I was trying to point out that even if you change "nerd" to a restrictively defined "geek" the statement about Dr. Simonyi wouldn't be true. Your interpretation's more reasonable, though; now I feel illiterate.

  74. Great. more Hungarian Notation? by Chapter80 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't wait to see what personSimonyi does to the spacecraftSoyuzTMA-10 conventionNamingConvention.

    1. Re:Great. more Hungarian Notation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is excellent use of Hungarian! very funny. for more info of naming conventions in the Soyuz on-board documentation see blog on intentsoft.com.

  75. Re:If your child is a Geek, reform through the Lor by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

    I don't think the Jargon File is the best authority on the geek versus nerd debate, because that's focused on the slang of hacker culture of the days of yore (pre-1994, let's say) and those terms are somewhat more widespread than that.

    The ultimate answer, I think, is that geeks and nerds are pretty much the same thing, and although a lot of people make a distinction, what that distinction is varies from region to region. However, I have gotten the impression that the "Nerds are socially inept, geeks are merely weird" way of looking at it is fairly popular.

    --
    "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  76. He's going to see the 10th Monolith? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Tycho Magnetic Anomaly 10? I thought there were only two, at least until #2 replicated itself to turn Jupiter into a star.

    "Whoa, it's full of stars" - Neo Bowman

  77. haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nerds in space!

  78. first retard in space? by peter303 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Kind of retarded for not notiing their have been 40 PhDs in space already as astronauts or shuttle specialists. Plus three of the private astronauts made their fortunes in the computer industry.

  79. Still bitter about 1956 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone should tell the Russians that shooting Hungarians into orbit just isn't the answer.

  80. The Jargon file is wrong by geekoid · · Score: 1

    well, I guess if everyone uses those definitions, then it is not wrong;however hostorically those are not what the terms meant.

    In short, a geek is/was someone who has extreme interest and enthusiasm for topics not in the main stream.

    A nerd was someone with a high degree of technical knowledge, and perfers the technical arena more then the social.
    note: you can be a nerd with social skills, there just not your preference.

    also note, you can be a geek AND a nerd.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  81. Didn't the Simpsons already de-bunk this headline? by RunzWithScissors · · Score: 1

    Now let's meet the crew, we have
    Bob Smith, A statistician
    Joe Franklin, Another statistician
    and
    Tom Reynolds, A completely different type of statistician.
    You can't tell me that a crew of statisticians isn't going to be nerdy!

    -Runz

  82. lpszComment = "Great!" by brocktune · · Score: 1

    for (unsigned long ulCount = 10; ulCount > 0; ulCount--)
    {
          char szMsg[5];
          MessageBox (NULL, itoa(ulCount,szMsg,10), "Countdown", MB_OK);
    }

    MessageBox (NULL, "Liftoff!", "Countdown", MB_OK);

    This is how of many of us 40-ish programmers learned to code UIs...

  83. Re:If your child is a Geek, reform through the Lor by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Nerds create the things geeks obsess with.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  84. Cosmonaut Kirk by jgercken · · Score: 1

    Wonder if he intentds to pack his vintage Star Trek uniform and bang out some one liners when up there. Maybe bring home a pet Tribble?

    --
    Never ascribe to malice what can be adequately attributed to ignorance. -Napoleon
  85. Re:If your child is a Geek, reform through the Lor by jbrader · · Score: 1

    Well played

    --
    You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
  86. Han Solo by freeze128 · · Score: 1
    Charles oversaw the development of Multiplan, Word, and Excel among many other achievements.
    "Travelling through hyperspace ain't like developing Office applications, boy! Without precise coordinates from the nava computer we'd fly right through a star or bounce too close to a supernova, and that would end our trip real quick, wouldn't it?"

    "What's that flashing?"
  87. Re:If your child is a Geek, reform through the Lor by 8ball629 · · Score: 1

    Let's face it, we're all nerds and/or geeks because:

    1. We're debating over the classification of nerds and geeks.
    2. The debate is taking place on ./ "News for nerds [and geeks]. Stuff that matters."

  88. For Extra Nerd Points by Stanistani · · Score: 1

    Identify Strelka and Belka... without searching on the Net...

  89. As much as I despise Microsoft by Coeurderoy · · Score: 1

    M. Simony:
    Apparently took a night watch job baby sitting an old lamp (no not the recent version of lamp) based computer (thus they did not need to power it down at night, and since lamps are most likely to burn out when you turn them on or off...

    And not only wrote a large part of the early versions of word, he also organized the teams so that it would work

    And left microsoft

    so no he is not the first, but it's still cool

    (now if bill and steve could also take a rocket ticket, prefereably for proxima centauris, or even better the magelanian clouds, we would have a couple of quiter centuries ....)

  90. Clearly MS is snaked by Linux yet again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As everyone else already said, Mark Shuttleworth was the first Nerd In Space. I just wanted to point out that yet again the Linux world beat the MS world to the punch.

  91. There are 10 kinds of people ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those who go into space, and those who don't.

  92. Ohh come on... by Greg.Rodden · · Score: 1

    You're telling me astronauts aren't some of the biggest nerds around?

    --
    I have ridden the mighty moon worm!